User talk:Abbas Kwarbai: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:38, 5 November 2020

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much sir, for this contribution that I made is it acceptable or it requires needed information? Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 03:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, Abbas Kwarbai. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is for notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Drm310, please I want to know if my contribution (biography of Professor Tyler L. Adams) is under view, rejected or waiting for some to confirm it ? Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 03:28, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the content you posted here, because it is not appropriate to place it on this page. Please go to Wikipedia:Your first article for guidance on how to create an article in the draft space. Please also note that copying and pasting content from the website you found it on is not by itself enough for it to be accepted on Wikipedia. Academic individuals must meet Wikipedia's notability criteria to be considered worthy of inclusion. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:58, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Drm310 for the guidance. Please can help me to direct me to the place where I can publish this article that I made because I have actually correct it (not from direct website as you started it) , and the Article has reach almost all the requirements to be publish here in Wikipedia. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 08:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a new brand. It has never been published in any website. But please I want to have the website where this draft is related regarding copy right. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 20:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About my publication

Please is my publication tally with Wikipedia redirective Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 16:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abbas Kwarbai, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Abbas Kwarbai! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much HostBot for your positive response. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 16:37, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Abbas Kwarbai. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theroadislong (talk) 17:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tyler L. Adam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tyler L. Adam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tyadamsphd.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 18:31, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any connection to Tyler Adam?

As you are now aware, your draft has been deleted because you copy/pasted copyright information into the draft. You can attempt to create a new draft, but all content must be paraphrased in your own words, not copied. Obviously, the names of schools, organizations and honors can be copied, but not the sentences. You appear to be urgent in creating an article about Adam. Drafts submitted to Articles for Creation are usually reviewed within weeks, but sometimes as long as months. There is no way to speed this process. A more important set of questions: What, if any, is your connection to Tyler Adams? Do you know him personally? Are you attempting to create this article as a favor? Are you being paid or otherwise compensated? David notMD (talk) 08:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AK has answered elsewhere not paid, but considers Tyler L. Adams (correct spelling of last name) a mentor. Advised to state COI. David notMD (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is a great connection between Tyler L Adams and me. He is my mentor, all the educational materials that I'm looking from are provided. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 13:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Abbas Kwarbai. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 19:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

May 2020

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 19:34, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 19:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Abbas Kwarbai. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 20:56, 18 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Declaring COI

To declare a conflict of interest WO:COI on your User page there is a template to insert, or you can just Edit your User page to state that You consider Tyler Adams a mentor, but that you are not being paid or in any other way compensated for attempting to create an article about him. After that you can again attempt a draft. Of utmost importance, you cannot copy content from existing websites or other publications. Also, please remember to 'sign' your comments by typing four of ~ at the end. David notMD (talk) 14:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have already drafted another, but my questions that I want to ask is that, is it possible copy and paste references, how can arrange the some biography using table such as processedor, graduate school etc in the Wikipedia ? Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 18:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Abbas Kwarbai! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What's the wisdom behind writing Retrieved in any article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How can I arrange bio details using table in Wikipedia and can I copy and paste references before it's impossible to write it. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 11:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand it. Please can anyone help me to share more light on my article because based on what I'm seeing on my talk page the article is deleted but here in tearoom is saying "your threat has been archieved" Though they are same. Please what specifically have problem with my article. How can I afresh ? Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My article about professor Tyler L Adams was declined almost four times. I was accused of copyright, later I did it with hundred percent free from plagiarism, I used nearly eight independent and liable source or link as my reference but someone was telling me it seems to personal promotion. This person has graduate more twenty professor, I know some of them are in Wikipedia and they are yet to contribute to journalism like him. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please someone should respond to my questions Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 10:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abbas Kwarbai I have responded multiple times on your talk page, that you can create the draft here Draft:Tyler L. Adam. I am guessing that English is not your first language as you seem to have great difficulty understanding basic instructions here? Theroadislong (talk) 11:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look at what you wrote to me "I have responded multiple times on your talk page, that you can create the draft here Draft:Tyler L. Adam. I am guessing that English is not your first language as you seem to have great difficulty understanding basic instructions here? Theroadislong (talk) 11:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)" and you are asking for me to contest for deletion. You replied me by saying I can draft it here and I did so. What specifically do you want me do please. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 11:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abbas Kwarbai You need to click the red link Draft:Tyler L. Adam and create your draft there as requested multiple times. Theroadislong (talk) 11:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks, I'm ready to go for deletion of this one Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 11:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can I copy it directly from here to the draft, or I must to write afresh. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 12:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well typed it again in draft section. So is there any notification that I can get please? Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 15:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm yet to get any response, please can anyone respond to me about the draft I made? Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 08:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abbas Kwarbai That is because you have NOT submitted it for review. Theroadislong (talk) 08:13, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... The above person biography references are all from liable source, he is an international scholar and academician whose work is full of interest. He has been contributing to academic since more twenty years ago. Numerous of his publish work are in Amazon and others. Tyler L Adams has graduate numerous professors. I would like the administrators to follow the link references to verify whether my publication is genuine person or not. Another interesting part of his work he worked with United States department of state cultural affairs division Fulbright senior specialist. A lot of his fellow student search him using Wikipedia but find nihility to his information.

