Jump to content

Crusading movement: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Popular Crusades: moved from Crusades, tags to follow
m Disambiguating links to Occitan (link changed to Occitans) using DisamAssist.
 
(854 intermediate revisions by 89 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Framework of Christian holy war}}
{{about|the ideology and institutions associated with crusading|the expeditions themselves|Crusades}}
{{about|the ideology and institutions associated with crusading|the expeditions themselves|Crusades}}
{{other uses|Crusade (disambiguation)|Crusader (disambiguation)}}
{{Use British English|date=October 2020}}
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=June 2022}}
[[File:The Church of the Holy Sepulchre-Jerusalem.JPG|thumb|right|upright=1.35|alt=photograph of the church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem|The [[church of the Holy Sepulchre]] in Jerusalem. This is a site of Christian pilgrimage built where Christian Roman authorities pinpointed the purported location of Jesus' burial and resurrection in Jerusalem in 325.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=xxiii}} One of the objectives of the Crusades was to free the Holy Sepulchre from Muslim control.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=1}}]]


The '''crusading movement''' encompasses the framework of [[ideology|ideologies]] and [[institution]]s that described, regulated, and promoted the [[Crusades]]. The crusades were [[religious war]]s that the [[Christians|Christian]] [[Latin church]] initiated, supported, and sometimes directed in the [[Middle Ages]]. The members of the church defined this movement in legal and [[Theology|theological]] terms that were based on the concepts of holy war and [[pilgrimage]]. In theological terms, the movement merged ideas of [[Old Testament]] wars that were believed to have been instigated and assisted by God with [[New Testament]] ideas of forming [[Christocentric|personal relationships with Christ]]. The institution of crusading developed with the encouragement of church reformers the 11th{{nbsp}}century in what is commonly known as the [[Gregorian Reform]] and declined after the 16th{{nbsp}}century Protestant [[Reformation]].
[[File:SCONTRO A NABLUS - AFFRESCHI CONTROFACCIATA S. BEVIGNATE.JPG|thumb|upright=1.5|alt= Fresco from San Bevignate showing men on horseback fighting | Fresco from [[San Bevignate]] depicting the [[Templars]] battling the [[Saracens]], possibly the [[battle of Nablus (1242)]]]] The '''Crusading movement''' was one of the most important elements and defining attributes of late medieval [[western culture]]. It impacted almost every country in Europe, the western Islamic world, touching many aspects of life, influencing the Church, religious thought, politics, the economy, and society. It had a distinct ideology that was evident in texts describing, regulating, and promoting [[crusades]]. It began with a call from [[Pope Urban II]] for an armed [[Christian pilgrimage|pilgrimage]] to recover the Christian holy places in [[Jerusalem]]. In 1095, he promised participants spiritual reward during a church council in [[Council of Clermont|Clermont]], France. The [[First Crusade|expedition]] led to the founding of four [[crusader states]] in [[Syria (region)|Syria]] and [[Palestine (region)|Palestine]] and inspired further military endeavours and popular movements, now known collectively as [[crusades]]. Roman Catholic church leaders developed the movement by offering spiritual reward to those who fought for the defence of the holy places and extended this to fighting Muslim rulers in the [[Iberian Peninsula]], pagan tribes in the [[Baltic region]], primarily in Italy against enemies of the [[Papacy]], and non-Catholic groups. Supporters who were unable or unwilling to fight could acquire the same spiritual privileges through donations.


The idea of crusading as holy war was based on the [[Greco-Roman world|Greco-Roman]] [[Just war theory]]. A "just war" was one where a legitimate authority is the instigator, there is a valid cause, and it is waged with good intentions. The Crusades were seen by their adherents as a special [[Christian pilgrimage]]{{snd}}a physical and spiritual journey authorised and protected by the church. The actions were both a pilgrimage and [[penance|penitental]], Participants were considered part of Christ's army and demonstrated this by attaching crosses of cloth to their outfits. This marked them as followers and devotees of Christ and was in response to biblical passages exhorting Christian "to carry one's cross and follow Christ". Everyone could be involved, with the church considering anyone who died campaigning a [[Christian martyr]]. This movement was an important part of late-medieval western culture, that impacted politics, the economy and wider society.
The legal and theological foundations were formed from the [[Just_war_theory#Christian_views|theory of Holy War]], the concept of [[pilgrimage]], [[Old Testament]] parallels to Jewish wars instigated and assisted by God, and [[New Testament]] Christocentric views on forming individual relationships with Christ. Participants in crusade were viewed as {{lang|la|[[milites Christi]]}}, or Christ's soldiers. Volunteers took a vow and received [[Indulgence|plenary indulgences]] from the Church. Motivation may have been the [[absolution|forgiveness]] of sin, [[feudalism|feudal]] obligation to participate in their lords’ military actions, or honour and wealth. The movement impacted almost every country in Europe and the western Islamic world, touching many aspects of life, influencing the Church, religious thought, politics, the economy, and society.
Muslims, Jews, pagans, and non-Catholic Christians were frequently killed in large numbers. Islamic holy war known as [[Jihad]] revived; schism grew between Catholicism and [[Greek Orthodox Church|Orthodoxy]]; and antisemitic laws were made. Crusading ventures expanded the borders of western Christendom, consolidated the collective identity of the Latin Church under papal leadership and reinforced the connection between Catholicism, feudalism and [[militarism]]. The republics of [[Republic of Genoa|Genoa]] and [[Republic of Venice|Venice]] flourished, establishing communes in the crusader states and expanding trade with eastern markets. Accounts of crusading heroism, [[chivalry]] and [[piety]] influenced [[medieval romance]], [[Medieval philosophy|philosophy]] and [[Medieval literature|literature]]. Societies of professional soldiers under [[Religious order (Catholic)|monastic]] vows emerged as [[Military order (religious society)|military orders]] in the crusader states and at western Christendom's Iberian and Baltic borderlands. Trading in spiritual rewards prospered, scandalising pious Catholics, and developing into one of the causes of the 16th-century [[Protestant Reformation]].


The original focus and objective was the liberation of [[History of Jerusalem during the Middle Ages|Jerusalem]] and the sacred sites of Palestine from non-Christians. The city was considered to be Christ's legacy and it was symbolic of divine restoration. The site of Christ's redemptive acts was pivotal for the inception of the First Crusade and the subsequent establishment of crusading as an institution. The campaigns to reclaim the Holy Land were the ones that attracted the greatest support, but the crusading movement's theatre of war extended wider than just Palestine. Crusades were waged in the [[Iberian Peninsula]], northeastern Europe against the [[Wends]], the [[Baltic region]], campaigns were fought against those the church considered [[heretic]]s in France, Germany, and Hungary, as well as in Italy where Pope's indulged in armed conflict with their opponents. By definition all the crusades were waged with [[Pope|papal]] approval and through this reinforced the Western European concept of a single, unified Christian church under the [[papal primacy|Pope]].
==Background==
{{Campaignbox Crusades|state=expanded}}


==Major features==
The [[First Crusade]] inspired a movement that became one of the most significant defining elements and attributes of late medieval western culture.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=36}} This movement touched every country in Europe and almost every aspect of life including the Church, religious thought, politics, the economy, and society. It created its own literature and had an enduring impact on the history of the western Islamic world and the [[Baltic region]].{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|pp=4-5}} A distinct ideology is evident in the texts that described, regulated, and promoted crusades. These were defined in legal and theological terms based on the theory of [[Holy War]] and the concept of [[pilgrimage]]. Theologically there was a merging of Old Testament parallels to Jewish wars instigated and assisted by God with New Testament Christocentric views on forming individual relationships with Christ. Holy war was based on {{lang|la|bellum iustum}}, the ancient idea of [[just war]]. [[Augustine of Hippo]] Christianised this, and canon lawyers developed it from the 11th{{nbsp}}century into {{lang|la| bellum sacrum}}, the paradigm of Christian holy. The criteria were holy war must be initiated by a legitimate authority such as a pope or emperor considered as acting on divine authority; that there was {{lang|la| causa iusta}}, a just cause such as serious offence, overt aggression or injurious action; a threat to Christian religion; and {{lang|la| intentio recta}} waged with pure intentions like the good of religion or co-religionists. In the 12th{{nbsp}}century, [[Gratian]] and the [[Decretists]] elaborated on this, and [[Thomas Aquinas]] refined it in the 13th{{nbsp}}century. The idea that holy war against pagans could be justified simply by their opposition to Christianity, suggested by [[Henry of Segusio]], was never universally accepted. Crusades were considered special pilgrimages, a physical and spiritual journey under ecclesiastical jurisdiction and the protection of the church. Pilgrimage and crusade were penitential acts; popes considered crusaders earned a plenary indulgence giving remission of all God-imposed temporal penalties.{{sfn|Maier|2006a|pp=627–629}}
{{further|Cluniac Reform|Gregorian Reform|History of the papacy (1048–1257)}}
Historians trace the beginnings of the crusading movement to the significant changes within the [[Latin church]] enacted during the mid and latter eleventh century.{{sfn|Bull|1995|p=26}} These are now known as the [[Gregorian Reform]], from a term popularised by the French historian [[Augustin Fliche]]. He named the changes after one of the leading reforming [[pope]]s [[Pope Gregory VII|Gregory VII]]. The use of the term oversimplifies what was in fact numerous discrete initiatives, not all of which were the result of papal action.{{sfn|Morris|1989|pp=80–81}}


A group of [[Reformism (historical)|reformers]] took control of the governance of the church with ambitions to use this control to eradicate behaviour they viewed as corrupt.{{sfn|Bull|1995|p=26}} This takeover was initially supported by the [[Holy Roman Empire]] and by [[Henry III, Holy Roman Emperor]] in particular, but went on to lead to conflict with his son, [[Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor]]. The reformers believed in [[papal primacy]]. That is the Pope was the head of all of Christendom as heir of [[St Peter]]. Secular rulers, even including the emperor, were subject to this and could be removed.{{sfn|Barber|2012|pp=93–94}}
Crusades were described in terms of [[Old Testament]] history analogous to the Israelites' conquest of [[Canaan]] and the wars of the [[Maccabees]]. This presented wars against the enemies of Israel waged by God's people, under divine leadership against the enemies of a true religion. The Crusades were believed to be sacred warfare conducted under God's authority and support. Old Testament figures such as [[Joshua]] and [[Judas Maccabaeus]] were presented as role models. Crusaders were viewed as {{lang|la| milites Christi}} Christ's soldiers forming the {{lang|la| militia Christi}} or Christ's army. This was only metaphorical up to the first crusade, when the concept transferred from the clerical to secular. From the end of the 12th{{nbsp}}century the terms {{|crucesignatus}} or {{lang|la|crucesignata}} meaning "one signed by the cross" were adopted. Crusaders attached crosses of cloth to their clothing marking them as a follower devotee of Christ, responding to the biblical passage in Luke 9:23 "to carry one's cross and follow [Christ]". The cross symbolised devotion to Christ in addition to the penitential exercise. This created a personal relationship between crusader and God that marked the crusader's spirituality. It was believed that anyone could become a crusader, irrespective of gender, wealth, or social standing. Sometimes this was seen as an {{lang|la|imitatio Christi}} or imitation of Christ, a sacrifice motivated by charity for fellow Christians. Those who died campaigning were seen as martyrs. The Holy Land was seen as the patrimony of Christ; its recovery was on the behalf of God. The [[Albigensian Crusade]] was a defence of the French church, the [[Northern Crusades|Baltic Crusades]] were campaigns conquering lands beloved of Christ's mother Mary for Christianity.{{sfn|Maier|2006a|pp=629–630}}


The reformist groups opposed previously widespread behaviour such as [[simony|the sale of clerical positions]] and [[clerical marriage]].{{sfn|Morris|1989|p=80}} The changes were not without opposition, causing [[schism|splits]] within the church and between the church and the emperor.{{sfn|Morris|1989|p=82}} However, the reform faction successfully created the ideology for men they saw as God's agents. From the second half of the 11th{{nbsp}}century, it enabled them in the refashioning of the church along the moral and spiritual lines they believed in.{{sfn|Latham|2012|p=110}} Historians consider that this was a pivotal moment, because the church was now under the control of men who supported a concept of [[holy war]] and would plan to make it happen.{{sfn|Morris|1989|p=144}}
From the beginning, crusading was strongly associated with the recovery of Jerusalem and the Palestinian holy places. The historic Christian significance of Jerusalem as the setting for Christ's act of redemption was fundamental for the First Crusade and the successful establishment of the institution of crusading. Crusades to the Holy Land were always met with the greatest enthusiasm and support, but crusading was not tied exclusively to the Holy Land. By the first half of the 12th{{nbsp}}century, crusading was transferred to other theatres on the periphery of Christian Europe: the [[Iberian Peninsula]]; north-eastern Europe against the [[Wends]]; by the 13th{{nbsp}}century, the missionary crusades into the Baltic region; wars against heretics in France, Germany, and Hungary; and mainly Italian campaigns against the papacy's political enemies. Common to all were Papal sanction and the medieval concept of one Christian community, one church, ruled by the papacy separate from {{lang|la|gentiles}} or non-believers. Christendom was a geopolitical reference, and this was underpinned by the penitential practice of the medieval church. These ideas rose with the encouragement of the [[Gregorian Reform]]ers of the 11th{{nbsp}}century and declined after the [[Reformation]]. The ideology of crusading was continued after the 16th{{nbsp}}century mainly by the military orders, but dwindled in competition with other forms of religious war and new ideologies.{{sfn|Maier|2006a|pp=630–631}}


The reformers now viewed the church as an independent force with God given authority to act in the secular world for religious regeneration. The creation of the institutions of crusading were a means by which the church could act militarily with the support of the armed aristocracy. This would in turn lead to creation of formal processes for the raising of armed forces through which the church could enforce its will. While these fundamentals applied the crusading movement flourished, when they ceased to be significant the movement declined.{{sfn|Latham|2011|pp=240–241}}{{sfn|Latham|2012|pp=128-129}}
==Definition==
Crusades were the fighting of Christian [[religious wars]], the authorisation and objectives of which derived from the pope through his legitimate authority as [[Vicar of Christ]]. Combatants received forgiveness for confessed sin, legal immunity, freedom from debt interest and both their family and property was protected by the church. They swore vows like those of a pilgrimage, the duration of which was determined by completion, by absolution or by death. Those who died in battle or completed the vow were considered martyrs with eternal salvation. The first, original and best-known crusade was the expedition to recover Jerusalem from Muslim rule in 1095. For centuries, the Holy Land was the most significant factor in terms of rhetoric, imagination, and ideology.{{sfn|Tyerman|2004|pp=14-16}}


===Penance and indulgence===
At first, the term ''crusade'' used in modern [[historiography]] referred to the wars in the [[Holy Land]] beginning in 1095. The range of events to which the term has been applied has been extended, so its use can create a misleading impression of coherence, particularly regarding the early crusades. The [[Latin]] terms used for the campaign of the First Crusade were {{lang|la|iter}}, "journey", and {{lang|la|peregrinatio}}, "pilgrimage".<ref name="Asbridge 2012 40">{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|p=40}}</ref> The terminology of crusading remained largely indistinguishable from that of [[Christian pilgrimage]] during the 12th{{nbsp}}century. This reflected the reality of the first century of crusading, when not all armed pilgrims fought and not all who fought had taken religious vows. It was not until the late 12th and early 13th&nbsp;centuries that a more specific "language of crusading" emerged.<ref name="Tyerman259">{{Harvnb|Tyerman|2006|p=259}}</ref> [[Pope Innocent&nbsp;III]] used the term {{lang|la|negotium crucis}} or "affair of the cross". [[Sinibaldo Fieschi]], the future Pope Innocent&nbsp;IV, used the terms {{lang|la|crux transmarina}}{{mdash}}"the cross overseas"{{mdash}}for crusades in the [[Outremer]] (crusader states) against Muslims and {{lang|la|crux cismarina}}{{mdash}}"the cross this side of the sea"{{mdash}}for crusades in Europe against other enemies of the church.<ref name="Tyerman480">{{Harvnb|Tyerman|2006|p=480}}</ref> The modern English "crusade" dates to the early 1700s.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=77}}{{efn-ua|name=Tyerman2011}} The term used in modern [[Arabic]], {{lang|ar-Latn|ḥamalāt ṣalībiyya}} {{lang|ar|حملات صليبية|rtl=yes}}, lit. "[[:wikt:حملة|campaigns]] of the [[:wikt:صليب|cross]]", is a loan translation of the term "crusade" as used in western historiography.<ref>{{Harvnb|Determann|2008|p=13}}</ref>
{{further|Crusade indulgence}}


Before the crusading movement was established, the church had developed a [[Restitution (theology)|system]] that enabled Christians to gain forgiveness and [[absolution|pardon for sins]] from the church on behalf of God. They did this by demonstrating genuine [[contrition]] through [[Confession (religion)|admissions of wrongdoing]] and acts of [[Atonement in Christianity|penance]]. Christianity's requirement to avoid violence was still a significant issue for the warrior class. Gregory VII offered them a potential solution In the latter part of the 11th{{nbsp}}century. This was that they too could have their sins forgiven if they supported him in fighting for papal causes, but only if this service was given altruistically.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=61}}{{sfn|Latham|2012|p=123}} Later popes expanded on this offer to those willing to fight for their causes. [[Urban II]] launched the [[First Crusade]] at [[Council of Clermont|Clermont]] in November 1095. He made two offers to those who would travel to Jerusalem and fight for control of the sites Christians considered sacred. They were that those who fought would receive exemption from [[penance]] for the sins they committed and while they fought the church would protect all their property from harm.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=69–70}} The enthusiasm of the crusading movement challenged what had been conventional theology. This can be seen in a letter from [[Sigebert of Gembloux]] to [[Robert II, Count of Flanders]]. Sigebert is critical of [[Pope Paschal II]] and in congratulating Robert on his safe return from Jerusalem he pointedly omits any reference at all of the fact that Robert had been fighting on a crusade.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995b|p=80}}
French Catholic lawyer [[Étienne Pasquier]], who lived from 1529 to 1615, is thought to be the first historian to attempt the numbering of each crusade in the Holy Land. He suggested there were six.<ref>{{Harvnb|Tyerman|2011|pp=47–50}}</ref> In 1820 [[Charles Mills (historian)|Charles Mills]] wrote ''[[History of the Crusades for the Recovery and Possession of the Holy Land]]'' in which he counted nine distinct crusades from the First Crusade of 1095–1099 to the [[Ninth Crusade]] of 1271–72. This convention is often retained for convenience and tradition, even though it is a somewhat arbitrary system for what some historians now consider to be seven major and numerous lesser campaigns.<ref name="Davies 1997, p. 358">{{Harvnb|Davies|1997|p=358}}</ref>


Later pope's would develop the institution even further. Not only would crusaders avoid what were considered the God-imposed punishments for their sins but the guilt and the sin itself would be expunged. The method through which this was achieved was the granting by the church of what was called a [[Indulgence#Plenary indulgences|plenary indulgence]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=3}} [[Calixtus II]] made the same offer privileges and extended the protection of property to crusaders' relations.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=2}} [[Innocent III]] reinforced the importance of the oaths crusaders took. He also emphasised the view the forgiveness of sin was a [[Grace in Christianity|gift from God]]. It was not considered a reward for the suffering endured by the crusader while on crusade.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=235–237}}{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=524–525}} It was in the 1213 [[papal bull]] called {{lang|ln|[[Quia maior]]}} that he reached out beyond the noble warrior class. He offered all other Christians the opportunity to redeem their vows without even going on crusade. This led to the unforeseen consequence of creating a market for religious rewards. This would later scandalise some devout Christians and through this become a contributing factor for the [[Protestant Reformation]] from the 16th{{nbsp}}century.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=533–535}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=238–239}} As late as the 16th{{nbsp}}century, some writers continued to seek atonement for their sins through the practice of crusading. At the same time [[John Foxe]] the English [[Martyrology|martyrologist]] and others saw this as "the impure [[idolatry]], and [[Profanity|profanation]]"{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=40–41}}
The term "Crusade" may differ in usage depending on the author. In an influential article published in 2001, [[Giles Constable]] attempted to define four categories of contemporary crusade study:
*''Traditionalists'' such as [[Hans Eberhard Mayer]] restrict their definition of the Crusades to the Christian campaigns in the [[Holy Land]], "either to assist the Christians there or to liberate Jerusalem and the Holy Sepulcher", during 1095–1291.<ref>{{Harvnb|Constable|2001|p=12}}</ref>
* ''Pluralists'' such as [[Jonathan Riley-Smith]] use the term Crusade of any campaign explicitly sanctioned by the reigning Pope.<ref>{{Harvnb|Riley-Smith|2009|p=27}}</ref> This reflects the view of the Roman Catholic Church (including medieval contemporaries such as Saint [[Bernard of Clairvaux]]) that every military campaign given Papal sanction is equally valid as a Crusade, regardless of its cause, justification or geographic location. This broad definition includes attacks on [[paganism]] and [[heresy]] such as the [[Albigensian Crusade]]; the [[Northern Crusades]] and the [[Hussite Wars]]; and wars for political or territorial advantage such as the [[Aragonese Crusade]] in Sicily, a Crusade declared by Pope Innocent{{nbsp}}III against [[Markward of Anweiler]] in 1202;<ref>{{Harvnb|Lock|2006|pp=255–256}}</ref> one against the [[Stedingen|Stedingers]]; several (declared by different popes) against Emperor [[Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor|Frederick{{nbsp}}II]] and his sons;<ref>{{Harvnb|Lock|2006|pp=172–180}}</ref> two Crusades against opponents of King [[Henry&nbsp;III of England]]<ref>{{Harvnb|Lock|2006|p=167}}</ref> and the [[Reconquista|Christian re-conquest of Iberia]].<ref name="Davies 1997, pp. 362–364">{{Harvnb|Davies|1997|p=358}}</ref>
*''Generalists'' such as Ernst-Dieter Hehl see Crusades as any holy war connected with the Latin Church and fought in defence of the faith.
*''Popularists'' including Paul Alphandery and Etienne Delaruelle limit the Crusades only to those characterised by popular groundswells of religious fervour—that is, only the First Crusade and perhaps the People's Crusade.<ref>{{Harvnb|Constable|2001|pp=12–15}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Tyerman|2011|pp=225–226}}</ref>


Popes continued in the practice of issuing crusade bulls for generations, but [[Alberico Gentili]] and [[Hugo Grotius]] created an international rule of law that was secular rather than religious.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|p=919}} The wars against the [[Ottoman Empire]] and in defence of Europe were conflicts on which [[Lutherans]], [[Calvinists]], and [[Roman Catholics]] could agree in principle. So the importance to recruitment of the granting of indulgences became increasingly redundant and declined.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=439-440}}
== History ==


===Crusades in the Holy Land===
===Christianity and war===
[[File:SCONTRO A NABLUS - AFFRESCHI CONTROFACCIATA S. BEVIGNATE.JPG|thumb|upright=1.5|alt= Fresco from San Bevignate showing men on horseback fighting | [[Fresco]] from [[San Bevignate]] depicting the [[Templars]] battling the [[Saracens]], the [[Battle of Nablus (1242)]]]]
{{main|Crusades}}
{{further|Just war theory}}
[[File:Temple mount.JPG|thumb|upright=1.35| The present-day [[Temple Mount]] in Jerusalem, known to the crusaders as "the [[Solomon's Temple|Temple of Solomon]]". This was the founding headquarters of the [[Knights Templar]] and the order derived its name from the location.|alt=Contemporary photograph of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem]]


The 4th-century theologian [[Augustine of Hippo]] Christianised theories of {{lang|la|bellum justum}} or [[just war theory|just war]] that dated from the [[Greco-Roman world]]. In the 11th{{nbsp}}century [[Canon law of the Catholic Church|canon lawyers]] extended his thinking to create the [[paradigm]] of {{lang|la| bellum sacrum}}, or a form of Christian holy war.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=14–16,338,359}} The theory was based on the idea that Christian warfare could be justified even though it was considered a sin. It was necessary to meet three criteria if a war was to be considered just. Firstly, it must be declared by an authority that the church considered legitimate. Secondly, the war must have defensive objectives or to be for the recovery of stolen property and rights. Lastly, the intentions of those taking part must be good.{{sfn|Latham|2012|p=98}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=14}}
In 1095, Pope Urban called for what is now recognised as the first crusade. There was a widespread response by thousands of predominantly poor Christians in the [[People's Crusade]] and a force led by Western European nobles may have numbered 100,000. The result was the successful capture of [[siege of Antioch| Antioch]] and [[Siege of Jerusalem (1099)|Jerusalem]]. Many crusaders now considered their pilgrimage complete and returned to Europe but [[Godfrey of Bouillon]] took the position of Defender of the Holy Sepulchre. When he died his brother, [[Baldwin&nbsp;I of Jerusalem|Baldwin]] became the first [[King of Jerusalem]]Latin king. {{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=41, 72–82,89–96, 96–103,116}} [[Pope Eugenius&nbsp;III]] raised the unsuccessful [[Second Crusade]] in response to the conquest of the crusader state of [[Siege of Edessa (1144)|Edessa]].{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=84–91}} [[Pope Gregory&nbsp;VIII]] proposed the [[Third Crusade]] after the Crusader states were largely overrun following the [[Battle of Hattin]] in 1187.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=343–357}} [[Jaffa]] was recaptured and the force twice advanced to within a day's march of Jerusalem but recognised they lacked the resources to capture and hold the city. Instead, a three-year truce gained pilgrim access to the city. {{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=443–513}} Pope Innocent&nbsp;III called the [[Fourth Crusade]] in 1198, but the army diverted instead and captured Christian [[Siege of Constantinople (1203)|Constantinople]]. The result was that the Fourth Crusade never came within {{convert|1000|miles}} of its objective of Jerusalem.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge |2012|p=530}}</ref> The unsuccessful [[Fifth Crusade]] largely in Hungary, Germany, Flanders with the strategic intent to attack the isolated, easier to defend and self-sufficient Egypt.<ref>{{Harvnb|Riley-Smith|2005|pp=179–180}}</ref> In 1228, [[Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor|Holy Roman Emperor Frederick{{nbsp}}II]] led the [[Sixth Crusade]] that gained most of Jerusalem and a strip of territory that linked the city to Acre through diplomacy, negotiation, and force.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=563–571}}</ref> In 1249, [[Louis IX of France|Louis&nbsp;IX]] led the [[Seventh Crusade]]'s attack on Egypt that was defeated at [[Battle of Al Mansurah|Mansura]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Tyerman |2006|pp=770–775}}</ref> <ref>{{harvnb|Asbridge|2012|p=605}}</ref> His 1270 [[Eighth Crusade]] was diverted by his brother Charles to [[Tunis]] where Louis and much of his army died through disease.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=643–644}}</ref>


