User talk:Arrwiki

Welcome

Hello, Arrwiki! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Srikanth (Logic) 12:46, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியா

வணக்கம் Arrwiki

Did you know?

A large majority of the Tamil population is more comfortable with Tamil than English^{[citation needed]}
Tamil Wikipedia, with 25,000 articles is one of the leading Indic language wikipedias
It is easy to type to in Tamil using transliteration tools like E-Kalappai, NHM Writer and Suratha
Tamil Wikipedia needs experienced wiki contributors like you to expand exponentially

எனவே வாருங்கள்! தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியாவில் உங்கள் கட்டுரைகளை மொழிபெயருங்கள். உங்களுக்கு பிடித்த விஷயங்களைப் பற்றி த. விக்கியில் புதிதாய் எழுதுங்கள்.

ஏற்கனவே, சுந்தர், சோடாபாட்டில், லாஜிக் விக்கி போன்ற பல ஆங்கில விக்கிப்பயனர்களின் வரவு தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியாவை வளர்க்க உதவி வருகிறது. நீங்களும் எங்களுடன் இணைந்தால் தமிழர்களுக்காக தமிழிலேயே கட்டற்ற அறிவுக் களஞ்சியத்தை உருவாக்கி விடலாம்.

இப்படிக்கு,
தமிழ் விக்கிப்பீடியர்கள்

Srikanth (Logic) 12:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop!

Stop uploading thumbnail images without source or licence information. They are all going to be deleted soon. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You ignored the above message so I have blocked you briefly. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:44, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Jeeva.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeeva.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Ajmal.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ajmal.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arrwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I shall assure you that henceforth such grave errors shall not occur again. It was an overlooked error. No unlicensed images shall be uploaded ever again from this User account/IP. Apologies for the damage done!

Decline reason:

Please log in to your account, and make the request from there.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I own this responsibility and shall assure you that henceforth such grave errors shall not occur again. It was an overlooked error. No unlicensed images shall be uploaded ever again from this User account/IP.}} Arrwiki (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nottam

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nottam, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.nowrunning.com/movie/2588/malayalam/nottam/preview.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 10:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has been removed now. Thanks for the alert.

Speedy deletion nomination of Karbonn Mobiles

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karbonn Mobiles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Travelbird (talk) 10:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contents have been added. Arrwiki (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karbonn Mobiles

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Karbonn Mobiles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Mean as custard (talk) 12:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creating film articles

Hi Arrwiki! When creating film articles, like Katha Screenplay Darshakatvam Appalaraju, can you please put {{WikiProject Film}} on the talk page? This allows the project to keep track of all the film articles created. You can also put these on other film articles if they are lacking one. Thank you! BOVINEBOY2008 09:24, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Theen Maar

The article Theen Maar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article appears to fail WP:NFF if only on the basis that the single source referenced still calls the film "Kushiga" rather than the title given and so appears too uncertain for a stand-alone article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fæ (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ajay Rao

The article Ajay Rao has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 18:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kirathaka

The article Kirathaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 01:15, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Karnataka

I've noticed you've been adding {{WikiProject Karnataka}} to some talk page articles as Project banners. There is no project called WikiProject Karnataka and that template is supposed to be used on User pages, not the talk pages of articles. Thanks! BOVINEBOY2008 14:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well Noted! Thanks.

Proposed deletion of Ajay Rao

The article Ajay Rao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Scarcely any claim of significance in the article, and no substantial sources to support what little there is.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Film pages

Films can only be given articles once filming has officially been announced or begun. Do not create movies just from an announcement, like you did with Yohan: Adhyayam Ondru. They will be nominated for deletion. EelamStyleZ (talk) 14:41, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Audio codec worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 15:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please stop adding kannadastore.com as a reference. The source is not reliable. For details on what source is acceptable, please go through WP:RS and WP:V. Thank you. — Abhishek ^Talk 09:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Telugu films of 2010s for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Telugu films of 2010s is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telugu films of 2010s until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 08:51, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Puttanna Kanagal Award

