User talk:Cloudz679/Archive5

About Myself

My TalkPage

Archives

Awards

Sandbox

Your GA nomination of Patrik Berger

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Patrik Berger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Sourcing in the lead

Your right, I did know that but I was quick to revert (mainly for the way it was written). Will keep that in mind from now on. Cheers mate. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 15:48, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks mate, looking forward to that. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 15:53, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Patrik Berger

The article Patrik Berger you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Patrik Berger for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Chris, I believe I have addressed all the points raised. C679 06:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

John Johnson

Hi,I want to inform you that I have addressed all your points of John Johnson for the GA review. Thanks! RRD13 (talk) 04:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

I hope you're aware that there are outstanding points on the review which have not been addressed. Please leave a message once you have actually addressed everything. Thanks, C679 10:13, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Patrik Berger

The article Patrik Berger you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Patrik Berger for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:42, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!

Hello Cloudz679, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition began on 1 January. There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 20:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2014/Submissions/Cloudz679

Hi Cloudz; I'm afraid I've had to remove Patrik Berger, as this seems to be last year's article. That's not to say it's not a very good article, just to say it's not one that's eligible for WikiCup points. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

GA review

Thanks again for taking the time to review. :) Lemonade51 (talk) 18:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for the great work in getting it up to standard! C679 18:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Jack Stewart (ice hockey)/GA1

Hi Cloudz679! Thank yo for the GA review, and hopefully, I have responded to your comments. Cheers! Resolute 03:39, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK dates

Hello. I have indeed noticed, and if I were just adding my latest, I'd put its date as per my talk page notification just as you did (and sorry I overwrote your accurate date). Please feel free to correct any other discrepancies, but when doing a large backlog, as was the case today, it really would take me significantly longer to check which batch each item was in and if necessary adjust the date, than it does to just take them all from the archive as is. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:22, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Hit 'em Up review

Hey I had a question on the Talk:Hit 'Em Up/GA1 page about what you mean by prose. I'm close to being finished fixing the issues, just started class though so I've been less active. Anyways, thanks a bunch, CrowzRSA 05:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

I think everything is fixed now. CrowzRSA 00:18, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Okay I read through the article and fixed a lot of stuff, and did quite a bit of rearranging. But nonetheless, I do believe the article looks a lot better now. Anyways, no rushes, just lettin' you know. Thanks for your cooperation! CrowzRSA 02:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• 12george1 (submissions) and TropicalAnalystwx13 (submissions) were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
• WonderBoy1998 (submissions) scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Wikipedia:Featured topics/She Wolf.
• TheAustinMan (submissions) scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
• Igordebraga (submissions) has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Quarter Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Sydney Leroux (estimated annual readership: 258,876) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Hmlarson (talk) 19:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Reduta Jazz Club

Hi Clouds - I'm sure that Louis Armstrong played in a jam session at Reduta, it was in 1965, when he came to Prague to play nine (sold out) concerts in Lucerna. After one of the concerts, in the night, they continued in the club. It's somewhere in the books, but I can't find it now so it's probably better not to mention that without sources :) Thanks for your help, btw, and congrats on the GA mentioned above, about a pretty football girl. That's really an impressive article. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

No problem about Reduta, I just removed the Armstrong and Charles part because I thought they are significant enough to require sources, if you can find an appropriate source there is no time limit! As for the GA, I was just the reviewer but I am glad you enjoyed reading the article! Thanks, C679 10:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Far Forest Scrolls

I see you've swung by the talk page of this article, do you think it merits a sockpuppetry investigation? I'm not sure how one goes about this.TheLongTone (talk) 18:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

@TheLongTone: If you're interested, you can take it to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. Thanks, C679 18:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

On GA review of A Whole Nother Story

Thanx for taking your time off and reviewing the article - A Whole Nother Story. I am really sorry to have wasted your time. I know it is not close to Good Article status. But it was my first article and I was pretty new to wikipedia at the time of its nomination. Since then i have got much more acquainted with wikipedia's ways and rules. I have read a number of wikipedia policies and style pages, criterion for different statuses. I have also been assessing a lot of articles for Wiki Projects and am much more familiar with the different processes in wikipedia now. So i have improved now ad am really sorry for doing this mistake. I kind of flowed in the excitement of making my first article ad thought it was pretty much better than the other new articles. Sorry :), should have withdrawn the nomination after realizing it was not GA class but i wanted to see the views of a reviewer on it. Consider it a mistake of a younger and lesser inexperienced editor. Please, forgive this as a first mistake.

