User talk:Lihaas

Welcome!

Hello, Lihaas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!  S3000  ☎ 17:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Imphal Bombing

Lihaas, the edit made by me was disputing the source of your news source article 10. You can visit the website yourself and see that there is no information about the
owners themselves. You are welcome to leave me a explanation.
amresh2k's talk page —Preceding undated comment was added at 06:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC).

Archive 1

Friedman fixed

Please remove banner. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.219.38.245 (talk) 17:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Reporting vandalism

Hi Lihaas, yes, I reported that editor at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. For future reference you can follow the instructions there for reporting repeated vandalism, should you find any. Thanks for helping deal with vandalism on Wikipedia. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 13:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi again Lihaas. No, adding the semi-protection template to the top of the article does not cause the article to become semi-protected. Only an administrator can semi-protect an article. You can request semi-protection at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 16:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Mariott bombing islamabad

Lihass, I don't understand this 3 revert-something. Does it mean that I cannot include my template again? Why do people object to it being in the See also section? I mean , one could understand if it featured in the article, but in the reference/See also section? If you think it wouldn't be prudent for me to include it any more, can I ask you to put it in again?Nick Finnsbury (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Template:U.S. strikes in Bajour/Waziristan

Friedman?

Please tell me how external links are evidence of a conflict of interest. You, or anyone else, are free to add links that dispute the links posted. Please elaborate and/or remove the COI banner. I am more than happy to work with you on this. --Briantx90 (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)BrianTX90

Edit summary

Just a note re your edit summary "artifact is not spelled artefact". Yes it is - in British English. There's no particular reason why British spelling should be preferred in the Swastika article, but it is for specifically British and Commonwealth topics and some others in which historically it has been the dominant spelling system adopted. Paul B (talk) 14:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, the main thing is consistency - whether US or UK spellings are used. I was drawing something to your attention, not advocating UK spelling for this article. Paul B (talk) 14:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Start a section then, if you think it appropriate. I may not respond for a while as I have to go offline in 5 minutes. Paul B (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1KYKslZY8s

I wasn't experimenting but I was in a hurry.User talk:Yousaf465 Accepted.I also used show preview option.User talk:Yousaf465

Where is the evidence?

Hey U! Why did you add this warning to my Talk Page. Where is its evidence? If it was a right evidence so I will accept it, if your reason to added this warning to my Talk Page is that I were restored the Template of Miss Universe Org. Winners (2008) so you are wrong and you must sorry now. Remember all users have right to delete their owned Talk Page. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 16:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Version 0.7 reviewing

Hi, I see that you've signed up for the 1.0 review team. We need your help right now, because we had around 70 nominations last week! As you probably know, Version 0.7 is coming out soon, mainly based on the bot selection. This relieves us of the burden of manually assessing 30,000 articles, but we need the manual system to catch the articles that might "fall through the cracks" - such as a couple of missing provinces needed to complete a set. If you're no longer interested in reviewing, please can you remove your name from the list of reviewers?

You should consult the criteria, but I would suggest that most manual nominations of B-Class articles or higher are expected to pass, unless they are fairly obscure. You can get a good sense of the importance by looking at the article in the bot's list (check the talk page to find which projects have tagged it); an importance score (excluding quality) of <700 indicates that the article is probably too obscure, unless it is needed to complete a useful set (e.g., all the counties of England). I take the view that if someone who is knowledgeable on the topic spends the time to nominate the article, it is likely to be OK, but just occasionally people try to argue for an obscure or poor-quality article.

So, are you able to help? Many thanks, Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Roma people

Hi there! Thats a fake and propaganda number. Never was 1 million Gypsy in Hungary, official 190 000, maximum 600 000 in the reality. Just look the Wikipedia Hungary. Gypsies said in Romania live 5 million Roma, thats also fake! MagyarTürk —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC).

