Butch and femme: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by Sorbetfordogs (talk) to last version by Flyer22 |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Image:Butch Femme Society by David Shankbone.jpg|thumb|300 px|Lesbian Butch/Femme Society march in New York City's [[Gay Pride Parade]].]] |
[[Image:Butch Femme Society by David Shankbone.jpg|thumb|300 px|Lesbian Butch/Femme Society march in New York City's [[Gay Pride Parade]].]] |
||
'''Butch and femme''' are terms used to describe individual women in the lesbian community that ascribe to or acknowledge a [[Masculinity|masculine]] (butch) or [[Femininity|feminine]] (femme) identity with its associated traits, behaviors, styles, self-perception and so on. |
|||
'''Butch and femme''' are terms used to describe individual [[gender identity|gender identities]] in the lesbian, [[gay]], [[bisexual]], [[transgender]] and [[cross-dressing]] [[subculture]]s<ref>{{cite web|last=Wickens|first=Kathryn|title=Butch–Femme Definitions|url=http://www.butch-femme.net/butchfemmenetwork_016.htm|publisher=Butch–Femme Network, founded in Massachusetts in 1996|accessdate=11 October 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Hollibaugh|first=Amber L.|title=My Dangerous Desires: A Queer Girl Dreaming Her Way Home|year=2000|publisher=Duke University Press|isbn=0822326191|pages=249|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=41bNbaMuyPoC&dq=transgender+butch+femme&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Boyd|first=Helen|title=My Husband Betty: Love, Sex and Life With a Cross-Dresser|year=2004|publisher=Sdal Press|isbn=1560255153|pages=64|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vCT70HjI_a4C&dq=en+femme&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> to ascribe or acknowledge a [[Masculinity|masculine]] (butch) or [[Femininity|feminine]] (femme) identity with its associated traits, behaviors, styles, self-perception and so on. This concept has been called a "way to organize sexual relationships and gender and sexual identity".<ref>{{cite book|last=Kramararae|first=Chris|title=Rutledge International Encyclopaedia of Women|year=2000|publisher=Routledge|isbn=0415920892|pages=133|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YCKLHBXeyyYC&dq=Butch+femme+organising+sex+1980s&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> It is sometimes assumed by scholars to be solely a [[lesbian]] dyadic system, with the individual identities of butch and femme dependent on each other for their existence; but this denies the personal experiences of many women in butch–butch and femme–femme relationships.<ref>{{cite book|last=Beeming|first=Brett|title=Queer Studies: A Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Anthology|year=1996|publisher=NYU press|isbn=0814712584|pages=23–27|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2rh1fdNCqGYC&dq=assumption+butch+and+femme+dyad&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> |
|||
Both the expression of individual lesbians of butch and femme identities and the relationship of the lesbian community in general to the notion of butch and femme as an organizing principle for sexual relating have varied over the course of the 20th century.<ref>{{cite book|last=Harmon|first=Lori|title=Gender Identity, Minority Stress, And Substance Use Among Lesbians|year=2007|publisher=ProQuest|isbn=0549398058|pages=5–7|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=T0KhKXJxitoC&dq=butch-femme+70s&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> Some [[lesbian feminist]]s have argued that butch–femme is simply a replication of [[heterosexual]] relations while other commentators argue that, while it resonates with heterosexual patterns of relating, butch–femme simultaneously challenges it.<ref>{{cite book|last=Sullivan|first=Nikki|title=Critical Introduction to Queer Theory|year=2003|publisher=Edinburgh University Press|isbn=0748615970|page=28|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=eB6meILZ4toC&dq=Sheila+Jeffries+butch+femme+heterosexual&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> Research in the 1990s in the United States showed that "95% of lesbians are familiar with butch/femme codes and can rate themselves or others in terms of those codes, and yet the same percentage feels that butch/femme was "unimportant in their lives"".<ref>{{cite book|last=Caramagno|first=Thomas C.|title=Irreconcilable Differences? Intellectual Stalemate in the Gay Rights Debate|year=2002|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=0275977110|page=138|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1fjdi-s463YC&dq=loulan+95%25&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> |
Both the expression of individual lesbians of butch and femme identities and the relationship of the lesbian community in general to the notion of butch and femme as an organizing principle for sexual relating have varied over the course of the 20th century.<ref>{{cite book|last=Harmon|first=Lori|title=Gender Identity, Minority Stress, And Substance Use Among Lesbians|year=2007|publisher=ProQuest|isbn=0549398058|pages=5–7|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=T0KhKXJxitoC&dq=butch-femme+70s&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> Some [[lesbian feminist]]s have argued that butch–femme is simply a replication of [[heterosexual]] relations while other commentators argue that, while it resonates with heterosexual patterns of relating, butch–femme simultaneously challenges it.<ref>{{cite book|last=Sullivan|first=Nikki|title=Critical Introduction to Queer Theory|year=2003|publisher=Edinburgh University Press|isbn=0748615970|page=28|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=eB6meILZ4toC&dq=Sheila+Jeffries+butch+femme+heterosexual&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> Research in the 1990s in the United States showed that "95% of lesbians are familiar with butch/femme codes and can rate themselves or others in terms of those codes, and yet the same percentage feels that butch/femme was "unimportant in their lives"".<ref>{{cite book|last=Caramagno|first=Thomas C.|title=Irreconcilable Differences? Intellectual Stalemate in the Gay Rights Debate|year=2002|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=0275977110|page=138|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1fjdi-s463YC&dq=loulan+95%25&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
===Femme=== |
===Femme=== |
||
Both heterosexuals and lesbians sometimes question the difference between heterosexual women and femmes. ''Visible: A Femmethology, Vol 1'' states: "Femme is perpetually misunderstood and remains cloaked in silence and invisibility. [...] On a daily basis queer femmes must confront the pain of invisibility: we know what it feels like to be dismissed and not taken seriously, to have our very lives, families, and |
Both heterosexuals and lesbians sometimes question the difference between heterosexual women and femmes. ''Visible: A Femmethology, Vol 1'' states: "Femme is perpetually misunderstood and remains cloaked in silence and invisibility. [...] On a daily basis queer femmes must confront the pain of invisibility: we know what it feels like to be dismissed and not taken seriously, to have our very lives, families, and identities questioned by queers and straights alike."<ref>{{cite book|last=Lowrey|first=Sassafras|title=Visible: A Femmethology, Vol 1|year=2009|publisher=Homofactus Press|isbn=0978597346|page=162|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=J5850VM21VIC&dq=butch+femme+erotica+community&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Although butch–femme wasn't the only organizing principle among lesbians in the mid-20th century, it was particularly prominent in the working-class lesbian bar culture of the 1940s, '50s, and '60s, where butch–femme was the norm, while butch–butch and femme–femme relationships were taboo.<ref>{{cite web |last=Theophano |first=Teresa |title=Butch–Femme |work=[[glbtq.com]] |publisher= |year=2004 |url=http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/butch_femme_ssh.html |accessdate=2007-01-25 }}</ref> Those who switched roles were called ''ki-ki'', a [[pejorative]] term, and they were often the butt of jokes.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kennedy |first=Elizabeth Lapovsky |author2=Madeline D. Davis |title=Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community |publisher=Penguin |year=1994 |location=New York |isbn=0-14-023550-7 |pages=212–213 | url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0T8F0daflZ4C&dq=Boots+of+leather&hl=en&sa=X&ei=SQgkUf7gIIOKhQeEuoCIAw&ved=0CEIQ6AEwAA }}</ref> In the 1950s, in an early piece of [[Queer studies|lesbian studies]], the gay rights campaigning organisation [[ONE, Inc.]] assigned Stella Rush to study "the butch/femme phenomenon" in gay bars. Rush reported that women held strong opinions, that "role distinctions needed to be sharply drawn," and that not being one or the other earned strong disapproval from both groups.<ref>{{cite book |last=Bullough |first=Vern |title=Before Stonewall: Activists in lesbian and gay rights in historical context |publisher=Harrington Park Press |year=2002 |location=New York |isbn=1-56023-192-0 |pages=139 }}</ref> It has been noted that, at least in part, kiki women were unwelcome where lesbians gathered because their apparent lack of understanding of the butch–femme [[dress code]] might indicate that they were policewomen.<ref>{{cite book|last=Atkins|first=Dawn|title=Looking Queer: Body Image and Identity in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Communities|year=1998|publisher=Routedge|isbn=0789004631|pages=20|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Rd31TPHaxdEC&dq=Butch/butch&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> |
