User talk:Eyesnore/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Eyesnore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:44, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 18:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eyesnore: Please explain how an in context direct quote from an article in the New York Times can be seen as "libellous"?Anonnyc (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Eyesnore: I made an edit that you changed claimiing it appeared to be vandalism. I made the edit to the accuplacer portion of the college board page in an effort to save someone in a position that I was in alot of time by providing an answer to a question that I could not fiind else where. Leave the edit alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.124.189.40 (talk) 23:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eyesnore, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Eyesnore! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FDMI

Regarding your revert: more performing of the required diligence and fewer poorly justified accusations, I think. 178.16.4.252 (talk) 03:37, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then, you may report a false positive to ClueBot NG. Eyesnore (talk) 03:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks

Perhaps you should be aware it is impossible to make a personal attack against a robot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.50.148.9 (talk) 20:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please read WP:Vandalism. I appreciate your efforts to keep the place clean, and this edit was not productive, but there is no need to slap a level-3 warning on the talk page of a new editor (see WP:BITE). Thank you. Drmies (talk) 06:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

The page for Mayor Murphy was changed because it did not reflect how he spells his name. I changed it out of respect to how the Mayor actually spells his name. If you go to the mayor's web page you will see that he uses the accent over his middle initial, his name is Spelled with the Irish spelling tradition not the English one. Perhaps you consider it vandalism, but I consider it a correction, after all should not his page reflect how he spells his name not how others may wish it to be Spelled? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DexterPG (talk • contribs) 18:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why undo fact that Nirmal Baba cheated Yuvraj Singh ??

Hello Eyesnore,

Why do you feel the change in the section "Allegations of fraud" on Nirmal Baba's page to be defamatory ? The fact that he cheated India cricketer Yuvraj Singh has been reported in the media. Please check the reference. The story has been reported by many Indian newspapers. Check out the video on youtube which has Yuvraj's father Jograj Singh's interview given to PTC news channel.

This recent edit can hurt Nirmal Baba's feelings, so that is defamatory content. Eyesnore (talk) 01:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8r-tRariBQ

I hope you understand Hindi language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.90.7.2 (talk) 01:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Eyesnore.. all the information that i entered on the Prayag Jha wiki page was valid and were pictures of her original art work. I am her relative who owns this material. was wondering why you deleted all of it ? Chillar123 (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Columbia stuff

Hey, so you may want to be a bit more careful when CSD tagging, as that article was clearly notable. In terms of your CSD log, you can set up Twinkle to do that for you, if you want to not have to tag them every time. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Les Miserables character pages

Hi there,

I got your message titled "January 2013" from here.

I was not trying to "vandalize" the Thénardiers page in any way, I only tried to keep the consistency to the changes that have been recently done on the other Les Misérables character pages (The person who did the changes did not do so for Fantine and Marius Pontmercy. I have since changed this).

Recently, I had noticed that most of the other character pages had their song descriptions in the "Songs" categories and the actor lists in the "Adaptations" categories removed and changed. I saw that most of these pages got these changes, while some did not, and I'm unsure why that is, hence why I made the changes to the pages I have just mentioned for consistency reasons.

If you see the edit histories from the other character pages, you will see that I put the lists back, but some pages got changed again, while some did not. Because "Songs" and "Adaptations" have their own pages (Songs from Les Misérables and Adaptations of Les Misérables), I realized that the actor lists can be added to "Adaptations" anytime, while the "Songs" page has a Song Lyrics link under its External Links section. Therefore, I decided to correct the other character pages that were missed.

