Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians against censorship/Members

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians against censorship

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Daemorris (talk | contribs) at 01:56, 13 July 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you would like to be a member of Wikipedians against censorship, please add your name at the bottom of this list:

  1. Kaldari 19:57, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Gorgonzilla 21:48, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zoe 22:46, August 20, 2005 (UTC)--Jarashi 01:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 02:38, 2005 August 21 (UTC)
  5. Redwolf24 Hell yes! (Insert image of autocunnilingus here) (See WP:BEARD for a group trying to censor Jimbo's beard)
  6. Karmafist 04:12, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Kaldari, let's keep this up regardless of what happens with WfD.[reply]
  7. Lomedae 08:20, August 21, 2005 (UTC) Of course.
  8. I'm not sure this project is such a good idea (polarization and all), but I agree with the aims. ~~ N (t/c) 22:36, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hipocrite 23:24, 21 August 2005 (UTC) Wholeheartedly.[reply]
  10. OfficerDibble 10:08, 22 August 2005 (UTC) The fight must go on citizens, do not rest.[reply]
  11. NickGorton 01:50, 23 August 2005 (UTC) Great idea![reply]
  12. Oldak Quill 14:01, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Dmn € Դմն 01:17, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --ShaunMacPherson 15:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC) When people were trying to delete the auto ######## images without offering justification I knew that a project like this would be necessary and am glad it is now created.[reply]
  15. Serodio 22:34, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. KrisW6 KrisW6 19:14, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Clawed 03:28, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Brian1979 02:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)Most definitely[reply]
  19. WikidSmaht (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2005 (UTC) Very well. Let us see what we can do.[reply]
  20. Piecraft (talk) 21:28, 26 September 2005 (UTC) I will do my best in light of everything to oppose malevolent censorship.[reply]
  21. JobE6 03:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC) Their wikiproject should have been deleted.[reply]
  22. Groyn88 I support the inclusion of any iota of information which is not absolutely false, malicious, defamatory or directly harmful. Let's create a flexible peoples' encyclopedia which reflects human diversity and freedom of expression.Groyn88 08:47, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Merovingian {T C @} 08:52, 3 October 2005 (UTC), Why not?[reply]
  24. Purplefeltangel 17:20, 23 October 2005 (UTC) Yup, I'm in both Encyclopedic Merit and this WikiProject . . . why? Because I feel that there is a fine line between "expecting quality" and "censorship" and while we should always expect quality, it should never cross that line.[reply]
  25. Tom 08:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Danny Yee 01:05, 7 December 2005 (UTC) some people consider bare ankles indecent[reply]
  27. Adam Clark(User_Talk) (email) 05:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC) For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The concept of censorship is not only disturbing, but is also dangerous.[reply]
  28. Mushroom 00:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Metta Bubble 11:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Jquarry 02:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC) Count me in. There's too many PC N#zis and bubble-wrappers in the world.[reply]
  31. Rogue 9 06:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC) "The attempt to silence a man is the greatest honor you can bestow on him. It means you recognize his superiority to yourself." -- Joseph Sobran[reply]
  32. —BorgHunter (talk) 16:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC) Absolutely.[reply]
  33. ¿ WhyBeNormal ? 21:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Fantom 18:49, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Kerowyn 10:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Megamix? 03:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Kickboy 02:33, December 25, 2005 (UTC)
  38. Ouuplas 16:55, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Seancdaug 02:24, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Aumakua 09:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC) "When the official organ of a purportedly scientific society plays thought police by censoring scholarly work to appease the politicians, it ceases to deserve the allegiance of a rational mind." -- Paul E. Meehl. (I apply this in a much broader sense: When [anything] plays thought police by censoring scholarly work to appease [anyone] it ceases to deserve the allegiance of a rational mind. May Wikipedia forever avoid that condition.)[reply]
  41. Rainmonger 15:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Useless Fodder 08:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC) Censorship is the foundation of subjugation.[reply]
  43. Ronline ✉ 08:23, 29 December 2005 (UTC) - It is absolutely draconian and contradictory to attempt to censor Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.[reply]
  44. BostonMA 02:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 14:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. The JPS 20:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. CCMichalZ 21:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Werdna648T/C\@ 21:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Zilog Jones 04:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. —Andux 13:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Madashell 15:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia should include any information that fits into its role as a free encyclopedia, any policy which attempts to censor material on the grounds of "decency" (i.e. personal taste) is contrary to the purported aims of Wikipedia.[reply]
  52. Paul 12:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Brian New Zealand 21:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Agree all the way[reply]
  54. Thryduulf 22:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Copysan 05:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC) And Proud of it![reply]
  56. Wisco 14:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC) -- People who want to control words and images want to control thought.[reply]
  57. DrIdiot 19:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC) -- There are enough people in society telling us what we can say and what we can hear. Let wikipedia be free of the shackles of the ambiguous and subjective guidelines of decency.[reply]
  58. Sean (talk || contribs)
  59. dirtyliberal 05:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship has no place in an learning environment. Wikipedia is the ultimate learning environment where the only currency is knowlegde. To tolerate censorship would be to tolerate a cancer growing on ones soul.[reply]
  60. Masonpatriot 06:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Irongaard 08:41, 13 January 2006 (UTC) -- People who do not want to be offended should avoid all forms of mass media and stay inside, rather than trying to force the entire world to conform to thier views.[reply]
  62. MatthewKeys 21:37 16 January 2006 (Pacific) -- We need a place free of censorship. Not everyone can be on a TV show and voice their opinion--but everyone can contribute to Wikipedia and use the Internet.
