Jump to content

User talk:Tymek: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Paweł5586 (talk | contribs)
Line 1,667: Line 1,667:


Dobra robota, oczywiście historycy angielscy najlepiej widziani, ale Z tego co zauważyłem, to Ukraińcy nie krępują się by używać swoich źródeł, więc gdzie nie ma anglików to wrzucaj naszych. Prośba o zaglądnięcie do zbrodni w Pawłokomie w angielskim haśle. Była ona popełniona jako odwet za uprowadzenie Polaków i należy również o niej pisać w kontekście rzezi wołyńskiej.--[[User:Paweł5586|Paweł5586]] ([[User talk:Paweł5586|talk]]) 11:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Dobra robota, oczywiście historycy angielscy najlepiej widziani, ale Z tego co zauważyłem, to Ukraińcy nie krępują się by używać swoich źródeł, więc gdzie nie ma anglików to wrzucaj naszych. Prośba o zaglądnięcie do zbrodni w Pawłokomie w angielskim haśle. Była ona popełniona jako odwet za uprowadzenie Polaków i należy również o niej pisać w kontekście rzezi wołyńskiej.--[[User:Paweł5586|Paweł5586]] ([[User talk:Paweł5586|talk]]) 11:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Hej, widziałem Wolę Ostrowiecką, ciesze się, że zrobiłeś ten art, wygląda lepiej niż nasz Polski. Wkrótce go poprawie. Robię teraz zbiorcze hasła o [http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szablon:Zbrodnie_nacjonalist%C3%B3w_ukrai%C5%84skich zbrodniach w powiatach] i linkuje zbrodnie które warto opisać. Gdybyś się zastanawiał o czym napisać to możesz rzucić okiem. BTW, widziałem że w artykule konsekwentnie stawiasz przypis przed znakiem interpunkcyjnym. Jak to jest w Anglii? Ja słyszałem że tam na odwrót niż u nas przypis powinien być raczej po znaku interpunkcyjnym?--[[User:Paweł5586|Paweł5586]] ([[User talk:Paweł5586|talk]]) 17:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


== DYK for Independent Students Union ==
== DYK for Independent Students Union ==

Revision as of 17:30, 20 May 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Tymek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

National parks

Hi there! Where do you take all those articles on Polish national parks from? Halibutt 14:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you can, please learn how to wikify articles, and when you add new Poland-related articles, leave us a note at Portal:Poland/New_article_announcements. Tnx for your contribs!--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tymek, I have just reverted your last edit of Wisloka Debica. Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. You can, of course, attempt to obtain permission. Many thanks. - Nzd (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tymek, that's ok then ;) I would put a note on the talk page, stating that it's reproduced from the site, but that you own that text, and you are releasing it under the GFDL. Could I also ask that you make the additions look a little less like a cut-&-paste dump, with appropriate section headings and wikilinks? I will help with this now it's here. Sorry about that, but I would definately add that note, or someone else will probably come along and reach the same conclusion. All the best, and thanks for the contribution!. - Nzd (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, no particular interest in Polish football, just an interest in the game in general. I've been working my way through Category:Football (soccer) clubs looking for articles to populate Category:Establishments by year and Category:Football (soccer) chairmen and investors. I just happened to get to the Polish clubs recently.. By the way, you should sign your messages on talk pages, which you can do by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. All the best. - Nzd (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may want to share them with us at the above address.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify/cats/etc.

History of football in Poland is certainly an interesting field. It would be great if you could properly wikify your articles, and add them to the appopriate categories. I'd recommend you go over the articles you have created, see how others cleaned them up, and learned from them. See also their talk pages. A poza tym - dobra robota :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you had any questions about Ruch Chorzów, the most prominent football club in Poland in late 30' you can ask me, cause I'm multigeneration fan of that club ;) Jeśli czytasz po polsku możesz sobie poczytać to (muszę jeszcze poprawić trochę nie-encyklopedyczne stwierdzenia ;) D_T_G (PL) 10:28, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kluby

Jeśli możesz to proszę - rozwiń te artykuły: Śląsk Świętochłowice, Piast Gliwice. Lub jeszcze inne z [1]. Wiele nawet dobrych klubów nie ma artykułu na en:Wiki. W razie czego daję linka do spisu takich klubów: [2]. Pozdrawiam. LUCPOL 00:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Władysław Szczepaniak

Hi, thanks for all your help! I'm trying to help clean up Władysław Szczepaniak and couldn't make it what you meant by "For the last time appeared on the field in 1947, soon after Polonia’s 1946 victory in the Championships of Poland." If you could respond at Talk:Władysław Szczepaniak, that would be great! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Józef Korbas

Tymek, thanks for the quick response earlier. Another question for you regarding Józef Korbas. I noticed that Korbas has a birth year, but no death information. If Korbas is still alive, could you please add him to Category:Living people? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Śląsk Świętochłowice

Byłbym bardzo wdzięczny jakbyś mógł poprawić artykuły związane z Śląskiem Świętochłowice i jego stadionem OSiR Skałka... tutaj masz polskie strony pl:Śląsk Świętochłowice i pl:OSiR Skałka... bardzo pozdrawiam Adik7swiony 21:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Długość artykułu

Nie przejmuj się tym, 30kb to nie jest wcale tak dużo :) Pisz dalej. Kilka uwag: brakuje źródeł (references, citations, zobacz WP:CS), obrazki sa niesformatowane i nie maja podpisow, zobacz WP:XIMG i WP:CAP. Na koniec, brakuje tez kategorii (WP:CAT). Jak cos nie jasne, pytaj sie dalej :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus  talk  00:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesli uzywasz Firefoxa, to on ma pewne problemy z dlugimi artykulami na Wiki (ja uzuwam Mozilli m.in. dlatego). Jesli nie, to nie wiem dlaczego nie mozesz doklejac tekstu... :( -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus  talk  17:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Futbol

Tymku, nie do końca rozumiem w czym może być problem. Artykuł jak dotąd ma zaledwie 30kb, najdłuższy z moich jak dotąd ma blisko dwa razy tyle i nie miałem żadnych problemów z jego pisaniem. Może używasz jakiejś dziwnej przeglądarki (czyt: czegoś innego niż Mozilla Firefox)? A może po prostu używasz zbyt wielu sekcji i system sobie nie radzi? Ale to chyba mało prawdopodobne... Tak czy owak - kilka spraw:

  1. nie wiem czy zdajesz sobie sprawę z tego, że okres prehistorii polskiego futbolu już opisałem - w History of football in Poland.
  2. mój artykulik na razie ma gigantyczną przewagę nad Twoim. Nie jest lepszy, ale zwyczajnie cytuje źródła i odnośniki, których w Twoim artykule brak, a to duży błąd. Im więcej źródeł dodasz, tym lepiej. Może nawet z czasem będzie to można promować do FA..?
  3. Nie słyszałem o takim sporcie jak soker. Futbol owszem, ale soker? A tak na serio - nie dajmy się zwariować. Sam artykuł o piłce nożnej na angielskiej wiki może być ujednoznaczniony, bo amerykanie mają problem z tymi nazwami. Ale artykuł o historii polskiej piłki nie musi używać podwójnego nazewnictwa. MSZ wygląda to cokolwiek dziwnie.
  4. Tak czy siak - jako że oba artykuły traktują na razie o tym samym - może by je połączyć?

//Halibutt 18:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Źle mnie zrozumiałeś. Nie wywyższam się ani się nie czepiam. Po prostu artykuł ze źródłami jest z zasady sto razy lepszy od artykułu bez nich, nawet jeśli jest faktycznie "gorszy". Źródła: git; brak źródeł: nie cacy. Co do nazwy - to właśnie Amerykanie mają z tym problem, ale nie sądzę, by w każdej sytuacji trzeba było iść im na rękę. Tak jak Wikipedia nie nazywa się Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (Encyclopaedia). A co do artykułów - zauważ że ten mój jest jedynie pierwszą częścią i w zamierzeniu miał pokrywać całą historię - zgodnie z tytułem. Stąd mój pomysł by je połączyć i współpracować. //Halibutt 04:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Śląsk Świętochłowice

Sorry about that. I did do a little more cleanup just now. Biruitorul 21:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not especially interested in Polish soccer (but more in Romanian). Rather, my main concern is with proper diacritics (for instance writing Śląsk and not Slask. Biruitorul 01:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Korbas date of death

You can add whatever information you have to Józef Korbas. Do you have a source, maybe someplace online where you found it? If so, just add that. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Mala informacja

Dobra ksiazka. Artykul Second Polish Republic potrzebuje wielu statystyk. Takze historical demographics of Poland. Zerknij tez na Category:History of Poland (1918–1939).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki za informację

Dzięki za informację , ale myślę , że nie robię nic nielegalnego . Informacja w polskim prawie nie jest łamaniem praw autorskich . Trzeba tylko podać źródła..i ja to robię...ale chyba już zaprzestanę...Dzięki za ostrzeżenie :-) .Bartekos 20:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mój team to Tarant Wójcin :-)...i tylko nie mów , że to zespół za słaby by mieć swoje miejsce w wikipedii :-) . A jeszcze co do tych moich artykułów - nie kopiuję ich z książek tego Pana . Piszę według określonego szablonu (a więc , nazwisko , data urodzenia , śmierci , narodowość , co dana osoba osiągnęła itd. , przecież to można znaleźć w wikipedii , a od z tych encyklopedii to biorę czasami tylko ciekawostki i czasami nazwę klubu w jakim dany zawodnik grał . A jeżeli chodzi o zawodników współczesnych to robię np tak : Krzysztof Łągiewka . Pozdrawiam Bartekos 20:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...kurczę...Myślałem całą noc o tym co mi powiedziałeś :-) . I co teraz mam zrobić ? Skasować wszystkie te notki , które zrobiłem np. o zawodnikach Meksyku z M.Ś. 1930 ? Sam już nie wiem co robić...Naprawdę mam już dość tej wikipedii . Pozdrawiam Bartekos 09:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiesz co..chyba masz rację nie ma się czym przejmować (choć teraz jak w wyszukiwarce wpisze się nazwisko autora , to wyskakują moje artykuły) , pytałem się paru osób i wszystko wydaje się ok . Tam gdzie mogłem skreśliłem takie szczegółowe informacje , które wydawały mi się kontrowersyjne np. Antoni Szymanowski . Aha...Rozpocząłem prace nad Jutrzenka Kraków , ale szczerze powiedziawszy za dużo o tym klubie nie wiem . Znalazłem coś na stronie statystyków piłki nożnej i to dodałem . Może ty masz jakieś informacje o tym klubie ? (jak np.barwy) Pozdrawiam Bartekos 12:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jutrzenka i Cracovia ? Info wziąłem ze źródła , które jest podane..ale jeszcze raz sprawdzę...

