User talk:Biruitorul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

/Archive1 /Archive2 /Archive3 /Archive4 /Archive5 /Archive6 /Archive7 /Archive8

Nohat-logo-XI-big-text.png This user is one of the 400 most active Wikipedians of all time.

Disambiguation link notification for December 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democrats (Greenland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unionism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open![edit]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open![edit]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open![edit]

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of localities in Moldova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stăuceni, Chișinău. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alina Gorghiu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Liberal Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Global account[edit]

Hi Biruitorul! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Ion Agârbiceanu[edit]

Hi! Thank you for your substantial contributions to the article Ion Agârbiceanu, which I created but was substantially expanded by you. I am thinking to nominate the article to be assessed whether it should be a good article or not. Please reply either on my talk page or on the Ion Agârbiceanu talk page, and I will reply wherever you reply to this comment. Thanks! Gug01 (talk) 22:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01

Hi again! A lot has changed since January 5 in the article, and I am once again pondering if the article is ready for GA. What do you think? Please reply on my talk page. Gug01 (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Romania may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • pdf do not have ID cards]. International sources give higher figures than the official census([http://europeandcis.undp.org/uploads/public/File/rbec_web/vgr/chapter1.1.pdf [[UNDP]]'s Regional

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Alexandra Bădoi[edit]

Hi! I see you placed not one, but two speedy deletion templates at article Alexandra Bădoi [1]. You claim that the subject is not significant. May I ask: why? Did you check Google search and try to find sources? Didn't you see that Romanian Wikipedia has well sourced article about the same person (ro:Alexandra_Bădoi). Google News search returns 17.6000 hits [2]. I strongly advise you to make those checks next time before you propose an article for deletion. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Ion I. Agârbiceanu[edit]

Hi! I remember fondly your edits on the page Ion Agârbiceanu. I just noticed that the page for his son, Ion I. Agârbiceanu, is a stub. Could you please expand the article? Gug01 (talk) 22:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Goodbye to Language[edit]

Just to confirm, I should not put the English google translated version of articles in the url section of a citation, right?--Deoliveirafan (talk) 19:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Hi Biruitorul, I know we interacted years ago on bilaterals. Hadn't seen you for a while since seeing you prod an ambassador article. LibStar (talk) 05:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ion Agârbiceanu[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Teodor Atanasiu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Deunanknute (talk) 17:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC) Not edit warring, helping. Strikethrough by Deunanknute (talk) 21:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Traian Brăileanu[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Traian Brăileanu at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Traian Brăileanu[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:46, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Biruitorul (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I was sincerely unaware that I'm not allowed to restore my own comments while logged out. I've read the policy carefully and this is what I interpreted it as meaning. I think this block is far too lengthy and far too abrupt, as well as punitive in nature. Biruitorul Talk 05:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think you should agree not to edit logged out from now on. PhilKnight (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

So explain to me how you believe that editing the same text from an account and three separate IP addresses doesn't involve "contributing to the same page or discussion"?—Kww(talk) 14:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Biruitorul, Kww is pointing at item 5 in ILLEGIT, and it's a valid point. Please tell me you're going to reread that policy and that you'll update us on whether you found it exciting and educational reading or not. Drmies (talk) 15:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
    • First, Kww, the three separate addresses were not my doing. I wouldn't know how to change my IP even if I wanted to; it just happened.
    • Second, my understanding of the term "account" in the policy was that it refers to registered accounts.
    • Third, the edits were of a purely technical nature - restoring an improperly excised text - and didn't "contribute to the discussion" one way or the other. The discussion was about the notability of an article subject, not whether my comments were fit to be removed.
    • Fourth and finally, having said all that, I accept that I made a mistake and I do not intend to repeat it. I've learned my lesson. - Biruitorul Talk 17:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Please reread the lead of WP:SOCK: "Editors who use unlinked alternative accounts, or who edit as an IP address editor separate from their account, should carefully avoid any crossover on articles or topics, because even innocuous activities such as copy editing, wikifying, or linking might be considered sock puppetry in some cases and innocuous intentions will not usually serve as an excuse." Given that, do you see how most of your history of anonymous editing has been contraindicated by policy? I'd be more than happy to terminate the block on your account in exchange for soft-blocking your IP addresses and a pledge that you will log in to edit in the future.—Kww(talk) 17:23, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Unblock granted[edit]