Still, i think you were a little too harsh on the article. I mean, it was definitely passing criteria 3a, 3b and 4. At the least 3a and 3b. Also I think it passes or at least is close to passing 2a and 2c and 1b. I know it needs improving in prose and was certain that it will fail in references but i presumed that it will at least pass the other criterion. I might be wrong and if I am, please tell me so and also how i might improve upon my mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by King Of The Wise (talk • contribs) 16:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Everything is covered at the review, I am happy you are keen on improving it, I suggest you involve related WikiProjects if you want editors to collaborate with you, perhaps leave a message at the relevant talk pages. Nobody writes GA-class articles on their own, don't worry about it. C679 17:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

 Done though you could have removed them yourself as the link was present on the template doc pages (Template:FIFA player/doc, Template:NFT player/doc) etc. and not the templates themselves. These doc pages are not protected. GiantSnowman 19:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Ok, can you give me a reason why u removed "profile at transfermarkt" at Valmir Sulejmani? Eni.Sukthi.Durres (talk) 20:53, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Holding cell (section: To orphan), due to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 December 10. Thanks, C679 20:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Haha, sorry, too quick with my 'archive' button! Good work, we now need to remove the links to TM that aren't on the template... GiantSnowman 16:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Beyond my technical know-how, I'm afraid. GiantSnowman 16:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been removing Transfermarkt from articles citing that it's "not a reliable source". Why do you feel that it's not reliable? Raul17 (talk) 18:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

See here and in particular here. I would advise you add alternative sources to enable verification of player articles which may have relied on Transfermarkt. C679 18:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I use Transfermarkt basicly for the ending of contracts and transfer fees for academy players since the other source list those unless the Madrid site reports it. Bummer! Is Futbolme a reliable source since I have found errors in some players' transfers/clubs played for list? Thanks again Raul17 (talk) 21:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

It's not listed at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard and there doesn't appear to have been any significant discussion at the WikiProject page, so it's up to you, but if there is evidence that it uses user-generated content, it wont withstand scrutiny. C679 10:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

If I'm not mistaken, they would ask for help with their transfer list. Because of my ignorance, I did not think that was a red flag for reliability. Thanks. Raul17 (talk) 07:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Byron Webster

Hi, thanks for adding his 2007/08 stats. Do you have any idea if his 2008/09 might be available? I've had no luck in finding them, no doubt due to Most playing in the second tier that season. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

As you alluded to, the second tier is not very well covered in terms of player stats. Sites like Transfermarkt and playerhistory.com cover it, but the first is unreliable and the second has been down for quite some time. I suppose his club Baník Most may have the stats somewhere, but they are not on the website. It's a shame because other clubs, e.g. Baník Sokolov, actually record the stats of their own accord, which although a primary source, is at least reliable. Thanks, C679 20:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

A couple of additional things: First I found his club profile page, [1], without any playing stats. Second, a different games/goals total on the Czech Wikipedia article, but it is unsourced and the contributor has been inactive since 2010, so it looks like for now at least it is going to continue to be an unsolved mystery! Thanks, C679 20:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Sydney Leroux

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

1. Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
2. Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
3. WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

• Hahc21 (submissions), who helped take Thirty Flights of Loving through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
• Prism (submissions), who claimed the first featured list of the competition with Natalia Kills discography.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions), who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance salamander, now a good article, scored 108 points.

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Martin Miller (Czech actor)

Ha I wrote this. Looks good for GA actually.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

The problem was the lack of information about him biographically so the prose reads a bit like a list and contains some irrelevant information to pad it out. I disagree with a number of the reviewers comments. For a minor character actor it's pretty comprehensive, not that it really needs to be for GA. I'll give it a read shortly.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

There you go, now GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing it to my attention and adding to it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milan Baroš

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Milan Baroš you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 08:00, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Klára Svatoňová

Hello, I meant to say that the curler in question falls under the notability guidelines set up in WP:CURLING. She meets three areas of the criteria:

• Has participated in a World Curling Tour sanctioned event. She has played in four WCT events in her career. [2]
• Has participated in a World Curling Federation sanctioned event. She has played in six WCF events in her career. [3]
• Has participated in an Olympic qualifying event for any country. Yes, she played in the Curling at the 2014 Winter Olympics – Qualification event

It should be noted she is currently also playing in the World Championships, which means she is clearly playing in the highest level of the sport, which means she falls under the criteria set in WP:SPORTS. Unfortunately, I do not speak Czech, so my only sources are in the English media, perhaps as a Czech speaker you could help out? -- Earl Andrew - talk 22:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for adding a reference! I was wondering if it had been the first medal in curling for the Czech Republic. -- Earl Andrew - talk 22:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milan Baroš

The article Milan Baroš you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Milan Baroš for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 06:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Atletico Madrid GAR

Hi I'm not sure about the conventions for a GAR. When does the timeframe for a review end? Or is it that because you have supported it, it can be delisted right now? '''tAD''' (talk) 13:26, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Per WP:GAR, you as the nominator for GAR are not allowed to close the review if it is a "community review". However it doesn't appear to be a community review. Did you notify the last GA reviewer, User:Mr.Kennedy1, per policy? I see he is listed as "retired", but you should still do it. Also the main contributors, which can be found using a link at the page I mentioned. Beyond this I would add a week, then close and delist it, in the absence of any disputes. C679 13:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Baros

Well done on getting Milan Baros to GA on 17 March. Today just fitted into the timespan for me to nominate it for a WP:DYK. '''tAD''' (talk) 13:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, it had totally slipped my mind… C679 14:27, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Martin Miller (actor, born 1899)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Martin Miller (actor, born 1899) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 21:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup error

Hi there- this is just a quick note to apologise for a small but important mistake in the last WikiCup newsletter; it is not 64 users who will progress to the next round, but 32. J Milburn (talk) 18:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Shandor Vayda

Did he play in the Czech Republic? No, he didn't. The FFU reference doesn't seem to include any matches outside of Ukraine. Also could you point out where "loans" are discussed, as I cannot easily see them. Thanks, C679 20:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, he not spent any game for main team, but in his interview he said, that was on loan in FK Dukla ("Жаль, що не вдалося там заграти і навіть дебютувати за основну команду": http://football.ua/ukraine1league/news/196101.html). I hope, it's true. But if you have opposite certain information, you can remove it. Sincerely, --Noel baran (talk) 20:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Professional league?

Nicolas Lüchinger plays for FC St. Gallen in the Swiss Super League. Tell me why the Swiss Super League is not a professional team, as stated in your PROD.--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

No evidence he has actually "played", from what I can gather. C679 16:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

How would you or I find out if he actually played, or just sat on the bench?--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

WP:BURDEN. C679 04:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Martin Miller (actor, born 1899)

The article Martin Miller (actor, born 1899) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Martin Miller (actor, born 1899) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 01:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Review of Aleksandar Đurić

Fixed the issues as noted. Please proceed with further reassessment. LRD NO (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your time and dedication to this review. I've learned much from my first GA nomination considering I'm relatively new to Wikipedia. LRD NO (talk) 12:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Could you give your opinion about this Talk-section

... of Belgium national football team? "Managing the records: short summary and a separate article?" It would be highly appreciated! Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 08:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Could I tempt

... you to help with Viktor Dyk? He has a couple of days to complete a x5 expansion and as has been pointed out to me - Dyk should have a DYK. Victuallers (talk) 11:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up, 1126 bytes, target = 5630, I will see what I can do to get the article to eligibility! C679 13:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the help. Its a pity it lost the image as I think that was "the hook". I will tell you if I do another article. I have done another since but she was a TV presenter and I'm not sure she was of interest. Thanks for sharing Victuallers (talk) 14:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Viktor DYK award

	Viktor DYK award
	I present you the Dyk of all DYKs, Viktor Dyk. You may have had absolutely no idea who he wass or what he did, but it's clear now that he was a total Dyk. DYK that Dyk does now have a DYK? With your help we have DYK'ed the Dyk. :P Victuallers (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Karlovy Vary Region

Hello! Your submission of Karlovy Vary Region at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sven Manguard Wha? 21:16, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Liberec Region