  63. Dudewheresmypizz4 14:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC) I now realise that censorship is ignorance.[reply]
  64. --ChrisRy5 22:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC) Support your freedom of speech on Wikipedia!![reply]
  65. Nortonew 06:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship seeks to suppress information. The absence of information is ignorance. Thus censorship seeks to promote ignorance. Wikipedia's mission is directly contrary to the promotion of ignorance.[reply]
  66. Jeff Silvers 19:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship is arbitrary and counter-productive to the ultimate goal of Wikipedia.[reply]
  67. • Dussst • T | C 20:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC) - Freedom of speech is one of our fundamental human rights. Lets ensure it survives on, and applies to, Wikipedia![reply]
  68. Shell 03:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  69. Hermeneus (user/talk) 11:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Noble Skuld the Legend Killer 18:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Ibaranoff24 23:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Gala.martin 00:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia should include any information that fits into its role as a free encyclopedia[reply]
  73. Schultz 15:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC) I support this with all of my heart![reply]
  74. helohe (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Brokenfrog Fully against censorship of relevant content.
  76. Amherst5282 00:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. almightylinuxgod 01:55 Jan 26th 2006 - Wiki for everyone!
  78. DMichel 19:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Censorship does not belong here.[reply]
  79. robsteadman 00:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC) I am appalled that there is censoring going on in some articles and repression of verifiable fact when some editors don;t like it. This is an encyclopedia - it should contain verifiable facts not POV opinions.[reply]
  80. Kelisi 16:45, 28 January 2006 (UTC) There are far too many self-appointed censors here. I have personally undone some of the damage that they have wrought.[reply]
  81. Iamvered 04:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC) Censorship is a weapon of the small-minded to unfairly control what they cannot understand. Wow, that sounds good. Quote me![reply]
  82. Chairman S. 07:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  83. --Oz Hutton 16:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  84. ZoBlitz 04:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Ombudsman 09:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Vanky 12:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Halcatalyst 21:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  88. getcrunkjuicecontribs 19:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  89. CoderGnome 21:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  90. REDTURTLE -- 15:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Tomyumgoong 03:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Luis María Benítez 15:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  93. DanielDemaret 17:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Matt White 20:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Armon 01:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  96. LordRevan 02:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Moriane 17:07, 12 February 2006 (UTC) What a great group! Sign me up.[reply]
  98. ‣ᓛᖁ♀ᑐ 05:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC) It's been long enough since the initial debacle.[reply]
  99. Cnwb 05:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  100. OrbitOne 09:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  101. JtkieferT | C | @ ---- 23:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  102. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  103. rmosler 11:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Frenchman113 01:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  105. USER-cacophony 20:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Stainedglasscurtain 21:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Ross 17:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Discordance 14:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Kasey54 15:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  110. The Republican 20:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Zdunne 02:50, 27 Febraury 2006 (UTC)
  112. e-user 06:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC) Truth and censorship cannot coexist.[reply]
  113. Daniel Morris 14:36, 2 March 2006 (GMT)
  114. user:Richardkselby
  115. User:UKWiki 16.47, 4th March 2006 (GMT)
  116. Wwagner 21:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC) The day you stop learning is the day you die. Censorship is death![reply]
  117. myselfalso 04:56, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  118. phonzonappy If we dont know the truth, then what do we know? 21:08:36, March 7, 2006
  119. Dee ayche! 22:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Acebrock 20:22, 9 March 2006 (UTC)anti censorship, works for me considering the censorship by the government.
  121. Funnybunny 17:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  122. J.A. Terranson 1234H, 12 March 06 - Wikipedia is fast losing it's moral courage, authority, and in the end, it's relevence.
