Jump to content

User talk:68.39.174.238

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Big X (talk | contribs) at 23:55, 24 November 2007 (→‎Thank you very much: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Click here to force update / purge / reload this talk page
This IP address resolved to c-68-39-174-238.hsd1.nj.comcast.net as of 23 January 2007, 14:03 (UTC)


And the point of that is? 68.39.174.238 02:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That people keep wondering which ISP allows IPs to remain static for years? Flyingtoaster1337 08:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comcaſt gives some degree of statisticity[sic] by mapping IPs to MAC addrs. Hence, by keeping the same MAC addr facing their DHCP svrs, I've been steadily assigned this IP addr for about 2 years. Prior to that I'd had some different routers with different IPs. Some of my contributions can be seen to articels like New City Village (Which are totall newbies). 68.39.174.238 22:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see nothing wrong with removing this box. The user that added it used an edit summary of ":P", and it is redundant to the whois links on the bottom. Regards, Tuxide 04:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not annoying, it just didn't immediately make sense. 68.39.174.238 07:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Note! The template-message(s) below contain(s) material found amusing and is/are kept for that reason.
They are NOT intended, nor should they be used, for any research or serious use.

Your neighbors have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against letting off fireworks and munitions in celebration of the Gregorian New Year against the peace of this State, the government and dignity of the same. To contest this block, please move to another State and let them deal with you or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

Note to sysops: Shooting off fireworks where it's illegal should almost never be done. If you disagree, contact your system's administrators.
Note: In the event of persistent disregard for the law, like your neighbors displayed this year, AGAIN, the local authorities should do something, but are almost certain to not do so, unless their fireworks do something like start a fire.
68.39.174.238

Vandalism Fighter
Real Name: Unknown.
Position: Persistent.
Edits: Well over 15000.
Wants a user page: NO.
Asked to register: Many, many times.
Asked to admin: Many, many times.
Is a vandal: No
Location: New Jersey
First known edit: 26 September 2005
2005 Archives: 1 · 2
2006 Archives: 1 · 2
2007 Archives: 1 · 2


Attention:

This IP address, 68.39.174.238, is registered to highly intelligent brain cells dedicated to fighting vandals and is shared by multiple brain cells. Comments left on this page may be received by other brain cells of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered brain cell operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your ganglion. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of your fingers that communicates between your brain cells and the Wikimedia servers. Such fingers are shared among a huge number of bodily usages compared to the number of brain cells using your particular ganglion. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

--Nlu (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]




To see old comments, please see "my" archives (1, 2, 3) ([Foul language]... obnoxious removal of old text... One of these days I'll revert them ALL!)

The below text is transcluded from a sub page because people kept complaining that my page was too long D:... (Thanx to User:BD for the move). Note that this (The page and then lists) were suggested by others, IE. I'm not maintaining these for self-aggrandizement, nor do I solicit people's entires here. 68.39.174.238 11:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of users who want you to make an account

"Don't fly with the finches when you can soar with the eagles."

If you urge 68.39.174.238 to get an account, you can add this userbox to your user page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylu (talk • contribs) {{User talk:68.39.174.238/accountbeggars}}