My mistake

I didn't remember to add the explanation to the talk.I had to said about the link that now this organization has taken responsibility but Government hasn't confirmed that it is responsible.So I removed the other two and added this.Actually when I was editing this,I was also busy with Tv.As new info was coming in.Sorry for that.User talk:Yousaf465

I would like to ask why did you removed the youtube video.Whether it's something to do with the Language or some other issue.Pl don't take it seriously. User talk:Yousaf465

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Muslim world Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Olympic Sports Centre Life Chain Hari Rud Planned Parenthood The French Navy in the 21st Century Son of man Committee 2008 Russian presidential election, 2008 Waraqah ibn Nawfal Reproductive rights List of messiah claimants Mormon (prophet) Madinan sura Estriol Souphanouvong Pattern of Sexual Politics

Cleanup Foreign relations of Israel Islamofascism True Jesus Church in Singapore Merge Prostitution of children Nordic race Dawah Add Sources Ephebophilia Sexual abuse Ijtihad Wikify Black nationalism Ertzaintza Raoul Wallenberg Expand People of the Book Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan CRY America

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Unable to do

I will be unable to do so right now as I don't have a stable internet connection right now.Pl add the BBC's peoples comments to that article.[1]User talk:Yousaf465

Re: Slavery

I beg your pardon? The statement is already stated to come from the FTS source, and if you're really anal-retentive you (or I) can add the external link to their site to make it even more clear.

Moving on, I fail to see how it is defamatory. Uncited perhaps, but defamatory? What?

Lastly, it's really, really annoying to see a templated message on my talk page. Templates are for mass-warning faceless IPs, not firmly-established editors. Octane ^{[improve me?]} 27.09.08 1947 (UTC)

It would be a lot nicer if you'd give some substance to your posts, rather than foisting the assumption of your line of attack onto me. Nevertheless I think I have figured out the kernel of a point in your blip of a reply: {{uw-defamatory2}} is used for "[i]nserting factual inaccuracies and/or libel" into articles, not for being harsh with other users. If you are really offended by "ye arse", take it to WP:DR. Octane ^{[improve me?]} 27.09.08 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Virginity pledge

I'm sorry if my comment was too informal for you to realise my intention is discussing an improvement to the article- but it was, please WP:AGF, this contained several facts we could seek sources for or explain in the article- how many women are doing it, and how it has less participation in other countries, though that's probably growing. For all this we could probably find WP:RS, indeed it was mentioned in a documentary on mainstream television in the UK. The talk page is not yours to WP:OWN, and even if you didn't value my comment or think it might lead to an improvement, it was only up two days and others might have felt like replying to it even if you didn't, which could have led to us all deciding on extra cites and facts to the article. Please don't revert me again but WP:AGF and see that your personal judgement of my comment is just that- your personal, subjective judgement with which others might well not agree, and I assure you my intention is to improve wikipedia, what with my having been here three years.:) Sticky Parkin

Floyd Martinson

Could you please clarify your position on the sex researcher Floyd Martinson. forestPIG^(grunt) 20:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Tripoli death toll

Yes, I do : here. I will change the source on the article. From, Smuckers ^{It has to be good} 20:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Please do not condescend to anonymous users, especially those with IP addresses used by many people, as you did on User talk:129.71.73.243. My edits were valid and addressed not only NPOV issues but typos and errors. 129.71.73.243 (talk) 04:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

NPOV Violation

Apparently you can get these by adding personal opinions to talk pages now. I suppose it was a pretty controversial topic - after all I added a comment about whether an article should be split under the section where people comment about whether the article should be split. Thankfully, you titled the warning you put on my talk page "Septembet 2008," so I know just how seriously I have to take your threat of edit-blocking. Incidentally, were you shrooming when you put up this warning? Looks like other people have had similar experiences with you. Is it eugor, or is it just idiotic trolling? Only time will tell. But I'm sick of being harassed by irresponsible pseudo-admins. -Fredgoat (talk) 07:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Funny, I looked at WP:Civility like you suggested, and I couldn't find the place where it says you should solicit your friends to help you gang up on people. Actually, I noticed it had some specific and unfavorable things to say about WP:Harassment. Leave me alone, and tell KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 to leave me alone, too. -Fredgoat (talk) 01:57, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism?

