Jump to content

User talk:Koala15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Craigjm94 (talk | contribs) at 11:05, 19 June 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ace Hood

Any reason as to why you removed the single "Supposed to Do" from the discography list??? W3513Y1994 (talk) 11:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Koala15, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Koala15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Koala15. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Koala15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 23:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Hey Koala15! I'm awarding you this Barnstar for your works in articles mostly related to animation and others. Thank you and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 09:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Czarface, Koala15!

Wikipedia editor Pjposullivan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Terrific article, a pleasure to read. Many thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Pjposullivan's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for your contributions to bring Monsters, Inc. up to GA status! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article The Incredibles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 11:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Incredibles

The article The Incredibles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Incredibles for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! One of my favorites. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ratatouille (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ratatouille (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ratatouille (film)

The article Ratatouille (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ratatouille (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Half Million Award

The Half Million Award
For your contributions to bring Ratatouille (film) (estimated annual readership: 632,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Half Million Award for bringing Ratatouille to Good Article status.

Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:37, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Bug's Life

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Bug's Life you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 12:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Bug's Life

The article A Bug's Life you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Bug's Life for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 12:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Toy Story 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toy Story 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mediran -- Mediran (talk) 11:31, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Marshall Mathers LP 2

Orlady (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Berzerk (song)

Orlady (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
For making Toy Story 2 a GA. Keep it up! ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 11:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Finding Nemo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Finding Nemo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Finding Nemo

The article Finding Nemo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Finding Nemo for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jionpedia -- Jionpedia (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shrek

The article Shrek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shrek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cars (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cars (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 3 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) @ 18:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It has now passed. Rcsprinter (indicate) @ 23:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Half Million Award

The Half Million Award
For your contributions to bring Cars (film) (estimated annual readership: 964,012) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Bobnorwal (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go get 'em, tiger! :D Bobnorwal (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pinocchio (1940 film)

The article Pinocchio (1940 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pinocchio (1940 film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Loeba -- Loeba (talk) 20:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koala - I was happy to do this GAN but wanted to mention that it's a wee bit disheartening not to get a word of thanks (reviewing does take time and effort). I'm sure you didn't mean to be rude but I wanted to give you a head's up for the future - it's always good to thank your reviewer. That's all, no hard feelings. Keep up the good editing --Loeba (talk) 08:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Good Article Barnstar
For making Disney's Pinocchio a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:11, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasia

Well done for the quick work on another film GA. You will be happy to know that this article swiftly passed the review. I knew from the start this one would easily pass! ☠ Jaguar ☠ 19:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the help. Koala15 (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fantasia (film)

The article Fantasia (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fantasia (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Disney Barnstar
This is for making Fantasia (1940) a GA! And also because you made a GA out of three consecutive Disney articles (Cars, Pinocchio and this). I wish you all the best for making more GA's out of Disney articles. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Koala15 (talk) 05:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Jungle Book (1967 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Jungle Book (1967 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished the review and put it on hold for seven days. It's a good article - only a few minor points need to addressing. Let me know when you're done with them. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
For making Disney's Jungle Book a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Corpse Bride

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Corpse Bride you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Corpse Bride

The article Corpse Bride you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Corpse Bride for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quarter Million Award

The Quarter Million Award
For your contributions to bring Corpse Bride (estimated annual readership: 276,997) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Corpse Bride to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! And again, congratulations! –Prototime (talk · contribs) 03:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Jungle Book (1967 film)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disney and Pixar articles

Your work in this area is unparalleled, and as a lover of these grand animated films, I can't thank you enough for your tireless efforts to bring them up to scratch. Just thought I'd let you feast your eyes on some stats I've put together on the article quality of some of the categories. Its fascinating to see how low many of the articles are (or at least were, when I first created these stat articles in 2012 - before your improvements). Nevertheless there is much work to be done.

I was also wondering if, due to your expertise, you could look over some of the work I've been doing in the realm of animated films and perhaps build upon them through copyediting, research, or other helpful advice to make the articles even better?--Coin945 (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3
Thanks ill check them out. Koala15 (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers. Though I'm the first to admit that I'm not the greatest Wikipedia editor, I have a massive passion for this topic so have tried to improve the articles with great effort. I sincerely hope you and I can make some of these articles really good. :)--Coin945 (talk) 16:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prashant! -- Prashant! (talk) 01:40, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peanuts (film)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


Corpse Bride

I would like to create this post to prevent unnecessary future edits. Peter Lorre the actor that I am referencing originally called Laszlo Lowenstein was already in the wikipedia page before I edited it. Peter Lorre and Laszlo are the same people. He changed his name.