This user has urged 68.39.174.238 76.117.247.55 to get an account.
Note that User:Nathanrdotcom has created a page for culinary (And possibly other) inducements, which was formerly located on my main user page. Thanx N.R.!
136 Wikipedians want 68.39.174.238 to get an account.
Feel free to add to this list
  1. Titoxd(?!? - did you read this?) 02:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. HappyCamper 02:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I've read this page, and yes, you should make one. NSLE (T+C+CVU) 02:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Shanel 02:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC) Do it, doooo ittt......[reply]
    I hate you, you keep beating me to reverting :P--Shanel 02:42, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. -- Francs2000 02:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oran e (t) (c) (e-mail) 03:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Holy bejeesus, yes. CHAIRBOY (☎) 03:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Robert 04:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support I thought he already was one. 04:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC) CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:04, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    REAL smooth. I'm blaming whoever said that somewhere around here D:... 68.39.174.238 04:05, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry but votes and comments from editors without accounts dont count. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:09, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    This vote has no effect and so votes and editors with accounts don`t count. 68.39.174.238 04:11, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Speedy Support You MUST create a account, excellent vandal fighter, hell I could even nominate you for adminship quickly if you do :D --Aranda 56 04:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support as long as I don't have to. — 12.201.72.68 04:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support. --Ixfd64 05:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support or assimilatemerge to Borg. --Nlu (talk) 06:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. Get an account, if for no other reason than to be recognized as a non-vandal. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 06:49, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    GEH! I STRONGLY protest the assertation that IPs are vandals, or the assumption of that. I *WILL NOT* get an account solely to satisfy such people. 68.39.174.238 06:51, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    When I say "recognized", I allude to the fact that a username entry would be easier for a human patroller to recognize as a contribution from a trustworthy editor, rather than incurring simultaneous scrutiny by six or seven patrollers. Also, while it would be debatable to say "most IP users are vandals" (because I suspect a large portion of the IP-user vandalism is caused by relatively few actual people), it not debatable to say "most vandalism does come from IP users." Thus, you should, really, take no offense to this. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 07:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    If it wasn't for the fact that other pplseem to think so I likely whouldn't take that that way... 68.39.174.238 07:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. user:JiFish - You are a good user. You should get an account. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 14:28, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Izehar (talk) 14:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support --tyomitch 14:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Excellent vandal fighter --Prodego talk 17:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support. You should create an account and then immediately nominate yourself for adminship. You would be helping the RC patrol by creating an account with an easily recognizable user name. --TantalumTelluride 19:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    I propose the name Sixty-eight on Wheels!. --Nlu (talk) 20:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support good editor who needs an account!--Alhutch 21:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support What they said –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 23:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support. Would make a great user! ;] --негіднийлють (Reply|Spam Me!*|RfS) 00:45, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support—do it, do it now! =) Bmdavll talk 22:53, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support - so we can admin you three minutes later. JFW | T@lk 11:44, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Support Yes unless you already are one. Keep removing vandalism and good work. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 16:37, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Strong support. the wub "?!" 17:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support, so we can admin you. --Wikiacc (talk) 21:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. That and sysop-ship after two months of using that account. IPs don't last forever, you know. Me and him are really fighting that Communism dude, anyway. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 05:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support - has an anon ever been granted adminship before? --Celestianpower háblame 14:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support Jwissick(t)(c) 07:10, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support, and happy new year. :D —Locke Cole • t • c 08:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --F. Cosoleto 01:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Support. Get an account already! It's not that hard to log in every time. — Alex 07:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Strongly Support You are a great editor and have done a great job fighting vandalism. You should be an admin, as a matter of fact. Mrbelvedereposter28 23:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. support: Heh. Ombudsman 06:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Support: I swear I had a vote here before... WikiFanatic 22:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Come on! You are so great! You would be adminned so fast! Viva La Vie Boheme
  38. get an account already! You would be a very good wikipedian! ID'd award you a barnstar but I really can't atm for 2 reasons: lost my accounts pass and I cant award a barnstar to a masked avenger :D keep up the good work, with an account or not! :D --217.129.205.214 23:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC) (AKA Chaos Reaver[reply]
  39. Support -- Tvaughn05e (Talk)(Contribs) 15:21, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. SUPPORT!!!! (whoops, have I already voted before? I wear my userbox with pride... GET AN ACCOUNT!)Nippoo 12:05, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Support. Every damn time you beat me to a revert I have to check the diffs to make sure it's legit. Really annoying :( --Rory096 08:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Computerjoe's talk 17:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Strong Support: This user could probably get admin in a week if he joined. M o P 18:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Support-I stumbeled here by accident, had no idea what I was stumbling into, but I have the feeling I've stumbeled on to something pretty large. Yeah, I would say get an account. I really do like and deeply respect how you're trying to make a good name for IP's but If anything it would just be much easier to remember. 68.39.174.238 just isn't that catchy. ;-) --Sgore 03:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. What, you're not already an admin?!-Support And for the hell of it, have another barnstar. Also, I'm going to create you a user page with all your barnstars on it. (Just don't revert me, lol) --ZsinjTalk 03:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Just a thought: perhaps we should create a userbox saying "I am one of those who urged 68.39.174.238 to create an account", then all those above can proudly display it on their user pages! Ekjon Lok 02:26, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Hehehe...