Bird: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Diet and feeding: add some citations, remove some uncited examples as an extra dozen or so ciations would make this thing uneditable and unreadable
→‎Distribution: page number cleanup
(76 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
'''Birds''' ([[class (biology)|class]] '''Aves''') are [[Bipedalism|biped]]al, [[warm-blooded]], [[egg (biology)|egg-laying]] [[vertebrate]] animals. Birds [[evolution|evolved]] from [[Theropoda|theropod]] [[dinosaur]]s during the [[Jurassic]] period, and the earliest known bird is the Late Jurassic ''[[Archaeopteryx]]''. Ranging in size from tiny [[hummingbird]]s to the huge [[Ostrich]] and [[Emu]], there are around 10,000 known living bird species in the world, making them the most diverse class of [[Terrestrial animal|terrestrial]] vertebrates.
'''Birds''' ([[class (biology)|class]] '''Aves''') are [[Bipedalism|biped]]al, [[warm-blooded]], [[egg (biology)|egg-laying]] [[vertebrate]] animals. Birds [[evolution|evolved]] from [[Theropoda|theropod]] [[dinosaur]]s during the [[Jurassic]] period, and the earliest known bird is the Late Jurassic ''[[Archaeopteryx]]''. Ranging in size from tiny [[hummingbird]]s to the huge [[Ostrich]] and [[Emu]], there are around 10,000 known living bird species in the world, making them the most diverse class of [[Terrestrial animal|terrestrial]] vertebrates.


Modern birds are [[body plan|characterised]] by feathers, a beak with no teeth, the laying of hard-shelled eggs, a high [[metabolism|metabolic]] rate, a four-chambered heart, and a lightweight but strong [[Bird skeleton|skeleton]]. All birds have forelimbs modified as wings and most can [[bird flight|fly]], though the [[ratite]]s and several others, particularly [[Endemism in birds|endemic]] island species, have also lost the ability to fly. Birds also have unique [[digestive system|digestive]] and [[respiratory system]]s that are highly adapted for flight.
Modern birds are [[body plan|characterised]] by feathers, a beak with no teeth, the laying of hard-shelled eggs, a high [[metabolism|metabolic]] rate, a four-chambered heart, and a lightweight but strong [[Bird skeleton|skeleton]]. All birds have forelimbs modified as wings and most can [[bird flight|fly]], though the [[ratite]]s and several others, particularly [[Endemism in birds|endemic]] island species, have lost the ability to fly. Birds also have unique [[digestive system|digestive]] and [[respiratory system]]s that are highly adapted for flight.


Many species of bird undertake long distance annual [[bird migration|migrations]], and many more perform shorter irregular movements. Birds are social and communicate using visual signals and through calls and [[bird song|song]], and participate in social behaviours including cooperative hunting, cooperative [[Helpers at the nest|breeding]], [[Flocking (behavior)|flocking]] and [[Mobbing behavior|mobbing]] of predators. Birds are primarily [[Varieties of Monogamy|socially monogamous]], with engagement in [[non-human animal sexual behavior|extra-pair copulations]] being common in some species - other species have [[polygamy|polygamous]] or [[polyandry|polyandrous]] breeding systems. Eggs are usually laid in a nest and [[Avian incubation|incubated]] and most birds have an extended period of parental care after hatching.
Many species of bird undertake long distance annual [[bird migration|migrations]], and many more perform shorter irregular movements. Birds are social and communicate using visual signals and through calls and [[bird song|song]], and participate in social behaviours including cooperative hunting, cooperative [[Helpers at the nest|breeding]], [[Flocking (behavior)|flocking]] and [[Mobbing behavior|mobbing]] of predators. Birds are primarily [[Varieties of Monogamy|socially monogamous]], with engagement in [[non-human animal sexual behavior|extra-pair copulations]] being common in some species—other species have [[polygamy|polygamous]] or [[polyandry|polyandrous]] breeding systems. Eggs are usually laid in a nest and [[Avian incubation|incubated]] and most birds have an extended period of parental care after hatching.


Birds are economically important to humans: many are important sources of food, acquired either through hunting or farming, they also provide other products. Some species, particularly [[songbird]]s and [[parrot]]s, are popular as pets. Birds [[List of fictional birds|figure prominently]] in all aspects of human culture from religion to poetry and popular music. About 120–130 species have become [[extinction|extinct]] as a result of human activity since 1600, and hundreds more before this. Currently around 1,200 species of birds are threatened with extinction by human activities and efforts are underway to [[bird conservation|protect]] them.
Birds are economically important to humans: many are important sources of food, acquired either through hunting or farming, and they provide other products. Some species, particularly [[songbird]]s and [[parrot]]s, are popular as pets. Birds [[List of fictional birds|figure prominently]] in all aspects of human culture from religion to poetry and popular music. About 120–130 species have become [[extinction|extinct]] as a result of human activity since 1600, and hundreds more before this. Currently around 1,200 species of birds are threatened with extinction by human activities and efforts are underway to [[bird conservation|protect]] them.


==Evolution and taxonomy==
==Evolution and taxonomy==
{{main|Bird evolution}}
{{main|Bird evolution}}
[[Image:Archaeopteryx bavarica Detail.jpg|right|thumb|220px|''[[Archaeopteryx]]'', the earliest known bird.]]
[[Image:Archaeopteryx bavarica Detail.jpg|right|thumb|220px|''[[Archaeopteryx]]'', the earliest known bird]]


The first [[scientific classification|classification]] of birds was developed by [[Francis Willughby]] and [[John Ray]] in their 1676 volume, ''Ornithologiae''.
The first [[scientific classification|classification]] of birds was developed by [[Francis Willughby]] and [[John Ray]] in their 1676 volume, ''Ornithologiae''.<ref>
Del Hoyo, Josep, Andy Elliott & Jordi Sargatal (1992). ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]] Vol 1''. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, ISBN 84-87334-10-5
<ref>
Del Hoyo, Josep, Andy Elliott & Jordi Sargatal ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]] Vol 1'' 1992. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, ISBN 84-87334-10-5
</ref>
</ref>
[[Carolus Linnaeus]] modified that work in 1758 to devise the taxonomic classification system still in use.
[[Carolus Linnaeus]] modified that work in 1758 to devise the taxonomic classification system still in use.<ref>
{{la icon}} {{cite book | last = Linnaeus | first = Carolus | authorlink = Carolus Linnaeus | title = [[Systema Naturae|Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata]] | publisher = Holmiae. (Laurentii Salvii) | date = 1758 | pages = 824 | url=http://dz1.gdz-cms.de/index.php?id=img&no_cache=1&IDDOC=265100}}</ref>
<ref>
Birds are categorised as the [[Class (biology)|biological class]] Aves in [[Linnean taxonomy]]. [[Phylogenetic taxonomy]] places Aves in the dinosaur [[clade]] [[Theropoda]].<ref name="Theropoda">
{{la icon}} {{cite book | last = Linnaeus | first = Carolus | authorlink = Carolus Linnaeus | title = [[Systema Naturae|Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata]] | publisher = Holmiae. (Laurentii Salvii). | date = 1758 | location = | pages = 824 | url = | doi = | id = }}([http://dz1.gdz-cms.de/index.php?id=img&no_cache=1&IDDOC=265100 online at Göttinger Digitalisierungszentrum])
Livezey BC, Zusi RL (2007). Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. ''Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society'' '''149''' (1), 1–95. {{DOI|10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x}}
</ref>
Birds are categorised as the [[Class (biology)|biological class]] Aves in [[Linnean taxonomy]]. [[Phylogenetic taxonomy]] places Aves in the dinosaur [[clade]] [[Theropoda]].
<ref name="Theropoda">
'''Livezey''', Bradley C. & '''Zusi''', Richard L. (2007): Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 149 (1), 1–95. {{DOI|10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x}}
</ref>
</ref>
Aves and a sister group, the [[Order (biology)|order]] [[Crocodilia]], together are the sole living members of the [[reptile]] clade [[Archosauria]]. [[Phylogenetics|Phylogenetically]], Aves is commonly defined as all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of modern birds and ''[[Archaeopteryx|Archaeopteryx lithographica]]''.
Aves and a sister group, the [[Order (biology)|order]] [[Crocodilia]], together are the sole living members of the [[reptile]] clade [[Archosauria]]. [[Phylogenetics|Phylogenetically]], Aves is commonly defined as all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of modern birds and ''[[Archaeopteryx|Archaeopteryx lithographica]]''.<ref>
{{cite book |author= Padian K, Chiappe LM |editor= Currie PJ & Padian K |title= Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs|year= 1997|publisher= [[Academic Press]]|location= San Diego|pages= 41–96|chapter= Bird Origins}}
<ref>
{{cite book |author= Padian, K. & L. M. Chiappe |editor= Currie PJ & Padian K |title= Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs|origdate= |year= 1997|publisher= [[Academic Press]]|location= San Diego|isbn= |id= |pages= 41-96|chapter= Bird Origins}}
</ref>
</ref>
''Archaeopteryx'', from the [[Kimmeridgian]] stage of the [[Late Jurassic]] (some 155-150 million years ago), is the earliest known bird under this definition. Others have defined Aves to include only the modern bird groups, excluding most groups known only from fossils,<ref>{{cite book |last= Gauthier |first= J.|editor= K. Padian |title= The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight. Mem. California Acad. Sci 8|year= 1986|isbn= |oclc= |doi= |id= |pages= 1-55|chapter= Saurischian Monophyly and the origin of birds}}</ref> in part to avoid the uncertainties about the placement of ''Archaeopteryx'' in relation to animals traditionally thought of as theropod dinosaurs.<!-- See WP:RS [http://www.phylonames.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7]--><!--Mayr et al 2005 "A well-preserved Archaeopteryx specimen with theropod features" + comment + Mayr's comment on the comment-->
''Archaeopteryx'', from the [[Kimmeridgian]] stage of the [[Late Jurassic]] (some 155–150 million years ago), is the earliest known bird under this definition. Others have defined Aves to include only the modern bird groups, excluding most groups known only from fossils,<ref>{{cite book |last= Gauthier |first= J|editor= K. Padian |title= The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight. Mem. California Acad. Sci 8|year= 1986|pages= 1–55|chapter= Saurischian Monophyly and the origin of birds}}</ref> in part to avoid the uncertainties about the placement of ''Archaeopteryx'' in relation to animals traditionally thought of as theropod dinosaurs.<!-- See WP:RS [http://www.phylonames.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7]--><!--Mayr et al 2005 "A well-preserved Archaeopteryx specimen with theropod features" + comment + Mayr's comment on the comment-->

Modern birds all sit within the [[subclass (biology)|subclass]] [[Neornithes]], which is divided into two [[superorder]]s, the [[Paleognathae]] (mostly flightless birds like [[ostrich]]es), and the wildly diverse [[Neognathae]], containing all other birds. <ref name="Theropoda"/> Depending on the [[alpha taxonomy|taxonomic]] viewpoint, the number of species cited varies anywhere from 9,800 <ref>[[Clements, James]] (2007) ''[[The Clements Checklist of Birds of the World]]''. [[Cornell University Press]] ISBN 978-0801445019</ref> to 10,050 <ref>Gill, Frank & Minturn Wright (2006) ''Birds of the World: Recommended English Names''. [[Princeton University Press]] ISBN 978-0-691-12827-6</ref> known living bird species in the world.



Modern birds all sit within the [[subclass (biology)|subclass]] [[Neornithes]], which is divided into two [[superorder]]s, the [[Paleognathae]] (mostly flightless birds like [[ostrich]]es), and the wildly diverse [[Neognathae]], containing all other birds.<ref name="Theropoda"/> Depending on the [[alpha taxonomy|taxonomic]] viewpoint, the number of species cited varies anywhere from 9,800<ref>[[Clements, James]] (2007). ''[[The Clements Checklist of Birds of the World]]''. [[Cornell University Press]] ISBN 978-0801445019</ref> to 10,050<ref>Gill, Frank & Minturn Wright (2006). ''Birds of the World: Recommended English Names''. [[Princeton University Press]] ISBN 978-0-691-12827-6</ref> known living bird species in the world.


===Dinosaurs and the origin of birds===
===Dinosaurs and the origin of birds===
Line 55: Line 48:
[[Image:Confuciusornis.jpg|left|thumb|220px|''[[Confuciusornis]]'', a Cretaceous bird from [[China]]]]
[[Image:Confuciusornis.jpg|left|thumb|220px|''[[Confuciusornis]]'', a Cretaceous bird from [[China]]]]


There is [[Origin of birds|significant evidence]] that birds evolved from [[Theropoda|theropod]] [[Dinosauria|dinosaurs]], specifically, that birds are members of [[Maniraptora]], a group of theropods which includes [[dromaeosaur]]s and [[Oviraptoridae|oviraptorids]], among others.<ref> Paul G. (2002) "Looking for the True Bird Ancestor" Pp. 171-224. In ''Dinosaurs of the Air, The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds''. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore ISBN 0-8018-6763-0</ref> As more non-avian theropods that are closely related to birds are discovered, the formerly clear distinction between non-birds and birds becomes blurred. Recent discoveries in [[Liaoning]] Province of northeast [[People's Republic of China|China]], demonstrating that many small [[Feathered dinosaurs|theropod dinosaurs had feathers]], contribute to this ambiguity.<ref>Norell, M. & M. Ellison (2005) ''Unearthing the Dragon, The Great Feathered Dinosaur Discovery'' Pi Press, New York, ISBN 0-13-186266-9</ref>
There is [[Origin of birds|significant evidence]] that birds evolved from [[Theropoda|theropod]] [[Dinosauria|dinosaurs]], specifically, that birds are members of [[Maniraptora]], a group of theropods which includes [[dromaeosaur]]s and [[Oviraptoridae|oviraptorids]], among others.<ref> Paul G (2002). "Looking for the True Bird Ancestor", pp. 171–224. In ''Dinosaurs of the Air, The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds''. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore ISBN 0-8018-6763-0</ref> As more non-avian theropods that are closely related to birds are discovered, the formerly clear distinction between non-birds and birds becomes blurred. Recent discoveries in [[Liaoning]] Province of northeast [[People's Republic of China|China]], demonstrating that many small [[Feathered dinosaurs|theropod dinosaurs had feathers]], contribute to this ambiguity.<ref>Norell M, Ellison M (2005). ''Unearthing the Dragon, The Great Feathered Dinosaur Discovery'' Pi Press, New York, ISBN 0-13-186266-9</ref>


The basal bird ''[[Archaeopteryx]]'' from the [[Jurassic]] era is well-known as one of the first [[transitional fossil]]s to be found in support of [[evolution]] in the late 19th century, though it is not considered a direct ancestor of modern birds. ''[[Confuciusornis]]'' is another early bird; it lived in the [[Early Cretaceous]]. [[Protoavis|''Protoavis texensis'']] may be even older although the fragmentary nature of this [[fossil]] leaves it open to considerable doubt whether this was a bird ancestor.<ref>Zhou, Z. (2004) The origin and early evolution of birds: discoveries, disputes, and perspectives from fossil evidence. ''[[Die Naturwissenschaften]]'' '''91''' (10): 455-471.</ref> Other [[Mesozoic]] birds include the [[Enantiornithes]], ''[[Yanornis]]'', ''[[Ichthyornis]]'', ''[[Gansus]]'' and the [[Hesperornithiformes]], a group of flightless divers resembling [[grebe]]s and [[loon]]s.
The basal bird ''[[Archaeopteryx]]'' from the [[Jurassic]] era is well-known as one of the first [[transitional fossil]]s to be found in support of [[evolution]] in the late 19th century, though it is not considered a direct ancestor of modern birds. ''[[Confuciusornis]]'' is another early bird; it lived in the [[Early Cretaceous]]. [[Protoavis|''Protoavis texensis'']] may be even older although the fragmentary nature of this [[fossil]] leaves it open to considerable doubt whether this was a bird ancestor.<ref>Zhou Z (2004). The origin and early evolution of birds: discoveries, disputes, and perspectives from fossil evidence. ''[[Die Naturwissenschaften]]'' '''91''' (10): 455–71.</ref> Other [[Mesozoic]] birds include the [[Enantiornithes]], ''[[Yanornis]]'', ''[[Ichthyornis]]'', ''[[Gansus]]'' and the [[Hesperornithiformes]], a group of flightless divers resembling [[grebe]]s and [[loon]]s.


The [[dromaeosaurid]]s ''[[Cryptovolans]]'' and ''[[Microraptor]]'' may have been capable of powered flight to an extent similar to or greater than that of ''Archaeopteryx''. ''Cryptovolans'' had a sternal [[keel (bird)|keel]] and had ribs with [[uncinate process]]es. In fact, ''Cryptovolans'' makes a better "bird" than ''Archaeopteryx'' which is missing some of these modern bird features. Because of this, some palaeontologists have suggested that dromaeosaurs are actually basal birds, and that the larger members of the family are secondarily flightless, i.e. that dromaeosaurs evolved from birds and not the other way around.<ref> Paul, G. (2002) "Were some Dinosaurs Also Neoflightless Birds?" Pp. 224-258. In ''Dinosaurs of the Air, The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds''. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore ISBN 0-8018-6763-0</ref> Evidence for this theory is currently inconclusive, as the exact relationship among the most advanced maniraptoran dinosaurs and the most primitive true birds are not well understood.
The [[dromaeosaurid]]s ''[[Cryptovolans]]'' and ''[[Microraptor]]'' may have been capable of powered flight to an extent similar to or greater than that of ''Archaeopteryx''. ''Cryptovolans'' had a sternal [[keel (bird)|keel]] and had ribs with [[uncinate process]]es. In fact, ''Cryptovolans'' makes a better "bird" than ''Archaeopteryx'' which is missing some of these modern bird features. Because of this, some palaeontologists have suggested that dromaeosaurs are actually basal birds, and that the larger members of the family are secondarily flightless, i.e. that dromaeosaurs evolved from birds and not the other way around.<ref>Paul G (2002). "Were some Dinosaurs Also Neoflightless Birds?" pp. 224–58. In ''Dinosaurs of the Air, The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds''. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore ISBN 0-8018-6763-0</ref> Evidence for this theory is currently inconclusive, as the exact relationship among the most advanced maniraptoran dinosaurs and the most primitive true birds are not well understood.


Although [[ornithischia]]n (bird-hipped) dinosaurs share the hip structure of birds, birds actually originated from the [[saurischia]]n (lizard-hipped) dinosaurs, and thus evolved their hip structure [[Analogy (biology)|independently]].<ref>Rasskin-Gutman, D. & A. Buscalioni (2001) "Theoretical morphology of the Archosaur (Reptilia: Diapsida) pelvic girdle" ''[[Paleobiology (journal)|Paleobiology]]'' '''27''' (1): 59-78</ref> In fact, the bird-like hip structure also developed a third time among a peculiar group of theropods, the [[Therizinosauridae]].
Although [[ornithischia]]n (bird-hipped) dinosaurs share the hip structure of birds, birds actually originated from the [[saurischia]]n (lizard-hipped) dinosaurs, and thus evolved their hip structure [[Analogy (biology)|independently]].<ref>Rasskin-Gutman D, Buscalioni A (2001). "Theoretical morphology of the Archosaur (Reptilia: Diapsida) pelvic girdle" ''[[Paleobiology (journal)|Paleobiology]]'' '''27''' (1): 59–78</ref> In fact, the bird-like hip structure also developed a third time among a peculiar group of theropods, the [[Therizinosauridae]].


An alternate theory to the dinosaurian origin of birds, espoused by a few scientists (most notably [[Larry Martin]] and [[Alan Feduccia]]), states that birds (including [[maniraptora]]n "dinosaurs") evolved from early [[archosaur]]s like ''[[Longisquama]]'',<ref>[[Feduccia, A.]], T. Lingham-Soliar & J. R. Hinchliffe (2005) Do feathered dinosaurs exist? Testing the hypothesis on neontological and paleontological evidence. ''Journal of Morphology'' '''266''' (2): 125-166</ref> a theory which is contested by most [[palaeontology|palaeontologists]] and evidence based on feather development and evolution.<ref>Prum, R. (2003) "Are Current Critiques Of The Theropod Origin Of Birds Science? Rebuttal To Feduccia 2002" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''120''' (2): 550-561 </ref>
An alternate theory to the dinosaurian origin of birds, espoused by a few scientists (most notably [[Larry Martin]] and [[Alan Feduccia]]), states that birds (including [[maniraptora]]n "dinosaurs") evolved from early [[archosaur]]s like ''[[Longisquama]]'',<ref>[[Alan Feduccia|Feduccia A]], Lingham-Soliar T, Hinchliffe JR (2005). Do feathered dinosaurs exist? Testing the hypothesis on neontological and paleontological evidence. ''Journal of Morphology'' '''266''' (2): 125–66. PMID 16217748</ref> a theory which is contested by most [[palaeontology|palaeontologists]] and evidence based on feather development and evolution.<ref>Prum R (2003). "Are Current Critiques Of The Theropod Origin Of Birds Science? Rebuttal To Feduccia 2002" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''120''' (2): 550–61 </ref>


===Early evolution of birds===
===Early evolution of birds===
{{Seealso|Fossil birds}}


{{userboxtop| toptext=&nbsp;}}
{{userboxtop| toptext=&nbsp;}}
Line 87: Line 81:
}}
}}
}}
}}
<center><small>Basal bird phylogeny simplified after Chiappe, 2007<ref name="chiappe2007">Chiappe, L.M. (2007). ''Glorified Dinosaurs: The Origin and Early Evolution of Birds'', Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd., 263pp.</ref></small></center>
<center><small>Basal bird phylogeny simplified after Chiappe, 2007<ref name="chiappe2007">Chiappe LM (2007). ''Glorified Dinosaurs: The Origin and Early Evolution of Birds'', Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd., 263pp.</ref></small></center>
{{userboxbottom}}
{{userboxbottom}}
During the [[Cretaceous Period]], birds diversified into a wide variety of forms.<ref name="chiappe2007"/> Many of these groups retained [[symplesiomorphy|primitive characteristics]], such as clawed wings and teeth, though the latter was lost independently in a number of bird groups, including [[modern birds]] (Neornithes). {{Fact|date=July 2007}} While the earliest birds retained the long bony tails of their ancestors (birds such as ''Archaeopteryx'' and ''[[Jeholornis]]''),<ref name="chiappe2007"/> more advanced birds shortened the tail with the advent of the [[pygostyle]] bone in the [[clade]] Pygostylia.
During the [[Cretaceous Period]], birds diversified into a wide variety of forms.<ref name="chiappe2007"/> Many of these groups retained [[symplesiomorphy|primitive characteristics]], such as clawed wings and teeth, though the latter was lost independently in a number of bird groups, including [[modern birds]] (Neornithes).{{Fact|date=July 2007}} While the earliest birds retained the long bony tails of their ancestors (birds such as ''Archaeopteryx'' and ''[[Jeholornis]]''),<ref name="chiappe2007"/> more advanced birds shortened the tail with the advent of the [[pygostyle]] bone in the [[clade]] Pygostylia.


The first large, diverse lineage of short-tailed birds to evolve were the [[Enantiornithes]], or "opposite birds", so named because the construction of their shoulder bones was the reverse of the condition seen in modern birds. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} Enantirornithes occupied a wide array of ecological niches, from sand-probing shorebirds and fish-eaters to tree-dwelling forms and seed-eaters.<ref name="chiappe2007"/> More advanced lineages also specialized in eating fish, like the superficially [[gull]]-like subclass of [[Ichthyornithes]] ("fish birds").<ref>Clarke J. (2004): Morphology, Phylogenetic Taxonomy, and Systematics of ''Ichthyornis'' and ''Apatornis'' (Avialae: Ornithurae). ''Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History'' '''286''': 1-179 [http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/bitstream/2246/454/1/B286.pdf]</ref> One order of Mesozoic seabirds, the [[Hesperornithiformes]], became so well adapted to hunting fish in marine environments that they lost the ability to fly and became primarily aquatic. Despite their extreme specializations, the Hesperornithiformes represent some of the closest relatives of modern birds.<ref name="chiappe2007"/> For a comprehensive listing of prehistoric bird groups, see [[Fossil birds]].
The first large, diverse lineage of short-tailed birds to evolve were the [[Enantiornithes]], or "opposite birds", so named because the construction of their shoulder bones was the reverse of the condition seen in modern birds.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Enantirornithes occupied a wide array of ecological niches, from sand-probing shorebirds and fish-eaters to tree-dwelling forms and seed-eaters.<ref name="chiappe2007"/> More advanced lineages also specialized in eating fish, like the superficially [[gull]]-like subclass of [[Ichthyornithes]] ("fish birds").<ref>Clarke J (2004). [http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/bitstream/2246/454/1/B286.pdf Morphology, Phylogenetic Taxonomy, and Systematics of ''Ichthyornis'' and ''Apatornis'' (Avialae: Ornithurae)] (PDF). ''Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History'' '''286''': 1–179 </ref> One order of Mesozoic seabirds, the [[Hesperornithiformes]], became so well adapted to hunting fish in marine environments that they lost the ability to fly and became primarily aquatic. Despite their extreme specializations, the Hesperornithiformes represent some of the closest relatives of modern birds.<ref name="chiappe2007"/>


===Radiation of modern birds===
===Radiation of modern birds===
{{Seealso|Sibley-Ahlquist taxonomy|dinosaur classification}}
Modern birds are classified in the subclass Neornithes, which are now known to have evolved into some basic lineages by the end of the Cretaceous (see ''[[Vegavis]]''<!--see also Hitorical Biology 18:205-->).<ref>Clarke, J. A.; Tambussi, C. P.; Noriega, J. I.; Erickson, G. M. & Ketcham, R. A. (2005): Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' '''433''': 305-308. [[Digital Object Identifier|DOI]]:10.1038/nature03150 [http://www.digimorph.org/specimens/Vegavis_iaai/nature03150.pdf PDF fulltext] [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v433/n7023/suppinfo/nature03150.html Supporting information]</ref> The Neornithes are split into the [[Paleognathae]] and [[Neognathae]]. The paleognaths include the [[tinamou]]s of [[Central America|Central]] and [[South America]] and the [[ratite]]s. The ratites are large flightless birds, and include [[ostrich]]es, rheas, [[cassowary|cassowaries]], [[kiwi]]s and [[emu]]s (though some scientists suspect that the ratites represent an artificial grouping of birds which have independently lost the ability to fly in a number of unrelated lineages).<ref>van Tuinen, M., [[Charles Sibley|C. Sibley]], & S. Blair Hedges (1998) "Phylogeny and Biogeography of Ratite Birds Inferred from DNA Sequences of the Mitochondrial Ribosomal Genes" ''[[Molecular Biology and Evolution (journal)|Molecular Biology and Evolution]]'', '''15''' (4): 370–376</ref>


Modern birds are classified in the subclass Neornithes, which are now known to have evolved into some basic lineages by the end of the Cretaceous (see ''[[Vegavis]]''<!--see also Hitorical Biology 18:205-->).<ref>Clarke JA, Tambussi CP, Noriega JI, Erickson GM, Ketcham RA (2005). Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' '''433''': 305–308. {{DOI|10.1038/nature03150}} PMID 15662422[http://www.digimorph.org/specimens/Vegavis_iaai/nature03150.pdf PDF fulltext] [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v433/n7023/suppinfo/nature03150.html Supporting information]</ref> The Neornithes are split into the [[Paleognathae]] and [[Neognathae]]. The paleognaths include the [[tinamou]]s of [[Central America|Central]] and [[South America]] and the [[ratite]]s. The ratites are large flightless birds, and include [[ostrich]]es, rheas, [[cassowary|cassowaries]], [[kiwi]]s and [[emu]]s (though some scientists suspect that the ratites represent an artificial grouping of birds which have independently lost the ability to fly in a number of unrelated lineages).<ref>van Tuinen M, [[Charles Sibley|Sibley C]], Blair Hedges S (1998). "Phylogeny and Biogeography of Ratite Birds Inferred from DNA Sequences of the Mitochondrial Ribosomal Genes" ''[[Molecular Biology and Evolution (journal)|Molecular Biology and Evolution]]'', '''15''' (4): 370–376. PMID 9549088</ref>
The basal divergence from the remaining Neognathes was that of the [[Galloanserae]], the superorder containing the [[Anseriformes]] ([[duck]]s, [[goose|geese]], [[swan]]s and [[screamer]]s), and the [[Galliformes]] (the [[pheasant]]s, [[grouse]], and their allies, together with the [[mound builder (bird)|mound builders]], and the [[guan]]s and their allies). The dates for the splits are much debated by scientists. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} It is agreed that the Neornithes evolved in the Cretaceous and that the split between the Galloanseri from other Neognathes occurred before the [[Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event|K-T extinction event]], but there are different opinions about whether the [[Evolutionary radiation|radiation]] of the remaining Neognathes occurred before or after the extinction of the other dinosaurs.<ref name = "Ericson">Ericson, P. G. P., C. L. Anderson, T. Britton, A. Elzanowski, U. S. Johansson, M. Kallersjo, J. I. Ohlson, T. J. Parsons, D. Zuccon & G. Mayr (2006) "Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils" ''[[Biology Letters]]'' '''2''' (4): 543-547 [http://www.systbot.uu.se/staff/c_anderson/pdf/neoaves.pdf]</ref> This disagreement is in part caused by a divergence in the evidence, with molecular dating suggesting a Cretaceous radiation and [[fossil]] evidence supporting a [[Tertiary]] radiation. Attempts to reconcile the molecular and fossil evidence have proved controversial.<ref name = "Ericson"/><ref>Brown, J., B. Payn, & D. Mindell (2006) "Nuclear DNA does not reconcile 'rocks' and 'clocks' in Neoaves: a comment on Ericson ''et al.'' ''Biology Letters'' '''3''' 1-3</ref>


The basal divergence from the remaining Neognathes was that of the [[Galloanserae]], the superorder containing the [[Anseriformes]] ([[duck]]s, [[goose|geese]], [[swan]]s and [[screamer]]s), and the [[Galliformes]] (the [[pheasant]]s, [[grouse]], and their allies, together with the [[mound builder (bird)|mound builders]], and the [[guan]]s and their allies). The dates for the splits are much debated by scientists.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} It is agreed that the Neornithes evolved in the Cretaceous and that the split between the Galloanseri from other Neognathes occurred before the [[Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event|K-T extinction event]], but there are different opinions about whether the [[Evolutionary radiation|radiation]] of the remaining Neognathes occurred before or after the extinction of the other dinosaurs.<ref name = "Ericson">Ericson PGP, Anderson CL, Britton T, ''et al.'' (2006). "[http://www.systbot.uu.se/staff/c_anderson/pdf/neoaves.pdf Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils]" (PDF). ''[[Biology Letters]]'' '''2''' (4): 543–47. PMID 17148284</ref> This disagreement is in part caused by a divergence in the evidence, with molecular dating suggesting a Cretaceous radiation and [[fossil]] evidence supporting a [[Tertiary]] radiation. Attempts to reconcile the molecular and fossil evidence have proved controversial.<ref name = "Ericson"/><ref>Brown JB, Payne RB, Mindell DP (2006). "Nuclear DNA does not reconcile 'rocks' and 'clocks' in Neoaves: a comment on Ericson ''et al.'' ''Biology Letters'' '''3''' 1–3. PMID 17389215 </ref>
The classification of birds is a contentious issue. [[Charles Sibley|Sibley]] & [[Jon Ahlquist|Ahlquist]]'s ''Phylogeny and Classification of Birds'' (1990) is a landmark work on the classification of birds, although frequently debated and constantly revised. A preponderance of evidence seems to suggest that the modern bird orders constitute accurate [[taxon|taxa]]. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} But scientists disagree about the relationships between orders; evidence from modern bird anatomy, fossils and DNA have all been brought to bear on the problem but no strong consensus has emerged. More recently, new fossil and molecular evidence is providing an increasingly clear picture of the evolution of modern bird orders. See also: [[Sibley-Ahlquist taxonomy]] and [[dinosaur classification]].

The classification of birds is a contentious issue. [[Charles Sibley|Sibley]] and [[Jon Ahlquist|Ahlquist]]'s ''Phylogeny and Classification of Birds'' (1990) is a landmark work on the classification of birds, although frequently debated and constantly revised. A preponderance of evidence seems to suggest that the modern bird orders constitute accurate [[taxon|taxa]].{{Fact|date=July 2007}} But scientists disagree about the relationships between orders; evidence from modern bird anatomy, fossils and DNA have all been brought to bear on the problem but no strong consensus has emerged. More recently, new fossil and molecular evidence is providing an increasingly clear picture of the evolution of modern bird orders.


