User talk:Bollyjeff/Archive 3

Peer Review of Bipasha Basu

Please help developing Bipasha Basu by peer reviewing it. Thank you Srinivas 12:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Don2 bo figures based on a tweet ? How lame ?

Please check out my edit request at Don2 talk page . The editors are using taran adarsh tweet for posting figures . How lame is that now ? Thanks.Seeta mayya (talk) 23:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Rowspans

Did you notice that sortability works even for tables with "rowspans". —Commander _{(Ping me)} 14:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Ya, anyway it's good to avoid rowspans. Again if the IP makes disruptive edits, make a report at WP:AIV. —Commander _{(Ping me)} 17:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Preity

Hey Bollyjeff. Thanks for contributing to the Preity Zinta article. The info you added was actually there until a few months ago when Rahul (BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ) and I agreed that it is not very important and I removed it. My opinion is that stars appear regularly on different shows of this sort, and donating their winnings is quite the normal thing to do and is to be expected. Zinta, like many other celebs, has appeared on numerous such shows and always donated the money she won. Making a list of all of them or mentioning some would not make sense IMO, nor could it be classified "humanitarian work" as such. Your opinion? Shahid • ^Talk2me 21:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

LOL of course she had donated hers as well - I saw the show and it's actually there on YouTube if I'm not mistaken. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:22, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello

First of all I'd like to say I am sorry for my angrey behavior the other day, I was truly pissed and I lashed out. I do maintain the fact that none of the things I said were directed at u. That said, I have no objection to being friends if U still like that. The only friend I had here was Ankit and well, I guess U know the whole story of his departure. I deserved that block tho, I did go against Wiki rules knowing it well enough, but she just, pisses me off to no end, anyway, that's abt all I had to say. Cheers. --Meryam90 (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. but she did it with Ra.One and then just went away and came back to Don2 :P Oh! why must I suffer?! Just why?! :D No just kidding, I need to learn how to keep my cools really, I was good at it so far :P anyway, talking abt WP:crystal. Should we make a page for the new Yash Chopra film? filming started today.--Meryam90 (talk) 15:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

sources: NDTV & Intoday, and Talaash (2012 film) article was first titled Reema Kagti's Untitled Project --Meryam90 (talk) 15:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Well I think I do have enough info....The problem is, I actually never created an article and I don't even think I know how to. :S

I mean, look at Dhoom 3: Back in Action, filming will start at December 2012 and it already has an article. Btw, doesn't that fall under WP:Crystal? --Meryam90 (talk) 16:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks man, looks good so far, but I am sure it will grow bigger slowly as time passes. seriously, just released I am really kinda new to wiki...lol I just created my first article. :D Oh btw, I was thinking, Can Don 2 make it to GA now or does it need more work? --Meryam90 (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

I know what U mean, but seems like a trend now to update every lil detail abt Box Office, esp for film released last year, I mean Ready, Bodyguard, Rockstar, The dirty picture, Ra.One and etc...I love how Hollywood movies just update the North America gross and the rest of the world's. Anyway, I've been thinking about that; getting a PR. Will list it then and see how it goes :D --Meryam90 (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Saqib Saleem

Can you check the above article and do a short copy-edit? Thanks in advance, — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done

Re: actor templates

Should i remove everything? -- Karthik Nadar 13:34, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Ohh! But still friend, I don't mind correcting my mistakes. Should I take effort to revert all my additions? Thanks a lot for poking my mistake. -- Karthik Nadar 13:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done: Will make sure not to repeat it again. :) -- Karthik Nadar 13:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

NOOO

What do you mean by "give up"? Don't tell me you you're retiring, because I am not gonna let it happen!! And what the... you mean by saying that you do nothing useful? This? This? This or maybe this??? I say take a one-day break, but you are one of the best editors working on articles related to Indian films right now, and if you give up... well, I'm not going to even think about it. Don't make me lost hope on this project. Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

And once again: NOOOOOO!!! Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:51, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

And last time, I promise: NOOOOO!!! Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Take it easy. I meant giving up on reverting all the silly unsourced nonsense. I still want to do some useful stuff, but when I do something I like it to stay done. I feel its a waste of my time doing things like reverting x and y additions to a filmography because its not sourced or filming yet. It just comes back 5 minutes later. Anyway, thanks for the nice comments; I am not going anywhere. BollyJeff || talk 20:04, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

SIGH. Look, Wikipedia can be a bit uneasy at times, or often actually, but it's a phase. I've learnt to see it as a good experience to learning and I like editing even if there are tons of idiots on here. I remember when you started editing, you wondered why I was reverting so many editors with similar edit summaries. I'm sure you do understand it a bit more right now - it's just impossible to keep track of each edit and fix every mistake and teach every new user how to edit WP and what not to do. Many of them vandalise, many have some sort of agenda (adding POV, slanders or just load articles with scripts), and then, everything that needs to be fixed is left to just a few people who really want to see the project evolve. It's quite a task, and at some point you get fed up because you want to do contructive stuff. After all, my time on here is limited, and so is yours. I can say right now that unless the rules are changed significantly, nothing in this regard is going to change. Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bollyjeff. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

X.One ^SOS 17:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Masala

He seems to be very intellectual. Keep warning for Blanking, if he crosses 4 warns, report him to WP:AIV. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One poster

I left a nice (but pointed) message on Bilaalu's talk page about the poster and your concerns, asking them not to revert it unless they get consensus on the talk page. Might also make sense to submit that image for deletion. Ravensfire (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Shriya Saran

Yes I do have those reference. Did you had ever visit the article on Saguni?? An article on Sify where Shriya had said that she was not approached for Saguni. [1]

About Hero, there is another article from The Times of India which confirmed that Yami Gautam will star in Hero replacing Shriya. [2]

A small request why can't you search the web instead of sending text to me?? For Nuvve Nenu there is plenty of sources, the controversy where Telangana protesters thrown stone on Shriya's caravan was ocured during the filming Nuvve Nenu. At least for this, please search yourself, I's currently working on the other article so please kindly figure out yourself. Finally, do not stick to the old facts do check the web in order to keep updating the facts in wiki.

(Ason27 (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC))

Instead asking me to do the fixation on Saguni's article, why no you do that?? By the way the filming of Nuvve Nena almost complete. The name of the film is under consideration but most probably it will be named as Nuvva Nena since many website had already mention about it. I wonder how can you hold so many good articles without surfing the web?? (Ason27 (talk) 14:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC))

Re Paranoia

As per the NFA archive, it says 'acting'. Source says "He has acted in Ketan Mehta's feature film Holi and a short film by Aditya Bhattacharya." Source also says he was assistant director on Manzil Manzil and Zabardast. I was not sure whether to include it or not.

As per rediff interview, you can say that it was acting in Paranoia. This is what Aditya Bhattachary said, "Aamir and me were classmates in school. In 1983, we had done a short film called Paranoia. We -- along with Mansoor Khan -- also had a band together. So we were good friends. He did not want to be an actor -- he was quite confused about what he wanted to do in life. Some people had their doubts about him, as he was short and had big ears. He was not star material. But I had absolute faith in him" (2nd page).

What say? Thanks. - Vivvt^Talk 15:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Done. Thanks. - Vivvt^Talk 15:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Enthiran

Hello, Bollyjeff. You have new messages at Talk:Enthiran.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

X.One ^SOS 07:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Katrina Kaif

I have reverted your edits at the article for Katrina Kaif. I looked at the link you referenced and it states that "There is ultimately no consensus about which language to use." Furthermore, an RfC was recently held to discuss this issue for the Katrina Kaif article and that should be honoured. Thanks, Anupam^Talk 15:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I will be contacting him in the near future to address this issue. In the mean time the RfC should be respected. Thanks, Anupam^Talk 15:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't mean to revert your other edits. I restored your other edits. I will contact the reviewing administrator and figure this out. With regards, Anupam^Talk 16:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I left a message on User:DeltaQuad's talk page and will see what he has to say. If I stand corrected, I will be more than happy to allow your to proceed. I just can't see how a mass removal of scripts is helpful. Also, even if your proposal passes, Jacqueline Fernandez is not Indian; Sri Lanka is a separate country. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 16:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I understand. If you feel an article should not really have a script then you can remove it. I think articles like Katrina Kaif can keep the script, since an RfC was specifically held on that issue. Feel free to keep your edits on the Lisa Ray article. Have a good day, Anupam^Talk 16:32, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Indic scripts

For film articles, "Indic scripts for film language and English translation". Is that the policy? I dont mind it. But then shouldnt IPA also be included? Because the purpose of having IPA on other articles was to facilitate non-indians to vocalize the jibber-jabber we do. Irrespective of what the article is, if the words are non-english they should be able to pronounce it. Isnt it? Also for English translation do we use references or we translate them ourselves? For example, You don't get Life a Second Time is not the real translation of ZNMD. Another example: Initially the article called it The one that moves is a Vehicle but then found IMDB saying That which runs is a car for Chalti Ka Naam Gaadi -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 13:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Replied - Animeshkulkarni (talk) 15:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Bodyguard collections

Hi Bollyjeff . Would you please comment here (whatever you think is right). Providing the maximum possible gross figure for Ra.One which is an official number, and disallowing a third-party reliable source isn't fair for Bodyguard. Thanks in advance. Scieberking (talk) 05:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I will not fight over these types of issues anymore. See WP:DONTPANIC. BollyJeff || talk 13:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Alright, fair enough :) Greetings. Scieberking (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Sivandha Mann

Sivandha Mann (Red Soil) is the article of a Sivaji Ganesan film, created by me. Since my computer is in repair and I cannot do many stuff outside the computer (like uploading images or editing things easily), can you please upload an image of a CD cover to the infobox in it? Thanks for reading. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot dude. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Usage of free pictures in articles

Hi there, I noticed you reverted my edit of the article Dev Anand. I understand that the image I used was a non-free one, and you said that only free images may be used. Could you please explain the difference between non-free and free images? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fireblazex3 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Dhoom 2

I really appreciate the great work you did on this article; I just happened to come by this as a part of the GAs in the Indian Cinema task force, and decided to give a look. And frankly, I was rather unpleasantly surprised. Forgive me, but I must list out some things I saw extremely lacking in the article :-

• Dhoom 2 is a Hindi film, and hence a full-nation release. I cannot understand why there is only one line written about the national record (first week) and the rest of the box office section deals with Kochi, Chennai etc. whose collections contribute barely a fraction to the total gross earned by the film. In all ideality, the film's gross should be reported on a national scale, and that can be done using BOI figures.