{{User 68.39.174.238}} Titoxd(?!? - help us) 02:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Templatized by —Locke Cole • t • c 06:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. +44 Support - pretty please. We can really use an admin with your level of quality contributions and dedication to The Project. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 06:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. +44 Support - I've done it at some point. And you could be admin! -- Jjjsixsix (t)/(c) @ 06:07, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Support; you are a true member of Wikipedia, regardless of whether or not you have an official membership; however, to be an admin - a position which you deserve - you must be a regesterd member. PS: Don't format your hard drive and reinstall your Operating System - you don't want to lose your IP! David P. A. Hunter 11:03, 29 April 2006 (UTC) PS: The template above can now be seen at User:hunterd/68.39.174.238, making it a true template; I will keep it here until you get an account - at which point I'll move it into your user page. It can be used by typing: {${User:Hunterd/68.39.174.238}$} without the dollar signs($).[reply]
  49. --Randy Johnston 00:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Get an account.--GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 05:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Support you can be a even better contributor if you make an account! The Gerg 16:17, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Support I really hate the fact that you always beat me to reverting, and then I have to check that you're not a vandal, although you're an anon user! Very annoying! >.< --Emc² (CONTACT ME) 22:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support You really should join!
  54. Do it c'mon, all the kids at school are doing it! Just one user account, it won't kill you. Just click the sign up link and inhale deep. Hold it in - don't sign out. Oh wait, we're talking about user accounts? --AbsolutDan (talk) 02:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Please. --Zoz (t) 18:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Very, Very, Very, Strong Support. Oh, come on. You really do help us out a lot. ―Linux|erist 11:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Cleared for signing up to get an account Then, you'll be able to assist me in my admin work :D --Pilot|guy 13:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Give it up sign up, it is so much easier with an account. I edited on and off for about six months and it is much better.
  59. --John Lake 03:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Support--KojiDude (talk) 05:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Ater thinking about it for a while, I changed my vote to Oppose. You have the freedom to do whatever you want, and if you don't want to get an account, more power too ya!--KojiDude (viva la BAM!) 01:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Die die must join. I support you!--Tdxiang 07:20, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. I was just passing by, when I noticed what an excellent editor this IP is. You shouls seriously get an account, what happens when you change ISP? Your current IP and identity will be lost forever! How do you prove you were connected to this IP back then? +Hexagon1 (t) 03:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Support, good IP vandal fighter around, get an account please. --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 09:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Support Of course, why not get one? You're obviously a very good vandal fighter. - Bootstoots 16:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Strong support Give in to your anger! Bakanov 17:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Support, so you might someday become an admin. --StuffOfInterest 12:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. SUPPORT!, We need you!! Mrstupid 20:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Support automatic admin, or maybe in fact I will, nominate you for adminship anyway. Wikipedia's False Prophet holla at me Improve Me 16:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Support If anything, getting an account will make removing vandalism more efficient. I too used to edit anonymously for some time, until I plucked up my courage and declared myself openly.--Planetary 03:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Support Should get an account in the most brief delays.
  70. Support u mostlikly find this fun so just get oneTrackMonkey 03:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Support. How scary is a vandal fighter called "68"? Get a really intimidating username. Reaaaalllyy intimidating. Kribbeh 16:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Support. Join us!! --Dylan Lake 23:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC) changed to Indifferent Dylan Lake 04:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Support - Join us!!!, we'd like you here!!! --AAA! 03:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Support I found this page after catching a very well-written paragraph by this IP. I was surprised, and strongly encourage this user to get an account!--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 00:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Support It's better been a registered user. --JForget 02:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Support Registration is better than Generalization. --Omega Archdoom05:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Support. When pgkbot says "Whitelist User:68.39.174.238" it just looks wrong to me. ;) --SonicChao talk 21:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Yes please. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Support, any anon user who helps fight vandalism so well should get an account. This way we can put a name ot the greatness.--Wizardman 03:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Yes -- but stay out of the kitchen ... and for Pete's sake, don't touch those pies! --A. B. (talk) 14:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Support. What happens if your ISP blocks you? I'm frightened for you, frankly. You should be an admin, not an anon at the whim of his service provider. I've also offered an inducement, which I will seriously, really, truly send you if you get an account. --N Shar 02:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  81. You really should register for an account, bro. You're setting yourself up as a target for discrimination. As you definitely know by now, many people run on the assumption that anonymous accounts are newbies or vandals, and scrutinize the edits of such accounts very heavily. You almost seem to encourage this, by keeping your userpage redlinked and by refusing to register, but I'd still like to suggest that you do so. The couple of minutes it takes to set up an account would save you a lot of hassle in the long run. Just my two cents though, and I'm sure you have your reasons for not doing so. Either way, best of luck to you and thanks for your contributions. =) – Lantoka (talk) 21:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Strong support. Please create an account to continue. — Meteoroid ←  02:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Please create an account! >Kamope< Talk · Sign Here 11:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Strong support You will be able to contribute much more effectively if you get an account. -Mschel 18:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Strong support. If you want to have full rights here, get an account! Jimbo Wales has written that users with "anonymous IP numbers do not have the same civil rights as logged in members of the community. If you want to be a good editor, get an account, make good edits." -- Jimbo Wales So get that account. -- Fyslee/talk 05:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support: Good god, get an account for god sake or maybe you like the limelight you're gathering here. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 02:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I reject that scurrility. 68.39.174.238 02:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Get One NOW: IPs are normally assumed to have low edit counts ... yours is higher than RFA candidates!! For the love of God, please create one. ~ Magnus animum (aka Steptrip) 01:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Full Support per above:)) Caglarkoca 06:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Please Do - because I dont want to see an IP Becoming an Admin..----Cometstyles 21:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Everything Youre an ispiration to all of us, 68.39.174.238 - Please make an account ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 17:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  91. yay: so I can email function you, as well as not lose you in my watchlist. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 07:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Yes. ffm ✎talk 15:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Yes please! An IP doing an RfA would look weird... - G1ggy Talk/Contribs 23:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Support, become an admin while yer at it :-). Tim{speak} 19:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Support, and I will support you for adminship :) Sr13 04:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Support - Over due to become an admin! --Hirohisat Talk 06:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Support ~ Oh, for goodness sake. I just don't understand you people who persistently refuse to get a free account which can be registered within 5 minutes. An IP address hardly gives one any more anonimity than an account, or anything like that. I find it easier and more natural to talk to the person behind a memorable, pronouncable, username than the person behind a string of numbers and dots. If I aggravate you with this, sorry. vlad§inger tlk 14:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Support: Anthony Appleyard 20:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Support ack Vladsinger --Bencomplain 09:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Support - You have to put fuel in a car to make it work. Rudget Contributions 18:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Support - Get an account and we'll award you a cookie!
  102. Support ON WHEELS! PayneXKiller 04:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Support - But hey don't get an account on my account! Sting_au | Talk 11:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Support — excellent spam clean-up [1] --Oxymoron83 17:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Support per Vladsinger   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support You have been nominated for admin once. Remember? Marlith T/C 01:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Please share a reference for that statement. Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Where else? Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/68.39.174.238! (It was deleted intially, and may have been deleted again) There was also a "would like to" template False Prophet (Or whatever his name was, that was his signature) put on this page. 68.39.174.238 02:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Your RfA was created thrice, deleted twice and expired once. Why don't you want an account? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  107. For GOODNESS sakes man,just do it it wont hurt!!!! Esskater11 02:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Hell yeah!--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 21:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Support! --HotAbs (talk) 19:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Support Go for it, you know you want to - even if you IP number is your account :-)
  111. Support. One day you will lose the IP address. ISPs change them. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 15:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Gwaaaan Or at least shove a public key on the page so when you lose the IP we know the real you... Pseudomonas(talk) 13:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Get one Now! RT | Talk 16:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Get a friggin' account! Shapiros10 (talk) 20:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  115. sixtyeight_thirtynine_onehundredandseventyfour_twohundredandthrityeight is as good a name as an IP, man --Enric Naval (talk) 00:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  116. THE STRONGEST SUPPORT. Basketball110 what famous people say 00:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  117. 9999999999999999999999999999999999% Support I would like you to become a member because you have valueable controbutions. — ComputerGuy890100 17:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  118. I can't nominate an IP for adminship :( Alexfusco5 23:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  119. --Hadseys ChatContribs 02:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Yep MBisanz talk 08:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Come on dude/dudet! You would be an amazing Admin! If I were you I wouldn't be able to LIVE with myself until I got an account! Do Whatever You want to do, Your probably the best IP user! Cheerz! DarkZorro 14:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Hey, why not ...... Dendodge.TalkHelp 16:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Uh, duh 21655 ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 16:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  124. That would be REALLY nice.-- Freshbakedpie (Wanna talk?) \'_'/ 21:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Support Wow. just, wow. RC-0722 247.5/1 23:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Support Not having an account limits your ability to contribute to the project; for example 1) IPs cannot create new articles, 2) IPs cannot edit protected pages, 3) IPs cannot become admins, and 4) IPs often times do not receive as much respect as users with accounts do. Just get an account; I don't see any reason why you wouldn't want to. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 01:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    All IPs can incite new articels' creation, file for unprotection, cause administrators to work and repudiate illegitimacies (usually indirectly in the last case, sometimes in all cases). 68.39.174.238 (talk) 22:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Support Even if you still edit from this one, we could still let you have the sysop tools already. Thingg⊕⊗ 23:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  128. I want you for adminship. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 00:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Support Hurry up and get one! SchfiftyThree 21:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Support Just do it! Enigma message 18:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Support Don't you want WP:SQUEEGEE...? IceUnshattered [ t ] 21:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Support Just get one, you will be happy!!!! Please get one!!NOWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!Mertozoro (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  133. User:Frogger3140/vote Please get an account so you can edit semi-protected pages 5 days later after editing 10 or more articles. Otherwise, if you want me to edit a semi-protected page, just give me a message to which article. P.S. Join Wikipedia's Department of Fun if you want to make funny stuff. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 13:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Extremely strong support. Register an account. If you do then you're RFA would be successful. Great editor. Neptune5000 (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  135. GET AN ACCOUNT! Man, the wiki needs you! Vinson 01:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of users who do not want you to make an account