====Modern bird orders====
====Modern bird orders====
Line 163: Line 159:
==Distribution==
==Distribution==


[[Image:House sparrow04.jpg|thumb|left|250px| The range of the [[House Sparrow]] has expanded dramatically due to human activities.<ref>[[Newton, Ian]] (2003) ''[[The Speciation and Biogeogrpahy of Birds]]'' ISBN 0-12-517375-X, p. 463</ref> ]]
[[Image:House sparrow04.jpg|thumb|left|250px| The range of the [[House Sparrow]] has expanded dramatically due to human activities.<ref>Newton, Ian (2003). ''The Speciation and Biogeogrpahy of Birds'' ISBN 0-12-517375-X, p. 463</ref> ]]


Birds breed on all seven continents, with the highest [[biodiversity|diversity]] occurring in tropical regions; this may be due either to higher [[speciation]] rates in the tropics or to higher [[extinction]] rates at higher latitudes.<ref>Weir J, Schulter D (2007). "The Latitudinal Gradient in Recent Speciation and Extinction Rates of Birds and Mammals" ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''315''' (5818): 1574–76. PMID 17363673</ref> They are able to live and feed in most of the world's terrestrial habitats, reaching their southern extreme in the [[Snow Petrel|Snow Petrel's]] breeding colonies, found as far as {{convert|440|km|mi|-1}} inland in [[Antarctica]].<ref>Brooke M (2004). ''Albatrosses And Petrels Across The World'': Procellariidae. [[Oxford University Press]], Oxford, UK ISBN 0-19-850125-0 </ref> Several families of birds have adapted to life both on the world's oceans and in them, with some [[seabird]] species coming ashore only to breed<ref name = "Burger">Schreiber EA, Burger J (2001). ''Biology of Marine Birds'', Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7 </ref> and some [[penguin]]s recorded diving as deeply as {{convert|300|m|ft|-1}}.<ref>Sato K, Naito Y, Kato A, ''et al.'' (2002). "Buoyancy and maximal diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume?" ''Journal of Experimental Biology'' '''205''' (9): 1189–97. PMID 11948196 </ref> Many species have established [[alien (biology)|naturalised breeding populations]] in areas to which they have been introduced by humans. Some of these introductions have been deliberate; the [[Ring-necked Pheasant]], for example, has been introduced around the world as a [[game bird]].<ref>Hill DA, Robertson P (1988). ''The pheasant: ecology, management, and conservation'' BSP Prof. Books, Oxford, UK.
Birds breed on all seven continents, with the highest [[biodiversity|diversity]] occurring in tropical regions; this may be due either to higher [[speciation]] rates in the tropics or to higher [[extinction]] rates at higher latitudes.
</ref> Others are accidental, such as the [[Monk Parakeet]]s that have escaped from captivity and established breeding colonies in a number of North American cities.<ref>Spreyer MF, Bucher EH (1998). Monk Parakeet ("Myiopsitta monachus"). In ''The Birds of North America, No. 322'' (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. </ref> Some species, including the [[Cattle Egret]],<ref> Arendt W (1988). "Range Expansion of the Cattle Egret,(''Bubulcus ibis'') in the Greater Caribbean Basin" ''Colonial Waterbirds'' '''11''' (2): 252–62. {{DOI|10.2307/1521007}}</ref> [[Yellow-headed Caracara]]<ref> Bierregaard RO (1994). "Yellow-headed Caracara" in ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]]. Volume 2; New World Vultures to Guineafowl'' (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-873337-15-6 </ref> and [[Galah]],<ref> Juniper T, Parr M (1998). ''Parrots: A Guide to the Parrots of the World'', London: [[Helm Identification Guides|Christopher Helm]], ISBN 0-7136-6933-0 </ref> have [[Avian range expansion|spread naturally]] far beyond their original ranges as [[agriculture|agricultural practices]] created suitable new habitat.
<ref>Weir J & Schulter D (2007) "The Latitudinal Gradient in Recent Speciation and Extinction Rates of Birds and Mammals" ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''315'''(5818): 1574-1576
</ref> They are able to live and feed in most of the world's terrestrial habitats, reaching their southern extreme in the [[Snow Petrel|Snow Petrel's]] breeding colonies, found as far as 440 km inland in [[Antarctica]].
<ref>Brooke, M. (2004). ''Albatrosses And Petrels Across The World'': Procellariidae. [[Oxford University Press]], Oxford, UK ISBN 0-19-850125-0 </ref> Several families of birds have adapted to life both on the world's [[ocean]]s and in them, with some [[seabird]] species coming ashore only to breed
<ref name = "Burger">Schreiber, Elizabeth A. & Burger, Joanne.(2001.) ''Biology of Marine Birds'', Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7 </ref> and some [[penguin]]s recorded diving as deeply as 300 m.
<ref>Sato K, Naito Y, Kato A, Niizuma Y, Watanuki Y, Charrassin JB, Bost CA, Handrich Y, Le Maho Y (2002) "Buoyancy and maximal diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume?" ''Journal of Experimental Biology'' '''205'''(9): 1189–1197 </ref> Many species have established [[alien (biology)|naturalised breeding populations]] in areas to which they have been introduced by humans. Some of these introductions have been deliberate; the [[Ring-necked Pheasant]], for example, has been introduced around the world as a [[game bird]].
<ref>D. A. Hill, P. Robertson (1988). ''The pheasant: ecology, management, and conservation'' BSP Prof. Books, Oxford, UK.
</ref> Others are accidental, such as the [[Monk Parakeet]]s that have escaped from captivity and established breeding colonies in a number of North American cities. <ref>Spreyer, M. F., and E. H. Bucher. (1998). Monk Parakeet ("Myiopsitta monachus"). In ''The Birds of North America, No. 322'' (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. </ref> Some species, including the [[Cattle Egret]], <ref> Arendt W (1988) "Range Expansion of the Cattle Egret,(''Bubulcus ibis'') in the Greater Caribbean Basin" ''Colonial Waterbirds'' '''11'''(2): 252-262. </ref> [[Yellow-headed Caracara]] <ref> Bierregaard, R. O. (1994) "Yellow-headed Caracara" in ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]]. Volume 2; New World Vultures to Guineafowl'' (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-873337-15-6
</ref> and [[Galah]], <ref> Juniper, Tony & Mike Parr. (1998) ''Parrots: A Guide to the Parrots of the World'', London: [[Helm Identification Guides|Christopher Helm]], ISBN 0-7136-6933-0 </ref> have [[Avian range expansion|spread naturally]] far beyond their original ranges as [[agriculture|agricultural practices]] created suitable new habitat.


==Anatomy==
==Anatomy==
Line 181: Line 170:
Compared with other vertebrates, birds have a [[body plan]] that shows many unusual adaptations, mostly to facilitate [[bird flight|flight]].
Compared with other vertebrates, birds have a [[body plan]] that shows many unusual adaptations, mostly to facilitate [[bird flight|flight]].


The skeleton consists of bones which are very light. They have large pneumatic (air-filled) cavities which connect with the [[respiratory system]].
The skeleton consists of bones which are very light. They have large pneumatic (air-filled) cavities which connect with the [[respiratory system]].<ref>Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988). [http://www.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/Adaptations.html Adaptations for Flight.] Based on The Birder's Handbook (Paul Ehrlich, David Dobkin, and Darryl Wheye. 1988. Simon and Schuster, New York. Retrieved on [[July 14]] [[2007]].
<ref>Paul R. Ehrlich, David S. Dobkin, and Darryl Wheye (1988). [http://www.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/Adaptations.html Adaptations for Flight. Based on The Birder's Handbook (Paul Ehrlich, David Dobkin, and Darryl Wheye. 1988. Simon and Schuster, New York] Accessed [[July 14]] 2007.
</ref>
</ref>
The skull bones are fused and do not show [[cranial sutures]].
The skull bones are fused and do not show [[cranial sutures]].<ref name = "Gill">Gill F (1995). ''Ornithology'' WH Freeman and Company, New York ISBN 0-7167-2415-4
<ref name = "Gill">Gill F (1995) ''Ornithology'' WH Freeman and Company, New York ISBN 0-7167-2415-4
</ref>
</ref>
The [[orbit (anatomy)|orbits]] are large and separated by a bony [[septum]]. The [[vertebral column|spine]] has cervical, thoracic, lumbar and caudal regions with the number of cervical (neck) vertebrae highly variable and especially flexible, but movement is reduced in the anterior thoracic vertebrae and absent in the later vertebrae.<ref>[http://www.paulnoll.com/Oregon/Birds/Avian-Skeleton.html The Avian Skeleton (Accessed May 2007)]</ref> The last few are fused with the [[pelvis]] to form the synsacrum. <ref name = "Gill"/> The ribs are flattened and the [[sternum]] is keeled for the attachment of flight muscles, except in the flightless bird orders. The forelimbs are modified into the wings.<ref>[http://fsc.fernbank.edu/Birding/skeleton.htm Birds in the Classroom (Accessed May 2007)]</ref>
The [[orbit (anatomy)|orbits]] are large and separated by a bony [[septum]]. The [[vertebral column|spine]] has cervical, thoracic, lumbar and caudal regions with the number of cervical (neck) vertebrae highly variable and especially flexible, but movement is reduced in the anterior thoracic vertebrae and absent in the later vertebrae.<ref>[http://www.paulnoll.com/Oregon/Birds/Avian-Skeleton.html The Avian Skeleton.] paulnoll.com. Retrieved on [[2007-09-13]].</ref> The last few are fused with the [[pelvis]] to form the synsacrum.<ref name = "Gill"/> The ribs are flattened and the [[sternum]] is keeled for the attachment of flight muscles, except in the flightless bird orders. The forelimbs are modified into the wings.<ref>[http://fsc.fernbank.edu/Birding/skeleton.htm Skeleton of a typical bird.] Fernbank Science Center's Ornithology Web. Retrieved on [[2007-09-14]].</ref>


Like the [[reptile]]s, birds are primarily ''uricotelic'', that is their [[kidney]]s extract nitrogenous wastes from their bloodstream and excrete it as [[uric acid]] instead of [[urea]] or [[ammonia]]. The uric acid is excreted along with feces as a semisolid waste and they do not have a separate urinary bladder or opening.<ref>Ehrlich, P. R., David S. Dobkin, and Darryl Wheye. 1988. Bird essays. Drinking. [http://www.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/Drinking.html]</ref><ref>Tsahar, Ella,Carlos Martínez del Rio, Ido Izhaki and Zeev Arad (2005) Can birds be ammonotelic? Nitrogen balance and excretion in two frugivores. Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 1025-1034 [http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/208/6/1025</ref> Some birds such as hummingbirds however can be ''facultatively ammonotelic'', excreting most of the nitrogenous wastes as ammonia.<ref>Preest, M. R. and Beuchat, C. A. (1997). Ammonia excretion by hummingbirds. ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' 386,561-562.</ref> They also excrete [[creatine]] rather than [[creatinine]] as in mammals. <ref name = "Gill"/> This material, as well as the output of the intestines, emerges from the bird's [[cloaca]].<ref>J. Mora, J. Martuscelli, Juana Ortiz-Pineda and G. Soberon (1965) The Regulation of Urea-Biosynthesis Enzymes in Vertebrates. ''[[Biochemical Journal]]'' 96:28-35 [http://www.biochemj.org/bj/096/0028/0960028.pdf]</ref><ref>Packard, G. C. (1966) The Influence of Ambient Temperature and Aridity on Modes of Reproduction and Excretion of Amniote Vertebrates. ''[[The American Naturalist]]''. 100(916):667-682</ref> The cloaca is a multi-purpose opening: their wastes are expelled through it, they mate by [[Bird anatomy#Reproduction|joining cloaca]], and females lay eggs out of it. In addition, many species of birds regurgitate [[Pellet (ornithology)|pellets]].<ref>Balgooyen T (1971) "Pellet Regurgitation by Captive Sparrow Hawks (''Falco sparverius'')" ''[[Condor (journal)|Condor]]'' '''73''' (3): 382-385</ref>
Like the [[reptile]]s, birds are primarily ''uricotelic'', that is their [[kidney]]s extract nitrogenous wastes from their bloodstream and excrete it as [[uric acid]] instead of [[urea]] or [[ammonia]]. The uric acid is excreted along with feces as a semisolid waste and they do not have a separate urinary bladder or opening.<ref>Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988). [http://www.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/Drinking.html Bird essays. Drinking.] Birds of Stanford. Retrieved on [[2007-09-13]].</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Tsahar E, Martínez del Rio C, Izhaki I, Arad Z |title=Can birds be ammonotelic? Nitrogen balance and excretion in two frugivores |journal=J. Exp. Biol. |volume=208 |issue=Pt 6 |pages=1025–34 |year=2005 |pmid=15767304 |doi=10.1242/jeb.01495 | url = http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/208/6/1025 }}</ref> Some birds such as hummingbirds however can be ''facultatively ammonotelic'', excreting most of the nitrogenous wastes as ammonia.<ref>Preest MR, Beuchat CA (1997). Ammonia excretion by hummingbirds. ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' '''386''', 561–62. {{DOI|10.1038/386561a0}}</ref> They also excrete [[creatine]] rather than [[creatinine]] as in mammals.<ref name = "Gill"/> This material, as well as the output of the intestines, emerges from the bird's [[cloaca]].<ref>Mora J, Martuscelli J, Ortiz-Pineda J, Soberon G (1965). [http://www.biochemj.org/bj/096/0028/0960028.pdf "The Regulation of Urea-Biosynthesis Enzymes in Vertebrates"] (PDF). ''[[Biochemical Journal]]'' '''96''':28–35 PMID 14343146</ref><ref>Packard GC (1966). "The Influence of Ambient Temperature and Aridity on Modes of Reproduction and Excretion of Amniote Vertebrates". ''[[The American Naturalist]]''. '''100''' (916):667–82</ref> The cloaca is a multi-purpose opening: their wastes are expelled through it, they mate by [[Bird anatomy#Reproduction|joining cloaca]], and females lay eggs out of it. In addition, many species of birds regurgitate [[Pellet (ornithology)|pellets]].<ref>Balgooyen T (1971). "Pellet Regurgitation by Captive Sparrow Hawks (''Falco sparverius'')" ''[[Condor (journal)|Condor]]'' '''73''' (3): 382–85. {{DOI|10.2307/1365774}}</ref>


Birds have one of the most complex [[respiratory system]]s of all animal groups.<ref name = "Gill"/> When a bird inhales, 75% of the fresh air bypasses the lungs and flows directly into a posterior [[air sac]] which extends from the lungs and connects with air spaces in the bones and fills them with air. The other 25% of the air goes directly into the lungs. When the bird exhales, the used air flows out of the lung and the stored fresh air from the posterior air sac is simultaneously forced into the lungs. Thus, a bird's lungs receive a constant supply of fresh air during both inhalation and exhalation.
Birds have one of the most complex [[respiratory system]]s of all animal groups.<ref name = "Gill"/> When a bird inhales, 75% of the fresh air bypasses the lungs and flows directly into a posterior [[air sac]] which extends from the lungs and connects with air spaces in the bones and fills them with air. The other 25% of the air goes directly into the lungs. When the bird exhales, the used air flows out of the lung and the stored fresh air from the posterior air sac is simultaneously forced into the lungs. Thus, a bird's lungs receive a constant supply of fresh air during both inhalation and exhalation.<ref> Maina JN (2006). "Development, structure, and function of a novel respiratory organ, the lung-air sac system of birds: to go where no other vertebrate has gone" ''Biological Reviews'' '''81''' (4): 545–79. PMID 17038201</ref>

<ref>
Sound production is achieved using the [[syrinx (biology)|syrinx]], a muscular chamber with several tympanic membranes, situated at the lower end of the trachea where it bifurcates.<ref name = "Suthers"> Suthers RA, Zollinger SA (2004). "Producing song: the vocal apparatus" ''Behavioral Neurobiology of Birdsong, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences'' '''1016''': 109–29. PMID 15313772</ref> The bird's heart has four chambers and the right aortic arch gives rise to systemic aorta (unlike in the mammals where the left arch is involved).<ref name = "Gill"/> The postcava receives blood from the limbs via the renal portal system. Birds, unlike mammals, have nucleated erythrocytes, that is, [[red blood cells]] which retain a [[cell nucleus|nucleus]].<ref>Scott RB (1966). "Comparative hematology: The phylogeny of the erythrocyte". ''Annals of Hematology''. '''12''' (6): 340–51. PMID 5325853</ref>
Maina JN (2006) "Development, structure, and function of a novel respiratory organ, the lung-air sac system of birds: to go where no other vertebrate has gone" ''Biological Reviews'' '''81'''(4): 545-579
</ref>
Sound production is achieved using the [[syrinx (biology)|syrinx]], a muscular chamber with several tympanic membranes, situated at the lower end of the trachea where it bifurcates.<ref name = "Suthers"> Suthers RA, Zollinger SA (2004) "Producing song - The vocal apparatus" ''Behavioral Neurobiology of Birdsong, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences'' '''1016''': 109-129</ref> The bird's heart has four chambers and the right aortic arch gives rise to systemic aorta (unlike in the mammals where the left arch is involved).<ref name = "Gill"/> The postcava receives blood from the limbs via the renal portal system. Birds, unlike mammals, have nucleated erythrocytes, i.e. [[red blood cells]] which retain a [[cell nucleus|nucleus]].<ref>Scott, Robert B. (1966) Comparative hematology: The phylogeny of the erythrocyte. ''Annals of Hematology''. '''12''' (6): 340-351</ref>


The [[digestive system]] of the bird is unique, with a [[crop (anatomy)|crop]] for storage and a [[gizzard]] that contains swallowed stones for grinding food, given the lack of teeth.
The [[digestive system]] of the bird is unique, with a [[crop (anatomy)|crop]] for storage and a [[gizzard]] that contains swallowed stones for grinding food, given the lack of teeth.<ref>
Gionfriddo JP, Best LB (1995). "Grit Use by House Sparrows: Effects of Diet and Grit Size". ''[[Condor (journal)|Condor]]'' '''97''' (1): 57–67. {{DOI|10.2307/1368983}} [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v097n01/p0057-p0067.pdf Full-text PDF]
<ref>
</ref> Most are highly adapted for rapid digestion, an adaptation to flight.<ref name = Attenborough">[[Attenborough, David|Attenborough, D]] (1998). ''[[The Life of Birds]]'', [[Princeton University Press]], ISBN 0-691-01633-X</ref> Some migratory birds have the additional ability to reduce parts of the intestines prior to migration.<ref name = "Battley">Battley PF, Piersma T, Dietz MW, Tang S, Dekinga A, Hulsman K (2000). [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=10687826 "Empirical evidence for differential organ reductions during trans-oceanic bird flight".] ''Proc Biol Sci''. '''267''' (1439):191–5. PMID 10687826 [http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/y818qp8v0bku0dbc/ Erratum] in ''[[Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences]]'' '''267''' (1461):2567.</ref>
Gionfriddo J & Best L (1995) "Grit Use by House Sparrows: Effects of Diet and Grit Size" ''[[Condor (journal)|Condor]]'' '''97'''(1): 57-67 [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v097n01/p0057-p0067.pdf]
</ref> Most are highly adapted for rapid digestion, an adaptation to flight.
<ref name = Attenborough">[[Attenborough, David]] (1998) ''[[The Life of Birds]]'', [[Princeton University Press]], ISBN 0-691-01633-X</ref> Some migratory birds have the additional ability to reduce parts of the intestines prior to migration.<ref name = "Battley">Battley, P.F., Piersma, T., Dietz, M.W., Tang, S., Dekinga, A., Hulsman, K.(2000) "Empirical evidence for differential organ reductions during trans-oceanic bird flight" ''[[Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences]]'' '''267'''(1461): 2567-2567</ref>


The [[nervous system]] is large relative to the bird's size.<ref name = "Gill"/> The most developed part of the brain is the one that controls the flight related function while the [[cerebellum]] coordinates movement and the [[cerebrum]] controls behaviour patterns, navigation, mating and nest building.
The [[nervous system]] is large relative to the bird's size.<ref name = "Gill"/> The most developed part of the brain is the one that controls the flight related function while the [[cerebellum]] coordinates movement and the [[cerebrum]] controls behaviour patterns, navigation, mating and nest building.


Most birds cannot move there eyes, although there are exceptions, like the [[Great Cormorant]].<ref>White CR, Day N, Butler PJ, Martin GR (2007) Vision and Foraging in Cormorants: More like Herons than Hawks?. PLoS ONE 2(7): [http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0000639]</ref> Birds with eyes on the sides of their heads have a wide [[visual field]] while birds with eyes on the front of their heads like owls have [[binocular vision]] and can estimate field depth.<ref>Martin GR, Katzir G (1999) "Visual fields in short-toed eagles, ''Circaetus gallicus'' (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds" ''Brain Behaviour and Evolution'' '''53'''(2): 55-66</ref>
Most birds cannot move their eyes, although there are exceptions, like the [[Great Cormorant]].<ref>White CR, Day N, Butler PJ, Martin GR (2007). [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=17653266 "Vision and Foraging in Cormorants: More like Herons than Hawks?"] ''PLoS ONE''. '''25''';2(7):e639 PMID 17653266</ref> Birds with eyes on the sides of their heads have a wide [[visual field]] while birds with eyes on the front of their heads like owls have [[binocular vision]] and can estimate field depth.<ref>Martin GR, Katzir G (1999). "Visual fields in short-toed eagles, ''Circaetus gallicus'' (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds". ''Brain Behaviour and Evolution'' '''53''' (2): 55–66. PMID 9933782</ref>


Most birds have a poor [[olfaction|sense of smell]] with notable exceptions including [[kiwi]]s,<ref>Sales, J. (2005) "The endangered kiwi: a review" ''Folia Zoologica'' '''54'''(1-2): 1-20</ref> [[vulture]]s<ref name="Avian Sense of Smell">{{cite web|url=http://www.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/Avian_Sense.html |author=Ehrlich, Paul R., Dobkin, David S., Wheye, Darryl. |title=The Avian Sense of Smell|accessmonthday=[[25 July]]|accessyear=2007|language=English}}</ref> and the [[tubenoses]].<ref>Lequette, B., Verheyden, C., Jowentin, P. (1989) "Olfaction in Subantarctic seabirds: Its phylogenetic and ecological significance" ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''91''': 732-135. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v091n03/p0732-p0735.pdf]</ref> The [[visual system]] is usually highly developed. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} Water birds have special flexible lenses, allowing accommodation for vision in air and water.<ref name = "Gill"/> Some species also have dual [[fovea]]. Birds are [[tetrachromacy|tetrachromatic]], possessing [[ultraviolet]] [[cone cell]]s in the eye as well as green, red and blue ones.<ref>Wilkie S, Vissers P, Das D, de Grip W, Bowmaker J & Hunt D (1998) "The molecular basis for UV vision in birds: spectral characteristics, cDNA sequence and retinal localization of the UV-sensitive visual pigment of the budgerigar (''Melopsittacus undulatus'')" ''[[Biochemical Journal]]'' '''330''': 541–547</ref> This allows them to perceive ultraviolet light; which is used in courtship. Many birds show plumage patterns in ultraviolet that are invisible to the human eye; so that some birds, whose sexes appear similar are distinguished by the presence of [[ultraviolet]] reflective patches of feathers. Male [[Blue Tit]]s have an ultraviolet reflective crown patch which is displayed in courtship by posturing and raising of their nape feathers.<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Proc. Biol. Sci.|year=1998|volume=265|issue=1395|pages=445–450|id=10.1098/rspb.1998.0315|title=Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits|author=S. Andersson, J. Ornborg, and M. Andersson}}
Most birds have a poor [[olfaction|sense of smell]] with notable exceptions including [[kiwi]]s,<ref>Sales J (2005). "The endangered kiwi: a review". ''Folia Zoologica'' '''54''' (1–2): 1–20. [http://www.ivb.cz/folia/54/1-2/01-20.pdf Full-text PDF]</ref> [[vulture]]s<ref name="Avian Sense of Smell">{{cite web|url=http://www.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/Avian_Sense.html |author=Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D |title=The Avian Sense of Smell|accessmonthday=[[25 July]]|accessyear=[[2007]]|publisher = Stanford Birds}}</ref> and the [[tubenoses]].<ref>Lequette B, Verheyden C, Jowentin P (1989). "Olfaction in Subantarctic seabirds: Its phylogenetic and ecological significance". ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''91''': 732–35. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v091n03/p0732-p0735.pdf PDF]</ref> The [[visual system]] is usually highly developed.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Water birds have special flexible lenses, allowing accommodation for vision in air and water.<ref name = "Gill"/> Some species also have dual [[fovea]]. Birds are [[tetrachromacy|tetrachromatic]], possessing [[ultraviolet]] [[cone cell]]s in the eye as well as green, red and blue ones.<ref>Wilkie S, Vissers P, Das D, de Grip W, Bowmaker J, Hunt D (1998). "The molecular basis for UV vision in birds: spectral characteristics, cDNA sequence and retinal localization of the UV-sensitive visual pigment of the budgerigar (''Melopsittacus undulatus'')". ''[[Biochemical Journal]]'' '''330''': 541–47. PMID 9461554 </ref> This allows them to perceive ultraviolet light; which is used in courtship. Many birds show plumage patterns in ultraviolet that are invisible to the human eye; so that some birds, whose sexes appear similar are distinguished by the presence of [[ultraviolet]] reflective patches of feathers. Male [[Blue Tit]]s have an ultraviolet reflective crown patch which is displayed in courtship by posturing and raising of their nape feathers.<ref>{{cite journal|journal=Proc. Biol. Sci.|year=1998|volume=265|issue=1395|pages=445–50|doi=10.1098/rspb.1998.0315|title=Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits|author=Andersson S, Ornborg J, Andersson M}}
</ref> Ultraviolet light is also used in foraging - [[kestrel]]s have been shown to search for prey by detecting the UV reflective urine trail marks left on the ground by rodents.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Viitala, J. Korpimaki, E. Polakangas, P. Koivula, M|year=1995|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]|volume=373|issue=6513||pages=425-427|title=Attraction of kestrels to vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet light.}}
</ref> Ultraviolet light is also used in foraging—[[kestrel]]s have been shown to search for prey by detecting the UV reflective urine trail marks left on the ground by rodents.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Viitala J, Korpimaki E, Polakangas P, Koivula M|year=1995|journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]|volume=373|issue=6513||pages=425–27|title=Attraction of kestrels to vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet light}}
</ref> The eyelids of a bird are not used in blinking, instead the eye is lubricated by the [[nictitating membrane]], the third eyelid that moves horizontally.<ref>Williams D, Flach E (2003) "Symblepharon with aberrant protrusion of the nictitating membrane in the snowy owl (''Nyctea scandiaca'')" ''Veterinary Ophthalmology'' '''6'''(1): 11-13
</ref> The eyelids of a bird are not used in blinking, instead the eye is lubricated by the [[nictitating membrane]], the third eyelid that moves horizontally.<ref>Williams DL, Flach E (2003). "Symblepharon with aberrant protrusion of the nictitating membrane in the snowy owl (''Nyctea scandiaca'')" ''Veterinary Ophthalmology'' '''6''' (1): 11–3. PMID 12641836
</ref> The nictitating membrane also covers the eye and acts as a contact lens in many aquatic birds.<ref name = "Gill"/> The bird [[retina]] has a fan shaped blood supply system called the [[pecten]].<ref name = "Gill"/> The avian [[ear]] lacks external [[pinna]]e but is covered by feathers, although in some birds (the ''[[Asio]]'', ''[[Horned owl|Bubo]]'' and ''[[Scops owl|Otus]]'' [[owl]]s, for example) these feathers form tufts which resemble ears. The inner ear has a [[cochlea]] but it is not spiral as in mammals.<ref>Saito N (1978). "Physiology and anatomy of avian ear". ''The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America'' '''64''' (1) {{DOI|10.1121/1.2004193}}</ref>
</ref> The nictitating membrane also covers the eye and acts as a contact lens in many aquatic birds.
<ref name = "Gill"/> The bird [[retina]] has a fan shaped blood supply system called the [[pecten]].<ref name = "Gill"/> The avian [[ear]] lacks external [[pinna]]e but is covered by feathers, although in some birds (the ''[[Asio]]'', ''[[Horned owl|Bubo]]'' and ''[[Scops owl|Otus]]'' [[owl]]s, for example) these feathers form tufts which resemble ears. The inner ear has a [[cochlea]] but it is not spiral as in mammals.
<ref>Saito N (1978) "Physiology and anatomy of avian ear" ''The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America'' '''64'''(1)</ref>


Some birds use chemical defenses against predators. Some [[Procellariiformes]] can eject an unpleasant [[stomach oil|oil]] against an aggressor,<ref>Warham, J. (1976) "The Incidence, Function and ecological significance of petrel stomach oils." ''Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society'' '''24''' 84-93 [http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje/free_issues/ProNZES24_84.pdf]</ref> and some species of [[pitohui]], found in [[New Guinea]], secrete a powerful [[neurotoxin]] in their skin and feathers.<ref>Dumbacher, J.P., Beehler, B., Spande, T., Garraffo, H., Daly, J. (1992). "Homobatrachotoxin in the genus ''Pitohui'': chemical defense in birds?". ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''258'''(5083): 799-801.</ref>
Some birds use chemical defenses against predators. Some [[Procellariiformes]] can eject an unpleasant [[stomach oil|oil]] against an aggressor,<ref>Warham J (1976). "The Incidence, Function and ecological significance of petrel stomach oils." ''Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society'' '''24''' 84–93. [http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje/free_issues/ProNZES24_84.pdf PDF]</ref> and some species of [[pitohui]], found in [[New Guinea]], secrete a powerful [[neurotoxin]] in their skin and feathers.<ref>Dumbacher JP, Beehler B, Spande T, Garraffo H, Daly J (1992). "Homobatrachotoxin in the genus ''Pitohui'': chemical defense in birds?". ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''258''' (5083): 799–801. PMID 1439786 </ref>


===Feathers and plumage===
===Feathers and plumage===
{{main|Feather|Flight feather}}
{{main|Feather|Flight feather}}
[[Image:African Scops owl.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The plumage of the [[African Scops Owl]] allows it to blend in with its surroundings]]
[[Image:African Scops owl.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The plumage of the [[African Scops Owl]] allows it to blend in with its surroundings.]]