• Initially, it had become quite the trend to use millions in Indian film articles; that practice, however, has long since expired and it has been agreed upon to use Indian notations crore and lakh. The fact that Dhoom 2 still uses 350 million-type figures is disconcerting.

• The INRConvert template is missing in several instances; this is a new development, so hopefully it should be rectified soon enough.

• The lead section mentions the worldwide gross as 1.34 billion; however, the infobox (and correct figure) shows 150 crore.

• The reviews section does not mention even one review from the Indian side; all of them are from the US. This is unacceptable by MOS:FILM standards, which clearly states that local film reviews should always be preferred.

Otherwise, the article seems worthy of the GA tag. I can understand that you worked on this article nearly two years back, and I'm informing you as a friend; had some other editor chanced upon it, he could have had the article demoted. I hope you can rectify these mistakes, as we certainly don't want to lose GAs, especially from Indian Cinema. Cheers! ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)]

Sure thing. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Nice work; however, I don't think you understood the box office section part. In Bollywood films, no article mentions any regional figures; its always something like (national) first weekend, first week, second week, third week (if big enough) and lastly the total NET (not gross) and worldwide gross. The Kochi-Andhra part shouldn't be there at all; I'll remove it, and change the gross India figure to net. The Indian reviews section needs tweaking and some additions, and I'll help out with that. I've struck out the parts completed, and hopefully I can dig up on BOI figures and add some stuff to the BO section. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 06:34, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Reply:

• Ah yes, I didn't replace it; I will, when I can dig up that info on the first weekend, week etc. collections. Being a rather older film, it'll be tough to find it.

• They aren't direct quotes? Oops. I thought they were. Argh! Now I have to go through all those reviews and find suitable quotes :(.

• The outdated part happens for every film actually; that's why its sometimes important to have a dedicated editor(s) on every film article so that periodically they can update the ranking. I did leave the part of it being the highest-grossing film of all time at its time of release; I don't think we can bypass this problem, its more or less a manual one. Even the recent films like Agneepath will back up in the rankings once some of the big Khan releases come, and subsequently its rankings will also have to be changed. Nothing that can be done with that actually.

Hope this helps. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

• Bollyjeff, this is Dhoom 2. I hope you remember exactly how many records this film broke at the time of release. For its time, yes those figures are absolutely notable and should be put up. The only problem is that the figures are rather difficult to find from RS.

• You could say that again; of all the articles, Ra.One needs a LOT of review cutback. Wouldn't you agree :D ?

• I don't think that's what is usually done; perhaps we can get a bit of consensus on this. That way, it'll be equally applicable to all film articles.

~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

So its enough to just write a line from the review; I'm not very used to that, and frankly I don't find that very good-looking. Besides, I doubt Dhoom 2 has too many reviews - at the maximum 10-15 (in contrast to Ra.One's 38). Right now, I think we should concentrate on finding all the major reviews and putting it in the article, otherwise technically the article fails the "Complete" criteria of GA. I really hate consensus-making, especially in films, and I'm looking for an excuse to avoid another fan-war. let's hope for the best. Btw, please take a look at the Ra.One reviews section and tell me what you think. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Somebody has changed the BO section of Lage Raho Munna Bhai, as its looking really stupid right now and has some terribly fanboyistic material in it. Perhaps we can get the best of both worlds, and use a big BO section and a big reviews section :D. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Exactly; its because some of these GAs/FAs are not maintained that the unfortunate article demotion takes place. The mindset is that once an article reaches FA status, its over; move on. And that's quite harmful in the long run (and more so for film articles). ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Mukesh moved

Your views on move of singer "Mukesh" to Mukesh Mathur required here User_talk:Aurorion#Mukesh_moved --Animeshkulkarni (talk) 09:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar

I noticed that you do a lot of work on Salman Khan's page. I appreciate your efforts. Would you please update his page about his surgery he had in the United States for his Trigeminal Neuralgia and the brain aneurysm that was discovered in India before he came her for surgery. I read Wikipedia, but am not into editing. If you would get his page updated , that would be wonderful. I'm a big US fan of his. Have a great day! Sfalumberjacks (talk) 15:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Move

Opinions are required here. X.One ^SOS 14:12, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of films considered the best for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Thank you, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:16, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Request

Since you have contributed a lot to the article of Dhoom 2, will you please put your expertise into work again, and expand the article of Dhoom series ? |BINEET| 18:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bineetojha (talk • contribs)

Accusations

If you accuse someone of being a sockpuppet, please provide some evidence to back this up. Otherwise, I'll consider your little slur a personal attack. --FnH (talk) 09:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Request

Please follow this link. Thank you. |BINEET| 13:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bineetojha (talk • contribs)

Regarding Film fare award list

I will be very happy to discuss the matter regarding tabulation on Filmfare Award for Best Actor. I think tabulation enables better visibility, organization and condensation of data(maybe not the code size) on screen. Jpmeena (talk) 15:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Whats wrong ?

Why there is problem in mentioning controversy in Shahrukh wiki when we are mentioning controversy in Amitabh wiki. As honest wiki writer we should report everything without favor, prejudice, fear and fair in our reporting. Why to hide. I thought you being the most fair as I read your wiki work will be correct to all and will defend the freedom of free press and honest reporting.

Whoever this is, please sign your comments by typing four tildes (~). ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review

This is to inform you that there is currently a peer review going on for the article Ra.One here. Your participation is most welcome. Regards, ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism/Edit War on Sholay Article

Hey Bollyjeff, Sorry to bother you, but this tamil wikipedian named secretofsuccess (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Secret_of_success) keeps removing hindi script from Sholay (and possibly other movie articles). The movies are in HINDI. You can't remove hindi script for the names of HINDI movies. Can you please tell him to stop vandalizing and possibly even give him a warning. Also, for further reference, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_with_official_status_in_India . Thanks for your time Bollyjeff. Please reply on my talk page if need be. Demetriusss (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One

Could you please explain why full stops are not needed for the cast section, as you cut them away with this edit? X.One ^SOS 10:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bollyjeff. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Peer review/Ra.One/archive2.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 04:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Rani Mukerji

Please look over Rani Mukerji's page. Shahid is trying to sabotage it. It's running for GA, I hope you can be of good help. - Whitneyhoustanfanforever 8 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitneyhoustanfanforever (talk • contribs)

Jeff, I am only a month old on wikipedia but I can sense what this Shshshsh has been conspiring. I am only adding reliable sources and work that has been there in the history but people have removed it like Shshshsh and it is valuable. You have made the Rani article deprived of all facts and I'm only incorporating that. You can use those stories somewhere but some people are just lazy and they revert edits without giving them a thought? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitneyhoustanfanforever (talk • contribs) 04:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey

You had no reason to strike some of your comments on User:Whitneyhoustanfanforever's talk page - the user is indeed a sock and is now indefinitely blocked. Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One

Could you take a look here, go down to the bottom and see the problems regarding the critical reception section? I'd be much obliged. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Please take a look at the Casting and Filming section of the article. Is there any problem having the two images in it? Secret of success seems strangely against the addition of the photo. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, that Battersea Power Station was not mentioned in the text, so its probably not important enough to have a picture, right? BollyJeff || talk 14:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your sincere and diligent effort to revert vandalism on some of the celebrity pages that I watch. Keep up the great work. Wifione Message 15:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One

Bollyjeff, could you comment on the budget issue raised in the peer review? Thanks in advance. Secret of success (talk) 15:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• Of importance is the fact that you should strongly consider leaving a message (warning/welcome or other) at the talk page of the user whose edit you are rollbacking.
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

Wifione ^Message 18:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Your comment

What do you mean by saying "I would assume that SoS was improving the article, not trying to delist it"? Do explain, for I did not seem to understand clearly, or might have misunderstood it. The article did not deserve GA and I delisted it for that reason. Secret of success (talk) 06:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Bollyjeff, I suggest you explain what your comment meant. All this while you seemed to be thinking that I do not delist articles. I delisted the article because it deserved to be delisted. Was there any problem with that? If so, I suggest you put it forward. Secret of success (talk) 05:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Right, my apologies if I pressed you too much. I just wanted answers, that's all. With regards, Secret of success (talk) 17:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Chak De India...

I wonder if the time is right to push Chak De India to FA. Needs a clean up, updated refs and I think it worthy of a section that during the World Cup last year, the song became something of an anthem. But we need to find sources for it. I have a lot going on in real life so I come and go here but if you are interested in pushing it to FA let me know. -Classicfilms (talk) 17:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Again

Hello, Bollyjeff. You have new messages at Classicfilms's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: non-notable review for Barton Hollow

theupcoming.co.uk, not a notable review. SnapSnap 23:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

You can't use just any review you found online. WP:ALBUM/REVSIT has a list of some sources of professional reviews. Also, check the Metacritic page for this particular album; with a few exceptions (Prefix Magazine in this case), most reviews are from reputable sources. Hope it was helpful. SnapSnap 18:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

No problem. :) SnapSnap 18:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Screen Award for Best Female Playback

Hi Bollyjeff, I'd appreciate your intervention on this page. There's a discussion going there, but I'm getting a bit fed up dealing with fans. This time a user says Alka Yagnik won the award while all reliable sources, including the official site, claim otherwise. The user's edits on the Alka Yagnik are also pretty amusing. Shahid • ^Talk2me 22:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey there's the source from The Tribune, which is totally reliable, and the official source mentioned Bhosle. Shahid • ^Talk2me 00:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Krrish

Ya sure. It has improved a lot, and I mean a lot, since its GAR. References 13, 30 and 37 still need justification for reliability. Also, the "home media" could be moved to release. I'll try putting up a complete review after I finish Players (film). Regards, Secret of success (talk) 05:49, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

No, just an informal review in the talk page. A peer review is not needed for such a small article. I am okay with ref 30, the reviews used seem to be authentic. Secret of success (talk) 13:05, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

You might want to check out this. Beyond this, I think, lies the article's GA. Secret of success (talk) 14:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

You might want to consider expanding the lead. The soundtrack's composer needs to be included. A sequel is currently being filmed, not in development. Rekha and Naseruddin Shah deserve a mention. The production section contains info about development and casting, they need to be summarized. Date of release and no. of prints is necessary. Secret of success 10:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and the plot exceeds 800 words. Try limiting it within 700. Secret of success 10:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bollyjeff. You have new messages at Karthikndr's talk page.
Message added 15:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 15:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

List of highest-grossing Bollywood films

Okay, let me explain. You are obviously very well-versed with the copyright problems that the list faced, as a result of which we had to opt for a "extract" format. The "extract" format was adopted only for certain lists because those lists seemed to directly copy from Box Office India's website. However, the month-gross table is not present in the BOI website. If you carefully note, all the box office figures are from BOI.

Now, I remember Moonriddengirl as well as Mlauba (who implemented the 1,3,6,10 table format) decided to leave the month-gross table intact. The reason stated was "The said table is a creative extension of referenced box office figures which does not violate copyright". Meaning that even if the table is not there in BOI, the content of the table is from BOI and so the table is usable; in fact, its the only table we can use in full because BOI has no such listing. Of course, if what you meant was that I should add a reference for each box office figure, I can surely do that. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes there was WP:OR at the back of my head but I guessed that if an administrator (who is a part of the Wikimedia Board) found no fault, there was no problem. The list was compiled by me at a time when the entire Top 30 list was present; I had to go through the list and find the highest-grossers. Since then its been periodically updated. Yes yes, I know it sound a hell of a lot like OR but since the figures are all from BOI, and are there for everyone to see ... I don't understand what you mean by "adding a line or two about how the list was made". I can add references citing each film's box office figure. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:33, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

As I said, I went through the entire Top 30 list of highest grossers and checked the release dates of them. According to that I made the list. Its a good luck that all the months' top grossers were also top 30 grossers :P You mean I should write that in the article? "The list is derived from the Top 30 list of highest-grossing Bollywood films"? Regarding the Krrish thing, it is used even with Hollywood (List of highest-grossing films) that the LAST release to have passed the previous record is stated; if two such releases come in a single year then the higher grosser comes in the table. I doubt, however, that Krrish was the last film to beat Gadar, but I shall surely check. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:06, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Btw, Krrish netter 69.25 crores which is considerably less than Gadar's net of 75.5 crores. There is no question of Krrish having broken that record. And I checked through the BOI list, and the list in the Wikipedia one is perfectly correct. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Ah, a perennial Hollywood-Bollywood problem. The difference in "gross" and "net gross" (simply Net) is that Gross is the actual amount a film earns at the box office. The Net is the final amount remaining after deduction of entertainment taxes. Such a difference doesn't exist in Hollywood. However, in Bollywood, we should use the "Net gross" (Net) figures alone. Gross can be added as a bonus information. To note, the worldwide theatrical revenue is "Gross", not "Net". Confusing, isn't it? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

My, so many inconsistencies! The opening week figure is completely incorrect, heavily inflated, and that's whether you take Net or Gross. Here is the list of all-time opening weeks; Krrish is ranked 26. Net - 29.67 crore, Gross - 41.56 crore. The article should have the net figures. In the same section the editor gave 75 cr first week, and then 69 cr total. Talk about contradictions! And there looks to be a lot of similar problems in the section. I'll see if I can clean up a bit. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

The list is outdated, but the figures are accurate. I was just telling you how much Krrish earned in its first week; that amount certainly doesn't change with time :P No problem. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Well i'll try to clear the confusion :P Box Office India announces how much each film earns worldwide. That worldwide figure is a GROSS figure because its not possible to account for complex tax differences in so many countries. However, in India what matters is what the theaters and producers get at the end. And that is NET, not Gross. So, in the infobox, we should write the worldwide GROSS while everywhere else in the article, the NET values should be written. Note, there is no rule to keep out domestic GROSSES - you can add them if the figures are available, but remember that NET is always the priority. Actually, whatever BOI reports is the net; the gross is added later to the website. So yeah, you should write the 29 crore thing in the section but you should leave the 117 crore figure as it is. Hope this helps. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

I am really sorry for the late reply; I was a bit busy. The actual film industry's method of calculating success is by a method called return of investment (ROI); it highlights all the revenue a film earns for the producers/distributors. That ROI model is used to calculate success of a film in the industry, so BOI works that way and ranks films by the distributor share as its the share that goes to the producers/disributors. A small example, My Name Is Khan has a higher net revenue than Housefull, but the latter's distributor share is higher. BUT, in Wikipedia, we always go by the actual figures. In case of Hollywood, its the gross; in case of Bollywood its the net. The distributor share is, again, ancillary information. I hope this helps :) ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Ra.One nominated for Featured Article

This notice is to inform you that I have nominated the article Ra.One for a featured article promotion. The nomination can be viewed here. Any comments are welcome at the article's or my talk page. Thank you. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Your AIV report

Hi Bollyjeff, could you add here a link to a guideline (which I presume exists somewhere) on what exactly a "release date" is? I've seen this argued all over, 0-day hacked leak, rushed release to respond to the hack, official release date (usually a Tuesday), released in another country before official release in main/home country, 2nd release with bonus track - so hopefully it's laid out in one place somewhere. I really think the IP you reported was acting in good faith, just misunderstanding, and you did give a pretty brief explanation mixed in with the vandalism warnings. I will keep an eye on them, and if they keep at it after a patient and full explanation, I will block them, or a AN/I or AIV report if I'm not around. Franamax (talk) 18:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

59th National Film Awards

With reference to the current National Awards announced, I have created an article 59th National Film Awards. As you are an experienced editor on wiki and on India film project, I would appreciate if you can review the article and provide some comments as per your convenience, it would be helpful to improve the article. Thanks. - Vivvt^Talk 03:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiThanks

WikiThanks

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.2.110 (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Question

Its always good to reduce the size of the page as it loads quiet quickly. Anyways clicking on the edit option on that directs to Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/Notable articles. SO, is there any problem in it? If yes, we can discuss now and decide! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 02:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Sivaji

I don't think there was a need to undo the whole edit like you did in that article unless it was entirely controversial. Secret of success 06:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Maybe so, but I was irritated at their continued ignoring of the message, and did not feel like weeding out what was good. BollyJeff || talk 17:16, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Expansion in list

I've been working on an expansion of the highest-grossing films by month table in the List of highest-grossing Bollywood films. Its there in my sandbox right now. Could you give your comments on it? Its not yet fully complete (some months require some additions) but just generally. Thanks, ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 05:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

I think it looks nice, but is not verifiable, being comprised of a lot of original research. BollyJeff || talk 12:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

No, just like the original list (without expansion) the expanded list is derived from present lists on Box Office India. Here and all the yearly lists here were the sources, much like how the non-expanded list is derived from the same sources. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Fine, then add those two links as sources for the section. The section presently has zero sources, and needs some. BollyJeff || talk 18:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

I will, once I complete the list :) Yes, the section lacks refs; I'll have to see to the other sections too. Cheers. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Would you mind taking a look at the expanded section here? I have added references and a more detailed explanation as well. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:00, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award Thanks for your recent contributions! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 22:57, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Krrish_3#Title

I don't think we need this section at all, do we? It barely has any content, and is rather immaturely written (the stuff about Rakesh Roshan clarifying it with two sites). The rest can be put under the production section, without a sub-section (due to lack of content), until expansion. What do you say? Secret of success 06:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

When it is abundantly clear that this really the title, like when theatrical posters come out, yes, but it doesn't hurt to have it there now; it's a stub article anyway. Given that people have been changing the title EVERY DAY, I really think it should stay there for a while. If you think it is "immaturely written", well you are free to change that, but it just paraphrases what the sources said. BollyJeff || talk 11:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

What good is it for two sentences to have a section? Does something like "Rakesh Roshan clarified with rediff blah blah...Rakesh Roshan also clarified with Bollywood Hungama" sound uh..normal? Completely against WP:NOT. Like I said, we can keep only the "casting" as a sub-section and remove the headers of all the other sections (music, title, etc.) and merge it at the beginning of the "Production", right? Secret of success 12:01, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

The first sentence says Hrithik, not Rakesh, so I think it's good to have them both. But, do what ever makes you happy, okay? BollyJeff || talk 12:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