Hello! Your submission of Liberec Region at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 97198 (talk) 10:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 April newsletter

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to Czar (submissions) and Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

GA of John Johnson

Hey! I saw you commented in the nomination page of John Johnson (footballer), are there more comments you want to add before making the final decision? Thanks! FairyTailRocks 08:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

I have made additional comments there, and tagged the article for improvement. Thanks, C679 13:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Looks like he is already finished. Any thoughts? FairyTailRocks 14:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

@FairyTailRocks: The grammar is really poor there now but it seems to meet ATTRIBUTEPOV at least. C679 14:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Antonín Kinský

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Antonín Kinský you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheQ Editor -- TheQ Editor (talk) 19:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Antonín Kinský

The article Antonín Kinský you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Antonín Kinský for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TheQ Editor -- TheQ Editor (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Congrats, Cloudz. Good work. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 16:19, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

CCI closed

MER-C 10:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Australian Turkish List

Hi Cloudz679, You have alot of exciting articles and very interesting. I'm only new in the game I have a long way to go to be at your level bro. I recently added another Turkish Australian to the list; Turgay Oztas- 1972 Football Player Australian born- Turkish Parents, but couldn't added to the list column with the other names. I presume I'm not authorized like yourself to edit to there. Can you pls add it to the list if its possible, thank you so much and will continue to follow your interesting articles, all the best champ... Regards Barista72 Barista72 (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Another identity of Yopie or friend

I am looking through you, another (maybe the same) enemy of common sense.....All foul tricks by Czechs Askave (talk) 08:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Luka Modric review

Thank you for the fast response and an even faster review. I was in doubt myself about the article even being close to decently written. I am not nor was I ever involved with the article; never made a single edit. I was talked into nominating the article on behalf of another, newer Wikipedian who didn't know how to do it themselves (whom I also "tutored" in the beginning), without giving it a decent read myself beforehand, which I realize now, was a ridiculous thing to do. There is undoubtedly a lot to be done on the article, as you generously pointed out and I hereby apologize for the time wasted. Thanks and sorry once again; and keep doing what you're doing! Happy editing! -ProKro (talk) 13:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

I checked before and saw you had just the single edit to the page, updating the stats. No effort was wasted, hopefully the review enables improvements to be made to the article and we may see it at GA in the future. Thanks, C679 15:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

SPI Askave

I have added a comment to this case, mentioning an IP. It did not want to throw it full into the investifation, as it is your case. The Banner talk 19:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 11 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tomáš Rosický page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tomáš Rosický

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tomáš Rosický you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matty.007 -- Matty.007 (talk) 18:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tomáš Rosický

The article Tomáš Rosický you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tomáš Rosický for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Matty.007 -- Matty.007 (talk) 08:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Just managed to pass yesterday, got back later than I expected from walking, and managed to make one edit before my phone ran out of battery. Thanks again, Matty.007 09:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your review. C679 19:54, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem. I was going to nom for DYK, but saw that you seem to nom your own stuff. Do you mind me nominating it, or do you want to do it? Thanks, Matty.007 18:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Have nominated. Thanks again, will complete your review when I have time. C679 22:00, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 June newsletter

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's Godot13 (submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, Casliber (submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with Sven Manguard (submissions) taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to 12george1 (submissions) and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from Figureskatingfan (submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from Cloudz679 (submissions) and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of Sven Manguard (submissions).

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations on the newsletter mention! Thanks, Matty.007 19:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikicup semifinalists interview request

As you may know, I write for the Signpost, basically Wikipedia's newsletter. I'd like to do a feature on the semifinalists, would you be willing to provide, say, 250 to 500 words saying: (1.) Why did you join the Wikicup? (2.) What you you hope to get out of it? and (3.) Which of your contributions to the Wikicup are your favourites?

Not quite sure how I'll order them - I'll probably make the ed17 decide, as, you know, Conflict of Interest: I am a semifinalist. I'd imagine point order or alphabetical or the like.