The article Puttanna Kanagal Award has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability of this award.Article also has no context, does not say what the award is, etc - not an asset to the encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 10:09, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film Third for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film Third is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film Third until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film Second for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film Second is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film Second until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Veryhuman (talk) 00:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film First for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film First is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film First until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

New Article has been created, which consolidates the three articles listed above

I have created a new article here: Karnataka State Film Award for Best Film, which consolidates all of these articles into one. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the consolidation. Will work towards better structuring in future.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Telugu films of 2011 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Action and Mr. Perfect

Aditya (Kannada actor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Love (film)

Kannada films of 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Suresh Krishna

Katari Veera Surasundarangi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Suresh Krishna

Sidlingu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Duniya (film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Telugu films of 2012

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Telugu films of 2012 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Telugu films of 2012

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Telugu films of 2012 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Telugu films of 2012

Hi Arrwiki, you recently removed a deletion tag from Telugu films of 2012. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sadhana Sargam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Kireedom and Saathiya

Adhinayakudu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Venu Madhav

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bhoot returns

a new poster has released with all 2 principle leads pl update.thnx :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitesayz1 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Tamil films of 1990, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chandrabose and Manorama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kannada films of 2003 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mani, Nandi, Heart Beats, Super Star (film), Saikumar and Khushi

Kannada films of 2005 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chakri

Kannada films of 2007 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jayanthi

Kannada films of 2010 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chakri

Kannada films of 2011 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Director

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

BIG Star Most Entertaining Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Imtiaz Ali and Delhi Belly

BIG Star Most Entertaining Film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Big Picture and Arbaaz Khan

Telugu films of 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Action

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi (2012 film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Lakshmi (2012 film), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Shakti (2012 film). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi (2012 film)

I have redirected this article to Shakti (2012 film) because their content is the same and according to the sources provided, "Shakti" seems to be the correct name. Unless you have other reasons for creating two separate articles, please leave the redirect in place. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 14:13, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Telugu films of 2012

Hi, i have seen that you have been contributing a lot to the Telugu films of 2012 article. I want to know your opinion on dubbed films being listed in it. The article says that it consists a list of films produced in the Telugu film industry in the year 2012. Do dubbed films from Tamil, Malayalam make that list?. Please let me know what you think and i thank you for your contributions to the article. - (Krzna (talk) 03:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I guess you are correct about the films being watched in large numbers and I have also seen the list for previous years and they do include the dubbed films. I guess we can just continue including them. How about dubbed films from Hollywood?. Should they be included as well?. Last week a film called Mahaveerudu (John Carter) was released, should i include that in the list?. Do let me know what you think about them. Thanks for the help. - (Krzna (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Adding a new category sound good to me. I have already updated the list with few other films. Thanks for the help. - Krzna (talk) 00:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Breaking News (2012 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Breaking News (2012 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaking News (2012 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Hi Arvind,this barnstar is for your work on Kannada films 2012!!!!!!! Madhuric (talk) 12:29, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Madhuri, Thanks for recognizing and giving me a first barnstar. Arrwiki (talk) 05:40, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dashamukha

Hi,

I noticed that you had edited Dashamukha. Would you happen to have any contact info of the people who made the movie? --Muhammad(talk) 20:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help required

Hi Arvind, I would like you to help me in tagging and accessing the articles related to [Karnataka]. For example you and check out [this] and [this]. Make sure you enter edit summary for each and every edits that you do like Assessment for WP IND. You are [invited]. Please add your name in [participants list]. Thanks Much -- Madhuric (talk) 06:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	Kannada Cinema Barnstar of Excellence
	You've done a great deal of work on Kannada cinema. Highly impressed actually to see yearly lists like the Bollywood ones I created. Hopefully some time you will create lists for 50s and 60s Kannada movies by year! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S let me know if you want me to create some stubs on films by year and you fill them out with director/actor info like I've started doing with early 40s Bollywood films.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the appreciation. It is always pleasure to share the information here. I'll give my best in researching the Kannada flicks of the 50's and 60's as I don't belong to that era ^_^ . And I would really like to congratulate you for all the stupendous work in Bollywood category. That inspired me a lot to make the similar list in my mother tongue too... Arrwiki (talk) 06:22, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Darshan (actor)