And what is the need to take that tone, pray? Secret of success 14:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

It amazes me how you get so wound up over seemingly little things. I don't know why you had to remove my addition, but whatever. This is not life and death stuff, its only a hobby for me. BollyJeff || talk 14:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

I fail to comprehend which comment of mine gave an impression that I got wound up. What addition did I remove, please be explicit? I only bustled the contents above, as far as I can see. But no matter what, I can tell you, I never intended to avert this conversation, and I believe this is a result of a misunderstanding by you, as I have hardly seen any bad faith assumptions exerted from your side in the past. I hope you too feel the same way about me. With good faith, Secret of success 17:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Krrish series

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Rani's GA

I know right! And to think that she was termed "The Queen of Bollywood" a few years back. Smarojit (talk) 10:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Do not be a jerk by undoing something without having the correct knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram ganguly (talk • contribs) 13:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 01:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

congrats

congrats on ur recent qualifications. just one question: how do u get awards for every small work done by you? whereas i haven't got any despite my handwork in articles like Parasakthi, Pudhiya Paravai, Thiruvilayadal, Uthama Puthiran, Alibabavum 40 Thirudargalum and Kalyana Parisu? Kailash29792 (talk) 14:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Star award

Thank u very much for that award, I'll continue to work better. (I hope u checked the edit history of those articles, to see what I've been doing!) Kailash29792 (talk) 02:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes I did. BollyJeff || talk 02:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Screenshots

So what exactly is the consensus of the discussion? I guess it has to apply to Farhan Akhtar as well. Secret of success (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Gone. If you have an issue, please take it up at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Film_screenshots_in_actor_BLPs. I was told by some administrators there that the pics are not appropriate. The reasons are given there. BollyJeff || talk 15:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Images

I agree that the images in the Rani Mukerji, Aishwarya Rai article don't contribute anything significant to the subject matter. But what about the images being used in several other articles such as Kareena Kapoor, Preity Zinta etc? Should they also be removed, then? Smarojit (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Gone. BollyJeff || talk 15:41, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

For god's sake, please don't immediately indulge in mass removal just because you "feel" there is a consensus. Until the discussion ends, keep it as a standstill. I am reverting some of your edits for that reason UNTIL the discussion gets over. Secret of success (talk) 13:52, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey mate, she definitely has. ;-) Honestly, the images do not matter to me as much as the quality of the article, but I sincerely believe it does satisfy criterion #8 because no free images could show her during this period, arguably the most successful of her career, as opposed to the many other images you've removed. I find that it is irreplaceable, but then when consensus is reached, I'll be more than willing to accept the verdict, though I don't think it can automatically apply to all articles. Hope you're doing well. Shahid • ^Talk2me 21:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Honestly, I feel that the screenshot of Vidya in the The Dirty Picture needs to be incorporated in her article. Isn't that why a non-free image is for? To represent a completely different look of an actor; and nothing can be as "different" as Vidya Balan playing Silk. Smarojit (talk) 04:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Can you two guys bring up these examples on the questions page, to see what they say about them? And thank you both for being nice about it. I am only trying to do what is right. BollyJeff || talk 11:28, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Well I've known you long enough on this project to understand that everything you're doing is not without a reason and is only done to avoid any problems in the future. You have my respect for doing this. Right now I'm a little busy, will try to take part in the discussion when I have more time. Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham...

It would be great if we could work together on the article. I have been trying to gather sources for quite some time; and would definitely do with some help. Thanks a lot for your initiative. Cheers. Smarojit (talk) 08:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. And yes, I have been a bit busy due to my exams, but I shall start work on the production section as soon as I can. Smarojit (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

I am still working on the "Filming" section, so I should be done with that in a couple of days. I guess I'll start work on the "Themes" section soon, where the journal will surely come handy. Do you happen to have any more book sources? Because if we find some good books then we can include a lot more information! Smarojit (talk) 04:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Yep, all that will go in the Themes section, which I will work on next. I am also going to include a DVD Feature: The making of K3G next. And I also have my exams to give, so I guess I'll do all that when my paper gets over. Phew! :-D Smarojit (talk) 16:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

I think we need some more information in the filming section. Do you know where we can get that from? Smarojit (talk) 04:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

It seems that the article looks good enough now. Should we nominate it for GA, then? Smarojit (talk) 05:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Done. Good luck with Krrish. :) Smarojit (talk) 13:44, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

The only reason why I formatted your refs was to maintain uniformity in all the references in the article. And thanks for pointing out the Kajol caption. :-) Smarojit (talk) 12:04, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your Signature Breaks Templates

The two pipes (||) in your signature break templates. The pipe is part of the template syntax, and when you use your signature in a template, the parser reads the pipe as indicating the next parameter in the template. You should either remove the pipes, or replace them with the pipe template {{pipe}}, to stop them breaking the template syntax.

For an example see Talk:Krrish. Notice in {{GA nominee}} your signature is cut off half way, and the timestamp is coloured green? While this might seem minor, it does create problems when User:GA bot tries to parse the template. I expect that this may have affected other templates as well. --Chris 07:01, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Request

Hi, i want to take a kind attention on one of article named Divya Bharti. It has been developed by keeping grammar and all those required stuff.will you please take look to article?.also please leave your suggestion to make it good article.please do reply.thnksRavishankar (talk) 18:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hello Ravishankar, i saw yours and another User:Rpaigu's edits on the article. But i have reverted those. You should not remove the "citation needed" tags placed on the article without providing the citations. Also most important, this is ENCYCLOPEDIA. Not some fan forum. Hence stuff like "her film roles along with her screen persona contributed to a change in the concept of a Hindi film heroine", " Bharti was also an expert driver", "With her parents' permission, she signed up for both films", "That was the green signal for other film makers to enter the fray." and what not, should not be here. You should learn how these articles should be. You might wanna go through some better articles about Indian actresses. Try Dimple Kapadia, Preity Zinta, Vidya Balan, etc. Also go through what Reliable Sources are. IMDB, Flicker, enotes.com, gundogtimes.com, popcorn.oneindia.com are not reliable sources. In case of doubt feel free to ask me or Bollyjeff or any other experienced editors. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:52, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

thnks for your attention on my edits. will definitely follow the encyclopedic rule for further editing.keep guiding meMumbaifreaks (talk) 06:46, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I have replied to few doubts by User:Rpaigu on his talk page User_talk:Rpaigu#Divya_Bharati. You should also go through it. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I agree with what he said ^. Also have a look at Shriya Saran, which I worked on, and Kareena Kapoor. Notice that the GAs have an average of 100 references, whereas Divya Bharti now has 2. That should give you some idea of the level of work involved. Especially when you are talking about someone with a controversial death, you really have to back up everything that is written with good sources. These may be hard to find, which would explain why the article has not been developed well up to now. Good luck. BollyJeff | talk 02:58, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Dear, I personally think this is one of the dumbest reasons I've ever heard. This actress came out roughly 20 years ago, and it's quite impossible to find suitable info. with 100 references. If you're asking me to try sourcing statements like " Some critics found analogies similar to Jesus, which Mankiewicz claims were set purposely as he himself finds the character to be a symbol of Christ." Then Congratulations! you've fixed all the problems. You've kicked the pig! (Here please do not consider it as a personal attack) . But whatever you are saying is doesn't seems practical. well wishesRpaigu (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

I know it is hard, like I said that is why it hasn't been done up to now. I am not saying that you have to have 100 refs, but you do have to cover controversial statements with a ref, or remove them. Also, not all refs need to be internet links. Book refs are good if you can find them; search GoogleBooks on her name for example. Videos can also sometimes be used. BollyJeff | talk 19:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Old awards

Is it possible to find sources (other than imdb) for awards like Filmfare, IIFA and others which were given around 10 years back? I had to withdraw a GA nomination for Farhan Akhtar by some random user, as I was not able to handle this. Secret of success (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

For filmfare go [here] and click the 'Past Awards' pulldown on the right. For IIFA go here and hover over 'IIFA through the years' on the left to pick a year. BollyJeff | talk 11:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much. Secret of success (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Hats off to you for your patience and dedication to your work in Indian cinema. Your name will always be present in the glory of the stars. Secret of success (talk) 15:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hi, once a ago i'd nominated Aishwarya Rai as a good article but was failed, never mind. Justification was given like, it's a nice article but doesn't meet wiki's good article policy. what is this good article policy. Please explain(if possible) in your words rather than posting Wikipedia links cos i am very lazy to read such long long :P :D It would be more helpful, if you could directly tell the requirements Aishwarya Rai page needs. Thank You Rpaigu (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, I hate to say it, but if you are too lazy to read the links, then you probably aren't gonna have the will power to get the article into proper condition either. Wikipedia:Good article criteria defines the basic requirements. If you look a few paragraphs above this comment, at User_talk:Bollyjeff#Request_3, someone already gave a pretty good explanation, and we pointed to some existing Bollywood actress GAs. Generally in plain talk, 1: the subject must be fully covered, which is going to be a lot of info, since she is a major figure in Indian cinema, and 2: everything must be reliably sourced. I hope this helps. BollyJeff | talk 17:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

I've seen User_talk:Bollyjeff#Request_3 , and i am happy. presently well known for what are the requirements for good article. I'v given much clear comprehension. Your two sentences the subject must be fully covered, and everything must be reliably sourced. and the GAs have an average of 100 references are strong enough to articulate. Well wishes and Thank YouRpaigu (talk) 06:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Krrish

Hello. Your submission at the good article nominations page has been seen, and I have taken up your request. You can see the suggestions here. Regards, ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Re:User:Avad.bollywood3

I reported the account at WP:WPSPAM, I hope its the right place. Any suggestion in such cases? rahul (talk2me) 13:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Hi, this is for you.thanks to warn me earlier. Actually enthusiasm is totally responsible who has made me blind for the moment. But will follow your suggestion. Best regards. Majorcaptain (talk) 05:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Scarlett Johansson

I've checked the url here and did a ctrl+f and could not find the word "symbol".Curb Chain (talk) 21:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

yep the askmen ref works.Curb Chain (talk) 00:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Filmfare

Hello, is it possible to find out 1992 filmfare best male or female debut award 1992? Majorcaptain (talk) 14:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

The awards are correct as listed at Filmfare Award for Best Male Debut and Filmfare Award for Best Female Debut. BollyJeff | talk 00:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bollyjeff. You have new messages at DRAGON BOOSTER's talk page.
Message added 12:31, 23 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 12:31, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Krrish

If you don't already have one, I would strongly suggest you to apply for a free one-year HighBeam account to gain access to a lot of material for Krrish. I have one and have been able to find some useful sources for you. You can contact Ocaasi regarding this matter. Cheers. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I am still reviewing Krrish. Just some time please. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 12:17, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

I have placed another set of concerns in the GA review. Please check. There is going to be a hail of reference problems, so be braced for it :). ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Multi-tasking is one of the ways how one can cut the boredom one gets by working on only a single article. The Krrish article has only reference reviews left, and there are a few issues. Would it be impossible to wait until tomorrow? You do know that Mughal-e-Azam is in much more dire need of improvement than Krrish (which is obviously going to be certified a GA). I hope you understand. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

If and when you have completed the reference bit for Krrish, drop a message in my talk page. Cheers. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Try Google Search. Simply say something like "IIFA Awards 2008 winners". Something should pop up. No, first-party sources are most certainly not supposed to be used, and I'm definitely not going to relent on this since its one of the editing pillars. Please find a solution. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

The best reliable sources are the newspapers, which most certainly publish these things. Check TOI, Mumbai Mirror websites, go to their Search panels and check. Regarding the Google Search, I had a few doubts regarding your searching abilities since you failed to find the Masand review which popped up practically immediately for me. I shall also search for the sources, alright? But that may have to wait until tomorrow. Regarding the National Awards, the document released is compiled by a number of reliable people including film industry members, critics etc. Its only published by the Government, hence its reliable. There's a big difference. I'm happy to see the progress of the references, and assuredly you need not get tensed up. It will get sorted out. Cheers. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

The first reference is an Indiatimes source (which hosts The Times of India) and hence it is reliable; the page is only decorated in the Filmfare manner. Could you point out a GA which uses the second source? Of course, there is also WP:OSE but I would not like to bring that up. If you find me tough, you are free to approach any other reviewer to carry out the process. I'm just saying this, but other editors have liked my detailedness in reviews, and I prefer to keep it that way. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 19:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Well so much for lack of IIFA resources. I found a reliable source which states that Krrish won Best Actor here. The other two awards were found here. See? Now let's get around this and start adding the necessary reliable sources. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

You are needed...

....over here. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Centenary_year. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Silver jubilee

Here are some sources for the following films:

1. Vivah

2. Lagaan

3. Gadar That's not even an extensive list. I couldn't find reliable sources for K3G, Koi...Mil Gaya, Mohabbatein etc. But they all have celebrated a silver jubilee. Smarojit (talk) 05:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Anytime, my friend. And yes, Kajol was quick. That's how I am - impulsive and quick. Not that I am proud of it. Smarojit (talk) 16:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Highbeam Research

Hi. Not sure if you have applied for this or not but in a recent article on a 2004 independent Filipino movie I found this to be an incredible resource and found lots of Filipino newspaper articles not picked up by google. I strongly recommend this for anyone who edits articles on films and cinema personalities to get this asap as it wil be an invaluable research tool and will often turn up detailed articles which will not appear in google. You can gain access to the full articles by applying for it at Wikipedia:HighBeam/Applications. For sure it'll have tons on Indian actors and films which so far you've been unable to access on google. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Mughal-e-Azam

I know you are very interested in this article, so it may make you happy to know that I've got a big interest in improving the article now. What say we collaborate together and make it a worthy FA? I am now beginning to understand the statement you made regarding conflicting information, and I guess that will be troublesome. I've already re-worked the lead, though it will be subject to some changes when the whole article is revamped. Cheers. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Would you believe me if I told you that I have a minimum of thirty solid, high-quality reliable sources waiting to be unleashed on the article? I spent much of today gathering them. Plus, I have the constant blessings of the terrifically useful Highbeam, so the number may hit 40 or even 50. No worries about the references; online sources are adequate in number, I can assure you that. In fact, with the amount of content I have fallen into, there has to be great planning as to where and how the content goes. I'll be doing this tomorrow. If you find any useful sources, do not hesitate to use them. Cheers. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:23, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. Till then, you could find some offline sources or scholarly sources (which is not my specialty). Best of luck regarding your work :). ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Bipasha Basu

I've reviewed the article and placed the article on hold. Looks like the nominator isn't active. As one of the major contributors will you be able to address the issues by taking part in the review. Respond as soon as possible. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 18:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, I was thinking it was a bit off from GA the last time I looked; let me have a look at your comments. Are they pretty much complete, or are you just getting started? BollyJeff | talk 18:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Just looking at your first few comments, there is even more than that, like contradictory information about her schools. Also I believe that the personal section is way too short. I honestly don't think it is good enough yet for GA, and I don't have the time to do it justice now. BollyJeff | talk 03:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Yup! Lot of facts are not verified by the sources and many are contradictory as you say. Lede does not adequately summarize the article. Also her modeling career needs to be given a fair amount of weight-age. Anyway, I leave it to the nominator to improve upon these issues. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 08:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

section split

I'd like u to take part in this discussion: Talk:Mughal-e-Azam#section split. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bollyjeff. You have new messages at Wifione's talk page.
Message added 16:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wifione ^Message 16:52, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

May I Know Why? (non-free image not needed here)

There was lack of soundtrack cover for DDLJ. I added it. With the reference of source from where i obtained it. But you removed it... May I know why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankurgow3 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Sholay soundtrack

Hi, if you checked the current version of the reference, please also update the "Retrieved" date. Right now it says the date is 2010; you shouldn't change one without the other. Thanks. Nczempin (talk) 15:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Bollyjeff. You have new messages at Nczempin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free media (File:SivandhaMann.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:SivandhaMann.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

INCINE notification

Hello. This is to inform you that there is a discussion going on at WT:INCINE regarding a specific user. The discussion can be viewed here. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 12:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Bombay's Tamil title

Hi. This is regarding the addition of the Tamil title for the aforementioned film. I did not understand what you meant by your summary of 'No scripts per outcome of RfC' when you reverted my edit. Most of the articles on films in regional Indian or foreign-to-English language films on Wikipedia have their respective language titles in parentheses right after the title. For eg.: Oldboy, Three Monkeys, City of God, Letters from Iwo Jima, Children of Heaven, Farewell My Concubine, Kaho Naa... Pyaar Hai, Lamhe, Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam, Mohabbatein, Mother India, Rangeela, Dil To Pagal Hai, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai and many others. Please let me know if there is a discussion/rule regarding the formatting of the titles, so that my edits are in sync with the norms. Anant Singh (talk) 00:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Alright. Understandable. Thanks for the information. Anant Singh (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks For Improving the article Naam Hai Boss. I created this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamgauravkumar (talk • contribs) 10:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Mughal-e-Azam should get GA nomination?

Pls share ur thoughts here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mughal-e-Azam#GA_nomination ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 12:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

To reply to your edit summary, no, its not okay for me. However, I believe that a source can always be found; remember, it was this belief that brought out two reliable sources for the IIFA Awards for Krrish. Hence, a temporary solution. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:54, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Hey ! I just dropped by to see if you have any suggestions for the discussuion taking place here. And thanks for your good work. Keep Doing it ! Bineet Ojha |BINEET| 16:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Sgt. Pepper straw poll

There is currently a straw poll taking place here. Your input would be appreciated. ~ GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 23:53, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The WikiProject Film Award
		I, Anupam, hereby award Bollyjeff the WikiProject Film Award for his/her valued contributions to WikiProject Film. Thanks for all your hard work on Bollywood related articles! You deserve this! With regards, AnupamTalk 03:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC) Awarded 03:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Check your Wikipedia email:

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 00:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Bollyjeff. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Its GA!!! Good job. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh yeah..., they say i have to encourage you to review some article. You are sufficiently encouraged already. If someone asks, say that i did it. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 21:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Or.... lets encourage you to give your comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/59th National Film Awards/archive1. Yes! Come on BollyJeff! You can do it!! We want COMMENTS! We want COMMENTS!! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:43, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Indian Cinema Task Force in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on the Indian Cinema Task Force for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Ranveer Singh

Hi, I have just joined Wikipedia. I am developing the Ranveer Singh page. Can I know how I can automatically monitor the fancruft being added in the page? I saw in the history that you reverted some changes with a tool. Please reply on my talk page. IndianBio (talk) 06:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

I clicked on the Twinkle tool in preference but its not appeading in my wiki page???????? What's wrong :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianBio (talk • contribs) 12:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Hola

Hi Bollyjeff, been a long time. How are you doing? I haven't been that active on Wikipedia of late, but have made some copy edits to the Shahrukh Khan article. Don't know how long I can continue editing here. What's new with you? Smarojit (talk) 03:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't have any spare time now to sit and edit articles. I try to squeeze in whenever I can, but I don't think a proper full-blown edit is possible in the near future. And I read the Mughal-e-Azam article; great work. I will, however, work on the Kajol article when the review begins. Keep in touch. :-) Smarojit (talk) 03:03, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Ranbir Kapoor

Hi there, remember me? Thanks for advising me on Twinkle, although its still not functioning properly for me. I was wondering if you can tell me who's working on the Ranbir Kapoor article. I edit the Ranveer Singh article and it is immaculately structured, I was wondering if I can do the same and expand the Kapoor article 4 times as well. Do reply, Regards IndianBio (talk) 16:09, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. It seems that no one is exactly working on the article. Although, seeing the wonderful Kareena Kapoor article, I'm really daunted by the fact that how can I bring the Ranbir article to such dizzying heights. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey BollyJeff, I understood the points that you made. The Ranveer Singh article can be a nice muse for me to work on the Ranbir Kapoor article I guess. Also, I got what you said about Reflinks interactive session. Thanks for the info and I will always keep that in mind. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra

Hey there! Hope you're doing ok. I Need help with the Priyanka Chopra article. Wanna get it to GA .. Pleaseee.. BTW, you're a great editor!! Hope you'll consider my request. Bye!MrSalvatore (talk) 2:51, 31 August (UTC)

Thank you for the tips. I'll start working on it. MrSalvatore (talk) 5:21, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Need your opinion on something. Is it ok if I merge the early life and beauty pageants sections? (talk) 6:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

A Yash Chopra Romance

Hi. Please change the protection level of the page. It is undergoing too many edits especially with speculated titles. Arjann (talk) 18:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Taare Zameen Par

Hey, an editor has been constantly making changes to the lead today regarding the movie title and refuses to discuss it. I've given up today to avoid edit warring, but just wanted to give a heads up if you hadn't seen it. Ωphois 19:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey, do you mind giving your opinion on the matter in the discussion page? I tried opening a discussion with the editor, but again he just reverts without giving his reasons. Thanks. Ωphois 23:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

I opened a dialogue on the talk page, but I'll go ahead and post a link to it on his talk page. I had requested your opinion on the talk page so that a consensus on the matter could be built for which presentation to use. I've also posted on the task force page asking for people's opinions. This user previously kept changing "Taare Zameen Par" throughout the article to "Like Stars on Earth", and didn't stop until more than one editor showed disagreement. Personally, I think he has just been purposely disrupting this page since we disagreed with him on that matter. As for the previous discussions, this is really the only Bollywood article I've worked on, so I don't really know where those discussions are located. The lead stuff is based on other Bollywood articles, and the Bollywood MoS differ somewhat from the regular film MoS. Ωphois 23:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey, just letting you know that I reported Jsigned on the ANI here. Thanks. Ωphois 23:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Is this the discussion on titles that you were referring to? Ωphois 00:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I added two of them. BollyJeff | talk 00:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey, I was able to get an admin to close the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(films)#Titles_of_Indian_film_articles. The conclusion by the admin was "Closing this per the call on ANI. The conclusion is to continue following the advice in WP:COMMONNAME: the article's name should be the name mostly commonly used in English sources. If it is the original Indian name, use that. Redirect all other titles". Is that something that should be added to a policy/guideline page? Ωphois 21:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

BTW, what do you think we should do regarding Jsigned? I can live with the current version, but personally I think the DVD title should be placed later in the lead. The film was released in cinemas internationally as TZP, and the "Like Stars on Earth" title only applies to the later DVD release. Since the lead section actually discusses the DVD release, I think it would make most sense to put it there. If you agree with me and are willing to fight for it (Secret of Success may also), then we can try dicussing it again on the talk page. If Jsigned refuses to discuss it and keeps reverting, then we can just report him for 3RR or report him at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct. Anyways, thanks for your assistance so far. Ωphois 21:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I am not willing to fight for it. WP is collaborative after all, and it won't keep me awake at night. I am not sure that a policy change is actually needed because they mainly just confirmed that WP:commonname applies here. I would just keep the link to these discussions in case it comes up again. BollyJeff | talk 23:26, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Reassessment

Hi, can you assess this article? —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 13:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I called it start class. Not sure if you wanted to add an ICTF banner, but I did not. BollyJeff | talk 13:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Although the story is connected with India, I don't think it will fall under the scope of ICTF. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 16:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra

Hey mate! The lead lacks info about her modelling career. Will you add some more? You have a way with words. GleekVampire (talk) 02:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok. I just asked coz the GA review said it needed more info. Anyway, thanks for the heads up about the citations in the lead. GleekVampire (talk) 02:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Ok i'm on it! Also I was thinking, Should we add a personal life section? There was this huge controversy with her former assistant. She even spoke about it in the media. What do you think? GleekVampire (talk) 02:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I've got proper sources. Here are some links. Check them and decide if it's ok for me to add the info. http://www.mumbaimirror.com/article/30/2008082720080827023917887291d5bc8/U-make-me-sick-.html http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2006-05-28/news-interviews/27822741_1_chhota-shakeel-prakash-jaju-bollywood-actress-priyanka-chopra http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/celebrity/priyanka-s-accused-secy-prakash-jaju-speaks-to-clear-name_17426.htm GleekVampire (talk) 02:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

I'll look for some more info before creating the section. Thank you for your guidance. :) GleekVampire (talk) 02:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

A possible vandal?

Hello Bolly, what's up with Lionstaken (talk · contribs) and his continuous addition of empty sections and trivia news in the Madhuri Dixit article? Can we do something about him/her? Seems the user is turning a deaf ear to warnings and explanations others have given in his talk page. I don't exactly know the process to deal with such users —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:53, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Really good additions on the Chopra article. I might take it to my sandbox and add more, currently finishing the Madhuri Dixit Award page. After that I might ask you for help. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Bolly, some of the references in the Chopra article are missing accessdate, date, author name etc, and I found the citation to the website actually provides them. Just notifying, I will change them when I find others also. Great work. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Jab Tak Hai Jaan

by Arjann (talk) 12:43, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Please can you change or request to change the level of page protection of Jab Tak Hai Jaan by introducing Wikipedia:Protection policy Semi-Protection lock as the page is undergoing to many unwanted edits.

Bollywood Hungama

A dead link is a situation where the link simply doesn't show up, and where nobody can get access to, unless fixed. The recent black-out of Bollywood Hungama did not create such a case, rather it only limited the number of users who could access the links. People with authorization can access the links without trouble, and specifically, as per guidelines here, "Sources can be expensive, print-only, or available only in certain places. A source does not stop being reliable simply because you personally aren't able to obtain a copy." Secret of success (talk) 16:46, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

No, I don't think you got my point. If replacements are available, though replacement would be a good option, it is not mandatory, and nor does it mean that the present links are unreliable. If they are the only site to have the information, it doesn't matter, so as long as the information isn't highly subjective. If it is, (the recent dabangg khan request you turned down) maybe we could take your approach. PS. You would be interested to see through this once more, regarding dead links in GA's. Secret of success (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

There, there, we don't wanna get nasty, do we? The criteria we have to follow to get an article to GA is fixed at the moment. Period. If you feel that it stands too low for your level, why don't you take a giant leap and chase FA? Note this. If you have two articles, one as good as a GA and another as good as FA, it makes absolutely no difference in a GA review, and will not get you any special recognition in such a situation. Secret of success (talk) 07:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

The last time I looked, I never asked you to make sections "bigger" in Sholay like you did here. All my queries were mainly about prose and unsourced statements. In Farhan Akhtar, the article has been expanded to the maximum possible extent. I added all information I could find about him. I will try to take care of prose issues if you list them, but my query is about the article's coverage. Because of the fact that the film career is really long, the early life section appears comparatively short. But it isn't. If you are expecting something like Kareena Kapoor or Shahrukh Khan, you will have to walk away disappointed because Akhtar is not as popular as those two. Secret of success (talk) 04:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Look, I'm not asking you to pass the article downright. All I'm saying is, avoid comparing articles when you do a GA review and do not expect the extraneous features of one in another in order to pass it. Secret of success (talk) 04:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

JTHJ

pls share ur thoughts here: Talk:Jab_Tak_Hai_Jaan#english_translation ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:26, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra

Hi Bolly, I think the article needs a protection seeing the amount of vandalism and slow-poisoning taking place. Oh and a copy edit. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, may be you are right about the vandalism, I don't know how much is considered a tolerable limit. About the copy edit, I was talking about the recent most section, and it suffering from something called WP:RECENTISM I found out. Did you read this Manual? Its kinda good. We can may be ask someone who writes Featured articles to give it a brush? Or may be a Peer review? —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Sure we can. Good luck with the GA. Any help needed let me know, —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:33, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Mughal-e-Azam

Any plans on FAC?--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

yes I was involved in quite a few FAs, but those were 4 years back. The only film FA that I was involved with was Lage Raho Munnabhai which was even earlier. FA nominations have become tougher now.

We will soon resume work on Mother India. That sfn style of referencing is not a prerequisite for FA. As you noted, it is good for articles that use book sources extensively,,but not that much for articles mainly based on multiple web sources. The reference style of MeA is good, that won't be a problem. While the article is comprehensive, some information borders on trivia, that is my main concern. --Dwaipayan (talk) 15:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Madhuri Dixit

Can you please help me report {{user|Lionstaken} for continuously adding unsourced fancruft on the above article, even after repeated warnings and blocks. I'm helpless. Please!! —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Priyanka chopra is also a reecording artist! like jenifer lopez

Hi, Bollyjeff....i think you are one of the best Editors on Wikipedia and I ad.ire you,but the problem is priyanka Chopra article is too short and it should be included in Recording artists category,because she had released her single and will release her album after that which I makes her an artist like Jennifer Lopez,who was also an actor.hope you can help.(Pks1142 (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC))

Hi Pks1142, I'm IndianBio and to answer your question, no, Chopra has not yet taken singing as a career like Jennifer Lopez and other actress/singers have, like Madonna, or Mariah Carey or the late Whitney Houston. Hence it would be WP:CRYSTAL to call her a singer as a career for now, just because she released a song, which has not been released also as a single. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Madhuri filmography

Hi Bolly, what do you think of a Madhuri Dixit filmography article ala Jennifer Lopez filmography? She has a long history of films and can be a stand-alone list. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Interscope Records Singles redirected to Priyanka chopra,WHY?

Hello sir with due respect,I just wanted to ask you that why you redirected our company's single by William an PC to latter's article.this article was created to spread the awareness as according to Google,this single is widely searched on internet,we even get calls about single info.so I request you to pls revert all the edits.If I'm not wrong you are an Indian cinema Wikipedian so focus on fil articles,this articles belongs to Musician category.(Pks1142 (talk) 05:39, 10 October 2012 (UTC))

Bommarillu GAR

No consensus is the same as keep in this context, but that seems a clearer description of the article's history. Therefore I've removed the request from WP:AN. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:06, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra

I am reviewing the article and have left some comments in the review. The article has issues but it can be easily elevated, with a bit of effort. Hope to see you there. Secret of success (talk) 12:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Trivia in Mughal-e-Azam

Unfortunately I have now forgot which things seemed trivial,in the article. I remember one though. The incident of Naushad throwing away the money probably is rather anecdotal and trivial, too. Anyway, don't have to remove that, as of now. Will read the article later again, and if something comes into mind, will write that down.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:57, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

PC Miss India

Bolly, regarding the Miss India contest for PC, I have an old Femina magazine, where the contest is detailedly analyzed. The cover is of PC, Lara and Diya with Shahrukh Khan. Title of the article on PC is "Adabtability comes easy", written by Satya Saran, dated March 15, 2000. It details about Chopra's placement, her enrollment, her previous life etc. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 07:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok so Femina magazine is reliable I guess. I don't know how to cite a physical magazine, I will just provide the details, you format it later. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:18, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You are a regular patroller. Keep up! ---zeeyanketu talk to me 04:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

In my city come in those categories

I just want to say that in my city have those categories that why ,I created as per music category rules and regulations of music and songs on Wikipedia.It should be there because Wikipedia have places for categories pages.(Pks1142 (talk) 17:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC))

I am not very familiar with those music rules. It is under review now, and if it is meant to stay, it will. BollyJeff | talk 18:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Taare Zameen Par

Hey, in case you didn't notice, just wanted to give you a heads up that Jsigned/Film Fan has requested a move for TZP to it's English title on the talk page. Thanks. Ωphois 18:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Infobox Images

When I change the image of Actors or others I Just want to keep the image updated and the images which are uploaded or changed by me are licensed and better than old images and does not have any problem, Thank You Greatuser (talk) 11:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) What a coincidence Greatuser! I just now removed the image you added on Salman Khan and then accidentally came across this msg you left here. I have removed that image from infobox. The one i added is recognized as Valued Image on Commons and hence is better for article.
I will also be removing your other images from articles as they are not useful for infoboxes. Eg: File:Khan_at_audio_release_of_JTHJ.jpg has SRK from knee till head. That view does not show his face properly. Whereas the previous image File:Shahrukh interacts with media after KKR's maiden IPL title.jpg was his closeup. Now SRK hasn't gone very old in 5 months that you need to update his image. In case you are adding new images, make sure they are better than the previous ones. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Yash Chopra

Your opinion would be appreciated here: Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#Yash_Chopra_dies. Secret of success (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry for that comment, please do accept my apologies. I struck it out as it was personal, please slap me with a trout if you feel like it. Don't worry about PC, I am on the verge of passing it. Just finish the talk with Bollywood Dreamz, and address the one last issue I have posted, and you will have it.

After you get it for GA, try it out for FA. She has a good potential, and is gaining a lot of popularity. You don't have to worry about me, because I will retire soon. :) Secret of success (talk) 16:50, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

The article is now a GA. Congrats and best of luck for your future ventures. Regards. Secret of success (talk) 11:26, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Sorry!

Sorry for copying "This user holds a Cho Dan (black belt) in Tang Soo Do / Soo Bahk Do a Korean martial art" Actually, It mistakenly was copied by me, I am Really sorry about that and I have removed the template and Thank You for informing me, Greatuser (talk) 05:24, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

hi there, I am very thankful for your effort in adding to the Amitabh Bachchan filmography It is my dream list.. but I have some more to add to it, but i dont know how, and becuz i dont want to missed it up, i will give you my info for you to review and add. 1- Bombay Talkie is a 1970 2- Garam Masala ismissing from the list. Amitabh Bachchan was the Ustaad in a (Special Appearance) & Robert Taylor (uncredited) .. I think a review is highly needed Dudy Freedom 10:58, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Femina

Bolly, did you forget about the Femina source for Chopra? :( —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Production Banner

I have mentioned in a discussion that a production banner might be an essential information and added YRF as an example. I have been told to use studio parameter. Can you have a look here: Template_talk:Infobox_film#Parameter_confusion.21? --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:26, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Use of rollback

You know, stuff like this is by no means vandalism, and some of it was even constructive. Please don't use the rollback tool to revert such things, for that feature is meant only for pure and obvious vandalism. Though I think you would have done so, please go through WP:RBK before further reverts. Secret of success · talk 14:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Listen, if you have a problem with some part of my edit, kindly revert ONLY that part. Please do not undo someone's edit fully (if you're lazy to click a few times, no one could care any less). Using twinkle in such cases is not allowed, since twinkle doesn't have partial revert as a feature. Please use the undo key for such situations. Secret of success · talk 02:39, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

No one really cares whether you possess a gold mine of time or not. Play by the rules if you wish to stay away from trouble, that is the golden rule here. PS. Calling someone's edit vandalism when it is clearly not, is a personal attack. Secret of success · talk 13:32, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes, one thing constructive? Hindi language --> Hindi. You did not call it vandalism, but you used the rollback tool against it, then it implies that you consider it vandalism. Never mind. Secret of success · talk 13:43, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

In My City

Bolly, can you copy-edit this Chopra article a little bit? And I'm really getting tired of this user going on adding puffery content glorifying Chopra and removing content without discussion etc. Going borderline vandalism I think. How do you deal with people and fan boys like this? :( —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Bollywood

Hello Bollyjeff, if you would like to leave comments which concern you or would cast a vote in support or opposition depending on your observation, I would much appreciate it. Thanks. — Bill william compton^Talk 15:41, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Irrelevant inclusion to In My City

Hi, Well you what's happening.someone is saying me a fan boy??? Ok I want to ask if I would say to add the following thing to Priyanka Chopra article along with reference will you.. Priyanka Chopra's team thought to promote her on Hollywood by shooting her video like Rose from titanic and her team arranged her interviews ,film interviews.And a known writer said if she can make her place in Hollywood,then she will be a pioneer in Asia.

You would say -NO

In the same read this you'll understand

Seeing that many pop artists use music and reality-based videos to create awareness around their upcoming releases, Chopra's team planned to create different promotional contents, like interviews of the artist, and behind-the-scenes footage with long-and-short documentaries, that would be released to the internet. The videos and interviews would focus on Chopra's journey in becoming a pop artist. Since most of the top ten hits in India are mainly songs from Bollywood films—where the actors lip-synch to the song—Chopra's label wanted to promote her as the first Bollywood actress who can also sing. According to Lee Hawkins from The Wall Street Journal, "If Chopra is able to convincingly establish herself as a respected singer, she will be a pioneer in South Asia. Throughout 2011, Anthony Saleh, one of Carter's partners at Atom Factory Inc., worked closely with Chopra for several weeks. Beyond selling music, the team planned to use Chopra's popularity and tap into ancillary revenue streams such as corporate sponsorships, high-fashion modeling, film and television, concert touring, and music publishing. Saleh added that they also "plan on developing [Chopra] as a songwriter

This doesn't. Make sense right.It seems the article is becoming college of blog columns.Here it looks what her team thought,her team planned,her team arranged headlines,someone is predicting her future.Does it talk about promotion.

If you have to include to any article will you add like this.pls Say something bcoz I'm tired of IndianBio taunting me.Im tired explaing this to indianBio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pks1142 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

FA Nomination for Priyanka Chopra

Hi,Bollyjeff.I had nominated the article for Featured article.Please do comment and share your views.(Green Parakeet (talk) 05:54, 23 November 2012 (UTC))

I don't think it is quite ready yet. BollyJeff | talk 02:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, well I don't know how question for the reliability of sources arised but Maralia is true on his concern,well I'll provide the sources which you LL require.Green Parakeet (talk) 04:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra

hi bollyjeff I think we should transform a whole subsection of Music Career of Priyanka Chopra to an entire section because she had admitted that she will always act and sing. And it should be added with more details in music cater section.(Pks1142 (talk) 06:48, 28 November 2012 (UTC))

I got your point.Ya you are right about all those things.I understand you and have faith on you completely. Chopra article to FA....good idea but all India today sources are dead links ,peer review tells all.Well thanks for your help.....well I must say, you transformed that article completely to an amazing biographical piece of work.We will support you on FA.(Pks1142 (talk) 16:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC))

Ya you are absolutely right....howzz that if I give you all exact sources of different publisher.Tell me I'll send you all the exact sources.(Pks1142 (talk) 00:47, 29 November 2012 (UTC))

Hey I added that filmfare lust because ,it was also present in Vista balan's article.thats whyPks1142 (talk) 19:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

what is this of you

did u know? in Ra.One (a good article), a lot of content has been deleted by IP users and you never took notice of it? pls go through the article, and also check revision histories to help restore deleted content. the article should have a permanent protection from IP users bcoz they can remove anything without telling and its difficult to be notified of their misdeeds. I say this to User:Ankitbhatt also. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:20, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

no response? Kailash29792 (talk) 19:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

PC

Hey mate! Thanks for the corrections, I'll be careful next time. Ok, i'll add singer in the lead and info box. One more thing, can you please help me find some more info or reviews for her Telugu film "Apuroopam"? There's no wikipedia article either. GleekVampire (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Cool! Here's the link - http://specials.rediff.com/movies/2009/jan/05slide9-best-actresses-2008.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by GleekVampire (talk • contribs) 00:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Yea, she looks awesome! I'm glad you're trying to get article to FA. Lemme know if you need any help. :) GleekVampire (talk) 00:50, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For the cleanup of Munna Bhai M.B.B.S.. Looks to me like you got everything, so I've marked it complete. Do you agree?--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:44, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

I was investigating items in Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 September 12, and it looked to me like you cleaned it up nicely, so I am marking it as completed. Just want to make sure you agree.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 14:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer, and thanks for your work.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

gave some reliable sources fo Chopra

Hi ,I had submitted some sources to talk page of Chopra which could be helpful.if you need more help then ask me.Green Parakeet (talk) 16:33, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra Endorsements

Hey bollyjeff I have some concerns about endorsement section, it says she has represented brands like so and so.it nothing say about the brands she endorses now It is confusing whether she is endorsing or endorsed.you know what I mean.Pks1142 (talk) 03:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

English Vinglish

Hi..I have seen your work in many film reviews and am impressed by your good work. Could you also review the article on the film English Vinglish? At present it has been given a rating of start class by WikiProject Film. However a lot of materials and references have been added since the last time it was rated. Wiki project India has rated it as C-class. I have requested a reassessment a month back but no response. Could you please look into the article and get it rated higher and also give suggestion how it can be improved. Naveed (talk) 07:17, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for those edits

Ya hi, well I was reliable in those edits but ya I'll take care about that as that was too much details.Well are you gearing up for Priyanka Chopra to become one of Wikipedia FA.I hope so and again sorry. Will not do againPks1142 (talk) 14:43, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

BOX OFFICE

You may help here Talk:Jab Tak Hai Jaan#Discussion continued---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Conrgats on the FA

Thanks a lot. I have put up a request here, for 1 January (her birthday). The review wasn't particularly tough, just took a really long time to get through. And I owe a huge thanks to Dwaipayanc for guiding me through the whole process. It's good to know that you are working on Priyanka's article; she has a very interesting career. If you want, I can go through the article and let you know what I think. Cheers. --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 04:36, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Hi, Bollyjeff I want to present this Original Barnstar for your amazing work on Priyanka Chopra and I hope it will soon be FA. Green Parakeet (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Autumn-imh.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Autumn-imh.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra lead

How are you doing? Well I have some concern over GleekVampire's edit on Chopra's lead section. I saw he removed details of her recent success and Filmfare Awards. I know we can't add much to lead but if you see even Hollywood personalities like Meryl streep , there is detail of every won academy award and others. Since, FA are prominent in India so they must lie in the lead. Also, he removed recent success of her films. Again if you see other pages, they have recent success as well in the lead. It shows she had commercial success as well along with critical. If these are not included in lead then it may cause negative effect on readers as most of readers only love to read introduction lead. That's why I am saying it gives more effective impression that she also had commercial success as well. Pls comment on this.Green Parakeet (talk) 09:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hey Bollyjeff, I had added the source, you asked about her family sacrifice on her talk page check outGreen Parakeet (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't think it's necessary to add each and every Filmfare Award she has won in the lead. This sentence covers all the awards - "Throughout her career, Chopra has received many awards, including a National Film Award for Best Actress and Filmfare Awards in four distinct categories." Take a look at the Vidya Balan and Kareena Kapoor articles as well, the editors have done the same. Secondly, Barfi! was a commercially successful film so I don't see the point in adding Don and Agneepath in the lead.GleekVampire (talk) 23:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

I think that GleekVampire is right on this one. The summary sentence means we should not list awards separately in the lead. Also, there are enough films listed in the lead already. Let's not turn this into an Ajay Devgan or Salman Khan article with a huge listing of films in the lead. BollyJeff | talk 01:09, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Reply

Unfortunately yes ,the source says that in true term, she is nominated for Best female artist. you can check in her list page. I had added and had given reference of the official website of WMA.Pks1142 (talk) 15:33, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

I mean to say she is nominated for best female artist but HT had mistakenly printed that ,you can check the official site of www.worldmusicawards.com, which I had used as reference in list of Awards by Chopra page. I think you understand.

one more thing I had added hit status of thamizhan in the lead with reference, review the article of Chopra and tell me howwzz that.ThanksPks1142 (talk) 17:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

hey there, Ups and downs???? So I engaging section title.sorry for revert and I know will revert back but by the name of that section it looks like she had give only flop films. Ok your call, I think previous sections were too good than this.Sorry for even consulting you.im crying and I can't see myself do broken due to others. In not gonna ask you again.Pks1142 (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi bollyjeff, well I'm right now working on Chopra award list towards FL, I'm Making it better, giving more sources, battered introduction as per awards list intro. Still work is on. Pls check my Sandbox 3 and tell me how it is shaping up.Pks1142 (talk) 08:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Bollyjeff, Howzz you doing User:Giants2008 told me to take chopra list for PEER REVIEW. It will help for its further improvisation. Please contribute as much you can. Thanka you.(Pks1142 (talk) 09:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC))

New project

Here is the new project for you Review the Parineeti Chopra as GA Greatuser (talk) 12:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

You and I must work together on getting some articles to GA and FA again now that Shahid has basically left us.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Love Priyanka, OK. As for GA I was thinking of some of the post Mother India classics, perhaps a 60s movie and Rekha. I know Shahid was keen on getting Rekha to GA and its one I'd also like to see at that level. Rekha and Amitabh I think we should try to get to GA as soon as we can.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:32, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

No problem but.

• Hi Bollyjeff, you are most familair to Indian film subject, I have no any objections to add new information, but changing the layout and image, that should be discussed. I think it is more better to add that information to subject's article of List of awards and nominations received by Shreya Ghoshal and Shreya Ghoshal discography. That will be more appropriate, I think so. If you want to add instead, you can do it but please add the information, not changing the layout.Thanks for your collaboration. Justice007 (talk) 17:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Why do you keep trolling my contributions????? I get that some of them are unsourced and all, but seriously, what the heck? ASGtheDON (talk) 04:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	A long-overdue barnstar to one of the finest fellow editors on Wikipedia. :) smarojit (buzz me) 14:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

	The Glowing Christmas Tree
	Merry Christmas to you, Bollyjeff! --Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 08:21, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Chopra filmography

Hi, Howzz you? Well, For the last couple of days, I was working on Chopra filmography. When I saw Jennifer Lopez filmography. I was working day and night on my Sandbox 4. Would would you please take a look, as I think a page for filmography is needed strongly. Take a look and tell me. Lot of work is left on the page.Pks1142 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Don't be so rude......I am just saying because that would be helpful to us for the main article. Main article would gain more space and I think it's fine to have another filmography article, Christian Bale filmography is an example of this and I think it's fine. Rest the details of directors and gross, I think it's obvious because when you talk about films you would like to talk about the highlights of the films..... The directors and the budget air the gross. If that was not important then, those article must not have passed FL. Its a huge thing to pass FL. If she would have a discography page, then you can't go against it.Pks1142 (talk) 18:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

FLC Nomination

hi, I have nominated the chopra awards list. Please feel free to contribute Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Priyanka Chopra/archive1. It got better after the peer review Thanks.Pks1142 (talk) 04:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

It's Ok.....Bollyjeff. I would try my best to find those sources and I can understand why you were opposing her filmography. You are a good person and a Wikipedia too. Don't worry, we will try our best for FA. For Now, I'm trying to take Chopra list to FLC. Could you please represent your views on the archive page. Cheers!—PKS:1142 · ^(TALK) 15:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

Hi. Getting Balan to FA came with a price. My grades this semester were kind of low for my liking. So I guess I need to concentrate on improving my grades for now. --smarojit ^{(buzz me)} 06:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Mumtaz (actress)

(Reverted 3 edits by 210.212.78.161 (talk): Scripts are not wanted now, and please move the quotes to wikiquote [3] and place a link here. ([[WP:T...)

Can you please guide me to do it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.78.161 (talk) 08:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.78.161 (talk) 08:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

What is the reason????

Enthiran is the highest-grossing Indian film of all time.How can you deny that fact????????????????????????????????? Can u explain me whether Box Office India website is better than NDTV,CNN IBN ,TV9,Indian Express and India Today.

Most of the bollywood users are dominating the actual facts.I request you to lead the proper Wikipedia rules.

India Today [[4]]

Indianexpress[[5]]

TV9[[6]]

NDTV[[7]]

CNN-IBN[[8]]

[[9]] Pamsha (talk) 17:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2013

Torreslfchero (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year!

--Plea$ant 1623 ✉ — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Wishing you a very happy new year! Yours truly ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 18:44, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Wishing you a very “Happy NEW YEAR“ filled with peace, prosperity and happiness.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 19:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)