User talk:Anthony Bradbury

Current time: 12:58, November 10 (UTC)

Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.

Archives

Problem when redirecting variational method

Hello, I created the page Variational method (disambiguation) and asked for the page Variational method to be move to Variational method (quantum mechanics). Apparently, you did this, but something went wrong and the content of the page disappeared. How to fix that? Timflutre (talk) 19:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Basalisk's talk page.
Message added 16:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 16:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at TinyTemper's talk page.
Message added 16:36, 15 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

– Connormah (talk) 16:36, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes setting on articles

Hello, Anthony. I see that you set "Pending changes" on North Sydney Boys High School. However, if you look at the page for setting protection, near the top of the page you will see a pink box that says "Pending changes protection should not be enabled on any pages except Wikipedia-namespace pages that are exclusively used for testing", and, at the top of the box for actually setting Pending changes, you will see that it says "do not use on articles per RFC result". I have, therefore, removed the pending changes setting from the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:01, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Pwizzle12

I thought that he committed vandalism by switching two names around and removing links to their wikipages at the same time.--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 19:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Hello mister how do you do's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

T-10 tank

It seems you have inadvertently blanked the article and page history while moving T-10 Heavy Tank to T-10 tank (both are now identical redirects). Muad (talk) 02:38, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm, I requested the move, but my intent was to have the article text saved under T-10 tank. Instead it appears the result (see history) was to have the short redirect text under both T-10 Heavy Tank and T-10 tank and the article text became completely lost. Please restore the text. --Kubanczyk (talk) 12:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion was clearly unintentional so I have restored it after seeing a post at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Article and history blanked. Maybe you clicked "Delete and move" more than once because the move didn't seem to go through. That can be dangerous if you don't check the result afterwards. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, looks good now! --Kubanczyk (talk) 16:28, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CAT:RFU transcluding itself into blocked list

I tried reverting the latest edit but for some reason that didn't do the trick. Not sure what is in it that is causing the self reference. Blackmane (talk) 20:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

very strange indeed. Blackmane (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible unblock?

I am inclined to unblock at User talk:Gregory1132. I think the editor is well-meaning. The main thing that holds me back is a feeling that there may be WP:COMPETENCE issues, but I am inclined to think we should give the person a chance. What do you think? JamesBWatson (talk)

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Basalisk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. Ready to roll after my on-calls. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 22:05, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iamthemuffinman's unblock request

Hi Anthony. Iamthemuffinman has (finally!) posted a sound-looking unblock request, which I'm inclined to grant. However, you and a number of other admins have been involved with his block in the past, so I'd like to get your take on it too; if you have a moment, please could you have a look at User talk:Iamthemuffinman and leave an opinion? Cheers, Yunshui 雲‍水 12:57, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

siamese people

please recovery this article and move it into my sandbox

i think whos want to delete it, it's so narrowmind and i think that article suitible in wikipedia. i think if this website not have siamese article - meaning castilian people will not appear in wikipedia to --โจ : แฟน ท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 13:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at KLL Joe's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New medical organization

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 21:16, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frukwan

Hello! Recently you blocked Official Frukwan Page for a username violation. I believe they're back as 216.16.220.32 making what appears to be a legal threats (here and here). I've left a response on their talk page, asking them to retract the threat and work with me but I thought I should report it now instead of waiting for them to continue spouting legal codes they have no understanding of. OlYeller21^Talktome 16:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Anthony Walker

Tony:
The article about John Anthony Walker has not survived your move,
although the related talk page has survived it.
What gives?
Thanks.
Doc.
DocRushing (talk) 20:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the deleted edits and removed the circular redirect. Toddst1 (talk) 22:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

stop deleting my stuff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew110 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roblox rustman89 and rustman65 and rustman56 was almost certainly not vandalism. Rich Farmbrough, 22:57, 27 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Talk:Mattheus Marinus Schepman

Hello, my friend. Would it be okay to restore the accompanying article? The speedy was a bit speedy. I contested it but was a bit late. The creator is an experienced editor, and perhaps should have a chance to expand it. Many thanks if you can help. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that the subject is the discoverer of many gastropod species. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. That was quick. If you did that any faster, it would have folded space-time. Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside...

I did not consider their message about "having done research" as relating to WP:OR whatsoever, based on the context. I still think she means the type of research we actually want - now that she understands WP:RS (✉→BWilkins←✎) 17:42, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you are right; I did not read it that way, but that may simply reflect my misinterpretation of her comment. I hope so.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 23:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Thai people

please perform opnion in my section about (compare the term between of siamese and thais) --โจ : แฟน ท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 20:00, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thai people

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at KLL Joe's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FYI

If you'd still like to co-nom me, I'd appreciate it. You can find the nomination here. Hope you're well, and thanks in advance. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 14:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To anyone watching this page; this is not a canvass, as I made the offer to nom or co-nom some time ago, and asked him to tell me when he was ready. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony, now that you conominated him, were you going to support or oppose him? ;) Guessing you just haven't logged in since it went live... Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Talk:Putrada_Ekadashi#Contested_deletion.
Message added 13:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reason of creation at discussion. was creating a stub when deleted. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Putrada Ekadashi without discussion is deleted. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

	long enough admin
	Thank you for being "an Administrator on Wikipedia long enough to know what I can do, and what I cannot. I am always prepared to do the first, and to consult on the second", and for seeing when others can do the same, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (6 June 2007)! - signature

User:161.55.204.50

Hello Anthony. Would you please block this IP? He's obviously trolling (see his other contributions on my talk page and the earlier comments on the article talk). His only purpose here is to harass me and disrupt the article, and is probably User:Labyrinth13, who has been harassing me off and on since he was indef blocked in 2007. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 17:03, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trolling and I am not labrinth13. Why won't anyone listen to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.55.204.50 (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All I need is help with putting in the reference in the article. I tried to discuss this but Parsecboy keeps removing my talk. Thank you for your help. 161.55.204.50 (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What you are attempting to inset is clear and blatant vandalism. Stop trolling or you will be blocked. Parsecboy (talk) 17:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not vandalizm. I have a reference. All I want to do is discuss it, but you keep removing my discussion from a talk page. I'm sorry if you are mad at someone, but this is important to me. 161.55.204.50 (talk) 17:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then provide the reference. Oh wait, there aren't any. Stop playing games. Parsecboy (talk) 17:16, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I TRIED to but you remove talk pages from me. Why? 161.55.204.50 (talk) 17:17, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No you didn't. Link to the webpage or provide the book details. Again, there aren't any, so just stop trolling. Parsecboy (talk) 17:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but you need to leave my talk page alone. And apologizing to me, to. 161.55.204.50 (talk) 17:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Provide the source or leave. Period. Parsecboy (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why you so rude? 161.55.204.50 (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Show us the source for your "contribution" or you will be blocked for vandalism and trolling. End of discussion. Parsecboy (talk) 17:24, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did, and you are a rude man. Can I get another admin who not as rude as this? 161.55.204.50 (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The source you provided in no way substantiates the addition you want to make. Nice try, but you need something else. Parsecboy (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That your own opinion. I would like the opinion of a admins who are not so mad at somebody. 161.55.204.50 (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's a simple fact. For a source to substantiate a claim, it needs to make that claim. The website you linked to does not make that claim. Keep on deflecting, though. Parsecboy (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Making formal requests for different admins to discuss my link. Thank you. 161.55.204.50 (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is now becoming increasingly clear that you are trolling. This is my talk page, so anything you post here will not be deleted except by me. Please post here the link which you are using as a source. If you do not do so, within a short time from now, I will block you. Any other post on the tpic which clearly fascinates you before you reply here will also result in a block. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony: Science for this has 10% of them as gay men: http://www.bismarck-class.dk/bismarck/crew/bismarck_survivors_list.html Also the admin call Parsecboy deleted my talk pages in voilations. Thank you for this help. this admin is angry at that or may be an anti-gay admin.161.55.204.50 (talk) 18:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IP blocked for a week. Competence issues at best, trolling at worst. In the future, please don't feed them. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Link does not confirm your posting. Block is justified. Any further trolling will rewult in a longer block. Kinu, it was worth confirming. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:07, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page

I had created the page Mostyn Embrey about my grandfather and it was almost immediately deleted. Can you undelete it or allow me to do the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frazey (talk • contribs) 19:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks

You know Anthony, it was your email to me several months ago that first made me think about an RfA. You've been with me from start to finish, and I wouldn't be in this position now without you. Thanks for motivating me to do this and not letting me sit on it! I'm in your debt. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 03:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominaterd (or co-nominated) very few editors for the tools; if age is not dimming my recollection there have been five including your good self. All have been accepted, and all have fulfilled my expectations. I am quite certain, as I have said to you more than once, that you will fill the position admirably. I did it for you, but to be fair predominantly for the good of the encyclopedia which will be enhanced by your elevation to the clean-up crew. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:58, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the first "project" that Anthony and I have crossed paths on, and I can't think of a better one to start with. I think it is healthy when the two nominators and the candidate aren't part of a single group, and represent a larger section of the community. Basalisk was my third nom, all successful. Monty, who is there now, is my fourth. Personally, I feel very good about the 2012 "crop" of admin, even if I'm one of them. I think we are very fortunate to have a great amount of diversity in the admin selection this year. And Anthony, by all means, you are welcome to comment on any future candidates that I review or ask my input on any you have in mind. I have a back log right now, having been on vacation, but I hope to start working on that this coming week. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 03:13, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Galexia deletion due to 2008 discussion. Galexia in 2012 is now a contribution to pop-culture from radio to album chartings'

Hello Dr. Bradbury, As a large fan of Galexia I created the band's wikipedia article - Prior to its deletion I had many sources such as interviews, photos of amazon.com chart positions, 2009's Album of The Year award presented by "Audio Oddyssey United Kingdom". I believe the page should be considered for restoration and allow myself, other music fans familiar with Galexia and the general Wikipedia moderator base to reference the citations as many articles, photos, videos and press content can be found via Google search. - The next Galexia album still has a page and I believe my Band page was well written in comparison, but needed the rest of the biography, citations, and information that I was slowly gathering to create an A+ article about one of the (in my, and many listeners opinion) most innovative band's to come out of obscurity and become signed to a major label with experimental music, and making it a success. I would appreciate a response back when you have time, as I'd like to add further information along with photos and interviews. - The page was initially deleted from what I can see as being "non-notable persons" back in the 2006-2008 era, I was not even a fan yet back then so I can agree with the deletion back then as Galexia was releasing the debut album. Now Galexia is releasing a third and final album under Atlantic Records after selling a combined Gold amount of the first two albums combined, Now In Technicolor! (The albums name, with the single "Hey Hey, Takei!") is expected by analysts to sell 150 thousand units in the end of Q4 2012 and first half of Q1 2013. Perhaps we can discuss the future of Galexia on WikipediA? - Galexia is mentioned if other pages with prominent stability and interesting information. I'd like to aid in sharing the band's full biography and information for the world. Thank you for the time, and I apologize for the long user talk my ADHD gets the best of me :).