"Better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven."

If you urge 68.39.174.238 to not get an account, you can add this userbox to your user page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylu (talk • contribs) {{User talk:68.39.174.238/noaccount}}

This user thinks 76.117.247.55 should not get an account.
  1. Support. Well me... some wikipedians seem to think that edits of anon nicks are somehow magically more trustworthy then anon IP’s, what’s the difference really... dynamic IP’s I think. Believe you make a fine statement here. - 80.134.200.171 18:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong Support. Yeah, I'm sick of the users thing. The only thing it brings is people wanting to earn a reputation, POV and blog-like behaviour, "look my user is better than yours" 141.30.221.42 15:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose – why mess with a good thing if it ain't broke? – Doug Bell talk•contrib 10:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Suppose that I should log in to sign this comment. 68.166.50.142 19:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC) (Ashibaka)[reply]
  5. Support. Give the guy/gal a break already David D. (Talk) 20:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I really would put myself as apathetic because I really don't care what you do and it really isn't any of my buisness, but I support your goal/opinion so here goes. Kotepho 01:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. This is a wiki and accounts are not required. I oppose the tendency of users with accounts to think that for some reason those human beings who haven't registered accounts with the WikiMedia Foundation are untrustworthy. -lethe talk + 16:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Strong Support. Thought it was just damn rude, saw on someones user page that they insisted you get a username, as if they were proud of it. What a jerk JayKeaton 17:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support or Oppose I'm so confused with what to put there! Keep your IP, who cares if you're not logged in. Still one of the best edittors on Wikipedia--Joe Jklin 16:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose! Don't conform to their standards! :P DakPow e rs (Talk) 21:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose Fight the power! Bwa ha ha! Yar! Ahhhhhh! Ah... Ha. Zwooooooop! 69.145.123.171 Hello!
  12. Support That is, support your right to edit without an account name. This is, after all, "the free encyclopdia that anyone can edit". Anyone. --67.169.212.172 23:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support your opposition to making an account. You're legendary. Czj 04:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Agreed. Your non-conformity is a shining example of "WP:AGF towards IPs" to us all. I tip my hat and salute you Mr. 68 --  Netsnipe  ►  01:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support your stand. Whose business is this but yours? --Storkk 12:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support (or oppose, or whatever means I think you shouldn't get an account). I would have been neutral, but some of the comments in the "get an account" section scared me, with their zombie-like cries of "join us, join us!" I felt like I was watching one of the Evil Dead movies. Don't do it! Don't drink the Kool-Aid! :) -- Xtifr 01:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. No account You have made over 14,000 edits without an account, why start now? Laur ə nwhisper 20:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. I'd rather see you earn the title of all-time leader in total edits under a single anonymous IP, which, at the time of this writing, is held by 202.156.6.54 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) with 20049 edits. Scobell302 02:24, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    That is hardly the same thing. 202.156.6.54 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is an ISP, with quite a few users, and a hell of a lot of blocks. vlad§inger tlk 14:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. No account needed - All of us here should be judged by our editing record, alone. - Mauco 04:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. You are so cool I was doing the same thing you're doing before I found out I had a dynamic IP. Don't give up to peer pressure!! --JDitto 03:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support. you = amazing Maddox 21:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
  22. Whatever Makes You Happy - Uhnkay? -- weirdoactor t|c 14:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  23. No account needed - why spoil the romance? Moreschi Request a recording? 20:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oppose. However, being an anon hides your identity. —  Mete oroid  ←  02:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. support I think i really like the idea of an ip being one of wikipedias best vandal fighters--Fang 23 18:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. support Fight the Wikielitism! Too much snobism with usernames.Blue Leopard 05:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support. Cogent example to all. --Gwern (contribs) 00:35 19 April 2007 (GMT)
  28. Support YOU ARE ANONYMOUS, YOU ARE LEGION. --Saint-Paddy 03:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support There's something special about it when you don't even have an account. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 22:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support, as the ultimate argument for why anon IPs must always be allowed to edit Wikipedia. I'm actually an established user myself, but I'm voting here as a logged-out IP as a respectful homage to your greatness. 82.41.24.45 02:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Support It wouldn't be the same if you were just another username-d contributor, another pixel in the ubiquitous sea of established users. Your IP-ness is what makes you special, don't throw it away! --Ye Olde Luke 06:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Oppose. The time to get an account was a long, long, long time ago, and it would be pointless now. -- I. Pankonin (t/c) 08:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Stay anonymous. Otherwise you won't be associated with all your existing contributions. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 15:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Stay the course Fight the bigotry power. 74.133.9.95 (talk) 20:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oppose You are unique in IP addresses. I would stay as you are now. But, of course, you are you. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 04:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Oppose - Don't give in to them :) --Laveol T 22:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of users, anonymous or otherwise, who really don't care

"Indifference is the essence of humanity."

If you don't care if 68.39.174.238 makes an account, you can add this userbox to your user page! {{User talk:68.39.174.238/dontcare}}

This user does not care if 68.39.174.238 76.117.247.55 gets an account.

List of users, anonymous or otherwise, who think it's none of their business

"He who is a good neighbor keeps a controlled nose."

If you think that it's none of your business if 68.39.174.238 gets an account, you can add this userbox to your user page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylu (talk • contribs) {{User talk:68.39.174.238/noneofmybusiness}}

