User talk:Alexlatham96/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:23, 22 July 2021

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring and sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! nsaum75 ^{!Dígame¡‎} 20:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

TX loops/spurs

Howdy. If the previous history is not on the respective Highway Designation file page, then either it didn't exist or was accidentally removed from the database. Loop/Spurs 7 and 400, most likely the latter. I'll see if I can find anything out about those two. 25or6to4 (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

...and now that you found the city it was in, I found a map of it. [1] Was the old N-S routing of US 96 through Jasper. 25or6to4 (talk) 02:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Farm to Market Road 1994

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Farm to Market Road 1994 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Kinu ^t/_c 18:02, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Farm to Market Road 3504

You removed some information from Farm to Market Road 3504 because the highway designation was decommissioned. We have reverted that and updated the article properly. As a comparison, U.S. Route 41 Business (Marquette, Michigan) was decommissioned in 2005, and that article just passed through FAC as a Featured Article with its junction list. The information is still valid if presented in the past tense. Imzadi 1979 → 01:42, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of National Highways in India by highway number, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharatpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of National Highways in India by highway number (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Nowgong, Bina, Sonapur, NH 49, Fulbari and Sagar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Latin-script letters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old English alphabet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Grammar

Regarding you additions to several FM/RM articles, detail is certainly useful, but introducing poor grammar lowers the quality of the article. I have reverted several of your additions, which you may notice on my and/or your contributions page. You are free to reintroduce the previously added content if you can correct the previously introduced grammatical errors. Thank you for your contributions. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ranch to Market Road 620 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Texas State Highway 4 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the proposed road, a new route was under construction southeast from Aspermont, taking SH 4 to [{Anson, Texas|Anson]]. By 1928,SH 4 was extended through [[Abilene, Texas|Abilene]] and [[Coleman, Texas|Coleman]] to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 4 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Code page 774 page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Code page 915 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{| {{chset-tableformat}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Losing chess

Hi. What is source for add'l analysis added? Thx. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 01:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

What are sources for 1.e3 c5 Whtie wins, and 1.c3 e5 Black wins, and 1.f3 Black wins? IHTS (talk) 03:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of future North American area codes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| 742 || [[Ontario]] || [Area codes 905 and 289|905,289, and 365]] || 2036 – 1st Qtr {{fact}}|| None

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of future North American area codes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

List of State Routes in Nevada

While I appreciate the effort, I reverted your most of your recent edits to this page--see Talk:List of State Routes in Nevada for my rationale. If you were pulling information from the AA Roads website, please know that some of their log entries with these additional numbers are not 100% correct based on other information.

Welcome, roadfan!

Hello, Alexlatham96, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads ^connect as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC.

Again, welcome! Rs chen 7754 16:37, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

List of state trunklines in Michigan‎‎

An overhaul and update of the list similar to what you're doing is on my things to do, but it's very cool if you want to keep going. Just be careful about how you're phrasing things because we don't have any sources that say that "yes, the MSHD renumbered any highways to avoid duplicating the then-new U.S. Highways in 1926", because they did intentionally duplicate US 24/M-24, US 25 and M-25 and US 131/M-131 (and later intentionally duplicated US 112 and M-112).

One other request, but for the various former highways, can you dab the links if the number was reused? For example, look at the M-111s and you'll see that they're dabbed by year ranges. At some point, we'll get around to creating those redlinks so that they point exactly where we want them to point. Imzadi 1979 → 19:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Okay. will do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexlatham96 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 4 October 2015‎ (UTC)

Also, they should be in chronological order, so the first M-6 gets listed first, then the second M-6, and finally the third/current M-6. Imzadi 1979 → 21:47, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Where are you finding some of these? I've removed the second M-114 because you just copied the row for the original M-114, left the length and citations in place and changed the termini and notes. I have no idea where you found that one, and no one else would too for something that supposedly only existed on paper in 1965 when you left a 1945 map citation in place.
Can you please help go through and add some citations of some sort for your recent additions to the list? Now that Michigan's Interstates and US Highways are Featured Topics, I need to get back to List of state trunkline highways in Michigan to bring it up to FL standards to finish my goal of having the Michigan State Trunkline Highway System be a Featured Topic with the Featured or Good Topics on the various subsystems. Imzadi 1979 → 18:30, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

I saw these on the Michigan Highways website. Alexlatham96

You know we can't quite use that site without verifying its information to other sources? Do you have access to any old Michigan maps or other sources? If not, you shouldn't be adding to the list by relying on a self-published source for your content. Imzadi 1979 → 00:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of State Roads in New Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Placitas, New Mexico. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Additions to List of State Routes in Nevada prior to 1976

Can you tell me where you found evidence of SR 44A or SR 94? I've never seen those on a map, or in the old Nevada Revised Statutes (where state highways used to be described by law, prior to 1976). Your other additions were good--surprised I left those out. -- LJ ↗ 20:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

SR 44A- SR 44 near Ruth southward. (see Google Maps)

I deleted SR 94 from the list.