(Koah Pelletier 20:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)) (talk)

Heel Shade Lundy IS A REAL PERSON AND THE INFO ON THAT PAGE WAS REAL YOU HEARTLESS BASTERD! — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeelShadeLundy (talk • contribs) 20:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Ahmadce's talk page.
Message added 23:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Nothing urgent. Just clearing one thing up. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 23:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 14:37, 5 December 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Errm, I err, well, I made a mistake. (Don't hit me!)

Hello, Anthony. You declined an unblock request at User talk:Saadus, giving as your reason "You have removed your earlier unblock request in which you admitted that your account was compromised, and have also removed my unblock decline. I request an explanation of these deletions. Any further posting here designed to conceal this situation will cause me to deny you access to this page." I confess that in fact I removed the declined unblock request, by mistake, in the course of declining another unblock request, as you can see here. Since this invalidates the reason for your declining the latest unblock request, and since you made that decline because I had misled you, I have reverted your decline. Let me know if you think I was wrong to do so. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:29, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I in turn confess that I did not check to see who had removed it. Leaving him blocked as compromised is quite satisfactory. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:33, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

recover my article Kapil_goyal

Why my page is deleted by you.please recover it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Er.goyal.kapil (talk • contribs) 11:12, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sherby

Hi, I've restored this article. The page contains a lot of history and at some point it was about someone completely different and then overwritten to the current version, which was why I put it up at AfD. I probably should have reverted the overwriting before nominating it, but I think it should stay at AfD for now, since no one seems to have noticed my comment about the previously "deleted" article. - filelake shoe  12:47, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 02:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

On a different subject than the YGM a few sections up. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 02:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfD vote

Per your recent vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The7stars (2nd nomination), it appears information in the article had been removed prior to you coming to the AfD. This has now been rectified. Could you please go and give it another look? Thank you. Silverseren^C 11:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Striga

Hi Anthony. Thanks for carrying out the move of Striga (plant) to Striga. Pardon me if I'm interrupting you in the middle of the process, but could you move the talk page as well? It looks like you may have forgotten. Thanks, BDD (talk) 23:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Patchy1's talk page.
Message added 12:13, 11 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Patchy1 12:13, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved again

Hi Anthony, sorry to bother you. remember this?. I'm afraid Phúc Yên has been stripped of accents again. I'm not going to revert per VN geo RM results and RfC majority a second time. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for move

Thank you very much for deleting the Last rites redirect and for moving Last Rites to that page! – Paine (Climax!) 02:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at BermanAndCompany's talk page.
Message added 20:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ryan Vesey 20:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eknath

It is not Wikipedia copying from [1], it is vice versa. The site copies Kanhopatra, Surdas, Chokhamela etc. with the reference signs like [1]. Please undelete. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 03:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	HI I am from albania and i am new in wiki.i great page gjovani gjonaj can u halp me to edit it. its eazy to delate . sory fore my english REÇ (talk) 12:59, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Ingrid Gjoni is very notability in albania. Google ingrid Gjoni, and It's OK to remove this i not care.I do it for fun REÇ (talk) 11:16, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anthony, I saw that you deleted the page en.wikipedia.com/wiki/ASEES because of "Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.wplgroup.com/aci/eu-partners/asees.asp". This page you have linked is about a event that ASEES is sponsoring. If you check http://www.asees.es you can see the Sino-Spanish Association for Energy and Sustainability has a banner about this event. Actually, in the page you linked they mention ASEES' website. Anyway, thank you for controlling Wikipedia and doing this better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenchina (talk • contribs) 02:37, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday cheer

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt ^{my talk page} is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.

User talk:BilalSaleh

Hi, Anthony, I know another admin may not unblock the editor without following very specific procedures, but I'm assuming I can unblock him if I choose to do so, right? WP:AEBLOCK doesn't explicitly address the issue, but it seems to me that its silence on the issue implies that it's okay.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hannele

Hi, thank you for helping to move Hannele! Azylber (talk) 08:06, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Jim1138's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dubious (to put it mildly) block

Very likely you are watching one or more of the relevant talk pages, but just in case you aren't I thought I would mention that I have unblocked 68.46.61.211. There are certainly problems with the editing, but not the extreme sort of vandalism that would justify a six month block without any warning whatever. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:09, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Was approached by someone you blocked ages ago on IRC, user:Carliiitaeliza, she is quiet annoying! copy pasted your reasons for blocking her. anyway, Happy New Year :D Danger^Mouse (talk) 19:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request regarding Ben-Jamin Newham

I request that the page be un-deleted and the deletion discussion be re-opened for the sake of having a definative discussion on the books that renders the "deletion" consensus so that future creations can be speedied under the CSD:G4 rule. Thank you for your time and patience. Hasteur (talk) 18:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:04, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Anthony Bradbury

Pratyya ^{(Happy New Year)} — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2024. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2024 goes well for you.