What are you talking about? I tagged that article because i thought, as the tag said, that it was telling a fictional story in an in universe manner. Please assume good faith before reverting other editors posts as vandalism. ----Greatestrowerever^{Talk Page} 22:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Clarence Thomas

Used RafaelGarcia is engaging in an edit war on this article. The talk page is full of requests that the extensive section about allegations against Thomas be reduced. I have only sought to add a single paragraph noting some of the refutations of Hill's testimony, but RafaelGarcia has deleted them 4 or 5 times now. HELP!  :) Thanks (Wallamoose (talk) 01:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC))

I have deleted nothing; I simply moved all the info so that the info against the accusers was all together. Also, Wallamoose doesn't know how to cite properly. He cites to a huge index of tons of testimony instead of citing to individual testimony PDFs. In addition, he's making NPOV edits trying to tell readers the significance of things; that is unsupported by the text. Also, he's made statements unsupported by citations.RafaelRGarcia (talk) 01:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Wallamoose's accusations of bias and impropriety are untrue. I work hard on that article, and I brought in material from the Supreme Court book by CNN legal analyst and respected author, Jeffrey Toobin. I also used quotations from Thomas's own opinions. Unfortunately, though, Wallamoose is prone to delete anything about Thomas that maybe makes him look bad, instead of adding things to make him look good, which has caused some conflict. I'm not going to respond to Walla if he posts here; I'm just making clear that I work at all times in good faith. Every sentence I write is cited. Everything I do is to improve the Supreme Court content on Wikipedia, which is woefully thin. RafaelRGarcia (talk) 02:11, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I answered your query on my talk page. FYI, I am a big fan of Kolams. Do you know what those are? There's a place near here where they have Masala Dosas too. So it reminds me of my time on the subcontinent. But I miss the Kolams. I just searched for it on here and was happy to find a site. But it doesn't work when you put in kolams or Kolams. Could you fix that? I saw an Indian author just won the booker prize. Anyway, Party on. Are you one of Midnight's Children? That would be cool! (Wallamoose (talk) 04:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC))

September 11 attacks

Dear Lihass, can you explain some of your edits to the September 11 attacks article? Why did you erase links without any discussion?[2] And what about this edit?[3] The attacks had a significant economic impact not just on the US market, but also on the world markets. If you feel that article has any unverified statements or claims, please address them in the talkpage of the article. Have a nice day! AdjustShift (talk) 19:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Dear Lihass, thanks for your explanations. You were trying to help the article. I've found a link (See page 17) stating the impact of 9/11 on the world market. You've raised some other concerns. I’ll try to find more reliable sources to verify some statements of the article. Our 9/11 article should be a Featured article. Your help will certainly benefit the article. Have a nice day! :-) AdjustShift (talk) 15:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Terrorist attacks 2008

"The following is a timeline of acts and failed attempts that can be considered non-state terrorism in 2008."

"Military actions by states during war are usually not considered terrorism, even when they involve significant civilian casualties." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism#State_terrorism)

That's the reason I don't consider US strike as terrorism.

Thanks. Kormin (talk) 11:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Why do you want a discussion if you don't answer ? So began discuss about it, or stop editing the article. Thanks. Kormin (talk) 10:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Lihaas, I understand your argument. I am curious to see the AFD closing. Nice arguments. did enjoy. Docku:“what up?” 21:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

I did not understand ur question???? sorry. Docku:“what up?” 02:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I was thinking about your arguments. Is merging the two articles under the title of nationalism your suggestion? Docku:“what up?” 23:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Nationalism article

Hello. In the summary of your edit to the article on Nationalism, you wrote that "a reference to an abstract of a book that doesn't mention the relevant matter is not acceptable". I agree but, since this was not the case with the reference you removed, I have restored it. If you look carefully, the reference is to a specific page in the book (page 29), not the abstract that Google Books provides as an overview of the source. Most print sources are not linked on Wikipedia at all, but I decided to provide the Google Books link to this one and others in the article, in case someone who does not have library access would like to take a look at it. The specific page that is referenced can be found here and, as you can see, it supports the text of the article. – SJL 03:01, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Tables

{{help}}

I have been trying to figure out the errors on the tables at the Ahmedabad_Rockets page, as I have copied the table code from the tournament page, but to no avail as to why the information after the table is cut off. Can any wiki expert figure this out?

