Jump to content

User talk:Satori Son

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bully25 (talk | contribs) at 13:35, 15 April 2010 (→‎Talk page: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Satori Son is, for now, a "part-time" Wikipedian and will be less active on Wikipedia for the near future (please see this note for more info). If you leave me a message,
I may not be able to respond for some time. If this is a time-sensitive matter,
please contact another administrator or use one of the various noticeboards below.


    Orphaned non-free image File:B&W Nautilus.JPG

    ⚠

    Thanks for uploading File:B&W Nautilus.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

    If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 05:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    Make love not reverts

    There is no need to revert my edits. We should all work to get along. Went away to fly (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    There was a need. Welcome to Wikipedia, but if you continue to edit disruptively, your account will be blocked from editing. — Satori Son 14:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Prod

    Would you be offended if I removed the PROD on Ephraim D. Zanger and sent it to AfD instead? Niteshift36 (talk) 18:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    No, not at all. Thanks for asking. — Satori Son 18:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Yep, been there many times. Usually I'll just let the PROD notice sit there until they remove it and then take it to AfD, but I definitely understand where you're coming from. Whatever you want to do is perfectly fine with me. — Satori Son 19:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Reliable source

    Why is Thinkers50.com not a reliable source? (I refer to this edit.) Their method is explained here. - Fayenatic (talk) 19:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia only uses information from "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy".[1] You need to find a real source that has published this, not some for-profit vanity site with the plea "If you’d like to sponsor the Thinkers 50, please click on the link below." Shameful. — Satori Son 19:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I have a copy of the printed version. Greenwood Publishing Group sounds a reliable publisher. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, I'm sure you do. And you're still completely missing the point: We evaluate a source by whether it has "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy," not by whether you've heard of the printing company. — Satori Son 20:09, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I hope The Times is good enough. I've got better things to do than this as well. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    As well as what? — Satori Son 20:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    No, as well as who! As well as you. Fayenatic (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Fair enough. To be honest, I had a really bad day at work and your reverts just rubbed me the wrong way. The article's in bad shape, but you're probably right about this specific sourcing issue and I'm sincerely sorry for being a jerk about it.

    You've been here as long, and worked just as hard, as I have, and you don't deserve me getting all pissy about a fairly minor issue. I'll defer to you on it, and please have a great night! — Satori Son 23:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Apology accepted! I thought you'd probably had one of those days. Glad you spotted my message. - Fayenatic (talk) 08:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Welcome back

    Hi there SATORI, VASCO here,

    Please read title of message!! Cheers, have a great weekend!

    From Portugal, VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 03:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you very much. Sorry I had to leave on my break so abruptly last time, but something came up that took all of my spare time for quite a while. At least I was able to travel to some fascinating places.
    Not sure how active I'll be even now, but it's nice to be back. — Satori Son 15:33, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello Satori Son, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Mooretown, Shreveport, Louisiana has been removed. It was removed by Phil Bridger with the following edit summary '(contest deletion - basic searches find loads of coverage in reliable sources)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Phil Bridger before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 14:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Excuse me, do you know who of Cornell South? Obviously not.

    05:15, 8 September 2007 Satori Son (talk | contribs) deleted "Cornell South" ‎ (Expired PROD, concern was: "Article is incoherent and is likely a hoax.")

    What about the article was incoherent, and who gave you the authority to judge it's authenticity? How is it "likely a hoax? How did you determine this conclusion?

    Google it. That's ok, I did it for you:

    Cornell South | Facebook Cornell South is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Cornell South and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the ... http://www.facebook.com/people/Cornell-South/100000399171987 - Cached —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.167.7.17 (talk) 05:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Seeing you haven't edited in a few days in a few days, i think this related ANI discussion may be archived before you get back. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 10:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the heads up. Not every day that an uncontested PROD deletion I made two and a half years ago makes ANI. — Satori Son 14:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Mike Speedy

    I've decliend the prod at Mike Speedy, since city councilmen for major cities are quite likely to be notable. Nyttend (talk) 01:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    The same goes for N. Susie Day. Nyttend (talk) 01:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll be happy to submit these to AfD, but you may want to look at the following:
    And our current guidelines at WP:POLITICIAN state a local politician is only sufficiently notable if they "have received significant press coverage."[2]Satori Son 14:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Expert assistance needed

    Hi there SATORI, VASCO here,

    Here's the following: given you promptly acted, shortly after your return, on Chapecoense's case - not a vandal but a very difficult editor to work with, i would like for you to have a look at this case:

    User:Bort08 had an account (duh!), then said he would leave (he even asked someone how to delete an account), but returned as Filipão shortly after. After a while, he desisted on that and worked anon, as 99.235.160.143 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/99.235.160.143). Writes virtually no summaries, is somewhat confrontational (as seen here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ra%C3%BAl_Oliveira&diff=270549021&oldid=270548795 and here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Freshfighter9#talk_page_for_99.235.160.143), and keeps reverting my good edits, without no explanations (i have sent him hundreds of messages, all accounts "accounted", receiving only one back, where he said he agreed on my approach, to find him doing the exact opposite).

    Your views please, when possible,

    Thanks a lot in advance, take care, from Portugal,

    VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    I’m very sorry, Vasco, but I simply do not have the time to take on another problem editor in the Association football articles. Between trying to keep an eye on Bruno, the most disruptive editor there, and my own interests at the entire site (both editorial and administrative), my Wiki-plate is full. Oh, and real life stuff sometimes keeps me busy, too.
    I know you have not had good luck with WP:AN/I in the past, but that is the usual venue for requests such as this. You can also request some back-up from the editors at WikiProject Football.
    Sorry, again, and good luck. — Satori Son 18:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Understand it fully my friend, really appreciate your kind and prompt answer. Will try my luck elsewhere - it's not a "dangerous" vandal, so the haste is not at its fullest...

    Take care, have a great weekend, VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    These items i put on this list are real cons and shouldn't be removed or on a different list

    • Another Anime Convention (in Nashua, New Hampshire in the fall)
    • Bakuretsu Con (in Colchester, Vermont in the fall)
    • ConnectiCon (in Hartford, Connecticut in the summer)
    • PortConMaine (in South Portland, Maine in the summer)

    —Preceding unsigned comment added by BunnyHareRabbit (talkcontribs) 17:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    As long as they all have articles (please see WP:Write the article first), that sounds fine to me. — Satori Son 21:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    And please keep a cool head when discussing this. Personal attacks against other editors such as this and this are only going to succeed in getting you blocked from editing. — Satori Son 21:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Following me?

    You see that i've 'once again' started making nonsense pages? Are you one of those admins that follows the edits of wiki users that you don't happen to like? Don't answer that, i took a leaf out of your book and checked your edit log, yes you do.

    Please don't, it's fairly rude and hostile.

    Bully25 (talk) 13:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    PS
    Thank you for not using a prefab message on my talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bully25 (talkcontribs) 13:27, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
    You're welcome. — Satori Son 13:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk page

    Look, if i sent you a message that was for the most part well written and respectful but added a bunch of random swearing/abuse at the end, you'd likely remove just the last part right? Similar thing with your message.