Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests/2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January

[edit]

Other (Jan)

[edit]

User:McClenon mobile

[edit]
Alternate account of User:Robert McClenon McClenon mobile (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC) (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rollidan

[edit]
I previously had reviewer rights, and I am now returning to activity on Wikipedia after a leave of absence. I am well aware of the criteria and instructions for articles and I will work to approve AFC's that are prepared for creation. Rollidan (talk) 01:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:اِفلاق

[edit]
I have recently changed my username, so I am not able to load the AFCH script, kindly add my current username to the participants list. signed, Iflaq (talk) 09:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, but next time give your old username please! Primefac (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac Ah! Sorry for that, However there was a hint in my Signature دَستخَط، اِفلاق (کَتھ باتھ) 14:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I saw that as I was responding here, should have paid more attention to the sig! Primefac (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (Jan)

[edit]

User:Toadspike

[edit]
Hello! I am requesting AfC review access because I would like to review new articles and help new editors. I currently have 925 live edits on the English Wikipedia, have passed an article (Anna Pestalozzi-Schulthess) through AfC, and have read over the reviewing instructions. I have a basic understanding of AfD and notability, enough to be able to contribute to AfC. Toadspike (talk) 18:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. While I appreciate the enthusiasm, there just isn't the level of editing in the areas where we want to see experience (in particular, deletion-related areas) for me to feel comfortable with your knowledge of our notability criteria. Primefac (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mysterious Whisper

[edit]
I applaud those AfC reviewers who've been gradually getting the backlog of pending AfC submissions under control over the last few weeks. However, there's still a 2-month wait, on average, to even get feedback on a draft. I've been able to spend more time editing Wikipedia lately, and I'd like to help tackle this backlog. I've reviewed the instructions. I have thousands of edits going back to 2012, a majority of them in article space, and the articles I've created, as well as this DRV, and the few AfDs I've participated in, show I have a working knowledge of notability guidelines and deletion policies. Mysterious Whisper (talk) 18:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pichemist

[edit]
I'm requesting AFC rights because I believe this might help me succeed in becoming a New Page reviewer. I have created 24 articles, with only one being deleted and (If I'm not mistaken) all of them have been reviewed. Pichemist (talk) 20:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. While I appreciate the enthusiasm, there just isn't the level of editing in the areas where we want to see experience (in particular, deletion-related areas) for me to feel comfortable with your knowledge of our notability criteria. Primefac (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac I see, may you elaborate on your statement regarding deletion-related areas? I don't think I follow. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 18:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To give a slightly long-winded answer, there are the "hard" criteria (edit counts, time) and the more subjective criteria (knowledge of the notability guideliens etc). There has been a shift in the opinions of those in the project recently that we need to put more focus on the latter for new applicants, specifically in the areas of article deletion; it's one thing to create good content (which you clearly have done) but it's another to recognise content that isn't up to Wikipedia's standards (and additionally, how to improve them if possible). This latter group is best demonstrated by participation at AFD and by WP:CSD experience; being able to properly identify pages that need to be speedy deleted, or correctly weigh the merits of a page at AFD, will give a better indication of how well you will be able to assess the drafts you will be reviewing.
In other words, I think you have a good head on your shoulders, but a little more experience would be largely beneficial. (and for the record, I'm not saying you have to drop everything and smash through 100 AFDs by next month or anything, just pop over and see how things work) Primefac (talk) 20:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah I see know, thanks alot for your time and suggestions. Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 20:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Annie Kingdom

[edit]
I'm interested in becoming an AFC reviewer. I frequently go through junks on New Page Feed, tag as well as in draftspace here. I have a good handle on our deletion policies & what constitutes notability/reliable sources. I also know how imperative WP:RS is, I understand the strong WP:PILLARS of Wikipedia. Currently I have created some articles with no issues so far and believe I can do more to help reduce backlog. If granted i intend to start from the oldest pages to see if i can trim it down. Thanks in advance. Annie Kingdom (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done. Almost all of your edits are repetitive gnoming, after which you jumped into patrolling a few days ago, which leaves me little to assess; I would like to see a more meaningful track record before granting this right. Please consider re-applying in a few months. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chumpih

[edit]
I put forward my name about a month ago, but the response was a query regarding deletion experience. Well, in the past month I've been involved in such areas, so there should be some form with which to rate now.
Regarding Creation, I might be able to help out a little. I've created a few articles myself, including Marc Canham (composer), George Kent Ltd and Jimmy Jewell (saxophonist) along with associated work to tidy inbound links and disambiguations, so I'm familiar with the review process from the receiving end. I'm familiar with WP:NOTE and have not pursued page creation for articles of dubious notability. Perhaps mostly, I would like to think I have the sensibilities to duck out and leave things to more experienced editors where appropriate, including making notifications and requests to them. Chumpih t 19:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 20:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:२ तकर पेप्सी

[edit]
Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Please allow me to review articles, I didn't new it that I need to apply such request here and by mistake I reviewed some articles without the permission, I request to allow me to do this २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 01:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, as I'm not sure you are fully understanding of the notability policies and guidelines; I'm seeing at least three of your drafts that have been declined in recent months. Primefac (talk) 14:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have just submitted one draft and other draft which I created was Rejected was submitted by other user not by me.

User:TartarTorte

[edit]
I would like AfC reviewing rights because I participate a fair bit at AfD and would like to help review pages. I think that my knowledge from AfD should help. TartarTorte 22:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vitaium

[edit]
I want to request this rights because I mostly experience at requesting CSD in drafts and user pages and have read notability guidelines and have more than 500 edits to mainspace Vitaium (talk) 11:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, mainly because I'm not sure you are experienced in the area of CSDs - you have a huge number of warnings and deleted pages listed at your user page. Primefac (talk) 14:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Onmyway22

[edit]
I patrol recent changes and do CSD, PROD, and XfD of articles if it fails criteria. I read and understood the reviewing guidelines. I think I can help to review drafts and help to reduce the backlog. Thank you Onmyway22 talk 08:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails to meet minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kelly222

[edit]
I want to contribute. Kelly222 (talk) 23:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails to meet minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chlod

[edit]
I'd like to help review drafts in fields that I'm used to writing or reviewing content in, such as weather-related, computer science-related, and Philippine-related articles. I've already read through the reviewing instructions, general notability guideline, some specific notability guidelines, and pages pertaining to the deletion policy. Chlod (say hi!) 23:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:EpicPupper

[edit]
Hi there, I'd like to help out with AFC review. I've created an article myself (Stig Jarle Hansen), and I help out with vandalism patrolling as well. I've read through the reviewing instructions, deletion policy, and general notability guideline already. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 23:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Correogsk

[edit]
Hi! I am requesting afc helper script rights. I have several years of experience editing Wikipedia. Best regards from Mexico City (CDMX) and thanks a lot in advance! Correogsk or Gustavo. Correogsk or Gustavo (talk) 23:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: I've moved this to the proper section. (Non-administrator comment) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 00:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ts12rAc

[edit]
I am interested in helping with AfC and reducing the AfC backlog. I believe I meet the criteria and I am familiar with reviewing instructions. Ts12rActalk to me 07:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zippybonzo

[edit]
I would like to help reduce the backlog by declining submissions with no notability or citations and approving those that meet the criteria. I believe I meet the requirements, give or take 10 or so edits. I have around 20 or so CSD tags, I also have over 1,000 total edits with around 510 in mainspace and focus on Anti-Vandalism and maintenance and always wish the backlog was smaller. I believe I have sufficient experience with the policies and guidelines. Thank you for reviewing my request, Zippybonzo (talk) 19:38, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; you have a handful of successful G11s, but 75% of your contributions are just reverting folks and there is no AFD participation. Primefac (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:A. C. Santacruz

[edit]
I'd like to help clear out the backlog. While I haven't been involved with many new article creations (only created Battle of Mayals and 2020–2022 Chinese property sector crisis), I do a lot of GAN reviews and recently started doing FA reviews and Peer reviews as well, so I feel I have a strong understanding of content PAGs. I'm not particularly versed in WP:NSPORT so would steer clear from those types of articles, but am confident in my understanding of the other SNGs. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 19:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You might be able to tell what makes a good article great, but your AFD stats indicate you're not quite as knowledgeable on the lower end of the spectrum. Primefac (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wgullyn

[edit]
I'd like to help clear the backlog of new articles. I've participated in a couple dozen AfDs and have around 20 CSD nominations (all of which were deleted). I have recently gained rollback and pending changes reviewer rights and have spent a while fighting vandalism. Wgullyn (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Engr. Smitty

[edit]
Autopatrolled and new pages reviewer for a long time now. Aware on how notability guidelines and deletion criteria work. I think I would be very helpful in reviewing AFC submissions. Thanks. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Skarmory

[edit]
I am a New Page Reviewer as of a few days ago, and I have moved articles to draftspace, which makes me somewhat uncomfortable because I can move them there but not really back. I think my CSD log looks good, and my XfDs as far as I know have all succeeded, though there are only a couple of those (I didn't have the XfD log enabled at first so that might be harder to find). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February

[edit]

Name change (Feb)

[edit]

User:Matthewrb

[edit]
Previously listed under my old username, could that access be transferred to my new username please? ~ Matthewrb Comments · Changes 01:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ingenuity

[edit]
I just had my username changed from User:Wgullyn to User:Ingenuity, but that change has not been reflected in the participants page. I would appreciate if an administrator could add me back to the page so I can use the helper script. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 11:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 09:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pbsouthwood

[edit]
It would seem that I have been inactive in reviewing for more than 6 months and have been relegated. If there are no objections I would like to be restored. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 15:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (Feb)

[edit]

User:BuySomeApples

[edit]
I've got a lot of experience working on the WP:DYK backlog but I also try to help out with AfD/GA when I can. I read up on the review guidelines and want to help with the backlog there as well. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC) BuySomeApples (talk) 04:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:DownTownRich

[edit]
I would like AfC reviewing rights I have been participating a bit in AfC and during that time I was able to gain a bit of knowledge. I have made contributions in creating new articles and redirects into full fledge articles for the community in addition to that with the moving of articles (latest being Sberbank. With the current backlog the knowledge that I have can be valuable here. DownTownRich (talk) 20:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mako001

[edit]
I am looking to help out with the infamous AfC backlog (no offence to the AfC reviewers), and thereby broaden my Wikihorizons a bit. I have a good understanding of the core content policies, and have read and understand the reviewing instructions. I started out with little to no experience of deletion, made a bunch of embarrassing mistakes (the first parts of my PROD and CSD logs make me groan), but have quickly obtained a solid grasp of the deletion policy, the whole CSD thingy, and my idea of what belongs is now much closer to what actually does. Please feel free to raise any further queries below, I'll keep an eye out here and respond as soon as possible. Mako001 (C)  (T)  13:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:HelpingWorld

[edit]

Hello, I am a avid draft creator and have some experience with AFC. I meet the requirements to be one and I read the entire guidelines. I have a good understanding of AFC and accepting or declining articles. I know the notability guidelines from the back of my head and I am going to apply to New Page Patroller. I look at the AFC drafts all the time and I read about them and make them better. I am usually online and feel free to message me when the results come out. Thanks. HelpingWorld (talk) 01:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, I am concerned by some of the messages on your talk page and your editing activity as far as speedy deletions go. Primefac (talk) 11:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Elemimele

[edit]
I'm nervous of making this request and think I'm probably too low on experience: but the AfC backlog is a big frustration and I'd like to help if I can (it's not fair to grumble without being willing to do anything). I've created a couple of articles (one got merged into a similarly-named item), but not hugely experienced there; I've also taken part in quite a few AfD debates, but my record may look a bit rubbish as I've got some really embarrassing ones from when I first started out, and tend not to take part in the obvious rubber-stamp keeps and deletes. Happy to help if I can, probably mostly concentrating on UK and science/tech areas, with occasional forays into Germany and early/classical music. Elemimele (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Red X I withdraw my nomination (Advised off-wiki that I'm not sufficiently experienced, which I suspected anyway) Elemimele (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Siliconred

[edit]
I'm interested in becoming a participant in reviewing AfC articles. SiliconRed (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2022 (UTC) SiliconRed (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:ArsenalGhanaPartey

[edit]
I know both the deletion policy and the notability guideline well. I am active in the AfD department and have experience with drafts and creating articles. I am also interested to help with the AfC Backlog. I mainly work on football/soccer articles. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 18:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Neoinsession

[edit]
I'd like to help review drafts in fields that I'm used to writing content in, fields such as BLP, music, buildings/shopping malls, actors, schools and artists-related articles. I've gone through the reviewing instructions, general notability guideline, and pages pertaining to the deletion policy. Neoinsession (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry, but  Not done. I am concerned with the fact that multiple editors have expressed concerns about your editing – including about copyright issues – in recent months, and that many of your recent creations have been draftified because of sourcing issues. I would recommend gaining some additional experience in mainspace editing before reapplying. Best, --Blablubbs (talk) 22:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Blablubbs: well, I'm the one who's been cleaning up articles who violates copyrights, and yes I'll admit that few of my work was move to draft. However, I think I've gained enough knowledge to be responsible for this right. I'll keep improving and perhaps I'll reapply soon. Neoinsession (talk) 04:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Femkemilene

[edit]
I'd like to help with the backlog. I've read the reviewing instructions, GNG, several subject-specific notability guidelines, and have upped my participation at AfD recently. Femke (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 09:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Evvekk

[edit]
Requesting afc helper script rights to help clear out AfC review backlog. Evvekk (talk) 01:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. I will note for the record that there might be no AFD experience, but the user has successfully had a number of drafts accepted and (as far as I can tell) only one declined (almost two years ago). Primefac (talk) 09:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:GoldMiner24

[edit]
I have read through the reviewing policies and notability criteria. I have recently been participating at AfD and I believe I have a good understanding of what makes a good wiki page. I've also made two articles which have been approved through AfC. I'd like to help clear through the AfC backlog. GoldMiner24 Talk 19:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Asilvering

[edit]
I've bumped into enough articles that have been rejected, improved, and then trapped in waiting-for-reviewer limbo that it's starting to feel painful to have to leave them there. Pretty familiar with WP:NBOOK and WP:NAUTHOR at this point, so that's mostly what I'd plan to be reviewing. Happy to help on articles with German/romance-language sources. I don't bite. asilvering (talk) 05:58, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Willuconquer

[edit]
I would be happy to help in order to improve and approve a number of submissions concerning Cambodia and Southeast Asia in general, as I am managing communications as well as "Wikipedia in the classroom" programs for our Wikipedia Khmer. I have also already read through the reviewing instructions, general notability guideline, some specific notability guidelines, and pages pertaining to the deletion policy. Thank you. Willuconquer (talk) 08:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, too many copyright issues. Primefac (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:MB

[edit]
Don't really have time to help out much, but I have had on occasion wanted to used the Script to move an article to mainspace. MB 04:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Juggyevil

[edit]
I would like to help with reviewing pages. I believe I have a decent understanding of notability and the AFD process. I would like to contribute more.Juggyevil (talk) 09:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done. This is partially because your AfD record seems to be mostly late votes echoing what previous ones have said (with not in-depth rationales that would enable me to assess your knowledge of deletion policy), partially because of the absence of at least some speedy deletion experience, and partially because of the fact that your edit count is artificially inflated because you spread out minor copy-edits across multiple tiny contributions. Please collect some more experience before reapplying. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March

[edit]

Renames (Mar)

[edit]

User:511KeV

[edit]
Technical request after renaming from user:اِفلاق. signed, 511KeV (talk) 13:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (Mar)

[edit]

User:Behind_the_moors

[edit]

I believe I have a sound knowledge of notability and my AFD nom record speaks about it. I am a quick learner and don't repeat mistakes. Try me, I will not let you down. Behind the moors (talk) 19:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Behind the moors, what did you learn from this? (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac That we can't use copyright content on Wikipedia. Also, while editing I learned about https://copyvios.toolforge.org/. It helped me to fix this mistake and I am going to use this while reviewing also.🙂 Behind the moors (talk) 10:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:13, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:MrTallBoy

[edit]
I have been a wikipedia editor since January 2021, with more than 3000 edits so I feel like i can help with reviewing articles. MrTallBoy (talk) 09:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC). afc helper script rights MrTallBoy (talk) 07:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Numberguy6

[edit]
I have been an active editor since July 2016, with tens of thousands of edits. I have a lot of experience placing maintenance tags on articles. --Numberguy6 (talk) 14:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Elminster Aumar

[edit]
Hello, I would like to request participation in AfC, I am an old who went inactive for sometime, previously I participated in new page patrolling, Wikiprojects related to my city. I am now again interested in becoming active on Wikipedia and creating articles and helping with backlog of AfC, thank you.

Elmisnter! (talk) 22:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC) Elmisnter! (talk) 22:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 18:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brunnock

[edit]
Have spent years categorizing articles and nominating AfDs. I guess I should start approving some. Sean Brunnock (talk) 15:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC) Sean Brunnock (talk) 15:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, your editing has been pretty much non-existent since 2007, only returning to real activity in the last month or two. With the notability requirements changing wildly since then, I am only looking at your most recent editing, which unfortunately does not meet the minimum thresholds. No prejudice against re-applying in the future. Primefac (talk) 18:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What threshold? According to xtools, I have over 900 edits this year. Sean Brunnock (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And only 378 article-space edits. Primefac (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:ScottishFinnishRadish

[edit]
I have been reviewing and repairing declined drafts, and would like to use the script to move drafts to mainspace. In the future I'll likely review other drafts as well. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mike1901

[edit]
I would like to help out with reviewing articles as there can be quite a backlog! (alongside also working the WP:NPP backlog). (I do appreciate there's been a gap in my editing - but have ensured I've brought myself up to date with current notability guidance before I resumed reviewing new pages via the Page Curation tool) Thanks! Mike1901 (talk) 14:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:PerryPerryD

[edit]
I have been on wikipedia for over a year now, Have been involved in a few CSD and AFD Discussions, and am generally experienced with the project itself, I have fully read the rules and guidelines and believe that I am eligible for this role to allow articles to see a light on this project, while denying the ones that aren't there yet according to the criteria. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 15:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 12:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Toadspike

[edit]
I requested AfC permission a while back, and was told to try gaining more experience with deletion. Since then, I have participated in quite a few AfD discussions, where I complete a thorough investigation of every article before voting. I have vastly improved my understanding of the notability guidelines and have had a lot of practice finding sources (through both TWL and my school resources). I think I am now ready to help fight this backlog. If not, please let me know what I should do. Toadspike (talk) 21:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:DaxServer

[edit]
I'd like to review the drafts, primarily that of [Indian] films. I believe I have enough experience surrounding the [film] notability guidelines and dealt with many in AfD discussions. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zippybonzo

[edit]
So, I requested access sometime in January, and now, I have a significantly better understanding of the citation quality guidelines, the notability guideline and the BLP guideline - most of which comes from anti-vandalism work - however, I would like to try to clear the (4000ish) AfC backlog, because there is a ton of content in there, some of which needs declining as it is promotional, some of them need high quality citations (e.g a reputable news source), some of them are good and need accepting but are waiting for the backlog to clear. Zippybonzo | talk 19:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And yes I have participated in a bunch of AfD discussions. Zippybonzo | talk 19:09, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pavlov2

[edit]