ThanksLihaas (talk) 07:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm not really sure what it is you're asking, as the Ahmedabad Rockets table looks fine and is displaying the information that is coded into the text. Are you referring to information that didn't transfer from the other page? Where is the other page?--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 08:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

(comment moved from User talk:Aervanath#Ahmedabad Rockets)if you see at the bottom of the page (and then in the code) you will not there is something missing. The title for the "References" is missing, although part of the references are there. Lihaas (talk) 08:09, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

There may be formatting issues with your Web browser. I can see all of that content. Weird.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 08:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Definition of the word further

For your information here is the definition of thw word "FURTHER" [[4]], regards --Woogie10w (talk) 00:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Lesbian

Your edits to this article are puzzling. The most significant issue is the overshadowing of what is clearly the most widespread use of the term referencing female homosexuality to a localized term that many do not use, but admittedly is still valid: a resident of the island of Lesbos. Why have you decided against all reliable sourcing that the more popular use of the word refers to the island inhabitants? By placing the use of the word to mean the Greek inhabitants of Lesbos before the terminology of female homosexuality, it gives the Greek island meaning more importance over the use of lesbian. This, quite simply, is astonishing. Secondly, you duplicated the reflist, deleted an external link, and added a section called "History of the term" that begins in 2008. I don't see how that's history.

To avoid further reverts, please discuss your changes on the talk page. This is a community project. --Moni3 (talk) 00:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

If you carry on edit warring against consensus at Lesbian you will be blocked. Gwen Gale (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Dalton

It's close to the Georgia/Tennessee border. See Dalton, Georgia. --RDavi404 (talk) 00:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

The Indian Barnstar of National Merit

		The Indian Barnstar of National Merit
		I hearby award Lihaas for his contributions to India content on Wikipedia ,especially regarding Lok Sabha consitutencies and to let him know that his contributions havent gone unnoticed. Thanks and Keep up your good work -- Tinu Cherian - 06:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

.

ITN

On 23 October, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) 2008 Imphal bombings, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 11:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Citations

With respect to this, all of that information is cited in the two sources; I just didn't think that having 50 ^[1] icons floating around would help. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 23:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Everything is from one of the two sources at the bottom. We could always just get a bunch of news articles saying the same thing and cite that way... And sure, move it to the talk page. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 23:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Defining child sexual abuse as pedophilia in the Sexual ethics and legality section of the Sexual intercourse article

As I stated in my edit summary upon reverting that edit you made, not all of the lowlifes known as child sexual abusers are pedophiles. And pedophilia is in reference to the mental condition. You could put "sometimes medically defined as pedophilia" or something like that.

Calling child sexual abuse pedophilia in the Sexual intercourse article was also discussed on the Sexual intercourse talk page.

Also, as I'm sure you noticed, we do not define child sexual abuse in the lead of the Child sexual abuse article here as pedophilia (at least not as its primary definition), for the very reason I noted above, though we do note pedophilia in its lead.

Plus, child sexual abuse is the legal term for an adult or late teenager engaging in sex with a child, or even sometimes an adult engaging in sex with a late teenager below the age of consent. Flyer22 (talk) 21:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

ITN

On 30 October, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) 2008 Assam bombings, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 11:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

An Incorrect Flagging?

Hello, you flagged me as not having a neutral point of view in the article about the 2008 Assam bombings, yet you changed nothing of my edit, which was in fact merely an edit of incorrect grammar /syntax in a quote. I do not mean to be unfriendly, but am curious as to the reason I was flagged. 58.28.153.88 (talk) 12:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Ah but you see they weren't my words. It was directly from the quote of Ban Ki Moon's. And even so, you didn't change it, just flagged me. But nevermind, it doesn't really matter. Happy editing. 58.28.153.88 (talk) 08:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: list of terror attack 2008

I don't mind it all. But i was wondering. What does this two mean Headline News. October 30, 2008.13:00. a b News X. October 30, 2008. 13:30 in article 2008 Assam bombings--SkyWalker (talk) 04:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for late reply. I don't think television media can be used has source. All source should be in written. Even videos can not be added has source. --SkyWalker (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Politics of Memory

Hello. I'm curious about this subject. Is this similar to the politics of history (also not yet an article) meaning how society and cultural memories are developed and passed on, epitomized by the saying "Hisory is written by the victors"? ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

