Category:Wikipedia essays
![]() | This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. |
This category contains Wikipedia essays – project pages on Wikipedia-related topics, but with no official status.
Pages tagged with {{essay}}
categorize here if they are in the Wikipedia namespace and into Category:User essays if they are in userspace. Please use more specific templates where appropriate:
{{Behavioral essay}}
{{Civility essay}}
{{Deletion essay}}
{{Humorous essay}}
{{Information page}}
{{Notability essay}}
{{Template essay}}
{{Supplemental essay}}
{{WikiProject advice}}
Essays in the Wikipedia namespace may be edited by anyone. Essays in the User namespace are normally edited only by the user that hosts the page and are categorized with Category:User essays, usually via {{user essay}}. User essays may be moved categorically into the Wikipedia namespace and this category if they are frequently referenced, as evidenced by becoming an evolving expression of multiple editors. Wikipedia essays may be moved into userspace (or deleted) if they are found to be unhelpful or to contradict a settled point of policy. Additional essays may be found in the WMF-wide meta:Category:Essays. For non-Wikipedia-related essays, as article topics, see Category:Essays.
Subcategories
This category has the following 12 subcategories, out of 49 total.
(previous page) (next page)R
S
- Wikipedia essays about stubs (6 P)
T
V
- Wikipedia essays about vandalism (21 P)
W
- Wikipedia warning essays (28 P)
- Essays about what Wikipedia is (15 P)
- Wikipedia supplemental pages (141 P)
Pages in category "Wikipedia essays"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 2,107 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)R
- Wikipedia:Race and ethnicity
- Wikipedia:RACRBE
- Wikipedia:Raising awareness
- Wikipedia:Reactions to... articles
- Wikipedia:Read before commenting
- Wikipedia:Read the archives
- Wikipedia:Read the room
- Wikipedia:Reader
- Wikipedia:Reader Knows Nothing
- Wikipedia:Readers first
- Wikipedia:Reality Wins Again
- Wikipedia:Really old articles that shouldn't be deleted due to a lack of references
- Wikipedia:Reasonability rule
- Wikipedia:Reasonableness
- Wikipedia:Recent years
- Wikipedia:Recentism
- Wikipedia:Recheck before posting
- Wikipedia:Recovering from Wikipediholism
- Wikipedia:Wikipedihol
- Wikipedia:Recreation of previously deleted pages
- Wikipedia:Red flags in edit summaries
- Wikipedia:Redirect instead
- Wikipedia:Redirect, DAB entry or hatnote needed
- Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap
- Wikipedia:Redirects are costly
- Wikipedia:Redirects to nowhere
- Wikipedia:Redlinks within reason, Bluelinks within context
- Wikipedia:Redundancy is good
- Wikipedia:RedWarn/Unofficial builds
- Wikipedia:Refer it upward
- Wikipedia:Reference database
- Wikipedia:Reference desk advice
- Wikipedia:Reference Desk philosophies
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/How to create a new reference desk
- Wikipedia:Reflections on RfX
- Wikipedia:Reform
- Wikipedia:Reform of WikiProjects
- Wikipedia:Reformatting pages
- Wikipedia:Related information/answers
- Wikipedia:Relationships with academic editors
- Wikipedia:Relevance emerges
- Wikipedia:Relevance of content
- Wikipedia:Reliability of GNIS data
- Wikipedia:Reliability of open government data
- Wikipedia:Reliability of open government data/Intralexical's Response
- Wikipedia:Reliable source examples
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources for software articles
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Genocide and mass atrocities
- Wikipedia:Reliably sourcing statements
- Wikipedia:Relist bias
- Wikipedia:Relisting can be abusive
- Wikipedia:Remember the reader
- Wikipedia:Removal of non-free images
- Wikipedia:Rendering math
- Wikipedia:Repainting the Great Wall of China
- Wikipedia:Repetition in argumentation
- Wikipedia:Replies to common objections
- Wikipedia:Reporting interaction ban violations
- Wikipedia:Reproposal tags
- Wikipedia:Requesting free content
- Wikipedia:Research
- Wikipedia:Research recruitment
- Wikipedia:Researching Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Resolving NPOV disputes
- Wikipedia:Responding to a failure to discuss
- Wikipedia:Responding to incivility
- Wikipedia:Responsibility
- Wikipedia:Responsible Editing Pledge
- Wikipedia:Responsible tagging
- Wikipedia:Responsiblity
- Wikipedia:Restoring part of a reverted edit
- Wikipedia:Revert notification opt-out
- Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary
- Wikipedia:Revert, ignore
- Wikipedia:Revert, ignore, semi-protect
- Wikipedia:Reverting
- Wikipedia:Review aggregators
- Wikipedia:Review tests
- Wikipedia:Reviving the active admin corps
- Wikipedia:Revocation of our licensing is not permitted
- Wikipedia:RfA cheatsheet
- Wikipedia:RfA inflation
- Wikipedia:RfA is dead
- Wikipedia:RfA Review/Question
- Wikipedia:RfA Review/Reflect
- Wikipedia:RfC Committee
- Wikipedia:Rhetoric
- Wikipedia:Righting Small Wrongs
- Wikipedia:Roadmaps for article titles
- Wikipedia:Robotic editing
- Wikipedia:Roll on the floor and laugh
- Wikipedia:Rollback for users
- Wikipedia:Rolling Stone charts
- Wikipedia:Romanization of Bashkir
- Wikipedia:Romanization of Belarusian
- Wikipedia:Romanization of Javanese
- Wikipedia:Romanization of Russian
- Wikipedia:Rome wasn't built in a day
- Wikipedia:Rough consensus
- Wikipedia:Rude
- Wikipedia:Rulespam
S
- Wikipedia:SAFE
- Wikipedia:Salting is usually a bad idea
- Wikipedia:Sample country outline
- Wikipedia:Sanctions against editors should not be punitive
- Wikipedia:Sandbox thief
- Wikipedia:Sanitize
- Wikipedia:Sarcasm is really helpful
- Wikipedia:Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander
- Wikipedia:Saying something doesn't make it so
- User:Scarpy/Managing page images
- Wikipedia:Scepticism is mainstream
- Wikipedia:Schools and colleges banned WP in 2007-2008
- Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments
- Wikipedia:Scientific consensus
- Wikipedia:Scientific point of view
- Wikipedia:Scientific, academic, mainstream, and proportional point of view
- Wikipedia:Scooby-Doo threshold
- Wikipedia:Scope
- Wikipedia:Search engine optimization
- Wikipedia:Seems legit
- Wikipedia:Selection pages
- Wikipedia:Self-appointed prophet
- Wikipedia:SelfSelection
- Wikipedia:Semantic Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Semi-duplicate
- User:Sennalen/Prefer truth
- User:Sennalen/Write the Infinite Article
- Wikipedia:Separate articles for administrative divisions to settlements
- Wikipedia:Serendipity
- Wikipedia:Service level agreement
- Wikipedia:Settle the process first
- Wikipedia:Sexual content
- Wikipedia:Sexual content/FAQ
- Wikipedia:Shadowless Fists of Death!
- Wikipedia:Sham consensus
- Wikipedia:Shirt58's Law
- Wikipedia:Shoot it early
- Wikipedia:Shoot yourself in the foot
- Wikipedia:Short horizontal line
- Wikipedia:Should I fork?
- Wikipedia:Should you ask a question at RfA?
- Wikipedia:Shouting things loudly does not make them true
- Wikipedia:Shrink, don't split
- Wikipedia:Shunning
- Wikipedia:Sign your hat
- Wikipedia:Signatures of living persons
- Wikipedia:Signs of sockpuppetry
- Wikipedia:Silence does not imply consent when drafting new policies
- Wikipedia:Simple English Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Simple Flying
- Wikipedia:Simplified
- Wikipedia:Sinclair's Law
- Wikipedia:Single-purpose account
- Wikipedia:Singles criteria
- Wikipedia:Skeptical point of view
- Wikipedia:Skim read
- Wikipedia:Sledgehammer
- Wikipedia:Slippery slope
- Wikipedia:Slurs
- Wikipedia:Smarter than Einstein
- Wikipedia:Smite
- Wikipedia:Smokers
- Wikipedia:So how exactly do you verify a Wikipedia article?
- Wikipedia:So your article got deleted
- Wikipedia:Soccer team
- Wikipedia:Social networking
- Wikipedia:Socially desirable purposes
- Wikipedia:Society
- Wikipedia:Sociology of Wikipedia via Rorty and Berger
- Wikipedia:SODUCKERANG
- Wikipedia:Solutions looking for a problem
- Wikipedia:Some Observant Words Regarding Editing And People
- Wikipedia:Somebody else's problem
- Wikipedia:Someone else fix it
- Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Questions
- Wikipedia:Sour grapes
- Wikipedia:Source counting
- Wikipedia:Source it
- Wikipedia:Source pH
- Wikipedia:Source your plot summaries
- Wikipedia:Sources – SWOT analysis
- Wikipedia:Sources first
- Wikipedia:Sourcing content about newer phenomena
- Wikipedia:Spam event horizon
- Wikipedia:Spam paranoia
- Wikipedia:Specialized-style fallacy
- Wikipedia:Speedwriter
- Wikipedia:Speedy deletion of drafts
- Wikipedia:Splat tables
- Wikipedia:Splitting resolution
- Wikipedia:Spoons versus forks
- Wikipedia:St. Wikipe
- Wikipedia:Stable version to revert to
- Wikipedia:Stack Exchange is eating our lunch
- Wikipedia:Stackexchange and Reddit
- Wikipedia:Standard exception to Projectspace limitations
- Wikipedia:Standard offer
- Wikipedia:Star essays
- Wikipedia:Statement on Wikipedia from participating communications firms