User talk:20.133.0.13
 | New messages will appear at the bottom of this page. |
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
 | This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. |
 | Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history. |
 This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
|
|---|
| The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
May 2012
June 2012
September 2012
October 2012
Your insinuations about certain editors are not acceptable: they are personal attacks. I note this edit, and now this one, which I've removed as trolling. The block log for this IP address is not quite as long as that for some of those editors you pointed at, but much more justified, and I am adding to it with a block for trolling. Drmies (talk) 14:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)  {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 14:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Not possible to create account. This IP is used by large organisation with very many users. This "vandalism" seem to be just two observations about a certain editor. May or may not be by same person, but hardly vandalism. 20.133.0.13 (talk) 10:07, 10 October 2012 (UTC) November 2012
December 2012
April 2013Hi, Just to let you know I edited your contribution to the page "England Handball Association" as the runner-up was Ruislip Eagles and not Great Dane (source:http://eharesults.weebly.com/play-offs.html). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.140.133.56 (talk) 13:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
July 2013
October 2013
November 2013
December 2013
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Bayer (Musician).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! nonsense ferret 13:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MessageMan, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Bayer (Musician), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jay Diggins (October 9)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jay Diggins.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 01:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Bayer (Musician)
Hello 20.133.0.13. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Andrew Bayer (Musician)".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Bayer (Musician)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Jay Diggins, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Jay Diggins was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/user/iamjaydiggins) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Your edits to February 2
Some of your edits on the page February 2 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:
- The page you linked to is a Disambiguation page.
Please choose the individual that you mean from that page, and link to their Wikipedia page. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 11:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
March 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Belt (mechanical). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:56, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
April 2014
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Polyamide, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to CIE 1931 color space does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!
Also, I suggest to review this guideline: WP:ENGVAR
—BarrelProof (talk) 16:27, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Your changes to Color space and Color model seem to have the same issues (but I don't see a problem with your changes to Candela, Lumen, Radiance and Irradiance, since the WP:ENGVAR-related changes in those edits seem to be improving the consistency of what was already the dominant variation in those articles). —BarrelProof (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Guidelines on national varieties of English
In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. --Srleffler (talk) 01:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Your repeated edit and its reference to "international spelling"
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CIE 1931 color space. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges.
I see that you repeated the change of spelling, this time with the edit summary "reverted to international spelling". I actually have a significant amount of sympathy with the concept of international spelling. However, that is not the way Wikipedia has agreed to manage its articles. Again I suggest to please read the WP:ENGVAR section of the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Rather than attempting to apply "international spelling", Wikipedia prefers to allow different articles to use different varieties of English and to have stability in regard to which variety is used in a particular article. Your repetition of the change seems disruptive and unhelpful, since it seems to not follow this guideline.
Please also see where the Wikipedia:Manual of Style says "Style and formatting should be consistent within an article, though not necessarily throughout Wikipedia. Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason. Edit warring over optional styles is unacceptable.
"
—BarrelProof (talk) 16:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Clutch because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 08:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your addition to Moors murders article has been reverted , as it was totally unnecessary. From your editing history, it appears that you are not making constructive edits. Please use the sandbox if you wish to experiment. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 12:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
Hello, I'm LRD NO. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Papiss Cissé because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! LRD 11:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
December 2014
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Carl Fogarty— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 17:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Did you watch the final? He had to eat a camel's penis. Why have you deleted that? 20.133.0.13 (talk) 17:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Main Page, you may be blocked from editing. Babita arora 11:03, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- The edit said this: "If you think that 'Fuck is such a tepid word that literally just means sex' I think you're missing the whole point of that article?" That was a quote there. So it's ok to use the f-word on the Main Page, but not in a direct quote in a dicussion? That's hypocrisy of the highest order. 20.133.0.13 (talk) 11:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- HI,Thanks for help about Rafale.124.13.234.53 (talk) 11:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |