Jump to content

Feminist sex wars

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Crzer07 (talk | contribs) at 09:09, 26 May 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Part of a series on
Feminism
History
Waves
Timelines
Women's suffrage by country
Intersectional variants
Socialist
Multicultural
Other variants
Religious variants
Movements and ideologies
Concepts
Outlooks
Theory
Areas of study
By continent/country
Lists and categories
Lists
Categories
Feminism portal

The Feminist Sex Wars, also known as the Lesbian Sex Wars, or simply the Sex Wars or Porn Wars, were acrimonious debates amongst feminists regarding a number of issues broadly relating to sex. The debates polarised into two sides during the late 1970s and early 1980s and the aftermath of this polarisation of feminist views during the sex wars continues to this day.[1] The sides were characterized by anti-porn feminist and sex-positive feminist groups with disagreements regarding sexuality, pornography and other forms of equal representation, prostitution, the role of trans women in the lesbian community, lesbian sexual practices, sadomasochism and other sexual issues. The feminist movement was deeply divided as a result of these debates.[2][3][4][5][6] The Feminist Sex Wars are sometimes viewed as part of the division that led to the end of the second-wave feminist era. [citation needed]

In 1995, Lisa Duggan reviewed the antagonistic nature of the feminist sex wars:

Ah, the porn wars. These debates among feminists, which extended from the late seventies to the mid-eighties, did indeed feel like "war". The battles were bitter, often personal and vituperative. The scars remain.[7]

The Combatants

The two sides became labelled anti-pornography feminists and sex-positive feminists.

Anti-pornography feminists

In New York in 1976 Andrea Dworkin was active in organising demonstrations against the film Snuff. However, attempts made to also start an organisation to continue anti-pornography campaigning by feminists in the city failed. In LA organising was more successful and the group Women Against Violence Against Women was founded in 1976 in response to the film and then also proceeded to campaign against the advertising for the Rolling Stones' album Black and Blue.[8] The anti-pornography movement in the USA gained ground with the creation of Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media in 1977, in San Francisco, following a 1976 conference on violence against women held by local women's centers. Early members included Susan Griffin, Kathleen Barry and Laura Lederer. WAVPM organised the first national conference on pornography in San Francisco in 1978 which included the first Take Back the Night march.[9] The conference led to anti-pornography feminists organizing in New York in 1979 under the banner of Women Against Pornography,[10] and to similarly-orientated organisations and efforts being created across the United States. In 1983 Page Mellish, a one-time member of WAVPM and of WAP, founded Feminists Fighting Pornography to focus on political activism seeking legal changes to limit the porn industry. Andrea Dworkin and Catherine MacKinnon wanted civil laws restricting pornography[11] and to this end drafted the Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance. They viewed male sexual dominance as the root of all female oppression, and thus condemned pornography, prostitution, and other manifestations of male sexual power.[12]

Pro-sex feminists

From 1979 feminist journalist Ellen Willis was one of the early voices criticising anti-pornography feminists for what she saw as sexual puritanism, moral authoritarianism and a threat to free speech. Her 1981 essay, Lust Horizons: Is the Women's Movement Pro-Sex? is the origin of the term, "pro-sex feminism".[13] The response to the anti-pornography strand of feminism by the sex-positive feminists was one that promoted sex as an avenue of pleasure for women, seeing anti-pornography positions as aligned to the political right-wing's war on recreational sex and pornography.[14] Early sex positive groups included Samois, founded in San Francisco in 1977, whose early members included Gayle Rubin and Pat Califia and the Lesbian Sex Mafia, founded by Dorothy Allison and others in New York in 1981. The Feminists Anti-Censorship Taskforce (FACT) was set up in 1984 by Ellen Willis in response to the Dworkin-MacKinnon Ordinance,[15] in 1989 Feminists Against Censorship, formed in the UK, its members including Avedon Carol and Feminists for Free Expression formed in the USA in 1992 with founding members including Veronica Vera and Candida Royalle.