I think politics of history may be a better phrasing, but either way we can always add a redirect. Yes, I am interested in working on the topic with you. I think it's an excellent one. I was suggesting the famous quote "history is written by the victors" as an example of how history/memory is not an objective science. There are also cultural issues, as with indigineous tribes who have no history in the form of written documents, but maintain oral histories and cultural history through folkloric traditions. I also thought of Milan Kundera's work. In the first story in his book Laughter and Forgetting a photo is being taken of officials in winter. One German official lends his hat to his superior, but he later falls out of favor with the government and is airbrushed out of the photo, expunged from all official documents, and effectively out of history. All that remains of him is his fur hat in the photo. This happened quite a bit in China also as I recall. It's your idea so I would ask you to start the article in whatever form you choose and I will add to it from there. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, I did some bold editing of the article. I'm a bit tired so references will have to wait. Feel free to delete, revert, rewrite as you see fit. Also let me know any comment you have here, on the articles talk page, or on my talk page as per your desire. Thanks for welcoming me to the project, I hope you won't regret your decision to include me from teh outset.  :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Lihaas. What's cooking? As far as the article, I've been preoccupied with other pursuits. But I have thought about it. Basically I'd like to just build it out more with the various sections: ie Iron Curtain, Western World, China etc. Maybe even a section on Wikipedia and/or the internet. Add content, add references. The usual thing. I'm also aching to move the "German example" from the introduction into the body of the article. Take care. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Little context in Lihaas/National Socialist

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lihaas/National Socialist, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lihaas/National Socialist is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lihaas/National Socialist, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to the Economics WikiProject

Hi, and welcome to the Economics WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Economics.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Expand some economics stubs.
• Pitch in on our current FA drive.
• Assess the quality and importance of unassessed Economics articles.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! --Patrick (talk) 18:11, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:FURTHER

Please read WP:FURTHER carefully. External links refer to relevant websites, or websites of relevant organizations, while further readings refer to addition articles and publications. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:36, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

ITN

On 10 November, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) Russian submarine K-152 Nerpa, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 21:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Abhinav_Bharat_Society

Hi thanks for contributing

one help can you help in updating the wiki link below

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abhinav_Bharat_Society —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pahadiraja (talk • contribs) 04:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humour. Best wishes. ~~~~

.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 12:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

First, this template was meant as a friendly notice, second, do not get involved if you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. That incident had absolutely nothing to do with templates, and was in fact an entirely different matter. If you want to talk about being uncivil, you should look in a mirror. Do not make assumptions when material to verify the facts is widely available.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 12:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Right now, I'm going to sigh. Why? Because for one, you mis-quoted me. I did not tell you to not get involved where it doesn't concern you, get it right. I said, do not get involved until you fully grasp the situation. Per your original comment, it was very obvious that you did not, and per your most recent comment, you still obviously do not, so, instead of trusting you that you would actually go find out what the thread was about, I'm going to go ahead and not trust you, and explain it here:

That user was talking about me behind my back, and did not alert me. My question was asking what the comments about me were specifically about, and an admin agreed with me on the matter. It had nothing to do with templates, so again, I did not say for you to not get involved where it does not concern you, I said if you are going to get involved, make sure you know exactly what is going on first. Do not make assumptions based on limited knowledge of the situation.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 23:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Thirdly, I have never attacked you, so please, do not state falsely otherwise.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 23:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Well then, I do apologize for that, as it had slipped my mind. But besides that point, you were uncivil in the fact that you were making judgments upon me without completely reviewing the available material. Secondly, in what way is this a slashing match. What went on is quite simple. You templated an established user. I then gave you a friendly note about templating established users. You responded by telling me I was wrong, and that something just like this incident happened in the past. And that is where you were wrong, as, as I stated above, the incident had nothing to do with templating others. The user in question in the conversation which you referenced had posted a topic on another user's talk page who's thread title was my username, and pointed to a page which was about me. When I asked him the purpose of this comment, he outright refused to reply, as you can easily see on my talk page. Finally, an admin intervened, and agreed with my thoughts of if someone is talking about me, I have the right to know.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 23:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

And to continue to get things right, suggesting that another user has been uncivil is not an attack. I have not attacked you. The only reason I am apologizing is because you obviously took offense to it.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 23:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Abkhazia edit

I reverted that edit immediately myself. Lighten up.128.138.42.218 (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC) And the old "monologue" edit was good faith, and was actually a reasonable edit. It should have never been flagged. This is certainly not on the level of putting up a bunch of penis images on some page or other. Geez.128.138.42.218 (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC) How is it "vandalism" if you revert it yourself immediately? The only people who will see it are those who want to amuse themselves by going through old edits, and all sorts of vandalism is preserved there for the ages anyway. That's part of the fun of wikipedia. At any rate, this wasn't worth the angry response with an exclamation point. That's what I mean by "lighten up." As I said, the one for "monologue" was good faith and should never have been messaged at all, just reverted if someone decided it wasn't notable. The FARC one was similar, I concede. But as I said, this was hardly worth getting your shorts in a knot over.128.138.42.218 (talk) 17:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Yeah, I admit I shouldn't be stupid like that. I actually have a WP username that I use for serious edits. The temptation to mess around with an IP is sometimes great, but I understand that I shouldn't do it, and won't in the future.128.138.42.218 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC).

