Tamil Eelam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Tamil Eelam
தமிழீழம்
Aspirational state
Tamil Eelam
Flag of Tamil Eelam
Flag
Official seal of Tamil Eelam
Seal
Area that is claimed for Tamil Eelam
Area that is claimed for Tamil Eelam
Coordinates: 08°45′N 80°30′E / 8.750°N 80.500°E / 8.750; 80.500Coordinates: 08°45′N 80°30′E / 8.750°N 80.500°E / 8.750; 80.500
Capital Trincomalee
Largest City Trincomalee
Districts
Area[1]
 • Total 21,952 km2 (8,476 sq mi)
 • Land 20,533 km2 (7,928 sq mi)
 • Water 1,419 km2 (548 sq mi)  6.46%
Population (2009)[2]
 • Total 3,496,000
 • Density 160/km2 (410/sq mi)
Ethnicity(1981)[3]
 • Eelam Tamil 1,189,000 (1981) – 1,388,828 (2001)
 • Sinhalese 45,000 (1981) – 685,896 (2011)
 • Moor 415,267 (16.11%)
 • Indian Tamil 76,905 (2.98%)
 • Other 10,292 (0.40%)
Religion(1981)[4]
 • Hindu 1,251,742 (48.57%)
 • Buddhist 498,938 (19.36%)
 • Muslim 422,239 (16.38%)
 • Catholic 381,679 (14.81%)
 • Other 22,590 (0.88%)
Official Languages Tamil, Sinhala

Tamil Eelam (Tamil: தமிழீழம் tamiḻ īḻam, generally rendered outside Tamil-speaking areas as தமிழ் ஈழம்) is a proposed independent state that Tamils in Sri Lanka and the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora aspire to create in the north and east of Sri Lanka. Tamil Eelam has no official status or recognition by world states though sections of the Eelam were under de facto control of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) for most of the 2000s. The name is derived from the ancient Tamil name for Sri Lanka, Eelam.[5]

History[edit]

Ancient period[edit]

Evidence of a settlement of people with burial practices similar to that found in the Tamil Nadu region in India and further North was excavated at megalithic burial sites at Pomparippu in the western coast and in Kathiraveli in the eastern coast. These are dated between 2nd century BC and 2nd century AD.[6] Although it is not known when ethnic Tamils first settled in Sri Lanka. Tamil royal dynasties in this period are known to have patronized Tamil Saivite culture in the east that paralleled the growth of the community in the area, and by the 6th century, a special coastal route by boat was functioning to the Koneswaram temple of Trincomalee and Thirukkovil temple of Batticaloa. It wasn't until the 13th century that there was firm evidence of the rise of a significant Tamil Hindu social formation in the Jaffna Peninsula, complete with a Hindu king and a palace, in the aftermath of the collapse of the classical Sinhala Dry Zone civilisations.[7] By the 11th and 12th centuries AD the upper half of the eastern province had a large Tamil community.[8]

Eastern Tamils had feudal organizations that centered around Ur Podiyar[9] at a village level and the Kudi system that controlled social interactions. They also were organized politically as Vannimai chiefs[10] who came nominally under the Kandyan kingdom. The most important social group were the Mukkuvar who had originated from South India and had repeatedly invaded Sri Lanka as evidenced by Sinhalese literature of that period called Kokila Sandeśa as the Mukkara Hatana. One of the local traditions that records the landing and settling of eastern Sri Lanka is called Mattakallappu Manmiam (Tamil:மட்டக்களப்பு மான்மியம்).[11]

Among the medieval Vanni cheftaincies, those of Panankamam, Melpattu, Mulliyavalai, Karunavalpattu, Karrikattumulai an Tennamaravadi in the north of the island were incorporated into the Jaffna Kingdom. The chieftaincy in Trincomalee was at times incorporated into the northern Kingdom. Hence Vannimai's just south of the Jaffna peninsula and in the eastern Trincomalee district usually paid an annual tribute to the Jaffna Kingdom instead of taxes. The tribute was in cash, grains, honey, elephants, and ivory. The annual tribute system was enforced due to the greater distance from Jaffna.[12]

Medieval period[edit]

The Jaffna kingdom (Tamil: யாழ்ப்பாண அரசு) (1215–1624 CE), also known as Kingdom of Aryacakravarti, of modern northern Sri Lanka was a historic independent monarchy that came into existence after the invasion of Magha, who is said to have been from Kalinga, in India.[1][2][3][4] Established as a powerful force in the north, east[citation needed] and west of the island, it eventually became a tribute paying feudatory of the Pandyan Empire in modern South India in 1258, gaining independence later with the fragmentation of the Pandyan control.[1][5] For a brief period, in the early to mid-14th century, it was an ascendant power in the island of Sri Lanka when all regional kingdoms accepted subordination. However, the kingdom was eventually overpowered by the rival Kotte Kingdom, around 1450.[5]

Aspiration and Chelvanayakam[edit]

The Federal Party (Sri Lanka) (FP) became the most dominant Tamil political party in 1956 and lobbied for a unitary state which gave Tamil and Sinhalese equal rights, including recognition of two official languages (Tamil and Sinhala) and considerable autonomy for the Tamil areas.[13][14] It was against this backdrop that the Federal party decided to sign the Bandaranaike-Chelvanayakam Pact in July 1957. As the name goes, it was merely an agreement between the two individuals and lacked any legality. It was never approved by the parliament or the ruling party or the Cabinet. However, soon afterwards the agreement was abandoned by the Sinhala party. In 1965, another pact, the Senanayake-Chelvanayakam Pact was signed but also not implemented.[15] The failure of the Sinhalese dominated government to implement devolutionary agreements through the 1950s and 1960s, abrogation of power-sharing promises, worsening economic conditions, and lack of territorial autonomy caused further disillusionment and isolation among northern Tamils.[16]