Although butch–femme wasn't the only organizing principle among lesbians in the mid-20th century, it was particularly prominent in the working-class lesbian bar culture of the 1940s, '50s, and '60s, where butch–femme was the norm, while butch–butch and femme–femme relationships were taboo.<ref>{{cite web |last=Theophano |first=Teresa |title=Butch–Femme |work=[[glbtq.com]] |publisher= |year=2004 |url=http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/butch_femme_ssh.html |accessdate=2007-01-25 }}</ref> Those who switched roles were called ''ki-ki'', a [[pejorative]] term, and they were often the butt of jokes.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kennedy |first=Elizabeth Lapovsky |author2=Madeline D. Davis |title=Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community |publisher=Penguin |year=1994 |location=New York |isbn=0-14-023550-7 |pages=212–213 | url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0T8F0daflZ4C&dq=Boots+of+leather&hl=en&sa=X&ei=SQgkUf7gIIOKhQeEuoCIAw&ved=0CEIQ6AEwAA }}</ref> In the 1950s, in an early piece of [[Queer studies|lesbian studies]], the gay rights campaigning organisation [[ONE, Inc.]] assigned Stella Rush to study "the butch/femme phenomenon" in gay bars. Rush reported that women held strong opinions, that "role distinctions needed to be sharply drawn," and that not being one or the other earned strong disapproval from both groups.<ref>{{cite book |last=Bullough |first=Vern |title=Before Stonewall: Activists in lesbian and gay rights in historical context |publisher=Harrington Park Press |year=2002 |location=New York |isbn=1-56023-192-0 |pages=139 }}</ref> It has been noted that, at least in part, kiki women were unwelcome where lesbians gathered because their apparent lack of understanding of the butch–femme [[dress code]] might indicate that they were policewomen.<ref>{{cite book|last=Atkins|first=Dawn|title=Looking Queer: Body Image and Identity in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Communities|year=1998|publisher=Routedge|isbn=0789004631|pages=20|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Rd31TPHaxdEC&dq=Butch/butch&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> |
||
However, "inherent to butch–femme relationships was the presumption that the butch is the physically active partner and the leader in lovemaking....Yet unlike the dynamics of many heterosexual relationships, the butch's foremost objective was to give sexual pleasure to a femme. The essence of this emotional/sexual dynamic is captured by the ideal of the "stone butch |
However, "inherent to butch–femme relationships was the presumption that the butch is the physically active partner and the leader in lovemaking....Yet unlike the dynamics of many heterosexual relationships, the butch's foremost objective was to give sexual pleasure to a femme. The essence of this emotional/sexual dynamic is captured by the ideal of the "stone butch", or untouchable butch....To be untouchable meant to gain pleasure from giving pleasure. Thus, although these women did draw on models in heterosexual society, they transformed those models into an authentically lesbian interaction."<ref>{{cite book |last=Davis |first=Madeline |last2=Kennedy |first2=Elizabeth Lapovsky |chapter=Oral History and the Study of Sexuality in the Lesbian Community |title=Hidden from History: Reclaiming the Gay & Lesbian Past |year=1990 |editor=Duberman |location=New York |publisher=Meridian, New American Library, Penguin Books |isbn=0452010675}}</ref> |
||
[[Antipathy]] toward female butches and male femmes has been interpreted by some commentators as [[transphobia]],<ref>{{cite book|last=Tyler|first=Carol-Ann|title=Female Impersonation|year=2003|publisher=Routledge|isbn=0415916887|pages=91|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xBb55sOOIX4C&dq=Butch+femme+transphobia&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> although female butches and male femmes are not always [[transgender]] or identified with the [[transgenderism (social movement)|transmovement]]. |
|||
==Other terms and identities== |
==Other terms and identities== |
||
Line 55: | Line 53: | ||
===Gay male terms=== |
===Gay male terms=== |
||
