User talk:Chris Light

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About Contributor[edit]

(oldest record Feb 2008)


Where I have spent my life so far, spelled out in flags...

Decades here:
Years here:
Months here: |
Idea copied from User:Invertzoo > User:Dentren > Grutness > Moriori > Calton > et. al..



Your First Barnstar[edit]

The Original Barnstar
For your excellent Indiana State Park pictures, I present to you your first Barnstar Bedford Pray 17:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Great pictures, but is that one pic from Clifty Falls or from McCormick's Creek. As they are 100+ miles apart, there's a big difference.--Bedford Pray 17:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers![edit]

The Indiana Barnstar
In acknowledgment of your many recent edits, images, and improvements of article within, Wiki Project Indiana, most notably your work Native American articles, I hereby award you this barnstar! Keep up the great work! Charles Edward 15:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geography and photographs[edit]

The Geography Barnstar
For your contributions in the area of geography, I hereby award you this barnstar. Omnedon (talk) 14:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


In particular, nice job on the cemetery listing on the Porter County page, including the photographs you've added. Omnedon (talk) 14:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions[edit]

Some of these pages, I've created, others I've added images. Still others, a bit of text or details. Many of these pages are primarily the work of others, to which I was able to added a bit more information or an illustration. This may appear to be a big ego boosting, but it's really a way for me to check back on sites where I've left something still pending, i.e., History of the National Park Service (United States), National Park Service, Indiana Dunes Nat'l Lakeshore

NPS[edit]


Geologic[edit]

State Articles[edit]


History Articles[edit]

Surname[edit]

NRHP pics and articles[edit]

Col. Isaac C. Elston House

Hi Chris Light -- I came across your nice new stub article Col. Isaac C. Elston House and found that i could fix it up a little, which i did. Great pic you took! I see also that you have made other edits to National Register of Historic Places listings in Indiana and some other individual historic sites. Just to let you know, if you are creating a new article for any NRHP site you can get a nice, prepared infobox ready for cut and pasting into the article, by visiting Elkman [1], a site developed and supported by User:Elkman. In the Elston House case, it looks to me like you copied an infobox from another article then modified it somewhat, but it appeared that you erroneously left in some info that applied to the other place. It's easier and more accurate to get a new infobox with the info from the National Register database already filled out. It's still just a start, and you are free to correct or expand on info that comes in that way. Anyhow, keep up the good work!  :) doncram (talk) 12:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please know that many covered bridges are listed on the Register, including the Geeting and Warnke Bridges whose pictures are now included at National Register of Historic Places listings in Preble County, Ohio. Thanks for the pictures! Nyttend (talk) 00:30, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for posting a picture of this house a few months ago! I was just in Crawfordsville today and photographed it because it's in the Elston Grove Historic District, not knowing that it was also NRHP-listed. The NRHP lists the Elston House on Wabash Avenue, but with the Wabash College page to which you link on the Elston House article, I'm going to note that as an error by the NRHP. If you'd not posted this, who knows how long it would have been before the error was caught. Nyttend (talk) 23:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the new gastropod article![edit]

Just wanted to say thanks so much for creating the article which is now entitled, List of non-marine mollusks of the Indiana Dunes. I added in the bivalves from the National Geographic list, and divided the gastropods into land and freshwater species. I just wanted to say that with scientific names, only the first name (the genus name) is unique within one phylum. A species name may often be found in many other unrelated species within the same class, so be careful about creating links to what is sometimes the wrong species which just happens to have the same species name. In any case, the new article is a valuable addition to Wikipedia, so thanks! If you create any more mollusk-related articles, please feel free to ask me for help. All good wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 20:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I can say one more thing? The scientific names (that is the genus and species) of organisms should always be in italics. Thanks again, Invertzoo (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I realize I need to ask: are you intending to make an article on Insects of the Indiana Dunes? Because if so, I will mention it in the invertebrates article. Insects are also invertebrates. As I said before, all the scientific names of all the organisms (including plants) in all of your articles need to be in italics, if you can go back and do that. And one more thing, if you can try to remember to always fill in the "edit summary" whenever you make an edit, that would be very helpful. Thanks and best wishes to you, Invertzoo (talk) 14:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The text of Invasive plant species in the Indiana Dunes[edit]