In the 1970 election the United Front (UF) led by Sirimavo Bandaranaike came into power. The new government adopted two new policies that were considered discriminatory by the Tamil people.[17] First, the government introduced a discriminatory system regulating university admissions, specifically targeted at reducing the intake of overachieving Tamils and other minorities in the Sri Lankan educational system. The scheme allotted up to 40% of the university placement to rural youth (primarily from Sinhala areas). The government claimed that this was an affirmative action scheme to assist geographically disadvantaged students to gain tertiary education. According to K. M. de Silva, a historian, the system of standardisation of marks required the Tamil students to achieve higher marks than the Sinhalese students to get into university.[18][19] A similar policy was adapted for employment in the public sector, leaving less than 10 percent of civil service jobs available to Tamil speakers.[17][20] The Federal Party opposed these policies and Chelvanayakam resigned his parliamentary seat on October 1972. The new constitution in 1972 further exacerbated long standing grievances and sense of discrimination for the Sri Lankan Tamil people. This had emboldened younger Tamils to seek ways to form a Tamil homeland (nation) where the rights and freedoms of the Tamil people could be protected and nurtured.[16]

In 1973, Tamil parties' call for regional autonomy was replaced with the demand for a separate state called Tamil Eelam. Two years later, in 1975, all Tamil political parties merged and became known as the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF). In 1976, the first national convention of the Tamil United Liberation Front was held at Vaddukoddai, where the party adopted a unanimous resolution called the Vaddukodai Resolution. This resolution charged that the Sinhalese government, with the use of the constitution of 1972, had used its power to "deprive the Tamil nation of its territory, language, citizenship, economic life, opportunities of employment and education thereby destroying all the attributes of nationhood of the Tamil people." The resolution further called for the "Free, Sovereign, Secular Socialist State of TAMIL EELAM".[21]

As a result of the Vaddukodai resolution, the Tamil United Liberation Front became the first Tamil political party to run its campaign on a separatist platform. It swept the parliamentary elections in the Tamil-dominated districts of the North and East in 1977, winning 18 seats and became the largest opposition in Parliament.[22][23] The reason for the success of the TULF was seen as the result of growing Tamil agitation for self-determination.[16]

During the time of the Vaddukodai declaration, there were several Tamil militant organizations who believed that armed struggle was the only way to protect the sovereignty of the Tamil areas. TULF, however, believed in peaceful parliamentary ways towards achieving a solution.[24] Though the TULF had adapted a separatist platform, they were still open to peaceful negotiations and decided to work towards a political agreement with President J.R Jayewardene. The outcome was the District Development Councils scheme (DDC) passed in 1980. The District Development Councils scheme was based, to some extent, on decentralization of the government within a united Sri Lanka. DDCs were soon abandoned because the two sides were not able to agree to the number of District Ministers in the Tamil districts.[25] In 1983 the Sixth Amendment was passed and required Tamil members of parliament and Tamils in public office to take the oath of allegiance to the unitary state of Sri Lanka. The Sixth Amendment forbade advocating a separate state even by peaceful means. Consequently, the TULF was expelled from the parliament for refusing to take the oath.[26]

The Era of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam[edit]

A stamp issued by a militant group in 1983.
Kilinochchi Court

The parts of northern and eastern Sri Lanka which were formerly under the control of the LTTE were run as a de facto state[27][28][29] with its own government[30][31][32] in these areas. The Tamil Tigers also established a military wing[33][34][35] with land combat force, naval force (the Sea Tigers), air wing which they called "Tamil Eelam Air Force",[36] In addition, the LTTE had run a judicial system complete with local, supreme and high courts. The US state department alleged that the judges had very little standards or training and acted as agents to the LTTE; it also accused the LTTE of forcing Tamils under their control to accept their judicial system although the Tamils know that they were not forced and that a vote was taken to decide who would take control .[37] Furthermore, within areas controlled by the LTTE the Tigers performed state functions including the operation of a civil Police Force, Human Rights organizations, offices for the coordination of humanitarian assistance board,[30] health boards and education boards.[31][38][39] It also ran a Bank (Bank of Tamil Eelam), a radio station (Voice of Tigers) and a Television station (National Television of Tamil Eelam).[32]

Following the clearance of Kilinochchi by government troops which had been the administrative capital of the de facto LTTE controlled area[40] on 2 January 2009, the LTTE's civil administration system was suspended as the "state" of Tamil Eelam was gradually crushed by the resurgent Sri Lankan Army. The last pocket of territory controlled by the LTTE and vis-a-vis the remaining part of the LTTE controlled area was captured by the Sri Lankan Army on 18 May 2009. During this operation almost the entire civil and military leadership of the LTTE were killed. Tens of thousands of LTTE cadres surrendered to government troops.

Post-LTTE era[edit]

Following the defeat of LTTE, pro-LTTE political party Tamil National Alliance (TNA), also the largest political group representing Sri Lankan Tamil community, dropped its demand for a Tamil Eelam, in favour of a federal solution.[41][42] There are ongoing bilateral talks between President Rajapaksa's UPFA government and the TNA, on a viable political solution and devolution of power.[43] Pro Tamil groups advocating independence for Tamil areas of Sri Lanka continue to run websites and radio telecasts.[44] Since 19 May 2009 Tamil Eelam has ceased to exist as a physical entity but remains as political aspiration among sections of the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora. In May 2010, New York based lawyer Visvanathan Rudrakumaran formed a Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam intending to use soft power to reach its end.[45] The Self Proclaimed Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam continues to claim that they represent the Sri Lankan Tamils.[46]

Geography[edit]

Historically, Tamil settlements had occurred in the Dry semi-arid territories of the island nation. The region is divided into three parts namely North,East where the majority of the native Tamils occur, and the northern part of the Puthalam district which had a large Tamil influence in the pre-colonial times.