WP:PORNBIO

As a member of WikiProject Pornography, I'm just letting you know there's currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography about changing the WP:PORNBIO criteria. Your opinions would be appreciated. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 15:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Novemebr 2008

Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes. -- Banjeboi 02:34, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Lesbian disambig

The term is already disambiguated at the top of the page. Moreover, I'm not aware of any consensus for duplicating this disambiguation in the first sentence of the article. Gwen Gale (talk) 05:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

I've replied on my talk page. I think you misunderstand at least two policies. Gwen Gale (talk) 05:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do

Hi Lihaas.Please do add Indo-Palestinian relations to the WP:PALESTINE new articles page. It will help other project members to become aware of its existence and pitch in.

I will take a look at Israeli Apartheid Week again soon. To be honest, I have little patience for the mountains made out of molehills by some of those who edit in this area, and often find it best to simply disengage and go somewhere else until things die down again. But I will peek in, if only to come back here and offer you advice.

Thanks for all your contributions and happy editing.Tiamut^talk 21:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Edits to religion-based articles

Hey there. I notice that you've been doing quite a bit of editing to some religion-based articles such as The Holy See, Vatican City, Foreign relations of the Vatican, Pope Benedict XVI... Having been involved in these articles for a while, I know that they often fall subject to lengthy edit wars, and there are many many people monitoring them. While you obviously have as much right as anyone to edit them, a friendly suggestion would be to discuss a little more in the talk pages so everyone has a better understanding of why you're making certain changes, and there can be some exchange back and forth. The number of edits, and the significant changes you have been making will inevitably lead to some reverts. Please take some time to engage the community a little more before-hand. Thanks! --Anietor (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Vatican foreign relations

Hi there! You might want to check out the Category:Foreign relations of the Holy See category and its subcats for more information. It also appears that, under the current naming convention, Foreign relations of the Holy See would be a better title. Do you mind if I move it there? --Hemlock Martinis (talk) 20:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry mate...

Didn't see your message until now. I was just editing away obliviously. My bad. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by By78 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Your edits to Lesbian

You have been reported for edit warring here. --Moni3 (talk) 13:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[5] made on November 26 2008 to Lesbian

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The duration of the block is 12 hours.

Please stop the edit warring. Please don't call people vandals just because you don't like their edits. Please don't remove reports from the 3RR page [6] [7]

William M. Connolley (talk) 23:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Maps

Hey Lihaas, I can help make the maps you had requested on WT:IN. Let me know if the maps are still needed or you are working on the same. I would need 1 day to make both. --GPPande talk! 07:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Please be careful with use of tags

Your tag of Adoption in the United States as requiring a global perspective was clearly inappropriate, and has been removed. Ray (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

CST

I tried to fix part of this article but got reverted and labeled as "proactive" (which is interpreted to mean in favour of child abuse). I am not willing to engage with this editor. Is it possible that you could analyse the situation and come back with an opinion? 77.243.225.87 (talk) 01:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

ITN for 2009 Gujarat Hepatitis outbreak

On 22 February, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Gujarat Hepatitis outbreak, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 20:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

you supporyt needed here

I need your help here [8].User:Yousaf465 (talk)

ITN for 2009 FATA mosque attack

On 27 March, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 FATA mosque attack, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 05:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India and state terrorism

you forgot to sign here. --Docku: What's up? 18:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Porn Awards

Of interest? Power.corrupts (talk) 16:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

• I propose to roll back the too bold change - comments? Power.corrupts (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

India – Syria relations

Hello! Your submission of India – Syria relations at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your article's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --BorgQueen (talk) 06:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I have speedy deleted the page, it had content copied nearly literally from a copyrighted source. Copyright violations are not allowed on Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 09:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Self-published book