Based on Biruitorul's comments above, my fellow administrators' comments at User talk:Kww#Biruitorul block, and the editor's entire history of good-faith contributions, I am granting the unblock request. I do not agree that Biruitorul's agreement to softblocking of IPs should be required before the unblock is granted, and in any event, given that this appears to be a dynamic IP the suggestion is not workable. I agree with Kww and others that Biruitorul should avoid logged-out editing in the future. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Thank you NYB. Drmies (talk) 17:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • uh oh. it's ex-Arb vs. ex-Arb [3]. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
    • It is?? Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
      • You and Phil took slightly opposite approached within a minute of each other. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
        • I see that now. And it didn't show up for me as an edit conflict because I created a new section. For whatever it's worth, I think I'm right. More importantly, I take the user's statement that he won't repeat what he did and he's learned his lesson, as being equivalent to the commitment not to edit logged-out again that PhilKnight has asked for. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
          • You usually do.—Kww(talk) 18:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
            • We have what I take as the editor's commitment that he won't edit logged-out again. I think that is the main thing you and PhilKnight were looking for. If Biruitorul is willing to make that more explicit when he returns to this page, so much the better. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
          • I don't think a promise to never edit logged out is critical, and I interpret Biruitorul's comments above as agreeing that he will never edit the same page with both his account and an IP anymore. So I'd say the unblock is fine. Someone less soft than you or I could have made a case for keeping a shortened block in place for edit warring, but that would seem pointless now. Unless Phil insists on pistols at dawn. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
            • I don't perceive this as a serious case of edit-warring, and in any event "time served" would suffice as a sanction for an editor with no real blocks in eight years. In any event, I'm not an early riser, so pistols at dawn are not a solution unless Phil wants to start without me. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
              • I'm out: I'm the only Alabamian without a gun. As for Biruitorul, I think he understands that if he edits as an IP again in verboten space he'll be blocked again and, Kevin, that should be the purpose--to prevent further disruption. Floquenbeam, I have great respect for you, but going forward will you please consider changing such unnecessary modal verbosity as "would seem pointless" to "seems pointless"? Thank you muchly. Drmies (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
                • I'm perfectly fine with Brad's unblock. PhilKnight (talk) 20:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Arboroasa[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Constantine (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constantin Cantacuzino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gheorghe Bogdan-Duică, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luceafărul (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Do not revert or change the edits of others[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at:

shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Deunanknute (talk) 17:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC) Eminescus (talk) 18:52, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your contribuitions[edit]

Hi Mr. Biruitorul, I see you have added content for some personalities. My article on Justin Capra is based on references from news, interview, articles from trusted sources (CNN, Yahoo News, Adevarul, GDS, etc).

It is very good you pointed out to a book written by Lehto, a lawyer, "The American jet-pack".

You know lawyers. They get the money from defending even bad people, so they know how to make a bad person look good and a good-faith person look bad.

Lehto wrote that Justin Capra didn't provide documentation to prove he built the jet-pack in 1958.

- my opinion: nobody had any documentation at home from Military or Air-force at home, it is against the law. Secondly, all the newspapers in Communism were only writing about the Communist Leaders and Communism achievements, no other article can be found about Military inventions.

Lehto wrote that Justin Capra doesn't have videos or photos of him flying the jet-pack, then wen photos were provided he said they weren't dated

- his arguments are so silly, but because for the record, let me say something: in 1958 there was no digital camera, or no cameras that could print the date on the photos. In 1958 there was barely TV. In 1958 there was no SmartPhone or some other gadgets. What is Lehto thinking when asking his silly questions? That some fouls would be caught in his "layer smart spider net"? His questions are so childish, so fooolish.

Lehto continues with his childish, narrow-minded and silly questions: How did Justin Capra learn to fly the device, and other bla-bla-bla-ish garbage questions

- if look deeper in the articles, Justin didn't fly the jet-pack himself. It was flown by a specialist in the army - a paratrooper. His name is stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eminescus (talkcontribs) 19:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Florian Ștefănescu-Goangă[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Gheorghe Bogdan-Duică[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Procedee repudiate[edit]

Repudiem procedee care, recurgând la demolarea lui Anonymus, decretează absenţa românilor din spaţiile pe care aceştia le locuiesc.

Citat din: I. A. Pop, Românii şi maghiarii din Transilvania sec IX-XIV, Centrul de studii Transilvane, Cluj Napoca 1996, pag.7

http://www.slideshare.net/FrescatiStory/ioan-aurel-pop-romanii-si-maghiarii-din-transilvania-sec-ix-xiv?qid=6e6fa4ac-d8bf-4ec2-a8c6-cd9aacc6c45b&v=qf1&b=&from_search=2

De ce cenzurati academicienii din Romania ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.112.36.185 (talk) 19:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop the edit war[edit]

Stop icon
Your recent editing history at Justin Capra shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your account to be blocked from editing.

--Eminescus (talk) 01:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Traian Bratu[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Ion Stoica (aviator)[edit]

Can you check please Talk:Ion Stoica (aviator). Thanks! --TudorTulok (talk) 11:52, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Vasile Patilineț[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Toma Ciorbă and 94.102.49.88[edit]

Greetings. I had seen that an IP editor had tagged this article for AfD. In a fit of WP:AGF, I completed the nomination as a courtesy (as I have done for other IP editors), even though I think the article is a clear keeper. Then I found that the same IP just reported you at WP:AN#User:Biruitorul. I don't know what this person is on about, but I wanted to make sure you were notified of both actions. Thanks, and have a good day. --Finngall talk 20:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hunedoara County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dacian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Need assistance from users who know well the MOS:LEAD policy[edit]

An extra opinion is necessary at Talk:Székely_Land#The_name_in_the_Old_Hungarian_alphabet regarding the inclusion of the name DLÖFLYEKÉSZ. Thanks in advance for your help. 62.197.243.19 (talk) 08:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Argeș County Museum[edit]

Materialscientist (talk) 06:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)