This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello and thanks for your post on my talk page, happy to oblige. Alas the same comments have been continued by the other party.Pawac (talk) 21:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
I see, Pawac. I've removed the comments and I will not hesitate to block the user if they continue. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:47, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks awfully. Kind regards.Pawac (talk) 13:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Restore Oslo (Microsoft) as user draft?
I'd like to take a shot at cleaning up the old, deleted article on the M/Oslo programming language for the Microsoft WikiProject. Would it be possible to get the article restored and moved into my user space so I can review its state and history, and hopefully get a decent article written (or at least a decent section on it in another appropriate page)? Thanks. // coldacid (talk|contrib) 20:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi coldacid. I've moved the article to your userspace. Regards, 22:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Rjd0060. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page. Message added 17:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Page protection.
The justification is that I am an admin, you are an admin; if I tell you it's up to you, it's up to you. I thought that was being friendly enough. Shame you had to make an issue out of it. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Kudpung, it is indeed a shame that an administrator feels that being an administrator is justification enough. Very well. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Safety of electronic cigarettes
Thank you for protecting the page. But the mammoth edits still remain. They were never discussed and most of them are part of an ongoing RFC. Rather than discuss the edits and come to consensus its been a revert them back in problem. Per WP:CAUTIOUS major edits should be discussed, they never were even after removal. Letting them stay allows those that want to bypass consensus building just ignore any discussion. AlbinoFerret 22:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
AlbinoFerret is continuing to delete reliable sources from position statements from reputable organisations. AlbinoFerret also deleted a number of sources including reviews without a specific objection on the talk page. See Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes#Positions. Most editors disagree with AlbinoFerret at the RfC. See WP:SNOW. User:Bbb23 blocked AlbinoFerret for violating the three-revert rule at the Safety of electronic cigarettes page.[1]
You have not discussed one edit in the 19k characters you inserted. Per WP:CAUTIOUS major edits should be discussed. AlbinoFerret 22:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I did discuss sources you deleted[11] and your response was "Reliability does not guarantee inclusion."[12] That is not a specific objection. QuackGuru (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Apologies - I forgot to include the disclaimer..
Please debate this on the article talk page; not here. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar
For clearing the backlogs with the power of a thousand admins! Chillum 00:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Heartily seconded. We now have 1,590 AAE (active admin equivalents)! FourViolas (talk) 11:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
An award
The UAA Pony
For keeping us safe from bad usernames, here's a pony. Keegan (talk) 23:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
Can i get deleted copy of this article? This article got deleted as per "Proposed Deletion", I did work on this article last year and I was away from Wikipedia for sometime. I believe I could have saved this article. So please help me with it.
I just noticed that you blocked them the other day because of their username. It's not really a problem because they have got a new name, User:Rosiecornwall, but according to Wikipedia:Username policy#Usernames implying shared use that particular style of username is permitted: "However, usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", "WidgetFan87", etc." Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Your recent blocks
The "scrub" related blocks - no socks ID'd. Risker (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, Risker. I had completely forgot about those. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted Page
01:23, 9 August 2014 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted page Alpha Sigma Rho (Expired PROD, concern was: Can't find that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Deleted at AfD in 2011.) In regards to this deletion, I am trying to get this deletion removed. The other page created beforehand lacked sources. I would like to recreate the page with valid and credible sources. ChoklatGeisha (talk) 03:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi ChoklatGeisha. I'm not sure if you have reviewed the "proposed deletion policy" that this article was deleted in accordance with but it does allow for undeletion of the article upon request. Would you like me to place the page in your userspace so you can work on improving it prior to moving it back to the mainspace? Rjd0060 (talk) 21:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Yes please! that would be wonderful! I am very new to wikipedia, so I am just trying to follow the flow of order. ChoklatGeisha (talk) 21:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
User:Rjdoo6o, Thank you so much!!!! I truly appreciate this! Thank you! ChoklatGeisha (talk) 21:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
N00b question- Just to eliminate all categories, I deleted the current content on the page. I have been working on all of the information to list in my user sandbox. Could I actually publish that page under this new article name , or do I need to actually add the information from my sandbox onto the restored draft page? If so, do i follow the same procedure to publish this article as I would if this was in a sandbox? ChoklatGeisha (talk) 21:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
23:53, 4 April 2015 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted page Stellar Information Technology Pvt. Ltd. (Expired PROD, concern was: No indication or assertion of notability) I'm handling this page since 2009 and suddenly, it's deleted. I would want to get this page undeleted as we've added everything legitimate. If you find anything illegitimate in particular, feel free to suggest and I'd happy to address the same.
I'd truly appreciate if you can get this deletion removed and restore the page as it was before. Thank you so much in advance.
Newbie confused
I am new to Wikipedia and just edited my first article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wantage_Hall. I know that there have been a lot of edits in the past so I read the comments and tried to reference things properly, which seemes to be the main issue. My edit was then removed. I have tried to find out why using the talk page of the editor who undid my edit, but now I am unable to edit the post at all. I was just wondering why? I am confused by the 'vandalism' comment that you made- as far as I could tell, I was acting within the Wikipedia guidelines? Could you please let me know where I went wrong? (Also sorry if I'm not using this chat properly too-I'm a bit confused by it :/ ) Aperrett (talk) 00:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Aperrett, a simple look at the history should be an indicator that something is not right. Wikipedia does not tolerate such behavior, as outlined here. Once the page protection expires please do not engage in the same activity and engage in discussion with your fellow editors instead of edit warring. The notes left in the edit summaries in the history to you will likely also be of help. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Rjd0060 Please explain to me what I have done wrong- I made my edit, which contained far fewer words than previous edits, so should have avoided the 'too much detail issue' and also used reliable sources, such as the University of Reading to enforce my edit, which was the other historical issue. This was then undone. I disagreed with this, so I reinstated my edit, and then wrote on the other editor's talk page hoping to resolve the issue. I only undid someone else's edit once, so I did not break the 3 revert rule. As this was my first ever edit, I am really not sure what I have done wrong and am regretting entering the Wikipedia minefield in the first place. As far as I am aware I acted as I should, so could you please explain to me why this is classed as 'edit warring'? Aperrett (talk) 00:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Review the page history. Aperrett was not the only account involved but there are way too many disruptive edits, thus page protection or blocking was warranted. Most people do not complain when I do not block them and protect the page instead but I could have went that route. You need to discuss things with the people you were arguing with, not me. I am completely neutral on the topic. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted Page
"19:53, 9 April 2015 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted page Akoisexual (Expired PROD, concern was: A neologism that apparently came out of tumblr. No reliable sources available, fails basic notability.)"
Thank you for the most literal example of asexual erasure ever. I will be sure to post a screenshot of this on Tumblr, where many of my akoisexual friends are. I was busy getting suggestions and collecting sources<ref>http://www.lithromantic.org/frequently-asked-questions.html</ref><ref>http://aromantics.wikia.com/wiki/Lithromantic</ref><ref>http://www.asexuality.org/wiki/index.php?title=Lithromantic</ref> and testomonials from people (many of whom from Tumblr, as it is a place where we don't get literally erased). Please restore the page immediately so that I may make these changes, bringing the page up to Wikipedia's referencing standards, as I was well aware the draft failed to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncaveishere (talk • contribs) 22:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Ryan,
Even after consistent request to undelete our company page (Target: Stellar_Information_Technology_Pvt._Ltd.), there is no action has been taken to undelete the same. I'd request you once again to kindly look into the matter more seriously as we really want to restore our company page.
