Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎User-reported: Edits are not vandalism (using responseHelper)
→‎User-reported: ec NYB edit not vandalism
Line 26: Line 26:
*{{vandal|Newyearbaby}} &ndash; On [[1969 NFL season]]:. Continued addition of unsourced material [[WP:OR]]? after numerous warnings. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 21:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
*{{vandal|Newyearbaby}} &ndash; On [[1969 NFL season]]:. Continued addition of unsourced material [[WP:OR]]? after numerous warnings. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 21:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
::{{AIV|nv}} &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
::{{AIV|nv}} &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 21:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
:::(ec) Not vandalism on the reported article. There are a handful of debated edits between the reporting user and NYB recently that are questionable. [[User:Strikerforce|<span style="color:#3333cc;">'''Striker'''</span><span style="color:#330099;">'''force'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Strikerforce|<span style="color:#3333cc;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 21:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:19, 20 September 2018


    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 21:06 on 15 September 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    Note: It really isn't feasible to figure out what the edit filter is supposed to do by reading it, so I can't be sure, but this looks to me like a false positive. JBW (talk) 20:17, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed, a false positive. The filter isn’t aimed at this activity. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Nothing but constructive editing. JBW (talk) 20:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User-reported

    Warned user. I am not convinced that this is vandalism, although it does appear disruptive. A warning has been posted. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    (ec) Not vandalism on the reported article. There are a handful of debated edits between the reporting user and NYB recently that are questionable. StrikerforceTalk 21:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]