Among the subcultures composed of butch gay and bisexual men is the "[[Bear (gay culture)|bear community]]". Gay men who are more femme are sometimes described as "flamers |
Among the subcultures composed of butch gay and bisexual men is the "[[Bear (gay culture)|bear community]]". Gay men who are more femme are sometimes described as "flamers".<ref>{{cite book|last=Clarkson|first=Jay Robert|title=Masculinity Means Never Having to Say Your Masculine|year=2006|publisher=ProQuest|isbn=0542795078|pages=166|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lfKciq5f6pQC&dq=Flamer+gay+man&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> "Homomasculinity" is a term coined in 1977 by [[LGBT social movements|gay activist]] editor in chief of ''Drummer'' magazine [[Jack Fritscher]] .<ref name="Jack Fritscher">[http://www.jackfritscher.com./ Jack Fritscher, Ph.D.]</ref> The term describes a [[subculture]] of gay men who prefer masculine-identified men as legitimately as some men prefer effeminate men and drag queens. Equating the three self-fashioning identity labels "gay," "homosexual," and "homomasculine," Fritscher also coined "homofemininity" for lesbians to whom he opened ''Drummer'' magazine in the late 1970s by publishing writing about the [[Society of Janus]] and writing from [[Samois]], a group founded by [[LGBT social movements|gay activists]] [[Patrick Califia]] and [[Gayle Rubin]]. Humanist Fritscher intended "homomasculinity" as an identity concept and never as an exclusionary concept as promulgated by [[Jack Malebranche]] in his latter-day book ''Androphilia''. The term "homomasculinity" grew out of the gay-identity movement and the [[leather subculture]] of 1970's [[San Francisco]]. and is detailed in Fritscher's gay linguistics essay [http://jackfritscher.com/Academic/Queer_Words.html "Homomasculinity: Framing Keywords of Queer Popular Culture"] presented at the Queer Keyword Conference, University College Dublin, Ireland, April 2005.<ref name="Jack Fritscher"/> [[Banjee]] or banjee boy is a term from the 1980s or earlier that describes a certain type of young [[Latino]] or [[Black people|Black]] [[men who have sex with men|man who has sex with men]] and who dresses in [[urban fashion]] for reasons that may include expressing [[masculinity]], hiding his [[sexual orientation]] or attracting male partners. The term is mostly associated with [[New York City]] and may be [[Nuyorican]] in origin. This evolved into [[Down-low (sexual slang)|down-low]] culture.{{citation needed|date=February 2013}} |
||
==Community== |
==Community== |
Revision as of 02:24, 9 April 2015
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Butch and femme are terms used to describe individual women in the lesbian community that ascribe to or acknowledge a masculine (butch) or feminine (femme) identity with its associated traits, behaviors, styles, self-perception and so on.
Both the expression of individual lesbians of butch and femme identities and the relationship of the lesbian community in general to the notion of butch and femme as an organizing principle for sexual relating have varied over the course of the 20th century.[1] Some lesbian feminists have argued that butch–femme is simply a replication of heterosexual relations while other commentators argue that, while it resonates with heterosexual patterns of relating, butch–femme simultaneously challenges it.[2] Research in the 1990s in the United States showed that "95% of lesbians are familiar with butch/femme codes and can rate themselves or others in terms of those codes, and yet the same percentage feels that butch/femme was "unimportant in their lives"".[3]
Etymology and symbology
The word femme (alternative spelling: fem) is taken from the French word for woman. The word butch, meaning "tough kid" may have been coined by abbreviating the word butcher, as first noted in George Cassidy's nickname, Butch Cassidy. Butch gained the sense "male-like lesbian" in the 1940s.[4]
The butch web designer Daddy Rhon created a symbol of a black triangle intersecting a red circle to represent butch/femme sexuality, which was first used at the beginning of the 21st century on the website butch-femme.com and has started to be used elsewhere.[5]
Attributes
There is debate as to who the terms butch and femme can apply, and particularly whether transgender individuals can be identified in this way. For example, Jack Halberstam argues that FTM transgender persons cannot be considered butch since it constitutes a conflation of maleness with butchness. He further argues that butch–femme is uniquely geared to work in lesbian relationships.[6] Stereotypes and definitions of butch and femme vary greatly, even within tight-knit LGBT communities.