Finally I hope my request will be considered and the administrators would follow the link I shared to verify what I'm saying. And all the content of write is 100% free from plagiarism

You have created an article on your user page, that is not allowed you need to place it here Draft:Tyler L. Adam. Theroadislong (talk) 14:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong, a note: this user had previously published content at that page, which was subsequently deleted for copyvio and as far as I can tell has done the same thing on their user page. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 14:50, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that's the draft, please can you assist me to take it on draft. As in, how can I get to draft section. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 14:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to verify your statement before making final judgment. The copyvio that I made was directly from my personal website. Whereas this one that I made is not on content but here. Why are you saying it is still copy and paste? Please let us be good when judging a particular case. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 17:19, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abbas Kwarbai, If the copyvio that [you] made was directly from [your] personal website, then you must declare that you release the information to Wikipedia (and by extension, public domain so that anyone can use that information for their own ends) on said website as another user has pointed out. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 18:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please I'm looking for someone to direct me draft section so that I can forward it from talk user to there. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 17:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I already did that above? You can create the draft here Draft:Tyler L. Adam. Theroadislong (talk) 17:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You said I have already done it the draft. Please I want to know if my article is has problem Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 17:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not referring to this publication, I'm referring to other one that was been deleted. On this recent article no any copyvio on it. It is satisfactory to Wikipedia? Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 18:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Abbas Kwarbai! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Please how many days or hours does it take to publish article/information/biography/ history in Wikipedia., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Abbas Kwarbai

A tag has been placed on User:Abbas Kwarbai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spencer^T•C 12:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because I think this is not contribution to Wikipedia but myself introduction. It is my biography with reference but if you think it goes opposite of Wikipedia acceptance, please delete it immediately. Thanks

Starting over

If you intend to start over on Adams (which I do not recommend), then on your User page, state in a simple sentence that you consider Adams to be your mentor, but you are not being paid to try to create an article. Then use WP:YFA to create a draft. DO NOT copy content from websites into your draft - that is copyright violation and leads to rapid deletion of the draft. Must be in your own words. You will also have to learn how to create references. Last - your User page is for a short description of your intentions as a Wikipedia editor. Not your biography. Or your website. Or your social media. David notMD (talk) 09:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tyler L. Adams has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tyler L. Adams. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tyler L. Adams (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tyler L. Adams (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoingBatty were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are still no inline citations. The draft needs independent sources to demonstrate how Adams meets Wikipedia:Notability (academics)#Criteria (References 1-6 and 11 do not mention Adams at all. Reference 7 is a biography on his employer's web site probably written by Adams - not independent. Reference 8 is a biography of Adams, and there is no mention in the draft of Adams' relationship with the Global Listening Centre. Reference 9 is an interview by Adams' alma mater. References 10,12,13 are written by Adams).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 00:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tyler L. Adams has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tyler L. Adams. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 04:01, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, I have draft Dr Linda Iheme, please I need to have response on it Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 07:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Linda Iheme

