User:Cyberbot I/AfD's requiring attention

Below are the top 25 AfD discussions which are most urgently in need of attention from !voters. The urgency for each AfD is calculated based on various statistics, including current number of votes, time until closing date, number of times relisted, overall discussion length, etc. This page is updated by a bot roughly every 6 hours, and was last updated on 23:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC).

AfD	Time to close	Votes	Size (bytes)	Relists	Score
Pacific Rim Productions, Inc.	6 years ago	3	1489	0	3685.36
Andrew G. C. Sage	6 years ago	0	1217	0	404.39
Henry Probasco	6 years ago	0	2142	1	400.12
Scammers (band)	6 years ago	0	1409	0	393.26
Ogden Gavanski	6 years ago	0	2789	0	390.17
The Financial Daily	6 years ago	0	1495	0	381.35
Daily News (Karachi)	6 years ago	0	1389	0	381.09
Live Three	6 years ago	1	3369	1	375.33
Dave Levin	6 years ago	0	1986	0	373.74
Pavel Gregorić	6 years ago	1	2725	1	371.82
Care Co-ordination Network UK	6 years ago	0	2228	1	364.71
Munzali Jibril	6 years ago	0	2133	1	364.71
Scene writers	6 years ago	0	2164	1	364.61
Jon Pollack	6 years ago	0	2412	1	364.45
Anjum Rehmani	6 years ago	1	2775	0	363.45
CAVEman (image)	6 years ago	1	2478	1	354.16
Saadia Sehar Haidari (2nd nomination)	6 years ago	1	3805	1	350.05
Roman Kartsev (2nd nomination)	6 years ago	1	2676	1	350.05
Subi Jacob George	6 years ago	1	3397	1	349.88
Jasmine Kaur Roy	6 years ago	0	1267	0	338.25
National Notary Association	6 years ago	0	1910	0	330.53
Grassroots comics	6 years ago	1	1564	0	330.34
6 Dogs	6 years ago	1	1332	0	330.05
Wise Cracks Concrete Technologies Inc.	6 years ago	1	3100	0	328.71
Vitals (website)	6 years ago	0	3105	0	324.75

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy G5. czar 14:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Pacific Rim Productions, Inc.

Pacific Rim Productions, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Delete It is created by a user, Ja'vonapedia who is a sockpuppet of Simulation12. It has been blocked indefinitely. It was created by this user in violation of block or ban and also fails WP:GNG. Evil Idiot (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
• Delete Speedy WP:G5 Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
• Delete Agree with nom and fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – Joe (talk) 22:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Andrew G. C. Sage

Andrew G. C. Sage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only substantive coverage from a RS is from Barbarians at the Gate: The Fall of RJR Nabisco. Other RS coverage is fleeting and thus does not establish notability. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigma^msg 23:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Henry Probasco

Henry Probasco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There doesn't appear to be significant coverage in reliable sources. --Michael White^T·C 23:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Comment I'm open to merging some or all of it to the article Henry Probasco House. (That said, on looking at it again, the German article implies much more can be said of him.)--T. Anthony (talk) 23:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:42, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigma^msg 23:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Keep: Historically notable figure in Cincinnati and Ohio. There is a lot of historical information about the man and likely much more can be found. In just a short time I found historical information: Cincinnati.com, Cincinnatimagazine.com, Beardbarons.com, 1899 auction of items belonging to Henry Probasco, and one from the University of Cincinnati library. The Newberry Library in Cincinnati houses a large collection of Arabic and Turkish Manuscripts that came from the collections belonging to Henry Probasco. Otr500 (talk) 07:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:33, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Scammers (band)

Scammers (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NMUSIC. Article asserts no claims of notability and while the guideline suggests it be a "subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works", all I can really see/find is a short section referenced from Impose (magazine) in a past revision. (The page was created by User:Closetgodrecords who was blocked minutes later for a clear violation of WP:ORGNAME.) Vanstrat ⁽⁽🗼⁾⁾ 07:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - Bandcamp is not a reliable source; that really is the extent of "coverage" devoted to this band which says nothing for GNG.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 15:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Ogden Gavanski

