Jump to content

Airbus A330: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
explanation phrase
Copyedit done
(106 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
|}
|}


The '''Airbus A330''' is a [[Wide-body aircraft|wide-body]], twin-engine [[jet airliner]], developed by the European consortium [[Airbus|Airbus Industrie]], a division of [[EADS]]. Versions of the A330 have a range of {{Convert|7400|to|13430|km|nmi}} and can accommodate up to 335 passengers in a [[Travel class|two-class layout]] or carry {{Convert|70|t|lb}} of cargo. The airliner originates from the 1970s, when Airbus began studying derivatives of its [[Airbus A300|A300]] before moving to larger designs, and launching the A330 in June 1987. It incorporates [[fly-by-wire]] flight controls technology, introduced by Airbus on the [[Airbus A320 family|A320]], and has the same [[cockpit]] as the A320. The A330 was developed in parallel with the four-engine [[Airbus A340]], with which it shares common [[airframe]] components. The airliner was Airbus's first to be offered with three engine options from General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, and Rolls-Royce.
The '''Airbus A330''' is a [[Wide-body aircraft|wide-body]], twin-engine, [[jet airliner]] made by [[Airbus]], a division of [[EADS]]. Versions of the A330 have a [[Range (aircraft)|range]] of {{Convert|7400|to|13430|km|nmi}} and can accommodate up to 335 passengers in a [[Travel class|two-class layout]] or carry {{Convert|70|t|lb}} of cargo.


The origin of the A330 dates to the 1970s as one of several conceived derivatives of Airbus's first airliner, the [[Airbus A300|A300]]. The A330 was developed in parallel with the [[Airbus A340|A340]], which shared many common [[airframe]] components but differed in having four engines. Both planes incorporated [[fly-by-wire]] flight controls technology, introduced by Airbus on the [[Airbus A320 family|A320]], and received the same display-filled "[[glass cockpit]]" as the A320. In June 1987, with enough orders from various customers, Airbus launched the A330 and A340. The A330 was Airbus's first airliner offered with three engine options; those being from General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, and Rolls-Royce.
The A330-300, the first A330 passenger variant, took its maiden flight on 2 November 1992, and entered commercial service with [[Air Inter]] in 1994. Because of dwindling sales, Airbus followed up with the slightly shorter A330-200 variant in 1998 that has been more popular. Airbus has also used the A330 as the basis for development of a dedicated [[Cargo aircraft|freighter]], and two [[Aerial refueling|tanker]] variants: the [[Airbus A330 MRTT|A330 MRTT]] and, in conjunction with [[Northrop Grumman]], the proposed [[EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45|KC-45]]. The KC-45 was initially chosen for the [[U.S. Air Force]]'s [[KC-X]] competition, but, after controversy, Boeing's tanker was chosen.


The A330-300, the first variant, took its maiden flight in November 1992, and entered passenger service with [[Air Inter]] in January 1994. Responding to dwindling sales, Airbus followed up with the slightly shorter A330-200 variant in 1998, which has proved more popular. More recently developed A330 variants include a dedicated [[Cargo aircraft|freighter]] and two [[Aerial refueling|tanker]]s: the [[Airbus A330 MRTT|A330 MRTT]] and, in conjunction with [[Northrop Grumman]], the proposed [[EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45|KC-45]]. In the U.S. Air Force's [[KC-X]] competition, the KC-45 won initially but, after appeal, lost to Boeing's tanker.
Since its launch, the A330 has allowed Airbus to expand its market share in wide-body airliner sales. Airlines have selected the A330 as a replacement for less economical [[trijet]] airliners, and to compete with rival twinjet aircraft. [[Boeing]] has offered variants of the [[Boeing 767|767]] and [[Boeing 777|777]] as competitors, along with the [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner|787]], due to enter service in late 2011. Airbus's [[Airbus A350|A350]] will also share this wide-body airliner market. As of May 2011 the A330's order book stood at 1,127, of which 789 had been delivered. The largest operator is [[Delta Air Lines]] with 32 aircraft. The A330 is expected to continue selling until at least 2015.

Since its launch, the A330 has allowed Airbus to expand market share in wide-body airliners. Airlines have selected the A330 as a replacement for less economical [[trijet]]s and instead of rival twinjets. [[Boeing]] has offered variants of the [[Boeing 767|767]] and [[Boeing 777|777]] as competitors along with the [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner|787]], scheduled to enter service in late 2011. Airbus's [[Airbus A350|A350]] will also share this wide-body airliner market. As of May 2011 the A330's order book stood at 1,127, of which 789 had been delivered. The largest operator is [[Delta Air Lines]] with 32 aircraft. The A330 is expected to continue selling until at least 2015.
{{TOC limit|limit=3}}
{{TOC limit|limit=3}}


== Development ==<!--linked from [[Airbus A340]]-->
== Development ==<!--linked from [[Airbus A340]]-->

{| class=" collapsible collapsed" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; background-color: white; text-align: center; width: 75%;" cellpadding="5px"
|-
! scope="col" bgcolor="steelblue" style="color: white; text-align: right; width: 23%; padding-right: 10px;"| Model &nbsp;
! scope="col" bgcolor="paleturquoise" | A300
! scope="col" bgcolor="paleturquoise" | A310
! scope="col" bgcolor="paleturquoise" | A320
! scope="col" bgcolor="paleturquoise" | A330
! scope="col" bgcolor="paleturquoise" | A340
|-
! scope="row" bgcolor="steelblue" style="color: white; text-align: right; width: 20%; padding-right: 10px;" | Previous designation(s)
| bgcolor="azure" | –
| bgcolor="azure" | B10
| bgcolor="azure" | SA1, SA2, SA3
| bgcolor="azure" | TA9 (B9)
| bgcolor="azure" | TA11 (B11)
|-
! scope="row" bgcolor="steelblue" style="color: white; text-align: right; width: 20%; padding-right: 10px;" | Introduced
| bgcolor="azure" | 1972
| bgcolor="azure" | 1983
| bgcolor="azure" | 1988
| bgcolor="azure" | 1994
| bgcolor="azure" | 1993
|-
! scope="row" bgcolor="steelblue" style="color: white; text-align: right; width: 20%; padding-right: 10px;" | Body
| bgcolor="azure" | Wide
| bgcolor="azure" | Wide
| bgcolor="azure" | Narrow
| bgcolor="azure" | Wide
| bgcolor="azure" | Wide
|-
! scope="row" bgcolor="steelblue" style="color: white; text-align: right; width: 20%; padding-right: 10px;" | Engines
| bgcolor="azure" | Two
| bgcolor="azure" | Two
| bgcolor="azure" | Two
| bgcolor="azure" | Two
| bgcolor="azure" | Four
|-
! scope="row" bgcolor="steelblue" style="color: white; text-align: right; width: 20%; padding-right: 10px;" | Range
| bgcolor="azure" | Short–medium
| bgcolor="azure" | Medium–long
| bgcolor="azure" | Short–medium
| bgcolor="azure" | Medium–long
| bgcolor="azure" | Long
|-
|}


=== Background ===
=== Background ===
Line 35: Line 83:
[[File:Main landing gear of Airbus A330 and A340.jpg|thumb|upright|A330 [[undercarriage]]|alt=Four-wheel undercarriage unit of the A330/A340 on static display.]]
[[File:Main landing gear of Airbus A330 and A340.jpg|thumb|upright|A330 [[undercarriage]]|alt=Four-wheel undercarriage unit of the A330/A340 on static display.]]


Designed during the early 1970s, the Airbus A300 was envisioned as part of a diverse family of commercial aircraft.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p9-18>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=9–18}}</ref> In pursuit of this long-term goal, studies began in the 1970s into derivatives of the A300B, the production version of the A300.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p9-18/><ref>{{harvnb|Wensveen|2007|p=63}}</ref> Before introduction into service of the first Airbus airliners, engineers within Airbus identified nine possible variations of the A300, with names A300B1 through B9.<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=183}}</ref> A tenth variant, the A300B10, was conceived in 1973 and developed into the long-range [[Airbus A310]].<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p18-9/> Airbus then focused its efforts on single-aisle (SA) studies, coming up with a family of airliners later known as the [[Airbus A320 family]], the first commercial aircraft with digital [[fly-by-wire]] controls. The decision to work on the A320, instead of a four-engine aircraft proposed by the [[West Germany|West Germans]],{{#tag:ref|In the 1970s, Airbus was composed of standalone companies from the UK (British Aerospace), France ([[Sud Aviation]]) and West Germany ([[Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm|MBB]]).|group="Nb"}} created divisions within Airbus. During the development phase of the SA studies, which were targeted at the same market as the [[Boeing 737]] and [[McDonnell Douglas DC-9|Douglas DC-9]], Airbus turned its focus back to the wide-body aircraft market, simultaneously working on both projects.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p18-9>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=18–19}}</ref>
Introduced in 1972, Airbus's first airliner, the A300, was envisioned as part of a diverse family of commercial aircraft.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p9-18>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=9–18}}</ref> In pursuit of this goal, studies began in the 1970s into derivatives of the A300.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p9-18/><ref>{{harvnb|Wensveen|2007|p=63}}</ref> Before introducing the A300, Airbus identified nine possible variations named A300B1 through B9.<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=183}}</ref> A tenth variant, the A300B10, was conceived in 1973 and developed into the long-range [[Airbus A310]].<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p18-9/> Airbus then focused its efforts on single-aisle (SA) studies, coming up with a family of airliners later known as the [[Airbus A320 family]], the first commercial aircraft with digital [[fly-by-wire]] controls. During the SA studies Airbus turned its focus back to the wide-body aircraft market, simultaneously working on both projects.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p18-9>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=18–19}}</ref>


Development of the A300B9, a larger derivative of the A300, began during the mid-1970s. The B9 was essentially a lengthened A300 with the same wing, coupled with the most powerful [[turbofan engine]] available at the time. It was targeted at the growing demand for high-capacity, medium-range, transcontinental trunk routes.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p22-3>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=22–23}}</ref> Offering the same range and payload as the [[McDonnell Douglas DC-10]], but being 25 per cent more fuel efficient,<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p22-3/> the B9 was seen as a viable replacement for the DC-10 and [[Lockheed L-1011 TriStar]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 October 1981|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1981/1981%20-%203243.html |title=Commercial Aircraft of the World part 2|work=Flight International |accessdate=23 January 2011|page=1,155}}</ref>
During the mid-1970s, Airbus began development of the A300B9, a larger derivative of the A300, which would eventually become the A330. The B9 was essentially a lengthened A300 with the same wing, coupled with the most powerful [[turbofan engine]]s available. It was targeted at the growing demand for high-capacity, medium-range, transcontinental trunk routes.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p22-3>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=22–23}}</ref> Offering the same range and payload as the [[McDonnell Douglas DC-10]], but being 25 per cent more fuel efficient,<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p22-3/> the B9 was seen as a viable replacement for the DC-10 and [[Lockheed L-1011 TriStar]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 October 1981|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1981/1981%20-%203243.html |title=Commercial Aircraft of the World part 2|work=Flight International |accessdate=23 January 2011|page=1,155}}</ref>


At the same time, a 200-seat four-engine version, then known as the B11, was also under development.<ref name="Eden p.30">{{harnvb|Eden|2008|p=30}}</ref> That aircraft was planned to take the place of less efficient [[Boeing 707]]s and [[Douglas DC-8]]s in commercial use.<ref name="N&W p.23">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=23}}</ref> To differentiate the programme from the SA series, the B9 and B11 were re-designated as the TA9 and TA11 respectively, with TA standing for "twin aisle".<ref name="Eden p.30"/> Development costs were reduced by the decision to use the same [[fuselage]] and wing components for the two aircraft series, with projected savings estimated at US$500&nbsp;million. The adoption of a common wing structure also had the technical advantage of the TA11's outboard engines' weight counteracting the upward [[wing loading]] in order to reduce the [[bending moment]] at the wing-to-fuselage connections.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p22-3/> Another factor was the split preference of those within Airbus and, more important, those of the company's prospective customers. Airbus vice-president for strategic planning, Adam Brown, recalled:
At the same time, a 200-seat four-engine version, the B11, which would eventually become the A340, was also under development.<ref name="Eden p.30">{{harnvb|Eden|2008|p=30}}</ref> That aircraft was planned to take the place of less efficient [[Boeing 707]]s and [[Douglas DC-8]]s in commercial use.<ref name="N&W p.23">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=23}}</ref> To differentiate from the SA series, the B9 and B11 were re-designated as the TA9 and TA11, with TA standing for "twin aisle".<ref name="Eden p.30"/> Development costs were reduced by using the same [[fuselage]] and wing for the two aircraft, with projected savings of US$500&nbsp;million. Another factor was the split preference of those within Airbus and, more important, those of the company's prospective customers. Airbus vice-president for strategic planning, Adam Brown, recalled:
<blockquote>North American operators were clearly in favour of a twin, while Asians wanted a quad. In Europe, opinion was split between the two. The majority of potential customers were in favour of a quad despite the fact, in certain conditions, it is more costly to operate than a twin. ... They liked that it could be ferried with one engine out, and could 'fly anywhere'.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p22-3/><ref>{{Cite journal|title=Airbus A330/A340|work=Flight International |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1997/1997%20-%202917.html |last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max et al.|date=4 November 1997 |format=PDF |accessdate=26 January 2011|page=29}}</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>North American operators were clearly in favour of a twin, while Asians wanted a quad. In Europe, opinion was split between the two. The majority of potential customers were in favour of a quad despite the fact, in certain conditions, it is more costly to operate than a twin. ... They liked that it could be ferried with one engine out, and could 'fly anywhere'.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p22-3/><ref>{{Cite journal|title=Airbus A330/A340|work=Flight International |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1997/1997%20-%202917.html |last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max et al.|date=4 November 1997 |format=PDF |accessdate=26 January 2011|page=29}}</ref></blockquote>


=== Design effort ===
=== Design effort ===
The first specifications for the TA9, an aircraft that could accommodate 410 passengers in a one-class layout, emerged in 1982.<ref name="N&W p.24">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=24}}</ref> They showed a large underfloor cargo volume that could hold five cargo pallets or sixteen [[Unit Load Device|LD3]] cargo containers in the forward, and four pallets or fourteen LD3s in the aft hold&mdash;double the capacity of the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar or DC-10, and at the time {{Convert|8.46|m|ft}} longer than the [[Airbus A300]]. A shorter-range derivative of the B9, called the B12, was planned by Airbus. It also sketched two variants, the TA9-100 for short-range {{Convert|2800|km|nmi|abbr=on}} sectors, and the longer-range TA9-200 for deployment on {{Convert|6100|km|nmi|abbr=on}} flights.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p24-5>{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=24–25}}</ref>


The first specifications for the TA9 and TA11, aircraft that could accommodate 410 passengers in a one-class layout, emerged in 1982.<ref name="N&W p.24">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=24}}</ref> They showed a large underfloor cargo volume that could hold five cargo pallets or sixteen [[Unit Load Device|LD3]] cargo containers in the forward, and four pallets or fourteen LD3s in the aft hold&mdash;double the capacity of the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar or DC-10, and {{Convert|8.46|m|ft}} longer than the Airbus A300.<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p24-5>{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=24–25}}</ref>
By June 1985, TA9 and TA11 had received more improvements, including the adoption of the A320 [[flight deck]], digital fly-by-wire (FBW) control system, and [[side-stick]] control.<ref name="N&W p.27">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=27}}</ref> The adoption of a common cockpit design across the new Airbus series allowed operators to make significant cost savings, with flight crews able to transition from one to another after only one week's training.<ref name="Lawrence p.73">{{harvnb|Lawrence|Thornton|2005|p=73}}</ref> The TA9 would use the [[vertical stabiliser]], [[rudder]], and circular fuselage sections of the A300-600, extended by two barrel sections. Components across the aircraft were [[Modular design|modular]] and interchangeable with other Airbus aircraft where possible.<ref name="Lawrence p.73"/>


By June 1985, the TA9 and TA11 had received more improvements, including the adoption of the A320 [[flight deck]], digital fly-by-wire (FBW) control system, and [[side-stick]] control.<ref name="N&W p.27">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=27}}</ref> The common cockpit of the new Airbus series allowed operators to save money because flight crews would be able to transition after only one week's training.<ref name="Lawrence p.73">{{harvnb|Lawrence|Thornton|2005|p=73}}</ref> The two TAs would use the [[vertical stabiliser]], [[rudder]], and circular fuselage sections of the A300-600, extended by two barrel sections.<ref name="Lawrence p.73"/>
Airbus briefly considered the [[variable camber wing]], a concept that requires changing of the [[airfoil]] or wing profile in-flight to produce the optimum shape for a given phase of flight. Studies were carried out by [[British Aerospace]] (BAe), now part of [[BAE Systems]], at [[Hatfield Aerodrome|Hatfield]] and [[Filton Aerodrome|Bristol]]. Airbus estimated this would yield a two per cent improvement in aerodynamic efficiency,<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=26}}</ref> but the plan was later abandoned on the grounds of cost and difficulty of development.<ref name="Eden p.30"/> A true [[laminar flow]] wing (a low-drag shape that improves fuel efficiency) was also considered but rejected.<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=196}}</ref>


Airbus briefly considered the [[variable camber wing]], a concept that requires changing the wing profile for a given phase of flight. Studies were carried out by [[British Aerospace]] (BAe), now part of [[BAE Systems]], at [[Hatfield Aerodrome|Hatfield]] and [[Filton Aerodrome|Bristol]]. Airbus estimated this would yield a two per cent improvement in aerodynamic efficiency,<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=26, 31}}</ref> but the feature was rejected because of cost and difficulty of development.<ref name="Eden p.30"/> A true [[laminar flow]] wing (a low-drag shape that improves fuel efficiency) was also considered but rejected.<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=196}}</ref>
[[File:Egyptengine.jpg|thumb|right|The A330 was the first Airbus application for which Rolls-Royce supplied engines, with its [[Trent 700]] turbofans.<ref name="N&W p.44">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=44}}</ref>|alt=A mostly blue jet engine suspended on a wing; it is characterised by its smooth nacelle, or outer casing.]]


[[File:Egyptengine.jpg|thumb|The A330 was the first Airbus application for which Rolls-Royce supplied engines, with its [[Trent 700]] turbofans.<ref name="N&W p.44">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=44}}</ref>|alt=A mostly blue jet engine suspended on a wing; it is characterised by its smooth nacelle, or outer casing.]]
Airbus decided from the start that the A330 would be offered with a choice of [[aircraft engines|engines]] supplied by the three major engine manufacturers, [[Rolls-Royce plc|Rolls-Royce]], [[Pratt & Whitney]], and [[GE Aviation]]. In 1988, both Rolls-Royce and Pratt & Whitney agreed to produce engines for the A330, while GE Aviation was first to offer the [[General Electric CF6#F6-80|General Electric CF6-80C2]]. However, later studies indicated that more thrust was needed from this engine to increase the initial power requirement from {{Convert|267|to|289|kN|lbf|abbr=on|lk=on}}.<ref name="N&W pp.44-45">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=44–45}}</ref> GE took the CF6-80C2 and enlarged the fan from {{Convert|236|to|244|cm|in|sigfig=2}} to create the [[General Electric CF6#CF6-80E1|CF6-80E1]], giving a new thrust output of {{Convert|300|-|320|kN|lbf|sigfig=2|abbr=on}}.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Model CF6-80E1|publisher=GE Aviation|url=http://www.geae.com/engines/commercial/cf6/cf6-80e1.html|accessdate=25 January 2011}}</ref> Rolls-Royce initially wanted to use the {{Convert|267|kN|lbf|adj=on|abbr=on}} [[Rolls-Royce Trent#Trent 600 – First proposal|Trent 600]] to power Airbus's newest twinjet, and the upcoming [[McDonnell Douglas MD-11]]. However, the company later agreed to develop an engine solely for the A330 in the form of the [[Rolls-Royce Trent 700|Trent 700]], with a larger diameter and {{Convert|311|kN|lbf|sigfig=2|abbr=on}} of thrust.<ref name="N&W p.47">{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=47}}</ref> In the meantime, Pratt & Whitney signed an agreement that covered the development of the A330-only [[Pratt & Whitney PW4000|PW4168]]. The company similarly increased the fan size to augment power,<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p44-46>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=45–46}}</ref> enabling the engine to deliver {{Convert|311|kN|lbf|sigfig=2|abbr=on}} of thrust.<ref name=PW4000>{{Cite web|title=PW4000-100|publisher=Pratt & Whitney|url=http://www.pw.utc.com/products/commercial/pw4000-100.asp|accessdate=30 April 2011}}</ref>


Airbus decided from the start that the A330 would have a choice of [[aircraft engines|engines]] from the three major engine manufacturers, [[Rolls-Royce plc|Rolls-Royce]], [[Pratt & Whitney]], and [[GE Aviation]]. GE Aviation first offered the [[General Electric CF6#F6-80|General Electric CF6-80C2]]. However, later studies indicated that more thrust was needed to increase the initial power capability from {{Convert|267|to|289|kN|lbf|abbr=on|lk=on}}.<ref name="N&W pp.44-45">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=44–45}}</ref> GE took the CF6-80C2 and enlarged the fan from {{Convert|236|to|244|cm|in|sigfig=2}} to create the [[General Electric CF6#CF6-80E1|CF6-80E1]], giving a new thrust output of {{Convert|300|-|320|kN|lbf|sigfig=2|abbr=on}}.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Model CF6-80E1|publisher=GE Aviation|url=http://www.geae.com/engines/commercial/cf6/cf6-80e1.html|accessdate=25 January 2011}}</ref> Rolls-Royce initially wanted to use the {{Convert|267|kN|lbf|adj=on|abbr=on}} [[Rolls-Royce Trent#Trent 600 – First proposal|Trent 600]] to power Airbus's newest twinjet and the upcoming [[McDonnell Douglas MD-11]]. However, the company later agreed to develop an engine solely for the A330, the [[Rolls-Royce Trent 700|Trent 700]], with a larger diameter and {{Convert|311|kN|lbf|sigfig=2|abbr=on}} of thrust.<ref name="N&W p.47">{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=47}}</ref> Similarly, Pratt & Whitney signed an agreement that covered the development of the A330-only [[Pratt & Whitney PW4000|PW4168]]. The company increased the fan size to augment power,<ref name=Nor_Wagn_p44-46>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=45–46}}</ref> enabling the engine to deliver {{Convert|311|kN|lbf|sigfig=2|abbr=on}} of thrust.<ref name=PW4000>{{Cite web|title=PW4000-100|publisher=Pratt & Whitney|url=http://www.pw.utc.com/products/commercial/pw4000-100.asp|accessdate=30 April 2011}}</ref>
On 27 January 1986, the Airbus Industrie Supervisory Board held a meeting in [[Munich]], [[West Germany]]. Following the meeting, the board chairman, [[Franz Josef Strauß]], released a statement that said, "Airbus Industrie is now in a position to finalise the detailed technical definition of the TA9, which is now officially designated the A330, and the TA11, now called the A340, with potential launch customer airlines, and to discuss with them the terms and conditions for launch commitments". The designations were originally reversed; they were switched so the quad-jet airliner would have a "4" in its name. On 12 May, Airbus sent sale proposals to five prospective airlines, including [[Lufthansa]] and [[Swissair]].<ref name="N&W p.27"/>

