Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-04-25/Recent research: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
====Survey dataset of over 100,000 Wikipedia users ==== |
====Survey dataset of over 100,000 Wikipedia users ==== |
||
From the abstract:<ref>{{Cite arXiv| arxiv = 2311.07964 | last1 = Cruciani| first1 = Caterina| last2 = Joubert| first2 = Léo| last3 = Jullien| first3 = Nicolas| last4 = Mell| first4 = Laurent| last5 = Piccione| first5 = Sasha| last6 = Vermeirsche| first6 = Jeanne| title = Surveying Wikipedians: a dataset of users and contributors' practices on Wikipedia in 8 languages| date = 2023-12-01}} Dataset: {{Cite| last1 = Cruciani| first1 = Caterina| last2 = Joubert| first2 = Léo| last3 = Jullien| first3 = Nicolas| last4 = Mell| first4 = Laurent| last5 = Piccione| first5 = Sasha| last6 = Vermeirsche| first6 = Jeanne| title = Surveying Wikipedians: a dataset of users and contributors’ practices on Wikipedia in 8 languages| date = 2023-12-01| url = https://nakala.fr/10.34847/nkl.4ecf4u8m | doi = 10.34847/nkl.4ecf4u8m}} |
From the abstract:<ref>{{Cite arXiv| arxiv = 2311.07964 | last1 = Cruciani| first1 = Caterina| last2 = Joubert| first2 = Léo| last3 = Jullien| first3 = Nicolas| last4 = Mell| first4 = Laurent| last5 = Piccione| first5 = Sasha| last6 = Vermeirsche| first6 = Jeanne| title = Surveying Wikipedians: a dataset of users and contributors' practices on Wikipedia in 8 languages| date = 2023-12-01}} / Dataset: {{Cite| last1 = Cruciani| first1 = Caterina| last2 = Joubert| first2 = Léo| last3 = Jullien| first3 = Nicolas| last4 = Mell| first4 = Laurent| last5 = Piccione| first5 = Sasha| last6 = Vermeirsche| first6 = Jeanne| title = Surveying Wikipedians: a dataset of users and contributors’ practices on Wikipedia in 8 languages| date = 2023-12-01| url = https://nakala.fr/10.34847/nkl.4ecf4u8m | doi = 10.34847/nkl.4ecf4u8m}} |
||
</ref> |
|||
<blockquote style="padding-left:1.0em; padding-right:1.0em; background-color:#eaf8f4;"> |
<blockquote style="padding-left:1.0em; padding-right:1.0em; background-color:#eaf8f4;"> |
||
"The dataset focuses on Wikipedia users and contains information about demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the respondents and their activity on Wikipedia. The data was collected using a questionnaire available online between June and July 2023. The link to the questionnaire was distributed via a banner published in 8 languages on the Wikipedia page. [...] The survey includes 200 questions about: what people were doing on Wikipedia before clicking the link to the questionnaire; how they use Wikipedia as readers (``professional'' and ``personal'' uses); their opinion on the quality, the thematic coverage, the importance of the encyclopaedia; the making of Wikipedia (how they think it is made, if they have ever contributed and how); their social, sport, artistic and cultural activities, both online and offline; their socio-economic characteristics including political beliefs, and trust propensities. More than 200 000 people opened the questionnaire, 100 332 started to answer, and constitute our dataset, and 10 576 finished it."</blockquote> |
"The dataset focuses on Wikipedia users and contains information about demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the respondents and their activity on Wikipedia. The data was collected using a questionnaire available online between June and July 2023. The link to the questionnaire was distributed via a banner published in 8 languages on the Wikipedia page. [...] The survey includes 200 questions about: what people were doing on Wikipedia before clicking the link to the questionnaire; how they use Wikipedia as readers (``professional'' and ``personal'' uses); their opinion on the quality, the thematic coverage, the importance of the encyclopaedia; the making of Wikipedia (how they think it is made, if they have ever contributed and how); their social, sport, artistic and cultural activities, both online and offline; their socio-economic characteristics including political beliefs, and trust propensities. More than 200 000 people opened the questionnaire, 100 332 started to answer, and constitute our dataset, and 10 576 finished it."</blockquote> |
||
See also the project's page on Meta-wiki: [[m:Research:Surveying readers and contributors to Wikipedia|Research:Surveying readers and contributors to Wikipedia]] |
|||
====Despite teachers' skepticism, 86% of Estonian high school students use Wikipedia at least a couple of times per month (female students more often)==== |
====Despite teachers' skepticism, 86% of Estonian high school students use Wikipedia at least a couple of times per month (female students more often)==== |
Revision as of 06:31, 23 April 2024
Article display preview: | This is a draft of a potential Signpost article, and should not be interpreted as a finished piece. Its content is subject to review by the editorial team and ultimately by JPxG, the editor in chief. Please do not link to this draft as it is unfinished and the URL will change upon publication. If you would like to contribute and are familiar with the requirements of a Signpost article, feel free to be bold in making improvements!