North[edit]

An island in the waters of the Jaffna peninsula

The Northern province is just 22 miles (35 km) south of the Indian state of Tamil Nadu.The mythical Adam's Bridge(Sethu Bridge) is scattered in between the waters of the Mannar islet and the Indian mainland.The North is surrounded by the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay to the west, Palk Strait to the north, the Bay of Bengal to the east and the Eastern, North Central and North Western provinces to the south.It has a total area of 8,884 square kilometers (3,430.1 sq mi)[1].

The Bay of Bengal at Point Pedro, the northernmost point of the island

It is divided into two distinct geographic areas: Jaffna peninsula and the central Vanni region.

The Jaffna peninsula has a number of bays and lagoons along its coastline and much of the coast consists of sandy beaches.A chain of both inhibited and uninhibited islands are also found along the Jaffna peninsula, with sandy beaches and tropical weather.

The sparsely populated Vanni region, is covered in tropical forests with numerous rivers flowing through them making agriculture and forestry the primary resources of the area.Among the trees of the dry-land forests are some valuable species, such as satinwood, ebony, ironwood, and mahogany.

East[edit]

The Eastern part of the Tamil Eelam has an area of 9,996 square kilometers (3,859.5 sq mi)[1]. The Area is surrounded by to the north, the Bay of Bengal to the east, and the central highlands to its West,South and south-West.

Eastern's coast is dominated by lagoons, the largest being Batticaloa Lagoon, Kokkilai Lagoon, Upaar Lagoon and Ullackalie Lagoon.

Much of the coastline has a number of inlets from the sea often making them excellent inland ports and fishing harbours.The East has a rich biodiversity and is the natural habitat to various species that exist here.

Political divisions and Demographics[edit]

Fire-wood sellers in Batticaloa district

In the 1881 census, Sri Lankan Tamils numbered 687,200 constituting 25% of the total population.The Tamil-speaking Muslim community who used to live largely in the Northern and the Eastern provinces comprised another 6% of the population.

Following the independence which saw large scale movements in search of better economic opportunities all over the country and the several state sponsored Sinhala colonization in Tamil territories, the demographics of the state had been heavily altered.

The three decade Civil war that followed the anti-Tamil policies further affected the North and the East with over 80,000–100,000 people estimated to have been killed and over 400,000 Tamils fleeing their homes for refuge.Many people still live in IDP camps in the North and the East and the present-day demographics of the region has been changing due to more and more Sinhalese settling in these territories.

Province District Population  % Sri Lankan Tamil  % Indian Tamil  % Sri Lankan Moor Sinhalese
Northern Province Jaffna District 831,112 97% 0.4% 1.6% 0.5%
Kilinochchi District 91,641 97% 1.7% 0.8%
Mannar District 106,940 63.7% 26.6% 8.1%
Mullaitivu District 77,152 89.8% 4.8% 5%
Vavuniya District 95,904 76.2% 6.9% 16.5%
Eastern Province Amparai District 388,970 20.0% 0.36% 41.5% 37.7%
Batticaloa District 330,333 72% 0.1% 23% 3.4%
Trincomalee District 255,948 36.4% 0.1% 29.3% 33.4%
North-Western Province Puthalam district 709,677 6.8% 0.3% 18.8% 73.7%
  • 1981 Census report

Politics[edit]

The United Kingdom gained control of Sri Lanka in 1815 and administratively unified the island[18] with a legislative council in 1833 with three Europeans and one each for Sinhalese, Sri Lankan Tamils and Burghers. British Governor William Manning, who arrived in Ceylon in 1919, created a reformed legislative council in 1921 and actively encouraged Sinhala communal thinking in the legislative council.[47][48] As a result, the Tamils started to develop communal consciousness and began to think of themselves as needing to be represented by Tamil leadership.[47][48] It was this development that made way for the development of the Tamil political organization called the All Ceylon Tamil Congress headed by G. G. Ponnambalam.[49][50]

Sri Lanka achieved independence from the British in 1948 and in the same year the government of Sri Lanka, with the acceptance vote from G.G. Ponnambalam, passed a new act called the Ceylon Citizenship Act which disenfranchised the Indian Tamil plantation workers[51][52][53] Though Ponnambalam did not vote for all the bills pertaining to the Ceylon citizenship act (including the offending bill), his silence in parliament made the Tamil public believe that he was not interested in Indian Tamil rights.[54] In 1949 a new Tamil political party, named the Federal Party, was formed and was led by S. J. V. Chelvanayakam who earlier broke away from All Ceylon Tamil Congress because of the latter's decision to tie up with the UNP.[51]

In 1956 the government enacted another act called the Official Language Act (commonly known as the Sinhala Only Act) which made the Sinhala as the sole official language of Sri Lanka.[52][55] The Ceylon Citizen Act and the Official Language Act were seen as discriminatory policies towards the minorities and led to increased ethnic and political tensions between the two communities. The Federal Party (FP) opposed both the Ceylon Citizenship Act and the Sinhala Only Act and as a result became popular amongst the Tamil population.[52][55] As a result of their popularity the Federal party became the most dominant party in the Tamil districts after the 1956 elections.

Pongu Tamil[edit]

Pongu Tamil (or Tamil Uprising) is an event that is held in support of "Tamils Right to Self-Determination" and "Tamil Traditional homeland". Pongu Tamil was first organized in Jaffna on January 2001 by students of the Jaffna University. The event was organized in response to alleged disappearances, mass graves and abuses under the government's military rule and was designed as peaceful protest. The event attracted between 4000–5000 students amid the event being banned in Jaffna, an area controlled by the Sri Lankan Army, and allegations of intimidation and death threats by the police.[56] In 2003, the event was held again and attracted over 150,000 people and has become an annual event in the LTTE held areas of Sri Lanka. In the recent years some members of Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora have also picked up on the notion and it has become an annual event in the countries they reside.[27] In 2008, the event was held in New Zealand, Norway, Denmark, Italy, South Africa, France, Australia, England and Canada. According to TamilNet, a pro-rebel website, the event attracted thousands of people in these countries including over 7,000 in France,[57] 30,000 in England [58] and over 75,000 in Canada.[59] Australia is said to have attracted about 2000 people displayed the Australian flag, Tiger symbol and picture of Velupillai Prabhakaran.[60]

Tamil National Alliance's Manifesto and policies[edit]

The Tamil National Alliance stands on a platform for Tamil aspirations of self-determination and equality, having won at elections held in the north and east. The alliance is the largest Tamil Political Party in Sri Lanka, has come up with two manifestos since 2001. In general the policies are based on the what is known as the Thimpu principles amongst Tamil nationalists. They are

  • Recognition of the Tamils of Sri Lanka as a distinct nationality.
  • Recognition of an identified Tamil homeland and guarantee of its territorial integrity.
  • Based on the above, recognition of the inalienable right of self-determination of the Tamil nation.
  • Recognition of the right to full citizenship and other fundamental democratic rights of all Tamils who look upon the island as their country.'