Alternate conceptualizations suggest that butch and femme are not attempts to take up "traditional" gender roles. This argument situates "traditional" gender roles as biological, and historical imperatives, a claim that has been contested by Sigmund Freud, Judith Butler, Anne Fausto-Sterling, and many others. These authors regard gender as both socially and historically constructed, rather than as essential, "natural", or strictly biological. The femme lesbian historian Joan Nestle argues that femme and butch may be seen as distinct genders in and of themselves,[7] while Jewelle Gomez suggests that butch and femme were early instances of transgender.[8]
Research shows that lesbians report greater satisfaction and fewer problems in their relationships when there is an equal power balance between participants; those relationships with a butch–femme dynamic were as likely to have power equality as other lesbian relationships.[9]
Butch
"Butch'" can be used as an adjective or a noun[10] to describe an individual's gender or gender performance. A masculine person of any gender can be described as butch. The term butch tends to denote a degree of masculinity displayed by a female individual beyond what would be considered typical of a tomboy. It is not uncommon for women with a butch appearance to meet with social disapproval. A butch woman could be compared to an effeminate man in the sense that both genders are historically linked to homosexual communities and stereotypes.[original research?] A 1990s survey of butches showed that 50% were primarily attracted to femmes while 25% reported being usually attracted to other butches.[11]
Femme
Both heterosexuals and lesbians sometimes question the difference between heterosexual women and femmes. Visible: A Femmethology, Vol 1 states: "Femme is perpetually misunderstood and remains cloaked in silence and invisibility. [...] On a daily basis queer femmes must confront the pain of invisibility: we know what it feels like to be dismissed and not taken seriously, to have our very lives, families, and identities questioned by queers and straights alike."[12]
History
Prior to the middle of the 20th century in Western culture, homosexual societies were mostly underground or secret, making it difficult to determine how long butch and femme roles have been practiced by women.
Early 20th century
It is known that butch–femme dress codes date back at least to the beginning of the 20th century as photographs have survived of butch–femme couples in the decade of 1910–1920 in the United States; they were then called "transvestites".[13] However, according to the Routledge International Encyclopaedia of Women, although upper-class women like Radclyffe Hall and her lover Una Troubridge lived together in unions that resembled butch–femme relationships, "The term butch/femme would have been categorically inconsequential, however, and incomprehensible to these women."[14]
Mid-20th century
In the 1940s in the U.S., most butch women had to wear conventionally feminine dress in order to hold down jobs, donning their starched shirts and ties only on weekends to go to bars or parties as "Saturday night" butches. The 1950s saw the rise of a new generation of butches who refused to live double lives and wore butch attire full-time, or as close to full-time as possible. This usually limited them to a few jobs, such as factory work and cab driving, that had no dress codes for women.[15] Their increased visibility, combined with the anti-queer rhetoric of the McCarthy era, led to an increase in violent attacks on gay and bisexual women, while at the same time the increasingly strong and defiant bar culture became more willing to respond with force. Although femmes also fought back, it became primarily the role of butches to defend against attacks and hold the bars as queer women's space.[16] While in the '40s, the prevailing butch image was severe but gentle, it became increasingly tough and aggressive as violent confrontation became a fact of life.[17]
Although butch–femme wasn't the only organizing principle among lesbians in the mid-20th century, it was particularly prominent in the working-class lesbian bar culture of the 1940s, '50s, and '60s, where butch–femme was the norm, while butch–butch and femme–femme relationships were taboo.[18] Those who switched roles were called ki-ki, a pejorative term, and they were often the butt of jokes.[19] In the 1950s, in an early piece of lesbian studies, the gay rights campaigning organisation ONE, Inc. assigned Stella Rush to study "the butch/femme phenomenon" in gay bars. Rush reported that women held strong opinions, that "role distinctions needed to be sharply drawn," and that not being one or the other earned strong disapproval from both groups.[20] It has been noted that, at least in part, kiki women were unwelcome where lesbians gathered because their apparent lack of understanding of the butch–femme dress code might indicate that they were policewomen.[21]
However, "inherent to butch–femme relationships was the presumption that the butch is the physically active partner and the leader in lovemaking....Yet unlike the dynamics of many heterosexual relationships, the butch's foremost objective was to give sexual pleasure to a femme. The essence of this emotional/sexual dynamic is captured by the ideal of the "stone butch", or untouchable butch....To be untouchable meant to gain pleasure from giving pleasure. Thus, although these women did draw on models in heterosexual society, they transformed those models into an authentically lesbian interaction."[22]
