Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:14, 19 July 2013

↑ To top of page

Shortcuts

Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia! (Am I in the right place?)

For other types of questions, use the search box, see the reference desk or Help:Contents. If you have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page.
Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.
For real-time help, use our IRC help channel, #wikipedia-en-help.
New editors may prefer the Teahouse, a help area for beginners.

Ask a question

Search the frequently asked questions

Search the help desk archives and other help pages

July 16

Mohammed Zahur Khayaam

Hello,

Wiki states that the esteemed Indian composer, Mohammed Zahur Khayaam passed away on July 13, 2013 i.e. two days ago. However, I can't find any articles on internet that confirm this sad news. Could you please either confirm that this is indeed correct, or have it removed from Khayaam's page.

Mandee — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.99.248 (talk) 03:05, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed -- I've removed the unsourced death date from the article and cautioned the IP editor not to add unsourced material. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A wiki affiliated database that is for only certain viewers/users

Hi, I am woefully ignorant on this topic but I saw here a few weeks/months ago something about a business owner asking about a wiki affiliated site that one can limit viewers on, basically run a remote type wiki that I could limit who sees the data submitted, as well as who can edit. Thanks, tried searching this on both the help desk and Reference desk computer archive with no luck yet.^{Market St.⧏}_{⧐ Diamond Way} 03:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See the list at Comparison_of_wiki_software#Features_1. The "page access control" feature means you can restrict who can read and write in the wiki. You can dig further into each one of those to find one that suits your needs. RudolfRed (talk) 03:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks RudolfRed, let me ask it this way since that was a lot of info, is there a wikipedia related site that counts your edits across the wikipedia platform that limits who may read those edits? I see MediaWiki but it looks like it is a software download type thing. ^{Market St.⧏}_{⧐ Diamond Way} 03:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Within Wikipedia itself, edits go live when they're saved. The content can't be limited to specific people, else that would defeat the point of an open encyclopaedia; if an editor changed a page, that page would be locked out forever and visible only to a few people on a list. The Wiki software, however, provides the ability to lock pages, but I don't think it can be triggered by a specific editor changing a page; you'd have to manually lock out each page. There may be a workaround for this, but I'm not too versed in that area, so I'm unsure of what to suggest. drewmunn talk 08:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are asking how you can run your own private (or partly private wiki). If you control a web-server, and are able to install software, then you can install Mediawiki (or other wiki software) and configure it how you like. If not, there are sites like Wikia, where you can create your own wiki within a public site. I don't know what kind of access controls you can put on those, though. --ColinFine (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the info, as I mentioned I am woefully ignorant on that so I will continue to look in the archives but I think the answer to that one back then was one of the "wikis" that wasn't part of wikipedia's platform. Much appreciation for all the help, this can be marked resolved! ^{Market St.⧏}_{⧐ Diamond Way} 13:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Need to correct/update the article on Bakarkhani

Hello Wikipedia

I came across the article on Bakarkhani (Baqerkhani), a kind of bread. I find that the article does not inform correctly and has filled up the page by repeating information, which was a disappointment. Adding to that that article was not well researched and has informed about the item from one perspective only. In the later sections the article has been filled with repetitions and without any mention of the types and process of making. This Bread was brought into Indian/ Bengali cuisine via Muslim influence, which obviously has been modified according to the availability of local ingredients. These breads are mostly round, spicy, with hard crusts and almost like biscuits in texture. The bread, Bakar Khani Roti translated as Bakar Khan's Bread (where Roti is the generic name for Indian Breads),the then Governor of Bengal, in pre-independance India. It is made of flour, ghee, water, molasses with soaked saffron, poppy or nigella seeds, sugar and salt. It later baked either on a girdle or an oven. It is cooked extensively in Dacca/ Dhaka and stays fresh for a good while. They compliment the Kebab and Korma, which along with many different types of bread like Naan(leavened Bread), Roomali (Bread fine and soft as a Handkerchief), Paratha(Spiced, or filled dough fried in ghee or butter), were brought in by the Muslim rulers. There are types and additions to this basic recipe, where many different types of ingredients are added to make the bread spicier or tastier.

I cannot comment about the legend, that goes with it. The types of bread given by the author has not been elaborated upon and this article needs to be researched more.

Thank you

Regards Bigjala — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigjala (talk • contribs) 04:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bigjala, thanks for bringing this to our attention, however if you have WP:RELIABLESOURCES you can choose to be WP:BOLD and offer constructive edits and additions to the article. You may also wish to start a discussion on that article's talk page on your concerns for accuracy or even the wikiprojects covering that topic to involve editors who have greater expertise on the exact issues (WikiProject India may have someone who can directly assist). Given the specificity of the topic and your concerns those may be the most efficient routes. ^{Market St.⧏}_{⧐ Diamond Way} 04:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is a mess. Some whole sections are repeated, and it uses bold-face in non-standard ways. It badly needs editing by someone familiar with Wikipedia practise. I would do it myself, but I know nothing about its subject matter. Maproom (talk) 08:06, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reversal of text

So, I made this seemingly innocuous change ([1]), which resulted in this mess ([2]).

Can someone please explain what happened to me? A412 (Talk • C) 05:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When a browser sees Arabic text it has to guess how much of the following text is to be displayed right-to-left. By default, digits and braces don't trigger the switch back to left-to-right, so the birth/death dates were displayed "backwards". I've added a Left-to-right mark so that the browser gets a much clearer signal. -- John of Reading (talk) 05:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't know that. Thanks for fixing it! A412 (Talk • C) 05:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Locally uploading files above 100 MB to English Wikipedia

How do you locally upload a file over 100 MB to the English Wikipedia? WhisperToMe (talk) 07:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to this it can't be done. 100MB is the limit. Or have I misread your question? Dismas|^(talk) 07:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There was a trick around the 100MB limit that was available on the Commons. I think it involved the files being uploaded in pieces instead of being done all at once. WhisperToMe (talk) 07:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2011/11#100_MB_size_limit talks about it a bit - I want to know if I can do that here too WhisperToMe (talk) 07:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I should probably look this up before replying but can you upload 100+MB files on Commons? Just going off the link you provided, there were technical hurdles that had not yet been sorted out. It doesn't mention a working method to surpass 100MB, just proposes a theoretical method. Dismas|^(talk) 08:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretically, you could upload a file of any size (up to the limit of free space on the server), but the upload limit set on the server seems to be 100MB. This isn't something within the Wiki software necessarily, so there's not likely to be a practical workaround. Splitting the file would resolve the issue cross-limit (both server and Wiki), but reassembling it is likely to cause issues within the software, and I doubt a bit-file would stand up to scrutiny. drewmunn talk 08:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think I set an option on Commons which split up the upload, so I was technically able to upload files over 100 MB WhisperToMe (talk) 15:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the file so big? (Depending on the type of data there may be a more efficient format.) RJFJR (talk) 14:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It may be so big because of the conversion process. I converted it from WMV to OGV. The WMV was 46.9 MB but when I converted it to OGV it was 114 MB. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just follow the instructions at commons:Help:Server-side upload. Theopolisme (talk) 16:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It's at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51510 WhisperToMe (talk) 06:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I need help from someone else to make a new article

Good morning. I want to grab a little help if someone is free; I have been reading through an article on here, and one of the important people in it doesn't have an article here yet. I know a little about him but I think it needs someone with more expertise to make the article. The article would be about a Veterinary surgeon called Gathorne Robert Girdlestone, who first described and used a salvage procedure to rescue the hip joints of an animal with a damaged Femoral Head and/or Femoral Neck. Is there somewhere on here I can ask other people to make the article or to help with it, please? Thank you. Bashir-ibn-john (talk) 10:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is Wikipedia:Requested articles though that has a bit of a backlog. Dismas|^(talk) 10:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Veterinary medicine might be a good place to ask for collaborators. --ColinFine (talk) 13:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All Articles on a Specific Subject

