Jump to content

User talk:Rgdem999

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rgdem999, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Rgdem999! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Military history project

[edit]

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! AustralianRupert (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
HMS Valhalla (1917), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LegoKontribsTalkM 20:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
HMS Valentine (1917), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 12:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
HMS Valorous (1917 Destroyer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 05:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve HMS Valorous (1917 Destroyer)

[edit]

Hi, I'm Mrt3366. Rgdem999, thanks for creating HMS Valorous (1917 Destroyer)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

  1. Wikify.
  2. Add more references and
  3. also add inline citations to establish notability for the ship

It's otherwise a nice work.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Whitshed (D77), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gneisenau, Scharnhorst and Prinz Eugen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Rgdem999! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

AFC published

[edit]
HMS Witherington (D76), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

September 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed you added a link to an image on your computer in a recent edit, possibly in an attempt to display that image on the page. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request an upload. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 11:42, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 11:43, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Wild Swan (D62)

[edit]

Hello, I'm Benea. I noticed that you made a change to an article, HMS Wild Swan (D62), but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. In addition you reintroduced several stylistic errors, and most problematically of all, an unsourced oral account that had previously been removed for violating several of wikipedia's core policies. It's great that you are contributing to these articles, but perhaps you would be willing to come to the talkpage their to discuss some of these problems, so that your contributions make the maximum improvement to the article. Benea (talk) 21:42, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

[edit]

Please be careful with edits like this, where you revert a large number of improvements made since your last edit. Again, it's great that you are adding sources now, but please respect basic style edits like italicising the name, how you use infobox fields, wikification edits, etc. If you are unsure about any of the features, please don't hesitate to ask. But please don't assume any edits made by other users are inherently unhelpful, even if you disagree with some of the changes. Let's discuss them first. Benea (talk) 23:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure how you are editing these pages, but once again in making changes to this article you lost a lot of improvements made by other users. In future please be more careful, if you are unable to make edits to articles without overwriting work done by other users, your own edits will begin to be reverted on sight. Benea (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
HMS Wivern (D66), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Alanl (talk) 16:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve HMS Wivern (D66)

[edit]

Hi, I'm Alanl. Rgdem999, thanks for creating HMS Wivern (D66)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Very good start!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
HMS Worcester (D96), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Alanl (talk) 20:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve HMS Worcester (D96)

[edit]

Hi, I'm Alanl. Rgdem999, thanks for creating HMS Worcester (D96)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You should be able to create any new articles directly. There is no need for you to go through AfC. Message me if you are having trouble.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

[edit]

If so, message me, and I will be happy to review them for you. Alanl (talk) 20:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Valorous (1917)

[edit]

Your addition to HMS Valorous (1917) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. In addition to my previous warnings about overwriting other user's improvements and additions, it is now clear that some of what you are adding is copy and pasted from copyrighted sources, in violation of basic wikipedia policy. Please desist from this style of editing or you are likely to face a block. Please address these issues and communicate on your talk page or mine, rather than lose your contributions entirely. Benea (talk) 02:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as HMS Worcester (D96), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-09VW-Worcester.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:HMS Worcester (D96) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Socrates2008 (Talk) 11:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rgdem999. You have new messages at Socrates2008's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Editing

[edit]

Since you don't seem to want to respond on my talk page, I hope you don't mind posting here just to clarify what I think are a few misunderstandings. I never reviewed or rejected your proposed article on HMS Venomous, that was a user at WP:Articles for creation. I actually suspect it was incorrectly rejected, and that another editor would probably have approved it.

When you have been producing these articles, you have been doing so with a range of minor errors that are perfectly understandable if you haven't been editing wikipedia long. Other users are usually perfectly willing to spend a little time addressing these issues. In this edit on HMS Witherington (D76) for example, I introduced italic formatting for ship names, directed shiplinks directly to the article rather than the ship list page, added some categories, made more links and wikification edits, etc. Your next edits after this were to revert all my changes to your last version. I asked you about this on your talkpage, you did not respond.

Similarly I queried your sources for when you added large amounts of unreferenced information to articles, and you made the very positive step of adding citations. When checking these however I found that the information in these articles was being taken from the sources directly, either when you copied and pasted lines like

HMS Valorous was one of the unsung escorts which protected coastal convoys throughout WW2. This work received little detailed publicity but was very hazardous, as evidenced by the number of ship structures which could be seen off the East coast for many years after the end of WW2. She was paid off and placed in Reserve after VJ Day. She was put on the Disposal List in 1946 and sold for breaking-up on 4th March 1947 at Thornaby

or merely made changes to the word order elsewhere, which is not enough to pass the threshold of originality. Copyright violations are a serious issue, and I made several attempts to edit out the worst of these from HMS Valorous (1917), and raised this issue on your page. Instead, you reverted me again, once more losing all the improvements and reintroducing the copyright violation. At this stage it become necessary to take this to the copyright violation notification board. The only article I have tagged has been HMS Valorous (1917), the other articles were so tagged were done by User:Socrates2008. I haven't looked at them in detail, but I'm sure he will be happy to talk you through some of the specific instances he found there, and how these can be fixed.

Nobody owns the articles they create on wikipedia, they can be edited by anyone. Therefore it is unacceptable to edit in the way that you have been doing, by reverting changes made by other users to the version of your last edits. As I have said throughout, I am more than happy to talk you through how the infobox templates work, why ship names are italicised, and the reasons behind all the other changes I made, and why the way you have been editing is not in keeping with the standards, rather than as you seem to think, being in accordance with them. But please don't simply ignore this offer and go back to reverting users that change the formatting to the style standardised for all ship articles.

Finally, please accept that users here, including myself, have been acting in good faith. We have made a number of attempts to raise concerns with you, and blanking these articles for copyright violations has been a last resort. We'd much rather you entered into discussions and took some time to understand and apply guidelines and policies, to make your contributions even more positive. In light of this, please don't go calling people bullies or 'non-persons'. Benea (talk) 13:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rgdem999, that's some very sound advice - I'd urge you to take it onboard if you're wanting to stick around and keep editing articles. Socrates2008 (Talk) 13:34, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Worcester (D96), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gneisenau, Scharnhorst and Prinz Eugen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Colne (1905), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woolston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style

[edit]

Hi! While your created articles are appreciated, I'd like you to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's manual of style ("WP:MOS"), especially the manual on dates and numbers (WP:MOSNUM). They contain a set of style guidelines to follow when editing or creating articles, so that articles maintain clarity and consistency over the entire encyclopedia. Your articles have an idiosynchratic style that is unfortunately not in accordance with the style guidelines. For example (from HMS Exe (1903)):

"The 9th Flotilla"
"She was laid down on the 14th of July, 1902"

Thank you. Kolbasz (talk) 13:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Leven

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to HMS Leven (1898), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Your recent changes to the article on HMS Leven completely removed a large amount of cited information as well as adding information that is not supported by the citation that you claim - in particular you added that "After 30 September 1913, she was known as an C Class destroyer and had the letter ‘C’ painted on the hull below the bridge area and on either the fore or aft funnel.", citing it to Conway's All the World’s Fighting Ships 1906 to 1922 - in fact Conway's says nothing about the destyoyers having there class number painted on them. Please do not misrepresent sources like this. (I notice that you have also made this claim, with the same incorrect citation on other articles that you have contributed to recently - you need to provide the real source where you got this information, or it is liable to be removed.)Nigel Ish (talk) 19:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The information that was contained in the original was partially in error. Also it was the incorrect template for warships.

Also the template for all vessels within a class structure should match.

I cannot use your modified template unless you modify all ships within the class being editted. Oh by the way the class is the C Class of turtleback destryers.

Rgdem999 (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Leven was NOT identical to the three 30-knotters ordered from Fairfield under the 96–97 programme (Gipsy, Fairy and Osprey), and differed again from the two ships ordered next year (Falcon and Ostrich), as shown by the specifications, which were taken from Lyon's The First Destroyers, a book concentrating on Royal Navy Turtleback destroyers, and written by an experienced naval historian working at the National Maritime Museum at Greenwich and having full access to the ship's plans and ship's covers. Surely the details should match the actual details for an individual ship, as found in high quality sources, not general average sources for the whole class. The "C-class" re-classification was a 1913 attempt to backfit some sort of order into Royal Naval destroyers (i.e. a three-funnel 30-knotter) and is rightly described in the 1860–1905 Conway's as "of little use in giving a historical account of the development of the destroyer" with ships varying massively between builders - with effectively only the armament and contracted speed being specified. Your reply does not explain your deletion of correctly cited information, or your misrepresentation of sources. I have started a discussion of your edits here.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:04, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You also directly copied text from the uboat.net page on UB 34. You have been warned before about close paraphrasing - it is not acceptable.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I use only Janes or Conway's for ships specs as noted on each article. A warning from some on Wiki the greatest copy and paste org I have ever seen. Paraphrasing is paraphrasing. However with your requirement for footnotes on everyline (only peculiar to Wiki) that professional writers don't use. (I am not one)

I have almost 500 articles on First World War Dwestroyers to either put here or make my own website. When you put something into an article make sure it is correct. I used several items from you article. One item was placed directly in, one of your external lim=nks was used as a reference, I read the article to see if there is something that can be used within my edits.

Before you revert an article make sure you read it compare the info in it. I would like the cost item entered as I do not have that info and you do feel free. That what was in your article is still there in the new one if you would look.

Rgdem999 (talk) 21:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you win and I quit!!!

Yuo should revert the other edits I have done, the entire E Class, the entire D Class and the entire C Class with the exception of the Turbine specials.

I am done with people who do not know how to write factual articles on Royal Navy Ships. The Royal Navy is not run by the US.

Have a nice day. Oh yeah you can delete this account as I am done with you.

Rgdem999 (talk) 22:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unwarranted bold text

[edit]

I know you've been told before, so I won't beat about the bush. Please stop inserting bold text in articles where it is inappropriate, like you did here. The guidance is found at MOS:BOLD. Thanks. Shem (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

HMS Brazen (1896) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Brown
HMS Recruit (1896) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Brown
HMS Thorn (1900) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Brown
HMS Vigilant (1900) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Brown
HMS Vulture (1898) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Brown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:11, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Submission of rewrite for Devastation Class Ironclad

[edit]

In the last 14 months since my last submission to Wikipedia, I have spent my time gathering more reference material for articles on Royal Navy Ships. I have ammassed almost a thousand items for possible submission to your service.

I have submitted a rewrite of the Devastation Class Ironclad type warship. I have attempted to blend what was already written into the new article trying to fill in the uncitated items of the article. Some items have been reworded, however, I believe I have kept the intent of the original intact.

I have corrected what I bekieve were errors in the original according to my sources and added more information.

I will only submit articles through the Draft article window and it will be upto the reviewers to decide if I should continue submissions or publish my material elsewhere.Rgdem999 (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC) Robert[reply]

Have found new information for engine types, suppliers and a parcular item for the main armament of HMS Thunderer 38 ton guns. Changes will be forth coming.Rgdem999 (talk) 16:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devastation Turret Class Ship has been accepted

[edit]
Devastation Turret Class Ship, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 15:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:HMS Bulldog (1909) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:HMS Bulldog (1909). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HMS Bulldog (1909) (July 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:
Please fix the formatting errors in the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tseung Kwan O (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HMS Bulldog (1909) has been accepted

[edit]
HMS Bulldog (1909), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox citations

[edit]

Be advised that cites in the infobox are discouraged by WP:INFOBOXCITE. Also remember that the infobox is designed to be a summary of the description, not a substitute. Please see French cruiser Gloire (1900) for an example of how to properly structure a ship article. It is not a good idea to repeat the full name of a source every time you use it, the name(s) of the author(s) and a page # or chapter # will generally suffice. If using more than one source by the same authors, you can disambiguate between them by using year of publication.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because the book French Cruisers 1922 - 1956 is an e-book no page numbers are available. I need to identify where in the book the information comes from. I only do this for the person verifying the information.Rgdem999 (talk) 03:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that and there's no problem with in doing so. In the short term, I only suggest that you just use the chapter # rather than both the number and the chapter name to reduce the clutter in the notes.

100mm/45 Modèle 1933 moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, 100mm/45 Modèle 1933, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. In addition, please see WP:CIT on what information needs to be included in footnotes/references in order to pass WP:VERIFY. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 14:05, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

[edit]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

[edit]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:100mm/45 Modèle 1933

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rgdem999. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:100mm/45 Modèle 1933, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While researching this item insufficient info to complete

Invitation to join WikiProject Ships

[edit]
WikiProject Ships
WikiProject Ships
Hello Rgdem999! I noticed your contributions to a ship article, and thought you might be interested in WikiProject Ships, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of ships of all kinds.

If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! ~~~~

You'll find the answers re templates and ship commanders there Lyndaship (talk) 07:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate templates

[edit]

Instead of repeatedly creating the same template with different names, look for the "More" menu at the top of your page and select "Move", then assign a new name to the page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This link still redirects me to the Wikipedia page for the Royal Navy. Until when I click on the link and it takes me to the 'Creating HMS Cruiser 1705 page I will look at this as Wikipedia DOES NOT want this page created. Rgdem999 (talk) 22:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Rgdem999[reply]

HMS Cruizer (1705)

[edit]

FYI - HMS Cruizer (1705) has been created per your request at WP:RFPP. It's a redirect right now, but feel free to convert it to an article when you're ready. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clicking the ling still takes me to the Wikipedia page for the Royal Navy. Until the link takes me to the 'Creating HMS Cruizer 1705' page I will tret this link as Wikipedia does NOT want anyone creating this arct6icle. Rgfem999 Rgdem999 (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:EDRED for instructions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating HMS Larke (1675).

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi. Nice job on the ship articles. However, when creating footnotes, please include page numbers.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 19:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E-books do not6 have page numbers as the page you are looking is dependant on your screen size. To see if the book (citation) is from an e-book look to the ISBN number for the entry (EPUB). if present no page numbers exist.
Rgdem999 Rgdem999 (talk) 19:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed all content from HMS President (1650). Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ost (talk) 04:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am presently rewriting the article as it has major errors in it and alot of missing info. The only thing I removed was a redirect link. I have been working on this update all friggin day and dont want someone to obliterate it. Rgdem999 (talk) 05:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I posted my update to President 1650 and some IDIOT reverted it back to an erroneous article. I will NOT stand for this revert back to my article. the Ship Bonaventure 1650 does NOT exist. and changing it back to the redirect command shows that Wikipedia is a home to bullies who remove completed articles just to please themselves. Rgdem999 (talk) 05:53, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 1650 Programme Group a different title by using the DISPLAYTITLE magic word. This functionality is for changing the formatting and presentation of the title only, and does not work to change a page's title to something meaningfully different. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else.
I have commented out the part that caused an error, feel free to repair it. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Right now I am trying to make sense of the page Line of Battle. Currently working at getting the Fourth Rate vessels to make sense. The original author has done a lot of work there with one specific regerence without cross checking other references and the actual starting point of the six tier English Navy (Navy Royal, Commonwealth Navy and Royal Navy). Will propose the change once I get it drafted. Quite a few ships that were renamed in 1660 are title as if they were launched with the rename rather than titling the articles with the original name of the vessel. I believe the vessel listings are too long and clumbersome to be useful. will send my idea once it is completed. Article is in my sandbox and will not expand the vessel articles any further until the proposal is complete.
The original author did do a lot of work and is to be commended. what I am working on will make the ship lists more manageable, hopefully
Rgdem999 Rgdem999 (talk) 01:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of HMS Tyger

[edit]

I noticed that you redirected HMS Tyger, an article (of more than 15,000 bytes) about a specific ship, to HMS Tiger, which is a list article. HMS Tyger is one on the ships listed in HMS Tiger. I assume that this was a mistake and I have reverted that edit. - Donald Albury 16:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling of the name of the article is incorrect for this vessel the contents of the article has been moved to the correct page in its entirity. Please contact me prior to doing something that is kinda irresponsible and something that you know nothing about what I am doing.
Please I am going through the Fourth Rates one ship at a time filling in information and ensuring the article contains correct information and is as complete as I can make it currently.
Rgdem999 Rgdem999 (talk) 16:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have set this back to the correct article.
Change it again and I will DELETE it Rgdem999 (talk) 21:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I am not the user who restored HMS Tyger. Your blanking of that article today appears to be in violation of the guideline at Wikipedia:Page blanking and the policy at Wikipedia:Edit warring. My advice to you is to restore the HMS Tyger article, and then engage in discussion about what to do with the article on the talk page. - Donald Albury 22:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is what he did to mine so Tit for tat
Do NOT mention this to me until you have dealt with him. The idea of wikipedia is to permit multiple authors improve the content. When individuals 'goal tend' thier articles then Wikipedia must enforce their guidelines or this will become the greatest waste of space on the internet.
right now I am copying what I have completed to date, then I will totally withdraw from this abomination of a website. Rgdem999 (talk) 22:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Wikipedia:Requested moves for the proper procedure for renaming articles. Now that 'HMS Tyger' and 'HMS Tiger (1647)' have been restored to their prior states, you may request a move or name change by adding Template:Requested move at the bottom of Talk:HMS Tyger, including your arguments for the move in the 'reason' field. - Donald Albury 10:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Centurion (1650), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Santa Cruz. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thought this link was valid will remove it Rgdem999 (talk) 13:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at HMS Tiger (1647), you may be blocked from editing. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking one page and pasting the contents into a different title is not allowed. Pages should be renamed properly to maintain their attribution history. You may be able to do this yourself, if the change is uncontroversial (or you are happy for it to be named back by anyone for any reason), if you have the permissions, and if the new page title has no non-trivial edit history. Otherwise, starts a requested move discussion and, assuming consensus, someone with the correct power will make the move at the end of the discussion. Trying to circumvent this is disruptive editing at best. Doing it repeatedly after multiple other editors revert the changes is an edit war and you risk being blocked from editing. Lithopsian (talk) 13:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well that is what was done to my article so if you have not chastized the perpertratraitor of this then just FUCK RIGHT OFF Rgdem999 (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What article are you talking about? Please note that you do not own any article. Please remember that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and that civility is a requirement, as is assuming good faith. - Donald Albury 17:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating HMS Amity (1650).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating HMS Marmaduke (1652).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:37, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating HMS Gillyflower (1651).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating Advantage (1590).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ship names

[edit]

Good morning.

I have noticed in my role as a WikiProject Military History Coordinator a number of Royal Navy ship articles with names not using the prefix "HMS", and redirecting titles with that prefix to just the given name and if applicable the year of launch. The obverse has thus far been the practice for the titles of Royal Navy ship articles; could you follow that practice? –♠Vami_IV†♠ 07:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English Naval ships that are built prior to May 1660 SHOULD NOT be labeled as HMS as the moniker 'Royal' was not granted until the Restoration of King Charles II.
English ships built prior to this time only became part of the 'Royal Navy' only did so after May 1660. Prior to this they were in the Navy Royal or were the vessels of the reigning monarch.
the ten years following the English Civil Wars were commonwealth ships and did not receive the 'GHMS' prefix as England at the time was not ruled by a Monarch.
To annotate a ship with HMS built prior or commissioned prior to May 1660 is an absolute error.
I have spent over 10 years researching the English and Royal Navy and still do not consider my self as an expert in this matter BUT I do know what is correct in a professional setting and what is not.
I am considering transferring the articles I have been writing to your platform, but am unsure of the practices of your platform that include the bullying of people who wish to submit articles and help expand the knowledge of this subject.
Robert (rgdem999) Rgdem999 (talk) 16:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would hardly call Vami_IV's request bullying, but you are correct in that HMS prefixs aren't appropriate for pre-Restoration ships.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bullying an author is when an article is reverted with no ACTUAL fact checking of what was written. The article that I refer to is the item on Tiger 1647. The article is incorrectly titled as no hard copy reference supports the title 'TYGER'. This article was blatently and in a bullish manner just reverted without any corroborating evidence that my edit was incorrect or in error.
This is called bullying as it is just the original author not excepting the terms of Wikipedia for updating of articles with supported material.
Robert (rgdem999 142.127.231.151 (talk) 19:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is really a couple of centuries before my time, but I will note that Winfield, British Warships in the Age of Sail, 1603–1714 does spell it Tiger, but admits that he has corrected several of the spellings in Pepys' 1660 Register.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia being a tertiary source, we follow the sources. Perhaps we could have some textual support for some of the facts being bandied? Rodger (Rodger, N.A.M. (2004). The Command of the Ocean: A Naval History of Britain 1649–1815. London: Penguin. ISBN 0-713-99411-8) mentions a Royal Navy under Charles I in the index but not the text and a Navy Royal under Henry VIII, James I and Charles I, also in the index but not the text. Sadly, none of this bears on the use of "HMS". Gog the Mild (talk) 19:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Or perhaps Wikipedia guidelines? I am indebted to ((u|Pickersgill-Cunliffe}} for "Ship naming conventions state "do not use the HMS prefix for English ships from before 1660. The term "His Majesty's Ship" was introduced around 1660 and was routinely abbreviated HMS from about 1780 onwards"." Gog the Mild (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The English Navy at the time of Charles I was known as the The Navy Royal as these were the King's Ships. Up to the 1649 (execution of Charles I) the english navy was not soley owned by the King. After the Restoration in May 1660 Charles II permitted the Navy the moniquer 'Royal' in place of English Navy Rgdem999 (talk) 01:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating Quittance (1590).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Exeter (1680), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackwall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1677 Construction Programme

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 1677 Construction Programme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://books.google.be/books?id=95WCAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1678&dq=A+common+establishment+for+masts+and+other+top+hamper&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwim7vykw9L4AhWPg_0HHTObC54Q6AF6BAgJEAI#v=onepage&q=A%20common%20establishment%20for%20masts%20and%20other%20top%20hamper&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 11:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised the offending content and would like to resubmit the article. I have rewritten and restructured the content. Would you prefer the article be placed in my sandbox or just recreate on the original spot that was deleted. Not interested in offending anyone or be in breach of rules. If this is not adequate please let me know. Rgdem999 (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have placed the revision in my sandbox. Would like a yeah or Naye if I should continue or do you delete or block my ability to edit. Rgdem999 (talk) 22:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:100mm/45 Modèle 1933

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "45 Modèle 1933".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:27, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cannot find enough information to complete so thank you for removing this
I have decided to write and contribute ships of the 17th and 18th centuries as I have much more information in these areas Rgdem999 (talk) 14:27, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating 1689 Programme Group.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating HMS Looe (1697).

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Keep making the encyclopedia better

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 02:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating HMS Falcon (1704).

User:BusterD, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice tightly done start-class work. I'm replacing a couple of "she" with Falcon to keep the text more specific.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BusterD}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BusterD (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sounds good to me Rgdem999 (talk) 19:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Rgdem999

Thank you for creating Martin (1652).

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Same ship: Called HMS here.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 18:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ships built prior to May 1660 that have HMS in the title are erroneous as the Royal Navy and the right to have HMS before the name was only granted in May 1660 by HRH King Charles II at the Restoration of the Monarchy.
If you wish to change it to the incorrect title feel free. BUT you will need to change to 1651 Programme group and the incorrect Frigate list. No actual frigates were built prior to 1750. All prior ships were not frigates, unless you are going to class every single sailing ship as a frigate. Rgdem999 (talk) 18:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

[edit]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

[edit]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

[edit]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"HMS Cruizer (1705)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect HMS Cruizer (1705) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 24 § HMS Cruizer (1705) until a consensus is reached. Tevildo (talk) 19:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rgdem999&oldid=1173380822"