On 27 January 1986, the Airbus Industrie Supervisory Board held a meeting in [[Munich]], [[West Germany]]. Afterwards, the board chairman, [[Franz Josef Strauß]], released a statement that said, "Airbus Industrie is now in a position to finalise the detailed technical definition of the TA9, which is now officially designated the A330, and the TA11, now called the A340, with potential launch customer airlines, and to discuss with them the terms and conditions for launch commitments". The designations were originally reversed; they were switched so the quad-jet airliner would have a "4" in its name. On 12 May, Airbus sent sale proposals to five airlines, including [[Lufthansa]] and [[Swissair]].<ref name="N&W p.27"/>


=== Production and testing ===
=== Production and testing ===
{{See also|1994 A330 test flight crash}}


In preparation for production of the A330 and A340, Airbus's partners invested heavily in new facilities. In England, [[Filton]] was the site of BAe's [[Pound sterling|£]]7&nbsp;million investment in a three-storey technical centre with {{Convert|15000|m2|sqft|abbr=on}} of floor area.<ref name="N&W p.51">{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=51}}</ref> BAe also spent £5&nbsp;million expanding its [[Chester]] wing production plant to add a new production line.<ref name="N&W p.51"/> In Germany, [[Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm]] (MBB) invested [[Deutsche Mark|DM]]400&nbsp;million ($225&nbsp;million) at various manufacturing facilities in the [[Weser]] estuary, including at [[Bremen]], Einswarden, [[Varel]], and [[Hamburg]].<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=53–54}}</ref> However, it was France that saw the biggest investments, with [[Aérospatiale]] starting construction of a new [[French franc|Fr.]]2.5&nbsp;billion ($411&nbsp;million) final-assembly plant adjacent to [[Toulouse-Blagnac Airport]] in [[Colomiers]]; by November 1988, the pillars for the new ''[[Clément Ader]] assembly hall'' had been erected.<ref name="N&W p.52">{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=52}}</ref> The assembly process would feature increased automation, such as robots drilling holes and installing fasteners during the wing to fuselage mating process. For this particular process the use of automation lowered labour costs twenty per cent and reduced time five per cent.<ref name="N&W p.53">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=53}}</ref>
In preparation for production of the A330 and A340, Airbus's partners invested heavily in new facilities. In England, [[Filton]] was the site of BAe's [[Pound sterling|£]]7&nbsp;million investment in a three-storey technical centre with {{Convert|15000|m2|sqft|abbr=on}} of floor area.<ref name="N&W p.51">{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=51}}</ref> BAe also spent £5&nbsp;million adding a new production line to its [[Chester]] wing production plant.<ref name="N&W p.51"/> In Germany, [[Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm]] (MBB) invested [[Deutsche Mark|DM]]400&nbsp;million ($225&nbsp;million) at various manufacturing facilities in the [[Weser]] estuary, including at [[Bremen]], Einswarden, [[Varel]], and [[Hamburg]].<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=53–54}}</ref> France saw the biggest investments, with [[Aérospatiale]] starting construction of a new [[French franc|Fr.]]2.5&nbsp;billion ($411&nbsp;million) final-assembly plant adjacent to [[Toulouse-Blagnac Airport]] in [[Colomiers]]; by November 1988, the pillars for the new ''[[Clément Ader]] assembly hall'' had been erected.<ref name="N&W p.52">{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=52}}</ref> The assembly process would feature increased automation, such as robots drilling holes and installing fasteners during the wing-to-fuselage mating process.<ref name="N&W p.53">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=53}}</ref>


[[File:TLS factory 7413v.jpg|thumb|left|Final assembly area for the A330, next to [[Toulouse-Blagnac Airport]] in [[Colomiers]]|alt=View from the air. Runway to the left and bottom. To the right long buildings and lots of aircraft.]]
[[File:TLS factory 7413v.jpg|thumb|left|Final assembly area for the A330, next to [[Toulouse-Blagnac Airport]]|alt=View from the air. Runway to the left and bottom. To the right long buildings and lots of aircraft.]]


On 12&nbsp;March 1987, Airbus received the first orders for the twinjet. The domestic French airline [[Air Inter]] placed five firm orders and fifteen [[Option (aircraft purchasing)|options]], while [[Thai Airways International]] requested eight aircraft, split evenly between firm orders and options.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=A330/A340|work=Flight International |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1997/1997%20-%202917.html |accessdate=24 January 2011|year=1997}}</ref><ref name="N&W p.31">{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=31}}</ref> Airbus announced the next day that it would formally launch the A330/A340 programme by mid-April 1987, with deliveries of the A340 to begin in May 1992, and A330 deliveries to start in 1993. [[Northwest Airlines]] followed the other airlines by signing a letter of intent for twenty A340s and ten A330s on 31 March.<ref name="N&W p.31"/>
On 12&nbsp;March 1987, Airbus received the first orders for the twinjet. The domestic French airline [[Air Inter]] placed five firm orders and fifteen [[Option (aircraft purchasing)|options]], while [[Thai Airways International]] requested eight aircraft, split evenly between firm orders and options.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=A330/A340|work=Flight International |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1997/1997%20-%202917.html |accessdate=24 January 2011|year=1997}}</ref><ref name="N&W p.31">{{harnvb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=31}}</ref> Airbus announced the next day that it would formally launch the A330/A340 programme by mid-April 1987, with deliveries of the A340 to begin in May 1992, and A330 deliveries to start in 1993. [[Northwest Airlines]] followed the other airlines by signing a letter of intent for twenty A340s and ten A330s on 31 March.<ref name="N&W p.31"/>


BAe eventually received £450&nbsp;million of funding from the UK government, well short of the £750&nbsp;million they had originally requested for the design and construction of the wings.<ref name="N&W p.32">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=32}}</ref> Funding from the German and French governments followed thereafter, while Airbus issued subcontracts to companies in Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Greece, Italy, India, Japan, South Korea, Portugal, the United States, and the former Yugoslavia.<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=32, 55}}</ref> With funding in place, Airbus jointly launched the A330 and A340 programmes on 5&nbsp;June 1987, just prior to the [[Paris Air Show]].<ref name="N&W p.32"/><ref>{{Cite web |title= Timeline 40 Years of Innovation |publisher= Airbus S.A.S |url= http://www.airbus.com/fileadmin/media_gallery/files/press_centre/presskits_backgrounders/Airbus_40_years_of_innovation_-_timeline_illustrated.pdf |format= PDF |accessdate =2 March 2011 |page=2}}</ref> At that time the order book stood at 130 aircraft from ten customers, including lessor [[International Lease Finance Corporation]] (ILFC). Of the order total, forty-one were for A330s.<ref name="N&W p.32"/> In 1989, Asian carrier [[Cathay Pacific]] joined the list of purchasers, ordering nine A330s, and later increasing this number to eleven.<ref>{{Harvnb|Eden|2008|p=32}}</ref>
BAe eventually received £450&nbsp;million of funding from the UK government, well short of the £750&nbsp;million they had originally requested for the design and construction of the wings.<ref name="N&W p.32">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=32}}</ref> The German and French governments also provided funding. Airbus issued subcontracts to companies in Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Greece, Italy, India, Japan, South Korea, Portugal, the United States, and the former Yugoslavia.<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=32, 55}}</ref>
With funding in place, Airbus launched the A330 and A340 programmes on 5&nbsp;June 1987, just prior to the [[Paris Air Show]].<ref name="N&W p.32"/><ref>{{Cite web |title= Timeline 40 Years of Innovation |publisher= Airbus S.A.S |url= http://www.airbus.com/fileadmin/media_gallery/files/press_centre/presskits_backgrounders/Airbus_40_years_of_innovation_-_timeline_illustrated.pdf |format= PDF |accessdate =2 March 2011 |page=2}}</ref> At that time, the order book stood at 130 aircraft from ten customers, including lessor [[International Lease Finance Corporation]] (ILFC). Of the order total, forty-one were for A330s.<ref name="N&W p.32"/> In 1989, Asian carrier [[Cathay Pacific]] joined the list of purchasers, ordering nine A330s and later increasing this number to eleven.<ref>{{Harvnb|Eden|2008|p=32}}</ref>


The final assembly of the first A330 started with the tenth airframe of the A330/A340 line, with wing-fuselage mating beginning in mid-February 1992. This aircraft, coated with anti-corrosion paint, was rolled out on 31 March without its General Electric CF6-80E1 engines, which were installed by August. During a static test the wing failed just below requirements, although engineers at BAe later solved the problem.<ref name="N&W p.78-79"/> At the [[Farnborough Airshow]] that year, Northwest deferred deliveries of sixteen A330s from its order to 1994.<ref name="N&W p.78">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=78}}</ref>
The wing-fuselage mating of the first A330, the tenth airframe of the A330/A340 line, began in mid-February 1992. This aircraft, coated with anti-corrosion paint, was rolled out on 31 March without its General Electric CF6-80E1 engines, which were installed by August. During a static test, the wing failed just below requirement, but BAe engineers later solved the problem.<ref name="N&W p.78-79"/> At the [[Farnborough Airshow]] that year, Northwest deferred delivery of sixteen A330s to 1994.<ref name="N&W p.78">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=78}}</ref>


The first completed A330 was rolled out on 14&nbsp;October 1992, with the [[maiden flight]] following on 2&nbsp;November. Weighing {{Convert|181,840|kg|lb|sigfig=3|abbr=on}}, including {{Convert|20,980|kg|lb|sigfig=3|abbr=on}} of test equipment,<ref name="N&W p.78-79"/> the A330 became the biggest twinjet to have ever flown, although it would be eclipsed by the Boeing 777. The flight lasted five hours and fifteen minutes, during which speed, height, and other flight configurations were tested; ultimately Airbus intended the test flight programme to consist of six aircraft flying a total of 1,800 hours.<ref name="N&W p.78-79">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=78–79}}</ref> On 21 October 1993, the Airbus A330 received the European [[Joint Aviation Authorities]] (JAA) and US [[Federal Aviation Administration]] (FAA) certification simultaneously, after the culmination of 1,114 airborne test hours and 426 test flights. At the same time, weight tests came in favorable, showing the plane was {{Convert|500|kg|lb|abbr=on}} under weight.<!--This coincided with the revelation of weight test results showing the aircraft was {{Convert|500|kg|lb|abbr=on}} under its expected weight--><ref name="N&W p.85">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=85}}</ref>
The first completed A330 was rolled out on 14&nbsp;October 1992, with the [[maiden flight]] following on 2&nbsp;November. Weighing {{Convert|181,840|kg|lb|sigfig=3|abbr=on}}, including {{Convert|20,980|kg|lb|sigfig=3|abbr=on}} of test equipment,<ref name="N&W p.78-79"/> the A330 became the biggest twinjet to have flown although later eclipsed by the Boeing 777. The flight lasted five hours and fifteen minutes during which speed, height, and other flight configurations were tested. Ultimately Airbus intended the test flight programme to consist of six aircraft flying a total of 1,800 hours.<ref name="N&W p.78-79">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=78–79}}</ref> On 21 October 1993, the Airbus A330 received the European [[Joint Aviation Authorities]] (JAA) and US [[Federal Aviation Administration]] (FAA) certification simultaneously after the culmination of 1,114 airborne test hours and 426 test flights. At the same time, weight tests came in favorable, showing the plane was {{Convert|500|kg|lb|abbr=on}} under weight.<!--This coincided with the revelation of weight test results showing the aircraft was {{Convert|500|kg|lb|abbr=on}} under its expected weight--><ref name="N&W p.85">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=85}}</ref>


On 30 June 1994, trouble struck the certification programme for the PW4000 engine when an A330 registered {{Nowrap|F-WWKH}},<ref>{{Cite web |title= Accident description |publisher= Aviation-Safety.net |date= 24 January 2011 |url= http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19940630-0 |accessdate= 25 January 2011}}</ref> aircraft number 042, crashed near Toulouse-Blagnac Airport. The flight was designed to test [[autopilot]] response during a worst-case scenario with the [[Center of gravity of an aircraft|centre of gravity]] near its [[Center of gravity of an aircraft#CG aft of aft limit|aft limit]]. Flown by Michel Cais of Air Inter, and Chief Test Pilot Nick Warner, five other people, including a [[KLM]] captain, were also on board.<ref name="N&W pp.86-87">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=86–87}}</ref> All seven onboard died. The accident was investigated by an internal branch of ''Direction General d'Aviation'', which revealed that the accident was a result of slow response and incorrect procedures taken by the crew, and poor co-ordination of the recovery procedure.<ref name="N&W p.89">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=89}}</ref>
On 30 June 1994, [[1994 A330 test flight crash|trouble struck]] during certification of the Pratt & Whitney engine when an A330 crashed near Toulouse.<ref>{{Cite web |title= Accident description |publisher= Aviation-Safety.net |date= 24 January 2011 |url= http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19940630-0 |accessdate= 25 January 2011}}</ref> Both pilots and the five passengers died.<ref name="N&W pp.86-87">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=86–87}}</ref> The flight was designed to test [[autopilot]] response during a worst-case scenario with the [[Center of gravity of an aircraft|centre of gravity]] near its [[Center of gravity of an aircraft#CG aft of aft limit|aft limit]]. The accident was investigated by an internal branch of ''Direction General d'Aviation'', which revealed that the accident resulted from slow response and incorrect actions by the crew during the recovery.<ref name="N&W p.89">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=89}}</ref>


=== Entry into service ===
=== Entry into service ===
[[File:Cathay Pacific A330-300 B-LAE SYD 06-08.jpg|thumb|[[Cathay Pacific]] was one of the first operators of the A330.|alt=White jet passenger aircraft with thick green cheatline taking off from runway.]]
[[File:Cathay Pacific A330-300 B-LAE SYD 06-08.jpg|thumb|[[Cathay Pacific]] was one of the first operators of the A330.|alt=White jet passenger aircraft with thick green cheatline taking off from runway.]]


Air Inter became the first operator of the A330, putting the aircraft into service on 17 January 1994 between [[Orly Airport]], Paris and [[Marseille]].<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=84–85}}</ref> Deliveries to [[Malaysia Airlines]] (MAS) and Thai Airways International were postponed because of [[delamination]] of the [[composite material]]s in the PW4168 engine's [[Thrust reversal|thrust reverser]] assembly. Thai Airways received its first A330 during the second half of the year, operating it on routes from [[Bangkok]] to both [[Taipei]] and [[Seoul]] on 19&nbsp;December 1994.<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=86, 89}}</ref><ref name="Eden p.32">{{harvnb|Eden|2008|p=32}}</ref> MAS received its A330 on 1&nbsp;February 1995 and then rescheduled deliveries of its other ten aircraft on order.<ref name="Eden p.32"/> Cathay Pacific received its Trent 700 powered A330s just days later, following the certification of that engine on 22&nbsp;December 1994.<ref name="N&W p.89"/>
Air Inter became the first operator of the A330, putting the aircraft into service on 17 January 1994 between [[Orly Airport]], Paris, and [[Marseille]].<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=84–85}}</ref> Deliveries to [[Malaysia Airlines]] (MAS) and Thai Airways International were postponed because of [[delamination]] of the [[composite material]]s in the PW4168 engine's [[Thrust reversal|thrust reverser]] assembly. Thai Airways received its first A330 during the second half of the year, operating it on routes from [[Bangkok]] to [[Taipei]] and [[Seoul]].<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=86, 89}}</ref><ref name="Eden p.32">{{harvnb|Eden|2008|p=32}}</ref> Cathay Pacific received its Trent 700 powered A330s following the certification of that engine on 22&nbsp;December 1994.<ref name="N&W p.89"/> MAS received its A330 on 1&nbsp;February 1995 and then rescheduled its other ten orders.<ref name="Eden p.32"/>


Airbus intended the A330 to compete directly in the [[ETOPS|Extended-range Twin-engine Operation Performance Standards]] (ETOPS) market, specifically with the Boeing 767.<ref>{{harvnb|Wensveen|2007|page= 65}}</ref> (ETOPS is a standard that allows longer range flights away from a diversion airport for aircraft that have met special design and testing standards.) Instead of the "ETOPS out of the box" or "Early ETOPS" approach taken by Boeing with its 777,<ref group=Nb>This meant that the Boeing 777 was certified for 180-minutes ETOPS from the first day of service. As a result, the aircraft could be 180&nbsp;minutes (3&nbsp;hours) of flying time from a diversionary airport during transoceanic services.</ref> Airbus chose to gradually increase ETOPS approval on the A330 using in-service experience. Airbus suggested that the A340 and A330 were essentially identical other than their engine number; the A340's airline experience could be applied to the A330's ETOPS approval.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Pandey |first=Mohan |title=How Boeing Defied the Airbus Challenge |year=2010 |publisher= CreateSpace |location= North Charleston, South Carolina| isbn=9781450501132 |pages=71–72 |url=http://www.amazon.com/How-Boeing-Defied-Airbus-Challenge/dp/1450501133/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1298947973&sr=1-1|accessdate=29 June 2011}}</ref> The plans were for all three engine types to enter service with 90-minute approval, before increasing to 120 minutes after the total A330 fleet accumulated 25,000 flight hours, and then to 180 minutes after 50,000 flight hours, in 1995.<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=81}}</ref><ref group=Nb>After a total of 25,000 airborne hours, the A330 would be allowed a maximum of 120&nbsp;minutes (2&nbsp;hours) of flight time from a diversionary airport. After 50,000 hours, the limit would be raised to 180&nbsp;minutes (3&nbsp;hours).</ref> [[Aer Lingus]] and Cathay Pacific were two of the primary airlines assisting Airbus in this endeavour by building up in-service flight hours on over-ocean flights.<ref>{{harvnb|Cole|2000|pages=37, 41}}</ref> In November 2009, the A330 became the first aircraft to receive ETOPS&ndash;240 approval, which is now offered by Airbus as an option.<ref>{{Cite press release|url= http://www.airbus.com/presscentre/pressreleases/press-release-detail/detail/a330-is-first-airliner-to-be-certified-for-etops-beyond-180-minutes/search-results/ |title=A330 is first airliner to be certified for ETOPS 'beyond 180 minutes'|publisher=Airbus S.A.S |date=12 November 2009 |accessdate= 6 April 2011}}</ref>
Airbus intended the A330 to compete in the [[ETOPS|Extended-range Twin-engine Operation Performance Standards]] (ETOPS) market, specifically with the Boeing 767.<ref>{{harvnb|Wensveen|2007|page= 65}}</ref> (ETOPS is a standard that allows longer range flights away from a diversion airport for aircraft that have met special design and testing standards.) Instead of the "ETOPS out of the box" or "Early ETOPS" approach taken by Boeing with its 777,<ref group=Nb>This meant that the Boeing 777 was certified for 180-minutes ETOPS from the first day of service. As a result, the aircraft could be 180&nbsp;minutes (3&nbsp;hours) of flying time from a diversionary airport during transoceanic services.</ref> Airbus gradually increased ETOPS approval on the A330 using in-service experience. Airbus suggested that the A340 and A330 were essentially identical except for their engine number; the A340's experience could be applied to the A330's ETOPS approval.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Pandey |first=Mohan |title=How Boeing Defied the Airbus Challenge |year=2010 |publisher= CreateSpace |location= North Charleston, South Carolina| isbn=9781450501132 |pages=71–72 |url=http://www.amazon.com/How-Boeing-Defied-Airbus-Challenge/dp/1450501133/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1298947973&sr=1-1|accessdate=29 June 2011}}</ref> The plans were for all three engine types to enter service with 90-minute approval, before increasing to 120 minutes after the total A330 fleet accumulated 25,000 flight hours, and then to 180 minutes after 50,000 flight hours, in 1995.<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=81}}</ref><ref group=Nb>After a total of 25,000 airborne hours, the A330 would be allowed a maximum of 120&nbsp;minutes (2&nbsp;hours) of flight time from a diversionary airport. After 50,000 hours, the limit would be raised to 180&nbsp;minutes (3&nbsp;hours).</ref> [[Aer Lingus]] and Cathay Pacific were two important airlines assisting Airbus in this endeavour by building up in-service flight hours on over-ocean flights.<ref>{{harvnb|Cole|2000|pages=37, 41}}</ref> In November&nbsp;2009, the A330 became the first aircraft to receive ETOPS&ndash;240 approval, which has since been offered by Airbus as an option.<ref>{{Cite press release|url= http://www.airbus.com/presscentre/pressreleases/press-release-detail/detail/a330-is-first-airliner-to-be-certified-for-etops-beyond-180-minutes/ |title=A330 is first airliner to be certified for ETOPS 'beyond 180 minutes'|publisher=Airbus S.A.S |date=12 November 2009 |accessdate= 2 July 2011}}</ref>


=== Further development ===
=== Further development and ongoing sales ===


Because of dwindling A330-300 sales, increased market penetration by the [[Boeing 767#767-300ER|Boeing 767-300ER]], and airline requests for increased-range and smaller aircraft, Airbus developed the Airbus A330-200.<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=91}}</ref> Known as the A329 and A330M10 during development, the A330-200 would offer an estimated nine per cent lower operating costs than the Boeing 767-300ER.<ref name="N&W pp.92-93"/> The plane was aimed at the {{Convert|11900|km|nmi|adj=on|lk=out|abbr=on}} sector, where Airbus predicted demand for 800 aircraft between 1995 and 2015.<ref name="N&W pp.92-93">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=92–93}}</ref> The project with US$450&nbsp;million in expected development costs was approved by the Airbus Industrie Supervisory Board on 24 November 1995.<ref name="N&W pp.92-93"/>
In response to dwindling A330-300 sales, increased market penetration by the [[Boeing 767#767-300ER|Boeing 767-300ER]], and airline requests for increased-range and smaller aircraft, Airbus developed the Airbus A330-200.<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=91}}</ref> Known as the A329 and A330M10 during development, the A330-200 would offer nine per cent lower operating costs than the Boeing 767-300ER.<ref name="N&W pp.92-93"/> The plane was aimed at the {{Convert|11900|km|nmi|adj=on|lk=out|abbr=on}} sector, where Airbus predicted demand for 800 aircraft between 1995 and 2015.<ref name="N&W pp.92-93">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=92–93}}</ref> The project, with US$450&nbsp;million in expected development costs, was approved by the Airbus Industrie Supervisory Board on 24 November 1995.<ref name="N&W pp.92-93"/>


[[File:A330-200 Air Transat C-GGTS.jpg|thumb|left|An [[Air Transat]] A330-200. The variant was introduced to combat flagging sales and had longer range than the A330-300.|alt=An white A330 with blue engines and tail is taxiing on an apron under a foggy overcast; the foreground is dominated by green grass, while a hangar is visible in the background.]]
[[File:A330-200 Air Transat C-GGTS.jpg|thumb|left|An [[Air Transat]] A330-200. The variant was introduced to combat flagging sales and had longer range than the A330-300.|alt=An white A330 with blue engines and tail is taxiing on an apron under a foggy overcast; the foreground is dominated by green grass, while a hangar is visible in the background.]]


The A330-200 first flew on 13&nbsp;August 1997, with Airbus Chief Test Pilot William Wainwright and test pilot Bernard Schafer at the controls, accompanied by three flight test engineers.<ref name="Norris 2001 95">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=95}}</ref> The sixteen-month certification process involved logging 630 hours of test flights.<ref name="Norris 2001 95"/> The A300-200's first customer was ILFC; these aircraft were leased by [[Canada 3000]], who thereby became the A330-200's first operator.<ref name="Norris 2001 99">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=99}}</ref>
The A330-200 first flew on 13&nbsp;August 1997.<ref name="Norris 2001 95">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=95}}</ref> The sixteen-month certification process involved logging 630 hours of test flights.<ref name="Norris 2001 95"/> The A300-200's first customer was ILFC; these aircraft were leased by [[Canada 3000]], who became the A330-200's first operator.<ref name="Norris 2001 99">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=99}}</ref>


As Airbus worked on its A330-200, [[hydraulic pump]] problems were reported by both A330 and A340 operators. This issue was the suspected cause of a fire that destroyed an [[Air France]] A340 in January 1994.<ref name="N&W p.96"/> On 4&nbsp;January that year, a Malaysia Airlines A330-300, while undergoing regular maintenance at [[Singapore Changi Airport]], was consumed by a fire that started in the right-hand main undercarriage well. The incident caused US$30&nbsp;million in damage, and the aircraft took six months to repair.<ref name="N&W p.96">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=96}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|title=Airbus issues hydraulic pump warning after A330/340 fires|work=Flight International|date=15 January 1997|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/1997/01/15/1386/airbus-issues-hydraulic-pump-warning-after-a330340.html|accessdate=5 February 2011}}</ref> Consequently, operators were advised to disable electrical pumps in January 1997.<ref name="N&W p.96"/>
As Airbus worked on its A330-200, [[hydraulic pump]] problems were reported by both A330 and A340 operators. This issue was the suspected cause of a fire that destroyed an [[Air France]] A340 in January 1994.<ref name="N&W p.96"/> On 4&nbsp;January that year, a Malaysia Airlines A330-300, while undergoing regular maintenance at [[Singapore Changi Airport]], was consumed by a fire that started in the right-hand main undercarriage well. The incident caused US$30&nbsp;million in damage, and the aircraft took six months to repair.<ref name="N&W p.96">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=96}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|title=Airbus issues hydraulic pump warning after A330/340 fires|work=Flight International|date=15 January 1997|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/1997/01/15/1386/airbus-issues-hydraulic-pump-warning-after-a330340.html|accessdate=5 February 2011}}</ref> Consequently, operators were advised to disable electrical pumps in January 1997.<ref name="N&W p.96"/>


Other problems involved in-flight shutdowns of Trent 700-powered A330-300s. On 11&nbsp;November 1996, engine failure on a Cathay Pacific flight forced the aircraft back to [[Ho Chi Minh City]].<ref>{{Cite journal|title=In-flight Trent 700 failure forces Cathay A330 back to Saigon|work=Flight International|last=Lewis|first=Paul|date=20 November 1996|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/1996/11/20/10019/in-flight-trent-700-failure-forces-cathay-a330-back-to.html|accessdate=5 February 2011}}</ref> On 17&nbsp;April 1997, Cathay Pacific's affiliate, [[Dragonair]], also experienced an engine shutdown on board one of its A330s, caused by carbon clogging its [[oil filter]]. As a result, Cathay Pacific self-imposed a suspension of its 120-minute ETOPS clearance. Another engine failure occurred on 6&nbsp;May during [[climb]]out with a Cathay Pacific A330. The problem was traced to a bearing failure in the [[Transmission (mechanics)|gearbox]] built by [[Hispano-Suiza]]. Three days later, a Cathay Pacific A330 on climbout during a Bangkok–Hong Kong flight experienced a drop in oil pressure. The resultant [[Flameout|engine spool down]] forced the flight back to Bangkok, and the cause was later traced to metal contamination in the engine's [[Integrated circuit|master chip]].<ref name="N&W pp96-97">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=96–97}}</ref> Both Cathay Pacific and Dragonair voluntarily grounded their A330 fleet for two weeks<ref>{{Cite news| last=Creedy| first=Steve| title=Cathay Pacific pilots hailed as heroes| work=The Australian|date=16 April 2010 |url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/cathay-pacific-pilots-hailed-as-heroes/story-e6frg95x-1225854262928|accessdate=5 February 2011}}</ref> following a fifth engine failure on 23&nbsp;May. The combined fifteen-aircraft grounding caused major disruption since Cathay's eleven A330s made up seventeen per cent of its fleet and fifteen per cent of its passenger capacity. Rolls-Royce and Hispano-Suiza worked to resolve the problem, and a redesigned system for lubricating the areas involved was later dispatched to airlines.<ref name="N&W pp96-97"/>
Another issue was in-flight shutdowns of the Trent 700-powered A330-300s. On 11&nbsp;November 1996, engine failure on a Cathay Pacific flight forced it back to [[Ho Chi Minh City]].<ref>{{Cite journal|title=In-flight Trent 700 failure forces Cathay A330 back to Saigon|work=Flight International|last=Lewis|first=Paul|date=20 November 1996|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/1996/11/20/10019/in-flight-trent-700-failure-forces-cathay-a330-back-to.html|accessdate=5 February 2011}}</ref> On 17&nbsp;April 1997, Cathay Pacific's affiliate, [[Dragonair]], experienced an engine shutdown on an A330, caused by carbon clogging the [[oil filter]]. As a result, Cathay Pacific self-suspended its 120-minute ETOPS clearance. Another engine failure occurred on 6&nbsp;May during [[climb]]out with a Cathay Pacific A330. The problem was traced to a bearing failure in the [[Transmission (mechanics)|gearbox]] built by [[Hispano-Suiza]]. Three days later, a Cathay Pacific A330 on climbout during a Bangkok–Hong Kong flight experienced a drop in oil pressure. The resultant [[Flameout|engine spool down]] forced the flight back to Bangkok. The cause was later traced to metal contamination in the engine's [[Integrated circuit|master chip]].<ref name="N&W pp96-97">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pp=96–97}}</ref> Cathay Pacific and Dragonair voluntarily grounded their A330 fleets for two weeks<ref>{{Cite news| last=Creedy| first=Steve| title=Cathay Pacific pilots hailed as heroes| work=The Australian|date=16 April 2010 |url=http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/cathay-pacific-pilots-hailed-as-heroes/story-e6frg95x-1225854262928|accessdate=5 February 2011}}</ref> following a fifth engine failure on 23&nbsp;May. The combined fifteen-aircraft grounding caused major disruption because Cathay's eleven A330s made up fifteen per cent of its passenger capacity. Rolls-Royce and Hispano-Suiza worked to resolve the problem, and a redesigned system for lubricating the areas involved was dispatched to airlines.<ref name="N&W pp96-97"/>


[[File:New A330-200F Freighter on static display.jpg|thumb|right|The freighter variant, the A330-200F, debuts at the Singapore Airshow 2010.<ref>{{Cite video|title=Airbus A330-200F Freight Makes Public Debut|date=10 February 2010|publisher=Airbus S.A.S|url=http://videos.airbus.com/video/iLyROoafvZFl.html|accessdate=21 May 2011}}</ref>|alt=A A330-200F in Airbus's white and blue livery on display under a partly cloudy but otherwise clear sky. The engine inlets are covered.]]
[[File:New A330-200F Freighter on static display.jpg|thumb|The freighter variant, the A330-200F, debuts at the Singapore Airshow 2010.<ref>{{Cite video|title=Airbus A330-200F Freight Makes Public Debut|date=10 February 2010|publisher=Airbus S.A.S|url=http://videos.airbus.com/video/iLyROoafvZFl.html|accessdate=21 May 2011}}</ref>|alt=A A330-200F in Airbus's white and blue livery on display under a partly cloudy but otherwise clear sky. The engine inlets are covered.]]


Airbus next worked on an A330 freighter variant. Responding to flagging [[Airbus A300|A300-600F]] and [[Airbus A310|A310F]] sales, the company began marketing the Airbus A330-200F, a derivative of the A330-200 around 2001.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2006/03/14/205407/airbus-aims-to-fill-freighter-void-with-a330-derivative.html|title=Airbus aims to fill freighter void with A330 derivative|work=[[Flight International]]|date=14 March 2006|accessdate=29 JUne 2011}}</ref> The freighter has a range of {{Convert|7400|km|nmi|abbr=on|adj=on}} with {{Convert|65|t|lb|abbr=on}} on board, or {{Convert|5900|km|nmi|abbr=on}} with {{Convert|70|t|lb|abbr=on}}.<ref name=":A330-200F range">{{Cite web|title= A330-200F / Range|publisher=Airbus S.A.S|url=http://www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/freighter/a330-200f/performance/|accessdate=28 January 2011}}</ref> The plane features a larger nosegear, housed in a distinctive bulbous "blister fairing".<ref name="Blister fair">{{Cite web|first=Max|last=Kingsley-Jones|title=PICTURES: First Airbus A330-200F shows off nose-gear blister fairing |work=Flight International|date=4 August 2009|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/08/04/330563/pictures-first-airbus-a330-200f-shows-off-nose-gear-blister-fairing.html|accessdate=29 June 2011}}</ref> The modifaction was made to raise the raise the nose of the aircraft to create a level cargo deck during loading.
Airbus next worked on an A330 freighter variant. Responding to flagging [[Airbus A300|A300-600F]] and [[Airbus A310|A310F]] sales, the company began marketing the Airbus A330-200F, a derivative of the A330-200, around 2001.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2006/03/14/205407/airbus-aims-to-fill-freighter-void-with-a330-derivative.html|title=Airbus aims to fill freighter void with A330 derivative|work=[[Flight International]]|date=14 March 2006|accessdate=29 JUne 2011}}</ref> The freighter has a range of {{Convert|7400|km|nmi|abbr=on|adj=on}} with {{Convert|65|t|lb|abbr=on}} on board, or {{Convert|5900|km|nmi|abbr=on}} with {{Convert|70|t|lb|abbr=on}}.<ref name=":A330-200F range">{{Cite web|title= A330-200F / Range|publisher=Airbus S.A.S|url=http://www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/freighter/a330-200f/performance/|accessdate=28 January 2011}}</ref> The plane features a larger nosegear than the passenger-carrying A330. Housed in a distinctive bulbous "blister fairing", the gear emerges to raise the nose of the aircraft so that the cargo deck is level during loading.<ref name="Blister fair">{{Cite web|first=Max|last=Kingsley-Jones|title=PICTURES: First Airbus A330-200F shows off nose-gear blister fairing |work=Flight International|date=4 August 2009|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/08/04/330563/pictures-first-airbus-a330-200f-shows-off-nose-gear-blister-fairing.html|accessdate=29 June 2011}}</ref>


The A330-200F made its maiden flight on 5&nbsp;November 2009.<ref name="A330-200F 1st flight">{{Cite news|last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max|title=A330-200F touches down after successful maiden flight |work=Flight International|date=5 November 2009|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/11/05/334435/a330-200f-touches-down-after-successful-maiden-flight.html|accessdate=28 January 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Airbus flies new freighter it hopes to build in U.S.|agency=Reuters India|date=6 November 2009|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2009/11/06/idINIndia-43690620091106|accessdate=28 January 2011}}</ref> This marked the start of a four-month, 180-hour certification programme. JAA and FAA certifications were expected by March the following year,<ref name="A330-200F 1st flight"/> although approval by the JAA was delayed until April.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Buyck|first=Cathy|title=A330-200F receives EASA Type Certification|publisher=ATW Online|date=12 April 2010|url=http://atwonline.com/aircraft-engines-components/news/a330-200f-receives-easa-type-certification-0427|accessdate=30 January 2011}}</ref> The first delivery was subsequently made to the [[Etihad Airways]] cargo division, Etihad Crystal Cargo, in July 2010.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Farnborough: Etihad takes delivery of first A330-200F|work=Flight International|date=20 July 2010|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/07/20/344864/farnborough-etihad-takes-delivery-of-first-a330-200f.html|accessdate=29 January 2011|last=Reals| first=Kerry}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.airlinesanddestinations.com/airlines/airbus-etihad-display-first-customer-a330-200f-freighter-at-farnborough/|date=20 July 2010|title=Airbus Hands Over Etihad’s First A330-200F Freighter at Farnborough|publisher=Airlinesanddestinations.com|accessdate=25 May 2011}}</ref>
The A330-200F made its maiden flight on 5&nbsp;November 2009.<ref name="A330-200F 1st flight">{{Cite news|last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max|title=A330-200F touches down after successful maiden flight |work=Flight International|date=5 November 2009|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/11/05/334435/a330-200f-touches-down-after-successful-maiden-flight.html|accessdate=28 January 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Airbus flies new freighter it hopes to build in U.S.|agency=Reuters India|date=6 November 2009|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2009/11/06/idINIndia-43690620091106|accessdate=28 January 2011}}</ref> This marked the start of a four-month, 180-hour, certification programme. JAA and FAA certifications were expected by March the following year although approval by the JAA was delayed until April.<ref name="A330-200F 1st flight"/><ref>{{Cite news|last=Buyck|first=Cathy|title=A330-200F receives EASA Type Certification|publisher=ATW Online|date=12 April 2010|url=http://atwonline.com/aircraft-engines-components/news/a330-200f-receives-easa-type-certification-0427|accessdate=30 January 2011}}</ref> The first delivery was subsequently made to the [[Etihad Airways]] cargo division, Etihad Crystal Cargo, in July 2010.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Farnborough: Etihad takes delivery of first A330-200F|work=Flight International|date=20 July 2010|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/07/20/344864/farnborough-etihad-takes-delivery-of-first-a330-200f.html|accessdate=29 January 2011|last=Reals| first=Kerry}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.airlinesanddestinations.com/airlines/airbus-etihad-display-first-customer-a330-200f-freighter-at-farnborough/|date=20 July 2010|title=Airbus Hands Over Etihad’s First A330-200F Freighter at Farnborough|publisher=Airlinesanddestinations.com|accessdate=25 May 2011}}</ref>


By the end of May 2011, a total of 1,127 A330s had been ordered, with 789 delivered.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> The largest operators of the A330 are the 32 run by Delta Air Lines—which had an all-Boeing fleet before getting its A330s in its merger with Northwest Airlines—and Cathay Pacific with 31.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> Airbus announced in February 2011 that it intended to raise production rates from seven-and-a-half to eight per month to nine per month in 2012, and ten per month in 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://atwonline.com/aircraft-engines-components/news/airbus-boost-a330-production-10-monthly-2013-0203 |title=Airbus to boost A330 production to 10 monthly in 2013 |accessdate=5 March 2011 |author=Karp, Aaron |date=4 February 2011 |publisher=ATW Online}}</ref> Airbus expects the A330 to continue selling until at least 2015.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Rothman|first=Andrea|title=Airbus’s A330 Back in Fashion as Boeing 787 Falters (Update1) |publisher=Bloomberg|date=8 January 2009|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aOFuFKLehXiA|accessdate=24 January 2011}}</ref>
By the end of May 2011, a total of 1,127 A330s had been ordered, with 789 delivered.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> The largest operators of the A330 are the 32 run by Delta Air Lines—which had an all-Boeing fleet before getting its A330s in its merger with Northwest Airlines—and Cathay Pacific with 31.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> Airbus announced in February 2011 that it intended to raise production rates from seven-and-a-half to eight per month to nine per month in 2012, and ten per month in 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://atwonline.com/aircraft-engines-components/news/airbus-boost-a330-production-10-monthly-2013-0203 |title=Airbus to boost A330 production to 10 monthly in 2013 |accessdate=5 March 2011 |author=Karp, Aaron |date=4 February 2011 |publisher=ATW Online}}</ref> Airbus expects the A330 to continue selling until at least 2015.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Rothman|first=Andrea|title=Airbus’s A330 Back in Fashion as Boeing 787 Falters (Update1) |publisher=Bloomberg|date=8 January 2009|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aOFuFKLehXiA|accessdate=24 January 2011}}</ref>
Line 105: Line 155:
The A330 is a medium-size, wide-body airliner, with two engines suspended on pylons under the wings. On the ground, the two-wheel nose undercarriage and two 4-wheel [[bogie]] main legs built by [[Messier-Dowty]] support a [[Maximum Ramp Weight|maximum ramp weight]] (MRW) of {{Convert|230.9|t|lb|abbr=on}}, while the designed [[maximum takeoff weight]] (MTOW) is {{Convert|230|t|lb|abbr=on}} on the A330-200 variant. An option allows a maximum ramp weight of {{Convert|233.9|t|lb|abbr=on}} with a maximum takeoff weight of {{Convert|233.0|t|lb|abbr=on}}.<ref name="Airbus A330-200 specifications"/>
The A330 is a medium-size, wide-body airliner, with two engines suspended on pylons under the wings. On the ground, the two-wheel nose undercarriage and two 4-wheel [[bogie]] main legs built by [[Messier-Dowty]] support a [[Maximum Ramp Weight|maximum ramp weight]] (MRW) of {{Convert|230.9|t|lb|abbr=on}}, while the designed [[maximum takeoff weight]] (MTOW) is {{Convert|230|t|lb|abbr=on}} on the A330-200 variant. An option allows a maximum ramp weight of {{Convert|233.9|t|lb|abbr=on}} with a maximum takeoff weight of {{Convert|233.0|t|lb|abbr=on}}.<ref name="Airbus A330-200 specifications"/>


The A330 is a low-wing [[Cantilever#Aircraft|cantilever monoplane]], whose wing is virtually identical to that of the Airbus A340. The wing is swept back at 30 degrees,<ref name="N&W p.50">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=50}}</ref> and, along with other design features, allows a maximum operating [[Mach number]] of 0.86.<ref name="Airbus A330-300 specifications"/> Originally designed with a {{convert|56|m|ftin|abbr=on}} [[Wingspan|span]], it was later extended to {{convert|58.6|m|ftin|abbr=on}},<ref name="N&W p.31"/> and finally to {{convert|60.3|m|ftin|abbr=on}}. Each wing also has a {{Convert|2.74|m|ftin|adj=on|abbr=on}} tall [[Wingtip device|winglet]], instead of the wingtip fences found on earlier Airbus aircraft. The wing has a very high thickness to [[Chord (aircraft)|chord]] ratio of 12.8 per cent,<ref name="Gunston p.195"/><!--{{#tag:ref|This is the thickness to chord ratio of the early Airbus A340 variants, which share the same wing with the A330.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.aviamarket.org/reviews/civil-aircraft/521-airbus-a340.html?start=1|publisher=Aviamarket.org|accessdate=15 May 2011|title=Airbus A340 - Design Features, Flying Controls, Landing Gear, Power Plant, Accommodation, Avionics, Dimensions|quote=...thickness/ chord ratios 15.25 per cent at root, 11.27 per cent at inner kink, 9.86 per cent at outer kink and 10.60 per cent at tip.}}</ref>|group="Nb"}}--> which means that a long span and high [[Aspect ratio (wing)|aspect ratio]] can be attained without a severe weight penalty; for comparison, the rival MD-11 has a thickness to chord ratio of 8–9 per cent.<ref name="Gunston p.195">{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=195}}</ref><!--<ref>{{Cite web|title=Re-Engineering the Design Process Through Computation|date=January–February 1999|url=http://aero-comlab.stanford.edu/Papers/AIAA-2412-887.pdf|format=PDF|quote=This wing is quite thick, actually thicker than the McDonnell Douglas baseline design across the span, with a thickness to chord ratio of more than 14 per cent at the root and 9 per cent at the tip.|work=[[Princeton University]]|page=11|last=Jameson|first=Anothony}}</ref></ref>-->
The A330 is a low-wing [[Cantilever#Aircraft|cantilever monoplane]] with a wing virtually identical to that of the Airbus A340. The wing is swept back at 30 degrees and, along with other design features, allows a maximum operating [[Mach number]] of 0.86.<ref name="N&W p.50">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=50}}</ref><ref name="Airbus A330-300 specifications"/> Originally designed with a {{convert|56|m|ftin|abbr=on}} [[Wingspan|span]], it was later extended to {{convert|58.6|m|ftin|abbr=on}} and finally to {{convert|60.3|m|ftin|abbr=on}}.<ref name="N&W p.31"/> Each wing also has a {{Convert|2.74|m|ftin|adj=on|abbr=on}} tall [[Wingtip device|winglet]] instead of the wingtip fences found on earlier Airbus aircraft. The wing has a very high thickness-to-[[Chord (aircraft)|chord]] ratio of 12.8 per cent, which means that a long span and high [[Aspect ratio (wing)|aspect ratio]] can be attained without a severe weight penalty.<ref name="Gunston p.195"/><!--{{#tag:ref|This is the thickness to chord ratio of the early Airbus A340 variants, which share the same wing with the A330.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.aviamarket.org/reviews/civil-aircraft/521-airbus-a340.html?start=1|publisher=Aviamarket.org|accessdate=15 May 2011|title=Airbus A340 - Design Features, Flying Controls, Landing Gear, Power Plant, Accommodation, Avionics, Dimensions|quote=...thickness/ chord ratios 15.25 per cent at root, 11.27 per cent at inner kink, 9.86 per cent at outer kink and 10.60 per cent at tip.}}</ref>|group="Nb"}}--> For comparison, the rival MD-11 has a thickness-to-chord ratio of 8–9 per cent.<ref name="Gunston p.195">{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=195}}</ref><!--<ref>{{Cite web|title=Re-Engineering the Design Process Through Computation|date=January–February 1999|url=http://aero-comlab.stanford.edu/Papers/AIAA-2412-887.pdf|format=PDF|quote=This wing is quite thick, actually thicker than the McDonnell Douglas baseline design across the span, with a thickness to chord ratio of more than 14 per cent at the root and 9 per cent at the tip.|work=[[Princeton University]]|page=11|last=Jameson|first=Anothony}}</ref></ref>-->


The A330 benefited from the A340 wing development.<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=188}}</ref> The failure of [[International Aero Engines]] to deliver the radical [[High-bypass turbofan|ultra-high-bypass]] V2500 "SuperFan", which had promised a significant [[Fuel efficiency|fuel burn reduction]] of around 15 per cent<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=197}}</ref> for the A340 led Airbus to redesign, among other things, the A340 wing to compensate for the loss in predicted engine efficiency.<ref name="N&W p.31"/> The wings were designed and manufactured by BAe,<ref name=Norris_Wagner_p50-1>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pages=50–51}}</ref> and the new design was a long slender wing with a very high aspect ratio to provide high aerodynamic efficiency.{{#tag:ref|The higher the aspect ratio, the greater the aerodynamic efficiency.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/geom.html|publisher=NASA|accessdate=17 March 2011|title=Wing Geometry Definitions|quote=A higher aspect ratio wing has a lower drag and a slightly higher lift than a lower aspect ratio wing.}}</ref>|group="Nb"}} At {{Convert|60.3|m|ft|abbr=on}},<ref name="A330-300 specs"/> the wingspan is similar to the larger Boeing 747-200, but with only 65 per cent of the wing area.<ref name="N&W p.50"/>
The A330 benefited from the A340 wing development.<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=188}}</ref> The failure of [[International Aero Engines]] to deliver the radical [[High-bypass turbofan|ultra-high-bypass]] V2500 "SuperFan", which had promised a significant [[Fuel efficiency|fuel burn reduction]] of around 15 per cent for the A340, led Airbus to redesign, among other things, the A340 wing to compensate.<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=197}}</ref><ref name="N&W p.31"/> The wings were designed and manufactured by BAe, and the new design was a long slender wing with a very high aspect ratio to provide high aerodynamic efficiency.<ref name=Norris_Wagner_p50-1>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|pages=50–51}}</ref>{{#tag:ref|The higher the aspect ratio, the greater the aerodynamic efficiency.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/geom.html|publisher=NASA|accessdate=17 March 2011|title=Wing Geometry Definitions|quote=A higher aspect ratio wing has a lower drag and a slightly higher lift than a lower aspect ratio wing.}}</ref>|group="Nb"}} At {{Convert|60.3|m|ft|abbr=on}}, the wingspan is similar to the larger Boeing 747-200 but with 65 per cent of the wing area.<ref name="N&W p.50"/><ref name="A330-300 specs"/>


[[File:Airbus A330-200 flight deck forward displays.jpg|thumb|left|The A330 adopted the six-screen cockpit design also used with the A320 and A340.|alt=Cockpit of the A330. All instruments and displays are switched on. Two seats occupy both sides of the cockpit, separated by a center console.]]
[[File:Airbus A330-200 flight deck forward displays.jpg|thumb|left|The A330 adopted the six-screen cockpit design also used with the A320 and A340.|alt=Cockpit of the A330. All instruments and displays are switched on. Two seats occupy both sides of the cockpit, separated by a center console.]]


The A330 features the same fuselage and cabin width as the [[Airbus A300|Airbus A300-600]], at {{Convert|5.64|m|ftin|abbr=on}} and {{Convert|5.28|m|ftin|abbr=on}}, respectively.<ref name="A330-300 specs"/><ref name="A330-200 specs"/> The aircraft's airframe is primarily based on that of the A300-600, with many parts in common. This allows for 2–2–2<ref>{{Cite web|title=The quietest cabin in the sky|publisher=Airbus S.A.S|url=http://www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/a330a340/passenger-comfort/|accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref> six-abreast seat arrangement in [[First class (aviation)|first]] and [[business class]], and 2–4–2 eight-abreast in [[Economy class|economy]].<ref name="A330 from AT.com">{{Cite web|title=Airbus A330 Wide-Bodied Medium/Long-Range Twin-Engine Airliner, Europe|publisher=Aerospace-technology.com|url=http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/a330/|accessdate=31 January 2011}}</ref> The A330's vertical stabiliser and rudder are made mostly of [[composite material]]s.<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=58}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Miravete|1999|p=149}}</ref> The A330's fuselage and major components are largely common with the A340.
The A330/A340 airframe is based on that of the [[Airbus A300|Airbus A300-600]], with many common parts, and has the same fuselage and cabin width: {{Convert|5.64|m|ftin|abbr=on}} and {{Convert|5.28|m|ftin|abbr=on}}.<ref name="A330-300 specs"/><ref name="A330-200 specs"/> Allowed seating is 2–2–2 six-abreast in [[First class (aviation)|first]] and [[business class]], and 2–4–2 eight-abreast in [[Economy class|economy]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=The quietest cabin in the sky|publisher=Airbus S.A.S|url=http://www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/a330a340/passenger-comfort/|accessdate=1 February 2011}}</ref><ref name="A330 from AT.com">{{Cite web|title=Airbus A330 Wide-Bodied Medium/Long-Range Twin-Engine Airliner, Europe|publisher=Aerospace-technology.com|url=http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/a330/|accessdate=31 January 2011}}</ref> The vertical stabiliser and rudder are made mostly of [[composite material]]s.<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=58}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Miravete|1999|p=149}}</ref>


The A330 and A340 would share the same [[glass cockpit]] flight deck layout as the A320, featuring electronic instrument displays rather than mechanical gauges, and saving costs for airlines. For example, flight crew transition from the A330 to A340 takes as little as three days.<ref>{{Cite web|title= A330 Family / cockpit |publisher=Airbus S.A.S |url=http://www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/passengeraircraft/a330family/commonality/|accessdate=2 March 2011}}</ref> Instead of a conventional [[Yoke (aircraft)|control yoke]], the flight deck features side-stick controls, six main displays, and the [[Electronic Flight Instrument System]] (EFIS), which covers navigation and flight displays, as well as [[Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor]] (ECAM).<ref name="A330 from AT.com"/><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.smartcockpit.com/data/pdfs/plane/airbus/A330/misc/A330_Flight_Deck_and_Systems_Briefing_For_Pilots.pdf|accessdate=31 January 2011|title=A330 Flight deck and systems briefing for pilots|publisher=Smartcockpit.com|format=PDF|work=Airbus S.A.S|page=173|date=March 1999}}</ref> Apart from the flight deck, the A330 also has the fly-by-wire system common to the A320 family, the A340, the [[Airbus A380|A380]], and the upcoming [[Airbus A350|A350]]. It also features three primary and two secondary [[Aircraft flight control system|flight control systems]], as well as a [[flight envelope]] limit protection system.<ref name="A330 from AT.com"/>
The A330 shares the same "glass cockpit" flight deck layout as the A320 and A340, featuring electronic instrument displays rather than mechanical gauges.<ref>{{Cite web|title= A330 Family / cockpit |publisher=Airbus S.A.S |url=http://www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/passengeraircraft/a330family/commonality/|accessdate=2 March 2011}}</ref> Instead of a conventional [[Yoke (aircraft)|control yoke]], the flight deck features side-stick controls, six main displays, and the [[Electronic Flight Instrument System]] (EFIS), which covers navigation and flight displays, as well as [[Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor]] (ECAM).<ref name="A330 from AT.com"/><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.smartcockpit.com/data/pdfs/plane/airbus/A330/misc/A330_Flight_Deck_and_Systems_Briefing_For_Pilots.pdf|accessdate=31 January 2011|title=A330 Flight deck and systems briefing for pilots|publisher=Smartcockpit.com|format=PDF|work=Airbus S.A.S|page=173|date=March 1999}}</ref> Apart from the flight deck, the A330 also has the fly-by-wire system common to the A320 family, the A340, the [[Airbus A380|A380]], and the upcoming [[Airbus A350|A350]]. It also features three primary and two secondary [[Aircraft flight control system|flight control systems]], as well as a [[flight envelope]] limit protection system.<ref name="A330 from AT.com"/>
{{-}}
{{-}}


== Variants ==
== Variants ==

=== A330-300 ===<!-- This section is linked from [[Lufthansa]] -->
=== A330-300 ===<!-- This section is linked from [[Lufthansa]] -->
[[File:Usairways a330-300 n278ay arp.jpg|thumb|An A330-300, the original variant, of [[US Airways]] taking off|alt=A white A330 with a blue underside and red markings is seen taking off against a dark and cloudy overcast; the undercarriage are retracting.]]
[[File:Usairways a330-300 n278ay arp.jpg|thumb|An A330-300, the original variant, of [[US Airways]] taking off|alt=A white A330 with a blue underside and red markings is seen taking off against a dark and cloudy overcast; the undercarriage are retracting.]]


The A330-300, which entered service in 1993, was developed as a replacement for the A300. It is based on a stretched A300-600 fuselage {{Convert|63.69|m|ftin|abbr=on}} long,<ref name="A330-300 specs"/> but with new wings, stabilisers and fly-by-wire systems. The -300 carries 295 passengers in a three-class cabin layout, 335 in two-class, or 440 in a single-class layout. It has a range of {{Convert|10500|km|nmi|abbr=on}}. The -300 has a large cargo capacity, comparable to that of early [[Boeing 747]]s. It is powered by the choice of two General Electric CF6-80E, Pratt & Whitney PW4000, or Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines, all of which are [[ETOPS/LROPS|ETOPS-180]] rated. On the ground, it uses the Honeywell 331–350C [[auxiliary power unit]]
The A330-300, which entered service in 1993, was developed as a replacement for the A300. It is based on a stretched A300-600 fuselage {{Convert|63.69|m|ftin|abbr=on}} long but with new wings, stabilisers and fly-by-wire systems. The -300 carries 295 passengers in a three-class cabin layout, 335 in two-class, or 440 in a single-class layout. It has a range of {{Convert|10500|km|nmi|abbr=on}}. The -300 has a large cargo capacity, comparable to that of early [[Boeing 747]]s. It is powered by the choice of two General Electric CF6-80E, Pratt & Whitney PW4000, or Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines, all of which are [[ETOPS/LROPS|ETOPS-180]] rated. On the ground, it uses the Honeywell 331–350C [[auxiliary power unit]]
(APU).<ref name="Product Catalog"/>
(APU).<ref name="Product Catalog"/><ref name="A330-300 specs"/>


French domestic airline Air Inter was the launch customer for the aircraft. As of May 2011, 508 -300s had been ordered, 362 of which had been delivered, with 361 remaining in operation.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> The list price of each -300 is $222.5&nbsp;million.<ref name=Airbus_prices/> The closest competitors have been the [[Boeing 777|Boeing 777-200]], and the now-out-of-production [[McDonnell Douglas MD-11]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1990/1990%20-%202625.html |work= Flight International |date=5–11 September 1990 |accessdate=16 March 1990|format=PDF|page=115|title=Mass Market}}</ref> Airbus is planning a two-tonne increase in maximum gross weight of the -300.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/11/25/350165/airbus-poised-to-launch-higher-weight-a330-300.html|accessdate=28 November 2010|title=Airbus poised to launch higher-weight A330-300|date=25 November 2010|first=Olivier|last=Bonnassies|work=Flight International}}</ref>
As of May 2011, 508 -300s had been ordered, 362 of which had been delivered, with 361 remaining in operation.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> The 2011 list price is $222.5&nbsp;million.<ref name=Airbus_prices/> The closest competitors have been the [[Boeing 777|Boeing 777-200]] and the now-out-of-production [[McDonnell Douglas MD-11]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1990/1990%20-%202625.html |work= Flight International |date=5–11 September 1990 |accessdate=16 March 1990|format=PDF|page=115|title=Mass Market}}</ref> Airbus is planning a two-tonne increase in maximum gross weight of the -300.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/11/25/350165/airbus-poised-to-launch-higher-weight-a330-300.html|accessdate=28 November 2010|title=Airbus poised to launch higher-weight A330-300|date=25 November 2010|first=Olivier|last=Bonnassies|work=Flight International}}</ref>


=== A330-200 ===
=== A330-200 ===


[[File:Egyptair.a330-200.su-gci.arp.jpg|thumb|An [[EgyptAir]] A330-200 during a landing approach. The absence of a centre-line main undercarriage distinguishes the A330 from the A340.|alt=Twin-engine passenger jet with undercarriage extended during approach for landing]]
The A330-200 is a shortened but longer-range stablemate of the A330-300, entering service in 1998, four years after the -300. Launched in 1995, when sales for the -300 were flagging, it was developed to compete with the Boeing 767-300ER.<ref name="FI OOTF"/> The [[Boeing 767#767-400ER|767-400ER]] also competes with the -200 to a lesser extent,<ref>{{Cite book|last=Norris|first=Guy; Mark Wagner|title=Modern Boeing Jetliners|publisher=MBI Publishing|year=1999|location=St. Paul, Minnesota|isbn=0-7603-0717-2|page=117|quote=The results of the Airbus studies produced...ultimately the A330-200. Airbus outlined an aircraft capable of carrying 256 passengers over a range of 6,400&nbsp;nautical miles with, it claimed, up to 9% lower operating costs than the 767-300ER...The new A330-200 caused Boeing to take another look at its 767 plans...|chapter=767: Stretching and Growing}}</ref> as will the [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner|787 Dreamliner]] after entering service.<ref>{{Cite news|last= Regan|first=James and Tim Hepher|title=Airbus ups A330 output, revokes freighter order|work=India Reuters|date=3 February 2011|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/02/03/idINIndia-54636020110203|accessdate=16 March 2011|quote=European planemaker Airbus confirmed plans on Thursday for a 25 percent increase in production of its A330 long-range aircraft as it cashes in on delays to the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.}}</ref> The A330-200 programme relied on plans for higher-weight A340s, which would eventually become the [[Airbus A340-300|A340-300E]].<ref>{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=93}}</ref>
[[File:Egyptair.a330-200.su-gci.arp.jpg|thumb|An [[EgyptAir]] A330-200 during a landing approach. The absence of a centre-line main undercarriage distinguishes the A330 from early A340s|alt=Twin-engine passenger jet with undercarriage extended during approach for landing]]


The A330-200 is ten fuselage frames shorter<ref name="FI OOTF">{{Cite journal|last=Henley|first=Peter|title=One of the family|journal=Flight International|date=25 February–3 March 1998|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1998/1998%20-%200442.html|accessdate=25 January 2011}}</ref> than the original -300, with a length of {{Convert|58.82|m|ftin|abbr=on}}.<ref name="A330-200 specs"/> To compensate for the smaller [[Torque|moment arm]] of the shorter fuselage, the vertical stabiliser height of the -200 was increased by {{Convert|104|cm|in|abbr=on}} over that of the -300.<ref name="N&W p.94">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=94}}</ref> The -200's wing was also modified; structural strengthening of the wing allowed the maximum takeoff weight of the -200 to be increased to {{Convert|229.8|t|lb|abbr=on}}.<ref name="N&W p.94"/>
The A330-200 is a shortened, longer-range A330, which entered service in 1998. Typical range with 253 passengers in a three-class configuration is {{Convert|13,400|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name="A330-200 specs"/> The A330-200 is ten fuselage frames shorter than the original -300, with a length of {{Convert|58.82|m|ftin|abbr=on}}.<ref name="A330-200 specs"/><ref name="FI OOTF">{{Cite journal|last=Henley|first=Peter|title=One of the family|journal=Flight International|date=25 February–3 March 1998|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1998/1998%20-%200442.html|accessdate=25 January 2011}}</ref> To compensate for the smaller [[Torque|moment arm]] of the shorter fuselage, the vertical stabiliser height of the -200 was increased by {{Convert|104|cm|in|abbr=on}}.<ref name="N&W p.94">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=94}}</ref> The -200's wing was also modified; structural strengthening of the wing allowed the maximum takeoff weight of the -200 to be increased to {{Convert|229.8|t|lb|abbr=on}}.<ref name="N&W p.94"/> The -200 is offered with three engine types similar to those found on the -300 and uses a similar APU.<ref name="Product Catalog">{{Cite web|url=https://commerce.honeywell.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ECategoryDisplay?catalogId=10101&storeId=10651&categoryId=32443&langId=-1|accessdate=18 November 2010|title=Product Catalog|publisher=Honeywell}}</ref> Airbus also boosted fuel capacity by using the centre section {{Convert|139,100|L|USgal|lk=out|abbr=on}} fuel tank, standard in the A340.<ref name="Norris 2001 95"/>


As of March 2011, 558 of the -200 had been ordered, 412 of which had been delivered, with 408 aircraft still in operation.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> The 2011 list price is $200.8&nbsp;million.<ref name=Airbus_prices/> The changes made to the -200 significantly improved the economics of the aircraft and made the variant more popular than the four-engine A340.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> The -200 competes with the Boeing 767-300ER and to a lesser extent the [[Boeing 767#767-400ER|767-400ER]].<ref name="FI OOTF"/><ref>{{Cite book|last=Norris|first=Guy; Mark Wagner|title=Modern Boeing Jetliners|publisher=MBI Publishing|year=1999|location=St. Paul, Minnesota|isbn=0-7603-0717-2|page=117|quote=The results of the Airbus studies produced...ultimately the A330-200. Airbus outlined an aircraft capable of carrying 256 passengers over a range of 6,400&nbsp;nautical miles with, it claimed, up to 9% lower operating costs than the 767-300ER...The new A330-200 caused Boeing to take another look at its 767 plans...|chapter=767: Stretching and Growing}}</ref> The [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner|787 Dreamliner]] poses future competition.<ref>{{Cite news|last= Regan|first=James and Tim Hepher|title=Airbus ups A330 output, revokes freighter order|work=India Reuters|date=3 February 2011|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/02/03/idINIndia-54636020110203|accessdate=16 March 2011|quote=European planemaker Airbus confirmed plans on Thursday for a 25 percent increase in production of its A330 long-range aircraft as it cashes in on delays to the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.}}</ref> The A330-200 is also available as an ultra-long-range [[Business jet|corporate jet]] from [[Airbus Executive and Private Aviation]], under the banner "A330-200 Prestige".<ref>{{Cite web|title=A330-200 Prestige specifications|publisher=Airbus S.A.S|url=http://www.airbus.com/fileadmin/media_gallery/files/tech_data/jetFamily/media_object_file_A330_200_specifications.pdf|format=PDF|accessdate=21 May 2011}}</ref>
Airbus also boosted fuel capacity by using the centre section {{Convert|139,100|L|USgal|lk=out|abbr=on}} fuel tank, standard in the A340.<ref name="Norris 2001 95"/> Typical range with 253 passengers in a three-class configuration is {{Convert|13,400|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name="A330-200 specs"/> The -200 is offered with three engines similar to those found on the -300 and uses a similar APU to that of the A330-300.<ref name="Product Catalog">{{Cite web|url=https://commerce.honeywell.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ECategoryDisplay?catalogId=10101&storeId=10651&categoryId=32443&langId=-1|accessdate=18 November 2010|title=Product Catalog|publisher=Honeywell}}</ref> The changes made to the -200 significantly improved the economics of the aircraft and made the variant more popular than the four-engine A340. The number of -200s sold, at 562 as of May 2011, surpasses the whole A340 family, with 479 sales.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/>

As of March 2011, 558 of the variant had been ordered, 412 of which had been delivered, with 408 aircraft still in operation.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> Each unit, in 2011 prices, costs $200.8&nbsp;million.<ref name=Airbus_prices/> The A330-200 is also available as an ultra-long-range [[Business jet|corporate jet]] from [[Airbus Executive and Private Aviation]], under the banner "A330-200 Prestige".<ref>{{Cite web|title=A330-200 Prestige specifications|publisher=Airbus S.A.S|url=http://www.airbus.com/fileadmin/media_gallery/files/tech_data/jetFamily/media_object_file_A330_200_specifications.pdf|format=PDF|accessdate=21 May 2011}}</ref>


==== A330-200F ====
==== A330-200F ====
Line 141: Line 187:
[[File:The very first Airbus A330-200F.jpg|thumb|The first Airbus A330-200F during climbout, with undercarriage still retracting. The blister fairing under the nose was added to correct nose-down attitude inherent on passenger versions<ref name="Blister fair"/>|alt=An aircraft in white livery with blue markings is taking off against a solid blue sky.]]
[[File:The very first Airbus A330-200F.jpg|thumb|The first Airbus A330-200F during climbout, with undercarriage still retracting. The blister fairing under the nose was added to correct nose-down attitude inherent on passenger versions<ref name="Blister fair"/>|alt=An aircraft in white livery with blue markings is taking off against a solid blue sky.]]


The A330-200F is an all-cargo derivative of the A330-200, capable of carrying {{Convert|65|t|lb||abbr=on}} over {{Convert|7400|km|nmi|abbr=on}}, or {{Convert|70|t|lb|abbr=on}} up to {{Convert|5900|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name=":A330-200F range"/> To overcome the standard A330's nose-down body angle on the ground, the A330F uses a revised nose undercarriage layout. The normal A330-200 undercarriage is used, however its attachment points are lower in the fuselage, requiring a distinctive blister fairing on the nose to accommodate the retracted nose gear, and providing a level deck for cargo loading.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/08/04/330563/pictures-first-airbus-a330-200f-shows-off-nose-gear-blister-fairing.html|title=First Airbus A330-200F shows off nose gear blister fairing|work=Flight International|date=4 August 2009|accessdate=12 February 2011}}</ref> Power is provided by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 or Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines. General Electric does not plan to offer an engine for the A330-200F.<ref>{{Cite news|title=GE drops A330-200F plan and opens door to P&W|work=Flight Global|date=15 June 2007|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/06/15/214692/ge-drops-a330-200f-plan-and-opens-door-to-pw.html|accessdate=10 November 2010}}</ref>
The A330-200F is an all-cargo derivative of the A330-200 capable of carrying {{Convert|65|t|lb||abbr=on}} over {{Convert|7400|km|nmi|abbr=on}} or {{Convert|70|t|lb|abbr=on}} up to {{Convert|5900|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name=":A330-200F range"/> To overcome the standard A330's nose-down body angle on the ground, the A330F uses a revised nose undercarriage layout to provide a level deck during cargo loading. The normal A330-200 undercarriage is used, but its attachment points are lower in the fuselage, thus requiring a distinctive blister fairing on the nose to accommodate the retracted nose gear.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/08/04/330563/pictures-first-airbus-a330-200f-shows-off-nose-gear-blister-fairing.html|title=First Airbus A330-200F shows off nose gear blister fairing|work=Flight International|date=4 August 2009|accessdate=12 February 2011}}</ref> Power is provided by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 or Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines. General Electric does not plan to offer an engine for the A330-200F.<ref>{{Cite news|title=GE drops A330-200F plan and opens door to P&W|work=Flight Global|date=15 June 2007|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/06/15/214692/ge-drops-a330-200f-plan-and-opens-door-to-pw.html|accessdate=10 November 2010}}</ref>


As of May 2011, Airbus had 57 firm orders, with the price of each -200F listed at $203.6&nbsp;million.<ref name=Airbus_prices/> As well as new-build freighters, Airbus has proposed passenger-to-freighter conversions of existing -200 airliners.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/07/21/344898/farnborough-qatar-fires-warning-shot-at-airbus-over-a330.html|date=21 July 2010|accessdate=21 July 2010|title=Farnborough: Qatar fires warning shot at Airbus over A330 conversions|first=Max|last=Kingsley-Jones|publisher=Flight Daily News}}</ref> Comparable freighters to the -200F include Boeing's [[Boeing 767|767-300F]].<ref name = 'A330 200F specs'/>
As of May 2011, Airbus had 57 firm orders. The list price is $203.6&nbsp;million.<ref name=Airbus_prices/> As well as new-build freighters, Airbus has proposed passenger-to-freighter conversions of existing -200 airliners.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/07/21/344898/farnborough-qatar-fires-warning-shot-at-airbus-over-a330.html|date=21 July 2010|accessdate=21 July 2010|title=Farnborough: Qatar fires warning shot at Airbus over A330 conversions|first=Max|last=Kingsley-Jones|publisher=Flight Daily News}}</ref> Comparable freighters to the -200F include Boeing's [[Boeing 767|767-300F]].<ref name = 'A330 200F specs'/>


==== A330-200HGW ====
==== A330-200HGW ====


In 2008, Airbus released plans for a higher [[gross weight]] version of the A330-200 to more effectively compete against the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. This new A330 version will have a maximum takeoff weight of {{Convert|238|t|lb|abbr=on}},<ref name="A330-200HGW">{{Cite journal|title=Airbus to offer heavier A330 against delayed 787|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/09/10/315762/airbus-to-offer-heavier-a330-against-delayed-787.html|accessdate=10 February 2011|date=10 September 2008|work=Flight Global}}</ref> and its new range will be up to {{Convert|12450|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name="A330-200HGW"/> The new-build A330-200HGW will have the option of an extra {{Convert|610|km|nmi|abbr=on}} of range, or an additional {{Convert|3.4|t|lb|abbr=on}} of payload over the standard 233-tonne -200. [[Korean Air]] became the first customer on 27 February 2009, ordering six -200HGWs. Deliveries of the first aircraft started in 2010.<ref>{{Cite press release|title=Korean Air orders six more A330-200s |publisher=Airbus S.A.S|date=27 February 2009 |url=http://www.airbus.com/newsevents/news-events-single/detail/korean-air-orders-six-more-a330-200s/search-results-1/|accessdate=21 May 2011}}</ref><!-- The delivery of 6 aircraft would raise the fleet to 25 aircraft. The latest 5-aircraft order said Korean had 23 aircraft in service, with two more A330-200s scheduled to be delivered. http://www.airbus.com/presscentre/pressreleases/press-release-detail/detail/korean-air-places-firm-order-for-five-more-a330s/ -->
In 2008, Airbus released plans for a higher [[gross weight]] version of the A330-200 to more effectively compete against the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.<ref name="A330-200HGW">{{Cite journal|title=Airbus to offer heavier A330 against delayed 787|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/09/10/315762/airbus-to-offer-heavier-a330-against-delayed-787.html|accessdate=10 February 2011|date=10 September 2008|work=Flight Global}}</ref> The new-build A330-200HGW will have the option of an extra {{Convert|610|km|nmi|abbr=on}} of range, or an additional {{Convert|3.4|t|lb|abbr=on}} of payload over the standard 233-tonne -200. [[Korean Air]] became the first customer on 27 February 2009, ordering six -200HGWs. Deliveries of the first aircraft started in 2010.<ref>{{Cite press release|title=Korean Air orders six more A330-200s |publisher=Airbus S.A.S|date=27 February 2009 |url=http://www.airbus.com/presscentre/pressreleases/press-release-detail/detail/korean-air-orders-six-more-a330-200s/|accessdate=21 May 2011}}</ref><!-- The delivery of 6 aircraft would raise the fleet to 25 aircraft. The latest 5-aircraft order said Korean had 23 aircraft in service, with two more A330-200s scheduled to be delivered. http://www.airbus.com/presscentre/pressreleases/press-release-detail/detail/korean-air-places-firm-order-for-five-more-a330s/ -->


===Military variants===
===Military variants===


==== Airbus A330 MRTT ====
==== Airbus A330 MRTT ====

[[File:A330-200 conversion to A330 MRTT.jpg|thumb|A team of engineering personnel assembled in front of a an A330 MRTT converted from an A330-200 |alt=Crowd of people assembled in front of unpainted aircraft. A tall building serves as the backdrop for the photograph]]
[[File:A330-200 conversion to A330 MRTT.jpg|thumb|A team of engineering personnel assembled in front of a an A330 MRTT converted from an A330-200 |alt=Crowd of people assembled in front of unpainted aircraft. A tall building serves as the backdrop for the photograph]]


Line 158: Line 205:
==== EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45 ====
==== EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45 ====


The [[EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45]] is a version of the A330 MRTT for the [[United States Air Force]] (USAF)'s [[KC-X]] aerial refuelling programme. In February 2008, the USAF selected the A330 MRTT variant, which they designated KC-45A, to replace the [[Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker]].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Gilmore|first=Gerry J. |title=Air Force Awards Tanker Contract to Northrop Grumman|work=defense.gov|date=29 January 2008|url=http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=49134|accessdate=10 November 2010}}</ref> The replacement process was mired in controversy, instances of corruption, and allegations of favouritism.<ref>{{Cite news| url=http://ca.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idCAN2861183920080302 |work=Reuters |title=Northrop, EADS tanker win sparks controversy in U.S |date=2 March 2008|last= Shalal-Esa|first=Andrea|accessdate=12 February 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite press release|title=Boeing Protests U.S. Air Force Tanker Contract Award|publisher=Boeing|date=11 March 2008|url=http://boeing.com/news/releases/2008/q1/080311b_nr.html |accessdate=12 March 2011}}</ref> In July 2010, EADS submitted a tanker bid to the USAF without [[Northrop Grumman]] as a partner.<ref>{{Cite press release |url=http://www.a330mrtt.com/Press/PressRelease/tabid/190/ArticleId/42/EADS-North-America-intends-to-submit-proposal-for-U-S-Air-Force-tanker-42.aspx |title=EADS North America intends to submit proposal for U.S. Air Force tanker |publisher=Airbus S.A.S |date=20 April 2010 |accessdate=8 March 2011}}</ref><ref name=KC-X_bids_in_July2010>{{Cite news| last=Trimble| first=Stephen| url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/07/09/344276/usaf-receives-three-proposals-for-kc-x-but-antonov-team-admits.html| title=USAF receives three proposals for KC-X, but Antonov team admits concerns| work=Flight International|date=9 July 2010| accessdate=31 January 2011}}</ref> However, on 24 February 2011, the USAF picked the [[Boeing KC-767]] proposal, later named [[Boeing KC-46|KC-46]], as the winner<ref>{{Cite news|last=Trimble|first=Stephen|title=EADS concedes KC-X contract award to Boeing|work=Flight International|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/03/04/353951/eads-concedes-kc-x-contract-award-to-boeing.html|date=4 March 2011|accessdate= 13 May 2011}}</ref> because its lower cost.<ref>{{Cite news|title=[UPDATED]: USAF selects Boeing for KC-X contract|last=Trimble|first=Stephen|work=Flight Global|date=24 February 2011|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/02/24/353642/updated-usaf-selects-boeing-for-kc-x-contract.html|accessdate=29 June 2011}}</ref>
The [[EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45]] is a version of the A330 MRTT for the United States Air Force (USAF)'s [[KC-X]] aerial refuelling programme. In February 2008, the USAF selected the A330 MRTT variant, which they designated KC-45A, to replace the [[Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker]].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Gilmore|first=Gerry J. |title=Air Force Awards Tanker Contract to Northrop Grumman|work=defense.gov|date=29 January 2008|url=http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=49134|accessdate=10 November 2010}}</ref> The replacement process was mired in controversy, instances of corruption, and allegations of favouritism.<ref>{{Cite news| url=http://ca.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idCAN2861183920080302 |work=Reuters |title=Northrop, EADS tanker win sparks controversy in U.S |date=2 March 2008|last= Shalal-Esa|first=Andrea|accessdate=12 February 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite press release|title=Boeing Protests U.S. Air Force Tanker Contract Award|publisher=Boeing|date=11 March 2008|url=http://boeing.com/news/releases/2008/q1/080311b_nr.html |accessdate=12 March 2011}}</ref> In July 2010, EADS submitted a tanker bid to the USAF without [[Northrop Grumman]] as a partner.<ref>{{Cite press release |url=http://www.a330mrtt.com/Press/PressRelease/tabid/190/ArticleId/42/EADS-North-America-intends-to-submit-proposal-for-U-S-Air-Force-tanker-42.aspx |title=EADS North America intends to submit proposal for U.S. Air Force tanker |publisher=Airbus S.A.S |date=20 April 2010 |accessdate=8 March 2011}}</ref><ref name=KC-X_bids_in_July2010>{{Cite news| last=Trimble| first=Stephen| url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/07/09/344276/usaf-receives-three-proposals-for-kc-x-but-antonov-team-admits.html| title=USAF receives three proposals for KC-X, but Antonov team admits concerns| work=Flight International|date=9 July 2010| accessdate=31 January 2011}}</ref> However, on 24 February 2011, the USAF picked the [[Boeing KC-767]] proposal, later named [[Boeing KC-46|KC-46]], as the winner because of its lower cost. <ref>{{Cite news|last=Trimble|first=Stephen|title=EADS concedes KC-X contract award to Boeing|work=Flight International|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/03/04/353951/eads-concedes-kc-x-contract-award-to-boeing.html|date=4 March 2011|accessdate= 13 May 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=[UPDATED]: USAF selects Boeing for KC-X contract|last=Trimble|first=Stephen|work=Flight Global|date=24 February 2011|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/02/24/353642/updated-usaf-selects-boeing-for-kc-x-contract.html|accessdate=29 June 2011}}</ref>


=== Undeveloped variants ===
=== Undeveloped variants ===
Line 165: Line 212:
{{See also|Airbus A350}}
{{See also|Airbus A350}}


To compete with Boeing's [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner#Background|7E7]], Airbus offered a minimum-change derivative called the A330-200''Lite'' in 2004. This aircraft was also to be a suitable replacement for the ageing Airbus A300-600Rs and earlier Boeing 767s.<ref name="A330-200Lite">{{Cite news |work=Bloomberg News |publisher=Pprune.org|title= Airbus Looks At Offering Lite A330 To Rival B7E7 |date= 29 May 2004 |last= Rothman |first= Andrea|url=http://www.pprune.org/dg-p-reporting-points/132026-airbus-looks-offering-lite-a330-rival-b7e7.html|accessdate=29 June 2011}}</ref> As the name indicated, this proposed variant would have had a lower maximum takeoff weight of {{Convert|202|t|lb}}, coupled with de-rated engines,<ref>{{Cite web |last= Ionides |first= Nicholas |coauthors= Max Kingsley-Jones |url= http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2004/06/15/182912/sia-widebody-decision-expected-soon.html |title= SIA widebody decision expected soon |work=Flight International |date= 15 June 2004 |accessdate= 8 April 2011}}</ref> giving a range of {{Convert|7400|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name="A330-200Lite"/> It was offered to a number of airlines, including [[Singapore Airlines]], who were looking to replace their Airbus A310-300s.<ref>{{Cite web |title= Emergence of 'A330-200 Lite' Unlikely to Impact Existing Values |publisher=Aviationtoday.com |date= 28 June 2004 |url= http://www.aviationtoday.com/manufacturers/boeing/Emergence-of-A330-200-Lite-Unlikely-to-Impact-Existing-Values_3681.html |accessdate= 21 February 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title= Singapore not ready to buy 7E7 |work=[[Seattle Post-Intelligencer]] |date= 26 August 2004 |url= http://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/Singapore-not-ready-to-buy-7E7-1152549.php|accessdate= 23 February 2011}}</ref> Airlines, however, were not satisfied with the compromised aircraft; the company instead proceed with an entirely new aircraft, the A350 XWB.<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=253}}</ref>
To compete with Boeing's [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner#Background|7E7]], Airbus offered a minimum-change derivative called the A330-200''Lite'' in 2004. As the name indicated, this proposed variant would have had a lower maximum takeoff weight of {{Convert|202|t|lb}}, coupled with de-rated engines, giving a range of {{Convert|7400|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref>{{Cite web |last= Ionides |first= Nicholas |coauthors= Max Kingsley-Jones |url= http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2004/06/15/182912/sia-widebody-decision-expected-soon.html |title= SIA widebody decision expected soon |work=Flight International |date= 15 June 2004 |accessdate= 8 April 2011}}</ref><ref name="A330-200Lite"/> It was aimed at [[Singapore Airlines]], who had looked to replace its Airbus A310-300s.<ref>{{Cite web |title= Emergence of 'A330-200 Lite' Unlikely to Impact Existing Values |publisher=Aviationtoday.com |date= 28 June 2004 |url= http://www.aviationtoday.com/manufacturers/boeing/Emergence-of-A330-200-Lite-Unlikely-to-Impact-Existing-Values_3681.html |accessdate= 21 February 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title= Singapore not ready to buy 7E7 |work=[[Seattle Post-Intelligencer]] |date= 26 August 2004 |url= http://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/Singapore-not-ready-to-buy-7E7-1152549.php|accessdate= 23 February 2011}}</ref> The variant was also to be a replacement for Airbus A300-600Rs and early Boeing 767s.<ref name="A330-200Lite">{{Cite news |work=Bloomberg News |publisher= Seattle Times |title= Airbus Looks At Offering Lite A330 To Rival B7E7 |date= 29 May 2004 |last= Rothman |first= Andrea|url=http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20040529&slug=airbuslite29 |accessdate= 29 June 2011}}</ref> Airlines, however, were not satisfied with the compromised aircraft; the company instead proceed with an entirely new aircraft, the A350 XWB.<ref>{{harvnb|Gunston|2009|p=253}}</ref>


==== A330-300HGW ====
==== A330-300HGW ====


The A330-300HGW was to be a higher gross weight version of the -300 at {{Convert|240|t|lb|abbr=on}}, a {{Convert|7|t|lb|adj=on}} increase over the -300, which called for structural strengthening of the wing. It was also to have an increased fuel capacity of {{Convert|139,100|L|USgal|abbr=on}}; the {{Convert|41,600|L|USgal|abbr=on|adj=on}} fuel capacity increase was possible through the adoption of the centre section fuel tank, and allowed for the range to be increased to {{Convert|11000|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name="Longer range A330-300">{{Cite journal|title=Longer-range A330-300 studied|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/2000/2000-1%20-%200487.html|work=Flight International|date=1–7 August 2000|accessdate=31 January 2011}}</ref> Among those that showed interest was leasing company ILFC, who was seeking airliners which could fly from the West Coast of the United States to Europe.<ref name="Longer range A330-300"/>
The A330-300HGW was to be a higher gross weight version of the -300 at {{Convert|240|t|lb|abbr=on}}, a {{Convert|7|t|lb|adj=on}} increase over the -300, which called for structural strengthening of the wing. It was also to have an increased fuel capacity of {{Convert|139,100|L|USgal|abbr=on}}; the {{Convert|41,600|L|USgal|abbr=on|adj=on}} fuel capacity increase was possible through the adoption of the centre section fuel tank, which allowed for a longer range of {{Convert|11000|km|nmi|abbr=on}}. Among those that showed interest was leasing company ILFC, who was seeking airliners which could fly from the West Coast of the United States to Europe.<ref name="Longer range A330-300">{{Cite journal|title=Longer-range A330-300 studied|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/2000/2000-1%20-%200487.html|work=Flight International|date=1–7 August 2000|accessdate=31 January 2011}}</ref>


Power was to be supplied by all three engines offered to the two other A330 passenger models, although plans were also considered for the -500 to be the first twinjet application of the [[Engine Alliance GP7000]],<ref name="Longer range A330-300"/> a joint programme between GE Aviation and Pratt & Whitney. It was scheduled to fly during the third quarter of 2003, with entry into service in 2004.<ref name="Longer range A330-300"/> However, the programme was ended after insufficient customer interest was secured.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Size or Speed|work=Flight International|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/2001/2001%20-%203055.html|accessdate=31 January 2011|last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max |date=4–10 September 2001}}</ref>
Power was to be supplied by all three engines offered to the two other A330 passenger models although plans were also considered for the -500 to be the first twinjet application of the [[Engine Alliance GP7000]], a joint programme between GE Aviation and Pratt & Whitney.<ref name="Longer range A330-300"/> It was scheduled to for entry into service in 2004.<ref name="Longer range A330-300"/> However, the programme was ended because customers were not interested enough.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Size or Speed|work=Flight International|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/2001/2001%20-%203055.html|accessdate=31 January 2011|last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max |date=4–10 September 2001}}</ref>


==== A330-500 ====
==== A330-500 ====


Also known as the A330-100,<ref name="Norris & Wagner p.103">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=103}}</ref> the A330-500 was a proposed "shrink" of the A330-200 version, launched in July 2000 at the Farnborough Airshow.<ref name="-500 rejections">{{Cite journal|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/2000/2000-1%20-%202110.html|title=Airline rejections threaten A330-500 launch|work=Flight International|date=17–23 April 2001|accessdate=31 January 2011|last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max and Peter Lewis}}</ref> The -500's maximum takeoff weight was to be {{Convert|228|t|lb|abbr=on}}, a {{Convert|5|t|lb|adj=on}} decrease from the A330-200, achieved by removing eight fuselage frames, four fore and four aft of the wing. This would allow for the seating of 222 passengers, and, with the reduced MTOW, was to give a range of {{Convert|12970|km|nmi|abbr=on}}. A lighter sub-variant, at {{Convert|195|t|lb|abbr=on}}, would have flown up to {{Convert|8060|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name=Frawley_A330>{{Cite book|last=Frawley |first=Gerald |title=The International Directory of Civil Aircraft, 2003/2004 |chapter= Airbus A330-200", "Airbus A330-300 |work=Aerospace Publications|location=Fyshwick, Australia |year=2003 |isbn1-875671-58-7}}</ref> The aircraft would have had 5 per cent better [[Thrust specific fuel consumption|specific fuel consumption]] than the A300-600, powered by either the CF6-80G2, PW4000, or the Trent 500.<ref name="Norris & Wagner p.103"/>
Also known as the A330-100, the A330-500 was a proposed "shrink" of the A330-200 version launched in July 2000 at the Farnborough Airshow.<ref name="Norris & Wagner p.103">{{harvnb|Norris|Wagner|2001|p=103}}</ref><ref name="-500 rejections">{{Cite journal|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/2000/2000-1%20-%202110.html|title=Airline rejections threaten A330-500 launch|work=Flight International|date=17–23 April 2001|accessdate=31 January 2011|last=Kingsley-Jones|first=Max and Peter Lewis}}</ref> The -500's maximum takeoff weight was to be {{Convert|228|t|lb|abbr=on}}, a {{Convert|5|t|lb|adj=on}} decrease from the A330-200, achieved by removing eight fuselage frames, four fore and four aft of the wing. This would allow for the seating of 222 passengers and, with the reduced MTOW, was to give a range of {{Convert|12970|km|nmi|abbr=on}}. A lighter sub-variant, at {{Convert|195|t|lb|abbr=on}}, would have flown up to {{Convert|8060|km|nmi|abbr=on}}.<ref name=Frawley_A330>{{Cite book|last=Frawley |first=Gerald |title=The International Directory of Civil Aircraft, 2003/2004 |chapter= Airbus A330-200", "Airbus A330-300 |work=Aerospace Publications|location=Fyshwick, Australia |year=2003 |isbn1-875671-58-7}}</ref> The aircraft would have had 5 per cent better [[Thrust specific fuel consumption|specific fuel consumption]] than the A300-600, powered by either the CF6-80G2, PW4000, or the Trent 500.<ref name="Norris & Wagner p.103"/>


Prospective customers included ILFC, [[CIT Group|CIT Aerospace]], Lufthansa, and [[Hapag-Lloyd]]. The latter two, however, were unimpressed with the long-range variant, preferring a shorter-range aircraft, which was better suited to their route structure.<ref name="-500 rejections"/> Singapore Airlines was also an expected customer, as they were looking for a replacement for the A310.<ref name="Norris & Wagner p.103"/><ref name="-500 rejections"/> Airbus intended to freeze the design in late 2001, with the first flight scheduled for the third quarter of 2003, and entry into service within a year.<ref name=Frawley_A330/> The programme was later abandoned, as interest from customers was lacking.<ref>{{cite web|work=[[Flight International]]|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2001/09/04/135649/size-or-speed.html|accessdate=25 May 2011|title=Size or speed|date=4 September 2001}}</ref>
Prospective customers included ILFC, [[CIT Group|CIT Aerospace]], Lufthansa, and [[Hapag-Lloyd]]. The latter two, however, were unimpressed with the long-range variant, preferring a shorter-range aircraft, which was better suited to their route structure.<ref name="-500 rejections"/> Singapore Airlines was also an expected customer because they were looking for a replacement for the A310.<ref name="Norris & Wagner p.103"/><ref name="-500 rejections"/> Airbus intended to freeze the design in late 2001, with the first flight scheduled for the third quarter of 2003 and entry into service within a year.<ref name=Frawley_A330/> The programme was later abandoned, as interest from customers was lacking.<ref>{{cite web|work=[[Flight International]]|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2001/09/04/135649/size-or-speed.html|accessdate=25 May 2011|title=Size or speed|date=4 September 2001}}</ref>


==Operators==
==Operators==
{{Main|List of Airbus A330 operators}}
{{Main|List of Airbus A330 operators}}


As of May 2011, 784 Airbus A330 of all types were in airline service.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> In May 2011 there were a total 418 A330-200s in service with various airlines, including [[Emirates (airline)|Emirates]] (27), [[Air China]] (20), [[TAM Linhas Aereas]] (20), Etihad Airways (16), [[Qatar Airways]] (16), Air France (15), and others with fewer aircraft.<ref name=Flight_Int_2010/> For the A330-300, there were 361 in service, with Cathay Pacific (32), Delta Air Lines (21), Thai Airways International (20), [[China Airlines]] (20), Korean Air (16), and others with smaller numbers.<ref name=Flight_Int_2010>{{Cite journal |title= World Airliner Census |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/08/23/346301/airliner-census-2010-fleet-growth-marginal-and-idle-jets-at-record.html |work=[[Flight International]] |page=31 |date= 24–30 August 2010}}</ref>
As of May 2011, 784 Airbus A330 of all types were in airline service.<ref name="Airbus_Orders"/> In May 2011 there were a total 418 A330-200s in service with various airlines, including [[Emirates (airline)|Emirates]] (27), [[Air China]] (20), [[TAM Linhas Aereas]] (20), Etihad Airways (16), [[Qatar Airways]] (16), and Air France (15).<ref name=Flight_Int_2010/> For the A330-300, there were 361 in service with major operators being Cathay Pacific (32), Delta Air Lines (21), Thai Airways International (20), [[China Airlines]] (20), and Korean Air (16).<ref name=Flight_Int_2010>{{Cite journal |title= World Airliner Census |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/08/23/346301/airliner-census-2010-fleet-growth-marginal-and-idle-jets-at-record.html |work=[[Flight International]] |page=31 |date= 24–30 August 2010}}</ref>


===Orders and deliveries===
===Orders and deliveries===
Line 210: Line 257:


* On 30 June 1994, an A330 owned by Airbus [[1994 A330 test flight crash|on a test flight]] simulating an engine failure on climbout crashed shortly after takeoff from Toulouse, killing all seven on board.<ref>{{Cite web |author=Aviation Safety Network |authorlink=Aviation Safety Network|title=Airbus A330-321, F-WWKH, 30&nbsp;June 1994 accident description |url=http://www.aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19940630-0|work=ASN Aviation Safety Database |publisher=[[Flight Safety Foundation]] |location=[[Alexandria, Virginia|Alexandria]], Virginia|year=2005 |accessdate=7 June 2009}}</ref>
* On 30 June 1994, an A330 owned by Airbus [[1994 A330 test flight crash|on a test flight]] simulating an engine failure on climbout crashed shortly after takeoff from Toulouse, killing all seven on board.<ref>{{Cite web |author=Aviation Safety Network |authorlink=Aviation Safety Network|title=Airbus A330-321, F-WWKH, 30&nbsp;June 1994 accident description |url=http://www.aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19940630-0|work=ASN Aviation Safety Database |publisher=[[Flight Safety Foundation]] |location=[[Alexandria, Virginia|Alexandria]], Virginia|year=2005 |accessdate=7 June 2009}}</ref>

* On 24 July 2001, the [[Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam]] [[Bandaranaike Airport attack|attacked Bandaranaike International Airport]], [[Colombo]], Sri Lanka. Two [[SriLankan Airlines]] A330s were destroyed, among other airliners and military aircraft.<ref name=flight_srilankan>{{cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2001/07/31/134058/srilankan-turns-to-emirates-for-help-after-raid.html|work=[[Flight International]]| accessdate=23 May 2011|title=SriLankan turns to Emirates for help after raid|date=31 July 2001}}</ref><ref name="srilanka">{{Cite web|url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20010724-1 |work= ASN Aviation Safety Database |publisher= [[Flight Safety Foundation]]|accessdate=3 August 2006 |title=ASN Aircraft accident description Airbus A.330-243 4R-ALF – Colombo-Bandaranayake Internation Airport}}</ref>
* On 24 July 2001, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam [[Bandaranaike Airport attack|attacked Bandaranaike International Airport]], Colombo, Sri Lanka. Two [[SriLankan Airlines]] A330s were destroyed among other airliners and military aircraft.<ref name=flight_srilankan>{{cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2001/07/31/134058/srilankan-turns-to-emirates-for-help-after-raid.html|work=[[Flight International]]| accessdate=23 May 2011|title=SriLankan turns to Emirates for help after raid|date=31 July 2001}}</ref><ref name="srilanka">{{Cite web|url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20010724-1 |work= ASN Aviation Safety Database |publisher= [[Flight Safety Foundation]]|accessdate=3 August 2006 |title=ASN Aircraft accident description Airbus A.330-243 4R-ALF – Colombo-Bandaranayake Internation Airport}}</ref>
* On 7 October 2008, [[Qantas Flight 72]], an A330-303 (VH-QPA), suffered a rapid loss of altitude in two sudden uncommanded pitch down manoeuvres, causing serious injuries while {{Convert|150|km|nmi|abbr=on}} from the [[RAAF Learmonth|Learmonth]] air base in northwestern Australia. After declaring an emergency, the aircraft landed safely at Learmonth. A total of 106 people onboard were injured, fourteen seriously. A year after the incident Qantas still did not know what caused the critical computer malfunction.<ref name="ATSB_MR_20081008">{{Cite press release |title= 2008/40 – Qantas Airbus Incident Media Conference |publisher=[[Australian Transport Safety Bureau]] (ATSB) |date= 8 October 2008|url= http://www.atsb.gov.au/newsroom/2008/release/2008_40.aspx |accessdate= 8 October 2008}}</ref>

* On 1 June 2009, [[Air France Flight 447]], an A330-203, en route from [[Rio de Janeiro]] to Paris with 228 people on board, disappeared over the Atlantic Ocean.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/06/01/327211/air-france-no-success-in-contacting-missing-a330.html |title=Air France: No success in contacting missing A330 |date=1 June 2009 |accessdate=1 June 2009 |work=Flight International, Air Transport Intelligence news|last=Kaminski-Morrow |first=David }}</ref> The aircraft crashed in the Atlantic Ocean {{convert|640|-|800|km|nmi}} northeast of the islands of [[Fernando de Noronha]]. All passengers and crew were killed. Malfunctioning [[pitot tube]]s provided an early focus for the investigation.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8087303.stm|title=Bodies found from missing plane |date=6 June 2009 |accessdate=6 June 2009 |publisher=BBC News}}</ref> <!-- This entry is a summary. Further details go in related ''Air France Flight 447'' article, not here. -->
* On 7 October 2008, [[Qantas Flight 72]], an A330-303 (VH-QPA), suffered a rapid loss of altitude in two sudden uncommanded pitch down manoeuvres causing serious injuries while {{Convert|150|km|nmi|abbr=on}} from the [[RAAF Learmonth|Learmonth]] air base in northwestern Australia. After declaring an emergency, the aircraft landed safely at Learmonth. 106 people onboard were injured, fourteen seriously. A year after the incident Qantas still did not know what caused the computer malfunction.<ref name="ATSB_MR_20081008">{{Cite press release |title= 2008/40 – Qantas Airbus Incident Media Conference |publisher=[[Australian Transport Safety Bureau]] (ATSB) |date= 8 October 2008|url= http://www.atsb.gov.au/newsroom/2008/release/2008_40.aspx |accessdate= 8 October 2008}}</ref>
* On 25 December 2009, a passenger on [[Northwest Airlines Flight 253]], an A330-300,<ref name="NYT-20091226-2">{{Cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/27/us/27plane.html|title=Passengers Took Plane's Survival Into Own Hands|date=26 December 2009|last1=Shane |first1=Scott and Eric Lipton|last2=|first2= |work=The New York Times |accessdate=26 December 2009}}</ref> attempted to detonate explosives in his underwear while the flight was in the air. Passengers and crew subdued the perpetrator, [[Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab]].<ref name="WSJ-20091226">{{Cite news|url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126184081273605825.html?mod=googlenews_wsj|title=Bomb Attempt Made on U.S.-Bound Flight|date=26 December 2009|last1=Boudette|first1=E. Neal, Andy Pasztor and Peter Spiegel|last2=|first2=|last3=|first3=|work=Dow Jones & Company, Inc|accessdate=26 December 2009}}</ref>

* On 1 June 2009, [[Air France Flight 447]], an A330-203, en route from [[Rio de Janeiro]] to Paris with 228 people on board, disappeared over the Atlantic Ocean.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/06/01/327211/air-france-no-success-in-contacting-missing-a330.html |title=Air France: No success in contacting missing A330 |date=1 June 2009 |accessdate=1 June 2009 |work=Air Transport Intelligence news|last=Kaminski-Morrow |first=David }}</ref> The aircraft crashed in the Atlantic Ocean {{convert|640|-|800|km|nmi}} northeast of the islands of [[Fernando de Noronha]]. All passengers and crew were killed. Malfunctioning [[pitot tube]]s provided an early focus for the investigation.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8087303.stm|title=Bodies found from missing plane |date=6 June 2009 |accessdate=6 June 2009 |publisher=BBC News}}</ref> <!-- This entry is a summary. Further details go in related ''Air France Flight 447'' article, not here. -->

* On 25 December 2009, a passenger on [[Northwest Airlines Flight 253]], an A330-300, attempted to detonate explosives in his underwear while the flight was in the air. Passengers and crew subdued the perpetrator, [[Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab]].<ref name="NYT-20091226-2">{{Cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/27/us/27plane.html|title=Passengers Took Plane's Survival Into Own Hands|date=26 December 2009|last1=Shane |first1=Scott and Eric Lipton|last2=|first2= |work=The New York Times |accessdate=26 December 2009}}</ref><ref name="WSJ-20091226">{{Cite news|url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126184081273605825.html?mod=googlenews_wsj|title=Bomb Attempt Made on U.S.-Bound Flight|date=26 December 2009|last1=Boudette|first1=E. Neal, Andy Pasztor and Peter Spiegel|last2=|first2=|last3=|first3=|work=Dow Jones & Company, Inc|accessdate=26 December 2009}}</ref>

* On 13 April 2010, an A330-300 on [[Cathay Pacific Flight 780]] from [[Surabaya]], Indonesia, with 309 passengers and thirteen crew on board, made an emergency landing at [[Hong Kong International Airport]] after a dual engine problem. Several tires deflated from severe braking as the aircraft landed at high speed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/04/14/340635/cathay-a330-in-high-energy-landing-had-dual-engine-problem.html |title=Cathay A330 in high-energy landing had dual engine problem |date=14 April 2010 |last1=Kaminski-Morrow |first1=David |work=Air Transport Intelligence|accessdate=2 March 2011}}</ref> Eight passengers were injured.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/04/13/340562/injuries-after-cathay-a330-engine-shuts-down-on-approach.html |title=Injuries after Cathay A330 engine shuts down on approach |date=13 April 2010 |last1=Kaminski-Morrow |first1=David |work=Air Transport Intelligence |accessdate=14 April 2010}}</ref> The preliminary incident report suggested that contamination of the fuel loaded at Surabaya caused the engine throttles to jam.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Contaminated fuel prime suspect in Cathay A330 throttle-jam |publisher=Flight Global|date=11 August 2010|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/08/11/346045/contaminated-fuel-prime-suspect-in-cathay-a330-throttle-jam.html|accessdate=2 March 2011|last=Kaminski-Morrow|first=David}}</ref>
* On 13 April 2010, an A330-300 on [[Cathay Pacific Flight 780]] from [[Surabaya]], Indonesia, with 309 passengers and thirteen crew on board, made an emergency landing at [[Hong Kong International Airport]] after a dual engine problem. Several tires deflated from severe braking as the aircraft landed at high speed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/04/14/340635/cathay-a330-in-high-energy-landing-had-dual-engine-problem.html |title=Cathay A330 in high-energy landing had dual engine problem |date=14 April 2010 |last1=Kaminski-Morrow |first1=David |work=Air Transport Intelligence|accessdate=2 March 2011}}</ref> Eight passengers were injured.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/04/13/340562/injuries-after-cathay-a330-engine-shuts-down-on-approach.html |title=Injuries after Cathay A330 engine shuts down on approach |date=13 April 2010 |last1=Kaminski-Morrow |first1=David |work=Air Transport Intelligence |accessdate=14 April 2010}}</ref> The preliminary incident report suggested that contamination of the fuel loaded at Surabaya caused the engine throttles to jam.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Contaminated fuel prime suspect in Cathay A330 throttle-jam |publisher=Flight Global|date=11 August 2010|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/08/11/346045/contaminated-fuel-prime-suspect-in-cathay-a330-throttle-jam.html|accessdate=2 March 2011|last=Kaminski-Morrow|first=David}}</ref>

* On 12 May 2010, [[Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771]], an A330-202, crashed on approach to [[Tripoli International Airport]], Libya on a flight from [[OR Tambo International Airport]], Johannesburg, South Africa. All but one of the 104 people on board were killed, the sole survivor being a nine-year-old Dutch boy.<ref name=BBC8676758>{{Cite news |url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8676758.stm|title = Plane crash in Libya 'kills more than 100 on board' |publisher=BBC News |date = 12 May 2010|accessdate=12 March 2011}}</ref>
* On 12 May 2010, [[Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771]], an A330-202, crashed on approach to [[Tripoli International Airport]], Libya, on a flight from [[OR Tambo International Airport]], Johannesburg, South Africa. All but one of the 104 people on board were killed The sole survivor was a nine-year-old Dutch boy.<ref name=BBC8676758>{{Cite news |url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8676758.stm|title = Plane crash in Libya 'kills more than 100 on board' |publisher=BBC News |date = 12 May 2010|accessdate=12 March 2011}}</ref>

<!-- Entries need to meet criteria at [[WP:AIRCRASH#Aircraft and airlines (A)]] to be added here. Thanks. -->
<!-- Entries need to meet criteria at [[WP:AIRCRASH#Aircraft and airlines (A)]] to be added here. Thanks. -->


Line 411: Line 465:
! over 180 min.
! over 180 min.
|-
|-
| A330-201 || 2002 || 2009 || [[General Electric CF6#CF6-80E1| General Electric CF6-80E1A2]]
| A330-201 || 2002 || 2009 || [[General Electric CF6#CF6-80E1|General Electric CF6-80E1A2]]
|-
|-
| A330-202 || 1998 || 2009 || CF6-80E1A4 / CF6-80E1A4B
| A330-202 || 1998 || 2009 || CF6-80E1A4 / CF6-80E1A4B
Line 425: Line 479:
| A330-223F || 2010 || N/A || PW4170
| A330-223F || 2010 || N/A || PW4170
|-
|-
| A330-243 || 1999 || 2009 || [[Rolls-Royce Trent 700| Rolls-Royce Trent 772B-60]]
| A330-243 || 1999 || 2009 || [[Rolls-Royce Trent 700|Rolls-Royce Trent 772B-60]]
|-
|-
| A330-243F || 2010 || N/A|| Trent 772B-60
| A330-243F || 2010 || N/A|| Trent 772B-60
Line 454: Line 508:
==See also==
==See also==
{{Portal box|Aviation}}
{{Portal box|Aviation}}
{{aircontent
|see also= <!-- other related articles that have not already linked: -->
* [[Competition between Airbus and Boeing]]
* [[Competition between Airbus and Boeing]]
|related= <!-- designs developed into or from this aircraft: -->
* [[Airbus A330 MRTT]]
* [[Airbus A340]]
|similar aircraft= <!-- aircraft that are of similar Role, Era, and Capability this design: -->
* [[Airbus A350]]
* [[Boeing 777|Boeing 777-200]]
* [[Boeing 787 Dreamliner]]
* [[Ilyushin Il-96]]
|lists= <!-- Relevant lists that this aircraft appears in. -->
* [[List of civil aircraft]]
* [[List of civil aircraft]]
<!-- See [[WP:Air/PC]] for more explanation of these fields. -->
<!-- See [[WP:Air/PC]] for more explanation of these fields. -->
}}
{{-}}


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 23:20, 2 July 2011

A330
A white, blue yellow and grey Lufthansa A330 on approach, configured for landing with gears down and flaps extended
Lufthansa A330-300 in landing configuration on approach to Frankfurt Airport in 2010
Role Wide-body jet airliner
National origin Multi-national
Manufacturer Airbus
First flight 2 November 1992
Introduction 17 January 1994 with Air Inter
Status In production
Primary users Delta Air Lines
Cathay Pacific
Qatar Airways
Emirates
Produced 1993–present
Number built 789 as of 31 May 2011[1]
Developed from Airbus A300
Variants Airbus A330 MRTT
EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45

The Airbus A330 is a wide-body, twin-engine, jet airliner made by Airbus, a division of EADS. Versions of the A330 have a range of 7,400 to 13,430 kilometres (4,000 to 7,250 nmi) and can accommodate up to 335 passengers in a two-class layout or carry 70 tonnes (150,000 lb) of cargo.

The origin of the A330 dates to the 1970s as one of several conceived derivatives of Airbus's first airliner, the A300. The A330 was developed in parallel with the A340, which shared many common airframe components but differed in having four engines. Both planes incorporated fly-by-wire flight controls technology, introduced by Airbus on the A320, and received the same display-filled "glass cockpit" as the A320. In June 1987, with enough orders from various customers, Airbus launched the A330 and A340. The A330 was Airbus's first airliner offered with three engine options; those being from General Electric, Pratt & Whitney, and Rolls-Royce.

The A330-300, the first variant, took its maiden flight in November 1992, and entered passenger service with Air Inter in January 1994. Responding to dwindling sales, Airbus followed up with the slightly shorter A330-200 variant in 1998, which has proved more popular. More recently developed A330 variants include a dedicated freighter and two tankers: the A330 MRTT and, in conjunction with Northrop Grumman, the proposed KC-45. In the U.S. Air Force's KC-X competition, the KC-45 won initially but, after appeal, lost to Boeing's tanker.

Since its launch, the A330 has allowed Airbus to expand market share in wide-body airliners. Airlines have selected the A330 as a replacement for less economical trijets and instead of rival twinjets. Boeing has offered variants of the 767 and 777 as competitors along with the 787, scheduled to enter service in late 2011. Airbus's A350 will also share this wide-body airliner market. As of May 2011 the A330's order book stood at 1,127, of which 789 had been delivered. The largest operator is Delta Air Lines with 32 aircraft. The A330 is expected to continue selling until at least 2015.

Development

Background

Four-wheel undercarriage unit of the A330/A340 on static display.
A330 undercarriage

Introduced in 1972, Airbus's first airliner, the A300, was envisioned as part of a diverse family of commercial aircraft.[2] In pursuit of this goal, studies began in the 1970s into derivatives of the A300.[2][3] Before introducing the A300, Airbus identified nine possible variations named A300B1 through B9.[4] A tenth variant, the A300B10, was conceived in 1973 and developed into the long-range Airbus A310.[5] Airbus then focused its efforts on single-aisle (SA) studies, coming up with a family of airliners later known as the Airbus A320 family, the first commercial aircraft with digital fly-by-wire controls. During the SA studies Airbus turned its focus back to the wide-body aircraft market, simultaneously working on both projects.[5]

During the mid-1970s, Airbus began development of the A300B9, a larger derivative of the A300, which would eventually become the A330. The B9 was essentially a lengthened A300 with the same wing, coupled with the most powerful turbofan engines available. It was targeted at the growing demand for high-capacity, medium-range, transcontinental trunk routes.[6] Offering the same range and payload as the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, but being 25 per cent more fuel efficient,[6] the B9 was seen as a viable replacement for the DC-10 and Lockheed L-1011 TriStar.[7]

At the same time, a 200-seat four-engine version, the B11, which would eventually become the A340, was also under development.[8] That aircraft was planned to take the place of less efficient Boeing 707s and Douglas DC-8s in commercial use.[9] To differentiate from the SA series, the B9 and B11 were re-designated as the TA9 and TA11, with TA standing for "twin aisle".[8] Development costs were reduced by using the same fuselage and wing for the two aircraft, with projected savings of US$500 million. Another factor was the split preference of those within Airbus and, more important, those of the company's prospective customers. Airbus vice-president for strategic planning, Adam Brown, recalled:

North American operators were clearly in favour of a twin, while Asians wanted a quad. In Europe, opinion was split between the two. The majority of potential customers were in favour of a quad despite the fact, in certain conditions, it is more costly to operate than a twin. ... They liked that it could be ferried with one engine out, and could 'fly anywhere'.[6][10]

Design effort

The first specifications for the TA9 and TA11, aircraft that could accommodate 410 passengers in a one-class layout, emerged in 1982.[11] They showed a large underfloor cargo volume that could hold five cargo pallets or sixteen LD3 cargo containers in the forward, and four pallets or fourteen LD3s in the aft hold—double the capacity of the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar or DC-10, and 8.46 metres (27.8 ft) longer than the Airbus A300.[12]

By June 1985, the TA9 and TA11 had received more improvements, including the adoption of the A320 flight deck, digital fly-by-wire (FBW) control system, and side-stick control.[13] The common cockpit of the new Airbus series allowed operators to save money because flight crews would be able to transition after only one week's training.[14] The two TAs would use the vertical stabiliser, rudder, and circular fuselage sections of the A300-600, extended by two barrel sections.[14]

Airbus briefly considered the variable camber wing, a concept that requires changing the wing profile for a given phase of flight. Studies were carried out by British Aerospace (BAe), now part of BAE Systems, at Hatfield and Bristol. Airbus estimated this would yield a two per cent improvement in aerodynamic efficiency,[15] but the feature was rejected because of cost and difficulty of development.[8] A true laminar flow wing (a low-drag shape that improves fuel efficiency) was also considered but rejected.[16]

A mostly blue jet engine suspended on a wing; it is characterised by its smooth nacelle, or outer casing.
The A330 was the first Airbus application for which Rolls-Royce supplied engines, with its Trent 700 turbofans.[17]

Airbus decided from the start that the A330 would have a choice of engines from the three major engine manufacturers, Rolls-Royce, Pratt & Whitney, and GE Aviation. GE Aviation first offered the General Electric CF6-80C2. However, later studies indicated that more thrust was needed to increase the initial power capability from 267 to 289 kN (60,000 to 65,000 lbf).[18] GE took the CF6-80C2 and enlarged the fan from 236 to 244 centimetres (93 to 96 in) to create the CF6-80E1, giving a new thrust output of 300–320 kN (67,000–72,000 lbf).[19] Rolls-Royce initially wanted to use the 267 kN (60,000 lbf) Trent 600 to power Airbus's newest twinjet and the upcoming McDonnell Douglas MD-11. However, the company later agreed to develop an engine solely for the A330, the Trent 700, with a larger diameter and 311 kN (70,000 lbf) of thrust.[20] Similarly, Pratt & Whitney signed an agreement that covered the development of the A330-only PW4168. The company increased the fan size to augment power,[21] enabling the engine to deliver 311 kN (70,000 lbf) of thrust.[22]

On 27 January 1986, the Airbus Industrie Supervisory Board held a meeting in Munich, West Germany. Afterwards, the board chairman, Franz Josef Strauß, released a statement that said, "Airbus Industrie is now in a position to finalise the detailed technical definition of the TA9, which is now officially designated the A330, and the TA11, now called the A340, with potential launch customer airlines, and to discuss with them the terms and conditions for launch commitments". The designations were originally reversed; they were switched so the quad-jet airliner would have a "4" in its name. On 12 May, Airbus sent sale proposals to five airlines, including Lufthansa and Swissair.[13]

Production and testing

In preparation for production of the A330 and A340, Airbus's partners invested heavily in new facilities. In England, Filton was the site of BAe's £7 million investment in a three-storey technical centre with 15,000 m2 (160,000 sq ft) of floor area.[23] BAe also spent £5 million adding a new production line to its Chester wing production plant.[23] In Germany, Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm (MBB) invested DM400 million ($225 million) at various manufacturing facilities in the Weser estuary, including at Bremen, Einswarden, Varel, and Hamburg.[24] France saw the biggest investments, with Aérospatiale starting construction of a new Fr.2.5 billion ($411 million) final-assembly plant adjacent to Toulouse-Blagnac Airport in Colomiers; by November 1988, the pillars for the new Clément Ader assembly hall had been erected.[25] The assembly process would feature increased automation, such as robots drilling holes and installing fasteners during the wing-to-fuselage mating process.[26]

View from the air. Runway to the left and bottom. To the right long buildings and lots of aircraft.
Final assembly area for the A330, next to Toulouse-Blagnac Airport

On 12 March 1987, Airbus received the first orders for the twinjet. The domestic French airline Air Inter placed five firm orders and fifteen options, while Thai Airways International requested eight aircraft, split evenly between firm orders and options.[27][28] Airbus announced the next day that it would formally launch the A330/A340 programme by mid-April 1987, with deliveries of the A340 to begin in May 1992, and A330 deliveries to start in 1993. Northwest Airlines followed the other airlines by signing a letter of intent for twenty A340s and ten A330s on 31 March.[28]

BAe eventually received £450 million of funding from the UK government, well short of the £750 million they had originally requested for the design and construction of the wings.[29] The German and French governments also provided funding. Airbus issued subcontracts to companies in Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Greece, Italy, India, Japan, South Korea, Portugal, the United States, and the former Yugoslavia.[30]

With funding in place, Airbus launched the A330 and A340 programmes on 5 June 1987, just prior to the Paris Air Show.[29][31] At that time, the order book stood at 130 aircraft from ten customers, including lessor International Lease Finance Corporation (ILFC). Of the order total, forty-one were for A330s.[29] In 1989, Asian carrier Cathay Pacific joined the list of purchasers, ordering nine A330s and later increasing this number to eleven.[32]

The wing-fuselage mating of the first A330, the tenth airframe of the A330/A340 line, began in mid-February 1992. This aircraft, coated with anti-corrosion paint, was rolled out on 31 March without its General Electric CF6-80E1 engines, which were installed by August. During a static test, the wing failed just below requirement, but BAe engineers later solved the problem.[33] At the Farnborough Airshow that year, Northwest deferred delivery of sixteen A330s to 1994.[34]

The first completed A330 was rolled out on 14 October 1992, with the maiden flight following on 2 November. Weighing 181,840 kg (401,000 lb), including 20,980 kg (46,300 lb) of test equipment,[33] the A330 became the biggest twinjet to have flown although later eclipsed by the Boeing 777. The flight lasted five hours and fifteen minutes during which speed, height, and other flight configurations were tested. Ultimately Airbus intended the test flight programme to consist of six aircraft flying a total of 1,800 hours.[33] On 21 October 1993, the Airbus A330 received the European Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) and US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certification simultaneously after the culmination of 1,114 airborne test hours and 426 test flights. At the same time, weight tests came in favorable, showing the plane was 500 kg (1,100 lb) under weight.[35]

On 30 June 1994, trouble struck during certification of the Pratt & Whitney engine when an A330 crashed near Toulouse.[36] Both pilots and the five passengers died.[37] The flight was designed to test autopilot response during a worst-case scenario with the centre of gravity near its aft limit. The accident was investigated by an internal branch of Direction General d'Aviation, which revealed that the accident resulted from slow response and incorrect actions by the crew during the recovery.[38]

Entry into service

White jet passenger aircraft with thick green cheatline taking off from runway.
Cathay Pacific was one of the first operators of the A330.

Air Inter became the first operator of the A330, putting the aircraft into service on 17 January 1994 between Orly Airport, Paris, and Marseille.[39] Deliveries to Malaysia Airlines (MAS) and Thai Airways International were postponed because of delamination of the composite materials in the PW4168 engine's thrust reverser assembly. Thai Airways received its first A330 during the second half of the year, operating it on routes from Bangkok to Taipei and Seoul.[40][41] Cathay Pacific received its Trent 700 powered A330s following the certification of that engine on 22 December 1994.[38] MAS received its A330 on 1 February 1995 and then rescheduled its other ten orders.[41]

Airbus intended the A330 to compete in the Extended-range Twin-engine Operation Performance Standards (ETOPS) market, specifically with the Boeing 767.[42] (ETOPS is a standard that allows longer range flights away from a diversion airport for aircraft that have met special design and testing standards.) Instead of the "ETOPS out of the box" or "Early ETOPS" approach taken by Boeing with its 777,[Nb 1] Airbus gradually increased ETOPS approval on the A330 using in-service experience. Airbus suggested that the A340 and A330 were essentially identical except for their engine number; the A340's experience could be applied to the A330's ETOPS approval.[43] The plans were for all three engine types to enter service with 90-minute approval, before increasing to 120 minutes after the total A330 fleet accumulated 25,000 flight hours, and then to 180 minutes after 50,000 flight hours, in 1995.[44][Nb 2] Aer Lingus and Cathay Pacific were two important airlines assisting Airbus in this endeavour by building up in-service flight hours on over-ocean flights.[45] In November 2009, the A330 became the first aircraft to receive ETOPS–240 approval, which has since been offered by Airbus as an option.[46]

Further development and ongoing sales

In response to dwindling A330-300 sales, increased market penetration by the Boeing 767-300ER, and airline requests for increased-range and smaller aircraft, Airbus developed the Airbus A330-200.[47] Known as the A329 and A330M10 during development, the A330-200 would offer nine per cent lower operating costs than the Boeing 767-300ER.[48] The plane was aimed at the 11,900 km (6,400 nmi) sector, where Airbus predicted demand for 800 aircraft between 1995 and 2015.[48] The project, with US$450 million in expected development costs, was approved by the Airbus Industrie Supervisory Board on 24 November 1995.[48]

An white A330 with blue engines and tail is taxiing on an apron under a foggy overcast; the foreground is dominated by green grass, while a hangar is visible in the background.
An Air Transat A330-200. The variant was introduced to combat flagging sales and had longer range than the A330-300.

The A330-200 first flew on 13 August 1997.[49] The sixteen-month certification process involved logging 630 hours of test flights.[49] The A300-200's first customer was ILFC; these aircraft were leased by Canada 3000, who became the A330-200's first operator.[50]

As Airbus worked on its A330-200, hydraulic pump problems were reported by both A330 and A340 operators. This issue was the suspected cause of a fire that destroyed an Air France A340 in January 1994.[51] On 4 January that year, a Malaysia Airlines A330-300, while undergoing regular maintenance at Singapore Changi Airport, was consumed by a fire that started in the right-hand main undercarriage well. The incident caused US$30 million in damage, and the aircraft took six months to repair.[51][52] Consequently, operators were advised to disable electrical pumps in January 1997.[51]

Another issue was in-flight shutdowns of the Trent 700-powered A330-300s. On 11 November 1996, engine failure on a Cathay Pacific flight forced it back to Ho Chi Minh City.[53] On 17 April 1997, Cathay Pacific's affiliate, Dragonair, experienced an engine shutdown on an A330, caused by carbon clogging the oil filter. As a result, Cathay Pacific self-suspended its 120-minute ETOPS clearance. Another engine failure occurred on 6 May during climbout with a Cathay Pacific A330. The problem was traced to a bearing failure in the gearbox built by Hispano-Suiza. Three days later, a Cathay Pacific A330 on climbout during a Bangkok–Hong Kong flight experienced a drop in oil pressure. The resultant engine spool down forced the flight back to Bangkok. The cause was later traced to metal contamination in the engine's master chip.[54] Cathay Pacific and Dragonair voluntarily grounded their A330 fleets for two weeks[55] following a fifth engine failure on 23 May. The combined fifteen-aircraft grounding caused major disruption because Cathay's eleven A330s made up fifteen per cent of its passenger capacity. Rolls-Royce and Hispano-Suiza worked to resolve the problem, and a redesigned system for lubricating the areas involved was dispatched to airlines.[54]

A A330-200F in Airbus's white and blue livery on display under a partly cloudy but otherwise clear sky. The engine inlets are covered.
The freighter variant, the A330-200F, debuts at the Singapore Airshow 2010.[56]

Airbus next worked on an A330 freighter variant. Responding to flagging A300-600F and A310F sales, the company began marketing the Airbus A330-200F, a derivative of the A330-200, around 2001.[57] The freighter has a range of 7,400 km (4,000 nmi) with 65 t (143,000 lb) on board, or 5,900 km (3,200 nmi) with 70 t (150,000 lb).[58] The plane features a larger nosegear than the passenger-carrying A330. Housed in a distinctive bulbous "blister fairing", the gear emerges to raise the nose of the aircraft so that the cargo deck is level during loading.[59]

The A330-200F made its maiden flight on 5 November 2009.[60][61] This marked the start of a four-month, 180-hour, certification programme. JAA and FAA certifications were expected by March the following year although approval by the JAA was delayed until April.[60][62] The first delivery was subsequently made to the Etihad Airways cargo division, Etihad Crystal Cargo, in July 2010.[63][64]

By the end of May 2011, a total of 1,127 A330s had been ordered, with 789 delivered.[1] The largest operators of the A330 are the 32 run by Delta Air Lines—which had an all-Boeing fleet before getting its A330s in its merger with Northwest Airlines—and Cathay Pacific with 31.[1] Airbus announced in February 2011 that it intended to raise production rates from seven-and-a-half to eight per month to nine per month in 2012, and ten per month in 2013.[65] Airbus expects the A330 to continue selling until at least 2015.[66]

Design

The undercarriage of an A330 have been retracted, showing an underside view of an A330 during flight. Under each wing is a turbofan engine.
Planform view of a Cyprus Airways A330-200, showing the long slender wing

The A330 is a medium-size, wide-body airliner, with two engines suspended on pylons under the wings. On the ground, the two-wheel nose undercarriage and two 4-wheel bogie main legs built by Messier-Dowty support a maximum ramp weight (MRW) of 230.9 t (509,000 lb), while the designed maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) is 230 t (510,000 lb) on the A330-200 variant. An option allows a maximum ramp weight of 233.9 t (516,000 lb) with a maximum takeoff weight of 233.0 t (513,700 lb).[67]

The A330 is a low-wing cantilever monoplane with a wing virtually identical to that of the Airbus A340. The wing is swept back at 30 degrees and, along with other design features, allows a maximum operating Mach number of 0.86.[68][69] Originally designed with a 56 m (183 ft 9 in) span, it was later extended to 58.6 m (192 ft 3 in) and finally to 60.3 m (197 ft 10 in).[28] Each wing also has a 2.74 m (9 ft 0 in) tall winglet instead of the wingtip fences found on earlier Airbus aircraft. The wing has a very high thickness-to-chord ratio of 12.8 per cent, which means that a long span and high aspect ratio can be attained without a severe weight penalty.[70] For comparison, the rival MD-11 has a thickness-to-chord ratio of 8–9 per cent.[70]

The A330 benefited from the A340 wing development.[71] The failure of International Aero Engines to deliver the radical ultra-high-bypass V2500 "SuperFan", which had promised a significant fuel burn reduction of around 15 per cent for the A340, led Airbus to redesign, among other things, the A340 wing to compensate.[72][28] The wings were designed and manufactured by BAe, and the new design was a long slender wing with a very high aspect ratio to provide high aerodynamic efficiency.[73][Nb 3] At 60.3 m (198 ft), the wingspan is similar to the larger Boeing 747-200 but with 65 per cent of the wing area.[68][75]

Cockpit of the A330. All instruments and displays are switched on. Two seats occupy both sides of the cockpit, separated by a center console.
The A330 adopted the six-screen cockpit design also used with the A320 and A340.

The A330/A340 airframe is based on that of the Airbus A300-600, with many common parts, and has the same fuselage and cabin width: 5.64 m (18 ft 6 in) and 5.28 m (17 ft 4 in).[75][76] Allowed seating is 2–2–2 six-abreast in first and business class, and 2–4–2 eight-abreast in economy.[77][78] The vertical stabiliser and rudder are made mostly of composite materials.[79][80]

The A330 shares the same "glass cockpit" flight deck layout as the A320 and A340, featuring electronic instrument displays rather than mechanical gauges.[81] Instead of a conventional control yoke, the flight deck features side-stick controls, six main displays, and the Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS), which covers navigation and flight displays, as well as Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor (ECAM).[78][82] Apart from the flight deck, the A330 also has the fly-by-wire system common to the A320 family, the A340, the A380, and the upcoming A350. It also features three primary and two secondary flight control systems, as well as a flight envelope limit protection system.[78]

Variants

A330-300

A white A330 with a blue underside and red markings is seen taking off against a dark and cloudy overcast; the undercarriage are retracting.
An A330-300, the original variant, of US Airways taking off

The A330-300, which entered service in 1993, was developed as a replacement for the A300. It is based on a stretched A300-600 fuselage 63.69 m (208 ft 11 in) long but with new wings, stabilisers and fly-by-wire systems. The -300 carries 295 passengers in a three-class cabin layout, 335 in two-class, or 440 in a single-class layout. It has a range of 10,500 km (5,700 nmi). The -300 has a large cargo capacity, comparable to that of early Boeing 747s. It is powered by the choice of two General Electric CF6-80E, Pratt & Whitney PW4000, or Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines, all of which are ETOPS-180 rated. On the ground, it uses the Honeywell 331–350C auxiliary power unit (APU).[83][75]

As of May 2011, 508 -300s had been ordered, 362 of which had been delivered, with 361 remaining in operation.[1] The 2011 list price is $222.5 million.[84] The closest competitors have been the Boeing 777-200 and the now-out-of-production McDonnell Douglas MD-11.[85] Airbus is planning a two-tonne increase in maximum gross weight of the -300.[86]

A330-200

Twin-engine passenger jet with undercarriage extended during approach for landing
An EgyptAir A330-200 during a landing approach. The absence of a centre-line main undercarriage distinguishes the A330 from the A340.

The A330-200 is a shortened, longer-range A330, which entered service in 1998. Typical range with 253 passengers in a three-class configuration is 13,400 km (7,200 nmi).[76] The A330-200 is ten fuselage frames shorter than the original -300, with a length of 58.82 m (193 ft 0 in).[76][87] To compensate for the smaller moment arm of the shorter fuselage, the vertical stabiliser height of the -200 was increased by 104 cm (41 in).[88] The -200's wing was also modified; structural strengthening of the wing allowed the maximum takeoff weight of the -200 to be increased to 229.8 t (507,000 lb).[88] The -200 is offered with three engine types similar to those found on the -300 and uses a similar APU.[83] Airbus also boosted fuel capacity by using the centre section 139,100 L (36,700 US gal) fuel tank, standard in the A340.[49]

As of March 2011, 558 of the -200 had been ordered, 412 of which had been delivered, with 408 aircraft still in operation.[1] The 2011 list price is $200.8 million.[84] The changes made to the -200 significantly improved the economics of the aircraft and made the variant more popular than the four-engine A340.[1] The -200 competes with the Boeing 767-300ER and to a lesser extent the 767-400ER.[87][89] The 787 Dreamliner poses future competition.[90] The A330-200 is also available as an ultra-long-range corporate jet from Airbus Executive and Private Aviation, under the banner "A330-200 Prestige".[91]

A330-200F

An aircraft in white livery with blue markings is taking off against a solid blue sky.
The first Airbus A330-200F during climbout, with undercarriage still retracting. The blister fairing under the nose was added to correct nose-down attitude inherent on passenger versions[59]

The A330-200F is an all-cargo derivative of the A330-200 capable of carrying 65 t (143,000 lb) over 7,400 km (4,000 nmi) or 70 t (150,000 lb) up to 5,900 km (3,200 nmi).[58] To overcome the standard A330's nose-down body angle on the ground, the A330F uses a revised nose undercarriage layout to provide a level deck during cargo loading. The normal A330-200 undercarriage is used, but its attachment points are lower in the fuselage, thus requiring a distinctive blister fairing on the nose to accommodate the retracted nose gear.[92] Power is provided by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 or Rolls-Royce Trent 700 engines. General Electric does not plan to offer an engine for the A330-200F.[93]

As of May 2011, Airbus had 57 firm orders. The list price is $203.6 million.[84] As well as new-build freighters, Airbus has proposed passenger-to-freighter conversions of existing -200 airliners.[94] Comparable freighters to the -200F include Boeing's 767-300F.[95]

A330-200HGW

In 2008, Airbus released plans for a higher gross weight version of the A330-200 to more effectively compete against the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.[96] The new-build A330-200HGW will have the option of an extra 610 km (330 nmi) of range, or an additional 3.4 t (7,500 lb) of payload over the standard 233-tonne -200. Korean Air became the first customer on 27 February 2009, ordering six -200HGWs. Deliveries of the first aircraft started in 2010.[97]

Military variants

Airbus A330 MRTT

Crowd of people assembled in front of unpainted aircraft. A tall building serves as the backdrop for the photograph
A team of engineering personnel assembled in front of a an A330 MRTT converted from an A330-200

The Airbus A330 MRTT is the Multi-Role Transport and Tanker (MRTT) version of the A330-200, designed for aerial refuelling and strategic transport.[98] As of June 2011, the A330 MRTT has been ordered by the air forces of Australia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom.[99][100]

EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45

The EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45 is a version of the A330 MRTT for the United States Air Force (USAF)'s KC-X aerial refuelling programme. In February 2008, the USAF selected the A330 MRTT variant, which they designated KC-45A, to replace the Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker.[101] The replacement process was mired in controversy, instances of corruption, and allegations of favouritism.[102][103] In July 2010, EADS submitted a tanker bid to the USAF without Northrop Grumman as a partner.[104][105] However, on 24 February 2011, the USAF picked the Boeing KC-767 proposal, later named KC-46, as the winner because of its lower cost. [106][107]

Undeveloped variants

A330-200Lite

To compete with Boeing's 7E7, Airbus offered a minimum-change derivative called the A330-200Lite in 2004. As the name indicated, this proposed variant would have had a lower maximum takeoff weight of 202 tonnes (445,000 lb), coupled with de-rated engines, giving a range of 7,400 km (4,000 nmi).[108][109] It was aimed at Singapore Airlines, who had looked to replace its Airbus A310-300s.[110][111] The variant was also to be a replacement for Airbus A300-600Rs and early Boeing 767s.[109] Airlines, however, were not satisfied with the compromised aircraft; the company instead proceed with an entirely new aircraft, the A350 XWB.[112]

A330-300HGW

The A330-300HGW was to be a higher gross weight version of the -300 at 240 t (530,000 lb), a 7-tonne (15,000 lb) increase over the -300, which called for structural strengthening of the wing. It was also to have an increased fuel capacity of 139,100 L (36,700 US gal); the 41,600 L (11,000 US gal) fuel capacity increase was possible through the adoption of the centre section fuel tank, which allowed for a longer range of 11,000 km (5,900 nmi). Among those that showed interest was leasing company ILFC, who was seeking airliners which could fly from the West Coast of the United States to Europe.[113]

Power was to be supplied by all three engines offered to the two other A330 passenger models although plans were also considered for the -500 to be the first twinjet application of the Engine Alliance GP7000, a joint programme between GE Aviation and Pratt & Whitney.[113] It was scheduled to for entry into service in 2004.[113] However, the programme was ended because customers were not interested enough.[114]

A330-500

Also known as the A330-100, the A330-500 was a proposed "shrink" of the A330-200 version launched in July 2000 at the Farnborough Airshow.[115][116] The -500's maximum takeoff weight was to be 228 t (503,000 lb), a 5-tonne (11,000 lb) decrease from the A330-200, achieved by removing eight fuselage frames, four fore and four aft of the wing. This would allow for the seating of 222 passengers and, with the reduced MTOW, was to give a range of 12,970 km (7,000 nmi). A lighter sub-variant, at 195 t (430,000 lb), would have flown up to 8,060 km (4,350 nmi).[117] The aircraft would have had 5 per cent better specific fuel consumption than the A300-600, powered by either the CF6-80G2, PW4000, or the Trent 500.[115]

Prospective customers included ILFC, CIT Aerospace, Lufthansa, and Hapag-Lloyd. The latter two, however, were unimpressed with the long-range variant, preferring a shorter-range aircraft, which was better suited to their route structure.[116] Singapore Airlines was also an expected customer because they were looking for a replacement for the A310.[115][116] Airbus intended to freeze the design in late 2001, with the first flight scheduled for the third quarter of 2003 and entry into service within a year.[117] The programme was later abandoned, as interest from customers was lacking.[118]

Operators

As of May 2011, 784 Airbus A330 of all types were in airline service.[1] In May 2011 there were a total 418 A330-200s in service with various airlines, including Emirates (27), Air China (20), TAM Linhas Aereas (20), Etihad Airways (16), Qatar Airways (16), and Air France (15).[119] For the A330-300, there were 361 in service with major operators being Cathay Pacific (32), Delta Air Lines (21), Thai Airways International (20), China Airlines (20), and Korean Air (16).[119]

Orders and deliveries

Orders Deliveries
Type Total Backlog Total 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
A330-200 562 140 422 18 32 38 49 42 39 29 25 19 36 16 27 40 12
A330-200F 57 52 5 5
A330-300 508 146 362 21 50 38 23 26 23 27 22 12 6 19 16 4 11 14 10 30 9 1
Total[1] 1,127 338 789 39 87 76 72 68 62 56 47 31 42 35 43 44 23 14 10 30 9 1

Accidents and incidents

As of June 2011, the Airbus A330 had been involved in thirteen major incidents,[120] including six confirmed hull-loss accidents[121] and two hijackings, for a total of 338 fatalities.[122] The following are notable accidents and incidents:

  • On 30 June 1994, an A330 owned by Airbus on a test flight simulating an engine failure on climbout crashed shortly after takeoff from Toulouse, killing all seven on board.[123]
  • On 7 October 2008, Qantas Flight 72, an A330-303 (VH-QPA), suffered a rapid loss of altitude in two sudden uncommanded pitch down manoeuvres causing serious injuries while 150 km (81 nmi) from the Learmonth air base in northwestern Australia. After declaring an emergency, the aircraft landed safely at Learmonth. 106 people onboard were injured, fourteen seriously. A year after the incident Qantas still did not know what caused the computer malfunction.[126]
  • On 1 June 2009, Air France Flight 447, an A330-203, en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris with 228 people on board, disappeared over the Atlantic Ocean.[127] The aircraft crashed in the Atlantic Ocean 640–800 kilometres (350–430 nmi) northeast of the islands of Fernando de Noronha. All passengers and crew were killed. Malfunctioning pitot tubes provided an early focus for the investigation.[128]
  • On 13 April 2010, an A330-300 on Cathay Pacific Flight 780 from Surabaya, Indonesia, with 309 passengers and thirteen crew on board, made an emergency landing at Hong Kong International Airport after a dual engine problem. Several tires deflated from severe braking as the aircraft landed at high speed.[131] Eight passengers were injured.[132] The preliminary incident report suggested that contamination of the fuel loaded at Surabaya caused the engine throttles to jam.[133]


Specifications

A330-200 A330-200F A330-300
Cockpit crew Two
Seating capacity,
typical
253 (3-class)
293 (2-class)
380 (maximum)
n/a 295 (3-class)
335 (2-class)
440 (maximum)
Length 58.82 m (193 ft 0 in) 63.69 m (208 ft 11 in)
Wingspan 60.3 m (197 ft 10 in)
Wing area 361.6 m2 (3,892 sq ft)
Wing sweepback 30°
Tail height 17.39 m (57 ft 1 in) 16.90 m (55 ft 5 in) 16.83 m (55 ft 3 in)
Cabin width 5.28 m (17 ft 4 in)
Fuselage width 5.64 m (18 ft 6 in)
Cargo capacity 136 m3 (4,800 cu ft) 475 m3 (16,800 cu ft)
70 t / up to 12 couriers[95]
162.8 m3 (5,750 cu ft)
Operating empty weight
(typical)
119,600 kg (263,700 lb) 109,000 kg (240,000 lb) 124,500 kg (274,500 lb)
Maximum takeoff weight
(MTOW)
230,000 kg (510,000 lb)
to 238,000 kg (525,000 lb)
227,000 kg (500,000 lb)
to 233,000 kg (514,000 lb)
230,000 kg (510,000 lb)
to 235,000 kg (518,000 lb)
Maximum landing weight 180,000 kg (396,900 lb) 185,000 kg (407,925 lb)
Cruising speed Mach 0.82 (871 km/h/537 mph at 11,000 m/36,000 ft)
Maximum operating speed Mach 0.86 (913 km/h/563 mph at 11,000 m/36,000 ft)
Maximum range, fully loaded 13,430 km (7,250 nmi) 7,400 km (4,000 nmi) 10,830 km (5,850 nmi)
Takeoff distance at MTOW 2,220 m (7,280 ft) n/a 2,500 m (8,200 ft)
Maximum fuel capacity 139,090 L (36,740 US gal) 97,530 L (25,760 US gal)
Service ceiling 12,527 m (41,100 ft)
Engines (×2)
(see below)
General Electric CF6-80E1
Pratt & Whitney PW4000
Rolls-Royce Trent 700
Pratt & Whitney PW4000
Rolls-Royce Trent 700
General Electric CF6-80E1
Pratt & Whitney PW4000
Rolls-Royce Trent 700
Thrust (×2) 287–320 kN (65,000–72,000 lbf) 287–316 kN (65,000–71,000 lbf) 287–320 kN (65,000–72,000 lbf)

Source: Airbus,[67][69][75][76][135][136] Pratt & Whitney,[22] EASA,[137] FAA,[138] The International Directory of Civil Aircraft[117]

Engines

Variant ETOPS approval date[137] Engine type(s)[137]
180 minutes over 180 min.
A330-201 2002 2009 General Electric CF6-80E1A2
A330-202 1998 2009 CF6-80E1A4 / CF6-80E1A4B
A330-203 2001 2009 CF6-80E1A3
A330-223 1998–2009 2009 Pratt & Whitney PW4168A / PW4168A-1D / PW4170
A330-223F 2010 N/A PW4170
A330-243 1999 2009 Rolls-Royce Trent 772B-60
A330-243F 2010 N/A Trent 772B-60
A330-301 1995 2009 CF6-80E1A2
A330-302 2007 2009 CF6-80E1A4
A330-303 2007 2009 CF6-80E1A3
A330-321 1995 2011 PW4164
A330-322 1995 2011 PW4168
A330-323 1999–2009 2009 PW4168A / PW4168A-1D / PW4168B / PW4170
A330-341 1996 2009 Trent 768-60
A330-342 1996 2009 Trent 772-60
A330-343 1999 2009 Trent 772B-60
A330-343 2006 2009 Trent 772C-60

See also

References

Notes
  1. ^ This meant that the Boeing 777 was certified for 180-minutes ETOPS from the first day of service. As a result, the aircraft could be 180 minutes (3 hours) of flying time from a diversionary airport during transoceanic services.
  2. ^ After a total of 25,000 airborne hours, the A330 would be allowed a maximum of 120 minutes (2 hours) of flight time from a diversionary airport. After 50,000 hours, the limit would be raised to 180 minutes (3 hours).
  3. ^ The higher the aspect ratio, the greater the aerodynamic efficiency.[74]
Citations
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h "Airbus orders and deliveries" (Microsoft Excel). Airbus S.A.S. May 2011. Retrieved 8 June 2011.
  2. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 9–18
  3. ^ Wensveen 2007, p. 63
  4. ^ Gunston 2009, p. 183
  5. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 18–19
  6. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 22–23
  7. ^ "Commercial Aircraft of the World part 2". Flight International. 17 October 1981. p. 1,155. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  8. ^ a b c Eden 2008, p. 30
  9. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 23
  10. ^ Kingsley-Jones, Max; et al. (4 November 1997). "Airbus A330/A340" (PDF). Flight International: 29. Retrieved 26 January 2011. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  11. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 24
  12. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 24–25
  13. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 27
  14. ^ a b Lawrence & Thornton 2005, p. 73
  15. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 26, 31
  16. ^ Gunston 2009, p. 196
  17. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 44
  18. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 44–45
  19. ^ "Model CF6-80E1". GE Aviation. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  20. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 47
  21. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 45–46
  22. ^ a b "PW4000-100". Pratt & Whitney. Retrieved 30 April 2011.
  23. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 51
  24. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 53–54
  25. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 52
  26. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 53
  27. ^ "A330/A340". Flight International. 1997. Retrieved 24 January 2011.
  28. ^ a b c d Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 31
  29. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 32
  30. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 32, 55
  31. ^ "Timeline 40 Years of Innovation" (PDF). Airbus S.A.S. p. 2. Retrieved 2 March 2011.
  32. ^ Eden 2008, p. 32
  33. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 78–79
  34. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 78
  35. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 85
  36. ^ "Accident description". Aviation-Safety.net. 24 January 2011. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  37. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 86–87
  38. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 89
  39. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 84–85
  40. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 86, 89
  41. ^ a b Eden 2008, p. 32
  42. ^ Wensveen 2007, p. 65
  43. ^ Pandey, Mohan (2010). How Boeing Defied the Airbus Challenge. North Charleston, South Carolina: CreateSpace. pp. 71–72. ISBN 9781450501132. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  44. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 81
  45. ^ Cole 2000, pp. 37, 41
  46. ^ "A330 is first airliner to be certified for ETOPS 'beyond 180 minutes'" (Press release). Airbus S.A.S. 12 November 2009. Retrieved 2 July 2011.
  47. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 91
  48. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 92–93
  49. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 95
  50. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 99
  51. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 96
  52. ^ "Airbus issues hydraulic pump warning after A330/340 fires". Flight International. 15 January 1997. Retrieved 5 February 2011.
  53. ^ Lewis, Paul (20 November 1996). "In-flight Trent 700 failure forces Cathay A330 back to Saigon". Flight International. Retrieved 5 February 2011.
  54. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 96–97
  55. ^ Creedy, Steve (16 April 2010). "Cathay Pacific pilots hailed as heroes". The Australian. Retrieved 5 February 2011.
  56. ^ Airbus A330-200F Freight Makes Public Debut. Airbus S.A.S. 10 February 2010. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
  57. ^ "Airbus aims to fill freighter void with A330 derivative". Flight International. 14 March 2006. Retrieved 29 JUne 2011. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  58. ^ a b "A330-200F / Range". Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 28 January 2011.
  59. ^ a b Kingsley-Jones, Max (4 August 2009). "PICTURES: First Airbus A330-200F shows off nose-gear blister fairing". Flight International. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  60. ^ a b Kingsley-Jones, Max (5 November 2009). "A330-200F touches down after successful maiden flight". Flight International. Retrieved 28 January 2011.
  61. ^ "Airbus flies new freighter it hopes to build in U.S." Reuters India. 6 November 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2011.
  62. ^ Buyck, Cathy (12 April 2010). "A330-200F receives EASA Type Certification". ATW Online. Retrieved 30 January 2011.
  63. ^ Reals, Kerry (20 July 2010). "Farnborough: Etihad takes delivery of first A330-200F". Flight International. Retrieved 29 January 2011.
  64. ^ "Airbus Hands Over Etihad's First A330-200F Freighter at Farnborough". Airlinesanddestinations.com. 20 July 2010. Retrieved 25 May 2011.
  65. ^ Karp, Aaron (4 February 2011). "Airbus to boost A330 production to 10 monthly in 2013". ATW Online. Retrieved 5 March 2011.
  66. ^ Rothman, Andrea (8 January 2009). "Airbus's A330 Back in Fashion as Boeing 787 Falters (Update1)". Bloomberg. Retrieved 24 January 2011.
  67. ^ a b "Specifications Airbus A330-200". Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  68. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 50
  69. ^ a b "Specifications Airbus A330-300". Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  70. ^ a b Gunston 2009, p. 195
  71. ^ Gunston 2009, p. 188
  72. ^ Gunston 2009, p. 197
  73. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, pp. 50–51
  74. ^ "Wing Geometry Definitions". NASA. Retrieved 17 March 2011. A higher aspect ratio wing has a lower drag and a slightly higher lift than a lower aspect ratio wing.
  75. ^ a b c d "A330-300 Dimensions & key data". Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 2 March 2011.
  76. ^ a b c d "A330-200 Dimensions & key data". Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 2 March 2011.
  77. ^ "The quietest cabin in the sky". Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  78. ^ a b c "Airbus A330 Wide-Bodied Medium/Long-Range Twin-Engine Airliner, Europe". Aerospace-technology.com. Retrieved 31 January 2011.
  79. ^ Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 58
  80. ^ Miravete 1999, p. 149
  81. ^ "A330 Family / cockpit". Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 2 March 2011.
  82. ^ "A330 Flight deck and systems briefing for pilots" (PDF). Airbus S.A.S. Smartcockpit.com. March 1999. p. 173. Retrieved 31 January 2011.
  83. ^ a b "Product Catalog". Honeywell. Retrieved 18 November 2010.
  84. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference Airbus_prices was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  85. ^ "Mass Market" (PDF). Flight International. 5–11 September 1990. p. 115. Retrieved 16 March 1990. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  86. ^ Bonnassies, Olivier (25 November 2010). "Airbus poised to launch higher-weight A330-300". Flight International. Retrieved 28 November 2010.
  87. ^ a b Henley, Peter (25 February–3 March 1998). "One of the family". Flight International. Retrieved 25 January 2011. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  88. ^ a b Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 94
  89. ^ Norris, Guy; Mark Wagner (1999). "767: Stretching and Growing". Modern Boeing Jetliners. St. Paul, Minnesota: MBI Publishing. p. 117. ISBN 0-7603-0717-2. The results of the Airbus studies produced...ultimately the A330-200. Airbus outlined an aircraft capable of carrying 256 passengers over a range of 6,400 nautical miles with, it claimed, up to 9% lower operating costs than the 767-300ER...The new A330-200 caused Boeing to take another look at its 767 plans...{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  90. ^ Regan, James and Tim Hepher (3 February 2011). "Airbus ups A330 output, revokes freighter order". India Reuters. Retrieved 16 March 2011. European planemaker Airbus confirmed plans on Thursday for a 25 percent increase in production of its A330 long-range aircraft as it cashes in on delays to the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.
  91. ^ "A330-200 Prestige specifications" (PDF). Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
  92. ^ Kingsley-Jones, Max (4 August 2009). "First Airbus A330-200F shows off nose gear blister fairing". Flight International. Retrieved 12 February 2011.
  93. ^ "GE drops A330-200F plan and opens door to P&W". Flight Global. 15 June 2007. Retrieved 10 November 2010.
  94. ^ Kingsley-Jones, Max (21 July 2010). "Farnborough: Qatar fires warning shot at Airbus over A330 conversions". Flight Daily News. Retrieved 21 July 2010.
  95. ^ a b Kingsley-Jones, Max (20 May 2010). "Airbus's general freight hauler: A330-200F technical description". Flight International. Retrieved 12 February 2011.
  96. ^ "Airbus to offer heavier A330 against delayed 787". Flight Global. 10 September 2008. Retrieved 10 February 2011.
  97. ^ "Korean Air orders six more A330-200s" (Press release). Airbus S.A.S. 27 February 2009. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
  98. ^ "A330 MRTT". Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 17 February 2011.
  99. ^ Hoyle, Craig (6 October 2010). "A330 tanker gains military certification". Flight International. Retrieved 17 February 2011.
  100. ^ "A330 MRTT: Multi Role Tanker Transport". Airbusmilitary.com. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  101. ^ Gilmore, Gerry J. (29 January 2008). "Air Force Awards Tanker Contract to Northrop Grumman". defense.gov. Retrieved 10 November 2010.
  102. ^ Shalal-Esa, Andrea (2 March 2008). "Northrop, EADS tanker win sparks controversy in U.S". Reuters. Retrieved 12 February 2011.
  103. ^ "Boeing Protests U.S. Air Force Tanker Contract Award" (Press release). Boeing. 11 March 2008. Retrieved 12 March 2011.
  104. ^ "EADS North America intends to submit proposal for U.S. Air Force tanker" (Press release). Airbus S.A.S. 20 April 2010. Retrieved 8 March 2011.
  105. ^ Trimble, Stephen (9 July 2010). "USAF receives three proposals for KC-X, but Antonov team admits concerns". Flight International. Retrieved 31 January 2011.
  106. ^ Trimble, Stephen (4 March 2011). "EADS concedes KC-X contract award to Boeing". Flight International. Retrieved 13 May 2011.
  107. ^ Trimble, Stephen (24 February 2011). "[UPDATED]: USAF selects Boeing for KC-X contract". Flight Global. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  108. ^ Ionides, Nicholas (15 June 2004). "SIA widebody decision expected soon". Flight International. Retrieved 8 April 2011. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  109. ^ a b Rothman, Andrea (29 May 2004). "Airbus Looks At Offering Lite A330 To Rival B7E7". Bloomberg News. Seattle Times. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  110. ^ "Emergence of 'A330-200 Lite' Unlikely to Impact Existing Values". Aviationtoday.com. 28 June 2004. Retrieved 21 February 2011.
  111. ^ "Singapore not ready to buy 7E7". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 26 August 2004. Retrieved 23 February 2011.
  112. ^ Gunston 2009, p. 253
  113. ^ a b c "Longer-range A330-300 studied". Flight International. 1–7 August 2000. Retrieved 31 January 2011.
  114. ^ Kingsley-Jones, Max (4–10 September 2001). "Size or Speed". Flight International. Retrieved 31 January 2011.
  115. ^ a b c Norris & Wagner 2001, p. 103
  116. ^ a b c Kingsley-Jones, Max and Peter Lewis (17–23 April 2001). "Airline rejections threaten A330-500 launch". Flight International. Retrieved 31 January 2011.
  117. ^ a b c Frawley, Gerald (2003). "Airbus A330-200", "Airbus A330-300". The International Directory of Civil Aircraft, 2003/2004. Fyshwick, Australia. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help); Text "isbn1-875671-58-7" ignored (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  118. ^ "Size or speed". Flight International. 4 September 2001. Retrieved 25 May 2011.
  119. ^ a b "World Airliner Census". Flight International: 31. 24–30 August 2010.
  120. ^ "Airbus A330 incidents". Aviation-Safety.net. 26 June 2011. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  121. ^ "Airbus A330 hull-losses". Aviation-Safety.net. 26 June 2011. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  122. ^ "Airbus A330 Accident Statistics". Aviation-Safety.net. 26 June 2011. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  123. ^ Aviation Safety Network (2005). "Airbus A330-321, F-WWKH, 30 June 1994 accident description". ASN Aviation Safety Database. Alexandria, Virginia: Flight Safety Foundation. Retrieved 7 June 2009.
  124. ^ "SriLankan turns to Emirates for help after raid". Flight International. 31 July 2001. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
  125. ^ "ASN Aircraft accident description Airbus A.330-243 4R-ALF – Colombo-Bandaranayake Internation Airport". ASN Aviation Safety Database. Flight Safety Foundation. Retrieved 3 August 2006.
  126. ^ "2008/40 – Qantas Airbus Incident Media Conference" (Press release). Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB). 8 October 2008. Retrieved 8 October 2008.
  127. ^ Kaminski-Morrow, David (1 June 2009). "Air France: No success in contacting missing A330". Air Transport Intelligence news. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
  128. ^ "Bodies found from missing plane". BBC News. 6 June 2009. Retrieved 6 June 2009.
  129. ^ Shane, Scott and Eric Lipton (26 December 2009). "Passengers Took Plane's Survival Into Own Hands". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 December 2009.
  130. ^ Boudette, E. Neal, Andy Pasztor and Peter Spiegel (26 December 2009). "Bomb Attempt Made on U.S.-Bound Flight". Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Retrieved 26 December 2009.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  131. ^ Kaminski-Morrow, David (14 April 2010). "Cathay A330 in high-energy landing had dual engine problem". Air Transport Intelligence. Retrieved 2 March 2011.
  132. ^ Kaminski-Morrow, David (13 April 2010). "Injuries after Cathay A330 engine shuts down on approach". Air Transport Intelligence. Retrieved 14 April 2010.
  133. ^ Kaminski-Morrow, David (11 August 2010). "Contaminated fuel prime suspect in Cathay A330 throttle-jam". Flight Global. Retrieved 2 March 2011.
  134. ^ "Plane crash in Libya 'kills more than 100 on board'". BBC News. 12 May 2010. Retrieved 12 March 2011.
  135. ^ "Specifications Airbus A330-200F". Airbus S.A.S. Retrieved 1 February 2011.
  136. ^ "A330: Airplane characteristics for airport planning" (PDF). Airbus S.A.S. 11 January 2011. pp. 42–51. Retrieved 31 January 2011.
  137. ^ a b c "EASA Type-Certificate Data Sheet EASA.A.004 Airbus A330" (PDF). European Aviation Safety Agency. 6 May 2011. Retrieved 28 June 2011. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |paGeneral Electric= ignored (help)
  138. ^ "FAA type certificate data sheet No. A46NM" (PDF). Federal Aviation Agency. pp. 1–3. Retrieved 5 March 2011.
Bibliography

Further reading

Template:Link FA