Jump to content

Constitution of Canada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Praxidicae (talk | contribs) at 12:19, 20 April 2020 (rv lta gvozdet). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Part of a series on the
Constitution of Canada
Constitutional history
Document list
Constitutional law

flag Canada portal

icon Law portal

The Constitution of Canada (Template:Lang-fr) is the supreme law in Canada.[1] It outlines Canada's system of government and the civil and human rights of those who are citizens of Canada and non-citizens in Canada.[2] Its contents are an amalgamation of various codified acts, treaties between the Crown and indigenous peoples (both historical and modern), uncodified traditions and conventions. Canada is one of the oldest constitutional democracies in the world.[3]

According to subsection 52(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982, the Canadian Constitution consists of the Canada Act 1982 (which includes the Constitution Act, 1982), acts and orders referred to in its schedule (including in particular the Constitution Act, 1867, formerly the British North America Act, 1867), and any amendments to these documents.[4] The Supreme Court of Canada has held that the list is not exhaustive and also includes a number of pre-confederation acts and unwritten components as well.[5] See list of Canadian constitutional documents for details.

History of the constitution

Main article: Constitutional history of Canada

The first semblance of a constitution for Canada was the Royal Proclamation of 1763.[6] The act renamed the northeasterly portion of the former French province of New France as Province of Quebec, roughly coextensive with the southern third of contemporary Quebec. The proclamation, which established an appointed colonial government, was the constitution of Quebec until 1774, when the British parliament passed the Quebec Act, which expanded the province's boundaries to the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers (one of the grievances listed in the United States Declaration of Independence). Significantly, the Quebec Act also replaced the French criminal law presumption of guilty until proven innocent with the English criminal law presumption of innocent until proven guilty; but the French code or civil law system was retained for non-criminal matters.[7]

A painting depicting negotiations that would lead to the enactment of the British North America Act, 1867

The Treaty of Paris of 1783 ended the American War of Independence and sent a wave of British loyalist refugees northward to Quebec and Nova Scotia.[8] In 1784, the two provinces were divided; Nova Scotia was split into Nova Scotia, Cape Breton Island (rejoined to Nova Scotia in 1820), Prince Edward Island, and New Brunswick, while Quebec was split into Lower Canada (southern Quebec) and Upper Canada (southern through lower northern Ontario). The winter of 1837–38 saw rebellion in both Canadas, prompting their being rejoined as the Province of Canada in 1841.

The British North America Act of 1867 established the Dominion of Canada as a federation of provinces.[9] Initially, on 1 July 1867, four provinces entered into confederation as "One dominion under the name of Canada": Canada West (former Upper Canada, now Ontario), Canada East (former Lower Canada, now Quebec), Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick.[9] Title to the Northwest Territories was transferred by the Hudson's Bay Company in 1870, out of which the province of Manitoba (the first to be established by the Parliament of Canada) was created. British Columbia joined confederation in 1871, followed by Prince Edward Island in 1873. The Yukon Territory was created by Parliament in 1898, followed by Alberta and Saskatchewan in 1905 (all out of parts of the Northwest Territories). Newfoundland, Britain's oldest colony in the Americas and by then also a Dominion, joined Confederation in 1949. Nunavut was created in 1999 from the Northwest Territories.

An Imperial Conference in 1926 that included the leaders of all Dominions and representatives from India (which then included Burma, Bangladesh, and Pakistan), led to the eventual enactment of the Statute of Westminster 1931. The statute, an essential transitory step from the British Empire to the Commonwealth of Nations, provided that existing Dominions became fully sovereign of the United Kingdom and any new Dominions would be fully sovereign upon the grant of Dominion status.[10] Although listed, Newfoundland never ratified the statute so was still subject to imperial authority when its entire system of government and economy collapsed in the mid-1930s. Canada did ratify the statute but with a requested exception—the Canadian federal and provincial governments could not agree on an amending formula for the Canadian constitution. It would be another 50 years before this was achieved. In the interim, the British parliament periodically passed enabling acts with respect to requested constitutional amendments as they arose; this was never anything but a rubber stamp.[11]

The patriation of the Canadian constitution was achieved in 1982 when the British parliament, with the request and assent of the Canadian parliament, passed the Canada Act 1982, which included in its schedules the Constitution Act, 1982. The United Kingdom thus formally absolving itself of any remaining responsibility for, or jurisdiction over, Canada. In a formal ceremony on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Queen Elizabeth II proclaimed both acts as law on 17 April 1982.[12] Constitution Act, 1982, includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Prior to the Charter, various statutes protected an assortment of civil rights and obligations but nothing was enshrined in the constitution until 1982. The Charter has thus placed a strong focus upon individual and collective rights of the people of Canada.[13]

Enactment of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms has fundamentally changed much of Canadian constitutional law.[14] The act also codified many previously oral constitutional conventions and made amendment of the constitution in general significantly more difficult. Previously, the Canadian federal constitution could be amended by a solitary act of the Canadian or British parliament, by formal or informal agreement between the federal and provincial governments, or even simply by adoption as custom of an oral convention or performance that shows precedential but unwritten tradition. Since the act, textual amendments must now conform to certain specified provisions in the written portion of the Canadian constitution.

Constitution Act, 1867

Main article: Constitution Act, 1867

This was an Act of the British parliament, originally called the British North America Act 1867. It outlined Canada's system of government, which combines Britain's Westminster model of parliamentary government with division of sovereignty (federalism). Although it is the first of 20 British North America Acts, it is the most famous as the primary document of Canadian Confederation. With the patriation of the Constitution in 1982, this Act was renamed Constitution Act, 1867. In recent years, the 1867 document has mainly served as the basis on which the division of powers between the provinces and federal government are analyzed.

Constitution Act, 1982

Main article: Constitution Act, 1982

Endorsed by all provincial governments except that of Quebec, this was the formal Act of Parliament that effected Canada's full legislative independence from the United Kingdom. Part V of this act established an amending formula for the Canadian constitution, the lack of which (due to more than 50 years of disagreement between the federal and provincial governments) meant Canada's constitutional amendments still required enactment by the British parliament after Statute of Westminster in 1931.

The Act was enacted as a schedule to the Canada Act 1982, a British Act of Parliament which was introduced at the request of a joint address to the Queen by the Senate and House of Commons of Canada. As a bilingual act of parliament, the Canada Act 1982 has the distinction of being the only legislation in French that has been passed by an English or British parliament since Norman French (Law French) ceased to be the language of government in England. In addition to enacting the Constitution Act, 1982, the Canada Act 1982 provides that no further British Acts of Parliament will apply to Canada as part of its law, finalizing Canada's legislative independence.

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Main article: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

As noted above, this is Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Charter is the constitutional guarantee of the civil rights and liberties of every citizen in Canada, such as freedom of expression, of religion, and of mobility. [citation needed] Part II addresses the rights of Aboriginal peoples in Canada. [citation needed]

It is written in plain language to ensure accessibility to the average citizen. It applies only to government and government actions with the intention to prevent government from creating laws that are unconstitutional.

Amending formula

Main article: Amendments to the Constitution of Canada

Instead of the usual parliamentary procedure, that includes the monarch's formal royal assent for enacting legislation, amendments to the Constitution Act, 1982, must be done in accordance with Part V of the Constitution Act, 1982, which provides for five different amending formulae. Amendments can be brought forward under section 46(1) by any province or the federal legislature. The general formula set out in section 38(1), known as the "7/50 formula", requires: (a) assent from both the House of Commons and the Senate; (b) the approval of two thirds of the provincial legislatures (at least seven provinces) representing at least 50 per cent of the population (effectively, this would include at least Quebec or Ontario, as they are the most populous provinces). This formula specifically applies to amendments related to the proportionate representation in Parliament, powers, selection, and composition of the Senate, the Supreme Court and the addition of provinces or territories.

The other amendment formulae are for particular cases as provided by in the act. An amendment related to the Office of the Queen, the use of either official language (subject to section 43), the amending formula itself, or the composition of the Supreme Court, must be adopted by unanimous consent of all the provinces in accordance with section 41. In the case of an amendment related to provincial boundaries or the use of an official language within a province alone, the amendment must be passed by the legislatures affected by the amendment (section 43). In the case of an amendment that affects the federal government only, the amendment does not need approval of the provinces (section 44). The same applies to amendments affecting the provincial government alone (section 45).