This user thinks it's none of their business if 68.39.174.238 gets an account.
  • In Between I've seen the work you've done, and I have to say, I'm quite impressed—especially concerning reverting vandalism. You've contributed a lot to Wikipedia :). I just wanted to say, I do want you to make an account but I also am also, at the same time, won over by your strong resolve that you're not creating an account to show us Wikipedians that not all IP addresses are vandals or such, and won't make an account to as you said, "to satisfy such people" and/or to become an admin. Because of your resolve, I have much respect for your decision (even if I disagree with it) and hereby support your choice either way. —Mirlen 05:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutely, completely, your choice. I respect whatever decision you make. -- Rick Block (talk) 05:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a free wiki, you do what you're comfortable with! bd2412 T 22:39, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • YA RLY --Ted 23:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do whatever you want to do not what other people tell you to do
  • none of my business but i havent got a clue how i got to this page it scares me--Childzy 21:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's cool if you don't want to be narcissistic like the rest of us. Or perhaps your name is really 68.39.174.238. Not that there's anything wrong with that. · j·e·r·s·y·k·o talk · 03:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm completely indifferent as to whether or not you get an account...although it makes you seem like on of those huge silent thugs called Five or Zero or something :) Anthøny 15:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was unaware it was possible to register an IP address as a username... I wouldn't've thought the software would allow it... 68.39.174.238 (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can't register a username with only numbers, but IP addresses have dots in the middle, don't they? You could try registering with a random string of numbers separated be dots to see of it would work. Or maybe you've already tried. Joshua Issac (talk) 11:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose account creation. You can create a username with numbers and dots. See this request for administrator status. The person has no userpage, no contributions, no anything, though. Maybe the feature is disabled now. I changed my vote again, by the way. --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job fighting vandalism... but

meh

I see you've been editing the Mather article heavily. Why not create an account?

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create a account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, including:

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You're great!

68.39.174.238, keep up the good work!

--sunstar nettalk 23:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Unusual edit

I don't follow this edit Raul654 01:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure it's because that's the page that WP:MH redirects to. Dekimasuよ! 12:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page is too long!

Hi 68.39.174.238. Unfortunately, your talk page is too long and some browsers may have difficulty rendering it. I suggest a user will archive this page for you. Thank you. Meteoroid 03:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I'm awesome.

From what I have skimmed, people are asking you to get an account. Because I feel like it, I am asking that you never register. I love you. Chris Griswold (☎☓) 07:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir. I have gone to a lot of trouble helping a school who happen to like Wikipedia for references [I don't know why]. I have written and edited some articles for their website and used Wikipedia as a link for them. You claim. They are blatant copyright violations. Not so,belongs to them and me. That you claim to own the copyright to the material implies that you are associated with the institute, which is a clear conflict of interest. No more than I am associated with you. I have done this with my own free time but your objections are noted and since you are the one with a lot of free time trawling websites looking for articles to edit, then maybe you should do it for them. Yours disgusted.

Get an account!

Please get an account! Call it something like 6839.174comcast for example, that way you'll be able to do all the things you can't do as anon, which include:

  • File uploads
  • Move pages to new names (and revert pagemove vandalism, the scourge of Wikipedia...)
  • Participate in Requests for adminship, and articles for deletion

Go ahead, do it soon!! you'll miss out... --sunstar nettalk 15:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking discussion

You may want to comment on this thread on WP:AN where someone has proposed to have you blocked. Even community-banned and Arbcom-banned users get notified of discussions on whether they should be blocked, so I think not doing the same for you would be a tad discourteous. ;) Awyong J. M. Salleh 10:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This has to be the first time it has ever been suggested someone be blocked to force them to register so they can be nominated for an adminship. Congratulations?--Isotope23 18:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]



A well overdue award for the coolest and fun IP who should be needs to be an administrator!, I hereby award 68.39.174.238 with the “Cool Award.” Real96 20:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologize for the harassment, per the blocking discussion. You are an excellent editor to this project! Real96 20:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

LOL GOTCHA :D

Anyway, just letting you know that Primetime has been taken care of now. Apologies for your inability to edit the Cplot page. Hope you're staying out of the drama! —Pilotguy go around 05:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From what I have skimmed, people are asking you to get an account. Because I feel like it, I am asking that you never register. I love you. Chris Griswold (☎☓) 07:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


I'm with Chris. I love you 2. Its cool you don't wanna sign in! But since i did I'll sign out too! allie_collegegirl21 03:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

user page recreated and redeleted

Hi - I just thought you might find the deletion log listing for your user page amusing. I'm not sure what the record is for most often deleted page, but I suspect your page is in the running. -- Rick Block (talk) 02:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The weather in London has been deleted 71 times and now cannot be recreated (see Wikipedia:Protected titles/Deliberate redlinks). Your page has only been deleted 28 times, but unless it's added to the deliberate redlinks page (which seems improbable) will eventually overtake London's weather. -- Rick Block (talk) 04:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please create an account to continue

Have you created your account yet? 68.111.92.229 19:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Barnstar of Anonymous Contribution

The Barnstar of Anonymous Contribution
As a fellow anonymous contributor, I hereby award you, the anonymous contributor(s) hailing from 68.39.174.238, with the Barnstar of Anonymous Contribution, for the unsung and thankless service you have rendered unto Wikipedia, in your countless minor edits and bigger contributions over time. They have made a difference in our community. Cheers! 68.111.92.229 20:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: No...