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Linda Iheme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.naijalikerz.com/photo-lady-bags-highest-record-of-5-distinctions-in-medical-school-uniben/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:18, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, align to be deleted but I hope the references there and the format are correct and are independent source. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 15:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my article which has no any copyvio, please I need response about it Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 00:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My new drafted article about Linda Iheme was submitted almost fifteen hours ago, please help me in accessing it, though someone has edited well but haven't say anything about it. Does that means it has no any correction? If yes, what's the next step please? Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tyler L. Adams (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Which of the Wikipedia:Notability (academics)#Criteria does Adams meet? I don't see any independent sources. I don't understand your placement of the Global Listening Centre reference, and I don't understand why the draft doesn't mention the Global Listening Centre. The capitalization, italics, and punctuation should be fixed, as do the Amazon references. Independent book reviews would be better than the Rogue Operatives and Amazon references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 03:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, actually know I don't my stand with this Tyler L Adams article. As I pointed out all the correction such as citations of his name in reference links, capitalization, and books are being italicsed, so I need a straight forward feedback about the correction. Does my correction align with Wikipedia or not. Thanks Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 04:50, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tyler L. Adams (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no change since last decline it is disruptive to keep re-submitting without improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I don't think I need help to communicate with real time chat help, all what I need is help me by yourself to access it Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 08:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction: Draft: Gordon Tredgold

Please I need your help to access this new article of Gordon Tredgold, though one of the admin has edited it. If it's okay, how can I can I move it for submission please Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 05:28, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Tredgold (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the references are not secondary, reliable sources that are independent of the subject. most are passing mentions, self-published, WP:UGC, etc.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gordon Tredgold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gordon Tredgold, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 01:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sani Sha'aban without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you believe this individual is not notable, please address it through the proper deletion processes. It is not appropriate to blank a page that you did not author or that has edit history. Ost (talk) 21:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks for the letting me know that isn't good to leave blank here in Wikipedia. The subject above don't provide adequate link to clearly shows who is. As i can see only one independent source was cited as reference. The two remaining references are his personal website and his Facebook page which is not running in the internet. As someone who is politician, he need strong references to be cited. The only one independent source he used may probably paid them to cite him. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 21:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, the independent source that he claimed to be cited doesn't mention him anymore. So, I requested to this biography to go for speedy deletion. Because the independent source he used is doesn't mention him anymore, and the two remain references are not independent source because he is the one that wrote by himself (person published)

Please, this page isn't eligible to be Wikipedia. Those that approved this biography to be live doesn't meet with Wikipedia. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't use the {{ping}} template, it is unlikely that editors will see your messages to them on your talk page. I see nothing in the page history of Sani Sha'aban to indicate that it was nominated for Speedy Deletion, but I would encourage you to use one of the other deletion venues; since this page has existed for 10 years, it is likely worth having a discussion where you specify the rationale in the deletion discussion rather than on your talk page. To your point, what is shown at the link for the reference does not validate the information, but the article appears to continue and have more information that is not freely available online. Also, please be aware that the page may be retained if sources exist to indicate that the subject is notable (even if they are not currently in the article), as pages are not deleted just for needing cleanup. —Ost (talk) 13:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me in reviewing this draft: Abdullahi Dauda Belel, I spent three days with no any response Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 23:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned above, people will not be notified that you are trying to talk to them on your talk page unless you use the {{ping}} template. You should use that template with an editor's username as a parameter (e.g., {{ping|Abbas Kwarbai}}) to notify them that you have responded to them or have a question for them. For more general help, you should consider continuing to use the WP:TEAHOUSE or try {{help me}}.

As to your request to review a draft, I would like to let it continue with editors that are more involved with WP:AfC, as I'm not familiar enough with this topic and the concerns from the previous reviewer to make a determination about this draft. I have several thoughts to help you be successful as an editor:

Three days is not a long time for a draft to be reviewed; we have drafts that have been submitted over a month ago that have still not been addressed; everyone here is a volunteer and there is no deadline
When requesting help, please link to the draft (e.g., Draft:Abdullahi Dauda Belel) so that editors don't have to find it themselves
Please respect processes and respond to the questions that others post on your talk page. Looking down this page, I see concerned editors to whom you have not responded, though you continue to post to ask for help.