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.

Unicorn144

I was looking at him for another reason (a dispute at Sun Myung Moon and saw that you'd deleted his latest. He's got a long string of deleted or redirected articles[2]. See also his userpage User:Unicorn144. Do you think the problem is big enough yet to start doing something about him? Dougweller (talk) 11:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pastırma

Hi there. Sorry to have caused you time and labour with the pastırma move. I misread a comment on the discussion page and made that renaming. Have a Happy Year. --E4024 (talk) 20:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked user

Hello Sir,I think 48 hrs are few for this user as it's a vandalism only account.Thanx---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 21:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir,Thanks for guidance.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 21:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx a lot Sir,I have been here from just 7 months,We are still learning and It is delightful to learn something from sysop's.Glad to speak to you.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 21:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah,offcourse,it is my pleasure.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 21:48, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually,I support English football Team .Terry and Lampard have been common to both teams....p.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 21:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I live in the capital New Delhi while my native place is Uttarakhand here.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 22:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm,Truth never hide,India have enough resources but Excessive population and immense corruption is a big worry,I am not sure where India's future is going.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 22:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway,thanx for your compliments.I love European culture too.It's really nice to chat with you.I am logging off now.Whenever i will have some query,I will consult with you for sure.Take care..)

Lord Huron

I awoke to my surprise to find that this article had been either A7'ed or G4'ed, it looks like both...I wrote it yesterday. It contains a sufficient number of third party references to demonstrate the band's notability, making it ineligible for an A7, and it is substantially different (I presume) than the previously deleted version, which would lift it out of G4 territory. Could you please take a second look? Thanks. Chubbles (talk) 20:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Chubbles (talk) 20:44, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Believe it or not, the redirector is a sockpuppet whom I will be having blocked shortly. He's been a bee in my bonnet for months now. Chubbles (talk) 20:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, there's no reason you should have noticed, but the account is demonstrating a definite pattern of behavior I've seen before. I've got an open SPI case on the matter. Chubbles (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page on Cacique Cheese

Hello, I noticed that you've marked a page for Cacique Cheese company for speedy deletion. I'd like to make clear that I have no affiliation with this company and the page contained a simple history of the company and a link to the company's webpage, which is certainly in similarity with like-pages currently existing on wikipedia for many other similar companies in the same consumer product sector (manufacturers of cheese products). There was absolutely no "advertising" or spam on the page, and as an administrator of another wiki site (WeRelate.org), I am certainly aware of what comprises blatent advertising and spam.

I'd appreciate it if you could reverse the speedy deletion at your earliest convenience.

Thank you.

Delijim (talk) 22:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Thanks for the quick response to my deletion request on ISO 3166-2:IN-GO. I'll try to be more careful when creating redirects in the future. —Stepheng3 (talk) 23:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Geoffrey Shakespeare, 1st Baronet article missing

Hello Anthony. Sir Geoffrey has vanished in a puff of electrons. Did we have a real article on him at one time? Now there's just a bunch of redirects that go in a circle. I found a mention of him in Special:DoubleRedirects, and when investigating, saw your name in the log. We must have had a real article at one time: see answers.com. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 22:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The fog of electrons has cleared. See my talk! EdJohnston (talk) 16:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Sabrosky rewrite was almost ready

I didn't mention on the talk page I was soon to put up a brand new article about him because I thought there would be some warning the article was about to be deleted. At my sandbox I'm showing you current refs and the bibliography, text and more info in progress. So feel free to put it back now or when I tell you I'm ready, probably Monday, cause I'm trying to finish off higher priority now. Thanks. CarolMooreDC 23:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

link=User talk:<Fox2k11>

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at [[User talk:<Fox2k11>|User talk:<Fox2k11>]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. --Fox2k11 (talk) 18:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Masshole

Why did you delete Masshole? G4 is for "A sufficiently identical and unimproved copy, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion. This excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version" That was an article the word "Masshole" that was originally deleted, this was just a disambag pointing readers to Massachusetts#Demographics (which discribes the people of Massachusetts) and Reckless driving, I didn't recreate the deleted article. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 20:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Masshole

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Masshole. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Emmette Hernandez Coleman's talk page.
Message added 20:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this...

I've declined your speedy at Hyderabad Kalibari because it seems to be a building rather than an organisation. (That's the third I've declined tonight - unusual...) Feel free to disagree. You've been doing it longer. I only looked to see whose tag it was after I'd declined it. I do have doubts about the notability of the thing, though. Peridon (talk) 23:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for deleting the duplicate article on the 9th Airborne Division. I was the person who created that article and was rather annoyed to see it duplicated for no good reason. Looking over the contributions for Vintagemilitary01 I'm getting the feeling they were just 'cutting & pasting' to create their articles. In the article you deleted Vintagemilitary01 had simply copied the text from 9th Airborne Division (United States), added one small line and removed all the references, I'm wondering if this is the case with the other articles. The user seems to have disappeared since the 26th of December 2012.Graham1973 (talk) 01:13, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Hi, I noticed that Michael Corey was redirected to Mike Corey. This happened on a previous page, yet I was able to look at the version history and get the refs I had placed. This happened with Rhonald Jhun>Ronald Jhun. I was wondering how I go about finding the text that used to be at Michael Corey. It would be a pain to have to hunt down those refs and then addd the citations. PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 20:38, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie! PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 03:26, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Berzerker1982