Please stop removing the tag requesting more sourcing until the vast majority of content in the article is actually sourced. -- The Red Pen of Doom 13:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, you should make yourself familiar with WP:OR and WP:PEACOCK. I have fully reverted your recent additions to the article. -- The Red Pen of Doom 13:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kalpana-muhurth-a-remake-of-kanchana-film-f9826c86.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kalpana-muhurth-a-remake-of-kanchana-film-f9826c86.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:47, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barfi (film)

Hello, Arrwiki. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Barfi (film), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 04:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bulbul (film)

The article Bulbul (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFILM no indication it has entered principal photography stage

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yaare Koogadali

The article Yaare Koogadali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:Verifiability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PhantomTech (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Please don't "move" pages as you did with Radhan Ganda/Radhikan Ganda. It destroys the edit history of the pages. Please move them using the guide at WP:MOVE. BOVINEBOY2008 15:43, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Huli

Hello, Arrwiki, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Raja Huli, appears to be directly copied from http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-03-14/news-interviews/37712066_1_yash-and-meghana-raj-raja-huli-guru-deshpande. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Raja Huli if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 09:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Tara (Kannada actress) does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! — Abhishek ^Talk 13:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Emraan Hashmi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Arrwiki. You have new messages at A930913's talk page.
Message added 13:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Kannada films of 2013 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ramesh Aravind.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Ramesh Aravind.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-karnataka/a-versatile-actor-takes-the-stage-at-delhi-belli-hejje/article4100305.ece. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Arrwiki. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. jonkerz ♠talk 09:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Arrwiki

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Prayog

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stephen Prayog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Stephen-Prayog/1387629923. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 71.199.125.210 (talk) 01:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Filmfare Award for Best Actor – Kannada may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

for-Kannada-goes-to--/articleshow/21215657.cms And the Filmfare Award for Kannada goes to...]</ref>]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:53, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Kannada films of 2004 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|| M N Krupakar || Action ||<ref>http://www.viggy.com/english/current_onganesh_launch.asp Om Ganesh]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 in Telugu film may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

news/this-friday-releasing-movies-list-july-12-2013 This Friday Releasing Movies List July 12, 2013]</ref>
|| Naveen Chandra, [[Piaa Bajpai]], [[Abhimanyu Singh]], [[Kishore (actor)|Kishore]], [Nasser]], [[Nathalia Kaur]] || [[Action film|Action]] || || <ref>[http://www.apherald.com/Movies/Reviews/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:58, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Telugu films of 2003 may have broken the syntax by modifying 7 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of R. P. Patnaik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. P. Patnaik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. P. Patnaik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I've begun some cleanup and sourcing, but additional assistance would be appreciated. SCHMIDT, ^{Michael Q.} 03:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Jayammana Maga.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jayammana Maga.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dakota Express may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[{Category:2002 films]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:41, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hamsalekha may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|1999 || ''Snehaloka'' ''Sambrama'' ''[[AK-47 (film)|AK-47]'' ''Arunodaya'' ''Aryabhata'' ''Hrudhaya Hrudhaya'' ''Yare

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Brindavana poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brindavana poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Kannada films of 1991 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| ''Naagini'' || Sripriya || [[Shankar Nag]], [[Ananth Nag]], [[Rajani]], [[Geetha (actress)|Geetha], [[Tara (Kannada actress)|Tara]], [[Devaraj]] || [[Sankar Ganesh]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Avinash, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 14:57, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been changing categories on a number of Indian male actor articles. They are male and the category should reflect that. If you disagree then you will need to open a discussion at WP:CFD, although I don't think you'll get much support there because I think that the issue has only recently been discussed and the consensus has been applied accordingly. - Sitush (talk) 14:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Kannada films of 2002 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Guna Kumar || [[Vijay Raghavendra]], [[Radhika (Kannada actress)|Radhika]], Ritu Singh, [Doddanna]] || [[Hamsalekha]] || Oct 11 release

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Bollywood films of 2013 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] || Gurmmet Singh || [[Dimple Kapadia]], [[Manu Rishi]], [[Manjot Singh]], [[Anand Tiwari]]<ref>[http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/movie-review-of-what-the-fish/1/330918.html Movie Review: What

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aithalakkadi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[kn:ಐತಲಕ್ಕಡಿ]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Chakravyuha (1983 Film)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Chakravyuha (1983 Film), Arrwiki!