Using these theories the church supported various Christian groups in conflicts with their Muslim neighbours at the borders of Christendom. In what is now Northern Spain encouragement was given during the [[Crusade of Barbastro|siege of Barbastro]]. The [[Normans]] of Southern Italy were supported in their [[Norman conquest of Sicily|conquest]] of the [[Emirate of Sicily]]. Gregory VII even planned to lead a campaign himself in support of the Byzantine Empire in 1074. He was unable to gather the necessary support, possibly because his personal leadership was unacceptable. Despite this, his plans did leave a template for future crusades.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|p=16}} As did the campaigns in Spain where leading thinkers and fighters developed practical and fundamental arguments for the crusading movement.{{sfn|Madden|2013|p=15}}
Crusading to the Holy Land Jerusalem declined for multi-faceted reasons. Historians have attempted to explain this in terms of Muslim reunification and [[jihadi]] enthusiasm. But Muslim unity was sporadic and the desire for [[jihad]] ephemeral and the nature of crusading was unsuited to the conquest and defence of the Holy Land. Crusaders were on a personal pilgrimage and usually returned when it was completed. Although the philosophy of crusading changed over time, the crusades continued to be conducted by short-lived armies led by independently minded potentates, rather than centralised leadership. Religious fervour enabled significant feats of military endeavour but proved difficult to direct and control. Succession disputes and dynastic rivalries in Europe, failed harvests, and heretical outbreaks, all contributed to reducing Latin Europe's concerns for Jerusalem. Ultimately, even though the fighting was also at the edge of the Islamic world, the vast distances made the mounting of crusades and the maintenance of communications insurmountably difficult.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge |2012|pp=660–664}}</ref>


The thoughts and writing on these theories were eventually consolidated into {{lang|la|Collectio Canonum}} or ''Collection of Canon Law'' by [[Anselm of Lucca]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=61}} [[Thomas Aquinas]] and others extended these theories in the 13th{{nbsp}}century. This created a concept of [[religious war]]. {{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=14–15}} This enabled various popes to use canon law in the call for crusades against their [[Crusades against Christians|enemies in Italy]]. Rome was the estate of St Peter, so the popes' campaigns were defensive and only fought for the preservation of Christian territory.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=195–198}} The church combined two themes in the creation of crusading, one from the [[Old Testament]] and one from the [[New Testament|New]]. The first was the wars of the Jews. These were believed to have come from the instigation and will of God. The second was the [[Christocentric]] ideas related to Christians forming individual relationships with Christ. It was believed these were instigated and assisted by God. Secondly, the [[Christocentric]] concept of forming an individual relationship with Christ that came from the [[New Testament]]. In this way the church was able to combine the ideas of holy war and [[Christian pilgrimage]] to create the legal and theocratic justifications for the crusading movement.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=14–16,338,359}}
=== Reconquista===
{{main|Reconquista}}
The Christian conquest of the Iberian Peninsula from Muslim control has been called the {{lang|es|reconquista}} or "reconquest" since the 19th{{nbsp}}century. The memory of the vanished [[Visigothic kingdom]], destroyed in the 8th{{nbsp}}century, was an important foundation for the Christian expansion of the 10th and 11th{{nbsp}}centuries. Few early sources exist that justify it religiously before the end of the 11th{{nbsp}}century. The Reconquista was not incessant religious war, but long peaceful periods interspersed with short crises; only the borders were marked by conflict. Between the 8th and 11th{{nbsp}}centuries five Christian realms developed in the mountainous, inaccessible border zones in the extreme north of the peninsula: the kingdoms of [[Kingdom of Asturias|Asturias]], [[ Kingdom of Castile|Castile]], [[Kingdom of Navarre|Navarre]], [[Kingdom of Aragon|Aragon]] and the [[County of Barcelona]]. <ref>{{Harvnb|Jotischky|2004|pp=183–184}}</ref> In 1137, Barcelona and Aragon were united dynastically and in 1143 Portugal became independent. Castile and Leon were united for the second and final time in 1230. At the beginning of the 11th{{nbsp}}century, Muslim Spain collapsed into a number of petty Muslim realms called Taifa kingdoms. The Christians expanded south and captured [[Toledo, Spain|Toledo]] in 1085.{{sfn|Jaspert|2006|pp=1013–1015}}
The Roman church's influence was limited until the second half of the 11th{{nbsp}}century, beginning with [[Pope Alexander&nbsp;II]] offering indulgences and papal justification to a contingent of French knights who took part in the [[Crusade of Barbastro|conquest of Barbastro]]. First Aragon, quickly followed by the other kingdoms, adopted the Roman liturgy. In response, the Iberian Muslims sought support from the [[Almoravid dynasty]] in North Africa, who conquered much of Iberia, and the predominantly secular conflict became religious. The papacy's commitment increased, and the number of foreign warriors joined the fight against the Muslims. The situation influenced the papacy's attitude toward the use of force against Islam short of making it a crusade. It lacked the crusading vow, cross taking, or the plenary indulgence. But by 1121 the Christian warriors were given identical indulgences to those of the Holy Land. The First Lateran Council of 1123 regulated that those who took the cross could campaign for Jerusalem or Spain. Crusade bulls were issued for recruitment and simultaneously with the establishment of military orders in Outremer military confraternities were founded in Aragon. 12th{{nbsp}}century literature contributed to promoting the Reconquista as a crusade through ''[[The Song of Roland]]'' and {{lang|la|[[Historia Caroli Magni|Historia Karoli Magni et Rotholandi]]}} representing Iberian campaign of the [[Emperor Charlemagne]] as a crusade as well as Christian praising ''[[chansons de geste]]''. Like in the Outremer, the struggle became domestic border warfare with few objections to Muslin-Christian alliances which often antagonised foreign crusaders. {{sfn|Jaspert|2006|pp=1015–1017}}
At the same time as the Second Crusade in 1147 and 1148, and the campaign against the pagan Wends beyond the Elbe, the Iberians attacked with foreign assistance. <ref>{{Harvnb|Jotischky|2004|p=190}}</ref> Lisbon was taken. The Castilians conquered Almeria and Tortosa, and [[Lleida]] surrendered to [[Ramon Berenguer&nbsp;IV, Count of Barcelona]]. It was the high point of international support and, in contrast to the Outremer, the Iberians reduced reliance on external force. Although foreign rulers undertook crusading in Spain, they were unsuccessful without native support. The Iberian military orders kept alive the crusading ideal and included foreigners but became Iberian in nature. In the late 12th{{nbsp}}century, the Almoravids were displaced by the [[Almohad Caliphate]], who defeated Castile at [[Battle of Alarcos|Alarcos]] in 1195. This prompted a united Christian response with support from Pope Innocent&nbsp;III and in a 1212 victory at [[Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa|Las Navas de Tolosa]]. The expansion gathered momentum with papal support in the 1230s. Castille conquered Cordoba and Seville; Aragon, the Valencia and the Balearic Islands; and Portugal the Algarve, nearly completing the conquest of [[Al-Andalus]]. The Muslim [[Emirate of Granada]], in the mountainous area of the Sierra Nevada in the south, remained for over two centuries. Foreign crusaders gained crusading indulgences through participation in the 1309 capture of Gibraltar and the 1340 Christian victory at the [[Battle of Río Salado]]. Chivalrous and courtly ideals marked these expeditions; for many, honour and adventure counted equally with the welfare of their souls. The unity under the joint rule of Aragon and Castile led to a ten-year campaign and in 1492, the conquest of Granada which ended the Reconquista, concluded. It remained a justification for Spanish expansion into America. {{sfn|Jaspert|2006|pp=1017–1018}}
The Reconquista included colonisation named {{lang|es|repoblacion}} by [[Mozarabs]] from Al-Andalus or Catholic northern Iberia. Predominantly French foreigners inhabited the pilgrimage routes to [[Santiago de Compostela]]. Settlers were granted liberal privileges (called {{lang|es|fueros}}) to move to densely inhabited Muslim and Jewish areas. The treatment of the natives was pragmatic rather than tolerant. <ref>{{Harvnb|Jotischky|2004|p=191}}</ref> Jews and Muslims were called {{lang|es|Mudejars}}, paid a poll tax, could not carry weapons and limited to special quarters. They were mostly allowed their religious practices, personal safety, and were permitted limited self-governance. These restrictions and pressure resulted in gradual acculturation and [[syncretism]]. Those Jews who would not convert were expelled in 1492, and Mudejar baptism was required shortly after. In 1609, the [[Morisco]] Christian descendants of Muslims were expelled from Spain.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=7–8}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Davies|1997|pp=444–454}}</ref>{{sfn|Jaspert|2006|pp=1018–1019}}


The historian Carl Erdmann mapped out the three stages for the argument creating the institution of the crusading movement:
===Crusades against Christians===
* defending Christen unity was a just cause;
[[File:Albigensian Crusade 01.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|alt=Two illuminations: the pope admonishing a group of people and mounted knights attacking unarmed people with swords|Miniatures showing [[Pope Innocent&nbsp;III]] excommunicating, and the crusaders massacring, Cathars(BL Royal 16 G VI, fol. 374v, 14th{{nbsp}}century)]]Christian holy war had a long history pre-dating the 11th{{nbsp}}century when papal reformers began equating the universal church with the papacy. This resulted in the [[Peace and Truce of God]] movement supporting military defence of the church, clergy and its property. In 1053 [[Pope Leo&nbsp;IX]] attacked the [[Italo-Normans]] granting troops sin remission in return for a holy war. Later, Pope Gregory&nbsp;VII and his militia {{lang|la|Sancti Petri}} considered fighting for the papacy as penitential; death brought salvation. This was less about an Augustinian just war than militant Christianity fighting in defence of the church from the 8th{{nbsp}}century. Late 11th{{nbsp}}century works by [[Anselm of Lucca]] and [[Bonizo of Sutri]] focused on heretics and schismatics rather than infidels. The First Crusade encouraged further holy wars, peacekeeping in northern France, papal fighting with [[Roger II of Sicily|King Roger&nbsp;II of Sicily]] in the 1120s and 1130s, and against various heretics, their protectors, and mercenary bands in the 1130s and 1170s. Although there is little evidence of crusade preaching, Pope Innocent&nbsp;III is said to have waged the first "political" crusade from November 1199 for Sicily against [[Markward of Anweiler]]. Full crusading apparatus was first deployed against Christians in the conflict with the [[Cathar]] heretics of southern France and their Christian protectors in 1208. In 1215, the [[Fourth Lateran Council]] gave the Albigensian Crusade, between 1209 and 1229, equivalence with the Eastern crusades. This crusade was supported by developments such as the creation of the [[Papal States]], the aim to make the crusade indulgence available to the laity, the reconfiguration of Christian society, and ecclesiastical taxation.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006b|p=326}}
* that [[Pope Gregory I]] and his followers' ideas for missionary conquest was also in accordance;
* that [[Islam]] should be fought in defence of Christendom, an idea developed under the reformist popes [[Pope Leo IX|Leo IX]], [[Pope Alexander II|Alexander II]], and Gregory VII.{{sfn|Latham|2012|p=121}}


===Knights, chivalry and the military orders===
The Papacy's drive for homogenous Christianity encouraged crusades against any group with which there were differences such as:
{{further|Chivalry|Knighthood|Military order (religious society)}}
[[File:Gestorum Rhodie obsidionis commentarii - BNF Lat6067 f3v.jpg|thumb|Grand Master [[Pierre d'Aubusson]] with senior knights, wearing the [[Maltese cross|"Rhodian cross"]] on their habits. Dedicatory miniature in ''Gestorum Rhodie obsidionis commentarii'' (account of the [[Siege of Rhodes (1480)|Siege of Rhodes of 1480]]), BNF Lat 6067 fol. 3v, dated 1483/4.]]


Innovations in military technology and thinking made the first crusades feasible. Tactics developed to utilise heavily armoured cavalry. Italy's [[maritime republics]] built increasingly large navies. Society was controlled by [[castles]] and the men who garrisoned them. These new techniques in turn developed new social mores developed during extensive training. In turn this led to the rise of combat as sport.{{sfn|Morris|1989|pp=150, 335}} At this time although knights were praised in literature they remained distinct from the aristocracy. Crusading and [[chivalry]] developed together, and in time chivalry helped shap the ethos, ideals and principles of crusaders.{{sfn|Bull|1995|p=22}} Tournaments were held where knights could exhibit their martial prowess. This provided venues where the crusading movement could recruit, spread propaganda and announce the enlistment of senior figures.{{sfn|Lloyd|1995|pp=43–44}} Despite the undoubted courage and commitment of crusading knights and some notable commanders in military terms the campaigns in the [[Levant]] were not typically impressive. The creation of disciplined units was challenging. In feudal Europe strategy and institutions were too immature. Power structures were too fragmented.{{sfn|Honig|2001|pp=113—114}}
* the Dutch Drenther peasants from [[Drenther Crusade|1228 to 1232]];
* Bosnians fighting the Hungarians from [[Bosnian Crusade|1227]];
* the Stedinger peasants from [[Stedinger Crusade|1232 to 1234]];
* English rebels in 1216, 1217 and 1265;
* Greek Orthodox Byzantines fighting to reclaim territory lost to the Fourth Crusade in 1231, 1239 and the 14th{{nbsp}}century until the Ottomans provided a greater threat.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006b|p=326}}


Literature presented the exemplar of an idealised, perfect knight in works such as romance Alexandre written around 1130. These works extolled adventure, courage, charity and manners. The church could not accept readily all the values presented. Its spiritual views contrasted with ideas of excellence, achieved glory through military deeds and romantic love. Even though the church feared the warrior class it needed to co-opt its power and did this symbolically through developed liturgical [[blessing]]s to sanctify new knights.{{sfn|Morris|1989|pp=335-336}} In time kings represented themselves as members of the knighthood for propaganda purposes.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=53}} Crusading became seen as integral to the ideas of this ideal.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=50, 64}} From the time of the [[Fourth Crusade]], it became an adventure normalised in Europe, creating separation between the knights and other social classes. At this point the relationship between knightly adventure, religious, and secular motivation was altered.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995b|p=84}}
[[File:Hussitenkriege.tif|thumb|upright|left|alt=Medieval image of the Battle of Domazlice |[[Hussites|Hussite]] victory over the Crusaders in the [[Battle of Domažlice]], c.{{nbsp}}1500, Jena Codex fol.{{nbsp}}56r ]]Various Popes used crusading for securing the papacy's political position:


In the polities created by the crusading movement in the [[Eastern Mediterranean]] known as the [[Crusader states]] the creation of military religious orders was one of the few innovations from outside Europe.{{sfn|Prawer|2001|p=252}} In 1119 a small band of knights formed to protect pilgrims journeying to Jerusalem. These became the [[Knights Templar]]. Many other orders followed this template. The [[Knights Hospitaller]] were providing medical services and added a military wing to become a much larger organisation. These orders became Latin Christendom's first professional fighting forces and played a major part in the defence of the [[Kingdom of Jerusalem]] and the other crusader states.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=168-169}} Papal acknowledgement encouraged significant donations of money, land and recruits from across western Europe. The orders built their own castles and developed international autonomy.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=169-170}}
* Against the [[Hohenstaufen]]'s of Germany and Sicily from 1239 to 1269 preventing encirclement by their German, Italian and Sicilian territories, reasserting papal feudal claims over Sicily and to defend the [[March of Ancona]] and the duchy of Spoleto. Church taxation funded [[John of Brienne]]'s campaigns of 1228 to 1230, but it was in 1239 that [[Gregory&nbsp;IX]] first called a formal crusade when Frederick threatened Rome after defeating the [[Lombard League]]. Following the emperor's death, crusading continued against his sons, the legitimate [[Conrad&nbsp;IV of Germany]] and the illegitimate [[Manfred, King of Sicily]]. [[Pope Clement&nbsp;IV]] recruited [[Charles&nbsp;I of Anjou]], the younger brother of [[Louis&nbsp;IX of France]], who in February 1266 defeated and killed Manfred at the [[Battle of Benevento|Benevento]], in August 1268 defeated [[Conradin]], Conrad&nbsp;IV's son, at [[Battle of Tagliacozzo|Tagliacozzo]] and ended the Staufen dynasty male line in October with Conradin's execution in October.
* Against [[Ezzelino&nbsp;III da Romano]] and [[Alberico da Romano|his brother Alberic]] in 1255.
* Against [[Sardinia]] in 1263
* The [[Sicilian Vespers]], the wars for Angevin control of Sicily from 1282 to 1302. In 1282 the Sicilians rebelled against Charles&nbsp;I of Anjou and Frederick's son-in-law, [[Peter&nbsp;III of Aragon]], annexed the island. A 1283 [[Aragonese Crusade |crusade]] invading [[Kingdom of Aragon|Aragon]] and a 1285 crusade invading the island by [[Philip&nbsp;III of France]] failed. Crusading against Aragonese rulers continued when [[Frederick III of Sicily|Frederick&nbsp;III of Sicily]] refused to return the island to the Angevins. This ended in 1302 with the [[treaty of Caltabellota]].
* Maintaining papal interests during the [[Avignon Papacy]] from 1309 to 1377.
* During the [[Western Schism]] between 1378 and 1417.
* Against [[Louis&nbsp;IV, Holy Roman Emperor]] reasserting imperial claims from 1310 to1313.
* [[Pope Boniface&nbsp;VIII]] conflict with the [[Colonna family]] in 1297.
* The 1306 suppression of the heresies of [[Fra Dolcino]] in [[Piedmont]].
* Against Venice over Ferrara in 1309/1310
* Crusades organised by cardinal-legates such as [[Bertrand du Pouget]] and [[Gil Albornoz]] against Milan and Ferrara in 1321; against Milan, Mantua, and rebels in Ancona in 1324; against Cesena and Faenza in 1354; against Milan again in 1360, 1363, and 1368; against mercenary companies such as that of [[Konrad von Landau]] In 1357, 1361 and 1369/1370.
* During the Great Schism between 1378 and 1417, Roman [[Pope Urban&nbsp;VI]] launched crusades against his Avignon rival [[Pope Clement&nbsp;VII]] in 1378. Clement&nbsp;VII gave crusade privileges to competitors in the Neapolitan succession, as did [[Antipope John&nbsp;XXIII]] in 1411 and 1414.
* In 1383, [[Pope Urban&nbsp;VI]] gave [[Henry le Despenser]]'s English [[Despenser's Crusade|campaign]] against Flanders the status of crusade as was [[John of Gaunt]]'s attempt on the throne of Castile in 1386.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006b|p=327}}


When [[fall of Acre|Acre]] fell, bringing to a close the holding of Christian territory in the Holy Land the Hospitallers relocated to [[Cyprus in the Middle Ages|Cyprus]]. Later the order conquered and ruled [[Rhodes]] (1309–1522) and finally settled in [[Hospitaller Malta|Malta]] (1530–1798). The orders successor organisation, the [[Sovereign Military Order of Malta]] still exists today. King [[Philip&nbsp;IV of France]] extinguished the Templars around 1312. This was probably for financial and political reasons. He pressurised [[Pope Clement&nbsp;V]] to dissolve the order. The grounds of [[sodomy]], magic, and heresy listed in various [[papal bulls]] such as {{lang|ln|[[Vox in excelso]]}} and {{lang|ln|[[Ad providam]]}} were probably false.{{sfn|Davies|1997|p=359}}
After 1417, the papacy became reluctant to use crusading for political ends, perhaps recognising the lack of adequate church funds to sponsor large armies, the futility, and the damage they caused to the standing of both papacy and crusade. Only [[Pope Julius&nbsp;II]] continued crusading in Italy. However, religious crusades continued against the [[Hussite Wars|Hussites of Bohemia]] in 1420, 1421, 1422, 1427, 1431 and between 1465–1471.<ref>{{Harvnb|Lock|2006|pp=201–202}}</ref>


===Common people===
Another was planned between 1428 and 1429. The Reformation prompted a revival with several schemes, including against [[Henry VIII&nbsp;of England]] and [[Elizabeth&nbsp;I of England]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2006b|pp=328–329}}
{{further|Popular crusades}}


[[File:Peter the Hermit.jpg|thumb|Miniature of [[Peter the Hermit]] leading the [[People's Crusade]]. From the ''[[Abreujamen de las estorias]]'' (14th century).]]Historians now take a greater interest than before questioning why significant numbers of the lower classes travelled on the early crusades or took part in the unsanctioned popular outbreaks of the 13th and 14th centuries.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|pp=8–9}} The papacy wanted to recruit warriors who could fight, but in the early years of the movement it was impossible to exclude others, including women. Indeed, retinues included many to provide services who could also fight in emergencies.{{sfn|Bull|1995|p=25}} The church considered that engaging in crusade must be entirely voluntary. Recruitment propaganda used understandable mediums which could also be unclear. For the poor the instituition of the crusade was offensive, while in church doctrines it was an act of self-defence.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|pp=8–9}}
===Crusades against the Ottoman Empire===
[[File:NikopolisSchlacht.jpg|thumb|alt=Image of Battle of Nicopolisc |1475 miniature of the [[Battle of Nicopolis]] by [[Jean Colombe]] called ''Les Passages d'Outremer'', [[Bibliothèque nationale de France#Manuscript collection|BnF]] Fr 5594]]The Papacy regularly offered crusade privileges from the 1360s generating no significant military response against Muslims in the Mediterranean. The first revival of activity was a 1390 Genoese plan to seize the Tunisian port of [[Al-Mahdiya]]. Both the Roman and Avignon popes awarded indulgences and the French king's uncle, [[Louis&nbsp;II, Duke of Bourbon]], was the leader. There is little evidence of cross taking, and the exercise was more of a chivalric promenade by a small force. After a disease-ridden, nine-week siege, the [[Barbary Crusade|Tunis crusade]] agreed to withdraw.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=402}} After their victory at the [[Battle of Kosovo]] in 1389, the Ottomans had conquered most of the [[Balkans]] and had reduced Byzantine influence to the area immediately surrounding [[Constantinople]], which [[Siege of Constantinople#Ottoman sieges|they later besieged]]. In 1393, the [[Bulgaria]]n Tsar [[Ivan Shishman of Bulgaria|Ivan Shishman]] lost Nicopolis to the Ottomans. In 1394 [[Pope Boniface&nbsp;IX]] proclaimed a new Crusade against the Turks, although the [[Western Schism]] had split the papacy.<ref name="Davies 1997 448">{{Harvnb|Davies|1997|p=448}}</ref> [[Sigismund of Luxemburg]], King of Hungary, led this Crusade which involved several French nobles including [[John the Fearless]], the son of the Duke of Burgundy, who became the Crusade's military leader. Sigismund advised the Crusaders to focus on defence when they reached the Danube, but they besieged the city of [[Nikopol, Bulgaria|Nicopolis]]. The Ottomans defeated them in the [[Battle of Nicopolis]] on 25{{nbsp}}September, capturing 3,000 prisoners.<ref>{{Harvnb|Lock|2006|p=200}}</ref>


From the 12th{{nbsp}}century onwards the crusading movement generated propaganda material to spread the word. A good example was the work of a Dominican friar called [[Humbert of Romans]]. In 1268 he gathered the best crusading arguments in one work.{{sfn|Lloyd|1995|pp=46–48}}{{sfn|Morris|1989|pp=458, 495}} The poor had different viewpoints to the theologans. Often based on an end of the world [[Eschatology|eschatological]] belief. When Acre was lost to the Egyptians there were resulting popular but brief outbursts of crusade fervour.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=263}} However, the most Christians did not typically crusade to Jerusalem. Instead, they would often build models of the [[Holy Sepulchre]] or dedicate places of worship. These were acts theat existed before the crusading movement, but they became increasingly popular in association. They may have formed part of other forms of regular religious devotion. In 1099 Jerusalem was known as ''the remotest place'' but these practices made tangible crusading.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=xxv}}
As the Ottomans pressed westward, Sultan [[Murad&nbsp;II]] destroyed the last [[Crusade of Varna|Papal-funded Crusade]] at [[Varna, Bulgaria|Varna]] on the [[Black Sea]] in 1444 and four years later crushed the last Hungarian expedition.<ref name="Davies 1997 448"/> [[John Hunyadi]] and [[Giovanni da Capistrano]] organised a 1456 Crusade to lift the [[Siege of Belgrade (1456)|Siege of Belgrade]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Lock|2006|pp=202–203}}</ref> [[Æneas Sylvius]] and [[John of Capistrano]] preached the Crusade, the princes of the Holy Roman Empire in the Diets of Ratisbon and Frankfurt promised assistance, and a league was formed between Venice, Florence and Milan, but nothing came of it. Venice was the only polity to continue to pose a significant threat to the Ottomans in the Mediterranean, but it pursued the "Crusade" mostly for its commercial interests, leading to the protracted [[Ottoman–Venetian Wars]], which continued, with interruptions, until 1718. The end of the Crusades, in at least a nominal effort of Catholic Europe against Muslim incursion, came in the 16th{{nbsp}}century, when the Franco-Imperial wars assumed continental proportions. [[Francis&nbsp;I of France]] sought allies from all quarters, including from German Protestant princes and Muslims. Amongst these, he entered into one of the [[capitulations of the Ottoman Empire]] with [[Suleiman the Magnificent]] while making common cause with [[Hayreddin Barbarossa]] and a number of the Sultan's North African vassals.<ref>{{Harvnb|Davies|1997|pp=544–545}}</ref>