"possibly because you are a new user"--yes, that, and WP:ROPE I suppose. It ended where it was bound to end. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uninvolved view sought

Could you take a look at User talk:Xanxari en., and at my talk page and User talk:Bharathiya? I've given him 24 hours (now expired) to withdraw what I consider a legal threat (although a somewhat unlikely one...). He hasn't, and has repeated a mention of court. I'd be grateful for an uninvolved opinion. Peridon (talk) 12:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked him on the basis of his legal threat at 12.07 today. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You're obviously ahead of me... Peridon (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Tiruchirappalli International Airport to Tiruchirappalli Airport

Thanks for the move. Could you please move the talk page as well? — Abhishek ^Talk 14:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Please check this official link of AAI http://www.aai.aero/tenders/airfield.pdf Its clearly mentions Tiruchirapalli International Airport ! What is the reason for changing its name back to old form? Naanmahan (talk) 17:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gentlemen, I have now moved the article page and the talk page I think both ways in response to G6 requests, which are supposed to be non-controversial. If you are not happy then put the tag back on the article; i am not happy just moving it back and forth.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony, please move the associated talk page as well. There were discussions that the airport name has not changed. There are no sources that the airport name has changed, but still Naanmahan wanted to move the article. I don't know to what extent a tender can be considered as a declaration of the name change. Please move the talk page. Let Naanmahan start an RM for this. — Abhishek ^Talk 02:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Both, Now the name has been changed as per http://www.aai.aero/allAirports/Trichy_airpo_gi.jsp from Tiruchirapalli Airport to Tiruchirapalli International AirportNaanmahan (talk) 13:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Nobody suggested it and I never though about it. Interesting suggestion though... --Biker Biker (talk) 22:35, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contest of the deletion of the Lee Westwick page

I would like to contest the Speedy Deletion of the page : Lee Westwick I would like to note that the request for deletion was made by a user that does not have any knowledge about the subject, also this was requested in a bias and malicious way. The user that requested the deletion of the page stated the following : "Subject is not notable in any way, obviously written by subject and treats it like his personal blog" I would like to state that I do completely understand that Wikipedia is totally separate to Twitter but there is clear evidence here that the user that requested the speedy deletion is bias and clearly requested the speedy deletion maliciously ( https://twitter.com/aleczandah ) My opinion is Wikipedia should be a place to correct errors or false information, however if this is done by someone out of spite or is not knowledgeable on the subject it should be looked into. I am knowledgeable on the subject and will provide references to prove the subjects notability and significance. The subject "Lee Westwick" was a cast member of the TV program The Bill - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Bill_cast_members The above is also backed up like other cast members of the same TV Program with the following reference : http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4253417/ Also the subjects other working roles can be viewed here : http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4253417/resume (some of which are not notable however the ones that were not notable in anyway I see where not mentioned within the page about the subject. The subject also has a significance in the industry for using his notability to raise money for charity with reference of some of the subjects charitable work are referenced here http://www.bigissueinthenorth.com/2012/02/ebay-for-the-trust/4834 http://www.bigissueinthenorth.com/2012/02/ebay-for-the-trust/4834/lee-westwick-mobo-awards-9 The Subjects attendance of The 65th Cannes film festival is backed up with photographic evidence from links below, however I feel a reference needs to be added from an article or news source. Although it can be seen this information is correct. http://coolspotters.com/actors/lee-westwick/and/award-shows/the-cannes-film-festival#medium-2393334 further references about the subject can be at the following links, however I think the main sources and most notable are above. http://www.zimbio.com/Lee+Westwick - http://coolspotters.com/actors/lee-westwick/wallpapers - https://www.youtube.com/user/breakupsdrama The statement that the user made stating the subject used Wikipedia as a personal blog, I completely disagree, I believe if this was the true case then all the non notable things would also of been added, for example the subjects mini drama series or more etc. Using the following pages to express the notability of Lee Westwick, The subject would have the same notability as a majority of his fellow cast members who also have pages on Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberta_Taylor - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minna_Aaltonen - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bryan_Marshall However I am of the opinion that the page of Lee Westwick should not have been deleted. I can see how the conclusion for Speedy Deletion was met on a little merit, being more references of the subject were needed on this page. I request the page to be Un-deleted also all of the above notable references to back up the information and show the subjects notability and significance should be added to the page. ← Kirsty Hurst — Preceding unsigned comment added by KirstyHurst (talk • contribs) 13:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neither the nominating editor nor the deleting admin (me) are required to have ay knowledge of the subject. The decision to nominate and the decision to delete are made solely on the basis of the content of the article. If you feel that the deletion is not reasonable please go to deletion review page. Until, or if, the community give a view I stand by my decision.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can not see how someone with no knowledge on a subject can state that the subject is not notable in anyway when there is evidence also reference as proof that the subject is notable and significant. I also feel this borders on opinions and not the facts being that of the subject is notable and significant. If the article is re-written with References, and clearly shows the subjects notability and significance is that allowed? or does it have to be through the deletion review page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KirstyHurst (talk • contribs)