Any suggestions/ guidance to restore the same would be truly appreciated.
Thanks,
Amit Pandey
Stellar Information Technology Pvt. LTD.
Emily Venter
The page LPK (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LPK) was removed from wikipedia while I was in the process of updating it and providing references. Can you please reinstate and I will complete the requested changes? Des Titres 20:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Des Titres, the page was deleted almost a year ago. Are you sure this is the correct one? If so I am happy to restore it. However, if the article is not brought up to the quality standards that Wikipedia has, it could be deleted again. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
I cannot explain where this section came from, I didn't create it, I only made 1 edit today, to add the section above thus: [13]. Des Titres (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
In fact this diff looks like you moved it here, added my sig, and replied, all in 1 edit! Des Titres (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Apologies.. Grabbed the wrong diff when I was trying to fix that. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Rjd0060, I noticed you recently semi-protected Wantage Hall with the reason given as "Persistent vandalism". As far as I can tell, before your intervention that article had only been edited 4 times in the last year, and none of those edits could justifiably be classed as vandalism. Could you double-check your action please, and consider unprotecting it. Thank you. Des Titres (talk) 20:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Des Titres, if you don't see a significant amount of edit warring and other disruption in the history then I am surprised. It would appear (though I cannot be certain, of course) that one of the users engaging in the reverting was originally using an IP and then created an account to continue the same behavior. Apologies that the reason I selected was incorrect. I've fixed it. As you know, the alternative to page protection (during edit warring or other situations) is blocking accounts. We could unprotect it and go that route if the dispute continues to interfere with the article history - and I fear it would as I see no discussion on the talk page regarding the disputed items.
And of course you're free to request another opinion if you disagree with my decision but please link this discussion there so the reviewing administrator has full context. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Pff, you beat me to it! -- Luktalk 21:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey Luk. When I saw your block notice I had assumed you thought you got it. :-) Rjd0060 (talk) 05:17, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Help?
Hello and thank you for your time. I am a bit new to Wikipedia, admittedly, and I believe I need your assistance on clearing up a few things. Back in August, you seemed to have disapproved something for my sorority's wiki page. I am attempting to re-create a page for our organization and per Wiki's instructions, I needed to reach out to you. This should be lifted, correct? 01:23, 9 August 2014 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted page Alpha Sigma Rho (Expired PROD, concern was: Can't find that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Deleted at AfD in 2011.) Please let me know the next steps to take to have the page re-instated. I believe there were not a lot of verifiable sources within the page, but I will find sources to contribute to our authenticity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha Sigma Rho Sorority (talk • contribs)
And a final note, please sign your talk page messages by typing ~~~~ after your comment. It will add your username and a date, like this: Rjd0060 (talk) 17:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Protection at Acharya S
You had protected till 22 August which was bit excessive. Talk page is stale, you should remove the protection. Noteswork (talk) 11:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Noteswork, given the lengthy protection history, the long protection was completely justified. You are free to get a third opinion via WP:RFUP, linking to this thread. If another admin would like to remove the protection or switch to PC and monitor the page, they're welcome to. Rjd0060 (talk) 16:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
It was and there were many Rfcs too. I would ask at RFUP. Noteswork (talk) 17:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
You deleted this April 15, and I'd like to bring it back... but greatly modified. The deleted version was poorly sourced and seemd to concentrate on the man's films, but in searching I found he has enough coverage and recognition as a Chef to meet WP:BIO. Thoughts on User:MichaelQSchmidt/working/Joseph Ciminera?? Thanks Schmidt, Michael Q. 08:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, MichaelQSchmidt. To be brutally honest, I have no opinion on either the deleted article nor your proposed one. I deleted it solely as a procedural action. If you'd like me to restore the old article once you move your draft to the mainspace, I can do that - it is especially important if you used parts of the old article. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Comparing the two, I do use some of the same words (LOL) but mine is nicely sourced and not a copy of the deleted content. Thanks. Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Restore article
Hi, I noticed that you deleted the article for WebAIM and was wondering what needed to happen to get that restored? I work for WebAIM and I was wondering what the reason was for deletion? I saw in the delete log that it was a proposed deletion, but I don't understand the reasoning, which states "no indication of notability". What do I need to do to get this page back up? Thanks for your help. AceHyzer (talk) 17:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
AceHyzer, in accordance with the proposed deletion policy, I have restored the article per your request. However, note that the article could be deleted again via another process if it is not brought up to the content standards set by the editing community. Please review this notability guideline that you saw before and I encourage you to make any necessary improvements to the article to avoid another deletion. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
178.92.14.22, in accordance with the proposed deletion policy, I have restored the article per your request. However, note that the article could be deleted again via another process if it is not brought up to the content standards set by the editing community. Please review this notability guideline that you saw before and I encourage you to make any necessary improvements to the article to avoid another deletion. Additionally, just because one page exists on a particular topic does not mean another is entitled to exist. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Restore deleted page
Hello
I notice that 'Advanced Business Solutions' has been deleted and that'Advanced 365' has a notice to be deleted.
Please would you be able to place the pages in my userspace so I can work on improving them for resubmission? Lsofiano (talk) 15:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Lsofiano, I've restored the article. You should be able to move it to your userspace for improvement. I'd encourage that so it is not deleted via another process. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi I noticed you deleted my page as well "Gabe Barcia-Colombo." I am a TED speaker but my name was listed as Gabriel Barcia-Colombo instead. I saw in the delete log that it was a proposed deletion, but I don't understand the reasoning, which states "no indication of notability". What do I need to do to get this page back up? Thanks for your help.You can find me linked under the official ted wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabebc (talk • contribs) 06:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Gabebc, in accordance with the proposed deletion policy, I have restored the article per your request. However, note that the article could be deleted again via another process if it is not brought up to the content standards set by the editing community. Please review this notability guideline that you saw before and I encourage you to make any necessary improvements to the article to avoid another deletion. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Image of Richard III's tomb
Leicester Cathedral's New Media Officer is now advised of the need of a free licence, see separate email. Please give them time to provide it before removing the image, they have been most helpful with me and should not have problems extending the permission for free use. I am not sure I would have taken on this initiative if I had known it'd be such a headache though... Isananni (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Isananni, if the file is deleted - it can easily be restored after the permission email is verified. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Restore page for AWeber
Hi there. I see that you deleted the page for AWeber. I represent AWeber and was wondering what I need to do to get this page back up. Please advise. narolsonsd (talk) 17:15, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
narolsonsd, in accordance with the proposed deletion policy, I have restored the article per your request. However, note that the article could be deleted again via another process if it is not brought up to the content standards set by the editing community. Please review this notability guideline that you saw before and I encourage you to make any necessary improvements to the article to avoid another deletion. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
In future, please do a google book search before deleting an article. It should never have been deleted. A lot of very notable articles are unsourced, even ones like Sunset Strip. We don't delete them. Unsourced doesn't necessarily mean non notable. If you've been given tools on here, I expect you to use them with caution. As the person who deleted this, it was your duty to check in google books to assess notability rather than taking the word of the person who wrongfully prodded it. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Dr. Blofeld. I will have to respectfully disagree. In accordance with the proposed deletion policy, it is not up to the deleting administrator to work on improving the tagged articles. Somebody else should have removed the tag in the allotted period. As you'll see above, a lot of people have issue with the policy. Unfortunately, I'm just the messenger in this case - and if you'd like to change the PROD policy, you'd have to take other steps to do that. Otherwise, I would have happily restored the article per your request, in accordance with the aforementioned policy. While I do more extisive reviews on some of the PROD deletions, all that is required is a 4-point check prior to deletion. Apologies for the inconvenience. Good day. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:16, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
I didn't say it was up to you to work on the articles. But I do think before you delete anything here you should do a quick check yourself as people frequently tag notable articles because they're short/undeveloped. If you do a check and it seems they;re right, delete it, if it seems actually there's a fair few hits, remove the tag and alert the article creator. How much is it to ask you to do a 10 second google search in books and assess whether there's hits or not?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:21, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Well, if I was going to put the effort into finding sources I might as well add them to the article while removing the PROD tag since we wouldn't want an article around without sources. Especially a BLP. Every editor has access to PROD'd articles a whole week before they are ultimately deleted (or not). That's the time for article improvement. If a PROD tag is removed, by an admin who denies it for example, chances of the article getting updates and brought up to standards? Slim to none, considering it was up for deletion for a week and nobody noticed that, either. So again I don't think we have an issue here but more so with the process of proposed deletions. Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:28, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Another give away should be if the article has several interwiki links to other wikipedias.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
I'd delete it again if I ran across the same situation. So again, take your argument to the PROD talk page and change the policy if you do not like it, rather than complaining to me for carrying out the community-elected protocol. I have nothing else to say on this, Dr. Blofeld. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
People who can't admit fault are a real problem on here. You can't be trusted with the tools. Do this again and I'll have you desysopped. It's pure laziness.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
restore deleted page Marco Marchi & the mojo workers
Hello I notice that 'Marco Marchi & the mojo workers' has been deleted. Please would you be able to place the pages in my userspace so I can work on improving them for resubmission? Perhaps you can give me some help. What do I need to do to get this page back up? Bloezen (talk) 12:23, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I notice that you deleted the page for Uplike.
Uplike was just named as France’s fastest-growing tech startup by The Newt Web (TNW) and won the Tech5 startup contest.
There is also official a video on Youtube posted by TNW.
Uplike is also mentioned in the The Next Web wikipedia page.
Please would you be able to place the page in my userspace so I can work on improving it, maybe with your help, for resubmission. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatkarl27 (talk • contribs) 09:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Question about article deletion
Hi there! I noticed that your username was listed as having deleted List of programmes broadcast by Cartoon Network UK & Ireland since it was apparently a redirect to deleted page Cartoon Network (Middle East & Africa). Do you know if that had been the case for long? A UK & Ireland article wouldn't have existed as a redirect for a different version of the channel in a different country, so I'm wondering if the redirect was a result of some temporary vandalism, and possibly one sockpuppet editor in particular who has affected a number of similar articles in the past. I can't see the article history as the article has been deleted, but I'd be surprised if the redirect had been in place for very long, and it wouldn't have been a legitimate edit if it was. Do you happen to have any more information? Thanks. Bonusballs (talk) 18:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Bonusballs, it was a redirect to that target page since the page was originally created and moved in 2011. The target title changed a couple of times since then but it always led to the same article. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Surprising! Thanks for your help. :) Bonusballs (talk) 10:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleting Doctors Worldwide article
Hi, I hope you are well, I would like to know the factors that will prevent deleting Doctors Worldwide, because it is International non-governmental organization registered in UK and in turkey, and we are working in 30 countries around the world,& this is our English website http://www.doctorsworldwide.org/
& our Turkish website https://www.yyd.org.tr/tr
of course I would like to see my INGO in the Wikipedia if it has the indication of notability,Best.--Drmustaffa (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
LPL1940
Hi. You might wonder if my username might not comply with the rules. Actually I am board member of the LPL named in this article, and responsible for media-relations. Therefore I do not mislead by using "wrong" names, that could be mistaken. If you still think the Username is not good, I can change, as my name is Lex.
Edit : Ok asked for name change to LPL_Lex to comply.
OK. You also should sign your name after messagrees on a talk page by adding ~~~~ after your messages. It identifies your name and the time of the message. Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Help?
Hello. We corresponded a while ago when you helped me understand an issue I was having. As an admin, I was hoping you could help me out with this this... Tried to go through the right procedures but the user has taken to simply vandalizing the page in an effort to get his/her way. --Zackmann08 (talk) 22:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Zackmann08, there are several admins who patrol the 3RR/EW noticeboard. Please be patient until an admin gets to your issue and they will take care of it in accordance with current practices. From what I can tell, your requests looks good. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:44, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Gahana, Ohio
They're back. please protect or play whack a mole. John from Idegon (talk) 01:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi John from Idegon. I've semi-protected the article for 36 hours. Thanks for the note. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
tea party movement page
Anyone can claim their website is a "tea party" website. There really isn't any evidence to support the claim that the Koch Brothers made the first tea party website in 2002. I recommend a review of this claim because it's in the main introduction and i can find ZERO evidence. Catsmeow8989 (talk) 08:45, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Here is the section that I feel should be examined:
In 2002, the first Tea Party movement website was designed and published by Citizens for a Sound Economy and stated "our US Tea Party is a national event, hosted continuously online and open to all Americans who feel our taxes are too high and the tax code is too complicated."[22][23][24] According to Fox News Channel commentator Juan Williams, the Tea Party movement emerged from the "ashes" of Ron Paul's 2008 presidential primary campaign.[25]Catsmeow8989 (talk) 08:47, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I notice that you deleted the page for Uplike.
Uplike was just named as France’s fastest-growing tech startup by The Newt Web (TNW) and won the Tech5 startup contest.
There is also official a video on Youtube posted by TNW.
Uplike is also mentioned in the The Next Web wikipedia page.
Please could you re-activate the page so I can work on improving it and add new essential references, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatkarl27 (talk • contribs) 09:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Jack Harris (broadcaster)
I see you had deleted the page for Jack Harris (broadcaster) for notability being in question and non-encyclopedia standards, as this is a local sports and news broadcast personality. In this day and age Wikipedia has grown to have more content than any print encyclopedia ever could, including content relevant to certain specific audiences (such as local history). You'll notice most major local journalists and media personalities now have entries. Refer to [staff of WPVI in Philadelphia] where every personality has a page. In the case of the Tampa Bay market, figures such as Keith Cate, Dick Crippen and Paul Dellegatto all have pages, though only of significance to one or two media markets. In fact, on the WTVT page, Jack Harris is now the only Notable former on-air staff not to have a Wikipedia entry.
The previous Jack Harris page was rather long and included a good deal of information that wasn't necessary in its level of detail and failed to provide enough references to back its notability. With restoring this page, I (or another contributor) could create a considerably trimmed down version (a paragraph or two), explaining his significance as a 50+ year sports, radio and television broadcaster, with ample references and citations.
Xb2u7Zjzc32 - as the PROD policy explains they may be undeleted in most cases simply by request. So I don't see any issue in your comment. But you'll need to pull it out of the userspace as I see it was usefied in order to do so. Regards. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
EPUB shows several Linux readers, so "essential" may be a bit of an overstatement, but that isn't a deletion criterion, is it? LeadSongDogcome howl! 12:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Not sure what else is being asked here. The article was deleted in accordance with the proposed deletion policy (which means a tag was in place for a certain number of days) and can be undeleted in accordance with the same policy. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
You had deleted this page after WP:PROD expired. This person is actually the best known cartoonist from the Indian state of Kerala and notability can be easily established. I can improve the article if it is possible for you to undelete it. I failed to notice the earlier deletion notice. Thank you. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 05:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
You blocked Saviodesigns for an improper (company) username. The user has now stated thas he is the sole user of the account, apologized, and requested a new name. I would like to unblock, but wanted to make sure that you had no ojections first. DES(talk) 02:57, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
No issues here, of course. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:27, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
I went ahead and unblocked him myself, DESiegel. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
I noticed you deleted the page for Ben Kirshner because of the concern that he is CEO of non-notable company. I just want to confirm you took into consideration that he is the CEO of Elite SEM and Coffeeforless.com. He is a well known business man and part of a few company boards, organizations etc. The article page I believe was flagged for deletion because the company page (Elite SEM) on Wikipedia page had issues. There was a large discussion taking place on the Talk section for both pages with many other users discussing this. I would ask that you please reconsider and undelete the page. I can help improve the article as well.
Hey, is here any sort of way we can have a consensus or a discussion on getting the Nakia Burrise and Karan Ashley articles back? They were deleted as they didn't fall under Wikipedia guidelines, but I disagree. They are both very notable actresses. Boaxy (talk) 23:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Boaxy, if you provide the specific titles of the article(s) they may be undeleted in accordance with the PROD policy. Of course if the articles are not brought up to standards they still could be deleted via another process so I encourage improvement if you do want the article(s) restored. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 12:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
All set, Boaxy. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 19:17, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Lennox and Addington Historical Society
You deleted the page - was there anything not on [14] that could be transferred there? Jackiespeel (talk) 09:29, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Jackiespeel, I deleted the page... in accordance with the PROD policy. Please read that policy if you are interested in knowing your options which include requesting undeletion. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:30, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Some topics are best hived off to 'a suitably themed wiki' as too obscure for WP - and it was just in case there was an easy way of finding the material. Jackiespeel (talk) 21:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Information and articles on Michael Turner were hard to find but he was consistently in British Film and Television. As he wasn't generally a principal actor, I think jobbing actor is the term, he would probably remain one of those actors whom you had seen but couldn't always name. A reliable source IMDb was used and listed his appearances over 47 years. It does seem a shame to have deleted his entry, but as there seems to be little information on his personal life it may not have made for an informative article. Similar actors appear in a BlogSpot named familiar-unknown. Stedbeat (talk) 10:15, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Stedbeat, I've restored the article. Rjd0060 (talk) 04:54, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Rjd0060 I tend to suggest what I feel are neglected articles from time to time, I like to put them to the test to see if anyone else has any information. It was particularly time consuming for me, even to get it to the stub stage, so I'm glad to see you have restored it. Stedbeat (talk) 12:31, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Monte Carlo Machine Learning Library Page
The page was deleted in May for some reason which is unclear to me. I am the creator of the page as well as the library, which is hosted still on Sourceforge. Can you please
restore it? And also, maybe even tell me why you deleted it in the first place? Maybe someone changed the links? Thx (i dont remember my username, i will add it later...) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.91.233.85 (talk) 22:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Oni73 (talk) 05:51, 20 July 2015 (UTC)The former comment was added by me, now i have an account :)
Please re-read the entire log entry message at this location, Oni73. Next to my username which you must have clicked it clearly explains the reasons it was deleted. Note that if you request undeletion in accordance with the proposed deletion policy if you do not work on improving the article then it could be deleted again. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Josh Charles (musician)
Why was Josh Charles deleted ? he has been featured in numerous national publications, tv shows, and is an active producer and well-known songwriter and keyboard player.
It was deleted for the reason listed right next to my name that led you here. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Question...
Why was the article on actress Francesca Smith deleted? Did it completely lack of sources and couldn't exist without them? --2602:306:37EB:47E0:E00E:DDFF:5DBC:5DB (talk) 05:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Please re-read the entire log entry message at this location, 2602:306:37EB:47E0:E00E:DDFF:5DBC:5DB. Next to my username which you must have clicked it clearly explains the reasons it was deleted. Note that if you request undeletion in accordance with the proposed deletion policy if you do not work on improving the article then it could be deleted again. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I just found out today that my wikipedia page (David Allen (Game Designer)) was deleted in April of this year. I found this out today by tracing a link from one of the games I've created listed on Wikipedia. I am David Allen (the game designer), and I would appreciate it if my page is restored. My username is Requnix
The original page is/was: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Allen_(game_designer)
Please let me know if any specific work needs to be don to verify/validate the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Requnix (talk • contribs) 06:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Requnix, I've restored the article. Also, please sign your talk page posts by leaving four tildes (~~~~) so that they are identifiable to you and timestamped. Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 04:54, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you - did you need me to do anything more regarding the page to solidify it? Requnix (talk) 23:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
why did you lock the plastic beach page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.235.131.127 (talk) 01:43, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Obviously because of repeated vandalism as seen in the reason for protection. Dakar (talk) 02:17, 1 August 2015 (UTC) There was no vandalism all info was cited with resources. Just because you dont like them dosent mean their accolades cant be added. I thought the whole concept is adding different opinions to the page, regardless of personal beliefs. Ive been polite and resonable, but the fact that any positive info aim
dded
concerning them is deleted is ridiculous.I IM
I protected it in accordance with the protection policy as it was subject to constant disruptive editing. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:54, 1 August 2015 (UTC) Im aware sir, but that does not fall on me. That is purely because everytime i put info someone would delete it making me have to retype it again and again.
181.48.9.61 autoblock
Hi there, I see that you've blocked User:181.48.9.61. I came across a request to create an SPI for this address based on edits to the same pages from 181.48.9.62(talk·contribs·WHOIS) (which is only different by the last bit) which is not blocked. Would you like to reset the block and make it a range-block? Ivanvector🍁 (talk) 15:43, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Ivanvector, not particularly if there are only two addresses. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:54, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Schwede66, since the article was deleted via the proposed deletion process and no discussion ever took place, the article is allowed to be recreated and/or restored. If you still believe the article should be deleted you should try the AFD process instead. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:54, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Ok - that makes sense. Just out of interest, who created the article originally? Schwede66 04:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Michal Jakubek
Hello Rjd0060. Please, can you undelete article about Slovak footballer Michal Jakubek, he made his debut for MFK Skalica against FK Senica on 2 August 2015. source:[15], Thank you in advance IQual (talk) 10:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
I've restored the article, IQual. I encourage you to work on improving the aspects of the article that led to its deletion otherwise it could end up being deleted again. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mike Nawrocki. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 09:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of World Film Magic. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Please reinstall page for World Film Magic, there are more references that can be added. Thank You Sysytom59 (talk) 02:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Please thoroughly review the Proposed Deletion policy, specifically the section regarding undeletion requests if you would like the article undeleted, that is not an issue and there is no need for a deletion review.