Further the alliance stands for:

  • The immediate lifting of the economic embargo currently in force in parts of the northeast province
  • The withdrawal of the residential and travel restrictions foisted on the Tamil nationality
  • The immediate cessation of the war being currently waged in the northeast

Three of its sitting Members of the Parliament K. Sivanesan, Joseph Pararajasingham and Nadarajah Raviraj have been assassinated since 2006, which the TNA party blames on the Sri Lankan Government's army and paramilitary forces.

LTTE's Interim Self Governing Authority[edit]

On 31 October 2003 during the peace talks, with the ceasefire still holding, the LTTE issued their proposals for an ISGA. The ISGA would have broad powers such the right to impose the rule of law, collect taxes, run the administration and oversee the rehabilitation process in the north and east, and it would be controlled by the LTTE until elections were held. Crucially however, the LTTE had dropped their demand for an independent Tamil Eelam in favour of regional autonomy.[61] The key points of the LTTE's proposals are:[62][63]

  • An ISGA will established for the eight districts in the and Northern and Eastern provinces until a final negotiated settlement is reached and implemented.
  • Initially the members of the ISGA will be appointed by the parties to this agreement with the LTTE appointing an absolute majority, but

Democratic elections will be held if no final negotiated settlement is reached and implemented within five years.

  • The ISGA shall have plenary power for the governance of the north-east including powers in relation to resettlement, rehabilitation, reconstruction, development, raising revenue including imposition of taxes, revenue, levies and duties, law and order, and over land.
  • The GOSL agrees that any and all of its expenditures in or for the north-east shall be subject to the control of the ISGA.
  • The ISGA shall have powers to borrow internally and externally, provide guarantees and indemnities, receive aid directly, and engage in or regulate internal and external trade.
  • The ISGA shall have direction and control over any and all administrative structures and personnel in the north-east.
  • The ISGA shall have the power to alienate and determine the appropriate use of all land in the north-east that is not privately owned.
  • Land occupied by the armed forces of the GOSL must be immediately vacated and restored to the possession of the previous owners. The GOSL must also compensate the owners for the past dispossession of their land.
  • The ISGA shall be responsible for the resettlement and rehabilitation of displaced civilians and refugees in such lands.
  • The ISGA shall have control over the marine and offshore resources of the adjacent seas and the power to regulate access thereto.
  • The ISGA will have control over the natural resources in the north-east region. The GOSL shall ensure that all monies due under existing agreements are paid to the ISGA.
  • All future agreements concerning matters under the jurisdiction of the ISGA shall be made with the ISGA.

International reaction to the LTTE's proposals was generally positive. US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage gave a cautious welcome, saying that the proposal is "the first time I have seen such a comprehensive delineation of the aspirations of the LTTE...it is significant". The European Union's Head of Mission in Colombo welcomed the proposals as an "important step forward in the peace process".[64]

Sri Lankan reaction was mixed. The GOSL reacted by stating that the proposal "differs in fundamental respects from the proposals submitted by the GOSL. The GOSL is convinced that the way forward lies through direct discussion of the issues arising from both sets of proposals". The Tamil National Alliance (TNA), the main political party representing Sri Lankan Tamils, welcomed the proposals positively. R. Sampanthan, leader of the TNA, said "The ISGA proposal..bears historical importance in the political history of Tamils in the island. The ISGA provides a base to find a permanent political solution to the Tamil national question".[65]

Support for Tamil Eelam[edit]

Sri Lanka[edit]

The main pledge made by the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) in its manifesto for the 1977 parliamentary election was "to establish an independent sovereign, secular, socialist State of Tamil Eelam...".[66] The TULF won all 14 seats in the Northern Province after receiving more than 278,000 votes (68%). In the Eastern Province the TULF won 4 of 10 seats after receiving nearly 140,000 votes (32%). Sri Lankan Tamils constituted 92% and 43% of the population in each of the provinces respectively.

In March 2010 the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), the largest political group representing the Sri Lankan Tamils, dropped its demands for an independent Tamil Eelam but continues to demand greater autonomy through federalism.[67][68][69][70] The TNA's change of policy is believed to be a pragmatic one based on the reality of the political situation in Sri Lanka: the Tamil Tigers have been defeated, the Sri Lankan government/military have the support of the regional super powers (China, India and Pakistan), there is no international support for independence and it is illegal in Sri Lanka to support separatism.[69][71] However, the TNA's watered down demands are still a lot more than what the Sri Lankan government is prepared to give.[69]

Support for regional autonomy[edit]

Nearly a year after the LTTE's loss in the Sri Lankan Civil war the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), in its manifesto for the 8 April general election, has renounced its demand for Tamil Eelam instead campaigning for greater regional autonomy.[70] The TNA said it would settle for a "federal structure" in the northern and eastern provinces with power over land, finance, and law and order,[72] and "if the Sri Lankan state continues its present style of governance without due regard to the rights of the Tamil-speaking people" it will launch a Gandhi-style civil disobedience campaign. [68][69] In the manifesto the TNA has also demanded for the re-merger of northern and eastern provinces, which was separated in 2006, and has also made a pledge to lobby the international community, including India and has called for power sharing arrangements between both parties.[68][73][74]

