Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 12:19 on 16 September 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Alerts

Bot-reported

• 2405:201:a403:4164:dcf9:1847:4ebe:93dd (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. Spencer^T•C 10:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Alison Buchanan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Repeated vandalism, spreading of false information, and moving of pages against consensus. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 03:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 12:35, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

• Jamez2hot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. →Στc. 06:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. One bad new page creation, probably not sufficient to block. TeaDrinker (talk) 11:35, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

• Itutorlife (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations after final warning on March 5th.. Eeekster (talk) 07:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
• 122.168.239.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism, including 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 – Bentogoa (talk) 11:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Question: Is this a request for arbcom enforcement; it doesn't seem to be simple vandalism. TeaDrinker (talk) 11:41, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

I agree. This user seems to be editing in good faith, even if his edits are inappropriate. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Declined. Edits are not vandalism and user has not edited since last warning. There are plenty of people with their eyes on these articles, so it'll be taken care of. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

• Flutoo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Has been warned to not vandalize on his talk page, and yet he did it again.Dustinlull (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
• Cnlikebo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account; account is being used only for promotional purposes. User seems to be adding multiple pieces of text taken from http://www.chinesezodiac.org , which licenses CC-SA. However, same text appears on chinese.horoscope.com and other websites with copyright. The user is also adding promotional links to the same site (http://www.chinesezodiac.org/compatibility and http://www.chinesezodiac.org/calculator) on all edited pages.. dockingman^talk 12:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)