Was there an SR 87?

SR 44A was not a state route from what I can tell, but one old description of SR 44 does include a spur to Kimberly. However, the 44A on Google Maps is not consistent with this description, and is probably a more recent White Pine County route number. As far as I can tell, there was no SR 87. -- LJ ↗ 23:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Use of deprecated template

Hello, Alex. Please take note that Template:Roadlink is deprecated, and the use of ordinary wikilinks instead is "strongly encouraged." --R'n'B (call me Russ) 02:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of numeral systems page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tigon language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gb and Ch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Code page 943

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Code page 943, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thefullwiki.org/Code_page_932.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

I have changed the material for Code Page 932 to the IBM version Alexlatham96 (talk).

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Code page 1010, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaeresis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Citations for São Paulo Metrô article edits Suggestion

Hello/Olá! Thanks for taking the time to make edits on some São Paulo Metrô pages. I noticed that you included the ExpansãoSP blog in the change summary, but not in the articles themselves. The blog is very interesting, but I can't help but wonder how reliable it is as a source of information… the official CPTM and MetrôSP websites do not have a lot of this same information, after all. I am not saying that the you shouldn't include this information, only that I think your contributions will last longer and be scrutinized less if they have a clear citation—even if the citation is for a blog like ExpansãoSP. Thanks again! giso6150 (talk) 00:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Farm to Market Roads in Texas (1–99) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of state highways in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moreno, California. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of state highways in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oak Grove, California. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Farm to Market Roads in Texas (500–599) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Portuguese code page 1022?

Hi Alex, I see that you added a number of codepage IDs to the ISO/IEC 646 article a couple of months back. Verifying them, I found two problems:

In one occasion when codepage 1010 was stated for a French 7-bit codepage (the one with ISO-IR 25), the correct codepage ID would have been 1104 rather than 1010. (I have also seen this documented elsewhere as "codepage 1114", which, however, is wrong as well.) Anyway, I have fixed this.

I didn't know these were different!

--(unsigned) 2016-06-23T01:36:15‎ Alexlatham96

In another occasion, and this is the reason why I contact you, you stated that the ID for a Portuguese 7-bit codepage (the one with ISO-IR 16) would be 1022. Unfortunately, I cannot find this ID in any codepage registry (including my own one). Can you provide a source for this? Thanks. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 09:59, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

I couldn't find a source, but I assumed it was almost certainly code page 1022. You can remove that until it is confirmed.

--(unsigned) 2016-06-23T01:36:15‎ Alexlatham96

Okay, thanks for clearing this up.

--Matthiaspaul (talk) 02:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Hi, Alexlatham96. I'm concerned about this recent edit you've made. You might know this, but on Wikipedia (and in everything you write, too), we don't make claims and assumptions without citing them. And just to let you know, the fact about California State Route 69 being renumbered because of 69s isn't true. Thanks.

Kevon kevono (talk) 00:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

See http://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=17893.msg2155550#msg2155550. There was one guy stealing the 69 signs, like in other states.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexlatham96 (talk • contribs) 02:12, 11 July 2016‎ (UTC)

But that's not a reliable source, because anyone can go on there and post whatever they want, right or wrong. --Rs chen 7754 03:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

@Kevon kevono: I find it a little troubling that you templated a long-term user (5 years, 10 months) who made a good-faith addition to an article. Given your editing history, I'd caution you against trying to take the high road like this and point out things in this way to other editors. In the future, a better method would be a simple note without a template, without the dated header, etc. In other words, maybe you should have asked why the edit was made without an explicit source. Remember, we actually do not require a source for everything around here. Even at the Good Article level, only 5 sorts of things need explicit citations.

As for the edit itself, I call it a good-faith addition. Yes, I'd like to see a better source than a user forum like that, because Rschen7755 is right that we shouldn't use that. However, If that forum posting could lead you to a usable source, then use that and move along. I probably would have made a similar edit, without a source provided, until I located a better source than the forum posting. I might even have tagged it myself with {{citation needed}} just to prompt someone to include it, or to remind me to add it later.