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka prohibits violation of territorial integrity of the island nation, outlawing any advocation of Tamil Elam as a separate nation.[75]

Tamil diaspora[edit]

The Norwegian Tamil Forum and related groups have organised similar protests in Norway with MP support for Tamil self-determination, as has the Canadian Tamil Congress in Canada.[citation needed]

Tamil referendums[edit]

During 2009–2010 a number of referendums were held in Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora communities to ascertain support for an independent Tamil Eelam, despite attempts by the Sri Lankan government and its supporters to prevent them.[76] The referendums, although organised by Tamil groups, have been conducted by independent organisations with independent observers. Voters have been asked their opinion on the following statement:

"I aspire for the formation of the independent and sovereign state of Tamil Eelam in the north and east territory of the island of Sri Lanka on the basis that the Tamils in the island of Sri Lanka make a distinct nation, have a traditional homeland and have the right to self-determination."

To date referendums have been held in ten countries (Norway, France, Canada, Switzerland, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Denmark, Italy and Australia). Referendums are expected be held in other countries with significant Tamil diaspora population.[77] More than 99% of Tamils who voted supported an independent Eelam. The referendums have no legal effect, and were not organised by any government.

India[edit]

A survey in late 2008 by the Tamil Nadu daily Ananda Vikatan found 55.4% of Indian Tamils in the state supported the separation of Tamil Eelam, while 34.63% supported a federal Tamil Eelam.

Notable supporters of independence include politicians Vaiko and Nedumaran. Directors Bharathiraaja, Seeman and Ameer Sultan are strong advocates of the independence of Tamil Eelam. Muthukumar, a DTP operator for a Tamil magazine 'Penne Nee' doused himself with kerosene at the Regional Passport Office, Chennai,Tamil Nadu, India and set himself on fire to highlight the Tamil plight.[78]

On April 2012 DMK president M. Karunanidhi said that India should prevail upon the United Nations to help carve out a separate Tamil Eelam from Sinhala-dominated Sri Lanka. Raising the issue in the Lok Sabha during zero hour, DMK leader T.R. Baalu said tyranny in the Tamil areas was continuing and Sinhalese army men were roaming around Tamil habitats in Sri Lanka and "thousands of people have been kept behind barbed wire fences." He said the Indo-Sri Lankan accord was not being ratified and the 13th Amendment (devolution of powers to ethnic Tamils) was not being implemented.[79][80][81]

Others[edit]

Lee Kuan Yew said of the movement

One-man one-vote led to the domination of the Sinhalese majority over the minority Tamils who were the active and intelligent fellows who worked hard and got themselves penalized. And English was out. They were educated in English...The country [Ceylon] will never be put together again. Somebody should have told them – change the system, loosen up, or break off. And looking back, I think the Tunku was wise. (The reference is to Tunku Abdul Rahman the Malaysian Prime Minister under whose rule Singapore separated from Malaysia). I offered a loosening up of the system. He said: "Clean cut, go your way". Had we stayed in, and I look at Colombo and Ceylon, I mean changing names, sometimes maybe you deceive the gods, but I don't think you are deceiving the people who live in them. It makes no great difference to the tragedy that is being enacted. They failed because they had weak or wrong leaders."[82]

Virginia Judge, who visited the North East area noted that in a three-year period Tamils had developed a virtual state within a state. She has stated she supports a genuine federal Tamil Eelam that guarantees the right of the Tamil minority to autonomy so their culture is protected and they enjoy full economic and political rights. She has voiced support to a federal structure with equity and self-determination for the Tamil people.[83] The MP John Murphy stated that the targeting of Tamil civilians by the Sri Lankan Government's forces in airstrikes "clearly demonstrates that it does not regard the Tamil people to be part of its population." It strengthened his support for the Tamil people's case for self-determination.[84] In 2008, he handed a petition of 4000 signatories to the Australian House of Representatives accusing the Government of Sri Lanka of being guilty of the crime of genocide, supporting the Tamil right to self-determination.[85]

A 1981 resolution adopted by the United States Massachusetts House of Representatives called for the restoration and reconstitution of the separate sovereign state of Tamil Eelam, supporting the right to self-determination of the Tamils of Eelam.[86]

The ANC of the Government of South Africa, noting in January 2009 that the continued conflict on the island has been cited on international monitoring mechanisms as reaching genocidal proportions described the conflict as a liberation war between the Tamil Tigers for self-determination and the Sri Lankan Government that had led to the deaths of thousands of lives, and called for an end to hostilities and a political solution.[87] Willis Mchunu of the state legislature of KwaZulu-Natal condemned the genocide of Tamils and expressed support to the Tamil struggle for freedom. Mtandeni Dlungwana, leader of the province's branch of the African National Congress Youth League stated they were fully backing the Tamil Eelam struggle.[88]

Scholar and activist Noam Chomsky, in a February 2009 interview, said of the Tamil Eelam struggle: "Parts of Europe, for example, are moving towards more federal arrangements. In Spain, for example, Catalonia by now has a high degree of autonomy within the Spanish state. The Basque Country also has a high degree of autonomy. In England, Wales and Scotland in the United Kingdom are moving towards a form of autonomy and self-determination and I think there are similar developments throughout Europe. Though they're mixed with a lot of pros and cons, but by and large I think it is a generally healthy development. I mean, the people have different interests, different cultural backgrounds, different concerns, and there should be special arrangements to allow them to pursue their special interests and concerns in harmony with others."[89]

In a September 2009 submitted Sri Lankan Crisis Statement, Chomsky was one of several signatories calling for full access to internment camps holding Tamils, the respect of international law concerning prisoners of war and media freedom, the condemnation of discrimination against Tamils by the state since independence from Britain, and to urge the international community to support and facilitate a political solution that addresses the self-determination aspirations of Tamils and protection of the human rights of all Sri Lankans.[90] A major offensive against the Tamils in the Vanni region of their homeland in 2009 resulted in the deaths of at least 20,000 Tamil civilians in 5 months, amid widespread concerns war crimes were committed against the Tamil population. At a United Nations forum on R2P, the Responsibility to Protect doctrine established by the UN in 2005, Chomsky said:

..."What happened in Sri Lanka was a major Rwanda-like atrocity, in a different scale, where the West didn't care. There was plenty of early warning. This [conflict] has been going on for years and decades. Plenty of things could have been done [to prevent it]. But there was not enough interest."[91]

Chomsky was responding to a question that referred to Jan Egeland, former head of the UN's Humanitarian Affairs' earlier statement that R2P was a failure in Sri Lanka.[91]

Worldwide Councils and Organisations[edit]

Flag of the Tamil Democrats with the traditional colors of Tamil Eelam

Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam[edit]

The Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE) is formed by unification of the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora which aims to create Tamil Eelam, a state which TGTE aspire to create in the north and east provinces of Sri Lanka.[92] The TGTE and Tamil Eelam have no official status or recognition by any state or authority. The TGTE has been called a "ploy to perpetuate terrorism" by the Government of Sri Lanka,[93] which is itself under international pressure for alleged war crime probes.[94] For its part, the TGTE has maintained that it is a democratic organization, and intends to use soft power and not military power to its end.[45] The exact words found in TGTE constitution are : "Whereas the TGTE has guided us towards a democratic system of government, in order to establish an independent state of Tamil Eelam based on the principles of peace, non-violence, tolerance, pluralism, transparency and accountability".[95]

Democratic Norwegian Council of Eelam Tamils[edit]

The Norwegian Council of Eelam Tamils (NCET) attracted enough number of participants in the poll that took place Sunday in 16 centres of the different regions of Norway, in which 2767 voters turned out to elect 5 members under a national list and 10 under regional lists. Noticeable of the results was Mr. Bjønar Moxnes topping the national list polling 1864 votes.

28-year-old Bjørnar Moxnes who won under national list, is a postgraduate student of Sociology and is a group leader of the democratically functioning Rødt Party of left politics in Norway.Mr. Vijayshankar from Tamil Nadu is elected to the Council topping the list of Western Region. Considering the electoral history of Eezham Tamils, who have hitherto been imposed with constitutions and were voting in elections conducted by others, this is their first ever country-wide elections, conducted on their own, to form a political body of their own, based on their own constitution. The eight-member Election Commission performed the task with professional perfection, observers said.[96]

Swiss Council of Eelam Tamils[edit]

The Swiss Council of Eelam Tamils (SCET) is established on the basis of democratic participation by the population of Tamil Eelam-descent (Eelam Tamils in Switzerland). The Council of the Eelam Tamils has been working in Switzerland. The Council represents the interests of the Eelam Tamils in Switzerland at national and international level. At the same time, this Council has the mandate to work for the rights of Eelam Tamils in Sri Lanka. The Council is in his activities strictly to the laws, rules and regulations of Switzerland.[citation needed]

British Tamils Forum[edit]

British Tamils Forum, a conglomeration of British Tamil diaspora organizations states as its aim to "highlight the humanitarian crises and human rights violations perpetrated by the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL), and to advance the Tamil national cause through democratic means."[97] The forum has garnered recognition and appraisal from several prominent figures in public life during its tenure. Annual political rallys are organised by the BTF and in June, July, September and October 2008, the forum organised and participated in several public demonstrations in London. It worked in union with the NSSP, the TYO (Tamil Youth Organisation), S4P (Solidarity for Peace), the UK Socialist Party, International Socialist Group and South Asia Solidarity Group in supporting the right to self determination of the Tamil people in Tamil Eelam. All Party debates in UK Parliament have highlighted gatherings organised by the BTF and the issues the forum has raised.[98][99]

Maison du Tamil Eelam[edit]

Maison du Tamil Eelam[100] is in France based Council of Eelam Tamils.

National Council of Canadian Tamils[edit]