Can you please reply at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-07-30/Wikicup#Cloudz679? Thanks! Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 00:22, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Template:DZfoot

Hello. A couple years you created the DZfoot template after I had requested it. The website has since change the format of the links to player profiles. It's now http://www.dzfoot.com/fiche-joueur?id=2215 instead of http://www.dzfoot.com/joueur.php?joueur_id=2055&saison_id=18. Any chance you can make the change to the code? I feel like I could do it myself but I'm afraid to break everything. TonyStarks (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Looks like User:Spudgfsh updated it before I had the chance to. Is it working the way you'd like now? Thanks, C679 10:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Czech Fourth Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mutěnice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Portal:Czech Republic/Selected anniversaries

Saw this through Vejvančický's talk, the highest temperature one was out of date - 40.2 was surpassed by 40.4 degrees celsius in Dobřichovice on August 20 2012[4] (I remember it well as I was in nearby Černošice that day). I moved it to August but it messes up the 5 blurbs per month thing so you may want to just remove it altogether and put in something else for July, can't think of anything off the top of my head though, especially since Cyril and Meth day is not really an anniversary, just a nameday. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  20:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for picking up on this. I have re-worked the Portal material to balance five hooks per month and re-added a hook which was previously in July. I also added the temperature information to the Dobřichovice article. Thanks, C679 23:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Bruno Nazário

Hey over there. I just want to let you know that I have deleted your remarks regarding no/a single source at this article. I have added required sources. DrunkenGerman (talk) 21:27, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 August newsletter

The final of the 2014 WikiCup begins in a few short minutes! Our eight finalists are listed below, along with their placement in Round 4:

1. Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer, finished top of Pool A and was the round's highest scorer. Godot is a featured picture specialist, claiming large numbers of points due to high-quality scans of historical documents, especially banknotes.
2. Casliber (submissions) is a WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist every year since 2010. In the semi-final, he was Pool B's highest scorer. Cas's points primarily come from articles on the natural sciences.
3. Czar (submissions) was Pool A's runner-up. Czar's points come mostly from content related to independent video games, including both articles and topics.
4. Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Pool B's runner-up. Another featured picture specialist, many of Adam's points come from the restoration of historical media. He has been a WikiCup finalist twice before.
5. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) won the WikiCup in 2012 and 2013, and enters this final as the first wildcard. She focuses on biology-related articles, and has worked on several high-importance articles.
6. 12george1 (submissions) is the second wildcard. George's points come primarily from meteorology-related articles. This year and last year, George was the first person in the competition to score.
7. Sturmvogel 66 (submissions), the third wildcard, was the 2010 champion and a finalist last year. His writes mostly on military history, especially naval history.
8. Bloom6132 (submissions), the fourth and final wildcard, has participated in previous WikiCups, but not reached any finals. Bloom's points are mostly thanks to did you knows, featured lists and good articles related to sport and national symbols.

We say goodbye to this year's semi-finalists. Matty.007 (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), WikiRedactor (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), Yellow Evan (submissions), Prism (submissions) and Cloudz679 (submissions) have all performed well to reach this stage of the competition, and we hope they will all be joining us again next year.

There are two upcoming competitions unrelated to the WikiCup which may be of interest to those who receive this newsletter. The Stub Contest will run through September, and revolves around expanding stub articles, especially high-importance or old stubs. In addition, a proposal has been made for a new competition, the GA Cup, which the organisers plan to run next year. This competition is based on the WikiCup and aims to reduce the good article review backlog.

There is now a thread for brainstorming on how next year's WikiCup competition should work. Please come along and share your thoughts- What works? What doesn't work? What needs changing? Signups for next year's competition will be open soon; we will be in touch. If, at this stage of the competition, you are keen to help the with the WikiCup, please do what you can to participate in review processes. Our finalists will find things much easier if the backlogs at good article candidates, featured article candidates, featured picture candidates and the rest are kept at a minimum. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment on moving Champions League page to a new disambiguation page

Hi. I note that you had previously commented on moving the Champions League page to Champions League (disambiguation) at Talk:Champions League. This was however in 2011. I was wondering your thoughts on it now and if so help participate in the request for move at Talk:Champions League. With Thanks - Master Of Ninja (talk) 14:02, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

St. Nicholas' Deanery Church, Znojmo

Hi Cloudz679/Archive5, there's a conversation about declining your copy-edit request for the above article here; also please note that the article has been tagged as a copyright violation and sent for investigation. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:24, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 September newsletter

In one month's time, we will know our WikiCup 2014 champion. Newcomer Godot13 (submissions) has taken a strong lead with a featured list (historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876) and a raft of featured pictures. Reigning champion Cwmhiraeth (submissions) is in second place with a number of high-importance biology articles, including new FA Isopoda and new GA least weasel. Casliber (submissions), who is in his fifth WikiCup final, is in third, with featured articles Pictor and Epacris impressa.