No wreszcie nauczyłem się dodawać przypisy...:-). Teraz już chyba jest korekt ? Prawda ? Nad czym teraz pracujesz ? Ja zająłem się niektórymi piłkarzami , którzy kiedyś grali w naszej lidze. No wiesz są to raczej krótkie notki jak np. Gift Musadzi , ale to zawsze coś . Poza tym dodałem trochę o historii Tarant Wójcin , być może napiszę historię mojej miejscowości...Muszę pomyśleć nad zdjęciami . Oczywiście swojej roboty :-) Pozdrawiam Bartekos 21:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tłumaczenie

Cześć stary! Wielkie dzięki za przetłumaczenie tekstu pieśni, świetna robota, zaraz włożyłem go do artykułu. Naprawdę doceniam to! - Darwinek 10:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Co do tego piwka :) Przejeżdżasz może kiedy przez Śląsk Cieszyński? :) Jestem Polakiem z Czech, więc to "czeskie piwo" myślałem na serio. - Darwinek 17:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć. Czytałem dyskusję dotyczącą roku 1938 oraz interwencji Polski na Zaolziu. Chcę zapytać, czy Richard Watts w swojej książce mówi też o naszej mniejszości? Czy też interesuje się tylko sprawami politycznymi itp. - Darwinek 20:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Trains

Hello and welcome to the Trains WikiProject! Thank you for adding your name to our project membership list. Our goal is to build the most comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. As a project member, you may add the project membership userbox to your user page if you wish.

If you haven't done so already, please add our main project page to your watchlist and take some time to review the Trains project manual of style where we have collected guidelines and suggestions on notability and style for a consistent representation of rail transport related material. If you're curious about where to start, we've gathered a few suggestions in the Trains project to do list. If you'd like to specialize in a particular area of study within rail transport, take a look at the current Trains project task forces.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the project talk page or on my talk page. Again, welcome and happy editing! Slambo (Speak) 15:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Autonomiczne Województwo Śląskie

"Dlaczego zmieniles zawartosc artykulu o Autonomicznym Wojewodztwie Slaskim w latach miedzywojennych?"

Wikipedia opiera się na tym, że można stale poprawiać i zmieniać hasła. Artykuł starałem się jak najbardziej upodobnić do artykułu w polskiej wersji językowej.

"Zachowales sie nieladnie, tak sie nie robi, usunales sporo wiadomosci ktore sa istotne i jak najbardziej prawdziwe"

Początek zdania zostawiam bez komentarza. Jeśli chodzi o drugą część tego zdania: nie usunąłem sporo wiadomości. Prawie nic nie usunąłem. Głównie dodałem infobox i zrobiłem zmiany redakcyjne. Przypatrz się dokładnie moim zmianom.

"usunales tez powiat frysztacki ktory nalezal do tego wojewodztwa w okresie jesien 1938-wrzesien 1939"

Ja w artykule przedstawiłem dane z 1929, wtedy nie było tego powiatu w województwie.

Po za tym, z twojej wersji wynika, że Chorzów (pop. 128 900) był większym miastem od Katowic (pop. 126 200) co nie było prawdą. LUCPOL 19:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Wedlug spisu powszechnego Polski z 1931 roku Chorzow byl wiekszy od Katowic"

Czy aby na pewno? PS. Zobacz też tu.

"Powiat frysztacki nalezal do tego wojewodztwa od roku 1938, ale nie rozumiem dlaczego calkowicie go usunales, skoro istnial (wystarczylo napisac, ze istnial w latach 38-39)"

Tu się z tobą zgadzam. Ale o tym później.

"A co z tym jezykiem slaskim? Gdzie to znalazles?"

Dane przeniosłem z pl.wikipedii. Wiem, że ten język był nieoficjalny, lecz infobox ma w kodzie wpisane "Official" (czego nie ma na pl.wikipedii) i stąd te komplikacje. Nie mniej jednak poprawiłem - wpisałem adnotacje 1Non official. PS. Czeski również wtedy nie był oficjalnie uznawanym językiem w województwie.

Mam do Ciebie propozycję, utwórz proszę tabelę z miastami i powiatami tak jak jest w artykule lecz z twoimi danymi. Dane są znacznie bardziej czytelne dzięki tabeli. Tabelę wprowadź w brudnopisie lub w mojej dyskusji lub po prostu w dyskusji artykułu. Jeśli będzie wszystko OK to podmieni się tabele w artykule. LUCPOL 19:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Jak piszesz do mnie to pisz po polsku. Dalej nie wiem co z tą wielkością Chorzowa. Wytłumacz mi to jeszcze raz... tym razem po polsku. Po drugie: twoje dane które przedstawiłeś są nieco mylące, bowiem przedstawiasz dane jednostek z 1931 roku danymi statystycznymi z 1939 roku kiedy był inny podział administracyjny (czy tak?). Może więc mi wyjaśnisz po polsku co oznaczają daty "1931" i "1939" w twoich danych. PS. Było by miło jak byś usunął ten post, ja zgadzam się na usunięcie swojego. Te posty wprowadzają złą atmosferę i na dodatek twój post kwalifikuje się jako trolling. Więc lepiej je usunąć. Usuń oba (zezwalam na usunięcie swojego). LUCPOL 11:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Polacy grający obecnie poza granicami kraju

Hej ! Rozpocząłem prace nad projektem Polish footballers playing currently abroad , ale roboty przy tym jest bardzo dużo. Jakbyś znał kogoś kto chciałby w tym uczestniczyć to zapraszam . Do tej pory zrobiłem - Austrię , Belgię i Cypr , ale zdaję sobie sprawę , że mogłem pominąć paru piłkarzy zwłaszcza z niższych lig . Pozdrawiam Bartekos 12:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glayzy ...

.. jak mówią u nas albo po prostu tory. :) Myślę, że nie jest to dobry pomysł. Zostawiłbym to tylko w ramach istniejącego już artykułu, który wspomniałeś i dodałbym szczyptę informacji o tym, że tereny te (Zaolzie) weszły w skład Polski dopiero w X 1938. Szczerze mówiąc, to Zaolzie jest i tak małym skrawkem ziemi. :) - Darwinek 09:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

crazy indeed

That's right.. Definitely, some lists need some cleanup, clear referencing etc. --Beaumont (@) 08:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC) PS. I admit that I'm a little tired of this counterproduction (you can check the number of reverts in maaany entries) and, as you can see in my talk, the situation did contribute to my interest in Citizendium.[reply]

Re:Tak sobie

Dzieki za mile slowa, to zawsze przyjemnie widziec ze jest sie docenianym :) Za czesto obrywa mi sie od trolli ktorym nadepne na odcisk :) Ja teraz tez jestem w USA, z kilkoma ksiazkami tylko, wiec wiekszosc moich artykolow opiera sie na necie (Google Books jest baaardzo przydatne). Zapraszam do sledzenia dyskusji na WP:PWNB - staram sie tam pisac o roznych ciekawych dyskusjach i stronacj! I tez gratuluje wielu dobrych artykulow! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba

A raczej szereg. Linkuj nowe artykuly z miejsc gdzie ktos moze chciec o nich poczytac (np. Łódź Voivodeship (1919-1939) na Łódź Voivodeship. Uwazaj na styl nazw (Łódź Voivodeship (1919-1939) a nie Lodz Voivodeship 1919-1939. A WP:TRIVIA nie lubi - artykul trzeba wkleic gdzies. Poza tym, dobra robota :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Źródła

Cześć. Czy mógłbyś podać źródła tych informacji. Pozdrawiam. LUCPOL 11:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bitter Glory

Czesc. Czy moglbys prosze dorzucic kilka informacji z ksiazki Bitter Glory, ktora niedawno wspominales? Przydalo by sie w artykule o Zaolziu. Dzieki bardzo. - Darwinek 20:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Byloby bardzo fajnie. Szczegolnie w piatek 13. :). - Darwinek 07:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Futbol

Jasne. :) W naszej zaolzianskiej prasie pojawiaja sie niekiedy felietony o dawnych czasach, kiedy to zycie spoleczne Polakow na Zaolziu kwitlo, ale ostatnio o sporcie niczego nie bylo. Mam w domu jedna taka broszurke o sporcie polskim na Zaolziu, o futbolu tez tam pisza, ale spokojnie dorzucaj. P.S. Masz moze zamiar w lecie zatrzymac sie u nas? - Darwinek 10:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moze w lecie, planuje znow troche popracowac nad artykulami dotyczacymi Zaolzia. Mam w domu te broszurke, wiec ze zrodlami nie mialo by byc problemow. Ale teraz duzo pracy do szkoly. :) - Darwinek 15:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tymek. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Light1.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Tymek. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PKP

Hi!

Thanks for your comments about editing your PKP in 1939 page. I know how hard it can be to produce something like that, especially in a foreign language and using technical language.

If you have any other railway pages you want me to look at then let me know.

Beerfestival.

Re:pytanie

O wiele lepsze to bedzie jako rozbudowa sekcji 'history' w artykulach o tych stacjach. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiesz, nie wiem, jest search box, poszukaj, zobacz. Sa artykuly o wielu stacjach...-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jan's Valley

Updated DYK query On 22 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jan's Valley, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 23:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 24 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Polish Coal Trunk-Line, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 23:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYKI

Tak, to ja :) Nie wahaj sie nominowac ich sam, ja sie dowiaduje o nich z new article annoucements i niekiedy za pozno (DYKi pozwalaja nominowac artykuly ktore przekroczyly wielkosc stuba w ostatnich 5 dniach, nie pozniej). Tak czy owak, dobra robota z tymi artykulami! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  17:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blisko - 20-ego :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  17:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polonia

Dzieki za start tego artykulu, szykowalem sie kiedys go zaczac, ale Twoja pomoc popchnela mnie w tym kierunku. :) Dzieki. Zklaryfikowalem kilka danych. Chodzilo o najsilniejszy polski klub pilkarski ze Zaolzia, wiec artykul byl tu potrzebny na pewno. - Darwinek 19:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it wasn't directly copied from anywhere, it may be a translation of a Polish one, which would have meant the same problem: it is a derivative work of a text protected by copyright, and it can't be used on Wikipedia without permission of its copyright holder. - Mike Rosoft 19:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reviewing the linked Polish articles, it seems to me that it's not a direct translation from the Polish, but a free re-phrasing, which should be okay. However, it still needs cleanup - statements like "however, it was not a regular train as we imagine it" are better suited for a magazine article than for an encyclopedia. Regards, Mike Rosoft 19:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • To clarify: a translation from Polish Wikipedia or another source which is under a free license (or in public domain) would have been acceptable as well. - Mike Rosoft 19:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neither am I a native English speaker; I happen to be Czech. So, many greetings from the Czech Republic to our northern neighbors. :-) - Mike Rosoft 19:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Luxtorpeda i DYK

OK, rzecz jest dosc prosta: idziesz do Template talk:Did you know i pod odpowiednia data (ostatni duzy edit) dajesz 'hook'a, czyli ... did you know cos ciekawego z artykulu, mozesz takze dolozyc zdjecie jesli jest na wolnej licencji lub PD. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  15:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voivodeships (1921-1939)

Hi. Following the work that you have done on the Voivodeships of 1921-1939, you might be interested in using {{Infobox Former Subdivision}} to help with displaying some information. As an example, I have implemented this template on the Poznań Voivodeship (1921-1939) article. If you do not want to use this template, feel free to revert it. If you want to use it, see [3] for other entries that use the template, or leave me a note if you have any questions. - 52 Pickup 20:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See also Administrative division of Second Polish Republic.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  00:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From deleted article, I'd suggest merging into an existing one. But Wikipedia is not a collection of trivia (see WP:TRIVIA).

