User talk:Philg88

Welcome to the talk page of Philg88 - Please click here to leave a new message...

IF YOU CAME HERE BECAUSE I DELETED AN ARTICLE THAT YOU CREATED OR WORKED ON: Please see WP:REFUND first. Thanks.

December 13 2014

Thank you Philg88. You explained to me on my Teahouse question what the problem was with my subpage being critiqued for 2 disambiguation entries. I figured out why that had happened. It was when it was edited. The problem was due to my original citations. I have corrected them and I appreciate your help. JanvermontJanvermont (talk) 14:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Sunil Kumar Verma

Please tell me what next about article on Sunil Kumar Verma i.e how can I start working on this now after it has been userfied?? I am new to wiki editing business...but will try my best Educationtemple (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

@Educationtemple: Crisco 1492 has kindly offered to userfy the article and he will let you know when that has been done. You then need to ensure that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, particularly with regards to notability, which means adding the references you cited at the deletion review. If you are unsure what to do you can always ask at the Teahouse. Good luck!  Philg88 ^♦talk 15:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks  Philg88 . Thanks for kind suggestion. I see that it has been userfied now. I will try my best to do justice with this. If unsure at some step, would request help. Once I have done it at my end, I will update you and the House accordingly. Regards. Educationtemple (talk) 16:01, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 16:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello  Philg88 . I have worked on this article after it was userfied and re-written with all new evidences. Could you please review this for me so that it could be rescued as normal article out of userspace? User:Educationtemple/Sunil Kumar Verma Educationtemple (talk) 20:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Sir,  Philg88  I note that one editor has left a note to speedy delete the article that I have developed in my userspace after it was userfied. Could you please help to get this notice removed and review the new article with all the latest references discussed in DRV and then move it into the article space as appropriate. Thanks. Educationtemple (talk) 05:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Educationtemple: Hi there, FreeRangeFrog kindly removed the speedy deletion notice from your draft before I got there so don't worry about that. Excellent work on the revised version, well done! That said, we don't normally have a large pull quote in the middle of an article—it can be precised and turned into article text with appropriate references. If you don't mind, I will do that along with a couple of tweaks to the style and grammar. Let me know if that course of action is OK with you. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

In fact, if you do these tweaks, it would be an honor indeed! Please go ahead  Philg88  and thanks in advance. Educationtemple (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Educationtemple! All done and I hope that you are satisfied with the result! You might want to consider submitting this to the Did You Know? project, which would mean a link to the article from the main page. The hook might be something like: "Did you know that Sunil Kumar Verma was co-inventor of a technology that allows the identification of any bird, mammal or fish?" Best,  Philg88 ^♦talk 08:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Wonderful Job! Dear  Philg88 . Many Thanks......I will try to submit this to Did You Know? project as you suggested. Thanks again. Educationtemple (talk) 16:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Dear  Philg88 , I had a look of DYK project. I Read rules and tried to submit the article ..I fear that I may mess up the things during submission/nomination....May I request you to please give few more minutes and nominate it...?? The following DYK would be relevant =

Did you know that Sunil Kumar Verma was co-inventor of Universal primer technology, which allows identification of any unknown biological sample and its assignation to a known species source?

Please let me know if you could do this, please! Thanks. Educationtemple (talk) 15:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

and Yes, please let me know if you need my input on any specific article on advance science and technology related topics from anywhere in world, Specific topics related to Indian Educationists, Academicians, Academic Policies, Discoveries and innovations done in the world, Caste and religion related topics, or history related issues specifically the history of Indian subcontinent. I would be happy to work with you and provide my unbiased findings and share the knowledge. Educationtemple (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done See Template:Did you know nominations/Sunil Kumar Verma May I suggest you put something on your user page? It looks a bit odd having a red-linked author in a DYK submission. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 17:21, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done Oh! I did not realize that! Thanks! As soon as I have more contributions on Wiki, I will add more sections on my userpage accordingly. I need to learn a lot though! Hope DYK for Sunil Kumar Verma would be voted positively by reviewers. Cheers! Educationtemple (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello  Philg88 . After the nomination it got stuck at that stage. What is the next obvious step / stage? Just for my knowledge. Educationtemple (talk) 08:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

@Educationtemple: Don't worry it's not stuck. Sometimes it takes a while for submissions to be reviewed. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 08:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Bhargava

Sorry to bother you but I'm struggling right now to find an admin who edits even occasionally in the India topic area. Things are getting heated at Bhargava and it wouldn't surprise me if there is some meatpuppetry going on, given three different redlinked accounts turning up in rapid succession. Any chance you could add it to your watchlist for a day or two? - Sitush (talk) 10:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

No problem at all, my friend, I'll take a look. Oddly enough, I was planning to leave you a message this morning over the neutrality of the Punjab, India article. I'm not sure that the tag for the whole thing is warranted - the problem seems to be with the "Economy" section, even though the claims are sourced. I've fixed the problem with the "Transportation" section (I think) but I'd be grateful if you'd have a look and remove the tags if appropriate. Best,  Philg88 ^♦talk 10:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm off out for an hour or two but will look at the Punjab thing later, sure. - Sitush (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