The one characteristic that distinguishes birds from all other living groups is the covering of [[feather]]s. Feathers are epidermal growths attached to the skin that serve a variety of functions to birds: they aid in [[thermoregulation]] by insulating birds from cold weather and water, they are essential to [[bird flight]], and they are also used in display, camouflage and signalling.<ref name ="Gill"/> There are several different types of feather that serve different purposes. Feathers need maintenance, and birds preen or groom their feathers daily (they around 9.2% of their daily time budget on this),<ref>Walther B & Clayton D (2005) "Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high maintenance handicaps" ''Behavioural Ecology'' '''16'''(1):89-95</ref> using their bills to brush away foreign particles, and applying [[wax]]y secretions from the [[uropygial gland]], which protects feather flexibility and also acts as an anti-microbial agent, inhibiting the growth of feather-degrading [[bacteria]].<ref>Shawkey, M., Pillai, S., Hill, G., (2003) "Chemical warfare? Effects of uropygial oil on feather-degrading bacteria". ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''34'''(4): 345-349.</ref> This may be supplemented with the secretions of [[formic acid]] from [[ant]]s, which birds apply in a behaviour known as [[Anting (bird activity)|anting]] in order to remove feather parasites.<ref>Ehrlich, P.R.; Dobkin, D.S.; Wheye, D. (1986) "The Adaptive Significance of Anting" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''103'''(4): 835 [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v103n04/p0835-p0835.pdf]</ref>
The one characteristic that distinguishes birds from all other living groups is the covering of [[feather]]s. Feathers are epidermal growths attached to the skin that serve a variety of functions to birds: they aid in [[thermoregulation]] by insulating birds from cold weather and water, they are essential to [[bird flight]], and they are also used in display, camouflage and signalling.<ref name ="Gill"/> There are several different types of feather that serve different purposes. Feathers need maintenance, and birds preen or groom their feathers daily (they around 9.2% of their daily time budget on this),<ref>Walther BA, Clayton DH (2005). "Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high maintenance handicaps". ''Behavioural Ecology'' '''16''' (1):89–95. {{DOI|10.1093/beheco/arh135}}</ref> using their bills to brush away foreign particles, and applying [[wax]]y secretions from the [[uropygial gland]], which protects feather flexibility and also acts as an anti-microbial agent, inhibiting the growth of feather-degrading [[bacteria]].<ref>Shawkey M, Pillai S, Hill G, (2003). "Chemical warfare? Effects of uropygial oil on feather-degrading bacteria". ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''34''' (4): 345–49. {{DOI|10.1111/j.0908-8857.2003.03193.x}}</ref> This may be supplemented with the secretions of [[formic acid]] from [[ant]]s, which birds apply in a behaviour known as [[Anting (bird activity)|anting]] in order to remove feather parasites.<ref>Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1986). "The Adaptive Significance of Anting". ''[[The Auk]]'' '''103''' (4): 835.[http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v103n04/p0835-p0835.pdf PDF.]</ref>


The arrangement and appearance of feathers on the body is known as [[plumage]]. Within species plumage can vary with age, social status, {{Fact|date=July 2007}} with higher ranked individuals displaying their status, or most commonly {{Fact|date=July 2007}} [[sexual dimorphism|by sex]]. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} Plumage is regularly [[moult]]ed, the standard plumage of a bird that has moulted after breeding is known as the non-breeding plumage, or in the [[Humphrey-Parkes terminology]], 'basic plumage'; breeding plumages or variations of the basic plumage are known under the Humphrey-Parkes system as 'alternate plumages'.<ref>Humphrey P & Parkes K (1959) "An approach to the study of molts and plumage" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''76''': 1-31</ref> Moult is annual in most species {{Fact|date=July 2007}} but some species may have two moults a year, {{Fact|date=July 2007}} while large birds of prey may moult once in two or three years. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} Ducks and geese moult their [[flight feather|primaries and secondaries]] simultaneously and become flightless for about a month.
The arrangement and appearance of feathers on the body is known as [[plumage]]. Within species plumage can vary with age, social status,{{Fact|date=July 2007}} with higher ranked individuals displaying their status, or most commonly [[sexual dimorphism|by sex]].{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Plumage is regularly [[moult]]ed, the standard plumage of a bird that has moulted after breeding is known as the non-breeding plumage, or in the [[Humphrey-Parkes terminology]], 'basic plumage'; breeding plumages or variations of the basic plumage are known under the Humphrey-Parkes system as 'alternate plumages'.<ref>Humphrey P, Parkes K (1959). "An approach to the study of molts and plumage". ''[[The Auk]]'' '''76''': 1–31. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v076n01/p0001-p0031.pdf PDF].</ref> Moult is annual in most species{{Fact|date=July 2007}} but some species may have two moults a year,{{Fact|date=July 2007}} while large birds of prey may moult once in two or three years.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Ducks and geese moult their [[flight feather|primaries and secondaries]] simultaneously and become flightless for about a month.<ref>de Beer SJ, Lockwood GM, Raijmakers JHFS, Raijmakers JMH, Scott WA, Oschadleus HD, Underhill LG (2001). [http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/stats/adu/ringmanual.htm SAFRING Bird Ringing Manual.] SAFRING.
<ref>de Beer, S. J., G. M. Lockwood, J.H.F.A. Raijmakers, J.M.H. Raijmakers, W.A. Scott, H. D. Oschadleus, L. G. Underhill. 2001. SAFRING Bird Ringing Manual. SAFRING. [http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/stats/adu/ringmanual.htm]
</ref>
</ref>
Different groups of birds have different moulting patterns and strategies. Some drop the feathers starting sequentially from outward-in {{clarifyme}} while others replace feathers inwards-out {{clarifyme}} and the rare others lose all their feathers at once. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} The first or centripetal moult as termed for the moult of tail feathers is seen for instance in the [[Phasianidae]]. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} The second or centrifugal moult is seen for instance in the tail feathers of the [[woodpecker]]s and [[treecreeper]]s, {{Fact|date=July 2007}} although it begins with the second innermost pair of tail-feathers and the central pair of feathers is molted last, so as to permits the continuous presence of a functional climbing tail.<ref>Mayr, E and M. Mayr. 1954. The tail molt of small owls. ''[[The Auk]]'' '''71''' (2): 172-178</ref> The general pattern seen in the passerines is that the primaries are replaced outward, secondaries inward, and the tail from center outward. {{Fact|date=July 2007}}
Different groups of birds have different moulting patterns and strategies. Some drop the feathers starting sequentially from outward-in {{clarifyme}} while others replace feathers inwards-out {{clarifyme}} and the rare others lose all their feathers at once.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} The first or centripetal moult as termed for the moult of tail feathers is seen for instance in the [[Phasianidae]].{{Fact|date=July 2007}} The second or centrifugal moult is seen for instance in the tail feathers of the [[woodpecker]]s and [[treecreeper]]s,{{Fact|date=July 2007}} although it begins with the second innermost pair of tail-feathers and the central pair of feathers is molted last, so as to permits the continuous presence of a functional climbing tail.<ref>Mayr E, Mayr M (1954). "The tail molt of small owls". ''[[The Auk]]'' '''71''' (2): 172–78. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v071n02/p0172-p0178.pdf PDF]</ref> The general pattern seen in the passerines is that the primaries are replaced outward, secondaries inward, and the tail from center outward.{{Fact|date=July 2007}}


Feathers do not arise from all parts of the bird skin but grow in specific tracts or ''pterylae''. The distribution pattern of these feather tracts or ''pterylosis'' is used in taxonomy and systematics. Prior to nesting, the females of most bird species gain a bare ''brood patch'' by loss of feathers close to the belly. The skin here is well supplied with blood vessels and helps in incubation.<ref>Turner JS (1997) "On the thermal capacity of a bird's egg warmed by a brood patch" ''Physiological Zoology'' '''70'''(4): 470-480 </ref>
Feathers do not arise from all parts of the bird skin but grow in specific tracts or ''pterylae''. The distribution pattern of these feather tracts or ''pterylosis'' is used in taxonomy and systematics. Prior to nesting, the females of most bird species gain a bare ''brood patch'' by loss of feathers close to the belly. The skin here is well supplied with blood vessels and helps in incubation.<ref>Turner JS (1997). "On the thermal capacity of a bird's egg warmed by a brood patch". ''Physiological Zoology'' '''70''' (4): 470–80. PMID 9237308</ref>


===Flight===
===Flight===
{{main|Bird flight}}
{{main|Bird flight}}
[[Flying and gliding animals|Flight]] characterises most birds, and distinguishes them from almost all other vertebrates with the exception of mammalian [[bat]]s and the [[extinct]] [[pterosaurs]]. As the main means of locomotion for most bird species, {{clarifyme}} flight is used for breeding, feeding, and predator avoidance and escape. Birds have a variety of adaptations to flight, including a lightweight skeleton, two large flight [[muscle]]s, the pectoralis (which accounts for 15% of the total mass of the bird) and the supercoracoideus and a modified forelimb (the [[wing]]) serving as an [[aerofoil]]. <ref name = "Gill"/> Wing shape and size primarily determines the type of flight each species is capable of. Many birds combine powered or flapping flight with less energy intensive [[soaring]] flight. About 60 species of extant birds are [[flightless]], and many extinct birds were also flightless.<ref>Roots, C (2006) ''Flightless Birds'' Greenwood Press ISBN 978-0313335457 </ref> Flightlessness often arises in birds on isolated islands, probably due to the lack of land predators and limited resources, which rewards the loss of costly unnecessary adaptations.<ref>McNab B (1994) "Energy Conservation and the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds" ''[[The American Naturalist]]'', '''144'''(4): 628-642 </ref> Penguins, while flightless, use similar musculature and movements to "fly" through the water, as do [[auk]]s, [[shearwater]]s and [[dipper]]s.<ref>Kovacs C & Meyers R (2000) "Anatomy and histochemistry of flight muscles in a wing-propelled diving bird, the Atlantic Puffin, ''Fratercula arctica''" ''Journal of Morphology'' '''244'''(2): 109-125[http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/71008392 Abstract]</ref>
[[Flying and gliding animals|Flight]] characterises most birds, and distinguishes them from almost all other vertebrates with the exception of mammalian [[bat]]s and the [[extinct]] [[pterosaurs]]. As the main means of locomotion for most bird species, {{clarifyme}} flight is used for breeding, feeding, and predator avoidance and escape. Birds have a variety of adaptations to flight, including a lightweight skeleton, two large flight [[muscle]]s, the pectoralis (which accounts for 15% of the total mass of the bird) and the supercoracoideus and a modified forelimb (the [[wing]]) serving as an [[aerofoil]].<ref name = "Gill"/> Wing shape and size primarily determines the type of flight each species is capable of. Many birds combine powered or flapping flight with less energy intensive [[soaring]] flight. About 60 species of extant birds are [[flightless]], and many extinct birds were also flightless.<ref>Roots C (2006). ''Flightless Birds'' Greenwood Press ISBN 978-0313335457 </ref> Flightlessness often arises in birds on isolated islands, probably due to the lack of land predators and limited resources, which rewards the loss of costly unnecessary adaptations.<ref>McNab B (1994). "Energy Conservation and the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds". ''[[The American Naturalist]]'', '''144''' (4): 628–42. </ref> Penguins, while flightless, use similar musculature and movements to "fly" through the water, as do [[auk]]s, [[shearwater]]s and [[dipper]]s.<ref>Kovacs C, Meyers R (2000). "Anatomy and histochemistry of flight muscles in a wing-propelled diving bird, the Atlantic Puffin, ''Fratercula arctica''". ''Journal of Morphology'' '''244''' (2): 109–25. [http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/71008392/ABSTRACT Abstract]</ref>


==Behaviour==
==Behaviour==
Most birds are [[diurnal animal|diurnal]], but some birds, such as many species of [[owl]]s and [[nightjar]]s, are [[nocturnal]] or [[crepuscular]] (active during twilight hours), and many coastal [[wader]]s feed when the tides are appropriate, by day or night.<ref>Robert, M; McNeil, R; Leduc, A (1989) "Conditions and significance of night feeding in shorebirds and other water birds in a tropical lagoon." ''Auk'' '''106'''(1) 94-101.</ref>
Most birds are [[diurnal animal|diurnal]], but some birds, such as many species of [[owl]]s and [[nightjar]]s, are [[nocturnal]] or [[crepuscular]] (active during twilight hours), and many coastal [[wader]]s feed when the tides are appropriate, by day or night.<ref>Robert M, McNeil R, Leduc A (1989). "Conditions and significance of night feeding in shorebirds and other water birds in a tropical lagoon." ''Auk'' '''106''' (1) 94–101. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v106n01/p0094-p0101.pdf PDF]</ref>



===Diet and feeding===
===Diet and feeding===
Line 241: Line 220:
Birds feed on a variety of materials, including [[nectar (plant)|nectar]], [[fruit]], [[plant]]s, [[seed]]s, [[carrion]], and various types of small [[animals]] including other birds.<ref name = "Gill"/> Because birds have no teeth, the [[digestive system]] of birds is specially adapted to process [[mastication|unmasticated]] food items that are usually swallowed whole.
Birds feed on a variety of materials, including [[nectar (plant)|nectar]], [[fruit]], [[plant]]s, [[seed]]s, [[carrion]], and various types of small [[animals]] including other birds.<ref name = "Gill"/> Because birds have no teeth, the [[digestive system]] of birds is specially adapted to process [[mastication|unmasticated]] food items that are usually swallowed whole.


Various feeding strategies are used by birds. Gleaning for insects, invertebrates, fruit and seeds is used by many species. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} Sallying from a branch and flycatching for insects is used by many [[songbird]]s. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} [[Nectar]] feeders such as [[hummingbird]]s,<ref>Roberts, W. Mark (1995) "Hummingbird licking behavior and the energetics of nectar feeding" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''112''' (2): 456-463 </ref>, [[sunbird]]s,<ref>Gill,Frank B. and Wolf, Larry L. (1979) "Nectar loss by Golden-winged Sunbirds to competitors" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''96'''(3): 448-461</ref> amongst others are facilitated by specially adapted brushy [[tongue]]s and in many cases bills designed to fit co-adapted flowers.<ref> Paton,D.C. and B.G. Collins (1989) "Bills and tongues of nectar-feeding birds:A review of morphology,function, and performance, with intercontinental comparisons" ''Aust. J. Ecol.'' '''14''' 473-506</ref> Probing for invertebrates is used by [[shorebird]]s with long bills; in the case of shorebirds length of bill and feeding method are associated with [[Ecological niche|niche]] separation.<ref name = "Gill"/> <ref>Baker M & Baker A (1973) "Niche Relationships Among Six Species of Shorebirds on Their Wintering and Breeding Ranges " ''Ecological Monographs'', '''43'''(2): 193-212</ref> Pursuit diving under the water, using wings or feet for propulasion, is employed by [[loons]], [[diving duck]]s and [[penguin]]s, [[auk]]s, <ref name = "Burger"> while ariel predators [[sulidae|sulid]]s, [[kingfisher]]s and [[tern]]s use plunge diving. Three species of [[prion (bird)|prion]], the [[flamingo]]s and some ducks are [[filter feeder]]s.<ref>Cherel, Y., Bocher, P., De Broyer, C., Hobson, K.A., (2002) "Food and feeding ecology of the sympatric thin-billed ''Pachyptila belcheri'' and Antarctic ''P. desolata'' prions at Iles Kerguelen, Southern Indian Ocean" ''Marine Ecology Progress Series'' '''228''': 263–281 [http://www.cephdev.utmb.edu/refdb/pdf/7926.pdf]</ref> <ref>Jenkin P (1957) "The Filter-Feeding and Food of Flamingoes (Phoenicopteri)" ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences'' '''240'''(674) 401-493</ref> [[Geese]] and [[dabbling duck]]s are primarily grazers. Some species will engage in [[kleptoparasitism]], stealing food items from other birds; [[frigatebird]]s, [[gull]]s,<ref>Miyazaki, Masamine (1996) "Vegetation cover,kleptoparasitism by diurnal gulls and timing of arrival of nocturnal Rhinocereros Auklets" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''113'''(3) 698-702</ref> and [[skua]]s <ref> Belisle, Mark and Giroux,Jean-Francois (1995) "Predation and kleptoparasitism by migrating Parasitic Jaegers" ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''97'''(3)</ref> employ this type of feeding behaviour. Kleptoparasitism is not thought to play a significant part of the diet of any species, and is instead a supplement to food obtained by hunting; a study of [[Great Frigatebird]]s stealing from [[Masked Booby|Masked Boobies]] estimated that the frigatebirds could at most obtain 40% of the food they needed, and on average obtained only 5%.<ref>Vickery, J & Brooke, M. (1994) "The Kleptoparasitic Interactions between Great Frigatebirds and Masked Boobies on Henderson Island, South Pacific
Various feeding strategies are used by birds. Gleaning for insects, invertebrates, fruit and seeds is used by many species.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Sallying from a branch and flycatching for insects is used by many [[songbird]]s.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} [[Nectar]] feeders such as [[hummingbird]]s,<ref>Roberts WM (1995). "Hummingbird licking behavior and the energetics of nectar feeding." ''[[The Auk]]'' '''112''' (2): 456–63. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v112n02/p0456-p0463.pdf PDF] </ref> [[sunbird]]s,<ref>Gill FB, Wolf LL (1979). "Nectar loss by Golden-winged Sunbirds to competitors." ''[[The Auk]]'' '''96''' (3): 448–61. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v096n03/p0448-p0461.pdf PDF]</ref> amongst others are facilitated by specially adapted brushy [[tongue]]s and in many cases bills designed to fit co-adapted flowers.<ref> Paton DC, Collins BG (1989). "Bills and tongues of nectar-feeding birds: A review of morphology,function, and performance, with intercontinental comparisons." ''Aust. J. Ecol.'' '''14''' 473–506.</ref> Probing for invertebrates is used by [[shorebird]]s with long bills; in the case of shorebirds length of bill and feeding method are associated with [[Ecological niche|niche]] separation.<ref name = "Gill"/><ref>Baker M , Baker A (1973). "Niche Relationships Among Six Species of Shorebirds on Their Wintering and Breeding Ranges." ''Ecological Monographs'', '''43''' (2): 193–212. {{DOI|10.2307/1942194}}</ref> Pursuit diving under the water, using wings or feet for propulasion, is employed by [[loons]], [[diving duck]]s and [[penguin]]s, [[auk]]s,<ref name = "Burger"> while ariel predators [[sulidae|sulid]]s, [[kingfisher]]s and [[tern]]s use plunge diving. Three species of [[prion (bird)|prion]], the [[flamingo]]s and some ducks are [[filter feeder]]s.<ref>Cherel Y, Bocher P, De Broyer C, Hobson KA, (2002). "Food and feeding ecology of the sympatric thin-billed ''Pachyptila belcheri'' and Antarctic ''P. desolata'' prions at Iles Kerguelen, Southern Indian Ocean." ''Marine Ecology Progress Series'' '''228''': 263–81. [http://www.cephdev.utmb.edu/refdb/pdf/7926.pdf PDF]</ref><ref>Jenkin P (1957). "The Filter-Feeding and Food of Flamingoes (Phoenicopteri)." ''Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences'' '''240''' (674) 401–93. [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1957RSPTB.240..401J Abstract]</ref> [[Geese]] and [[dabbling duck]]s are primarily grazers. Some species will engage in [[kleptoparasitism]], stealing food items from other birds; [[frigatebird]]s, [[gull]]s,<ref>Miyazaki M (1996). "Vegetation cover, kleptoparasitism by diurnal gulls and timing of arrival of nocturnal Rhinocereros Auklets." ''[[The Auk]]'' '''113''' (3) 698–702</ref> and [[skua]]s<ref>Belisle M, Giroux JF (1995). "Predation and kleptoparasitism by migrating Parasitic Jaegers." ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''97''' (3). [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v097n03/p0771-p0781.pdf PDF]</ref> employ this type of feeding behaviour. Kleptoparasitism is not thought to play a significant part of the diet of any species, and is instead a supplement to food obtained by hunting; a study of [[Great Frigatebird]]s stealing from [[Masked Booby|Masked Boobies]] estimated that the frigatebirds could at most obtain 40% of the food they needed, and on average obtained only 5%.<ref>Vickery J, Brooke M (1994). "The Kleptoparasitic Interactions between Great Frigatebirds and Masked Boobies on Henderson Island, South Pacific." ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''96''': 331–40. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v096n02/p0331-p0340.pdf PDF] </ref> Finally, some birds are [[scavenger]]s, either specialised carrion eaters like [[vulture]]s or opportunists like gulls, corvids or other birds of prey.<ref>Hiraldo F, Blanco JC, Bustamante J (1991). "Unspecialized exploitation of small carcasses by birds." ''Bird Studies'' '''38''' (3): 200–207.</ref> Some birds may employ many strategies to obtain food, or feed on a variety of food items and are called generalists,<ref>Sakai HF, Ralph CJ, Jenkins CD (1986). "Foraging ecology of the Hawaiian Crow, an endangered generalist." ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''88''' (2) 211–19. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v088n02/p0211-p0219.pdf PDF] </ref> while others are considered specialists,<ref> Beissinger S (1983). "Hunting behaviour, prey selection and energetics of Snail Kites in Guyana: consumer choice by a specialist." ''[[The Auk]]'' '''100''' (1) 84–92. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v100n01/p0084-p0092.pdf PDF]</ref> concentrating time and effort on specific food items or having a single strategy to obtain food.
" ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''96''': 331-340 </ref> Finally, some birds are [[scavenger]]s, either specialised carrion eaters like [[vulture]]s or opportunists like gulls, corvids or other birds of prey.<ref>Hiraldo, F; Blanco, JC; Bustamante, J (1991) "Unspecialized exploitation of small carcasses by birds." ''Bird Studies'' '''38'''(3): 200-207</ref> Some birds may employ many strategies to obtain food, or feed on a variety of food items and are called generalists,<ref>Sakai, Howard F.,Ralph, C. John and Jenkins, C.D. (1986) "Foraging ecology of the Hawaiian Crow, an endangered generalist" ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''88'''(2) 211-219 </ref> while others are considered specialists,<ref> Beissinger, Steven (1983) "Hunting behaviour,prey selection and energetics of Snail Kites in Guyana:consumer choice by a specialist ''[[The Auk]]'' '''100'''(1) 84-92</ref> concentrating time and effort on specific food items or having a single strategy to obtain food.


===Migration===
===Migration===
{{main|Bird migration}}
{{main|Bird migration}}
[[Image:Bar-tailed Godwit migration.jpg|thumb|left|300px|The routes of satellite tagged [[Bar-tailed Godwit]]s migrating north from [[New Zealand]]. This species has the longest known non-stop migration of any species, up to 10,200 km]]
[[Image:Bar-tailed Godwit migration.jpg|thumb|left|300px|The routes of satellite tagged [[Bar-tailed Godwit]]s migrating north from [[New Zealand]]. This species has the longest known non-stop migration of any species, up to {{convert|10200|km|mi|-2|abbr=on}}.]]


Many bird species migrate to take advantage of global differences of seasonal temperatures to optimise availability of food sources and breeding habitat. These migrations vary among the different groups. Many landbirds, [[shorebird]]s and [[waterbird]]s undertake annual long distance migrations, usually triggered by length of daylight as well as weather conditions. These are characterised by a breeding season spent in the [[temperate]] or [[arctic]]/[[antarctic]] regions, and a non-breeding season in the [[tropical]] regions or opposite hemisphere. Prior to migration, birds substantially increase body fats and reserves and reduce the size of some of their organs.<ref name = "Klaassen">Klaassen M (1996) "Metabolic constraints on long-distance migration in birds" ''Journal of Experimental Biology'', '''199'''(1) 57-64</ref><ref name = "Battley"/> Migration is highly energetically demanding, particularly as birds need to cross deserts and oceans without refuelling; landbirds have a flight range of around 2500 km and shorebirds can fly up to 4000 km,<ref name = "Gill">Gill F (1995) ''Ornithology'' WH Freeman and Company, New York ISBN 0-7167-2415-4</ref> although the [[Bar-tailed Godwit]] is capable of non-stop flights of up to 10,200 km.<ref>[[BirdLife International]] (2007) [http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2007/04/bar-tailed_godwit_journey.html Long-distance Godwit sets new record] Retrieved [[14 April]] [[2007]].</ref> [[Seabird]]s also undertake long migrations, the longest annual migration being those of [[Sooty Shearwater]]s, which nest in [[New Zealand]] and [[Chile]] and spend the northern summer feeding in the North Pacific off [[Japan]], [[Alaska]] and [[California]], an annual round trip of 64,000&nbsp;km.<ref>Shaffer S.A., Tremblay Y., Weimerskirch H., Scott D., Thompson D.R., Sagar P.M., Moller H., Taylor G.A., Foley D.G., Block B.A., Costa D.P. (2006) "Migratory shearwaters integrate oceanic resources across the Pacific Ocean in an endless summer." ''Proc Natl Acad Sci.'' '''103'''(34): 12799-12802</ref> Other seabirds disperse after breeding, travelling widely but having no set migration route. Albatrosses nesting in the Southern Ocean often undertake circumpolar trips between breeding seasons.<ref>Croxall, J. P., Silk, J.R.D., Phillips, R.A., Afanasyev, V., Briggs, D.R., (2005) "Global Circumnavigations: Tracking year-round ranges of nonbreeding Albatrosses" ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''307''': 249-250.</ref>
Many bird species migrate to take advantage of global differences of seasonal temperatures to optimise availability of food sources and breeding habitat. These migrations vary among the different groups. Many landbirds, [[shorebird]]s and [[waterbird]]s undertake annual long distance migrations, usually triggered by length of daylight as well as weather conditions. These are characterised by a breeding season spent in the [[temperate]] or [[arctic]]/[[antarctic]] regions, and a non-breeding season in the [[tropical]] regions or opposite hemisphere. Prior to migration, birds substantially increase body fats and reserves and reduce the size of some of their organs.<ref name = "Klaassen">Klaassen M (1996). "Metabolic constraints on long-distance migration in birds." ''Journal of Experimental Biology'', '''199''' (1) 57–64. PMID 9317335</ref><ref name = "Battley"/> Migration is highly energetically demanding, particularly as birds need to cross deserts and oceans without refuelling; landbirds have a flight range of around {{convert|2500|km|mi|-2|abbr=on}} and shorebirds can fly up to {{convert|4000|km|mi|-2|abbr=on}},<ref name = "Gill">Gill F (1995). ''Ornithology'' WH Freeman and Company, New York ISBN 0-7167-2415-4</ref> although the [[Bar-tailed Godwit]] is capable of non-stop flights of up to {{convert|10200|km|mi|-2|abbr=on}}.<ref> [[BirdLife International]] (2007). [http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2007/04/bar-tailed_godwit_journey.html Long-distance Godwit sets new record.] Retrieved [[14 April]] [[2007]].</ref> [[Seabird]]s also undertake long migrations, the longest annual migration being those of [[Sooty Shearwater]]s, which nest in [[New Zealand]] and [[Chile]] and spend the northern summer feeding in the North Pacific off [[Japan]], [[Alaska]] and [[California]], an annual round trip of {{convert|64000|km|mi|-2|abbr=on}}.<ref>Shaffer SA, Tremblay Y, Weimerskirch H, ''et al.'' (2006) "Migratory shearwaters integrate oceanic resources across the Pacific Ocean in an endless summer." ''Proc Natl Acad Sci.'' '''103''' (34): 12799–802. PMID 16908846</ref> Other seabirds disperse after breeding, travelling widely but having no set migration route. Albatrosses nesting in the Southern Ocean often undertake circumpolar trips between breeding seasons.<ref>Croxall JP, Silk JRD, Phillips RA, Afanasyev V, Briggs DR (2005). "Global Circumnavigations: Tracking year-round ranges of nonbreeding Albatrosses." ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''307''': 249–50. PMID 15653503</ref>


Birds also display other types of migration. Some species undertake shorter migrations, travelling only as far as is required to avoid bad weather or obtain food. These include irruptive species,like boreal finches which may be quite common some years and almost absent in others. {{clarifyme}} This type of migration is normally associated with food availability.<ref>Wilson, Jr., W. Herbert (1999) "Bird feeding and irruptions of northern finches:are migrations short stopped?" ''North America Bird Bander'' '''24'''(4): 113-121 </ref> Species may also travel shorter distances over part of their range, with individuals from higher latitudes travelling into the existing range of conspecifics; others undertake partial migrations, where only a fraction of the population, usually females and subdominant males, migrates.<ref>Nilsson AK, Alerstam T, Nilsson JA (2006) "Do partial and regular migrants differ in their responses to weather?" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''123''' (2): 537-547 </ref> Partial migration can form a large percentage of the migration behaviour of birds in some regions; in Australia surveys found that 44% of non-passerine birds studied were partially migratory and 32% of passerines were.<ref>Chan K (2001) "Partial migration in Australian landbirds: a review" ''[[Emu (journal)|Emu]]'' '''101'''(4): 281-292</ref> Altitudinal migration is a form of short distance migration, in which birds spend the breeding season at higher altitudes elevations, and move to lower ones during suboptimal conditions. It is most often triggered by temperature changes and usually occurs when the normal territories become inhospitable also due to lack of food.<ref>Rabenold, Kerry N. and Rabenold, Patricia Parker,(1985) "Variation in Altitudinal Migration, Winter Segregation, and Site Tenacity in two subspecies of Dark-eyed Juncos in the southern Appalachians" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''102'''(4): 805-819.</ref> Some species may also be nomadic, holding no fixed territory and moving according to weather and food availability. [[True parrots|Parrot]]s as a [[family (biology)|family]] are overwhelmingly neither migratory nor sedentary but considered to either be dispersive, irruptive, nomadic or undertake small and irregular migration.<ref>Collar N (1997) "Family Psittacidae (Parrots)" in ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]] Volume 4; Sandgrouse to Cuckoos'' (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-87334-22-9</ref>
Birds also display other types of migration. Some species undertake shorter migrations, travelling only as far as is required to avoid bad weather or obtain food. These include irruptive species,like boreal finches which may be quite common some years and almost absent in others.{{clarifyme}} This type of migration is normally associated with food availability.<ref>Wilson WH Jr. (1999). "Bird feeding and irruptions of northern finches:are migrations short stopped?" ''North America Bird Bander'' '''24''' (4): 113–21. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/NABB/v024n04/p0113-p0121.pdf PDF] </ref> Species may also travel shorter distances over part of their range, with individuals from higher latitudes travelling into the existing range of conspecifics; others undertake partial migrations, where only a fraction of the population, usually females and subdominant males, migrates.<ref>Nilsson AK, Alerstam T, Nilsson JA (2006). [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3793/is_200604/ai_n16410121 "Do partial and regular migrants differ in their responses to weather?"] ''[[The Auk]]'' '''123''' (2): 537–47 </ref> Partial migration can form a large percentage of the migration behaviour of birds in some regions; in Australia surveys found that 44% of non-passerine birds studied were partially migratory and 32% of passerines were.<ref>Chan K (2001). "Partial migration in Australian landbirds: a review." ''[[Emu (journal)|Emu]]'' '''101''' (4): 281–92</ref> Altitudinal migration is a form of short distance migration, in which birds spend the breeding season at higher altitudes elevations, and move to lower ones during suboptimal conditions. It is most often triggered by temperature changes and usually occurs when the normal territories become inhospitable also due to lack of food.<ref>Rabenold KN, Rabenold PP(1985). "Variation in Altitudinal Migration, Winter Segregation, and Site Tenacity in two subspecies of Dark-eyed Juncos in the southern Appalachians." ''[[The Auk]]'' '''102''' (4): 805–19. [http://bilbo.bio.purdue.edu/www-ecology/faculty/rabenold/pdfs/Variation%20in%20altitudinal%20migration.pdf PDF]</ref> Some species may also be nomadic, holding no fixed territory and moving according to weather and food availability. [[True parrots|Parrot]]s as a [[family (biology)|family]] are overwhelmingly neither migratory nor sedentary but considered to either be dispersive, irruptive, nomadic or undertake small and irregular migration.<ref>Collar N (1997). "Family Psittacidae (Parrots)" in ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]] Volume 4; Sandgrouse to Cuckoos'' (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions: Barcelona. ISBN 84-87334-22-9</ref>


The ability of birds to return to precise locations across vast distances has been known for some time; in an experiment conducted in the 1950s a [[Manx Shearwater]] released in [[Boston, Massachusetts|Boston]] returned to its colony in [[Skomer]], [[Wales]] within 13 days, a distance of 5,150 kilometres (3,200&nbsp;mi).<ref> Matthews, G.V.T., (1953) "Navigation in the Manx Shearwater" ''Journal of Experimental Biology'' '''30'''(3): 370-396 [http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/30/3/370]</ref> Birds navigate during migration using a variety of methods. For [[diurnal animal|diurnal]] migrants the [[sun]] is used to navigate by, at night a stellar compass is used instead. Birds that use the sun compensate for the changing position of the sun during the day, by the use of an [[Chronobiology|internal clock]].<ref name = "Gill"/> Orientation with the stellar compass depends on the position of the [[constellation]]s surrounding [[Polaris]].<ref>Mouritsen H, Larsen O (2001) "Migrating songbirds tested in computer-controlled Emlen funnels use stellar cues for a time-independent compass" ''Journal of Experimental Biology'' '''204'''(8) 3855-3865</ref> These are backed up in some species with the ability to sense the Earth's [[geomagnetism]] through specialised sensitive [[photoreceptor]]s.<ref>Deutschlander M, Phillips J, Borland S (1999) "The case for light-dependent magnetic orientation in animals" ''Journal of Experimental Biology'' '''202'''(8): 891-908</ref>
The ability of birds to return to precise locations across vast distances has been known for some time; in an experiment conducted in the 1950s a [[Manx Shearwater]] released in [[Boston, Massachusetts|Boston]] returned to its colony in [[Skomer]], [[Wales]] within 13 days, a distance of {{convert|5150|km|mi|-2|abbr=on}}.<ref> Matthews GVT, (1953). "Navigation in the Manx Shearwater." ''Journal of Experimental Biology'' '''30''' (3): 370–96 [http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/abstract/30/3/370 Full text]</ref> Birds navigate during migration using a variety of methods. For [[diurnal animal|diurnal]] migrants the [[sun]] is used to navigate by, at night a stellar compass is used instead. Birds that use the sun compensate for the changing position of the sun during the day, by the use of an [[Chronobiology|internal clock]].<ref name = "Gill"/> Orientation with the stellar compass depends on the position of the [[constellation]]s surrounding [[Polaris]].<ref>Mouritsen H, Larsen O (2001). "Migrating songbirds tested in computer-controlled Emlen funnels use stellar cues for a time-independent compass." ''Journal of Experimental Biology'' '''204''' (8) 3855–65. PMID 11807103</ref> These are backed up in some species with the ability to sense the Earth's [[geomagnetism]] through specialised sensitive [[photoreceptor]]s.<ref>Deutschlander M, Phillips J, Borland S (1999). "The case for light-dependent magnetic orientation in animals." ''Journal of Experimental Biology'' '''202''' (8): 891–908. PMID 10085262</ref>


===Communication===
===Communication===
Line 258: Line 236:
[[Image:Stavenn Eurypiga helias 00.jpg|thumb|right|240px|The startling display of the [[Sunbittern]] mimics a large predator]]
[[Image:Stavenn Eurypiga helias 00.jpg|thumb|right|240px|The startling display of the [[Sunbittern]] mimics a large predator]]


Visual communication in birds serves a number of functions and is manifested in both [[plumage]] and [[behaviour]].<ref name = Attenborough"/> Plumage can be used to assess and assert social dominance,<ref>Mùller A (1988) "Badge size in the house sparrow ''Passer domesticus''". ''Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology'' '''22'''(5): 373-378</ref> display breeding condition in [[sexual selection|sexually selected]] species, even make a threatening display, such as the threat display of the [[Sunbittern]], which mimics a large possible predator. This display is used to ward off potential predators such as [[hawk]]s, and to protect young chicks.<ref>Thomas B & Strahl S (1990) "Nesting Behavior of Sunbitterns (''Eurypyga helias'') in Venezuela" ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''92'''(3): 576-581</ref> Variation in plumage also allows for identification, particularly between species. {{clarifyme}}
Visual communication in birds serves a number of functions and is manifested in both [[plumage]] and [[behaviour]].<ref name = Attenborough"/> Plumage can be used to assess and assert social dominance,<ref>Mùller A (1988). "Badge size in the house sparrow ''Passer domesticus''." ''Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology'' '''22''' (5): 373–378.</ref> display breeding condition in [[sexual selection|sexually selected]] species, even make a threatening display, such as the threat display of the [[Sunbittern]], which mimics a large possible predator. This display is used to ward off potential predators such as [[hawk]]s, and to protect young chicks.<ref>Thomas BT, Strahl SD (1990). "Nesting Behavior of Sunbitterns (''Eurypyga helias'') in Venezuela." ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''92''' (3): 576–81. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v092n03/p0576-p0581.pdf PDF]</ref> Variation in plumage also allows for identification, particularly between species.{{clarifyme}}