  • Total number of Voivodeships - 16 plus the capital city of Warsaw, which was regarded as a separate unit.
  • Biggest Voivodeships (as for Aug. 1, 1939):

- Polesie Voivodeship - area 36 668 km²,

- Volhynian Voivodeship - area 35 754 km²,

- Warszawa Voivodeship - area 31 656 km².

  • Smallest Voivodeships (as for Aug. 1, 1939):

- miasto stoleczne Warszawa (the capital city of Warsaw) - area 141 km²,

- Autonomous Silesian Voivodeship - area 5 122 km²,

- Tarnopol Voivodeship - area 16 533 km².

  • Most populous Voivodeships:

- Lwów Voivodeship - pop. 3 126 300,

- Kielce Voivodeship - pop. 2 671 000,

- Lodz Voivodeship - pop. 2 650 100.

  • Least populous Voivodeships:

- Nowogródek Voivodeship - pop. 1 057 200,

- Polesie Voivodeship - pop. 1 132 200

- miasto stoleczne Warszawa (the capital city of Warsaw) - pop. 1 179 500.

Counties

  • Total number of counties (as for Aug. 1, 1939) - 264, including 23 urban counties.
  • Biggest counties (as for Aug. 1, 1939):

- Wilno - Troki county (area 5 967 km²),

- Luniniec county (area 5 722 km²),

- Kowel county (area 5 682 km²).

  • Smallest counties (as for Aug. 1, 1939):

- Warszawa-Srodmiescie (mid-Warsaw), (area 10 km²),

- city of Bielsko, (area 10 km²),

- city of Gniezno, (area 18 km²).

  • Most populous counties:

- city of Lodz county (pop. 604 600),

- Warszawa-North county (pop. 478 200),

- Katowice county, (pop. 357 300).

  • Least populous counties:

- city of Bielsko county, (pop. 25 400),

- city of Gniezno, (pop. 30 700),

- Miedzychod county, (pop. 31 000).


  • Maly rocznik statystyczny 1939, Nakladem Glownego Urzedu Statystycznego, Warszawa 1939 (Concise Statistical Year-Book of Poland, Warsaw 1939).

Luxtorpeda

Updated DYK query On 8 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Luxtorpeda, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 20:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:uwaga tak sobie

Pierwsza uwaga, to niektorzy z nich czytaja po polsku, patrza na moja strone i kiedys ci to (i mnie...) wypomna, ze nietolerancyjni jestesmy itp. Po drugie, niestety ogolnie masz racje - warto sie jednak pocieszyc, ze to mniejszosc - znam wielu rozsadnych edytorow z tych krajow (a Vlad to skrajny przypadek, o czym zreszta swiadczy jego block log). A odrobina POVu nie jest zla, kazdy jest troche sPOViony, my takze. Zapraszam do edycji artykulow, mozesz takze oddac glos teraz czy pozniej.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  18:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GG

Uzywasz GG? Przydatna bestia do dyskusji o artykulach itp. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tytuły

WP:MOVE, WP:RM.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 17 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Plan Wschód, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 13:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not acceptable

Personal attacks like this are not acceptable. Please do not make any comments like that again. Picaroon (Talk) 19:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second Picaroon. While I appreciate the gist of your comment, civility should be maintained - even if the other party has been incivil many times, and showed astounding amounts of bad faith, "two wrongs does not make one right".-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this out and adjust the article (it can use a little expansion, too).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  17:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Luxtorpeda and Warsaw Main Rail Station

I've made a few changes to these articles. I thought the Luxtorpeda one was great - shame there are not any still about! Beerfestival 19:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - I had seen the video. I also visited Centralna a couple of years ago one snowy January. I couldn't get round the museum though as it was closed. Feel free to email me if you want any other pages looking at as I don't log into Wikipedia very often.

living torpedoes

Updated DYK query On 21 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article living torpedoes, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 22:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On July 24, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gestapo-NKVD Conferences, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On July 27, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fundusz Obrony Narodowej, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Well done on your work in Polish articles. Keep it up.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jerzy Bulanow

Updated DYK query On 5 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jerzy Bulanow, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 20:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 8 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Krakow Uprising (1944), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 16:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
For interesting articles about little-known Poland-related subject, I, Piotrus, present you with The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class. Keep up the good work!  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you started the article on Antoni Gałecki, perhaps you remember the source of the information? 24.6.65.83 05:20, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 2 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Krzyżtopór, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 17:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 8 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Otto Schimek, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 22:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On 10 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Church in Trzesacz, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

You were actually the only user User:Elkman did not inform, my guess is it was an accident.--Carabinieri 23:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello Tymek and thank you for that link. It was really interesting and educational. Thanks. - Darwinek 09:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 16 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Igo Sym, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 19:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring on today's FA

You are edit-warring with Irpen on Soviet invasion of Poland (1939) while it is on the main page. This is unacceptable and if it continues you will both be blocked rather than the page being protected. Please go to the talk page and discuss the issue. Thank you.--Chaser - T 04:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Łukasz Ciepliński

Updated DYK query On 23 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Łukasz Ciepliński, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 17:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Concentrate on articles, many require expansion. Endless debates not involved with articles aren't really leading to anything.--Molobo 19:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. Tymek 19:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Adam Lazarowicz, was selected for DYK!

Updated DYK query On September 30, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Adam Lazarowicz, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Football Hooligans' Fight at Grabiszynska Street in Wroclaw

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Football Hooligans' Fight at Grabiszynska Street in Wroclaw, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Stifle (talk) 20:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Football hooliganism

Hi thank you for your message. Yes indeed I do edit the various articles regularly, partly because I try to keep a middle ground between those who add stuff which is full of weasel words and often is just glorifying hooliganims, and those who just constantly criticise without any real thought. Also because there has been far too much unsourced content added to the different articles. For instance the List of hooligan firms article constantly sees users adding new Firms but ignoring the clear guidelines that they need to be mentioned in a third party source. I agree with you that the Poland section on the Football hooliganism article needs expanding. I would though strongly recommend that any sources are in English. One good source of information is always the BBC ([www.bbc.co.uk BBC online]). The source you provided (Warsaw Voice) which is in English on the article which I am currently working on (which you created but I have renamed to Wrocław football riot 2003 as I feel this is a less wordy title) seems a good source? Perhaps that site might contain more information? it might also be worth checking any British newspaper online websites, such as The Guardian or Daily Express? Or some times United States online newspapers or ESPN maybe? I hope you do not mind my work on the Wrocław article you created, I am in the middle of cleaning it up and should finish it later on tonight. Good luck! ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 19:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi yes, I will add the groups! I will do it later today, cheers. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 18:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi just to let you know that I will be adding the firms shortly this evening. I didn't get chance to do it last night. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the new article (football hooliganism in Poland) and yes I will have a look at it> I will put the "in use" tag on it when I am working on it. I will add the Polish firms first on the List of firms article. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 17:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Polish firms are now on the List of hooligan firms article. Also I have been working on your article this evening. I just wanted to tell you though that I thought it best to use only English language sources, which is why some sections have the "citation needed" tag. I did this because there appears to be quite a few English language sources, all the ones you found. Plus I am sure there will be others too. If I do not finish it tonight (which I doubt I will) I will continue working on it over the weekend. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 22:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please would you do me a favour and wait until I have finished editing the article before you add any more content. The "in use tag" is there so that other users do not edit whilst a user is working on an article. Your edit whilst adding more content only confused the article as it is and so for now I have reverted it until later. Thanks. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 00:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I have finished cleaning up the article now and have removed the "In use" tag. I have also added back in the information you added earlier today about "allies". You might need to check a couple of the wiki links though as two of them I was not totally sure they were the right football clubs. cheers, ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 02:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 2 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Kurylowka, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 22:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Despite you tried to offend me several times, I would like to explain myself at your talk one more time. This is not about me "denying" or saying that you write deliberately false articles. You are a strongly opinionated person and take some issues very close to heart and want the world know about certain things that the world was not informed of. That's as good a motivation to create content as any other. I just disagree with some of the ways of your presentations. I don't follow your edits and only run into your articles when prompted to them from elsewhere, like DYK suggestion page, noticeboards, links from other articles, etc. But another no less than myself experienced editor seems to try to help you in your first steps. He could have easily corrected a few easy to address things in your articles if he wanted. --Irpen 04:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

Updated DYK query On 11 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article football hooliganism in Poland , which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 talk 12:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Sometimes its better to just leave it. If somebody is very emotional instead of productive he will get into trouble. No need to be dragged down with him. --Molobo 15:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Movie on WWII Jewish Massacre Shocks Poles"

Check this out, Tymek: [4]. --Ludvikus 16:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agnieszka Arnold

Dear Tymek,

I believe that there are many, many, wonderful Polish people. And here's one living Pole I respect. I started a stub on this person just a moment ago. Can you help a little? Cheers. --Ludvikus 17:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the response

Tymek, thanks for clarifying the apology part in the article. Its really a shame that no official Ukrainian apology has been issued yet. But trust me, if many of us (including me) had our way, there would be an official apology. I am glad our nations have become good freinds. Thanks, Ostap 04:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

encouraging news

[5] Ostap 21:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

more: [6]. Ostap 21:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Przebraże Defence

Updated DYK query On 28 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Przebraże Defence, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 09:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: 1962 Szczecin military parade

Updated DYK query On 4 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1962 Szczecin military parade, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai 11:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ataki osobiste