(talk page stalker) The editors of an article are required to show notability using valid reliable sources (hint: imdb is NOT one of them). Any reader in the world should be able to see the supposed notability, and the proof. If the supposed sources do not show proof, then the article gets deleted - period. Especially if it's about a living person. If you believe the deletion to be in error by process, go to WP:DRV, but having viewed the "article", I have to agree with deletion. See WP:DELETE and WP:FIRSTARTICLE before proceeding and good luck (✉→BWilkins←✎) 17:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for a swift response, However can you explain how IMDB is not a valid source? when every single actor on wikipedia uses this for that reason. Would I be wrong in saying that if this is the case the every single Wikipedia page of these people need to be deleted aswell? ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List of The Bill cast members ) The subject in question has more notability than most of the other cast members. ( KirstyHurst (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC) )]] If I may just add an example ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minna Aaltonen ) this cast member of the same TV Program as the subject in question only has IMDB as a reference. Please correct me if I am wrong ( KirstyHurst (talk) 17:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC) )]][reply]

Please read WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS ... in short, just because one bad article exists (possibly only temporarily) it does not mean that another one can exist (✉→BWilkins←✎) 17:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think in this instance "x was kept so this should be too" is a valid reason for the page to be un-deleted. On its own merit Lee Westwick is a notable and significant celebrity and I have provided references and evidence to this effect. ( KirstyHurst (talk) 18:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC) )[reply]

(talk page stalker)You're not reading the link, Kitty. "Other crap exists" is explicitly listed as an invalid argument for retention of an article, not a valid one. At best, pointing out other crap that exists may provide useful guidance to winnow out other inappropriate articles which may be deleted. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, friends. Is there really a valid reason for having this discussion on my talk page? Kirsty, the wikipedia policies are as they are, including those on notability and on acceptability of sources. You may not agree; this does not affect our policy. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a by-the-way, Minna Aaltonen was created in 2006, before the current living person biography policy was in force. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:Apologies Anthony I will continue this via the Un-Deletion notice board. I understand what you are all saying. But do not understand why the page on Lee Westwick has been deleted for not being a notable or significant subject when Lee Westwick is notable and a significant subject. As per Anthonys request can we not continue this here but on the un-Deletion notice board ( KirstyHurst (talk) 21:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC) )]][reply]

Contested deletion

Thank you for marking Aqueduct (bridge) for speedy deletion, as it provides a good opportunity for discussing the merits of this new article. It was an attempt to resolve issues with the article Aqueduct. The term aqueduct refers to both a watercourse and a bridge for conveying a watercourse across a void. I was involved in the successful process in sorting out the various duplicated articles with little difference other than name which culminated in the article Controlled-access highway to combine Freeway, Motorway and many other articles. I have I think successfully userfied the draft article, and another one, Aqueduct (watercourse). I hope these draft articles will not also be marked for speedy deletion. The issues surrounding Aqueduct are under discussion here: Talk:Aqueduct#Merger_proposal. Draft articles are here:

Assuming good faith, Nankai (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Access

May I have talk page access back, so that I can go through an adoption course with Ryan Vessey or someone else? May I also mention that I can also use this access to place unblock request?. Thank you. Dannyboy1209 92.0.102.253 (talk) 17:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that the above was immediately followed by this edit. --Saddhiyama (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have done no more than to speak to blocking checkuser admin.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Bangarradancetheatre

Um... you may want to reconsider your decline of that unblock request. You may notice that on that same talk page, I declined an unblock request suggesting that the editor propose a name exactly that way.

We have ample precedent for this. See for example Mark at Alcoa (talk · contribs), particularly his talk page, in which admins and a bureaucrat agreed that it is acceptable to associate a username with a company as long as the username clearly belongs to one person and isn't a role account. This doesn't violate Wikipedia:Username policy. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that this may be a matter of interpretation, and I would have no difficulty in reversing myself if in your opinion to do so would be approriate. I am, of course, aware of the policy you state, but it seemed to me that this was a self-avowed role account, as shown by the editor's statemenr "The new account Bangarradancetheatre has been created by current Bangarra communications staff to update and maintain the information on the Bangarra Dance Theatre Wikipedia page". The new request, being one person's name, is obviously wholly non-controversial. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A personal name with the company appended, as in the Mark at Alcoa example, should also be noncontroversial. Personally I prefer usernames that are clearly personal yet openly disclose a conflict of interest at the same time, rather than usernames masquerading as independent individuals when they actually have a conflict of interest. Both types of usernames are compliant with the username policy, but only one has transparency. I believe such transparency benefits Wikipedia.