Signups for the 2015 WikiCup are open. All Wikipedians, new and experienced, are warmly invited to sign up for the competition. Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may also like to sign up for the GA Cup, a new WikiCup-inspired competition which revolves around completing good article reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Video gaming in the Czech Republic

Hi Cloudz679/Archive5, your requested copy-edit was done by Lstanley1979 (talk), who left you a mssage at the GOCE Requests page. I'm moving it here as I'm about to archive the request. You can see the original here. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 20:16, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

General English proof-reading/editing  Done LS1979. Requires a bit more sourcing, and might need a native Czech speaker to explain some of the specifics of the sources for the lede in particular. LS1979 (talk) 19:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 2013 Toronto Lynx season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 Toronto Lynx season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Toronto Lynx season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kingjeff (talk) 21:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

31 September

Hi. Thanks for the corrections, I appreciate it. I've actually noticed that mistake recently and would amend it slowly but gradually in my ongoing edits of those articles as I plan to. D_T_G (PL) 19:16, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello Cloudz679:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

WikiCup award

Awarded to Cloudz679 for participating in the 2014 WikiCup. J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 21:25, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014: The results

The 2014 WikiCup champion is Godot13 (submissions), who flew the flag of the Smithsonian Institution. This was Godot13's first WikiCup competition and, over the 10 months of the competition, he has produced (among other contributions) two featured lists and an incredible 292 featured pictures, including architectural photographs and scans of historical documents. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 and 2013 WikiCup champion, came in second, having written a large number of biology-related articles. Casliber (submissions), WikiCup finalist every year since 2010, finished in third.

A full list of our prize-winners follows:

• Godot13 (submissions) wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 181 featured pictures in the final round.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 65 did you knows in the final round.
• Casliber (submissions) wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for four featured articles in the final round.
• Czar (submissions) wins the prize for fourth place
• Sturmvogel 66 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• 12george1 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• ChrisGualtieri (submissions) wins the GA prize for 27 good articles in round 2 and the review prize for 28 good article reviews in round 1.
• Caponer (submissions) wins the FL prize for three featured lists in round 2.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize his work on featured portals.
• Figureskatingfan (submissions) wins the topic prize for a nine-article featured topic in round 3.
• ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the news prize for 28 in the news articles in round 3.

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have participated this year. We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

BNA access

Hello, Cloudz679. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup.

• We would like to announce that Josh (J Milburn) and Ed (The ed17), who have been WikiCup judges since 2009 and 2010 respectively, are stepping down. This decision has been made for a number of reasons, but the main one is time. Both Josh and Ed have found that, over the previous year, they have been unable to devote the time necessary to the WikiCup, and it is not likely that they will be able to do this in the near future. Furthermore, new people at the helm can only help to invigorate the WikiCup and keep it dynamic. Josh and Ed will still be around, and will likely be participating in the Cup this following year as competitors, which is where both started out.
• In a similar vein, we hope you will all join us in welcoming Jason (Sturmvogel 66) and Christine (Figureskatingfan), who are joining Brian (Miyagawa) to form the 2015 WikiCup judging team. Jason is a WikiCup veteran, having won in 2010 and finishing in fifth this year. Christine has participated in two WikiCups, reaching the semi-finals in both, and is responsible for the GA Cup, which she now co-runs.
• The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. While it may be impossible to please everyone, the judges will make every effort to ensure that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk), The ed17 (talk), Miyagawa (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

17:27:14, 9 December 2014 review of submission by Musicross

• Musicross (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Giorgos Koumendakis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My article was rejected because of the restraint number of footnotes (citations), so I was wondering if you could indicate the phrases that need a source. Thank you very very much. Musicross (talk) 17:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

23:59:19, 14 December 2014 review of submission by LindaCardiffnz

• LindaCardiffnz (talk · contribs)
  • User:LindaCardiffnz/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi

The first draft I wrote was rejected and blocked. I had this response from Wikipedia when I queried this block:

Hello lindacardiff,

Yes, you might as well create a new account. However, you should use the Article Wizard and create it as a draft, since creating it directly as an article will probably lead to a re-deletion and re-block.

jackmcbarn English Wikipedia Administrator

I therefore created a new draft called Nature Connections, but was unable to locate it when I reentered my account last week. I had not completed the links etc so started a new one.