Sources of the constitution

Further information: List of Canadian constitutional documents, Aboriginal land title § Canada, The Canadian Crown and Indigenous peoples of Canada, Canadian Aboriginal law, and Numbered treaties

Canada's constitution has roots going back to the thirteenth century, including England's Magna Carta and the first English parliament of 1275.[15] It is one of the oldest working constitutions in the world (others are: the United Kingdom, United States, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, Denmark).[citation needed] Canada's constitution is composed of several individual statutes. There are three general methods by which a statute becomes entrenched in the Constitution:

  1. Specific mention as a constitutional document in section 52(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982 (e.g., the Constitution Act, 1867).
  2. Constitutional entrenchment of an otherwise statutory English, British, or Canadian document because its (still in force) subject matter provisions are explicitly assigned to one of the methods of the amending formula (per the Constitution Act, 1982)—e.g., provisions with regard to the monarchy in the English Bill of Rights 1689[16][17] or the Act of Settlement 1701.
    • English and British statutes are part of Canadian law because of the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865; section 129 of the Constitution Act, 1867; and the Statute of Westminster 1931. If still at least partially unrepealed those laws then became entrenched when the amending formula was made part of the constitution.[citation needed]
  3. Reference by an entrenched document—e.g., the Preamble of the Constitution Act, 1867's entrenchment of written and unwritten principles from the constitution of the United Kingdom or the Constitution Act, 1982's reference to the Proclamation of 1763.
    • Crucially, this includes Aboriginal rights and Crown treaties with particular First Nations (e.g., historic "numbered" treaties; modern land-claims agreements).

Unwritten or uncodifed sources

The existence of unwritten constitutional components was reaffirmed in 1998 by the Supreme Court in Reference re Secession of Quebec.[18]

The Constitution is more than a written text. It embraces the entire global system of rules and principles which govern the exercise of constitutional authority. A superficial reading of selected provisions of the written constitutional enactment, without more, may be misleading.

In practice, there have been three sources of unwritten constitutional law:[19]

Conventions
Constitutional conventions form part of the constitution, but they are not judicially enforceable.[20] They include the existence of a prime minister and Cabinet, the fact that the Governor General in most circumstances is required to grant royal assent to bills adopted by both houses of parliament, and the requirement that the prime minister either resign or request a dissolution and general election upon losing a vote of confidence in the House of Commons.
Royal prerogative
Reserve powers of the Canadian Crown, being remnants of the powers once held by the British Crown, reduced over time by the parliamentary system. Primarily, these are the Orders in Council, which give the government the authority to declare war, conclude treaties, issue passports, make appointments, make regulations, incorporate, and receive lands that escheat to the Crown.[21]
Unwritten principles
Principles that are incorporated into the Canadian constitution by the preamble of the Constitution Act, 1867, including a statement that the constitution is "similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom", much of which is unwritten.[22] Unlike conventions, they are justiciable. Amongst those principles most recognized as constitutional to date are federalism, liberal democracy, constitutionalism, the rule of law, and respect for minorities.[23] Others include responsible government, representation by population,[24] judicial independence, parliamentary supremacy,[25] and an implied bill of rights. In one case, the Provincial Judges Reference (1997), a law was held invalid for contradicting an unwritten principle (in this case judicial independence).

Provincial constitutions

Unlike in most federations, Canadian provinces do not have written provincial constitutions.[26] Provincial constitutions are instead a combination of uncodified constitution, provisions of the Constitution of Canada, and provincial statutes.

Structures of the provincial government are described in parts of the Constitution. Part V of the Constitution Act, 1867 describes the governmental structure of the original four provinces. The three colonies that joined Canada had existing UK legislation which described their governmental structure, and this was affirmed in the terms of union, which now form part of Canada's Constitution (British Columbia Terms of Union,[27] the schedules of Prince Edward Island Terms of Union,[28] and Terms of Union of Newfoundland with Canada[29]). The remaining three provinces were created by statute, and their structures are described in those statutes, which now form part of Canada's Constitution (Manitoba Act, 1870,[30] Alberta Act,[31] and Saskatchewan Act[32]).