National Council of Canadian Tamils is a Not-For-Profit-Organization built by delegates elected by Tamils from districts across Canada. NCCT is registered as Not-For-Profit-Organization with both Federal and Provincial governments of Canada.[citation needed]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Area of Sri Lanka by province and district". Statistical Abstract 2010. Department of Census & Statistics. 
  2. ^ "Estimated mid year population by district, 2005–2009". Statistical Abstract 2010. Department of Census & Statistics. 
  3. ^ "Population by ethnic group and district, Census 1981, 2001". Statistical Abstract 2010. Department of Census & Statistics. 
  4. ^ "Population by religion and district, Census 1981, 2001". Statistical Abstract 2010. Department of Census & Statistics. 
  5. ^ What Do Eelam & Ilankai Mean?. Sangam.org (2 April 2006). Retrieved on 28 July 2013.
  6. ^ de Silva, A History of Sri Lanka, p.129
  7. ^ de Silva, A History of Sri Lanka, p.132
  8. ^ de Silva, A History of Sri Lanka, p.131
  9. ^ The Kokkadicholai massacre and after
  10. ^ McGilvray, Mukkuvar Vannimai: Tamil Caste and Matriclan Ideology in Batticaloa, Sri Lanka, p.34-97
  11. ^ Subramaniam, Folk traditionas and Songs..., p.20
  12. ^ Gunasingam, M Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism, p.58
  13. ^ Wilson, A.J. Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism: Its Origins and Development in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, p.82-90
  14. ^ Kearney, R.N. (1985). "Ethnic Conflict and the Tamil Separatist Movement in Sri Lanka". Asian Survey 25 (9): 898–917. doi:10.1525/as.1985.25.9.01p0303g. JSTOR 2644418. 
  15. ^ Wilson, A.J. Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism: Its Origins and Development in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, p.81-110
  16. ^ a b c Kleinfeld, M. (2005). "Destabilizing the identity—territory nexus: Rights-based discourse in Sri Lanka's new political geography" (PDF). GeoJournal 64 (4): 287–295. doi:10.1007/s10708-005-5806-0. Retrieved 22 June 2008. 
  17. ^ a b Wilson, A.J. Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism: Its Origins and Development in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, p.102-103
  18. ^ a b Stokke, K.; Ryntveit, A.K. (2000). "The Struggle for Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka". A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy 31 (2): 285–304. doi:10.1111/0017-4815.00129. 
  19. ^ De Silva, K.M. (1984). "University Admissions and Ethnic Tension in Sri Lanka, 1977—1982". From Independence to Statehood: Managing Ethnic Conflict in Six African and Asian States. London: Frances Pinter: 97. 
  20. ^ Goldman, R.B. and Wilson, A.J. From Independence to Statehood, p.173-184
  21. ^ Pfaffenberger, B. (1981). "The Cultural Dimension of Tamil Separatism in Sri Lanka". Asian Survey 21 (11): 1145–1157. doi:10.1525/as.1981.21.11.01p0322p. JSTOR 2643999. 
  22. ^ DBS Jeyaraj. "TULF leader passes away". Hindu News. Retrieved 4 May 2008. 
  23. ^ Nadarajah, S.; Sriskandarajah, D. (2005). "Liberation struggle or terrorism? The politics of naming the ltte". Third World Quarterly 26 (1): 87–100. doi:10.1080/0143659042000322928. 
  24. ^ Schalk, P. (2002). "Ilavar and Lankans, Emerging Identities in a Fragmented Island" (PDF). Asian Ethnicity 3 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1080/14631360120095865. Retrieved 22 June 2008. 
  25. ^ Wilson, A.J. The Break-up of Sri Lanka: The Sinhalese-Tamil Conflict, p.142-143
  26. ^ Wilson, A.J. The Break-up of Sri Lanka: The Sinhalese-Tamil Conflict, p.228
  27. ^ a b "SFrom relief, rehabilitation to peace". Retrieved 21 June 2008. 
  28. ^ "Independence-seeking Tigers already run shadow state". Retrieved 21 June 2008. 
  29. ^ "'War victory party' in Sri Lanka". BBC News. 12 July 2007. Retrieved 21 June 2008. 
  30. ^ a b Stokke, K. (2006). "Building the Tamil Eelam State: emerging state institutions and forms of governance in LTTE-controlled areas in Sri Lanka". Third World Quarterly 27 (6): 1021–1040. doi:10.1080/01436590600850434. 
  31. ^ a b McConnell, D. (2008). "The Tamil people's right to self-determination". Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 (1): 59–76. doi:10.1080/09557570701828592. Retrieved 25 March 2008. 
  32. ^ a b Ranganathan, M. (2002). "Nurturing a Nation on the Net: The Case of Tamil Eelam". Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 8 (2): 51–66. doi:10.1080/13537110208428661. Retrieved 25 March 2008. 
  33. ^ Winn, N. (2004). Neo-Medievalism and Civil Wars. Frank Cass Publishers. p. 130. 
  34. ^ Rizas, S. (2005). "Neo-medievalism and Civil Wars Neil Winn". Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 5 (1): 157. 
  35. ^ McDowell, C.; McDowell, C. (1996). A Tamil Asylum Diaspora: Sri Lankan Migration, Settlement and Politics in Switzerland. Berghahn Books. 
  36. ^ Rowland Buerk (26 March 2007). "Tamil Tigers unveil latest tactic". BBC News. Retrieved 28 March 2007. 
  37. ^ "US slams police, Karuna and LTTE". BBC News. 
  38. ^ Goodhand, J.; Hulme, D.; Lewer, N. (2000). "Social Capital and the Political Economy of Violence: A Case Study of Sri Lanka". Disasters 24 (4): 390–406. doi:10.1111/1467-7717.00155. PMID 11138373. 
  39. ^ Wilson, A. J. (1988). The Break-up of Sri Lanka: The Sinhalese-Tamil Conflict. C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. ISBN 1-85065-033-0. 
  40. ^ "Kilinochchi captured in devastating blow to LTTE". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 3 January 2009. 
  41. ^ Haviland, Charles (13 March 2010). "Sri Lanka Tamil party drops statehood demand". BBC. Retrieved 18 August 2011. 
  42. ^ Burke, Jason (14 March 2010). "Sri Lankan Tamils drop demand for separate independent homeland". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 18 August 2011. 
  43. ^ "Next round of Govt.-TNA talks on May 12". AdaDerana. 30 April 2011. Retrieved 5 June 2011. 
  44. ^ [1][dead link]
  45. ^ a b TGTE 'Mission Statement' http://www.tgte-us.org/mission.html
  46. ^ http://www.govthamileelam.org/index.php/constitution-english
  47. ^ a b K. M. de Sila, History of Sri Lanka, Penguin 1995
  48. ^ a b K. M. de Silva, Ceylon Journal of Historical and Social Studies, vol 2(1), p 114 (1972)