Key Events

In October 1980 the National Organisation for Women identified what became known as the "Big Four" through declaring that "Pederasty, pornography, sadomasochism and public sex" were about "exploitation, violence or invasion of privacy" and not "sexual preference or orientation".[16] One of the more memorable clashes between the pro-sex and anti-porn feminists occurred at the 1982 Barnard Conference on Sexuality. Anti-pornography feminists were excluded from the events’ planning committee, so they staged rallies outside the conference to show their disdain.[12]

The debates

Pornography debate

Toward the end of the 1970s, much of the discourse in the feminist movement shifted from the discussion of lesbian feminism to focus on the new topic of sexuality. One of the primary concerns with sexuality was the issue of pornography, which caused a great divide among feminists. The two recognized sides of the debate were anti-pornography feminism and “pro-sex” feminism.[17] One of the major influences of anti-pornography feminism was its predecessor, lesbian feminism.[citation needed] Anti-pornography movements developed from fundamental arguments displayed by lesbianism, such as the notion of patriarchal sexual relations.[citation needed] Ellen Willis described these relations as being “based on male power backed by force.”[18] From this perspective, pornography is created exclusively for men by men and is a direct reflection of the man-dominant paradigm surrounding sexual relations.[19] Another idea taken from lesbian feminism by anti-pornography groups was that sexuality is about creating a compassionate bond and a lasting relation with another person, contrary to the belief of the purely physical nature of sex.[20]

In her book, Pornography: Men Possessing Women, Andrea Dworkin argued that the theme of pornography is male dominance and as a result it is intrinsically harmful to women and their well-being. Dworkin believed that pornography is not only damaging in its production but also in its consumption, since the viewer will mentally internalize pornography's misogynistic portrayal of women.[17] Robin Morgan summarized the view of anti-pornography feminists that pornography and violence against women are linked in her statement, "pornography is the theory, rape is the practice."[21]

The anti-pornography movement has been criticised by sex-positive feminists as a repression of sexuality and a move towards censorship.[19] In her article,Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality, Gayle Rubin characterizes sex liberation as a feminist goal and denounces the idea that anti-pornography feminists speak collectively for all of feminism. She offers the notion that what is needed is a theory of sexuality separate from feminism.[22] In XXX: A Woman's Right to Pornography, Wendy McElroy summarises the sex-positive perspective as "the benefits pornography provides to women far outweigh any of its disadvantages".[23]

The pornography debate among radical and libertarian feminists has focused on the depictions of female sexuality in relation to male sexuality in this type of media. [24] Radical feminists emphasize that pornography illustrates objectification and normalization of sexual violence through presentation of specific acts. [24] In contrast, libertarian feminists are concerned with the stigmatization of sexual minorities and the limited right to practice sexual choice that would be hindered without pornography. [24] Rather than pass personal judgement of sexual acts, each feminist camp should recognize the plasticity of sexual meaning. This would enable the feminist movement, through shared education and mutual respect, to benefit from a greater comprehension of the diverse sexual preferences that exist.

Sadomasochism debate

The main locus of the sex wars' debate on sadomasochism and other BDSM practices was San Francisco. Women Against Violence in Pornography and Media was founded there in 1977. Its first political action was to picket a live show at a strip club featuring women performing sadomasochistic acts on each other, in line with its stated aim to end all portrayals of women being "bound, raped, tortured, killed or degraded for sexual stimulation or pleasure".[25] As well as campaigning against pornography, WAVPM were also strongly opposed to BDSM, seeing it as ritualized violence against women and opposed its practice within the lesbian community.[citation needed] In 1978 SAMOIS was formed, an organisation for women in the BDSM community who saw their sexual practices as consistent with feminist principles.[26]

Prostitution debate

See also: Feminist views on prostitution

Another debate of the feminist sex wars centred on prostitution, with the women in the radical feminist or anti-pornography camp was frequently also the anti-prostitution camp, arguing against prostitution as being forced on women who had no other alternatives, whilst sex-positive feminists argued that this position ignored the self-agency of women who chose sex work, viewing prostitution as not inherently based on the exploitation of women. Carol Leigh notes that "The Prostitutes rights movement of the early 1970's evolved directly from the women's movement", but adds: "The women's movement in the U.S. has always been ambivalent about prostitutes".[27] The polarised views of feminists on prostitution have affected their positions on the related issue of human trafficking, which is frequently for the purpose of sexual exploitation, with anti-prostitution feminists taking up the position of abolitionists and sex-positive feminists that of regulationists.[28]