|
YOUR ARTICLE'S DESCRIPTIVE TITLE HERE
A monthly overview of recent academic research about Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, also published as the Wikimedia Research Newsletter.
...
- Reviewed by ...
...
- Reviewed by ...
...
- Reviewed by ....
Briefly
- The Wikimedia Foundation invites feedback on a whitepaper about "Wikimedia Research Best Practices Around Privacy" (until April 30), see also News and notes in this Signpost issue
- The Wikimedia Foundation's research department invites proposals (deadline: April 29) for the "Wiki Workshop Hall", a new feature of the annual Wiki Workshop online conference consisting of two 30-minute sessions "for Wikimedia researchers and Wikimedia movement members to connect with each other."
- See the page of the monthly Wikimedia Research Showcase for videos and slides of past presentations.
- ...
Other recent publications
Other recent publications that could not be covered in time for this issue include the items listed below. Contributions, whether reviewing or summarizing newly published research, are always welcome.
- Compiled by ...
Survey dataset of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
From the abstract:[1]
"The dataset focuses on Wikipedia users and contains information about demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the respondents and their activity on Wikipedia. The data was collected using a questionnaire available online between June and July 2023. The link to the questionnaire was distributed via a banner published in 8 languages on the Wikipedia page. [...] The survey includes 200 questions about: what people were doing on Wikipedia before clicking the link to the questionnaire; how they use Wikipedia as readers (``professional and ``personal uses); their opinion on the quality, the thematic coverage, the importance of the encyclopaedia; the making of Wikipedia (how they think it is made, if they have ever contributed and how); their social, sport, artistic and cultural activities, both online and offline; their socio-economic characteristics including political beliefs, and trust propensities. More than 200 000 people opened the questionnaire, 100 332 started to answer, and constitute our dataset, and 10 576 finished it."
See also the project's page on Meta-wiki: Research:Surveying readers and contributors to Wikipedia
Despite teachers' skepticism, 86% of Estonian high school students use Wikipedia at least a couple of times per month (female students more often)
From the abstract:[2]
"The article is based on a quantitative study in which 381 Estonian school children [9th and 12th grade students] participated in filling out an online survey. The questionnaire included both multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Findings: Statistical analyses and responses to open-ended questions showed that students often use Wikipedia as a primary source of information, but that their use of the site for learning tasks is guided by teachers’ attitudes and perceptions towards Wikipedia. Students perceive Wikipedia as a quick and convenient source of information but are uncertain about its reliability."
From the "Results" section:
"[...] 5% of the students surveyed use Wikipedia every day, 51% at least a couple of times a week and 30% a couple of times a month. To compare the groups, we conducted a t-test, which concluded that statistically significant differences were present across gender and grades. For the purpose of the calculations, we treated responses as numerical (rarely/not at all = 1, a few times a year = 2, a few times a month = 3, a few times a week = 4, every day = 5). For gender, the mean is 3.73 for women and 3.46 for men (p < 0.05). Thus, there is a statistically significant difference in the frequency of Wikipedia use between the two groups, with female students using Wikipedia more often than male students. [...] 24% of the students surveyed said that teachers had no objection to using Wikipedia, 3% said that teachers did not allow to use Wikipedia, 47% said that some teachers did and some did not and 10% said that they did not know. Teachers do not explicitly forbid students from using Wikipedia for learning tasks, but they do recommend that students use more trustworthy sources [...]"