  123. User:Theorb March 13, 2006
  124. VJ Emsi 21:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC) Hell yes.[reply]
  125. HolokittyNX 08:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC) The justification for this group's existence, based on protracted and logical examination of Wikipedia's goals: DUUUUH! ,,,^..^,,,[reply]
  126. --Nicholas 18:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  127. --Procrastinating@talk2me 21:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Me join -- 127.#.#.1 18:28, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Zavandi 13:19, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  130. NeoChrono Ryu 22:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Atul Malaviya 12:45 PM, 22 March 2006 (IST)
  132. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] - 04:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Chebab 17:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Mirlen 02:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  135. User:Killswitch Engage2.50 March 2006 (MT)
  136. Ramanpotential 03:13, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  137. --WhiteRhino 05:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Censorship is the beginning of the age of misunderstanding[reply]
  138. Khatores 01:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC) We don't need anyone to wipe our diapers anymore; censorship is mommyism.[reply]
  139. Loom91 11:03, 29 March 2006 (UTC) We must fight against the attack on humanity called censorship.[reply]
  140. Aldoliel 21:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC) Information wants to be free[reply]
  141. --Ariel al-Qasid 16:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  142. Why censor things. Our Bodies=Nature. acfan-Talk to me 00:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Noetic Sage 20:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Pc13 07:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Osbus 22:12, 4 April 2006 (UTC)- People in support of censorship can go start their own encyclopedia.[reply]
  146. Sfacets 07:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC) / fighting against censorship is a start...[reply]
  147. Samurai Drifter 22:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC) / What kind of idiot would SUPPORT censorship?[reply]
  148. Bubby the Tour G 02:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC) / Bring back the Brian Peppers article!!! And stop letting The Man put down YTMND fans contributions!!![reply]
  149. SteveB 03:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Censorship of the Justin Berry article without a compelling reason strikes me as arbitrary, capricious, and anti-wiki[reply]
  150. Zowayix whatever the time is (UTC)
  151. Oregon Bear 09:41, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  152. A. Kohler 02:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC) Censorship is against the purpose of the Wikipedia.[reply]
  153. Objectivist-C 23:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC) The only offensive thing is an assault on the truth.[reply]
  154. SURIV 23:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC) "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."[reply]
  155. Switch 17:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Motoma 23:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  157. User:Richman271 The "sum of all human knowledge" is not possible with censorship 16:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  158. User:Bgriffin 20:31, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Southpaw018 10:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC) I wish I had the RL time to help fight this fight. Alas, I lend only my voice. I hope it is better than nothing.[reply]
  160. General Eisenhower I like Wikipedia
  161. Terror Island 02:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Hezzy 21:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Vidkun 12:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Meneth 08:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Andy123(talk) 15:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Knucmo2 - Censorship is an unfair monopoly on thought and as a result distorts the decision making process.
  167. Amcfreely 19:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  168. MPN 11:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  169. —porges(talk)
  170. Barneyboo (Talk) 14:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC) - the only way we can make Wikipedia open and aspire to achieving NPOV is with an honest and complete exploration of human knowledge[reply]
  171. _-M o P-_ 07:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC) What is wrong and what is right in terms of vulgarity is based on point of view. Also, to discriminate one type of information against the other would be unencyclopedic.[reply]
  172. --DB0 10:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  173. User:Galoshes
  174. Nnp 22:41, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Beno1000 00:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Zippokovich 16:06 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  177. User:Elizmr
  178. User:Dave04
  179. UnDeadGoat 23:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  180. --Michael Johnson 04:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Sushi4u
  182. User:DJac75
  183. --Fragolino - (Follow the white rabbit!) 19:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Alan 05:22, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Gyre 06:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC) - I don't know how much help I'll be, but I'm giving my support![reply]
  186. Nowimnthing 12:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Josie dethiers 21:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Cicero Dog 13:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC) i have been blocked for my right to feedom of speech! Now i shall exercise it yet again![reply]
  189. BurningZeppelin 08:16, 22 May 2006 (EST)
  190. Revoish 10:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC) -- Damn right. Censorship makes baby Jesus cry =(.[reply]
  191. Samurai Drifter 04:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC) -- Censorship is just... plain... retarded.[reply]
  192. furrykef (Talk at me) 18:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Caprosser 01:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  194. // The True Sora 04:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  195. altobliz 01:29, 29 May 2006 (GMT)
  196. Korinth111 22:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Guinnog 10:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  198. CAPS LOCK 18:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Prefixcaz 05:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  200. User:Jimmy C--Jimmy C 12:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Let's tell 'em where to shove their censorship....[reply]
  201. Vincentvivi 06:42, 02 June 2006 (GMT)
  202. Gibbsale 8:36, 02 June 2006 (EST)
  203. JoeTalk!WorkEspMail 19:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Zuwiki // talk 05:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Darwin's Pug
