User talk:Anonymous Dissident: Difference between revisions
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Signpost: 27 June 2011: new section |
→Anime World Order Deletion: new section |
||
| Line 978: | Line 978: | ||
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 00:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)</div> |
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 00:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0153 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0153 --> |
||
== Anime World Order Deletion == |
|||
In the past, the page for the Anime World Order Podcast was deleted as the subject was deemed too trivial or not notable enough. Since the article was deleted, the podcast has since won the Parsec Award for best anime podcast the final year that they had the award.<ref>http://www.parsecawards.com/past-awards/2009-parsec-award-winners-finalists/</ref> They have also been guests regularly on industry podcasts such as ANNCast and have been listed as one of the most popular and respected anime podcasts on the internet<ref>http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=most%20popular%20anime%20podcasts&fp=1&cad=b</ref><ref>http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AnimeWorldOrder</ref> I believe this makes them notable enough to have their own page |
|||
[[User:Sevds|Sevds]] ([[User talk:Sevds|talk]]) 17:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:30, 29 June 2011
| ||
|
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Template:RFAq has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:28, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
| |||
Question
On the 2011 AO page what do you think of the diagrams. I think these are highly un needed since we have draw pages and are as redundent as the day by day summaries which you've rightly AFD. Just wanted to know what you thought as I am trying to get it to GA/FA standard but will probably have to remove the two things I've already mentioned and wanted some support before I did. KnowIG (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hello. I agree that they're redundant, so I support their removal. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
SUL help
Hi AnonDis. I need your help. Long ago you helped me clean my global account, since then all went smoothly, and I had an awesomely clean global account (created I think Dec 2009). But as you can see in the link, the SUL account doesn't exist anymore. Before its magical disappearance, I owned all "Rehman" account on all wikis... Is this a temporary glitch? Or did someone click the wrong button somewhere? Rehman 13:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Rehman. I think it must have been a temporary problem, because it looks fine to me now. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yup, looks normal. Thanks for your response. Warm regards. Rehman 02:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
awesome
way cool Decora (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors
Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.
If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE.
I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Added template for SuggestBot
Hi,
Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.
We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.
We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.
If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
|
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
|
Ling.Nut2 --> Ling.Nut.temp; Ling.Nut --> Ling.Nut2
- Hi there! I've heard you're a bureaucrat. I scrambled the password of Ling.Nut; am wondering if a CHU could restore my contribs to an account I can edit etc. If you wish to verify that I'm me, you can send an email to Ling.Nut from that user page... Many thanks, your friend, – Ling.Nut 03:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, Cymru.lass just pointed out the "send new password" button, which I had never noticed... clicked it; no reply yet but am waiting. Thanks! – Ling.Nut 03:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, sure. Give me a shout if that doesn't work for you. Kind regards, —Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- I pushed the "send me a new password" button, and a Wikipedia message came up that said one had been sent, but nothing arrived in my email account. I checked my junk mail too, of course. I'll try again once I'm sure 24 hours has elapsed (I'm afraid there may be some anti-vandalism code or something for excessive use of that button...) – Ling.Nut 05:01, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, sure. Give me a shout if that doesn't work for you. Kind regards, —Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, Cymru.lass just pointed out the "send new password" button, which I had never noticed... clicked it; no reply yet but am waiting. Thanks! – Ling.Nut 03:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Bot flag request
Could you please place a bot flag on the account: User:SCG01Bot Thanks. Jessy T/C 21:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Actually, you have to file a WP:BRFA to be the bot flag. —GFOLEY FOUR— 22:13, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:18, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)
|
WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011
For our freedom and yours Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper). Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:
This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools! With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself? You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC) |
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
We Are Defiance, Brian Calzini and Trust In Few
Hello Anonymous Dissident,
can you protect these article for new users and not registrated people because on the articles We Are Defiance and Brian Calzini someone meant to publish untrue informations and invectives against the singer. Please request my wish on my Discussion page. Have a nice evening Goroth (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
|
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
Awarded Barnstar
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| For all your contributions and hard work on the encyclopedia, I am pleased to present Anonymous Dissident with this Tireless Contributor Barnstar. — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 07:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:18, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Slam time again
Hi there. I notice that during the 2011 Australian Open you attempted to delete the day to day article and advised the removal of another silly table thing. Well guess what there back on the 2011 French Open page. I have been bold and removed both and we have a load of people going I like and nothing else. None of whom can come up with a constructive reason why they should be kept. Your view on why it is not suitable for wikipedia would be suitable here 400 not out (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hooray!