Unsanctioned popular crusading exploded in 1096, 1212, 1251, 1309, and 1320. These all exhibited violent [[antisemitism]] with the exception of the [[Children's Crusade]] of 1212. Despite hostility from the literate these crusades became so mytho-historicised in the written histories that they are some of the most highly remembered events transmitted by word of mouth from the period. That said "Children's Crusade" is not a precise definition. At the time the Latin {{lang|la|pueri}} was used for children;{{lang|la|peregrinatio}}, {{lang|la|iter}}, {{lang|la|expeditio}}, or {{lang|la|crucesignatio}} were used for crusade.{{sfn|Dickson|2008|p=xiii}}
===Baltic Crusades===
{{main|Northern Crusades}}
The campaigns for the conquest and conversion of the lands on the southern and eastern coast of the Baltic Sea from the late 12th{{nbsp}}century to the Reformation have become known as the Baltic or Northern Crusades. Attempts by Scandinavian, German, Polish, and Bohemian missionaries of pagan conversion to Latin Christianity failed before the late twelfth century, when crusaders from [[Sweden]], [[Gotland]] and [[Saxony]] conquered most of [[Latvia]] and [[Estonia]]. The [[Livonian Brothers of the Sword]] [[Military order (religious society)|military order]] provided a permanent occupation force while the crusaders wintered at home. Defeats at [[Battle of Saule|Saule]] in 1236 and at [[Battle on the Ice|Lake Peipus]] in 1242 halted the order's expansion into Lithuania and [[Russia]]. From 1237, Pope Gregory&nbsp;IX began absorbing the Sword Brothers into the [[Teutonic Order]]. Founded in Palestine as a hospital order after the [[Siege of Acre (1189–1191)|Siege of Acre]] in the 1190s, the Teutonic Knights were reorganised as a military order. Historian [[Robert Bartlett (historian)|Robert Bartlett]] defines the conquest and organisation of power in the Baltic as part of a general movement for 'the expansion of Latin Christendom'. It was made possible by the crusading ideology placing the full machinery of the Church behind superior military technology. It enabled the recruitment of troops by preaching the offer of spiritual rewards for combatants and the administrative machinery to establish a government in the conquered territories.<ref>{{Harvnb|Jotischky|2004|p=206}}</ref> {{sfn|Urban|2006|p=145–149}}


The many surviving written sources are of questionable accuracy. Dates and details are not consistent and they are interwoven with typical myth-history stories and ideas.{{sfn|Dickson|2008|pp=9–14}} Clerical writing contrasted the imagined innocence of the {{lang|la|pueri}} with the sexual license that was seen on the official crusades. It was the sin of the crusaders that was believed to bring God's displeasure and explain why the crusades were not successful.{{sfn|Dickson|2008|p=24}}
The Teutonic Order first responded to a request from [[Konrad&nbsp;I of Masovia]] for assistance against pagan Prussians in 1228. Over the following decades, with the assistance of regular crusades, they conquered the Prussians and attacked the Lithuanians. The Order purchased [[Brandenburg]] from [[Władysław&nbsp;I Łokietek]] in compensation for the military services they had provided Poland, and in 1309 the grand master transferred his headquarters to Prussia creating a unique [[State of the Teutonic Order|state]]. The state's chief rivals were the [[Kingdom of Poland (1025–1385)|Kingdom of Poland]] and the [[Archbishopric of Riga]]. The order refused cooperation with the local papal legates and concentrated on influence at the papal court. The grand masters looked for alliances, including with [[John of Bohemia]], and recruited French, Burgundian, Dutch, English, and Scottish knights for raids called ''reysen''.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Reyse - The Crusades |url=https://erenow.net/postclassical/crusades/790.php |url-status=live |access-date=24 January 2021 |website=Erenow}}</ref> These were exemplars of chivalric values and nobility. Historians see the [[battle of Tannenberg]] in 1410 as the turning point. The Order’s defeat was surprising and catastrophic; it was only by systematically destroying all available food in the 1414 [[Hunger War]] that the Poles and Lithuanians were repulsed. In 1435 the Livonian branch of the Teutonic Order suffered defeat at the [[Battle of Wilkomierz|battle of the Swienta River]] but in 1502 invaded Russia gaining half a century of peace. During the Reformation, Prussia became Protestant and in 1560, after defeat by the Russians at the [[Battle of Ergeme|Ermes]], the order secularised. Its territories were divided. Changing priorities caused the failure of the Baltic Crusades. Crusading was no longer seen as a method of earning salvation or effective in the wars waged in the Baltic. {{sfn|Urban|2006|pp=150–151}}


===Popular Crusades===
===Perception of Muslims===
{{further|Christianity and Islam}}
There were regular outbreaks of popular crusading enthusiasm from 1096 until 1514 and the Hungarian Peasants' Crusade. These [[Popular crusades]] were untypical, and their participants were unconventional crusaders. Historians describe these variously as people’s crusades, peasants’ crusades, shepherds' crusades, and crusades of the poor. With research into social memory, prophecy, crowd psychology, charismatic leadership, social dislocation, religious enthusiasm, and the place of preaching, processions, and visual culture in conveying religious ideology within medieval society, it is difficult for historians to identify common features. There is evidence of charismatic leadership up to the 14th{{nbsp}}century. [[Eschatology]] can be seen in antisemitic Judaic violence, and after 1250 a sense of election in the involuntary poor. Instead, popular crusades were diverse but shared historical circumstances with official crusades. These events demonstrate the power of crusading ideas that non-noble believers were engaged with the great events of Latin Christendom. Focusing on clerics and warrior knights underestimates the movement's significance. Early crusades such as the First, Second and Albigensian included peasants and non-combatants until the high costs of journeying by sea made participation in the Third and Fourth Crusade impossible for the general populace. The 1212 [[Children's Crusade]] was the first popular crusade beginning amongst the preaching for the Albigensian Crusade and parades seeking God's assistance for Iberian crusades. Afterwards, the professional and popular crusades diverged such as in 1309 when the [[Crusade of the Poor]] and one by the Hospitallers occurred almost simultaneously, both responding to Pope Clement&nbsp;V's crusading summons of the previous year. All crusades that were not preached officially were illicit and unaccompanied by papal representation. But it was not until the 1320 {{lang|la|pastores}} of the [[Shepherds' Crusade (1320)|Second Shepherds' Crusade]] that the papacy criticised a popular crusade. Frequently the language of crusading was used to describe these incidents such as {{lang|la|iter}}, {{lang|la|expeditionis}} and {{lang|la|crucesignatio}}. The objectives were traditional, such as regaining Jerusalem or the 1251 [[Shepherds' Crusade (1251)|First Shepherds' Crusade]] aiming to liberate Louis&nbsp;IX. Those who took part perceived themselves as authentic crusaders, evident in the use of pilgrimage and crusade emblems, including the cross. Victories in the [[Smyrniote crusades]] of 1344 aroused mass enthusiasm in Tuscany and Lombardy but also papal approbation. The Hungarian Peasants Crusade began as an official holy war against the Turks but became an uprising against the Hungarian nobility.{{sfn|Dickson|2006|pp=975–979}}
===Ideological development===
The use of violence for communal purposes was not alien to early Christians. The evolution of a Christian theology of war was inevitable when [[Roman citizenship]] became linked to Christianity and citizens were required to fight against the Empire's enemies. This was supported by the development of a doctrine of [[holy war]] dating from the works of the 4th-century [[Christian theology|theologian]] [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]]. Augustine maintained that an aggressive war was sinful, but acknowledged a "[[Just war theory|just war]]" could be rationalised if it was proclaimed by a legitimate authority such as a king or bishop, was defensive or for the recovery of lands, and without an excessive degree of violence.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=14–15}}{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=14–15}} Violent acts were commonly used for dispute resolution in Western Europe, and the papacy attempted to mitigate it.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=30–31}} Historians, such as [[Carl Erdmann]], thought the [[Peace and Truce of God]] movements restricted conflict between Christians from the 10th{{nbsp}}century; the influence is apparent in [[Pope Urban II]]'s speeches. Later historians, such as Marcus Bull, assert that the effectiveness was limited and it had died out by the time of the crusades.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=30–38}}
[[Pope Alexander II]] developed a system of recruitment via oaths for military resourcing that [[Pope Gregory VII|Gregory VII]] extended across Europe. {{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=31}} Christian conflict with Muslims on the southern peripheries of [[Christendom]] was sponsored by the Church in the 11th{{nbsp}}century, including the [[Crusade of Barbastro|siege of Barbastro]] and [[Norman conquest of Sicily|fighting]] in [[Emirate of Sicily|Sicily]]{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=18–19, 289}} In 1074 Gregory{{nbsp}}VII planned a display of military power to reinforce the principle of papal sovereignty. His vision of a holy war supporting Byzantium against the Seljuks was the first crusade prototype, but lacked support.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|p=16}} Theologian [[Anselm of Lucca]] took the decisive step towards an authentic crusader ideology, stating that fighting for legitimate purposes could result in the remission of [[Christian views on sin|sins]].{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=27–28}}
Elected pope in 1198, [[Pope Innocent III|Innocent III]] reshaped the ideology and practice of crusading. He emphasised crusader oaths and penitence, and clarified that the absolution of sins was a [[Grace in Christianity|gift from God]], rather than a reward for the crusaders' sufferings. Taxation to fund crusading was introduced and donation encouraged.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=235–237}}{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=524–525}} In 1199 he was the first pope to deploy the conceptual and legal apparatus developed for crusading to enforce papal rights. With his 1213 bull ''[[Quia maior]]'' he appealled to all Christians, not just the nobility, offering the possibility of vow redemption without crusading. This set a precedent for trading in spiritual rewards, a practice that scandalised devout Christians and later became one of the causes of the 16th-century [[Protestant Reformation]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=533–535}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=238–239}} From the 1220s crusader privileges were regularly granted to those who fought against heretics, schismatics or Christians the papacy considered non-conformist.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=336}} When Frederick II's army threatened Rome, [[Gregory IX]] used crusading terminology. Rome was seen as the [[Patrimony of Saint Peter]], and [[Canon law of the Catholic Church|canon law]] regarded crusades as defensive wars to protect theoretical Christian territory.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=195–198}}
[[Innocent IV]] rationalised crusading ideology on the basis of the Christians' right to ownership. He acknowledged Muslims' land ownership, but emphasised that this was subject to Christ's authority.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=256–257}} In the 16th{{nbsp}}century the rivalry between Catholic monarchs prevented anti-Protestant crusades but individual military actions were rewarded with crusader privileges, including Irish Catholic [[Second Desmond Rebellion|rebellions]] against English Protestant rule and the [[Spanish Armada]]'s attack on [[Elizabeth I of England|Queen Elizabeth I]] and England.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=358–359}}


[[Image:Grandes chroniques Roland.jpg|thumb|300px|The eight phases of the ''Song of Roland'' in one picture; illustration by [[Simon Marmion]] from an [[illuminated manuscript]] of the ''Grandes Chroniques de France'' (15th century), currently preserved in the [[Hermitage Museum]], [[St. Petersburg]]]]Literature such as the 11th{{nbsp}}century {{lang|fr|chanson de geste}} {{lang|fr|[[Chanson de Roland]]}} did not explicitly mention the crusades. But is likely there were propaganda motivations behind presenting the Muslim characters in monstrous terms and as idolators. Whatever the motivation Christian writers continued to use these representations.<ref>{{Harvnb|Routledge|1995|p=93}}</ref> Muslim characters were described as evil and as less than human. Their physical appearance was described as devilish and they were represented as having dark skin. Islamic ritual was mocked and insults made to [[Mohammad]]. This caricature continued to be used long after the fighting over territory subsided. At no time was the noun Muslim used, instead Muslims were called Saracens. Other derogatory adjectives were also used, such as [[infidel]], [[gentile]], enemy of God, and [[pagan]]. This was literature that supported the church's opinion that the crusades were a [[Manichean]] contest between good and evil.{{sfn|Jubb|2005|pp=227–229}} According to the historian [[Jean Flori]] the purpose behind this was for the church to be able to destroy its ideologically is competitors for the purpose of justifying Christianity entry into aggressive violent conflict.{{sfn|Jubb|2005|p=232}} This prejudice was not derived from ethnic identity or race. The church considered that all of humanity were descended from [[Adam]] and [[Eve]]. Typical of medieval opinion this was a social construct in which the differentiators were cultural. For example, the [[First Crusade]] [[Chronicle]]rs adopted terminology inherited from the Greeks of [[Classical antiquity|antiquity]]. They use the ethnology-cultural term {{lang|la|barbarae nationes}} or barbarians for the Muslims, and self-identified crusaders as [[Latins]].{{sfn|Jubb|2005|p=226}}
==Military orders==
{{Main|Military order (religious society)}}
[[Image:Baldwin II ceeding the Temple of Salomon to Hugues de Payens and Gaudefroy de Saint-Homer.jpg|thumb|alt=13th-century miniature of King Baldwin II granting the captured Al Aqsa Mosque to Hugues de Payens |13th-century miniature of [[Baldwin II of Jerusalem]] granting the captured [[Al Aqsa Mosque]] to [[Hugues de Payens]]]]
The crusaders' propensity to follow the customs of their Western European homelands meant that there were very few innovations developed from the culture in the crusader states. Three notable exceptions to this are the military orders, warfare and fortifications.<ref>{{harvnb| Prawer|2001| p=252}}</ref> The Knights Hospitaller, formally the Order of Knights of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem, were founded in Jerusalem before the First Crusade but added a martial element to their ongoing medical functions to become a much larger military order.<ref>{{harvnb|Asbridge|2012|p=169}}</ref> In this way, the knighthood entered the previously monastic and ecclesiastical sphere.<ref>{{harvnb| Prawer|2001| p=253}}</ref>


As contact increased respect for the Turks developed. {{lang|la|[[Gesta Francorum]]}} presents some negativity but also respect for them as opponents. It was considered values of chivalry were shared. In the {{lang|fr|[[Aspremont (chanson de geste)|Chanson d'Aspremont]]}} they were presnted as equals following the same codes of conduct. By the time of the [[Third Crusade]] the class differences were shown as within camps rather the between camps. The elite warrior class in both camps shared an identity that was not divided on religious or political groups. Epics began to include incidents of conversion to Christianity. This in part may have offered hope for a positive resolution at a time when military failure pointed to defeat.{{sfn|Jubb|2005|pp=234–235}}
Military orders like the Knights Hospitaller and Knights Templar provided Latin Christendom's first professional armies to support the Kingdom of Jerusalem and the other crusader states. The Templars, formally the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and the Temple of Solomon, and their [[Al-Aqsa Mosque|Temple of Solomon]] were founded around 1119 by a small band of knights who dedicated themselves to protecting pilgrims en{{nbsp}}route to Jerusalem.<ref>{{harvnb| Asbridge|2012| p= 168}}</ref> The Hospitallers and the Templars became supranational organisations as papal support led to rich donations of land and revenue across Europe. This led to a steady flow of recruits and the wealth to maintain multiple fortifications in the crusader states. In time, they developed into autonomous powers in the region.<ref>{{harvnb| Asbridge|2012|pp=169–170}}</ref> After the fall of Acre, the Hospitallers relocated to Cyprus, then conquered and ruled [[Rhodes]] (1309–1522) and Malta (1530–1798), and [[Sovereign Military Order of Malta|continue in existence to the present-day]]. King [[Philip&nbsp;IV of France]] probably had financial and political reasons to oppose the Knights Templar, which led to him exerting pressure on [[Pope Clement&nbsp;V]]. The pope responded in 1312, with a series of papal bulls including ''[[Vox in excelso]]'' and ''[[Ad providam]]'' that dissolved the order on the alleged and probably false grounds of sodomy, magic and heresy.<ref name="Davies 1997 359">{{Harvnb|Davies|1997|p=359}}</ref>


There remain a number of [[Crusade songs]] from the many crusaders who also wrote poetry such as [[Theobald I of Navarre]], [[Folquet de Marselha]], and [[Conon de Béthune]]. In return for [[patronage]] from the leaders of the crusades, poets wrote praising the ideals of the nobility.{{sfn|Routledge|1995|pp=94–95}} These relationships were of a feudal nature and were presented in this context. To demonstrate this the crusaders were God's vassals fighting the restore to him the (Holy) land.{{sfn|Routledge|1995|pp=97}} Muslims were presented as having stolen this land. Their mistreatment of its Christian inhabitants was considered an injustice for which revenge was required. In return, the perception of the Islamic [[Polity|polities]] resulted in an opposing position. This encouraged violent resistance to the idea of the imposition Christian governance on these terms.{{sfn|Latham|2012|p=120}}
==Finance of Crusades==
At first, crusaders self-funded the arms and supplies required for their campaigns. Non-combatants probably hoped to join the retinues of the lords and knights augmenting their resources with forage and plunder. Leaders seeking to maintain armies employed many fighters as virtual mercenaries. Fleets and contingents would organise communally to share financial risk. When the nature of crusading changed with transportation shifting from land to sea, there were fewer non-combatants and systems of finance developed. [[Tallage]] was imposed on Jews, townsmen and peasants and levies on secular and ecclesiastical vassals. This developed into formal taxation, including the [[Saladin Tithe]] in 1188. By the 13th{{nbsp}}century, the papacy's taxation of the church dwarfed secular contributions. There were serious protests when this revenue was transferred to theatres other than the Holy Land, or to secular rulers for other purposes. While actual methods varied, significant improvements were made in accounting and administration, although this did not prevent resistance, delay, and diversion of funds. In time, the military orders and Italian banks replaced the [[Curia]] in the crusade banking system. Secular taxation developed from this, and with the crusades becoming entwined with dynastic politics, led to resentment. Gifts, legacies, confiscations from heretics, donations deposited in chests placed in local churches, [[alms]], and the redemption of crusading vows provided funding. Some of these caused significant criticism, and Innocent&nbsp;III warned bishops to avoid extortion and bribery. Full plenary indulgences became confused with partial ones when the practice of commuting vows to crusade into monetary donations developed.{{sfn|Bird|2006|pp=432–436}}


==Women==
==History==
{{main|Women in the Crusades}}
Women accompanied crusade armies, supported society in the crusader states, and guarded crusaders' interests in the west. [[Margaret of Beverley]]'s brother Thomas of Froidmont wrote a first-person account of her adventures, including fighting at the siege of Jerusalem in 1187, and two incidents of capture and ransom. However, women rarely feature in the surviving sources, because of the legal and social restrictions on them. Crusading was defined as a military activity, and warfare was considered a male pursuit. Women were discouraged from taking part but could not be banned from what was a form of pilgrimage. Most women in the sources are noble spouses of crusaders.{{sfn|Hodgson|2006|pp=1285–1286}}{{sfn|Riley-Smith|2000|p=107}}


[[File:Passages d'outremer Fr5594, fol. 19r, Concile de Clermont.jpg|thumb|alt=Illustration of the Council of Clermont | Illustration of the [[Council of Clermont]], [[Jean Colombe]], ''[[Passages d'outremer|Les Passages d'Outremer]]'', BnF Fr{{nbsp}}5594, {{Circa|1475}} ]]
Sources that refer to the motivation of women indicate the same spiritual incentives, church patronage, and involvement in monastic reform and heretical movements. Female pilgrimage was popular and crusading enabled this for some women. Medieval literature illustrates unlikely romantic stereotypes of armed female warriors, while eyewitness Muslim sources recount tales of female Frankish warriors, but these are likely mocking the perceived weakness or barbarity of the enemy. Women probably fought, but chroniclers emphasised only in the absence of male warriors. Noblewomen were considered feudal lords if they had retinues of their own knights. They were often victims and regarded as booty. Lower-class women performed mundane duties such as bringing provision, encouragement, washing clothes, lice picking, grinding corn, maintaining markets for fish and vegetables, and tending the sick. They were associated with prostitution, causing concern of the perceived link between sin and military failure. Sexual relations with indigenous Muslims and Jews were regarded as a sin that would lead to divine retribution. Medieval historians emphasised the crusaders purified the Holy Places through widespread slaughter of men, women, and children. Sexual activity naturally led to pregnancy and its associated risks. Noblewomen were seldom criticised for their dutiful provision of heirs, but in the lower ranks pregnancy attracted criticism of the unmarried leading to punishment. Even the harshest of critics recognised woman were essential for a permanent Christian population, but apparently most female crusaders returned home after fulfilling their pilgrimage vows. Frankish rulers in the Levant intermarried with western European nobility, the local Armenian, and the Byzantine Christian population for political reasons. Continual warfare created a constant lack of manpower, and lands and titles were often inherited by widows and daughters who were offered in the West as favourable marriages. Bridegrooms brought entourages to secure their new domain, often causing friction with the established baronage.{{sfn|Hodgson|2006|pp=1288–1289}}
{{further|Res publica Christiana|First Crusade}}


In the late 11th and early 12th{{nbsp}}century the papacy became an entity capable of organised violence in the same manner as secular kingdoms and principalities. This required command and control systems that were not always fully developed or efficient. The result was the papacy leading secular fighting forces for its own ends.{{sfn|Latham|2012|p=117}}
The women left behind were impacted in several ways. The church pledged protection of property and families, but crusaders left charters including provision for their female relatives, money, or endowments to religious houses. There were concerns regarding adultery, which meant a wife could theoretically prevent her husband from crusading. Wives were described as inhibiting crusaders, but there is little hard evidence. Patterns of intermarriage in France suggest that certain marriage alliances transmitted traditions of crusading between families, encouraging the crusade ideal through the early religious education of children and employing supportive chaplains. Popes encouraged women to donate money or sponsorship instead of crusading, in return for the same spiritual benefits. This addressed the issue of non-combatants and raised funds directly or through monastic houses, including the military orders. Charters demonstrate crusaders sold or mortgaged land to female relatives or engaged in transactions where their consent was required. Without evidence it was impossible to know whether crusaders were alive or dead, so woman in the West could not remarry for between five to 100 years.{{sfn|Hodgson|2006|pp=1289–1290}}


This was begun by [[Pope Alexander II]] around 1159. He involved the papacy in the long running conflict with Muslims in the Mediterranean region. The church became involved in, and gave approval for, campaigns in [[Norman conquest of southern Italy#Conquest of Sicily, 1061–1091|Sicily]], [[Reconquista|Spain]] and [[Mahdia campaign of 1087|North Africa]] where the church worked with the republics of [[Republic of Pisa|Pisa]] and [[Republic of Genoa|Genoa]].{{sfn|Morris|1989|p=147}}
==Criticism==


Urban II laid the foundations of the crusading movement at the [[Council of Clermont]] in 1095. He was responding to requests for military support from the Byzantine Emperor [[Alexios I Komnenos]] that he received during the earlier [[Council of Piacenza]]. Alexios was fighting [[Turkish people]] who were migrating into [[Anatolia]], threatened [[Constantinople]] and had formed the [[Seljuk Empire]]. Urban expressed two key objectives for the crusade. Firstly, the freeing of Christians from Muslim rule. Secondly, freeing the church known as the Holy Sepulchre from Muslim control. This was believed to mark the location of Chris's tomb in Jerusalem.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=65, 69-70}}{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=1}}
There is evidence of criticism of crusading and the behaviour of crusaders from the beginning of the movement. Although few challenged the concept in the 12th{{nbsp}}and{{nbsp}}13th{{nbsp}}centuries, there were vociferous objections to crusades against heretics and Christian lay powers. The Fourth Crusade's attack on Constantinople and the use of resources against enemies of the church in Europe, the Albigensian heretics and Hohenstaufen, were all denounced. Troubadours ctiticised expeditions in southern France regretting the neglect of the Holy Land. The behaviour of combatants was seen as inconsistent with that expected of soldiers in a holy war. Chroniclers and preachers complained of sexual promiscuity, avarice, and overconfidence. Failures in the First Crusade, the [[battle of Hattin|Hattin]] and of entire campaigns was blamed on human sin. [[Gerhoh of Reichersberg]] connected that of the Second Crusade to the coming of the Antichrist. Remediation included penitential marches, reformation requests, prohibitions of gambling and luxuries, and limits on the number of women were attempted in. The Wurzburg Annals criticised the behaviour of the crusaders and suggested it was the devil's work. Louis&nbsp;IX of France’s defeat at the [[battle of Mansurah]] provoked doubt and challenge to crusading in sermons and treatises, such as [[Humbert of Romans]]'s {{lang|la|De praedicatione crucis}} (The preaching of the cross). The cost of armies led to taxation, an idea attacked as an unwelcome precedent by [[Roger Wendover]], [[Matthew Paris]]; and [[Walther von der Vogelweide]]. Concern was expressed of the Franciscan and Dominican friars abusing the system of vow redemption for financial gain. Some saw the peaceful conversion of Muslims as the best option, but there is no evidence that this represented public opinion and the continuation of crusading indicates the opposite. At the [[Second Council of Lyons]] in 1274, [[Bruno von Schauenburg]], Humbert, Gilbert of Tournai and William of Tripoli produced treatises articulating the change required for success. Despite criticism, crusading appears to have maintained popular appeal with recruits continuing to take the cross from a wide geographical area.{{sfn|Siberry|2006|pp=299–301}}


In the 12th{{nbsp}}century, [[Gratian]] and the [[Decretists]] elaborated on [[Augustinianism]]. Aquinas continued this in the 13th{{nbsp}}century.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=14,21}} This extended the reformers philosophy to end secular control of the Latin church and impose control over the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]]. It developed further the paradigm of working in the secular world for the imposition of what the church considered justice.{{sfn|Latham|2012|p=118}} After the initial success of the early crusades the settlers who remained or later migrated were militarily vulnerable. During the 12th and 13th centuries, frequent supportive expeditions were required to maintain territory that had been gained. A cycle developed of military failure, pleas for support and declarations of crusades from the church.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=36}}
==Medieval English literature==