Wikipedia editor Touch Of Light just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Excellent article. Well done.

To reply, leave a comment on Touch Of Light's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Chiru (film)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Chiru (film), Arrwiki!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ricky Kej may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* ''[[Accident (2009 film)|Accident]]'' - Film OST- Anand Audio- India)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:50, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dhruva Thare may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ref>http://www.videogirmit.com/dhruva-thare/movie-dr-rajkumar-video_bac1c49c4.html Dhruvathare]</ref>. The movie is famous for its evergreen songs which was composed by [[Upendra Kumar]]. Based

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eradu Kanasu

Hello, Arrwiki, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Eradu Kanasu, appears to be directly copied from http://moviemaathu.wordpress.com/2011/01/22/eradu-kanasu/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Eradu Kanasu if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 09:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for persistent copyright violations

You should already be aware of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Arrwiki. Since then, you have continued to violated the copyright policy: Chikkejamanru was copied from [1], Eradu Kanasu from [2] (self-reverted) and Ee Bandhana from [3]. Seeing as you don't appear to read this page:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MER-C 11:59, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arrwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear MER-C, it has been understood that my certain contributions to the articles that I have created have been against the policies of Wikipedia and I stand responsible for this. The mistake from my side was not to mention {{underconstruction}} tag for those articles which I had otherwise thought I would recreate the article in my own sentences in near future. This would not happen in future and would be extra cautious. Kindly refrain from blocking Arrwiki (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As explained below, that is no good. Copying someone else's work and posting it on a web page is illegal, and it doesn't somehow become all right so long as you put a note on the illegally copied material saying that you are working on it. Since you clearly still don't get the point abut copyright, unblocking you would not be a good idea. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 02:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, no, no. It doesn't work like that... You must not bring any copyright material into Wikipedia even if you intend to rewrite it. When you rewrite something, the previous version is not deleted off the server, and the copyright stuff is still there for people to access through the History record. You must do any rewriting off Wikipedia, and then bring it in when you have finished. You must also make sure that you get well away from the original. You can't just change a word here and a word there. It must be very different. Peridon (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arrwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK.OK. I get the point and here after I shall make sure all my articles would certainly contain the true content constructed only by me and shall take care not to copy or recreate other's work. Kindly unblock meArrwiki (talk) 09:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your somewhat dismissive request here doesn't seem to recognize the seriousness of copyright violations. A suggestion is that you make example edits/articles here on this talk page to demonstrate the type of things you plan to do if you were to be unblocked. only (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of File:Snehitharu poster.GIF

The file File:Snehitharu poster.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't serve any purpose when there is File:Snehitaru poster.JPG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:17, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Snehitharu poster.GIF

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snehitharu poster.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aridhu Aridhu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aridhu Aridhu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aridhu Aridhu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DragoMynaa (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karbonn Mobiles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karbonn Mobiles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karbonn Mobiles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmīrī ^TALK 21:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Attahasa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Attahasa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kadhayile Nayika for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kadhayile Nayika is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadhayile Nayika until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi (talk) 05:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Namitha I Love You

The article Namitha I Love You has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable reviews (not indiaglitz). Only one questionable source about dubbing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Aadi (2005 film)

The article Aadi (2005 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aadi (2005 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aadi (2005 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aadi (2005 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 00:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sri Naga Shakthi

The article Sri Naga Shakthi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:NFILM. No reliable sources/reviews. Indiaglitz is not reliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 07:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Take It Easy (2011 film)

The article Take It Easy (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]