Jump to content

Recovered Territories: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
LUCPOL (talk | contribs)
6,608 edits
wikilink: Stettin -> Szczecin, Ermland -> Warmia
Space Cadet (talk | contribs)
8,095 edits
NPOV
Line 1: Line 1:
{{sprotected|small=yes|date=August 2009}}
{{sprotected|small=yes|date=August 2009}}
'''Recovered''' or '''Regained Territories''' ({{lang-pl|Ziemie Odzyskane}}) was the official Polish term used by the [[People's Republic of Poland|Communist Polish post-war authorities]] to denote [[Former eastern territories of Germany|those territories which were assigned]] by the [[Yalta Conference|Big Three]] allies to [[Poland]] and incorporated into Poland after the [[Second World War]].<ref name="neires466">An explanation note in [http://books.google.com.au/books?id=a_49GjK8ovMC&pg=PA466&source=gbs_search_r&cad=0_2&sig=jMhtaVsIbLmsC_LA07eB0mYV158 ''"The Neighbors Respond: The Controversy Over the Jedwabne Massacre in Poland"''], ed. by Polonsky and Michlic, p.466</ref> No longer used officially<ref>Gregor Thum, ''Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175</ref> the alternative term '''"Western and Northern Territories"''' ({{lang-pl|Ziemie Zachodnie i Północne}}) is preferred,<ref name="Social Capital 51">Martin Åberg, Mikael Sandberg, ''Social Capital and Democratisation: Roots of Trust in Post-Communist Poland and Ukraine'', Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2003, ISBN 0754619362, [http://books.google.com/books?id=uy1nPLTUhscC&pg=PA51&sig=ln5zKXKfbZSpr1Uy8Ad8AB4-1Oc Google Print, p. 51]</ref><ref>Gregor Thum, ''Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175</ref> the "Western Territories" being the regions of [[Pomorze Zachodnie]] (the former [[Farther Pomerania]] and [[Szczecin]] area), [[Lubusz Land]] (the former [[Neumark]]) and [[Silesia]] (without [[Autonomous Silesian Voivodeship]]), and the "Northern Territories" being the [[Gdańsk]] area (the former [[Free City of Danzig]]) and the regions of [[Warmia]] and [[Masuria]] (both formerly parts of [[East Prussia]]).
'''Recovered''' or '''Regained Territories''' ({{lang-pl|Ziemie Odzyskane}}) was the official term used by the [[People's Republic of Poland|Communist Polish post-war authorities]] to denote [[Former eastern territories of Germany|those territories which were assigned]] by the [[Yalta Conference|Big Three]] allies to [[Poland]] and incorporated into Poland after the [[Second World War]].<ref name="neires466">An explanation note in [http://books.google.com.au/books?id=a_49GjK8ovMC&pg=PA466&source=gbs_search_r&cad=0_2&sig=jMhtaVsIbLmsC_LA07eB0mYV158 ''"The Neighbors Respond: The Controversy Over the Jedwabne Massacre in Poland"''], ed. by Polonsky and Michlic, p.466</ref> No longer used officially<ref>Gregor Thum, ''Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175</ref> the alternative term '''"Western and Northern Territories"''' ({{lang-pl|Ziemie Zachodnie i Północne}}) is preferred,<ref name="Social Capital 51">Martin Åberg, Mikael Sandberg, ''Social Capital and Democratisation: Roots of Trust in Post-Communist Poland and Ukraine'', Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2003, ISBN 0754619362, [http://books.google.com/books?id=uy1nPLTUhscC&pg=PA51&sig=ln5zKXKfbZSpr1Uy8Ad8AB4-1Oc Google Print, p. 51]</ref><ref>Gregor Thum, ''Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175</ref> the "Western Territories" being the regions of [[Pomorze Zachodnie]] (the former [[Farther Pomerania]] and [[Szczecin]] (Stettin) area), [[Lubusz Land]] ([[Neumark]]) and [[Lower Silesia]], and the "Northern Territories" being the [[Gdańsk]] area (the former [[Free City of Danzig]]) and the regions of [[Warmia]] and [[Masuria]] [[East Prussia]]).


The phrase "recovered" was used to [[propaganda|propagate]]<ref name="Cordell_1999">Tomasz Kamusella and Terry Sullivan in Karl Cordell, ''Ethnicity and Democratisation in the New Europe'', 1999, p.169: "[the term "recovered territories" was] christened so by the Polish communist-cum-nationalist propaganda", ISBN 0415173124, 9780415173124</ref> a picture of the Western and Northern Territories having been an integral part of Poland since [[History of Poland (966-1385)|medieval Piast times]], of which the [[People's Republic of Poland]] was the legitimate heir.<ref name="neires466"/><ref>Joanna B. Michlic, ''Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present'', 2006, pp.207-208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402</ref><ref>Norman Davies, ''God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes'', 2005, pp.381ff, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401</ref><ref>Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, ''Myths and Nationhood'', 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746</ref><ref>Jan Kubik, ''The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland'', 1994, pp.64-65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847</ref> Emphasis was put on periods the territories were [[Piast dynasty|Piast]] ruled, which was the case with the Western Territories during some periods of the [[High Middle Ages]], or Polish fiefs, as were the Northern Territories during some periods of the [[Early Modern Age]]. The [[Ostsiedlung|centuries of German presence and peaceful settlement]] were presented as a mere result of Germany's continuous "aggression" towards her eastern neighbors ("[[Drang nach Osten]]").<ref>Norman Davies, ''God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes'', 2005, pp.381ff, p.395, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401</ref><ref>Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, ''Myths and Nationhood'', 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746</ref><ref>Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, ''Poland and the European Union'', 2000, p.166, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854</ref> The post-war forced population movements were officially termed "repatriations,"<ref>Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, ''Myths and Nationhood'', 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746</ref> and the erstwhile German character and heritage of the territories was disregarded and denied.<ref name="Cordell_2005"/>
The phrase "recovered" was used to [[propaganda|propagate]]<ref name="Cordell_1999">Tomasz Kamusella and Terry Sullivan in Karl Cordell, ''Ethnicity and Democratisation in the New Europe'', 1999, p.169: "[the term "recovered territories" was] christened so by the Polish communist-cum-nationalist propaganda", ISBN 0415173124, 9780415173124</ref> a picture of the Western and Northern Territories having been an integral part of Poland since [[History of Poland (966-1385)|medieval Piast times]], of which the [[People's Republic of Poland]] was the legitimate heir.<ref name="neires466"/><ref>Joanna B. Michlic, ''Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present'', 2006, pp.207-208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402</ref><ref>Norman Davies, ''God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes'', 2005, pp.381ff, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401</ref><ref>Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, ''Myths and Nationhood'', 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746</ref><ref>Jan Kubik, ''The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland'', 1994, pp.64-65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847</ref> Emphasis was put on periods the territories were [[Piast dynasty|Piast]] ruled, which was the case with the Western Territories during some periods of the [[High Middle Ages]], or Polish fiefs, as were the Northern Territories during some periods of the [[Early Modern Age]]. The [[Ostsiedlung|centuries of German presence and peaceful settlement]] were presented as a mere result of Germany's continuous "aggression" towards her eastern neighbors ("[[Drang nach Osten]]").<ref>Norman Davies, ''God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes'', 2005, pp.381ff, p.395, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401</ref><ref>Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, ''Myths and Nationhood'', 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746</ref><ref>Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, ''Poland and the European Union'', 2000, p.166, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854</ref> The post-war forced population movements were officially termed "repatriations,"<ref>Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, ''Myths and Nationhood'', 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746</ref> and the erstwhile German character and heritage of the territories was disregarded and denied.<ref name="Cordell_2005"/>

Revision as of 01:39, 4 August 2009

Recovered or Regained Territories (Polish: Ziemie Odzyskane) was the official term used by the Communist Polish post-war authorities to denote those territories which were assigned by the Big Three allies to Poland and incorporated into Poland after the Second World War.[1] No longer used officially[2] the alternative term "Western and Northern Territories" (Polish: Ziemie Zachodnie i Północne) is preferred,[3][4] the "Western Territories" being the regions of Pomorze Zachodnie (the former Farther Pomerania and Szczecin (Stettin) area), Lubusz Land (Neumark) and Lower Silesia, and the "Northern Territories" being the Gdańsk area (the former Free City of Danzig) and the regions of Warmia and Masuria East Prussia).

The phrase "recovered" was used to propagate[5] a picture of the Western and Northern Territories having been an integral part of Poland since medieval Piast times, of which the People's Republic of Poland was the legitimate heir.[1][6][7][8][9] Emphasis was put on periods the territories were Piast ruled, which was the case with the Western Territories during some periods of the High Middle Ages, or Polish fiefs, as were the Northern Territories during some periods of the Early Modern Age. The centuries of German presence and peaceful settlement were presented as a mere result of Germany's continuous "aggression" towards her eastern neighbors ("Drang nach Osten").[10][11][12] The post-war forced population movements were officially termed "repatriations,"[13] and the erstwhile German character and heritage of the territories was disregarded and denied.[14]

The remaining German population was expelled and gradually replaced by Polish nationals.[15][16] While the majority of settlers moved in voluntarily from Central Poland and the wartime Polish diaspora, the Polish regime also forcibly resettled Ukrainians and other minorities as well as Polish "repatriants" from former Eastern Poland to the "recovered territories", and ensured thorough Polonization.[15][16][17][18]

The Oder-Neisse frontier was formally recognized by East Germany in the Treaty of Zgorzelec (1950) and by West Germany in the Treaty of Warsaw (1970), and was affirmed by the re-united Germany in the German-Polish Border Treaty (1990).

Area

Pre-1945 administrative division of the "Recovered Territories" (yellow)
Present-day administrative division of the "Recovered Territories" (dark green)
Further information: Former eastern territories of Germany

The Western Territories comprise the regions of:

The Northern Territories comprise:

Origin and use of the term

The term "Recovered Territories" was the official propaganda term[5][1] coined in the aftermath of World War II to denote the former eastern territories of Germany that were being handed over to Poland. The underlying concept was to define post-war Poland as the heir of the medieval Piasts' realm,[19][20][21] which was simplified into a picture of an ethnically homogeneous state matching the post-war borders,[22] as opposed to the later Jagiellon Poland, which was multi-ethnic and located further east.[23] One reason for post-war Poland's favoring a "Piast" rather than a "Jagiellon" tradition was Stalin's refusal to withdraw from the Curzon line and the Allies' readiness to satisfy Poland with German territory instead.[24] However the original argument for awarding formerly German territory to Poland – compensation – was changed to the argument that this territory in fact constituted "old Polish lands".[25] Another reason for the emphasis on the Piast era was the Polish desire to create an ethnically homogeneous rather than a multi-ethnic state.[26][27] Also, the Piasts were perceived to have defended Poland against German peoples, while the Jagiellons' rival had been the growing Duchy of Moscow, making them a less suitable basis for post-war Poland's Soviet-dominated situation.[28][29] Thus, with Soviet backing,[30] the PRL and PPR adopted this fundamentally "Piast concept"[31][32] against their pre-war peasant and nationalist opponents.[33] In fact, the question of the "Recovered Territories" was one of the few issues that did not divide the Polish Communists and their opposition, and there was unanimity regarding the western border. Even the underground anti-Communist press called for the Piast borders, "ending Germanisation and Drang nach Osten once and for all".[34] Post-war propagandists told the myth of the thousand-year struggle between Teuton and Slav[35] while the centuries of German history in the "recovered territories" remained untold.[36]

Polish communist Władysław Gomułka, Minister of Recovered Territories

Great efforts were made to propagate the view of "recovered Piast territory", which were actively supported by the Catholic Church.[37] The sciences were responsible for the development of this perception of history. In 1945 the Western Institute (Polish: Instytut Zachodni) was founded to coordinate the scientific activities. Its director, Zygmunt Wojciechowski, characterized his mission as follows: "We don't try for the so called objective historiography. It was our mission to present the Polish history of these countries and to project the current Polish reality of these countries upon their historical background.".[38] Historical scientists, archaeologists, linguists, art historians and ethnologists worked in an interdisciplinary effort to legitimize the new borders.[39] Their findings were popularised in countless monographs, periodicals, schoolbooks, travel guides, broadcasts and exhibitions.[40] Official maps were drawn up to show that the Polish frontiers under the first known Piast princes matched the new ones,[41] and the post-war generation was instructed to assume the Polish nation had evolved on that territory since time immemorial.[42] They were encouraged to believe the People's Republic's territory was indeed the "Polish motherland" (macierz), fixed over time even if occupied by "aliens" and regardless of multiple border and population changes in history.[43] The official view was that the Poles had always had the inalienable and inevitable right to inhabit the "recovered" territories, even if prevented from doing so by higher powers.[44] As a consequence, the Piast concept was accepted by millions of Poles and is still believed by many.[45] Furthermore, the Piast concept was used to persuade the Allied Powers, who found it difficult to define a Polish "ethnographic territory", to assume that it would be an untolerable injustice to not "give the territories back".[46]

Even though most of the "Recovered Territories" had been under German and Prussian rule for many centuries, many events of this history were perceived as part of "foreign" rather than "local" history in post-war Poland.[47] Polish scholars instead concentrated on the mediaeval Piast history of the region, the cultural, political and economic bonds to Poland, the history of the Polish-speaking population in Prussia and the "Drang nach Osten" as a historical constant since the Middle Ages.[48]

By 1949 the term "Recovered Territories" had been dropped from Polish communist propaganda, but it is still used occasionally in common language.[49] On the grounds that those areas should not be regarded as unique territories within the Polish state, the authorities began to refer to them instead as the "Western and Northern Territories".[3][50] Along with the debunking of communist historiography, the recovered territories thesis has been discarded.[14] However the fact that the territories acquired in 1945 had a wholly German character is not necessarily one that has been transmitted to the whole of Polish society.[14]

Polonization of the "Recovered Territories"

Along with the establishment of the People's Republic as the heir of the Piasts, the population had to be made to fit the new frontiers.[51] With its eastern territories (the Kresy) annexed by the Soviet Union, Poland was effectively moved westwards and its area reduced by almost 20% (from 389,000 km² to 312,000 km²).[52] Millions of "non-Poles" (mainly Germans and Ukrainians) had to be expelled from the new Poland, while the Poles east of the Curzon line had to be expelled from the Kresy. The expellees were termed "repatriates".[53] The result was the largest exchange of population in European history.[54] The picture of the new western and northern territories being recovered Piast territory was used to forge Polish settlers and "repatriates" arriving there into a coherent community loyal to the new regime,[55] and to justify the previous ethnic cleansing of the area.[56] Largely excepted from the expulsions of Germans were the "autochthons", close to three million ethnically Slavic inhabitants of Masuria (Masurs), Pomerania (Kashubians, Slovincians) and Upper Silesia (Silesians), of whom many did not identify with Polish nationality.[57] The Polish government aimed to retain as many autochthons as possible for propaganda purposes, as their presence on former German soil was used to indicate the intrinsic "Polishness" of the area and justify its incorporation into the Polish state as "recovered" territories.[58] "Verification" and "national rehabilitation" processes were set up to reveal a "dormant Polishness" and to determine which were redeemable as Polish citizens; few were actually expelled[59] The "autochthons" not only disliked the subjective and often arbitrary verification process, but they also faced discrimination even after completing it,[60] such as the Polonization of their names.[61]

Removal of German population and heritage

Further information: Flight and expulsion of Germans from Poland during and after World War II

Despite the propagandist picture of an ancient Polish territory, the "Recovered Territories" after the take-over still hosted a substantial German population, and the centuries of German presence had marked the area a German one. This had to be changed quickly, as the territories' legal status was uncertain at the end of the war, and left room for different interpretations even after the Potsdam Agreement. The Polish administration set up a "Ministry for the Recovered Territories", headed by the then deputy prime minister Władysław Gomułka.[62] A "Bureau for Repatriation" was to supervise and organize the expulsions and resettlements.

The expulsion of the remaining Germans in the first post-war years presaged a broader campaign to remove the footprints of centuries of German history and culture from public view. All German placenames were replaced with Polish[17] or Polonized medieval Slavic ones.[63][64] If no Slavic name existed, then either the German name was translated or new names were invented.[65] The German language was banned,[17][64] and many German monuments, graveyards, buildings etc. were demolished. Objects of art were moved to other parts of the country.[66] Protestant churches were either converted into Catholic ones or used for other purposes. Official propaganda spread all-round anti-German sentiment, which was shared by many of the opposition as well as many in the Catholic Church.[67]

Resettlement

According to the 1939 German census, the territories were inhabited by 8,855,000 people, including a Polish minority in the territories' easternmost parts.[68] While the German census placed the number of Polish-speakers and bilinguals below 700,000 people, Polish demographers have estimated that the actual number of Poles in the former German East was between 1.2[68] and 1.3 million.[69] In the 1.2 million figure, approximately 850,000 were estimated for the Upper Silesian regions, 350,000 for southern East Prussia and 50,000 for the rest of the territories.[68]

People from all over Poland quickly moved in to replace the former German population in a process parallel to the expulsions. While the Germans were interned and expelled, close to 5 million settlers[16][70] were either attracted or forced to settle the areas between 1945 and 1950. An additional 1,104,000 people had declared Polish nationality and were allowed to stay (851,000 of those in Upper Silesia), bringing up the number of Poles to 5,894,600 as of 1950.[68] The settlers can be grouped according to their background:

  • settlers from Central Poland moving voluntarily (the majority)[16]
  • Poles that had been freed from forced labor in Nazi Germany (up to two million)[15][16]
  • so-called "repatriants": Poles expelled from the areas east of the new Polish-Soviet border were preferably settled in the new western territories, where they made up 26% of the population (up to two million)[15][16]
  • non-Poles forcibly resettled during Operation Wisła in 1947. Large numbers of Ukrainians were forced to move from south-eastern Poland under a 1947 Polish government operation aimed at dispersing, and therefore assimilating, those Ukrainians who had not been expelled eastward already, throughout the newly acquired territories. Belarusians living around the area around Białystok were also pressured into relocating to the formerly German areas for the same reasons. This scattering of members of non-Polish ethnic groups throughout the country was an attempt by the Polish authorities to dissolve the unique ethnic identity of groups like the Ukrainians, Belarusians and Lemkos,[71] and broke the proximity and communication necessary for strong communities to form.
  • Tens of thousands of Jewish Holocaust-survivors, most of them "repatriates" from the East, settled mostly in Lower Silesia, creating Jewish cooperatives and institutions – the largest communities were founded in Wroclaw (Breslau, Lower Silesia), Szczecin (Stettin, Pomerania) and Wałbrzych (Waldenburg, Lower Silesia).[72] However most of them left Poland by 1968 due to antisemitic governmental campaigns[73]

Polish and Soviet newspapers and officials encouraged Poles to relocate to the west – "the land of opportunity".[16] These new territories were described as a place where opulent villas abandoned by fleeing Germans waited for the brave; fully furnished houses and businesses were available for the taking. In fact, the areas were devastated by the war, the infrastructure largely destroyed, suffering high crime rates and looting by gangs. It took years for civil order to be established.

In 1970, the Polish population of the Northern and Western territories for the first time caught up to the pre-war population level (8,711,900 in 1970 vs 8,855,000 in 1939). In the same year, the population of the other Polish areas also reached its pre-war level (23,930,100 in 1970 vs 23,483,000 in 1939).[68]

While the estimates of how many Germans remained vary, a constant German exodus took place even after the expulsions. In the years of 1956-1985, 407,000 people from Silesia and about 100,000 from Warmia-Masuria declared German nationality and left for Germany. In the early 1990s, after the Polish Communist regime had collapsed 300,000-350,000 people declared themselves German.[68]

Today the population of the territories is predominantly Polish, although a small German minority still exists in a few places, including Olsztyn (German: Allenstein), Masuria, and Upper Silesia, particularly in Opole Voivodeship.

Role of the Recovered Territories in the Communists' rise to power

The Communist government, not democratically legitimized but supported only by the Red Army, the UB secret service, terror and propaganda, sought to legitimize itself through anti-German propaganda.[74] The German "revanchism" was played up as a permanent German threat, with the Communists being the only guarantors and defenders of Poland's continued possession of the "Recovered Territories". Gomułka asserted that:

"The western territories are one of the reasons the government has the support of the people. This neutralizes various elements and brings people together. Westward expansion and agricultural reform will bind the nation with the state. Any retreat would weaken our domestic position."[17][75]

The redistribution of "ownerless property" among the people by the regime brought it broad-based popular sympathy.[17]

Legal status of the territories

Poland's old and new borders, 1945
Main article: Oder-Neisse line

During the Cold War the official position in the First World was that the concluding document of the Potsdam Conference was not an international treaty, but a mere memorandum. It regulated the issue of the German eastern border, which was to be the Oder-Neisse line, but the final article of the memorandum said that the final status of the German state and therefore its territories were subject to a separate peace treaty between Germany and the Allies of World War II. During the period from 1945 to 1990 two treaties between Poland and both East and West Germany were signed concerning the German-Polish border. In 1950 the German Democratic Republic and the People's Republic of Poland signed the Treaty of Zgorzelec, recognizing the Oder-Neisse line, officially designated by the Communists as the "Border of Peace and Friendship".[76] On 7 December 1970 the Treaty of Warsaw between the Federal Republic of Germany and Poland was signed concerning the Polish western border. Both sides committed themselves to nonviolence and accepted the existing de facto border - the Oder-Neisse line. However a final treaty was not signed until 1990 as the "Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany". This meant that for 45 years, people on both sides of the border (and of the issue) could not be sure that the settlement reached in 1945 would not be changed at some future date.

Until the Treaty on the Final Settlement, the West German government regarded the status of the German territories east of the Oder-Neisse rivers as that of areas "temporarily under Polish or Soviet administration". To facilitate wide international acceptance of German reunification in 1990, the German political establishment recognized the "facts on the ground" and accepted the clauses in the Treaty on the Final Settlement whereby Germany renounced all claims to territory east of the Oder-Neisse line. This allowed the treaty to be negotiated quickly and for unification of democratic West Germany and communist East Germany to go ahead quickly. In the same year as the Final Settlement came into effect, 1990, Germany signed a separate treaty with Poland, the German-Polish Border Treaty, confirming the two countries' present borders.

History of the "Recovered Territories" before 1945

Piast realm

Further information: History of Poland (966-1385)
Early Piast Poland in the end of the reign of Mieszko I, around 992
Early Piast Poland at her short-lived greatest extents around 1000 (dark red) and 1018 (within red line)

Numerous West Slavic tribes had inhabited most of the area of present-day Poland since the 6th century. Mieszko I of the Polans from his stronghold in the Gniezno area subdued various neighboring tribes in the second half of the 10th century, creating the first Polish state and becoming the first historically recorded Piast duke. His realm roughly included all of the area of the "Recovered Territories" except for Warmia-Masuria. His son and successor, Bolesław I, expanded the southern part of the realm, but lost control over Pomerania. After fragmentation, pagan revolts and a Bohemian invasion in the 1030s, Casimir I the Restorer again united most of the former Piast realm, including Silesia and the Lubusz Land, but without Pomerania. Pomerania was subdued again temporarily by Bolesław III in 1116-1121. On his death in 1138, Poland was divided into several semi-independent duchies, ruled by Bolesław's sons and later their succesors, who were often in conflict with each other. Partial reunification was achieved by Władysław I, crowned king of Poland in 1320, although the Silesian and Masovian duchies remained independent.

In the course of the 12th to 14th centuries, large numbers of German, Dutch and Flemish settlers moved into East Central and Eastern Europe (a process known as the Ostsiedlung). In Pomerania, Brandenburg, East Prussia and Silesia, the former West Slav (Polabian Slavs and Poles) or Balt population became extinguished or dissimilated except for small minorities. In Poland and Pomerelia (West Prussia), German settlers formed a minority.

Pomerania

Main article: History of Pomerania
Location of Pomerania (orange) in the "Recovered Territories" (green)

The Pomeranian parts of the Recovered Territories were subject to continuous Piast expeditions from the late 10th century. Mieszko I had conquered at least significant parts of the area, and a bishopric was established in the Kołobrzeg area by his son Bolesław I in 1000–1005/07, before the area was lost again. Despite attempts to again subdue the Pomeranian tribes, this was only managed by Bolesław III in several campaigns lasting from 1116 to 1121. There were successful Christian missions in 1124 and 1128, but by the time of Bolesław's death in 1138, most of Pomerania (the Griffin-ruled areas) had again regained independence. The Griffin duchy joined the Duchy of Saxony after the 1164 Battle of Verchen, and became part of the Holy Roman Empire in 1181. This period also marks the onset of the Ostsiedlung in Pomerania: the first village recorded as German was Hohenkrug in 1170. Except for a period of Danish rule from the 1180s to 1227, the Duchy of Pomerania remained with the Holy Roman Empire until the last Griffin duke died in 1648. At that time the area had been under Swedish control since 1630. From 1648 to 1720 Sweden kept the western part including Stettin, while Farther Pomerania was made a province of Brandenburg (later Brandenburg-Prussia, Prussia). In 1720 the Stettin area was transferred from Swedish Pomerania to the Prussian Province of Pomerania. In 1815, the Dramburg area of the Neumark was attached to the province, as was the Schneidemühl (Piła) area of the former Grenzmark Posen-Westpreußen in 1938.

Gdańsk (Danzig) and the Lauenburg and Bütow Land

Ducal Prussia (to 1525 Monastic state of the Teutonic Knights) as fief of the Crown of the Polish Kingdom 1466-1657
Further information: History of Gdańsk and Lauenburg and Bütow Land
Location of the former Free City of Danzig (orange) in the "Recovered Territories" (green)

The history of the Eastern Pomeranian areas around Gdańsk and Lauenburg-Bütow (Lębork and Bytów), which are also within the "Recovered Territories", differs somewhat from the history of the bulk of Pomerania. They are situated in the former region of Pomerelia, which was ruled by the Samborides dynasty who, unlike the Griffins, did not join the Holy Roman Empire and remained under Piast control, loosening in the course of the 13th century. After the death of the last Samboride in 1294, the Polish kings Przemysł II of Poland and Wenceslaus II and Władysław I for a short period ruled Pomerelia[77] in conflict with Brandenburg, who also claimed the region. The Teutonic takeover of Gdańsk (Danzig) followed in 1308, and after that Danzig and Lauenburg-Bütow became part of the monastic state of the Teutonic Knights until the Second Peace of Thorn (1466), when Danzig as a part of Royal Prussia became subject to the Polish Crown (though with substantial autonomy). Lauenburg-Bütow was handed over to the Griffin dukes and was a Polish fief for most of the time until the First Partition of Poland (1772). Danzig became a part of West Prussia in the Second Partition (1793), and was made the Free City of Danzig after World War I.

Lubusz Land

Main articles: Lubusz Land and Brandenburg
Further information: Neumark
Location of East Brandenburg (orange) in the "Recovered Territories" (green)
Neumark in 1320, Poland's border shown as a dotted line

The medieval Lubusz Land, including Lubusz (Lebus) itself, was also part of Mieszko's realm. Poland lost the bishopric of Lebus to Ascanian Brandenburg in 1252, who made it part of their Neumark. During this period, Ostsiedlung had already begun in the area. The Ascanian margraves expanded their territory east by marriage politics: The Zantoch region with the future town of Landsberg an der Warthe was added to Neumark in 1254 after a marriage of margrave Konrad I with a daughter of Przemysl I, and further northeastern areas were added after the 1277 Treaty of Arnswalde with the Pomerelian duke Mestwin II in return for financing this duke's marriage. Neumark was a pawn of the Teutonic Knights from 1402 to 1429, when it became the knights' possession. In 1454 however, the knights pawned the area to Brandenburg again until it was finally sold to the margraves in 1463. From 1535 to 1571, the area was ruled independently by Hans von Küstrin, thereafter it remained with Brandenburg until 1945. In the 18th century, the area saw a new colonisation effort by Germans and Hugenots. In 1815, some smaller northeastern areas around the town of Dramburg were integrated into the Province of Pomerania, and in 1938, a small area around the town of Schwerin/Warthe was made part of the province. The present-day Polish Lubusz Land comprises most of the former Neumark territory east of the Oder River.

Former Province of Posen-West Prussia

File:Bevölkerungsverteilung Ostmitteleuropa um 1918.jpg
Polish atlas showing ethnic groups in 1918
Further information: Province of Posen-West Prussia
Location of Posen-West Prussia (orange) in the "Recovered Territories" (green)

A small portion of the Recovered Territories east of the Lubusz Land had previously formed the western parts of the Polish provinces of Pomerelia and Greater Poland (Polonia Maior), being lost to Prussia in the First Partition (the Pomerelian parts) and the Second Partition (the remainder).

During Napoleonic times the Greater Poland territories were part of the Duchy of Warsaw, but after the Congress of Vienna they were returned to Prussia as part of the Grand Duchy of Posen (Poznań), later Province of Posen.

After World War I those parts of the former Province of Posen and of West Prussia which were not made part of the Second Polish Republic were administered as Grenzmark Posen-Westpreußen (Province of Posen–West Prussia) until 1938.

Silesia

Main article: History of Silesia
Location of Silesia (orange) in the "Recovered Territories" (green)

Silesia continued to be ruled by Piast dukes following the 12th-century fragmentation of Poland. The Silesian Piasts retained power in most of the region until the early 16th century, the last (George William, duke of Legnica) dying in 1675. The first German colonists arrived in the late 12th century, and large-scale German settlement started in the early 13th century with the reign of Henry I.[78] While Lower and Middle Silesia in the late Middle Ages became German-speaking except for some areas along the northeastern frontier, Upper Silesia retained a Polish character.[79] Here, the Germans who arrived during the Middle Ages were mostly Polonized; Germans dominated in large cities and Poles mostly in rural areas. The province came under the control of Bohemia, a state of the Holy Roman Empire, in the 14th century. Silesia passed to the Habsburg Monarchy of Austria in 1526, and was mostly conquered by Prussia's Frederick the Great in 1742. A small part of Upper Silesia became part of Poland after World War I, but the bulk of Silesia formed part of the post-1945 Recovered Territories.

Warmia and Masuria

Further information: Prussia (region) and East Prussia
Location of southern East Prussia (orange) in the "Recovered Territories" (green)

Unlike the remainder of the Recovered Territories, the northern territories of Warmia and Masuria did not form part of the Piasts' kingdom. Originally inhabited by pagan Old Prussians, these regions were incorporated into the state of the Teutonic Knights in the 13th and 14th centuries. By the Second Peace of Thorn (1466), an area of Warmia around Lidzbark was awarded to the Polish crown as part of Royal Prussia, though with considerable autonomy. The remainder of today's Warmia-Masuria region became part of Ducal Prussia, formally a Polish fief. The region was taken by Prussia in the First Partition of Poland (1772). It formed the southern part of East Prussia after World War I, becoming part of Poland after World War II, with northern East Prussia going to the Soviet Union to form the Kaliningrad Oblast.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c An explanation note in "The Neighbors Respond: The Controversy Over the Jedwabne Massacre in Poland", ed. by Polonsky and Michlic, p.466
  2. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  3. ^ a b Martin Åberg, Mikael Sandberg, Social Capital and Democratisation: Roots of Trust in Post-Communist Poland and Ukraine, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2003, ISBN 0754619362, Google Print, p. 51 Cite error: The named reference "Social Capital 51" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  4. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  5. ^ a b Tomasz Kamusella and Terry Sullivan in Karl Cordell, Ethnicity and Democratisation in the New Europe, 1999, p.169: "[the term "recovered territories" was] christened so by the Polish communist-cum-nationalist propaganda", ISBN 0415173124, 9780415173124
  6. ^ Joanna B. Michlic, Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present, 2006, pp.207-208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402
  7. ^ Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes, 2005, pp.381ff, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401
  8. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  9. ^ Jan Kubik, The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland, 1994, pp.64-65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847
  10. ^ Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes, 2005, pp.381ff, p.395, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401
  11. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  12. ^ Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, Poland and the European Union, 2000, p.166, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854
  13. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  14. ^ a b c Karl Cordell, Stefan Wolff, Germany's Foreign Policy Towards Poland and the Czech Republic: Ostpolitik Revisited, 2005, p.139: "In addition [...] it has been relatively easy for Polish historians and others to attempt to debunk communist historiography and present a more balanced analysis of the past - and not only with respect to Germany. It has been controversial, and often painful, but nevertheless it has been done. For example, Poland's acquisition in 1945 of eastern German territories is increasingly presented as the price Germany paid for launching a total war, and then having lost it totally. The 'recovered territories' thesis previously applied in almost equal measures by the communists and Catholic Church has been discarded. It is freely admitted in some circles that on the whole 'the recovered territorries' in fact had a wholly German character. The extent to which this fact is transmitted to other groups than the socially and politically engaged is a matter for some debate. [1]" ISBN 0415369746, 9780415369749
  15. ^ a b c d Dierk Hoffmann, Michael Schwartz, Geglückte Integration?, p.142 [2]
  16. ^ a b c d e f g Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, Poland and the European Union, 2000, p.168, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854: gives 4.55 million in the first years
  17. ^ a b c d e Dan Diner, Raphael Gross, Yfaat Weiss, Jüdische Geschichte als allgemeine Geschichte, p.164
  18. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.344, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  19. ^ Joanna B. Michlic, Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present, 2006, pp.207-208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402
  20. ^ Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes, 2005, pp.381ff, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401
  21. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  22. ^ Jan Kubik, The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland, 1994, pp.64-65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847
  23. ^ Jan Kubik, The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland, 1994, pp.65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847
  24. ^ Rick Fawn, Ideology and national identity in post-communist foreign policies, 2003, p.190, ISBN 0714655171, 9780714655178
  25. ^ Alfred M. De Zayas, Nemesis at Potsdam, p.168
  26. ^ Joanna B. Michlic, Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present, 2006, p.208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402
  27. ^ Jan Kubik, The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland, 1994, p.65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847
  28. ^ Jan Kubik, The Power of Symbols Against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland, 1994, p.65, ISBN 0271010843, 9780271010847
  29. ^ Rick Fawn, Ideology and national identity in post-communist foreign policies, 2003, p.190, ISBN 0714655171, 9780714655178
  30. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  31. ^ Rick Fawn, Ideology and national identity in post-communist foreign policies, 2003, p.190, ISBN 0714655171, 9780714655178
  32. ^ Joanna B. Michlic, Poland's Threatening Other: The Image of the Jew from 1880 to the Present, 2006, p.208, ISBN 0803232403, 9780803232402
  33. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  34. ^ Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe 1944-1948 By Philipp Ther, Ana Siljak Page 81
  35. ^ Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes, 2005, p.397, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401
  36. ^ Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes, 2005, p.391, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401
  37. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.287, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  38. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.282, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  39. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.281, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  40. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.283, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  41. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  42. ^ Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes, 2005, p.386, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401
  43. ^ Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes, 2005, pp.386, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401
  44. ^ Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes, 2005, pp.386, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401
  45. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  46. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  47. ^ Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland in Two Volumes, 2005, p.393, ISBN 0199253404, 9780199253401
  48. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.281, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  49. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  50. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.298, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  51. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  52. ^ Paczkowski, Andrzej (2003). "The Spring Will Be Ours: Poland and the Poles from Occupation to Freedom". translation Jane Cave. Penn State Press. p. 14.
  53. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  54. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  55. ^ Martin Åberg, Mikael Sandberg, Social Capital and Democratisation: Roots of Trust in Post-Communist Poland and Ukraine, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2003, ISBN 0754619362, Google Print, p.79
  56. ^ Geoffrey Hosking, George Schopflin, Myths and Nationhood, 1997, p.153, ISBN 0415919746, 9780415919746
  57. ^ Tomasz Kamusella in Prauser and Reeds (eds), The Expulsion of the German communities from Eastern Europe, p.28, EUI HEC 2004/1 [3]
  58. ^ Tomasz Kamusella in Prauser and Reeds (eds), The Expulsion of the German communities from Eastern Europe, p.28, EUI HEC 2004/1 [4]
  59. ^ Tomasz Kamusella in Prauser and Reeds (eds), The Expulsion of the German communities from Eastern Europe, p.28, EUI HEC 2004/1 [5]
  60. ^ Philipp Ther, Ana Siljak, Redrawing Nations: Ethnic Cleansing in East-Central Europe, 1944-1948, 2001, p.114, ISBN 0742510948, 9780742510944
  61. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, pp.363, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  62. ^ Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, Poland and the European Union, 2000, p.167, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854
  63. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.344, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  64. ^ a b Tomasz Kamusella and Terry Sullivan in Karl Cordell, Ethnicity and Democratisation in the New Europe, 1999, pp.175ff, ISBN 0415173124, 9780415173124
  65. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.344, 349, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  66. ^ Gregor Thum, Die fremde Stadt. Breslau nach 1945", 2006, p.520, ISBN 3570550176, 9783570550175
  67. ^ Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, Poland and the European Union, 2000, p.166, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854
  68. ^ a b c d e f Piotr Eberhardt, Jan Owsinski, Ethnic Groups and Population Changes in Twentieth-century Central-Eastern Europe: History, Data, Analysis, 2003, pp.142ff, ISBN 0765606658, 9780765606655
  69. ^ Wojciech Roszkowski "Historia Polski 1918-1997" page 157
  70. ^ Piotr Eberhardt, Jan Owsinski, Ethnic Groups and Population Changes in Twentieth-century Central-Eastern Europe: History, Data, Analysis, 2003, p.142 gives 4,79 million as of 1950, ISBN 0765606658, 9780765606655
  71. ^ Thum, p.129
  72. ^ Selwyn Ilan Troen, Benjamin Pinkus, Merkaz le-moreshet Ben-Guryon, Organizing Rescue: National Jewish Solidarity in the Modern Period, pp.283-284, 1992, ISBN 0714634131, 9780714634135
  73. ^ Thum, p.127 + p.128
  74. ^ Karl Cordell, Andrzej Antoszewski, Poland and the European Union, 2000, p.167, ISBN 0415238854, 9780415238854
  75. ^ Aleksander Kochański, Protokół obrad KC PPR w maju 1945 roku [The Minutes of the Session of the Central Committee of the Polish Workers' Party in May 1945], Dokumenty do dziejów PRL, 1 (Warsaw: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN), 1992.
  76. ^ Why is the Oder-Neiße Line a Peace Border? (1950)
  77. ^ A. Chwalba, Kalendarium Dziejów Polski, p. 72, ISBN 8308031366
  78. ^ Hugo Weczerka, Handbuch der historischen Stätten: Schlesien, 2003, p.XXXVI, ISBN 3-520-31602-1
  79. ^ Ernst Badstübner, Dehio - Handbuch der Kunstdenkmäler in Polen: Schlesien, 2003, p.4, ISBN 342203109X
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Recovered_Territories&oldid=305929581"