If the article is restored it need to be brought up to Wikipedia's qualify standards otherwise it could be deleted again via another process is unlikely to be reversed. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
An enthusiastic thanks to you for checking and clearing Category:Requested RD1 redactions and other areas of administrative backlog. Keep doing what you do! Mz7 (talk) 23:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Ulf Herman
Ulf Herman was deprodded by another editor before it was deleted. Shouldn't it go to AFD instead? 72.74.203.33 (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
The oage indicates that you deleted the page because of notability. Let me point out that Nupur has fought two elections, one which she won, and the other which she contested against the Chief Minister of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal. She is an author, lawyer, youth leader and one of the youngest leaders of the ruling party. Please do reinstate the page. happy to provide you content to back everything of what I have said
User: rajneilkamath — Preceding undated comment added 17:17, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
To RJD0060,
Hello!
As far as we know it shows that you deleted the page "Nupur Sharma" on 31st July 2015 at 17:56 pm. The reasons that you've mentioned for deletion of the page are incorrect which are -
1. She has fought 2 elections and not just one. First was the DUSU election in 2008 and won the position of the president of Delhi University. She fought her second election in January (Vidhansabha 2015) against the chief minister of Delhi and gave him a tough fight.
2. Talking of "no notability " - we have been going through several Wikipedia pages of people/personalities we've hardly heard of /seen - extinct in the world of media (I can share some examples if you ask for some)
3. To use the word Unsuccessful is easy but to justify it is a task. How can a woman who at the age of 30 has recently fought an election against the chief minister of Delhi cannot be successful? Somebody who we keep watching on almost all news channels all day long - how can she be unsuccessful and have no notability. So if you say that by loosing the Vidhansabha election against Kejriwal by a very small margin is unsuccessful then what do you call winning the DUSU elections in 2008? Let's be very clear on what we are trying to proove. A lawyer by profession, a columnist and a young leader of the BJP definitely is famous, active and successful.
Please do reinstate the page. We will be happy to provide you with the correct content/information as and when required.
Thanks
Kavya Mehrishi
(Mehrishik@gmail.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.60.52.74 (talk) 19:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Restored. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
The deletion log lists the reason as a lack of multiple reliable sources. There are a few I have found already - two credible news sources and a video interview - which contradict this. The production company haven't had any involvement with the page since its creation where multiple authors - apparently not just people connected to the film - have contributed. The Wiki page for this film acts to educate people on what is achievable through determination and how money doesn't always dictate a project's success. The page also conveniently aggregate all of the key information from articles written on the film so far onto a well presented, extremely familiar format for people across the globe.
By reinstating it you will help lots of young people achieve recognition for their work and start their careers.
I hope you don't mind me contacting you but I believe this is a really worthwhile cause. I contributed to this project on the Kickstarter early last year but am not directly connected with the film or its creators, for your reference.
Hello Rjd0060, could you please undelete the RealDownloader page? I wasn't aware the page was under review until today that I realized that RealDownloader, which I have been using for a while, appears to not be included in the newest release of Real networks with Windows 10 (not sure about previous versions of Windows). RealDownloader is, or maybe was, a very reliable video downloader utility supporting different video formats. Along with RealDownloader RealPlayer Converter and RealPlayer Trimmer were also installed... an edit that I'll make next to the RealNetworks page ;)
I never read the deleted article so not sure what I would find there but I was looking for the current state of the RealDownloader product, wheather it works with Windows 10 with which browsers and whether it is included with the new RealNetworks media player so I could decide to upgrade or not. The RealNetworks website does not talk about it at all.
Thanks in advance Jerikalla (talk) 05:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Restored. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much!! Jerikalla (talk) 22:21, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
One more page undeletion request
Hello Rjd0060, I just found out a Page I had started long back has been deleted. I wasn't aware the page was under review until today. Can you please undelete it? The page is Prakash Belawadi. If there is an issue with the content added to this wiki page, let me review and correct it. Hope it can be reinstated. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desi~enwiki (talk • contribs) 10:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello Rjd0060, I just found out that Kalkitech Page has been deleted. I wasn't aware the page was under review until today. Kalkitech is a 16 year old company and doing great work in utility communication standardization in India. I am not sure what Wikipedia guidelines for notability is, but i do believe if a page has been there for many many years, i do believe it has survived the test of time and one fine morning, it getting deleted is not correct or good. If it is not fit, it should have been taken out long long ago. Would appreciate if you can you please undelete it? . I forgot my wikipedia login and hence signing in as guest115.119.161.30 (talk) 11:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Prasanth
I will undelete it if you realize that the policy hasn't changed, as you implied. It was nominated for deletion and nobody objected for 7 days. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:30, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Ticket:2015081010014674
Can you explain what just happened at Virtual routing and forwarding? Accessing the ticket requires a login that I apparently don't have. ~Kvng (talk) 12:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Kvng, I think I made it clear in the summaries. I removed a copyright violation. What else do you need to know? Rjd0060 (talk) 12:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Which edit(s) introduced copyrighted material. URL or other source for copyrighted material. ~Kvng (talk) 12:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Kvng, The entire first paragraph was a near exact copy from another site, which was posted long before the article was created. It was added by 203.35.82.168 on 2014 JAN 30. The content was taken from Techtarget and we were contacted to removed it - which is what is contained in the ticket that you do not have access to, as it is restricted to proper OTRS agents. Anything else I can do for you? Rjd0060 (talk) Rjd0060 (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. ~Kvng (talk) 13:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Power Ranger actor one more
I need you to restore one more power ranger actor who you deleted as you assumed that was his only notability. Kevin Duhaney, is also an established cartoon and animation voice over artist, been in many disney channel shows, and also is a musician with music on youtube. So he has not only just done Power Rangers. So please restore his page like you did with the other two, thank you. This is also the last one it should be. Boaxy (talk) 08:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Boaxy, well what I need is for you to refactor your request with a complete list of articles you'd like restored. Furthermore, I don't appreciate your comment that "[I] assumed". For your information, the proposed deletion policy takes the decision making away from the administrator who deletes the article. It was nominated by a user, remained pending for a deletion without a single objection for 7 days, and I simply came along and deleted it. In fact, I likely didn't even read the article. Remember that assumptions are dangerous. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 12:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
As I mentioned before, this is the last article. I originally meant to conclude it in the first request. I apologize for my attitude. I just saw your reason for deletion was non notability outside of power rangers. I would agree if he didn't have nobility outside of that, but he does. Boaxy (talk) 12:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
So yes again this is the final article, I took the time to make sure, there should be no further inquiries about this issue.
Hello Rjd0060 I noticed that CEVA logistics page has been deleted. The reason for deletion that was mentioned was: Fails notability requirements per WP:CORP). Can you undelete the page. CEVA is one of the largest logistics companies in the world and as such notable enough to have an article on wikipedia.