Visual communication includes ritualised displays, such as those which signal aggression or submission, or those which are used in the formation of pair-bonds.<ref name = "Gill"/> These ritualised behaviours develop from non-signalling actions such as preening, adjustments of feather position, pecking or other behaviours.{{clarifyme}} The most elaborate displays are shown during courtship, such as the breeding dances of the [[albatross]]es, where the successful formation of a life-long pair-bond requires both partners to practice a unique dance,<ref>Pickering, S.P.C., & Berrow, S.D., (2001) "Courtship behaviour of the Wandering Albatross ''Diomedea exulans'' at Bird Island, South Georgia" ''Marine Ornithology'' '''29''': 29-37 [http://www.marineornithology.org/PDF/29_1/29_1_6.pdf]</ref> and the [[bird-of-paradise|birds-of-paradise]], where the breeding success of males depends on plumage and display quality.<ref>Pruett-Jones S & Pruett-Jones M (1990) "Sexual Selection Through Female Choice in Lawes' Parotia, A Lek-Mating Bird of Paradise" ''[[Evolution (journal)|Evolution]]'' '''44'''(3): 486-501</ref> Male birds can demonstrate their fitness through construction; females of [[weaver]] species, such as the [[Baya Weaver]], may choose mates with good nest-building skills,<ref> Quader S (2006). "What makes a good nest? Benefits of nest choice to female Baya Weavers (''Ploceus philippinus'')" ''[[The Auk]]'' '''123'''(2): 475-486</ref> while [[bowerbird]]s attract mates through constructing bowers and decorating them with bright objects.<ref>Humphries S, Ruxton GD (1999) "Bower-building: coevolution of display traits in response to the costs of female choice?" ''[[Ecology Letters]]'' '''2'''(6): 404-413</ref>
Visual communication includes ritualised displays, such as those which signal aggression or submission, or those which are used in the formation of pair-bonds.<ref name = "Gill"/> These ritualised behaviours develop from non-signalling actions such as preening, adjustments of feather position, pecking or other behaviours.{{clarifyme}} The most elaborate displays are shown during courtship, such as the breeding dances of the [[albatross]]es, where the successful formation of a life-long pair-bond requires both partners to practice a unique dance,<ref>Pickering SPC, Berrow SD (2001). "Courtship behaviour of the Wandering Albatross ''Diomedea exulans'' at Bird Island, South Georgia." ''Marine Ornithology'' '''29''': 29–37. [http://www.marineornithology.org/PDF/29_1/29_1_6.pdf PDF]</ref> and the [[bird-of-paradise|birds-of-paradise]], where the breeding success of males depends on plumage and display quality.<ref>Pruett-Jones SG, Pruett-Jones MA (1990). "Sexual Selection Through Female Choice in Lawes' Parotia, A Lek-Mating Bird of Paradise." ''[[Evolution (journal)|Evolution]]'' '''44''' (3): 486–501. {{DOI|10.2307/2409431}}</ref> Male birds can demonstrate their fitness through construction; females of [[weaver]] species, such as the [[Baya Weaver]], may choose mates with good nest-building skills,<ref> Quader S (2006). "What makes a good nest? Benefits of nest choice to female Baya Weavers (''Ploceus philippinus'')." ''[[The Auk]]'' '''123''' (2): 475–86. [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3793/is_200604/ai_n16410116 Full text].</ref> while [[bowerbird]]s attract mates through constructing bowers and decorating them with bright objects.<ref>Humphries S, Ruxton GD (1999). "Bower-building: coevolution of display traits in response to the costs of female choice?" ''[[Ecology Letters]]'' '''2''' (6): 404–13. {{DOI|10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00102.x}}</ref>


In addition to visual communication, birds are renowned for their auditory skills. Calls, and in some species [[bird song|song]], are the major means by which birds communicate with [[sound]]; though some birds use mechanical sounds, for example driving air thorugh their feathers, as do the ''[[Coenocorypha]]'' [[snipe]]s of [[New Zealand]],<ref name = "Miskelly">Miskelly, C. M. (1987): The identity of the hakawai. ''Notornis'' '''34'''(2): 95-116. [http://www.notornis.org.nz/free_issues/Notornis_34-1987/Notornis_34_2.pdf PDF fulltext]</ref> the territorial drumming of [[woodpecker]]s,<ref name = Attenborough"/> or the use of [[tool]]s to drum in [[Palm Cockatoo]]s.<ref>Murphy S, Legge S, Heinsohn R (2003) "The breeding biology of palm cockatoos (''Probosciger aterrimus''): a case of a slow life history" ''[[Journal of Zoology]]'' '''261''': 327-339</ref> Bird calls and songs can be very complex; sounds are created in the [[syrinx]], both sides of which, in some species, can be operated separately, resulting in two different songs being produced at the same time.<ref name = "Suthers"/>
In addition to visual communication, birds are renowned for their auditory skills. Calls, and in some species [[bird song|song]], are the major means by which birds communicate with [[sound]]; though some birds use mechanical sounds, for example driving air thorugh their feathers, as do the ''[[Coenocorypha]]'' [[snipe]]s of [[New Zealand]],<ref name = "Miskelly">Miskelly CM (1987). "The identity of the hakawai." ''Notornis'' '''34''' (2): 95–116. [http://www.notornis.org.nz/free_issues/Notornis_34-1987/Notornis_34_2.pdf PDF fulltext]</ref> the territorial drumming of [[woodpecker]]s,<ref name = Attenborough"/> or the use of [[tool]]s to drum in [[Palm Cockatoo]]s.<ref>Murphy S, Legge S, Heinsohn R (2003). "The breeding biology of palm cockatoos (''Probosciger aterrimus''): a case of a slow life history." ''[[Journal of Zoology]]'' '''261''': 327–39. {{DOI|10.1017/S0952836903004175}}</ref> Bird calls and songs can be very complex; sounds are created in the [[syrinx]], both sides of which, in some species, can be operated separately, resulting in two different songs being produced at the same time.<ref name = "Suthers"/>


Calls are used for a variety of purposes, several of which may be tied into an individual song.<ref> Brenowitz E, Margoliash D, Nordeen K (1998) "An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system" ''Journal of Neurobiology'' '''35'''(5): 495 - 500</ref> They are used to advertise when seeking a mate, either to attract a mate, aid identification of potential mates or aid in bond formation (often with combined with visual communication). They can convey information about the quality of a male and aid in female choice.<ref> Genevois, F; Bretagnolle, V (1994) "Male Blue Petrels reveal their body mass when calling" ''Ethology Ecology & Evolution'' '''6'''(3): 377–383.[http://riviste.nephila.it/en/scaricaNum.php?idelemento=23&IASGARD_SESSION=62997420ecbade428f26280390af0d24] </ref> They are used to claim and maintain territories. Calls can also be used to identify individuals, aiding parents in finding chicks in crowded colonies or adults reuniting with mates at the start of the breeding season.<ref>Jouventin P, Aubin T & Lengagne T. (1999) "Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition." ''Animal Behaviour'' '''57'''(6): 1175-1183.</ref> Calls may be used to warn other birds of potential [[predator]]s; calls of this nature may be detailed and convey specific information about the nature of the threat.<ref>Templeton C, Greene E, Davis K (2005) "Allometry of Alarm Calls: Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size" ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''308'''(5730) 1934-1937</ref>
Calls are used for a variety of purposes, several of which may be tied into an individual song.<ref> Brenowitz EA, Margoliash D, Nordeen KW (1998). "An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system." ''Journal of Neurobiology'' '''35''' (5): 495–500. PMID 9369455</ref> They are used to advertise when seeking a mate, either to attract a mate, aid identification of potential mates or aid in bond formation (often with combined with visual communication). They can convey information about the quality of a male and aid in female choice.<ref> Genevois F, Bretagnolle V (1994). "Male Blue Petrels reveal their body mass when calling." ''Ethology Ecology & Evolution'' '''6''' (3): 377–83.</ref> They are used to claim and maintain territories. Calls can also be used to identify individuals, aiding parents in finding chicks in crowded colonies or adults reuniting with mates at the start of the breeding season.<ref>Jouventin P, Aubin T, Lengagne T (1999). "Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition." ''Animal Behaviour'' '''57''' (6): 1175–83. PMID 10373249 </ref> Calls may be used to warn other birds of potential [[predator]]s; calls of this nature may be detailed and convey specific information about the nature of the threat.<ref>Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K (2005)/ "Allometry of Alarm Calls: Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size." ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''308''' (5730) 1934–37. PMID 15976305</ref>
{{Listen|filename=Troglodytes aedon.ogg|title=House Wren call|description=The call of the [[House Wren]], a common songbird from North America|format=[[Ogg]]}}
{{Listen|filename=Troglodytes aedon.ogg|title=House Wren call|description=The call of the [[House Wren]], a common songbird from North America|format=[[Ogg]]}}


===Flocking===
===Flocking===
[[Image:Red-billed quelea flocking at waterhole.jpg|thumb|left|300px|[[Red-billed Quelea]]s, the most numerous species of bird,<ref name = "flycatcher"> Sekercioglu, C. H. (2006) "Foreword" in ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]], vol. 11: Old World Flycatchers to Old World Warblers'' (eds. Josep del Hoyo, Andrew Elliott & David Christie) Barcelona:Lynx Edicions p. 48, ISBN 84-96553-06-X</ref> form enormous flocks&mdash;sometimes tens of thousands strong.]]
[[Image:Red-billed quelea flocking at waterhole.jpg|thumb|left|300px|[[Red-billed Quelea]]s, the most numerous species of bird,<ref name = "flycatcher"> Sekercioglu CH (2006). "Foreword" in ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]], vol. 11: Old World Flycatchers to Old World Warblers'' (eds. Josep del Hoyo, Andrew Elliott & David Christie) Barcelona:Lynx Edicions p. 48, ISBN 84-96553-06-X</ref> form enormous flocks&mdash;sometimes tens of thousands strong.]]
While some birds are essentially territorial or live in small family groups, other birds often form large [[flock (birds)|flocks]]. The benefits of aggregating in flocks are varied and flocks will form explicitly for specific purposes. Flocking also has costs, particularly to socially subordinate birds, which are bullied by more dominant birds; birds may also sacrifice feeding efficiency in a flock in order to gain other benefits.<ref>Hutto R (1988) "Foraging Behavior Patterns Suggest a Possible Cost Associated with Participation in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks" ''[[Oikos (journal)|Oikos]]'' '''51'''(1): 79-83</ref> The principal benefits are safety in numbers and increased foraging efficiency.<ref name = "Gill"/> Defence against predators is particularly important in closed habitats such as forests where predation is often by ambush and early warning provided by multiple eyes is important, this has led to the development of many [[mixed-species feeding flock]]s.<ref>Terborgh J (2005) "Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: Costs and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys" ''American Journal of Primatology'' '''21'''(2): 87 - 100</ref> These multi-species flocks are usually composed of small numbers of many species, increasing the benefits of numbers but reducing potential competition for resources. Birds also form associations with non-avian species; plunge diving [[seabird]]s associate with [[dolphin]]s and [[tuna]] which push shoaling fish up towards the surface,<ref name = "AU">Au, D.W.K. & Pitman, R.L. (1986) Seabird interactions with Dolphins and Tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific, ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'', '''88''': 304–317. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v088n03/p0304-p0317.pdf]</ref> and a mutualistic relationship has evolved between [[Dwarf Mongoose]]s and hornbills, where hornbills seek out mongooses in order to forage together, and warn each other of [[birds of prey]] and other predators.<ref>Anne O & Rasa E (1983) "Dwarf mongoose and hornbill mutualism in the Taru desert, Kenya" '' Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology'' '''12'''(3): 181-190</ref>
While some birds are essentially territorial or live in small family groups, other birds often form large [[flock (birds)|flocks]]. The benefits of aggregating in flocks are varied and flocks will form explicitly for specific purposes. Flocking also has costs, particularly to socially subordinate birds, which are bullied by more dominant birds; birds may also sacrifice feeding efficiency in a flock in order to gain other benefits.<ref>Hutto R (1988). "Foraging Behavior Patterns Suggest a Possible Cost Associated with Participation in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks." ''[[Oikos (journal)|Oikos]]'' '''51''' (1): 79–83. {{DOI|10.2307/3565809}}</ref> The principal benefits are safety in numbers and increased foraging efficiency.<ref name = "Gill"/> Defence against predators is particularly important in closed habitats such as forests where predation is often by ambush and early warning provided by multiple eyes is important, this has led to the development of many [[mixed-species feeding flock]]s.<ref>Terborgh J (2005). "Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: Costs and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys." ''American Journal of Primatology'' '''21''' (2): 87–100. [http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ajp.1350210203 PDF]</ref> These multi-species flocks are usually composed of small numbers of many species, increasing the benefits of numbers but reducing potential competition for resources. Birds also form associations with non-avian species; plunge diving [[seabird]]s associate with [[dolphin]]s and [[tuna]] which push shoaling fish up towards the surface,<ref name = "AU">Au DWK, Pitman RL (1986). "Seabird interactions with Dolphins and Tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific." ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'', '''88''': 304–17. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v088n03/p0304-p0317.pdf PDF]</ref> and a mutualistic relationship has evolved between [[Dwarf Mongoose]]s and hornbills, where hornbills seek out mongooses in order to forage together, and warn each other of [[birds of prey]] and other predators.<ref>Anne O, Rasa E (1983). "Dwarf mongoose and hornbill mutualism in the Taru desert, Kenya." ''Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology'' '''12''' (3): 181–90. [http://www.springerlink.com/index/HJ86151KQ3M713U6.pdf PDF]</ref>


===Resting and roosting===
===Resting and roosting===
The high metabolic rates of birds during the active part of the day is supplemented by rest at other times. [[Sleep]]ing birds often utilise a type of sleep known as vigilant sleep, where periods of rest are interspersed with quick eye-opening 'peeks' allowing birds to be sensitive to disturbance and enable rapid escape from threats.<ref>Gauthier-Clerc M, Tamisier A & Cezilly F (2000) "Sleep-Vigilance Trade-off in Gadwall during the Winter Period " ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''102'''(2): 307-313 [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v102n02/p0307-p0313.pdf] </ref> It has been widely believed that [[swift]]s may sleep while flying, however this is not supported by experimental evidence. It is however suggested that there may be certain kinds of sleep which are possible even when in [[bird flight|flight]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Rattenborg|first=Niels|year=2006|title=Do birds sleep in flight?|journal=[[Die Naturwissenschaften]]|volume=93|issue=9|pages=413-425}}</ref>
The high metabolic rates of birds during the active part of the day is supplemented by rest at other times. [[Sleep]]ing birds often utilise a type of sleep known as vigilant sleep, where periods of rest are interspersed with quick eye-opening 'peeks' allowing birds to be sensitive to disturbance and enable rapid escape from threats.<ref>Gauthier-Clerc M, Tamisier A, Cezilly F (2000). "Sleep-Vigilance Trade-off in Gadwall during the Winter Period." ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''102''' (2): 307–13 .[http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Condor/files/issues/v102n02/p0307-p0313.pdf PDF] </ref> It has been widely believed that [[swift]]s may sleep while flying, however this is not supported by experimental evidence. It is however suggested that there may be certain kinds of sleep which are possible even when in [[bird flight|flight]].<ref>{{cite journal|author=Rattenborg N|year=2006|title=Do birds sleep in flight?|journal=[[Die Naturwissenschaften]]|volume=93|issue=9|pages=413–25}}</ref>


Many sleeping birds bends their heads over their backs and tuck their [[beak|bills]] in their back feathers, others cover their beaks among their breast feathers. Many birds rest on one leg, some may pull up their legs into their feathers, especially in cold weather. Communal roosting is common, it lowers the [[thermoregulation|loss of body heat]] and decreases the risks associated with predators.<ref> Beauchamp G (1999) "The evolution of communal roosting in birds: origin and secondary losses" ''Behavioural Ecology'' ''' 10'''(6): 675-687</ref> Roosting sites are often chosen with regard to thermoregulation and safety.<ref>Buttemer W (1985) "Energy relations of winter roost-site utilization by American goldfinches (''Carduelis tristis'')" ''[[Oecologia]]'' '''68'''(1): 126-132</ref>
Many sleeping birds bends their heads over their backs and tuck their [[beak|bills]] in their back feathers, others cover their beaks among their breast feathers. Many birds rest on one leg, some may pull up their legs into their feathers, especially in cold weather. Communal roosting is common, it lowers the [[thermoregulation|loss of body heat]] and decreases the risks associated with predators.<ref> Beauchamp G (1999). "The evolution of communal roosting in birds: origin and secondary losses." ''Behavioural Ecology'' ''' 10''' (6): 675–87. [http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/10/6/675 Abstract]</ref> Roosting sites are often chosen with regard to thermoregulation and safety.<ref>Buttemer W (1985). "Energy relations of winter roost-site utilization by American goldfinches (''Carduelis tristis'')." ''[[Oecologia]]'' '''68''' (1): 126–32. [http://www.springerlink.com/index/W6583733L601WQ58.pdf PDF]</ref>


Perching birds roost on twigs and their tarsal muscles have a ratchet mechanism that locks their toes.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Many ground birds such as quails and pheasants roost in trees. A few parrots of the genus ''Loriculus'' roost hanging upside down.<ref>Buckley, F. G. & P. A. Buckley 1968. Upside-down Resting by Young Green-Rumped Parrotlets (''Forpus passerinus'') ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''70'''(1):89 doi:10.2307/1366517</ref> Some [[Hummingbird]]s go into a nightly state of [[torpor]] with a reduction in their metabolic rates,<ref>Carpenter F (1974) "Torpor in an Andean Hummingbird: Its Ecological Significance" ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''183'''(4124): 545 - 547</ref> as around a hundred other species, including [[owlet-nightjar]]s, [[nightjar]]s, and [[woodswallow]]s; {{clarifyme}} one species, the [[Common Poorwill]], even enters a state of [[hibernation]].<ref>McKechnie A, Ashdown R, Christian M & Brigham R (2007) "Torpor in an African caprimulgid, the freckled nightjar ''Caprimulgus tristigma''" ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''38'''(3): 261–266.</ref>
Perching birds roost on twigs and their tarsal muscles have a ratchet mechanism that locks their toes.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Many ground birds such as quails and pheasants roost in trees. A few parrots of the genus ''Loriculus'' roost hanging upside down.<ref>Buckley FG, Buckley PA (1968). "Upside-down Resting by Young Green-Rumped Parrotlets (''Forpus passerinus'')." ''[[Condor (journal)|The Condor]]'' '''70''' (1):89 {{DOI|10.2307/1366517}}</ref> Some [[Hummingbird]]s go into a nightly state of [[torpor]] with a reduction in their metabolic rates,<ref>Carpenter FL (1974.) "Torpor in an Andean Hummingbird: Its Ecological Significance." ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''183''' (4124): 545–47. PMID 17773043</ref> as around a hundred other species, including [[owlet-nightjar]]s, [[nightjar]]s, and [[woodswallow]]s; {{clarifyme}} one species, the [[Common Poorwill]], even enters a state of [[hibernation]].<ref>McKechnie A, Ashdown R, Christian M, Brigham R (2007). "Torpor in an African caprimulgid, the freckled nightjar ''Caprimulgus tristigma''." ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''38''' (3): 261–66. {{DOI|10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.04116.x}}</ref>


===Breeding===
===Breeding===
====Social systems====
====Social systems====
[[Image:Phalaropus lobatus.jpg|thumb|right|[[Red-necked Phalarope]]s have an unusual polyandrous mating system where males care for the eggs and chicks and brightly coloured females compete for males. <ref> Warnock, Nils & Sarah. (2001) "Sandpipers, Phalaropes and Allies" in ''The Sibley Guide to Bird Life and Behaviour'' (eds Chris Elphick, John B. Dunning, Jr & David Sibley) London: Christopher Helm, ISBN 0-7136-6250-6 </ref>]]
[[Image:Phalaropus lobatus.jpg|thumb|right|[[Red-necked Phalarope]]s have an unusual polyandrous mating system where males care for the eggs and chicks and brightly coloured females compete for males.<ref> Warnock, Nils & Sarah (2001). "Sandpipers, Phalaropes and Allies" in ''The Sibley Guide to Bird Life and Behaviour'' (eds Chris Elphick, John B. Dunning, Jr & David Sibley) London: Christopher Helm, ISBN 0-7136-6250-6 </ref>]]
The vast majority (95%) of bird species are [[Varieties of Monogamy|socially monogamous]]; although [[polygyny]] (2%) and [[polyandry]] (< 1%), [[polygamy]], [[polygynandry]] (where a female pairs with several males and the male pairs with several females) and promiscuity systems also occur.<ref name = "Gill"/> Some species may use more than one system depending on the circumstances. Monogamous species of males and females pair for the breeding season; in some cases, the pair bonds may persist for a number of years or even the lifetime of the pair.<ref>Freed (1987) "The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?" ''[[The American Naturalist]]'' '''130''' (4): 507-525</ref>
The vast majority (95%) of bird species are [[Varieties of Monogamy|socially monogamous]]; although [[polygyny]] (2%) and [[polyandry]] (< 1%), [[polygamy]], [[polygynandry]] (where a female pairs with several males and the male pairs with several females) and promiscuity systems also occur.<ref name = "Gill"/> Some species may use more than one system depending on the circumstances. Monogamous species of males and females pair for the breeding season; in some cases, the pair bonds may persist for a number of years or even the lifetime of the pair.<ref>Freed (1987) "The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?" ''[[The American Naturalist]]'' '''130''' (4): 507–25. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0147(198710)130%3A4%3C507%3ATLPBOT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-0 Abstract]</ref>


The advantage of monogamy for birds is bi-parental care. In most groups of animals, male parental care is rare, but in birds it is quite common; in fact, it is more extensive in birds than in any other vertebrate class.<ref name = "Gill"/> In birds, male care can be seen as important or essential to female fitness; in some species the females are unable to successfully raise a brood without the help of the male.<ref>{{cite journal |quotes=no | last=Gowaty | first=Patricia Adair | title=Male Parental Care and Apparent Monogamy among Eastern Bluebirds (''Sialia sialis'') | journal=[[The American Naturalist]] | volume=121 | issue=2 | pages=149-160 | year=1983}}</ref> Polygamous breeding systems arise when females are able to raise broods without the help of males.<ref name = "Gill"/> There is sometimes a division of labour in monogamous species, with the roles of incubation, nest site defence, chick feeding and territory defence being either shared or undertaken by one sex.<ref>Cockburn A (2006) "Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds" ''[[Proc. R. Soc. B]]'' '''273''':(1592) 1375–1383</ref>
The advantage of monogamy for birds is bi-parental care. In most groups of animals, male parental care is rare, but in birds it is quite common; in fact, it is more extensive in birds than in any other vertebrate class.<ref name = "Gill"/> In birds, male care can be seen as important or essential to female fitness; in some species the females are unable to successfully raise a brood without the help of the male.<ref>{{cite journal | author=Gowaty PA | title= Male Parental Care and Apparent Monogamy among Eastern Bluebirds (''Sialia sialis'') | journal=[[The American Naturalist]] | volume=121 | issue=2 | pages=149–60 | year=1983 | url = http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0147(198302)121:2%3C149:MPCAAM%3E2.0.CO;2-8}}</ref> Polygamous breeding systems arise when females are able to raise broods without the help of males.<ref name = "Gill"/> There is sometimes a division of labour in monogamous species, with the roles of incubation, nest site defence, chick feeding and territory defence being either shared or undertaken by one sex.<ref>Cockburn A (2006). "Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds." ''[[Proc. R. Soc. B]]'' '''273''':(1592) 1375–83. PMID 16777726</ref>


While social monogamy is common in birds, [[infidelity]], in the form of extra-pair copulations, is common in many socially monogamous species.<ref> Westneat DF, Stewart IRK (2003) "Extra-pair paternity in birds: Causes, correlates, and conflict" ''[[Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics]]'' '''34''': 365-396</ref> These can take the form of forced copulation (or [[rape]]) in [[duck]]s and other anatids,<ref>Gowaty PA, Buschhaus N (1998) "Ultimate causation of aggressive and forced copulation in birds: Female resistance, the CODE hypothesis, and social monogamy" ''[[American Zoologist]]'' '''38''' (1): 207-225 </ref> or more usually between dominant males and females partnered with subordinate males. It is thought that the benefit to females comes from getting better genes for her offspring, as well as an insurance against the possibility of infertility in the mate.<ref> Sheldon B (1994) "Male Phenotype, Fertility, and the Pursuit of Extra-Pair Copulations by Female Birds" ''Proceedings: Biological Sciences'' '''257'''(1348): 25-30</ref> Males in species that engage in extra-pair copulations will engage in mate-guarding in order to ensure parentage of the offspring they raise.<ref>Wei G, Yin Z, Lei F (2005) "Copulations and mate guarding of the Chinese Egret" ''Waterbirds'' '''28'''(4): 527-530</ref>
While social monogamy is common in birds, [[infidelity]], in the form of extra-pair copulations, is common in many socially monogamous species.<ref> Westneat DF, Stewart IRK (2003). "Extra-pair paternity in birds: Causes, correlates, and conflict." ''[[Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics]]'' '''34''': 365-396. [http://www.as.huji.ac.il/~gt/Bird_coloration5.pdf PDF]</ref> These can take the form of forced copulation (or [[rape]]) in [[duck]]s and other anatids,<ref>Gowaty PA, Buschhaus N (1998). [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3746/is_199802/ai_n8791262 "Ultimate causation of aggressive and forced copulation in birds: Female resistance, the CODE hypothesis, and social monogamy."] ''[[American Zoologist]]'' '''38''' (1): 207–25 </ref> or more usually between dominant males and females partnered with subordinate males. It is thought that the benefit to females comes from getting better genes for her offspring, as well as an insurance against the possibility of infertility in the mate.<ref> Sheldon B (1994). "Male Phenotype, Fertility, and the Pursuit of Extra-Pair Copulations by Female Birds." ''Proceedings: Biological Sciences'' '''257''' (1348): 25–30. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0962-8452(19940722)257%3A1348%3C25%3AMPFATP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23 Abstract]</ref> Males in species that engage in extra-pair copulations will engage in mate-guarding in order to ensure parentage of the offspring they raise.<ref>Wei G, Yin Z, Lei F (2005). "Copulations and mate guarding of the Chinese Egret." ''Waterbirds'' '''28''' (4): 527–30. [http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1675%2F1524-4695(2005)28%5B527%3ACAMGOT%5D2.0.CO%3B2&ct=1 Abstract]</ref>


Breeding usually involves some form of courtship display, most often performed by the male.<ref>Short, Lester L., (1993) ''Birds of the World and their Behavior'', Henry Holt and Co., ISBN 0-8050-1952-9</ref> Most are rather simple, and usually involve some type of [[bird song|song]]. Some displays can be quite elaborate, using such varied methods as tail and wing ''drumming'', dancing, aerial flights, and communal [[lek (mating arena)|lek]]s depending on the species. Females are most often involved with partner selection,<ref>Burton, Robert, (1985) ''Bird Behavior'', Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., ISBN 0-394-53857-5</ref> although in the polyandrous [[phalaropes]] the males choose brightly coloured females.<ref>Schamel D, Tracy DM, Lank DB, Westneat DF (2004) "Mate guarding, copulation strategies and paternity in the sex-role reversed, socially polyandrous red-necked phalarope ''Phalaropus lobatus''." ''Behaviour Ecology and Sociobiology'' '''57'''(2): 110-118 </ref> Courtship feeding, billing and preening are commonly performed between partners, most often after birds have been paired and mated.<ref name = Attenborough"/>
Breeding usually involves some form of courtship display, most often performed by the male.<ref>Short, Lester L (1993). ''Birds of the World and their Behavior'', Henry Holt and Co., ISBN 0-8050-1952-9</ref> Most are rather simple, and usually involve some type of [[bird song|song]]. Some displays can be quite elaborate, using such varied methods as tail and wing ''drumming'', dancing, aerial flights, and communal [[lek (mating arena)|lek]]s depending on the species. Females are most often involved with partner selection,<ref>Burton R (1985). ''Bird Behavior'', Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., ISBN 0-394-53857-5</ref> although in the polyandrous [[phalaropes]] the males choose brightly coloured females.<ref>Schamel D, Tracy DM, Lank DB, Westneat DF (2004). "Mate guarding, copulation strategies and paternity in the sex-role reversed, socially polyandrous red-necked phalarope ''Phalaropus lobatus''." ''Behaviour Ecology and Sociobiology'' '''57''' (2): 110–18. [http://www.springerlink.com/index/8BE48GKGYF2Q40LT.pdf PDF] </ref> Courtship feeding, billing and preening are commonly performed between partners, most often after birds have been paired and mated.<ref name = Attenborough"/>


====Territories, nesting and incubation====
====Territories, nesting and incubation====
Many birds actively defend a [[Territory (animal)|territory]] from others of the same species during the breeding season. Large territories are protected in order to protect the food source for their chicks. Species that are unable to defend feeding territories, such as [[seabird]]s and [[swift]]s, often breed in [[Colony (biology)|colonies]] instead; this is thought to offer protection from predators. Colonial breeders will defend small nesting sites, and competition between and within species for nesting sites can be intense.<ref>Kokko H, Harris M, Wanless S (2004) "Competition for breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot ''Uria aalge''. ''Journal of Animal Ecology'' '''73'''(2): 367-376</ref>
Many birds actively defend a [[Territory (animal)|territory]] from others of the same species during the breeding season. Large territories are protected in order to protect the food source for their chicks. Species that are unable to defend feeding territories, such as [[seabird]]s and [[swift]]s, often breed in [[Colony (biology)|colonies]] instead; this is thought to offer protection from predators. Colonial breeders will defend small nesting sites, and competition between and within species for nesting sites can be intense.<ref>Kokko H, Harris M, Wanless S (2004). "Competition for breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot ''Uria aalge''." ''Journal of Animal Ecology'' '''73''' (2): 367–76. {{DOI|10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00813.x}}</ref>
[[Image:Webervogelnst Auoblodge.JPG|thumb|left|240px|The nesting colonies of the [[Sociable Weaver]] are amongst the largest bird-created structures]]
[[Image:Webervogelnst Auoblodge.JPG|thumb|left|240px|The nesting colonies of the [[Sociable Weaver]] are amongst the largest bird-created structures.]]