Lastly, but Alexlatham96, you should be signing your comments on your own talk page. You can do so by inserting 4 tildes (~) at the end of your comments, which the server will convert into a signature. Imzadi 1979 → 04:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Does anyone know why 69 was really renumbered to 245? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexlatham96 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 11 July 2016‎

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alexlatham96. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Code page 1012

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Code page 1012 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PK T(alk) 23:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC) I just added more information and a reference to IBM's code page website. Alexlatham96 (talk) 23:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Alexlatham96 Alexlatham96

February 2017

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Copyright symbol, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 07:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. –Fredddie ™ 23:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. Thank you. -- Acefitt 00:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Alberta provincial highways, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Acefitt 00:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of State Trunk Highways in Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winchester, Wisconsin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Megabus M2 line

Has been discontinued, and is listed in the "discontinued" portion of the list.

--Allamericanbear (talk) 22:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S._Roads/Shields_task_force/Requests/Archive 7#List of United States Numbered Highways

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S._Roads/Shields_task_force/Requests/Archive 7#List of United States Numbered Highways. KylieTastic (talk) 14:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Bislama

You've added to the Macron article:

In Bislama, a macron is used on two letters m̄ p̄

Your ref for this a page at the Estonian Language Institute So, if this is a fact, then why is there no mention at:

Omniglot - http://www.omniglot.com/writing/bislama.php
Bislama language - the Wikipedia page

Seems unlikely to be the best source in the world for Bislama. Snori (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

I found this page [[2]].

The accented letters on eki.ee/letter actually correspond to letters in Robert Early's orthography, which is different from the 1995 orthography listed by Omniglot.

OK, thanks. You'll see I've moved this details stuff down into the body. Snori (talk) 02:03, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Marshallese

You deleted this completly from Macron, yet surely it would be better replaced with something like:

In Marshallese, in the most polished printed text, the letters Ā ā N̄ n̄ Ō ō Ū ū always appear with unaltered macrons directly above.

(using text directly from Marshallese language). Thoughts? Snori (talk) 09:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Marshallese already exists here. See: In Marshallese, a macron is used on four letters – ā n̄ ō ū – whose pronunciations differ from the unmarked a n o u.

Indeed. I didn't spot that. Snori (talk) 00:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Utah route history edits

Hello, this is to discuss your recent edits to 1962 Utah state route renumbering and 1977 Utah state route renumbering. I appreciate the effort, and freely admit that the versions of these articles prior to your changes needed work. However, there are a number of problems with the articles with the changes made, that also need to be addressed. First off is a minor one, it is neither correct nor helpful to label something as "New" when the change was made in 1962 and is no longer current as it was changed again in 1977. At a minimum those columns need different titles. More importantly are some other issues: now both articles rely on a template in Userspace (specifically User:NE2), and in fact appear to be drafts that NE2 did. That isn't wise and needs to be addressed ASAP, as NE2 could delete that template at any time, which would break these articles. If there is any connection between your account and NE2's that needs to be disclosed to avoid sockpuppet allegations. If not, we need to discuss with NE2 if these articles were ready for prime time. From what I can see, they were not. The current designation column and legislative notes were removed. IMO, these were the two most helpful columns in the articles as they existed prior to these changes. In fact, I am leaning towards reverting back to the prior revisions for that reason alone. Perhaps most important, having multiple entries for the same contiguous route number (for example State Route 1 is covered in 3 separate entries despite being a contiguous route) isn't helpful, and adds confusion. Please advise on what your vision is for these articles. If this is an interim step, I'm ok with that. However, if this is the "final version" of you vision, I'm inclined to revert until these issues can be addressed in a draft space. Please advise, Dave (talk) 13:56, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

@Moabdave: I substituted the template, so it no longer uses NE2's template. –Fredddie ™ 21:18, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks @Fredddie:. That fixed the most urgent of the issues, but I still have the above mentioned concerns that need to be discussed. Dave (talk) 21:55, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

I've reverted back for now. Hopefully we can start a dialog and move the article forward. Dave (talk) 16:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

I tried to expand both articles to get them in a more understandable format. Please review with I've done and comment if I've violated the spirit of what you were trying to do. Dave (talk) 04:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

List of State Roads in New Mexico

Please review the new entry at List of State Roads in New Mexico which has this wikitext:

{{routelist row
|state=NM
|type=NM 1927
|route=54
|terminus_a= [[Inscription Rock, New Mexico|Inscription Rock]]
|terminus_b= [[Hospah, New Mexico|Hospah]]
|length_mi=
|established=1927
|decommissioned=1930
|notes=renumbered to NM 53 because of US 54
}}

It is showing a big red error message: Lua error in Module:Routelist_row at line 277: Type not in database: NM 1927. I'm hoping you will know how to fix that. Johnuniq (talk) 10:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit summaries

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary, as you did on List of Alberta provincial highways. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field as it is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Acefitt 18:21, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. –Fredddie ™ 04:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Retired Names

Hi, Can you provide me with a source for Ola and Yalo being retired? The official list of names does not show that either of these names were retired.Jason Rees (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

See this says Quang and Ola were replaced (but not necessarily retired).
- Ah thanks for providing us with that list of names, unfortuantly the tropical cyclone naming lists for both the Australian region and South Pacific basins were signficantly overhauled at the last WMO meeting. As a result only Lam, Marcia, Pam, Winston and Ula have made it onto the official list of retired names on pg 24 onwards. Thanks for helping though. :) Jason Rees (talk) 08:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
The site says Debbie was retired.
- Hi Alex, If you look at BoM's site carefully - it doesnt specifically say that Debbie was retired, just that the name is scheduled to be replaced next year at the WMO meeting. As a result, its a bit of a grey area and I think we probably shouldnt consider it retired until we are told its retired by the WMO, as you never know it might not be retired.Jason Rees (talk) 21:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. –Fredddie ™ 23:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Because of...

Regarding [3] and similar edits, "because of US 176" doesn't really tell our readers anything. Does North Carolina have a policy of not duplicating route numbers? If so, there should be a paragraph on the list page that explains that. Also, you'd be better off adding a sentence or two in each article explaining why a route number was changed. –Fredddie ™ 11:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Farm to Market Roads in Texas (1400–1499), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Jacinto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of state highways in Texas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Interstate 169

Texas State Highway Loop 484 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Interstate 635

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Pokémon into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

The other page mentioned above is User:Alexlatham96/List of Pokémon. I realize that following WP:COPYWITHIN may seem tedious, but all that's required is a few words in the edit summary.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alexlatham96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

List of state highways in Kansas

Please fix your dates and review how to use {{routelist row}}. You can't put refs in the established/decommssioned parameters. –Fredddie ™ 02:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Georgia state routes

Make sure you cite all your changes on the Georgia state route list pages. I have noticed some "iffy" additions you have added. I was in process of working on those pages, but took a break. Also, make sure you leave an edit summary with your edits. Charlotte Allison (Morriswa) (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Iowa highways

At the risk of sounding WP:OWNy, please stop adding entries to the list en masse. When I add routes to the list, I have done my due diligence by double checking maps, finding lengths, among other things. Just adding them from Jason Hancock's page doesn't help us create a complete encyclopedia. –Fredddie ™ 04:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Well, you should add Iowa 46 to the table, as there is an article. Nothing more, unless there is an article or more information is found. Also, Iowa 42 and Iowa 179 were removed in 1980. Alexlatham96 (talk) 04:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Also, I made a userpage showing most of the highways.

Again, please stop. You're deliberately introducing errors to the page, whether you realize it or not. Re Iowa 33: Iowa 60's length has changed since Iowa 33 became Iowa 60, so it is incorrect to give Iowa 33 the current length of Iowa 60. This is among other errors. Please move on to another project. –Fredddie ™ 20:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Oops, you are right! I can't just copy the lengths. I quit editing; the lengths of Iowa 90 and Iowa 111, Iowa 162, etc. may be wrong!!!

Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Iowa/1926 renumbering I have a definitive source off-wiki, so this page is not necessary. –Fredddie ™ 22:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of state highways in Arkansas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to War Memorial Stadium, Ouachita and Buffalo River State Park

List of state routes in Alabama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Little River, Alabama

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve 1923 Virginia state highway renumbering

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Alexlatham96, thanks for creating 1923 Virginia state highway renumbering!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

SR 167

Do you have a source on the creation of SR 167? I assume you are referring to the Gateway Crossing roadway, but I haven't found anything on-line referring to it as SR 167 yet. Famartin (talk) 07:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

I saw it on the vahighways.com site. A picture is at the top of http://www.vahighways.com/route-log/va167.htm Alexlatham96 (talk) 21:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of state highways in Arkansas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ouachita and Buffalo River State Park

1940 Virginia state highway renumbering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Frog Level, Virginia

List of state roads in New Mexico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Placitas, New Mexico