Thank you.
Pemberly (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Pemberly, I'm afraid you are not realizing one of the core principles of Wikipedia and that is articles should contain verifiable material rather than the alleged "truth". Please click edit here on this section and read the information contained in the grey box ("If you are here...") and reply back if you would still like the article to be restored. Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:51, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Margaret Sanger
I'd love to know how you hope this will play out. The page has been something of a hotbed since the start of the latest assault on Planned Parenthood funding in July, and certainly we can expect that to continue through the anticipated Fall Congressional session, and perhaps into winter’s GOP primary season. If the problems cannot simply be made to go away, it might be better to deal with them sooner rather than later -- both because long wrangles are bad for volunteers, and more pressingly because this might well come ripe just as Arbcom gets finished with Shabbazz/Israel-Palestine. With continuing attention on Gender Gap and Gamergate at Wikipedia, a blowup here won't be good for the project.
But you do have some advantages. It might not be obvious, but Margaret Sanger falls under Gamergate as a gender-related dispute: if Lena Dunham’s sister does (and we have an ARCA ruling on that), certainly Sanger does. The 30 day/500 edit rule in place at Gamergate won't solve all the problems, but may make life easier. MarkBernstein (talk) 21:33, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
MarkBernstein, duly noted however as I noted I chose not to block you all for the reason that there are other things you can contribute to if you don't want to discuss and reach some sort of agreement. And to be honest your account stands out the most when looking at the reversions in the history. So back to your initial comment about my thoughts on how it will play out: my only interest was to cease the current edit warring and disruption. I've done so. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
sorry you think so. I'm not entirely sure, strictly speaking, that I've proposed a single revert on that page. I did do quite a bit of line editing today-- something in whichI have some professional background, incidentally, and which the article sorely needs. But if you really think that's unwelcome, well, good luck with the project while it lasts. MarkBernstein (talk) 00:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Request to undelete Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance
Hello Rjd0060. I understand the reason for deletion. We would like to work to improve the article, to meet the Wikipedia quality standards for Wikipedia. Would it be possible for you to undelete it, so that we may work on it. Also, can you point me to a resource that explains a period of time by which we need to make updates? I want to be sure we are working within the Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you, in advance, for your assistance.
LeahVanRooy (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Leah Van Rooy
LeahVanRooy, I've restored the article. There is no time limit for improvement - it's a matter of an editor finding and creating a discussion for deletion. Those discussions take about a week - during which time you are free to work on the article. If people see an improvement is begin made, chances are they will work with you. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Micheline Montreuil
If I indef'd it for an extended period, it was strictly an accidental selection of the wrong item from the drop-down menu of time options. I certainly didn't intend to protect it for anything more than the minimum amount of time necessary (i.e. 3 hours, the smallest block of time possible) to ensure that I'd have the time to explain to Ms. Montreuil why I had made the changes to her version that she was re-reverting — if I did select anything other than 3 hours, it was a pure accident and not at all what I was trying to do. Bearcat (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Bearcat, no problem. Thanks! Feel free to remove the semi I left it at or let it expire on its own. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Darrell Vaughn
Would you mind kindly restoring that and fdirecting me to the person that did the prod. they failed to notify me that it was nominated. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
No, I haven't visited the wiki since you left both messages. Note that people are not required to notify you but are encouraged to do so as a courtesy. Additionally, you could request undeletion elsewhere if we're not around. Anyways, I've restored it. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Yeah I understand all that it's common courtesy though at least on articles. Content creators should be respected to to fix the work. All that being said would you mind re-deleting it I reviewed it and did quite a bit of searching and the nominator was correct in their assessment, so while I'm irritated with how they did it ultimately I agree with the rationale at this point. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:07, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Undeletion of PreScouter
Hi Rjdoo600, Could you undelete the page PreScouter, it is an information-services company based in Evanston that has over 260 clients in the Fortune 500. Find more information at www.prescouter.com or www.prescouter.org
Resscsnwot, I've restored the article. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 03:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for doing that. Please can you check for a talk page? I've restored the link from Wikidata. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm just reporting that the article Gianluigi Donnarumma was recreated immediately after you had deleted it via PROD. Thanks. Spiderone 19:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Spiderone, that is not really prohibited - they are simlpy objecting to the deletion, clearly. I see there is now an AfD discussion so that will be the best way to go forward. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello Rjd0060, could you please undelete the RealDownloader page? I wasn't aware the page was under review until today that I realized that RealDownloader, which I have been using for a while, appears to not be included in the newest release of Real networks with Windows 10 (not sure about previous versions of Windows). RealDownloader is, or maybe was, a very reliable video downloader utility supporting different video formats. Along with RealDownloader RealPlayer Converter and RealPlayer Trimmer were also installed... an edit that I'll make next to the RealNetworks page ;)
I never read the deleted article so not sure what I would find there but I was looking for the current state of the RealDownloader product, wheather it works with Windows 10 with which browsers and whether it is included with the new RealNetworks media player so I could decide to upgrade or not. The RealNetworks website does not talk about it at all.
Thanks in advance Jerikalla (talk) 05:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Restored. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much!! Jerikalla (talk) 22:21, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
One more page undeletion request
Hello Rjd0060, I just found out a Page I had started long back has been deleted. I wasn't aware the page was under review until today. Can you please undelete it? The page is Prakash Belawadi. If there is an issue with the content added to this wiki page, let me review and correct it. Hope it can be reinstated. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desi~enwiki (talk • contribs) 10:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello Rjd0060, I just found out that Kalkitech Page has been deleted. I wasn't aware the page was under review until today. Kalkitech is a 16 year old company and doing great work in utility communication standardization in India. I am not sure what Wikipedia guidelines for notability is, but i do believe if a page has been there for many many years, i do believe it has survived the test of time and one fine morning, it getting deleted is not correct or good. If it is not fit, it should have been taken out long long ago. Would appreciate if you can you please undelete it? . I forgot my wikipedia login and hence signing in as guest115.119.161.30 (talk) 11:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Prasanth
I will undelete it if you realize that the policy hasn't changed, as you implied. It was nominated for deletion and nobody objected for 7 days. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:30, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Ticket:2015081010014674
Can you explain what just happened at Virtual routing and forwarding? Accessing the ticket requires a login that I apparently don't have. ~Kvng (talk) 12:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Kvng, I think I made it clear in the summaries. I removed a copyright violation. What else do you need to know? Rjd0060 (talk) 12:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Which edit(s) introduced copyrighted material. URL or other source for copyrighted material. ~Kvng (talk) 12:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Kvng, The entire first paragraph was a near exact copy from another site, which was posted long before the article was created. It was added by 203.35.82.168 on 2014 JAN 30. The content was taken from Techtarget and we were contacted to removed it - which is what is contained in the ticket that you do not have access to, as it is restricted to proper OTRS agents. Anything else I can do for you? Rjd0060 (talk) Rjd0060 (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. ~Kvng (talk) 13:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Power Ranger actor one more
I need you to restore one more power ranger actor who you deleted as you assumed that was his only notability. Kevin Duhaney, is also an established cartoon and animation voice over artist, been in many disney channel shows, and also is a musician with music on youtube. So he has not only just done Power Rangers. So please restore his page like you did with the other two, thank you. This is also the last one it should be. Boaxy (talk) 08:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Boaxy, well what I need is for you to refactor your request with a complete list of articles you'd like restored. Furthermore, I don't appreciate your comment that "[I] assumed". For your information, the proposed deletion policy takes the decision making away from the administrator who deletes the article. It was nominated by a user, remained pending for a deletion without a single objection for 7 days, and I simply came along and deleted it. In fact, I likely didn't even read the article. Remember that assumptions are dangerous. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 12:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
As I mentioned before, this is the last article. I originally meant to conclude it in the first request. I apologize for my attitude. I just saw your reason for deletion was non notability outside of power rangers. I would agree if he didn't have nobility outside of that, but he does. Boaxy (talk) 12:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
So yes again this is the final article, I took the time to make sure, there should be no further inquiries about this issue.