Is there a way to access a complete listing of all articles on a subject without having to "travel" from subcategory to subcategory to subcategory, only to find duplicate articles?? 150.198.1.211 (talk) 11:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You could check whether there is an outline or index related to the topic. Portal:Contents/Outlines and Portal:Contents/Indexes list outlines and indexes by topic. Whether there is an index or outline depends on how broad the subject is. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 11:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Or try Wikipedia:CatScan. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minerva

I am having trouble adding and citing (myself) as a donor for the roman statue of Minerva located in your article in Chester, UK. How do I do this or can I submit it to you for uploading and referencing myself as the source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregsiero (talk • contribs) 12:36, 16 July 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Greg. I'm not sure what you are asking. Are you saying you are the donor of something to Wikipedia? or that you were the donor of the statue to Chester? I thought you must be talking about a photo, but there isn't a photo of the shrine to Minerva (nor a mention of a statue of Minerva) in the article Chester. Or are you talking about a different article. Sorry, I think you'll have to be clearer about what you want. --ColinFine (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Are you referring to the article Chester? I don't see mention of a statue there, only of Minerva's Shrine, Chester. And a city article wouldn't usually mention a donor of a statue. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for re-review of article

Hello. I would like to respectfully request a re-review of the article:Articles for creation/Common Career Technical Core (CCTC). The person who reviewed it said it appeared to be advertisement; however, I included a number of outside sources to validate the information in the article. I also patterned the article after 2 existing Wikipedia articles: Next Generation Science Standards Common Core State Standards Since the page I created is for a set of educational standards that are now commonly recommended for Career Technical Education instructors, I used the existing Wikipedia pages about educational standards as my guide. I believe what I have created is in line with the existing pages, and I'm having trouble understanding why mine was declined as advertisement when the other two were accepted.

Any help or guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks! MelindaatNASDCTEc

MelindaatNASDCTEc (talk) 14:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See response to your question about another proposed article, in the next section, below. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for review

Hello. About a month ago, I submitted the page Articles for creation/National Association of State Directors of Career Technical Education Consortium (NASDCTEc) for review. I received a note from a reviewer that they were concerned that some of the content might be copied. I edited the content to alleviate any concerns with plagiarism, and I resubmitted the article for review. I've never received any response, though, and now the article shows that it is not under review at all. Any recommendations? Do I need to resubmit the article for review again?

Thanks!

MelindaatNASDCTEc (talk) 14:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One problem with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Association of State Directors of Career Technical Education Consortium (NASDCTEc) was that you had an unterminated <ref>, which caused the remainder of the page to be invisible and ignored. I've corrected this for you. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may get a quicker response from the dedicated AFC Help Desk at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.--ukexpat (talk) 19:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disappearance of Madeleine McCann

I thought this should be bought to your attention. This is serious - someone is trying to mess with Wiki: You will see below, that it seems to be people against the McCann's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disappearance_of_Madeleine_McCann&diff=prev&oldid=564280014 https://twitter.com/search/realtime?q=%23mccann

Win ‏@winnower14h Wikipedia argument over whether allegations of #McCann involvement are false or not...: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disappearance_of_Madeleine_McCann&diff=prev&oldid=564280014 … Collapse Reply Retweet Favorite More2 RETWEETS 1 FAVORITE 7:14 AM - 16 Jul 13 · Details Dr David Payne ™ ‏@DodgyDrPayne3h @winnower1 Great news! Will watch with interest, thanks :)) #mccann

https://www.facebook.com/groups/507450985946255/

Paul Rees Wikipedia argument over whether allegations of ‪#‎McCann‬ involvement are false or not... (with thanks to Winnower)

Disappearance of Madeleine McCann: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org The disappearance of Madeleine McCann occurred on the evening of Thursday, 3 May 2007, in Praia da Luz, a resort in the Algarve region of Portugal.[2] Madeleine, from the UK, was on holiday there with her parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, her twin siblings, and a group of seven family friends and thei... Like · · Follow Post · Share · 50 minutes ago 2 people like this.

Paul Rees Note recent edit by Slim Virgin: Addition of "false" re: allegations.

Paul Rees One to watch, Mr G... 34 minutes ago · Like · 1

Dan Gleebitz I am amazed at the detection powers of our fellow sleuths, Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.65.93.135 (talk) 17:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the problem or why this was brought to the Wikipedia Help Desk. There was a minor dispute about language, which was resolved with more neutral language. Plus, you're essentially asking the Help Desk to protect your POV on the issue: "This is serious ... it seems to be people against the McCann's". I'm not even sure which edits you're offended by. On the Facebook page you seem offended by SlimVirgin's use of "false" to describe the allegations against the McCanns. But the use of "false" actually is in FAVOR of the McCanns a la "they were falsely accused". Or are you offended by the removal of "false"? I think this is a reading comprehension issue. If you choose to reply with more information, please only include info relevant to understanding your complaint. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SlimVirgin has suggested to me that this might be a user warning of an external agenda to push POV on the article. I think that would be my reading comp fail. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia shows a article about a Nazi person

Dear Wikipedia,

A wikipedia page shows a Nazi Person and carry my name Franz Schreiber. Even there is a Swastika on the picture present right on the top. Could you please delete this article. thanks Franz Schreiber

see the article under Franz Schreiber — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.193.64.94 (talk) 19:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, we can't delete an article just because you have the same name as another person. The Franz Schreiber we have an article about died in 1976, though, so I don't think anyone will mistake you for him. Howicus (talk) 19:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MJB Company (Farmhouse Foods) Help

I don't understand the objection of the latest editor. Over time this article has been trimmed to it's most basic, factual statements. There is not an overarching tone of an advertisement. I want to resubmit this and for it to finally be accepted. Can you make any final suggestions (or even directly edit it) so that it is passable?

Here is the link to the page: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MJB Company (Farmhouse Foods Inc.) Thanks! 19:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)19:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)BrandEvangelist (talk) Brian

You may get a quicker response from the dedicated AFC Help Desk at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.--ukexpat (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Hi, I believe the answer might be buried in all the text of the rejection template. It looks to me like your draft article does not actually describe what makes your company notable for inclusion in the encyclopedia (see WP:CORP for specific guidelines). Therefore, as wikipedia is not a business directory, it may look like your article is being submitted purely to advertise the business. If you follow the guidelines I linked above and provide appropriate sources to prove notability in your article then it will have a much better chance of being accepted. CaptRik (talk) 20:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My agent's bio for J. Richard Burnoski

BIO FOR RICHARD “BRUNO” BURNOSKI

<obnoxious braggartry redacted> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.23.54.78 (talk) 21:54, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All very interesting... but why are you posting it here? As a rule of thumb – if J. Richard Burnoski was notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia article he would already have an article.--Aspro (talk) 22:12, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 17

wrong picture

you have the wrong picture for walter Brennan this id his picture. Rio bravo and whos minding the mint http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://celebgreat.com/pics/23/f5/Walter-Brennan-c93ea.jpg&imgrefurl=http://celebgreat.com/Best-awards-winners/Walter-Brennan.html&h=313&w=279&sz=90&tbnid=68Lt--bQkg1z5M:&tbnh=97&tbnw=86&zoom=1&usg=__AbInegD6tkPKxkToTccK5n9gs5s=&docid=KGMEds-SLWbP4M&sa=X&ei=GPPlUdyPM8TQiwK764G4Ag&ved=0CIgBEP4dMAw

you have Jack albertson. Jack Albertson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fireslyer (talk • contribs) 01:40, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Fireslyer: I see the image on Walter Brennan looks like the Google image you linked. Am I missing something? That's entirely possible, it happens a lot. ~Charmlet ^-talk- 02:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you by any chance referring to a photo or text shown to the right of a Google search? Google's Knowledge Graph uses a wide variety of sources. There may be a text paragraph ending with "Wikipedia" to indicate that particular text was copied from Wikipedia. An image and other text before or after the Wikipedia excerpt may be from sources completely unrelated to Wikipedia. We have no control over how Google presents our information. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:19, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

picture of Rhonda Sivarajah is off-center in the Wikipedia article Rhonda Sivarajah

Hello -

I uploaded a picture of Rhonda Sivarajah,in the Wikipedia article, Rhonda Sivarajah, Rhonda Sivarajah, however the picture is off-center.