Glad you're back! I hope you had a good time on your vacation. :) Acalamari 12:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hey Acalamari! It's good to be back, and I had a fantastic time in Europe. Thanks for the welcome back. My activity's still low these days because of school, but given time I'm sure I'll re-enter the fold. :-) —Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm glad to see you back as well :) —Disavian (talk/contribs) 20:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Anonymous Dissiden
You may not remember me, as it's literally been years since we've last spoken. I've recently decided to try to become active in Wikipedia again. However, things are much different than before. If you DO have a valid memory of me, you would remember how mutilated my grammar and punctuation was. Honestly, it's been about five years. I created this account underage which I'm pretty sure is a violation with the ToS. Aside from that, it'd be great hearing from you again and it'd be splendid if we both cooperated in editing articles like before. notactive (talk) 02:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hello Pendo, and welcome back. I do remember you, but it's clear you've changed somewhat since our last encounter. I'm always happy to hear about new and returning contributors; if you need help with anything as you re-enter the community, feel free to ask. Due to the pressures of my final year at high school, I'm not as active as I used to be and have not undertaken substantial editing projects for quite some time. My interest in Wikipedia hasn't waned, though, and I anticipate a return to full activity by November. It's good to hear from you. Cheers, —Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:34, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
|
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 June 2011
- News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft
- Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page
- Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case
- Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news
Ur message on my talk page
Hi AD. You posted quite rudely on my talk page "stop trolling at RD .. your continuous rudeness won't be tolerated .. you'll be blocked for a week"? A week? Really? Please don't say I'm trolling here because I just want to understand what I've done wrong. I explained to FBN what Parseval's identity is. You have no right absolutely to delete what I said and nor do you have a right to harrass me on my talk page. If you're unhappy, then please come to my talk page like a civil person and explain what you're unhappy about. Have you heard of WP:AGF? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.2.4.186 (talk) 09:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Also please read this excerpt of what I wrote:
You can thank me later for it but I'll tell you Parseval's identity. It's more conceptual to think of L^2 the space of measurable square-integrable functions on [-pi,pi] as a complex inner product space (Hilbert space). The idea is that the space has an orthonormal basis (general orthornormal basis can be found by wavelets) such as {e^{-in}} for n an integer. And if f is a function in L^2 you can take its inner product against each of these functions and get "components" of f. The point is, as you'd expect in any Hilbert space, the components are the only relevant data when it comes to taking inner products. So you can find the inner product (an integral) of two functions just by knowing their Fourier coefficients. Pretty cool math dude? So basically I advise you to find the Fourier coefficients of the function "x" on [-pi,pi] and take the inner product of this function with itself and apply Parseval. The PROOF of Parseval is probably well beyond the scope of your education; you'll see it when you get to university. It involves proving the completeness of the trigonometric system (in the L^2 case) which can be done nicely with convolution but I'll save the details to your lecturers at first year undergrad. uni.
I notice you said that you didn't know what "Fourier series" is and it shows since if you did know you'd see that the above is perfectly correct math. Feel free to consult anyone. But don't remove perfectly legitimate math just because you don't understand it. I don't want to insult you but I find you're insulting me by deleting text because you don't understand it.
For example Slawomir himself said I made a valid point. Did you read that? So I'm not a troll.