All birds lay [[amniotic egg]]s with hard shells made mostly of [[calcium carbonate]].<ref name = "Gill"/> The colour of eggs is controlled by a number of factors, those of hole and burrow nesting species tend to be white or pale, while those of open nesters such as [[Charadriiformes]] are [[camouflage]]d. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} There are many exceptions to this pattern, however; the ground nesting [[nightjar]]s have pale eggs, camouflage being provided instead by the bird's [[plumage]]. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} Species that are victims of [[brood parasite]]s like the [[Dideric Cuckoo]] will vary their egg colours in order to improve the chances of spotting a cuckoo's egg, and female cuckoos need to match their eggs to their hosts.<ref>Booker L & Booker M (1991) "Why Are Cuckoos Host Specific?" ''[[Oikos (journal)|Oikos]]'' '''57'''(3): 301-309</ref>
All birds lay [[amniotic egg]]s with hard shells made mostly of [[calcium carbonate]].<ref name = "Gill"/> The colour of eggs is controlled by a number of factors, those of hole and burrow nesting species tend to be white or pale, while those of open nesters such as [[Charadriiformes]] are [[camouflage]]d.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} There are many exceptions to this pattern, however; the ground nesting [[nightjar]]s have pale eggs, camouflage being provided instead by the bird's [[plumage]].{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Species that are victims of [[brood parasite]]s like the [[Dideric Cuckoo]] will vary their egg colours in order to improve the chances of spotting a cuckoo's egg, and female cuckoos need to match their eggs to their hosts.<ref>Booker L, Booker M (1991). "Why Are Cuckoos Host Specific?" ''[[Oikos (journal)|Oikos]]'' '''57''' (3): 301–09. {{DOI|10.2307/3565958}}</ref>


The eggs are usually laid in a [[nest]], which can be highly elaborate, like those created by [[weaver]]s and [[oropendola]]s, or extremely primitive, like some [[albatross]]es, which are no more than a scrape on the ground. Some species have no nest, the cliff nesting [[Common Guillemot]] lays its egg on bare rock and the egg of the [[Emperor Penguin]] is kept between the body and feet; this is especially prevalent in ground nesting species where the newly hatched young are [[precocial]]. Most species build more elaborate nests, which can be cups, domes, plates, beds scrapes, mounds or burrows.<ref>Hansell M (2000) ''Bird Nests and Construction Behaviour''. University of Cambridge Press ISBN 0-521-46038-7</ref> Most nests are built in shelter and hidden to reduce the risk of predation, more open nests are usually colonial or built by larger birds capable of defending the nest. Nests are mostly built out of plant matter, some species specifically select plants such as [[yarrow]] which have [[chemical]]s that reduce nest parasites such as [[mite]]s, leading to increased chick survival.<ref>Lafuma L, Lambrechts M & Raymond M (2001) "Aromatic plants in bird nests as a protection against blood-sucking flying insects?" ''Behavioural Processes'' '''56'''(2) 113-120</ref> Nests are often lined with feathers in order to improve the retention of heat.{{Fact|date=July 2007}}
The eggs are usually laid in a [[nest]], which can be highly elaborate, like those created by [[weaver]]s and [[oropendola]]s, or extremely primitive, like some [[albatross]]es, which are no more than a scrape on the ground. Some species have no nest, the cliff nesting [[Common Guillemot]] lays its egg on bare rock and the egg of the [[Emperor Penguin]] is kept between the body and feet; this is especially prevalent in ground nesting species where the newly hatched young are [[precocial]]. Most species build more elaborate nests, which can be cups, domes, plates, beds scrapes, mounds or burrows.<ref name = "Hansell">Hansell M (2000). ''Bird Nests and Construction Behaviour''. University of Cambridge Press ISBN 0-521-46038-7</ref> Most nests are built in shelter and hidden to reduce the risk of predation, more open nests are usually colonial or built by larger birds capable of defending the nest. Nests are mostly built out of plant matter, some species specifically select plants such as [[yarrow]] which have [[chemical]]s that reduce nest parasites such as [[mite]]s, leading to increased chick survival.<ref>Lafuma L, Lambrechts M, Raymond M (2001). "Aromatic plants in bird nests as a protection against blood-sucking flying insects?" ''Behavioural Processes'' '''56''' (2) 113–20. {{DOI|10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00191-7}}</ref> Nests are often lined with feathers in order to improve the retention of heat.<ref name = "Hansell"/>


Incubation, which regulates temperature to keep it optimum for chick development, usually begins after the last egg has been laid.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Incubation duties are often shared in monogamous species; in polygamous species a singe parent undertakes all duties.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Warmth from parents passes to the eggs through [[brood patch]]es, areas of bare skin on the abdomen or breast of the incubating birds. Incubation can be an energetically demanding process, for example adult albatrosses lose as much as 83 g of body weight a day.<ref>Warham, J. (1990) ''The Petrels - Their Ecology and Breeding Systems'' London: [[Academic Press]]</ref> The warmth for the incubation of the eggs of [[megapode]]s comes from the sun, decaying vegetation or from volcanic sources.<ref>Jones, Darryl N.; Dekker, René W.R.J.; & Roselaar, Cees S. (1995). ''The Megapodes''. Bird Families of the World 3. [[Oxford University Press]]: Oxford. ISBN 0-19-854651-3</ref> Incubation periods last between 10 days (in species of [[woodpecker]]s, [[cuckoo]]s and [[passerine]] birds) to over 80 days (in albatrosses and [[kiwi]]s).{{Fact|date=July 2007}}
Incubation, which regulates temperature to keep it optimum for chick development, usually begins after the last egg has been laid.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Incubation duties are often shared in monogamous species; in polygamous species a singe parent undertakes all duties.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Warmth from parents passes to the eggs through [[brood patch]]es, areas of bare skin on the abdomen or breast of the incubating birds. Incubation can be an energetically demanding process, for example adult albatrosses lose as much as 83 g of body weight a day.<ref>Warham, J. (1990) ''The Petrels - Their Ecology and Breeding Systems'' London: [[Academic Press]]</ref> The warmth for the incubation of the eggs of [[megapode]]s comes from the sun, decaying vegetation or from volcanic sources.<ref>Jones DN, Dekker, René WRJ, Roselaar, Cees S (1995). ''The Megapodes''. Bird Families of the World 3. [[Oxford University Press]]: Oxford. ISBN 0-19-854651-3</ref> Incubation periods last between 10 days (in species of [[woodpecker]]s, [[cuckoo]]s and [[passerine]] birds) to over 80 days (in albatrosses and [[kiwi]]s).<ref name = "Gill"/>


====Parental care and fledging====
====Parental care and fledging====
[[Image:Nectarinia dussumieri feeding young.jpg|thumb|left|A female [[Seychelles Sunbird]] with [[spider|arachnid]] prey attending its nest.]]
[[Image:Nectarinia dussumieri feeding young.jpg|thumb|left|A female [[Seychelles Sunbird]] with [[spider|arachnid]] prey attending its nest.]]


Chicks can be helpless or independent at birth, or be at any stage in between. The helpless chicks are known as [[altricial]], and tend to be born, small, naked and [[Blindness|blind]]; chicks that are mobile and feathered at birth are [[precocial]], chicks can also be semi-precocial and semi-altricial. Altricial chicks require help in [[thermoregulation]] and need to be brooded for longer than precocial chicks. {{Fact|date=July 2007}}
Chicks can be helpless or independent at hatching, or be at any stage in between. The helpless chicks are known as [[altricial]], and tend to be born, small, naked and [[Blindness|blind]]; chicks that are mobile and feathered at hatching are [[precocial]], chicks can also be semi-precocial and semi-altricial. Altricial chicks require help in [[thermoregulation]] and need to be brooded for longer than precocial chicks.{{Fact|date=July 2007}}


The length and nature of parental care varies widely amongst different orders and species. At one extreme, parental care in [[megapode]]s ends at nest building; the newly-hatched chick digs itself out of the nest mound without parental assistance and can fend for itself immediately.<ref>Elliot A (1994) "Family Megapodiidae (Megapodes)" in ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]]. Volume 2; New World Vultures to Guineafowl'' (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-873337-15-6 </ref> At the other extreme many seabirds have extended periods of parental care, the longest being [[Great Frigatebird]], the chicks of which take up to six months to [[fledge]] and are fed by the parents for up to another 14 months.<ref>Metz, V.G. & Schreiber, E.A. (2002). "Great Frigatebird (''Fregata minor'')" In ''The Birds of North America, No 681'', (Poole, A. & Gill, F., eds) The Birds of North America Inc:Philadelphia </ref>
The length and nature of parental care varies widely amongst different orders and species. At one extreme, parental care in [[megapode]]s ends at nest building; the newly-hatched chick digs itself out of the nest mound without parental assistance and can fend for itself immediately.<ref>Elliot A (1994). "Family Megapodiidae (Megapodes)" in ''[[Handbook of the Birds of the World]]. Volume 2; New World Vultures to Guineafowl'' (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-873337-15-6 </ref> At the other extreme many seabirds have extended periods of parental care, the longest being [[Great Frigatebird]], the chicks of which take up to six months to [[fledge]] and are fed by the parents for up to another 14 months.<ref>Metz VG, Schreiber EA (2002). "Great Frigatebird (''Fregata minor'')" In ''The Birds of North America, No 681'', (Poole, A. & Gill, F., eds) The Birds of North America Inc:Philadelphia </ref>


In some species the care of young is shared between both parents, in others it is the responsibility of just one sex. In some species other members of the same species will help the breeding pair in raising the young. These [[helpers at the nest|helpers]] are usually close relatives such as the chicks of the breeding pair from previous breeding seasons.<ref>Ekman J. (2006) "Family living amongst birds" ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''37'''(4): 289-298</ref> Alloparenting is particularly common in the [[Corvidae|corvids]], but has been observed in as different species as the [[Rifleman (bird)|Rifleman]], [[Red Kite]] and [[Australian Magpie]].
In some species the care of young is shared between both parents, in others it is the responsibility of just one sex. In some species other members of the same species will help the breeding pair in raising the young. These [[helpers at the nest|helpers]] are usually close relatives such as the chicks of the breeding pair from previous breeding seasons.<ref>Ekman J (2006). "Family living amongst birds." ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''37''' (4): 289–98. {{DOI|10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03666.x}}</ref> Alloparenting is particularly common in the [[Corvidae|corvids]], but has been observed in as different species as the [[Rifleman (bird)|Rifleman]], [[Red Kite]] and [[Australian Magpie]].
[[Image:Reed warbler cuckoo.jpg|thumb|150px|This [[Reed Warbler]] is raising the young of a [[Common Cuckoo]], a [[brood parasite]]]]
[[Image:Reed warbler cuckoo.jpg|thumb|150px|This [[Reed Warbler]] is raising the young of a [[Common Cuckoo]], a [[brood parasite]]]]


The point at which chicks [[fledge]] varies dramatically. The chicks of the ''[[Synthliboramphus]]'' murrelets, like the [[Ancient Murrelet]], leave the nest the night after they hatch, following their parents calls out to sea, where they are raised away from terrestrial predators.<ref>Gaston, A. J. (1994). Ancient Murrelet (''Synthliboramphus antiquus''). In ''The Birds of North America, No. 132'' (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences; Washington, D.C.: The American Ornithologists' Union.</ref> Some other species, especially ducks, move their chicks away from the nest at an early age. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} In most {{Fact|date=July 2007}} species chicks leave the nest soon after, or just before, they are able to fly. Parental care after fledging varies; in albatrosses chicks leave the nest alone and receive no further help, other species continue some supplementary feeding after fledging.<ref>Schaefer HC, Eshiamwata GW, Munyekenye FB, Bohning-Gaese K (2004) "Life-history of two African ''Sylvia'' warblers: low annual fecundity and long post-fledging care" ''[[Ibis (journal)|Ibis]]'' '''146'''(3): 427-437</ref> Chicks may also follow their parents during their first [[bird migration|migration]].<ref> Alonso JC, Bautista LM, Alonso JA (2004) "Family-based territoriality vs flocking in wintering common cranes ''Grus grus''" ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''35'''(5): 434-444</ref>
The point at which chicks [[fledge]] varies dramatically. The chicks of the ''[[Synthliboramphus]]'' murrelets, like the [[Ancient Murrelet]], leave the nest the night after they hatch, following their parents calls out to sea, where they are raised away from terrestrial predators.<ref>Gaston AJ (1994). Ancient Murrelet (''Synthliboramphus antiquus''). In ''The Birds of North America, No. 132'' (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences; Washington, D.C.: The American Ornithologists' Union.</ref> Some other species, especially ducks, move their chicks away from the nest at an early age.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} In most species chicks leave the nest soon after, or just before, they are able to fly.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Parental care after fledging varies; in albatrosses chicks leave the nest alone and receive no further help, other species continue some supplementary feeding after fledging.<ref>Schaefer HC, Eshiamwata GW, Munyekenye FB, Bohning-Gaese K (2004). "Life-history of two African ''Sylvia'' warblers: low annual fecundity and long post-fledging care." ''[[Ibis (journal)|Ibis]]'' '''146''' (3): 427–37. {{DOI|10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00276.x}}</ref> Chicks may also follow their parents during their first [[bird migration|migration]].<ref> Alonso JC, Bautista LM, Alonso JA (2004). "Family-based territoriality vs flocking in wintering common cranes ''Grus grus''." ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''35''' (5): 434–44. {{DOI|10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03290.x}}</ref>


====Brood parasites====
====Brood parasites====
{{main|Brood parasite}}
{{main|Brood parasite}}
Although some [[insect]]s and [[fish]] engage in [[brood parasite|brood parasitism]], most brood parasites are birds.<ref name = "brood">Davies, N. (2000) ''Cuckoos, Cowbirds and other Cheats''. [[T. & A. D. Poyser]]: London ISBN 0-85661-135-2</ref> Brood parasites are birds which lay their eggs in the nests of other birds. These eggs are often accepted and raised by the host species, often at the cost of their own brood. There are two kinds of brood parasite, obligate brood parasites, which are incapable of raising their own young and must lay their eggs in the nests of other species; and non-obligate brood parasites, which are capable of raising their own young but lay eggs in the nests of [[conspecific]]s in order to increase their reproductive output. <ref>Sorenson M (1997) "Effects of intra- and interspecific brood parasitism on a precocial host, the canvasback, ''Aythya valisineria''" ''Behavioral Ecology'' '''8'''(2) 153-161</ref> The most famous obligate brood parasites are the [[cuckoo]]s, although in total 100 species of cuckoos, [[honeyguide]]s, [[icterid]]s, [[estrildid finch]]es and [[Black-headed Duck|ducks]] are obligate parasites.<ref name = "brood"/> Some brood parasites are adapted to hatching before their hosts and pushing their hosts eggs out of the nest, destroying the egg or killing their chicks, ensuring that all the food brought to the nest is fed to them.<ref>Spottiswoode C & Colebrook-Robjent J (2007) "Egg puncturing by the brood parasitic Greater Honeyguide and potential host counteradaptations" ''Behavioral Ecology'' ''in press''. [http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/arm025v1 abstract]</ref>
Although some [[insect]]s and [[fish]] engage in [[brood parasite|brood parasitism]], most brood parasites are birds.<ref name = "brood">Davies N (2000). ''Cuckoos, Cowbirds and other Cheats''. [[T. & A. D. Poyser]]: London ISBN 0-85661-135-2</ref> Brood parasites are birds which lay their eggs in the nests of other birds. These eggs are often accepted and raised by the host species, often at the cost of their own brood. There are two kinds of brood parasite, obligate brood parasites, which are incapable of raising their own young and must lay their eggs in the nests of other species; and non-obligate brood parasites, which are capable of raising their own young but lay eggs in the nests of [[conspecific]]s in order to increase their reproductive output.<ref>Sorenson M (1997). "Effects of intra- and interspecific brood parasitism on a precocial host, the canvasback, ''Aythya valisineria''." ''Behavioral Ecology'' '''8''' (2) 153–61. [http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/8/2/153.pdf PDF]</ref> The most famous obligate brood parasites are the [[cuckoo]]s, although in total 100 species of cuckoos, [[honeyguide]]s, [[icterid]]s, [[estrildid finch]]es and [[Black-headed Duck|ducks]] are obligate parasites.<ref name = "brood"/> Some brood parasites are adapted to hatching before their hosts and pushing their hosts eggs out of the nest, destroying the egg or killing their chicks, ensuring that all the food brought to the nest is fed to them.<ref>Spottiswoode C, Colebrook-Robjent J (2007). "Egg puncturing by the brood parasitic Greater Honeyguide and potential host counteradaptations." ''Behavioral Ecology'' {{DOI|10.1093/beheco/arm025}}</ref>


==Ecology==
==Ecology==
Line 319: Line 297:
The diverse food habits and life-histories of birds are associated with a range of ecological positions.<ref name = "flycatcher"/> While some birds are generalists, others are highly specialized in their habitat or food requirements. Even within a habitat such as a forest, the [[niche]]s occupied by different groups of birds are varied with some species using the forest canopy, others using the space under the canopy, while still others may use the branches and so on. In addition forest birds may be classified into different feeding [[guild]]s such as [[insectivore]]s, [[frugivore]]s and [[nectarivore]]s. Aquatic birds show other food habits such as fishing, plant eating and piracy or [[kleptoparasitism]]. The birds of prey specialize in hunting mammals or other birds while the vultures have specialized as [[scavenger]]s.
The diverse food habits and life-histories of birds are associated with a range of ecological positions.<ref name = "flycatcher"/> While some birds are generalists, others are highly specialized in their habitat or food requirements. Even within a habitat such as a forest, the [[niche]]s occupied by different groups of birds are varied with some species using the forest canopy, others using the space under the canopy, while still others may use the branches and so on. In addition forest birds may be classified into different feeding [[guild]]s such as [[insectivore]]s, [[frugivore]]s and [[nectarivore]]s. Aquatic birds show other food habits such as fishing, plant eating and piracy or [[kleptoparasitism]]. The birds of prey specialize in hunting mammals or other birds while the vultures have specialized as [[scavenger]]s.


Some nectar-feeding birds are also important pollinators of plants and many frugivores play a key role in seed dispersal.<ref name = "Clout">Clout M & J Hay (1989) "The importance of birds as browsers, pollinators and seed dispersers in New Zealand forests" ''New Zealand Journal of Ecology'' '''12''' 27-33 [http://nzes.org.nz/nzje/free_issues/NZJEcol12_s_27.pdf]</ref> Numerous plants have adapted to using birds as their primary pollinators, and both flower and plant have [[coevolution|coevolved]] together,<ref>Stiles F (1981) "Geographical Aspects of Bird-Flower Coevolution, with Particular Reference to Central America" ''Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden'' '''68'''(2) 323-351</ref> in some cases to the point where the flower's primary pollinator is the only species capable of reaching the nectar.<ref>Temeles E, Linhart Y, Masonjones M & Masonjones H (2002) "The Role of Flower Width in Hummingbird Bill Length–Flower Length Relationships" ''Biotropica'' '''34'''(1): 68-80</ref>
Some nectar-feeding birds are also important pollinators of plants and many frugivores play a key role in seed dispersal.<ref name = "Clout">Clout M, Hay J (1989). "The importance of birds as browsers, pollinators and seed dispersers in New Zealand forests." ''New Zealand Journal of Ecology'' '''12''' 27–33 [http://nzes.org.nz/nzje/free_issues/NZJEcol12_s_27.pdf PDF]</ref> Numerous plants have adapted to using birds as their primary pollinators, and both flower and plant have [[coevolution|coevolved]] together,<ref>Stiles F (1981). "Geographical Aspects of Bird-Flower Coevolution, with Particular Reference to Central America." ''Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden'' '''68''' (2) 323–51. {{DOI|10.2307/2398801}}</ref> in some cases to the point where the flower's primary pollinator is the only species capable of reaching the nectar.<ref>Temeles E, Linhart Y, Masonjones M, Masonjones H (2002). "The Role of Flower Width in Hummingbird Bill Length–Flower Length Relationships." ''Biotropica'' '''34''' (1): 68–80. [http://www.amherst.edu/~ejtemeles/Temeles%20et%20al%202002%20biotropica.pdf PDF]</ref>


Birds have important impacts on the ecology of islands. In many cases they reach islands that mammals do not, and in which they may fulfill ecological roles played by larger animals; for example in New Zealand the [[Moa]]s were important [[browser]]s, as are the [[Kereru]] and [[Kokako]] today.<ref name = "Clout"/> Today the plants of New Zealand retain the [[Plant defense against herbivory|defensive adaptations]] evolved to protect them from the extinct moa.<ref>Bond W, Lee W & Craine J (2004) "Plant structural defences against browsing birds: a legacy of New Zealand's extinct moas" ''[[Oikos (journal)|Oikos]]'' '''104'''(3), 500–508.</ref> Large concentrations of nesting [[seabird]]s also have an impact on the ecology of islands and the surrounding seas, principally through the concentration of large quantities of [[guano]], which can have appreciable impacts on the richness of the local soil,<ref>Wainright S, Haney J, Kerr C, Golovkin A & Flint M (1998) Utilization of nitrogen derived from seabird guano by terrestrial and marine plants at St. Paul, Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska" ''Marine Ecology'' '''131'''(1) 63-71</ref> and of the surrounding seas. <ref>Bosman A & Hockey A (1986) "Seabird guano as a determinant of rocky intertidal community structure" ''Marine Ecology Progress Series'' '''32''': 247-257 [http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/32/m032p247.pdf]</ref>
Birds have important impacts on the ecology of islands. In many cases they reach islands that mammals do not, and in which they may fulfill ecological roles played by larger animals; for example in New Zealand the [[Moa]]s were important [[browser]]s, as are the [[Kereru]] and [[Kokako]] today.<ref name = "Clout"/> Today the plants of New Zealand retain the [[Plant defense against herbivory|defensive adaptations]] evolved to protect them from the extinct moa.<ref>Bond W, Lee W, Craine J (2004). "Plant structural defences against browsing birds: a legacy of New Zealand's extinct moas." ''[[Oikos (journal)|Oikos]]'' '''104''' (3), 500–08. {{DOI|10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12720.x}}</ref> Large concentrations of nesting [[seabird]]s also have an impact on the ecology of islands and the surrounding seas, principally through the concentration of large quantities of [[guano]], which can have appreciable impacts on the richness of the local soil,<ref>Wainright S, Haney J, Kerr C, Golovkin A, Flint M (1998). "Utilization of nitrogen derived from seabird guano by terrestrial and marine plants at St. Paul, Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska." ''Marine Ecology'' '''131''' (1) 63–71. [http://www.springerlink.com/index/DN8D70RYM7TUF42P.pdf PDF]</ref> and of the surrounding seas.<ref>Bosman A, Hockey A (1986). "Seabird guano as a determinant of rocky intertidal community structure." ''Marine Ecology Progress Series'' '''32''': 247–57 [http://www.int-res.com/articles/meps/32/m032p247.pdf PDF]</ref>


==Relationship with humans==
==Relationship with humans==
[[Image:Industrial-Chicken-Coop.JPG|thumb|150px|Industrial farming of chickens.]]
[[Image:Industrial-Chicken-Coop.JPG|thumb|150px|Industrial farming of chickens.]]


Birds are highly visible and common animals, and humans have had a long relationship with them. In some cases the relationship has been [[Mutualism|mutualistic]], such as the cooperative relationship between [[honeyguide]]s and tribesmen in obtaining honey,<ref>Dean W, Siegfried R, MacDonald I (1990) "The Fallacy, Fact, and Fate of Guiding Behavior in the Greater Honeyguide" ''Conservation Biology'' '''4'''(1) 99–101</ref> or [[Commensalism|commensal]], as found in the numerous species that benefit indirectly from human activities.<ref>Singer R & Yom-Tov Y (1988) "The Breeding Biology of the House Sparrow ''Passer domesticus'' in Israel" ''Ornis Scandinavica'' '''19''' 139-144 </ref> For example, the common pigeon or [[Rock Pigeon]] thrives in urban areas around the world. Human effects can also be detrimental, where species are threatened by human activities.
Birds are highly visible and common animals, and humans have had a long relationship with them. In some cases the relationship has been [[Mutualism|mutualistic]], such as the cooperative relationship between [[honeyguide]]s and tribesmen in obtaining honey,<ref>Dean W, Siegfried R, MacDonald I (1990). "The Fallacy, Fact, and Fate of Guiding Behavior in the Greater Honeyguide." ''Conservation Biology'' '''4''' (1) 99–101. [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00272.x PDF]</ref> or [[Commensalism|commensal]], as found in the numerous species that benefit indirectly from human activities.<ref>Singer R, Yom-Tov Y (1988). "The Breeding Biology of the House Sparrow ''Passer domesticus'' in Israel." ''Ornis Scandinavica'' '''19''' 139–44. {{DOI|10.2307/3676463}} </ref> For example, the common pigeon or [[Rock Pigeon]] thrives in urban areas around the world. Human activities can also be detrimental, threatening some bird species with extinction.


Birds also have many effects on humans. They can act as vectors for spreading diseases such as [[psittacosis]], [[salmonellosis]], [[campylobacteriosis]], mycobacteriosis (avian [[tuberculosis]]), [[avian influenza]] (bird flu), [[giardiasis]], and [[cryptosporidiosis]] over long distances. Some of these are [[zoonosis|zoonotic diseases]] which can also be transmitted to humans.<ref>Reed, Kurt D. Jennifer K. Meece, James S. Henkel, and Sanjay K. Shukla 2003. Birds, Migration and Emerging Zoonoses: West Nile Virus, Lyme Disease, Influenza A and Enteropathogens. Clin Med Res. '''1'''(1):5–12. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1069015]</ref> They can also be commercially important [[Pest (organism)|pest]]s on agricultural crops<ref>Dolbeer, R (1990) " Ornithology and integrated pest management: Red-winged blackbirds ''Agleaius phoeniceus'' and corn." ''[[Ibis (journal)|Ibis]]'' '''132'''(2): 309-322</ref> as well as hazardous to aviation due to the risk of [[bird strike]]s.<ref>Dolbeer R, Belant J, & Sillings J (1993) "Shooting Gulls Reduces Strikes with Aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport" ''Wildlife Society Bulletin '' '''21''': 442-450</ref> They are also important food and income sources.
Birds also effect humans. They can act as vectors for spreading diseases such as [[psittacosis]], [[salmonellosis]], [[campylobacteriosis]], mycobacteriosis (avian [[tuberculosis]]), [[avian influenza]] (bird flu), [[giardiasis]], and [[cryptosporidiosis]] over long distances. Some of these are [[zoonosis|zoonotic diseases]] that can also be transmitted to humans.<ref>Reed KD, Meece JK, Henkel JS, Shukla SK (2003). [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1069015 "Birds, Migration and Emerging Zoonoses: West Nile Virus, Lyme Disease, Influenza A and Enteropathogens."] Clin Med Res. '''1''' (1):5–12. PMID 15931279 </ref> Birds are also commercially important [[Pest (organism)|pest]]s on agricultural crops,<ref>Dolbeer R (1990). "Ornithology and integrated pest management: Red-winged blackbirds ''Agleaius phoeniceus'' and corn." ''[[Ibis (journal)|Ibis]]'' '''132''' (2): 309–22.</ref> as well as posing a hazard to aviation through [[bird strike]]s.<ref>Dolbeer R, Belant J, Sillings J (1993). "Shooting Gulls Reduces Strikes with Aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport." ''Wildlife Society Bulletin '' '''21''': 442–50. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0091-7648(199324)21%3A4%3C442%3ASGRSWA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2 Abstract]</ref> They are also important food and income sources.


In some ecosystems, birds are at the apex of food chains making them very sensitive indicators of [[pollution]].<ref>Kahle S, Becker PH. (1999) "Bird blood as bioindicator for mercury in the environment." ''Chemosphere''. '''39'''(14):2451-7</ref> The decline in bird populations in the US as a result of pesticide use is a famous example.<ref>[National Resources Defence Council (1997) [http://www.nrdc.org/health/pesticides/hcarson.asp The story of silent spring] accessed [[September 14]] 2007</ref> Birds and their diversity have therefore been considered as good indicators of ecosystem health and in the UK, bird diversity is used as one of 15 ''quality of life'' indicators.<ref>Gregory, R. D., Noble, D., Field, R., Marchant, J., Raven, M. and Gibbons, D. W. 2003. Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. ''Ornis Hung.'' '''12-13''': 11-24. [http://www.ebcc.info/wpimages/other/bio-iindicators.pdf?basket=d40db6ec0becebf9fc9fd551d4ae991e PDF]</ref>
In some ecosystems, birds are at the apex of food chains making them very sensitive indicators of [[pollution]].<ref>Kahle S, Becker PH (1999). "Bird blood as bioindicator for mercury in the environment." ''Chemosphere''. '''39''' (14):2451–7. PMID 10581697 </ref> The decline in bird populations in the US, as a result of pesticide use is a famous example.<ref>National Resources Defence Council (1997). [http://www.nrdc.org/health/pesticides/hcarson.asp The story of silent spring.] Retrieved on [[September 14]] [[2007]]</ref> Birds and their diversity have therefore been considered as good indicators of ecosystem health and, in the UK, bird diversity is used as one of 15 ''quality of life'' indicators.<ref>Gregory RD, Noble D, Field R, Marchant J, Raven M, Gibbons DW (2003). "Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. ''Ornis Hung.'' '''12–13''': 11–24. [http://www.ebcc.info/wpimages/other/bio-iindicators.pdf?basket=d40db6ec0becebf9fc9fd551d4ae991e PDF]</ref>


===Economic importance===
===Economic importance===
Birds are an important food source for [[human]]s. The most commonly eaten species is the domestic [[chicken]] and its [[Egg (biology)|eggs]], and [[goose|geese]], [[pheasant]]s, [[turkey (bird)|turkeys]], [[duck]]s and [[quail]] are also widely domesticated and eaten. [[Hunting]] remains an important method of obtaining birds, as it has been throughout history,<ref>Simeone, A. & Navarro, X. (2002) "Human exploitation of seabirds in coastal southern Chile during the mid-Holocene" ''Rev. chil. hist. nat'' '''75'''(2): 423–431 [http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-078X2002000200012&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=en]</ref> and has led to the [[extinct]]ion or [[endangered|endangerment]] of dozens of species.<ref> Keane A, Brooke MD, Mcgowan PJK (2005) "Correlates of extinction risk and hunting pressure in gamebirds (Galliformes)" ''Biological Conservation'' '''126''' (2): 216-233</ref> However, [[muttonbirding]] in Australia and New Zealand is an example of an ongoing sustainable harvest of two [[seabird]] species.<ref>Hamilton S (2000)"How precise and accurate are data obtained using. an infra-red scope on burrow-nesting sooty shearwaters ''Puffinus griseus''?" ''Marine Ornithology'' '''28'''(1): 1-6 [http://www.marineornithology.org/PDF/28_1/28_1_1.pdf]</ref>
Birds are an important food source for humans. The most commonly eaten species is the domestic [[chicken]] and its [[Egg (biology)|eggs]], as well as [[goose|geese]], [[pheasant]]s, [[turkey (bird)|turkeys]], [[duck]]s and [[quail]]. [[Hunting]] remains an important method of obtaining birds, as it has been throughout human history,<ref>Simeone A, Navarro X (2002). [http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-078X2002000200012&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=en "Human exploitation of seabirds in coastal southern Chile during the mid-Holocene."] ''Rev. chil. hist. nat'' '''75''' (2): 423–31 </ref> and has led to the [[extinct]]ion or [[endangered|endangerment]] of dozens of species.<ref> Keane A, Brooke MD, Mcgowan PJK (2005). "Correlates of extinction risk and hunting pressure in gamebirds (Galliformes)." ''Biological Conservation'' '''126''' (2): 216–33. {{DOI|10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.011}}</ref> However, [[muttonbirding]] in Australia and New Zealand is an example of an ongoing sustainable harvest of two [[seabird]] species.<ref>Hamilton S (2000). "How precise and accurate are data obtained using. an infra-red scope on burrow-nesting sooty shearwaters ''Puffinus griseus''?" ''Marine Ornithology'' '''28''' (1): 1–6 [http://www.marineornithology.org/PDF/28_1/28_1_1.pdf PDF]</ref>


Besides meat and eggs, birds provide [[feather]]s for clothing, bedding and decoration, [[guano]]-derived phosphorus and nitrogen used in fertiliser and gunpowder, and the central ingredient of [[bird's nest soup]].<ref>Koon L & Earl of Cranbrook (2002) ''Swiftlets of Borneo:Builders of Edible Nests'' Natural History Publications (Borneo) ISBN 983-812-060x </ref> In former times, the long wing feathers of geese and other birds were used as [[quill]]s for writing, and the word ''pen'' is derived from the Latin for feather ''penna''. {{Fact|date=July 2007}} Colourful birds (e.g. [[Parrot (family)|parrots]], and [[myna]]s) are often bred in [[aviculture|captivity]] or kept as [[pet]]s, and this practice has led to the illegal [[smuggling|trafficking]] of some endangered species.<ref>Cooney R & Jepson P (2006) "The international wild bird trade: what's wrong with blanket bans?" ''Oryx'' '''40'''(1): 18-23</ref> [[CITES]], an international agreement adopted in 1963, has worked to reduce the trafficking in the bird species.
Besides meat and eggs, birds provide [[feather]]s for clothing, bedding and decoration, [[guano]]-derived phosphorus and nitrogen that is used in fertiliser and gunpowder, and the central ingredient of [[bird's nest soup]].<ref>Koon L, Earl of Cranbrook (2002). ''Swiftlets of Borneo:Builders of Edible Nests'' Natural History Publications (Borneo) ISBN 983-812-060x </ref> In former times, the long wing feathers of geese and other birds were used as [[quill]]s for writing, and the word ''pen'' is derived from the Latin for feather ''penna''.{{Fact|date=July 2007}} Colourful birds (such as [[Parrot (family)|parrots]], and [[myna]]s) are bred in [[aviculture|captivity]] or kept as [[pet]]s, and this practice has led to the illegal [[smuggling|trafficking]] of some endangered species.<ref>Cooney R, Jepson P (2006). "The international wild bird trade: what's wrong with blanket bans?" ''Oryx'' '''40''' (1): 18–23. [http://journals.cambridge.org/production/action/cjoGetFulltext?fulltextid=409231 PDF]</ref> [[CITES]], an international agreement adopted in 1963, has worked to reduce the trafficking in the bird species.