  206. .t. 18:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  207. SushiGeek 18:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  208. EMC 20:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  209. InGenX 10:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Warhorus 16:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Ruaraidh-dobson 23:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC) Let's get <bleep> on their <bleep>s![reply]
  212. Karimarie 01:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  213. Flamarande 21:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC) "Freedom of Speech not only means that we have the freedom to say what we like to hear. It also means that other people have the liberty to say things we despise and hate."[reply]
  214. Mwhorn 03:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC) It's all relative. =][reply]
  215. SaturnYoshi 01:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC) The FCC is ruining peoples lives.[reply]
  216. Jason Palpatine 22:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  217. MoraSique 06:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  218. jhfireboy 18:02, 9 June 2006 (BST)
  219. jmsevits 05:38, 10 June 2006 (EST)
  220. Moose 09:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  221. James McNally 10:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  222. --Lord Snoeckx 10:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  223. --Ted 14:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  224. Cathryn 14:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC) I'm furious about this userbox deletion business. Are you guys working on this at all, or do I go somewhere else?[reply]
  225. Tal :) 09:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC) Likewise[reply]
  226. --SigmaX54 03:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  227. Superior1 19:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  228. Stepan Roucka 15:26, 22 June 2006 (CEST)
  229. Rlk89 23:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Osloboslo 10:37, 26 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  231. —Dananimal 22:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  232. Nqnpipnr 13:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  233. Kane77 22:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Outlyer 00:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Chicadi 23:07, 29 June 2006 (EST)
  236. S.Skinner 19:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  237. Akaces23 01:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  238. Killfest2 Sometime, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  239. --Qwerty qwerty 16:52, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  240. Jarashi 01:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  241. Disputed one 5:51 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  242. Cipher Destiny
  243. Goodnightmush 12:55, 5 July 2006 (EST)
  244. --Skully Collins 13:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Scienceman123 03:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  246. Wjhonson 01:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC), Fight Religion-based Censorship and the History Nazis! Notability is a guideline, not a requirement.[reply]
  247. Rsquire Rsquire 15:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  248. --Milliteq 07:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  249. Penelope D 02:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  250. --William Pembroke 16:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  251. Blackmissionary 10:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  252. --~VNinja~ 00:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  253. ).m41ku 16:25, 14 July 2006 (PST)
  254. ).User :the pink panther6:07 pm july 15 2006
  255. Sfacets 01:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC) -- Keep banging on the walls![reply]
  256. --Neural16:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  257. --Patrick 04:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  258. --Scarlet woman 12:41, 20 July 2006 (CET)
  259. Jum4 10:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC) -- Go GO GOO![reply]
  260. Maraud 22:49, 23 July 2006 (GMT+1)
  261. FaerieInGrey
  262. Kitia 20:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC) I want to join as many wikiprojects as possible![reply]
  263. Funnyfarmofdoom
  264. Hmrox 17:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  265. Dipics 01:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  266. Joel Llewellyn 02:19, 30 July 2006 (BST)
  267. --Kinghajj 01:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  268. --theblackBay -Theblackbay 05:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Please Learn History!. Please Learn about the Bond system! Please understand the Fraud. come to me for info.[reply]
  269. --Davin Bacon is a proud member.--Davin Bacon 00:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  270. Fatalserpent 01:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  271. Tempestdevil 08:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  272. NightSky 18:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC) -- Happy to help![reply]
  273. Jeffklib Say YES to freedom of speech!
  274. Doc ♬ talk 04:09, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  275. Bandgeek100
  276. Atomaton 12:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  277. — [Mac Davis] (talk)
  278. Krushsister 06:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC) : Free speech is a noble cause.[reply]
  279. EthnopunkEthnopunk 14:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  280. Maltelunden 17:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  281. Anthony J Fuchs 14:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC) -- "Someone who wants to control what you say is someone who wants to control what you think."[reply]
  282. Athanatis 06:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC) - Keep Wikipedia free in more than one sense of the word.[reply]
  283. Húsönd 01:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  284. Whiskey Rebellion 03:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC) Same as what Anthony J Fuchs said - later for censorship.[reply]
  285. Ibagli
  286. ~Inkington 19:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  287. 0L1 10:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  288. Durova 19:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC) I've supported this project's goals for long enough. Might as well join it officially.[reply]
  289. Dan027 07:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  290. Ivan K 07:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  291. USAOwnz I support freedom of speech!
  292. LaneRendell 20:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  293. RiFF 0:14, 13 september 2006 (UTC)
  294. Rougeblossom 13:33, 13 september 2006 (UTC)
  295. sthomson 21:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)We have the right to free speech and the responsibility to practice self-restraint.[reply]
  296. Appraiser 16 September 2006 In the business of disseminating information, censorship has no place.
  297. Feureau Censorship breeds ignorance: China, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Middle East, United States.