How do I correct this?

Cybermann — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cybermann (talk • contribs) 04:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Cybermann. Fixed. Image markup like |thumb and the like are for telling the software how to treat an image when stand-alone. Infobox templates supply the coding for images so you don't include such image markup when you use them. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minor correction to the above: Some Infobox templates supply the coding for images.... As it happens, {{Infobox politician}} does.--ukexpat (talk) 13:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elderwood Gang (Chinese Hacker Group) Page deleted

Like the title says, can a administrator review why this page was deleted. I feel like the gang itself hacked its way into deleting it from an admin's account.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elderwood_Gang — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crutt101 (talk • contribs) 07:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elderwood Gang was moved to Elderwood Group, and that page was deleted because there was only one editor working on it and they asked for it to be deleted. RudolfRed (talk) 07:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, User:M0rphzone was the only contributor and requested deletion with {{Db-g7}}. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You or others are welcome, of course, to create an article on this topic, assuming notability requirements are met. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help When Posssibly Dealing With An Overly Agressive / Manipulative Reviewer / editor?

Where Might One seek out others for counsil / help with such matters?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Truth, reality and justice (talk • contribs) 08:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Dispute resolution and Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Try to work things out by using the talk pages of the article (s) and of the other editor. If all else fails, Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard is the place to go, but this should be a last resort.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki link required

Hi, Can someone add an Interwiki link to Category:Railway stations in Seine-Maritime pointing at Catégorie:Gare de la Seine-Maritime in the Freanch Wikipedia ? I understand my version of Internet Explorer does not provide this facility, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 09:21, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done by PrimeHunter See [3] --Glaisher [talk] 10:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What IE version and why do you think it cannot do it? Do you see "Edit links" under the languages? I have done it. The English category already had its own entry at wikidata:Q8630350. I merged that into wikidata:Q9098131 which was linked from the French version. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:34, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I listed as active on French Wikipedia?

I checked my preferences for the first time in a long time, and noticed I'm "active on 2 project sites". I clicked the "global info" button, and it lists fr.wikipedia.org along with en and (correctly) notes I've made no edits there.

It also says I registered on April 11, 2013. I haven't registered for anything with the word "wiki" in it since February 2006. Is it normal to be autoregistered, or do I have a problem? Something else, maybe? InedibleHulk (talk) 11:16, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I can read enough French to get the gist of things, but not enough to write it, speak it or understand it spoken. So I'd rather not be there, if possible. InedibleHulk (talk) 11:18, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia projects have unified login. If you visit another project when you are logged in then your account is automatically created there. Special:CentralAuth/InedibleHulk shows you must have done that 22 April. "active" only means the account has been created. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) This seems to be a strange one - either you went on the French Wikipedia when logged it to Wikipedia, or some other SUL thing has happened. WP:VPT may know more. Mdann52 (talk) 12:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible you altered a file that's hosted on the French Wikipedia and pulled over to here from there, or that you otherwise strayed accidentally without realising it. It's nothing to worry about, but you may wish to head over there and put a redirect on your user talk to direct potential discussions to your English page. drewmunn talk 12:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That seems the only conceivable explanation. I can't remember ever visiting French Wikipedia, but I have worked with some images, possibly around April 22, which may have been used there. Thanks! InedibleHulk (talk) 21:38, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

It is not a big deal. I have numerous active accounts in languages I don't speak at all (mostly from fixing interwiki links and photos). It is not like you are require to keep an active participation at each site. Rmhermen (talk) 12:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When you haven't edited at the French Wikipedia there is no reason to make a link to your English account. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, Rmhermen, not a big deal to me, either. Just slightly odd and confusing, at first. And no, PrimeHunter, I don't intend on linking. Pointless, indeed. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:37, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

Note that when articles are transwikied to another language as this one was, the contributions from the English Wikipedia will show up in the history for attribution (as it is as here you can see contributions by long term en editors whom are not active on de). While this case is unrelated to you InedibleHulk, you may find that you have contributions to anther language Wikipedia that you have never edited (although you have no contributions on fr). While this doesn't apply to you on the French Wikipedia, it does for example in German. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How does X work?

i have created a page named Netarpal Deol. i want to know that why this page is deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Netar007 (talk • contribs)

See the message in the deletion tag:

This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a real person that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject.--ukexpat (talk) 13:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Notability (people). This is an encyclopedia. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can't see a user's comment

Can anyone else see this comment? I see the change in the history. If I edit the page, I can see the comment, but I don't actually see it on the talk page. Is it just me? Jauersock^dude?/_dude. 15:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. It's showing up now. I don't know what went wrong. Maybe I'm imagining things. Jauersock^dude?/_dude. 15:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It may be a caching issue; as I found out earlier today, adding ?action=purge to the end of the URL clears Wikipedia's cache (but not your browser's, mind). Worth bearing in mind in the future... drewmunn talk 16:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editing a box or table that doesn't have an edit button.

On the right of the Wiki entry that I am working on is a box with a photograph and biographical information about the person of interest. How can that box be edited? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebassistant (talk • contribs) 18:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From the main 'Edit' tab along the top. Dru of Id (talk) 18:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The section is an 'Infobox' which a template produces, starting from a double braces {{ and ending with them }}. The template will only recognise previously defined fields. Dru of Id (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Preferences/ Gadgets/ Appearance includes an option to include an edit link for the lead section. Even without that option, the Edit tab at the top of the page allows you to edit the whole page, including the infobox to which you refer. - David Biddulph (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be referring to the article Reb Anderson. You can edit the box by either clicking Edit or Edit source at the page. If you click Edit source, you should see some markup like this:

{{Infobox religious biography

|background =

|name =

}}

There you can edit the infobox by editing this code.

You can also edit it by clicking Edit. In that case, simply click on the infobox after clicking Edit. A small icon that looks like a puzzle piece should appear. Click on it to edit the info in the box. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 18:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an appropriate fair use right?

This image from this page on the BBC website for the article Nightmare in Silver? Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 18:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it was reduced in size, a non-free rationale template completed for that article and tagged with {{Non-free title-card}}, it would comply with WP:NFCC.--ukexpat (talk) 18:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is inappropriate. Some images like that have been discussed at WP:NFCR (see for example Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 21#Star Trek: Voyager episode images). Such screenshots are usually only appropriate if there is sourced discussion about the specific image, which is implicitly necessary for satisfying WP:NFCC#8. So while this might be appropriate under fair use, it is likely not compliant with NFCC#8. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 18:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Without it we are forced to direct users to a different article Cybermen to see the newer incarnation of the 2013 Cybermen, which will undoubtedly change again next series in some way or another. That article will eventually change to the newer image also, which means the reader is disadvantaged. I uploaded it as File:Doctor Who Nightmare In Silver Wallpaper.jpg.

With so many articles on episodes for multiple shows and films having a Fair Use image this is certainly up there with a good reasoning i believe. What do you think? Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 18:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, this is not an "episode image", it is a "title card" and we have hundreds if not thousands of articles where title cards are used pursuant to WP:NFCC without a problem, and as I mentioned above we even have a specific template for such use.--ukexpat (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have not placed it in the article after seeing the message by Toshio above. Have i tagged the image correctly UKexpat? Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 19:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to File:Doctor Who Nightmare In Silver title card.jpg which is a more accurate title and tweaked the info page. However, a non-free image must be used in an article - orphaned non-free images will be deleted.--ukexpat (talk) 19:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added it.--ukexpat (talk) 19:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. What did you mean by "However, a non-free image must be used in an article". I thought non-free images were to be avoided if a free version was available? Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 19:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Ukexpat Mea culpa. I admit I haven't looked carefully enough at the image, as I became distracted off-Wiki. My apologies. That use is probably okay, as Ukexpat pointed out above, as it is like cover art of a CD, where such images usually can be used. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 19:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Jenova See WP:NFCC#7. It is used in an article now, so that is no longer an issue. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 19:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes free images are preferred, but the only basis on which a non-free image can be uploaded is if it is used in an article - unused, non-free images are not permitted.--ukexpat (talk) 19:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know that bit, I just suffered a momentary lapse of brainpower with the phrasing and the heat. Thanks a lot for the help Ukexpat ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 08:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help! Another editor is threatening to block me over a good faith edit.

I made an edit to Noah (movie), noting that Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly who are playing husband and wife had also played husband and wife in A Beautiful Mind (and Connelly won an Academy Award). User:Elizium23 said, despite the fact that the information was right there on those two wiki pages (in the Cast lists), that not only was this unsourced but if it happened again, I would be blocked. I have made hundreds of edits on Wikipedia and never been threatened like this before. And it was our first encounter.

I looked at his Talk Page archive and there were a lot of unhappy people responding to similar blocking threats. Unfortunately, all of them were now red-link accounts, showing that they had deactivated their accounts.

It's absurd threats like this (I'm not even sure whether User:Elizium23 is an admin or not) which cause people to abandon their efforts to improve Wikipedia.

I have no way of finding where to file a complaint so I just came here and maybe I can get an neutral third party to stop these hasty and drastic threats. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you attempted to discuss this with the other editor? In any event, sourced or not I don't think your edit is encyclopedic. It smacks to me of movie trivia.--ukexpat (talk) 18:40, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I concur that the information is completely irrelevant to the article. More to the point, we do not use other Wikipedia pages as sources for articles, so Elizium was in the right on that matter. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see on a lot of other pages that when certain actors and directors work together (Scorsese & DeNiro, Del Toro & Perlman, etc.) that this fact is noted on their articles. How could the cast list that is posted on Noah be considered an unreliable source...or who has been cast in the movie? And A Beautiful Mind is a 12 year old film, that Jennifer Connelly won an Academy Award for...this is all on the Wikipedia page that has been worked on for over a decade. I can't refer to the page itself for having accurate information?

But even if you think this is trivial, that was not User:Elizium23's complaint...his complaint was that this fact didn't have adequate citation. My question is what else is required?

But regardless of how you view this edit, should a well-intentioned addition merit the threat of a block? That's what bothers me more. I've had very constructive conversations with other editors to improve an article. But I've never been threatened (and in our first encounter). I don't know whether he is an admin or not, but I don't this is assuming good faith in other editors and it just seems like the result of the threats have been editors deactivating their accounts. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 18:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The first thing to do in a case like this is to discuss with the other editor. Have you done that? If not, you should.--ukexpat (talk) 18:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've pointed User:Elizium23 to this discussion and asked why they used a template threatening blocking on a good-faith editor. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 19:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty obvious -- this IP editor has been warned several times already for similar actions. A warning that continuing the same behavior will eventually lead to a block is entirely appropriate. Looie496 (talk) 19:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. They've been warned for adding unsourced content to a BLP, deleting something without explaining in an edit summary, linking to YouTube, and adding poorly-understood content. And in a recent thread they're reading unpleasantness into comments where there is none. None of that is exactly what they're being warned for here. But, given all that, fair enough. IP, be more careful and support any changes you make with reliable sources. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 19:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)This is just a guess here but the user may have seen all the other editors on your talk page who had reverted your edits and just used a higher level warning template. (That warning is a standard template, by the way). Dismas|^(talk) 19:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OP, just to address your specific question: no, Wikipedia cannot be regarded as a reliable source by definition, regardless of how long the article in question has been under development. See WP:RS for the definition of reliable sources. - Ka renjc 21:16, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding "Unfortunately, all of them were now red-link accounts, showing that they had deactivated their accounts", that is incorrect. Red links to the name of a registered editor shows that an editor hasn't created a user page, typical of brand new or novice editors; red links to a user talk page (rarer) show that there is no talk page for that editor, either. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:19, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have retracted the warning per WP:AGF and his claim here that he was never threatened before. I took that to mean he has never been warned, perhaps he inherited his IP address from a more disruptive contributor. Elizium23 (talk) 05:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Printing articles about mathematics

What is the best way to print mathematical articles? Formulas often appear in a graphic-like format that is difficult to printed properly, at least from my browser (IE 10, Windows 7). There are two problems:

(1) The text comes out in gray scale with inexact borders. Small symbols, like subscripts, have broken, fuzzy shapes that are difficult to read.

(2) More serious, a plus sign can print as a minus sign. The problem goes away if you use the IE print dialog to change the DPI setting to 1200 from the default of 600, but this is hardly an obvious thing to do.

Example: Print the article "Goodstein's theorem". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsewsi (talk • contribs) 19:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saved that article as a PDF and it appears to have worked OK. Have you tried that?--ukexpat (talk) 19:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also try changing Preferences → Appearance → Math. I suggest trying MathJax first, then the others. -- Gadget850^talk 16:20, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quickie aircraft

The Quickie Aircraft was an original design by my brother Tom Jewett, not Burt Rutan. My brother was an aeronautical engineer and designed planes from the age of 3 years old. I witnessed his designs and this is his plane and he won the Outstanding New Design Award at the Oshkosh Fly In-I was there that year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.250.18 (talk) 19:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The involvement of 3 designers is mentioned at Rutan Quickie. If you have references to published reliable sources to support further information, please feel free to provide it, either directly to the article or on its talk page. Note that your personal knowledge, if unpublished, can not be used to support information in Wikipedia, as it needs to be verifiable. - David Biddulph (talk) 20:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Langdon

My Wikipedia page is: John Langdon (typographer)

My web assistant and I added quite a bit of new text a couple of months ago, and tried a couple of times to load several images to illustrate information covered in the text. Last time, we thought we were successful, but a couple of days later the images were no longer on my page.

I am an artist. It's important to me to have images of my work on my Wikipedia page. All the images I want to load are ones that I hold the copyrights for.

Neither my web assistant or I can figure out what the problem is. We believe we have followed all the guidelines and instructions. Can you help?

Thanks, John Langdon JohnLangdon (talk) 22:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to use copyrighted images that you hold the rights to, you can follow the guidance at WP:IOWN to licence the images in a way that is allowable at Wikipedia. Also, you and your assistant should make sure to read WP:COI and WP:AUTO for guidance on editing this article. RudolfRed (talk) 23:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) It appears from the messages on your user talk page that the images were loaded under a non-free use licence, claiming a fair use exemption. As shown in those messages, Wikipedia has tight restrictions on the use of non-free material. To avoid that problem, the material would need to be given a free licence, by the process described under donating copyrighted material.

Even then, it is possible that other editors might consider that the use of the images would be excessive. In your question above you say "I am an artist. It's important to me to have images of my work on my Wikipedia page". It might therefore be thought that you are trying to use the Wikipedia page for advertising or self-promotion. I would therefore recommend that you read Wikipedia's guidance on autobiography, and on conflict of interest. - David Biddulph (talk) 23:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 18

WATCHER

WHAT IS THE 'WATCHER' CATEGORY UNDER THE REVISION HISTORY AREA OF WIKIPEDIA PAGES? WHAT PURPOSE DOES IT SERVE AND HOW COULD I SIGN UP TO BE A WATCHER OF A PAGE?