@Sitush: I've left what I hope was a supportive message on the Bhargava talk page. It seems that Bhargavaflame is now claiming that Bhargava isn't a gotra but a grouping of 12 gotras. I don't know enough about this topic area to offer constructive input to the discussion, but I will back you up on matters of policy. Best,  Philg88 ^♦talk 11:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

That's ok. No-one expects you to understand the complexities - just so long as you understand the policies! A gotra is a clan; there can be many gotras in a caste and there can also be sub-clans. Sometimes it is easier to refer to this lot as a "community", simply because it saves us having to got bogged down in detail. I've replied there and am now off to look at Punjab (the article, I'm thousands of miles from the place). - Sitush (talk) 12:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I get the clan bit, but I'm missing the in-depth cultural and religious background knowledge. That, of course, is where Wikipedia comes in. I'll keep an eye on what develops at Bhargava. Enjoy The Punjab! Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 13:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Suny3598 (talk · contribs) doesn't seem to be getting the message. I'm pretty sure this is a meatfarm, working via some community forum. - Sitush (talk) 20:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

@Sitush: I've semi-protected the article for a week, which should stop any meatpuppetry for now. Let me know if you think further action is required. And thanks for your work on Punjab, India. Best,  Philg88 ^♦talk 21:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok, thanks very much. Am I ok to revert Suny's last removal of valid sourced info? I think it takes me over the edge. - Sitush (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Sam Sailor has already reverted, so nothing to worry about for now.  Philg88 ^♦talk 22:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Should I file at ANEW? Suny has removed "The Bhargava community were originally a trading caste ..." etc four times (with small differences) within the last 24 hours if I can count. Sam ^Sing! 22:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

I protected the page rather than block Suny to avoid a potential further backlash from other meat/sock puppets. I doubt if Suny will edit any other articles so blocking isn't really going to help the situation. That said, I'd like to hear what Sitush thinks. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 22:13, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

I doubt it is worth the effort filling in the ANEW template. I've already left the caste sanctions warning, so if they come back to do the same stuff again, I'd just find a willing admin to act per WP:GS/Caste. I've seen this pattern so many times, across so many caste articles, that I've long since given up concerning myself too much with WP:BITE when a group of like-minded accounts register very soon after each other. If Philg88 isn't willing, someone else will be. - Sitush (talk) 22:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Chinese source(s)

Hi, Ponyo suggested your name as someone who can read Chinese. Can you evaluate the Chinese article added as a source to Jannie Chan by Johnson103? Does it in fact say what he says it does? Yngvadottir (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Ponyo and Yngvadottir: It's an extract from a study of recent research carried out by the Singapore Hakka Research Association that says very little. More importantly it says nothing about Jannie Chan whatsoever and thus its applicability as a reference is therefore invalid—or as we Brits would say "complete bollocks".  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Jannie is actually mentioned on pg. 202 of the pdf. "梁純菁選擇胡文虎、張國林和曾秀麗為新馬客家企業家代表，並認為客家人的確具有創業文化的價值觀，可以滿足成功創業所需的條件。"  SmileBlueJay97  talk  09:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, well-spotted. Sorry, I only checked the first couple of pages. For accuracy, she was one of three people selected along with Hu Wenhu and Zhang Guolin. The reference is valid, my bad.  Philg88 ^♦talk 10:40, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

OK, I will add p. 202 to the ref. if no one else has. Thanks both! Yngvadottir (talk) 12:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Pregunta?

Buenas noches Philg88, ya tengo algunos conocimientos para crear paginas y pienso crear People from Guatemala, ademas ya voy avanzando en el ingles, tengo entendimiento en el idioma pero mi escritura y mi fluidez están jodidas :( ,pero me voy a basar en la pagina Nicaraguans, no en todo, solo la forma en que fue creada y la información sera diferente, pero no se si eso esta permitido en las instrucciones que requiere Wikipedia de como crear una pagina, buenas noches compañero :D (Halias 23) 20:18, 18 de Noviembre 2014 (UTC)

Hola Halias 23. Directrices Wikipedia sugieren que el título de este tipo de artículo debe ser Guatemalan people pero ese título redirigir actualmente a Demographics of Guatemala. ¿Hay algo en tu nuevo artículo propuesto que no está cubierto allí? Usted debe evitar la creación de People from Guatemala, ya que sería un WP: CONTENTFORK. Todo lo mejor,  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Night Train (composition)

Please don't use the word "consensus" when you mean "majority". Ghmyrtle (talk) 06:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Ghmyrtle: Majorities aren't applicable on Wikipedia per WP:NOTAVOTE. I meant "consensus", which is why I used the word.  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

I know very well that majorities aren't applicable. That's precisely why your decision surprised me. Ghmyrtle (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Ghmyrtle: I'm sorry if you don't agree with my decision on this. You are free to take the matter to move review if you believe that I somehow misinterpreted the consensus. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 07:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

No, it's not that big a deal - I was just surprised at your closing argument. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Ghmyrtle: No hard feelings I hope—you can't please all of the people all of the time!  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, Philg88. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

WyattAlex (talk) 09:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Conincidence

That we are dealing with 2 link promoters(at least right now). 1. User:Boby1187 2. User:59.180.60.185. I had formally warned Boby1187(see User_talk:Boby1187#Promotion.2Fspamming_a_website). Bladesmulti (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up Bladesmulti I've indeffed Boby1187 and will wait to see what happens with the IP. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 16:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Special:Contributions/Vipul.merinews is doing what these users have done, promotion. I have warned him. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:51, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome - IP appears to be Pratyushsingla, also indeffed.  Philg88 ^♦talk 16:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Bladesmulti: Blimey! They're coming thick and fast today. Vipul.merinews indeffed for spam.  Philg88 ^♦talk 16:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

The Wall

Hello! Some time ago you said that you might help out with some copy editing when Yakikaki and I were done fixing The Wall. Well now we are, and a bit of your magic touch would be much appreciated if and when you have the time. Yaki is off moving and I'll be at the SOIC, so the article is all yours. Best, w.carter-Talk 18:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

 Done kompis. Nice article, well done! Ha det så bra  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Young Stunna

Hello Philg88,

Thanks for moving the page Young stunna to Young Stunna. Stanleytux (talk) 07:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. Coincidentally, I just left you a message re talk page moves. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 07:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

ScotlandsPeople

I believe I have a preexisting account - can submit that in the form? Connormah (talk) 06:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

@Connormah: I'm not sure how ScotlandsPeople are going to handle this administratively and whether the free accounts will be a separate entity. By all means, mention it on the form in the "non-English wikis" field. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:49, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

I went ahead and submitted it under my preexisting account (didn't want to make another email address just for this purpose). I've never purchased anything on it (just redeemed some free credit offers from a while back). If it's a problem though, let me know and I will have to make a new one. Connormah (talk) 07:02, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Sure, let's wait and see how things pan out.  Philg88 ^♦talk 07:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Ayuda con una referencia

Hola Philg88. la pagina Spanish Costa Rican, la hice hace mas de una semana pero hay un problema con una referencia y no sabia a quien consultar ayuda, el problema es que busque en Google y me guié por un documento pdf con el titulo (Imprima este artículo - Universidad de Costa Rica), aunque después me di cuenta que es una descarga y en vez de aparecer un titulo web me aparece (file:///C:/Users/Usuario/Downloads/1938-3026-1-SM.pdf), que se podría hacer en ese caso?, Gracias (Halias 23) 16:16, 22 de Noviembre 2014 (UTC)

 Done He asked me too. w.carter-Talk 00:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Gracias.  Philg88 ^♦talk 07:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

AGR's block

Would you state this block on ANI? For user preference. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Sure.  Philg88 ^♦talk 13:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

@Bladesmulti: You may care to take a look at Nepal, it seems we have a potentially similar situation developing there.  Philg88 ^♦talk 08:18, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

I have that page added to my watchlist, I have just reverted him. It looks like he is continously involved in promoting his thought and discriminating others. See the edit history of India, Gautama Buddha( and the talk (page)) It is obvious that he has crossed 3rr, since he has changed pointed content for more than 3 times in 24 hours during the edit dispute. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:21, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

As it stands on Gautama Buddha, you are both at two reverts each so please be careful. It seems that we have a clear case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT with regard to Buddha's birthplace and I'm minded to consider this disruptive in light of the other article edits.  Philg88 ^♦talk 08:44, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes I did two times. He is just misrepresenting a faulty citation(UNESCO) and adding imaginary claims like "He lived most of his life in Nepal", etc, when they are not supported by the citation. Bladesmulti (talk) 09:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

I can't take sides in a content dispute to avoid becoming WP:INVOLVED. What I don't want here is for you to end up getting blocked for edit warring. I've left a further message on AGRs talk page, indicating that my patience is wearing thin.  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Comment

• Undid for (nonsensical and too against the rest of historicity) [1] when I had provided the source and Gautam Buddha has lived more than 15 yrs in Nepal. I had written the same.
• Undid revision without reason [2] Inclusion of History of India in name of History of Indian subcontinent in History of South Asia South Asia as if whole south asia is contained within India.
• Undid revision (irrevalent category) [3] But the category for english is relavent.
• Undid revision (nonsensial) [4]

Tasks done By Bladesmulti AmRit GhiMire "Ranjit" 02:41, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Of interest: [5] --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, Neil. I see AGR was blocked for a further week while I was catching up on some sleep. Peace now descends on Nepal and the Buddha! Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:35, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Closure too speedy, involvement

About this ANI thread, you closed [6]. You closed it way too early, clearly discussion was going on. You left no option to reply, while the editor you quoted (Scottywong) had changed their argument and made grave accusations against me. Also, in your closing statement, you show to take sides, that is: you entered your opinion in the conclusion. That makes you an involved editor (quite simply: opinions go in the thread, uninvolved editors close). I note that in a previous ANI closure where we met, you did the same [7] (then, even allowing a partisan editor to edit & cleanup the record after your closure). -DePiep (talk) 12:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure quite what end your message is supposed to achieve. I told you where participants could continue the discussion if necessary, where I see Andy Mabbett is waiting for you to reply. At the same time, I fail to see how my summary of what another admin said in an ANI closing summary can be construed as in any way WP:INVOLVED.  Philg88 ^♦talk 16:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

If you don't understand what my initial ANI post requested, why do you think you are capable of concluding it? Here you are asking for clarification afterwards, you should have asked in the ANI thread of course. Here you repeat that you have an opinion in this (however uninformed). As for Pigsonthewing "waiting" for a reply: not so. Pigsontewing started stalking me (not so strange, since you gave them a free pass for the earlier untalked reverts). All in all you show & repeat here that you have concluded the ANI without reading it, and biased against me. (And previously you allowed an editor change your closed ANI discussion, helping whitewashing your own actions and cloring me bad). Most disgusting point in your attitude, after not reading the points I mentioned, is that you start blaming me for not going to talkpages, while Pigsonthewing/Mabbett actually did the edit warring without any talkpage contribution. Disgusting attitude. -DePiep (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

After my opening sentence, I wrote: You closed it way too early, clearly discussion was going on. You did not respond to *that* in any way, your response here is evading and redirecting. You have the freedom of an admin to do so, in fact to ignore any text written. That must be the Admin's Sixth Pillar then. -DePiep (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

About the usage of G6 for speedy deletion

Hello, Philg88. First of all, thank you for moving Ilhabela. Now, I've been thinking: would it have been possible for me, as a non-admin, to add {{db-move|1=Ilhabela, São Paulo|2=unnecessary disamiguation}} or something like that to that page, so that it gets deleted and I can make the move myself without taking the time of admins? Or it doesn't make much difference if I do it myself or if I request the move? Thank you, Victão Lopes ^Fala! 20:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi there Victão, and thanks for the message. As you say, it doesn't make much difference but it's probably quicker to request it at non-controversial moves as an admin is likely to see it more quickly—the page is checked pretty often. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 21:44, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Referencia

Hola PHILG88, acabo de crear dos pagina German Salvadoran y Salvadorans in Guatemala, pero en la ultima pagina que te mencione, hay un problema con la primer referencia, y si se lo que pasa, pero se trata de un libro, y me indica que tengo que poner al autor, pero el libro que consulte, no dice el nombre autor solo dice que lo hizo la ONU y CEPAL. Gracias y feliz tarde (Halias 23) 02:59, 27 de Noviembre 2014 (UTC)

@Halias 23:  Done  Philg88 ^♦talk 07:53, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Philg88: Gracias :D (Halias 23) 11:16 28/11/2014 (UTC)

Technical page move: Java Servlet to Java servlet?

I noticed you removed the request to move Java Servlet to Java servlet and the page move log says it was moved but the page still has the old title. Was this an oversight? Thanks for your help. Jojalozzo 04:48, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Jojalozzo: No it wasn't an oversight. I carried out the move as an "uncontroversial technical request" but it clearly wasn't as Andy Dingley reverted the move. If you still want the article moved you will need to talk to Andy or post a {{requested move}} template on the talk page.  Philg88 ^♦talk 07:37, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

This has come and gone repeatedly over the years. It comes down to, "Does WP's abhorrence for capitalisation override Sun et al. (with sources) treating it as a proper noun phrase?"

It's probable, given WP's fondness for inventing neologisms over following reality, that it will end up lowercased. However it's certainly not "uncontroversial". Andy Dingley (talk) 11:56, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Extended content

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with… 65 Hinduism in South America (talk) Add sources 33 Amb (princely state) (talk) Add sources 88 Eluru (talk) Add sources 2,891 Bangalore (talk) Add sources 40 Battle of Colachel (talk) Add sources 123 Mamluk Dynasty (Delhi) (talk) Add sources 115 Pakistan and state-sponsored terrorism (talk) Cleanup 44 Kuvempu University (talk) Cleanup 29 Thangal Kunju Musaliar College of Engineering, Kollam (talk) Cleanup 14 Timeline of Shanghai (talk) Expand 689 India–Pakistan relations (talk) Expand 171 Telangana movement (talk) Expand 84 Mughal tribe (talk) Unencyclopaedic 50 Sindhudesh (talk) Unencyclopaedic 120 Karimnagar (talk) Unencyclopaedic 650 Xkcd (talk) Merge 33 Astor House Hotel (Shanghai) (talk) Merge 2,044 Hyderabad (talk) Merge 5 Charles Wood (actor) (talk) Wikify 51 Hinduism in the West Indies (talk) Wikify 40 Queensland Cup (talk) Wikify 3 Sahita (talk) Orphan 5 Map Link (talk) Orphan 2 Chestnut Hill Realty (talk) Orphan 11 Moti Ram Mehra (talk) Stub 44 Green chromide (talk) Stub 114 Bluemix (talk) Stub 9 Tsewang Rabtan (talk) Stub 21 Nepal Standard Time (talk) Stub 4 Dhetarwal (talk) Stub SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Vijender Kumar

Dear  Philg88 , as an attempt to enrich the Wikipedia:WikiProject India, I have drafted the article on Vijender Kumar, Professor of Law, who has recently assumed charge as Vice Chancellor of National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam, India. Please see the draft article here in my user space (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Educationtemple/sandbox/Vijender_Kumar): I shall be grateful if you could kindly review this and if appropriate, please move to main section. Thanks in advance. Educationtemple (talk) 15:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Educationtemple and welcome back. I've done some minor copyediting on the article but I'm afraid at the moment it is not suitable for main article space. The sections on "Education and career" and "Contributions" are completely unreferenced so you need to add appropriate citations from reliable sources in line with Wikipedia's WP:GNG/Biographies of living persons policy.  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:25, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear  Philg88  thanks for comments. I shall work on these points ASAP. Educationtemple (talk) 06:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear  Philg88  did some more tweaking, added some more references in "Education and career" and "Contributions". Please see the latest version (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Educationtemple/sandbox/Vijender_Kumar). If not still OK, I will have to do more research on the net to find out more about him. Please let me know. Thanks. Educationtemple (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

I already see his name on the article Commonwealth Scholarship and Fellowship Plan as well as the article on National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam (As Vice Chancellor of the University) . I shall update the inline links from these pages if this article is approved. Educationtemple (talk) 11:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

@Educationtemple: All done. Another nice article, well done!  Philg88 ^♦talk 11:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear  Philg88  This is wonderful! Thanks a lot once again! Cheers! Educationtemple (talk) 11:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for Being my teacher

Thank You Philg88

Educationtemple (talk) 16:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Fringe source

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uyghur_people&diff=635767398&oldid=635488688

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uyghur_people&diff=636171698&oldid=636099772

Sino-Platonic papers publishes fringe theories, it explicitly seeks out unknown and "independent" authors to publish "controversial" material.

http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp150_uyghurs.pdf

Rajmaan (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

I am afraid this is going to turn into a revert spree with me and him undoing each other's edits so someone needs to step in.Rajmaan (talk) 23:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

@Rajmaan: Hey my friend. This looks like a matter for WP:Dispute Resolution/Reliable sources noticeboard rather than something I can wave a magic wand at. FWIW, looking at the source I would say that a journal published by the Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations at University of Pennsylvania under the editorship of Victor H. Mair would generally be considered reliable. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

I discussed the problematic content at User talk:Hzh and decided on what to remove. (And as a side note, Mair doesn't publish "mainstream" material in that journal nor accepts material by people with established credentials, the reason Mair runs this journal is to give a platform for strange theories regarding ancient central asian connections or influence in China, I've seen articles there claiming indo-european provenance for words in Chinese that basically any mainstream linguist would dismiss, but that's not the specific issue here)Rajmaan (talk) 06:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

@Rajmaan: Looks like you have a constructive dialog underway with Hzh, so I don't think that there's any danger of an edit war developing. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

AYUDA URGENTE

Hola de nuevo Philg88, soy halias 23 con otra cuenta, perdi la contrasena de Halias 23, trate de restablecerla pero no se pudo, ayudeme a recuperar mi cuenta, muchisimas gracias, saludos de (ELreydeEspana) y (Halias 23) 11:51 01/12/14 (UTC)

I got the same message and have left a reply for this on my talk page. Feel free to add to the conversation here or there if I have misunderstood something (which is quite likely) Best, w.carter-Talk 18:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Replied there.  Philg88 ^♦talk 20:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

upsss, lo siento, solo necesitaba ayuda rapida, pero si es molestia que coloque el mismo mensaje a dos personas no lo haré mas (ELreydeEspana) 18:05 01/12/14 (UTC)

Como mover mi cuenta antigua con la actual?

Hola Philg88, W.carter me menciono que es administrador y puede ayudarme a mover mi historial, discusiones y otras cosas de mi antigua cuenta para esta nueva cuenta, no hay problema con el tiempo y comprendo porque aya en Europa el horario es muy diferente que en América, pero muchas gracias (user:ELreydeEspana) 19:13 1/12/14 (UTC)

Replied at W.carter's talk page. Please try and keep conversations in one place. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:02, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

A bunny for you

The soft bunny of happiness and tranquility.