=== 12th century ===
There exists greater than fifty texts in Middle English and Middle Scots from around 1225 to 1500 with Crusading themes. These were usually performed to an audience, as opposed to read, for entertainment and as propaganda for a political and religious identity, differentiating the Christian “us” and the non-Christian “other.” The works include romances, travelogues such as [[John Mandeville|Mandeville’s Travels]], poems such as [[William Langland]]’s [[Piers Plowman]] and [[John Gower]]’s [[Confessio Amantis]], the [[Hereford Map]] and the works of by [[Geoffrey Chaucer]]. Many were written after crusading fervour had diminished demonstrating a continuing interest. Chivalric Christendom is depicted as victorious and superior, holding the spiritual and moral high ground. They mainly originating from translated French originals and adaptations. Some, like [[Guy of Warwick]] used the portrayal of Muslim leaders as analogies to criticise contemporary politics. Popular motifs include chivalrous Christian knights seeking adventure and fighting Muslim giants or a king traveling in disguise such as Charlemagne in the Scots [[The Tale of Ralph the Collier|Taill of Rauf Coilyear]]. In crusading literature legendary figures are endowed with military and moral authority with Charlemagne portrayed as a role model, famed for his victories over the pagan Saxons and Vikings, his religious fervour marked by forced conversion. The entertainment aspect plays a vital role encouraging an element of “Saracen bashing”. The literature demonstrates populist religious hatred and bigotry, in part because Muslims and Christians were economic, political, military, and religious rivals while exhibiting a popular curiosity about and fascination with the "Saracens".{{sfn|Cordery|2006|pp=399–403}}
[[Image:Baldwin II ceeding the Temple of Salomon to Hugues de Payens and Gaudefroy de Saint-Homer.jpg|thumb|alt=13th-century miniature of King Baldwin II granting the captured Al Aqsa Mosque to Hugues de Payens |13th-century miniature of [[Baldwin II of Jerusalem]] granting the captured [[Al-Aqsa|Al Aqsa Mosque]] to [[Hugues de Payens]]]]The success of the First Crusade that began the crusading movement and the century was seen as astonishing. The explanation for this was given that it was only possible through the will of God.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995b|pp=78–80}} Paschal succeeded Urban as pope before news of the outcome reached Europe. He had experience of the fighting in Spain so readily applied similar remissions of sin to the combatants there, without the need for a pilgrimage to Jerusalem.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=293}} He did not stop there with the application of the institutions of crusading. He also did this against the Orthodox christians of Byzantium in favour of [[Bohemond I of Antioch]] for political reasons in Italy.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=335}}


It was in certain social and feudal networks that early crusade recruitment concentrated. Not only did these groups provide manpower, but also funding. Although it may have been pragmatic acceptance of the pressure of the reform movement that prompted the sales of churches and [[tithes]]. These families often had a history of pilgrimage, along with connections to [[Cluniac Reforms|Cluniac monasticism]] and the reformed papacy. They honoured the same saints. With inter-marriage this cultural mores were spread through society.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995b|p=87}} Paschal's successor [[Pope Calixtus II]] shared his Spanish interests. In 1123, at the [[First Council of the Lateran]] it was decided that crusading would be deployed in both Iberia and the [[Levant]]. The outcome was a campaign by [[Alfonso the Battler]] against Granada in 1125.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=2}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=293}}
==Propaganda==

For recruitment purposes, Popes marked the initiation of each crusade by public preaching of its aims, spiritual values and justifications. Preaching could be authorised and unofficial. The news cascaded through the church hierarchy in writing in a [[Papal bull]], although this system was not always reliable because of conflicts among clerics, local political concerns and lack of education. From the 12th{{nbsp}}century, the Cistercian Order was used for propaganda campaigns; the Dominicans and Franciscans followed in the 13th{{nbsp}}century. [[Mendicant]] friars and papal legates targeted geographies. After 1200, this sophisticated propaganda system was a prerequisite for the success of multiple concurrent crusades. The message varied, but the aims of papal control of the toll of crusading remained. Holy Land crusades were preached across Europe, but smaller ventures such as the Northern and Italian crusades were preached only locally to avoid conflict in recruitment. Papal authority was critical for the effectiveness of the indulgence and the validity of vow redemptions. Aristocratic culture, family networks and feudal hierarchies spread informal propaganda, often by word of mouth. Courts and tournaments were arenas where stories, songs, poems, news, and information about crusades were spread. Songs of the crusades became increasingly popular, although some troubadours were hostile after the Albigensian Crusade. Chivalric virtues of heroism, leadership, martial prowess, and religious fervour were exemplars. Visual representations in books, churches and palaces served the same purpose. Themes were expanded in church art and architecture in the form of murals, stained glass windows, and sculptures. This can be seen in the windows at the [[Basilica of Saint-Denis|abbey of Saint-Denis]], many churches modelled on the Holy Sepulchre at Jerusalem, or murals commissioned by [[Henry&nbsp;III of England]].{{sfn|Maier|2006b|pp=984–988}}
The crusaders established polities known as the Latin East, because it was impossible to defend Jerusalem in isolation. Despite this, regular campaigns were required in addition to the capability provided by the military orders. In Spain further expeditions were launched in 1114, 1118, and 1122. Eugenius III developed an equivalence between fighting the [[Wends]], fighting the Muslims in Spain and the Muslims in [[Second Crusade|Syria]]. The later crusade failed, with the result that the movement suffered its largest crisis until the 1400s. Fighting continued in Spain where there was three campaigns and there was one in the East in 1177. But it was the news of the crusaders defeat by the Muslims at the [[Battle of Hattin]] that restored the energy and commitment of the movement.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=2}}

The [[Renaissance of the 12th century]] coincided with the early years of crusading. Crusading themes were the subject of developing [[vernacular]] literature in the languages of Western Europe. Examples of [[Epic poetry]] include the {{lang|fr|[[Chanson d'Antioche]]}} describing the events in the 1268 [[Siege of Antioch (1268)|siege of Antioch]] and {{lang|fr|[[Canso de la Crozada]]}} about the [[Albigensian Crusade|crusading]] against the [[Cathars]] in Southern France. These are given the collective name of {{lang|fr|[[Chansons de geste]]}} in the [[French language]] which is borrowed from Latin for the term deeds done.{{sfn|Routledge|1995|pp=91–92}} Surviving [[Crusade song|songs]] about Crusading are rarer. But there are examples in the literary language of southern France, [[Occitan language|Occitan]], French, German, Spanish, and Italian that touch on the topic in an [[allegory|allegorical]] that date from the later half of the century. Two notable Occitan [[troubadours]] were [[Marcabru]] and [[Cercamon]]. They composed songs in the styles called {{lang|fr|[[sirventes]]}} and {{lang|fr|[[pastorela]]}} on the subject of lost love. Crusading wasn't a distinct genre, but the subject. The troubadours had northern French equivalents called {{lang|fr|[[Trouvère]]}} and German ones called {{lang|gn|[[Minnesang|Minnesänger]]}}. Collectively they left bodies of works themed on the crusades later in the century.{{sfn|Routledge|1995|pp=93–94}} This material transmitted information about crusading unmediated by the church. It is reinforced the status quo, the class identity of the nobility and its position in society. When the outcomes of events was less positive this was also a method of spreading criticisms of organisation and behaviour.{{sfn|Routledge|1995|p=111}}

In the latter part of the century Europeans developed language, fashion and cultural mores for crusading. Terms were adopted for those involved such as {{lang|la|crucesignatus}} or {{lang|la|crucesignata}}. These indicated that they were marked by the cross. This was reinforced by cloth crosses that they attached to their clothes. All of this was taken from the Bible. [[Luke 9]]:23, [[Mark 8]]:34 and [[Matthew 16]]:24 all implored believers to pick up their cross and follow Christ.{{sfn|Morris|1989|p=478}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=2}} It was a personal relationship with God that these crusaders were attempting to form. It demonstrated their belief. It enabled anyone to become involved, irrespective of gender, wealth, or social standing. This was {{lang|la|imitatio Christi}}, an "[[imitation of Christ]]", a sacrifice motivated by charity for fellow Christians. It began to be considered that all those who died campaigning were martyrs.{{sfn|Buck|2020|p=298}}

===13th century===

[[File:Jean de Mandeville and Edward II.png|thumb|Jean de Mandeville is sent forth from England on his expedition by [[Edward II]]]]Towards the end of the 12th{{nbsp}}century the crusading movement existed in a culture where is was believed that everything that happened was [[wikt:Providentialism|predestined]], either by God or fate. This [[Providentialism]] meant that the population welcomed, accepted and believed in a wide range of prophecy. One significant example of this was the writing of [[Joachim of Fiore]]. He included the fighting of the infidel in opaque works that combined writings on the past, on the present, and on the future.{{sfn|Barber|2012|p=408}} These works [[foreshadowing|foreshadowed]] the Children's Crusade. Joachim believed all history and the future could be divided into three ages. The third of these was the age of the Holy Spirit. The representatives of this age were children, or {{lang|la|pueri}}. Others aligned themselves to this idea. [[Salimbene]] and other [[Franciscans]] self described themselves as {{lang|la|ordo parvulorum}}. This translates as ''order of little ones''. Another example of this [[Apocalypticism]] can be seen in elements of the ''[[Austrian Chronicle of the 95 Rulers|Austrian Rhymed Chronicle]]''. In this apocalyptic mytho-history was melded to descriptions of the Children's Crusade. Innocent III built on this in 1213 announcing the end of Islam in the calls for the [[Fifth Crusade]] by announcing that the days of were over.{{sfn|Dickson|2008|pp=24–26}}

The crusading movement found that creating a single accepted ideology and an understanding of that ideology was a practical challenge. This was because the church did not have the necessary bureaucratic systems to consolidate thinking across the papacy, the monastic orders, [[mendicant]] friars, and the developing universities.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=20}} Ideas were transmitted through inclusion in literary works that included romances, travelogues like [[Mandeville's Travels]], poems such as [[Piers Plowman]] and [[John Gower]]'s [[Confessio Amantis]], and works by [[Geoffrey Chaucer]].{{sfn|Madden|2013|p=155}}{{sfn|Housley|2002|p=29}}{{sfn|Mannion|2014|p=21}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=330}} At this point in time the ideas of nationalism were largely absent. A more atomised society meant that literature tended to rather praise individual deeds of heroes like [[Charlemagne]] and the actions of major families.{{sfn|Richard|2005|p=207}} Innocent III developed new practices and revised the ideology of crusading from 1198 when he became pope. This included a new executive office constituted for the organisation of the Fourth Crusade. Executives were appointed in each church province in addition to autonomous preaching by the like of [[Fulk of Neuilly]]. This led to papal sanctioned provincial administrations and the codification of preaching. Local church authorities were required to report to these administrators on crusading policy. Propaganda was now more coherent despite an occasionally ad-hoc implementation.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=46}} Funding was increased through the introduction of [[hypothecated tax]] and greater donations.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=235–237}}{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=524–525}} He was also the first pope to deploy the apparatus of crusading against his fellow Christians.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=533–535}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=238–239}} This innovation became a frequent approach by the papacy that was used against those it considered [[dissenters]], heretics, or [[schism]]atics.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=336}}

====Popular crusading====
{{see|popular crusade}}
In 1212 there was an outbreak of popular crusading that is now known as the Childrens' crusade. This was the first of a number of similar events which lasted until 1514 the [[György Dózsa|Hungarian Peasants' Crusade]]. What these all had in common was that they were independent of the church. The first seems to have been a response to the preaching of the Albigensian Crusade and also religious processions seeking God's support for the fighting in Iberia. The church considered such outbreaks by rather unconventional crusaders as unauthorised and therefore illegitimate.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=258-260}} There is little remaining evidence for the identities, thoughts and feelings of those who took part.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995b|pp=66-67}} One unaccredited piece is the [[Berthold (patriarch of Aquileia)#Legacy|Austrian Rhymed Chronical]]. This includes alledgedly verbatim lyrics of the marching song of children heading east and offers evidence of eschatological beliefs.{{sfn|Dickson|2008|p=14}} The church was unable to comprehend the [[charisma]] of impoverished secular leaders like [[Nicholas of Cologne]] and how this could be used in recruiting such large followings.{{sfn|Dickson|2008|p=101-102}} Modern academic opinion is split on the definition of a crusade. Riley-Smith disregards these popular uprisings as not meeting the criteria, while Gary Dickson has produced in depth research.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=223}}

====Early century====

In the years between 1217 and 1221 Cardinal [[Pope Gregory IX|Hugo Ugolino]] of Segni led preaching campaigns and helped relax controls on funding and recruitment. He used the five percent income tax on the church known as the "clerical twentieth" to pay mercenaries in the Fifth Crusade and other {{lang|la|crucesignati}}.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|p=620}} In 1227, Hugo became pope and adopted the name Gregory IX.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006|p=648}} He clashed with Frederick II over territory in Italy, excommunicating him in 1239 and deploying the crusading tools of indulgences, privileges, and taxes in 1241.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=351-352}}{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|p=211}} The Christian right to land ownership was foundational to crusading ideology, although [[Innocent IV]] acknowledged Muslim rights he considered these only existed under the authority of Christ.{{sfn|Jotischky|2004|pp=256–257}} [[Pope Alexander IV|Alexander IV]] continued the policies of both Gregory IX and Innocent IV from his ascension in 1254 which led to further crusading against the Hohenstaufen dynasty.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=352}}

====Criticism====

{{main|criticism of crusading}}

During 12th and 13th{{nbsp}} centuries the concepts behind the crusading movement were rarely questioned, but there is evidence that practice was criticised. Events such as crusades against non-conforming Christians, the sack of Constantinople by the Fourth Crusade, crusading against the German Hohenstaufen dynsaty and the southern French Albigensian all drew condemnation. Questions were raised about the objectives of these and whether they were a distraction from the primary cause of fighting for the Holy Land. In particular, [[Occitans|Occitan]] Troubadours expressed discontent with expeditions in their southern French homeland. Additionally, reports of sexual immorality, greed, and arrogance exhibited by crusaders was viewed as incompatible with the ideals of a holy war. This gave commentators excuses or reasons for failures and setbacks in what was otherwise considered God's work. In this was defeats experienced such as during the First Crusade, by Saladin at Hattin and the defeat of [[Louis IX of France]] at the [[Battle of Mansurah (1250)]] could be explained. Some, such as Gerhoh of Reichersberg, linked this to the expected coming of the Antichrist and increased puritanism. {{sfn|Tyerman|2006|p=247}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=28}} This puritanism was the church's response to criticism, and included processions and reforms such as gambling bans and restrictions on women. Primary sources include the ''Würzburg Annals'' and Humbert of Romans's work ''De praedicatione crucis'' which translates as ''concerning the preaching of the cross''. Crusaders were thought to have fallen under satanic influence and doubts were raised about forcible conversion.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|p=314}}

====Later century====

The movement continued developing innovative organisational financial methods. However in 1274 it faced a significant low.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=260}} In response the [[Second Council of Lyons]] initiated the search for new ideas> The response to which showed a resilience that would enable the continuation of the movement.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=260}} This was not without opposition. Matthew Paris in ''{{lang|la|[[Chronica Majora]]}}'' and Richard of Mapham, the [[dean of Lincoln]] both raised note worthy concerns and the Teutonic Order for one, amongst others of the military orders were criticised for arrogance, greed, using their great wealth to pay for luxurious lifestyles, and an inadequate response in the Holy Land. Collaboration was difficult because of open conflict between the Templars and Hospitallers and among Christians in the Baltic. The autonomy of the orders was viewed in the church as leading to a loss of effectiveness in the East and overly friendlt relations with Muslims. A minority within the church including [[Roger Bacon]] made the case that aggression in areas like the Baltic actually hindered conversion.{{sfn|Forey|1995|p=211}} [[Pope Gregory X]] developed the objective of reunification with the Greek church as an essential prerequisite for further crusades.{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=399-401}} In planning the funding of this crusade he created a complex tax gathering regime by Latin Christendom into twenty-six collectorates, each directed by a general collector. In order to tackle fraud each collector would further delegate tax liability assessment. This system raised vast amounts which in turn prompted further clerical criticism of obligatory taxation.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=57}}

===14th century===

[[File:London, British Museum, Royal MS 19 D I, fol. 168r.png|thumb|Start of the ''[[Directorium ad passagium faciendum]]'', in a French translation by [[Jean de Vignay]], from a manuscript of the 1330s]]

Between the councils of Lyon in 1274 and Vienna in 1314, there existed over twenty treatises concerning the recovery of the Holy Land. These were instigated by Popes who, following the lead of Innocent III, sought counsel on the matter. This led to unfulfilled strategies for the blockading Egypt and possible expeditions to establish a foothold that would pave the way for full-scale crusades with professional armies. Discussions among writers often revolved around the intricacies of [[Capetian dynasty|Capetian]] and [[House of Barcelona|Aragonese]] dynastic politics. Periodic bursts of popular crusading occurred throughout the decades, spurred by events like the Mongol victory at [[Battle of Wadi al-Khaznadar|Homs]] and grassroots movements in France and Germany. Despite numerous obstacles, the papacy's establishment of taxation, including a six-year tithe on clerical incomes, to fund contracted professional crusading armies, represented a remarkable feat of institutionalisation.{{sfn|Housley|1995|pp=262–265}}

Beginning in 1304 and lasting the entire 14th{{nbsp}}century, the [[Teutonic Order]] used the privileges Innocent IV had granted in 1245 to recruit crusaders in Prussia and [[Livonia]], in the absence of any formal crusade authority. Knightly volunteers from every Catholic state in western Europe flocked to take part in campaigns known as {{lang|de|Reisen}}, or journeys, as part of a chivalric cult.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=275}} Commencing in 1332, the numerous [[Holy League]]s in the form of temporary alliances between interested Christian powers, were a new manifestation of the movement. Successful campaigns included the [[Smyrniote crusades|capture of Smyrna]] in 1344, the [[Battle of Lepanto]] in 1571, and the recovery of territory in the [[Balkans]] between 1684 and 1697.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=4}}

After the [[Treaty of Brétigny]] between England and France, the anarchic political situation in Italy prompted the [[curia]] to begin issuing indulgences for those who would fight the [[Routiers|merceneries]] threatening the pope and his court at [[Avignon]]. In 1378, the [[Western Schism]] split the papacy into two and then three, with rival Popes declaring crusades against each other. The growing threat from the [[Ottoman Turks]] provided a welcome distraction that would unite the papacy and divert the violence to another front.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=270}} By the end of the century, the Teutonic Order's {{lang|de|Reisen}} had become obsolescent. Commoners had limited interaction with crusading beyond the preaching of indulgences, the success of which depended on the preacher's ability, local powers' attitudes, and the extent of promotion. However, there is no evidence that the failure to organize anti-Turkish crusading was due to popular apathy or hostility rather than to finance and politics.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=281}}

===15th century===

[[Eugenius&nbsp;IV]] became Pope in 1431 and entered into ecumenical negotiation with the Byzantine Empire. [[John V Palaiologos]]'s discussions with Eugenius led to an announcement of unification of the Latin, Greek Orthodox, [[Armenian Apostolic Church|Armenian]], [[Church of the East|Nestorian]], and [[Maronite Cypriots|Cypriot Maronite]] churches. In return the Byzantines received military assistance. Between 1440 and 1444, Eugenius coordinated efforts to defend Constantinople from the Turks. However, this strategy failed in a disastrous defeat at the [[Battle of Varna]] in November 1444. The fall of Constantinople to Mehmed II in 1453 marked the beginning of a twenty-eight-year expansion of the sultanate.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=279}}

[[Pius II]] suggested to Mehmed II the possibility of converting to Christianity and emulating the legacy of Constantine. Despite coming close to organizing an anti-Turkish crusade in 1464, his plans ultimately failed. Throughout his papacy and those of his immediate successors, the raised funds and military resources were insufficient, poorly timed, or misallocated for effective action against the Turks. This was despite:
* the commissioning of advisory tracts reconsidering the political, financial, and military issues;
* Frankish rulers exiled from the Holy Land who toured Christendom's courts seeking assistance;
* individuals, such as [[Cardinal Bessarion]], dedicating themselves to the crusading movement; and
* the continued levying of church taxes and preaching of indulgences.{{sfn|Housley|1995|pp=279–280}}

Warfare was now more professional and costly.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=281}} This was driven by factors including contractual recruitment, increased intelligence and espionage, a greater emphasis on naval warfare, the grooming of alliances, new and varied tactics to deal with different circumstances and opposition, and the hiring of experts in siege warfare.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=264}} There was disillusionment and suspicion of how practical the objectives of the movements were. Lay sovereigns were more independent and prioritized their own objectives. The political authority of the papacy was reduced by the Western Schism, so popes such as Pius II and [[Innocent VIII]] found their congresses ignored. Politics and self-interest wrecked any plans. All of Europe acknowledged the need for a crusade to combat the Ottoman Empire, but effectively all blocked its formation. Popular feeling is difficult to judge: actual crusading had long since become distant from most commoners' lives. One example from 1488 saw [[Wageningen]] parishioners influenced by their priest's criticism of crusading to such a degree they refused to allow the collectors to take away donations. This contrasts with chronicle accounts of successful preaching in [[Erfurt]] at the same time and the extraordinary response for a crusade to relieve Belgrade in 1456.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=281}}

Around the end of the 15th{{nbsp}}century, the military orders were transformed. [[Kingdom of Castile|Castile]] nationalized its orders between 1487 and 1499. In 1523, the Hospitallers retreated from Rhodes to Crete and Sicily and in 1530 to Malta and Gozo. The [[State of the Teutonic Order]] became the hereditary [[Duchy of Prussia]] when the last Prussian master, [[Albert, Duke of Prussia|Albrecht of Brandenburg-Ansbach]], converted to [[Lutheranism]] and became the first duke under oath to his uncle the [[Sigismund I the Old|Polish king]].{{sfn|Luttrell|1995|pp=348}}

===16th century===
In the 16th{{nbsp}}century, the rivalry between Catholic monarchs prevented anti-Protestant crusades, but individual military actions were rewarded with crusader privileges, including Irish Catholic [[Second Desmond Rebellion|rebellions]] against [[English Reformation|English Protestant]] rule and the [[Spanish Armada]]'s attack on England under [[Elizabeth I of England|Queen Elizabeth I]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=358–359}} In 1562, [[Cosimo I de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany]], became the hereditary Grand Master of the [[Order of Saint Stephen]], a Tuscan military order he founded, which was modelled on the knights of Malta.{{sfn|Luttrell|1995|p=352}} The Hospitallers remained the only independent military order with a positive strategy. Other orders continued as aristocratic corporations while lay powers absorbed local orders, outposts, and priories.{{sfn|Luttrell|1995|p=364}}

===17th century and later===
Crusading continued in the 17th{{nbsp}}century, mainly associated with the [[Hapsburg]]s and the Spanish national identity. Crusade indulgences and taxation were used in support of the [[Cretan War (1645–1669)]], the [[Battle of Vienna]], and the [[Holy League (1684)]]. Although the Hospitallers continued the military orders in the 18th{{nbsp}}century, the crusading movement soon ended in terms of acquiescence, popularity, and support.{{sfn|Housley|1995|p=293}}

The [[French Revolution]] resulted in widespread confiscations from the military orders, which were now largely irrelevant, apart from minor effects in the Hapsburg Empire.{{sfn|Luttrell|1995|p=364}} The Hospitallers continued acting as a military order from its territory in Malta until the island was conquered by [[Napoleon]] in 1798.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|p=4}}{{sfn|Luttrell|1995|p=360}} In 1809, Napoleon went on to suppress the Order of St Stephen, and the Teutonic Order was stripped of its German possessions before relocating to Vienna. At this point, its identity as a military order ended.{{sfn|Luttrell|1995|p=352}}

In 1936, the Catholic church in Spain supported the coup of [[Francisco Franco]], declaring a crusade against [[Marxism]] and [[atheism]]. Thirty-six years of [[National Catholicism]] followed, during which the idea of Reconquista as a foundation of historical memory, celebration, and Spanish national identity became entrenched in conservative circles. Reconquista lost its historiographical hegemony when Spain restored democracy in 1978, but it remains a fundamental definition of the medieval period within conservative sectors of academia, politics, and the media because of its strong ideological connotations.<ref>{{Harvnb|García-Sanjuán|2018|p=4}}</ref>


==Legacy==
==Legacy==
The [[Kingdom of Jerusalem]] was the first experiment in [[European colonialism]], setting up the Outremer as a "Europe Overseas". The raising, transportation, and supply of large armies led to a flourishing [[Trade route|trade]] between Europe and the Outremer. The Italian city-states of [[Republic of Genoa|Genoa]] and [[Republic of Venice|Venice]] flourished, planting profitable trading colonies in the eastern Mediterranean.<ref>{{Harvnb|Housley|2006|pp=152–154}}</ref> The crusades consolidated the papal leadership of the Latin Church, reinforcing the link between Western [[Christendom]], [[feudalism]], and militarism, and increased the tolerance of the clergy for violence.<ref name="Davies 1997 359" /> Muslim libraries contained classical Greek and Roman texts that allowed Europe to rediscover pre-Christian philosophy, science and medicine.<ref>{{Harvnb|Nicholson|2004|pp=93–94}}</ref> The growth of the system of indulgences became a catalyst for the [[Reformation]] in the early 16th{{nbsp}}century.<ref>{{Harvnb| Housley |2006|pp=147–149}}</ref> The crusades also had a role in the formation and institutionalisation of the military and the [[Dominican Order|Dominican]] orders as well as of the [[Medieval Inquisition]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Strayer|1992|p=143}}</ref>