  298. Xtifr tälk 14:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  299. Prolog 11:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  300. Tjss(Talk) 16:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  301. --Maelnuneb | Talk 19:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  302. Astroview120mm 01:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  303. Dylan Lake 04:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  304. Effer 23:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  305. Knutars Speak freely at Free Talk Live
  306. IshangoF**k the censorship sh!t!!!!!--Ishango 18:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  307. Fighterx
  308. We don't care about such petty stuff such as censorship. Just keep things the way they already are. --lEoN2323 22:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  309. Kevin Ray Chua || talk || contribs 04:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC) STOP WIKI CENSORSHIP![reply]
  310. Sasha l 18:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  311. Davin Bacon 02:55, 14 October 2006 (UTC):Your God[reply]
  312. Icarus 23 00:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  313. ReverendG 04:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  314. Freedom. Dfrg.msc 1 . 2 . 3 05:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  315. SSPecter 18 October 2006
  316. Terrasidius Yeah man screw the bubble wrappers!!! 00:47 19 October MMVI {UTC}
  317. Caris42 17:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC) No Censorship[reply]
  318. Merkinsmum 20:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC) In particular, to stop the PR machines of wrong'uns removing criticism from articles.[reply]
  319. Kelvingreen 23:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  320. Orpheus 09:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC) - Censorship is wrong, no matter what the subject.[reply]
  321. DJSupreme23 - Peter Bjørn Perlsø 19:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC) - Censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored.[reply]
  322. NekrosKoma 9:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  323. seifip 10:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  324. Wiki Raja 21:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  325. TrevorLSciAct 02:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)"All censorships exist to prevent anyone from challenging current conceptions and existing institutions. All progress is initiated by challenging current conceptions, and executed by supplanting existing institutions. Consequently the first condition of progress is the removal of censorship." ~ George Bernard Shaw[reply]
  326. Cocoaguy 18:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC) Its the 1st amendment[reply]
  327. Arikwithana 21:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  328. --WW79 20:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC) - I don't believe an unabridged dictionary is censored.[reply]
  329. Sambob joe 12:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  330. Disinclination 01:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  331. Kendrick7talk 07:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC) I was starting to think I was all alone out here[reply]
  332. The suicide forest 21:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Sure, I'll join. Any noteworthy information should be made available to the public, and every issue should allow both sides to give their story. Censorship in Wikipedia is wrong.[reply]
  333. Aexon79 01:26, 19 November 2006 (CET) I definitely agree with the virtues of wikipedia against censorship.
  334. Danaimband 04:17 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  335. samillia 14:18 19 November 2006 (EST) No censorship! It is against the policy of wikipedia.
  336. --Andre(Talk) 01:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  337. Bojan 15:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  338. CL8 03:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  339. Information Center 10:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  340. --Injinera 19:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  341. JayJasper 16:32, 1 Decemember 2006 (EST)
  342. The Anonymous User
  343. B3radley 2:04, 03 December 2006 (UTC)
  344. siarach 19:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  345. Beggarsbanquet 17:40, 3 December 2006 (EST)
  346. WP:NOT censored, what more is there to say? Seraphimblade 00:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  347. Lord Gravitron Message | Contrib 15:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  348. DirkvdM 07:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  349. Dskluz 06:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  350. TaranRampersad 21:05, 7 December 2006
  351. Somitho 04:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  352. Tanaats 17:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  353. Willie the Walrein-talk to me 23:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC) - Is this an encyclopedia of indistinct knowledge or what?[reply]
  354. Squad'nLeedah 23:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC) Ill be in this, i believe in responsible reporting, but this isnt journalism, its a wikipedia and anything educational or relative needs to be included[reply]
  355. Dommedagsprofet 19:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC) This is what Wikipedia is all about![reply]
  356. James Brown[citation needed] 23:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  357. Ehouk1 00:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC) - NPOV cannot be censored[reply]
  358. Murderbike 02:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  359. Susiekins
  360. tremewanbill
  361. User:Zahir13
  362. User:Plattler01
  363. User:Tiger Marc Tiger MarcROAR! 01:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  364. ZombiesNTea 04:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  365. aniki21 17:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Libre is just as important as gratis.[reply]
  366. Zadernet 06:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  367. Lucy-marie 23:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  368. Nateland 11:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC) damn I hate censorship, and this place needs to have the LEAST of it.[reply]
  369. Nina Odell 05:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)I've recently added the entire "articles of low importance" category for Wikiproject Sexuality and Sexology to my watchlist. I encourage others to do the same.[reply]
  370. Leonidaa 11:17, 11 January 2007
  371. Cailil 13:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  372. Johnalden --Johnalden 03:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC) freedom of expression is essential to all.[reply]
  373. Iotha 19:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  374. Oleway
  375. --Redlock 20:08, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  376. James Altman 00:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  377. DTGardner 17:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  378. Wooyi 22:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC) I support freedom of expression.[reply]
  379. tom-da-bomb 11:02, 24 Janurary 2007 {UTC}
  380. Raystlyn 04:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  381. User:AmeliaMayKingston 15.10, 28 January 2007
  382. MiraFirefly 06:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC) "Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practises a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself." - John Stuart Mill[reply]
  383. Charles Baynham 23:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  384. Wolphii 00:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC) The only way an encyclopaedia should be.[reply]
  385. ErikB 03:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  386. Misou 19:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  387. Newtown11 11:54 10 February 2007 (CMT) I support freedom of expresion, religion, speech, choice, and diversty everywhere, not just Wikipedia. And so should you.
