Jump to content

User talk:Inhumer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 14:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

AfD nomination of Phyzix

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Phyzix, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phyzix. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. B.Wind (talk) 02:02, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 12:23, 25 April 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 08:49, 10 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 12:30, 23 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 16:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Speedy tagging - notifying authors

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for tagging Swords of Chaos (band) just now, but after you tag a page for speedy deletion you should copy to the author's talk page the warning which is generated for you on the speedy template, towards the bottom. Otherwise the newbie author doesn't know what's happened, thinks he pressed the wrong button, and often just puts the article in again. Also, if it's a new contributor who has never had a Welcome message, it's useful to give one before the speedy warning - it makes it less BITEy, and gives useful links that may help him do better next time. {{subst:firstarticle|<article name>}} is a good one. Keep up the good work - New Page Patrol needs all the eyes it can get! Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 18:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 17:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 13:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Speedy deletion declined: An Honest Mistake (band)

[edit]

Hello Inhumer, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of An Honest Mistake (band), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 19:38, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 16:02, 1 August 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 15:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Speedy tagging

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for tagging Soulblast just now, but after you tag a page for speedy deletion you should copy to the author's talk page the warning which is generated for you on the speedy template, towards the bottom. Otherwise the newbie author doesn't know what's happened, thinks he pressed the wrong button, and often just puts the article in again. Keep up the good work - New Page Patrol needs all the eyes it can get! Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 16:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 14:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 21:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 08:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 09:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

CSD

[edit]

Just to let you know, I've declined the speedy on Coilback; I think that a claim to notability is made, albeit vaguely so. You can take the article to AfD if you like, and I think that will likely result in deletion. All the best, Drmies (talk) 17:17, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

[edit]

I'm having a few issues with a particular editor, and I'm not entirely sure what the best approach is; I was wondering whether you could take a look. The issue is essentially this: said user generically dislikes list articles, preferring categories (despite long-standing consensus that the two are not mutually exclusive). To this end they nominated a bunch of the metal lists for deletion, although they subsequently admitted that they were looking for clean-up; examples are here, here and here. They also have a problem with artist nationality being recorded in llist articles (for example, this edit), although curiously they have no issue with date of formation being listed. The list articles were all kept following AfD, so their new tactic appears to be to delete everything without a source, which is fair enough if the editor has looked for sources themselves, but in this instance appears to be a pointed attempt to blank pages since they didn't get their own way at AfD. The latest, and most baffling altercation concerns the newly renamed (unilaterally by editor in question) list of Swedish death metal artists. Their unusual argument is that there is some huge distinction between a Swedish death metal band and a Swedish death metal band, although it is unclear where they have gleaned this distinction from. Nonetheless, I have done due diligence and found sources for everything on the list (initially Allmusic, although I have pointed said editor towards print sources (Daniel Ekeroth's Swedish Death Metal, Albert Mudrian's Improbable History, Terrorizer death metal specials etc.) but this particular chap is just removing all the sourced content (e.g this edit. A quick look at the talk page gives you a fairly clear idea of how they approach consensus-building; the "new inclusion criteria" have apparently been decided by him and him alone, and it far from clear exactly what they are. This kind of editing is essentially disruptive, but I'm not exacctly sure who to take the issue to... what do you reckon? Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]