Sorry to bother you again, but the text in this (very interesting) article has the look of being copied verbatim or almost verbatim from somewhere, presumably from the National Park Service reference you used? Do you know, is that source in the public domain? If not, then you can only copy brief sections of it, and they have to be in quote marks and fully attributed. If the source is not in the public domain then you have to rewrite all of the prose from scratch. Take a look at [2]. Thanks for your attention on this. Best, Invertzoo (talk) 14:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • I've been in contact with the editor of the Singing Sands (J. Manuszak) and all of the issue is written and designed by government employees. Thus it is public domain. It's good to keep checking. (Chris Light (talk) 18:15, 25 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Chris, how are you doing? Thanks for replying. That's great that it is in the public domain, but even with public domain material, according to the Wikipedia content guideline here: [3].:

"Proper attribution to the author or source of a work, even if it is in the public domain, is still required to avoid plagiarism".

Here are the Wikipedia guidelines on plagiarism: [4]. There is a section specifically about public domain sources at: Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public domain sources. All best wishes to you and thanks again, Invertzoo (talk) 22:49, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weather templates[edit]

Hi CL-- There was a few citation glitches with the weather table for Lutsen, Minnesota, which I think I have now fixed.[5] There is a similar citation issue at Grand Portage National Monument. I was going to fix that, but I wonder if the figures for Thunder Bay would be preferable, as Thunder Bay is closer to Grand Portage than is Lutsen. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 15:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably[edit]

I began to look for Thunder Bay, but was concerned that the international border might be misleading to some readers. But taking a 'world' approach, the border should not be an issue. Thunder Bay would be better and it's much closer. {Chris Light (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)}[reply]

Indiana Dunes[edit]

Hi Chris, I want to thank and congratulate you for your work on Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore! It's not too far away from becoming a WP:Good article! I would recommend lenthening the History section (Chronology of the Indiana Dunes has a lot of information), making sure that every paragraph has at least one or two references, and merging some of the small sections together (see WP:Sections#Section size guidelines). I hope you continue to work for this goal! Reywas92Talk 21:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template[edit]

Dear Chris, I gave some comment on this page. Best wishes, --Tom Meijer (talk) 11:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of CFD on subcategories of Category:United States National Park Service[edit]

See Categories For Discussion (CFD) at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 2#Various categories of "National Park areas" by state. doncram (talk) 02:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Number of National Monuments[edit]

I think it was quite premature to change all the numbers for national monuments. I'm posting here because you posted in multiple places. What was done seems a little inappropriate or incorrect. First, the reference you added [6] is just a useless list of links; it should link here. Second, now all the numbers are off. You number 99 and 74 on List of areas in the United States National Park System#National Monuments when 75 are linked, and you number 99 and 74 on List of National Monuments of the United States when 100 and 75 are linked, also not changing the 100 in the first sentence or the table. I compared the lists, and the NPS list is missing Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument, so they must be wrong. It is co-managed by the NPS and BLM, but the NPS still has a page for it [7], so I don't know why it is missing. I have changed the numbers back until we can find a solution. Reywas92Talk 22:52, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent the NPS and email about the status of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument. I will let you know if they respond, and we may decide to remove it from the lists, but the numbers should not yet be changed. Apparently it is not considered an official unit, but it is still a National Monument. Reywas92Talk 23:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, 'I think'. --Chris Light (talk) 12:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NR photos[edit]

A Holmes County pic by Chris Light

Good to see you back; you picked a great day to visit Holmes County! Thought you'd want to know — I've been working on expanding Ohio NR articles statewide, and my priority is on sites with photos, so it helps to have many more. As well, I replaced some of your photos at the Owen County, Indiana list, not because i objected to them, but because I visited when the sky was blue and leaves were on the trees, rather than on the cloudy wintry days on which you visited and photographed some of the sites. Nyttend (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I visit to say nice work with the pics, too! I like this Italianate house, the Joseph L. DeYarmon House, in National Register of Historic Places listings in Holmes County, Ohio. Also, i noticed Nyttend had removed a self-report of current conditions on a site; it is indeed unusual to include a source statement like that in an article, tho in the NRHP list-articles we do accept all kinds of location corrections, some significant enough to itemize at wp:NRIS info issues OH (if we want to get the NRHP to correct their info). Not sure if you are experienced or not, haven't checked your contribs. --doncram (talk) 21:40, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again. Could you possibly please comment at Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Holmes County, Ohio regarding what is known about the location of a school? Thanks. --doncram (talk) 14:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A photo you took[edit]

Hi, you took this photo, File:Missouri River joins the Mississippi River.JPG. It's been used on the Missouri River page for a long time but has caused some confusion. Maybe you could specify where exactly you took it? See Talk:Missouri River#Confusing picture. Thanks! Pfly (talk) 00:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:The-greater-buffalo-transportation-boats-ships-steamers-39367.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The-greater-buffalo-transportation-boats-ships-steamers-39367.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hoosier Valley Railroad Museum bridge photo[edit]

The C&I bridge HVRM uses looks nothing like your photo on their page. I don't think that bridge is anywhere on the whole line. Here are pictures of the Kankakee River bridge. Maybe you have one you could put up instead or find where that bridge really is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.230.185.102 (talk) 02:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please use infoboxes not html tables[edit]

I've noticed you used html table at Tri-County Fish and Wildlife Area. Per WP:HTML and our MoS, we don't use html, please use infoboxes instead. See Chain O'Lakes State Park (Indiana) for an example applicable to your new article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:49, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lake Huron frm Presque Isle Light (Presque Isle Mich).jpg[edit]

There seems to be a problem with the description of this image. Thunder Bay is not visible from either of the Presque Isle Lighthouses. The one lighthouse with a view of Thunder Bay is Thunder Bay Island Lighthouse which is only accessible by boat and probably hard to forget that. It is possible that this is a view from Old Presque Isle Light looking at a freighter leaving Stoneport. But Alpena and Thunder Bay would not be visible in that case. Can you remember which lighthouse this was from? Rmhermen (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done. Yes, you're right. I've changed the description.--Chris Light (talk) 21:25, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:California Historic Trail auto tour road marker.jpg[edit]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fort C at GRPO[edit]

Hi Chris, You uploaded a photo of Fort Charlotte to the GRPO entry, we're trying to remove the file for fear of protecting the resources up there. Thanks for all the work and articles here in our Vertical Files at Grand Portage! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.83.160.250 (talk) 19:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shirley Heinze Land Trust[edit]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shirley Heinze Land Trust, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.heinzetrust.org/history.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Agassiz[edit]

Nice work. I hadn't realized you were still working on it. I will stay away until you finish. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Early Lake Erie[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Early Lake Erie at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate articles, questionable NRHP status[edit]

Some questions have arisen regarding some articles that you've created. Chellberg Farm, which you created in 2008, and Anders Kjellberg Farm, which you created earlier this year, apparently cover the same subject. The Kjellberg Farm article, several others that you created earlier this year (Charles Johnson Farm, Gust Lindstrom Farm, and Pete Larsen Farm), and Swedish Farmsteads of Porter County, Indiana, which you created in 2009, state that the properties are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, which doesn't appear to be the case. Could you please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Refnum in infoboxes? Thanks. — Ammodramus (talk) 14:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremiah Service House[edit]

The article for Jeremiah Service House, mostly written by you, seems to be a closely paraphrased or in some cases simply a copy, of the nomination form. The nomination was written in 2000, and not by a federal (or even a state) employee. I may be missing something, but why isn't this a copyright violation? Generic1139 (talk) 23:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • Good question. Maybe I'll try to explain the nature of government forms and submissions for government action. Right now, I neither have the time or the details to try and explain it. Feel free to rewrite it if you wish, so that it's less paraphrase and direct quotes.--Chris Light (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. I brought the question up on at NRHP project, you may want to chime in there if you are interested. Generic1139 (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you![edit]

Chris Light
Wishing you a joyous Christmas and a prosperous new year!
BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Locations of images[edit]

Hi, I've been transferring some of your uploads to Commons. By any chance, do you remember where these pictures were taken?

Thanks, MB298 (talk) 00:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. MB298 (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnotes[edit]

Just FYI: you should add disambiguation notices using {{about}}, {{distinguish}} or another template in the Hatnote category. SounderBruce 22:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Houck Covered Bridge for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Houck Covered Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houck Covered Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 05:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“category:People of Valparaiso, Indiana”[edit]

You know there is already a category for “People from Valparaiso, Indiana,” right? If you are trying to differentiate people who live there but aren’t from there it would be more appropriate to add it as a sub-category of “Valparaiso University alumni.” I think there is danger of this category being confused with the “from” category though - do you know if other similar categories exist? Rikster2 (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • No, I was trying to add people to the category and all I could get was a new category. As such, I quit. I need to go back and do clean-up.--Chris Light (talk) 16:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo requests[edit]

Please don't remove the flags from {{USRD}} unless there is an adequate number of good photos that cover the entire highway. A map and shield in the Commons category is not sufficient. SounderBruce 21:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] 

*Totally agreed.  Didn't think I removed that one, several others have adequate photos.  Must have gotten ahead of myself.  Sorry.--Chris Light (talk) 04:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leads[edit]

Please read MOS:LEAD and follow the guidelines on how to construct a proper lead. I've noticed that several of your NRHP articles do not use proper bolding or introduce the subject's general notability and location in an obvious manner. SounderBruce 01:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my appreciation[edit]

Hey, thanks so much for all your work and contributions! I see you improving the various WM projects, and really appreciate you. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 03:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glacial Lake Missoula[edit]

Thanks for adding the info box to the article a way back. But I did have a question about one entry, and didn't want to change it without contacting you first. You entered: Residence time = 20 incidents. But this value should be a measurement of time such as days, weeks, etc. What did you mean by incidents? Thanks  • Bobsd •  (talk) 04:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem I had was that over a period of 2000 to 3000 years, Lake Missoula filled up and then emptied in a catastrophic flood. The glacial block would occur, and it would take 50-60 years for the lake to fill to a level, which lifted the ice tongue and emptied the lake in several weeks. The process repeated itself at least 20 times. So, it the duration 2 to 3,000 years? or 50-60 years? and since most lakes form and later disappear, the repeated growth of the same lake from the same watershed can't be reflected in the info box. Not that the last item needs to be included. If you have a different answer to the Residence time, I'd be glad for you to make the change.
References:
  • Bjornstad, Bruce N. (c. 2006). On the trail of the Ice Age floods : a geological field guide to the mid-Columbia basin / Bruce Bjornstad. Sandpoint, Idaho: Keokee Books. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-879628-27-4.
  • Soennichsen, John (c. 2008). Bretz's Flood : The Remarkable Story of a Rebel Geologist and the World's Greatest Flood / John Soennichsen. Seattle, Washington: Sasquatch Books. pp. 215–248. ISBN 978-1-57061-631-0.
Chris Light (talk) 04:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That makes total sense to me, and I think in this case, the template just doesn't work, because the term "Residence time" applies to constant inflow and outflow, not filling or emptying. I do not believe there is any documentation on rates, and in any case, every time it cycled, the rates might change (basically you have a new lake). I suggest we just not populate the "Residence time" term in the template, leaving an editor comment as to the reasoning. I'll make that change. Feel free to revert if another option occurs to you. Thanks for the response.  • Bobsd •  (talk) 16:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Owensboro Military Memorial.JPG[edit]

Notice

The file File:Owensboro Military Memorial.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image, low-medium quality. There is no Freedom of panorama for 2D/3D artworks in the United States, permission from the artist is needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chris_Light&oldid=1211824964"