  388. koolone i hate those ####### stars
  389. Hojimachongtalkcon After a horrid experience at Talk:Muhammad
  390. OMGitsMonica 2:48 EST, 16 Februrary 2007
  391. Awadewit 10:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC) I am not in favor of a partialpedia.[reply]
  392. Yahel Guhan 03:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  393. Pavithran 07:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)|Talk[reply]
  394. SeriousCat 04:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)  :)[reply]
  395. WassermannNYC 03:52, 24 February 2007 (EST) -- after a horrid experience at the List of Jewish American businesspeople article, I now fervently oppose those rogue administrators that like to censor and slant/skew certain articles (mostly Jewish-themed articles); I like to call them "administraitors" because of their betrayal of the spirit of the entire project.
  396. Laverick Phoenix 01:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC) -- Censorship distorts education and causes an impotence of the brain.[reply]
  397. East Stirlingshire 21:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC) -- Censorship obscures the truth.[reply]
  398. Destructo 087 04:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  399. HerkelThebrave I definitely want to join! I'm sick of people complaining about whether or not an article's "appropriate." Censorship is the first step of tyrrany and is terrible for learning.
  400. numbbelligerence 04:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  401. Joanna 23:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Expression should be neither repressed nor suppressed![reply]
  402. Alastair Haines 10:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  403. Stabby Joe 18:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC) - The internet is the one of the few places you can't silence truth, lets keep it that way![reply]
  404. Panagiotb 22:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC) - Censorship defies the meaning of a true Encyclopedia![reply]
  405. Randomfrenchie 04:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  406. Eog1916 08:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  407. Ferdia O'Brien The Archiver And The Vandal Watchman (Talk) 15:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  408. CA387 08:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  409. Timocrates 18:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  410. Kritt 06:37, 28 March 2007
  411. ColinLRtalk 20:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  412. ≈ The Haunted Angel //The Forest Whispers My Name// 14:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC) - Censorship is the bane of knowledge, fact. This is an encyclopedia, the personification of knowledge.[reply]
  413. abexy 05:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  414. TortureIsWrong 03:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  415. Djmckee1 18:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  416. User: Ianleck4
  417. Pokey Little Puppy 11 April 2007
  418. VanTucky 00:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  419. Viktym 22:07, 12 April 2007 (CST) Censorship distorts reality. It also obstructs the First Amendmant Rights to U.S. Citizens. Land of the FREE!
  420. Ketsuekigata 23:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  421. SelfStudyBuddy 08:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  422. Luigii249 19:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  423. StephenHjellum13 00:48, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  424. Bubya 19:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Boo Censorship!!![reply]
  425. Gordonov 17:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  426. HalHal 03:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  427. DieWeibeRose 23:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  428. C3pkeogh 20:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  429. Cdogsimmons 19:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC) Yes.[reply]
  430. J. D. Redding 02:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  431. SAS87 --SAS87 19:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  432. Larklight 12:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Censorship in all forms is interlectual sloth and ethically unacceptable[reply]
  433. Jw21/PenaltyKillah(discuss•edits) 20:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Censorship removes the truth. A breast is totally acceptable for a child's eyes, as long as there is discretion.[reply]
  434. Slyferret 07:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  435. St.daniel Talk 19:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  436. Yamaka122 22:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  437. Blueboy96 14:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC) As a journalist by training, I consider censorship the eighth deadly sin.[reply]
  438. Stefano Cortinovis 10:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  439. Michael J Swassing 04:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  440. SilkTork 17:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  441. Chris 14:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC) If the American left gets their way with the Fairness Doctrine, they will stop at nothing to silence the rest of information that is out in this country.[reply]
  442. SalaSkan 12:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC) absolutely. It's a pity that I didn't see this WikiProject before. SalaSkan 12:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  443. Kerilka 13:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  444. Morphyoss 03:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  445. WacoJacko 07:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  446. Soulrefrain 04:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  447. Soyseñorsnibbles 24 July 2007
  448. Coconuteire 15:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  449. DorothyBaez 6:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  450. Abcdefghayden 13:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  451. Tdreher 14:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  452. Shruti14 16:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Agree w/ aims/goals, just don't go too far and allow illegal activity, false imfo, etc and we must maintain quality to keep Wikipedia an acceptable primary resource[reply]
  453. Matthew2c4u Agree with Aims, Some information may be considered indecent by some but when there is disputed cesorship should not be considerdMatthew2c4u 12:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  454. Tornwarrior88 17:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC) We must stop censorship now!![reply]
  455. - Zeibura (Talk) 10:25, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  456. </Dave> 20:19, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  457. dominik92 August 2007
  458. Jacob 17:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  459. DavidJJJ 09:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  460. bitplane 28 August 2007
  461. Delta40 07:47, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  462. paulytlws
  463. Jared Hawkley 18:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Three cheers for free knowledge! Hip hip hooray![reply]
  464. Morfal 08:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Keeping up the good work![reply]