—Ost (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 04:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please someone should assist me in submitting Draft: Abdullahi Dauda Belel

Article submission

Hello, I have submitted the article and it's now waiting for review. You can continue improving it while waiting for review. Ugbedeg (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Tredgold (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gordon Tredgold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gordon Tredgold, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello Abbas Kwarbai. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Abbas Kwarbai. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Abbas Kwarbai|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Sulfurboy (talk) 05:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Tredgold (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pi were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gordon Tredgold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gordon Tredgold, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pi (Talk to me!) 19:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Template:Z161 Sulfurboy (talk) 22:43, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Draft:Gordon Tredgold, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda Iheme (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linda Iheme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Linda Iheme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha ^talk 11:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Hausa Wikimedia Community

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Hausa related articles or that you are in some way connected to Hausa. I thought you may be interested in joining
Hausa Wikimedians User Group

They are a group of editors working to improve Wikip(m)edia's Hausa projects coverage and topics related to Hausa people, culture etc. Please take a look and If you would be interested in joining feel free to add your name at the Members Page!
Thank You.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tyler L. Adams (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tyler L. Adams, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha ^talk 11:47, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khalil Haliru (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khalil Haliru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Khalil Haliru, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha ^talk 12:49, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Africa Polling Institute (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In the references, I see people citing polls conducted by API, along with two interviews of API's director. These don't support notability. What we need are people writing about API.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Africa Polling Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Africa Polling Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kabiru Bala has been accepted

Kabiru Bala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Em-mustapha ^talk 14:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Abbas Kwarbai, from its old location at User:Abbas Kwarbai. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Draft:Abbas Kwarbai. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well done sir, I have just make it on talk page not an article for submission, please help me to remove the template from it. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abbas Kwarbai: The page had a template on it saying it was a draft, and it followed the style of an article. You cannot have a user page that looks like an article. See WP:FAKEARTICLE. Instead, just write a bit about yourself as if you were introducing yourself to someone, like "Hi, my name is <name> and I am a <job> from <country>. I like to write articles about <interests>. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, let me do as you said sir, please can you help to submit this for me Draft:Jon Fortt Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Ihejiamaizu (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Ihejiamaizu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Grace Ihejiamaizu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 01:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Professor Charles Egbu (2) (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Professor Charles Egbu (2), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Professor Charles Egbu (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Professor Charles Egbu (2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 07:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olakunle Adedapo Soriyan (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olakunle Adedapo Soriyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Olakunle Adedapo Soriyan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha ^talk 15:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Dr Abdullahi Belel on LinkedIn.png

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Abdullahi Belel on LinkedIn.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda Iheme (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linda Iheme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Linda Iheme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 20:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wavetra Energy (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lapablo were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wavetra Energy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wavetra Energy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 20:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdullahi Dauda Belel (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdullahi Dauda Belel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdullahi Dauda Belel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bindu Babu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bindu Babu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.prfire.co.uk/dr-bindu-babu-is-accepted-into-forbes-business-council/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 'Salem's Lot (film) (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more detail to show it has commenced principal photography

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:'Salem's Lot (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:'Salem's Lot (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fisayo Soyombo (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more notability for journalist and coverage in external news sources not connected to him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fisayo Soyombo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fisayo Soyombo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:02, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Against "Summons of the Soul" (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Against "Summons of the Soul" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Against "Summons of the Soul", click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bashir Ahmad (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

This draft needs a disambiguator to distinguish it from other people with the same name. If accepted, it can be added to the disambiguation list at Bashir Ahmed.

The lede sentence does not specify that the subject and his employer are in Nigeria. Also Kano should be linked.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bashir Ahmad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bashir Ahmad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bashir Ahmad (August 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission.

It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

This draft was declined less than 12 hours ago and has been resubmitted without addressing the comments in the review. The review said that the lede sentence did not indicate that the subject and his employer are in Nigeria, and also said that Kano State should be linked. Neither has been done. The subject may or may not be notable. This draft does not establish notability, and it does not appear that this draft is likely to establish notability as long as the current submitter is submitting it tendentiously.

Do not attempt to resubmit this draft without discussion. (This does not mean that discussion will agree that this draft should be resubmitted.)

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdullahi Dauda Belel (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdullahi Dauda Belel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdullahi Dauda Belel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 14:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Umar (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Kindly incorporate more contents. He maybe notable as the new law enforcement chairman.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammed Umar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohammed Umar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasha Obama (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Family of Barack Obama. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There does not appear to be anything in this draft that would make her individually notable, apart from being in the family of Barack Obama, which we already have an article about.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sasha Obama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sasha Obama, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malia Obama (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Family of Barack Obama. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are two issues with this draft. First, there is a statement about her education that was clearly written in 2017 and has not been updated. This implies that the whole draft needs a more thorough review. Second, notability apart from the family of Barack Obama is marginal as written. This also implies that a more thorough rework is in order before resubmission.