An article that you have been involved in editing—Artificial cloud —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 18:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I see that the previous message regarding the reversal of deletion of this page was removed without any further response. Just making sure you didn't accidentally overlook it. Thanks for any help. Schitzophonic 23:54, 15 September 2015 (BST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schitzophonic (talk • contribs)
Schitzophonic, my apologies - must have slipped through the cracks! All set now. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Rjd0060 I noticed that CEVA logistics page has been deleted. The reason for deletion that was mentioned was: Fails notability requirements per WP:CORP). Can you undelete the page. CEVA is one of the largest logistics companies in the world and as such notable enough to have an article on wikipedia.
Thank you.
Pemberly (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Pemberly, I'm afraid you are not realizing one of the core principles of Wikipedia and that is articles should contain verifiable material rather than the alleged "truth". Please click edit here on this section and read the information contained in the grey box ("If you are here...") and reply back if you would still like the article to be restored. Thank you. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:51, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello :Rjd0060, I was not aware of any unverifiable materials on the CEVA Logistics page. Information included there was possible to look up in third party online publications as well as in CEVA's Annual reports. Anyhow I can review the article and remove what may be considered unverifiable material or include sources. Indeed, I would like the article to be restored. Thank you. Pemberly (talk) 15:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Done. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Fielded text
Hi. I found the Fielded text article well written and not a copy of CSV. (I am not the author). Actually I studied the topic and features explained at [16] are true extension of what CSV offer. The author provided reference and I'd also add [17] for example. I'll think about improving the article as a result of my small research and I hope this can be enough to for undeletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jstaniek (talk • contribs) 14:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
I've restored the article. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't know why you deleted this article about a very important Afghan figure. [18][19] I read your reasons but the article should have been re-written or something and not deleted. Just type his name "Mahmud Tarzi" in google search, such person MUST have a Wikipedia article. Can you undelete it please?--Krzyhorse22 (talk) 22:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello User:Krzyhorse22. The proposed deletion policy doesn't require the administrator to rewrite an article. As you claimed to have read the comments, you should know that I personally have no opinion on the article content, subject nor anything else. My only interest was the fact that it was proposed for deletion by one user, and that proposal went unobjected for 1 week. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Even if he was important enough to be on Wikipedia . The article citation doesn't align with Wikipedia requirments!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodredunce (talk • contribs) 22:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! I see you have deleted an article of this name in 2008. Is it possible if I take a look at the deleted article please? I would like to work on it as it is of historical significance to the local Christian community in Singapore. It is notable.
Hi Bpc.sg. The article has been restored. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Please restore NewsBank
Please restore NewsBank -- it is most obviously a very notable archival news database service available at hundreds of libraries around the world -- akin to LexisNexis.
Further, the cites had lots of incoming links to the article as a way of helpful verification for the reader.
If need be, I'll work on it to ensure the article is properly cited.
After all, I see it was just a Prod and not AFD. If someone wants, after my quality improvement work is done, they can then try AFD.
Could you please restore the prior article history, its prior talk page history, and any redirects you may have deleted that were incoming to that page? Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
You can give me a list of pages to restore and I can restore them. Otherwise you can recreate redirects. I have restored the article history and the talk page history per your request. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Is there a way to see which pages were the ones you'd deleted that were redirects? I'll try to find those and redirect them back. Thank you so much for your help, most appreciated !! :) — Cirt (talk) 01:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Nevermind, found them all, thank you! — Cirt (talk) 01:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Undeletion of Toma Bašić
Hi! I see that you've deleted the article for Toma Bašić because of an expired PROD - ironically, that had happened on the exact day he became eligible for an article, having made his debut in a fully pro league ( Prva HNL ). His debut on 10 August 2015 can be verified on multiple websites (Soccerway for example). If it's possible please return the article, and I'll update it. Thanks!
Zlopseto (talk) 23:05, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Zlopseto, I've restored the article. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! :) Zlopseto (talk) 09:22, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, RxPG is quite a popular website with over 500K users and is the largest and active medical forum in India. I was shocked to see the page missing and also wasn't able to find the discussion on proposed deletion list. Kindly help me to recreate the article. Thanks. --Pearll's SunTALK 19:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
The reason it was deleted is explained very clearly in the orange box visible at the top of this page when you try to edit it, and in the deletion log where the article used to be - which you visited because that's how you found your way here. 01:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your reply. While i added a comment on your talk page the "show" option didn't work as expected (could have been a browser issue) so had requested details here. I have posted a request on the "Un-deletion" request page as per your suggestion. Hope the article would be restored so i can work on the same to improve it as per wiki standards. Thanks. --Pearll's SunTALK 03:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Another administrator has moved the page to the draft article space to be worked on there. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your guidance. I shall do my best to improve the article. Pearll's SunTALK 18:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
JUCCCE / Joint-US China Collaboration on Clean Energy
AdventurousMe, I can undelete the page so that you have something to start from if you'd like. Just let me know the exact title. Rjd0060 (talk) 20:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
AdventurousMe, I've undeleted the article and its talk page. Feel free to create any redirects. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
'Annie Wallace' undelete
I request the undeletion of the article on actress 'Annie Wallace'. Over the past week she has received a significant amount of press as being the first trans actress to play a trans character on a British soap opera, namely 'Hollyoaks', and will appear in the show later this month. There are now numerous links on legitimate press sources.
This is practically a companion piece to the actor Riley Carter Millington, who HAS a page now, and whose announcement to the press occurred around the same time.
If the group was "clearly" notable it would be indicated in the article, which it is not. That's why it was deleted in the first place. I've restored it and now you should work on it to avoid another deletion. Regards, Rjd0060 (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the undelete. As per notability, being a military organization with US govt support would qualify for notability. --Soman (talk) 20:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
It must be shown in the article. Good luck. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Deletions
Hello, Rjd0060,
I don't think we have crossed paths before. I was just looking at the deletion log and noticed that somehow you deleted dozens of CSDs and Expired PRODs in the same minute. I know how that action is done if it is a mass revert of a banned users edits. But how to you simultaneously delete so many pages from different editors all at the same time? Is it a script of some kind? Thanks for any answer you can provide. LizRead!Talk! 22:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Liz, the deletions were all related to the proposed deletion policy. The CSDs were simply a result of the deleted PROD article. But to answer your question, the deletions are assisted by Twinkle. The process that I use when deleting these articles is ensuring that the PROD tag remained in place for an uninterrupted required pending period and that there were no previous deletions. If those conditions are met, the articles are eligible for deletion and deleted. Any talk pages and redirects are also deleted in accordance with the deletion policy. If you have any other questions feel free to ask. Rjd0060 (talk) 02:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
07:55, 2 October 2015 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted page Appknox (Expired PROD, concern was: WP:PROMO, WP:TOOSOON article about a non-notable one year old startup, created by undisclosed paid editor.)