But do you have a reliable source to back up your claim? Koala15 (talk) 01:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Peter Lorre was already cited as the source of inspiration before my edit I am not saying anything new. If you want to know about Peter Lorre as the inspiration of maggot you should talk to the previous user I am simply adding additional information. The source for Peter Lorre should not be my responsibility no offense to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.129.229.27 (talk) 02:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, it looks like you are correct i found a better source so i will add it in. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Koala15 (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.129.229.27 (talk) 03:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User:Koala15. I'm not the one who identified the copyvio - I am the administrator who tagged the dispute after the contents were removed and then twice restored and the problem was reported at WT:CP. The listing does not result in the deletion of whole articles when a specific section is problematic - as the template says, "Unless the copyright status of the text on this page is clarified, the problematic text or' the entire page may be deleted one week after the time of its listing." (emphasis added)

The listing should be addressed within several days time. In the meantime, as the template indicates, it should not be removed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The plot was removed, as I indicated, several times and put back. When disputes like this occur, the listing gives the contributor who disputes the finding time to argue his case and, if necessary, to rewrite the content. Frankly, I think plot removal would have been the better way to go, but when the removal is disputed the listing at WP:CP gives an opportunity for opposition to be aired and explored. Akin to an WP:AFD template, it lets people know how to voice their disagreement or reasons the content is okay or to aid in rewriting. It just takes a few days. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disney

Just now I noticed you managed to get The Jungle Book, of which I had done most of the hard work, into the Good Articles. Anyway, can you take a look at The Lion King, which I hope to finally restore the green shield on the corner? Thanks. igordebraga ≠ 05:14, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ill try to work on that one after i finish my next GA. Koala15 (talk) 15:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I also left a review for Lion King. Feel free to edit accordingly with my input there. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty and the Beast

If you wanted the GA review for Beauty and the Beast to begin afresh, it would have been better to just call up someone else to take over as reviewer in the same GA review page instead of creating a new page. Maybe if I have time, I will serve as the new reviewer. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how that works. But yeah, whichever. Koala15 (talk) 18:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I've stepped in as GA reviewer! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Koala, I feel sorry for the failure of the GA review (I can't believe the article has failed its GA review three times in a row!) But I feel that after you fix all what the reviewer said, it will look GA worthy. So I wish you better luck for the next review. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite sorry myself. I'm sure everyone worked really hard on it and hate to have to let their hopes down again. I would like to remind you though that I'm willing to give a reassessment after it's been touched up. Spend at least a week or so improving the article, and then contact me when you feel ready to re-nominate. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 08:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article now is in much better shape. Just fix up the citations issues I mentioned and it will finally be GA! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)

The article Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prashant! -- Prashant! (talk) 07:51, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Beauty and the Beast (1991 film)

The article Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 18:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pinocchio, etc.

Thanks for understanding. I just posted a question on this (prior to your correction) on the Film Project page. In the future, I think I'm going to post both dates, when there is a difference between the premiere and the actual release. I think most folks use imdb.com, which goes by the earliest date. I've been using the AFI database, which is pretty thorough, although not infallible (as my research into the release of the other Disney film - Fantasia showed me).Onel5969 (talk) 00:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah its always best to use both dates. Koala15 (talk) 02:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

Hi. Would you care to comment at this RfC for the article Artpop? It originally started as a proposal to remove an unverifiable statement decided upon by editors in a previous consensus but has moved to a similar proposal titled "Agyle's proposal". If not, feel free to ignore message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 04:29, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
For making Disney's Beauty and the Beast a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 04:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rio 2, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brazilian and Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasia

Hi. We had a discussion on the Film Project page regarding this. You can find the discussion here. I know it's a thin discussion, and am open to re-opening it. Please add your thoughts there.Onel5969 (talk) 02:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, since this movie had such a complicated release we can make an exception. Koala15 (talk) 02:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2

Re your reversion of my edits to the article:

You'll notice that I raised objections to the way in which the prose is structured in the "Development" section. I've already done some copy editing but it requires more work. I draw your attention to this specific paragraph: "On March 14, 2014 the Nevada Film Office announced that Sony Pictures had been awarded the first certificate of eligibility for the tax credit for the film Mall Cop 2.[10] Nevada Film Office Director, Eric Preiss, indicated that the production would get $4.3 million in tax credits based on the proposal in their application.[11] On March 25, 2014 Neal McDonough was added to the cast of the film to play the role of villain.[3] Daniella Alonso was also added to the cast on April 7, she would play Divina Martinez, the general manager of the Wynn Hotel, who is completely perplexed when Blart presumes that she's hitting on him.[4] On April 2, Sony set the film for an April 17, 2015 release date.[12] On April 25 D. B. Woodside joined the cast of the film.". This sequential order of events makes this section read quite clumsily. Why not name all the actors who were added to the cast, regardless of when they were added. My edit summary said the article read like a news release. The prose needs improvement so fix it if you wish the tag to be removed. EagerToddler39 (talk) 00:26, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah ill try to copy edit it. Koala15 (talk) 00:36, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Simpsons Brick Like Me.png

A tag has been placed on File:The Simpsons Brick Like Me.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Simpsons Brick Like Me.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Simpsons Brick Like Me.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:03, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disney film translations

The translation of songs and films etc. within the animated canon is a huge operation that is very well documented and very interesting. Sources for such an article would include The translation of songs in Disney's Beauty and the Beast: An example of manipulation. This article would follow the format of similar articles like Translations of The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter in translation. I would not even know where to begin so I offer it as a possibly pursuable project. If this sounds like something to interest you, I can obviously help out with gathering sources. (But the actual creating of articles TBH i can struggle with due to wanting to include every little tidbit and finding it hard to paraphrase without losing vital information, resulting in a quote-filled article).--Coin945 (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of other potential sources. (some great info about theme parks, which could be a supplementary angle than the films). Before even knowing what an article like this would include, I think an info dump to see all the possible angles is a good way to go:



Yeah maybe, that sounds interesting. Koala15 (talk) 17:24, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plácido Domingo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conductor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Minions

As far as the cast is concerned, I am going with the current listing of what IMDB is going with until otherwise. NoseNuggets (talk) 1:00 PM US EDT May 6 2014.

Mad Max

Village road is Australian, there are no American production companies involved.

Village Roadshow Pictures Atotalstranger (talk) 08:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Bros. is American and i believe they partially funded it. Koala15 (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Song genre reverts

What's with the reverts, according to various media sources and DJ Mustard himself, Ratchet (music genre) is considered a genre within hip hop.Backendgaming (talk) 04:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure there is no genre called "Ratchet" it is only a phrase to describe certain types of music, and even if it was you can't just change every song to the genre "Ratchet". You should probably read WP:GWAR. Koala15 (talk) 04:41, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Loiter Squad logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Loiter Squad logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plots of Simpsons

I saw that you write a plots episodes of Family Guy...so I decided to ask you to help a bit and Simpsons. Do you want? There are some episodes to expand, like Specs and the City, Diggs, The Winter of His Content, You Don't Have to Live Like a Referee, What to Expect When Bart's Expecting and Pay Pal. Djole 555 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:06, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i will try but i might have to watch them again, lol. Koala15 (talk) 19:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for expand listed episodes. When you will to do for an episode The Yellow Badge of Cowardge? Greeting! Djole 555 — Preceding undated comment added 19:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, ill try to write a plot for The Yellow Badge of Cowardge right now. Koala15 (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote something for Days of Future Future, but I'm not sure that it is good written. Can you check plot and edit it if something is wrong. Thanks in advance. Djole 555

Looks good i added to it a bit. Koala15 (talk) 23:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robot Chicken (season 5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malcolm X (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iggy Azalea The New Classic.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iggy Azalea The New Classic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Boondocks (season 4)

Show me a current source and I'll back down. I might also note that sometimes shows are out on DVD before they air. The set costs 40 dollars which I doubt they'd sell for only 10 episodes. They might have also decided to break up the season into two broadcast runs of 10 episodes. Grapesoda22 (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Reunion sampling Bagpipes from Baghdad by Eminem

The Reunion contains a sample of the song "Bagpipes from Baghdad", as performed by Eminem. It needs to be redone on Hell: The Sequel EP. Don't believe me, find me a source for it. If you can't, then you don't have a choice but to believe me. I have the album, and it says so in the sample credits in the short booklet. User:Skylar3214 4:50, 19 May 2014

Oh, i only deleted your edits because that censorship section was ridiculous, but you can add the sample credit back. Koala15 (talk) 02:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frankenstein (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Executive production on Hell: The Sequel by Eminem and Mr. Porter

Mr. Porter was not the co-executive producer, just because Eminem was the executive producer. Mr. Porter was also the executive producer, like it's displayed in the short booklet that says so. That means that Eminem and Mr. Porter ARE the executive producers for the EP. User:Skylar3214 12:00, 20 May 2014

G5s

By the way, I've never liked these types of deletions because sometimes they affect people who had nothing to do with the disruption that caused the deletion in the first place. But procedurally it's the deleting admin or someone familiar with the SPI that needs to make a call as to whether or not an article can be restored. That said, if you agree not to restore it to article space until you get a response from James, I'll userify the content for you. Deal? §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I wanna improve it anyway. Koala15 (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ambergris (Bob's Burgers), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.ovguide.com/tv_episode/bobs-burgers-season-4-episode-18-ambergris-4707590), and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ambergris (Bob's Burgers) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I accept that the content you re-added is not particularly substantial, but it is still obviously copied from the source. As you must well know, that is not acceptable here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well I don't know how words can be copyrighted, I don't think I'll ever understand why we can't copy a plot that Fox gives in their press release. I also didn't even get this plot from ovguide. But I will remove it for now and write a better one when I have free time. Koala15 (talk) 17:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 20:24, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I did. So did AbramTerger but you didn't warm him so I guess you only warn people you disagree with. Keep up the good work! Koala15 (talk) 20:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You did have multiple editors reverting you, while you were the only one reverting him. In all fairness though, I apologize for not immediately warning him too, but see here. STATic message me! 22:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay and Craig

Why did you undo my edits to "Sanjay and Craig?" --SalmonCat (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cause you were adding trivial facts to the cast section. Koala15 (talk) 14:52, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pound of Flesh (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joshua James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Little Dragon Nabuma Rubberband.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Little Dragon Nabuma Rubberband.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

STOP

Stop changing the title of Shaun the Sheep the Movie back to just Shaun the Sheep. This is the official title of the movie.

  • This is what Aardman officially announced it as. ("Teaser Trailer Released for Shaun the Sheep the Movie!")
  • This is what it says on the official movie poster.
  • This is what it's called on the official Studio Canal UK YouTube channel. ("From Aardman, the creators of Wallace & Gromit and Chicken Run, Shaun the Sheep the Movie is coming to cinemas worldwide from Spring 2015!")

StopmotionEd (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but are they just calling it Shaun the Sheep the Movie for people to not confuse it with the show? Cause the majority of sources just call it Shaun the Sheep. Koala15 (talk) 19:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter why they did it, it's still the official name of the film. StopmotionEd (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Metacritic's "normalized" scores

Despite Metacritic's claims, their scores are not "normalized". Please see WT:Manual of Style/Film/Archive 6#Metacritic's so-called "normalized" scores. Thanks. 75.177.156.78 (talk) 23:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Little Mermaid (1989 film)

The article The Little Mermaid (1989 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Little Mermaid (1989 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on another Disney GA :) XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing at 2014 in hip hop music

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 in hip hop music, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. You have been told several times, and have never given a reason for the removals. From now on I'll be reverting any such edits. Wetdogmeat (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I only removed that album because it doesn't look like it was released today. I don't think that warrants a warning like that. Koala15 (talk) 14:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It was released today. It was shipped with the Fait Accompli orders. It is a limited edition physical release that can only be bought directly from Canibus. I've told you multiple times about deleting entries from the article simply because you don't know anything about the albums or the artists. I've told you before to simply leave any entries like that alone; I check this article daily, I will take care of them. Saying that "it doesn't look like it was released today" might be an explanation for moving the entry to the 'unspecified' section, but you chose instead to delete it. You've done the same thing three or four times now, and that absolutely warrants a warning. Just stop doing it. Wetdogmeat (talk) 15:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well you know how hip hop albums go, they get pushed back so often so i can never tell if it was released or not if its not on a retail site. Koala15 (talk) 19:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but, again, that would explain you moving it to the 'unspecified' section, not deleting it entirely. Just leave it where it is in the future if you don't know what to do with it, and I'll sort it out. - Wetdogmeat (talk) 20:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Barnstar

Good Article Barnstar
For Disney's The Little Mermaid. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But why does the infobox have French as the second language? I don't remember the film having any French dialogue, after all it set in either Crotia or Denmark. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed "French" from the infobox. Undo it if I am wrong. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, i think your right, thanks for the barn star. Koala15 (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Ambition Second Week Sales

So, wait until they post the chart standings on Billboard and the sales on HipHopDx or the site I pulled the info from? I think Thursday is when that information is released. Maybe, tomorrow, perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RodneyP43 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah HipHopDX usually posts the full sales on Wednesday, Hits Daily Double is sometimes way off with their estimates so its best not use them. Koala15 (talk) 23:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do. Unless someone beats me to the punch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RodneyP43 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maps (Maroon 5 song)

User:Mayast leave it these genres as "pop, pop rock" without citation. I saw E! (source from "Composition" section) says "uptempo track" but does not says "pop". So I found MTV News says "midtempo pop tune", and Fuse says "rock-pop track" (actually it's pop rock).

P.S. Make sure if "References" section has the same link. 183.171.160.18 (talk) 06:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's because pop is mentioned in the second ref in this section (Radio.com: "more straightforward pop sheen"). I didn't want to put ref tags next to each word, but if you prefer it, I've added it now, together with the Fuse citation about pop rock. Mayast (talk) 08:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What is this referring to? Koala15 (talk) 14:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Koala15&oldid=613547000"