This draft has been declined because of notability concerns. This draft should be resubmitted by addressing the notability concerns in AFC comments or on the talk page of the draft. Do not resubmit this draft without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion. Do not simply add references, or make minor changes, without explaining how it satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malia Obama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Malia Obama, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Omoni Oboli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Benin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amina Namadi Sambo (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Padavalamkuttanpilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amina Namadi Sambo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amina Namadi Sambo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Padavalam Kuttan Pilla Talk 06:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, Abbas Kwarbai, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Sadeeqzaria (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you for letting me. I would always obey the rules and regulations of wikipedia. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Amina Namadi Sambo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amina Namadi Sambo. Thanks! An@ss_koko^{(speak up)} 06:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks, I have added independent secondary reliable sources such daily trust newspaper, leadership etc Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 12:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amina Namadi Sambo (August 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is a promotional press release, not an encyclopedia article.

DGG ( talk ) 08:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Assalam Maliky (talk) 11:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gordon Tredgold for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gordon Tredgold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Tredgold (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you so much for letting me. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 22:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Abbas Kwarbai, and welcome to Wikipedia's deletion process! Thank you for your contributions. As a newcomer, it may be helpful for you to read Wikipedia's deletion policy, and the pages describing the articles for deletion process, proposed deletion, and speedy deletion. Remember that deletion debates are not votes, and reasons matter, especially reasons relating to the central content policies of verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research, and what Wikipedia is not, and to the consensual community guidelines for biographies, corporations, music, and fiction. Also remember that deletion is not always the answer to a bad article. Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you have any questions. Again, welcome! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Tanko has been accepted

Muhammad Tanko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

An@ss_koko^{(speak up)} 21:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 21:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Africa Polling Institute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Africa Polling Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Africa Polling Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sagir Adamu Abbas has been accepted

Sagir Adamu Abbas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

An@ss_koko^{(speak up)} 14:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 14:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bindu Babu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay,the university is an accredited university, most medically related courses are not online, that's why I remove them. Thanks for the information Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 04:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abbas Kwarbai: Please provide a reliable source that proves it is an accredited university. The current source is reliable (the Hawaii government) and says it is not accredited. The university's own website says that courses are 100% online, so again, if you have a reliable source that states that the courses that this person attended / created are delivered on campus then please provide it. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you so much for alerting me. I don't have any connection with Dr Bindu Babu, I only know her in some news interview on youtube which make me to have interest in writing her article on Wikipedia. The issue of deleting her Quantum university is because I'm hoping to enrol a program in there university. Saying it is unaccredited university make me do delete the university. But when @Curb Safe Charmer told me to provide an evidence that the university is accredited, I went there to search and I really found that the university is unaccredited. From that incident, I stop even editing bindu Babu article Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 12:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well,i have experience some senior editors are warning me that I might be block from editing or using Wikipedia completely. That's I decided to declare "I'm thinking to leave Wikipedia completely" Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 15:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grace Ihejiamaizu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Linda Iheme @Canada.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Linda Iheme @Canada.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Linda Iheme, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Linda Iheme for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda Iheme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Iheme until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 21:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. You have twice failed to respond to notices about this. You may not ignore these notices.Template:Z161 Fiddle Faddle 21:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Please stop editing until you have answered this message. You may not ignore it.Template:Z162 Fiddle Faddle 12:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not being accused of commercial editing. You are being asked to declare whether you are or are not. There is no need to leave Wikipedia as you state on your user page, nor to take offence at being asked. All you need to do is to make a reply to these questions. Fiddle Faddle 15:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bindu Babu

It looks like you attempted to nominate Bindu Babu for deletion in this edit. However, the nomination was not completed. As indicated at WP:AFDHOWTO, it looks like you skipped Steps I and II and went directly to Step III, meaning that the article itself was not tagged, nor did you present the reasons for deletion. Please feel free to re-nominate the article if you still believe that it should be deleted. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Shirley Ze Yu.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Shirley Ze Yu.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Shirley Ze.png