  465. NerdyNSK 03:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  466. Bdhook 20:22, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  467. Souseiseki42 şœśэїŝәқι 02:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  468. Ka5hmirTalk To Me! 11:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  469. Blkprf 20:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  470. Mrmattkatt 01:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  471. Designdroide 4:22 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  472. iulian28ti - Any attempt to censor Wikipedia or avoid NPOV should be punishable by death 19:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  473. RaidonMakoto 19:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  474. MgCupcake 03:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  475. wooerfara3661 01:28 GMT, 7 November 2007
  476. Welland R 09:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  477. Phyesalis (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  478. (Noneforall (talk) 20:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  479. 86.136.216.177 (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  480. Jack?! 16:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  481. Pi 17:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  482. Paulshannon (talk) 15:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  483. --STX 03:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  484. Acs4b T C U 18:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC). Censorship is actually a violation of one of Wikipedia's policies. Wikipedia aims to be a free encyclopedia, and by censoring "vulgar words" or certain parts of the body, we are obviously preventing Wikipedia from reaching that target. Instead of censoring body parts, I strongly suggest that a template warning all users that the article contains "inappropriate images and words" be created. Plus, just because I am against censorship, that doesn't mean I support profanity![reply]
  485. SamuelRiv (talk) 19:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  486. Karonaway (talk) 01:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC) I agree that censorship is ftl![reply]
  487. Mytomi (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  488. mms (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  489. Urban Rose (talk) 02:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  490. Aktb (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  491. Hanter (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  492. William P. Coleman (talk) 16:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Censorship is indecent![reply]
  493. Typing Monkey - (type to me) 16:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  494. Da bomba3 (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  495. Adamshappy (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  496. Fuzzform - I came across this project after witnessing the Muhammad fiasco unfold. Whether or not a person takes offense to the sensory information being presented to them is entirely irrelevent in all cases here on Wikipedia. As Acs4b states above, "Censorship is actually a violation of one of Wikipedia's policies."
  497. NoMonaLisa NoMonaLisa (talk) 06:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  498. Yoda317 Censorship is wrong, people deserve to be shown things in grim reality
  499. TostitosAreGross - Censorship denies the reader of the true nature of situation and therefore is less educational.
  500. Max.diems (talk) 02:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  501. EmilyELewis Censorship only contributes to ignorance
  502. RFG17 (talk) 01:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Censorship blind us![reply]
  503. Timbouctou (talk) 00:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  504. Ben (talk) 20:52, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  505. 224jeff6 Talk 15:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC) Censorship is bullshit because life is uncensored![reply]
  506.  - oahiyeel talk 05:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  507. YoungWebProgrammer msg 01:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  508. нмŵוτнτ 23:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  509. Joshuarooney (Talk) 10:31 5 March 2008 (GMT)
  510. clpo13(talk) 10:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  511. pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  512. skribb (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  513. QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 13:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  514. Enric Naval (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC) swear words, certain images... should not be removed because someone feels ofended[reply]
  515. NocturnalA6 2.7 (talk) 04:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Censorship is sometimes important, but not when you want the world to know the facts.[reply]
  516. Legianon (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC) If you don't want the truth, close your eyes.[reply]
  517. Emil Kastberg (talk) 21:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  518. Cambrasa (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  519. User:Master Genk
  520. AC+79 3888 (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  521. Ryan shell (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC) (let's censor the censoring so there are no censors)[reply]
  522. FogDevil 00:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  523. Cybiko123 (talk) 02:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  524. User:Faizaguo(talk)
  525. Seanor3 18:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Against censorship in all its forms, Especially in Videogames.[reply]
  526. Connorflanagan Of course.
  527. MisterB777 (talk) 18:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC) I whole heartedly support the goals of this project and defending legitimate content from overzealous editing in the name if "decency".[reply]
  528. --AnotherSolipsist (talk) 20:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Everything except WP:N and WP:V is irrelevant.[reply]
  529. Iunaw 21:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  530. Wloveral (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  531. Realismadder (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  532. - -[The Spooky One] | [t c r] 05:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  533. Joyson Noel (talk) This is a free encyclopedia and must be without any bias or prejudice. Therfore, i will never tolerate the censorship of this website by self righteous hypocrites with their own narrow minded personal agenda. 01:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  534. OwenBlacker (Talk)
  535. Chipthief00
  536. JohnnyCalifornia
  537. Anjoe (talk) 18:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC) - What matters is the educational value of Wikipedia. If maximal informative material offend some people —- so be it.[reply]
  538. Sigurd Dragon Slayer (talk) 10:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  539. haha169 (talk) 23:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  540. Mustafa Ahmed (talk)--Mustafaahmedhussien (talk) 22:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC) - Anything could be offensive to someone... Censorship means shutting down wikipedia!!!!![reply]
  541. Malfacteur (Talk) 29 July 2008
  542. Forridean 29 July 2008
  543. Swampfire (talk) 00:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  544. forestPIG(grunt)
  545. Eurosceptic Libertarian (talk Say the facts as they are. Do not censor them to be politically correct. People can remain offended if the facts offend them.