Other terms and identities
Some young people in queer communities eschew butch or femme classifications, believing that they are inadequate to describe an individual, or that labels are limiting in and of themselves. Other people within the queer community have tailored the common labels to be more descriptive, such as "soft stud," "hard butch," "gym queen," or "tomboy femme." Comedian Elvira Kurt contributed the term "fellagirly" as a description for queer females who are not strictly either femme or butch, but a combination. In the 1950s and 1960s the term chi-chi was used to mean the same thing.[citation needed]
Those who identify as butch and femme today often use the words to define their presentation and gender identity rather than strictly the role they play in a relationship, and that not all butches are attracted exclusively to femmes and not all femmes are exclusively attracted to butches, a departure from the historic norm. Besides the terms "butch" and "femme", there are a number of other terms used to describe the dress codes, the sexual behaviours and/or the gender identities of the sexual subcultures who use them. The meanings of these terms vary and can evolve over time.
Lesbian terms
Femmes aka "lipstick lesbians" are feminine lesbians. A woman who likes to receive and not give sexually is called a "pillow queen".[23] Conversely, a butch woman may be described as a "stone butch", "diesel dyke"[24] "bulldyke", "bull bitch" or "bulldagger"[25]: 136 or simply just as a "dyke". The term boi is typically used by younger LGBT women. Defining the difference between a butch and a boi, one boi told a reporter: "that sense of play - that's a big difference from being a butch. To me, butch is like an adult...You're the man of the house."[26] There is also an emerging usage of the terms soft butch "stem" (stud-femme), "futch" (feminine butch)[27] or "chapstick lesbian" as terms for women who have characteristics of both butch and femme. Lesbians who are unisex and neither butch nor femme are called "androgynous" or "andros".[24] The usage of "dyke" has widened in recent years to encompass queer women in general. At one point, both were considered derogatory; "dyke" has become a more neutral term, but may still be taken as offensive if used in a derogatory manner or by those outside the LGBT community.[28] Another common term is "Stud". A stud is a dominant lesbian, usually butch. They tend to be influenced by urban and hip-hop cultures and are often, but not always, Afro-American.[29] In the New York City lesbian community a butch may identify herself as AG (aggressive) or as a stud.
In 2005, filmmaker Daniel Peddle chronicled the lives of AGs in his documentary The Aggressives, following six women who went to lengths like binding their breasts to pass as men. But Peddle says that today, very young lesbians of color in New York are creating a new, insular scene that's largely cut off from the rest of the gay and lesbian community. "A lot of it has to do with this kind of pressure to articulate and express your masculinity within the confines of the hip-hop paradigm..."—Village Voice
The AG culture has also been represented on film by Black lesbian filmmaker Dee Rees' 2011 work, Pariah.[30]
Gay male terms
Among the subcultures composed of butch gay and bisexual men is the "bear community". Gay men who are more femme are sometimes described as "flamers".[31] "Homomasculinity" is a term coined in 1977 by gay activist editor in chief of Drummer magazine Jack Fritscher .[32] The term describes a subculture of gay men who prefer masculine-identified men as legitimately as some men prefer effeminate men and drag queens. Equating the three self-fashioning identity labels "gay," "homosexual," and "homomasculine," Fritscher also coined "homofemininity" for lesbians to whom he opened Drummer magazine in the late 1970s by publishing writing about the Society of Janus and writing from Samois, a group founded by gay activists Patrick Califia and Gayle Rubin. Humanist Fritscher intended "homomasculinity" as an identity concept and never as an exclusionary concept as promulgated by Jack Malebranche in his latter-day book Androphilia. The term "homomasculinity" grew out of the gay-identity movement and the leather subculture of 1970's San Francisco. and is detailed in Fritscher's gay linguistics essay "Homomasculinity: Framing Keywords of Queer Popular Culture" presented at the Queer Keyword Conference, University College Dublin, Ireland, April 2005.[32] Banjee or banjee boy is a term from the 1980s or earlier that describes a certain type of young Latino or Black man who has sex with men and who dresses in urban fashion for reasons that may include expressing masculinity, hiding his sexual orientation or attracting male partners. The term is mostly associated with New York City and may be Nuyorican in origin. This evolved into down-low culture.[citation needed]
Community
Butch and femme socialisation took place in the working-class gay bars of the 1940s and 1950s[25]: 139 and bars continued to be a primary venue for interaction. In 1992, a "groundbreaking" anthology was published—The Persistent Desire: A Femme–Butch Reader, edited by femme Joan Nestle.[33]
Conferences
In the 21st century, national conferences began to be held in the United States for individuals identifying as butch and femme.