Thanks for uploading File:Shirley Ze.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amina Namadi Sambo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Amina Namadi Sambo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 14:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Amina Namadi Sambo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amina Namadi Sambo. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 14:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khalil Haliru (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khalil Haliru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Khalil Haliru, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shamsudeen Abdullahi (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shamsudeen Abdullahi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shamsudeen Abdullahi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha ^talk 11:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bindu Babu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bindu Babu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bindu Babu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PepperBeast (talk) 17:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your choice of subjects

Hello Abbas. Can you explain how you choose which subjects to write about? How did you decide to write about Genevieve Leveille, for example? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your question seems to be not understandable. I'm a crypro currency expert, and analyst, So I know Genevieve Leveille there, and I feel to write article about her. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Abbas Kwarbai. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Genevieve Leveille, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look, we are in different country with most of the people whom I wrote article about them. Saying I'm cryptocurrency expert and analyst, doesn't mean we have connection. I never know till three days ago when I read how she suffered in her clearly life.I don't use to write any article that has promotion. And I finally realize that you are following my footsteps to catch with crime or illegal activities in Wikipedia not for sanity of Wikipedia but selfish interest. Please you can block me because you been upsetting me putting some your interest editors to put investigation about me. Why the essence of asking me this question that's meaningless. Block me completely Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 10:50, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You replied to me earlier that you 'know Genevieve Leveille'. If you know her, you must declare a connection. If you actually meant that you only read about her, that's fine, no need to declare a connection.

You first contacted me on my talk page in July asking for help and I have been helping improve the articles that you've created since then. My concern at the moment is that I am still making the same fixes I made to your articles months ago on ones you've created very recently. I hope you will learn more about our manual of style for biographies and things like how we format dates and section headings so that other editors don't have to keep fixing these things.

You say that you don't write articles that have promotion, but for example Bindu Babu clearly had.

Please also pay attention to the warnings you've been given about uploading copyrighted text or images. In your message to Túrelio about the photo of Shirley Ze Yu you didn't understand that the person who took the photo needs to give permission to Wikipedia for it to be used not just on Wikipedia but anywhere. If you copy it off their social media profile they've not given permission. Taking a screenshot and modifying it is another form of copyright violation. As the original image that was deleted was uploaded by Abubakar A Gwanki can you explain any connection you have with that editor? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for exposing your treat to me. I only read and watched videos about Genevieve Leveille in crypto TV show. I have opportunity to mail Shirley Ze Yu through her websites whether her photo to be use in Wikipedia or not (I have read Wikipedia policy for photos), she replied me with permission to use any photo. In the case of her photos for now I uploaded yesterday, A friend of mine who was the camera man snapped her during her speech she made at Harvard university (American-China submit). So, I saw your negative recommendations about the photo which shows that photo is copy edited but you have no prove about it. I don't know any editor on Wikipedia for the past two months that you want to hear from me. And please stop asking me meaningless questions as you tarnish your respect to me on Wikipedia edition. You have assigned someone to investigate me, putting tag on me for investigation and finally your mission isn't achieve as you can't prove what you are alleging me.

Finally, the time I asked for your assistant on talk page, you haven't assist me with anything because your explanations isn't satisfactory. I don't want your assistant any more Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 14:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullahi Dauda Belel moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abdullahi Dauda Belel, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 02:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More preferred to delete the article than to move it to draft. It is your own problem not mine! Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 04:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Draft:Genevieve Leveille, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All what I know is that, I have warn you to stop involving on my activities on Wikipedia. I have never respect anyone other than you because your are not worth to what you are doing. All your activities is meant to annoy me but I don't care. But I have warn you to stop involving your activities. You are wasting your time putting me on your watchlist and be even editing my draft, STOP editing my draft. I don't want to help anymore. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 16:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shirley Ze Yu; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:07, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohammed Umar

The article Mohammed Umar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Accomplished, but outside the notices of his acting commission chair, no in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I align to delete if its not in accordance to Wikipedia Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 16:50, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

However, as a law enforcement agency acting chairman, he is notable to be in Wikipedia. It didn't say the acting chairman isn't notable to be in Wikipedia as I provided secondary independent reliable sources with all full coverage about him Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 16:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this approach will help

I have noticed you are having mixed success with creating new articles. I'd like to share with you a proven approach, one I have used for some time.

