Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk | contribs) at 14:26, 2 March 2020 (→‎JNU attack: Requesting semi-protection of JNU attack. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Template:Confirmed cases in 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary semi-protection is used on Coronavirus disease 2019 and this template is used on that page to report confirmed cases and deaths that have already been vandalised. Please assist. TIA! comrade waddie96 (talk) 10:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 13:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. N.J.A. | talk 13:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @NJA: Please see Template:Deaths in 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak which was protected (both were reported at the same time). I assume the same vandalism will occur with this template. comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the ping. As of now it is a bit pre-emptive, which is not what we normally do unless it’s a high risk template. I can accept an argument that it is, so to save trouble I will semi protect for 3 months, N.J.A. | talk 13:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Trivium (band)

    Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – The page seems to be a target for edit warring, and many edits are contested from the revision history. Thepenguin9 (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. One IPv6 /64 range involved that I could see. Blocked for 1 week. -- ferret (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Battle of Kiev (1943)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor keeps find-and-replacing Kiev with Kyiv against consensus (and it also breaks all the image and category names). Le Deluge (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, please warn the IP, and if they continue please ping me, I will block them--Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Joe Lycett

    Semi-protection: Things going a little crazy here since this British comedian legally changed his name to Hugo Boss. Also recomend protection against page moves in the short term too. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., was already moved protected indefinitely, N.J.A. | talk 13:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Sitar

    Semi-protection Some IPs are edit warring each other and also the regulars are confusing their edits for vandalism. NavjotSR (talk) 12:38, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. seems contained mostly for now, keep engaging in dispute resolution or report any edit warring at WP:ANEW N.J.A. | talk 13:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict) Declined I don't think protection is warranted here right now. Where's the talk page discussions? Slow moving and protection would only impact good faith IP editor. -- ferret (talk) 13:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    A Quiet Place Part II

    Semi-protection: Roaming IP editor keeps adding unsourced content to the "Cast" section. They are also removing red links in violation of WP:REDLINK despite the figures having the absolute potential for their own articles, likely removing it because they think red links look bad. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 12:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. if that doesn’t help re-report here or to me for re-consideration, N.J.A. | talk 13:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Doctor Eggman

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandals over the last few days. Johand199 (TalkContribs) 12:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., also users blocked by another admin, N.J.A. | talk 13:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Richard Grenell

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Dispute over whether Grenell still formally holds the position of U.S. ambassador to Germany. 1990'sguy (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    John Smith (actor)

    Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Third account this user has created with what I believe is the express purpose of vandalising this page with Neo-Nazi-related content. This is following months of the same vandalism under IPs. Such persistence shows that this is not gonna stop unless we commit to tougher protection. Alivardi (talk) 13:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Pop Smoke

    Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    JNU attack

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – from IP and new users. And this is a hot topic. I am requesting for indefinite page protection. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 14:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Module:Location map/data/Israel binyamin/doc

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Documentation subpage should be edited by anyone. Vitaium (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment: Are you sure you're in the right section? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: The page is currently template protected, so extended confirmed would indeed be a decrease. Favonian (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Frietjes: Notifying protecting admin per bright and yellow, yet so easily overlooked, instruction at the top of this section. Favonian (talk) 15:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @HJ Mitchell: protected it, I just moved it (not an admin). Frietjes (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2019–20 coronavirus outbreak

    Temporary pending changes. ~Nick~{talk} 02:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @El C: applied the indefinite Semi-Protection, so we need their input here. However, given that this outbreak is ongoing, it seems like a good idea to make it PC1 to prevent collateral damage by denying IPs who could add important information. — Maile (talk) 02:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, but I'm not at all convinced that protection needs to be downgraded from semi to pc1. El_C 02:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Maile66: I did not apply an indefinite duration — the protection is set to expire on 19 April 2020. El_C 02:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, pardon me. It's the page move that is indef protected. — Maile (talk) 02:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    No worries, Maile66 — I do that all the time, too. El_C 03:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done as this will increase work all round for everyone and prevent rapid updates. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:BrownHairedGirl/MyArchiveIndex

    Semi-protection: So that I can still edit it, now that I am no longer an admin. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:North East Delhi riots

    Unprotection: QEDK (seems to be offline) has said that any admin can revert the protection, Please unprotect the article talk page. People should be able to post suggestion. some amount of talk page Vandalism and BLP Vios can be removed easily. Blocking the talk simply floods the OTRS and shifts to other user pages. We should keep the page related comments at one place. Talk page. . ⋙–DBigXray 12:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Protection removed by El C--⋙–DBigXray 12:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Brianna Wu

    please update the sources for [12] and [13].

    12: https://archive.ph/ek0sE

    13: https://web.archive.org/web/20161101205623/http://www.briannawu.net/about

    Im not afraid (talk) 04:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I posted an edit request on the talk page there to look at this one. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Israel–Hamas war

    At present we have "On 24 May, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel must immediately halt its Rafah offensive.[1]"

    I suggest changing it to include a longer, semantically-complete, quotation, to read: "On 24 May, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel must immediately halt its military offensive, and any other action in the Rafah governorate, which may inflict on the Palestinian group in Gaza conditions of life that could bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.[2]"

    As the Guardian article points out, and reports judges as arguing, the last comma is critical to the meaning of the ruling. Hunc (talk) 10:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    References

    1. ^ "ICJ orders Israel to halt its offensive on Rafah, Gaza in new ruling". Al Jazeera. 2024-05-24. Retrieved 2024-05-24.
    2. ^ How a single comma is allowing Israel to question ICJ Rafah ruling. Israel is among those arguing that international court of justice directive is ambivalent and far from a blanket order to halt its offensive. Patrick Wintour, diplomatic editor. The Guardian. Wed 29 May 2024 https://www.theguardian.com/global/article/2024/may/29/how-a-single-comma-is-allowing-israel-to-question-icj-rafah-ruling

    Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{pagelinks}} template and then the reason. It looks like this: Wikipedia:Example (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Example|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) your request here. ~~~~

    Handled requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.