"Butch Voices" biennial conferences "for masculine of center people" were held in 2009, 2011 and 2013, the last being supported by a fundraiser called Beauty and the BUTCH—"an evening of deliciously BUTCH revelry, thrilling show of tantalizing teases from queers of all genders, and choose-your-own play party adventures".[34]
A Femme Conference held in 2012 claimed to "seek to explore, discuss, dissect, and support Queer Femme as a transgressive, gender-queer, stand-alone, and empowered identity and provide a space for organizing and activism within Queer communities".[35] Four conferences have been held, in 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012.[citation needed]
See also
- Amazon feminism
- Bear
- Bishonen
- Drag king
- Effeminate
- En femme
- Femininity
- Femminiello
- Gender identities in Thailand
- Girly girl
- Hijra (South Asia)
- Kathoey
- Lesbian-identified
- Lipstick lesbian
- Masculinity
- Sissy
- Soft butch
- Stone butch
- Stone femme
- Tomboy
- Travesti
Template:Multicol-break Butch/femme writers and activists
- Dorothy Allison
- S. Bear Bergman
- Judith Butler
- Lillian Faderman
- Leslie Feinberg
- Jack Fritscher
- Judith Halberstam
- Amber Hollibaugh
- Elvira Kurt
- Joan Nestle
- Gayle Rubin
- Ron Suresha
- Split Britches (an American performance troupe)
References
- ^ Harmon, Lori (2007). Gender Identity, Minority Stress, And Substance Use Among Lesbians. ProQuest. pp. 5–7. ISBN 0549398058.
- ^ Sullivan, Nikki (2003). Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. Edinburgh University Press. p. 28. ISBN 0748615970.
- ^ Caramagno, Thomas C. (2002). Irreconcilable Differences? Intellectual Stalemate in the Gay Rights Debate. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 138. ISBN 0275977110.
- ^ http://www.mootgame.com/ballast/2009_ballast_201.html[dead link ]
- ^ Lindstrom, Isaac (2008). To Fight, Live, and Love at the Gender Border in Trans People in Love. Taylor & Francis. p. 31. ISBN 0789035715.
- ^ Caramagno, Thomas C. (2002). Irreconcilable Differences? Intellectual Stalemate in the Gay Rights Debate. ABC-CLIO. pp. 137–8. ISBN 0275977218.
- ^ Nestle, Joan (1992). The Persistent Desire: A Femme–Butch Reader. Alyson Publications. ISBN 1555831907.
- ^ Munt, Sally (1998). Butch/Femme: Inside Lesbian Gender. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 229. ISBN 0304339598.
- ^ Gottman, John. "Do most successful lesbian relationships follow the butch/femme dynamic?". Gay Couples Institute. Retrieved 11 October 2012.
- ^ Bergman, S. Bear (2006). Butch is a noun. San Francisco: Suspect Thoughts Press. ISBN 0-9771582-5-X.
- ^ Caramagno, Thomas C. (2002). Irreconcilable Differences? Intellectual Stalemate in the Gay Rights Debate. ABC-CLIO. p. 138. ISBN 0275977218.