Dostajesz ostatnie ostrzeżenie. Jeśli jeszcze raz mnie zaatakujesz na wikipedii pisząc kłamstwa że nie mam wiedzy, poniżając mnie każąc przeczytać mi książki itp. a także ogóle czepialstwo (pisanie o userze zamiast o temacie) to zgłoszę cię do zablokowania. Nie życzę sobie abyś się tak do mnie zachowywał. Masz inne zdanie niż ja, ja mam inne zdanie niż ty. To nie znaczy że mam zaczynać pisać posty od wycieczek na inne osoby. Nie odpisuj mi, powyższe nie jest dyskusją lecz komunikatem: już nie będę tolerował czepialstwa w stosunku do mojej osoby. EOT. LUCPOL 20:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On 17 November, 2007, a fact from the article Franciszek Jarecki, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pilsudski

Czescz Tymeczku, I wanted to let you know that as much as I appreciated your vote and comment at the Pilsudski FA vote, A very good article about one of (the) greatest Poles of all times, it would have been better to say (and more "neutral") that the article is "about one of the greatest Polish leaders of all times". IMHO, Jogaila comes in second place. That they were both Lithuanians from Lithuania, is not anything to be ashamed of. Dr. Dan (talk) 04:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template for deletion

See Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:Polish_Football_Cup_winners.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 19:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article incorporates text translated from the corresponding Polish Wikipedia article

Zamiast tego tekstu uzywaj szablonu {{Polish}}. Skladnia: [[Template:Polish|nazwa artykulu na pl wiki|data tlumaczenia]]. Pozdr, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 03:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. Tymek (talk) 05:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Notability of Jozef Batory

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jozef Batory, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jozef Batory seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jozef Batory, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 09:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost

I think you asked me about this: Template:Signpost-subscription. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost-subscription

Wesołych Świąt

Darwinek wishes you a Merry Christmas!

Cześć Tymek! Życzę wesołych Świąt Bożego Narodzenia i wszystkiego najlepszego w Nowym Roku. - Darwinek (talk) 11:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 22 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jerzy Wolkowicki, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Daniel 11:29, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Techniczne

Nie zapominaj o dodawaniu en interwiki na pl stronach artykulow ktore tlumaczysz :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 15:21, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Piotrus and friends, in the midsts of Wigilia, wish you to enjoy this Christmas Eve!

Happy New Year!

Riurik wishes you a Happy 2008!

--Riurik(discuss) 21:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should not be too late for DYKing, I'll nominate it soon. Thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

WikiThanks.
WikiThanks.

Please accept my sincere thanks. I’m moving your ultimate Barnstar of National Merit 1st Class to my user page. --Poeticbent talk 18:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your award

I am really humbled by your award. Have an excellent New Year ! --Molobo (talk) 00:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Pozdrowienia Tymek! Dzięki bardzo za miły podarunek, w ogóle się go nie spodziewałem. Życzę wszystkiego dobrego, trzymaj się. - Darwinek (talk) 20:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 8 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 49th Hutsul Rifle Regiment, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 23:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 9 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1951 Polish-Soviet territorial exchange, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 05:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 9 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Warsaw Armoured Motorized Brigade, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--The Placebo Effect (talk) 13:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tymek,

Thank you for the beautiful Barnstar of National Merit. I will always cherish it.

It is good to feel part of a community with shared aspirations.

Congratulations on your own fine work! Nihil novi (talk) 07:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 16 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1985 Zielinski brothers escape, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bookworm857158367 (talk) 03:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar

Thanks for the Barnstar Tymek! ;) Visor (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Barnstar

Ku chwale Ojczyzny i na pohybel naszym wrogom ! Mathiasrex (talk) 19:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naszym wrogom? Dr. Dan (talk) 19:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you have no enemies, then you have no friends. This is how I see it. As for degtine, well, Svyturis and Zhiguli beer is good too. Tymek (talk) 19:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gross

Hi Tymek, certainly I'm not offended. I believe it does not matter if we like the person or not. I think that in writing the encyclopedic article we should try to be neutral, stick to documented facts and try to avoid opinions. We do not need, and should not be trying to portray Gross as a "nice person" or a "vampire". I already think that article discusses too much about Jedwabne pogrom, and this should be discussed in the Jedwabne pogrom article itself rather than in Gross' bio. --Lysytalk 19:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History of Polish Jews

Tymek, I have worked to hard on this page digging out a lot of material, so have some respect. Don't change things because you think so or "you don't care" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacurek (talkcontribs) 17:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I went and protected the page, asking for the two of you to post regarding the matter on the talk page. If there's problems beyond that sentence as well let me know. Wizardman 19:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Cool, thanks. I do not even know what I did to deserve a barnstar. :-) --Lysytalk 20:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 1 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Biały Słoń, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 13:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


DYK

Updated DYK query On 3 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marian Gołębiewski (soldier), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

As always on such occasions I don't know what to say. Thank you very much! Space Cadet (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miś Uszatek

I love that cartoon. Thanks for creating the article. Ostap 01:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Wow, my first barnstar! Thanks!!--Kotniski (talk) 07:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miś Uszatek

Updated DYK query On 14 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Miś Uszatek, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miłosz

Tymek, kindly read the Czesław Miłosz article and the flak concerning (talk) Jan Dzierzon's ethnicity. Since I don't wish to start a mini revert war, maybe you can explain your rationale here, since you didn't bother to do so at the article. Do consider both Milosz's and Dzierzon's quotes concerning their ethnicities, and the great deal of information available concerning Milosz's origins. Dr. Dan (talk) 14:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

traveling circus

Cześć Tymek, who exactly is the traveling circus? Is it the anti-Polish editors, or the "use (what we think is) English" crowd? Regards, Ostap 21:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get the email I sent? It seems my emails always end up being deleted as spam. Ostap 21:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tireless Defender of Truth Barnstar

I, nihil novi, hereby award you this Tireless-Defender-of-Truth Barnstar in recognition of your indefatigable efforts in defense of truth against the forces of mendacity, obscurantism and pettiness. Your work is greatly appreciated. Nihil novi (talk) 02:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom are voting to apply discretionary sanctions across East European articles. Martintg (talk) 21:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well done

Updated DYK query On 24 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gwiazda Polski , which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Victuallers (talk) 16:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 24 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gwiazda Polski, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bookworm857158367 (talk) 16:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Gwiazda Polski is such an interesting article that I was informed twice about its DYK update. That has never happened to me before. Tymek (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The 25 DYK Medal
Awarded to Tymek for his contributions to Polish content on DYK. Well done!! Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 01:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Czortkow Uprising

Glad to help out. I'm not a native English speaker either, and I'm fully aware of the grammatical differences between for example Polish and English. Czortkow Uprising is an interesting article on a subject I haven't heard of before. Manxruler (talk) 01:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My edits weren't completely random, no. I'm a World War II historian, and I've had a certain interest for Polish 20th century history ever since reading a work on WWII by a Polish author like 15 years ago. Also, I've read quite a bit on the Polish Independent Highland Brigade which fought at the Battles of Narvik together with Polish naval ships such as ORP Grom. Manxruler (talk) 01:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's ok. I do that all the time myself. Manxruler (talk) 02:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And, of course, I noticed your article because I hang out at the nomination page for the DYKs to check out all the new articles. Manxruler (talk) 02:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thanks again for helping out. I am planning to write more, just check out my edits now and then if you have time. Tymek (talk) 02:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pidhirtsi Castle

Updated DYK query On 2 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pidhirtsi Castle, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 10:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On March 5, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Czortkow Uprising, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 03:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of interest

WikiProject football (soccer) report.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acquafresca

But he's always played for the Italian teams, from U17 to U21, and nobody would ever define Paolo Maldini an Italian-Venezuelan because of his mother's passport. Then, are you sure he actually speaks Polish? I am asking this since I failed to find any sort of source (in Italian and English) stating this. --Angelo (talk) 08:44, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you! Yes, I expect there will be. And thank you very much for your support. Biruitorul (talk) 04:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 26 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maritime and Colonial League‎, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 04:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On 6 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Antoni Czortek, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raz Dwa Trzy

Frankly speaking, I'm not a big fan of their music, but I haven't listened their whole discography yet. Maybe some recommendations? Visor (talk) 10:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

West Slavic WP

Great! Have a look at User:Hexagon1/WSWP where the interim project page is hosted and add some Polish featured articles and stuff if you can, and have a look at my greeting, I used "Witamy!" but I'm not sure that's declined properly, it's meant to be akin to "Welcome" or "Vítejte!". +Hexagon1 (t) 04:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 15 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alojzy Ehrlich, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 15:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gryf Torun

A tag has been placed on Gryf Torun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paste (talk) 17:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion, specifically #A7, with no assertations of notability. If you read that criterion, you'll see that the original article did not appear to make any claims, technical or reasonable. FYI, when starting a stub article, it's best to make sure you make clear the notable facts about the subject in the beginning. If you sufficiently address at least one of these right away in the beginning of the article, even without references, it can't be a legitimate candidate for speedy deletion. (For music-related topics, check out Wikipedia's criteria for music-related notability. Just so you know, CSD candidates need not undergo a discussion before deletion; hence the "speedy" part of it.) Dropping the deleting admin a note, as you did, or contacting another admin, are good ways to get the article back, if there's some reason to think the article can circumvent the CSD. No hard feelings? Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

prawda

You're a fan of punk rock right? Have you heard this song? [7] :) Ostap 04:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The whole album is about the Warsaw Uprising? Sounds very intereeting, I will have look into it. And this "Prawda" does appear Polish [8]. I had never heard of them either, I just came across that song. Ostap 18:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huta Pieniacka

Sorry. I have tried to be very careful. Bandurist (talk) 01:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK!

Updated DYK query On 26 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Huta Pieniacka massacre, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strange edits

Hi, Tymek, the article is called Racism and football, not Racism and communism so the info you are trying to push is clearly off-topic. And to call Never Again International an extreme organisation, sounds very similar to extreme-right rethoric too me.