Anti-prostitution feminists identify prostitution as harmful to those who are directly involved in it: it spreads sexually transmitted diseases and threatens health[citation needed] and it involves violence towards prostitutes either by pimps or clients. According to a 2003 study: “violence is the norm for women in prostitution”.[29] These feminists also argue that women as a group are oppressed and harmed by prostitution even when they are not directly involved in it. Objectifying women through prostitution sends the message that men can buy a woman’s body. Scott Anderson explains, “prostitution plays a key role in sustaining the social inequality of women. It does so by defining women in general as sexual objects, available to any man who desires them”.[30] Similarly, prostitution legitimizes men’s demand for sex through the presence of coercion and rape of prostituted women. The nature of prostitution gives men power and control in the sexual ‘relationship’. Some anti-prostitution feminists argue further that prostitution is an issue that must be contextualized within a patriarchal and capitalist society. Although reasons for becoming a prostituted female are complex, many women are motivated by economic necessity. One woman pointed out that “hooking is the only job for which women as a group are paid more than men”[31] but despite this, most of the money prostitutes make is used and controlled by pimps.[32] Women who are struggling with poverty may turn to prostitution as a way to provide for themselves or their families, a last resort when they have few other opportunities. The social context of patriarchy gives women fewer opportunities and leaves them more likely to be in a position of economic need; given these circumstances they ‘choose’ to participate in prostitution because it is one of the seemingly few options available.[30]

The sex-positive perspective sees prostitutes as active agents in their lives and work and embraces more open views of sexuality and pleasure. It argues that women have power within the sexual experience of prostitution because they control the services and fees. They are seen as sexually liberated and may enjoy their work. Although there is not an easy way to quantify how much control and enjoyment any prostitute has over her work, sex-positive feminists also emphasize that, from a humanist perspective, individuals should have the right to choose their work, including the choice of prostitution.[33] They argue that sex work is not inherently exploitative or degrading and that there is much variation in the situation of sex workers. Most sex-positive feminists do recognize that women working as prostitutes face difficult realities of violence and possible criminal implications. This group often supports sex worker rights projects and the decriminalization of prostitution, which would allow prostitutes to organize and give them greater protection of health and safety. Decriminalization would allow sex work to be regulated, giving women more protection.[34]

Effects of the sex wars

The polarisation of feminist ideology during the sex wars has had wide ranging effects. Examples include, according to Liu (2011), "The confusion in the interpretation of the definition of human trafficking is a consequence of opposing feminist views on prostitution."[35]

Third-wave feminists' view on sex wars

Third-wave writings promote personal, individualized views on the gender-related issues focused on during the feminist sex wars, such as prostitution, pornography and sadomasochism. In particular, the third-wave view of pornography is that there is no greater meaning other than which the actor or consumer gives it.[citation needed] Items such as sex objects and porn, identified by some second wave feminists as instruments of oppression are now no longer being exclusively used by men but also by women.[36] Feminist critic Teresa de Lauretis sees the sex wars not in terms of polarised sides but as reflecting a third wave feminism inherently embodying difference, which may include conflicting and competing drives.[37][38] Meanwhile, critic Jana Sawicki rejects both the polarised positions, seeking a third way that is neither morally dogmatic or uncritically libertarian[37]