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

us-highways.com

That website should never have been cited in any Wikipedia articles per WP:SPS. It's even more important now that we don't add additional citations to it, or to the archived copies of it. I've already placed a bot request to remove citations and links to the site because it went dead a while back when Droz ended up in some legal difficulties in the state of Florida. Imzadi 1979 → 01:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Iowa highway edits

I feel like a broken record in saying that you have to cite your sources and you simply cannot copy off of a roadgeek site and call it your own work. You shouldn't even be using them at all! This is not me being overly protective of 10+ years of work, it's me reminding you that WP:V and WP:RS are Wikipedia policies. –Fredddie ™ 02:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

I was trying to edit the 1980 decommissioning, but I wanted to complete that and find lengths... Iowa 154, Iowa 203, Iowa 95, Iowa 90... in the 1980 decommissioning. I was trying to prepare you for this. You know better than me!!! How about you complete the 1980 decommissioning and 2003 decommissioning or prove that these were not part of the decommissioning? Alexlatham96 (talk) 02:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Alexlatham96:, I totally agree with Fredddie, you must cite your sources. Stop adding roadgeek site stuff. Some of that information is interesting, and could be true, but we need reliable sources for information, such as departments of transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. There are lots of dubious edits that you have been adding all over the USRD-specific articles. Charlotte Allison (Morriswa) (talk) 03:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I see many errors I made, mainly Iowa Highways, The US Highways, Colorado Highways, renumbering info, etc.Alexlatham96 (talk) 03:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC) I've seen people use these sources, but they are for their own site.

I don't work for you, so you're going to have to do the research on your own. WP:LIBRARY has some great options for doing research. –Fredddie ™ 11:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

I know you won't want to hear this, but I would suggest that you mass revert your edits until you do the research that Fredddie suggested that you do. Only then should you re-add the information, properly referenced this time. Wikipedia articles require reliable sources for information in the articles. Like I said, some of the information actually might be true, but – without a source – it can't be verified. As for the people using roadgeek sites for sources, that should be reverted and properly researched, as well. The roadgeek sites might have reliable information, but you need to find reliable sources, whether they are on the roadgeek sites or from searches. Newspaper sources can be used, as well. Charlotte Allison (Morriswa) (talk) 18:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of transit routes in Minneapolis–Saint Paul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 35W (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

List of state highways in Louisiana

Regarding LA 354: the DOTD's LRS shows the roadway as part of LA 341 beginning with the 2015 data set. The change apparently didn't make it onto the right-sizing map for St. Martin Parish. Those kinds of anomalies are not uncommon, and I can give several examples if need be.

On another note, as others have requested above, please cite your sources when adding content. I found no basis for your statement that LA 120 was formerly a continuous route and have reverted the edit. The original route description from 1955 clearly states the route existed in two parts, as it does today. Britinvasion64 (talk) 02:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Note: http://wwwsp.dotd.la.gov/Inside_LaDOTD/Divisions/Multimodal/Data_Collection/Mapping/Wall%20Map/Official%20Highway%20Map%20(side%201).pdf also shows 354!!! Alexlatham96 (talk) 02:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC) Note: http://wwwsp.dotd.la.gov/Inside_LaDOTD/Divisions/Multimodal/Data_Collection/Mapping/Wall%20Map/Official%20Highway%20Map%20(side%201).pdf is wrong too! I updated the LA 341 page to fix this!!!

You're correct in that the entry for LA 341 needs updating, but your edits introduced some new problems. You've changed content without updating the sources, so the content no longer accurately represents the sources. Also the junction list no longer matches the route description. This will now require some cleaning up. Also please use colons to help distinguish your comments from the previous editor's on talk page discussions. Britinvasion64 (talk) 03:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Discussion regarding your editing

A discussion has begun at WT:USRD regarding your editing. Your comments and cooperation are appreciated. –Fredddie ™ 02:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of King County Metro bus routes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sounder Bruce 23:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swype, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujarati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ISO/IEC 8859-10, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

recent article creations, April 2018

Hi.
First of all, the articles you have been creating, it is very much appreciated. But I would suggest you to slow down a little. I mean, you first created ISO-IR-182, and within span of 18 hours you created 13 more articles (a total of 14 articles). What I am trying to say is, instead of creating multiple articles in a short span; you should work on one article at a time. Like, create the article in your urespace, or draftspace. Once that draft is finished properly (including references, adding categories, incoming links from other articles; among few other things), you can publish it to the article space. Once an article is finished, you can move on to the next one. This is a good practice. Currently EBCDIC 003 has no references, and it had one external link, and the 99% of the article consists of the codepage layout table. —usernamekiran(talk) 08:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Alexlatham96 (talk) 22:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Yes, I understand. I fixed the articles.