The crusading movement left an enduring legacy, defining western culture in the late medieval period and leaving an historical impact on the Islamic world. The impact touched every aspect of European life.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|1995|pp=4–5, 36}}
The behaviour of the crusaders in the eastern Mediterranean area appalled the Greeks and Muslims, creating a lasting barrier between the Latin world and the Islamic and Orthodox religions. This became an obstacle to the reunification of the Christian church and fostered a perception of Westerners as defeated aggressors.<ref name="Davies 1997 359" /> Many historians argue that the interaction between the western Christian and Islamic cultures played a significant, ultimately positive, part in the development of European civilisation and the [[Renaissance]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Nicholson|2004|p=96}}</ref> Relations between Europeans and the Islamic world stretched across the entire length of the Mediterranean Sea, leading to an improved perception of Islamic culture in the West. But this broad area of interaction also makes it difficult for historians to identify the specific sources of cultural cross-fertilisation.<ref name="Asbridge 2012 667–668">{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=667–668}}</ref>


Historians have debated whether the Latin States created by the movement in the Eastern Europe were the first examples of [[History of colonialism|European colonialism]]. The ''Outremer'' is the name that is often used for these states. This translates as a ''Europe Overseas''.{{sfn|Davies|1997|p=359}}{{sfn|Morris|1989|p=282}} In mid-19th{{nbsp}}century historiography this became a focus for European [[nationalism]] and associated with European colonialism.{{sfn|Madden|2013|p=227}}{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=4-5}} This is a view that was contested. The Latin settlements did not easily fit to the model of a colony. They were neither directly controlled or exploited by a homeland. Historians have used the idea of a religious colony in order to accommodate these discrepancies in their colonial theories. A different definition covers a territory conquered and settled with religious motivation. This territory maintains close contact with its homeland, share the same religious views and requires support in both military and financial terms. [[Frankokratia|Venetian Greece]] carved out of the Byzantine Empire as a result of the crusading movement following the Fourth Crusade offers a better match to the traditional model of colonialism. Venice had a political and economic stake in these territories. Indeed, this was to such a degree that the region attracted settlers that would otherwise migrated to the Latin East. It this way its success actually weakened the crusader states.{{sfn|Phillips|1995|pp=112–113}}
Historical parallelism and the tradition of drawing inspiration from the Middle Ages, have become keystones of [[political Islam]] encouraging ideas of a modern jihad and long struggle, while secular [[Arab nationalism]] highlights the role of [[Western imperialism]].<ref name="Asbridge 2012 675–680">{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=675–680}}</ref> Muslim thinkers, politicians and historians have drawn parallels between the crusades and modern political developments such as the mandates given to govern [[French Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon|Syria, Lebanon]], [[Mandatory Palestine|Palestine]], and Israel by the United Nations.<ref>{{Harvnb|Asbridge|2012|pp=674–675}}</ref> Right-wing circles in the [[Western world]] have drawn opposing parallels, considering Christianity to be under an Islamic religious and demographic threat that is analogous to the situation at the time of the crusades. Crusader symbols and [[Criticism of Islam|anti-Islamic]] rhetoric are presented as an appropriate response, even if only for [[propaganda]]. These symbols and rhetoric are used to provide a religious justification and inspiration for a struggle against a religious enemy.<ref>{{Harvnb|Koch|2017|p=1}}</ref> Some historians, like [[Thomas F. Madden]], argue that modern tensions result from a constructed view of the crusades created by colonial powers in the 19th{{nbsp}}century and transmitted into Arab nationalism. For him, the crusades are a medieval phenomenon in which the crusaders were engaged in a defensive war on behalf of their co-religionists.<ref>{{Harvnb|Madden|2013|pp=204–205}}</ref>

The crusading movement created a flourishing system of [[Trade route|trade]] in the Mediterranean. New routes were created to serve the Outremer with [[Republic of Genoa|Genoa]] and Venice planting profitable trading outposts across the region.
{{sfn|Housley|2006|pp=152–154}} Many historians argue that the increasingly frequent contact between the Latin Christian and Islamic cultures was a positive. It was foundational in the progress of European civilisation and the [[Renaissance]].{{sfn|Nicholson|2004|p=96}} Closer contact with the Muslim and Byzantine worlds enabled access for western European scholars to classical Greek and Roman texts. This led to the rediscovery by pre-Christian philosophy, science, and medicine.{{sfn|Nicholson|2004|pp=93–94}} It is difficult to identify exactly the source of cultural interchange. The increase of knowledge of Islamic culture was the result of contact that stretched the breadth of the [[Mediterranean Sea]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=667–668}}

The movement enabled the papacy to consolidate its leadership of the Latin church. The clergy became inured to violence, while the church developed closer links with [[feudalism]] and military capability.{{sfn|Davies|1997|p=359}} The [[Medieval Inquisition]], Dominican and military orders as were all institutionalised.{{sfn|Strayer|1992|p=143}} A catalyst for the Reformation was the growing opposition to developments in the use of indulgences.{{sfn| Housley |2006|pp=147–149}} Relations between western Christians, the Greeks and the Muslims were also soured by the behaviour of the crusaders. These differences became an enduring barrier between the Latin, the Orthodox and Islamic worlds. The crusading movement had a reputation of a defeated aggressor and unification of the Christian churches became problematic.{{sfn|Davies|1997|p=359}} [[Political Islam]] makes historical parallels, provoking paradigms of jihad and struggle. [[Arab nationalism]] looks on the movement as an example of [[Western imperialism]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=675–680}} Thinkers, politicians, and historians in the Islamic world draw an equivalence with more recent events like the [[League of Nations]] [[French Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon|mandates to govern Syria, Lebanon]], [[Mandatory Palestine|Palestine]], and the [[United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine]].{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=674–675}} An opposing analogy has developed in [[Western world]] right-wing circles. Here, Christianity is considered to be under an similar existential Islamic religious and demographic threat. The result is [[Criticism of Islam|anti-Islamic]] rhetoric and symbols. This provides an argument for a contest with a religious foe.{{sfn|Koch|2017|p=1}} [[Thomas F. Madden]] argues that these modern tensions are the result of constructed view developed during the 19th{{nbsp}}century by the colonial powers. This in turn led to the rise of Arab nationalism. For Madden, the crusading movement is a defensive and solely medieval phenomenon.{{sfn|Madden|2013|pp=204–205}}


==Historiography==
==Historiography==

{{Main|Historiography of the Crusades}}
{{main|Historiography of the Crusades|Islamic views on the crusades}}
[[File:CouncilofClermont.jpg|thumb|alt=Illustration of the Council of Clermont | Illustration of the [[Council of Clermont]], [[Jean Colombe]], ''Les Passages d'Outremer'', BnF Fr{{nbsp}}5594, c.{{nbsp}}1475 ]]

Accounts of the First Crusade and the decade following the taking of Jerusalem in 1099 began the description and interpretation of crusading. From the early 12th{{nbsp}}century, the image and morality of earlier expeditions propagandised new campaigns. {{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|p=582}} The initial understanding of the crusades was based on a limited set of interrelated texts. Possibly dating from 1099, the most notable is ''[[Gesta Francorum]]'' ("exploits of the Franks") that created a papalist, northern French and Benedictine template for later works. These had a degree of martial advocacy that attributed both success and failure to God's will.{{sfn|Tyerman |2011|pp=8–12}} Vernacular adventure stories based on the work of [[Albert of Aachen]] challenged the clerical view. By 1200, the historian [[William of Tyre]] completed his ''Historia'' through which he expanded on Albert's writing describing the warrior state the Outremer became as a result of the tension between the [[wikt:providential|providential]] and secular.{{sfn|Tyerman |2011|pp=16–17}} The main interest of medieval crusade historiography remained in presenting moralistic lessons rather than information, extolling the crusades as moral exemplars and cultural norms.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=32}}
Almost immediately, the First Crusade provoked literary examination. Initially this served as propaganda for the crusading movement and was based on a few separate but related works. One of these, {{lang|la|Gesta Francorum}} literally translates as the deeds of the Franks. It created a template for later works based on papal, northern French, and [[Benedictines|Benedictine]] ideas. It considered military success or failure entirely to God's will in its promotion of violent action.{{sfn|Tyerman |2011|pp=8–12}}

By the 15th{{nbsp}}century, political concerns provoked self-interested polemics that mixed the legendary and evidential past. It was through humanist scholarship and theological hostility that an independent historiography emerged. The rise of the Ottoman Turks, the [[French Wars of Religion]], and the Protestant Reformation in the 16th{{nbsp}}century encouraged the study of the crusades. Traditionalist wars of the cross presented military, spiritually penitent and redemptive solutions while also being examples of papist superstition and corruption of religion. The crusades provided evidence for the English martyrologist [[John Foxe]] in his 1566 ''History of the Turks'' of papal idolatry and profanation. He blamed the sins of the Roman church for the failure of the crusades. War against the infidel was laudable, but crusading based on doctrines of papal power and indulgences was not. This was true when directed against Christian religious dissidents, such as the Albigensian and [[Waldensians]]. Some Roman Catholic writers considered the crusades gave precedents for dealing with heretics. Both strands thought the crusaders were sincere and were increasingly uneasy in considering war a religious exercise instead of for territory. This secularisation was based on juristic ideas of just war that [[Lutherans]], [[Calvinists]] and [[Roman Catholics]] could all subscribe. Roman Catholics diminished the role of Indulgences in tracts on the wars against the Turks. [[Alberico Gentili]] and [[Hugo Grotius]] developed secular international laws of war that discounted religion as a legitimate cause in contrast to popes, who persisted in issuing crusade bulls for generations.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|pp=582–583}}
[[Albert of Aachen]] produced contrasting vernacular stories of adventure.{{sfn|Tyerman |2011|pp=16–17}} At this point the early chroniclers concentrated on the moral lessons that could be taken from the crusades. This reinforced normative moral and cultural positions.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=32}} Academic crusade historian Paul Chevedden argued that the early accounts were already an [[anachronism]]. The writers were writing with the knowledge of the unexpected success of the First Crusade. For Chevedden, more can be learned about how the crusading movement was viewed in the 11th{{nbsp}}century in the works of Urban II who died ignorant of the crusade's success.{{sfn|Chevedden|2013|p=13}} Albert's adventure stories were developed and extended in turn by [[William of Tyre]] before the end of the 12th{{nbsp}}century.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=16–17}} William documented the early history of the military [[Crusader States]]. In this he illustrated the tension between secular and [[wikt:providential|providential]] motivation.{{sfn|Tyerman |2011|pp=16–17}}

Lutheran scholar [[Matthaus Dresser]] developed Foxe's work. The crusaders were credulous, misled by popes and profane monks, with conflicting temporal and spiritual motivation. Papal policy mixed with self-interest and the ecclesiastical manipulation of popular piety. He emphasised the great deeds by those who could be considered as German such as Godfrey of Bouillon.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|p=583}} Crusaders were lauded for their faith, but Urban&nbsp;II's motivation was associated with conflict with German Emperor Henry&nbsp;IV. Crusading was flawed, and ideas of restoring the physical Holy Places "detestable superstition".{{sfn|Tyerman |2011|pp=38–42}} Pasquier highlighted the failures of the crusades and the damage that religious conflict had inflicted on France and the church. He lists victims of papal aggression, [[Indulgence|sale of indulgences]], church abuses, corruption, and conflicts at home.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=47–50}} Dresser's nationalist view enabled the creation by non–Roman Catholic scholars of a wider cultural bridge between the papist past and Protestant future. This formed a sense of national identity for secular Europeans across the confessional divide. Dresser's colleague [[Reinier Reineck]] worked at editing crusade texts, especially of Albert of Aachen. More importantly, the French Calvinist diplomat [[Jacques Bongars]]'s ''[[Gesta Dei per Francos]]'' ("Deeds of God through the Franks") included all the main narrative sources for the First and the Fifth Crusades, the chronicle of William of Tyre, [[Marino Sanudo Torsello]]'s ''[[Secreta Fidelium Crucis]]'' ("secrets of the faithful cross") and [[Pierre Dubois (scholastic)|Pierre Dubois]]'s {{lang|la|[[De recuperatione Terrae Sanctae]]}} ("recovery of the Holy Land"). These textual scholars established two dominant themes for crusade historiography which were intellectual or religious disdain and national or cultural admiration. Crusading now had only a technical impact on contemporary wars but provided imagery of noble and lost causes such as [[William Shakespeare]]'s ''[[Henry IV, Part II]]'' and [[Torquato Tasso]]'s reinvention of Godfrey of Bouillon and the First Crusade in {{lang|la|[[Gerusalemme liberate]]}} as a romance of love, magic, valour, loyalty, honour, and chivalry. In the 17th{{nbsp}}century [[Thomas Fuller]] maintained moral and religious disapproval in his ''[[History of the Holy Warre]]'', and [[Louis Maimbourg]]'s {{lang|fr|[[Histoire des Croisades]]}} (history of the Crusades) embodied national pride. Both took crusading beyond the judgment of religion, and this secularised vision increasingly depicted crusades in good stories or as edifying or repulsive models of the distant past.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|pp=583–584}}
In the 16th{{nbsp}}century the [[Reformation]] and the Ottoman expansion shaped opinion. Protestant [[Martyrology|martyrologist]] [[John Foxe]] writing in his 1566 work ''History of the Turks'' blamed the sins of the Catholic Church for the failure of the crusades. He also criticised the use of crusading against those he considered had maintained the faith, such as the Albigensians and Waldensians. The Lutheran scholar Matthew Dresser (1536–1607) went further. He praised for their faith, but considered that Urban II was motivated by his conflict with [[Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor|Emperor Henry IV]]. Dresser considered that the flaw in the crusading movement was that the idea of restoring the physical holy places was "detestable superstition".{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=38–42}} One of the first to number the crusades was the French Catholic lawyer [[Étienne Pasquier]]. His suggestion was that there were six. In his work he highlighted the failures. In addition he raised the damage that religious conflict had inflicted on France and the church. The key points were the victims of papal aggression, the sale of indulgences, abuses in the church, corruption, and conflicts at home.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=47–50}}

18th{{nbsp}}century [[Age of Enlightenment]] philosopher historians narrowed the chronological and geographical scope to the Levant and the Outremer between 1095 and 1291. Some attempted to number crusades at eight while others such as Georg Christoph Muller counted five large expeditions that reached the eastern Mediterranean{{mdash}}1096–1099, 1147–1149,1189–1192, 1217–1229 and 1248–1254. In the absence of an Ottoman threat, foremost influential writers such as [[Denis Diderot]], [[Voltaire]], [[David Hume]] and [[Edward Gibbon]] considered crusading in terms of anticlericalism with disdain for the apparent ignorance, fanaticism, and violence.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|p=584}} They used crusading as a conceptual tool to critique religion, civilisation and cultural mores. For them, the positive effects of crusading, such as the increasing liberty that municipalities could purchase from feudal lords, were only by-products. 19th&nbsp;century crusade enthusiasts then criticised this view as being unnecessarily hostile to, and ignorant of, the crusades.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=79}} No orthodoxy developed. Voltaire in ''[[Essai sur les mœurs et l'esprit des nations]]'' (''Essay on the Manners and Spirit of Nations'') showed admiration for individual action. Gibbon presented heroism as a cultural norm that if freed of religion would offer advantage to the West, in his ''[[Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire]]''. He also contrasted Byzantium's cultural decadence with the vigorous brutality of the crusaders and Muslims. Following [[Joseph de Guignes]]'s {{lang|fr|[[Histoire des Huns]]}} ("history of the Huns") the ideas developed that crusading opened new markets for Western trade, manufacture, and technology. This foreshadowed the later ideas of the conflict between Christianity and Islam being in terms of "the World's Debate". Gibbon's contemporaries considered the West won the debate, not Christianity. As fear of the Ottomans subsided, a patronising orientalism developed. Interest was now on the cultural values, motives and behaviour of the crusaders as opposed to their failure. Napoleon's Egypt and Syria campaign from 1798 to –1799 increased the predominately French view that the prime concern of the crusades was the Holy Land. .{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|pp=584–585}} Alternatively, [[Claude Fleury]] and [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]] proposed the crusades were one stage in the improvement of European Civilisation; that paradigm was further developed by [[Rationalism|Rationalists]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=67}} In France, the idea that the crusades were an important part of national history and identity continued to evolve. In academic circles the phrase "Holy War" was the main descriptor, but the more neutral terms ''kreuzzug'' from German and the French ''croisade'' became established. The word "crusade" entered the English language in the 18th{{nbsp}}century as a hybrid from Spanish, French and Latin.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=71}} Gibbon followed Thomas Fuller in dismissing the concept that the crusades were a legitimate defence as they were disproportionate to the threat presented. Palestine was an objective, not because of reason but because of fanaticism and superstition.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=87}}
[[Age of Enlightenment]] philosopher-historians such as [[David Hume]], [[Voltaire]] and [[Edward Gibbon]] used crusading as a conceptual tool to critique religion, civilisation and cultural mores. For them the positives effects of crusading, such as the increasing liberty that municipalities were able to purchase from feudal lords, were only by-products. This view was then criticised in the 19th{{nbsp}}century by crusade enthusiasts as being unnecessarily hostile to, and ignorant of, the crusades.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=79}} Alternatively, [[Claude Fleury]] and [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]] proposed that the crusades were one stage in the improvement of European civilisation; that paradigm was further developed by the [[Rationalism|Rationalists]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=67}}

Increasingly positive views of the Middle Ages developed in the 19th{{nbsp}}century. One example was [[Frederick Wilken]]'s ''History of the Crusades'', written between 1807 to 1832, which pioneered the use of Eastern sources. A fascination in chivalry developed to support the moral, religious, and cultural mores of the establishment. [[William Robertson (historian)|William Robertson]] expanded on Fleury in a new, empirical, objective approach placing crusading in a narrative of progress towards modernity. His work elaborates the cultural consequences of the growth in trade, the rise of the Italian cities and progress. In this he influenced his student [[Walter Scott]],{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=80–86}} whose novels ''[[Ivanhoe]]'', in 1819 and ''[[The Talisman (Scott novel)|The Talisman]]'', in 1825, along with Charles Mills' 1820 work ''History of the Crusades'' demonstrated admiration of crusading ideology and violence. Protestant writers such as [[Henry Stebbings]] remained critical, but in a world of unsettling change and rapid industrialisation nostalgics, escapist apologists and popular historians developed a positive view of crusading.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|pp=584–585}}
The idea that the crusades were an important part of national history and identity continued to evolve. In scholarly literature, the term "holy war" was replaced by the neutral German ''kreuzzug'' and French ''croisade''.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=71}} Gibbon followed [[Thomas Fuller]] in dismissing the concept that the crusades were a legitimate defence, as they were disproportionate to the threat presented; Palestine was an objective, not because of reason but because of fanaticism and superstition.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=87}} [[William Robertson (historian)|William Robertson]] expanded on Fleury in a new, empirical, objective approach, placing crusading in a narrative of progress towards modernity. The cultural consequences of growth in trade, the rise of the Italian cities and progress are elaborated in his work. In this he influenced his student [[Walter Scott]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=80–86}} Much of the popular understanding of the crusades derives from the 19th{{nbsp}}century novels of Scott and the French histories by [[Joseph François Michaud]].{{sfn|Tyerman|2019|pp=448–449,454}} Michaud's viewpoint provoked Muslim attitudes. Previously, the crusading movement had aroused little interest among Islamic and Arabic scholars. This changed with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the penetration of European power into the Eastern Mediterrarean.{{sfn|Asbridge |2012 |pp=675–680}}

Jonathan Riley-Smith considers that much of the popular understanding of the crusades derives from the 19th{{nbsp}}century novels of Scott and the French histories by [[Joseph François Michaud]]. Michaud became the most influential 19th{{nbsp}}century historian of the Crusades with his 1812 {{lang|fr|[[Histoire des croisades]]}}, its 1831 revision and 1829 companion [[Bibliotheque des croisades]] {"library of the Crusades"). He married allied admiration with supremacist triumphalism. His views provided support for the nascent European commercial and political colonialism of the time in the Near East to the point where the Outremer were "Christian colonies". It was a long lasting view: [[T. E. Lawrence]] reminded the French claiming at the 1919 [[Versailles Peace Conference]] that "the Crusaders had been defeated; the Crusades had failed" In 1917, [[Louis Madelin]] described a benevolent Franco-Syrian society in Outremer, that was an attractive idea during the French mandates in Syria and Lebanon. Rene Grousset's 1934 to 1936 {{lang|fr|Histoire des croisades}} described {{lang|fr|La France du Levant}} ("France in the Levant"). In 1953 [[Jean Richard (historian)|Jean Richard]] described the kingdom of Jerusalem as "the first attempt by Franks of the West to found colonies".
In a 2001 article{{mdash}}"The Historiography of the Crusades"{{mdash}}Giles Constable attempted to categorise what is meant by "Crusade" into four areas of contemporary crusade study. His view was that ''Traditionalists'' such as [[Hans Eberhard Mayer]] are concerned with where the crusades were aimed, ''Pluralists'' such as [[Jonathan Riley-Smith]] concentrate on how the crusades were organised, ''Popularists'' including Paul Alphandery and Etienne Delaruelle focus on the popular groundswells of religious fervour, and ''Generalists'', such as Ernst-Dieter Hehl focus on the phenomenon of Latin holy wars.{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|pp=225–226}}{{sfn|Constable|2001|pp=1–22}} The historian [[Thomas F. Madden]] argues that modern tensions are the result of a constructed view of the crusades created by colonial powers in the 19th{{nbsp}}century and transmitted into Arab nationalism. For him the crusades are a medieval phenomenon in which the crusaders were engaged in a [[defensive war]] on behalf of their co-religionists.{{sfn|Madden|2013|pp=204–205}}

Heinrich von Syble revolutionised academic study of the crusades with his 1837 [[Geschichte des ersten Kreuzzuges]] {"history of the first crusade"} developing the ideas of his tutor [[Leopold von Ranke]] that William of Tyre's accounts were a secondary source. He used close textual analysis to reveal different narratives and argued that sources were transmitters of varied stories and legends, not objective fact. Between 1841 and 1906 in France, the main Western texts, as well as Arabic and Armenian texts, were edited in the ''[[Recueil des historiens des croisades]]'' (''Collection of the Historians of the Crusades''). New areas of research were explored:
The Byzantines harboured a negative perspective on holy warfare, failing to grasp the concept of the Crusades and finding them repugnant. Although some initially embraced Westerners due to a common Christianity, their trust soon waned. With a pragmatic approach, the Byzantines prioritised strategic locations such as Antioch over sentimental objectives like Jerusalem. They couldn't comprehend the merging of pilgrimage and warfare. The advocacy for infidel eradication by St. Bernard and the militant role of the Templars would deeply shock them. Suspicions arose among the Byzantines that Westerners aimed for imperial conquest, leading to growing animosity. Despite occasionally using the term "holy war" in historical contexts, Byzantine conflicts were not inherently holy but perceived as just, defending the empire and Christian faith. War, to the Byzantines, was justified solely for the defence of the empire, in contrast to Muslim expansionist ideals and Western knights' notion of holy warfare to glorify Christianity.{{sfn|Dennis|2001|pp=31-40}}
*[[Joseph Delaville Le Roulx]] on the Hospitallers;