...I haven't. It looks like you went in the other direction ;) 68.39.174.238 23:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem for IPs to become administrators is that IPs change periodically and admin privileges may not transfer from the old IP to the new IP. So it is not possible for you to become a "sysop anon". This is why you must create an account to correct this problem. 68.111.92.229 02:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hughes Complex

Hey, your picture of the Hughes Complex has been nominated for featured picture status. The all-caps references are an inside joke (Mr. Treason was a vandal who once threatened to sue Wikipedia in that particular court). Cheers! bd2412 T 03:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya

Hiya, you rock. I'm new, and I respect you Mr 68 39 174 238. --74.53.88.50 10:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account creation

You should create a new account just in case someone uses this IP or IP range to vandalize. Amos Han Talk 10:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pale blue dot

Pale blue dot is the name of a photo of planet Earth from deep space, taken because of Carl Sagan and is also the name of one of his books (not his best though). I liked the name so appropriated it as my username. Pale blue dot 20:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

Per your edit count. Real96 07:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am moving the userbox up. Real96 00:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you edit semi-protected articles

???? Thanks Caglarkoca 23:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know that registered users can edit semiprotected pages; but without an account, how do you edit them? :)) Caglarkoca 23:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
the article mighy not be semi-protected at all 201.39.174.238
I award you a barnstar for being a helpful Wikipedia user.64.230.41.86 00:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WOW!

The Special Barnstar
You are incredible. An anonymous editor, one of Wikipedia's best contributors. Props. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 22:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help me please :'(

You know in the "Users who want <insert your IP adress here> to get an account" section? You know the little counter thingy that tells how many users want you to get an account? Can you tell me how to make my own? Tell me through my talk page pls, or anyone who reads this who knows what I can do, please tell me :(. Wikipeep 494 05:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SIGN

What is the point on insisting that people sign their comments if you yourself have nothing other than an IP address to identify yourself. Very hypocritical if you ask me. Cfpresley 18:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what Ou-dis-sun means in By the Waters of Babylon

So that's what Ou-dis-sun means. IMO, however, these links are interpretion that doesn't really belong in the plot summary. It would, of course, be appropriate to explain the words you linked in the Analysis section. --Jtir 19:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alaska Congressional Elections, 2006

The contradiction was that the Democratic and the Republican candidate was listed with exactly the same number of votes. I had some free time now (which I didn't at the time), so I got the right vote numbers and fixed it. Railwayman 21:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The point

...for this? 68.39.174.238 22:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted that edit because it adds excess to excess, put all that information in a more readable format. If it's so interesting, then try making it more accessible. As it is - you can't really see the picture, the caption reads like a play in a play. Thanks Modernist 02:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

William Hogarth

This edit is OK, but I think it would be a lot better if you could work it into the "Other later works" section, with a brief description, especially since I don't think we have any other engravings prominently discussed. Cheers! Mdotley 01:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Industry and Idleness. I add stub sections for the remaining prints; I hope that helps a little. I came here to encourage you to get an account, but I see that there's no need. I don't work those Hogarth articles enough to remember your IP address. Good show, carry on! Mdotley 20:26, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! Well done.
Have you seen the work User:Yomangani did on articles like Four Times of the Day, Four Stages of Cruelty and The Gate of Calais?
A Harlot's Progress, A Rake's Progress and Marriage à-la-mode still need work. And we are missing The March to Finchley. -- !! ?? 12:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Warren

I removed the prod and added a sources; I'm not sure if the dates are correct but this person did exist as the article says he did. Salahx 20:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kashiwazaki-Kariwa monitoring.jpg

Thanks for the help with that. I've re-uploaded it to Image:Kashiwazaki-Kariwa monitoring2.jpg. Feel free to follow my footsteps and check that everything was done right. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 16:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And don't feel like you have to make an account! It forces people to respect IP edits!

Okay, you discussed a lot of things that I thought about when writing the fair-use rational, but I didn't want go too into depth about it, but there is certainly further discussion that can be had. In the article I mention that there is an apology saying basically "sorry our radiation detectors don't work because of the earthquake," so needless to say, that part should stay, as it's relevant content for the point that is being made. The left navigation is not 100% needed, but I also provide a link directly to the site itself right under the image. Anyway, I find that useful to be able to say:
  • Here is the screen shot during the earthquake, let's go look at what it says now
  • Oh, it gives radiation readings
Their site, however, is absolutely chock-full of cartoons explaining all about how radiation works and what not, very pretty, which is exactly what we must be sure to avoid. I'm sure they paid someone a lot of money to make those. So in terms of revisions to the image, we could
Oh, another thing I forgot to ask: In order to give my permission for deleting something, can I just say that I give permission or do I have to go searching for some appropriate template? And regarding your last comments on the image, that's fine if you remove the left part, it's not a big deal. The point is that this is just one of many mistakes by the utility that added to the public's fears regarding the incident, nor did it help their credibility when asserting that there was no danger. Yes, one is still out, but you only need one in the fist place to answer the question "is there discernible radiation release from the plant?" I know this image doesn't contain much in terms of promotional artwork, I just meant to say that I was highly tempted to use some others ^^ -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 18:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Communism Vandal