- ^ Lowrey, Sassafras (2009). Visible: A Femmethology, Vol 1. Homofactus Press. p. 162. ISBN 0978597346.
- ^ "Vintage Photographs". Isle of Lesbos.
- ^ Kramarae, Cheris (2000). Routledge International Encyclopedia of Women. Routledge. p. 132. ISBN 0415920892.
- ^ Kennedy, Elizabeth Lapovsky; Madeline D. Davis (1994). Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community. New York: Penguin. pp. 82–86. ISBN 0-14-023550-7.
- ^ Kennedy, Elizabeth Lapovsky; Madeline D. Davis (1994). Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community. New York: Penguin. pp. 90–93. ISBN 0-14-023550-7.
- ^ Kennedy, Elizabeth Lapovsky; Madeline D. Davis (1994). Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community. New York: Penguin. pp. 153–157. ISBN 0-14-023550-7.
- ^ Theophano, Teresa (2004). "Butch–Femme". glbtq.com. Retrieved 2007-01-25.
- ^ Kennedy, Elizabeth Lapovsky; Madeline D. Davis (1994). Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community. New York: Penguin. pp. 212–213. ISBN 0-14-023550-7.
- ^ Bullough, Vern (2002). Before Stonewall: Activists in lesbian and gay rights in historical context. New York: Harrington Park Press. p. 139. ISBN 1-56023-192-0.
- ^ Atkins, Dawn (1998). Looking Queer: Body Image and Identity in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Communities. Routedge. p. 20. ISBN 0789004631.
- ^ Davis, Madeline; Kennedy, Elizabeth Lapovsky (1990). "Oral History and the Study of Sexuality in the Lesbian Community". In Duberman (ed.). Hidden from History: Reclaiming the Gay & Lesbian Past. New York: Meridian, New American Library, Penguin Books. ISBN 0452010675.
- ^ McAuliffe, Mary (2008). Tribades, Tommies and Transgressives: Histories of Sexualities. Cambridge Scholars Pub. p. 273. ISBN 1847185924.
- ^ a b "Common lesbian slang and terminology". The Other Team. Retrieved Feb 2013.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ a b Haggerty, George E. (2000). Encyclopedia of Lesbian And Gay Histories and Cultures, Vol 1. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0815333544.
- ^ Levy, Ariel. "Where the Bois Are". New York News and Features. Retrieved Feb 2013.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ Belge, Kathy (2011). Queer: The Ultimate LGBT Guide for Teens. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 10. ISBN 9780547687322.
- ^ Author Keith W. Swain, PsyD, in his book Dynamic Duos, opted to use the terms "alpha" and "beta" to describe the biologically-based differences between more feminine gay men, (betas), and masculine gay men, (alphas).
- ^ Huskee, Maya. "Label me lesbian: A guide to types of lesbian". DeviantArt. Retrieved Feb 2013.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ George, Nelson (December 23, 2011). "New Directors Flesh Out Black America, All Of It". New York Times. Retrieved Feb 2013.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ Clarkson, Jay Robert (2006). Masculinity Means Never Having to Say Your Masculine. ProQuest. p. 166. ISBN 0542795078.
- ^ a b Jack Fritscher, Ph.D.
- ^ Davis, Leonard J. (2013). The Disability Studies Reader. Routledge. p. 325. ISBN 0415630525. Retrieved Nov 2014.
{{cite book}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ "Butch Voices Announcement". Butch Voices. Retrieved Nov 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ Conference Steering Committee. "Femme Conference Mission Statement". Femme Collective. Retrieved Nov 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help)
Further reading
Archival sources
- Jeanne Córdova Papers and Photographs are held in the One National Gay & Lesbian Archives.
- ONE Subject Files Collection Collection is housed at the One National Gay & Lesbian Archives.
- Early 20th Century Butch–Femme Photos
External links
- TransFemmeButch Forum
- ButchFemmePlanet.com
- Butch/Femme Society, New York
- Butch–Femme Network
- Lesbian Identity and the Politics of Butch–Femme Roles, Part 2
- I Don't Want You Anymore: Butch/Femme Disappointments
- Femme Community page: NYC, NY
- Femme Community page: Austin, TX
- Femme Conference page
- Femme Community page: Austraila