Thank you. 205.189.94.11 (talk) 00:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I added more information above. Thank you. 205.189.94.12 (talk) 20:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Johnson

<WP:BLP violations removed.> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seriouslyitstrue (talk • contribs) 21:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happened to see this while posting the message below. Obviously this isn't your fault, and, rather, the consequence of a job well done. It's always funny when the trolls come to tell you they're not trolling. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 23:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested speedy

Hi there. Just so you know, I've contested your A1 speedy at Jonathon lack, as A1 only applies in unequivocal cases. I assure you, you have my complete empathy, as someone who also started out working on RCP and NPP, and who's very familiar with that feeling of (we just need to delete it ALL!) that you sometimes get after tagging page after page after page. So sometimes you sorta get tunnel vision, and find yourself clicking the CSD button over and over again. So I perfectly understand. Remember that AFD can be just as exciting as CSD (moreso, in fact, because you get to fight off sockpupets and learn all sorts of bits of obscure policy), so when in doubt, it's the way to go. In this case, though, I've BLPPRODded the article, as it currently cites no sources. All the best. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 22:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Álvarez Díaz - Reply

Hi there EYESNORE, AL from Portugal here,

my edit was not controvesial at all and it does not need a source (or if so, then the other user before me would also have to provide one no?), this player already has a field for Sporting de Gijón B, which is the reserve team of Sporting de Gijón, the parent club thus. No need for a SECOND field with the same club, it does not have to do anything with a transfer between teams/organizations.

Attentively (and i still find it quite baffling an edit like this could be mistaken for VANDALISM as the edit summary says)- --AL (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, but i admit my summary could have been WAY better in order to avoid any confusion. --AL (talk) 01:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re User:Bay Area Rapid Transit

That's an LTA, see Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/John_Daker. Legoktm (talk) 03:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested speedy

Hello Eyesnore. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know however, regarding SideCar (company), that tagging articles for speedy deletion moments after creation as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3) and articles created through the Article Wizard, is too fast. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.

More importantly, A1 does not apply in this case because there is in fact sufficient context to identify the subject of the article: "SideCar is a technology company based in San Francisco, CA." The company may not be notable, but I think we should give the author time to develop it first. That's why it's best to patrol new pages from the back of the queue. You can always nominate it for deletion once the article has stabilized. Give it a few weeks. Happy editing. Braincricket (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CSD declined: Screw You (Cheryl Cole song)

Hey, Eyesnore! I just wanted to let you know that I declined your speedy deletion nomination of this page. Looking at the Wikipedia article that was linked to, I believe the author intended it to be a redirect, so I fixed the intended redirect, rather than delete it. Redirecting is actually a pretty useful trick as an alternative to deletion; please keep it in mind, especially for things like this. (Just in case you don't know how to make a redirect, it's pretty easy: just replace all the content of a page with #REDIRECT [[Title_of_redirect_target]].) Thanks! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 22:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder

Please make sure to provide an edit summary if reverting or undoing users for anything other than obvious vandalism or defamation. For instance, while I know that Bloomex has had a long history of issues with promotion, another reviewer might see your unexplained revert as problematic. No worries, and we all forget every now and then, but just thought I'd put that out there. — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 01:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duff Step

Hello, Eyesnore, Please put my comment on Lord Filkin back now! You have no right to decide for anyone what is "constructive" or not. You are completely out of line. Wikipedia is all about the free flow of sound information, so please do some actual work on this website. Thanks. Stephen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duff Step (talk • contribs) 01:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - Francophonie&Androphilie has pointed out that my comments above could be construed as a personal and unnecessary attack, so I apologise. However, does that change the substance of my original complaint - what right does Eyesnore have to delete a comment that is properly cited, formatted and accurate. I would very much appreciate an answer to this question. Thanks. Stephen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duff Step (talk • contribs) 02:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Laundronauts and copyright

I know that you reverted this edit, with the edit summary "not enough", but I still thought it worth pointing out to you that the page you linked to says "This article uses material from the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Laundronauts". It is a very common mistake to assume that any Wikipedia article that looks like another web page is copied from it, but in fact copying from Wikipedia is probably more common. Despite the claims of the IP editor, I can find no evidence anywhere that the Wikipedia article is a copyright infringement. As I said, I know that this time you self-reverted, but it is necessary to be on guard against similar mistakes. JamesBWatson (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not attacking anyone, but your assumption can be perceived as an attack. I am done editing. Good day Sir! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.112.88.67 (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

You just beat me to it, unfortunately, and unfortunately you completely failed to explain why you reverted. The correct answer is "conflict of interest, re-instatement of review to non-notable zine". Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh

WSXGA commonly refers to 1680x1050, even though it's short for WSXGA+. But why am I telling you? You're blindly trusting a bot. Good grief. --84.44.231.58 (talk) 06:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, I see that you have been advised to use edit summary explanations for everything besides obvious vandalism reverts. My edit was not vandalism (i.e. a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia), and you had no reason to assume it was. Therefore, you should have given some kind of explanation in the edit summary. You know, mindless reverters never become admins. Just in case you're trying to rack up revert edits for a future run. Sorry to have to tell you this, but better now than later. --84.44.231.58 (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Lasik

Sir, I responded to your comment on my talk page. Best, 213.232.200.195 (talk) 18:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for cleaning house twice for me today! Bob the WikipediaN ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Asaram Bapu

Please restore your edit! --Tito Dutta (talk) 02:40, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

27.252.222.48

yo it's me here you made a damn good call. today its hard to find people like you. well done — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.252.222.48 (talk) 01:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What should I do should I close this account or what i need help what did i do wrong--SegaKing247 05:20, 21 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SegaKing247 (talk • contribs)

Asaram Bapu

Can you please check the recent edits of Asaram Bapu article? --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic_Purcell Reverted?

Hey there. You reverted one of my changes to the page Dominic_Purcell. I don't understand why? The table in question is the tv series chart of this actor. I put a link for each TV show in the chart, as well as slightly formatted it better to be easier on the eyes. I don't see how making a hyperlink in a table is Vandalism. Every actor has this. Thanks for the help.

Reversion

Hi there. You reverted my edit of the Stockbridge talk page, giving in a mechanized notification, "without explaining why". I did explain why - if you actually take the time to see what I removed, it was some promotional material about the city and not about improving the article. This is classic fluff material, non-notable, non-cited, that needs to be removed - even from talk pages. Please use more caution when reverting IP edits. Thanks. 67.142.177.24 (talk) 02:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mulgrave mayor

I wasn't vandalizing when i said mulgrave's mayor was lorne macdonald, it says so right here (one of mulgrave's external links: http://www.townofmulgrave.ca/mayor-and-town-council.html 204.235.217.177 (talk) 02:27, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ving Rhames reversion on January 2013

Referring to this reversion, I added the line "Lemmon died less than three years later," because I felt it added emphasis on Ving Rhames' actions at the 1998 Golden Globe Awards. Being as close to his death as he was, and likely already beginning his battle with cancer at the time, he was emotionally overwhelmed at the ceremony, and, as noted in the article, it had a clear impact on his (remaining) life, as a whole. Because of this, Ving Rhames was lauded for his actions, and was likely just as emotionally stricken due to his fairly recent death. The sentence, albeit short, provides a very interesting insight into the story behind the award, and although it may not seem related to the article itself, I feel it's important context for the story as a whole (which is only told on the Ving Rhames page). To remove the sentence would deem the story incomplete, in my eyes. (rct2guy (talk) 02:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Stern Review

I don't understand why you removed the external link from the Stern Review page. Maybe there is a better place for it, actually I am going to try the page of effects of climate change on humanity, but it's certainly not spam. 85.40.209.178 (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Organized crime in Chicago"

Thank-you for reverting the recent vandalism on this page. The person who did that should be banned from Wikipedia forever, immediately! Can you help me do that? He did some other nonsense on the "OCIC" page a couple of months ago that I was able to revert. But, I also suspect that this person was the one to delete almost all the attribution on that page in the "1990s" section and "2000s" section. Seriously. I have yet to reconstruct that on the page. Thanks again. Canihaveacookie (Talk), January 22, 2013, 14:33 UTC-6

Vandalism Templates

I noticed you leaving vandalism notices on various people's talk pages. Could you please recommend some good templates for me? I have been reverting a lot of vandalism lately but falling down on the job of informing the perps (or at least leaving a record of their vandalism for others). ubiquity (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Status abuse

I did not personally attack him, yet he has done to me in the edits on the discography page and via email. Krusty111 (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

However, that edit contains purely disruptive material, which is attacking Status. See WP:No personal attacks. Eye snore 00:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Um, you called me stupid and the worst Wikipedia user, among other things. And also, I've never actually spoken to you before. And I've most certainly never emailed you... LOL. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 00:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle and User:Fatbutthead

Hey I just installed Huggle and I'm trying get familiar with it. Do you know what the heck happened why I reported Fatbutthead before I gave him a warning? I will supply diff links if needed. I noticed you reported him anyway. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 01:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

!

Eyesnore, please explain this...Kevin12xd (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Dombrowski Page

Please DELETE this page. It includes personal information which jeopardizes my safety. If my attempts to delete this unauthorized information ABOUT MYSELF are further thwarted, my attorney will be contacted immediately.

Alright, contact your attorney. Wikipedia is not the place for legal threats. You will have to PROD tag the page if you really want it deleted. Kevin12xd (talk) (contribs) 02:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, Second Undo - from the guy who you just undid in Halo: Combat Evolved maps

OMG. This is not the first, but the SECOND time i've been undone. AGAIN, FOR THE SECOND TIME, THIS IS NOT ANYTHING SPAMMISH, only a beneficial edit. My edit was only to add a map description from the game Halo: Combat Evolved! As a treat for what you did, YOU can go appeal for the anti-spambot Undo, and YOU can go undo the undo you just did a few minutes ago! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.18.47 (talk) 23:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

ProtossPylon has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Whenever I'm working, you always seem to turn up. Here's a cookie for my fellow vandal cop. ProtossPylon 01:11, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

A kitten for you!

um my George strait edit was for a deal with my school could u just leav it up ther for like a day or two

Ikeb77 (talk) 03:00, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

my george strait was resonabiile plus its for school could u leave it up for a day or two Ikeb77 (talk) 03:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Fischer

Bryan Fischer has said everything I posted, the information can be easily seen on his Twitter or on the Focal Point Facebook page that he runs, he has said the most horrible things and people need to know what kind of man he is — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.183.144.91 (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

75.183.144.91 @ Bryan Fischer

I will report this user for violating 3RR, unless you already have. - Mr X 19:14, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved article

I am just trying to move an something from my sandbox and make it live. I think I messed it up because it is not in my talk section and I don't know if it has been submitted. Kathryn.Anne.Anderson (talk) 01:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Not debt, but threaten？ This is how english Wikipedia turns to?

Realy?

Hi Eyesnore I only changed the article to trick a friend...i will show him the article and will tell you when he has viewed it.

hope thats ok? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwells1991 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused of being a Vandal

You recently revoked an edit I did and accused me of being a vandal, which I object to. The edit I did (Kate Robbins) is true to referable sources. You should have discussed with me first before a) taking any action and b) accusing me of being reckless or guilty of vandalism. If you are using Twinkle or other code to detect and 'speed' delete then you may be in violation of Wiki Policy. Alan7483 (talk) 23:55, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dealt with already. See User talk:Alan7483. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PERM

Hi Eyesnore. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but non admin comments - if at all necessary, and usually they are not - are not helpful as they just duplicate the work or research that the closing admin must do again anyway. Involvement in such strictly admin areas also needs significant experience and tenure. Otherwise, keep up your excellent anti-vandalism work :) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AR-15

Hi, just wanted to let you know that there's now a talk page discussion about the block of text you just reverted. Actually it is no longer a copyvio. De728631 (talk) 21:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Daniel Woxow

Have you reported this user? --PlanetEditor (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I reported this user to AIV, because of creation of bad redirects. Eye snore 16:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair play

Fair play that was a quick revert on your userpage. Too fast for me. 90.213.151.253 (talk) 22:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking pages

I've reported the IP user to AIAV; I think it's useless to continue reverting. Let him blank the page, the first admin will come around and block him. Otherwise the history of the page will become unreadable. --Mark91it's my world 17:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 20th Century Fox DVD IS NOT A HOAX!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toad005 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for all of your vandalism fighting! The Anonymouse (talk \| contribs) 21:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

spike milligan

Spike Milligan was born in India. There was never a country called 'British India' the official name as used also by the British was India not 'British India'. Kindly stop altering my correct ammendment as both you and Walter are incorrect. I being a British Citizen am more learned in this regard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.187.108 (talk) 03:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Charger Bulletin

Hi Eyesnore! I didn't notice what you changed - what changed, and can you explain what I did wrong so I'll know better for next time? Cheers, Zrosen88 16:52, 1 February 2013 (ET) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.197.178.207 (talk)

User:Meloveyoulongtimegi

Would you care to explain why you left me a Twinkle message about biting this new user eight minutes after you reported him at WP:AIV? Did you find some redeeming quality in any of his prior edits that made you think I had erred in jumping to a level four warning when he replaced the word Jew with kike and wrote that a person engages in butt-sex? I don't think there was any, because User:Elockid blocked him seconds before you left me your Twinkle message. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page, and your persistent fight against vandalism on Wikipedia. Arctic Kangaroo 05:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) Eye snore 05:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for protecting my talk page. Way2veers (talk) 21:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hi, you just sent me a message demanding that i stop making the contribution of "notable glitch artists" to glitch art. you asked me to provide references which i did provide and then you again deleted the section after i provided the references. can you please explain what i need to do differently. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fashomecca (talk • contribs) 21:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit to remove the list. as I explained on Fashomecca's talk page, the sources provided are either not proper sources (such as facebook) or the sources used do not make the claim suggested (i.e. that these are glitch artists). I think the discussion should be moved to the article talk page but I wanted to give you a heads-up. freshacconci talktalk 21:41, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barney the dog

Okay, I concede. the dog "battled" with lymphoma after all. Ridiculous lazy journalese. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.234.62 (talk) 23:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the extremely quick revert on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Alois Toldt

Hello Eyesnore. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alois Toldt, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: it's short, but the subject is quite clear; worth seeing whether refs can be found. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 20:35, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fakhro tower

Hey Eyesnore, I've declined your speedy nom of Fakrho tower because it's a useful redirect for those who search the subject without capitalizing the "t" in "Tower". It therefore doesn't fall under R3. Regards, Airplaneman ✈ 21:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For helping me deal with 173.72.7.195, AKA "Appleexpert1" Moosehadley (talk) 00:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from STiki!

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Eyesnore! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fastest Fingers on the Wiki

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For (twice!) managing to click that button before me. Heh. CoJaBo (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beckah Shae

It appears that the anon editing the Beckah Shae article is the subject. Perhaps a bit of latitude with the new editor may be in order. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:32, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar Priego

Hello, Eyesnore, How do i make a reliable source on the Oscar Priego page, let me know, thanks! User talk:Rebafan7, 12:06, February 2013 (UTC)

This is why I nominated the page for deletion as a biography of a living person that appears to have no references. All biographies of living people that are created after March 2010 must have sources. I will remove the tag if you provide a source to this biographical article. You can cite a source adding <ref></ref> formatting to a page. Cheers, Eye snore 06:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i didnt do any thing lik that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunjerbob (talk • contribs) 23:19, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Summaries

Hey, Eyesnore. :) I've been really impressed by a lot of the work you've been doing - allow me to "second" all of those barnstars above. A small point, though... I feel like I keep on noticing times you haven't given a summary when reverting non-vandalistic edits. I don't recall where I've seen it in the past, but today, for instance, I notice it here. Obviously it's not that big of a deal (you're not even the first person to do it on that article recently), but it really helps subsequent editors out (especially on PC-protected articles), when trying to see what's happened in the past. It's also, strictly speaking, a misapplication of rollback or the reviewer interface, though seeing as you already have more edits than I do, I don't think that I, nor anyone else, can really complain about the efficiency of your counter-vandalism work here. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 03:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect

This was not misuse. Look at the edits and you'll see it's an edit war where the IP editor is actually correct. If you wanted to do something productive you could have given both editors a warning for edit warring. Drmies (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For protecting my talk page. Thanks! Way2veers (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Eyesnore. Thanks for your message on my talk page. When I first tagged the page for speedy deletion, Criterion A1 was applicable. Hsnbapi12 has since edited the page adding sufficient context to identify the subject of the article and I agree that deletion per WP:BLPPROD is more appropriate at present. Way2veers (talk) 04:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An explanation

Hello, Eyesnore

I think I owe you an explanation about this fiasco. Actually, I was trying to revert 200.118.157.188's vandalism but somehow, your revert didn't show up on my log. I am sorry for any inconvenience that I may have caused.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for removing the vandalism by the Mangoeater1000 sockpuppet on my talk page. I greatly appreciate it. 72Dino (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken Salad deletion?

Hi eyesnore. I thought the "chicken salad" page was missing a good recipe. So I youtube searched, found one I really liked, and tried to help out. In the guidelines, which I read, it says "There is no blanket ban on linking to YouTube or other user-submitted video sites, as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page" and the guidelines mention nothing against what is contained in this video. However, perhaps I missed something, can you please explain what is wrong with posting a video recipe to help this page? For ppl like me who are looking for how to make a good chicken salad? 24.35.138.150 (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is because of the external links policy. Eye snore (pending changes) 16:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I am referencing, I've read everything and I don't understand where the link I posted defies any of the guidelines? Can you please explain specifically what the problem is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.35.138.150 (talk) 16:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jayjg

You can remove whatever you think is a personal attack and leave the rest in, instead of deleting my entire post, as it contains (in my humble opinion) a logical and well-structured argument against an administrator who apparently has some kind of personal bias against my good-faith edits.

If you've been wondering why Wikipedia has such an abysmal participation rate among users who read the site, it's because of people like you and Jayjg who constantly attack new/unestablished users and assume the worst in everyone. In reality, people are just trying to help out the site instead of being a troll or vandal (that word is tossed around way too often here) 98.210.60.236 (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seigokan Australia

If you have the right to delete files, I have the right to delete articles.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Seigokan Australia (talk • contribs) 01:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Admins have the ability to delete pages and files, but you are not one of them. Eye snore (pending changes) 01:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For cleaning up the vandalized history in Igli Tare. Thanks! Avoided (talk) 17:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

89.101.133.5

Hi, I've left a note at the IP's talk page but basically they've been blocked for block evasion. Giant Snowman 18:52, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle Revert

Please be careful with your reverts. The information added by the IP was indeed correct.[1] OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 21:03, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Complain about my username

Hello, You complained about my username. I don't understand why. I use it on a lot of websites and had never problems from Wikipedia FR. I translated an article from Wikipedia FR about Pierre Fichet. Is my contribution is anoying ? Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stack Overflow (talk • contribs) 22:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

hey wondering if you could comment on my page

IPodset (talk) 20:59, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Could you remove or update your warning to User talk:PrimalHawaii? He was merely trying to edit war incorrect information out of and article about a friend of his. He is learning the ways of wp now, I think. Many believe he was mistreated by having his edits reverted and being called a "liar and vandal" (his words at help desk).--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Sorry. I have to continue with my anti-vandal work. Cheers, Eye snore (pending changes) 22:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ponaganset High School

I do not understand why you deleted my edits. I added new administration and I reworded it so it would flow better. Also, I organized the notable teachers section by changing it to distinguished teachers, and I put the teachers in their own subheadings. Please change it back, as the edits were constructive. LORDDT01 (talk) 22:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CSR Racing Speedy Deletion

Hello, I do not understand why you marked this page for deletion. This is a game used by more than 2 million people, and I decided to create a page for it. However, two seconds into my edit, it was marked for deletion. I was still adding, deleting, and revising, but your "anti- vandalism" policies decided that you would try to delete my article. I'd say that you are the real vandal, deleting others' work in their process. I have made the necessary changes and hope that this doesn't happen again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holden Barnes (talk • contribs) 01:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nilai Sarda Page

Hey eyesnore, thanks for your help (I'm new to creating/editing wikipedia pages). I fixed it up, please check it out and let me know if there's anything else to fix. Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shack1108 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simon's Cat

My edit wasn't vandalism. I just found out about this Simon's Cat, thought it was cute, and went to Wikipedia for more information. I saw that the latest video wasn't included in list, so did my best to add it, fixing a couple of mistakes I made along the way. My edits had a link in them that directed people to the same website that the links above sent them to, proving that there was indeed a new video added to the Simon's Cat collection. I tried to copy the style of the entries above mine to the best of my abilities, but I guess in the eyes of the Wikipedia Nazis, I failed miserably. Therefore, I will leave the decision to revert or not to revert to you, as I am obviously unfit for the job. 72.193.217.157 (talk) 12:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please review

this. Everybody makes mistakes. Please try to learn from this one.
Best regards,
David in DC (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear EyeSnore, Charlesdrakew came onto my talk page before I did anything to his. Rather than automatically siding with someone with an account, why don't you try to just mind your own business? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.36.160.138 (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

huilo huilo

huilo huilo is pronounced wheelo-wheelo. Only loanwords in spanish use w. the w sound in spanish is as follows wa=hua we=hue wi=hui wu=no equivalent nor usages wo=huo, pronunciations are standard and useful here not vandalism nor unconstructive. learn some. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.71.205 (talk) 23:43, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bloody Christmas (1963)—Cypriot intercommunal violence merger

Hello. I noticed you have redirected the Talk:Bloody Christmas (1963) page to the Talk:Cypriot intercommunal violence page. Wanted to know if you are going to finish the merge and redirect for the main articles as well? GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 08:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian Land Forces

Dear Eyesnore, please don't take away all the information added into the ALbanian Land Forces, and i request that all of it would be added back, because it wasn't a vandalism but just a plus to the information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.226.83.98 (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata and Interwiki links

You are receiving this as you have recently deleted an interwiki link on a page that is not currently on Wikidata.

Please either make sure ALL links are on Wikidata before removing them OR leave the removal of interwiki links to bots.

·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 00:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I just started doing a lot of RC patrolling earlier this month when I was granted rollback. My userpage has already been vandalized twice. Thanks for the revert! Have a great day. –TC N7 JM 01:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Girls Club (season 11)

The color shouod be pink for the color box. So please change it to pink. Badgirlsclub1 (talk) 01:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)BadGirlsClub1[reply]

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Mangoeater1000

Hi Eyesnore, I have a question for you. I'm not familiar with the Long-Term abuse pages. It indicates that Mangoeater1000 should be reported to ANI or AIV. I have been reporting him to SPI (and unfortunately getting a lot of practice.) Is there any advantage to posting to ANI or AIV versus SPI? Thanks, 72Dino (talk) 04:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eyesnore. You have new messages at Eyesnore's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User talk:69.130.71.158 is constantly changing dates on the Peter Browne (Mayflower passenger) article. I have given him two good references on the talk page yet he persists. I have reverted him once and you have reverted him once. If I reverted him again, will it be considered 3RRs? Mugginsx (talk) 18:46, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I answered my own question. Mugginsx (talk) 20:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Sorry for editing the self management i didnt do it on purpose i was just playing with the edit button because i didnt know what it was for. tnx for corecting my mistake cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.12.139.164 (talk) 03:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When tagging templates for deletion:

Please remember to check the wrap with <noinclude> tags option for Twinkle. I don't think many users appreciate seeing a large MfD notice suddenly appear on their userpage. Thanks! Command and Conquer Expert! ^{speak to me...}_{review me...} 05:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Greatest Story Ever Told

At some posters ( http://sfyablog.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/the-greatest-story-ever-told.jpg ) it was stylized like that. Anyway, I am not going to revert it until a conclusion is reached.--94.65.145.7 (talk) 09:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle warning template

Hi, Eyesnore. Could you have a look at the message from User:Deb and my reply on my talk page. If you could amend the Huggle warn-1 template again to make it read better, I'm sure everyone would be grateful :) Or maybe you should revert for now and get consensus for the change? —SMALL JIM 20:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion rationales

Copyright violation trumps spam as a deletion reason. :) LadyofShalott 21:37, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my addition to the Winnipeg climate section?

Today around 4pm you reverted my changes to the Winnipeg climate section. Why?--74.216.14.150 (talk) 22:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gustaf-Otto

I took your expand from other language tag off - it can't be. This is a translation of the Swedish article with nothing left over. I've taken it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustaf-Otto Adelborg because I'm not convinced there is notability. I'd tag the Swedish article too, if I knew how. I've got something speedied on the French Wikipedia, but my French is way better than my Swedish... Peridon (talk) 22:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nations most needs

I declined the speedy; as it is comprehensible English, it does not meet the nonsense criterion. Want to AfD it? LadyofShalott 00:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beer!

		A beer on me!
		Thanks for those two quick reverts to my talk page! Have a beer on me! Frigid Ninja 18:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation for an edit.

Dear Eyesnore,

I would like to requesting the reason for your removing The Pikler Collection link (www.thepiklercollection.weebly.com) from the Emmi Pikler wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmi_Pikler), twice now.

The Pikler Collection has done the taken the following measures to ensure that it is as true to the Pikler approach as possible - Paid for usage of the photograph of Emmi Pikler to the Pikler Institute, HU Contacted nearly all of the people who's work is linked to in the collection Has permission to hold downloadable articles from relevant authors or publications Has made changes as requested by Dr Anna Tardos Has various required credits running through where they are needed Works closely with Pikler USA, Pikler UK and many other personal who have completed Pikler training in Budapest with Dr Anna Tardos and her team

I look forward to hearing from you.

Thank you, Collectioncurator — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collectioncurator (talk • contribs) 09:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ...

... for zapping that troll from my user page. davidiad { t } 20:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Sant Gurbachan Das Una Sahibwale

Hello Eyesnore. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Sant Gurbachan Das Una Sahibwale to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. I'm prepared to AGF that this is not a hoax and there was such a person, but it seems fairly clear that there are not the sources for an article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:54, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Many thanks, Eyesnore, for keeping an eye out for vandalism on my personal pages. Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 23:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

I was just looking through my user page history and I saw way back when you reverted some vandalism there. Thanks! — nerd fighter 02:21, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify has been deprecated

Hi Eyesnore! Just a friendly message to let you know that {{wikify}} has been deprecated in favor of more descriptive templates, such as {{underlinked}}. I see that you're using the release version of AWB, which still adds {{wikify}}. I suggest you download the latest SVN snapshot, which contains hundreds of bug fixes. Thanks, and happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

'Lady is a Tramp'Entry

Hi Eyesnore, I felt your text on a single version of this song, while fine in itself, completely dominated the topic, which is the actual song. I'd be be fine if it was mentioned briefly as a version of the song (there are countless others) and if it was linked to your comprehensive text about this version on another page. But the detail of this version should not be on the song's own page.

Best Wishes,

Geoff Geoffabatchelor (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message from D3323

I thought I did explained the whole thing. Didn't you see the "Talk" section in Evil Bong 3D: The Wrath of Bong — Preceding unsigned comment added by D3323 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is now proposed deletion, because it had failed the general notability guideline. Eye snore (PC) 02:42, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for being a fellow vandal fighter.--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Triangle piercing vulva.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Triangle piercing vulva.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]