Jump to content

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Teb728 (talk | contribs) at 11:22, 28 December 2020 (Reporting AdwaitTambe123.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Usernames for administrator attention

    This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

    1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
    2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
    3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
    4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
    5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
    6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
    7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
    This page was last updated at 17:38 on 20 June 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

    User-reported

    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. "Truth" in a username is not always inflammatory, it depends on the actions of the user. The user may have edited promotionally, but that is not a username issue. 331dot (talk) 07:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. The edit the user has made doesn’t directly promote that product, so I couldn’t outright say it’s a promotional username itself. That being said, I think a COIN report may be appropriate. Red Phoenix talk 16:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Being discussed with the user. Account is 13 years old, and based on the past editing it could be the article subject himself. It’s worth a discussion given the age of the account. Red Phoenix talk 17:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: I think it is also worth noting that the account predates the creation of the article by several years, and that they have not edited in six months. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. also The Bushranger One ping only 00:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]