*[[Louis de Mas Latrie]] on Latin Cyprus;
Scholars like [[Carole Hillenbrand]] assert that within the broader context of Muslim historical events, the Crusades were considered a marginal issue when compared to the collapse of the [[Caliphate]], the [[Mongol invasions]], and the rise of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, supplanting [[Arabs|Arab]] rule.{{sfn|Hillenbrand|1999|p=5}} Arab historians, influenced by historical opposition to Turkish control over their homelands, adopted a Western perspective on the Crusades.{{sfn|Hillenbrand|1999|p=5}} Syrian Christians proficient in Arabic played a vital role by translating French histories into Arabic. The first modern biography of Saladin was authored by the Ottoman Turk [[Namık Kemal]] in 1872, while the Egyptian Sayyid Ali al-Hariri produced the initial Arabic history of the Crusades in response to Kaiser [[Wilhelm II]]'s visit to Jerusalem in 1898.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=675–677}} The visit triggered a renewed interest in Saladin, who had previously been overshadowed by more recent leaders like [[Baybars]]. The reinterpretation of Saladin as a hero against Western imperialism gained traction among nationalist Arabs, fueled by anti-imperialist sentiment.{{sfn|Riley-Smith|2009|pp=6–66}} The intersection of history and contemporary politics is evident in the development of ideas surrounding jihad and Arab nationalism. Historical parallels between the Crusades and modern political events, such as the establishment of [[Israel]] in 1948, have been drawn.{{sfn|Asbridge|2012|pp=674–675}} In contemporary Western discourse, right-wing perspectives have emerged, viewing Christianity as under threat analogous to the Crusades, using crusader symbols and anti-Islamic rhetoric for propaganda purposes.{{sfn|Koch|2017|p=1}} Madden argues that Arab nationalism absorbed a constructed view of the Crusades created by colonial powers in the 19th century, contributing to modern tensions. Madden suggests that the crusading movement, from a medieval perspective, engaged in a [[defensive war]] on behalf of co-religionists.{{sfn|Madden|2013|pp=204–205}}
* Paul Riant on narrative sources for the Fourth and Fifth Crusades;
* Gustave Schlumberger on coins and seals of the Latin East;
* Camille Enlart on crusader castles.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|p=586}}
After 1815 and in the absence of widespread warfare, 19th{{nbsp}}century Europe created a cult of war based on the crusades, linked to political polemic and national identities. After [[World War I]] crusading no longer received the same positive responses; war was now sometimes necessary but not good, sanctified, or redemptive.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|p=586}} Michaud's viewpoint provoked Muslim attitudes. The crusades had aroused little interest among Islamic and Arabic scholars until the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the penetration of European power. The first modern Muslim account using medieval Islamic sources was the Egyptian [[Sayyid 'Ali al-Hariri]]'s 1899 [[Splendid Accounts in the Crusading Wars]]. The first modern Islamic biography of Saladin was by the Turkish [[Namik Kemal]] in 1872. This directly challenged the Michaud view. This began a theme in Islamic discourse based on an acceptance of Michaud representing a typical Western opinion.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|p=585}} In the late 19th{{nbsp}}century, Arabic-speaking Syrian Christians began translating French histories into Arabic, leading to the replacement of the term "wars of the Ifranj"—Franks—with ''al-hurub al Salabiyya''—wars of the Cross. [[Namık Kemal]] published the first modern Saladin biography in 1872. The Jerusalem visit in 1898 of [[Wilhelm II, German Emperor|Kaiser Wilhelm]] prompted further interest, with Sayyid Ali al-Hariri producing the first Arabic history of the crusades.<ref name="Asbridge 2012 675–680"/>
Originally planned in the early 1950s, the Wisconsin project under the general editorship of [[Kenneth Setton]] has suffered from doubt on coherence grounds after an explosion of new research. Israeli [[Joshua Prawer]] and Frenchman Jean Richard reshaped the historiography of the Latin East by re-examining legal practices and institutions. This created a new constitutional history that replaced ideas of the Latin East being a model feudal world. The 1969 to 1970 {{lang|fr|[[Histoire du royaume Latin de Jerusalem]]}} ("history of the Latin kingdom of Jerusalem") revisited the views of the Latin settlements in the East being proto colonies. In 1972's [[The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem: European Colonialism in the Middle Ages]] Prawer argued that, unlike the state of Israel, Frankish settlement was too limited to be permanent and the Franks did not engage with the local culture or environment. R.C. Smail supported this in an influential 1956 work on crusader warfare. This model directly challenged Madelin and Grousset. In turn Ronnie Ellenblum's 1998 [[Frankish Rural Settlement in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem]] modifies Prawar's model with more extensive rural Latin settlement.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|pp=586–587}}
[[Claude Cahen]] in 1940's {{lang|fr|[[Claude Cahen#Works|La Syrie du Nord a l'epoque des croisades]]}} ("Northern Syria at the time of the Crusades") established the study of the Latin settlements as features of Near Eastern history detached from the West. However, [[Hans Eberhard Mayer]] in 1965's [[Geschichte der Kreuzzuge]] ("history of the Crusades") questioned the definition of crusading. [[Jonathan Riley-Smith]] straddles the two schools on the actions and motives of early crusaders. The definition of the crusade remains contentious. Riley-Smith's view that "everyone accepted that the crusades to the East were the most prestigious and provided the scale against which the others were measured" is largely accepted. There is disagreement whether it is only those campaigns launched to recover or protect Jerusalem that are proper crusades e.g. Mayer and [[Jean Flori]]. or whether all those wars to which popes applied equivalent temporal and spiritual were equally legitimate e.g. Riley-Smith and [[Norman Housley]]. These arguments do not place what was only a coherent paradigm around 1200 in the context of Medieval Christian holy war, as argued by John Gilchrist that Crusading was result an ecclesiastical initiative but a submission by the church to secular militarism and militancy completed only in the early 13th{{nbsp}}century. Today, Crusade historians study the Baltic, the Mediterranean, the Near East, even the Atlantic, and crusading's position in, and derivation, from host and victim societies. Chronological horizons have crusades existing into the early modern world e.g. the survival of the Order of St. John on Malta until 1798.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|p=587}}
Academic study of crusading in the West has integrated into mainstream study of theology, the Church, law, popular religion, aristocratic society and values, and politics. The Muslim context now receives attention from Islamicists such as [[Peter M. Holt]], [[Robert Irwin (writer)|Robert Irwin]], and [[Carole Hillenbrand]]. The disdain of Runciman has been replaced by attempts to locate crusading within its social, cultural, intellectual, economic, and political context. Crusader historians employ wider ranges of evidence, including charters, archaeology, and the visual arts, to supplement chronicles and letters. Local studies have lent precision as well as diversity.{{sfn|Tyerman|2006c|p=587}}


==See also==
==See also==
Line 172: Line 195:
* [[List of principal crusaders]]
* [[List of principal crusaders]]
* [[List of Crusader castles]]
* [[List of Crusader castles]]
* [[Women in the Crusades]]

* [[Criticism of crusading]]
==Notes==
{{notelist-ua|refs=
{{efn-ua|name=Tyerman2011|Tyerman explains that "holy war" was the primary academic term from the early 16th&nbsp;century until the German term ''Kreuzzug'' ("war of the cross") and the French ''croisade'' became established. Regarding English usage, he writes: "[[A Dictionary of the English Language|Samuel Johnson's ''Dictionary'']] (1755) includes four variants: ''crusade, crusado, croisade'' and ''croisado'' (the word used by [[Francis Bacon]]). 'Crusade', perhaps first coined in 1706, certainly in vogue by 1753 when it was used in the English translation of [[Voltaire]]'s essay (published as ''History of the Crusades''; the following year as part of ''The General History and State of Europe''), was popularised through its use by [[David Hume|Hume]] (1761) and [[Edward Gibbon|Gibbon]]."{{sfn|Tyerman|2011|p=77}}}}
}}


==References==
==References==
Line 184: Line 204:
{{refbegin|30em}}
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book|last=Asbridge|first=Thomas|author-link=Thomas Asbridge|title=The Crusades: The War for the Holy Land|year=2012 |publisher=[[Simon & Schuster]]|isbn=978-1-84983-688-3}}
* {{cite book|last=Asbridge|first=Thomas|author-link=Thomas Asbridge|title=The Crusades: The War for the Holy Land|year=2012 |publisher=[[Simon & Schuster]]|isbn=978-1-84983-688-3}}
* {{cite book|last=Bird|first=Jessalynn|chapter=Finance of Crusades|pages=432–436|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=II:D-J|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006|publisher=[[ABC-CLIO]]|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Barber|first=Malcolm|author-link=Malcolm Barber|title=The Two Cities: Medieval Europe 1050-1320|year=2012 |publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=0-415-17414-7}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Buck|first1=Andrew D.|title=Settlement, Identity, and Memory in the Latin East: An Examination of the Term 'Crusader States'|journal=The English Historical Review|year=2020|volume=135|issue=573|pages=271–302|doi=10.1093/ehr/ceaa008}}
*{{cite book | last1= Constable | first1= Giles |chapter= The Historiography of the Crusades |editor-last1=Laiou| editor-first1=Angeliki E.| editor-last2=Mottahedeh| editor-first2=Roy P.|title=The Crusades from the Perspective of Byzantium and the Muslim World |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=YTAhPw3SjxIC |year=2001 |publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|isbn=978-0-88402-277-0|pages=1–22|access-date=2016-10-04 }}
* {{cite book|last=Cordery|first=Leona|chapter=English and Scots Literature|pages=399–403|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=II:D-J|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006|publisher=[[ABC-CLIO]]|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Bull|first=Marcus|chapter=Origins|pages=13–33|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Chevedden|first1=Paul E.|title=Crusade Creationism "versus" Pope Urban Ii's Conceptualization of the Crusades|journal=The Historian|year=2013|volume=75|issue=1|pages=1–46|jstor=24455961|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24455961|publisher=Taylor & Francis, Ltd.|doi=10.1111/hisn.12000|s2cid=142787038|access-date=2022-04-05|archive-date=2022-04-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220405163311/https://www.jstor.org/stable/24455961|url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Constable|first=Giles|author-link=Giles Constable|editor=Angeliki E. Laiou and Roy P. Mottahedeh|title=The Crusades from the Perspective of Byzantium and the Muslim World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YTAhPw3SjxIC|year=2001|publisher=Dumbarton Oaks|isbn=978-0-88402-277-0|chapter=The Historiography of the Crusades|pages=1–22}}
* {{cite book|title=[[Europe: A History]]|last=Davies|first=Norman|author-link=Norman Davies|year=1997|publisher=[[Random House|Pimlico]]|isbn=978-0-7126-6633-6}}
* {{cite book|title=[[Europe: A History]]|last=Davies|first=Norman|author-link=Norman Davies|year=1997|publisher=[[Random House|Pimlico]]|isbn=978-0-7126-6633-6}}
* {{cite book|last=Dennis|first=Gorge T.|chapter=Defenders of the Christian People:Holy War in Byzantium|pages=31–40|editor-last1=Laiou|editor-first1=Angeliki E.|editor-last2=Parviz Mottahedeh|editor-first2=Roy|title=The Crusades from the Perspective of Byzantium and the Muslim World|url=https://ia601805.us.archive.org/22/items/laiou-mottahedeh-the-crusades-from-the-perspective-of-byzantium-and-the-muslim-world/Laiou-Mottahedeh_The-Crusades-from-the-Perspective-of-Byzantium-and-the-Muslim-World.pdf|year=2001|publisher=[[Dumbarton Oaks]]|isbn=0-88402-277-3}}
* {{cite journal|last=Determann|first= Jörg|date=2008|title=The Crusades in Arabic Schoolbooks|journal=Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations|volume=19|issue=2|doi=10.1080/09596410801923949|issn=0959-6410|pages=199–214|s2cid= 143518665}}
* {{cite book|last=Dickson|first=Gary|chapter=Popular Crusades|pages=975–979|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=III:K-P|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Dickson|first=Gary|title=The Children's Crusade: Medieval History, Modern Mythistory|year=2008|publisher=[[Palgrave MacMillan]]|isbn=978-1-4039-9989-4}}
* {{cite book|last= Hodgson |first= Natasha|chapter=Women|pages=1285–1291|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=IV:R-Z|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Forey|first=Alan|chapter=The Military Orders 1120-1312|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|pages=184–217|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|year=1995|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}}
* {{cite journal|last=García-Sanjuán|first=Alejandro|title=Rejecting al-Andalus, exalting the Reconquista: historical memory in contemporary Spain|journal=Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies |volume=10 |issue=1 |date=2018|pages=127–145|doi=10.1080/17546559.2016.1268263|s2cid=157964339}}
* {{cite book|last=Housley|first=Norman|author-link=Norman Housley|title=Contesting the Crusades|publisher=[[Blackwell Publishing]]|year=2006|isbn=978-1-4051-1189-8}}
* {{cite book|last=Jaspert|first=Nikolas|chapter=Reconquista|pages=432–1019|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=IV:Q-Z|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Hillenbrand|first=Carole|author-link=Carole Hillenbrand|title=The Crusades: Islamic Perspectives|publisher=[[Edinburgh University Press]]|isbn=978-0-7486-0630-6|year=1999|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uNkWAQAAIAAJ}}
* {{cite book|last=Honig|first=Jan Willem|chapter=Warfare in the Middle Ages|pages=113–126|editor1-last=Hartmann|editor1-first=Anja V.|editor2-last=Hauser|editor2-first=Beatrice|title=War, Peace and World Orders in European History|year=2001|publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=978-0-415-24440-4}}
* {{cite book|last=Jotischky|first=Andrew|title=Crusading and the Crusader States|location=Harlow|publisher=[[Longman|Pearson Longman]]|year=2004|edition=1st|isbn=978-0-582-41851-6|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rTUlDwAAQBAJ}}
* {{cite book|last=Housley|first=Norman|author-link=Norman Housley|chapter=The Crusading Movement 1271-1700|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|pages=260–294|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|year=1995|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}}
* {{cite journal|last=Koch |first=Ariel |title=The New Crusaders: Contemporary Extreme Right Symbolism and Rhetoric |journal=[[Perspectives on Terrorism]] |volume=11 |issue=5 |date=2017 |pages=13–24 |url=http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/641/html| issn=2334-3745}}
* {{cite book |last=Lock|first=Peter |title=Routledge Companion to the Crusades |publisher=[[Routledge]] |year=2006 |isbn=0-415-39312-4 }}
* {{cite book|last=Housley|first=Norman|author-link=Norman Housley|title=Religious Warfare in Europe, 1400-1536|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|year=2002|isbn=0-19-820811-1}}
* {{cite book|last=Madden|first=Thomas F.|author-link=Thomas F. Madden|title=The Concise History of the Crusades|publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]] Publishers|year=2013|edition=Third|isbn=978-1-4422-1576-4}}
* {{cite book|last=Housley|first=Norman|author-link=Norman Housley|title=Contesting the Crusades|url=https://archive.org/details/housley-contesting-the-crusades/page/n3/mode/2up|publisher=[[Blackwell Publishing]]|year=2006|isbn=978-1-4051-1189-8}}
* {{cite book|last=Jotischky|first=Andrew|title=Crusading and the Crusader States|publisher=[[Longman|Pearson Longman]]|year=2004|edition=1st|isbn=978-0-582-41851-6|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rTUlDwAAQBAJ}}
* {{cite book|last=Maier|first=Christoph T.|chapter=Ideology|pages=627–631|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=II:D-J|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006a|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last= Maier|first= Christoph T. |chapter=Propaganda|pages=984–988|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=III:K-P|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006b|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Jubb|first=M.|year=2005|chapter=The Crusaders' Perceptions of their Opponents|pages=225–244|editor-last=Nicholson|editor-first=Helen J.|title=Palgrave Advances in the Crusades|publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]]|isbn=978-1-4039-1237-4}}
* {{cite journal |last=Koch |first=Ariel |title=The New Crusaders: Contemporary Extreme Right Symbolism and Rhetoric |journal=[[Perspectives on Terrorism]] |volume=11 |issue=5 |date=2017 |pages=13–24 |url=http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/641/html |issn=2334-3745 |access-date=2020-10-04 |archive-date=2021-03-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210324112022/http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/641/html |url-status=dead }}
* {{cite journal|last1=Latham|first1=Andrew A.|title=Theorizing the Crusades: Identity, Institutions, and Religious War in Medieval Latin Christendom|journal=International Studies Quarterly|date=2011|volume=55|issue=1|pages=223–243|doi=10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00642.x|jstor=23019520|doi-access=free}}
* {{cite book|last=Latham|first=Andrew A.|title=Theorizing Medieval Geopolitics - War and World Order in the Age of the Crusades|year=2012 |publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=978-0-415-87184-6}}
* {{cite book|last=Lloyd|first=Simon|chapter=The Crusading Movement 1095-1274|pages=34–64|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Luttrell|first=Anthony|chapter=The Military Orders, 1312{{ndash}}1798|pages=326–364|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Madden|first=Thomas F.|author-link=Thomas F. Madden|title=The Concise History of the Crusades|publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]] Publishers|year=2013|edition=Third|isbn=978-1-4422-1576-4}} <!-- 1999 edition available at https://archive.org/details/concisehistoryof00madd/page/n5/mode/2up -->
* {{cite book|last=Mannion|first=Lee|title=Narrating the Crusades|year=2014|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|isbn=978-1-107-05781-4}}
* {{cite book|last=Morris|first=Colin|title=The Papal Monarchy - The Western Church from 1050 to 1250|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=S-DnCwAAQBAJ&q=The+Papal+Monarchy+The+Western+Church+from+1050+to+1250|year=1989|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-826925-0|access-date=2022-05-27|archive-date=2023-08-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230818205619/https://books.google.com/books?id=S-DnCwAAQBAJ&q=The+Papal+Monarchy+The+Western+Church+from+1050+to+1250|url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Nicholson|first=Helen|title=The Crusades|publisher=[[Greenwood Publishing Group]]|year=2004|isbn=978-0-313-32685-1|url=https://archive.org/details/crusades00nich}}
* {{cite book|last=Nicholson|first=Helen|title=The Crusades|publisher=[[Greenwood Publishing Group]]|year=2004|isbn=978-0-313-32685-1|url=https://archive.org/details/crusades00nich}}
* {{cite book|last=Phillips|first=Jonathan|chapter=The Latin East, 1098-1291|pages=112–140|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Prawer|first=Joshua|author-link=Joshua Prawer|title=The Crusaders' Kingdom|publisher=Phoenix Press|year=2001|isbn=978-1-84212-224-2}}
* {{cite book|last=Prawer|first=Joshua|author-link=Joshua Prawer|title=The Crusaders' Kingdom|publisher=Phoenix Press|year=2001|isbn=978-1-84212-224-2}}
* {{cite book|last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan|author-link=Jonathan Riley-Smith|title= The First Crusaders, 1095–1131 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|year=2000|isbn=0-521-64603-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Richard|first=Jean|author-link=Jean Richard (historian)|year=2005|chapter=National feeling and the lagacy of the crusade|pages=204–224|editor-last=Nicholson|editor-first=Helen J.|title=Palgrave Advances in the Crusades|publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]]|isbn=978-1-4039-1237-4}}
* {{cite book|last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan|author-link=Jonathan Riley-Smith|title=The Crusades: A Short History|edition=Second|publisher=[[Yale University Press]]|year=2005|isbn=978-0-300-10128-7|url=https://archive.org/details/00book837650140}}
* {{cite book|last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan|author-link=Jonathan Riley-Smith|chapter=The Crusading Movement and Historians|pages=1–12|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan|chapter=The Crusading Movement and Historians|pages=1–12|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|year=1995|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19285428-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan|author-link=Jonathan Riley-Smith|chapter=The State of Mind of the Crusaders to the East|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|year=1995b|pages=66–90|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}}
* {{cite book |last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan |title=What Were the Crusades?|publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]]|year= 2009|isbn=978-0-230-22069-0}}
* {{cite book |last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan |author-link=Jonathan Riley-Smith|title=What Were the Crusades?|publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]]|year= 2009|isbn=978-0-230-22069-0}}
* {{cite book|last= Siberry|first=Elizabeth|chapter=Criticism of Crusading|pages=299–301|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=I:A-C|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Routledge|first=Michael|chapter=Songs|pages=90–110|editor-last=Riley-Smith|editor-first=Jonathan|title=The Oxford Illustrated History of The Crusades|url=https://archive.org/details/oxfordillustrate0000unse_q0x8/page/n5/mode/2up|url-access=registration|year=1995|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-285428-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Strayer|first=Joseph Reese|author-link=Joseph Strayer|year=1992|title=The Albigensian Crusades|publisher=[[University of Michigan Press]]|isbn=978-0-472-06476-2|url=https://archive.org/details/albigensiancrusa00stra}}
* {{cite book|last=Strayer|first=Joseph Reese|author-link=Joseph Strayer|year=1992|title=The Albigensian Crusades|publisher=[[University of Michigan Press]]|isbn=978-0-472-06476-2|url=https://archive.org/details/albigensiancrusa00stra}}
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|author-link=Christopher Tyerman|first=Christopher|title=God's War: A New History of the Crusades|publisher=[[Belknap Press]]|year=2006|isbn=978-0-674-02387-1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ULDUopVCVPoC|access-date=2022-04-20|archive-date=2023-08-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230818205558/https://books.google.com/books?id=ULDUopVCVPoC|url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|title=THE CRUSADES:A Very Short Introduction|url=https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Crusades_A_Very_Short_Introduction|year=2004|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=0-19-280655-6}}
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|author-link=Christopher Tyerman|title=God's War: A New History of the Crusades|publisher=[[Belknap Press]]|year=2006|isbn=978-0-674-02387-1|url=https://archive.org/details/godswarnewhistor00tyer}}
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|author-link=Christopher Tyerman|title=The Debate on the Crusades, 1099–2010|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t_DEyAEACAAJ|year=2011|publisher=[[Manchester University Press]]|isbn=978-0-7190-7320-5|access-date=2020-10-04|archive-date=2023-08-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230818205557/https://books.google.com/books?id=t_DEyAEACAAJ|url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|author-link=Christopher Tyerman|title=The World of the Crusades|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GIOVDwAAQBAJ|year=2019|publisher=[[Yale University Press]]|isbn=978-0-300-21739-1|access-date=2020-10-04|archive-date=2023-08-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230818205557/https://books.google.com/books?id=GIOVDwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|chapter=Crusades against Christians|pages=325–329|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=I:A-C|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006b|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|chapter=Historiography, Modern|pages=582–587|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=II:D-J|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006c|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|title=The Debate on the Crusades, 1099–2010|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t_DEyAEACAAJ|year=2011|publisher=[[Manchester University Press]]|isbn=978-0-7190-7320-5}}
* {{cite book|last=Tyerman|first=Christopher|title=The World of the Crusades|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GIOVDwAAQBAJ|year=2019|publisher=[[Yale University Press]]|isbn=978-0-300-21739-1}}
* {{cite book|last=Urban|first=William L.|chapter=Baltic Crusades|pages=184–192|editor-last=Murray|editor-first=Alan V.|volume=I:A-C|title=The Crusades: An Encyclopedia|year=2006|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-57607-862-0}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
{{refbegin|30em}}
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book|last=Cobb|first=Paul M.|title=The Race for Paradise : an Islamic History of the Crusades|location=New York|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=2014|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Cobb|first=Paul M.|title=The Race for Paradise : an Islamic History of the Crusades|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|year=2014|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Flori|first=Jean|year=2005|chapter=Ideology and Motivations in the First Crusade|editor-last=Nicholson|editor-first=Helen J.|title=Palgrave Advances in the Crusades|series=Palgrave Advances|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|location=London|doi=10.1057/9780230524095_2|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Flori|first=Jean|year=2005|chapter=Ideology and Motivations in the First Crusade|editor-last=Nicholson|editor-first=Helen J.|title=Palgrave Advances in the Crusades|pages=15–36|publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]]|doi=10.1057/9780230524095_2|isbn=978-1-4039-1237-4|ref=none}}
* {{cite journal|last1=Horowitz|first1=Michael C.|title=Long Time Going:Religion and the Duration of Crusading|journal=International Security|date=2009|volume=34|issue=27|pages=162–193|jstor=40389216|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/40389216|publisher=MIT Press|doi=10.1162/isec.2009.34.2.162|s2cid=57564747|ref=none|access-date=2022-08-16|archive-date=2022-08-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220816082248/https://www.jstor.org/stable/40389216|url-status=live}}
* {{cite book|last=Jubb|first=M.|year=2005|chapter=The Crusaders’ Perceptions of their Opponents|editor-last=Nicholson|editor-first=Helen J.|title=Palgrave Advances in the Crusades|series=Palgrave Advances|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|location=London|doi=10.1057/9780230524095_2|ref=none}}
* {{cite journal|last=Kedar|first=Benjamin Z.|title=Crusade Historians and the Massacres of 1096|journal=Jewish History|volume=12|issue=2|year=1998|pages=11–31|ref=none}}
* {{cite journal|last=Kedar|first=Benjamin Z.|title=Crusade Historians and the Massacres of 1096|journal=Jewish History|volume=12|issue=2|year=1998|pages=11–31|doi=10.1007/BF02335496|s2cid=153734729|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Kostick|first=Conor|title=The Social Structure of the First Crusade|publisher=Brill|year=2008|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Kostick|first=Conor|title=The Social Structure of the First Crusade|publisher=Brill|year=2008|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Maier|first=C.|year=2000|title=Crusade Propaganda and Ideology: Model Sermons for the Preaching of the Cross|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|doi=10.1017/CBO9780511496554|isbn=978-0-521-59061-7|ref=none}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Latham|first1=Andrew A. |title=Theorizing the Crusades: Identity, Institutions, and Religious War in Medieval Latin Christendom|journal=International Studies Quarterly|date=2011|volume=55|issue=1|pages=223-243|jstor=23019520|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/23019520|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Maier|first=C.|year=2000|title=Crusade Propaganda and Ideology: Model Sermons for the Preaching of the Cross|location=Cambridge|publisher=Cambridge University Press|doi=10.1017/CBO9780511496554|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Polk|first=William R.|title=Crusade and Jihad: The Thousand-Year War Between the Muslim World and the Global North|publisher=Yale University Press |year=2018|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Polk|first=William R.|title=Crusade and Jihad: The Thousand-Year War Between the Muslim World and the Global North|publisher=Yale University Press |year=2018|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Riley-Smith|first=Jonathan|chapter=The crusading movement|pages=127–140|editor1-last=Hartmann|editor1-first=Anja V.|editor2-last=Hauser|editor2-first=Beatrice|title=War, Peace and World Orders in European History|year=2001|publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=978-0-415-24440-4|ref=none}}
* {{cite book|last=Tuck|first=Richard|year=1999|title=The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-820753-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d3RYAwAAQBAJ|ref=none}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Tyerman|first1=Christopher|author-link=Christopher Tyerman|title=Were There Any Crusades in the Twelfth Century?|journal=The English Historical Review|date=1995|volume=110|issue=437|pages=553–577|jstor=578335|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|doi=10.1093/ehr/CX.437.553|ref=none|doi-access=free}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}

{{Crusader States}}
{{Crusader States}}
{{Middle Ages}}
{{Middle Ages}}
Line 236: Line 266:
|book1 = Crusades
|book1 = Crusades
|portal1 = Christianity
|portal1 = Christianity
|portal2 = War
|portal2 = Islam
|portal3 = Islam
|portal3 = Middle Ages
|portal4 = Middle Ages
|portal4 = History
|portal5 = History
|portal5 = Religion
|portal6 = Religion
|commons = y
|commons = y
|commons-search = Category:Crusades
|commons-search = Category:Crusades
Line 255: Line 284:
|v-search = Crusades
|v-search = Crusades
|d = y
|d = y
|d-search = Q340187
}}
}}


{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}
{{short description|A series of religious wars sanctioned by the Latin Church that began in the medieval period and continued for many centuries}}


[[Category:Crusades| ]]
[[Category:Crusades| ]]

Latest revision as of 15:45, 27 June 2024

photograph of the church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem
The church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. This is a site of Christian pilgrimage built where Christian Roman authorities pinpointed the purported location of Jesus' burial and resurrection in Jerusalem in 325.[1] One of the objectives of the Crusades was to free the Holy Sepulchre from Muslim control.[2]

The crusading movement encompasses the framework of ideologies and institutions that described, regulated, and promoted the Crusades. The crusades were religious wars that the Christian Latin church initiated, supported, and sometimes directed in the Middle Ages. The members of the church defined this movement in legal and theological terms that were based on the concepts of holy war and pilgrimage. In theological terms, the movement merged ideas of Old Testament wars that were believed to have been instigated and assisted by God with New Testament ideas of forming personal relationships with Christ. The institution of crusading developed with the encouragement of church reformers the 11th century in what is commonly known as the Gregorian Reform and declined after the 16th century Protestant Reformation.