[[Image:FishingCormorants.jpg|thumb|Cormorants used by fishermen in Southeast Asia. The practice is in steep decline but survives in some areas as a tourism attraction.]]
[[Image:FishingCormorants.jpg|thumb|Cormorants used by fishermen in Southeast Asia. The practice is in steep decline but survives in some areas as a tourism attraction.]]
Other birds have long been used by humans to perform tasks; [[falcon]]s for hunting, and [[cormorant]]s to catch fish. Pigeons were used as a messenger as early as 1 AD, according to [[Pliny the Elder|Pliny]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} and played an important role as recently as [[World War II]]. Today, such activities are more commonly undertaken as a hobby, or for entertainment and tourism,<ref>Manzi, M (2002) "Cormorant fishing in Southwestern China: a Traditional Fishery under Siege. (Geographical Field Note)." ''Geographic Review'' '''92'''(4): 597-603</ref> or for [[sport]] including [[pigeon racing]], which evolved from {{Fact|date=July 2007}} the tradition of messenger pigeons.
Other birds have long been used by humans to perform tasks; [[falcon]]s for hunting, and [[cormorant]]s to catch fish. Pigeons were used as a messenger as early as 1 AD, according to [[Pliny the Elder|Pliny]]{{Fact|date=July 2007}} and played an important role as recently as [[World War II]]. Today, such activities are more common as a hobbies, or for entertainment and tourism,<ref>Manzi M (2002). [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1895/is_200210/ai_n8674873 "Cormorant fishing in Southwestern China: a Traditional Fishery under Siege. (Geographical Field Note)."] ''Geographic Review'' '''92''' (4): 597–603.</ref> or for [[sport]] including [[pigeon racing]], which evolved from{{Fact|date=July 2007}} the tradition of messenger pigeons.


The scientific study of birds is called [[ornithology]]. Birds are among the most extensively studied of all animal groups; [[chicken]]s and [[pigeon]]s are popular as experimental subjects, and are often used in [[biology]] and [[comparative psychology]] research. Hundreds of academic [[List of ornithology journals|journals]] and thousands of scientists {{Fact|date=July 2007}} are devoted to bird research, while amateur enthusiasts (called birdwatchers, twitchers or, more commonly, [[birding|birders]]) number in the millions.<ref>Pullis La Rouche, G. (2006). Birding in the United States: a demographic and economic analysis. ''Waterbirds around the world.'' Eds. G.C. Boere, C.A. Galbraith & D.A. Stroud. [[The Stationery Office]], Edinburgh, UK. pp. 841-846. [http://www.jncc.gov.uk/PDF/pub07_waterbirds_part6.2.5.pdf]</ref> Many homeowners erect [[bird feeder]]s near their homes to attract various species. [[Bird feeding]] has grown into a multimillion dollar industry; for example an estimated 75% of households in Britain provide food for birds at some point during the winter.<ref>Chamberlain DE, Vickery JA, Glue DE, Robinson RA, Conway GJ, Woodburn RJW, Cannon AR (2005) "Annual and seasonal trends in the use of garden feeders by birds in winter" ''[[Ibis (journal)|Ibis]]'' '''147'''(3): 563-575</ref>
The scientific study of birds is called [[ornithology]]. Birds are among the most extensively studied of all animal groups; [[chicken]]s and [[pigeon]]s are popular as experimental subjects, and are often used in [[biology]] and [[comparative psychology]] research. Hundreds of academic [[List of ornithology journals|journals]] and thousands of scientists{{Fact|date=July 2007}} are devoted to bird research, while amateur enthusiasts (called birdwatchers, twitchers or, more commonly, [[birding|birders]]) number in the millions.<ref>Pullis La Rouche, G. (2006). Birding in the United States: a demographic and economic analysis. ''Waterbirds around the world.'' Eds. G.C. Boere, C.A. Galbraith & D.A. Stroud. [[The Stationery Office]], Edinburgh, UK. pp. 841–46. [http://www.jncc.gov.uk/PDF/pub07_waterbirds_part6.2.5.pdf PDF]</ref> Many homeowners erect [[bird feeder]]s near their homes to attract various species. [[Bird feeding]] has grown into a multimillion dollar industry; for example an estimated 75% of households in Britain provide food for birds at some point during the winter.<ref>Chamberlain DE, Vickery JA, Glue DE, Robinson RA, Conway GJ, Woodburn RJW, Cannon AR (2005). "Annual and seasonal trends in the use of garden feeders by birds in winter." ''[[Ibis (journal)|Ibis]]'' '''147''' (3): 563–75. [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00430.x PDF]</ref>


===Importance in religion, folklore and culture===
===Importance in religion, folklore and culture===
Birds feature prominently in [[folklore]], [[religion]] and popular [[culture]], in which they fulfil a number of roles. In religion they may serve as messengers or priests and leaders for a [[deity]], such as in the cult of [[Make-make]] where the [[Tangata manu]] (bird men) of [[Easter Island]] served as chiefs,<ref>Routledge S & Routledge (1917) "The Bird Cult of Easter Island" ''Folklore'' '''28'''(4): 337-355.</ref> or as attendants, as in the case of [[Hugin and Munin]], two [[Common Raven]]s which whisper news into the ears of the [[Norse god]] [[Odin]].<ref>Chappell J (2006) Living with the Trickster: Crows, Ravens, and Human Culture. ''PLoS Biol'' '''4'''(1):</ref> They may also serve as religious symbols, for example the symbolism of [[Jonah]] as a [[dove]] ('''יוֹנָה'''), with its various associated meanings, fright, passivity, mourning and beauty.<ref>Hauser A (1985) "Jonah: In Pursuit of the Dove" ''Journal of Biblical Literature'' '''104'''(1): 21-37.</ref> Birds can themselves be deified, as occurred to the [[Common Peacock]] by the [[Dravidian]]s of [[India]], who perceived the peacock as Mother Earth.<ref>Nair P (1974) "The Peacock Cult in Asia" ''Asian Folklore Studies'' '''33'''(2): 93-170.</ref> Birds have also been perceived as [[monster]]s, including the legendary [[Roc (mythology)|Roc]]<ref>Wittkower R (1938) "'Roc': An Eastern Prodigy in a Dutch Engraving" ''Journal of the Warburg Institute'' '''1'''(3): 255-257</ref> and the [[Māori]] legends about the ''Pouākai'', a giant bird capable of snatching humans, based on the extinct [[Haast's Eagle]].<ref>Tennyson, A. & Martinson, P. (2006) ''Extinct Birds of New Zealand'' Te Papa Press,Wellington ISBN 978-0-909010-21-8</ref> In some parts of the world many birds are regarded with suspicion; in parts of [[Africa]] [[owl]]s are associated with bad luck, [[witchcraft]] and death.<ref>Enriquez, P.L. & Mikkola H (1997). "Comparative study of general public owl knowledge in Costa Rica, Central America and Malawi, Africa". Pp. 160-166 In: J.R. Duncan, D.H. Johnson, T.H. Nicholls, (Eds). ''Biology and conservation of owls of the Northern Hemisphere. General Technical Report NC-190'', USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, Minnesota. 635 pp.</ref>
Birds feature prominently in [[folklore]], [[religion]] and popular [[culture]], in which they fulfil a number of roles. In religion they may serve as messengers or priests and leaders for a [[deity]], such as in the cult of [[Make-make]] where the [[Tangata manu]] (bird men) of [[Easter Island]] served as chiefs,<ref>Routledge S, Routledge K (1917). "The Bird Cult of Easter Island." ''Folklore'' '''28''' (4): 337-355.</ref> or as attendants, as in the case of [[Hugin and Munin]], two [[Common Raven]]s which whisper news into the ears of the [[Norse god]] [[Odin]].<ref>Chappell J (2006). [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1326277 "Living with the Trickster: Crows, Ravens, and Human Culture."] ''PLoS Biol'' '''4''' (1):e14. {{DOI|10.1371/journal.pbio.0040014}}</ref> They may also serve as religious symbols, for example the symbolism of [[Jonah]] as a [[dove]] ('''יוֹנָה'''), with its various associated meanings, fright, passivity, mourning and beauty.<ref>Hauser A (1985). "Jonah: In Pursuit of the Dove." ''Journal of Biblical Literature'' '''104''' (1): 21–37. {{DOI|10.2307/3260591}}</ref> Birds can themselves be deified, as occurred to the [[Common Peacock]] by the [[Dravidian]]s of [[India]], who perceived the peacock as Mother Earth.<ref>Nair P (1974). "The Peacock Cult in Asia." ''Asian Folklore Studies'' '''33''' (2): 93–170. {{DOI|10.2307/1177550}}</ref> Birds have also been perceived as [[monster]]s, including the legendary [[Roc (mythology)|Roc]]<ref>Wittkower R (1938). "'Roc': An Eastern Prodigy in a Dutch Engraving." ''Journal of the Warburg Institute'' '''1''' (3): 255–57. {{DOI|10.2307/750014}}</ref> and the [[Māori]] legends about the ''Pouākai'', a giant bird capable of snatching humans, based on the extinct [[Haast's Eagle]].<ref>Tennyson A, Martinson P (2006). ''Extinct Birds of New Zealand'' Te Papa Press, Wellington ISBN 978-0-909010-21-8</ref> In some parts of the world many birds are regarded with suspicion; in parts of [[Africa]] [[owl]]s are associated with bad luck, [[witchcraft]] and death.<ref>Enriquez PL, Mikkola H (1997). "Comparative study of general public owl knowledge in Costa Rica, Central America and Malawi, Africa." Pp. 160–66 In: J.R. Duncan, D.H. Johnson, T.H. Nicholls, (Eds). ''Biology and conservation of owls of the Northern Hemisphere. General Technical Report NC-190'', USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, Minnesota. 635 pp.</ref>


Birds feature in culture and art and have done so since prehistoric times. Birds are represented in early [[cave painting]]s along with other animals.<ref>Meighan C (1966) "Prehistoric Rock Paintings in Baja California" ''American Antiquity'' '''31'''(3): 372-392.</ref> Later birds came to be used in religious or symbolic art and design; among the most magnificent of these was the (now lost) [[Peacock Throne]] of the [[Mughal]] and [[Persian Empire|Persian]] emperors of [[India]].<ref> Clarke C (1908) "A Pedestal of the Platform of the Peacock Throne" ''The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin'' '''3'''(10): 182-183. </ref> With the advent of [[science|scientific]] interest in birds many paintings of birds were commissioned for books, amongst the most famous bird artists was [[John James Audubon]], whose paintings of [[North America]]n birds were a great commercial success in [[Europe]] and who later lent his name to the [[National Audubon Society]].<ref>Boime A (1999) "John James Audubon, a birdwatcher's fanciful flights" ''Art History'' '''22'''(5) 728-755</ref> Birds are also important in poetry; [[Homer]] incorporated [[Nightingale]]s into the [[Odyssey]], and poets have continued to use that species ever since.<ref>Chandler A (1934) "The Nightingale in Greek and Latin Poetry" ''The Classical Journal'' '''30'''(2): 78-84. </ref> The relationship between an [[albatross]] and a sailor is the central theme of [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]]'s [[The Rime of the Ancient Mariner]], the significance of which has increased with the adoption of the term as a [[Albatross (metaphor)|metaphor for a 'burden']].<ref>Lasky E (1992) "A Modern Day Albatross: The Valdez and Some of Life's Other Spills" ''The English Journal'', '''81'''(3): 44-46.</ref> Birds serve as other metaphors in the [[English language]], for example [[vulture fund]]s and vulture investors, where [[vulture]]s are perceived as unpleasant and possibly unethical. <ref>Carson A (1998) "Vulture Investors, Predators of the 90s: An Ethical Examination" ''Journal of Business Ethics'' '''17'''(5): 543-555</ref> Perceptions of individual bird species vary from culture to culture; while owls are considered bad luck in some parts of Africa they are regarded as wise across much of Europe,<ref> Lewis D (2005) [http://www.owlpages.com/articles.php?section=Owl+Mythology&title=Myth+and+Culture Owls in Mythology and Culture]. Accessed [[September 15]] 2007</ref> and [[Hoopoe]]s were considered sacred in [[Ancient Egypt]], symbols of virtue in [[Persia]], thieves across much of Europe and harbingers of war in [[Scandinavia]].<ref>Dupree N (1974) "An Interpretation of the Role of the Hoopoe in Afghan Folklore and Magic" ''Folklore'' '''85'''(3): 173-193.</ref>
Birds feature in culture and art and have done so since prehistoric times. Birds are represented in early [[cave painting]]s along with other animals.<ref>Meighan C (1966). "Prehistoric Rock Paintings in Baja California." ''American Antiquity'' '''31''' (3): 372–92. {{DOI|10.2307/2694739}}</ref> Later birds came to be used in religious or symbolic art and design; among the most magnificent of these was the (now lost) [[Peacock Throne]] of the [[Mughal]] and [[Persian Empire|Persian]] emperors of [[India]].<ref>Clarke CP (1908). "A Pedestal of the Platform of the Peacock Throne." ''The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin'' '''3''' (10): 182–83. {{DOI|10.2307/3252550}}</ref> With the advent of [[science|scientific]] interest in birds many paintings of birds were commissioned for books, amongst the most famous bird artists was [[John James Audubon]], whose paintings of [[North America]]n birds were a great commercial success in [[Europe]] and who later lent his name to the [[National Audubon Society]].<ref>Boime A (1999). "John James Audubon, a birdwatcher's fanciful flights." ''Art History'' '''22''' (5) 728–55. {{DOI|10.1111/1467-8365.00184}}</ref> Birds are also important in poetry; [[Homer]] incorporated [[Nightingale]]s into the [[Odyssey]], and poets have continued to use that species ever since.<ref>Chandler A (1934). "The Nightingale in Greek and Latin Poetry." ''The Classical Journal'' '''30''' (2): 78–84. </ref> The relationship between an [[albatross]] and a sailor is the central theme of [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]]'s [[The Rime of the Ancient Mariner]], the significance of which has increased with the adoption of the term as a [[Albatross (metaphor)|metaphor for a 'burden']].<ref>Lasky E (1992). "A Modern Day Albatross: The Valdez and Some of Life's Other Spills." ''The English Journal'', '''81''' (3): 44–46. {{DOI|10.2307/820195}}</ref> Birds serve as other metaphors in the [[English language]], for example [[vulture fund]]s and vulture investors, where [[vulture]]s are perceived as unpleasant and possibly unethical.<ref>Carson A (1998). "Vulture Investors, Predators of the 90s: An Ethical Examination." ''Journal of Business Ethics'' '''17''' (5): 543–55. [http://www.springerlink.com/index/W676R8803NL06L38.pdf PDF]</ref> Perceptions of individual bird species vary from culture to culture; while owls are considered bad luck in some parts of Africa they are regarded as wise across much of Europe,<ref> Lewis DP (2005). [http://www.owlpages.com/articles.php?section=Owl+Mythology&title=Myth+and+Culture Owls in Mythology and Culture.] The Owl Pages. Retrieved on [[September 15]] [[2007]].</ref> and [[Hoopoe]]s were considered sacred in [[Ancient Egypt]], symbols of virtue in [[Persia]], thieves across much of Europe and harbingers of war in [[Scandinavia]].<ref>Dupree N (1974). "An Interpretation of the Role of the Hoopoe in Afghan Folklore and Magic." ''Folklore'' '''85''' (3): 173–93.</ref>


===Conservation===
===Conservation===
{{main|Bird conservation}}
{{main|Bird conservation}}
{{Seealso|Late Quaternary prehistoric birds|Extinct birds}}
[[Image:Albatross hook.jpg|thumb|250px|right|This [[Black-browed Albatross]] has been hooked on a long-line. 19 of the 21 species of albatross are threatened by this type of fishing, three [[Critically endangered species|critically]] so.]]


[[Image:Albatross hook.jpg|thumb|250px|right|This [[Black-browed Albatross]] has been hooked on a long-line. This type of fishing threatens 19 of the 21 species of albatross, three [[Critically endangered species|critically]] so.]]
Humans have had a large impact on many bird species. Human activities have in some cases allowed some species to dramatically expand their natural ranges, in other species ranges have decreased and have even resulted in many [[extinction]]. Over a hundred species have gone extinct in historical times,<ref>Fuller, E (2000): ''Extinct Birds'' (2nd ed.). [[Oxford University Press]], Oxford, New York. ISBN 0-19-850837-9</ref> although the most dramatic human caused extinctions occurred in the [[Pacific Ocean]] as people colonised the islands of Melanesia, Polynesia and Micronesia, during which an estimated 750-1800 species of bird went extinct.<ref>Steadman D, (2006). ''Extinction and Biogeography in Tropical Pacific Birds'', University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-77142-7</ref> Many bird populations are currently declining worldwide, with 1,221 species listed as [[threatened species|threatened]] by [[Birdlife International]] and the [[IUCN]].<ref>[[Birdlife International]] (2007) [http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2007/05/2007_red_list_update.html 1,221 and counting: More birds than ever face extinction] Accessed [[3 June]] 2007.</ref> The biggest cited reason surrounds habitat loss.<ref>Norris K & Pain D (eds) (2002) ''Conserving Bird Biodiversity: General Principles and their Application'' Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521789493</ref> Other threats include overhunting, accidental mortality due to [[bird strike|structural collisions]] and as [[long-line fishing]] [[bycatch]],<ref>Brothers NP. 1991. "Albatross mortality and associated bait loss in the Japanese longline fishery in the southern ocean." ''Biological Conservation'' '''55''': 255–268.</ref> pollution (including oil spills and pesticide use),<ref>Wurster D, Wurster C & Strickland W (1965) "Bird Mortality Following DDT Spray for Dutch Elm Disease" ''Ecology'' '''46'''(4): 488-499</ref> competition and predation by nonnative [[invasive species]],<ref>Blackburn T, Cassey P, Duncan R, Evans K & Gaston K (2004) "Avian Extinction and Mammalian Introductions on Oceanic Islands" ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''305''': 1955-1958</ref> and climate change. Governments, along with numerous [[conservation biology|conservation]] [[charitable organisation|charities]], work to protect birds, either through laws to protect birds, [[In-situ conservation|preserving]] and [[ecological restoration|restoring bird habitat]] or establishing [[Ex-situ conservation|captive populations]] for reintroductions. The efforts of conservation biology have met with some success, a study estimated that between 1994 and 2004 16 species of bird that would otherwise have gone extinct were saved.<ref>Butchart S, Stattersfield A & Collar N (2006) "How many bird extinctions have we prevented?" ''Oryx'' '''40'''(3): 266-279 [http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2006/08/butchart_et_al_2006.pdf]</ref>


Humans have had a large impact on many bird species. Human activities have in some cases allowed some species to dramatically expand their natural ranges, in other species ranges have decreased and have even resulted in many [[extinction]]. Over a hundred species have gone extinct in historical times,<ref>Fuller E (2000). ''Extinct Birds'' (2nd ed.). [[Oxford University Press]], Oxford, New York. ISBN 0-19-850837-9</ref> although the most dramatic human caused extinctions occurred in the [[Pacific Ocean]] as people colonised the islands of Melanesia, Polynesia and Micronesia, during which an estimated 750–1800 species of bird went extinct.<ref>Steadman D (2006). ''Extinction and Biogeography in Tropical Pacific Birds'', University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-77142-7</ref> Many bird populations are currently declining worldwide, with 1,221 species listed as [[threatened species|threatened]] by [[Birdlife International]] and the [[IUCN]].<ref>[[Birdlife International]] (2007). [http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2007/05/2007_red_list_update.html 1,221 and counting: More birds than ever face extinction.] Retrieved on [[3 June]] [[2007]].</ref> The biggest cited reason surrounds habitat loss.<ref>Norris K, Pain D (eds) (2002). ''Conserving Bird Biodiversity: General Principles and their Application'' Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521789493</ref> Other threats include overhunting, accidental mortality due to [[bird strike|structural collisions]] and as [[long-line fishing]] [[bycatch]],<ref>Brothers NP (1991). "Albatross mortality and associated bait loss in the Japanese longline fishery in the southern ocean." ''Biological Conservation'' '''55''': 255–68.</ref> pollution (including oil spills and pesticide use),<ref>Wurster D, Wurster C, Strickland W (1965). "Bird Mortality Following DDT Spray for Dutch Elm Disease." ''Ecology'' '''46''' (4): 488–99. {{DOI|10.1126/science.148.3666.90}}</ref> competition and predation by nonnative [[invasive species]],<ref>Blackburn T, Cassey P, Duncan R, Evans K, Gaston K (2004). "Avian Extinction and Mammalian Introductions on Oceanic Islands." ''[[Science (journal)|Science]]'' '''305''': 1955–58. {{DOI|10.1126/science.1101617}}</ref> and climate change. Governments, along with numerous [[conservation biology|conservation]] [[charitable organisation|charities]], work to protect birds, either through laws to protect birds, [[In-situ conservation|preserving]] and [[ecological restoration|restoring bird habitat]] or establishing [[Ex-situ conservation|captive populations]] for reintroductions. The efforts of conservation biology have met with some success, a study estimated that between 1994 and 2004 16 species of bird that would otherwise have gone extinct were saved.<ref>Butchart S, Stattersfield A, Collar N (2006). "How many bird extinctions have we prevented?" ''Oryx'' '''40''' (3): 266–79 [http://www.birdlife.org/news/news/2006/08/butchart_et_al_2006.pdf PDF]</ref>
See [[Late Quaternary prehistoric birds]] for taxa which disappeared in prehistoric and early historic times, usually due to human activity (i.e., starting with the [[Upper Paleolithic Revolution]]). For birds having gone extinct in modern times (since 1500), see [[Extinct birds]].


==References==
==References==
Line 365: Line 343:
{{Wikispecies|Aves}}
{{Wikispecies|Aves}}
{{Wikibookspar|Dichotomous Key|Aves}}
{{Wikibookspar|Dichotomous Key|Aves}}
{{sisterlinks|Bird}}
*[http://www.bsc-eoc.org/avibase/avibase.jsp?lang=EN&pg=home Avibase] - The World Bird Database
*[http://www.bsc-eoc.org/avibase/avibase.jsp?lang=EN&pg=home Avibase] The World Bird Database
*[http://www.i-o-c.org/IOComm/index.htm International Ornithological Committee]
*[http://www.i-o-c.org/IOComm/index.htm International Ornithological Committee]
*[http://www.birdlife.org/ Birdlife International] - Dedicated to bird conservation worldwide; has a database with about 250,000 records on endangered bird species
*[http://www.birdlife.org/ Birdlife International] Dedicated to bird conservation worldwide; has a database with about 250,000 records on endangered bird species
*[http://www.hbw.com/ibc/ The Internet Bird Collection] - A free library of videos of the world's birds
*[http://www.hbw.com/ibc/ The Internet Bird Collection] A free library of videos of the world's birds
*[http://www.audubon.org/bird/index.html Birds and Science] from the [[National Audubon Society]]
*[http://www.audubon.org/bird/index.html Birds and Science] from the [[National Audubon Society]]
*[http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/index.php SORA] Searchable online research archive; Archives of the following ornithological journals [[The Auk]], [[Condor (journal)|Condor]], Journal of Field Ornithology, North American Bird Bander, Studies in Avian Biology, Pacific Coast Avifauna, and [[the Wilson Bulletin]].
*[http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/index.php SORA] Searchable online research archive; Archives of the following ornithological journals [[The Auk]], [[Condor (journal)|Condor]], Journal of Field Ornithology, North American Bird Bander, Studies in Avian Biology, Pacific Coast Avifauna, and [[the Wilson Bulletin]].
Line 376: Line 355:
*[http://people.eku.edu/ritchisong/birdbiogeography1.htm Bird biogeography]
*[http://people.eku.edu/ritchisong/birdbiogeography1.htm Bird biogeography]


{{sisterlinks|Bird}}
{{Footer Birds}}
{{Footer Birds}}



Revision as of 02:19, 16 September 2007

Birds
Temporal range: 160 Ma
Late Jurassic - Recent
Superb Fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus, juvenile
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Subphylum:
Class:
Aves

Linnaeus, 1758
Orders

About two dozen - see section below

Birds (class Aves) are bipedal, warm-blooded, egg-laying vertebrate animals. Birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs during the Jurassic period, and the earliest known bird is the Late Jurassic Archaeopteryx. Ranging in size from tiny hummingbirds to the huge Ostrich and Emu, there are around 10,000 known living bird species in the world, making them the most diverse class of terrestrial vertebrates.

Modern birds are characterised by feathers, a beak with no teeth, the laying of hard-shelled eggs, a high metabolic rate, a four-chambered heart, and a lightweight but strong skeleton. All birds have forelimbs modified as wings and most can fly, though the ratites and several others, particularly endemic island species, have lost the ability to fly. Birds also have unique digestive and respiratory systems that are highly adapted for flight.

Many species of bird undertake long distance annual migrations, and many more perform shorter irregular movements. Birds are social and communicate using visual signals and through calls and song, and participate in social behaviours including cooperative hunting, cooperative breeding, flocking and mobbing of predators. Birds are primarily socially monogamous, with engagement in extra-pair copulations being common in some species—other species have polygamous or polyandrous breeding systems. Eggs are usually laid in a nest and incubated and most birds have an extended period of parental care after hatching.

Birds are economically important to humans: many are important sources of food, acquired either through hunting or farming, and they provide other products. Some species, particularly songbirds and parrots, are popular as pets. Birds figure prominently in all aspects of human culture from religion to poetry and popular music. About 120–130 species have become extinct as a result of human activity since 1600, and hundreds more before this. Currently around 1,200 species of birds are threatened with extinction by human activities and efforts are underway to protect them.

Evolution and taxonomy

Archaeopteryx, the earliest known bird

The first classification of birds was developed by Francis Willughby and John Ray in their 1676 volume, Ornithologiae.[1] Carolus Linnaeus modified that work in 1758 to devise the taxonomic classification system still in use.[2] Birds are categorised as the biological class Aves in Linnean taxonomy. Phylogenetic taxonomy places Aves in the dinosaur clade Theropoda.[3] Aves and a sister group, the order Crocodilia, together are the sole living members of the reptile clade Archosauria. Phylogenetically, Aves is commonly defined as all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of modern birds and Archaeopteryx lithographica.[4] Archaeopteryx, from the Kimmeridgian stage of the Late Jurassic (some 155–150 million years ago), is the earliest known bird under this definition. Others have defined Aves to include only the modern bird groups, excluding most groups known only from fossils,[5] in part to avoid the uncertainties about the placement of Archaeopteryx in relation to animals traditionally thought of as theropod dinosaurs.

Modern birds all sit within the subclass Neornithes, which is divided into two superorders, the Paleognathae (mostly flightless birds like ostriches), and the wildly diverse Neognathae, containing all other birds.[3] Depending on the taxonomic viewpoint, the number of species cited varies anywhere from 9,800[6] to 10,050[7] known living bird species in the world.

Dinosaurs and the origin of birds

File:Confuciusornis.jpg
Confuciusornis, a Cretaceous bird from China

There is significant evidence that birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs, specifically, that birds are members of Maniraptora, a group of theropods which includes dromaeosaurs and oviraptorids, among others.[8] As more non-avian theropods that are closely related to birds are discovered, the formerly clear distinction between non-birds and birds becomes blurred. Recent discoveries in Liaoning Province of northeast China, demonstrating that many small theropod dinosaurs had feathers, contribute to this ambiguity.[9]

The basal bird Archaeopteryx from the Jurassic era is well-known as one of the first transitional fossils to be found in support of evolution in the late 19th century, though it is not considered a direct ancestor of modern birds. Confuciusornis is another early bird; it lived in the Early Cretaceous. Protoavis texensis may be even older although the fragmentary nature of this fossil leaves it open to considerable doubt whether this was a bird ancestor.[10] Other Mesozoic birds include the Enantiornithes, Yanornis, Ichthyornis, Gansus and the Hesperornithiformes, a group of flightless divers resembling grebes and loons.

The dromaeosaurids Cryptovolans and Microraptor may have been capable of powered flight to an extent similar to or greater than that of Archaeopteryx. Cryptovolans had a sternal keel and had ribs with uncinate processes. In fact, Cryptovolans makes a better "bird" than Archaeopteryx which is missing some of these modern bird features. Because of this, some palaeontologists have suggested that dromaeosaurs are actually basal birds, and that the larger members of the family are secondarily flightless, i.e. that dromaeosaurs evolved from birds and not the other way around.[11] Evidence for this theory is currently inconclusive, as the exact relationship among the most advanced maniraptoran dinosaurs and the most primitive true birds are not well understood.

Although ornithischian (bird-hipped) dinosaurs share the hip structure of birds, birds actually originated from the saurischian (lizard-hipped) dinosaurs, and thus evolved their hip structure independently.[12] In fact, the bird-like hip structure also developed a third time among a peculiar group of theropods, the Therizinosauridae.

An alternate theory to the dinosaurian origin of birds, espoused by a few scientists (most notably Larry Martin and Alan Feduccia), states that birds (including maniraptoran "dinosaurs") evolved from early archosaurs like Longisquama,[13] a theory which is contested by most palaeontologists and evidence based on feather development and evolution.[14]

Early evolution of birds

During the Cretaceous Period, birds diversified into a wide variety of forms.[15] Many of these groups retained primitive characteristics, such as clawed wings and teeth, though the latter was lost independently in a number of bird groups, including modern birds (Neornithes).[citation needed] While the earliest birds retained the long bony tails of their ancestors (birds such as Archaeopteryx and Jeholornis),[15] more advanced birds shortened the tail with the advent of the pygostyle bone in the clade Pygostylia.

The first large, diverse lineage of short-tailed birds to evolve were the Enantiornithes, or "opposite birds", so named because the construction of their shoulder bones was the reverse of the condition seen in modern birds.[citation needed] Enantirornithes occupied a wide array of ecological niches, from sand-probing shorebirds and fish-eaters to tree-dwelling forms and seed-eaters.[15] More advanced lineages also specialized in eating fish, like the superficially gull-like subclass of Ichthyornithes ("fish birds").[16] One order of Mesozoic seabirds, the Hesperornithiformes, became so well adapted to hunting fish in marine environments that they lost the ability to fly and became primarily aquatic. Despite their extreme specializations, the Hesperornithiformes represent some of the closest relatives of modern birds.[15]

Radiation of modern birds

Modern birds are classified in the subclass Neornithes, which are now known to have evolved into some basic lineages by the end of the Cretaceous (see Vegavis).[17] The Neornithes are split into the Paleognathae and Neognathae. The paleognaths include the tinamous of Central and South America and the ratites. The ratites are large flightless birds, and include ostriches, rheas, cassowaries, kiwis and emus (though some scientists suspect that the ratites represent an artificial grouping of birds which have independently lost the ability to fly in a number of unrelated lineages).[18]

The basal divergence from the remaining Neognathes was that of the Galloanserae, the superorder containing the Anseriformes (ducks, geese, swans and screamers), and the Galliformes (the pheasants, grouse, and their allies, together with the mound builders, and the guans and their allies). The dates for the splits are much debated by scientists.[citation needed] It is agreed that the Neornithes evolved in the Cretaceous and that the split between the Galloanseri from other Neognathes occurred before the K-T extinction event, but there are different opinions about whether the radiation of the remaining Neognathes occurred before or after the extinction of the other dinosaurs.[19] This disagreement is in part caused by a divergence in the evidence, with molecular dating suggesting a Cretaceous radiation and fossil evidence supporting a Tertiary radiation. Attempts to reconcile the molecular and fossil evidence have proved controversial.[19][20]

The classification of birds is a contentious issue. Sibley and Ahlquist's Phylogeny and Classification of Birds (1990) is a landmark work on the classification of birds, although frequently debated and constantly revised. A preponderance of evidence seems to suggest that the modern bird orders constitute accurate taxa.[citation needed] But scientists disagree about the relationships between orders; evidence from modern bird anatomy, fossils and DNA have all been brought to bear on the problem but no strong consensus has emerged. More recently, new fossil and molecular evidence is providing an increasingly clear picture of the evolution of modern bird orders.

Modern bird orders

This is a list of the taxonomic orders in the subclass Neornithes, or modern birds. This is the traditional classification (the so-called Clements order), revised by the Sibley-Monroe classification. The list of birds gives a more detailed summary of the orders, including families.

Subclass Neornithes
Paleognathae:

Neognathae:

The radically different Sibley-Monroe classification (Sibley-Ahlquist taxonomy) based on molecular data became quite influential, as recent molecular, fossil and anatomical evidence supported the Galloanserae.[19] By 2006, increasing evidence made it possible to verify the major proposals of the taxonomy. For example, see Charadriiformes, Gruiformes or Caprimulgiformes.

Distribution

The range of the House Sparrow has expanded dramatically due to human activities.[21]

Birds breed on all seven continents, with the highest diversity occurring in tropical regions; this may be due either to higher speciation rates in the tropics or to higher extinction rates at higher latitudes.[22] They are able to live and feed in most of the world's terrestrial habitats, reaching their southern extreme in the Snow Petrel's breeding colonies, found as far as 440 kilometres (270 mi) inland in Antarctica.[23] Several families of birds have adapted to life both on the world's oceans and in them, with some seabird species coming ashore only to breed[24] and some penguins recorded diving as deeply as 300 metres (980 ft).[25] Many species have established naturalised breeding populations in areas to which they have been introduced by humans. Some of these introductions have been deliberate; the Ring-necked Pheasant, for example, has been introduced around the world as a game bird.[26] Others are accidental, such as the Monk Parakeets that have escaped from captivity and established breeding colonies in a number of North American cities.[27] Some species, including the Cattle Egret,[28] Yellow-headed Caracara[29] and Galah,[30] have spread naturally far beyond their original ranges as agricultural practices created suitable new habitat.

