Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
* {{pagelinks|Sciences Po}} |
* {{pagelinks|Sciences Po}} |
||
'''Full protection''' Persistent vandalism contrary to the consensus on the lead. Edit-warring with no discussion in spite of subject in talk page. This page has been fully protected a number of times, but each time the protection was lifted, disruptive editing caused new protection. Once again now. --[[User:Launebee|Launebee]] ([[User talk:Launebee|talk]]) 23:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC) |
'''Full protection''' Persistent vandalism contrary to the consensus on the lead. Edit-warring with no discussion in spite of subject in talk page. This page has been fully protected a number of times, but each time the protection was lifted, disruptive editing caused new protection. Once again now. --[[User:Launebee|Launebee]] ([[User talk:Launebee|talk]]) 23:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
=== [[GAP Inc.]] === |
|||
* {{pagelinks|GAP Inc.}} |
|||
'''Full protection:''' Strong accusations being levied based upon weak or even inappropriate sources based on current standards of wikipedia and academia in general with regards to forced abortions of laborers. [[User:Stuffedturkey|Stuffedturkey]] ([[User talk:Stuffedturkey|talk]]) 23:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC) |
|||
==Current requests for reduction in protection level== |
==Current requests for reduction in protection level== |
Revision as of 23:39, 23 August 2017
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection : High level of IP vandalism. Repetitive change of statistics to reflect current season in previous season's page, instead of creating a new page for the current season.
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: IP has violated the no restore clause of the Arbitration decision. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 02:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Administrator note - This article is right up to the line of what I would consider to be "reasonably construed as belonging to the Arab-Israeli conflict." I'm leaning decline on the protection request as while the conflict is mentioned it is not the main subject of the article and we generally try to be as open to editing as possible as a default stance. However, I would appreciate a second opinion from another admin prior to handling the request. Mifter (talk) 07:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Mifter - If the article contains content that could or would be considered "Arab-Israeli conflict-related", then the article is within the realms of this topic and therefore WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 would apply. Broadly construed is what this very situation is meant for; if content within an article subject has a legitimate argument to be considered within a given topic under discretionary sanctions or if the content appears to be "borderline" or "dancing" within the given topic, then the article can be considered as being within that particular topic and therefore under discretionary sanctions. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- User:Oshwah, User:Mifter The article clearly belongs to the area and the IP disruption is ongoing could someone protect it?--Shrike (talk) 07:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Shrike - I've semi-protected the article for two days. Mifter requested above for another admin to respond and give him input - I'd like to see his response and thoughts before adding 30/500 to this article. I don't want to step on anyone's toes :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:14, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- User:Oshwah, User:Mifter The article clearly belongs to the area and the IP disruption is ongoing could someone protect it?--Shrike (talk) 07:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Mifter - If the article contains content that could or would be considered "Arab-Israeli conflict-related", then the article is within the realms of this topic and therefore WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 would apply. Broadly construed is what this very situation is meant for; if content within an article subject has a legitimate argument to be considered within a given topic under discretionary sanctions or if the content appears to be "borderline" or "dancing" within the given topic, then the article can be considered as being within that particular topic and therefore under discretionary sanctions. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and hoax edits by User:Taiki0409 IP sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:46, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Question: @LG-Gunther:, can you please provide a few diffs showing this disruptive editing? Thanks, Nakon 19:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the last protection expired, IP socks of indef blocked User:Karadenizlim25 return to make the same disruptive edits. Deli nk (talk) 14:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Nakon 19:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Declined Nakon 19:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The most recent series of edits was nothing but test edits and an ESRB rating edit made without consensus. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:20, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 19:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Massively BLP-violating edits coming from persistent edit-warrior with probable COI. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 16:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nakon 19:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement.. DrStrauss talk 17:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Edit war with an IP user. Brankestein (talk) 17:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nakon 20:06, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unregistered accounts cite unsourced content. . SahabAliwadia 17:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 20:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unexplained deletion of sourced content, regarding his marriage to his former wife. One such deletion was by the account Ash201633, who with this edit seems to suggest they are Louise Linton the former wife in question. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC) have a conflict of interest. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 20:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Nakon: The information has been removed again with this edit. Is this still not enough disruption? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 21:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Nakon: The information has been removed again with this edit. Is this still not enough disruption? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 20:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 20:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Someone keeps trying to post bogus info about the game "Uno" with house rules as a joke. Hornpipe2 (talk) 20:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 20:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Probably worth a block or 2 as well. Toddst1 (talk) 21:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Just the one. I asked here already about this article. It's somewhere above atm. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 22:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- @User:Hillbillyholiday could we get you to try and engage in a conversation on the talk page over editwarring.--Moxy (talk) 22:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- No. It's an unequivocably 3rr-exempt situation. --Hillbillyholiday (talk) 23:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing persistent vandalism. Joeyconnick (talk) 22:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Four IP numbers have removed reliably sourced content with ridiculous edit summaries in the last 15 minutes. Looks like an off-site concerted effort. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated edits by different IPs changing description to "supersonic transport". Appears to be in relation to this Reddit thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/softwaregore/comments/6duemj/the_airbus_a330_is_a_supersonic_transport/. Kbseah (talk) 22:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Full protection Persistent vandalism contrary to the consensus on the lead. Edit-warring with no discussion in spite of subject in talk page. This page has been fully protected a number of times, but each time the protection was lifted, disruptive editing caused new protection. Once again now. --Launebee (talk) 23:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Strong accusations being levied based upon weak or even inappropriate sources based on current standards of wikipedia and academia in general with regards to forced abortions of laborers. Stuffedturkey (talk) 23:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.