P.S. chat with User:Krzyzowiec led me to discovery of Jan Mosdorf‎ article, which was created by you. May I suggest not to use Holocaust denial (IHR) and openly nationalistic portals (nacjonalista.pl) as reference here in Wiki. Cheers. M0RD00R (talk) 01:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your activities here remind me of contributions of user Krzyzowiec, with only one exeption - you represent a different POV. I will not accept so-called advice from extreme left-wing, anti-Polish POV-pusher as you. Cheers. BTW Nigdy Wiecej is not associated with Never Again International, read a little before you write lies. Tymek (talk) 01:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Of course you don't have to listen to my advice. But WP:NPA, WP:CIV, WP:AGF is a jolly good read. Take your time to read it, because clearly you are not familiar with it, or ignore those policies on purpose. Cheers. M0RD00R (talk) 01:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are left-wing, aren't you? You are an anti-Polish POV pusher, aren't you? Since when writing truth has become a personal attack? BTW I know where you are coming from, it must have been a shock for you to find out that a right-wing Polish politician died in Auschwitz for helping Jews. Strange world, isn't it? Tymek (talk) 01:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Śląska klasa A - 1921 - 1926 i puchary Fliegera

Cześć, Twoje arty na wiki są świetne i unikatowe, jak np. Lower Level Football Leagues in Interwar Poland. Właśnie chciałem zapytać jak to było z tą Klasą A na polskim Śląsku w międzywojniu, bo czytam tylko pośrednie teksty o tym (Enc. Gowarzewskiego o Ruchu) i nie mam pełnego obrazu jak to właściwie było. Pewien użytkownik na polskiej wiki pisał kiedyś, że już w 1921 próbowano przeprowadzić polskie mistrzostwo okręgu Górnego Śląska i prowadziła w nich Pogoń Katowice, ale wszędzie gdzie czytam, to przewija się stwierdzenie, że okręg ten powołano do życia dopiero w lutym 1922, w okręgowych mistrzostwach brało udział 38 drużyn w 4 grupach, ostatecznie wygrał Ruch, ale jak do tego doszło to nie wiem. Druga edycja śląskiej klasy A rozpoczęła się jeszcze w 1922 a skończyła już przed wiosną 1923, takie jesień-zima, a mistrzem została Iskra Siemianowice. Jesienią zreorgenizowano rozgrywki, bo doszło kilka klubów z niemieckich rozgrywek, do klasy A dołączyły katowickie Diana i 1.FC. W 1924 klasę A rozegrano dopiero po Igrzyskach Olimpijskich, jesienią, a dokończono w styczniu roku następnego (zaległe mecze), wygrał AKS i za to grał w MP w 1925. W 1925 nie było klasy A, za to był Puchar Stanisława Fliegera, w finale w styczniu 1926 wygrał Ruch i za to zagrał w pierwszej edycji Pucharu Polski w 1926. W 1926 rozegrano też po roku przerwy klasę A, wygrał Ruch, a jeszcze pod koniec 1926 roku odbył się znowu Puchar Stanisława Fliegera i znowu wygrał Ruch. Tak to było? Dałoby radę jakoś to zebrać, poprawić i coś skrobnąć w powyższym artykule? :) Pozdrawiam, D_T_G (PL) 18:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ciekawe archiwum! Oj, będzie sobie na czym popsuć wzrok ;) Ale tak wracając do tego artykułu o ligach okręgowych w międzywojniu to po oczach rzuca się tam czerwony link Koszarawa Żywiec, gdy tymczasem artykuł na pl-wiki pl:Koszarawa Żywiec jest całkiem, całkiem. Na prawdę nie wiedziałem, że grali w lidze śląskiej... ciekawe czy jakieś inne kluby z małopolskiego też grały, z Białej może... Pozdrawiam, D_T_G (PL) 22:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Threats

Hi! I need to complain about the threats and inexplicable arch-hostile behaviour of user LUCPOL towards me:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:81.106.128.119

He wrote it in Polish, but I do not know why I should be bullied without any reason here... How can I officially reprot this??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.128.119 (talk) 10:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for granting me a barnstar

You made my day, Tymek! Appreciate it. greg park avenue (talk) 01:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Massacres of Poles in Volhynia

This article is short of references in lead - please add appropriate references otherwise any statement that is challenged can be deleted. Bobanni (talk) 20:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We do not add references to every sentence, this would not make sense. Please specify what you dislike and then I will do my best. Tymek (talk) 20:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zygmunt Jan Rumel

You wrote

Hi, since you are a poet yourself, perhaps you would like to take a look and help with the article about this unknown poet, Zygmunt Rumel. Thanks. Tymek (talk) 20:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done An interesting article. I had fun improving it. Do remember to put it up for WP:DYK. Cheers. --Poeticbent talk 06:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks man, good job! I have already nominated it for DYK. Tymek (talk) 16:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wawelberg Group

Hi Tymek. Nice article. Thanks for thinking about me. Once again I came across your work when I looked around the DYK noms, your Polish military history articles really are quite interesting. Keep up the fine work. As I'm sure you don't mind I'll have a look and see if there's anything more in the article that I can edit. Manxruler (talk) 19:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, what Polish Legions are you referring to? The WWI ones or the inter-war ones? Manxruler (talk) 19:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Having looked at the Polish source for the Polish Legion fact, I assume it refers to the WWI legions. Correct me if I'm wrong. Manxruler (talk) 19:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. See: Polish Legions. They're talking about various units during WWI, the interbellum and WWII. Manxruler (talk) 19:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 24 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Action Hyacinth, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Olaf Davis | Talk 09:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zygmunt Rumel

Updated DYK query On 26 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zygmunt Rumel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]



Racism in association football

Hi, regarding this article, please can you and M0RD00R start a discussion at WP:FOOTBALL regarding the POV rather than simply continually counter each other's edits. Regards, GiantSnowman 12:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Wawelberg Group

Updated DYK query On 28 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wawelberg Group, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 16:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Andrzej Kurylewicz

A tag has been placed on Andrzej Kurylewicz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ziggy Sawdust 20:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you may have seen already, I have declined to delete this article speedily, as there is a clear assertion of notability. Regards, BencherliteTalk 20:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melomani

Updated DYK query On 8 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Melomani, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Post

On Lukas Podolski and Miroslav Klose: yes, Klose said he felt a German. Yes, Klose's family and the Jesch family (maternal family of Miroslav Klose) were subjected to Polonization with force. You can already see that in the name: "Kloze" in Polish administration, but changed back to the original "Josef Klose" by his father in 1986 in West Germany. You say you do not want an edit war, but you keep changing things such as "Opole" not being allowed to be called "Oppeln", while it officially is a bilingual community with bilingual rights under Polish law even. This is not 1970 communist Poland, and your edits are unwanted. Yes, Klose said he felt a German in the interview. But of course due to the Communist Polish pressure against ethnic Germans of Silesia, he was forced to be raised in the Polish language, otherwise they might have faced reprisals. By the way, I like Poland and the Polish people and Polish culture and Royal Polish history, but not the silly 19th century extreme forms of nationalism found among Poles. Klose and Podolski are German Silesians with much Slavic Silesian and Polish influences too. But Herbert Hupka is not "Polish" either, just because his last name sounds Slavic Silesian, either. Let's stop the edits bakc and forth and read the sources in Der Spiegel and other history. I do not care what they choose, but if they consider themselves as Germans, they are Germans. Not what Poles would like them to be. The late Adam Ledwon (r.i.p.) was a German Silesian in reality too, but he felt more Polish, as he is German by ancestry, but raised in schools and society of Communist Poland. Stay to the facts....Smith2006 (talk) 14:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Howard Webb

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you.--John (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, edit wars are not good, but enlighten me and tell what is going on. Words of Croatian ambassador, uttered publicly on TV and properly cited, are not relevant? So what is relevant? Tymek (talk) 17:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest taking it to Talk:Howard Webb. Per WP:BLP it needs a better source and a talk page consensus before it can be considered for inclusion. --John (talk) 17:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted your first edit as you know having also posted on my talk page. As per comments by John your edit was potentially libelous and against WP:BLP and as such should be removed immediately. What's more the source was not in the English language and was not a well known source. Comments from a Croatian Ambassador even if to Poland are non-consequential in the scheme of thingsTmol42 (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. I'm watching the game too and rooting for the Poles!Tmol42 (talk) 18:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fortified Area of Silesia DYK

Updated DYK query On 17 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fortified Area of Silesia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When making controversial reverts on a contentious article, please use an edit summary and contribute to the talk page. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 04:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was my edit controversial? In what way? And do I have to explain all my edits on talk pages? Thank you. Tymek (talk) 22:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Given that there was a heated discussion between a number of editors in which you did not participate, yes, I'd say your edit was controversial. Did you not read the talk page before you made that edit? If not, why did you revert an edit marked as reverting original research? It would have been a good idea to use the talk page or the edit summary to explain why you thought it was not original research, or if you concurred that it was in fact original research, why you were restoring an edit that violated WP policy. In any circumstance, it is always a good idea to use an edit summary. Gamaliel (talk) 22:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is your opinion that my edit was controversial, in my opinion it was not. And yes, I read the talk page, a little good faith would be nice, as this is one of key policies. Tymek (talk) 22:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I assume your edit was made in good faith. I merely ask you to explain the reasoning behind this good faith edit for the benefit of other editors, especially when you involve yourself in an ongoing, heated edit war. I ask nothing that is not considered a regular, accepted editing practice on Wikipedia. Gamaliel (talk) 23:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for assuming good faith, it is better than before. Now, a question. Is there a policy that says I have to explain my edits on talk pages of articles and participate in discussions there? Otherwise, you do ask a thing that is not considered a regular practice. Tymek (talk) 23:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I find it difficult to believe that you have been editing Wikipedia for two years and do not know it is standard, accepted practice to encourage the use of edit summaries and article talk pages, especially when making controversial edits in a heated edit war. If you are somehow simply unaware of this, then let me assure you that this is indeed the case and I strongly encourage you to use edit summaries and talk pages from now on. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 23:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for encouragement, it means a lot to me. Now, is it an official policy or not? And please, do not stop assuming good faith, I have been editing for two years, and nobody has ever came up to me with messages like those. Tymek (talk) 23:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see where I have not assumed good faith. I assume all your edits were made in good faith, I merely seek to get you to adhere to standard Wikipedia practices that encourage collaboration between editors of good faith. And I note that WP:AGF is a guideline, not a policy, but it is something we encourage of all contributors nonetheless. Gamaliel (talk) 23:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So now we understand each other. Good. Thanks Tymek (talk) 23:56, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV-pushing

You wrote
Looks like it is cool for most Eastern European editors (except for Poles) to POV-push whatever they want, and at the same time to call Poles POV-pushers without even being warned. Sad but true. Molobo is a great loss, too bad. Tymek (talk) 23:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful

And don't approach 3RR. Or you will end up where Molobo is. Let the other side edit war and deal with them like they try to deal with you: smartly. PS. For reverting IPs, see WP:CHECKUSER.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I did not even notice I had crossed the 3RR. It is hopeless to discuss with editors backed by a swarm of anons of mercy, who come out of nowehere. Tymek (talk) 16:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Djiękuje

Thanks for your nice comment at Talk:Lukas Podolski. BTW, did you notice that the Turkish national team has two players born and raised in Germany?