Section 45 of the Constitution Act, 1982 allows each province to amend its own constitution. However, if the desired change would require an amendment to any documents that form part of the Constitution of Canada, it would require the consent of the federal government under section 43. This was done, for example, by the Constitution Amendment, 1998, when Newfoundland asked the federal government to amend the Terms of Union of Newfoundland to allow it to end denominational quotas for religion classes.[33]

Provinces have used their power under section 45 to enact statutes related to elections and rules for its legislature. For examples of this, see Constitution of Quebec and Constitution Act (British Columbia). However, these acts are regular statutes, and are not enshrined as constitutional documents. They do not, generally, require a referendum or a super-majority of legislators to amend them. However, there are a small number of statutes that cannot be amended by a simple majority of the legislative assembly. For example, section 7 of the Constitution of Alberta Amendment Act, 1990 requires plebiscites of Metis settlement members before that act can be amended.[34] Courts have not yet ruled about whether this kind of language really would bind future legislatures, but it might do so if the higher bar was met when creating the law.[26]

One way that provinces have put some statutes 'above' others is through quasi-constitutionality. This is the practice of allowing some statutes to take precedence over all others. Quasi-constitutionality is often applied to human rights laws, allowing those laws to act as a de facto constitutional charter of rights.

Vandalism of the proclamation paper

In 1983, Peter Greyson, an art student, entered Ottawa's National Archives (known today as Library and Archives Canada) and poured red paint mixed with glue over a copy[35] of the proclamation of the 1982 constitutional amendment. He said he was displeased with the federal government's decision to allow United States missile testing in Canada and had wanted to "graphically illustrate to Canadians" how wrong he believed the government to be. Greyson was charged with public mischief and sentenced to 89 days in jail, 100 hours of community work, and two years of probation.[36] A grapefruit-sized stain remains on the original document; restoration specialists opted to leave most of the paint intact, fearing that removal attempts would only cause further damage.[37]