Ways to improve EBCDIC 037-2

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Alexlatham96, thanks for creating EBCDIC 037-2!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

I just added a reference.Alexlatham96 (talk) 04:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I added a references section with {reflist} so the ref can be seen now. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

For improving Wikipedia's coverage of code pages for the worst encoding system ever created. — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve EBCDIC 283

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Alexlatham96, thanks for creating EBCDIC 283!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:41, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve EBCDIC 281

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Alexlatham96, thanks for creating EBCDIC 281!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Code page 897 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Code page 932

Code page 903 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Code page 936

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Code page 897, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Code page 932 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state highway spurs in Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas State Highway Loop 410 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Farm to Market Roads in Texas (1–99), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Agua Dulce, Texas and Prairie Hill, Texas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Farm to Market Road 1472, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Farm to Market Road 255 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1934 state highway renumbering (North Carolina)

Hello, Alexlatham96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1934 state highway renumbering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 10:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1937 South Carolina state highway renumbering

Hello, Alexlatham96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1937 South Carolina state highway renumbering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 10:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1937 state highway renumbering (North Carolina)

Hello, Alexlatham96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1937 state highway renumbering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 10:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1940 state highway renumbering (North Carolina)

Hello, Alexlatham96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1940 state highway renumbering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 10:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1961 state highway renumbering (North Carolina)

Hello, Alexlatham96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1961 state highway renumbering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 11:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Spliting discussion for List of state highways in Utah

An article that you have been involved with (List of state highways in Utah) has content that is proposed to be removed and move to another article (List of former state highways in Utah). If you are interested, please visit the discussion at the talk page. Thank you. BRES2773 (talk) 14:49, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alexlatham96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alexlatham96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: State highways deleted by the Utah State Legislature in 1953 (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SportingFlyer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only one source. Should probably be merged with the 1969 to "defunct Utah state highways."

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:State highways deleted by the Utah State Legislature in 1953 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:State highways deleted by the Utah State Legislature in 1953, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 00:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Alexlatham96! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer talk 00:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Arizona State Route 181 was established by the Arizona Department of Transporation “between 1935 and 1938 with its current routing.”

On the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_State_Route_181 page, you edited the page to say that, "the route was established by the Arizona Department of Transportation between 1935 and 1938 with its current routing." Do you have a citation or reference for that information? Thank you. Diegopimp (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

New Mexico State Road 171

In the http://dot.state.nm.us/content/dam/nmdot/Transportation_Commission/Regular_Minutes_October_16_2014.pdf that said nm 171 is transferred also says that nm 195 was. Do you think just the portion of nm 195 in the city is decommissioned or the entire length of nm 95? Bacardi379 (talk) 21:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC) In the city only. The majority of NM 195 is outside the city. NM 195 still shows on [the AADT listing], but NM 171 does not.

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scrabble letter distributions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaeresis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, I'm SounderBruce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sounder Bruce 01:51, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

ISO 6862 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to ↓, ←, → and ↑

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

New Orleans RTA list of routes

I don't know where your list of former New Orleans RTA routes came from, but I found a couple of problems with it.

Most important, your listing of several former routes (41, 43, 44, 45) as Canal Streetcar to various destinations is simply incorrect. The Canal streetcar never went to those destinations. Those were bus routes. I have changed those entries in the list.

I also added some former bus routes, as listed in an official RTA System Map dated January 2005.

Regards, HGFriedman (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!Alexlatham96 (talk) 02:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC) I now see the Canal Streetcar was not reactivated until 2004.

Your draft article, Draft:State highways deleted by the Utah State Legislature in 1953

Hello, Alexlatham96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "State highways deleted by the Utah State Legislature in 1953".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 10:43, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Sock cleanup

Thanks for fixing the Najaf ali bhayo tags on User:DMacks1 and others. How did you find these edits? They were from long ago, from a seemingly inactive sock-drawer. DMacks (talk) 04:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

I found them when finding out who created the hoax article (which was created and now requires administrator access to create because of the socks).Alexlatham96 (talk) 04:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Gotcha. Thanks again, DMacks (talk) 06:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

I suspect User:Padamier is another sock of Najaf ali bhayo. Alexlatham96 (talk) 06:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC) See [[4]]