Sca (talk) 20:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I know about the Turks, and in 2002 Korea-Japan almost half of their team was born or raised in Germany. I will be rooting for Germany tomorrow. Greetings. Tymek (talk) 20:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 26 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 104th Company of Syndicalists, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lwów (ship)

Updated DYK query On 28 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lwów (ship), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 14:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Raids on communist prisons in Poland (1944-1946)

Thanks, thats the exact way to explain a lay man. I like it - since World War II is my interest area. Keep up the good work. --gppande «talk» 19:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cold War

Hi, Tymek. You know much more about this than I do, so could I please ask your opinion on this edit? Also, feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cold War. Biruitorul Talk 21:28, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raids on communist prisons in Poland (1944-1946)

Updated DYK query On 2 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Raids on communist prisons in Poland (1944-1946), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 08:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stanisław Pyjas

Updated DYK query On 5 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stanisław Pyjas, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do insert polemics etc.

Please do not insert polemics or advertise for revert-buddies. Thanks. Jayjg (talk) 01:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because the banned editor Jacurek, as in all his edits, it trying to blame the victims, and in particular is placing undue weight on carefully chosen anecdotes from a polemical work written by a sociologist, not a historian. On top of that, half the paragraph isn't even sourced. Jayjg (talk) 02:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't play games. You are restoring work authored by a banned editor, and the material in question is mostly unsourced, and the rest, as stated, is sourced to cherry-picked anecdotes in a polemical work by a sociologist, not a historian. Jayjg (talk) 02:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to discuss this issue further, please take the discussion to the relevant article talk page. Jayjg (talk) 03:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1939

Why do you write about unknown people (in Births)? Red links should be removed.Xx236 (talk) 06:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What does unknown mean? Anyway, at the beginning, whole Wikipedia consisted of red links. Give it some time man. Tymek (talk) 17:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help

Hejka Tymek! I have a kind request to you. Last year you greatly helped with translation of Płyniesz Olzo po dolinie poem. This summer I would like to expand several articles about Zaolzie writers and poets and include several short excerpts from their works. Can I ask you then for a help with more smooth translation? Thanks. P.S. Jan Kubisz is the first one but quote in his article seems it doesn't need better translation. - Darwinek (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Super, spróbuj proszę więc ten króciutki wiersz Adolfa Fierli:
Kopalnie
Zwiedzałem dzisiaj boży świat
Ukorzon i błagalnie;
I z oczu rzęśne spadły łzy
Płynące nieprzerwalnie,
Gdyż wszystkich wiosek cichy łan
Zmieniono na kopalnie.
Zwiedzałem cichy zagon dziś
Gdzie dawniej rosły kwiaty,
I gdzię się baran z owcą pasł
Przy ścieżce obok chaty,
A gdzie dziś zamiast prostych traw
Dzień krwawej ryczy spłaty.
Stanąłem dzisiaj w szybu próg
W udręki dusznej chwili,
Gdy czarni od spiekoty prac
Do sztolni się spuścili.
I duszą targnął suchy ból:
Potrzaskanego wynosili...

Chciałbym nominować do DYKa. Wielkie dzięki! - Darwinek (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, świetna robota, już wkleiłem. Wielkie dzięki, Radegastów możemy dać kilka, RC jest chyba najtańszym krajem w UE jeśli chodzi o piwko. Dolar (20 koron) za 0.5 l w knajpie. Poza tym dłużę Ci jeszcze jednego browarka za Olzę. Na pewno kiedyś wpadnij, w takim razie daj znać do przodu. - Darwinek (talk) 19:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Teraz kolej na Pawła Kubisza i jego DYKa. Kubisz to jeden z najważniejszych poetów zaolziańskich, burzyciel numer jeden. Pisał często gwarą, ale na pewno zrozumiesz. Słowo rzymkocić oznacza wydawanie głośnych dzwięków, hałasowanie. Oto fragment, o którego tłumaczenie Cię proszę:

Twardo, silno, uporczywie -
Chcym rzymkocić słowym w gniywie,
Chcym buntować, sie... przeklinać
W ziąb i boleść słowa scinać!
W poszarpaniu całej duszy,
Wszystko w bezpamięć rozkruszyć,
Strzaskać, zburzyć, potarasić -
W nic ostatni czuci zgasić!

Wielkie dzięki! Nagroda to trzeci Radegast :). Artykuł o Kubiszu wydłużę lada chwila, już mam wersję roboczą w sandboksie. - Darwinek (talk) 17:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jest świetnie! Już zedytowałem artykuł, możesz zajrzeć i przeczytać, los Kubisza i jego życie są dla Zaolzia całkiem charakterystyczne. Jeżeli chodzi o tłumaczenia, to w następnych dniach-tygodniu poproszę jeszcze o przetłumaczenie fragmentów Jasiczka, Przeczka i Wawrosza a potem dam Ci znów spokój na cały boski rok. :) - Darwinek (talk) 19:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article was just created on the 21st. For a time Law and Justice was on there listed as far right extremists! You might want to have a look at it. Ostap 05:01, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are right its just a place for axe grinding. Do you think afd? Ostap 01:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Cześć. Proszę teraz o krótki fragment wierszu obozowego Gustawa Przeczka.

Kij do krwi smaga przygięte plecy,
W brzuch kopie ciężki but -
Psem tylko jesteś i numer znaczysz,
Dłoń twą kolczasty skował drut.
O straszną śmierć się ocierasz co dzień,
Zbrodniczy gaz cię zwala z nóg,
Straciłeś siebie - a w ciągłym głodzie
We mgle się stracił dobry Bóg.

Chciałbym nominować do DYKa. Normalnie nie mam problemów z tłumaczeniem cytatów, ale do poezji brakuje mi lepszego angielskiego. Wielkie dzięki. - Darwinek (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jest dobrze, Poeticbent przetłumaczył. - Darwinek (talk) 08:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obórki

Hi Lysy, where did you find info that massacre in Oborki was perpetrated by the Germans? Look here [9] and here [10]. I hope you have no doubts and you will restore it. Tymek (talk) 05:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. First of all, allow me for a general comment on the article: I'm sure you'll agree that with such a sensitive issue, we have to be very careful with the selection of sources. Recent research and publications bring new developments and it's important to remember that the opinions expressed 20 years ago may be negated by recent findings. Generally, the article suffers from poor sources selection, web pages, press articles, older or politically motivated publications. I think we should try to stick to recent publications of professional historians where possible.
Back to Obórki pacification, first let me note that both links you provide confirm that the action was conducted by Ukrainian police, not by UPA. Ukrainian police was under German command, even the webpage of wachowscy.com that you provided confirms that the action was "commanded by a German". It also does not states whether the actual shooting was done by Germans or Ukrainians but says: "jeden z oprawców strzelał ofierze w tył głowy". As for Piotrowski, while I generally value his works, in this case he does not provide a detailed account of what happened, and only generally mentions the incident. On the other hand Polish historians such as Grzegorz Motyka of IPN or Andrzej Sowa of Jagiellonian University state that not only the action was commanded by Germans but also Germans personally murdered the Poles. This is confirmed by Feliks Trusiewicz. You may note, that the villagers were herded and murdered in Trusiewicz's barn. I'll add relevant references to the article. Here is e.g. what Sowa writes: "W historiografii polskiej winą za większość z tych represji obciążano nacjonalistów ukraińskich", and: "Tak też było w wypadku mordu, dokonanego 13 i 14 listopada 1942 r. na 53 osobach w Obórkach w pow. łuckim, gdzie pacyfikacja przeprowadzana była przez policję ukraińską, ale egzekucji osobiście dokonywali nadzorujący ją Niemcy". I hope that explains the situation. --Lysytalk 10:06, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I've seen the page before, thanks. --Lysytalk 05:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, you've removed a large part of the article with this edit. --Lysytalk 00:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Battle of Saint Anne's Mountain

Ciekawy artykul. Mozesz spokojnie sam nominowac, to jest przyjete. Stworzylem kategorie o powstaniu - przydaloby sie wykorzystac w innych artykulach (Category:Silesian Uprisings); artykul o bitwie trzeba z linkowac z innych bo na razie jest orphan.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polish First League

Hi Tymek. In this edit, you added a statement that all clubs in the league "must have professional status". Do you have a reference for this, like from the league itself or the PZPN? I don't mind if it's on Polish. Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ 57 08:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's great thanks. пﮟოьεԻ 57 21:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Usunąłęś połowę artykułu, przypuszczam że przypadkowo.Xx236 (talk) 07:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

Proposed deletion of 1939 in Poland

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 1939 in Poland, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RayAYang (talk) 00:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 6 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Annaberg, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 14:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Masterpiece2000

Hello, Tymek. I noticed that you've contributed heavely to Poland-related articles. I'm not from Poland, but I'm interested in Poland-related articles. I also noticed that you are a member of WikiProject Poland. I created Category:WikiProject Poland participants. Why don't you add the category on your user page? Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huta Stepanska

Hello! I just wanted to commend you on your excellent article about Huta Stepanska. I enjoyed reading your work. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK 12/8

Updated DYK query On 12 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Huta Stepanska, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:41, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed it to Huta Stepanska, as this is the article written and nominated by me. Tymek (talk) 03:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Odp

Nie ma sprawy. Poeticbent juz przetlumaczyl, co bylo trzeba. Teraz koncentruje sie na Olimpiade a potem i tak nie wiem, czy wroce do artykulow o Zaolziu, bo bede wyjezdzal w pazdzierniku. Tak na marginesie wielkie dzieki za nowe artykuly o polskich sportowcach. Tylko uwazaj na nazewnictwo, bo "athlete" tutaj oznacza lekkoatlete. Trzymaj jutro kciuki siatkarzom i szczypiornistom. Masz mozliwosc ogladac mecze Polakow w Chicago? - Darwinek (talk) 20:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 24 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jerzy Sosnowski, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Another one in the bag! :) - Mailer Diablo 03:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you heard this yet? Ostap 06:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

[11] --Koretek (talk) 12:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren (talk) 22:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

15th August 1943 Polish raid against Germanisation of Pisza

Sure you can write about it. I will improve if it is needed. Right now I am focusing on 1939 mass murder by Germans in Poland.--Molobo (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL warning--Show me the diffs

Show me the diffs indicating that I see "all Poles as antisemites" as you claimed here. If you cannot supply the diffs, I will have to ask you to cease making such defamatory claims, or I will have to take steps through the proper channels to ensure that you xease making such defamatory, blatantly false claims. thank you. Boodlesthecat Meow? 04:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, I assume you cannot find any diffs indicating where I ever said "all Poles as antisemites." thank you for your apology. Boodlesthecat Meow? 15:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on my talk. Boodlesthecat Meow? 15:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting of sourced info

What are you referring to. Boodlesthecat Meow? 17:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL warning

Please note, regarding your malicious and false claim of vandalism here and here, that I was in themiddle of fixing refs that had gotten unformatted. This occurred while I was correcting mistaken author attributions in the refs Piotrus added. In the middle, a bot came in, causing a bit of confusion. While I was further attempting a fix, you jumped in within four minutes with and uncivil, malicious and bogus charge of "vandalism."