A nice bunny being given to you, and maybe not for the first or last time. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. It's becoming a bit of a zoo here!  Philg88 ^♦talk 15:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Some good news for a change

Gotland says thanks you! Yesterday morning Radio Gotland had a 18 minutes spot about the List of church ruins on Gotland becoming a FL and Wikipedia in general. :) The National Swedish Radio will follow suit with a short spot too, date unknown. This was because of a tweet. This info shamelessly nicked from User talk:Yakikaki#Radio. Best, w.carter-Talk 12:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Good news indeed, kompis. But we've both already had more than our allocated fifteen minutes of fame.  Philg88 ^♦talk 15:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Well, I just thought it was great the WP got some free ad time on the wireless. :) Cheers, w.carter-Talk 16:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

nurd

Qin sux buttz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diggitycow (talk • contribs) 15:59, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Indef blocked.  Philg88 ^♦talk 16:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

... needs more work --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:02, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Should be OK now.  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Let's hope. Did you know that "Hope" is the first entry on my talk? - My name (for you) is just Gerda --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

I miss Kiefer --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Demiurge1000

I indef sysop protected. Appropriate? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:10, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't want to keep reverting all day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:14, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

And I don't want to keep revdelling. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Totally appropriate in the circumstances - there is no reason for anyone except admins or WMF to edit the page.  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Revdel

Is the BLP vio rationale only for articles? Should "grossly insulting..." be the rationale when directed against users/at userspace? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

AFAIK, a User/User Talk page does not fall within Wikipedia's BLP policy so I guess that rationale is only for articles. "Grossly insulting ..." is a good catch all as it's pretty wooly.  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

James Matheson, William Jardine (merchant), History of Jardine, Matheson & Core drug trafficking

Are you contending that they i)opium is not a drug/narcotic, ii)that Jardine and Matheson were not smugglers.

Would you be brave enough to rewrite these three articles to remove opium smuggling from their resumes. If not "drug trafficker" what do you suggest? Would the category one up be agreeable Category:Smugglers.--KTo288 (talk) 19:49, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay Category:Smugglers added to the two, with smuggler in place of drug trafficker in the case of Jardine, because even by the definitions of the time that was what they did.--KTo288 (talk) 19:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, and thanks for the message. I'm not contending that opium isn't a drug nor that Jardine and Matheson weren't opium smugglers because that's what reliable sources say. What I am against is linking this to modern day drug trafficking, which is a completely different pigeon and doesn't factor in the social and moral context of the first half of the 19th century. Of course, if one wanted to split hairs, it was the Chinese who actually smuggled the drug into the country, JM just flogged it to them off Lintin Island or further up the coast. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 20:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Newburn may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of this form of operation to be found amongst other English battles".<ref name=EH />{{rp|7}} p. 7}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:12, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

 Fixed

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Xuanzang may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Between 632 and early 633, he studied with various monks, including 14 months with Vinītaprabha ({{zh|t=毘膩多缽臘婆 or 調伏光), 4 months with Candravarman ({{zh|t=旃達羅伐摩|labels=no}} or {{zh|t=月胃|labels=no}}),

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)  Fixed

ani

sorry to ask here but I placed a request at ani, and have gotten no response, what should I do--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ozzie10aaaa and thanks for the message. I've closed the discussion at the ANI board and commented accordingly. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 18:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

For Your amusement

It's a proven fact: Wikipedians are desperate for some fun. Adding an expansion of 54,735 bytes didn't even make the Page view statistics blink. But look what this diff (yes, I was a bit bored) made to the views. :) Q.E.D. w.carter-Talk 20:59, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Blimey, kompis, that's a serious spike! Suitably amused. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:43, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Satyananda Saraswati

Thanks for taking care of that. I put full pp on for 48 hours on Friday and didn't hand out any blocks because I hoped (stupidly) that they might actually discuss in the meantime. But no, wait for the protection to end and back to square 1. I suspect it will continue and more blocks ensue. Nthep (talk) 08:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. The indef-semi should stop some of it, but you're quite right, this is the sort of content that will continue to be argued over. Break out the sock radar ... sigh ...  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:05, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

You are right, I was also hoping that an of the people that kept in deleting the content added was going to come forward to have a real discussion but it didn't really work. Sorry that I requested a third party opinion. It seemed to be like the best next step. I will follow your advise using one of the other approaches. What do you recommend we should do next. Basically followers of the person in question are trying to avoid some of the content revealed in a public hearing to be added to the bio. Any suggestions are welcomed. Totocol (talk) 09:29, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

@Totocol: Asking an admin for advice? Heavens above, whatever next! As far as the article is concerned, all you can do is ensure that all potentially controversial content is solidly referenced. That said, I noticed a WP:CITEKILL section - you don't need nine references - pick the best three. As for potential socking and disruption, there are two members of the Evil Cabal watching the article...  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:41, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Update: Sock radar activated. Babakin007 indef blocked after loud quacking heard from the article's direction.  Philg88 ^♦talk 20:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Since he has started an RFC, I have reverted his changes. Because it is one of the rule of RFC that the requested changes must not be implemented if they are new. I don't see how they are necessary or they cause any impact in his career, it is just an allegation by a person who is just a former member of center. Some hours ago, I had also asked for page protection. I am also not sure that why these SPAs have singed in after years, other than edit warring on this article. Bladesmulti (talk) 09:54, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