The idea of crusading as holy war was based on the Greco-Roman Just war theory. A "just war" was one where a legitimate authority is the instigator, there is a valid cause, and it is waged with good intentions. The Crusades were seen by their adherents as a special Christian pilgrimage – a physical and spiritual journey authorised and protected by the church. The actions were both a pilgrimage and penitental, Participants were considered part of Christ's army and demonstrated this by attaching crosses of cloth to their outfits. This marked them as followers and devotees of Christ and was in response to biblical passages exhorting Christian "to carry one's cross and follow Christ". Everyone could be involved, with the church considering anyone who died campaigning a Christian martyr. This movement was an important part of late-medieval western culture, that impacted politics, the economy and wider society.

The original focus and objective was the liberation of Jerusalem and the sacred sites of Palestine from non-Christians. The city was considered to be Christ's legacy and it was symbolic of divine restoration. The site of Christ's redemptive acts was pivotal for the inception of the First Crusade and the subsequent establishment of crusading as an institution. The campaigns to reclaim the Holy Land were the ones that attracted the greatest support, but the crusading movement's theatre of war extended wider than just Palestine. Crusades were waged in the Iberian Peninsula, northeastern Europe against the Wends, the Baltic region, campaigns were fought against those the church considered heretics in France, Germany, and Hungary, as well as in Italy where Pope's indulged in armed conflict with their opponents. By definition all the crusades were waged with papal approval and through this reinforced the Western European concept of a single, unified Christian church under the Pope.

Major features[edit]

Historians trace the beginnings of the crusading movement to the significant changes within the Latin church enacted during the mid and latter eleventh century.[3] These are now known as the Gregorian Reform, from a term popularised by the French historian Augustin Fliche. He named the changes after one of the leading reforming popes Gregory VII. The use of the term oversimplifies what was in fact numerous discrete initiatives, not all of which were the result of papal action.[4]

A group of reformers took control of the governance of the church with ambitions to use this control to eradicate behaviour they viewed as corrupt.[3] This takeover was initially supported by the Holy Roman Empire and by Henry III, Holy Roman Emperor in particular, but went on to lead to conflict with his son, Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor. The reformers believed in papal primacy. That is the Pope was the head of all of Christendom as heir of St Peter. Secular rulers, even including the emperor, were subject to this and could be removed.[5]

The reformist groups opposed previously widespread behaviour such as the sale of clerical positions and clerical marriage.[6] The changes were not without opposition, causing splits within the church and between the church and the emperor.[7] However, the reform faction successfully created the ideology for men they saw as God's agents. From the second half of the 11th century, it enabled them in the refashioning of the church along the moral and spiritual lines they believed in.[8] Historians consider that this was a pivotal moment, because the church was now under the control of men who supported a concept of holy war and would plan to make it happen.[9]

The reformers now viewed the church as an independent force with God given authority to act in the secular world for religious regeneration. The creation of the institutions of crusading were a means by which the church could act militarily with the support of the armed aristocracy. This would in turn lead to creation of formal processes for the raising of armed forces through which the church could enforce its will. While these fundamentals applied the crusading movement flourished, when they ceased to be significant the movement declined.[10][11]

Penance and indulgence[edit]

Before the crusading movement was established, the church had developed a system that enabled Christians to gain forgiveness and pardon for sins from the church on behalf of God. They did this by demonstrating genuine contrition through admissions of wrongdoing and acts of penance. Christianity's requirement to avoid violence was still a significant issue for the warrior class. Gregory VII offered them a potential solution In the latter part of the 11th century. This was that they too could have their sins forgiven if they supported him in fighting for papal causes, but only if this service was given altruistically.[12][13] Later popes expanded on this offer to those willing to fight for their causes. Urban II launched the First Crusade at Clermont in November 1095. He made two offers to those who would travel to Jerusalem and fight for control of the sites Christians considered sacred. They were that those who fought would receive exemption from penance for the sins they committed and while they fought the church would protect all their property from harm.[14] The enthusiasm of the crusading movement challenged what had been conventional theology. This can be seen in a letter from Sigebert of Gembloux to Robert II, Count of Flanders. Sigebert is critical of Pope Paschal II and in congratulating Robert on his safe return from Jerusalem he pointedly omits any reference at all of the fact that Robert had been fighting on a crusade.[15]

Later pope's would develop the institution even further. Not only would crusaders avoid what were considered the God-imposed punishments for their sins but the guilt and the sin itself would be expunged. The method through which this was achieved was the granting by the church of what was called a plenary indulgence.[16] Calixtus II made the same offer privileges and extended the protection of property to crusaders' relations.[17] Innocent III reinforced the importance of the oaths crusaders took. He also emphasised the view the forgiveness of sin was a gift from God. It was not considered a reward for the suffering endured by the crusader while on crusade.[18][19] It was in the 1213 papal bull called Quia maior that he reached out beyond the noble warrior class. He offered all other Christians the opportunity to redeem their vows without even going on crusade. This led to the unforeseen consequence of creating a market for religious rewards. This would later scandalise some devout Christians and through this become a contributing factor for the Protestant Reformation from the 16th century.[20][21] As late as the 16th century, some writers continued to seek atonement for their sins through the practice of crusading. At the same time John Foxe the English martyrologist and others saw this as "the impure idolatry, and profanation"[22]

Popes continued in the practice of issuing crusade bulls for generations, but Alberico Gentili and Hugo Grotius created an international rule of law that was secular rather than religious.[23] The wars against the Ottoman Empire and in defence of Europe were conflicts on which Lutherans, Calvinists, and Roman Catholics could agree in principle. So the importance to recruitment of the granting of indulgences became increasingly redundant and declined.[24]

Christianity and war[edit]

Fresco from San Bevignate showing men on horseback fighting
Fresco from San Bevignate depicting the Templars battling the Saracens, the Battle of Nablus (1242)

The 4th-century theologian Augustine of Hippo Christianised theories of bellum justum or just war that dated from the Greco-Roman world. In the 11th century canon lawyers extended his thinking to create the paradigm of bellum sacrum, or a form of Christian holy war.[25] The theory was based on the idea that Christian warfare could be justified even though it was considered a sin. It was necessary to meet three criteria if a war was to be considered just. Firstly, it must be declared by an authority that the church considered legitimate. Secondly, the war must have defensive objectives or to be for the recovery of stolen property and rights. Lastly, the intentions of those taking part must be good.[26][27]

Using these theories the church supported various Christian groups in conflicts with their Muslim neighbours at the borders of Christendom. In what is now Northern Spain encouragement was given during the siege of Barbastro. The Normans of Southern Italy were supported in their conquest of the Emirate of Sicily. Gregory VII even planned to lead a campaign himself in support of the Byzantine Empire in 1074. He was unable to gather the necessary support, possibly because his personal leadership was unacceptable. Despite this, his plans did leave a template for future crusades.[28] As did the campaigns in Spain where leading thinkers and fighters developed practical and fundamental arguments for the crusading movement.[29]

The thoughts and writing on these theories were eventually consolidated into Collectio Canonum or Collection of Canon Law by Anselm of Lucca.[12] Thomas Aquinas and others extended these theories in the 13th century. This created a concept of religious war. [30] This enabled various popes to use canon law in the call for crusades against their enemies in Italy. Rome was the estate of St Peter, so the popes' campaigns were defensive and only fought for the preservation of Christian territory.[31] The church combined two themes in the creation of crusading, one from the Old Testament and one from the New. The first was the wars of the Jews. These were believed to have come from the instigation and will of God. The second was the Christocentric ideas related to Christians forming individual relationships with Christ. It was believed these were instigated and assisted by God. Secondly, the Christocentric concept of forming an individual relationship with Christ that came from the New Testament. In this way the church was able to combine the ideas of holy war and Christian pilgrimage to create the legal and theocratic justifications for the crusading movement.[25]

The historian Carl Erdmann mapped out the three stages for the argument creating the institution of the crusading movement:

  • defending Christen unity was a just cause;
  • that Pope Gregory I and his followers' ideas for missionary conquest was also in accordance;
  • that Islam should be fought in defence of Christendom, an idea developed under the reformist popes Leo IX, Alexander II, and Gregory VII.[32]

Knights, chivalry and the military orders[edit]

Grand Master Pierre d'Aubusson with senior knights, wearing the "Rhodian cross" on their habits. Dedicatory miniature in Gestorum Rhodie obsidionis commentarii (account of the Siege of Rhodes of 1480), BNF Lat 6067 fol. 3v, dated 1483/4.

Innovations in military technology and thinking made the first crusades feasible. Tactics developed to utilise heavily armoured cavalry. Italy's maritime republics built increasingly large navies. Society was controlled by castles and the men who garrisoned them. These new techniques in turn developed new social mores developed during extensive training. In turn this led to the rise of combat as sport.[33] At this time although knights were praised in literature they remained distinct from the aristocracy. Crusading and chivalry developed together, and in time chivalry helped shap the ethos, ideals and principles of crusaders.[34] Tournaments were held where knights could exhibit their martial prowess. This provided venues where the crusading movement could recruit, spread propaganda and announce the enlistment of senior figures.[35] Despite the undoubted courage and commitment of crusading knights and some notable commanders in military terms the campaigns in the Levant were not typically impressive. The creation of disciplined units was challenging. In feudal Europe strategy and institutions were too immature. Power structures were too fragmented.[36]

Literature presented the exemplar of an idealised, perfect knight in works such as romance Alexandre written around 1130. These works extolled adventure, courage, charity and manners. The church could not accept readily all the values presented. Its spiritual views contrasted with ideas of excellence, achieved glory through military deeds and romantic love. Even though the church feared the warrior class it needed to co-opt its power and did this symbolically through developed liturgical blessings to sanctify new knights.[37] In time kings represented themselves as members of the knighthood for propaganda purposes.[38] Crusading became seen as integral to the ideas of this ideal.[39] From the time of the Fourth Crusade, it became an adventure normalised in Europe, creating separation between the knights and other social classes. At this point the relationship between knightly adventure, religious, and secular motivation was altered.[40]

In the polities created by the crusading movement in the Eastern Mediterranean known as the Crusader states the creation of military religious orders was one of the few innovations from outside Europe.[41] In 1119 a small band of knights formed to protect pilgrims journeying to Jerusalem. These became the Knights Templar. Many other orders followed this template. The Knights Hospitaller were providing medical services and added a military wing to become a much larger organisation. These orders became Latin Christendom's first professional fighting forces and played a major part in the defence of the Kingdom of Jerusalem and the other crusader states.[42] Papal acknowledgement encouraged significant donations of money, land and recruits from across western Europe. The orders built their own castles and developed international autonomy.[43]

When Acre fell, bringing to a close the holding of Christian territory in the Holy Land the Hospitallers relocated to Cyprus. Later the order conquered and ruled Rhodes (1309–1522) and finally settled in Malta (1530–1798). The orders successor organisation, the Sovereign Military Order of Malta still exists today. King Philip IV of France extinguished the Templars around 1312. This was probably for financial and political reasons. He pressurised Pope Clement V to dissolve the order. The grounds of sodomy, magic, and heresy listed in various papal bulls such as Vox in excelso and Ad providam were probably false.[44]

Common people[edit]

Miniature of Peter the Hermit leading the People's Crusade. From the Abreujamen de las estorias (14th century).

Historians now take a greater interest than before questioning why significant numbers of the lower classes travelled on the early crusades or took part in the unsanctioned popular outbreaks of the 13th and 14th centuries.[45] The papacy wanted to recruit warriors who could fight, but in the early years of the movement it was impossible to exclude others, including women. Indeed, retinues included many to provide services who could also fight in emergencies.[46] The church considered that engaging in crusade must be entirely voluntary. Recruitment propaganda used understandable mediums which could also be unclear. For the poor the instituition of the crusade was offensive, while in church doctrines it was an act of self-defence.[45]

From the 12th century onwards the crusading movement generated propaganda material to spread the word. A good example was the work of a Dominican friar called Humbert of Romans. In 1268 he gathered the best crusading arguments in one work.[47][48] The poor had different viewpoints to the theologans. Often based on an end of the world eschatological belief. When Acre was lost to the Egyptians there were resulting popular but brief outbursts of crusade fervour.[49] However, the most Christians did not typically crusade to Jerusalem. Instead, they would often build models of the Holy Sepulchre or dedicate places of worship. These were acts theat existed before the crusading movement, but they became increasingly popular in association. They may have formed part of other forms of regular religious devotion. In 1099 Jerusalem was known as the remotest place but these practices made tangible crusading.[50]

Unsanctioned popular crusading exploded in 1096, 1212, 1251, 1309, and 1320. These all exhibited violent antisemitism with the exception of the Children's Crusade of 1212. Despite hostility from the literate these crusades became so mytho-historicised in the written histories that they are some of the most highly remembered events transmitted by word of mouth from the period. That said "Children's Crusade" is not a precise definition. At the time the Latin pueri was used for children;peregrinatio, iter, expeditio, or crucesignatio were used for crusade.[51]

The many surviving written sources are of questionable accuracy. Dates and details are not consistent and they are interwoven with typical myth-history stories and ideas.[52] Clerical writing contrasted the imagined innocence of the pueri with the sexual license that was seen on the official crusades. It was the sin of the crusaders that was believed to bring God's displeasure and explain why the crusades were not successful.[53]

Perception of Muslims[edit]

The eight phases of the Song of Roland in one picture; illustration by Simon Marmion from an illuminated manuscript of the Grandes Chroniques de France (15th century), currently preserved in the Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg

Literature such as the 11th century chanson de geste Chanson de Roland did not explicitly mention the crusades. But is likely there were propaganda motivations behind presenting the Muslim characters in monstrous terms and as idolators. Whatever the motivation Christian writers continued to use these representations.[54] Muslim characters were described as evil and as less than human. Their physical appearance was described as devilish and they were represented as having dark skin. Islamic ritual was mocked and insults made to Mohammad. This caricature continued to be used long after the fighting over territory subsided. At no time was the noun Muslim used, instead Muslims were called Saracens. Other derogatory adjectives were also used, such as infidel, gentile, enemy of God, and pagan. This was literature that supported the church's opinion that the crusades were a Manichean contest between good and evil.[55] According to the historian Jean Flori the purpose behind this was for the church to be able to destroy its ideologically is competitors for the purpose of justifying Christianity entry into aggressive violent conflict.[56] This prejudice was not derived from ethnic identity or race. The church considered that all of humanity were descended from Adam and Eve. Typical of medieval opinion this was a social construct in which the differentiators were cultural. For example, the First Crusade Chroniclers adopted terminology inherited from the Greeks of antiquity. They use the ethnology-cultural term barbarae nationes or barbarians for the Muslims, and self-identified crusaders as Latins.[57]

As contact increased respect for the Turks developed. Gesta Francorum presents some negativity but also respect for them as opponents. It was considered values of chivalry were shared. In the Chanson d'Aspremont they were presnted as equals following the same codes of conduct. By the time of the Third Crusade the class differences were shown as within camps rather the between camps. The elite warrior class in both camps shared an identity that was not divided on religious or political groups. Epics began to include incidents of conversion to Christianity. This in part may have offered hope for a positive resolution at a time when military failure pointed to defeat.[58]

There remain a number of Crusade songs from the many crusaders who also wrote poetry such as Theobald I of Navarre, Folquet de Marselha, and Conon de Béthune. In return for patronage from the leaders of the crusades, poets wrote praising the ideals of the nobility.[59] These relationships were of a feudal nature and were presented in this context. To demonstrate this the crusaders were God's vassals fighting the restore to him the (Holy) land.[60] Muslims were presented as having stolen this land. Their mistreatment of its Christian inhabitants was considered an injustice for which revenge was required. In return, the perception of the Islamic polities resulted in an opposing position. This encouraged violent resistance to the idea of the imposition Christian governance on these terms.[61]

History[edit]

Illustration of the Council of Clermont
Illustration of the Council of Clermont, Jean Colombe, Les Passages d'Outremer, BnF Fr 5594, c. 1475

In the late 11th and early 12th century the papacy became an entity capable of organised violence in the same manner as secular kingdoms and principalities. This required command and control systems that were not always fully developed or efficient. The result was the papacy leading secular fighting forces for its own ends.[62]

This was begun by Pope Alexander II around 1159. He involved the papacy in the long running conflict with Muslims in the Mediterranean region. The church became involved in, and gave approval for, campaigns in Sicily, Spain and North Africa where the church worked with the republics of Pisa and Genoa.[63]

Urban II laid the foundations of the crusading movement at the Council of Clermont in 1095. He was responding to requests for military support from the Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos that he received during the earlier Council of Piacenza. Alexios was fighting Turkish people who were migrating into Anatolia, threatened Constantinople and had formed the Seljuk Empire. Urban expressed two key objectives for the crusade. Firstly, the freeing of Christians from Muslim rule. Secondly, freeing the church known as the Holy Sepulchre from Muslim control. This was believed to mark the location of Chris's tomb in Jerusalem.[64][2]

In the 12th century, Gratian and the Decretists elaborated on Augustinianism. Aquinas continued this in the 13th century.[65] This extended the reformers philosophy to end secular control of the Latin church and impose control over the Eastern Orthodox Church. It developed further the paradigm of working in the secular world for the imposition of what the church considered justice.[66] After the initial success of the early crusades the settlers who remained or later migrated were militarily vulnerable. During the 12th and 13th centuries, frequent supportive expeditions were required to maintain territory that had been gained. A cycle developed of military failure, pleas for support and declarations of crusades from the church.[67]

12th century[edit]

13th-century miniature of King Baldwin II granting the captured Al Aqsa Mosque to Hugues de Payens
13th-century miniature of Baldwin II of Jerusalem granting the captured Al Aqsa Mosque to Hugues de Payens

The success of the First Crusade that began the crusading movement and the century was seen as astonishing. The explanation for this was given that it was only possible through the will of God.[68] Paschal succeeded Urban as pope before news of the outcome reached Europe. He had experience of the fighting in Spain so readily applied similar remissions of sin to the combatants there, without the need for a pilgrimage to Jerusalem.[69] He did not stop there with the application of the institutions of crusading. He also did this against the Orthodox christians of Byzantium in favour of Bohemond I of Antioch for political reasons in Italy.[70]

It was in certain social and feudal networks that early crusade recruitment concentrated. Not only did these groups provide manpower, but also funding. Although it may have been pragmatic acceptance of the pressure of the reform movement that prompted the sales of churches and tithes. These families often had a history of pilgrimage, along with connections to Cluniac monasticism and the reformed papacy. They honoured the same saints. With inter-marriage this cultural mores were spread through society.[71] Paschal's successor Pope Calixtus II shared his Spanish interests. In 1123, at the First Council of the Lateran it was decided that crusading would be deployed in both Iberia and the Levant. The outcome was a campaign by Alfonso the Battler against Granada in 1125.[17][69]

The crusaders established polities known as the Latin East, because it was impossible to defend Jerusalem in isolation. Despite this, regular campaigns were required in addition to the capability provided by the military orders. In Spain further expeditions were launched in 1114, 1118, and 1122. Eugenius III developed an equivalence between fighting the Wends, fighting the Muslims in Spain and the Muslims in Syria. The later crusade failed, with the result that the movement suffered its largest crisis until the 1400s. Fighting continued in Spain where there was three campaigns and there was one in the East in 1177. But it was the news of the crusaders defeat by the Muslims at the Battle of Hattin that restored the energy and commitment of the movement.[17]

The Renaissance of the 12th century coincided with the early years of crusading. Crusading themes were the subject of developing vernacular literature in the languages of Western Europe. Examples of Epic poetry include the Chanson d'Antioche describing the events in the 1268 siege of Antioch and Canso de la Crozada about the crusading against the Cathars in Southern France. These are given the collective name of Chansons de geste in the French language which is borrowed from Latin for the term deeds done.[72] Surviving songs about Crusading are rarer. But there are examples in the literary language of southern France, Occitan, French, German, Spanish, and Italian that touch on the topic in an allegorical that date from the later half of the century. Two notable Occitan troubadours were Marcabru and Cercamon. They composed songs in the styles called sirventes and pastorela on the subject of lost love. Crusading wasn't a distinct genre, but the subject. The troubadours had northern French equivalents called Trouvère and German ones called Minnesänger. Collectively they left bodies of works themed on the crusades later in the century.[73] This material transmitted information about crusading unmediated by the church. It is reinforced the status quo, the class identity of the nobility and its position in society. When the outcomes of events was less positive this was also a method of spreading criticisms of organisation and behaviour.[74]

In the latter part of the century Europeans developed language, fashion and cultural mores for crusading. Terms were adopted for those involved such as crucesignatus or crucesignata. These indicated that they were marked by the cross. This was reinforced by cloth crosses that they attached to their clothes. All of this was taken from the Bible. Luke 9:23, Mark 8:34 and Matthew 16:24 all implored believers to pick up their cross and follow Christ.[75][76] It was a personal relationship with God that these crusaders were attempting to form. It demonstrated their belief. It enabled anyone to become involved, irrespective of gender, wealth, or social standing. This was imitatio Christi, an "imitation of Christ", a sacrifice motivated by charity for fellow Christians. It began to be considered that all those who died campaigning were martyrs.[77]

13th century[edit]

Jean de Mandeville is sent forth from England on his expedition by Edward II

Towards the end of the 12th century the crusading movement existed in a culture where is was believed that everything that happened was predestined, either by God or fate. This Providentialism meant that the population welcomed, accepted and believed in a wide range of prophecy. One significant example of this was the writing of Joachim of Fiore. He included the fighting of the infidel in opaque works that combined writings on the past, on the present, and on the future.[78] These works foreshadowed the Children's Crusade. Joachim believed all history and the future could be divided into three ages. The third of these was the age of the Holy Spirit. The representatives of this age were children, or pueri. Others aligned themselves to this idea. Salimbene and other Franciscans self described themselves as ordo parvulorum. This translates as order of little ones. Another example of this Apocalypticism can be seen in elements of the Austrian Rhymed Chronicle. In this apocalyptic mytho-history was melded to descriptions of the Children's Crusade. Innocent III built on this in 1213 announcing the end of Islam in the calls for the Fifth Crusade by announcing that the days of were over.[79]

The crusading movement found that creating a single accepted ideology and an understanding of that ideology was a practical challenge. This was because the church did not have the necessary bureaucratic systems to consolidate thinking across the papacy, the monastic orders, mendicant friars, and the developing universities.[80] Ideas were transmitted through inclusion in literary works that included romances, travelogues like Mandeville's Travels, poems such as Piers Plowman and John Gower's Confessio Amantis, and works by Geoffrey Chaucer.[81][82][83][84] At this point in time the ideas of nationalism were largely absent. A more atomised society meant that literature tended to rather praise individual deeds of heroes like Charlemagne and the actions of major families.[85] Innocent III developed new practices and revised the ideology of crusading from 1198 when he became pope. This included a new executive office constituted for the organisation of the Fourth Crusade. Executives were appointed in each church province in addition to autonomous preaching by the like of Fulk of Neuilly. This led to papal sanctioned provincial administrations and the codification of preaching. Local church authorities were required to report to these administrators on crusading policy. Propaganda was now more coherent despite an occasionally ad-hoc implementation.[86] Funding was increased through the introduction of hypothecated tax and greater donations.[18][19] He was also the first pope to deploy the apparatus of crusading against his fellow Christians.[20][21] This innovation became a frequent approach by the papacy that was used against those it considered dissenters, heretics, or schismatics.[87]

Popular crusading[edit]

In 1212 there was an outbreak of popular crusading that is now known as the Childrens' crusade. This was the first of a number of similar events which lasted until 1514 the Hungarian Peasants' Crusade. What these all had in common was that they were independent of the church. The first seems to have been a response to the preaching of the Albigensian Crusade and also religious processions seeking God's support for the fighting in Iberia. The church considered such outbreaks by rather unconventional crusaders as unauthorised and therefore illegitimate.[88] There is little remaining evidence for the identities, thoughts and feelings of those who took part.[89] One unaccredited piece is the Austrian Rhymed Chronical. This includes alledgedly verbatim lyrics of the marching song of children heading east and offers evidence of eschatological beliefs.[90] The church was unable to comprehend the charisma of impoverished secular leaders like Nicholas of Cologne and how this could be used in recruiting such large followings.[91] Modern academic opinion is split on the definition of a crusade. Riley-Smith disregards these popular uprisings as not meeting the criteria, while Gary Dickson has produced in depth research.[92]

Early century[edit]

In the years between 1217 and 1221 Cardinal Hugo Ugolino of Segni led preaching campaigns and helped relax controls on funding and recruitment. He used the five percent income tax on the church known as the "clerical twentieth" to pay mercenaries in the Fifth Crusade and other crucesignati.[93] In 1227, Hugo became pope and adopted the name Gregory IX.[94] He clashed with Frederick II over territory in Italy, excommunicating him in 1239 and deploying the crusading tools of indulgences, privileges, and taxes in 1241.[95][96] The Christian right to land ownership was foundational to crusading ideology, although Innocent IV acknowledged Muslim rights he considered these only existed under the authority of Christ.[97] Alexander IV continued the policies of both Gregory IX and Innocent IV from his ascension in 1254 which led to further crusading against the Hohenstaufen dynasty.[98]

Criticism[edit]