I know this is likely an old topic stuffed in the back of your mind, but you may wish to take a look at these edits by Aqui venho de novo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), a sockpuppet of Encyclopedist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (a former user in good standing turned vandal/troll) and if necessary, update your Newgatery page. TML 20:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that this story has taken yet another strange turn: Encyclopedist (using the account Nteyclsociedai (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) now denies making the above edits (see this and this for details). I wonder whether he's really telling the truth, or just playing good cop/bad cop...68.161.106.223 12:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deserved

The Chain Barnstar of Recognition
For making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar. So that everyone who deserves one will get one Pseudoanonymous 19:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have much more than 500+ please don't be offended; I am thinking about

  • The Chain Barnstar of Merit: 1500+
  • The Chain Barnstar of Diligence: 2500+
  • The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour: 5000+

But I have to make them first Pseudoanonymous 19:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories/Noticeboard, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Buddhipriya 04:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That edit was defiantly not vandalism, the editor was just talking on a talk page :). Yamaka122 ...:) 16:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Lights has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Cheers, Lights 00:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
On your talk page! --Hirohisat Talk 06:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eh?

I really don't understand you... what was that about? —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's where I got my name from. It was actually an alternate adaptation of The Flying Dutchman which I had read just before signing up to a particular website, I needed a new name and though Vanderdecken sounded cool. It stuck, I now use it everywhere. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Small world experiment and Small-world phenomenon

user page

It would be rather unusual, but you could request your user page be protected from recreation at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. -- Rick Block (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If salting were necessary you could probably just ask any admin to do it. Orderinchaos 16:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sinebot interfering with your article draft

I noticed a auto-sign bot messing up your draft [3]. You could get the bot to stop doing that if you put {{nobots}} on that page. You could even get the bot to ignore you on every page, but that'd mean having to make a user page for it to read - more info here. ;) Resurgent insurgent 03:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

If i create a RfA_2 for you, will you actually accept this time? aliasd·U·T 13:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...I remember one of "my" previous ones was deleted and the submitted left a particularly sharp message. 68.39.174.238 13:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have almost attained 20,000 edits, over 10,000 on mainspace, all signed, and all good edits. You have been active for 2 years. Furthermore, you are a great vandal hunter! I believe there is a good rationale for it, as long as you can vouch that nobody will gain access to your admin tools, is that possible, do other people use your IP from your place? aliasd·U·T 13:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The CIA, perhaps... Orderinchaos 03:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh don't mind me, I was just being humorously scurrilous :) Orderinchaos 12:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It would be hard on MediaWiki to sysop an IP. bibliomaniac15 15 years of trouble and general madness 01:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of a template

Hi
About a month ago you deleted this template diff and replaced it with a redirect to Template:Db-noncom, you gave the reason that the tempalte was Blatantly non commercial. Will you please expand on your reason for deleting the template, and, in your opinion how that template could have been used commercially.

Mads Angelbo Talk / Contribs 18:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstand. The licence is non commercial. Wikipedia is unable to include media that is not available for non commercial use. If you go back and look at what you just linked us to again, mabye you will understand. aliasd·U·T 00:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GL/IMPROVE#SVG + GIF(!) = SVG

I ...think I've got this sorted? Adam Cuerden talk 23:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

Your "newgatery" page has been nominated for deletion here. 128.2.251.16 18:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD

My deepest apologies - my very weak defense is that I was about to run out at the time and completely forgot, and only just remembered now. Hopefully you are not offended by my callousness. ~ Riana ⁂ 21:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archive

Mind archiving this page? -- Cat chi? 15:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes... 68.39.174.238 16:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why? -- Cat chi? 16:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I never archive... 68.39.174.238 20:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are you always this unfriendly and closed to any advice/request? -- Cat chi? 20:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not, I'm just terse since these questions didn't seem to call for much elaboration. The emotions behind short text unfortunately are easily lost in writing and (re)reading. 68.39.174.238 00:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Well my concern is that overly long talk pages become harder to use. People with slow bandwidth would have a hard time contacting you. Given you have a decent amount contribution I was merely trying to help you and people trying to contact you. -- Cat chi? 00:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
If the issue is anons cannot create pages, I'm sure innumerable folks would be happy to create as many blank archive pages for your use as you'd like. I'd also expect any of the folks who run talk page archiver bots would be happy to add your page to their list. Not meant as pressure, just trying to be helpful. -- Rick Block (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He can create pages in the user talk namespace (and all other talk spaces). Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page (or lack thereof)

I suspect no one will ever try to create your "User" page again, after this config change which causes your sig to no longer show a hideous redlink. Instead people can look at your contribs or user talk page. Yay! Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's bizzare, but I suppose people will always be after the red-linked tab up there. That and the loads of older signatures I still have. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For being a decent and quality editor. Acalamari 23:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much

So how many edits do you have? Why don't you actually make your userpage? Where did you see my sig? -The Big X 23:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.39.174.238&oldid=173582650"