@Bladesmulti: I've no idea either. I've extended the full protection for a week pending the result of the RFC.  Philg88 ^♦talk 10:12, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for intervening again. I hope the result is that the editors that are trying to delete new information with valid references are not able to continue deleting the new information added. Totocol (talk) 18:52, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'll keep an eye on how things develop. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 18:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring again, I have no idea what to do really, I thought that 190.(the IP) is a new editor, but now it seems like Totocol has been also editing with IP. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library - ScotlandsPeople - I've not got mail

It's a little while now since you left me a talk page message about ScotlandsPeople. I've not had a mail about an account, and if one was sent, it would need to be sent again. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that. Let me check into it and get back to you. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 16:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

@Charles Matthews: ScotlandsPeople now have all the relevant details so you should hear something in the next few days. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 08:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE coordinator elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Candidate nominations for Guild coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015, are currently underway. The nomination period will close at 23:59 on December 15 (UTC), after which voting will commence until 23:59 on December 31, 2014. Self-nominations are welcomed. Please consider getting involved; it's your Guild and it won't coordinate itself, so if you'd like to help coordinate Guild activities we'd love to hear from you. Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis. Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Info

Hi there,I wanted to ask you that what is the meaning of good faith edits?? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devesh 4-2-2000 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

@Devesh 4-2-2000: In the context of why I reverted your edit on Lucknow, it means that you made an edit with the right motive but that it didn't fit in with established Wikipedia policies and guidelines. You can read more about good faith here. Cheers,  Philg88 ^♦talk 17:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you,Buddy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devesh 4-2-2000 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	I'm sorry for the conflict in the Teahouse and now I reward this to you. DEW. Adrenaline (Nahnah4) 10:15, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!  Philg88 ^♦talk 10:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Day 3

This is day 3 of a large scale overload cyber attack on the Swedish Internet. My only access is via an old phone with an obsolete webhost. So no edits, no mail, nothing. Just to let you know. w.carter-Talk 10:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey, @W.carter: do we have article about this cyber attack? Sounds like it will pass our WP:NEVENTS. Jim Carter 11:02, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

I have no idea. You have to look, I can't see anything here. Most pages can't be reached, WP is one of the few that is open to me. Even writing this takes forever on this old thing I have to use now. w.carter-Talk 11:12, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

@Jim Cartar: (I'm posting here to keep the conversation intact.) Back online, for now. The attack was actually three consecutive attacks, but not noteworthy since they did not affect the entire system just most of it. A hacker group called Lizard Squad, thought to originate in Russia, has claimed responsibility for it. The were out to cause trouble for the gaming company Electronic Arts and blacked out large parts of Sweden in the process. In a statement they say that the attacks will continue on this and other gaming companies until Christmas. Through open servers they managed to access 25 million computers and use them in an overload. Best, w.carter-Talk 15:36, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that kompis. From my experiences in China, I know how annoying an outage like that can be. Chin up and I'm sure they'll fix it soon!  Philg88 ^♦talk 16:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh. Sorry to hear that @W.carter:. I hope it will be fixed soon. But if we get news coverage for a good amount of time then an article maybe possible. Btw what does kompis mean? Jim Carter (from public cyber) 18:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

@Jim Cartar: Yes, it's annoying, but we'll manage. It's fixed for now and I've hooked up at an old account on a small server that is not affected, a bit slower that usual but working. Sort of like working with Morse code while the aliens are attacking. ;) Kompis is Swedish for "my friend". Cheers, w.carter-Talk 19:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Lucia!

Happy Saint Lucia's day!

---

"Good Morning" Philg88:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia!
13 December is the day when Swedes perplex the rest of the world by showing up way too early in the morning dressed in white tunics, candles in their hair, singing and bringing saffron buns and breakfast in bed to nice people. Hope you have a bright day!
    – w.carter-Talk 00:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!  Philg88 ^♦talk 07:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) (humourous message) You mean December 13 is Taylor Swift's birthday, W.carter? DEW. Adrenaline (Nahnah4) 09:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

I doubt if they'll rename it "St Taylor's Day" but you could try ... .  Philg88 ^♦talk 10:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

She's always welcome to apply for "being Lucia" and help us scare the crap out of the Nobel laureates on this morning. Most of them stay on a couple of days after the ceremony and get morning treatment. :) w.carter-Talk 10:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhajanpura

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhajanpura

I edited innotechive as a site/blog name but you reverted it . Innotechive is not a name of shop .