DOES IT PROVIDE A SORT OF ALERT OR RSS FEED CONCERNING EDITS TO A PAGE? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.67.176 (talk) 01:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The watch feature is available to all logged in users. You can choose to receive emails when a watched page is edited. See more at Help:Watching pages. It's free and easy to create an account. Wikipedia:Why create an account? shows other benefits. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:18, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your shift key is stuck. All capitals in print looks like SHOUTING. Britmax (talk) 07:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changing crest on Christian Brothers, Fremantle site

Hello there. I have a long-standing account with Wikipedia but have not used it for some time and am not autoconfirmed. I wish to be able to change the logo on the Christian Brothers College, Fremantle site CBC Fremantle as they have been rebranded. I am the Communications and Marketing Coordinator at the College. Please let me know how I can go about this. Thank you. Cherie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagebee (talk • contribs) 02:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I ripped the new one from your website and replaced it at File:Cbcfremantle crest.png. The website doesn't have a higher resolution one though. Have the graphics department provide one online in better resolution and we can use that. If you wish to keep copyright then we can only upload locally at about 300px wide max. The above file on commons probably violates any copyright you have on the logo. See: commons:Commons:Fair use and Wikipedia:Non-free content. Fair use and non-free mean about the same.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The crest I can see on your link is still the old one. I am the graphics department! :-) 300px wide will probably suffice. How can I supply a higher resolution online? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagebee (talk • contribs) 06:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The file on Commons is a copyright violation and I have tagged it for deletion as such. Please follow the process set out at WP:IOWN to communicate permission to use, but note that permission must be for all purposes. Permission restricted to use only on Wikipedia is insufficient. If you are not prepared to release it on that basis, it can be uploaded to Wikipedia pursuant to the non-free content criteria, but it will have to be low-res.--ukexpat (talk) 13:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use and non-free mean about the same - not quite, Wikipedia's non-free content criteria are more strict than "fair use".--ukexpat (talk) 13:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How to add table rows in new Visual Editor?

Hi,

I'm having a bit of trouble adding rows to table using the visual editor. Anyone care to help?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdk1000 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My best advice is to just use regular editing and wait a month or 20 until VE's many problems are fixed and lack of features is remedied. See Help:Table for information on playing with tables. Note that it says at WP:VE that "The content of some "complex" formatting, including tables and definition lists, will display and can be edited, but editors using VE cannot modify the structures or add new entries, such as an additional row for a table."--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Visual editor doesn't work with changing table layout. Wikipedia:VE#Limitations. RudolfRed (talk) 03:44, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

woody strode

I AM TRYING TO FINE PICTURES OF WOODY STRODE'S SECOND WIFE TINA TOMPSON STRODE AND PICTURE'S OF ANY KIDS OF HIS FIRST WIFE AND SECOND WIFE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.179.123.145 (talk) 05:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the leading space which upset the formatting of your question, and please stop SHOUTING. - David Biddulph (talk) 06:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This page is for help with using or editing Wikipedia, which your question doesn't appear to be. You might find somebody who can answer yo at the Entertainment Reference Desk. --ColinFine (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Having problems adding a wikilink (may have found a bug in the timeline code)

So I was trying to fix a link on Devil May Cry on the timeline under "Gameplay".

Link to edit source

It's the last entry on the timeline (2013: DmC) that's giving me problems. No matter what I do, I can't get it to link. Even stranger, when I take off the "|DmC" and leave just the page's name, which is DmC: Devil May Cry, on the timeline it ignores the "DmC: " and just leaves the text as "Devil May Cry". I would have guessed that the code "DmC: " has special meaning on wiki code but I can link to it just fine normally (link should be working here for example.) It's just on the timeline where it goofs up.

--DeeBoFour20 (talk) 06:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The <timeline> code indeed doesn't like the "DmC:" and apparently wrongly considers it a prefix. Sounds like a bug to me. As a workaround I've linked to [[:DmC: Devil May Cry|DmC]] with an additional colon at the beginning. It looks strange but links to the correct article, and the pipe hides the crutch from a cursory glance. Huon (talk) 06:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reported here. Huon (talk) 06:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged malware link in the Laurie Penny article

User:Gary Dee has removed a link from the article on the British journalist Laurie Penny claiming (at Talk:Laurie Penny#Malware Link Removal) that a link is to malware. As far as I have been able to determine, this claim is entirely false, and I have reverted (see my own comments on the talk page), but I would be grateful for a third opinion. Philip Cross (talk) 09:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The hypersensitive malware-checking gubbins in use here, which normally blocks between 5% and 10% of links that I click on when checking AfC submission sources, allows me to visit the URL in question without even so much as popping up a warning. So I think there is no malware problem. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW McAfee Site Advisor gives Zero Books an all clear - I'm not sure what the other links listed on the talk page are, nor why they are there. Arjayay (talk) 10:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've used Sucuri to check our workplace website a few times and that claims that the site contains malicious spamming code (See here). And in all fairness Norton are consistently one of the worst products to use in tests. Not finding anything is not the same as the website being clean. Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 10:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Point noted, I have mentioned the security issue with the Zero Books website elsewhere, and an assumption my installed software might not be sufficient to identify a problem was my motivation for asking for another opinion. Gary Dee has removed a link to Zero Books from the Richard Seymour article, which I have also reverted. Rightly or wrongly, this user was busy removing alleged malware links from numerous articles earlier today (UTC/GMT). Philip Cross (talk) 10:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

collapsing lengthy explanation of the problem. Looie496 (talk) 22:34, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HI.

Let us See: STEP 1
As we can see here:
http://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.zero-books.net
the link: hxxp://www.johnhuntpublishing.com/login-v2.html as a referrer in the HTML section of www.zero-books.net.
Next Step checking this HTML-SRC:
REFERENCE HERE:
http://jsunpack.jeek.org/?report=36d9d0e70ec4309195b9ea9f87982794da85612e
IF you want to download the HTML Header to analyse, and search for that Link, you can do that here:
GET FILE: http://jsunpack.jeek.org/dec/getfile?hash=35cd/6f930761815deda95ae726bddd7ecc1e9bfd
STEP 2:
As we can see here:
http://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.johnhuntpublishing.com
The Johnhuntpublishing-Link includes:
hxxp://www.indiastudies.org/?aw5ka=535382 AS A REFERRER
THE HTML-SRC of this link (indiastudies) can be downloaded from here (for analysis):
http://jsunpack.jeek.org/?report=562822446907682aa2ec3eab1722555c1c280d2f
THE GET FILE IS HERE: http://jsunpack.jeek.org/dec/getfile?hash=8bdd/e408f5442ec7db5a48ba122181b1645e2615
THE (HIDDEN) LINKS THAT CAN BE FOUND HERE ARE:

#how_to_take
#interactions
#missed_drug
#precaution
#side_effects
#storage
#uses
./cache/1353339979.viagra.gif
/
/about.php
/blank.gif
/cart.php
/contact.php
/faq.php
/featured_products.php
/js/autocomplete_result_builder.js
/new_arrivals.php
/shipping.php
/status.php
/tos.php
/unsubscribe.php
acaiberry.php
accutane_generic.php
actos_generic.php
acyclovir.php
adalat_generic.php
adhd.php
albuterol_generic.php
aldactone_generic.php
alesse-generic.php
allegra_generic.php
allergy_relief.php
alli_generic.php
allopurinol-generic.php
altace_generic.php
amaryl_generic.php
amoxicillin_generic.php
anadoil.php
anafranil_generic.php
angeliq_generic.php
ansaid_generic.php
anti_anxiety.php
antibiotics.php
anticonvulsants.php
antidepressants.php
anti-fungal_and_parasites.php
antiinflammatory.php
antipsychotic_treatment.php
arava_generic.php
arcoxia_generic.php
aricept-generic.php
aristocort_generic.php
asacol-generic.php
ashva-gandha.php
asthma_relief_and_management.php
atarax_generic.php
atomoxetine.php
augmentin_generic.php
avanafil.php
avandia_generic.php
avapro_generic.php
aygestin_generic.php
azulfidine-generic.php
baclofen_generic.php
benemid-generic.php
blood_pressure.php
bodydetox.php
brahmi.php
budesonide-generic.php
buspar_generic.php
buspirone.php
cache/1352113989.viagra_small.png
cache/1352203885.inv_logo_10816_phone_1_8244591.png
cache/1355680555.inv_logo_11973_directrxonline.net.png
calan_generic.php
cancer_symptoms_relief.php
casodex_generic.php
celebrex_generic.php
celexa_generic.php
cephalexin_generic.php
cialis_brand.php
cialis_daily_tadalafil_generic.php
cialis_generic.php
cialis_soft_pills_generic.php
cipro_generic.php
clarina-anti-acne-gel.php
cleocin.php
clomid_generic.php
clomipramine.php
clozaril_generic.php
colondetox.php
colospa_generic.php
crestor_generic.php
cymbalta_generic.php
cytoxan_generic.php
danazol_generic.php
deltasone_generic.php
depo-medrol-generic.php
detox.php
diabetes_treatment.php
digestive_health_and_nausea.php
dilantin_generic.php
ed-trial-packs.php
effexor_generic.php
eldepryl_generic.php
etodolac-generic.php
evista_generic.php
exelon_generic.php
extreme-ed-pack.php
eye-conditions.html.php
famvir_generic.php
fast-results-ed-pack.php
female_rx_oil.php
female_viagra_generic.php
finpecia_generic.php
flomax_generic.php
Fluoxetine.php
fosamax_generic.php
frumil_generic.php
geodon_generic.php
geriforte.php
gold-ed-pack.php
hair_loss_treatment.php
heart_and_cholesterol.php
hoodia_800.php
http://ad.yieldmanager.com/pixel?id=2370267&t=2
http://www.rxprofits.net/
https:
https://www.directrxonline.net/cart.php
hydrea_generic.php
images/general/currency_rx.gif
images/general/express_icon.gif
images/template_1/all__.8475294e.min.css
images/template_1/favicon.ico
imigran_generic.php
imitrex.php
inderal_generic.php
indocin_generic.php
javascript: void(0)
javascript:void(0)
js/jquery/jquery.autocomplete.js
js/template_1/all__.6c60d3b5.min.js
lamictal_generic.php
lamisil_generic.php
lasix_generic.php
levaquin_generic.php
levitra_generic.php
levitra_soft_generic.php
levlen_generic.php
levonorgestrel_generic.php
levothroid_generic.php
lexapro_generic.php
lioresal_generic.php
lipitor_generic.php
liv52.php
liv52-ds.php
lovegra-generic.php
loxitane_generic.php
maxalt_generic.php
mega_hoodia.php
mega-hoodia_plus.php
mens_health.php
mens_sexual_health.php
mentalhealth.php
mentat.php
mestinon_generic.php
methocarbamol_generic.php
methotrexate_generic.php
minoxidil_generic.php
mircette-generic.php
mobic_generic.php
motrin_generic.php
muscle_relaxants.php
mysoline_generic.php
naprosyn_generic.php
neem.php
neurontin_generic.php
nexium_generic.php
norvasc_generic.php
olanzapine-generic.php
optimum-performance-ed-pack.php
oral-jelly-ed-pack.php
orlistat.php
ortho-tri-cyclen-generic.php
ovral-generic.php
pain_relief.php
parlodel_generic.php
paxil_generic.php
phenergan_generic.php
plavix_generic.php
ponstel_generic.php
praziquantel-generic.php
prednisone_generic.php
premarin_brand.php
premarin_generic.php
prevacid_generic.php
priligy-dapoxetine-generic.php
prilosec_generic.php
professionalcialis.php
professional-ed-pack.php
professionalviagra.php
propecia_generic.php
proscar_generic.php
protonix_generic.php
prozac_generic.php
relafen_generic.php
renova_generic.php
requip_generic.php
retin_a_generic.php
risperdal_generic.php
rogaine_generic.php
seroquel_generic.php
serpina.php
singulair_generic.php
skin_care_and_dermatology.php
sleep_aids.php
sleepwell.php
slimfast.php
slimfast_plus.php
smoking_cessation.php
smok-ox.php
soft-tab-ed-pack.php
strattera_generic.php
super-active-ed-pack.php
synthroid_generic.php
tadora.php
thyroid_health.php
tizanidine_generic.php
topamax_generic.php
trial_ed_pack_generic.php
valtrex_generic.php
viagra_brand.php
viagra_generic.php
viagra_oral_jelly_generic.php
viagra_soft_pills_generic.php
voltaren-emulgel-generic.php
voltaren-generic.php
vrikshamla.php
vytorin_generic.php
weight_loss.php
wellbutrin_generic.php
wellbutrin_sr_generic.php
womenra.php
womens_health.php
womens_sexual_health.php
xeloda_generic.php
xenical_generic.php
yasmin_generic.php
zanaflex_generic.php
zithromax_generic.php
zocor_generic.php
zoloft_generic.php
zovirax_generic.php
zyban_generic.php
zyloprim_generic.php
zyprexa_generic.php
zyrtec_generic.php</nowiki>

THIS IS CLASSIC Blackhat SEO SPAM.
THE MALICIOUS THREAD BESIDES THIS IS THAT THIS LINK ALSO INCLUDES A BROWSER EXPLOIT:
JS/Exploit-Blacole.cw
https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/7bda12e014fbea3c7e40dd6120ae082ac0414fd22ee4be41f51352bc8db1dc19/analysis/1374156502/
https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/96ef783eeedd0aee71e7d00ead72625a7426222bdc0265036bb9c16edb5b5e28/analysis/1374156503/
THOSE FILES CAN ALSO BE FOUND HERE: http://jsunpack.jeek.org/?report=562822446907682aa2ec3eab1722555c1c280d2f
GETFILES ARE:
http://jsunpack.jeek.org/dec/getfile?hash=9c2e/29741fb3a1d12e84d107c2e34e2e5ad3b3c2
http://jsunpack.jeek.org/dec/getfile?hash=0ff0/7cb9e424c535bc524169034e9650557f7361r
Final Destination via EXPLOIT (REDIRECT) WILL COME TO THIS DOMAIN:
hxxp://www.directrxonline.net/viagra_generic.php
http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/www.directrxonline.net
http://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.directrxonline.net

A Second Possibility to check it (on a far more undeep level) are these links:

To keep it short: If someone will click the link from Johnhuntpublishing-Link at www.zero-books.net, in case he has no Security Software, or an updated OS, could be harmed by infection. All in all, as a threat like this is being detected, there is a no-go, for having links like this in a Wikipedia-article; evidence enough for removing those links once more. --Gary Dee 16:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a url as malware is defensible. Removing an entire citation because a url (website) is possibly compromised is not acceptable. The url can be hidden with wikicode, or possibly a link at archive.org can be substituted, but it's unacceptable to simply remove an entire cite because one part is problematical. (I see another editor has put all of the citation back into the article except the url; better, though not best.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 04:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Germaine Greer

I am not and have never claimed to be a Professor Emerita of Warwick University. Please remove this untrue statement from my Wikipedia entry.

This may easily be verified by contacting the university.

This is not the first time I have tried to correct this error. I am tired of removing it from promotion materials etc.

Please do as I ask.

Thankyou,

Germaine Greer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.68.117.40 (talk) 11:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. I can find no support for the statement at [4] etc. Maproom (talk) 11:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Might I ask, no disrespect intended, if you normally remove information from somebody's article without proof that the person addressing you is who they really claim to be? As a new user, I purely ask to find out if you have to do this first, then enquire, or if you have a way to verify without editors knowing. Thank you. Bashir-ibn-john (talk) 12:18, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mean to butt in but I thought I'd try to help (though helping others has been burning me lately). Anyway, we don't always just take their word for it. It appears that User:Maproom couldn't find any support for the item and therefore removed it. Per WP:BLP:

"All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons (or in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion."