Indef'ed. DMacks (talk) 07:19, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of U.S. Route 261

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as U.S. Route 261, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 08:02, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of U.S. Route 265

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as U.S. Route 265, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 08:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Iowa highway list

Thanks for adding more highways to the Iowa list. Going forward, can you make sure you're disambiguating the routes? Just add "|dab=<established year>–<decommissioned year>". It'll save a lot of work down the road. –Fredddie ™ 00:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry about the rollback, I misclicked. If you look at the log, you'll see that all but a few of the kilometer figures have a 0 in the thousandths place. Based on that, I can't believe that all those measurements landed on a zero. So I made it convert from 1.63 instead of 1.630, which gives us false precision. –Fredddie ™ 02:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, I'm HeartGlow30797. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of state highways in Iowa without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HeartGlow30797 (talk) 02:47, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

I corrected my error with my edit. Alexlatham96 (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state routes in Pennsylvania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Interstate 76 and Bethel Township, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1934 state highway renumbering (North Carolina)

Hello, Alexlatham96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1934 state highway renumbering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 12:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Editing other users' comments

Why have you edited another user's comments here? ST47 (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

I was trying to update this to show this user as a false positive. I will undo if necessary.Alexlatham96 (talk) 20:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Feel free to leave a comment in the "other users" section if you feel that you have additional information to add, but please don't edit comments that were left by other users, and particularly evidence left by checkusers. ST47 (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

LTA tagging

Hello. This is incorrect. For this one, please refer to my comments at meta[5]. The other one is just entirely dubious.[6] Additionally one should not be using a CU-confirmed tag without good authority. It may be best to leave these completely alone. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 22:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Corrected. Please update/delete these pages.Alexlatham96 (talk) 22:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

I apologize. I should not have changed these.Alexlatham96 (talk) 23:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I've deleted them. When I say it may be best to leave these completely alone, that's a British English understatement. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Xarrep432 and Hagrid1984 are sockpuppets of TryToBeFunny. I hate username filters is a sockpuppet of Cruizir. Also, the master of TryToBeFunny should be changed to Hagrid1984, which is the oldest account. Alexlatham96 (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Farm to Market Roads in Texas (100–199), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Osage, Texas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1926 Wisconsin state highway renumbering

Hello, Alexlatham96. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1926 Wisconsin state highway renumbering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Misleading references

When changing the decommissioning date of a highway from the year the route was repealed to the date that the route transfer was completed, please do not leave the existing reference to the law in place as you did here and here. Putting information behind a source that doesn't corroborate that information can be highly damaging to Wikipedia's credibility; some consider it to be hoaxing and I have seen editors blocked for it. In this case I can tell what you were trying to do and that the information was better as a result, but please be mindful of this in the future. The repeal can still be mentioned separately in the history section, as you'll notice in the two articles I mentioned. --Sable232 (talk) 23:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of bus routes in London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cobham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of bus routes in London, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Metrobus and Red Eagle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A roads in Zone 4 of the Great Britain numbering scheme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stoke Heath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state trunk highways in Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jackson, Wisconsin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Unicode and decomposable characters

Hi Alexlatham96, in one of your recent edits to Acute accent (which you later changed) you wrote that "Unicode apparently forgot to encode B́" as a decomposable (=precomposed, or composite) character. Note that even if a decomposable character ⟨b́⟩ had been encoded this would only have happened for round-trip convertibility with (pre-)existing encodings irrespective of whether those encodings also define a codepoint for its case-folded counterpart ⟨B́⟩. In other words: If ⟨b́⟩ had been encoded as a single character, but not ⟨B́⟩, this wouldn't have happened by oversight, but for a good reason. It is essential to understand that Unicode has a clear and stabile policy of not adding new Latin decomposable characters to the standard only because they are used in some language. — It is precisely for this reason that decomposable ⟨J̌⟩ will never be added to Unicode though decomposable ⟨ǰ⟩ is encoded. Never. Even if laypersons who don't know the technical details and policies of the Unicode standard feel there "should" be a case-folded decomposable counterpart of ⟨ǰ⟩. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 04:25, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Unicode did not forget to encode b́. It was just found by Unicode to be written as b' (B followed by apostrophe, but the uppercase is written as B́). Unicode quit encoding new precomposed characters after version 3.0. Alexlatham96 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Well, what is technically correct is that Unicode 3.0 was issued in Septemer 1999, and although in practice this policy had been followed for years it wasn't formally frozen until version 3.1.