In any case the user has re-requested unblocking for changing the name to just a personal name, so there's no issue anymore, and no need to reverse yourself. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recently deleted page

Hi! Greetings! The page EPZ thana was deleted by you as a patroller tagged it for a speedy deletion. I think the patroller has mistakenly tagged it because, an admin has reverted his tagging from an article here, which has the same amount of context that the deleted article had and also both are of the same category. If possible, I'm requesting you to revert the deletion. Thanks --Zayeem ^(talk) 14:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Old redirect

Hi. I really liked WP:BASTARD. Any chance I could get you to undelete it for me? Hope you're well. --MZMcBride (talk) 07:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) FYI, MZMcBride is not an admin. Black Kite (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? When was he desysopped?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some time between 4 September 2009 and 19 January 2010 - there seems to be an entry missing from the rights log. As I recall, it was self-requested. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:21, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I've found it, so the answer is 19 January 2010 - three years ago. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus, it's really been three years. Time flies. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

It's pretty hard not to break the rule when editors working in concert are deleting one's edit in quick succession. These "various" editors seem to be either in communication with one another or might even be one person using multiple IP addresses. Interesting how they will tolerate no mention of the AR-15's use in mass shootings to be part of the "history" section of the article. Why don't you expend some of your energy looking into that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trblmkr1 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting ridiculous. The editor's first article edit after coming off of an edit warring block was to reintroduce the material. While my major concern was copyvio, other editors made it clear that they had an issue with the inclusion of the material. Ryan Vesey 15:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Ryan, but I changed the material from a quote to my own words and took out anything that could be construed as opinion. As to my deletion of all the non-Colt makers of AR-15 clones is because the heading "Manufacturers of the AR-15" is factually incorrect. This has absolutely nothing to do with with my factual edit of the History section. It merely illustrates that your precision about editing only extends so far as to keep negative info about the AR-15 out of the page altogether. Trblmkr1 (talk) 16:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I left your material about Sandy Hook in (although another editor removed it because it wasn't technically an AR-15). All I did was address the contribution, you can either say only Colt creates AR-15's so the gun used in the shooting was not an AR-15 or you can say that all the variants of the AR-15 can be referred to as an AR-15 so the various manufacturers can be said to produce AR-15s. In regards to the comment in question, the talk page is literally filled with discussion on the issue, I suggest you take part. Ryan Vesey 16:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like your idea on the manufacturers heading, I modified it slightly, but you can undo it if you still feel your section heading was better. Sorry Anthony for the discussion carrying over to your talk page, it can certainly be moved Ryan Vesey 16:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have no problem about being on this page; it was only that I was not actually involved in the controversy. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

trblmkr

Sorry AB, misread the post. No, trblmkr is my general online handle and does not denote any attitude or intention. You have nothing to worry about. Trblmkr1 (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Need you to undo an improper page delete.

Hello, You have accidentally identified my article on the popular phrase "What Difference Does it Make?" because you thought it was a personal attack page. I can assure you it is not. It is attempting to explain the pop phenomenon of the phrase and it's link to Hilary Clinton. Unless you can explain why repeating U.S. Senate Hearing testimony about a person is a personal attack, then please undo your page delete. Paululrich (talk) 22:24, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony,

to answer your question "Why did you chose this particular piece of her testimony to highlight?" - The answer is that I did not choose that particular piece of testimony to highlight. It was not my choice - it was the media's choice. Its not like I'm picking and choosing Senate testimony phrases of people and putting them on wikipedia. The reason I chose this needed a wikipedia page is, as I reference in my article with 4 separate references (I could have done hundreds) this is a popular phenomenon - this misquote - and it deserves an explanation as to why it shows up in so many political cartoons and articles and commentaries and TV shows and etc.. etc. etc...... MY article explains where the phrase, a misquote, comes from. But if you don't feel that its appropriate on Wikipedia for another reason, then leave it deleted. Just let me know why. Paululrich (talk) 22:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Ulrich

I noticed that you had some involvement with him over a removed attack page. By accident "What Difference Does It Make? (quote)"? He announced that he wanted to recreate that article, now a similar article "What Difference Does It Make? (phrase)" is removed as attack page. I think he works with a sockpuppet or meatpuppet!

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mdandrea. The Banner talk 22:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who had involvement with Paul Ulrich? I'm not sure what you are getting at, but I can assure you I'm not working with anyone else. I'm trying to keep and article I spent a lot of time on from getting deleted. I spent over two hours on that article and I think its relevant information about a popular catch phrase. Is that so wrong? Paululrich (talk) 23:02, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flag, coat of arms of New York

It seems you recently moved Flag of New York to Coat of arms of New York, apparently per some discussion on a WikiProject page. However, the discussion (and the associated changes) was mostly unilateral and post-facto. I ask that you please move Coat of arms of New York back to Flag of New York. Thanks. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 05:52, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a functioning redirect from Flag of New York to Coat of arms of New York, and the article is headed by a graphic of the coat of arms, not of a flag.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:43, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

Hello Sir,I would like to do editing in Western countries related articles especially from english speaking countries but it is difficult for me to judge which sources are reliable or not.So,Please suggest me frequently used websites or reliable newspapers there so i will insert info comfortably.Much needed,Thanx---zeeyanketu ^discutez 08:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nyang Gwardlidac

I later tagged it for CSD at the suggestion of another editor, but thank you for your message. Admittedly, sometimes I tend to err too far on the side of caution when it comes to AfD vs. CSD with new pages. CtP (t • c) 21:55, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 23:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

—Theopolisme (talk) 23:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User Binksternet misreports vandalism

User Binksternet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Binksternet) misreports vandalism for people who, based on citations and documents, try to modify his numerous, repetitive and negative texts inserted in the pages of most early aviation pioneers that compete in a way or another with Wright Brothers, whose fanatic and very undocumented supporter is. I explained in the last comment from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Traian_Vuia why I want to make the changes in the page and I was suspended as vandal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.203.73.246 (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspammer has ignored your warning