Anatomy

External anatomy of a bird: 1 Beak, 2 Head, 3 Iris, 4 Pupil, 5 Mantle, 6 Lesser coverts, 7 Scapulars, 8 Median coverts, 9 Tertials, 10 Rump, 11 Primaries, 12 Vent, 13 Thigh, 14 Tibio-tarsal articulation, 15 Tarsus, 16 Feet, 17 Tibia, 18 Belly, 19 Flanks, 20 Breast, 21 Throat, 22 Wattle

Compared with other vertebrates, birds have a body plan that shows many unusual adaptations, mostly to facilitate flight.

The skeleton consists of bones which are very light. They have large pneumatic (air-filled) cavities which connect with the respiratory system.[31] The skull bones are fused and do not show cranial sutures.[32] The orbits are large and separated by a bony septum. The spine has cervical, thoracic, lumbar and caudal regions with the number of cervical (neck) vertebrae highly variable and especially flexible, but movement is reduced in the anterior thoracic vertebrae and absent in the later vertebrae.[33] The last few are fused with the pelvis to form the synsacrum.[32] The ribs are flattened and the sternum is keeled for the attachment of flight muscles, except in the flightless bird orders. The forelimbs are modified into the wings.[34]

Like the reptiles, birds are primarily uricotelic, that is their kidneys extract nitrogenous wastes from their bloodstream and excrete it as uric acid instead of urea or ammonia. The uric acid is excreted along with feces as a semisolid waste and they do not have a separate urinary bladder or opening.[35][36] Some birds such as hummingbirds however can be facultatively ammonotelic, excreting most of the nitrogenous wastes as ammonia.[37] They also excrete creatine rather than creatinine as in mammals.[32] This material, as well as the output of the intestines, emerges from the bird's cloaca.[38][39] The cloaca is a multi-purpose opening: their wastes are expelled through it, they mate by joining cloaca, and females lay eggs out of it. In addition, many species of birds regurgitate pellets.[40]

Birds have one of the most complex respiratory systems of all animal groups.[32] When a bird inhales, 75% of the fresh air bypasses the lungs and flows directly into a posterior air sac which extends from the lungs and connects with air spaces in the bones and fills them with air. The other 25% of the air goes directly into the lungs. When the bird exhales, the used air flows out of the lung and the stored fresh air from the posterior air sac is simultaneously forced into the lungs. Thus, a bird's lungs receive a constant supply of fresh air during both inhalation and exhalation.[41]

Sound production is achieved using the syrinx, a muscular chamber with several tympanic membranes, situated at the lower end of the trachea where it bifurcates.[42] The bird's heart has four chambers and the right aortic arch gives rise to systemic aorta (unlike in the mammals where the left arch is involved).[32] The postcava receives blood from the limbs via the renal portal system. Birds, unlike mammals, have nucleated erythrocytes, that is, red blood cells which retain a nucleus.[43]

The digestive system of the bird is unique, with a crop for storage and a gizzard that contains swallowed stones for grinding food, given the lack of teeth.[44] Most are highly adapted for rapid digestion, an adaptation to flight.[45] Some migratory birds have the additional ability to reduce parts of the intestines prior to migration.[46]

The nervous system is large relative to the bird's size.[32] The most developed part of the brain is the one that controls the flight related function while the cerebellum coordinates movement and the cerebrum controls behaviour patterns, navigation, mating and nest building.

Most birds cannot move their eyes, although there are exceptions, like the Great Cormorant.[47] Birds with eyes on the sides of their heads have a wide visual field while birds with eyes on the front of their heads like owls have binocular vision and can estimate field depth.[48]

Most birds have a poor sense of smell with notable exceptions including kiwis,[49] vultures[50] and the tubenoses.[51] The visual system is usually highly developed.[citation needed] Water birds have special flexible lenses, allowing accommodation for vision in air and water.[32] Some species also have dual fovea. Birds are tetrachromatic, possessing ultraviolet cone cells in the eye as well as green, red and blue ones.[52] This allows them to perceive ultraviolet light; which is used in courtship. Many birds show plumage patterns in ultraviolet that are invisible to the human eye; so that some birds, whose sexes appear similar are distinguished by the presence of ultraviolet reflective patches of feathers. Male Blue Tits have an ultraviolet reflective crown patch which is displayed in courtship by posturing and raising of their nape feathers.[53] Ultraviolet light is also used in foraging—kestrels have been shown to search for prey by detecting the UV reflective urine trail marks left on the ground by rodents.[54] The eyelids of a bird are not used in blinking, instead the eye is lubricated by the nictitating membrane, the third eyelid that moves horizontally.[55] The nictitating membrane also covers the eye and acts as a contact lens in many aquatic birds.[32] The bird retina has a fan shaped blood supply system called the pecten.[32] The avian ear lacks external pinnae but is covered by feathers, although in some birds (the Asio, Bubo and Otus owls, for example) these feathers form tufts which resemble ears. The inner ear has a cochlea but it is not spiral as in mammals.[56]

Some birds use chemical defenses against predators. Some Procellariiformes can eject an unpleasant oil against an aggressor,[57] and some species of pitohui, found in New Guinea, secrete a powerful neurotoxin in their skin and feathers.[58]

Feathers and plumage

The plumage of the African Scops Owl allows it to blend in with its surroundings.

The one characteristic that distinguishes birds from all other living groups is the covering of feathers. Feathers are epidermal growths attached to the skin that serve a variety of functions to birds: they aid in thermoregulation by insulating birds from cold weather and water, they are essential to bird flight, and they are also used in display, camouflage and signalling.[32] There are several different types of feather that serve different purposes. Feathers need maintenance, and birds preen or groom their feathers daily (they around 9.2% of their daily time budget on this),[59] using their bills to brush away foreign particles, and applying waxy secretions from the uropygial gland, which protects feather flexibility and also acts as an anti-microbial agent, inhibiting the growth of feather-degrading bacteria.[60] This may be supplemented with the secretions of formic acid from ants, which birds apply in a behaviour known as anting in order to remove feather parasites.[61]

The arrangement and appearance of feathers on the body is known as plumage. Within species plumage can vary with age, social status,[citation needed] with higher ranked individuals displaying their status, or most commonly by sex.[citation needed] Plumage is regularly moulted, the standard plumage of a bird that has moulted after breeding is known as the non-breeding plumage, or in the Humphrey-Parkes terminology, 'basic plumage'; breeding plumages or variations of the basic plumage are known under the Humphrey-Parkes system as 'alternate plumages'.[62] Moult is annual in most species[citation needed] but some species may have two moults a year,[citation needed] while large birds of prey may moult once in two or three years.[citation needed] Ducks and geese moult their primaries and secondaries simultaneously and become flightless for about a month.[63] Different groups of birds have different moulting patterns and strategies. Some drop the feathers starting sequentially from outward-in [clarification needed] while others replace feathers inwards-out [clarification needed] and the rare others lose all their feathers at once.[citation needed] The first or centripetal moult as termed for the moult of tail feathers is seen for instance in the Phasianidae.[citation needed] The second or centrifugal moult is seen for instance in the tail feathers of the woodpeckers and treecreepers,[citation needed] although it begins with the second innermost pair of tail-feathers and the central pair of feathers is molted last, so as to permits the continuous presence of a functional climbing tail.[64] The general pattern seen in the passerines is that the primaries are replaced outward, secondaries inward, and the tail from center outward.[citation needed]

Feathers do not arise from all parts of the bird skin but grow in specific tracts or pterylae. The distribution pattern of these feather tracts or pterylosis is used in taxonomy and systematics. Prior to nesting, the females of most bird species gain a bare brood patch by loss of feathers close to the belly. The skin here is well supplied with blood vessels and helps in incubation.[65]

Flight

Flight characterises most birds, and distinguishes them from almost all other vertebrates with the exception of mammalian bats and the extinct pterosaurs. As the main means of locomotion for most bird species, [clarification needed] flight is used for breeding, feeding, and predator avoidance and escape. Birds have a variety of adaptations to flight, including a lightweight skeleton, two large flight muscles, the pectoralis (which accounts for 15% of the total mass of the bird) and the supercoracoideus and a modified forelimb (the wing) serving as an aerofoil.[32] Wing shape and size primarily determines the type of flight each species is capable of. Many birds combine powered or flapping flight with less energy intensive soaring flight. About 60 species of extant birds are flightless, and many extinct birds were also flightless.[66] Flightlessness often arises in birds on isolated islands, probably due to the lack of land predators and limited resources, which rewards the loss of costly unnecessary adaptations.[67] Penguins, while flightless, use similar musculature and movements to "fly" through the water, as do auks, shearwaters and dippers.[68]

Behaviour

Most birds are diurnal, but some birds, such as many species of owls and nightjars, are nocturnal or crepuscular (active during twilight hours), and many coastal waders feed when the tides are appropriate, by day or night.[69]

Diet and feeding

Feeding adaptations in beaks. A:Nectarivore, B:Insectivore, C:Granivore, D:Specialist Seed-eater, E:Fishing, F:Netting, G:Filter feeding, H:Surface probing, I:Probing, J:Surface skimming, K:Raptorial

Birds feed on a variety of materials, including nectar, fruit, plants, seeds, carrion, and various types of small animals including other birds.[32] Because birds have no teeth, the digestive system of birds is specially adapted to process unmasticated food items that are usually swallowed whole.

Various feeding strategies are used by birds. Gleaning for insects, invertebrates, fruit and seeds is used by many species.[citation needed] Sallying from a branch and flycatching for insects is used by many songbirds.[citation needed] Nectar feeders such as hummingbirds,[70] sunbirds,[71] amongst others are facilitated by specially adapted brushy tongues and in many cases bills designed to fit co-adapted flowers.[72] Probing for invertebrates is used by shorebirds with long bills; in the case of shorebirds length of bill and feeding method are associated with niche separation.[32][73] Pursuit diving under the water, using wings or feet for propulasion, is employed by loons, diving ducks and penguins, auks,Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).[74] Geese and dabbling ducks are primarily grazers. Some species will engage in kleptoparasitism, stealing food items from other birds; frigatebirds, gulls,[75] and skuas[76] employ this type of feeding behaviour. Kleptoparasitism is not thought to play a significant part of the diet of any species, and is instead a supplement to food obtained by hunting; a study of Great Frigatebirds stealing from Masked Boobies estimated that the frigatebirds could at most obtain 40% of the food they needed, and on average obtained only 5%.[77] Finally, some birds are scavengers, either specialised carrion eaters like vultures or opportunists like gulls, corvids or other birds of prey.[78] Some birds may employ many strategies to obtain food, or feed on a variety of food items and are called generalists,[79] while others are considered specialists,[80] concentrating time and effort on specific food items or having a single strategy to obtain food.

Migration

The routes of satellite tagged Bar-tailed Godwits migrating north from New Zealand. This species has the longest known non-stop migration of any species, up to 10,200 km (6,300 mi).

Many bird species migrate to take advantage of global differences of seasonal temperatures to optimise availability of food sources and breeding habitat. These migrations vary among the different groups. Many landbirds, shorebirds and waterbirds undertake annual long distance migrations, usually triggered by length of daylight as well as weather conditions. These are characterised by a breeding season spent in the temperate or arctic/antarctic regions, and a non-breeding season in the tropical regions or opposite hemisphere. Prior to migration, birds substantially increase body fats and reserves and reduce the size of some of their organs.[81][46] Migration is highly energetically demanding, particularly as birds need to cross deserts and oceans without refuelling; landbirds have a flight range of around 2,500 km (1,600 mi) and shorebirds can fly up to 4,000 km (2,500 mi),[32] although the Bar-tailed Godwit is capable of non-stop flights of up to 10,200 km (6,300 mi).[82] Seabirds also undertake long migrations, the longest annual migration being those of Sooty Shearwaters, which nest in New Zealand and Chile and spend the northern summer feeding in the North Pacific off Japan, Alaska and California, an annual round trip of 64,000 km (39,800 mi).[83] Other seabirds disperse after breeding, travelling widely but having no set migration route. Albatrosses nesting in the Southern Ocean often undertake circumpolar trips between breeding seasons.[84]

Birds also display other types of migration. Some species undertake shorter migrations, travelling only as far as is required to avoid bad weather or obtain food. These include irruptive species,like boreal finches which may be quite common some years and almost absent in others.[clarification needed] This type of migration is normally associated with food availability.[85] Species may also travel shorter distances over part of their range, with individuals from higher latitudes travelling into the existing range of conspecifics; others undertake partial migrations, where only a fraction of the population, usually females and subdominant males, migrates.[86] Partial migration can form a large percentage of the migration behaviour of birds in some regions; in Australia surveys found that 44% of non-passerine birds studied were partially migratory and 32% of passerines were.[87] Altitudinal migration is a form of short distance migration, in which birds spend the breeding season at higher altitudes elevations, and move to lower ones during suboptimal conditions. It is most often triggered by temperature changes and usually occurs when the normal territories become inhospitable also due to lack of food.[88] Some species may also be nomadic, holding no fixed territory and moving according to weather and food availability. Parrots as a family are overwhelmingly neither migratory nor sedentary but considered to either be dispersive, irruptive, nomadic or undertake small and irregular migration.[89]

The ability of birds to return to precise locations across vast distances has been known for some time; in an experiment conducted in the 1950s a Manx Shearwater released in Boston returned to its colony in Skomer, Wales within 13 days, a distance of 5,150 km (3,200 mi).[90] Birds navigate during migration using a variety of methods. For diurnal migrants the sun is used to navigate by, at night a stellar compass is used instead. Birds that use the sun compensate for the changing position of the sun during the day, by the use of an internal clock.[32] Orientation with the stellar compass depends on the position of the constellations surrounding Polaris.[91] These are backed up in some species with the ability to sense the Earth's geomagnetism through specialised sensitive photoreceptors.[92]

Communication

Birds communicate principally using visual and auditory signals. Signals can be interspecific (between species) and intraspecific (within species).

The startling display of the Sunbittern mimics a large predator

Visual communication in birds serves a number of functions and is manifested in both plumage and behaviour.[45] Plumage can be used to assess and assert social dominance,[93] display breeding condition in sexually selected species, even make a threatening display, such as the threat display of the Sunbittern, which mimics a large possible predator. This display is used to ward off potential predators such as hawks, and to protect young chicks.[94] Variation in plumage also allows for identification, particularly between species.[clarification needed]

Visual communication includes ritualised displays, such as those which signal aggression or submission, or those which are used in the formation of pair-bonds.[32] These ritualised behaviours develop from non-signalling actions such as preening, adjustments of feather position, pecking or other behaviours.[clarification needed] The most elaborate displays are shown during courtship, such as the breeding dances of the albatrosses, where the successful formation of a life-long pair-bond requires both partners to practice a unique dance,[95] and the birds-of-paradise, where the breeding success of males depends on plumage and display quality.[96] Male birds can demonstrate their fitness through construction; females of weaver species, such as the Baya Weaver, may choose mates with good nest-building skills,[97] while bowerbirds attract mates through constructing bowers and decorating them with bright objects.[98]

In addition to visual communication, birds are renowned for their auditory skills. Calls, and in some species song, are the major means by which birds communicate with sound; though some birds use mechanical sounds, for example driving air thorugh their feathers, as do the Coenocorypha snipes of New Zealand,[99] the territorial drumming of woodpeckers,[45] or the use of tools to drum in Palm Cockatoos.[100] Bird calls and songs can be very complex; sounds are created in the syrinx, both sides of which, in some species, can be operated separately, resulting in two different songs being produced at the same time.[42]

Calls are used for a variety of purposes, several of which may be tied into an individual song.[101] They are used to advertise when seeking a mate, either to attract a mate, aid identification of potential mates or aid in bond formation (often with combined with visual communication). They can convey information about the quality of a male and aid in female choice.[102] They are used to claim and maintain territories. Calls can also be used to identify individuals, aiding parents in finding chicks in crowded colonies or adults reuniting with mates at the start of the breeding season.[103] Calls may be used to warn other birds of potential predators; calls of this nature may be detailed and convey specific information about the nature of the threat.[104]

Flocking

Red-billed Queleas, the most numerous species of bird,[105] form enormous flocks—sometimes tens of thousands strong.

While some birds are essentially territorial or live in small family groups, other birds often form large flocks. The benefits of aggregating in flocks are varied and flocks will form explicitly for specific purposes. Flocking also has costs, particularly to socially subordinate birds, which are bullied by more dominant birds; birds may also sacrifice feeding efficiency in a flock in order to gain other benefits.[106] The principal benefits are safety in numbers and increased foraging efficiency.[32] Defence against predators is particularly important in closed habitats such as forests where predation is often by ambush and early warning provided by multiple eyes is important, this has led to the development of many mixed-species feeding flocks.[107] These multi-species flocks are usually composed of small numbers of many species, increasing the benefits of numbers but reducing potential competition for resources. Birds also form associations with non-avian species; plunge diving seabirds associate with dolphins and tuna which push shoaling fish up towards the surface,[108] and a mutualistic relationship has evolved between Dwarf Mongooses and hornbills, where hornbills seek out mongooses in order to forage together, and warn each other of birds of prey and other predators.[109]

Resting and roosting

The high metabolic rates of birds during the active part of the day is supplemented by rest at other times. Sleeping birds often utilise a type of sleep known as vigilant sleep, where periods of rest are interspersed with quick eye-opening 'peeks' allowing birds to be sensitive to disturbance and enable rapid escape from threats.[110] It has been widely believed that swifts may sleep while flying, however this is not supported by experimental evidence. It is however suggested that there may be certain kinds of sleep which are possible even when in flight.[111]

Many sleeping birds bends their heads over their backs and tuck their bills in their back feathers, others cover their beaks among their breast feathers. Many birds rest on one leg, some may pull up their legs into their feathers, especially in cold weather. Communal roosting is common, it lowers the loss of body heat and decreases the risks associated with predators.[112] Roosting sites are often chosen with regard to thermoregulation and safety.[113]

Perching birds roost on twigs and their tarsal muscles have a ratchet mechanism that locks their toes.[citation needed] Many ground birds such as quails and pheasants roost in trees. A few parrots of the genus Loriculus roost hanging upside down.[114] Some Hummingbirds go into a nightly state of torpor with a reduction in their metabolic rates,[115] as around a hundred other species, including owlet-nightjars, nightjars, and woodswallows; [clarification needed] one species, the Common Poorwill, even enters a state of hibernation.[116]

Breeding

Social systems

Red-necked Phalaropes have an unusual polyandrous mating system where males care for the eggs and chicks and brightly coloured females compete for males.[117]

The vast majority (95%) of bird species are socially monogamous; although polygyny (2%) and polyandry (< 1%), polygamy, polygynandry (where a female pairs with several males and the male pairs with several females) and promiscuity systems also occur.[32] Some species may use more than one system depending on the circumstances. Monogamous species of males and females pair for the breeding season; in some cases, the pair bonds may persist for a number of years or even the lifetime of the pair.[118]

The advantage of monogamy for birds is bi-parental care. In most groups of animals, male parental care is rare, but in birds it is quite common; in fact, it is more extensive in birds than in any other vertebrate class.[32] In birds, male care can be seen as important or essential to female fitness; in some species the females are unable to successfully raise a brood without the help of the male.[119] Polygamous breeding systems arise when females are able to raise broods without the help of males.[32] There is sometimes a division of labour in monogamous species, with the roles of incubation, nest site defence, chick feeding and territory defence being either shared or undertaken by one sex.[120]

While social monogamy is common in birds, infidelity, in the form of extra-pair copulations, is common in many socially monogamous species.[121] These can take the form of forced copulation (or rape) in ducks and other anatids,[122] or more usually between dominant males and females partnered with subordinate males. It is thought that the benefit to females comes from getting better genes for her offspring, as well as an insurance against the possibility of infertility in the mate.[123] Males in species that engage in extra-pair copulations will engage in mate-guarding in order to ensure parentage of the offspring they raise.[124]

Breeding usually involves some form of courtship display, most often performed by the male.[125] Most are rather simple, and usually involve some type of song. Some displays can be quite elaborate, using such varied methods as tail and wing drumming, dancing, aerial flights, and communal leks depending on the species. Females are most often involved with partner selection,[126] although in the polyandrous phalaropes the males choose brightly coloured females.[127] Courtship feeding, billing and preening are commonly performed between partners, most often after birds have been paired and mated.[45]

Territories, nesting and incubation

Many birds actively defend a territory from others of the same species during the breeding season. Large territories are protected in order to protect the food source for their chicks. Species that are unable to defend feeding territories, such as seabirds and swifts, often breed in colonies instead; this is thought to offer protection from predators. Colonial breeders will defend small nesting sites, and competition between and within species for nesting sites can be intense.[128]

The nesting colonies of the Sociable Weaver are amongst the largest bird-created structures.

All birds lay amniotic eggs with hard shells made mostly of calcium carbonate.[32] The colour of eggs is controlled by a number of factors, those of hole and burrow nesting species tend to be white or pale, while those of open nesters such as Charadriiformes are camouflaged.[citation needed] There are many exceptions to this pattern, however; the ground nesting nightjars have pale eggs, camouflage being provided instead by the bird's plumage.[citation needed] Species that are victims of brood parasites like the Dideric Cuckoo will vary their egg colours in order to improve the chances of spotting a cuckoo's egg, and female cuckoos need to match their eggs to their hosts.[129]

The eggs are usually laid in a nest, which can be highly elaborate, like those created by weavers and oropendolas, or extremely primitive, like some albatrosses, which are no more than a scrape on the ground. Some species have no nest, the cliff nesting Common Guillemot lays its egg on bare rock and the egg of the Emperor Penguin is kept between the body and feet; this is especially prevalent in ground nesting species where the newly hatched young are precocial. Most species build more elaborate nests, which can be cups, domes, plates, beds scrapes, mounds or burrows.[130] Most nests are built in shelter and hidden to reduce the risk of predation, more open nests are usually colonial or built by larger birds capable of defending the nest. Nests are mostly built out of plant matter, some species specifically select plants such as yarrow which have chemicals that reduce nest parasites such as mites, leading to increased chick survival.[131] Nests are often lined with feathers in order to improve the retention of heat.[130]

Incubation, which regulates temperature to keep it optimum for chick development, usually begins after the last egg has been laid.[citation needed] Incubation duties are often shared in monogamous species; in polygamous species a singe parent undertakes all duties.[citation needed] Warmth from parents passes to the eggs through brood patches, areas of bare skin on the abdomen or breast of the incubating birds. Incubation can be an energetically demanding process, for example adult albatrosses lose as much as 83 g of body weight a day.[132] The warmth for the incubation of the eggs of megapodes comes from the sun, decaying vegetation or from volcanic sources.[133] Incubation periods last between 10 days (in species of woodpeckers, cuckoos and passerine birds) to over 80 days (in albatrosses and kiwis).[32]

Parental care and fledging

A female Seychelles Sunbird with arachnid prey attending its nest.

Chicks can be helpless or independent at hatching, or be at any stage in between. The helpless chicks are known as altricial, and tend to be born, small, naked and blind; chicks that are mobile and feathered at hatching are precocial, chicks can also be semi-precocial and semi-altricial. Altricial chicks require help in thermoregulation and need to be brooded for longer than precocial chicks.[citation needed]

The length and nature of parental care varies widely amongst different orders and species. At one extreme, parental care in megapodes ends at nest building; the newly-hatched chick digs itself out of the nest mound without parental assistance and can fend for itself immediately.[134] At the other extreme many seabirds have extended periods of parental care, the longest being Great Frigatebird, the chicks of which take up to six months to fledge and are fed by the parents for up to another 14 months.[135]

In some species the care of young is shared between both parents, in others it is the responsibility of just one sex. In some species other members of the same species will help the breeding pair in raising the young. These helpers are usually close relatives such as the chicks of the breeding pair from previous breeding seasons.[136] Alloparenting is particularly common in the corvids, but has been observed in as different species as the Rifleman, Red Kite and Australian Magpie.

This Reed Warbler is raising the young of a Common Cuckoo, a brood parasite

The point at which chicks fledge varies dramatically. The chicks of the Synthliboramphus murrelets, like the Ancient Murrelet, leave the nest the night after they hatch, following their parents calls out to sea, where they are raised away from terrestrial predators.[137] Some other species, especially ducks, move their chicks away from the nest at an early age.[citation needed] In most species chicks leave the nest soon after, or just before, they are able to fly.[citation needed] Parental care after fledging varies; in albatrosses chicks leave the nest alone and receive no further help, other species continue some supplementary feeding after fledging.[138] Chicks may also follow their parents during their first migration.[139]

Brood parasites

Although some insects and fish engage in brood parasitism, most brood parasites are birds.[140] Brood parasites are birds which lay their eggs in the nests of other birds. These eggs are often accepted and raised by the host species, often at the cost of their own brood. There are two kinds of brood parasite, obligate brood parasites, which are incapable of raising their own young and must lay their eggs in the nests of other species; and non-obligate brood parasites, which are capable of raising their own young but lay eggs in the nests of conspecifics in order to increase their reproductive output.[141] The most famous obligate brood parasites are the cuckoos, although in total 100 species of cuckoos, honeyguides, icterids, estrildid finches and ducks are obligate parasites.[140] Some brood parasites are adapted to hatching before their hosts and pushing their hosts eggs out of the nest, destroying the egg or killing their chicks, ensuring that all the food brought to the nest is fed to them.[142]

Ecology

File:Skua and penguin.jpeg
The South Polar Skua (left) is a generalist predator, taking the eggs of other birds, fish, carrion and other animals. This skua is attempting to push an Adelie Penguin (right) off its nest

The diverse food habits and life-histories of birds are associated with a range of ecological positions.[105] While some birds are generalists, others are highly specialized in their habitat or food requirements. Even within a habitat such as a forest, the niches occupied by different groups of birds are varied with some species using the forest canopy, others using the space under the canopy, while still others may use the branches and so on. In addition forest birds may be classified into different feeding guilds such as insectivores, frugivores and nectarivores. Aquatic birds show other food habits such as fishing, plant eating and piracy or kleptoparasitism. The birds of prey specialize in hunting mammals or other birds while the vultures have specialized as scavengers.

Some nectar-feeding birds are also important pollinators of plants and many frugivores play a key role in seed dispersal.[143] Numerous plants have adapted to using birds as their primary pollinators, and both flower and plant have coevolved together,[144] in some cases to the point where the flower's primary pollinator is the only species capable of reaching the nectar.[145]

Birds have important impacts on the ecology of islands. In many cases they reach islands that mammals do not, and in which they may fulfill ecological roles played by larger animals; for example in New Zealand the Moas were important browsers, as are the Kereru and Kokako today.[143] Today the plants of New Zealand retain the defensive adaptations evolved to protect them from the extinct moa.[146] Large concentrations of nesting seabirds also have an impact on the ecology of islands and the surrounding seas, principally through the concentration of large quantities of guano, which can have appreciable impacts on the richness of the local soil,[147] and of the surrounding seas.[148]

Relationship with humans

Industrial farming of chickens.

Birds are highly visible and common animals, and humans have had a long relationship with them. In some cases the relationship has been mutualistic, such as the cooperative relationship between honeyguides and tribesmen in obtaining honey,[149] or commensal, as found in the numerous species that benefit indirectly from human activities.[150] For example, the common pigeon or Rock Pigeon thrives in urban areas around the world. Human activities can also be detrimental, threatening some bird species with extinction.

Birds also effect humans. They can act as vectors for spreading diseases such as psittacosis, salmonellosis, campylobacteriosis, mycobacteriosis (avian tuberculosis), avian influenza (bird flu), giardiasis, and cryptosporidiosis over long distances. Some of these are zoonotic diseases that can also be transmitted to humans.[151] Birds are also commercially important pests on agricultural crops,[152] as well as posing a hazard to aviation through bird strikes.[153] They are also important food and income sources.

In some ecosystems, birds are at the apex of food chains making them very sensitive indicators of pollution.[154] The decline in bird populations in the US, as a result of pesticide use is a famous example.[155] Birds and their diversity have therefore been considered as good indicators of ecosystem health and, in the UK, bird diversity is used as one of 15 quality of life indicators.[156]

Economic importance

Birds are an important food source for humans. The most commonly eaten species is the domestic chicken and its eggs, as well as geese, pheasants, turkeys, ducks and quail. Hunting remains an important method of obtaining birds, as it has been throughout human history,[157] and has led to the extinction or endangerment of dozens of species.[158] However, muttonbirding in Australia and New Zealand is an example of an ongoing sustainable harvest of two seabird species.[159]

Besides meat and eggs, birds provide feathers for clothing, bedding and decoration, guano-derived phosphorus and nitrogen that is used in fertiliser and gunpowder, and the central ingredient of bird's nest soup.[160] In former times, the long wing feathers of geese and other birds were used as quills for writing, and the word pen is derived from the Latin for feather penna.[citation needed] Colourful birds (such as parrots, and mynas) are bred in captivity or kept as pets, and this practice has led to the illegal trafficking of some endangered species.[161] CITES, an international agreement adopted in 1963, has worked to reduce the trafficking in the bird species.

Cormorants used by fishermen in Southeast Asia. The practice is in steep decline but survives in some areas as a tourism attraction.

Other birds have long been used by humans to perform tasks; falcons for hunting, and cormorants to catch fish. Pigeons were used as a messenger as early as 1 AD, according to Pliny[citation needed] and played an important role as recently as World War II. Today, such activities are more common as a hobbies, or for entertainment and tourism,[162] or for sport including pigeon racing, which evolved from[citation needed] the tradition of messenger pigeons.

The scientific study of birds is called ornithology. Birds are among the most extensively studied of all animal groups; chickens and pigeons are popular as experimental subjects, and are often used in biology and comparative psychology research. Hundreds of academic journals and thousands of scientists[citation needed] are devoted to bird research, while amateur enthusiasts (called birdwatchers, twitchers or, more commonly, birders) number in the millions.[163] Many homeowners erect bird feeders near their homes to attract various species. Bird feeding has grown into a multimillion dollar industry; for example an estimated 75% of households in Britain provide food for birds at some point during the winter.[164]

Importance in religion, folklore and culture

Birds feature prominently in folklore, religion and popular culture, in which they fulfil a number of roles. In religion they may serve as messengers or priests and leaders for a deity, such as in the cult of Make-make where the Tangata manu (bird men) of Easter Island served as chiefs,[165] or as attendants, as in the case of Hugin and Munin, two Common Ravens which whisper news into the ears of the Norse god Odin.[166] They may also serve as religious symbols, for example the symbolism of Jonah as a dove (יוֹנָה), with its various associated meanings, fright, passivity, mourning and beauty.[167] Birds can themselves be deified, as occurred to the Common Peacock by the Dravidians of India, who perceived the peacock as Mother Earth.[168] Birds have also been perceived as monsters, including the legendary Roc[169] and the Māori legends about the Pouākai, a giant bird capable of snatching humans, based on the extinct Haast's Eagle.[170] In some parts of the world many birds are regarded with suspicion; in parts of Africa owls are associated with bad luck, witchcraft and death.[171]

Birds feature in culture and art and have done so since prehistoric times. Birds are represented in early cave paintings along with other animals.[172] Later birds came to be used in religious or symbolic art and design; among the most magnificent of these was the (now lost) Peacock Throne of the Mughal and Persian emperors of India.[173] With the advent of scientific interest in birds many paintings of birds were commissioned for books, amongst the most famous bird artists was John James Audubon, whose paintings of North American birds were a great commercial success in Europe and who later lent his name to the National Audubon Society.[174] Birds are also important in poetry; Homer incorporated Nightingales into the Odyssey, and poets have continued to use that species ever since.[175] The relationship between an albatross and a sailor is the central theme of Samuel Taylor Coleridge's The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, the significance of which has increased with the adoption of the term as a metaphor for a 'burden'.[176] Birds serve as other metaphors in the English language, for example vulture funds and vulture investors, where vultures are perceived as unpleasant and possibly unethical.[177] Perceptions of individual bird species vary from culture to culture; while owls are considered bad luck in some parts of Africa they are regarded as wise across much of Europe,[178] and Hoopoes were considered sacred in Ancient Egypt, symbols of virtue in Persia, thieves across much of Europe and harbingers of war in Scandinavia.[179]

Conservation

This Black-browed Albatross has been hooked on a long-line. This type of fishing threatens 19 of the 21 species of albatross, three critically so.