Please note that, asscording to WP:CIVIL, one form of incivility is "Referring to other editors' good-faith changes as vandalism". You have made endless false charges regarding my edits recentlty, including malicious and bogus claims (wghich you cannot back up) that I have consider "all Poles antisemites."

I request that you cease your ongoing harassment with these bogus, malicious and defamatory claims immediately. It will no longer be tolerated. Boodlesthecat Meow? 18:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus. Your interrupted the editing I was doing, which included fixing the refs. If you would like to apologize for your personal attack, you may. If not, I will probably report you for your ongoing incivility. Boodlesthecat Meow? 18:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL warning

Please don't use the 3RR forum as a way of harrassing editors, as you did here. It is another violation of WP:CIVIL on your part. Use the article talk page if you have issues about edits. And please read 3RR policy, and try to understand the difference between an edit and a revert. Boodlesthecat Meow? 05:35, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I consider this message as a very uncivil one. I am not harrasing you, I simply wanted the administrators noticeboard to pay attention to an edit war being waged on this page. I will continue doing whataver I think is necessary to improve the quality of the project. And kindly assume good faith. Tymek (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good faith is a two way street. Boodlesthecat Meow? 01:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

9/08/08 DYK

Updated DYK query On 8 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Collegiate church in Wiślica, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! -- RyRy (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Klodzko Fortress

Hey, just saw this article on new page patrol; it looks fantastic! Congratulations on coming up with such a stunning piece as a first draft :). Ironholds 19:40, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will do :). I was going to put a bit up for DYK until I saw you had. Have you considered archiving your talkpage, btw? It's a bit long. Ironholds 03:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kłodzko Fortress

Updated DYK query On 15 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kłodzko Fortress, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of interest

TS Koszarawa 1910 Żywiec - seems in need of copyediting (starts as historical, goes into modern? confusing...).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:23, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Markot

A tag has been placed on Markot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongomatic (talk) 06:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree, please see discussion at Talk:Markot.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a personal favor, any expantion to Szczyrzyc-related articles would be nice - that's where half of my family is from :) Think you could expand the Szczyrzyc County to a DYK quality? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 14:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tadeusz Kowalski: Between 1912-1928, football player of the Black Lvov team. Seems like your area of expertise? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 00:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, obviously, it it Czarni Lwow. Tymek (talk) 02:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Zamość Fortress

Updated DYK query On 6 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zamość Fortress, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for First mass transport to Auschwitz concentration camp

Updated DYK query On 7 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article First mass transport to Auschwitz concentration camp, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Origins of word Zydokomuna

Read this where it clearly shows you are mistaken in your claim. Would you please correcxt your wrror, as it clearly contradicts multiple sources. Boodlesthecat Meow? 03:58, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request

Marvelous, thanks.

By the by, I've been thinking about suggesting a bot to collate untranslated articles from other Wikis and put them in one big database on this one - I think the current translation request system needs some work. Would you be interested in such a proposal? --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 19:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning WP:CIVIL

Regarding this edit, where you tell me to "Please leave your opinion of the Institute to yourself." I provided sources for "my opinion" on this matter. Do not ever again tell me to not post comments with sources on this encyclopedia again. Boodlesthecat Meow? 00:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You presented defamatory opinion about a public instiution of Polish government. This opinion was unrelated to the discussion. If you have problems with understanding my point, I cannot do anything about it. This message is another example of your lack of manners and uncivility. Tymek (talk) 02:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So file a lawsuit against Haaretz and Professor Grabowski, who I sourced for this supposed "defamatory" information. Please look up defamatory. It might help you avoid having to receive WP:CIVIL warnings in the future. Boodlesthecat Meow? 02:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And what does this criticism have to do with massacre of Brzostowica Mala? Tymek (talk) 02:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Read what is already written on the AfD. The criticism is a commentary on the potential quality of the IPN as a source. It is a government agency, not an academic source. Government agencies, particularly prosecutorial ones, are not considered the most reliable of sources for historical articles. And in additon, as I cited, the IPN has been criticized for having a right wing nationliats POV. Boodlesthecat Meow? 03:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I got it now. Next time, whenever I want to supply a source to an article, I will ask you if the source has been criticized by Haaretz or Grabowski. This should be a common policy of Wikipedia. Only sources approved by Haaretz and Grabowski please. Those sources criticized by Haaretz are void. Tymek (talk) 15:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you have a counter-view regarding sources, feel free to express it. However, as I stated above, do not order me to "keep my opinions to myself," especially on a page like an AfD, where editors give opinions based on a reading of sources, among other things. Boodlesthecat Meow? 15:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation again

Dang it, forgot to reply yesterday. Thanks very, very much - you did a fine job with it. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 19:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Many thanks and much appreciated! —PētersV (talk) 02:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Romans xii. 20.

Polish politics

All Polish political articles need to be cleaned of POV. If you have time, would you like to help me go through this category (and the subcategories) and probably also this category and add some reality? I want to try to do it, but of course your help and expertise would be greatly appreciated and needed. Ostap 00:51, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Lets consider it as a wikipedia "task force". Certain articles are full of obvious POV, and yet others have no mention of criticism or scandal or controvresy. They lack balance. Ostap 23:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my. This is far worse than I thought. Ostap 00:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

50 DYK Medal

The 50 DYK Medal
Congratulations on your well-written Polish-related articles, which time and again has been featured on the Main Page. The DYK and Polish community is proud of your achievements! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 02:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's that time of year again

I've created Soviet repressions. Currently, it is just a stub, but it's an important and well-documented topic, so it should have no trouble at all.

You've been working on related topics before — perhaps you'd like to help? ΔιγουρενΕμπρος! 17:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Market Square (Lviv)

Updated DYK query On 5 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Market Square (Lviv), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 10:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tadeusz Isakowicz-Zaleski

Updated DYK query On 11 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tadeusz Isakowicz-Zaleski, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:):):)

All good, nice to hear from you. :)--Jacurek (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pilchowa

Dzieki za artykul. Spoko, tylko Ostrawa, ani ta wioska nie wchodza w sklad Zaolzia geograficznie. -- Darwinek (talk) 11:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gazeta Polska – źródło

Dzień dobry Tymku! Mamy mały problem w polskiej Wikipedii, a zupełnie nieświadomie stałeś się jego sprawcą. Otóż 18 kwietnia dodałeś do hasła Huta Pieniacka massacre artykuł "Opowieść o zamordowanej wiosce" ("Story of a murdered village"), article by Wojciech Orlowski, published on April 9, 2008 in Gazeta Polska weekly. Po pewnym czasie dokładnie po tej edycji [12] artykuł stał się źródłem informacji jako przypis [7] (nie rozimiem jak to możliwe, bo w kodzie cały czas jest {ref|Ilyushyn}, ale nie do końca znam mechanizmy Wikipedii). To samo źródło i informacja, jako wiarygodne, zostały dopisane do hasła w polskiej wersji masakra w Hucie Pieniackiej. Nikt nie zna treści artykułu, ponieważ jest niedostępny w sieci i trudno jest konflikt rozwiązać. Czy mógłbyś potwierdzić lub zaprzeczyć na ile treść artykułu pozwala na użycie go jako źródła, że według historyków ukraińskich odpowiedzialny za masakrę jest batalion policji niemieckiej. Będę wdzięczna jeśli odpiszesz mi na mojej polskiej stronie dyskusji. Pozdrawiam serdecznie Łeba (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Agnieszka Pilchowa

Updated DYK query On 23 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agnieszka Pilchowa, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

19:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Tymek. You have new messages at Mariah-Yulia's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Tymek.

Just wondering if you are aware about this: [[13]]--Jacurek (talk) 19:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please post in your own section

I removed your response from my section, per the rules. Please feel free to post your reply in your own section. Regards, Boodlesthecat Meow? 20:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving time

Tymek, I think you may want to archive your talk page. See WP:ARCHIVE.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For your userpage

You may want to use WP:BABEL language boxes and other userboxes.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged cooperation with Communist Security Service (Walesa)

Hi Tymek, I added this[[14]] to Walesa page. Please revue.--Jacurek (talk) 00:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering what is your opinion

[[15]]--Jacurek (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for K%C5%82omino

Updated DYK query On 17 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kłomino, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 23:13, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Murder of Jan Pawel Pietrzak

Updated DYK query On 19 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Murder of Jan Pawel Pietrzak, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The remedies that have been adopted are as follows;

(A) That discussing an issue on IRC necessarily excludes those editors who do not use IRC from the discussion (and excludes almost all non-administrators from the discussion if it takes place in #wikipedia-en-admins), and therefore, such IRC discussion is never the equivalent of on-wiki discussion or dispute resolution;
(B) That the practice of off-wiki "block-shopping" is strongly deprecated, and that except where there is an urgent situation and no reasonable administrator could disagree with an immediate block (e.g., ongoing blatant or pagemove vandalism or ongoing serious BLP violations), the appropriate response for an administrator asked on IRC to block an editor is to refer the requester to the appropriate on-wiki noticeboard; and
(C) That even though the relationship between the "wikipedia" IRC channels and Wikipedia remains ambiguous, any incidents of personal attacks or crass behavior in #wikipedia-en-admins are unwelcome and reflect adversely on all users of the channel.
  • Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will open a general request for comments regarding the arbitration enforcement process, particularly where general sanctions are concerned. Having received such comments, the Committee will consider instituting suitable reforms to the enforcement process.
  • Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will convene a community discussion for the purpose of developing proposed reforms to the content dispute resolution process.
  • Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will publish guides to presenting evidence and using the workshop page.