Hi, Anthony. I just wanted to alert you that persistent linkspammer TMafia, to whom you gave a final notice about linkspamming [User talk:TMafia#Persistent linkspamming here] on Dec. 12, has continued to do so starting on Dec. 16] and most recently, as I only just noticed, today again here. I thought you'd want to know. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 17:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dewy60

Hi, I notice you've added a final warning to Dewy60 after my request today. He's just edited The Prince of Egypt article again; although his edit wasn't clear-cut vandalism, it was repeating information already prominent in the article. What would you suggest was done from here? He doesn't seem to take well to advice (see his talk), but I don't know whether his latest edit warrants blocking. What do you think? drewmunn talk 18:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, me again! He's at it again; not quite helpful, not quite vandalism. I seriously think he doesn't understand the rules of the road. This time, it's Scary Movie. He's added a section about 'spin off' films that are simply films of the same genre. I haven't done anything to rectify this as of yet, because I don't want to get in the way of procedure (you've given him a final warning, I don't want to undermine that threat). drewmunn talk 16:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock reviewing

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at BuickCenturyDriver's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

–BuickCentury Driver 02:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Admin responsibilies

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at BuickCenturyDriver's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

–BuickCentury Driver 01:46, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hi Tony! I've been clearing my WP email inbox (~120,000 - stuff sure piles up in 4 years! Mostly mailing lists, luckily) and found some emails from you enquiring about my absence. Sorry I hadn't responded - I basically need a complete break to start out with, and then other things filled the void and I slowly had no time for Wikipedia anymore. Anyway, I've been editing around a bit for the past week or so, requested my admin tools back and have even used them a few times. It's fun - things have changed considerably in the time I've been away, so I'm trying not to go too fast. I've rediscovered the joys of writing articles!

Anyway, it's lovely you were so concerned about my absence - I feel I owe you a response to let you know I'm absolutely fine, sound in body and mind and all the other relevant bits, and hope that you're very well too :) I'm sure we'll run into each other around the place, now that I'm more active. ~ Riana ⁂ 03:55, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Thank you for your very rude and patronising reply. I do not believe that "everyone else seems to find this page as very straightforward". I'm sure the majority are as baffled as I was, or more so, and simply give up and go away, especially if their reward is hostility. The only users are those who have struggled through the fog. I don't particularly want to avoid using the page; what I want to do is report vandalism as simple as that. As it is, it seems there are layers of reporting I am supposed to struggle through. Much simpler to have a mechanism where a report is made, and automatically appropriate action is taken.

John of Cromer in Philippines (talk) mytime= Thu 17:45, wikitime= 09:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolay Zherdev

I appreciate your moves reverting all the moves. Just an FYI, proper Anglicization of his name is Nikolay as shown here. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 23:06, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just reverting: I am prepared to be guided. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 23:08, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~No problem. I'm not following you around, but I found another one you have Dmitri Ktistich his name is Dimitri Khristich. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 23:12, 7 March 2013 (UTC)~~ Nevermind.[reply]

Already fixed. :) -DJSasso (talk) 13:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know - I fixed it, having initially unfixed it! --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...but no thanks - for the moment at least. Got stuff happening that means I should be spending less wikitime, not more! --Biker Biker (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright help?

Anthony,

I need help with a dispute over three files on Clipper Magazine Stadium. The dispute can be found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2013_March_17#File:Clip_diamond.png

Copyright help?

Anthony,

I need help with a dispute over three files on Clipper Magazine Stadium. The dispute can be found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2013_March_17#File:Clip_diamond.png

A cookie for you!

Hello Mr Bradbury, I will be celebrating my birthday on 19 March. So, I would like to give you a treat. If you decide to "eat" the cookie, please reply by placing {{subst:munch}} on my talk page. I hope this cookie has made your day better. Cheers!

Arctic Kangaroo 15:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Thiyyar

Hi Anthony. I have finished editing above mentioned article, it is ready to submit for approval. As you advised I requested my colleague's help in proof reading and fixed article. Hope the article doesnt have any issues. Would you please have a look my article and advise me what i need to do to get it published in wiki. I was having a discussion in Ezhava page for removing POV Fork issue. I have provided valid and genuine book references to them and there is no point of keeping Thiyyar Cast as a POV Fork of Ezhava. Irajeevwiki (talk) 01:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New article for Anthony Ausgang

Hi Anthony Bradbury, the history of the Anthony Ausgang article shows you deleted the article July 1 2009. There was a note to contact you to review any new article with new content. I've also contacted others involved in deletion as instructed. I posted the new article to the Talk page at Talk:Anthony_Ausgang. Can you approve and post? Thanks.TBliss (talk) 07:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- --JamboQueen (talk) 08:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Thank you for the good advice. It seems like a mess and I just first thought that people with much experience and who have seen similar situation could help with supportive editorial policy comments. --JamboQueen (talk) 12:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANVASS In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it is done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. - The general notice written on your talk page did not include any reference, tone or words that could be interpreted as trying to influence the outcome of a discussion towards one side of a debate. Thank you for your most kind attention. --JamboQueen (talk) 12:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]