Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Flcelloguy: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Dragomiloff (talk | contribs)
1,888 edits
→Support: vote
Andypandy.UK (talk | contribs)
8,974 edits
support
Line 186: Line 186:
#'''Support''' Experienced, thorough, no dirty laundry [[User:Alan.ca|Alan.ca]] 10:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Experienced, thorough, no dirty laundry [[User:Alan.ca|Alan.ca]] 10:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Dragomiloff|Dragomiloff]] 13:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Dragomiloff|Dragomiloff]] 13:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
# appears to have great track record.--<font style="background:white">[[User:Andypandy.UK|Andeh]]</font> 13:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)



==Oppose==
==Oppose==

Revision as of 13:27, 8 December 2006

Statement

Hello! The Arbitration Committee, the final step in our dispute resolution process, is a critical and integral part of Wikipedia, and I humbly offer myself as a candidate for these elections. I’ve been here since May 2005, and was promoted to admin in August of that year. My contributions to Wikipedia (currently at 14,000 edits, although I give little value to edit counts) span a breadth of topics: from writing and contributing to the encyclopedia to helping newcomers to performing administrative tasks, I’ve always been dedicated to this wonderful project.

I’ve also had significant experience in our dispute resolution processes. I’ve been a member of the Mediation Committee, one of the key steps prior to arbitration, since September 2005 and am now one of the longest-serving active mediators. Seeing disputes firsthand and attempting to mediate the cases has provided me with invaluable experience, and will allow me to serve as Arbitrator more efficiently and with more judgment. I’ve also followed the activities of the Arbitration Committee closely, providing evidence in several cases. I also wrote the entire series about the Arbitration Committee and the elections for the Wikipedia Signpost’s series on the January 2006 ArbCom elections; articles covered everything from the history of the ArbCom, criticism of the committee, reform attempts, to duties and requirements of ArbCom members. During the series I also interviewed most of the ArbCom members. Conducting these interviews, along with researching and writing the series, has provided me with a keen and unique perspective about the ArbCom.

My experience is not limited to dispute resolution, though. I’ve nominated several featured articles and pictures, and created and improved countless others. I’ve also served the community in other capacities: I’ve written nearly 100 articles for the Signpost since August 2005, am on the OTRS team, am a Meta admin, and also am on the Communication Committee’s Internal Subcommittee, responsible for being a liaison for the community to the Foundation and vice versa. I’ve always been of the community, and will always be for the community.

My platform is simple: I will always listen closely to everyone, carefully consider all the options, and do whatever is best for the encyclopedia. Ultimately, the duty of the ArbCom is to improve the encyclopedia, and I will always keep that priority first.

It has been a great honor and privilege serving the community, and I look forward to continuing to serve.

Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Support

  1. Support Jd2718 00:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Spangineerws (háblame) 00:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Majorly 00:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nufy8 00:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ral315 (talk) (my votes) 00:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 00:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. maclean 00:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. bainer (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Coredesat 00:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. BhaiSaab talk 00:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Hello32020 00:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Strong Support. Titoxd(?!?) 00:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Jaranda wat's sup 01:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Thatcher131 01:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 01:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. KPbIC 02:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. pschemp | talk 02:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. ßottesiηi (talk) 02:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. —Mira 02:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support, although it will be sad to lose you from MedCom. ^demon[omg plz] 02:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Rebecca 03:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Warofdreams talk 03:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Flcelloguy works hard as co-organizer of edit counter; good sense of humor (remember story - dyslexic brother thought user name was Fellatio guy)--Hokeman 03:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Fine judgment; excellent, well-rounded wiki-career. Xoloz 04:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Serpent's Choice 04:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. THB 04:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Terence Ong 04:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. —AySz88\^-^ 04:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Peta 04:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support. Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 04:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Dylan Lake (t·c) 05:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support. alteripse 05:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Srikeit 05:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support Bucketsofg 05:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. ATren 05:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 05:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. semper fi — Moe 05:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support --Riley 06:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Without reservation. Joe 06:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. GizzaChat © 06:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Aminz 06:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aksi_great (talk) 07:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Tawker 07:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Support -- Mytwocents 07:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Support. Record of sound judgement. Good for the Arbcom duties. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Another Wikipedian 07:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Support excellent candidate! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alkivar (talk • contribs) 07:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
    Double vote ? Sandy (Talk) 17:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support Davewild 08:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Support Dr Debug (Talk) 08:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. cj | talk 09:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Weakly. – Chacor 09:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. AmiDaniel (talk) 10:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Sugaar 10:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. --MariusM 12:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 12:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Support Charles Matthews 12:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Support. Good work on the Freestylefrappe case. —Viriditas | Talk 12:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Support. Crum375 13:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Shyam (T/C) 13:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Mcginnly | Natter 13:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Christopher Parham (talk) 13:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support --CBD 13:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Support (based on answers to my questions) Anomo 14:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. --§hanel 14:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Support -- MightyWarrior 15:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 15:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. ➨ ЯEDVERS 16:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Support. Flcelloguy is very dedicated to Wikipedia, extremely attentive to what others have to say, and he always tries to work towards consensus. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. good work on Medcab... i'd trust flcelloguy to judge whats best for wiki.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 16:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support -- need more like him. =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support --mh 17:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. --Conti|✉ 17:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 18:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Support, though please cut the unnecessary words in your statement. Being "humble" never sounds quite right typed, in my opinion. Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 20:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support --Duke of Duchess Street 20:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Support --Zleitzen 21:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Support - Nihiltres 23:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Support --CComMack (t–c) 23:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Probably the easiest support vote I've ever cast. Absolutely qualified. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 23:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Gurch 23:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Indeed. --Alf melmac 23:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support RFerreira 23:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Michael Snow 23:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Support --Howrealisreal 23:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Support. JYolkowski // talk 00:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Support for a candidate whose credentials, experience, and dedication should make him a fine arbitrator. Newyorkbrad 01:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Support --Yarnalgo 01:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support TSO1D 01:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Support, though I hate to wish ArbCom on anyone. --humblefool® 02:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-05 02:09Z
  95. Support Yamaguchi先生 02:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support. Intelligent decision maker. Thanks for the welcome years ago! Royalbroil T : C 02:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  98. riana_dzasta 03:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  99. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support —JeremyA 03:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support Everything looks good, deserved 100%. // I c e d K o l a (Contribs) 04:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Support --hydnjo talk 04:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Strong support – Will make an excellent arbiter. – ClockworkSoul 07:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Snowball support' - Obviously a strong candidate. --Wooty Woot? contribs 07:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support--ragesoss 09:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support ×Meegs 10:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 11:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Support ST47Talk 11:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support Jpeob 11:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support. —Serein 11:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. robchurch | talk 12:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  112. -- Natalya 12:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Jon Harald Søby 12:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  114. —Nightstallion (?) 13:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support. flowersofnight (talk) 14:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Support. --Muchness 15:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Support Excellent "mission statement" -Drdisque 15:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Support.--Isotope23 15:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Support. - Taxman Talk 15:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Strong Support - While I've "seen the name around", my first experience with him was following the Board elections on m:Requests for comments/Board Election 2006. From what I saw there, I have little doubt that Flcelloguy will be a positive, thoughtful, and truly helpful member of the Arbitration committee. - jc37 16:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Support. Impressive breadth of experience, from editing to administration and serving on the Mediation Committee. —Goh wz 18:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Support.--Scimitar 19:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Support – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Support. --Fang Aili talk 19:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support --Connel MacKenzie - wikt 20:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Don't burn yourself out. Andre (talk) 22:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Nishkid64 01:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Support --Makgraf 03:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support extensively experienced.-- danntm T C 04:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Support. —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 04:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  131. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 04:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support -- EdJohnston 04:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  133. MaxSem 09:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Kusma (討論) 13:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Support. --Merlinme 13:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Support per bandwagon. Besides, a very impressive candidate. Metamagician3000 13:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Support -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 13:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Support. BlankVerse 15:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Support Fred Bauder 15:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Support Spartaz 17:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Support Superb candidate with tons of mediation experience ▪◦▪≡Ѕirex98≡ 20:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Support Alexj2002 21:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Support EdwinHJ | Talk 21:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Support. Good editor, lots of experience. --Danaman5 21:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  145. ∴ here…♠ 21:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Convincing amount of work and activities Okino 23:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  147. In my opinion, the best neutral cadidate out here! -- Kim van der Linde at venus 01:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Well, duh. Daveydweeb (chat/review!) 01:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Support. All of my observations of this user's behavior have been positive. --Elonka 06:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Support. One of the good guys. 06:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC) gK
  151. Support.MustTC 11:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Support he would be excellent in this role. James086Talk | Contribs 11:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Support. --Cactus.man ✍ 12:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Chris 14:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Support definitely. Deb 17:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  156. --Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 17:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Support ... Kenosis 18:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Mackensen (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Support Pascal.Tesson 22:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Support Cpuwhiz11 23:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Support Voted against me last election. Don't know why. Don't care. Excellent candidate. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 23:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  162. - crz crztalk 00:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  163. AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 01:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Support - Gnetwerker 07:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Support - JoeSmack Talk 08:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Support -- Randall Bart 08:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Support Experienced, thorough, no dirty laundry Alan.ca 10:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Support Dragomiloff 13:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  169. appears to have great track record.--Andeh 13:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Oppose

- crz crztalk 00:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --Van helsing 09:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, there seems pressure to jump on the bandwagon to support, but I'm not impressed by this candidate. HGB 07:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2006/Vote/Flcelloguy&oldid=92918830"