See also

References

  1. ^ Supreme Court of Canada; Public Works and Government Services Canada (November 1, 2000). The Supreme Court of Canada and its Justices 1875-2000: La Cour suprême du Canada et ses juges 1875-2000. Dundurn. pp. 27–. ISBN 978-1-77070-095-6.
  2. ^ Patrick Malcolmson; Richard Myers; Gerald Baier; Tom Bateman (2016). The Canadian Regime: An Introduction to Parliamentary Government in Canada, Sixth Edition. University of Toronto Press. pp. 75–76. ISBN 978-1-4426-3598-2.
  3. ^ John Courtney. David Smith (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Canadian Politics. Oxford University press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-19-533535-4.
  4. ^ Christopher Dunn (2015). Provinces: Canadian Provincial Politics, Third Edition. University of Toronto Press. p. 297. ISBN 978-1-4426-3399-5.
  5. ^ Adam Dodek (2016). The Canadian Constitution. Dundurn - University of Ottawa Faculty of Law. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-4597-3505-7.
  6. ^ Jeremy Webber (2015). The Constitution of Canada: A Contextual Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-78225-631-1.
  7. ^ Stephen May (2013). Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language. Routledge. p. 248. ISBN 978-1-136-83706-7.
  8. ^ James Harley Marsh (1999). American Revolution. The Canadian Encyclopedia. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-7710-2099-5. = "Treaty of Paris 1783". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved October 8, 2019.
  9. ^ a b W. D. Hussey. Government in Great Britain the Empire, and the Commonwealth. Cambridge University Press. p. 250. GGKEY:Z7HUCT7C4X9.
  10. ^ Trevor Harrison; John W. Friesen (2015). Canadian Society in the Twenty-First Century, 3e: An Historical Sociological Approach. Canadian Scholars’ Press. pp. 67–69. ISBN 978-1-55130-735-0.
  11. ^ Dupras, Daniel (April 3, 2000). "INTERNATIONAL TREATIES: CANADIAN PRACTICE". Depository Services Program. Public Works and Government Services Canada. Retrieved December 17, 2010. In 1931, under the Statute of Westminster, Canada and a number of other British dominions, acquired full independence(4) and with it authority to act internationally with all the attributes of a sovereign state. Full power over foreign affairs was thus conferred on Canada and section 132 of the Constitution Act, 1867 became obsolete." Footnote 4:"Except with respect to amendments to Canada's Constitution, which remained under the British Parliament's jurisdiction until 1982.
  12. ^ John McMenemy (2006). The Language of Canadian Politics: A Guide to Important Terms and Concepts. Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press. pp. 271–272. ISBN 978-0-88920-694-6.
  13. ^ Stephen Tierney (2016). Accommodating Cultural Diversity. Routledge. p. 95. ISBN 978-1-317-18591-8.
  14. ^ Stephen L. Newman (2004). Constitutional Politics in Canada and the United States. York University Press. pp. 63–65. ISBN 978-0-7914-5937-9.
  15. ^ Tidridge, Nathan (2010), Canada's Constitutional Monarchy: An Introduction to Our Form of Government, Toronto: Dundurn Press, p. 54, ISBN 9781459700840 {{citation}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  16. ^ Senate of Canada (March 20, 2013). "LCJC Meeting No. 74". Queen's Printer for Canada. Archived from the original on June 14, 2013. Retrieved March 24, 2013.
  17. ^ Re: Resolution to amend the Constitution, [1981] 1 SCR 753 at p. 785.
  18. ^ Gaetano Pentassuglia (2009). Minority Groups and Judicial Discourse in International Law: A Comparative Perspective. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 117. ISBN 978-90-04-17672-0.
  19. ^ Richard W. Bauman; Tsvi Kahana (2006). The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State. Cambridge University Press. pp. 159–161. ISBN 978-1-139-46040-8.
  20. ^ Dawn Oliver; Carlo Fusaro (August 9, 2011). How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 16–. ISBN 978-1-84731-788-9.
  21. ^ D. Michael Jackson (August 31, 2013). The Crown and Canadian Federalism. Dundurn. pp. 61–. ISBN 978-1-4597-0990-4.
  22. ^ Penny Bryden; Dimitry Anastakis (2009). Framing Canadian Federalism. University of Toronto Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-8020-9436-0.
  23. ^ these were identified in Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217
  24. ^ "ARCHIVED - Key Terms - Provinces and Territories - Canadian Confederation - Library and Archives Canada". Collectionscanada.gc.ca. Archived from the original on February 13, 2013. Retrieved April 17, 2013.
  25. ^ < Parliamentary Government in Canada: Basic Organization and Practices[permanent dead link‍]
  26. ^ a b "Conference on "Federalism and Sub-national Constitutions: Design and Reform"" (PDF). Retrieved December 16, 2019.
  27. ^ British Columbia Terms of Union, 16 May 1871 (UK), reprinted in RSC 1985, App II, No 10.
  28. ^ Prince Edward Island Terms of Union, 29 June 1873 (UK), reprinted in RSC 1985, App II, No 12.
  29. ^ Newfoundland Act, 12 & 13 Geo VI, c 22 (UK), reprinted in RSC 1985, App II, No 32.
  30. ^ Manitoba Act, 1870, SC 1870, c 3.
  31. ^ Alberta Act, SC 1905, c 3.
  32. ^ Saskatchewan Act, SC 1905, c 42.
  33. ^ Constitution Amendment, 1998 (Newfoundland Act), SI/98-25, (1998) C Gaz II, Extra No 1.
  34. ^ Constitution of Alberta Amendment Act, 1990, RSA 2000, c C-24.
  35. ^ "Why the Charter has its red blotch". The Globe and Mail. April 15, 2012. Retrieved October 18, 2019.
  36. ^ "Missile Protester sentenced for defacing constitution". CBC News.
  37. ^ "Missile Protestor defaces Constitution". CBC News.

Further reading

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Constitutions of Canada.
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Constitution_of_Canada&oldid=952070497"