See also

References

  1. ^ Atmore, Chris (2002). Sexual Abuse and Troubled Feminism in Snakes and Ladders: Reviewing feminists at the centuries end. Routeledge. p. 92. ISBN 0415197996.
  2. ^ Duggan, Lisa; Hunter, Nan D. (1995). Sex wars: sexual dissent and political culture. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-91036-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Hansen, Karen Tranberg (1990). Women, class, and the feminist imagination: a socialist-feminist reader. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. ISBN 0-87722-630-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Gerhard, Jane F. (2001). Desiring revolution: second-wave feminism and the rewriting of American sexual thought, 1920 to 1982. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-11204-1.
  5. ^ Leidholdt, Dorchen (1990). The Sexual liberals and the attack on feminism. New York: Pergamon Press. ISBN 0-08-037457-3. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ Vance, Carole S. Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Thorsons Publishers. ISBN 0-04-440593-6.
  7. ^ Duggan, Lisa (1995). Sex Wars: Sexual Dissent and Political Culture. Rutledge. p. 6. ISBN 0415910374.
  8. ^ Bronstein, Carolyn (2011). Battling Pornography: The American Feminist Anti-Pornography Movement 1976-1986. Cambridge University Press. pp. 88–97. ISBN 0521879922.
  9. ^ Currens, Elizabeth Gail (2007). Performing Gender, Enacting Community. ProQuest. p. 50. ISBN 0549268707.
  10. ^ McBride, Andrew. "The Sex Wars, 1970s to 1980s".
  11. ^ Demaske, Chris (2011). Modern Power and Free Speech: Contemporary culture and issues of equality. Lexington Books. p. 140. ISBN 0739127845.
  12. ^ a b McBride, Andrew. "Lesbian History".
  13. ^ Ellen Willis, Lust Horizons: The 'Voice' and the women's movement, Village Voice 50th Anniversary Issue, 2007. This is not the original "Lust Horizons" essay, but a retrospective essay mentioning that essay as the origin of the term. Accessed online 7 July 2007. A lightly revised version of the original "Lust Horizons" essay can be found in No More Nice Girls, pp. 3–14.
  14. ^ Johnson, Meri Lisa (2007). Third Wave Feminism and Television. I.B. Taurus. p. 70. ISBN 1845112466.
  15. ^ Boffin, Tina (1996). Stolen Glances in Lesbian Subjects: A Feminist Studies Reader. Indiana University Press. p. 121. ISBN 0253330602.
  16. ^ "Promiscuous Affections: A Life in the Bar". Retrieved Feb 2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  17. ^ a b McBridge, Andrew. >. "Lesbian History: The Sex Wars". University of Michigan. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  18. ^ Willis, Ellen (1983). In Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality. New York City: Monthy Review. pp. 460–467.
  19. ^ a b McBride, Andrew. >. "Lesbian History: The Sex Wars". University of Michigan. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  20. ^ Ferguson, Anne (1984). Signs. pp. 106–112.
  21. ^ Cavalier, Robert. "Feminism and Pornography". CMU Philosophy Department Web Server. Retrieved 6 December 2011.
  22. ^ Rubin, Gayle (1998). Social Perspectives in Lesbian and Gay Studies. New York City: Routledge. pp. 100–133.
  23. ^ McElroy, Wendy (1997). XXX: A Woman's Right to Pornography. St Martin's Press. ISBN 0312152450.
  24. ^ a b c Ferguson, A. 1984. "Sex War: The Debate between Radical and Libertarian Feminists." Chicago Journals. 10 (1): 106-112.
  25. ^ Bronstein, Carolyn (2011). Battling Pornography: The American Feminist Anti-Pornography Movement 1976-1986. Cambridge University Press. p. 139. ISBN 0521879922.
  26. ^ Rubin, Gayle S. (2@11). Deviations: A Gayle Rubin Reader. Duke University Press. p. 210. ISBN 0822349868. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  27. ^ Leigh, Carol. "On the Frontline of Sex Wars". On The Issues Magazine. Retrieved Feb 2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  28. ^ Liu, Min (2011). Migration, Prostitution and Human Trafficking: The Voice of Chinese Women. Transaction Publishers. p. 38. ISBN 1412815053.
  29. ^ Farley, Melissa (2003). "Prostitution and Trafficking in Nine Countries: An Update on Violence and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder". Journal of Trauma Practice.
  30. ^ a b Anderson, Scott (2002). "Prostitution and Sexual Autonomy: Making Sense of the Prohibition of Prostitution". Ethics: an International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy. 112 (4): 748. doi:10.1086/339672.
  31. ^ Overall, Christine (1992). "What's Wrong with Prostitution? Evaluating Sex Work". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society. 17 (4): 705. doi:10.1086/494761.
  32. ^ Barry, Kathleen (1981). "The Underground Economic System of Pimping". Journal of International Affairs.
  33. ^ Klinger, Kimberly (2003). "Prostitution Humanism and a Woman's Choice". Humanist.
  34. ^ Kissil, Karni,. "The Prostitution Debate in Feminism: Current Trends, Policy and Clinical Issues Facing an Invisible Population". Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  35. ^ Liu, Min (2011). Migration, Prostitution and Human Trafficking: The Voice of Chinese Women. Transaction Publishers. p. 37. ISBN 1412815053.
  36. ^ Crawford, Bridget J. (Mar. 1, 2010). "The Third Wave's Break From Feminism". International Journal of Law in Context. 6 (1). International Journal of Law in Context: 100. doi:10.1017/S1744552309990346Template:Inconsistent citations {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link) (author prof. law, Pace Univ., N.Y.) (review)
  37. ^ a b Code, Lorraine (2003). Encyclopaedia of Feminist Theories. Rroutledge. p. 445. ISBN 0415308852.
  38. ^ de Lauretis, Teresa (1990). "Feminism and Its Differences" (PDF). Pacific Coast Philology. 25 (1/2): 22–30. Retrieved Feb 2013. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Feminist_sex_wars&oldid=556841941"