Hello, I'm Pavlov2. I often patrol articles on the English wiki for anti-vandalism. I have a good understanding of CSD and XFD. I see a lot of drafts pile up. I hope to join this group to help review drafts. I have 519 edits to articles and I understood the basic instruction for reviewing the articles. I hope I could lend a hand for help if permitted. Many thanks. Pavlov2 (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Geertivp

[edit]
Help shorten the elapsed time before a draft article is reviewed. Geertivp (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 07:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April

[edit]

Renames (Apr)

[edit]

User:Sahaib

[edit]
Technical request after renaming from User:Sahaib3005. Sahaib (talk) 06:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, not sure why this wasn't marked as such. Primefac (talk) 19:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:PerfectSoundWhatever

[edit]
Technical request, from rename (User:Mcguy15 -> User:PerfectSoundWhatever) — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 00:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, with apologies for the delay. Primefac (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (Apr)

[edit]

User:Justiyaya

[edit]
Want to help with the AFC backlog and help new users create their first articles. I have read the reviewing instructions. Would likely focus on articles with Chinese language sources and articles about albums. Justiyaya 04:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 20:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Naleksuh

[edit]
Reason for requesting: Hello, I meet the outlined criteria and I would like to start reviewing drafts. I have seen many drafts awaiting review and, after reading the criteria and believing myself to meet them (2+ year old account, 2678 edits this might include deleted ones but certainly over 500 either way, understanding of reviewing, notability, deletion procedures etc). Have also been reviewing changes and increasing activity in help chat; and would like to be able to review some of the nearly 3k drafts that there are. Naleksuh (talk) 21:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Daniel Case

[edit]
I have been asked by a user I've worked with to review their submission, which I did, and now apparently I need to do this for the rights to formally approve it. OK. I would certainly be willing to assist more in the future. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fakescientist8000

[edit]
I want to help the AFC project in general, and help newer editors and inexperienced editors alike create their first articles. I have read the reviewing instructions, and I do not have any specific focuses, but we'll cross that bridge when we get there. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 14:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr Salvus

[edit]
I was granted the permission to do this in May 2021 for 6 months but then I never had the will to do this. I've refound the will to, can I have the permission? Dr Salvus 16:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.. Primefac (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Felix QW

[edit]
As a regular on the Maths WikiProject for the past months, I believe that additional AfC reviewers with subject expertise in technical topics from mathematics and related areas would be helpful. I have already gained some experience with AfD and am also active with WikiProject Merge, so I have had some exposure to areas outside of own content creation. Felix QW (talk) 07:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.. Primefac (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:WellThisIsTheReaper

[edit]
As per previous request. I have read through the Wikipedia guidelines and I feel that I am ready to start contribution via AfC. --WellThisIsTheReaper Grim 01:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.. Primefac (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Agucova

[edit]
Hi! I'm an editor with experience mostly patrolling, issuing corrections on articles and helping newcomers. I don't have much experience reviewing, except for helping editors with their AfC on local Wikimedia edit marathons (mostly eswiki). I would love to help to review AfCs and I think I'm generally knowledgeable about policies and notability guidelines. agucova (talk) 01:43, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing requirements. Primefac (talk) 20:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:C1K98V

[edit]
I am requesting afc helper script rights because I would like to help and review the drafts, that focuses on entertainment, blp. Whenever I came across such articles or drafts I tried to fix them. I believe I have some amount of experience which will help me in dealing with the notability guidelines as my creation are tagged for deletion for which editor, reviewer and even admins has provided me warning, suggestions, guidance. Last year, I was block for copyvio, you can check my talk since then I always try to make myself reminded that I won't repeat the mistake for which I am blocked. And most important thing I have learned from them. So, for me one month probation is enough to learn and show my postive contribution in the field and to help with backlog. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 04:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.. Primefac (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gusfriend

[edit]
Reason for requesting afc helper script rights:

I would like to help reduce the afc backlog a little. Gusfriend (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spiderone

[edit]
I fully understand the reviewing instructions and meet all of the criteria. I have been active with CSD, AfD, PROD for quite a while now and do monitor some articles in draft space. I also understand what it takes to build good articles and have contributed to a few GAs during my 13+ years here. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC) Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:HenryTemplo

[edit]
I want to help clear the backlog, and develop my skills as a Wikipedian! I have experience on both ends of the deletion process, and I hope I have sufficient knowledge of the relevant policies and guidelines as a result. I have been editing for nearly a year and a half, and have been involved in writing articles. I have experience with dealing with new users, and explaining to them the policies and guidelines they need to be aware of. I hope this makes me a subtable candidate for AfC reviewing! HenryTemplo (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 10:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I thought I did, never mind, would it be ok if I applied later, once I reach the minimum editing criteria? HenryTemplo (talk) 10:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. Primefac (talk) 10:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just out of interest, do I meet the other criteria? Thanks. HenryTemplo (talk) 10:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't even look, so please make sure you do when the time comes. Primefac (talk) 10:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May

[edit]

Returning (May)

[edit]

User:TucsonDavid

[edit]

I had prior access but have been inactive would like to be re added.TucsonDavidU.S.A. 21:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (May)

[edit]

User:Tomer T

[edit]
Helping with reviewing afc pending articles. I have read the guidelines and am an experienced editor in English and Hebrew Wikipedia, also an admin on Commons. Want to help particularly with Israel related articles. Tomer T (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kaleeb18

[edit]
I would like to help with reviewing articles and clearing up the backlog. I will probably mainly review article that the alert bot shows on the WikiProjects that I’m on. I think I can review articles because I have experience with things like this as I have reviewed 3 GA nominations, read the instructions, and pass the criteria to be a reviewer. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 14:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:0xDeadbeef

[edit]
I want to help with reviewing AfC articles. 0xDEADBEEF (T C) 11:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeverTry4Me

[edit]
I would like to request for AfC reviewer. I do understand, that it would be decided by the Administrators about my eligibility. Regards - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 03:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done; you are currently under a restriction to create new pages through the AFC process, and if you have been restricted in this way, then I do not feel you should also be taking on the role of AFC reviewer. Primefac (talk) 15:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iskandar323

[edit]
Hi, I'm requesting AfC helper script rights because I noticed the growing backlog and this seems like an area in which I can help out. Aside from meeting the minimum requirements and having read the instructions, I've created about a dozen mainspace pages and initiated about twice as many AfDs, so I feel I know my way around article requirements pretty well at this point. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:52, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:PerryPerryD

[edit]
I am decently experienced with the policies and guidelines of the Wikipedia project, I have noticed a severe backlog of un-reviewed draft articles and I want to do my part in clearing this. I understand the rules and guidelines of Articles for creation and I pass the criteria provided. Thank you. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I used "decently' incorrectly here. I understand the guidelines extremely well. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 12:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to re-write your criteria then, As i have over 1000 edits. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PerryPerryD: Primefac's decline is entirely appropriate. WP:AFC/P states that AfC reviewers must have: [...] a minimum of 500 undeleted edits to articles (this is not the same as total number of edits). (emphasis mine). By my count, you have 203 as of today. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did not see that last part, I thought it meant 500 minimum total contributions to wikipedia PerryPerryD Talk To Me 20:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PerryPerryD that of itself is of concern - the AfC criteria are moderately dense, not the worst on wikipedia by any means but far, far more detailed than the criteria for applying. If you couldn't understand these, I would want to see you have significantly more experience before considering you as an AfC reviewer. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:HenryTemplo

[edit]
(Re-requesting after achieving minimum editing criteria) I want to help clear the backlog! I have experience with dealing with new users, responding to queries at the Teahouse and explaining to new users the policies and guidelines they need to know. I have experience of both sides of AfD and hope I have sufficient knowledge of the process as a result! I am involved in article creating, having started several articles. I am enthusiastic and polite, and can usually respond to queries in a timely fashion. I have made myself familiar with the relevant guidelines regarding AfC reviewing. I hope all this makes me a suitable candidate for AFC reviewing! HenryTemplo (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:45, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zindor

[edit]
Was previously a reviewer but went inactive (retired). Now back and editing again. Regards, Zindor (talk) 17:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 12:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Primefac. I seem to be missing out the archives, here's a diff. Regardless, i will happily re-request after 500 mainspace edits on this account. Thanks for reviewing this request, Zindor (talk) 23:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 07:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Most Comfortable Chair

[edit]
I want to help out with the project. I have been around for a while; I have created a couple of articles and worked on plenty more. I am familiar with notability guidelines of Wikipedia, and I have read and understood AFCR. I have a fair amount of experience reviewing good article nominations — 45 to be exact — and that experience will help me in reviewing AfC nominations. Although I have not been able to spend much time in deletion related activities, I have a decent grasp of deletion policies — which I believe I have demonstrated with the limited participation I have had in that area. — The Most Comfortable Chair 17:18, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:45, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:SlySabre

[edit]
I have noticed that there have still been many drafts pending since January and would like to help out. I can tell you that I have one or two pending myself, however I will not be reviewing my own. There are several that I’ve found that I think I can provide good reasons as to why I may decline them, specifically usually they don’t have enough reliable sources and don’t show significant coverage. SlySabre (talk) 12:55, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:0xDeadbeef

[edit]
I want to help reviewing new articles. I have been declined before because I failed the minimum editing criteria, but I have fully reviewed the guidelines and I think I am ready to have the perm. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 11:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mulling this one over for another day or two; numerical requirements met, but 85% of those edits are rolling back vandalism. AFD stats are good but not huge. Primefac (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Reading Beans

[edit]

I would want to help in reviewing Nigerian articles in draft space. My CSD log, and AFD shows that I have read the general notability guidelines. And I believe I have met the requirements. Reading Beans Talk to the Beans? 10:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Owlf

[edit]
I have been here on Wikipedia since so long and has gained lots of experience and have knowledge about notability guidelines. I would like to help to clean up some AFC backlog. I would love to help and be a part of it. Regards, Owlf 📪 18:16, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:NiklausGerard

[edit]
Hello, I would like to continue to contribute to Wikipedia’s article creation and deletion process. I have significant experience in AFD, I have read the instructions for review, I have created 10 articles for the main space and edited quite a few more, and I have never had an issue following the guidelines of Wikipedia. NiklausGerard (talk) 15:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Capsulecap

[edit]
I have just reached 500 undeleted edits to mainspace. I've been interested in AFC for a while, but have not gotten the chance to apply before now. I have created three articles and participated in a few AFD discussions. I know what's notable and not notable. Additionally, I am a participant in recent changes patrol so I can see what is clearly unconstructive or advertising. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 23:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done; your AFD record seems to indicate that you do not have as good a grasp of notability at this time as would be ideal for this sort of work. Primefac (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac Understood, I have just gotten interested in using the random page tool to find non-notable pages. I'll make sure to read up on policies of the notability of specific topics. Hopefully in about a month I should be able to reapply with a larger and better AfD track record. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 16:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Haiiya

[edit]
Hey! I'd like to help with AFC submissions because I want to help get more notable articles into Wikipedia. I have Speedy deleted 2 articles, successfully PRODDED 2, and created 2 articles (1 is DYK, the other is a current nomination). I have ~1,000 edits, with 545 in the main. My areas of interest are related to Korea and the US or Virginia. Thanks! Haiiya (talk) (contribs) 21:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:TruthGuardians

[edit]
I would like to help clear up any backlog and help newcomers within my areas of expertise in my free time. TruthGuardians (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June

[edit]

Rename (Jun)

[edit]

User:DIVINE

[edit]
I had it with my username Owlf, i lost access while renaming it into DIVINE. Please re-grant the access. DIVINE 📪 20:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (a bit ago). Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Meena

[edit]
My username has changed from "DarkGlow" to "Meena" so needs updating on this list for me to be able to review drafts. Thank you in advance! – DarkGlow • 07:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Returning (Jun)

[edit]

User:VersaceSpace

[edit]

I'd like to be put back on probation, while I had the script I reviewed a ton of drafts, but I went IA in July last year so I lost it. I came back like two weeks ago and I think I'm ready to start reviewing again. --VersaceSpace 🌃 15:40, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done (noting that this is again for a probationary period). Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jprg1966

[edit]

I would like to be re-activated as an AfC reviewer. Have been inactive for a while but would like to help out again. --Jprg1966 (talk) 02:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (Jun)

[edit]

User:Jamiebuba

[edit]
Requesting the script to help clear out AFC logjam. I often tag pages and make edits to articles in Draftspace pending AFC review. I feel having this right will help in a tiny way of easing workload for other reviewers, am also very familiar with the notability guidelines. Jamiebuba (talk) 00:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Clovermoss

[edit]

I'm interested in participating in the AfC process and helping new editors with the basics of Wikipedia editing. I'm fairly certain that I meet the minimum criteria. I'm okay with being on the probationary list if nessecary. I have also asked Chetsford to remove my autopatrolled userright because I'm under the impression that would prevent drafts that I accept from being seen by new page patrollers and I would appreciate a second pair of eyes to make sure I'm not making mistakes. In general, I feel like I have a decent understanding of notability. My NPP school page is the best example of this, even I'm still shaky on certain aspects (e.g. lists). I promise to be careful when reviewing and I'm aware that the process is different from NPP (even if I haven't started contributing there either yet). I have read the Reviewing instructions page. Clovermoss (talk) 19:44, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My autopatrolled userright has been removed, so my concern about a second pair of eyes not seeing any drafts that I accept through AfC is no longer an issue. Clovermoss (talk) 13:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I have looked at your contributions, including taking an article to good article status, so I am confident with your understanding of policies. Regarding list articles, I've closed more of a few of these as "no consensus" at AfD, so I think being shaky on whether an individual one is notable or not is actually quite understandable. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Peter SamFan

[edit]

I believe I had access to the Helper Script back in 2016. Unfortunately, I've been inactive since then. Could I please have it back? Thanks. :) Peter Sam Fan 02:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done; the notability guidelines have changed quite significantly since then, and you seem to have only ~50 edits since your return. I'd like to see a little bit more activity before re-applying. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dark-World25

[edit]
I've got a decent grasp on notability guidelines and deletion policies, and would like to help with the backlog. CSD logs and PROD logs available. Thanks, Dark-World25 (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Itcouldbepossible

[edit]
I meet the minimum requirements for being an AFC reviewer. I have created quite a few articles on Bengali TV shows, and have developed a few more. Most of them are draft to article developments. I regularly patrol new pages (though I am not a new page reviewer) and make necessary changes. Now I also want to help out as an AFC reviewer. There is always a huge backlog of article that are submitted for review. Every time there is a minimum backlog of 2500 or more articles. Especially, there is almost no AFC reviewer to review Bengali TV or film related articles. They stay in submitted status for months after months. I would like to help in clearing the backlog, especially of articles that are related to Bengali television and biographies of people who are related to Bengali TV and film industry. Being a Bengali and an Indian, I think I would be able to determine notability and verifiability better than any other AFC reviewer. Therefore I am requesting AFC helper script rights so that I can help the community as much as I can. Thanks for reviewing my request. Regards, Itcouldbepossible Talk 14:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Primefac for reviewing my request. You said that I am on probation, so after 3 months my name would be removed from the list, or is it like temporary rights - a bot will come and remove me from the list. It is said 3-6 months, so it is no fixed time right? Can you just tell me what will I do after 3-6 months? Will I have to reapply? Itcouldbepossible Talk 06:31, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 06:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PrimefacOk, I understand now. After 3-6 months, I can request again to be a permanent reviewer and then you would re-evaluate me right? Itcouldbepossible Talk 12:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do evaluations when I have time, on a rolling basis. Primefac (talk) 13:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mori Calliope fan

[edit]
Recently, I've hit 500 edits to articles (though most of my recent efforts were to remove vandalism), and I would like to see if I could become a participant. I have a large experience with CSD (particularly in draftspace and userspace), and some experience with PROD and AfD. EDM fan 2 (talk) 15:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This account has been renamed. Mori Calliope fan talk 04:17, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Davisonio

[edit]
Returning reviewer - was inactive for a few months but would like to get reviewing again to work on the backlog. Craig Davison (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:FishandChipper

[edit]
I've been an active editor for some time now and I would very much like to help clear out the backlog. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 15:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Florificapis

[edit]
I have been reviewing a few drafts on early Christianity and related topics, so having AfC reviewing tools would be useful for me to have. I have also read all the instructions and have experience cleaning up dozens of new articles. Having created more than 70 new articles myself, I am also quite familiar with what new articles should or should not be like. Florificapis (talk) 20:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trakinwiki

[edit]
Hello admin, finally I have decided that I want to participate in this project. As I am here for long time and I have good understanding of rules. I have created 32 article's and only 1 got deleted. And I am confident that I can help clearing up the backlog. Thanks Trakinwiki (talk) 06:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, obviously, as a blocked sock. Primefac (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:NotReallySoroka

[edit]
I would like to request AfC reviewer rights to review WP:AFC/R submissions. I will recuse from reviewing new articles unless I receive explicit permission to do so, although I might ask for such permission any time. I will also recuse from reviewing my own AFC/R requests. As for experiences, I had read the guidelines, met the editorial requirements, and performed some pending changes reviews. Thank you. NotReallySoroka (talk) 05:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:SeoR

[edit]
I've been thinking about how to extend my involvement in the project - having added some Pending Changes work (>1.8k cases) - and Afc and NPP are options; I'd like to start with Afc. I've several years' experience (33k edits over 20k pages), have created a range of articles (~50), participated in a modest number of AfD discussions, and reviewed and rated thousands of articles, improving a considerable number along the way. I hope I can also contribute in this area, encouraging more editors to add to the encyclopedia, and helping filter out unready pieces. Thanks, SeoR (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC) SeoR (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I've been happy with your contributions to User:Ritchie333/Irish Monopoly, so I'm quite confident of your understanding of policy and what it takes to write an article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aoyoigian

[edit]
I have been editing Wikipedia for a while now and have a good knowledge regarding Wikipedia notability criteria and deletion policy. I would like to help now with reviewing articles and clearing up the backlog. Thank You. Aoyoigian (talk) 05:48, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Szmenderowiecki

[edit]
I was granted the New page patrol user right for a one-month trial but I did not gain access to the helper script. Did I miss something? Szmenderowiecki (talk) 13:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Hello! As far as I know Szmenderowiecki, WP:NPR is different from WP:AFCR. What you have got is the new page patroller rights. But AFC reviewer rights are totally different. NPR is for patrolling new pages and fixing errors and detect many other issues in new pages, while WP:AFCR is for reviewing draft submissions. This is for those who want to help out in reviewing drafts, that is either accepting it or declining it. You get access to the helper script if you are an AFC reviewer, not by becoming a NPR. I think you have mixed the two concepts, but could I help you a bit? Itcouldbepossible Talk 14:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, in that case I would like to gain access to the helper script. I have already done reviews of some drafts, but manually typing things and remembering the syntax of the templates is a bit tedious, and basically I can only decline at this stage, as I don't see the instructions to manually accept. I have not used the NPP tools too much yet, I've more been focused on the drafts, which also appear in my feed. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 14:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Danidamiobi

[edit]
With humbly over 185 Wikipedia articles across several topics, I am currently a Wikipedian in Residence at the Africa Narrative. As an undergraduate about 5 years ago, I started the Wikimedia Fan Club, University of Ilorin which has gone on to incubate tens of active editors on several language Wikipedias and Wikimedia projects.

I would love to help decongest the backlog of articles pending review in order to encourage and advise new editors. I believe draft creation is very tedious, often driven by the wrong cause, and mostly driven by good-faith editors and I would be glad to advise editors where wrong and approve where appropriate.

With this comes a great responsibility that I will be privileged to if granted. Danidamiobi (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Urban Versis 32

[edit]
I have almost 2000 edits on the English Wikipedia, and 900 in the mainspace. I have contributed to Wikipedia in many ways (Adding short descriptions to pages, Teahouse host, copy editing, contributing images, etc). I have sent various articles through AfC, have read up on the process and met all the requirements, and would like to help contribute to Wikipedia in another way. Thanks. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 16:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 20:10, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Q28

[edit]
I have edited over 1000 edit on main namespaces. I am a fromer-draft-reviewer on zhwiki, so I would like to here to help with the backlog. Q28 (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting this message from one of our zh-wiki colleagues. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:40, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Besides, I promise I won't do anything bad like zhwiki, On the contrary, if I screw up, you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Q28 (talk) 13:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They have created 30 articles of which 29 are deleted and nothing in their edit history gives me any faith they are remotely ready for reviewing submissions. KylieTastic (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@KylieTastic In fact, these deleted pages are all redirects. Redirects will also show up in this list after they are deleted. But I also have some experience in Chinese, and I think I can be get this permission. Q28 (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Q28 AfC also reviews redirects (WP:AFC/R). All language Wikipedias have different guidelines and polices so your experience on Chinese Wikipedia does little to help understating of ours. KylieTastic (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@KylieTastic，For the time being, I have stopped creating difficult to understand redirects. I hope that this mistake can be forgiven, after all, everyone makes mistakes. Q28 (talk) 05:54, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, per WT:AFC discussion. Primefac (talk) 07:10, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Baggaet

[edit]
I previously had this access before I was blocked. Now, I'd like to help again. I have a good knowledge of policies especially those related to the AFC. --Baggaet (talk) 16:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lil-unique1

[edit]
I have edited on and off for the best part of a decade and have over 50,000 edits. I have taken 25 articles through the GA process and have one featured list. I am a regular contributor to popular/modern music across a wide range of genres and therefore could really help with any such articles. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 17:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July

[edit]

Reactivate (July)

[edit]

User:Dee03

[edit]
I lost the permission in March due to inactivity. I would like to help out with the AFC backlog again. Dee03 00:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Snowycats

[edit]
Took a break, back now + happy to keep reviewing. Thanks! Snowycats (talk) 19:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remove (July)

[edit]

User:Paradise Chronicle

[edit]

I was encouraged to review some of these articles in the past, but now I am not so much interested anymore. So in order not to feel obliged (I know it is voluntary) I'd prefer to be removed from the team. If I have the right, I feel obliged to at least try to accept some AfC's.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:39, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename (July)

[edit]

User:Femke

[edit]
Recently renamed from Femkemilene to Femke. Could I have access back? Thanks. Femke (talk) 16:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC) Femke (talk) 16:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:NotReallyMoniak

[edit]
Renamed from "NotReallySoroka". Thanks and please ping on reply. NotReallyMoniak (talk) 16:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac, I have since reverted to being "NotReallySoroka", so I would appreciate it if you may change it back. Sorry for any inconvenience. NotReallySoroka (talk) 05:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, but please make up your mind what account you want to use. I'm not going to keep flip-flopping this every other month. Primefac (talk) 13:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (July)

[edit]

User:Storchy

[edit]
I'd like permission to review draft articles, as I've come across several good quality drafts waiting in the long review queue, while I was doing other cleanup tasks. With over 13,000 edits since joining in January, I believe I have sufficient experience editing to offer help with the draft article backlog. Thanks, Storchy (talk) 21:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:IAmChaos

[edit]
Hi, I am an NPR, and while I mostly review DABs and redirects, I also started doing articles, recently particularly after the drive started. I am also one of the actove reviewers at AFCRC, and you can see my reviews, as I have used the tool for them. As you can tell from my wikiactivity, I jump around a bit between what I do, and this is similar (but slightly different) to reviewing, and I've been looking for another region to stretch into. So if you would like to check my reviews and activity, I would like to apply for probation with AFC.
As for the requirements - 1&2   3-   I have read and understand (especially how it is different than NPR) 4- I believe that as an NPR this is  Good. 5- my logs are in my userspace - I will note ahead of time my this month on csd has a lot of blue links - one was a legitimate should not have been CSD'd one was ineligible, but I couldn't have known as I'm not an admin, one was a G12 that was dealth with through revdel and one was a G6 (move) so was actually deleted. 6-   . Happy Editing--IAmChaos 20:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr vulpes

[edit]
My wikipedia account is over 90 days old and I have contributed over 500 undeleted edits. I have reviewed the instructions for reviewing articles for creation. I have a good understanding on notability guidelines and deletion policies. Last month I finished NPP School and have been been granted NPP privileges. Before I started NPP School I was a pending changes reviewer. I'm about to start Counter Vandalism training laster this month. I've worked hard to address problems I've found in articles with their respective authors. When I've made mistakes I've taken accountability for my actions and have reached out to the author to let them know of my error example 1, 2. When reviewing articles I take a proactive role in trying to improve them, it's important for our community to help editors make good articles. For example in a recent AfD for The Negro Sailor I worked to improve the article enough to keep it. If there are any questions or concerns please let me know. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 04:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:LisafBia6531

[edit]
I want to help new users create articles, I have read the AfC criteria. LisafBia6531 (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum editing criteria. Primefac (talk) 07:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bread Enthusiast

[edit]
I'd like to contribute in this way. I have been actively editing for some time now, and I hope to be able to improve and help new editors/Wikipedians. Bread Enthusiast (talk) 22:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; the majority (3/4) of your edits have been semi-automated with shortdesc helper, and you have no obvious XfD or CSD experience to further gauge your experience and knowledge of our inclusion criteria. Primefac (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Onmyway22

[edit]
I have been editing and patrolling RC that participates CSD, XFD. Have good knowledge about the criteria. I would like to help with reviewing new draft and reduce the backlog. I can handle film, music also promotional and vandal submissions. Onmyway22 talk 07:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alaexis

[edit]
To review Draft:Moscovite-Novgorodian Wars. Alaexis¿question? 08:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC) Alaexis¿question? 08:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A user does is not required to be an AFC reviewer to move pages out of the draft space, so if you want to move it go right ahead; you do not need AFCH access. Primefac (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then why do you write "PLEASE NOTE: Editors whose usernames are not on the list are strongly cautioned not to review AfC submissions"? Alaexis¿question? 16:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Strongly cautioned" does not mean "forbidden"; if you know what you're doing, and you know you won't waste an NPR's time by moving it to the article space, then there is no reason to wait for a formal review. Primefac (talk) 16:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks! Alaexis¿question? 17:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dwaipayanc

[edit]
Would like to take part in the review process of drafts. Dwaipayan (talk) 00:45, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:NeverTry4Me

[edit]
I am creating articles through AfC. More than 50 AfC pages are approved. I want to be a participant as I want to continue creating pages through AfC procedure. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 13:57, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
NeverTry4Me, do you understand that this page is for requesting permissions to review AfC submissions? You can still create articles through AfC if you are not a reviewer. 0xDeadbeef 14:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
0xDeadbeef yes I do. Whatever user rights I do have and shall have, I shall maintain as per rules. Moreover, creating pages through AfC is now a real fun for me. I am really enjoying AfC. And as per rule, I have created double numbers of required pages and learned how should a reviewer do while reviewing. I have now learned a lot from these experiences and studying all criteria of notability. I shall be careful with good faith if the access is provided to me. Rest, decisions are always on the staff. Whatever they decide, that will be accepted in good faith. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 14:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
NeverTry4Me, just to verify, are you wanting to start reviewing drafts? Primefac (talk) 19:43, 26 July 2022 (UTC) (please do not ping on reply)[reply]
@Primefac: yes. I want to start reviewing the AfC drafts so that the long pending backlogs can be cleared soon. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 00:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac I guess I meet all 6 criteria. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 08:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, with apologies for the delay, I forgot you were up here. Primefac (talk) 07:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Thank you. Hope my requirements are checked thoroughly. Can you please add me to the list as I don't want to touch the page as per basic rule? - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 07:56, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: I don't understand why my right changes log and XTools are not showing it. Is it a technical glitch? Regards - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 02:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@NeverTry4Me AFC reviewer isn't exactly a userright that will show up in Special:UserRights/NeverTry4Me and as such will not show up in xtools. Instead it is only a list that the software checks every time someone tries to access the helper script and will block access if the username isn't on the list. This is why if you have a rename you need to be re-added to the list, and I believe this is similar to the AutoWikiBrowser's system. Justiyaya 03:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Justiyaya:, thanking you for your reply, I wanted to say the other users' XTools are showing as this and this. One editor raised this concern while I declined his draft as the draft had no reliable citations. Regards- - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 04:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@NeverTry4Me I believe they both are new page reviewers, which is different than AFC. I don't have the flag so if you look at my xtools you can't see it. Justiyaya 05:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Justiyaya Thank you for your helpful assistance. I'm honoured to get your assistance. My curiosity is now cleared. :) - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 05:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, with further apologies for the mixup, I had missed some major red flags, most significant of which being that you are actually prohibited from creating mainspace articles. Primefac (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Well, your mentioned "red flags" never said about AfC reviewer applying. You removed me, but the questioned articles are accepted by other reviewers already. A mild block can't be a barrier where I haven't violated any AfC rule. -✍ NeverTry4Me⛅ C♯ 14:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not about the AFC rules, it's the ban on creating articles; by creating a draft and then approving it yourself, you are effectively creating an article. If you had chosen to leave your own drafts alone and reviewed other editors' drafts, we wouldn't be in this situation. Primefac (talk) 18:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:DavidEfraim

[edit]
I have seen that there is a backlog of articles waiting for review. I have been cleaning up so many articles for some time. Thats how I figured I could try and help to reduce the backlog. You will find notices about two declined drafts in my talk page. I am not the creator of those and was just trying to bring some improvements. I have clearly read and understood reviewing instructions. DavidEfraim (talk) 16:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Omer123hussain

[edit]
I've been thinking about how to extend my involvement, I have been editing Wikipedia and I would like to help now with reviewing articles and clearing up the backlog. Thank You. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 12:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC) Omer123hussain (talk) 12:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, primarily for the glut of draftifications mentioned in your talk page archives. Primefac (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Somej

[edit]
Hello, have previously been an AFC script user, but dropped off for lack of time ... hoping to contribute to new article reviews again. Thanks! Somej (talk) 05:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Netherzone

[edit]
I'd like to help out at AfC. I've been an editor for over ten years, have created over 160 articles, am active at AfD (esp. in the Visual arts) and have a good record there with a clear understanding of the guidelines and policies of notability criteria. I've made around 30,000 edits in my time on Wikipedia. Netherzone (talk) 13:48, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac, you kindly added me to the list of Participants with this edit[1], but then removed me a couple hours later with this edit[2]. I'm pretty sure it was a mistake, however I am unable to use the AfC script because I was removed from the list. If it was not an inadvertent error, please let me know the reason why so I can improve whatever qualifications I may be lacking. Thank you in advance! Netherzone (talk) 14:32, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, did things in the wrong order - I should have checked for inactive reviewers before I added all of the new folks. Sorry about that! Primefac (talk) 14:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August

[edit]

No longer inactive (Aug)

[edit]

User:Jeff G.

[edit]
I will try to be more active in reviewing articles for creation.   — Jeff G. ツ 10:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hellknowz

[edit]
I didn't even notice the membership expired until the script told me and I went looking for an error before realizing 6 months have passed since I reviewed a draft. Technically, I "reviewed" one recently and was about to report Draft:Aidas Arciakov again. I haven't had the time to do actual reviews, but I am often navigating around drafts, so it would be helpful to actually be able to use the script should I see something actionable. —  HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 12:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ahecht

[edit]
I haven't spent much time at AfC recently, but plan to again in the future. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iazyges

[edit]
I help review a number of pages throughout my other editing activities and believe I pretty easily meet the qualifications. I also used to be active in NPP when I was more active, and plan to resume this. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC) Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:JalenFolf

[edit]
Returning to activity within AfC after brief spurts of inactivity. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vermont

[edit]
I haven't been active much recently, though I got back into NPP work a few days ago, which involves interactions with AfC. It would be helpful to have access to the script. Best, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 00:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:David.moreno72

[edit]
Appears that my account has been made inactive in error. Thanks David.moreno72 23:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was not in error, you have not reviewed a draft since 2020. I will re-add you to the list, though. Primefac (talk) 13:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Caorongjin

[edit]
I was formerly part of WP:AFC/P but was dropped due to inactivity. This lack of participation has been due in part to the pandemic. I intend on returning to WP:AFC and would be grateful to be re-added to the project. —Caorongjin 💬 09:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:17, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:SD0001

[edit]
Not sure about doing much reviewing (sorry), but I'd still need access for debugging script issues. – SD0001 (talk) 13:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tom (LT)

[edit]
I still participate infrequently and want be able to review the occasional AfC in my area of interest as able. Tom (LT) (talk) 10:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:TAnthony

[edit]
I'd like to help more with AfC, and the helper script rights will come in handy in general. — TAnthonyTalk 17:14, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Home Lander

[edit]
Reactivation; I got moved to the inactive list. Home Lander (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sir Joseph

[edit]
Please reactivate so I can use the AFCH and contribute. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:42, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:SuperSwift

[edit]
Need to go back into active reviews SuperSwift (talk) 07:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jr8825

[edit]
Lapsed due to inactivity. Regretfully I've only be able to use the tool a handful of times, but I'm mindful of the backlog and will try to contribute occasionally now I'm more active. Jr8825 • Talk 20:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Martin Urbanec

[edit]
My AfC access was removed due to inactivity. I'd like to help with reviewing drafts again – can you re-add me please? Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:IntoThinAir

[edit]
I was one of 279 users removed from the list of active users in this edit earlier this month, and I would like to be added back, because I am still interested in reviewing AFC submissions. IntoThinAir (talk) 16:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Redalert2fan

[edit]
Hello, I was removed for inactivity, but would like to continue to use the tool and help out once more. Therefore I would like to request access again. Redalert2fan (talk) 12:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Patient Zero

[edit]
Have returned after a break and would like access to the tool again. Best, Patient Zerotalk 20:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC) Patient Zerotalk 20:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename (Aug)

[edit]

User:Ratekreel

[edit]
I've been renamed from "Baggaet" to "Ratekreel". Would someone please update the page. Thanks. --Ratekreel (talk) 04:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New requests (Aug)

[edit]

User:MLGDatBoi1738

[edit]
Hey! I'd like to help out with Articles for Creation. I haven't had much experience in deleting articles or any of that, but I have read the guidelines and made some articles already, with one in progress right now. I'm pretty active, and I can help out with anything related to history, tech, and gaming. MLGDatBoi1738 (talk) 17:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now, mainly because of that lack of experience on the notability side of things, but also because of a few draftifications and questions about copyright violations. Nothing immediately disqualifying, but a bit more time editing will help. Primefac (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:B.Korlah

[edit]

I will like to volunteer with the AfC, I am an active Wikipedian and I hope to volunteer more on this and i hope I am found worthy to be granted the flag B.Korlah (talk) 11:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, as I am concerned with the number of G12 deletions listed on your userpage. Primefac (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@user:Primefac Thank you for your response, however all of this were while I was a newbie to Wikipedia as I wasn’t aware one could create from AfC, so I was creating some articles directly, which resulted to that. However in recent times, I’ve not had any article deleted, you could check, all my articles created have all been reviewed as I now understand the rudiments of editing Wikipedia. Just thought to let you know, thank you.

Regards

I still have concerns, but in the interest of good faith I will add you as a probationary member. Primefac (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spudlace

[edit]
Would like to help with the backlog. Spudlace (talk) 21:34, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Akim Ernest

[edit]
I am actively searching to see how I can help benefit the community. I think AFC is one way to do this. I am looking forward to guiding other users with their articles which are currently in this dreadful backlog. My created articles have landed me the autopatrolled right. With the knowledge of how content should be handled I think I'm a good candidate. Akim Ernest (talk) 19:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note this user has pretty minimal experience in mainspace or otherwise and multiple open perm requests without logical reasoning. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How is my reasoning not logical? This sounds like a robotic response. Akim Ernest (talk) 19:55, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm trying to figure out how you got the autopatrolled bit, considering most of your creations are stubs, except for two that were deleted. Aaron Duncan was CSD G4 /G11, and Akim Ernest was deleted via CSD A7, as it was about YOU; a vanity article. This means I would be against you getting any bit and would request other admin consider removing the autopatrolled bit. Stephen is who granted the bit, and I would ask he review his action if he is around. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    My Mistakes
    You are correct @Dennis Brown I have made some mistakes not going to run away from it. Aaron Duncan was one of them and of course me creating one in my name. I was fairly new to creating and editing. Please note I wasn't as involved or had enough experience during the time of those articles. Of course I don't qualify for a Wikipedia Page after looking deeper into what qualifies suitable for Wikipedia and it's main space. I started off at secondary school where I edited my school Wikipedia Castries Comprehensive Secondary School. I did break some structural elements back then as I really did not have any idea about what I was doing. I was corrected by Gene93k.
    My Development
    I have learned from those mistakes and I'm still learning how to be the best Wikipedian I can be. I understand you are appall to Stephen granting me the autopatrolled right but as you can see there has been no reoccurrence of any issues regarding my articles and no misuse of the privilege's given to me as being autopatrolled.
    I am looking forward to continuing my growth in voluntary work and I thank you @Dennis Brown for your remarks even if I don't concur with you. If you have any tips or resources you can provide to help me in my growth I would greatly appreciate it.
    One Link Bless Akim Ernest (talk) 21:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The problem is, the autopatrol bit should not be a simple bit to get. I think I had 20-25 real articles created before I got it, many years ago. And the fact that you created a vanity article on yourself disqualifies you from having the bit for some time. In my eyes, you shouldn't have it until you've have created at least a dozen actual articles that aren't stubs. And you don't need to be working in AFC, deciding for others which articles are accepted or not. I'm guessing you mean well, but you don't even have 800 edits yet. The best way you can help the encyclopedia is to learn the policies like WP:GNG, WP:V and write some articles that are more than stubs, and that clearly meet the criteria for inclusion. You simply don't have enough experience yet for either bit. If Stephen doesn't reply soon and dissuade me, I'm likely to remove the bit myself. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I would love to keep the bit but such a decision is not up to me. Thanks for your feedback. Akim Ernest (talk) 21:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done and I've removed autopatrolled. You seem to be hat collecting, which isn't how you can best help the encyclopedia. You need to learn more, edit more, create a few actual articles, then I would have no problem with you having the bits, but you simply aren't experienced enough. Having more bits doesn't make you a better contributor, making good edits does. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:LordPeterII

[edit]
Since I last inquired for membership here, I have participated in AfD as suggested. I still occasionally stumble upon things I didn't know, but feel that I have now a generally good idea on what constitutes an acceptable article. I am still most active at DYK, but since the backlog will likely not disappear, I would like to help out with a few AfC reviews every now and then. -- LordPeterII (talk) 11:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kp2016rockin

[edit]
I was a probationary member for the AfC rights until now. Re-requesting to continue reviewing AfCs and clearing the backlog. kpgamingz (rant me) 18:13, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:SWinxy

[edit]
Hey. I'd like to get access to AFCH so I can review and take action on AfCs submitted with WikiProjects Java and Computer Graphics banners on their talk page. I am aware of the reviewing instructions, and have a good understanding of WP:N (>70% AfD rate). Thanks. SWinxy (talk) 14:45, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:HouseBlaster

[edit]
Hello! I would like to try reviewing drafts. I have read the instructions, and would say that my understanding of notability/deletion is best demonstrated by my NPPS course. Thanks! HouseBlastertalk 00:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheRealSerenaJoy

[edit]
Interested in participating in this wiki project. I have participated in some GOCE requests and backlog drives. I have a solid understanding of the basic rules and knowledge of how to find more complex rules. Have a few barnstars. Have time on my hands, love to edit. TIA for consideration. The Real Serena JoyTalk 22:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC) The Real Serena JoyTalk 22:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Primefac,
I just noticed that this editor was recently blocked as a sockpuppet. I don't know the impact of that decision for removing any special privileges or being removed from the list. Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:MaxnaCarta

[edit]
Reason for requesting afc helper script rights

Ahoy! I just finished NPP school and was mentored by the lovely Atsme. This project is similar, and I'd like to participate in both projects. I come across many drafts during recent changes patroller and often see poor drafts that have just been edited then re-submitted. I can assist the backlog by reviewing such pages. Thanks MaxnaCarta (talk) 06:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nupamjo

[edit]
I wonder if i am eligible for afc reviewer. I might be able to lighten the load of pending drafts. I'm grateful. Nupamjo (talk) 06:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No. Primefac (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:JeBonSer

[edit]
I am a current NPP and I would also like to help in reviewing backlog AFCs. JeBonSer (talk | sign) 23:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September

[edit]

No longer inactive (Sep)

[edit]

User:Andrew nyr

[edit]
Have been inactive for a bit for the entire wiki. Hope to come back and help out. Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 04:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:LJF2019

[edit]
Have been inactive for a bit and now looking to come back to Wikipedia starting with reviewing articles, which I have significant experience with. LJF2019 talk 04:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC) LJF2019 talk 04:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tymon.r

[edit]
Back to active editing, I am a NPP, requesting access restored. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 19:17, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Paul2520

[edit]
I'm an active editor (and former reviewer) & recently mostly doing WikiGnome work (this calendar year, I've been focusing on getting the backlog in Category:CS1 errors: dates down). I really enjoy contributing new content; see my contributions and my DYK stats. I'm planning my 2023 goals, and want to at least help review say a couple articles per month.
I haven't done much with AfD, but if you recommend I get more experience there, I am open to doing so. paul2520 💬 18:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New users

[edit]

User:Lewolka

[edit]
Would like to take part in the review process of drafts, I particularly like helping improving articles. Lewolka (talk) 12:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:19, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good thank you Lewolka (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Njd-de

[edit]
Some weeks ago S0091 asked me whether I had thought of becoming an AfC reviewer. I have been doing a lot of anti-vandal work, and at some point focused on new page patrolling. I've been tagging some drafts for speedy deletion for various reasons (mainly utter promotion or hoax). However, every now and then I also come across drafts pending review that look like a good start but aren't quite up to the required standard. I would say I have a good understanding of our guidelines and policies, incl. on notability, (speedy)-deletion, paid-editing and sockpuppetry to mention a few. I would be happy to help with the backlog by reviewing and commenting on drafts. – NJD-DE (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Reba16

[edit]
Much of the work I have done on Wikipedia involves copy editing and otherwise reviewing new articles in my areas of interest, primarily physical sciences and medicine. I would like to help out reviewing new pages in the Articles for Creation process as well. Reba16 (talk) 14:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 18:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Why? I Ask

[edit]
Hello! I have been active in the AfD sphere and as a page creator myself. I figured I could use some of my downtime to help with the egregiously large backlog. Why? I Ask (talk) 22:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC) Why? I Ask[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 08:10, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Clarkcj12

[edit]
Reason for requesting afc helper script rights as I would like to help with the backlog. Clarkcj12 (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


October

[edit]

Returning (Oct)

[edit]

User:Etothepi

[edit]
Went inactive for a while due to a busy personal life but intend to start contributing again. eπ/💬 16:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alexandermcnabb

[edit]
Hiya. Thought I had this perm together with NPR, but apparently not, I just have NPR and, for some reason, the helper script. It'd be handy to work AfC alongside NPP! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC) Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. You did, but you stopped reviewing, so you got moved to inactive. Primefac (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (Oct)

[edit]

User:Dora the Axe-plorer

[edit]
I have been actively helping the backlog for NPP. Hoping to also do the same for AFC. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 02:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:ToastGuard

[edit]
I am looking to participate more in Wikipedia and have met the criteria listed. I have an in-depth knowledge of the Wikipedia guidelines, as proven by my history of anti-vandalism work. Toast (talk) 15:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fifthapril

[edit]
I joined Wikipedia around 6 months ago and since then I have gone through different Wikipedia polices and guidelines. I am also an active participant in AFD and I am interested in helping with the backlog. Thanks. Fifthapril (talk) 10:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now, mainly due to the number of your articles that have been moved to draft. Primefac (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac Thanks for the feedback. I appreciate it. I was expecting to be given the chance at least as a "Probation" because a couple of my pages were moved to draft but it was after this experience, my interest in reading about different Wikipedia guidelines grew more, I also actively started to participate in AFD discussions to gain more experience and majority of my Wikipedia contributions were also done in the last 2-3 weeks. Thanks again Fifthapril (talk) 13:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you can get those drafts accepted back to the article space, it will do much for any future request you make here. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 13:33, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the guidance. I appreciate it Fifthapril (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Primefac Do I need a make a separate request by adding a new section? My previous request was made on 7 October, 2022 but the request was declined due to my articles moved to draft space (Moved to draft space 7-8 weeks ago). But in the past 7-8 days, I have created Malik Muzaffar Khan Awan, Alam Zeb Umerzai, Babar Khan, Javed Akbar Khan, Qaimos Khan, Muhammad Asmatullah, Ghulam Muhammad, Behram Khan, Kiramat Ullah Khan, Syed Zahir Ali Shah. Apart from this, I am also actively involved in AFD discussions. Thanks Fifthapril (talk) 09:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Fifthapril (talk) 08:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Interstellarpoliceman

[edit]
I joined Wikipedia quite some time ago. Have been active on the German WP a bit more than here; made my mistakes, learned a lot, feeling comfortable joining the team -- if you let me. Would love to help. ☆☆☆ interstellarpoliceman ☆☆☆ 14:45, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:WildComet

[edit]
I've been familiarizing myself with the article creation process, mostly contribute around the topics of Canadian government and politics, keeping content up to date on bios, public officials, government organizations, and other content relating to this. Happy to help out with this project. —WildComet talk 00:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Asparagusus

[edit]
I am part of the GOCE (guild of copyeditors) and I believe that articles (and in this case, drafts) should be improved before they are deleted (with obvious exceptions like copyvios, et cetera). I am also a Teahouse host and am used to communicating with new and/or inexperienced editors (a large demographic of AFC users), as well as showing them relevant guidelines. (This has also given me plenty of connection with WP:COI/PAID editors.) I have created four articles (Compagopiscis, Calcarichelys, Paleollanosaurus, and Pelecymala). I also have a little bit of experience in AFD, though I think I've been voting too safely, something I'm working on. Asparagusus (interaction) 22:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:BlueNoise

[edit]
Hello. I would like to be added to the list of participants for the AfC WikiProject participant list. I've met all of the requirements for applying, and am always looking for new avenues to help contribute to the encyclopedia. Thank you for your time and consideration. BlueNoise (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC) BlueNoise (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trainsandotherthings

[edit]
I've been editing since July 2021, and have about 10,000 edits, of which over four thousand are in mainspace. I've been active at NPP, participated in numerous AfDs, and have written or rewritten several dozen articles, none of which have been deleted. I'm active essentially daily, and have reviewed the guidelines for AfC reviewing. I'd like to request this permission primarily to handle the review backlog for rail transport AfC submissions; one has been waiting since July and a large number were submitted recently. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:M4V3R1CK32

[edit]
Hello! I'm a bit of an on-again, off-again user who primarily lurks in the assessment queues for WikiProject Wisconsin, WikiProject Journalism, and WikiProject Newspapers. I'd like get AfC reviewer rights to clean up the AfC queues in those WikiProjects. I feel like I have a pretty good grasp of what constitutes a good source for Wikipedia, a good understanding of the AfC review rules (and perhaps more importantly, know where to go to view them again!). I also recently hit that 500 mainspace edits threshold. Let me know if you have any questions, and I'm excited to get started! M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 03:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 16:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hobit

[edit]
Planning on doing some reviews (finally). I should have time for a month or so, we'll see. Hobit (talk) 20:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:EchidnaLives

[edit]
Hello. I mostly work in counter-vandalism, but then I stumbled upon a new draft a few weeks ago, and noticed the massive AfC backlog. I looked into it more, and ended up reading through the Wikiproject pages for about an hour. I have recently decided to apply, as I believe I meet the requirements, have read all the instructions and would love to help, especially in order to reduce the queues at WikiProjects Australia and Melbourne. However, I am happy to work more in XfD and other relevant areas if necessary, but would be grateful to begin contributing now. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thatguy1987

[edit]
Hello! I would like to begin reviewing articles to help with the queues and believe I meet all the criteria to do so. Thank you! Thatguy1987 (talk) 09:51. 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 09:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dudhhr

[edit]
I often browse the Special:NewPagesFeed for drafts eligible for CSD, though I frequently notice drafts that are not eligible for CSD but should be reviewed and either accepted or declined. Access to the AfC script would allow me to reduce the currently extreme backlog by reviewing drafts ineligible for CSD. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 15:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 09:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! :) – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 14:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November

[edit]

Inactive (Nov)

[edit]

User:Passengerpigeon

[edit]
I was removed for inactivity but have returned. Passengerpigeon (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Launchballer

[edit]
I was removed for inactivity but I'm back now.--Launchballer 22:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Primefac (talk) 13:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Famousdog

[edit]
I think I was removed for inactivity because... life. I'm trying to get back to actively Wikipediaing. Famousdog (woof)(grrr) 18:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Primefac (talk) 13:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Overthrows

[edit]
Previously had AFC rights under username "EggOfReason" (diff where I was added). Username change (global log) resulted in removal from my list. Looking to start editing after hiatus, contributing to backlogs, including AFC. ‒overthrows 05:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Primefac (talk) 13:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Félix An

[edit]
Returning to WP. I had access to AFC before. Félix An (talk) 14:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC) Félix An (talk) 14:45, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Primefac (talk) 13:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (Nov)

[edit]

User:Wes sideman

[edit]
After reading the guidelines, I feel comfortable that I meet the criteria and can do a good job reviewing new articles. I have personally created two articles from scratch so far: Helms AIDS Amendments and Hearth: Memorial to the Enslaved. Wes sideman (talk) 15:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:ToastGuard

[edit]
I would like to expand what I do on Wikipedia, and have now made enough edits to qualify for this program. I previously requested rights but was denied due to the main space edit count. I frequently do Recent Changes Patrols, and review pending Changes. I have Rollbacker and pending changes rights as well. I have employed CSD and discussed articles on AFD. Toast (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Compusolus

[edit]
I would like to help with clearing the backlog of AfC pending articles, have created a number of articles myself, including through the AfC facility, and I believe I have the required knowledge regarding notability guidelines etc. Thank you. Compusolus (talk) 04:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC) Compusolus (talk) 04:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Inomyabcs

[edit]
Returning AFCH user with two successful reviews in 2015. I would like to help clear the backlog and make Wikipedia stronger. Thank you. Inomyabcs (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. This is because you have been out of the game since 2015, and barely meet our current criteria as it is. Primefac (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raydann

[edit]
Hi there! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite a while now, majorly in the recent changes area and doing counter-vandalism work. I look forward to join other Wikiprojects to diversify my editing and gaining experience in different topics. I think I have a good understanding of the reviewing process of AfC and would like to help review and clear the backlog here. I also review pending changes and have both the reviewer & the rollbacker rights. I was going to apply sooner but refrained from doing so and spent that time looking over the contributions of other AfC reviewers and occasionally going through New Pages log. Hope you will deem me worthy. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 17:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:M.Ashraf333

[edit]
I am familiar with the process of creating articles, and I tend to contribute to those that deal with Pakistani politics and government. I keep the content on these issues current by adding bios of relevant public figures, government agencies, and other relevant individuals and organizations and film and tv bios. I'm willing to assist with this project. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now, I have concerns about your AFD stats and deleted pages. Primefac (talk) 16:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:DecafPotato

[edit]
I would like to be able to review AfC submissions in order to help the encyclopedia grow and new articles be created. I have experience both creating and deleting articles, as well as experience with the AfC process (getting a bad article declined was one of the first things I did on Wikipedia, after all), and I hope to begin declining those bad submissions myself, lol :) – DecafPotato (talk) 03:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion.

User:Correogsk

[edit]
Hi! I am a Mexican Wikipedian since 2007 and have been editing/translating articles in/into English/French/Spanish. Thanks a lot, in advance! Correogsk or Gustavo (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC) Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 19:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Correogsk, just to check, are you looking to create articles or review them? Primefac (talk) 20:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac, both, thanks a lot! Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 16:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:43, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December

[edit]

Inactive (Dec)

[edit]

User:Izzy Moony

[edit]
Removed for inactivity in the past, returning on a regular basis now. Nightmare RarityEnter the palace 10:09, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Our metrics and requirements have changed a fair amount since you were last active with the project in 2014 and the last 8 years in which you were inactive; unfortunately you do not meet our current standards. Please feel free to re-apply when you do. Primefac (talk) 20:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Darylgolden

[edit]
Previously removed for inactivity, would like access to the tools again. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 04:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 20:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dane

[edit]
I was moved to the inactive list but would like to resume participating with AfC. -- Dane talk 14:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 20:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:StraussInTheHouse

[edit]
Return from wikibreak, would like to get stuck back in. Also, is the AfC freenode channel still used? Cheers, SITH (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:44, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Carolina2k22

[edit]
I was removed for inactivity under my previous username of User:Cairo2k18 but I am now relatively active again. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 20:41, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jodi.a.schneider

[edit]
Previously removed for inactivity, would like access to the tools again. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 23:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New (Dec)

[edit]

User:Blaze Wolf

[edit]
Hello! I'm wanting to become an AFC reviewer to help me out in the various areas in Wikipedia I help out in (Teahouse, anti-vandalism, AFD, helping out new users, and probably more), as well as help reduce the backlog some and help new users understand a bit more why their pages were declined. Sometimes I've come across drafts that have been submitted that I see are obviously not ready for mainspace, but have not been able to do much about it as a normal user. I've read through WP:AFCR and understand most of it (some of the wording at WP:AFCSTANDARDS confuses me a little, however I understand it enough to get the general idea). I'm mostly able to respond any questions a user might have in a timely manner (tho I may be busy at times due to things in IRL) and have a pretty good understanding of the notability criteria and deletion criteria (including what not to vote in AFDs). I've had some participation in the project before with helping revise some of the AFC decline messages to be a bit clearer as to what they describe. If there are still questions about whether I'm fit to become an AFC reviewer I have already received support from a current AFC reviewer (see User talk:Timtrent#AFC). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 20:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Casualdejekyll

[edit]
Hi! I want to become an AfC participant primarily to help out with questions about drafts on help forums such as the Teahouse and Help Desk. I also wish to help with the backlog. More hands makes quicker work, right? I believe that my AfD stats demonstrate that I understand the notability guidelines. casualdejekyll 23:56, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sarrail

[edit]
Hello! I'm requesting AFC helper scripter rights because I would like to help with the AFC backlog. I am familiar and reviewed the criteria for the requirements of AFC, and felt like I could take it here. I have some experience in CSD and AfD. Thank you! Sarrail (talk) 04:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Leggomygreggo8

[edit]
Hello, I’m confident I meet the requirements. I’ve created articles here and there, but I have recently worked on Draft:Sematary (rapper) and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I’d like to assist in the creation of new articles, especially ones where there is a solid base but some more help could be applied to make the article suitable for acceptance. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 14:56, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raydann

[edit]
Hi there! I'm requesting to join this project again (first one at Special:PermanentLink/1126664067#User:Raydann) as I believe I meet the eligibility criterions now. I have thoroughly read and understood the reviewing policies and can assure that I can be trusted with the AFCH tool. My contributions are clean and I seldom run into any dispute over the quality of my edits (a majority of them are reverting vandalism, but I have never run into any false positives, except at this one instance, which is not even entirely a false positive). Anyways, I believe I can provide good judgement while reviewing articles for creation. Thanks! ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:03, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Clayoquot

[edit]
I"m an experienced editor and I'd like to help. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 05:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Coderzombie

[edit]
Would love to help out articles for creation pages, especially related to Indian football and Gujarati films Coderzombie (talk) 12:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Among Us for POTUS

[edit]
I would like to become an AfC reviewer. I've been active in other areas of Wikipedia for some time (cleaning up spam and vandalism, fixing formatting errors, adding and cleaning up citations, collecting evidence for SPIs, etc.) and would like to expand my work area. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:FunIsOptional

[edit]
Hello! I'd love to help review AFCs. I'd consider myself to have a reasonable grasp on policy and the MOS. I wouldn't consider myself very good at writing new prose (the only example I can give is creating the article for the Momentum Party) but understanding it is the only requirement here right? Thanks for considering me! Fun Is Optional (talk page) (please ping on reply) 13:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:LordVoldemort728

[edit]
I am interested in becoming reviewer by that I can review good and bad drafts. My account meets all criteria of becoming reviewer -

​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 14:45, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pichemist

[edit]

I meet all the criteria and I'm pretty experienced around Wikipedia.

  1. My account is older than 90 days. (around 1500 days old)
  2. 500 undeleted articles in the mainspace. (around 800 and counting)
  3. Already gone trough the AFC reviewing instructions multiple times.
  4. Demonstrated understanding of policies/guidelines. Check my AfD requests.
  5. Definitely willing to respond as soon as possible to any and all questions.

Signed, Pichemist ( Contribs | Talk ) 21:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Turnagra

[edit]
We've got a bit of a backlog of draft articles over at WP:WPNZ which I'm keen to try and help clear. Turnagra (talk) 04:40, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:JML1148

[edit]

Hello, I would like access to the AFC helper script. I meet all of the requirements, and already am a New Page Patroller with a decent XfD/CSD/PROD log. Apart from NPP, I do anti-vandalism and copyediting work. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 23:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:VickKiang

[edit]
Would like to help out at AfC. IMO I meet the criteria; I am currently a WP:NPP (curation log), regularly participate in AfDs, improved two articles to GA status, and have read the reviewing instructions. VickKiang (talk) 23:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:M.Ashraf333

[edit]
Hi! I want to become an AfC participant primarily to help out with questions about drafts on help forums such as the Teahouse and Help Desk. I also wish to help with the backlog. More hands makes quicker work, right? I am familiar and reviewed the criteria for the requirements of AFC, and felt like I could take it here. I have experience in CSD and AfD. Thank you! M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. While I appreciate the interest in helping out, your talk page and AFD logs indicate that you are not quite as well-versed in deletion-related activities as would be ideal. Primefac (talk) 11:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants/Old_Requests/2022&oldid=1137394064"