ANd what about safety rate in this town , I had visited there once..— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thevigilante053 (talk • contribs)

Hi there Thevigilante053 and thanks for the message. It doesn't matter whether it's a shop. The relevant Wikipedia guideline clearly states that the following external links are not permitted: "Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority." Thank you for your understanding.  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Extended content

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with… 27 Venad (talk) Add sources 35 Velu Thampi Dalawa (talk) Add sources 17 Ambalavasi (talk) Add sources 33 Sethu Lakshmi Bayi (talk) Add sources 102 Saharanpur (talk) Add sources 32 Perintalmanna (talk) Add sources 3 Origin of Malankara Church of God Thrikkannamangal (talk) Cleanup 10 Chavara Thekkumbhagom (talk) Cleanup 35 Van Dyke Brown (talk) Cleanup 19 Bashir Ahmed Qureshi (talk) Expand 44 Kottarakkara (talk) Expand 19 Shafi Muhammad Burfat (talk) Expand 234 Culture of Sindh (talk) Unencyclopaedic 98 Dominant minority (talk) Unencyclopaedic 14 Kaduthuruthy (talk) Unencyclopaedic 553 Dravidian languages (talk) Merge 1,235 Organic farming (talk) Merge 4 Quilon Aerodrome (talk) Merge 118 Demographics of Kerala (talk) Wikify 9 Kaimal (talk) Wikify 106 Temples of Kerala (talk) Wikify 3 Kochu Hassan Kunju Bahadoor (talk) Orphan 2 St George church (talk) Orphan 4 Methan mani (talk) Orphan 29 Travancore-Cochin (talk) Stub 6 Avittom Thirunal Balarama Varma (talk) Stub 2 Rupalheri (talk) Stub 4 Thalapilly (talk) Stub 5 Mayyanad (talk) Stub 4 Amir Haider (talk) Stub SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:07, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2014 Newsletter Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in November's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 43 people who signed up for this drive, 26 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: The November Drive removed 26 requests from the Requests page and 509 articles from the {{copy edit}} backlog. We copy edited 83 articles tagged in the target months; July, August, and September 2013. Together with tag removals from articles unsuitable for copy editing, we eliminated July 2013 from the backlog and reduced August and September's tags to 61 and 70 respectively. As of 01:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC), the backlog stood at 1,974 articles, dipping below 2,000 for the first time in the Guild's history (see graph at right). Well done everyone! Blitz: The December Blitz will run from December 14–20 and will focus on articles related to Religion, in recognition of this month's religious holidays in much of the English-speaking world. Awards will be given out to everyone who copy edits at least one of the target articles. Sign up here! Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from 1 January to 30 June 2015 is now underway. Candidates can nominate themselves or others from December 01, 00:01 (UTC), until December 15, 23:59. The voting period will run from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. You can read about coordinators' duties here. Please consider getting involved and remember to cast you vote—it's your Guild and it doesn't organize itself! Thank you all once again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve anything without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletion caused problems

Phil, you deleted Kathi Darbar(Kshatriya) by renaming it without leaving a redirect. Unfortunately, you broke multiple links and redirects to this page in the process. The article had been at that mis-spaced title since 2010. Because the title is so old, it does not qualify for speedy deletion (which is exactly what you did), but instead needs discussion at WP:Redirects for discussion before being deleted. I've restored the redirect, but in the future, do not move without redirects unless the old name qualifies for speedy deletion. Also, do not move without a redirect without fixing incoming links. Thank you, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 17:28, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Strictly speaking it wasn't a speedy deletion but a page move over a redirect. That said, it was my bad not leaving the redirect, which I did on the basis of a spacing error not requiring one. Once all the wrongly spaced incoming links are fixed, the page can go.  Philg88 ^♦talk 18:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

The page should not be deleted, and its four years at that title would almost certainly lead to a keep decision at Redirects for Discussion. We can fix our links, but we can't fix the rest of the Internet. Since the page doesn't need to be deleted anyway, the incoming links don't really need to be fixed anyway. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 18:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

CE

Does this need any copyedit? Jim Carter 07:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done  Philg88 ^♦talk 08:51, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much friend! Any other suggestions on how to improve it further? Jim Carter 08:57, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Not really, looks OK to me.  Philg88 ^♦talk 08:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm thinking of nominating it for GA. Since you have some experience with GA process so any opinion? Jim Carter 09:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

I haven't done a thorough review but it certainly meets the outline criteria. I suggest that you file a request at the Ga nominations page.  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

A follow on question to previous help, now about removing an orphan tag

Hello Philg88,

You helped me before on Teahouse with a question about the Janice Lourie Wikipedia page, so I am returning with a follow on question. The page has been tagged with an orphan tag, however it is only a week old. It doesn't make sense to me that it should have internal links. The page has many external references to insure its notability.

Janice Lourie is pending AFC submission. (Just added the pending status in case that is relevant to me request)

Would it be appropriate for me to select undo and remove the tag? JanJanvermont (talk) 13:43, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Jan for the additionJanvermont (talk) 14:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)