During 12th and 13th  centuries the concepts behind the crusading movement were rarely questioned, but there is evidence that practice was criticised. Events such as crusades against non-conforming Christians, the sack of Constantinople by the Fourth Crusade, crusading against the German Hohenstaufen dynsaty and the southern French Albigensian all drew condemnation. Questions were raised about the objectives of these and whether they were a distraction from the primary cause of fighting for the Holy Land. In particular, Occitan Troubadours expressed discontent with expeditions in their southern French homeland. Additionally, reports of sexual immorality, greed, and arrogance exhibited by crusaders was viewed as incompatible with the ideals of a holy war. This gave commentators excuses or reasons for failures and setbacks in what was otherwise considered God's work. In this was defeats experienced such as during the First Crusade, by Saladin at Hattin and the defeat of Louis IX of France at the Battle of Mansurah (1250) could be explained. Some, such as Gerhoh of Reichersberg, linked this to the expected coming of the Antichrist and increased puritanism. [99][100] This puritanism was the church's response to criticism, and included processions and reforms such as gambling bans and restrictions on women. Primary sources include the Würzburg Annals and Humbert of Romans's work De praedicatione crucis which translates as concerning the preaching of the cross. Crusaders were thought to have fallen under satanic influence and doubts were raised about forcible conversion.[101]

Later century[edit]

The movement continued developing innovative organisational financial methods. However in 1274 it faced a significant low.[102] In response the Second Council of Lyons initiated the search for new ideas> The response to which showed a resilience that would enable the continuation of the movement.[102] This was not without opposition. Matthew Paris in Chronica Majora and Richard of Mapham, the dean of Lincoln both raised note worthy concerns and the Teutonic Order for one, amongst others of the military orders were criticised for arrogance, greed, using their great wealth to pay for luxurious lifestyles, and an inadequate response in the Holy Land. Collaboration was difficult because of open conflict between the Templars and Hospitallers and among Christians in the Baltic. The autonomy of the orders was viewed in the church as leading to a loss of effectiveness in the East and overly friendlt relations with Muslims. A minority within the church including Roger Bacon made the case that aggression in areas like the Baltic actually hindered conversion.[103] Pope Gregory X developed the objective of reunification with the Greek church as an essential prerequisite for further crusades.[104] In planning the funding of this crusade he created a complex tax gathering regime by Latin Christendom into twenty-six collectorates, each directed by a general collector. In order to tackle fraud each collector would further delegate tax liability assessment. This system raised vast amounts which in turn prompted further clerical criticism of obligatory taxation.[105]

14th century[edit]

Start of the Directorium ad passagium faciendum, in a French translation by Jean de Vignay, from a manuscript of the 1330s

Between the councils of Lyon in 1274 and Vienna in 1314, there existed over twenty treatises concerning the recovery of the Holy Land. These were instigated by Popes who, following the lead of Innocent III, sought counsel on the matter. This led to unfulfilled strategies for the blockading Egypt and possible expeditions to establish a foothold that would pave the way for full-scale crusades with professional armies. Discussions among writers often revolved around the intricacies of Capetian and Aragonese dynastic politics. Periodic bursts of popular crusading occurred throughout the decades, spurred by events like the Mongol victory at Homs and grassroots movements in France and Germany. Despite numerous obstacles, the papacy's establishment of taxation, including a six-year tithe on clerical incomes, to fund contracted professional crusading armies, represented a remarkable feat of institutionalisation.[106]

Beginning in 1304 and lasting the entire 14th century, the Teutonic Order used the privileges Innocent IV had granted in 1245 to recruit crusaders in Prussia and Livonia, in the absence of any formal crusade authority. Knightly volunteers from every Catholic state in western Europe flocked to take part in campaigns known as Reisen, or journeys, as part of a chivalric cult.[107] Commencing in 1332, the numerous Holy Leagues in the form of temporary alliances between interested Christian powers, were a new manifestation of the movement. Successful campaigns included the capture of Smyrna in 1344, the Battle of Lepanto in 1571, and the recovery of territory in the Balkans between 1684 and 1697.[108]

After the Treaty of Brétigny between England and France, the anarchic political situation in Italy prompted the curia to begin issuing indulgences for those who would fight the merceneries threatening the pope and his court at Avignon. In 1378, the Western Schism split the papacy into two and then three, with rival Popes declaring crusades against each other. The growing threat from the Ottoman Turks provided a welcome distraction that would unite the papacy and divert the violence to another front.[109] By the end of the century, the Teutonic Order's Reisen had become obsolescent. Commoners had limited interaction with crusading beyond the preaching of indulgences, the success of which depended on the preacher's ability, local powers' attitudes, and the extent of promotion. However, there is no evidence that the failure to organize anti-Turkish crusading was due to popular apathy or hostility rather than to finance and politics.[110]

15th century[edit]

Eugenius IV became Pope in 1431 and entered into ecumenical negotiation with the Byzantine Empire. John V Palaiologos's discussions with Eugenius led to an announcement of unification of the Latin, Greek Orthodox, Armenian, Nestorian, and Cypriot Maronite churches. In return the Byzantines received military assistance. Between 1440 and 1444, Eugenius coordinated efforts to defend Constantinople from the Turks. However, this strategy failed in a disastrous defeat at the Battle of Varna in November 1444. The fall of Constantinople to Mehmed II in 1453 marked the beginning of a twenty-eight-year expansion of the sultanate.[111]

Pius II suggested to Mehmed II the possibility of converting to Christianity and emulating the legacy of Constantine. Despite coming close to organizing an anti-Turkish crusade in 1464, his plans ultimately failed. Throughout his papacy and those of his immediate successors, the raised funds and military resources were insufficient, poorly timed, or misallocated for effective action against the Turks. This was despite:

  • the commissioning of advisory tracts reconsidering the political, financial, and military issues;
  • Frankish rulers exiled from the Holy Land who toured Christendom's courts seeking assistance;
  • individuals, such as Cardinal Bessarion, dedicating themselves to the crusading movement; and
  • the continued levying of church taxes and preaching of indulgences.[112]

Warfare was now more professional and costly.[110] This was driven by factors including contractual recruitment, increased intelligence and espionage, a greater emphasis on naval warfare, the grooming of alliances, new and varied tactics to deal with different circumstances and opposition, and the hiring of experts in siege warfare.[113] There was disillusionment and suspicion of how practical the objectives of the movements were. Lay sovereigns were more independent and prioritized their own objectives. The political authority of the papacy was reduced by the Western Schism, so popes such as Pius II and Innocent VIII found their congresses ignored. Politics and self-interest wrecked any plans. All of Europe acknowledged the need for a crusade to combat the Ottoman Empire, but effectively all blocked its formation. Popular feeling is difficult to judge: actual crusading had long since become distant from most commoners' lives. One example from 1488 saw Wageningen parishioners influenced by their priest's criticism of crusading to such a degree they refused to allow the collectors to take away donations. This contrasts with chronicle accounts of successful preaching in Erfurt at the same time and the extraordinary response for a crusade to relieve Belgrade in 1456.[110]

Around the end of the 15th century, the military orders were transformed. Castile nationalized its orders between 1487 and 1499. In 1523, the Hospitallers retreated from Rhodes to Crete and Sicily and in 1530 to Malta and Gozo. The State of the Teutonic Order became the hereditary Duchy of Prussia when the last Prussian master, Albrecht of Brandenburg-Ansbach, converted to Lutheranism and became the first duke under oath to his uncle the Polish king.[114]

16th century[edit]

In the 16th century, the rivalry between Catholic monarchs prevented anti-Protestant crusades, but individual military actions were rewarded with crusader privileges, including Irish Catholic rebellions against English Protestant rule and the Spanish Armada's attack on England under Queen Elizabeth I.[115] In 1562, Cosimo I de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany, became the hereditary Grand Master of the Order of Saint Stephen, a Tuscan military order he founded, which was modelled on the knights of Malta.[116] The Hospitallers remained the only independent military order with a positive strategy. Other orders continued as aristocratic corporations while lay powers absorbed local orders, outposts, and priories.[117]

17th century and later[edit]

Crusading continued in the 17th century, mainly associated with the Hapsburgs and the Spanish national identity. Crusade indulgences and taxation were used in support of the Cretan War (1645–1669), the Battle of Vienna, and the Holy League (1684). Although the Hospitallers continued the military orders in the 18th century, the crusading movement soon ended in terms of acquiescence, popularity, and support.[118]

The French Revolution resulted in widespread confiscations from the military orders, which were now largely irrelevant, apart from minor effects in the Hapsburg Empire.[117] The Hospitallers continued acting as a military order from its territory in Malta until the island was conquered by Napoleon in 1798.[108][119] In 1809, Napoleon went on to suppress the Order of St Stephen, and the Teutonic Order was stripped of its German possessions before relocating to Vienna. At this point, its identity as a military order ended.[116]

In 1936, the Catholic church in Spain supported the coup of Francisco Franco, declaring a crusade against Marxism and atheism. Thirty-six years of National Catholicism followed, during which the idea of Reconquista as a foundation of historical memory, celebration, and Spanish national identity became entrenched in conservative circles. Reconquista lost its historiographical hegemony when Spain restored democracy in 1978, but it remains a fundamental definition of the medieval period within conservative sectors of academia, politics, and the media because of its strong ideological connotations.[120]

Legacy[edit]

The crusading movement left an enduring legacy, defining western culture in the late medieval period and leaving an historical impact on the Islamic world. The impact touched every aspect of European life.[121]

Historians have debated whether the Latin States created by the movement in the Eastern Europe were the first examples of European colonialism. The Outremer is the name that is often used for these states. This translates as a Europe Overseas.[44][122] In mid-19th century historiography this became a focus for European nationalism and associated with European colonialism.[123][124] This is a view that was contested. The Latin settlements did not easily fit to the model of a colony. They were neither directly controlled or exploited by a homeland. Historians have used the idea of a religious colony in order to accommodate these discrepancies in their colonial theories. A different definition covers a territory conquered and settled with religious motivation. This territory maintains close contact with its homeland, share the same religious views and requires support in both military and financial terms. Venetian Greece carved out of the Byzantine Empire as a result of the crusading movement following the Fourth Crusade offers a better match to the traditional model of colonialism. Venice had a political and economic stake in these territories. Indeed, this was to such a degree that the region attracted settlers that would otherwise migrated to the Latin East. It this way its success actually weakened the crusader states.[125]

The crusading movement created a flourishing system of trade in the Mediterranean. New routes were created to serve the Outremer with Genoa and Venice planting profitable trading outposts across the region. [126] Many historians argue that the increasingly frequent contact between the Latin Christian and Islamic cultures was a positive. It was foundational in the progress of European civilisation and the Renaissance.[127] Closer contact with the Muslim and Byzantine worlds enabled access for western European scholars to classical Greek and Roman texts. This led to the rediscovery by pre-Christian philosophy, science, and medicine.[128] It is difficult to identify exactly the source of cultural interchange. The increase of knowledge of Islamic culture was the result of contact that stretched the breadth of the Mediterranean Sea.[129]

The movement enabled the papacy to consolidate its leadership of the Latin church. The clergy became inured to violence, while the church developed closer links with feudalism and military capability.[44] The Medieval Inquisition, Dominican and military orders as were all institutionalised.[130] A catalyst for the Reformation was the growing opposition to developments in the use of indulgences.[131] Relations between western Christians, the Greeks and the Muslims were also soured by the behaviour of the crusaders. These differences became an enduring barrier between the Latin, the Orthodox and Islamic worlds. The crusading movement had a reputation of a defeated aggressor and unification of the Christian churches became problematic.[44] Political Islam makes historical parallels, provoking paradigms of jihad and struggle. Arab nationalism looks on the movement as an example of Western imperialism.[132] Thinkers, politicians, and historians in the Islamic world draw an equivalence with more recent events like the League of Nations mandates to govern Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, and the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine.[133] An opposing analogy has developed in Western world right-wing circles. Here, Christianity is considered to be under an similar existential Islamic religious and demographic threat. The result is anti-Islamic rhetoric and symbols. This provides an argument for a contest with a religious foe.[134] Thomas F. Madden argues that these modern tensions are the result of constructed view developed during the 19th century by the colonial powers. This in turn led to the rise of Arab nationalism. For Madden, the crusading movement is a defensive and solely medieval phenomenon.[135]

Historiography[edit]

Almost immediately, the First Crusade provoked literary examination. Initially this served as propaganda for the crusading movement and was based on a few separate but related works. One of these, Gesta Francorum literally translates as the deeds of the Franks. It created a template for later works based on papal, northern French, and Benedictine ideas. It considered military success or failure entirely to God's will in its promotion of violent action.[136]

Albert of Aachen produced contrasting vernacular stories of adventure.[137] At this point the early chroniclers concentrated on the moral lessons that could be taken from the crusades. This reinforced normative moral and cultural positions.[138] Academic crusade historian Paul Chevedden argued that the early accounts were already an anachronism. The writers were writing with the knowledge of the unexpected success of the First Crusade. For Chevedden, more can be learned about how the crusading movement was viewed in the 11th century in the works of Urban II who died ignorant of the crusade's success.[139] Albert's adventure stories were developed and extended in turn by William of Tyre before the end of the 12th century.[137] William documented the early history of the military Crusader States. In this he illustrated the tension between secular and providential motivation.[137]

In the 16th century the Reformation and the Ottoman expansion shaped opinion. Protestant martyrologist John Foxe writing in his 1566 work History of the Turks blamed the sins of the Catholic Church for the failure of the crusades. He also criticised the use of crusading against those he considered had maintained the faith, such as the Albigensians and Waldensians. The Lutheran scholar Matthew Dresser (1536–1607) went further. He praised for their faith, but considered that Urban II was motivated by his conflict with Emperor Henry IV. Dresser considered that the flaw in the crusading movement was that the idea of restoring the physical holy places was "detestable superstition".[140] One of the first to number the crusades was the French Catholic lawyer Étienne Pasquier. His suggestion was that there were six. In his work he highlighted the failures. In addition he raised the damage that religious conflict had inflicted on France and the church. The key points were the victims of papal aggression, the sale of indulgences, abuses in the church, corruption, and conflicts at home.[141]

Age of Enlightenment philosopher-historians such as David Hume, Voltaire and Edward Gibbon used crusading as a conceptual tool to critique religion, civilisation and cultural mores. For them the positives effects of crusading, such as the increasing liberty that municipalities were able to purchase from feudal lords, were only by-products. This view was then criticised in the 19th century by crusade enthusiasts as being unnecessarily hostile to, and ignorant of, the crusades.[142] Alternatively, Claude Fleury and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz proposed that the crusades were one stage in the improvement of European civilisation; that paradigm was further developed by the Rationalists.[143]

The idea that the crusades were an important part of national history and identity continued to evolve. In scholarly literature, the term "holy war" was replaced by the neutral German kreuzzug and French croisade.[144] Gibbon followed Thomas Fuller in dismissing the concept that the crusades were a legitimate defence, as they were disproportionate to the threat presented; Palestine was an objective, not because of reason but because of fanaticism and superstition.[145] William Robertson expanded on Fleury in a new, empirical, objective approach, placing crusading in a narrative of progress towards modernity. The cultural consequences of growth in trade, the rise of the Italian cities and progress are elaborated in his work. In this he influenced his student Walter Scott.[146] Much of the popular understanding of the crusades derives from the 19th century novels of Scott and the French histories by Joseph François Michaud.[147] Michaud's viewpoint provoked Muslim attitudes. Previously, the crusading movement had aroused little interest among Islamic and Arabic scholars. This changed with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the penetration of European power into the Eastern Mediterrarean.[132]

In a 2001 article—"The Historiography of the Crusades"—Giles Constable attempted to categorise what is meant by "Crusade" into four areas of contemporary crusade study. His view was that Traditionalists such as Hans Eberhard Mayer are concerned with where the crusades were aimed, Pluralists such as Jonathan Riley-Smith concentrate on how the crusades were organised, Popularists including Paul Alphandery and Etienne Delaruelle focus on the popular groundswells of religious fervour, and Generalists, such as Ernst-Dieter Hehl focus on the phenomenon of Latin holy wars.[148][149] The historian Thomas F. Madden argues that modern tensions are the result of a constructed view of the crusades created by colonial powers in the 19th century and transmitted into Arab nationalism. For him the crusades are a medieval phenomenon in which the crusaders were engaged in a defensive war on behalf of their co-religionists.[135]

The Byzantines harboured a negative perspective on holy warfare, failing to grasp the concept of the Crusades and finding them repugnant. Although some initially embraced Westerners due to a common Christianity, their trust soon waned. With a pragmatic approach, the Byzantines prioritised strategic locations such as Antioch over sentimental objectives like Jerusalem. They couldn't comprehend the merging of pilgrimage and warfare. The advocacy for infidel eradication by St. Bernard and the militant role of the Templars would deeply shock them. Suspicions arose among the Byzantines that Westerners aimed for imperial conquest, leading to growing animosity. Despite occasionally using the term "holy war" in historical contexts, Byzantine conflicts were not inherently holy but perceived as just, defending the empire and Christian faith. War, to the Byzantines, was justified solely for the defence of the empire, in contrast to Muslim expansionist ideals and Western knights' notion of holy warfare to glorify Christianity.[150]

Scholars like Carole Hillenbrand assert that within the broader context of Muslim historical events, the Crusades were considered a marginal issue when compared to the collapse of the Caliphate, the Mongol invasions, and the rise of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, supplanting Arab rule.[151] Arab historians, influenced by historical opposition to Turkish control over their homelands, adopted a Western perspective on the Crusades.[151] Syrian Christians proficient in Arabic played a vital role by translating French histories into Arabic. The first modern biography of Saladin was authored by the Ottoman Turk Namık Kemal in 1872, while the Egyptian Sayyid Ali al-Hariri produced the initial Arabic history of the Crusades in response to Kaiser Wilhelm II's visit to Jerusalem in 1898.[152] The visit triggered a renewed interest in Saladin, who had previously been overshadowed by more recent leaders like Baybars. The reinterpretation of Saladin as a hero against Western imperialism gained traction among nationalist Arabs, fueled by anti-imperialist sentiment.[153] The intersection of history and contemporary politics is evident in the development of ideas surrounding jihad and Arab nationalism. Historical parallels between the Crusades and modern political events, such as the establishment of Israel in 1948, have been drawn.[133] In contemporary Western discourse, right-wing perspectives have emerged, viewing Christianity as under threat analogous to the Crusades, using crusader symbols and anti-Islamic rhetoric for propaganda purposes.[134] Madden argues that Arab nationalism absorbed a constructed view of the Crusades created by colonial powers in the 19th century, contributing to modern tensions. Madden suggests that the crusading movement, from a medieval perspective, engaged in a defensive war on behalf of co-religionists.[135]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. xxiii.
  2. ^ a b Riley-Smith 1995, p. 1.
  3. ^ a b Bull 1995, p. 26.
  4. ^ Morris 1989, pp. 80–81.
  5. ^ Barber 2012, pp. 93–94.
  6. ^ Morris 1989, p. 80.
  7. ^ Morris 1989, p. 82.
  8. ^ Latham 2012, p. 110.
  9. ^ Morris 1989, p. 144.
  10. ^ Latham 2011, pp. 240–241.
  11. ^ Latham 2012, pp. 128–129.
  12. ^ a b Tyerman 2011, p. 61.
  13. ^ Latham 2012, p. 123.
  14. ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 69–70.
  15. ^ Riley-Smith 1995b, p. 80.
  16. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 3.
  17. ^ a b c Riley-Smith 1995, p. 2.
  18. ^ a b Tyerman 2019, pp. 235–237.
  19. ^ a b Asbridge 2012, pp. 524–525.
  20. ^ a b Asbridge 2012, pp. 533–535.
  21. ^ a b Tyerman 2019, pp. 238–239.
  22. ^ Tyerman 2011, pp. 40–41.
  23. ^ Tyerman 2006, p. 919.
  24. ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 439–440.
  25. ^ a b Tyerman 2019, pp. 14–16, 338, 359.
  26. ^ Latham 2012, p. 98.
  27. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 14.
  28. ^ Asbridge 2012, p. 16.
  29. ^ Madden 2013, p. 15.
  30. ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 14–15.
  31. ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 195–198.
  32. ^ Latham 2012, p. 121.
  33. ^ Morris 1989, pp. 150, 335.
  34. ^ Bull 1995, p. 22.
  35. ^ Lloyd 1995, pp. 43–44.
  36. ^ Honig 2001, pp. 113–114.
  37. ^ Morris 1989, pp. 335–336.
  38. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 53.
  39. ^ Riley-Smith 1995, p. 50, 64.
  40. ^ Riley-Smith 1995b, p. 84.
  41. ^ Prawer 2001, p. 252.
  42. ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 168–169.
  43. ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 169–170.
  44. ^ a b c d Davies 1997, p. 359.
  45. ^ a b Riley-Smith 1995, pp. 8–9.
  46. ^ Bull 1995, p. 25.
  47. ^ Lloyd 1995, pp. 46–48.
  48. ^ Morris 1989, pp. 458, 495.
  49. ^ Housley 1995, p. 263.
  50. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. xxv.
  51. ^ Dickson 2008, p. xiii.
  52. ^ Dickson 2008, pp. 9–14.
  53. ^ Dickson 2008, p. 24.
  54. ^ Routledge 1995, p. 93
  55. ^ Jubb 2005, pp. 227–229.
  56. ^ Jubb 2005, p. 232.
  57. ^ Jubb 2005, p. 226.
  58. ^ Jubb 2005, pp. 234–235.
  59. ^ Routledge 1995, pp. 94–95.
  60. ^ Routledge 1995, pp. 97.
  61. ^ Latham 2012, p. 120.
  62. ^ Latham 2012, p. 117.
  63. ^ Morris 1989, p. 147.
  64. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 65, 69-70.
  65. ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 14, 21.
  66. ^ Latham 2012, p. 118.
  67. ^ Riley-Smith 1995, p. 36.
  68. ^ Riley-Smith 1995b, pp. 78–80.
  69. ^ a b Tyerman 2019, p. 293.
  70. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 335.
  71. ^ Riley-Smith 1995b, p. 87.
  72. ^ Routledge 1995, pp. 91–92.
  73. ^ Routledge 1995, pp. 93–94.
  74. ^ Routledge 1995, p. 111.
  75. ^ Morris 1989, p. 478.
  76. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 2.
  77. ^ Buck 2020, p. 298.
  78. ^ Barber 2012, p. 408.
  79. ^ Dickson 2008, pp. 24–26.
  80. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 20.
  81. ^ Madden 2013, p. 155.
  82. ^ Housley 2002, p. 29.
  83. ^ Mannion 2014, p. 21.
  84. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 330.
  85. ^ Richard 2005, p. 207.
  86. ^ Riley-Smith 1995, p. 46.
  87. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 336.
  88. ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 258–260.
  89. ^ Riley-Smith 1995b, pp. 66–67.
  90. ^ Dickson 2008, p. 14.
  91. ^ Dickson 2008, p. 101-102.
  92. ^ Tyerman 2011, p. 223.
  93. ^ Tyerman 2006, p. 620.
  94. ^ Tyerman 2006, p. 648.
  95. ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 351–352.
  96. ^ Jotischky 2004, p. 211.
  97. ^ Jotischky 2004, pp. 256–257.
  98. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 352.
  99. ^ Tyerman 2006, p. 247.
  100. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 28.
  101. ^ Tyerman 2019, p. 314.
  102. ^ a b Housley 1995, p. 260.
  103. ^ Forey 1995, p. 211.
  104. ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 399–401.
  105. ^ Riley-Smith 1995, p. 57.
  106. ^ Housley 1995, pp. 262–265.
  107. ^ Housley 1995, p. 275.
  108. ^ a b Riley-Smith 1995, p. 4.
  109. ^ Housley 1995, p. 270.
  110. ^ a b c Housley 1995, p. 281.
  111. ^ Housley 1995, p. 279.
  112. ^ Housley 1995, pp. 279–280.
  113. ^ Housley 1995, p. 264.
  114. ^ Luttrell 1995, pp. 348.
  115. ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 358–359.
  116. ^ a b Luttrell 1995, p. 352.
  117. ^ a b Luttrell 1995, p. 364.
  118. ^ Housley 1995, p. 293.
  119. ^ Luttrell 1995, p. 360.
  120. ^ García-Sanjuán 2018, p. 4
  121. ^ Riley-Smith 1995, pp. 4–5, 36.
  122. ^ Morris 1989, p. 282.
  123. ^ Madden 2013, p. 227.
  124. ^ Tyerman 2011, pp. 4–5.
  125. ^ Phillips 1995, pp. 112–113.
  126. ^ Housley 2006, pp. 152–154.
  127. ^ Nicholson 2004, p. 96.
  128. ^ Nicholson 2004, pp. 93–94.
  129. ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 667–668.
  130. ^ Strayer 1992, p. 143.
  131. ^ Housley 2006, pp. 147–149.
  132. ^ a b Asbridge 2012, pp. 675–680.
  133. ^ a b Asbridge 2012, pp. 674–675.
  134. ^ a b Koch 2017, p. 1.
  135. ^ a b c Madden 2013, pp. 204–205.
  136. ^ Tyerman 2011, pp. 8–12.
  137. ^ a b c Tyerman 2011, pp. 16–17.
  138. ^ Tyerman 2011, p. 32.
  139. ^ Chevedden 2013, p. 13.
  140. ^ Tyerman 2011, pp. 38–42.
  141. ^ Tyerman 2011, pp. 47–50.
  142. ^ Tyerman 2011, p. 79.
  143. ^ Tyerman 2011, p. 67.
  144. ^ Tyerman 2011, p. 71.
  145. ^ Tyerman 2011, p. 87.
  146. ^ Tyerman 2011, pp. 80–86.
  147. ^ Tyerman 2019, pp. 448–449, 454.
  148. ^ Tyerman 2011, pp. 225–226.
  149. ^ Constable 2001, pp. 1–22.
  150. ^ Dennis 2001, pp. 31–40.
  151. ^ a b Hillenbrand 1999, p. 5.
  152. ^ Asbridge 2012, pp. 675–677.
  153. ^ Riley-Smith 2009, pp. 6–66.

Bibliography[edit]

Further reading[edit]