Ogden Gavanski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO. Claim to notability seems to be WP:CREATIVE but no indication that he played a major role in any production cited. Actual article is heavily promotional. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

He's been a supervising producer, worked on the Chucky franchise, won a Canadian award for his film with Pedro Aldomovar, co-produced with Lions Gate Entertainment, worked with Hollywood stars, etc. For Canada, that's notable. Abonzz (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

I don't doubt any of what you write. However the notability guidelines, WP:CREATIVE don't make any sort country based consideration (vs some of the NSPORT guidelines which treat some things differently from different countries). That's why I wrote "he played a major role" since that's the standard the criteria is aiming for. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

(talk) Barkeep49 For producing the Chucky franchise, couldn't he fall under the following notability criteria"The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work." There are about seven films in the franchise. Thanks! Abonzz (talk) 13:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigma^msg 23:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
• Keep (talk) He is notable in Canada for having won a local award and having produced notable films. Also his work on the Chucky movie franchise fits the notability criteria for co-creating a collective body of work. Abonzz (talk) 13:51, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
• Keep He's notable not only in Canada but internationally for his work with US studios such as Lions Gate and Universal. His film "My Life Without Me" did not only get Canadian awards (Leo and Genie) but was also nominated for a number of Goya awards and won some (see the Wikipedia page). As well, it was in official competition at the Berlin Film festival. This film was co-produced by his company (Milestone) and Almodovar's (el Deseo). As the producer on a number of successful independent and studio films including Cult of Chucky, he definitely played a "major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work." A "producer" oversees the entire production, including creative and financial. User: Yeftini Veetz —Preceding undated comment added 14:33, 29 May 2018 (UTC) — Yeftini Veetz (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

• Keep Not only did he produce one of the most successful and highly rated chapters of the Chucky franchise, he's also been tapped by Universal to produce the latest movie in their Doom franchise (https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0310452/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1). User: Yeftini Veetz —Preceding undated comment added 13:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC) — Duplicate vote: Yeftini Veetz (talk • contribs) has already cast a vote above.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

The Financial Daily

The Financial Daily (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This newspaper fails to meet WP's notability criteria on newspapers and also fails to meet basic GNG. Never produced award winning work and no significant history either. Saqib (talk) 11:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - Without sources (the current version is entirely without), this fails V, NPOV, NOR, NOT, etc. Smmurphy^(Talk) 03:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

• Delete-No sources found. Fails WP:GNG — FR ⁺ 06:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Daily News (Karachi)

Daily News (Karachi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This newspaper fails to meet WP's notability criteria on newspapers and also fails to meet basic GNG. Never produced award winning work and no significant history either. Saqib (talk) 11:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - I don't find any independent coverage - indeed the link to its homepage seemed to link somewhere else. Without such sources, fails NPOV/NOTINDISCRIMINATE/NOTPROMO. Smmurphy^(Talk) 02:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Steve Smith (talk) 00:59, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Live Three

Live Three (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy the WP:NALBUM criteria outside of a single review by AllMusic. FamblyCat94 (talk) 05:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

• Comment: there's quite a few limited release live albums by Coil that could be AfD candidates... Live One, Live Two, Live Four, Megalithomania!, ANS, and the box set that contains all of them, The Key to Joy Is Disobedience, could all conceivably be bundled together for AfD, rather than just proposing one album in the series. I think all of them should be redirected to Coil (band). Richard3120 (talk) 23:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigma^msg 20:21, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 21:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

• Redirect. Even if the notability guideline for recordings can not be met - and I can't find sufficient sources - the article title is a perfectly valid search term, and there is no need for deletion. The policy-based solution per WP:ATD-R is to redirect to the artist article Coil (band) as a categorized {{R from album}} and {{R with possibilities}}. (The script Sagittarius+ can be useful.) Redirecting per ATD-R after a proper WP:BEFORE can always be tried before nominating for deletion. Sam Sailor 13:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Sandstein 09:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Dave Levin

Dave Levin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 13:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 15:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 15:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 15:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

 Comment: You might as well add Mike Feinberg for the same reason. – TheGridExe (talk) 15:41, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Pavel Gregorić

Pavel Gregorić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this meets WP:PROF or WP:NBIO. What notability there is relates to his atheism rather than his scholarship, and those sources that refer to this mention him only tangentially or in passing. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:20, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:20, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigma^msg 21:32, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

• Weak delete - associate professors rarely get to keep their own articles. Bearian (talk) 21:42, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
• comment - may meet notability requirements for an author based on reviews of his books. Thsmi002 (talk) 15:32, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steve Smith (talk) 00:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:24, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Care Co-ordination Network UK

Care Co-ordination Network UK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG, no Reliable sources ^{[Username Needed]} 09:19, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 14:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 14:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A Train^talk 13:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Munzali Jibril

Munzali Jibril (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet minimum inclusion requirements of WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Hitro talk 12:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Neutral: I try to stay away from this sort of discussion so as not be classed as a deletionist or an inclusionist. He was DVC of a University not approved to run graduate studies according to the NUC. Being the president of NIM and Nigeria Police Academy is tricky, but his position in the latter does not seem to be for the national headquarters, and I am on the fence for the status of significance of the former to confer automatic notability on its highest officer. I'll do more findings tomorrow. Sleep sleep. HandsomeBoy (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

update: its actually the headquarters, the one in Lagos is a branch going from neutral to Weak keep, till I wake up tomorrow. HandsomeBoy (talk) 21:10, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

I believe he meets WP:ANYBIO#1, being bestowed a national honour by the federal government, specifically OFR. Also, a solid case can be made that he meets criteria 6 of WP:SCHOLAR#Specific_criteria_notes as he has held the highest positions in several notable organizations such as National Universities Commission Nigeria Defense Academy, Nigeria Police Academy, Nigeria Academy of Letters and Nigerian Institute of Management. Notable individual. HandsomeBoy (talk) 19:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Scene writers

Scene writers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability has not been demonstrated. Not meeting minimum inclusion requirements of WP:BAND. Fails at WP:GNG too. Hitro talk 12:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:19, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:19, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: zero participation again
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kostas20142 (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - They have some minor media notice, all of which is already cited in the article, but nothing (except maybe this: [1]) rises above basic introductions to their existence. WP:EXIST and WP:TOOSOON are relevant here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. A Train^talk 13:05, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Jon Pollack

Jon Pollack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the WP:GNG criteria. --Mhhossein ^talk 14:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Mhhossein ^talk 14:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:38, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable television businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Steve Smith (talk) 01:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Anjum Rehmani

Anjum Rehmani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP was created by a user [2] who is known for creating hoax articles. While the subject of this article is real but xe seems not notable enough to warrant a standalone entry yet. Director of a museum is not something that would be expected to have an article on English Wikipedia. This article claims the subject has written some books but I don't see any notable (at least one of the book has a WP entry which is created by the same user) However author are not given an automatic free pass over WP:BIO just because they exist — their ability to qualify for Wikipedia articles is determined by criteria at WP:AUTHOR which fails in this case. Also the creator of this page is socking here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UA85. --Saqib (talk) 19:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

• Comment Creating editor UA85 has COI as Rehmani is the chairman of his organization/business. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
• Delete. Notwithstanding that the editor has proven untrustworthy (with another deleted article referencing his own sites), the nominator's analysis is sound. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

CAVEman (image)

CAVEman (image) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one WP:RS confirming existence, definitely not notable, never went anywhere. ^{[Username Needed]} 09:21, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 10:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enigma^msg 03:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Saadia Sehar Haidari

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Saadia Sehar Haidari
• Articles for deletion/Saadia Sehar Haidari (2nd nomination)

Saadia Sehar Haidari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP was nom for deletion last year but somehow kept so here I re-nom it for deletion. Journalists are not given an automatic free pass over WP:BIO just because they exist — their ability to qualify for Wikipedia articles is determined by criteria at WP:JOURNALIST which the subject clearly fails. Apparently the BLP is being written by the subject herself Sadiahaidari. Search doesn't produce any coverage and substantial information in the independent RS about the person either so fails to meet basic GNG. Saqib (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

• Keep award winning photojournalist in Pakistan. Noted as the country's first female photo journalist. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

And who say she's the country's first female photo journalist? This article which is written by the subject herself? Anyways, she's not the country's first female photo jour but maybe female video journalist as per this news story but this alone does not establish WP:N. None of the awards she received are significant or notable. --Saqib (talk) 20:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Keep I added some additional citations. She is an award-winning journalist and was the first female journalist for two major news organizations in Pakistan (Associated Press of Pakistan and Geo News). Passes WP:GNG for significant discussion in secondary sources. Lonehexagon (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

As I said above she is not the first female journalist in Pakistan. Please do some fact checking before !voting here. Working for news organisations does not make one notable and being "first female journalist for two major news organizations in Pakistan" is not something special. None of the awards she received are notable. You need to provide some coverage here to establish the WP:N.--Saqib (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

I didn't say she was the first female journalist in Pakistan. That was someone else. I said "She is an award-winning journalist and was the first female journalist for two major news organizations in Pakistan (Associated Press of Pakistan and Geo News)." I didn't say that is why she qualifies; I said she qualifies because her article satisfies WP:GNG for significant discussion in secondary sources. WP:N states "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." I believe that has been satified here.[3][4][5] Lonehexagon (talk) 19:41, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

OK and I believe she does not meet GNG because I don't think the coverage is significant as GNG requires. Two of the sources (WAN-IFRA and The Media Line) are of dubious quality so I would not even consider them to establish the WP:N. The standard set for sources to support claims within an article is a lower standard than that for sources to establish WP:N. My comments are concerned with sources used to establish notability. And I don't think the provided sources meet the criteria for establishing notability. --Saqib (talk) 21:24, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable journalist with non-notable work and awards lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Looking at the sources it sounds like she was in news for receiving Press Freedom Award in 2011 so WP:BLP1E applies. Fails WP:JOURNALIST. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:07, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Roman Kartsev

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Roman Kartsev
• Articles for deletion/Roman Kartsev (2nd nomination)

Roman Kartsev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although additional sources have been added since the last afd, none seem to have any value as references or suggest any real notability to meet WP:NACTOR Jac16888 ^Talk 14:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

• Keep lots of sources on Googlr Books note him as a popular and influential comedian of Odessa. Part of a variety team duo and then had numerous significant roles in film. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Weak Keep These reliable sources assert that he was a popular comdedian: [6][7]. -Indy beetle (talk) 04:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
• Keep Played Schwonder in Heart of a Dog (1988 film), the most notable adaptation of the book on screen and had a minor role in The Master and Margarita (miniseries) another fairly popular adaptation. Is both an Honored Artist of the RSFSR and a People's Artist of the Russian Federation. As for sources there plenty of them on the Russian article.--Catlemur (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
• Keep the Russian article shows that WP:GNG is passed and those references can be transferred to the English version, thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:23, 25 May 2018 (UTC) 18:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Subi Jacob George

Subi Jacob George (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib (talk) 19:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

• As per the latest revision,The article has relevant notability which includes gov. and sources from US patent numbers and Authority controls and local news and media. Stalin Sunny ^Talk2Me 02:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC) This user is creator of the page

Removed disruptive header. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:15, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

• Week Keep: May or may not "squeeze by" (I dislike that term) WP:GNG but certainly WP:PROF as a co-author and contributor to peer-reviewed scientific journals as an expert (a doctor) in the field. Otr500 (talk) 01:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete. Two high cited papers on GS but seemingly little else. Not remotely as pass of WP:Prof. WP:Too soon.Xxanthippe (talk) 03:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC).
• Strong keep clear pass of WP:Prof per Eppstein below. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:36, 31 May 2018 (UTC).

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Keep. His Google scholar profile shows 17 of his papers having over 100 citations, and an h-index of 44, well above threshold for WP:PROF#C1. Xxanthippe, where are you seeing only two highly-cited papers? —David Eppstein (talk) 05:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Vote changed. Where did I go wrong? Xxanthippe (talk) 06:36, 31 May 2018 (UTC).

• Keep as per David Eppstein.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:39, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Jasmine Kaur Roy

Jasmine Kaur Roy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Significant coverage not found. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:21, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 03:28, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 03:28, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 08:43, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

• Keep Her documentaries have received international acclaim, especially her most recent one Amoli. If the article can't be kept in its current form, it shouldn't be deleted. It should at least be turned into an article about Amoli, which easily has enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Lonehexagon (talk) 20:52, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

• Weak Keep looks notable for now according to references Heshiv (talk) 09:29, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

National Notary Association

National Notary Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails notability guidelines Wolfson5 (talk) 03:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 07:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

• Keep Tentatively. Seems kind of technical, and useful as a reference (e.g. for the inbound links from a few biographical articles), and not promotional. To me it seems reasonable for this to be split out of the too-long Notary public article. Note there is a lot of coverage about notaries in Wikipedia, I am surprised to see articles split out for Notary public (Florida), etc. I agree that the amount of coverage included is marginal, but it would be okay to include in the Notary public article, and then we have no basis to disallow it being split out. Perhaps it could be expanded/renamed to cover all notary public associations, heading off creation of articles. --Doncram (talk) 00:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Alternative comics. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:31, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Grassroots comics

Grassroots comics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a non-notable concept is part essay, part advocacy. Neither of the references mention this by name, and the external links are either blogs, dead links, or primary sources. Even if this were notable, which it isn't, it would still qualify for WP:TNT. Reyk _YO! 11:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

• Redirect to Alternative comics as essentially a badly sourced/written duplicate of that article._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 13:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh666 04:50, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:54, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

6 Dogs

6 Dogs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At present, failing on WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Maybe notable in future as per Wikipedia notability guidelines. Hitro talk 11:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 13:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

• Delete a non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Wise Cracks Concrete Technologies Inc.

Wise Cracks Concrete Technologies Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a franchising company, created by an acknowledged paid editor who created it as a draft but then moved it to main space without WP:AFC review. The references are mainly routine coverage on franchising sites. The company has also won "Waterproofing and Foundation Repair" awards in their area but these are not inherently notable. My searches are finding no reliable source coverage to indicate more than a firm going about its business; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

• Noting that the article creator also created redirects for names associated with the company, I have added these to the "find sources" above. AllyD (talk) 07:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
• Re: Failing "WP:CORPDEPTH" - the company is definitely more notable in the Atlantic Canada region than it is Canada-wide (it has been covered in regional/local news there a number of times, but tracking these sources down can be a challenge). That said, your concern given the sources included on the current version of the page seems reasonable. I'll see what I can do to remedy this by tracking down more (independent) sources that ideally also prove notability. Astro Reeves (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
• Delete Agree with nom, zero indications of notability, entirely promotional, fails WP:SPIP. A search for sources doesn't turn up anything that meets the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:59, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Vitals (website)

Vitals (website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's currently a dispute whether Vitals is a website or a company. Whatever it is, it doesn't seem to be notable enough to be the subject of an encyclopedia article. There's next to no media coverage beyond a few passing mentions, often as one in a list of doctor review sites. There's nothing better on the "In the news" page on vitals.com, and the article's current sources are even worse. Huon (talk) 00:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 02:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 02:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

This company has had more media attention than most. It was the subject of an NBC Nightly News segment and an NPR Planet Money podcast. https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/employers-offer-cash-incentives-to-encourage-healthcare-shopping-763391043752 http://snip.ly/HDwp?utm_source=StartUp+Health+Insider&utm_campaign=f055468f8c-StartUp_Health_Weekly_News_10-14-2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_250bac26a5-f055468f8c-312240461&mc_cid=f055468f8c&mc_eid=a7bea70577#http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2015/10/02/445371930/episode-655-pay-patients-save-money

More recently, the company has been mentioned as the partner of several large health plans, including BCBS Massachusetts, BCBS Louisiana and Highmark. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/payer-issues/bcbs-of-massachusetts-to-pay-members-up-to-250-per-procedure-when-they-shop.html http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/business/article_14225bc2-5c16-11e7-8b4f-b36bb8e56c52.html http://www.post-gazette.com/business/healthcare-business/2017/01/27/Highmark-insurance-opens-door-to-health-care-pricing/stories/201701240027 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmariestollars (talk • contribs) 11:33, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:36, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

• Delete: does not meet WP:NWEB nor WP:NCORP. Sourcing is passing mentions, routine funding news and / or WP:SPIP. Just a directory listing with no value to the readers. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:49, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.