  49. ^ Gunasingham, M.Sri Lankan Tamil nationalism: A study of its origins, p.
  50. ^ Wilson, A.J. Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism: Its Origins and Development in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, p.1-12
  51. ^ a b "Missed Opportunities and the Loss of Democracy". 
  52. ^ a b c De Silva, P.L. (1997). "The growth of Tamil paramilitary nationalisms: Sinhala Chauvinism and Tamil responses" (PDF). South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 20: 97–118. doi:10.1080/00856409708723306. Retrieved 27 April 2008. 
  53. ^ Wilson, A.J. Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism: Its Origins and Development in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, p.66-81
  54. ^ Wilson, A.J. Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism: Its Origins and Development in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, p.80
  55. ^ a b Tambiah, S.J. Sri Lanka: Ethnic Fratricide and the Dismantling of Democracy, p.
  56. ^ Orjuela, C. (2003). "Building Peace in Sri Lanka: a Role for Civil Society?". Journal of Peace Research 40 (2): 195. doi:10.1177/0022343303040002004. 
  57. ^ "Pongku Thamizh rally in France draws 7000". Tamilnet. 2008. Retrieved 7 July 2008. 
  58. ^ "Grand finale for Pongku Thamizh in London". Tamilnet. 2008. Retrieved 12 July 2008. 
  59. ^ "Spontaneous show of solidarity in Canada". Tamilnet. 2008. Retrieved 7 July 2008. 
  60. ^ "Tiger territory". 2008. Retrieved 10 August 2008. 
  61. ^ Sri Lanka thrown into political crisis, BBC News 4 November 2003
  62. ^ "Full text: Tamil Tiger proposals". BBC News. 1 November 2003. 
  63. ^ "THE PROPOSAL BY THE LIBERATION TIGERS OF TAMIL EELAM ON BEHALF OF THE TAMIL PEOPLE FOR AN AGREEMENT TO ESTABLISH AN INTERIM SELF-GOVERNING AUTHORITY FOR THE NORTHEAST OF THE ISLAND OF SRI LANKA". LTTE Peace Secretariat via TamilNet. 
  64. ^ "EU says Tamil Tiger proposals important step in peace bid". ABC News. 2 November 2003. 
  65. ^ "Sampanthan to address seminar on ISGA". TamilNet. 2 November 2003. 
  66. ^ "Tamil United Liberation Front General Election Manifesto, July 1977". Tamil Nation. Retrieved 18 December 2009. [dead link]
  67. ^ Tamils give up on independence – Central & South Asia. Al Jazeera English. Retrieved on 28 July 2013.
  68. ^ a b c Page, Jeremy (15 March 2010). "Tamil party renounces demand for Independent homeland". The Times (London). Retrieved 24 May 2010. 
  69. ^ a b c d Burke, Jason (14 March 2010). "Sri Lankan Tamils drop demand for separate independent homeland". London: The Guardian, UK. Retrieved 23 March 2010. 
  70. ^ a b Burke, Jason (14 March 2010). "Sri Lankan Tamils drop demand for separate independent homeland". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 24 May 2010. 
  71. ^ Haviland, Charles (13 March 2010). "Sri Lanka Tamil party drops statehood demand". BBC News. Retrieved 23 March 2010. 
  72. ^ [2][dead link]
  73. ^ AFP: Sri Lanka's main Tamil party vows civil disobedience. Google.com (13 March 2010). Retrieved on 28 July 2013.
  74. ^ Reddy, B. Muralidhar (15 March 2010). "We are firm on demand, says TNA". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 
  75. ^ Constitution of Sri Lanka – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. En.wikipedia.org. Retrieved on 28 July 2013.
  76. ^ "France goes for referendum on Tamil Eelam this weekend". TamilNet. 11 December 2009. Retrieved 20 December 2009. 
  77. ^ "Eezham Tamil mandate picks up global momentum". TamilNet. 3 November 2009. Retrieved 18 December 2009. 
  78. ^ "Suicide at Chennai passport office over Lanka Tamil plight". Indian Express. 29 January 2009. 
  79. ^ Dhar, Aarti (25 April 2012). "DMK for separate Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 
  80. ^ "Karunanidhi for Eelam, a la Kosovo, South Sudan". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 20 April 2012. 
  81. ^ Karunanidhi for Eelam, a la Kosovo, South Sudan – THE HINDU. Colombo Telegraph (20 April 2012). Retrieved on 28 July 2013.
  82. ^ Fook Kwag, Han; Warren Fernandez, Sumiko Tan (1998). Lee Kuan Yew – The Man and his Ideas. Times Editions. ISBN 978-981-204-049-7. 
  83. ^ Virginia Judge. "SRI LANKA CIVIL, POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS". Parliamentary debates – Parliament of New South Wales. Retrieved 9 January 2009. [dead link]
  84. ^ "Indiscriminate Attacks strengthen case for Tamil self-rule- Aussie MP". TamilNet. 5 May 2006. Retrieved 9 January 2009. 
  85. ^ "Australian parliamentarian calls for ceasefire". TamilNet. 17 February 2008. Retrieved 9 January 2009. 
  86. ^ "Resolution of US Massachusetts House of Representatives Calling for the Restoration of the Separate Sovereign State of Tamil Eelam". TamilNation.org. 18 June 1981. Retrieved 8 February 2009. [dead link]
  87. ^ "ANC urges immediate ceasefire between GoSL, LTTE, citing genocide". TamilNet. 29 January 2009. 
  88. ^ "KwaZulu condemns genocide of Tamils in Sri Lanka". TamilNet. 21 February 2009. Retrieved 21 February 2009. 
  89. ^ What Noam Chomsky says about Lankan conflict & Obama
  90. ^ Australians for Tamil Justice
  91. ^ a b Chomsky: Sri Lanka, a Rwanda-like major atrocity the West didn't care
  92. ^ "Lanka asks European countries not to support LTTE remnants". Hindustan Times. 15 May 2010. 
  93. ^ "Transnational Eelam Govt ploy to perpetuate terrorism". The Nation, Sri Lanka. 16 May 2010. 
  94. ^ Sri Lanka war probe 'lacks credibility' http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/sri-lanka-war-probe-lacks-credibility-20100811-11zkl.html
  95. ^ TGTE 'Constitution' http://www.tgte-us.org/constitution.html
  96. ^ 14.11.09 Natives of Norway, Tamil Nadu, among 37 contesting NCET elections. TamilNet (14 November 2009). Retrieved on 28 July 2013.
  97. ^ "UK Tamils Forum Index Page". British Tamils Forum. Retrieved 18 October 2008. 
  98. ^ British Tamils Forum. "President Rajapakse will think twice before visiting London next time – British Tamils Forum". Retrieved 18 October 2008. 
  99. ^ "House of Commons Hansard Debates for 14th October 2008". UKParliament.co.uk. 14 October 2008. Retrieved 18 October 2008. 
  100. ^ "Maison du Tamil Eelam". 

External links[edit]