Indeed. The point is that the statement was unsourced and was challenged. The identity of the challenger is irrelevant. Gandalf61 (talk) 12:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, Maproom was correct in removing it. Dismas|^(talk) 12:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been wrong of me to assume that 77.68.117.40 is in fact Germaine Greer (and I have no way of checking). In any case, the subject of an article has no veto over its contents. But it was easy to check the truth of the disputed statement – Warwick University, like most universities, has a web site which lists its academic staff. As I said above, I failed to find Germaine Greer on that list. Maproom (talk) 12:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BIOSELF there is a process (via WP:OTRS) for the subject of an article to identify themselves to the Foundation, but as noted above, in a case like this where a statement in a BLP is challenged, confirmation of the identity of the challenger isn't necessary.--ukexpat (talk) 13:34, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Google search Germaine Greer Professor Emerita University of Warwick finds many reliable sources saying Germaine Greer is Professor Emerita at University of Warwick. The first is http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/12/opinion/greer-women-and-guilt which is an article written by Germaine Greer herself! In all fairness, the Professor Emerita claim is in an Editor's note at the start, but if you are Germaine Greer then I suggest you also ask CNN to remove the claim. Normally that article alone would be a sufficient source for Wikipedia, and there are many others. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:33, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The passage you refer to reads "Editor's note: Germaine Greer, an Australian academic and journalist, is the author of "The Female Eunuch," "Sex and Destiny," "The Change," "Shakespeare's Wife" and "The Whole Woman." She is professor emerita of English literature and comparative studies at the University of Warwick in England." It was not written by Ms. Greer, but by a CNN editor; and was probably copied from the Wikipedia article. If Wikipedia itself does not qualify as a reliable source, I think a CNN reporter copying a section of it doesn't either. Maproom (talk) 18:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Wikipedia has the problem now that much of the non-Wikipedia world uses Wikipedia as a source. If we stuff it up, the error will be copied by others. HiLo48 (talk) 19:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As my Google search shows, the claim is in many reliable sources. I doubt CNN copied it from Wikipedia. It was added to Wikipedia 14 August 2008.[5] http://www.shakespearelaw.org/ is the official website of a conference hosted by the University of Warwick itself in July 2007. The front page links to Conference programme and Abstracts and Speakers. Both are from the time of the conference and say "Germaine Greer, Emeritus Professor of English and Comparative Studies at Warwick University". This claim is in so many reliable sources, including an official source, that it may be time we ask 77.68.117.40 to either contact WP:OTRS or refer to a public statement in a reliable source saying it's untrue. The latter could also be used to convince people outside Wikipedia. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I bet you're glad I asked about verifying the identity of the person making the request now :) I scare myself sometimes... Bashir-ibn-john (talk) 23:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki link required

Can somebody create a link between Gare de Port-Saint-Père-Saint-Mars on English wikipedia and "Gare de Port-Saint-Père - Saint-Mars" on the French. I can see languages on the left had side when I edit the English page but nothing to click to add links, I run IE8, Thanks GrahamHardy (talk) 11:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has linked them.[6] I see "Edit links" at Gare de Port-Saint-Père-Saint-Mars#p-lang in IE9, also with compatibility mode enabled. There have been problems with IE8 previously (bugzilla:44228) but I thought it was supposed to work now. What is your skin at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-rendering? Does it look like you can edit wikidata:Q3097322? Do you have compatibility mode enabled to mimic IE7? It's indicated by a blue broken page icon in the address bar. If it's blue then try clicking it to make it grey so compatibility mode is disabled. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Change background color of Template:User citizen

How to change background color? (Category:Nationality user templates) Ancientsteppe (talk) 17:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can probably do it with a corresponding "Template:User in ..." in Category:Nation of residence user templates, for example {{User in Mongolia}}. Which nationality and which color do you want? PrimeHunter (talk) 13:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

White color: Template:User citizen Mongolia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ancientsteppe (talk • contribs) 17:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As PrimeHunter said above, the detail is in Template:User in Mongolia. - David Biddulph (talk) 17:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this will say citizen with white background: {{User in Mongolia|20|color=white}}. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Class Size Re-Direct

To whom it may concern,

I write this message to request a redirect change. As it stands, when I type in "class size," it redirects me to student-teacher ratio which is a completely different thing in the realm of education (while still very much related). If at all possible, could "class size" instead be redirected to the "class size reduction" Wikipedia entry?

Thank you so much and I look forward to hearing from you soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Classszmatters (talk • contribs) 14:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have worked out how to do this for yourself. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you're asking here for us to overrule the opinion of two other editors who think the redirect should go to student-teacher ratio, sorry, that's not going to happen. The student-teacher ratio article mentions "class size" in the first caption and "smaller classes" in the second paragraph, so it's not obvious that the current redirect (as set out by the other editors) is wrong. In any case, if you want to get the redirect to be as you propose, you need to post at Talk:Student–teacher ratio, and see if you can get the majority of other editors to agree with your view that the redirect should not go to that article. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 04:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Allo Allo

Hi some of the episodes seem to be missing there were 89 Von Flockenstuffen In Command series 7 episode 1, Free at last 7 2, Eloping to England series 7 3 and others I put gold on and the titles where not on your site when I searched them the ones I was looking for the searches said series 7 but they aren't there. http://sharetv.org/shows/allo_allo_uk/season_7 share tv season 7. I don't know if others are missing http://sharetv.org/shows/allo_allo_uk/guides share tv all seasons/ episodes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.104.25 (talk) 15:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Series 7 episode 1 is 'Allo 'Allo! (series 7)#A Quiet Honeymoon which says: "Alternate titles: Von Flockenstuffen in Command". After that, episode 2 "An Almighty Bang" says "Alternate titles: Free at Last!". And episode 3 "Fleeing Monks" says "Alternate titles: Eloping to England". PrimeHunter (talk) 17:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Suitability

I'm composing a candidate article on a particular type of "failure mode and effect analysis" (relevant to reliability engineering) and I want to (1) clarify a possible conflict of interest, and (2) address listing my own work as a citation. ("Failure Mode and Effects Analysis" is a current Wikipedia article.)

Although I decided to write the article and did so on my own, I have a particular interest in the topic because I've worked with it for my current employer and we do the kind of analysis that is the topic of the article. Unfortunately, there are very few published references on this topic (a text cited in "Further Reading" is one of the few) and one of the key references cited in the article is a paper that I wrote on the topic. This paper was peer reviewed and published by one outside organization (and thereafter published in Proceedings of the 2008 Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, www.rams.org). The published paper was essentially reprinted by a second organization that solicited my permission to do so (it was published in Journal of System Safety). Therefore, while I have tried to make the article as factual as possible, some of the article's statements reflect my own engineering judgment based on part-time research on the topic for at least 10 years. The intent of the article is to present facts that would be useful for anyone attempting to perform the subject analysis, and to alert readers to recognize where their own engineering judgment may be required. Question is, how to proceed? Thanks. Bentpins (talk) 15:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Bentpins: That there are very few published articles on the topic means that it most likely fails to meet our requirements for a separate article. It sounds to me as if you should - at most - add a section to the existing article, Failure mode and effects analysis. And you should limit what you add to information that is contained in those articles. If you know something personally, but it's not published, it is not acceptable to be in a Wikipedia article because it fails our Verifiability policy. (And we classify it as original research, somethin also not acceptable.) Finally, keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, with the goal of providing overviews of information. Per yet another policy (yes, there are a lot), Wikipedia is not, for example, a guide or a how-to manual. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:57, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Table of contents taking up whole width of page

Every article I visit now has this very wide table of contents. Why is this happening? I didn't change any preferences? Are other people seeing this? If it's just me, how to fix it please? Lesion (talk) 19:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also facing this issue. It's been driving me nuts! – Recollected • 19:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. Though something was wrong with the page I was looking at, tried to learn how to fix it before realizing it might be a glitch. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This was a temporary glitch. If you are still seeing it, then bypass your browser cache - that's Ctrl+F5 in most browsers. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That worked for me. Dismas|^(talk) 20:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, a glitch. Had to refresh page a few times with hold ctrl + click refresh (chrome), now TOC is normal again. Thank you. Lesion (talk) 21:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This keeps happening. Clearing browser cache works for a while then the problem returns later... Lesion (talk) 03:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the color of a country on a map

The article Sub-Saharan Africa lists South Sudan as being in North Africa, but the UN classifies the country as being in East Africa. How do I change the color of South Sudan on the Map? 108.0.244.168 (talk) 19:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, there are no facilities within Wikipedia for editing graphics. You (or somebody) will have to edit the image file outside Wikipedia, and reupload it. I suggest you ask at the Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Map workshop. --ColinFine (talk) 19:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have the skills to make the change, but I am not totally clear about what you want. I think you are talking about the first map in the Sub-Saharan Africa article, and you want South Sudan switched from mid-green to dark green. Is that right? Maproom (talk) 22:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That must be it, and the description should also be updated. The source is http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm at the United Nations. commons:File:Sub-Saharan Africa definition UN.png is currently based on the 20 September 2011 version of the UN page which was still displayed 8 October 2012 [7] and listed South Sudan under "Northern Africa". The current UN page has South Sudan under "Eastern Africa". All other Eastern Africa countries in the map are dark green. Western and Southern Africa are also dark green. The UN page says: "The designation sub-Saharan Africa is commonly used to indicate all of Africa except northern Africa, with the Sudan included in sub-Saharan Africa." So today it's only Sudan and not South Sudan which is an exception. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PRstore Wikipedia Entry