When I plan to write an article about someone I start by researchng them. This works just as well with 'things' as with people. I need to find out whether I am about to waste my time. If I cannot find at lest three good references (see WP:THREE) then I know the topic is not yet ready for Wikipedia, that perhaps it never will be. Then I work as follows with the references:

In my user space, as a sub page, from the references, extract the facts I want to use. Ideally I want one fact per reference, but I am content with more
Sort the facts into the order I wish to use them, and use that as a storyboard (in written form, Idontl need pictures) for my article
Write the article, in my own words, placng the acts in the prose, and citing the facts
Stop and consider the draft article, and make sure that it is ready. It does not need to be long, it just needs to be ready.
If necessary, remove wording that adds no value
Finally, when I am certain, I move it into main space
After moving it to main soace, I add it to useful categories
Once there it is there. I get on with other things.

My hope is that other editors will enhance what I've written.

I'm going to offer you some recent examples:

Each of these is very short, very tightly written, and offers small scope for challenge and deletion. Each has been picked up to a greater or lesser extent by other editors and improved.

I'm not showing you these to show off! What I hope they do is point you in the direction where you succeed more often tham you are at present. I've seen, and understand, that you are disappointed when an article you have worked on is challened. I am when mine are, too. None of us has a 100% hit rate. Fiddle Faddle 17:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you so much for giving these fruitful advice. I will try my best to follow what you advice me. Thank you so much, i really how you take your time and explain this to me Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 18:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One extra tip is to take your time. There is no deadline to get new articles online. Work with care and precision, never with haste. I want you to succeed, not to become discouraged. Fiddle Faddle 18:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great. Thank you so much Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 19:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest Talk Page Archival?

User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo shows you how to set it up easily. It will make it much easier for you and others to see past obsolete conversations while keeping a transparent record of them Fiddle Faddle 22:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but I don't really understand you here Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 22:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Martina Fuchs

{{subst:copyvionote|1=File:Martina Fuchs .jpg|reason=Not 'own work'. Copied from https://premium-speakers.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/martina-fuchs-premium-speakers-3.jpeg}} And I have asked the permission from premium Speakers to use the photo, they granted me to use it Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 09:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Own work means you took the picture yourself. If you didn't but the copyright holder wants to make the image available for anyone to use then the copyright holder needs to fill out a form or send an email to Wikimedia to confirm that this is the case. The template for that is here. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rape in Nigeria moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rape in Nigeria, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Please see the notes I have left on the article talk page. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, good Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 07:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Userpage

Misread the thing you put on your userpage again, you are not accusing the editor of bias. But it’s still not an appropriate thing to put on your userpage. As it’s attacking them. LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 12:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Genevieve Leveille for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genevieve Leveille is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genevieve Leveille until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 10:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First I found interested when I realized that there is wikipedia project for women red (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Metrics/October_2020) about Genevieve Leveille. Her name is included amongst those that may have Wikipedia page this 2020. Based on my level of understanding, most of blockchain platform are verified source because they talk about financial issue unlike Forbes that is paid site. Following her notability, she is at least notable women to be included her Wikipedia page as it has even correlation with some Wikipedia project. I will like Genevieve Leveille page to still review and attain it to stay in Wikipedia. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 22:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martina Fuchs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, French and German.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aminu Musa Audu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aminu Musa Audu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aminu Musa Audu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hundred support for deleting this articles because most the references are not independent reliable sources. Thus, they are primary source Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1,081: / Line 1,081: @@
 ([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
+== Nomination of [[:Aminu Musa Audu]] for deletion ==
+<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Aminu Musa Audu]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
+The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aminu Musa Audu]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
+Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <span style="background-color:lightblue">'''''&nbsp;[[User:Velella|Velella]]&nbsp;'''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue">&nbsp;<sup>''[[User talk:Velella|Velella]] Talk ''</sup>&nbsp;</span> 20:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
+I'm hundred support for deleting this articles because most the references are not independent reliable sources. Thus, they are primary source  [[User:Abbas Kwarbai|Abbas Kwarbai]] ([[User talk:Abbas Kwarbai#top|talk]]) 22:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)