Jump to content

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m 22 users left. rm Spode Works project (blocked indef by Orangemike (ABD)). 1 comment(s) removed.
No edit summary
Line 78: Line 78:
*{{user-uaa|1=AFIAfeedfolks}} – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. User has submitted [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Feed Industry Association (AFIA)]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Feed Industry Association]] which coupled with the user name suggests a significant conflict of interest in editing.. [[User:Hasteur|Hasteur]] ([[User talk:Hasteur|talk]]) 15:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=AFIAfeedfolks}} – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. User has submitted [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Feed Industry Association (AFIA)]] and [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Feed Industry Association]] which coupled with the user name suggests a significant conflict of interest in editing.. [[User:Hasteur|Hasteur]] ([[User talk:Hasteur|talk]]) 15:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
::{{UAA|afc}} [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 23:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
::{{UAA|afc}} [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 23:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

*{{user-uaa|1=Damuthafukka}} – Violation of u-pol as an obscene and disruptive username. [[Special:Contributions/216.11.222.26|216.11.222.26]] ([[User talk:216.11.222.26|talk]]) 13:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:35, 11 July 2013

    Usernames for administrator attention

    This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

    1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
    2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
    3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
    4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
    5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
    6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
    7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
    This page was last updated at 14:26 on 3 September 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
    Note: Patrollers are kindly asked to monitor usernames listed at Filter 102, Filter 149, Filter 188, Filter 354 (tags), WP:UAA/HP, and CAT:UAA.


    User-reported

    afc Their last edits, anyway. Daniel Case (talk) 23:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    afc Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I think this user may just be confused and trying to do things the right way. Daniel Case (talk) 23:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: I would lay off this unless they add, say, spam links or something indicating that they are doing in this in some sort of official capacity. Daniel Case (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Question: Is this him or someone trying to impersonate him? I'm not sure. Daniel Case (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    User has requested a username change. Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Question: Where's the name violation? I can't see it. Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Name isn't a close enough match. Daniel Case (talk) 23:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Daniel Case (talk) 23:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Not offensive in this context. And I doubt they'll edit again. Daniel Case (talk) 23:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. I don't see what the problem is. Daniel Case (talk) 23:41, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    afc Daniel Case (talk) 23:42, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    User has requested a username change.Mitch32(Wikipedia's worst Reform Luddite.) 23:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Question: Linked page is a placeholder. And where, exactly, does the name show in the edits? Daniel Case (talk) 23:47, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    afc Daniel Case (talk) 23:51, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    afc Besides, it might be a real name. Daniel Case (talk) 23:53, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait until the user edits. Daniel Case (talk) 23:55, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    afc Daniel Case (talk) 23:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    afc Daniel Case (talk) 23:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]