More Details
Hi Annonymous Dissident. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Please do note, however, that the edits made by my IP in May were not by me. my IP is dynamic and likely I got the Ip assigned by another user. Thanks for your efforts in this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.2.4.186 (talk) 12:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Reinstatement of post by 49.2.4.186 on WP:RD/MA
I moved this thread from my Talk page. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Cuddlyable. Could I ask you to justify your re-insertion of a portion of 49.2.4.186's post on the mathematics reference desk? You've labelled it "non-inflammatory" in your edit summary, but reading carefully you'll see it still constitutes a jab at Fly By Night. The mathematical content of the post is of little worth anyway, in view of the OP's question ("...does not use Fourier series"). The IP has perpetrated similar obnoxiousness as recently as mid-May; I think that allowing any part of his comment to remain is "feeding the trolls", so to speak. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- After deleting 49.2.4.186's first paragraph that we certainly agree was inflammatory, I understood that 49.2.4.186 feels a need to explain Parseval's identity and decided that part is acceptable in the discussion. I see the jab remaining towards Flyby Night but in mitigation 49.2.4.186 had offered a reference that looks valid to me and received a rebuff for the effort, plus scepticism about whose the PDF is. Posts in small font are often frivolous anyway. I was not aware of a previous pattern of behaviour by this IP but I see that they are communicating in the section above. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Cuddlybabe! I don't understand why I'm being harrassed by Annonymous dissidude. I'm a mathematician probably more knowledgeable than him, what right does he have to boss me around? Besides I have every right to post Parseval's identity where I want to. FBN is allowed to accuse me and I'm not allowed to defend myself? Where's the freedom of speech? Anyways, please note that the pattern of behavior of "this IP" is not due to me. The edits there due to me are only for the June month. The other edits are probably by some other dude whose IP came back to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.2.4.186 (talk) 12:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Cuddlyable, the rebuff was in response to this out-of-the-blue jab; where it is suggested that I "brush up on the theory of integration". The sceptisim of the authorship of the PDF was well founded, because the IP admitted here that s/he didn't write it. — Fly by Night (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- To 49.2.4.186, the mitigation that I mentioned is not an exoneration. The issue with your post is civility, not the math. The latter looks appropriate but what I have seen of the former is not. I would find it hard to reconcile your apology "Sorry for the misunderstanding" above with complaint alleging harrasment and bossing posted just 11 minutes later. As this page belongs to Anonymous Dissident I advise you to respond considerately to Anonymous Dissident, who is tasked as an Admin here, without mocking anyone's name or their education as you see it. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hear, Hear! Just to add that Anonymous Dissident is both an administrator and a bureaucrat[1]. So he's not the kind of user that you should be insulting if you want to have a long Wikipedia career. — Fly by Night (talk) 14:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- FBN I'm not an idiot. Not that you suggested that but I can change my IP VERY EASILY. So if I'm blocked I'll just reset my IP and come back again. I'm not afraid of anyone. And I have every right to argue against a moderator. If he blocks me I'll take him to court and take legal action against the b*ugger. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.2.4.186 (talk) 01:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- See WP:LEGAL. I support Anonymous Dissident if s/he takes the action that the above makes inevitable. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 09:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- FBN I'm not an idiot. Not that you suggested that but I can change my IP VERY EASILY. So if I'm blocked I'll just reset my IP and come back again. I'm not afraid of anyone. And I have every right to argue against a moderator. If he blocks me I'll take him to court and take legal action against the b*ugger. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.2.4.186 (talk) 01:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hear, Hear! Just to add that Anonymous Dissident is both an administrator and a bureaucrat[1]. So he's not the kind of user that you should be insulting if you want to have a long Wikipedia career. — Fly by Night (talk) 14:15, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- To 49.2.4.186, the mitigation that I mentioned is not an exoneration. The issue with your post is civility, not the math. The latter looks appropriate but what I have seen of the former is not. I would find it hard to reconcile your apology "Sorry for the misunderstanding" above with complaint alleging harrasment and bossing posted just 11 minutes later. As this page belongs to Anonymous Dissident I advise you to respond considerately to Anonymous Dissident, who is tasked as an Admin here, without mocking anyone's name or their education as you see it. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Alison has already blocked the IP for his offences. I suggest we all step away from the issue. He's now a known quantity who distinguishes himself by the mathematical nature of his editing (in particular, I strongly sense that the actions in May were from him, given this fact). —Anonymous DissidentTalk 13:31, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:18, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 June 2011
- News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet
The Signpost: 27 June 2011
- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Anime World Order Deletion
In the past, the page for the Anime World Order Podcast was deleted as the subject was deemed too trivial or not notable enough. Since the article was deleted, the podcast has since won the Parsec Award for best anime podcast the final year that they had the award.[1] They have also been guests regularly on industry podcasts such as ANNCast and have been listed as one of the most popular and respected anime podcasts on the internet[2][3] I believe this makes them notable enough to have their own page Sevds (talk) 17:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)