Humans have had a large impact on many bird species. Human activities have in some cases allowed some species to dramatically expand their natural ranges, in other species ranges have decreased and have even resulted in many extinction. Over a hundred species have gone extinct in historical times,[180] although the most dramatic human caused extinctions occurred in the Pacific Ocean as people colonised the islands of Melanesia, Polynesia and Micronesia, during which an estimated 750–1800 species of bird went extinct.[181] Many bird populations are currently declining worldwide, with 1,221 species listed as threatened by Birdlife International and the IUCN.[182] The biggest cited reason surrounds habitat loss.[183] Other threats include overhunting, accidental mortality due to structural collisions and as long-line fishing bycatch,[184] pollution (including oil spills and pesticide use),[185] competition and predation by nonnative invasive species,[186] and climate change. Governments, along with numerous conservation charities, work to protect birds, either through laws to protect birds, preserving and restoring bird habitat or establishing captive populations for reintroductions. The efforts of conservation biology have met with some success, a study estimated that between 1994 and 2004 16 species of bird that would otherwise have gone extinct were saved.[187]

References

  1. ^ Del Hoyo, Josep, Andy Elliott & Jordi Sargatal (1992). Handbook of the Birds of the World Vol 1. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, ISBN 84-87334-10-5
  2. ^ Template:La icon Linnaeus, Carolus (1758). [[Systema Naturae|Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata]]. Holmiae. (Laurentii Salvii). p. 824. {{cite book}}: URL–wikilink conflict (help)
  3. ^ a b Livezey BC, Zusi RL (2007). Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 149 (1), 1–95. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x
  4. ^ Padian K, Chiappe LM (1997). "Bird Origins". In Currie PJ & Padian K (ed.). Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 41–96.
  5. ^ Gauthier, J (1986). "Saurischian Monophyly and the origin of birds". In K. Padian (ed.). The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight. Mem. California Acad. Sci 8. pp. 1–55.
  6. ^ Clements, James (2007). The Clements Checklist of Birds of the World. Cornell University Press ISBN 978-0801445019
  7. ^ Gill, Frank & Minturn Wright (2006). Birds of the World: Recommended English Names. Princeton University Press ISBN 978-0-691-12827-6
  8. ^ Paul G (2002). "Looking for the True Bird Ancestor", pp. 171–224. In Dinosaurs of the Air, The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore ISBN 0-8018-6763-0
  9. ^ Norell M, Ellison M (2005). Unearthing the Dragon, The Great Feathered Dinosaur Discovery Pi Press, New York, ISBN 0-13-186266-9
  10. ^ Zhou Z (2004). The origin and early evolution of birds: discoveries, disputes, and perspectives from fossil evidence. Die Naturwissenschaften 91 (10): 455–71.
  11. ^ Paul G (2002). "Were some Dinosaurs Also Neoflightless Birds?" pp. 224–58. In Dinosaurs of the Air, The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore ISBN 0-8018-6763-0
  12. ^ Rasskin-Gutman D, Buscalioni A (2001). "Theoretical morphology of the Archosaur (Reptilia: Diapsida) pelvic girdle" Paleobiology 27 (1): 59–78
  13. ^ Feduccia A, Lingham-Soliar T, Hinchliffe JR (2005). Do feathered dinosaurs exist? Testing the hypothesis on neontological and paleontological evidence. Journal of Morphology 266 (2): 125–66. PMID 16217748
  14. ^ Prum R (2003). "Are Current Critiques Of The Theropod Origin Of Birds Science? Rebuttal To Feduccia 2002" The Auk 120 (2): 550–61
  15. ^ a b c d e Chiappe LM (2007). Glorified Dinosaurs: The Origin and Early Evolution of Birds, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd., 263pp.
  16. ^ Clarke J (2004). Morphology, Phylogenetic Taxonomy, and Systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis (Avialae: Ornithurae) (PDF). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 286: 1–179
  17. ^ Clarke JA, Tambussi CP, Noriega JI, Erickson GM, Ketcham RA (2005). Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature 433: 305–308. doi:10.1038/nature03150 PMID 15662422PDF fulltext Supporting information
  18. ^ van Tuinen M, Sibley C, Blair Hedges S (1998). "Phylogeny and Biogeography of Ratite Birds Inferred from DNA Sequences of the Mitochondrial Ribosomal Genes" Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15 (4): 370–376. PMID 9549088
  19. ^ a b c Ericson PGP, Anderson CL, Britton T, et al. (2006). "Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils" (PDF). Biology Letters 2 (4): 543–47. PMID 17148284
  20. ^ Brown JB, Payne RB, Mindell DP (2006). "Nuclear DNA does not reconcile 'rocks' and 'clocks' in Neoaves: a comment on Ericson et al. Biology Letters 3 1–3. PMID 17389215
  21. ^ Newton, Ian (2003). The Speciation and Biogeogrpahy of Birds ISBN 0-12-517375-X, p. 463
  22. ^ Weir J, Schulter D (2007). "The Latitudinal Gradient in Recent Speciation and Extinction Rates of Birds and Mammals" Science 315 (5818): 1574–76. PMID 17363673
  23. ^ Brooke M (2004). Albatrosses And Petrels Across The World: Procellariidae. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ISBN 0-19-850125-0
  24. ^ Schreiber EA, Burger J (2001). Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7
  25. ^ Sato K, Naito Y, Kato A, et al. (2002). "Buoyancy and maximal diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume?" Journal of Experimental Biology 205 (9): 1189–97. PMID 11948196
  26. ^ Hill DA, Robertson P (1988). The pheasant: ecology, management, and conservation BSP Prof. Books, Oxford, UK.
  27. ^ Spreyer MF, Bucher EH (1998). Monk Parakeet ("Myiopsitta monachus"). In The Birds of North America, No. 322 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
  28. ^ Arendt W (1988). "Range Expansion of the Cattle Egret,(Bubulcus ibis) in the Greater Caribbean Basin" Colonial Waterbirds 11 (2): 252–62. doi:10.2307/1521007
  29. ^ Bierregaard RO (1994). "Yellow-headed Caracara" in Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 2; New World Vultures to Guineafowl (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-873337-15-6
  30. ^ Juniper T, Parr M (1998). Parrots: A Guide to the Parrots of the World, London: Christopher Helm, ISBN 0-7136-6933-0
  31. ^ Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988). Adaptations for Flight. Based on The Birder's Handbook (Paul Ehrlich, David Dobkin, and Darryl Wheye. 1988. Simon and Schuster, New York. Retrieved on July 14 2007.
  32. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Gill F (1995). Ornithology WH Freeman and Company, New York ISBN 0-7167-2415-4 Cite error: The named reference "Gill" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  33. ^ The Avian Skeleton. paulnoll.com. Retrieved on 2007-09-13.
  34. ^ Skeleton of a typical bird. Fernbank Science Center's Ornithology Web. Retrieved on 2007-09-14.
  35. ^ Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988). Bird essays. Drinking. Birds of Stanford. Retrieved on 2007-09-13.
  36. ^ Tsahar E, Martínez del Rio C, Izhaki I, Arad Z (2005). "Can birds be ammonotelic? Nitrogen balance and excretion in two frugivores". J. Exp. Biol. 208 (Pt 6): 1025–34. doi:10.1242/jeb.01495. PMID 15767304.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. ^ Preest MR, Beuchat CA (1997). Ammonia excretion by hummingbirds. Nature 386, 561–62. doi:10.1038/386561a0
  38. ^ Mora J, Martuscelli J, Ortiz-Pineda J, Soberon G (1965). "The Regulation of Urea-Biosynthesis Enzymes in Vertebrates" (PDF). Biochemical Journal 96:28–35 PMID 14343146
  39. ^ Packard GC (1966). "The Influence of Ambient Temperature and Aridity on Modes of Reproduction and Excretion of Amniote Vertebrates". The American Naturalist. 100 (916):667–82
  40. ^ Balgooyen T (1971). "Pellet Regurgitation by Captive Sparrow Hawks (Falco sparverius)" Condor 73 (3): 382–85. doi:10.2307/1365774
  41. ^ Maina JN (2006). "Development, structure, and function of a novel respiratory organ, the lung-air sac system of birds: to go where no other vertebrate has gone" Biological Reviews 81 (4): 545–79. PMID 17038201
  42. ^ a b Suthers RA, Zollinger SA (2004). "Producing song: the vocal apparatus" Behavioral Neurobiology of Birdsong, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1016: 109–29. PMID 15313772
  43. ^ Scott RB (1966). "Comparative hematology: The phylogeny of the erythrocyte". Annals of Hematology. 12 (6): 340–51. PMID 5325853
  44. ^ Gionfriddo JP, Best LB (1995). "Grit Use by House Sparrows: Effects of Diet and Grit Size". Condor 97 (1): 57–67. doi:10.2307/1368983 Full-text PDF
  45. ^ a b c d Attenborough, D (1998). The Life of Birds, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-01633-X
  46. ^ a b Battley PF, Piersma T, Dietz MW, Tang S, Dekinga A, Hulsman K (2000). "Empirical evidence for differential organ reductions during trans-oceanic bird flight". Proc Biol Sci. 267 (1439):191–5. PMID 10687826 Erratum in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 267 (1461):2567.
  47. ^ White CR, Day N, Butler PJ, Martin GR (2007). "Vision and Foraging in Cormorants: More like Herons than Hawks?" PLoS ONE. 25;2(7):e639 PMID 17653266
  48. ^ Martin GR, Katzir G (1999). "Visual fields in short-toed eagles, Circaetus gallicus (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds". Brain Behaviour and Evolution 53 (2): 55–66. PMID 9933782
  49. ^ Sales J (2005). "The endangered kiwi: a review". Folia Zoologica 54 (1–2): 1–20. Full-text PDF
  50. ^ Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D. "The Avian Sense of Smell". Stanford Birds. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessmonthday= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  51. ^ Lequette B, Verheyden C, Jowentin P (1989). "Olfaction in Subantarctic seabirds: Its phylogenetic and ecological significance". The Condor 91: 732–35. PDF
  52. ^ Wilkie S, Vissers P, Das D, de Grip W, Bowmaker J, Hunt D (1998). "The molecular basis for UV vision in birds: spectral characteristics, cDNA sequence and retinal localization of the UV-sensitive visual pigment of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus)". Biochemical Journal 330: 541–47. PMID 9461554
  53. ^ Andersson S, Ornborg J, Andersson M (1998). "Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits". Proc. Biol. Sci. 265 (1395): 445–50. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0315.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. ^ Viitala J, Korpimaki E, Polakangas P, Koivula M (1995). "Attraction of kestrels to vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet light". Nature. 373 (6513): 425–27. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  55. ^ Williams DL, Flach E (2003). "Symblepharon with aberrant protrusion of the nictitating membrane in the snowy owl (Nyctea scandiaca)" Veterinary Ophthalmology 6 (1): 11–3. PMID 12641836
  56. ^ Saito N (1978). "Physiology and anatomy of avian ear". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64 (1) doi:10.1121/1.2004193
  57. ^ Warham J (1976). "The Incidence, Function and ecological significance of petrel stomach oils." Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society 24 84–93. PDF
  58. ^ Dumbacher JP, Beehler B, Spande T, Garraffo H, Daly J (1992). "Homobatrachotoxin in the genus Pitohui: chemical defense in birds?". Science 258 (5083): 799–801. PMID 1439786
  59. ^ Walther BA, Clayton DH (2005). "Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high maintenance handicaps". Behavioural Ecology 16 (1):89–95. doi:10.1093/beheco/arh135
  60. ^ Shawkey M, Pillai S, Hill G, (2003). "Chemical warfare? Effects of uropygial oil on feather-degrading bacteria". Journal of Avian Biology 34 (4): 345–49. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2003.03193.x
  61. ^ Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1986). "The Adaptive Significance of Anting". The Auk 103 (4): 835.PDF.
  62. ^ Humphrey P, Parkes K (1959). "An approach to the study of molts and plumage". The Auk 76: 1–31. PDF.
  63. ^ de Beer SJ, Lockwood GM, Raijmakers JHFS, Raijmakers JMH, Scott WA, Oschadleus HD, Underhill LG (2001). SAFRING Bird Ringing Manual. SAFRING.
  64. ^ Mayr E, Mayr M (1954). "The tail molt of small owls". The Auk 71 (2): 172–78. PDF
  65. ^ Turner JS (1997). "On the thermal capacity of a bird's egg warmed by a brood patch". Physiological Zoology 70 (4): 470–80. PMID 9237308
  66. ^ Roots C (2006). Flightless Birds Greenwood Press ISBN 978-0313335457
  67. ^ McNab B (1994). "Energy Conservation and the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds". The American Naturalist, 144 (4): 628–42.
  68. ^ Kovacs C, Meyers R (2000). "Anatomy and histochemistry of flight muscles in a wing-propelled diving bird, the Atlantic Puffin, Fratercula arctica". Journal of Morphology 244 (2): 109–25. Abstract
  69. ^ Robert M, McNeil R, Leduc A (1989). "Conditions and significance of night feeding in shorebirds and other water birds in a tropical lagoon." Auk 106 (1) 94–101. PDF
  70. ^ Roberts WM (1995). "Hummingbird licking behavior and the energetics of nectar feeding." The Auk 112 (2): 456–63. PDF
  71. ^ Gill FB, Wolf LL (1979). "Nectar loss by Golden-winged Sunbirds to competitors." The Auk 96 (3): 448–61. PDF
  72. ^ Paton DC, Collins BG (1989). "Bills and tongues of nectar-feeding birds: A review of morphology,function, and performance, with intercontinental comparisons." Aust. J. Ecol. 14 473–506.
  73. ^ Baker M , Baker A (1973). "Niche Relationships Among Six Species of Shorebirds on Their Wintering and Breeding Ranges." Ecological Monographs, 43 (2): 193–212. doi:10.2307/1942194
  74. ^ Jenkin P (1957). "The Filter-Feeding and Food of Flamingoes (Phoenicopteri)." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 240 (674) 401–93. Abstract
  75. ^ Miyazaki M (1996). "Vegetation cover, kleptoparasitism by diurnal gulls and timing of arrival of nocturnal Rhinocereros Auklets." The Auk 113 (3) 698–702
  76. ^ Belisle M, Giroux JF (1995). "Predation and kleptoparasitism by migrating Parasitic Jaegers." The Condor 97 (3). PDF
  77. ^ Vickery J, Brooke M (1994). "The Kleptoparasitic Interactions between Great Frigatebirds and Masked Boobies on Henderson Island, South Pacific." The Condor 96: 331–40. PDF
  78. ^ Hiraldo F, Blanco JC, Bustamante J (1991). "Unspecialized exploitation of small carcasses by birds." Bird Studies 38 (3): 200–207.
  79. ^ Sakai HF, Ralph CJ, Jenkins CD (1986). "Foraging ecology of the Hawaiian Crow, an endangered generalist." The Condor 88 (2) 211–19. PDF
  80. ^ Beissinger S (1983). "Hunting behaviour, prey selection and energetics of Snail Kites in Guyana: consumer choice by a specialist." The Auk 100 (1) 84–92. PDF
  81. ^ Klaassen M (1996). "Metabolic constraints on long-distance migration in birds." Journal of Experimental Biology, 199 (1) 57–64. PMID 9317335
  82. ^ BirdLife International (2007). Long-distance Godwit sets new record. Retrieved 14 April 2007.
  83. ^ Shaffer SA, Tremblay Y, Weimerskirch H, et al. (2006) "Migratory shearwaters integrate oceanic resources across the Pacific Ocean in an endless summer." Proc Natl Acad Sci. 103 (34): 12799–802. PMID 16908846
  84. ^ Croxall JP, Silk JRD, Phillips RA, Afanasyev V, Briggs DR (2005). "Global Circumnavigations: Tracking year-round ranges of nonbreeding Albatrosses." Science 307: 249–50. PMID 15653503
  85. ^ Wilson WH Jr. (1999). "Bird feeding and irruptions of northern finches:are migrations short stopped?" North America Bird Bander 24 (4): 113–21. PDF
  86. ^ Nilsson AK, Alerstam T, Nilsson JA (2006). "Do partial and regular migrants differ in their responses to weather?" The Auk 123 (2): 537–47
  87. ^ Chan K (2001). "Partial migration in Australian landbirds: a review." Emu 101 (4): 281–92
  88. ^ Rabenold KN, Rabenold PP(1985). "Variation in Altitudinal Migration, Winter Segregation, and Site Tenacity in two subspecies of Dark-eyed Juncos in the southern Appalachians." The Auk 102 (4): 805–19. PDF
  89. ^ Collar N (1997). "Family Psittacidae (Parrots)" in Handbook of the Birds of the World Volume 4; Sandgrouse to Cuckoos (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions: Barcelona. ISBN 84-87334-22-9
  90. ^ Matthews GVT, (1953). "Navigation in the Manx Shearwater." Journal of Experimental Biology 30 (3): 370–96 Full text
  91. ^ Mouritsen H, Larsen O (2001). "Migrating songbirds tested in computer-controlled Emlen funnels use stellar cues for a time-independent compass." Journal of Experimental Biology 204 (8) 3855–65. PMID 11807103
  92. ^ Deutschlander M, Phillips J, Borland S (1999). "The case for light-dependent magnetic orientation in animals." Journal of Experimental Biology 202 (8): 891–908. PMID 10085262
  93. ^ Mùller A (1988). "Badge size in the house sparrow Passer domesticus." Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22 (5): 373–378.
  94. ^ Thomas BT, Strahl SD (1990). "Nesting Behavior of Sunbitterns (Eurypyga helias) in Venezuela." The Condor 92 (3): 576–81. PDF
  95. ^ Pickering SPC, Berrow SD (2001). "Courtship behaviour of the Wandering Albatross Diomedea exulans at Bird Island, South Georgia." Marine Ornithology 29: 29–37. PDF
  96. ^ Pruett-Jones SG, Pruett-Jones MA (1990). "Sexual Selection Through Female Choice in Lawes' Parotia, A Lek-Mating Bird of Paradise." Evolution 44 (3): 486–501. doi:10.2307/2409431
  97. ^ Quader S (2006). "What makes a good nest? Benefits of nest choice to female Baya Weavers (Ploceus philippinus)." The Auk 123 (2): 475–86. Full text.
  98. ^ Humphries S, Ruxton GD (1999). "Bower-building: coevolution of display traits in response to the costs of female choice?" Ecology Letters 2 (6): 404–13. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00102.x
  99. ^ Miskelly CM (1987). "The identity of the hakawai." Notornis 34 (2): 95–116. PDF fulltext
  100. ^ Murphy S, Legge S, Heinsohn R (2003). "The breeding biology of palm cockatoos (Probosciger aterrimus): a case of a slow life history." Journal of Zoology 261: 327–39. doi:10.1017/S0952836903004175
  101. ^ Brenowitz EA, Margoliash D, Nordeen KW (1998). "An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system." Journal of Neurobiology 35 (5): 495–500. PMID 9369455
  102. ^ Genevois F, Bretagnolle V (1994). "Male Blue Petrels reveal their body mass when calling." Ethology Ecology & Evolution 6 (3): 377–83.
  103. ^ Jouventin P, Aubin T, Lengagne T (1999). "Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition." Animal Behaviour 57 (6): 1175–83. PMID 10373249
  104. ^ Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K (2005)/ "Allometry of Alarm Calls: Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size." Science 308 (5730) 1934–37. PMID 15976305
  105. ^ a b Sekercioglu CH (2006). "Foreword" in Handbook of the Birds of the World, vol. 11: Old World Flycatchers to Old World Warblers (eds. Josep del Hoyo, Andrew Elliott & David Christie) Barcelona:Lynx Edicions p. 48, ISBN 84-96553-06-X
  106. ^ Hutto R (1988). "Foraging Behavior Patterns Suggest a Possible Cost Associated with Participation in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks." Oikos 51 (1): 79–83. doi:10.2307/3565809
  107. ^ Terborgh J (2005). "Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: Costs and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys." American Journal of Primatology 21 (2): 87–100. PDF
  108. ^ Au DWK, Pitman RL (1986). "Seabird interactions with Dolphins and Tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific." The Condor, 88: 304–17. PDF
  109. ^ Anne O, Rasa E (1983). "Dwarf mongoose and hornbill mutualism in the Taru desert, Kenya." Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12 (3): 181–90. PDF
  110. ^ Gauthier-Clerc M, Tamisier A, Cezilly F (2000). "Sleep-Vigilance Trade-off in Gadwall during the Winter Period." The Condor 102 (2): 307–13 .PDF
  111. ^ Rattenborg N (2006). "Do birds sleep in flight?". Die Naturwissenschaften. 93 (9): 413–25.
  112. ^ Beauchamp G (1999). "The evolution of communal roosting in birds: origin and secondary losses." Behavioural Ecology 10 (6): 675–87. Abstract
  113. ^ Buttemer W (1985). "Energy relations of winter roost-site utilization by American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis)." Oecologia 68 (1): 126–32. PDF
  114. ^ Buckley FG, Buckley PA (1968). "Upside-down Resting by Young Green-Rumped Parrotlets (Forpus passerinus)." The Condor 70 (1):89 doi:10.2307/1366517
  115. ^ Carpenter FL (1974.) "Torpor in an Andean Hummingbird: Its Ecological Significance." Science 183 (4124): 545–47. PMID 17773043
  116. ^ McKechnie A, Ashdown R, Christian M, Brigham R (2007). "Torpor in an African caprimulgid, the freckled nightjar Caprimulgus tristigma." Journal of Avian Biology 38 (3): 261–66. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.04116.x
  117. ^ Warnock, Nils & Sarah (2001). "Sandpipers, Phalaropes and Allies" in The Sibley Guide to Bird Life and Behaviour (eds Chris Elphick, John B. Dunning, Jr & David Sibley) London: Christopher Helm, ISBN 0-7136-6250-6
  118. ^ Freed (1987) "The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?" The American Naturalist 130 (4): 507–25. Abstract
  119. ^ Gowaty PA (1983). "Male Parental Care and Apparent Monogamy among Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis)". The American Naturalist. 121 (2): 149–60.
  120. ^ Cockburn A (2006). "Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds." Proc. R. Soc. B 273:(1592) 1375–83. PMID 16777726
  121. ^ Westneat DF, Stewart IRK (2003). "Extra-pair paternity in birds: Causes, correlates, and conflict." Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 365-396. PDF
  122. ^ Gowaty PA, Buschhaus N (1998). "Ultimate causation of aggressive and forced copulation in birds: Female resistance, the CODE hypothesis, and social monogamy." American Zoologist 38 (1): 207–25
  123. ^ Sheldon B (1994). "Male Phenotype, Fertility, and the Pursuit of Extra-Pair Copulations by Female Birds." Proceedings: Biological Sciences 257 (1348): 25–30. Abstract
  124. ^ Wei G, Yin Z, Lei F (2005). "Copulations and mate guarding of the Chinese Egret." Waterbirds 28 (4): 527–30. Abstract
  125. ^ Short, Lester L (1993). Birds of the World and their Behavior, Henry Holt and Co., ISBN 0-8050-1952-9
  126. ^ Burton R (1985). Bird Behavior, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., ISBN 0-394-53857-5
  127. ^ Schamel D, Tracy DM, Lank DB, Westneat DF (2004). "Mate guarding, copulation strategies and paternity in the sex-role reversed, socially polyandrous red-necked phalarope Phalaropus lobatus." Behaviour Ecology and Sociobiology 57 (2): 110–18. PDF
  128. ^ Kokko H, Harris M, Wanless S (2004). "Competition for breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalge." Journal of Animal Ecology 73 (2): 367–76. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00813.x
  129. ^ Booker L, Booker M (1991). "Why Are Cuckoos Host Specific?" Oikos 57 (3): 301–09. doi:10.2307/3565958
  130. ^ a b Hansell M (2000). Bird Nests and Construction Behaviour. University of Cambridge Press ISBN 0-521-46038-7
  131. ^ Lafuma L, Lambrechts M, Raymond M (2001). "Aromatic plants in bird nests as a protection against blood-sucking flying insects?" Behavioural Processes 56 (2) 113–20. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00191-7
  132. ^ Warham, J. (1990) The Petrels - Their Ecology and Breeding Systems London: Academic Press
  133. ^ Jones DN, Dekker, René WRJ, Roselaar, Cees S (1995). The Megapodes. Bird Families of the World 3. Oxford University Press: Oxford. ISBN 0-19-854651-3
  134. ^ Elliot A (1994). "Family Megapodiidae (Megapodes)" in Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 2; New World Vultures to Guineafowl (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-873337-15-6
  135. ^ Metz VG, Schreiber EA (2002). "Great Frigatebird (Fregata minor)" In The Birds of North America, No 681, (Poole, A. & Gill, F., eds) The Birds of North America Inc:Philadelphia
  136. ^ Ekman J (2006). "Family living amongst birds." Journal of Avian Biology 37 (4): 289–98. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03666.x
  137. ^ Gaston AJ (1994). Ancient Murrelet (Synthliboramphus antiquus). In The Birds of North America, No. 132 (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences; Washington, D.C.: The American Ornithologists' Union.
  138. ^ Schaefer HC, Eshiamwata GW, Munyekenye FB, Bohning-Gaese K (2004). "Life-history of two African Sylvia warblers: low annual fecundity and long post-fledging care." Ibis 146 (3): 427–37. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00276.x
  139. ^ Alonso JC, Bautista LM, Alonso JA (2004). "Family-based territoriality vs flocking in wintering common cranes Grus grus." Journal of Avian Biology 35 (5): 434–44. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03290.x
  140. ^ a b Davies N (2000). Cuckoos, Cowbirds and other Cheats. T. & A. D. Poyser: London ISBN 0-85661-135-2
  141. ^ Sorenson M (1997). "Effects of intra- and interspecific brood parasitism on a precocial host, the canvasback, Aythya valisineria." Behavioral Ecology 8 (2) 153–61. PDF
  142. ^ Spottiswoode C, Colebrook-Robjent J (2007). "Egg puncturing by the brood parasitic Greater Honeyguide and potential host counteradaptations." Behavioral Ecology doi:10.1093/beheco/arm025
  143. ^ a b Clout M, Hay J (1989). "The importance of birds as browsers, pollinators and seed dispersers in New Zealand forests." New Zealand Journal of Ecology 12 27–33 PDF
  144. ^ Stiles F (1981). "Geographical Aspects of Bird-Flower Coevolution, with Particular Reference to Central America." Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68 (2) 323–51. doi:10.2307/2398801
  145. ^ Temeles E, Linhart Y, Masonjones M, Masonjones H (2002). "The Role of Flower Width in Hummingbird Bill Length–Flower Length Relationships." Biotropica 34 (1): 68–80. PDF
  146. ^ Bond W, Lee W, Craine J (2004). "Plant structural defences against browsing birds: a legacy of New Zealand's extinct moas." Oikos 104 (3), 500–08. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12720.x
  147. ^ Wainright S, Haney J, Kerr C, Golovkin A, Flint M (1998). "Utilization of nitrogen derived from seabird guano by terrestrial and marine plants at St. Paul, Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska." Marine Ecology 131 (1) 63–71. PDF
  148. ^ Bosman A, Hockey A (1986). "Seabird guano as a determinant of rocky intertidal community structure." Marine Ecology Progress Series 32: 247–57 PDF
  149. ^ Dean W, Siegfried R, MacDonald I (1990). "The Fallacy, Fact, and Fate of Guiding Behavior in the Greater Honeyguide." Conservation Biology 4 (1) 99–101. PDF
  150. ^ Singer R, Yom-Tov Y (1988). "The Breeding Biology of the House Sparrow Passer domesticus in Israel." Ornis Scandinavica 19 139–44. doi:10.2307/3676463
  151. ^ Reed KD, Meece JK, Henkel JS, Shukla SK (2003). "Birds, Migration and Emerging Zoonoses: West Nile Virus, Lyme Disease, Influenza A and Enteropathogens." Clin Med Res. 1 (1):5–12. PMID 15931279
  152. ^ Dolbeer R (1990). "Ornithology and integrated pest management: Red-winged blackbirds Agleaius phoeniceus and corn." Ibis 132 (2): 309–22.
  153. ^ Dolbeer R, Belant J, Sillings J (1993). "Shooting Gulls Reduces Strikes with Aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport." Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 442–50. Abstract
  154. ^ Kahle S, Becker PH (1999). "Bird blood as bioindicator for mercury in the environment." Chemosphere. 39 (14):2451–7. PMID 10581697
  155. ^ National Resources Defence Council (1997). The story of silent spring. Retrieved on September 14 2007
  156. ^ Gregory RD, Noble D, Field R, Marchant J, Raven M, Gibbons DW (2003). "Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. Ornis Hung. 12–13: 11–24. PDF
  157. ^ Simeone A, Navarro X (2002). "Human exploitation of seabirds in coastal southern Chile during the mid-Holocene." Rev. chil. hist. nat 75 (2): 423–31
  158. ^ Keane A, Brooke MD, Mcgowan PJK (2005). "Correlates of extinction risk and hunting pressure in gamebirds (Galliformes)." Biological Conservation 126 (2): 216–33. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.011
  159. ^ Hamilton S (2000). "How precise and accurate are data obtained using. an infra-red scope on burrow-nesting sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus?" Marine Ornithology 28 (1): 1–6 PDF
  160. ^ Koon L, Earl of Cranbrook (2002). Swiftlets of Borneo:Builders of Edible Nests Natural History Publications (Borneo) ISBN 983-812-060x
  161. ^ Cooney R, Jepson P (2006). "The international wild bird trade: what's wrong with blanket bans?" Oryx 40 (1): 18–23. PDF
  162. ^ Manzi M (2002). "Cormorant fishing in Southwestern China: a Traditional Fishery under Siege. (Geographical Field Note)." Geographic Review 92 (4): 597–603.
  163. ^ Pullis La Rouche, G. (2006). Birding in the United States: a demographic and economic analysis. Waterbirds around the world. Eds. G.C. Boere, C.A. Galbraith & D.A. Stroud. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK. pp. 841–46. PDF
  164. ^ Chamberlain DE, Vickery JA, Glue DE, Robinson RA, Conway GJ, Woodburn RJW, Cannon AR (2005). "Annual and seasonal trends in the use of garden feeders by birds in winter." Ibis 147 (3): 563–75. PDF
  165. ^ Routledge S, Routledge K (1917). "The Bird Cult of Easter Island." Folklore 28 (4): 337-355.
  166. ^ Chappell J (2006). "Living with the Trickster: Crows, Ravens, and Human Culture." PLoS Biol 4 (1):e14. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040014
  167. ^ Hauser A (1985). "Jonah: In Pursuit of the Dove." Journal of Biblical Literature 104 (1): 21–37. doi:10.2307/3260591
  168. ^ Nair P (1974). "The Peacock Cult in Asia." Asian Folklore Studies 33 (2): 93–170. doi:10.2307/1177550
  169. ^ Wittkower R (1938). "'Roc': An Eastern Prodigy in a Dutch Engraving." Journal of the Warburg Institute 1 (3): 255–57. doi:10.2307/750014
  170. ^ Tennyson A, Martinson P (2006). Extinct Birds of New Zealand Te Papa Press, Wellington ISBN 978-0-909010-21-8
  171. ^ Enriquez PL, Mikkola H (1997). "Comparative study of general public owl knowledge in Costa Rica, Central America and Malawi, Africa." Pp. 160–66 In: J.R. Duncan, D.H. Johnson, T.H. Nicholls, (Eds). Biology and conservation of owls of the Northern Hemisphere. General Technical Report NC-190, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, Minnesota. 635 pp.
  172. ^ Meighan C (1966). "Prehistoric Rock Paintings in Baja California." American Antiquity 31 (3): 372–92. doi:10.2307/2694739
  173. ^ Clarke CP (1908). "A Pedestal of the Platform of the Peacock Throne." The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 3 (10): 182–83. doi:10.2307/3252550
  174. ^ Boime A (1999). "John James Audubon, a birdwatcher's fanciful flights." Art History 22 (5) 728–55. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.00184
  175. ^ Chandler A (1934). "The Nightingale in Greek and Latin Poetry." The Classical Journal 30 (2): 78–84.
  176. ^ Lasky E (1992). "A Modern Day Albatross: The Valdez and Some of Life's Other Spills." The English Journal, 81 (3): 44–46. doi:10.2307/820195
  177. ^ Carson A (1998). "Vulture Investors, Predators of the 90s: An Ethical Examination." Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5): 543–55. PDF
  178. ^ Lewis DP (2005). Owls in Mythology and Culture. The Owl Pages. Retrieved on September 15 2007.
  179. ^ Dupree N (1974). "An Interpretation of the Role of the Hoopoe in Afghan Folklore and Magic." Folklore 85 (3): 173–93.
  180. ^ Fuller E (2000). Extinct Birds (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. ISBN 0-19-850837-9
  181. ^ Steadman D (2006). Extinction and Biogeography in Tropical Pacific Birds, University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-77142-7
  182. ^ Birdlife International (2007). 1,221 and counting: More birds than ever face extinction. Retrieved on 3 June 2007.
  183. ^ Norris K, Pain D (eds) (2002). Conserving Bird Biodiversity: General Principles and their Application Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521789493
  184. ^ Brothers NP (1991). "Albatross mortality and associated bait loss in the Japanese longline fishery in the southern ocean." Biological Conservation 55: 255–68.
  185. ^ Wurster D, Wurster C, Strickland W (1965). "Bird Mortality Following DDT Spray for Dutch Elm Disease." Ecology 46 (4): 488–99. doi:10.1126/science.148.3666.90
  186. ^ Blackburn T, Cassey P, Duncan R, Evans K, Gaston K (2004). "Avian Extinction and Mammalian Introductions on Oceanic Islands." Science 305: 1955–58. doi:10.1126/science.1101617
  187. ^ Butchart S, Stattersfield A, Collar N (2006). "How many bird extinctions have we prevented?" Oryx 40 (3): 266–79 PDF

External links

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA