Jump to content

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
13 users left. rm Ihatethejews (blocked indef by Carlosguitar (ACB)).
Reporting MeatWhacker5000.
Tags: Twinkle Reverted
Line 44: Line 44:
*
*
*{{user-uaa|1=Junon.io Official}} &ndash; Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. — <span style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 12px red; background-color: black; padding: 3px; color: white"><b>[[User:Arccosecant|<span style="color:orange">csc</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Arccosecant|<span style="color: red">-1</span>]]</sup></b></span> 00:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=Junon.io Official}} &ndash; Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. — <span style="box-shadow: 0px 0px 12px red; background-color: black; padding: 3px; color: white"><b>[[User:Arccosecant|<span style="color:orange">csc</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Arccosecant|<span style="color: red">-1</span>]]</sup></b></span> 00:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
*
*{{user-uaa|1=MeatWhacker5000}} &ndash; Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. [[User:MJ94|MJ94]] ([[User talk:MJ94|talk]]) 01:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
*
*

Revision as of 01:44, 24 May 2021

    Usernames for administrator attention

    This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

    1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
    2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
    3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
    4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
    5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
    6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
    7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
    This page was last updated at 22:11 on 15 November 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

    User-reported

    Being discussed with the user. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Being discussed with the user. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Being discussed with the user. but I don't really see a violation here anyway. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:15, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Being discussed with the user. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:20, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. User states on user talk page the account is not shared and that it's not their real name. 331dot (talk) 12:27, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    331dot as per WP:ISU such username as above are not 'permitted' as they imply shared access, I dont think we can allow that username. Ratnahastin (talk)
    Ratnahastin The user has unequivocally stated that their account is not shared and the names that make it up are not their real name. Unless you have evidence they are lying, the username is not a violation. 331dot (talk) 17:05, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]