I'm working on compiling a book containing information about almost all Non-indigenous ethnic groups living or working in Pakistan. The population of a particular ethnic group would be obtain respectively from their diplomatic missions in Pakistan including regions with significant populations, languages spoken and religious affiliations. I'm not very good with writing so it would be great, if you would like to collaborate with me.--116.71.53.25 (talk) 06:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Moves

Please stop moving articles before reaching a consensus for that on the talk pages--TheFEARgod (Ч) 14:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem

Hi. The article Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War was marked as a copyright problem by another contributor on 20 January, but you don't seem to have been given the requisite notice. The copyright problems listing cannot be closed until a week after you have been. A review suggests that the contents are heavily drawn from [9] and [10].

If you are able, please clarify the copyright status of this material at the article's talk. Alternatively, you are welcome to help rewrite the material in the temporary space now linked from the article's front.

Requisite notice to follow. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Requisite notice: Copyright problem: Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/terroristoutfits/pwg.htm http://fas.org/irp/world/para/pwg.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) People's War saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Blatant vandalism on Jewish exodus from Arab lands

Thanks for your blatant vandalism on Jewish exodus from Arab lands. You've been warned once and only once. Next type you'll be reported. Thanks for your cooperation. Plot Spoiler (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Cut and paste moves

Don't do them. They break the page history and the license. Prodego ^talk 12:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Those links are broken now because I merged the histories. In any case, don't do cut and paste moves. See WP:RM WP:C&P. Prodego ^talk 12:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

2010 Moscow Metro bombings

Please sign your talkpage comments, please stop edit-warring, and please abide by the core Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:Consensus. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:25, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Signing your posts

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 23:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Lihaas, please remember to sign your posts to talk pages by typing four tildes at the end of your comment. Not doing this makes it much harder for others to follow a discussion. Thank you, -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 02:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Let me remind you once again. Please and thankyou, sign your post in the discussion page for the goodness' sake. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 23:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Just a bit more detail, to sign means that sign your every separate post, including your comment in Talk:2010_Moscow_Metro_bombings#media reaction section even though you may submit them in one single edit. Thank you. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 01:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

2010 Commonwealth Games

Just to check - surely this was an April Fool's joke? Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{Join WikiProject Athletics!} 23:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2010 Moscow Metro bombings, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 21:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of battles and other violent events by death toll, you will be blocked from editing. The reason given ... 'well, why isn't this other item reflected' ... is not a valid reason for deletion of appropriate content. Epeefleche (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to 2010 Moscow Metro bombings, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop deleting the phrase "Islamist" with references to RS articles from the lede, without any appropriate justification. Epeefleche (talk) 20:15, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

List of terrorist incidents, 2010 It's not Yotna removing the incidents it's this dude called Superfopp, he has been at it for a while now, he seems to think that they are not terrorist incidents. 90.208.224.100 (talk) 16:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

better table

Hi, I'm working on a much better and more informative table right now. It will be put up when I'm finished with it, a lot of things are sub par in the old table you used as a template. Hobartimus (talk) 04:19, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Official information

I would like to show you this official data, which clearly show that the Fidesz candidate in that district is Dr. Daher Pierre [11] Oszkar Molnar is independent candidate. Thank you. Since there is no direct links you have to click Single Member Constituencies then you see BORSOD-ABAÚJ-ZEMPLÉN 08 Edelény Dr. Daher Pierre FIDESZ - HUNGARIAN CIVIC UNION KDNP If you click 08 then you will Molnar as Independent. The Fidesz candidate is Daher Pierre. Hobartimus(talk) 12:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

ITN for Hungarian parliamentary election, 2010

On 12 April 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Hungarian parliamentary election, 2010, which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Well done, but when you post on WP:ITN/C, please sign with ~~~~. Thank you, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to 2010 Moscow Metro bombings, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop deleting the phrase "Islamist" with references to RS articles from the lede, without any appropriate justification Epeefleche (talk) 04:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to here, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. As discussed on my talk page. Epeefleche (talk) 02:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Economics census

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on WP:ITN/C, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Not signing your posts makes it very difficult to follow a thread and could be considered disruptive, so please start signing them. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Community restrictions

O Fenian (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Since you have ignored this, I have asked for Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement to be taken against you. O Fenian (talk) 07:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)