"With or without Wikipedia? Integrating Wikipedia into the Teaching Process in Estonian General Education Schools"
From the abstract:[3]
The study is based on semi-structured interviews with 49 teachers from 11 general education schools in Estonia. The results of the qualitative content analysis of the interviews indicate that teachers consider the use of Wikipedia to be a suitable for teaching, alongside other information sources and environments. However, teachers acknowledge some uncertainty and caution towards Wikipedia, as they do not consider it a very reliable teaching tool: an attitude largely inherited from the early days of Wikipedia. While teachers themselves are active and frequent Wikipedia users, and allow students to search for information, they do not assign Wikipedia-based text-creation tasks to students. "
References
- ^ Cruciani, Caterina; Joubert, Léo; Jullien, Nicolas; Mell, Laurent; Piccione, Sasha; Vermeirsche, Jeanne (2023-12-01). "Surveying Wikipedians: a dataset of users and contributors' practices on Wikipedia in 8 languages". arXiv:2311.07964. / Dataset: Cruciani, Caterina; Joubert, Léo; Jullien, Nicolas; Mell, Laurent; Piccione, Sasha; Vermeirsche, Jeanne (2023-12-01), Surveying Wikipedians: a dataset of users and contributors’ practices on Wikipedia in 8 languages, doi:10.34847/nkl.4ecf4u8m
- ^ Remmik, Marvi; Siiman, Ann; Reinsalu, Riina; Vija, Maigi; Org, Andrus (January 2024). "Using Wikipedia to Develop 21st Century Skills: Perspectives from General Education Students". Education Sciences. 14 (1): 101. doi:10.3390/educsci14010101. ISSN 2227-7102.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Reinsalu, Riina; Vija, Maigi; Org, Andrus; Siiman, Ann; Remmik, Marvi (June 2023). "With or without Wikipedia? Integrating Wikipedia into the Teaching Process in Estonian General Education Schools". Education Sciences. 13 (6): 583. doi:10.3390/educsci13060583. ISSN 2227-7102.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
- Supplementary references and notes:
This page is a draft for the next issue of the Signpost. Below is some helpful code that will help you write and format a Signpost draft. If it's blank, you can fill out a template by copy-pasting this in and pressing 'publish changes': {{subst:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload}}
Images and Galleries
|
---|
To put an image in your article, use the following template (link): This will create the file on the right. Keep the 300px in most cases. If writing a 'full width' article, change
Placing (link) will instead create an inline image like below [[File:|300px|center|alt=Placeholder alt text]]
To create a gallery, use the following to create |
Quotes
| |||
---|---|---|---|
To insert a framed quote like the one on the right, use this template (link): If writing a 'full width' article, change
To insert a pull quote like
use this template (link):
To insert a long inline quote like
use this template (link): |
Side frames
|
---|
Side frames help put content in sidebar vignettes. For instance, this one (link): gives the frame on the right. This is useful when you want to insert non-standard images, quotes, graphs, and the like.
For example, to insert the {{Graph:Chart}} generated by in a frame, simple put the graph code in to get the framed Graph:Chart on the right. If writing a 'full width' article, change |
Two-column vs full width styles
|
---|
If you keep the 'normal' preloaded draft and work from there, you will be using the two-column style. This is perfectly fine in most cases and you don't need to do anything. However, every time you have a However, you can also fine-tune which style is used at which point in an article. To switch from two-column → full width style midway in an article, insert where you want the switch to happen. To switch from full width → two-column style midway in an article, insert where you want the switch to happen. |
Article series
|
---|
To add a series of 'related articles' your article, use the following code or will create the sidebar on the right. If writing a 'full width' article, change Alternatively, you can use at the end of an article to create For more Signpost coverage on the visual editor see our visual editor series. If you think a topic would make a good series, but you don't see a tag for it, or that all the articles in a series seem 'old', ask for help at the WT:NEWSROOM. Many more tags exist, but they haven't been documented yet. |
Links and such
|
---|
By the way, the template that you're reading right now is {{Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue}}. |
Discuss this story
Wikipedians are more careful than to believe in the results of convenience sampling. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would be interesting (at least to me) to see the results/analyses of the following questions from the survey:
Anyway, thanks for creating those graphs and sharing some of the topline results! Some1 (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
HaeB: The issue with the survey is that the sample is non-random, so the results cannot be relied upon. It is not impossible that the self-selected participants represent a valid sample of the population, but there is no assurance that this is so. Very often, such a sample turns out to be skewed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
References
-SusanLesch (talk) 13:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]