Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bot clerking, archiving 5 threads, 2 pending requests remain. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Requesting semi-protection of Voisava. (TW)
Line 50: Line 50:
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent addition of [[WP:INTREF|unsourced or poorly sourced content]]&nbsp;– Persistent addition of unsourced contents by owner/manager of <http://divyabhartiportal.com>. They earlier used {{U|Divyabhartiportal}} account, now dynamic IP addresses. [[User:Anupmehra|<font color="blue">Anup</font>]] [[User_talk:Anupmehra|<font color="blue">[Talk]</font>]] 16:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent addition of [[WP:INTREF|unsourced or poorly sourced content]]&nbsp;– Persistent addition of unsourced contents by owner/manager of <http://divyabhartiportal.com>. They earlier used {{U|Divyabhartiportal}} account, now dynamic IP addresses. [[User:Anupmehra|<font color="blue">Anup</font>]] [[User_talk:Anupmehra|<font color="blue">[Talk]</font>]] 16:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
:{{rfpp|f|24 hours}} As some reverted edits appeared to be [[WP:AGF|good-faith]], including innocuous copyedits, and violation of [[WP:BLP]] may be contentious, I can't classify this as exempt from [[WP:3RR]], and must therefore treat it as a straight content dispute. Please discuss matters on the talk page. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 16:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
:{{rfpp|f|24 hours}} As some reverted edits appeared to be [[WP:AGF|good-faith]], including innocuous copyedits, and violation of [[WP:BLP]] may be contentious, I can't classify this as exempt from [[WP:3RR]], and must therefore treat it as a straight content dispute. Please discuss matters on the talk page. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 16:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

=== [[:Voisava]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Voisava}}

'''Indefinite semi-protection:''' Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started once again after the protection ended. Long lasting protection needed. '''<font face="Perpetua" size="3">[[User:Anastan|<font color="#1E90FF">Ąnαșταη</font>]] ([[User talk:Anastan|<font color="#1E90FF">ταlκ</font>]])</font>''' 17:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


==Current requests for reduction in protection level==
==Current requests for reduction in protection level==

Revision as of 17:53, 13 June 2016

    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Semi-protection: Persistant removal of referenced edits relating to controversy or party links to anti-vax organsiations , performed by a user or users associated with this political partyBenvenuto (talk) 05:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The main problematic editor is autoconfirmed, and s/he seems to be slowly getting with the program. Rami R 11:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism caused by anonymous users{disrupting and changing of content}. PageImprover (talk) 11:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. PageImprover, please read WP:NOTVAND NeilN talk to me 13:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Lots of edit warring, sock puppetry, and POV edits that might be from interested parties. IP addresses are involved in most of it. Semi-protection should make things settle down. 170.178.162.125 (talk) 12:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 13:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Several (repeat) incidents of vandalism related to current events in Orlando, may be worth semi-protecting to prevent further vandalism. Vaexa (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. User with same IP address continues to edit the page after previous page protection, and edit warring, in accurate information107.107.62.208 (talk) 13:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 13:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed after unprotection. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 16:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced contents by owner/manager of <http://divyabhartiportal.com>. They earlier used Divyabhartiportal account, now dynamic IP addresses. Anup [Talk] 16:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As some reverted edits appeared to be good-faith, including innocuous copyedits, and violation of WP:BLP may be contentious, I can't classify this as exempt from WP:3RR, and must therefore treat it as a straight content dispute. Please discuss matters on the talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started once again after the protection ended. Long lasting protection needed. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 17:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Handled requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.