As to ⟨b'⟩, or "B followed by apostrophe" that was intended to be a replacement for ⟨b́⟩: I can't find evidence for this in the Unicode archives (mailing lists, proposals, etc.). Would you be so kind as to point me to the relevant discussions and/or documents? — From the Unicode principles and POV the question of encoding a decomposable character ⟨b́⟩ was never raised, I think, because precomposed ⟨b́⟩ did not exist in any pre-Unicode encoding. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state highways in North Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairfield, North Carolina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at User talk:Dane § Deprodding of Deepika Dhiman

You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Dane § Deprodding of Deepika Dhiman. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:26, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Template:Z48

List of Kansas State Highways

I see you changed the date K-59 was decommissioned. Do you happen to know its location? Thanks. 420Traveler (talk) 23:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

I changed the date because US 59 was added to Kansas in 1934. I don't know the location of K-59, but I think it was an old number for another state highway, probably K-89. I at one time thought K-59 might have been the old number for the current K-2, but upon seeing the minutes, I found that this is not the case. Also, we don't know the location of K-91 and certain other highways. Alexlatham96 (talk) 02:17, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state routes in Alabama, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Georgia, Alpine, Alabama and Evergreen, Alabama.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Tagging user pages, again

I see you've been warned about this in the past. This time I'm not going to ask you nicely. I am telling you to stop tagging socks. Your edits are often at best, unhelpful, or at worst, inaccurate or disruptive, since some LTA's want their userpages to be tagged as a sort of shrine. So if a sock is missing a tag on their userpage, that's usually intentional. Read WP:DENY. Unless you are the blocking admin, a checkuser, or an SPI clerk, leave the userpages of blocked users alone. Sro23 (talk) 02:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Please delete the userpages I made and tagged as sockpuppets of Kingshowman (due to WP:DENY). Also, feel free to delete the other userpages I made and tagged as sockpuppets as well. Alexlatham96 (talk) 03:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. I understand you're trying to help, but in past when editors inexperienced with SPI would tag socks incorrectly, it only led to the socks themselves content and everyone else misled and confused. So there's sort of an unspoken rule about who should be doing the tagging and who shouldn't. There are other ways to help out at SPI if you're interested in combating sockpuppetry, such as adding additional evidence to sockpuppet investigation cases that could use some more. Sro23 (talk) 03:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

R̀ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, R̀, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Occitan scrabble.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Occitan scrabble.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC) I have corrected this.Alexlatham96 (talk) 07:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of South Carolina Highway 93 (1937)

A tag has been placed on South Carolina Highway 93 (1937) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The original SC 80 existed from the 1920s to 1952, not until 1937.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 10:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

"South Carolina Highway 93 (1937)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect South Carolina Highway 93 (1937). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 2#South Carolina Highway 93 (1937) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

State highways in South Carolina

I have been making a table in one of my sandboxes to update the List of state highways in South Carolina page. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

I see your draft. Thanks for telling me! I have restored Draft:1937 South Carolina state highway renumbering; you can help on that. Note that SC 524 went from US 521 Lancaster 0.2 miles to the village of New Brookland, according to this source. Highways that probably existed, but have not been found yet, are: SC 74, SC 148, SC 437, SC 535, SC 613, SC 634, SC 653, SC 661, and SC 666. Alexlatham96 (talk) 04:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state highway loops in Texas (200–299), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roosevelt, Texas and Caddo, Texas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of bus routes in London

added links pointing to Debden, Brentwood, Metrobus and Grays

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of state highways in North Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pleasant Hill, North Carolina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:R̀

Hello, Alexlatham96. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:R̀, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Discussion of Interest (PA Routes)

Hello, a couple of years ago you did a lot of great work at List of state routes in Pennsylvania. However, many of your entries are based on a possibly unreliable source. At your leisure, please see this discussion: Talk:List of state routes in Pennsylvania#"Clearly Existed". Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 02:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Karen language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaeresis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Nassau County bus routes

Hi - I noticed that you recently added many entries to the list of Nassau County bus routes, specifically the section regarding former bus routes that no longer exist. Do you have any sources for these new routes that you added? NYCDOT (talk) 22:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 982: / Line 982: @@
 ([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 05:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
+== Nassau County bus routes ==
+Hi - I noticed that you recently added many entries to the list of Nassau County bus routes, specifically the section regarding former bus routes that no longer exist. Do you have any sources for these new routes that you added? [[User:NYCDOT|NYCDOT]] ([[User talk:NYCDOT|talk]]) 22:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)