  546. Rimbaud 2 ([User talk:Rimbaud 2|talk]])
  547. --Mistabeen (talk) 14:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  548. 御門桜(MIKADO, Sakura) (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  549. l'aquatique || talk 07:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC) This whole UK thing has convinced me that censorship can only end badly in a Wiki environment.[reply]
  550. ERK talk • contribs 08:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  551. Skyler13 (Talk) 29 December 2008
  552. Mitch3000 19:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  553. SWMNPoliSciProject (talk) 12:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  554. Sioraf (talk) 21:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  555. Juancdg 00:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  556. Chendy (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC) If there is evidence, then information should stay[reply]
  557. The offensive is not the untruth. Elm-39 - T/C 19:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  558. Mkevlar 02:55, 16 Febuary 2009 (UTC)
  559. Sapph42 (talk) 03:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  560. Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  561. HampshireCricketFan (talk) 22:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  562. LizParker (talk) 07:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  563. K.Sørensen (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC) The government of People's Republic of China blocked a lot of articles on Wikipedia, like Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, in order to prevent something 'bad'...even searching "websites blocked china" can be censored...I'm a person who is against this kind of censorship! Do something![reply]
  564. User:Millennium_Twain ([[1]]) 11:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC) I was just threatened with blocking, because I added (referenced) sacred woman's history information and Jomon period (stone age) artwork to the Feminism_in_Japan article. I'm new here, so don't know how to tell when I am (we are) a victim of authorized administrative violence, or merely an individual editors violence. Any suggestions?[reply]
  565. Dendre (talk) 17:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC) This.[reply]
  566. Hokainsultin (talk) 04:53, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  567. Living under a rock (talk) 14:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  568. User:Politis, freedom of expression is of the essence, especially in a place like Wikipedia.
  569. tsunamishadow (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC), Political Correctness only prevents the truth. Censorship should only be used for matters of privacy.[reply]
  570. Zacherystaylor (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Censorship is especially bad when it prevents education about violence or Preventing School Violence Good day[reply]
  571. Secret Saturdays (talk) 04:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC) I hope people will visit this website and see the work of a millions of wikipedians up close without the fear of being censored. LONG LIVE THE 1ST AMENDMENT!![reply]
  572. Jiggly.cho
  573. Septagram
  574. Trickymaster (talk) 02:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  575. Raphaelguy 21:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC) I have no idea what to say, and that's okay here.[reply]
  576. SeriousKarma (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  577. Estrelly 05:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  578. English Bobby (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Fight the censor nuts![reply]
  579. Mahmudmasri (talk) 11:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Censorship blinds![reply]
  580. Maysara (talk) 11:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC) Yes![reply]
  581. Kingbirdy23 (talk) 21:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  582. ushrark 3:11, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
  583. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 11:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC) "A censor is a man who knows more than he thinks you ought to.” - Granville Hicks[reply]
  584. Omicron91 09:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC) (talk)[reply]
  585. --Saukkomies talk 04:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  586. hellais 00:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  587. JP419"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man" ...and with that said, let the war on censorship begin. Visit my page and check out the subjects for which I stand vigilant. Nothing on Wikipedia should be censored, whether by deletion or fundamental rewrite. I'm an inclusionist JP419 (talk) 09:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  588. Chetan Kandari
  589. Dront (talk) 13:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  590. PositivelyJordan (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  591. Scott i am (talk) Editing articles to censor them is just stupid. 19:35, 9 Febuary 2010 (UPC)
  592. --Gulivar (talk) 21:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  593. O'DaveY (talk) 09:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  594. Ink Falls 16:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  595. C4bl3Fl4m3 04:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
  596. User:Zonafan39 28 May 2010
  597. Shinryuu (talk) 21:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  598. Zenswashbuckler (talk) 28 June 2010
  599. Cosman246 (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  600. DamaclesBeDamned (talk) 13:40, 22 July 2010
  601. WackyWace converse | contribs 17:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  602. Junkie007 (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  603. Nowyouseemetalk2me 06:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  604. Yjo (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  605. Drbogdan (talk) 03:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  606. Kgasso (talk) 07:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  607. Hazzarington ,small.(talk) 18:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  608. Sandb 5 January 2011
  609. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 10:32, 9 January 2011 (UTC) (Make that 610).[reply]
  610. Outlaw265 (talk) 20:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  611. Tbennert (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  612. Cyclopiatalk 23:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  613. Smart30 --Smart30 (talk) 04:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  614. Daemorris (talk) 01:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikipedians_against_censorship/Members&oldid=439190908"