The original PRstore content for Wikipedia submitted by Scott Hepburn with references has been deleted. In its place are three terse negative entries about the company and its principals, including myself. I attempted to expand on this text through the editing process to provide additional history and context but this revised entry was deleted and "reverted" to the original negative text only. This is not right. We should be able to provide additional historical detail and context and not simply have the company portrayed with these three negative posts which were obviously posted by "haters." This is neither accurate nor fair. We want to be able to edit the text and have our edits accepted. Please let me know how we can make this right. Thank you for your assistance. Mike Butler, Founder, PRstore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.199.128.162 (talk) 21:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most of your changes have been made without any explanation or comment, and many of them have been unexplained removal of material: this tends to ring the "vandalism" bell for many people; making the same changes again without discussing them on the talk page is also likely to be seen as disruptive editing.

As far as I can see, the material you removed about the legal affairs were referenced to what appear to be reliable sources. This again makes removing them without explanation look like disruptive behaviour. When you added information to those sections, it was without references, and somebody very properly removed it.

What you need to do is

First, and most importantly, read our policy on conflict of interest, and understand why it is a very bad idea for you to be editing the article at all,.
Then, if there are things that you would like changed in the article, put your suggestions, with supporting citations to reliable independent sources, on the article's talk page Talk:PRstore, for uninvolved editors to consider them and edit the article. If it is the case that the information about legal process is incomplete or out of date, then Wikipedia would very much like it to be corrected or brought up to date - with solid citations. Please work within our processes and policies to make this happen. --ColinFine (talk) 22:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should also be aware that the article is now being watched by impartial editors. Further attempts to delete well-referenced criticism of the company, or to use the article for promotional purposes, will be reverted. Maproom (talk) 22:42, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Difficulties in start of video

I want to know if File:NSApolygraphvideo.webm was fully/correctly uploaded. When I try to start the video with the "play" button it doesn't start but when I move the dial the video content does go forward. Is this an issue with my browser, or does the upload need to be changed? WhisperToMe (talk) 23:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Xaverian High School

Why is Jason Calacanis notable as Co-founder of Weblogs, but the other Co-founder not? Brian Alvey is notable in his own right. Who made the wrong decision to,exclude him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.228.201.175 (talk) 23:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He was removed by a vandal. I have restored him. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 19

"Some parts of the edit form did not reach the server; double-check that your edits are intact and try again."

Hi there. So I just upgraded from IE9 to IE10, and whenever I'm editing and I click on "Preview", I get the message "Some parts of the edit form did not reach the server; double-check that your edits are intact and try again." I've tried it on three computers and it's the same thing on all of them. I've had a look around online thinking this might be an inherent problem with Wiki and IE10 but I can't find anything. Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks. Bertaut (talk) 01:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Bertaut: - I'm going to copy your question to WP:VPT, where more technical editors tend to hang out. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks. Bertaut (talk) 01:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a picture to the blue box

I am wondering how do I add a picture to the blue box on the right hand part of the entry? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisLHanssen069 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It would help if you told us the particular article you are here about but I think maybe you are talking about an infobox (which come in a rainbow of colors, not just blue). Do you mean, for example, a box like the one seen near the top right hand side of Hadji Ali? If so, the way it is done actually varies depending on which infobox the article uses, but for most, you add to the code of the infobox template: | image = followed by the actual name of the image you want to use, e.g. name of image.jpg

That is, click "edit source" at the top of the page, then look for code that is like what I am posting below, and insert the image code (shown in green):

{{Infobox person

| name = Name

| image = name of image.jpg

etc.

}}

Of course, you first have to locate a suitable image. That's a whole other topic, but note that we have a sister project, called the Wikimedia Commons with millions of images that can be used here natively. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My son who is in the Harris county jail today four guards went into his cell and took his papers for his defense and wouldn't tell who told them to get the papers Monday of this week the judge appoint

This Monday my son who is in the Harris county jail in Houston, Texas was appointed to represent him self in his trial because the appointed lawyer on his case had not in 21months given hin or talked to him about his case he had not seen any evidence in his case or even talked to him about anything around his case so the judge let my son fire the attorney and told the DA he had two weeks to get all boxes of evidence to where my son could go thru discoveries and evidence and today 07-18-13 four guards came to his cell and got his defense papers and would not say who ordered them to do this one of the guards said in the 20 years he had been there this had never happened and he was just following orders. My son Kelvin O'Brien told them that what they were doing was illegal and it was a felony to take his defense papers and read them we thank the DA was mad and ordered this done. The papers they took would show he was innocence in court . I'm going to report this to the judge that told the DA to get my son all evidence he had in two weeks. He's been there 22months and his trial has been put off 4times. Is there some legal route we can go to precut my sons rights.

this DA is so corrupt there's so many illegal things he's pulled too many to list here he needs to be investigated he thinks he rules that county and no one can touch him. I hope and pray that there's someway you can help thank you I hope this gets to the right people — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.147.123.145 (talk) 03:08, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not give legal advise, this is an encyclopedia. Mlpearc (powwow) 03:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contents boxes

Am I the only one seeing this? It's the same on every page. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 03:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's widespread. See WP:VPT#Contents box for further information. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 03:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

infobox - how to create one tutorial

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Theodore_H._Schwartz&oldid=564886172

@@ Line 734: / Line 734: @@
 :It's widespread. See [[WP:VPT#Contents box]] for further information. -- <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:John Broughton|John Broughton]] </font>  [[User talk:John Broughton |(♫♫)]] 03:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
+== infobox - how to create one tutorial ==
+infobox - how to create one tutorial
+http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Theodore_H._Schwartz&oldid=564886172

v t e Wikipedia help pages
*Visit the Teahouse* or the Help desk for an interactive Q & A forum. FAQs (?) Reference desks (?) Noticeboards (?) Cheatsheet (?) Directories (?)**
About Wikipedia (?)	Administration Purpose Principles Policies and guidelines What Wikipedia is not Disclaimer (parental advice) Making requests Who writes Wikipedia?
Help for readers (?)	FAQ Books Copyright Glossary Mobile access Navigation Other languages Searching Students Viewing media
Contributing to Wikipedia (?)	Advice for young editors Avoiding common mistakes Etiquette Simplified Manual of Style Simplified rule-set "Ignore all rules" "The rules are principles" Style-tips Tip of the day Your first article (article wizard)
Getting started (?)	Why create an account? Introductions by topic Graphics tutorials Picture tutorial IRC (live chat) tutorial VisualEditor user guide
Dos and don'ts (?)	Accessibility Biographies Biographies (living) Categorization Consensus Discussions Disambiguation Images Leads Links Lists References Tables Titles (of articles)
How-to pages and information pages (?)	Appealing blocks Article deletion Categories Citations/references Referencing for beginners Citation Style 1 Cite errors References and page numbers Convert Diff Editing Minor edit toolbar edit conflict Find sources Files Footnotes Image deletion Infoboxes Linking (link color) Logging in Merging Page name Renaming pages Redirect Passwords Email confirmation Reverting Simple vandalism cleanup Talk pages (archiving simple archiving) User contributions WP search protocol
Coding (?)	Wiki markup Barcharts Calculations Characters Columns Elevation Hidden text HTML Lists Magic words Music symbols Sections Sounds Tables Templates Transclusion URL Visual files
Directories (?)	Abbreviations Contents (Encyclopedia proper) Departments Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Guidelines Manual of Style Policies Tasks Tips Tools
Missing Manual Ask for help on your talk page (?)