Could you please therefore review the article here? It has the correct links etc.

Thank you Linda

LindaCardiffnz (talk) 23:59, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

@LindaCardiffnz: The first one, which is at Draft:Nature Connections is not blocked. You should make changes there and not at the second place, which is a duplicate. If the page is to be accepted, it should feel neutral, and describe what the company does, in a neutral way. Sentences like "We turn competitors into colleagues" sound as if they are coming from the organisation itself, and these should be re-written. If it's not factual, or third parties haven't discussed this part of the organisation, the sentence may not be appropriate. Looking at the references, #1 is a press release, #2 doesn't appear to mention the organisation directly, #3 is based on a press release from the same organisation that published #1, #4 doesn't discuss the organisation in detail, #5 is actually the same link as #1, #6 doesn't have a URL so I can't check it, and #7 is also the same link as #1. The article needs a minimum of two reliable sources discussing the organisation in detail, to meet the standards here. Press releases, and articles with a passing mention do not count towards these two. I will add this information to the draft page, and this should be addressed there if you want another reviewer to have another look. Let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks, C679 05:40, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

17:40:40, 15 December 2014 review of submission by 31.53.201.238

• 31.53.201.238 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Robin J.E. Scott (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, just added some national references which evidence notability (are bookmaker odds a secondary source?!) which were noted in several papers. Also discovered a quotation which was on page 2 of The Times in July. Note the Times link is behind a paywall - its the bottom of the article on Selina Scott - Link http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/politics/article4155143.ece

31.53.201.238 (talk) 17:40, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Czech zoos

Glad that you found the articles I started about Czech Zoos! Do you know if theres a Zoo Project in Czech, like Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo? Dan Koehl (talk) 01:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

@Dan Koehl: There doesn't seem to be a project, however cs:Portál:Živočichové may be useful, depending on what you're looking for. Hope it helps. Keep up the good work, C679 07:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much, I left a note at the discussion page for the cs:Diskuse k portálu:Živočichové. Dan Koehl (talk) 15:14, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

I think that Joseline Hernandez is a WELL KNOWN artist, and television personality. I'm not understanding why her wiki page was declined. She's been active on television and music since 2012! Can you explain to me why you declined it? ItsJasonRivera (talk) 22:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

John Denver

I added a few references. Not much is known about the album, so there are only a few that I have found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brycecordry (talk • contribs) 19:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

@Brycecordry:. Homestead is a self-publishing website and Amazon sells the stuff, neither is acceptable as a reliable source. How about reviews in music magazines, etc? C679 19:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I added more! There is not much out there, as it is still not popular, so it may be NN. Thanks, Brycecordry (talk) 02:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

/* Draft:Stuart Styron */

Hallo, there are lots of article https://www.google.de/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=z8qeVOCyNK3j8wfH8IHoDw#q=stuart+styron --2.243.192.195 (talk) 15:15, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

It's your responsibility to update the draft article to reflect that. The article is supposed to present the facts, we can't have an article just because there are lots of googlehits. Per WP:GHITS, "a large number of hits on a search engine is no guarantee that the subject is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia". C679 15:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

you want to delete? Why you not support the article? -- Flashfox7 (talk) 23:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

20:17:41, 27 December 2014 review of submission by Saladbowldon

• Saladbowldon (talk · contribs)
  • User:Saladbowldon/Fury figeroa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

why is my article the client. Has more verifiable citation than a lot of other articles that have been published. It is more complete then many other music articles. What do I need to add to get it published?

Saladbowldon (talk) 20:17, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Request on 21:07:44, 27 December 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Xiuyali

• Xiuyali (talk · contribs)
  • User:Xiuyali (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi There, May I include Lighthouse Education Inc. (Lighthouse Montessori School and Lighthouse Afterschool Academy) into the following wikipage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreen,_San_Jose,_California#Education Since my schools are located in this area.

Thanks!Xiuyali (talk) 21:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Xiuyali (talk) 21:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)