Which is not true at all. Regarding WP:PROMO the article was written in neutral stand-point. I would like to contribute and make sure, I can edit it properly and make the language more Neutral.
Regarding WP:TOOSOON is not applicable, since we are a funded start-up and we are already 1.65 years old. I don't see a clause which talks about a requirement for having an Article entry.
If you can un-delete the article, I can start working on it, and try to make the article better with a neutral standpoint and make sure, it doesn't falls under the WP:PROMO category.
Subho007, I've restored the article for you to work on. Rjd0060 (talk) 13:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Rjd0060 Thank you, I have started working on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subho007 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
"UGallery" Undelete
Hi. I request the un-deletion of the article on UGallery. Writers in the interior design and tech industries are covering UGallery and its role in the growing online art market.
Request for information for deletion of SmartFocus page
Hi,
My Smartfocus page was deleted due to the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline.
How can i find out which coverage it was within the page that wasn't justified enough?
I am unable to now view the page to justify any articles further, and we believe the page was reported by a disgruntled ex-employee of ours.
Can you please suggest how i move forward with this, as we would love to get the page back up and running.
Emvfr, I've restored the article for you to work on. Rjd0060 (talk) 13:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I have deleted or made changes to some of the content that sounded like an advertisment, as this was stated as being the problem i believe. I have also add more / different references to justify what has been said.
Is there still a cause for concern for the page to be removed? Or can the page remain up now?
Further to my previous comment, can you confirm if the SmartFocus page is now within the Wikipedia guidelines, or if there is still a cause for concern?
I believe the changes i made have improved the page as to make it not sound like an advertisment and have justified the articles further by adding more relevant links.
Please let me know if the page is now fine.
Many thanks
Emvfr (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Gary Carswell Deleted article at 00:48, 7 July 2015
This article was deleted at 00:48, 7 July 2015. Please could you confirm that this is an article about Gary Carswell a motor-cycle racer that died in an accident on the 11th April 2015 and the name of the editor that made the deletion request. The article has notability to the Isle of Man TT motor-cycle network of articles as a former Isle of Man TT competitor. I can expand the article and provide notability. Thanks ! agljones(talk)21:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello agljones. The subject of the deleted article is indeed the one you reference. It was a three-sentence stub. If you'd like to expand it I can restore the article. And lastly, it was nominated for deletion (via PROD) by Rocknrollmancer. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. You semi-protected the subject article at 23:42, 21 March 2012 for three days due to "Persistent vandalism / BLP issues". Those issues appear to have arisen again, as the last six edits of this GA by IP addresses were unsourced. Please consider protecting it for a longer period. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ(talk) 23:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jeff G.. I've semi-protected the article for a month. Rjd0060 (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Found Wiki Wack
type something in the search field, starting with "#" (a hashtag, or number sign)
Kindly undelete the article Magnolia (CMS). The article was deleted with the reason "Expired PROD", citing insufficient references per Wikipedia:Notability_(software) guidelines. I would like to attempt to revise the article to better meet the notability guidelines and provide more reliable references. Thank you, Ahietala
Hi Ahietala. I've restored it. It actually shouldn't have been deleted in the first place since it was deleted via PROD once previously. My mistake. Thanks for the note! Rjd0060 (talk) 21:40, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Request for undeletion: List of The Sword of Truth characters
Can you please undelete List of The Sword of Truth characters? There are 17 books in the series, they have sold millions worldwide, and the TV series lasted for 2 seasons. While it does need to be improved, it should not be deleted. At the most, it should be merged to The Sword of Truth, but honestly I don't see how you could fit everyone on that page, even if you only include characters that appear in multiple books because there are a lot of them. JDDJS (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
In addition to what JDDJS stated, I came here to ask why you felt the article needed deletion per WP:G8. I also thought about asking Sandstein why he felt the need to tag the article for deletion when he is aware that such articles exist for every type of television show; for example, Sandstein and I are fans of the Game of Thrones series, but I don't see that he tagged the List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters and List of Game of Thrones characters articles, which are not much better than the List of The Sword of Truth characters article, for deletion. Yes, I'm invoking WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I didn't notice until yesterday that Sandstein had prodded the article for deletion. I didn't think it would be deleted just like that, which is why I didn't address the matter on the article talk page. There are interviews given by the portrayers of the Legend of the Seeker characters, and that is just one way that the List of The Sword of Truth characters article can be fixed up. I suggest WP:Userfying the article in my userspace until it is further fixed up. JDDJS and others are more than welcomed to work on the article that way. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
My company, Sematext, is a legitimate IT consulting and software firm that has been in business for 5+ years. We have clients like Salesforce, Walmart, Thomson Reuters, Microsoft, and many others. Please check out site to see for yourself: https://sematext.com/
Several months ago our Wikipedia entry was deleted with the reason given as: "Advert for unnotable entity." With a customer list like we have, it is very far from being unnotable. Although we are a small company we are certainly legitimate. Can you please reinstate us soon, as we have some partnerships to be announced with larger companies this month and in 2016, and it looks odd to not even have a Wikipedia entry.
You can contact me directly with any questions: mick.emmett@sematext.com
Thank you,
Mick Emmett
Mickemmett (talk) 15:27, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
May I ask why you have deleted the page "List of obfuscators for .NET"? I can't see any reason for this in the talk page. LonelyPixel (talk) 14:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Please undelete the Jonathan Wutawunashe article. The person appears to have been a notable musician that is credited with reviving a genre (gospel music), is widely known in Zimbabwe, and is currently an ambassador. Thanks. Greenman (talk) 22:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Our company, PixelMEDIA, is a legitimate, Web Development Agency that has been in business for ~22 years. We have clients like US Bank, Stonyfield Farms, Vibram Shoe, Stonewall Kitchen and countless others. (Please see our site for verification: https://pixelmedia.com/)
While our Agency's rich history is not written on our site, we have clients across the world looking to learn this, and Wikipedia is where this ought to be taking place.
In November our Wikipedia entry was deleted with the reason given as: "not passing Notability guidelines." As one of the oldest media agencies in New England, and dozens of awards spanning decades, and With a customer list like our, it is very far from being unnotable as an online encyclopedia entry.
We did not receive notice of its nomination for deletion, in which case we would have surely intervened.
We're requesting reinstatement of our page as soon as possible -
You can contact me directly with any questions: jremmes@pixelmedia.com
Thank you,
Jordan
Jremmes (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Which you just deleted, was instantly reposted. Please delete it again. Curro2 (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Curro2. Articles deleted via the proposed deletion process can be re-created upon request. If you wish to ensure its deletion (should it be re-created again) you'll need to pursue AfD. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Done Rjd0060 (talk) 19:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)