Please see the above link to read the full case.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 10:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Merry XMAS from User:Piotrus. 12:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bóg się rodzi

Updated DYK query On 25 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bóg się rodzi, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 05:52, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1981 demonstrations

Hi, Tymek, and Happy New Year! (Maybe using diacritics could be a New Year's resolution?) Anyway, no worries on that. On the substantive issues: as far as I know, it's quite difficult to formally leave the RCC - either excommunication or a declaration before a bishop; otherwise the Church considers one to still be a member. Of course, in surveys, former Catholics can still answer something other than "Catholic". In any case, I've found three estimates (20 million Polish Catholics in 1939 (though of course within different borders), 30 million in 1978 and 34.4 million in 2003) - by whatever measure, the RCC was clearly larger than Solidarity. So I agree with your change (perhaps "non-religious" should become "secular", but either is fine). At first glance, the other article looks OK too, but I'll make some minor fixes as time permits. Anyway, it's great that you're chronicling these events - the '80s were a pretty miserable time in Eastern Europe (I only know the Poland of those days through the films of Kieślowski, though) - not at the traumatic level of the early Stalinist period perhaps, but every bit as awful for the human soul - the gray, grinding misery of the command economy heaving its last breaths. Thank God it's all over. - Biruitorul Talk 03:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While the contempt for dissenting opinions shown by those MEPs is indeed chilling, I think eventually this farce called the EU will unravel - in a democratic system (which it still is, more or less), you can only go so far with these sorts of games before the people have had enough. I think 2009 could be a very bad year for the EU (and consequently a very good year for the rest of us): our friend Mr Klaus will do all he can to mess up the proceedings; turnout at the June "elections" will be pitifully low; the German election could cause some nice distraction; the financial crisis could lead to Greece-like riots in Spain, Italy and elsewhere, further undermining the Euro; and the shadow of Lisbon will hang over everything - I predict (rather boldly at present) that Lisbon will fail, throwing the machine even further into crisis.
A bit of a plug: if you don't already, you should look at EU Referendum, at least when there's big EU-related news. Two recent posts to whet your appetite; indeed the second is worth quoting:
"By such tiny, barely-reported steps, each separated by many years, does the process gradually ensnare us so that, decades later, we look up and ask 'how the hell did we get into this mess?' By then it is too late.
"The genius of engrenage, though, is that nobody notices. Each step can be justified, in isolation, on apparently good grounds – as long as no one understands that it is a process, and the end point is economic and then political integration. By such means are we thus enslaved."
(For a fuller explanation of engrenage, see here, here & here. Oh, and sorry for the completely off-topic post!) - Biruitorul Talk 05:07, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1981 warning strike in Poland

Updated DYK query On January 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1981 warning strike in Poland, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Keep up the good work! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 17:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, amazing a strike that big didn't have an article. Thanks :) --gren グレン 20:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Summer 1981 hunger demonstrations in Poland

Updated DYK query On January 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Summer 1981 hunger demonstrations in Poland, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lublin 1980 strikes

Updated DYK query On January 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lublin 1980 strikes, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 22:54, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UPA

Witaj, macie w angielskiej Wiki niezłe artykuły o UPA. U nas niestety nie da się tego tak obiektywnie sformułować wystarczy poczytać edycje Birczanina, który nawet zaprzecza, że UPA była formacją nacjonalistyczną. Udało się jednak stworzyć parę artów o zbrodniach UPA, może dałbyś radę je wrzucić do angielskiej Wiki? Są tu i tu. No i fajnie by było jakbyś nas wsparł na polskiej Wiki, prawda musi się w końcu przebić. Odpowiedz tu. Pozdrawiam--Paweł5586 (talk) 09:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hej, da się tu stworzyć brudnopis? Nie bardzo orientuje się w angielskich realiach:)--Paweł5586 (talk) 09:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poles in Nowogródek Voivodeships

I hope you can clarify this with the inline refs you used to create this article, see this.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 07:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify, with a proper inline cites, which numbers (the sentence that begins with "According to the..." or "Its total 1931 population was..." or both) can be sourced to that yearbook? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jastrzebie-Zdroj 1980 strikes

Updated DYK query On January 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jastrzebie-Zdroj 1980 strikes, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 07:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

late thank you

Two months after, I thank you for this. Ostap 02:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Urban demographics for Second Polish Republic

Perhaps the MRS from 1939 would have some useful numbers for this? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Could you add references to the numbers you added? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Polish Population 1939

There was no 1939 Statistical Handbook published in Poland, the last one published before the war was in 1938. In 1941 the Polish government in London published a handbook of statistics. I have a photocopy. They list the 8/31/39 estimated population including Zalolzie as 35,339,00. I always try to have a printed copy of the sources I cite.--Woogie10w (talk) 00:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC) I checked the figures, Without Zalolzie on Jan 1, 1939 the population was 34,849,000, with Zalolzie 35,100,000. On Aug 31, 1939 the population without Zalolzie was 35,100,000 and with Zalolozie 35,339,000. The population of Zalolzie was 240,000 and the estimated natural increase in the population for all of Poland from Jan-Aug 1939 was 250,000. I hope this helps.--Woogie10w (talk) 02:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That 1939 edition never made to the west, in any case you see how the confusion arose. Zalolzie had 240,000 and the natural increase from Jan-Dec 39 was 250,000. In any case historians outside of Poland never include Zalolzie with Poland, just like the Sudetenland is not considered part of Germany. It is considered occupied Czech territory--Woogie10w (talk) 10:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

You were mentioned and thanked by Greg in his final remark (I just found about it today by accident). Read his post here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you could quickly add inline citations, you could T:TDYK it... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 15:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a new category for SURVIVORS of the Holocaust

Hi Tymek: Regarding the two CfDs at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 12#Category:Holocaust victims and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 12#Category:Nazi concentration camp victims, while I agree that the categories need to be sharpened, but if they are going to become categories about people who DIED only in Category:People who died in The Holocaust and Category:People who died in Nazi concentration camps respectively, then in all fairness and following good logic and historiography, following that reasoning, there should now therefore be two categories. ONE for those who DIED and one for those survivors who LIVED such as Category:Holocaust victims who survived and Category:Survivors of Nazi concentration camps that would allow for that. I am positive you will agree and kindly take a look at the two above CfD discussions again and note that that should be so, that both those who died and those who survived and lived, and who were/are of course notable, such as Elie Wiesel; Joel Teitelbaum; Yekusiel Yehudah Halberstam and many others that I know as being important to Jewish history, and there are many others like this from many other groups. It would be a great shame and travesty if those names were expunged only "because" they survived and escaped the fate the Nazis had wanted for them by having lived and not died in the Holocaust and/or the death and concentration camps. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 06:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miroslav Klose

Hello, I need your help with the Miroslav Klose article. The article clearly states "Klose himself said in a recent interview to Przegląd Sportowy that it would be best for him not to be called German or Polish, but European". When I changed "German" to "European" my edits were instantly reverted without any real explination. Many German posters insist on listing him simply as a "German footballer" despite Klose's own words claiming he does not want to be classified this way. I understand he plays in Germany but he was born in Poland, his mother was Polish and his father (German descent) was born in Poland, speaks Polish and played professional football in Poland. Also, Miroslav speaks Polish at home, has a Polish wife, and played professional football in Poland early in his career. I would like to honor Kloses' own decleration of his nationality. If listing him as "European" is a problem, then I would at least like to see it as "Polish-German" or "German-Polish" because lisitng him as only "German" does not properly reflect his full background. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Beckenbauer1974 (talk)

Congratulations. Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland has reviewed your contributions and decided you are an active member. Thank you for your encyclopedic contributions! But creating content by yourself is only part of the collaborative Wikipedia user experience, there is an active community of editors discussing how to better improve the Poland-related content; please consider joining our discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland. There are many editors who would like to work more closely with you, benefit from your insight, and help you with their experience! PS. Please also consider editing your entry in our participants list to state your areas of expertise/interest. I have defined your interests there based on our past interactions as the area of "history of interwar Poland", feel free to correct it.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sandomierz Voivodeship (1939)

Updated DYK query On March 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sandomierz Voivodeship (1939), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 15:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

call me, pls. (Skype?, voice?)

Hi./Serwus. Mieszkam na Sher... od 1991, a co do liceum to uczeszczlem/and my high school is Senn High School. http:users.rcn.com/marek --Mareklug talk 06:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zbrodnie nacjnalistów ukraińskich

Witaj, mógłbyś uzupełnić artykuł o nacjonalizmie ukraińskim o tekst z siemaszków? Źródło. Jest tam przedmowa po angielsku wystarczy przeredagować. W angielskim arcie o nacjonalizmie są fałszywe dane pisze o 35 tys. zamordowanych. Tymczasem na Wołyniu zabito 60 tys, w Małopolsce Wschodniej kolejne 60 tys. czyli w sumie liczba ofiar UPA jest 120 tys. Działania polskie były odwetem a nie ludobójstwem i w ich wyniku zginęło około 10 tys Ukraińców. Pozdrawiam--Paweł5586 (talk) 14:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ten--Paweł5586 (talk) 11:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hasło Lwów, też wypadałoby u anglików poprawić, owszem założone przez Daniela Halickiego, ale na terenie polskich Grodów Czerwieńskich. Kazimierz Wielki nie zajął go militarnie, ale przejął na podstawie umowy, i lokował na prawie magdeburskim.--Paweł5586 (talk) 11:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dobra robota, oczywiście historycy angielscy najlepiej widziani, ale Z tego co zauważyłem, to Ukraińcy nie krępują się by używać swoich źródeł, więc gdzie nie ma anglików to wrzucaj naszych. Prośba o zaglądnięcie do zbrodni w Pawłokomie w angielskim haśle. Była ona popełniona jako odwet za uprowadzenie Polaków i należy również o niej pisać w kontekście rzezi wołyńskiej.--Paweł5586 (talk) 11:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hej, widziałem Wolę Ostrowiecką, ciesze się, że zrobiłeś ten art, wygląda lepiej niż nasz Polski. Wkrótce go poprawie. Robię teraz zbiorcze hasła o zbrodniach w powiatach i linkuje zbrodnie które warto opisać. Gdybyś się zastanawiał o czym napisać to możesz rzucić okiem. BTW, widziałem że w artykule konsekwentnie stawiasz przypis przed znakiem interpunkcyjnym. Jak to jest w Anglii? Ja słyszałem że tam na odwrót niż u nas przypis powinien być raczej po znaku interpunkcyjnym?--Paweł5586 (talk) 17:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Independent Students Union

Updated DYK query On April 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Independent Students Union, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 13:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Otłoczyn railway accident

Updated DYK query On April 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Otłoczyn railway accident, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 19:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paczków

Updated DYK query On April 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paczków, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hel Fortified Area

Updated DYK query On May 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hel Fortified Area, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 13:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jablonkow Incident

Updated DYK query On May 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jablonkow Incident, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 05:07, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki za świetny artykuł! U nas na Zaolziu bardzo znany epizod WWII. W zeszłym roku pojawiła się chyba nawet książka na ten temat. - Darwinek (talk) 09:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chodzi o masakre w Stonawie? - Darwinek (talk) 17:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fajnie. Bitwa pod Skoczowem to ciekawy temat, chociaz bitwa byla mala w kontekscie wojen polskich. Jesli chodzi o te masakre, to bardzo kontrowersyjny temat na Zaolziu. Czesi i Polacy nie moga znalezc wspolnej plaszczyzny do dyskusji na ten temat. Interpretacja zdarzen zupelnie sie rozni. - Darwinek (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]