A web framework (WF) or web application framework (WAF) is a software framework that is designed to support the development of web applications including web services, web resources and web APIs. Web frameworks aim to alleviate the overhead associated with common activities performed in web development. For example, many web frameworks provide libraries for database access, templating frameworks and session management, and they often promote code reuse. Though they often target development of dynamic websites they are also applicable to static websites.
- 1 History
- 2 Types of framework architectures
- 3 Framework applications
- 4 Features
- 5 See also
- 6 References
||This article lacks historical information on the subject. Specifically: sources and the dates some of the ideas arose should be added. (June 2013)|
As the design of the World Wide Web was not inherently dynamic, early hypertext consisted of hand-coded HTML that was published on web servers. Any modifications to published pages needed to be performed by the pages' author. To provide a dynamic web page that reflected user inputs, the Common Gateway Interface (CGI) standard was introduced for interfacing external applications with web servers. CGI could adversely affect server load, though, since each request had to start a separate process.
Around the same time, full integrated server/language development environments first emerged, such as WebBase and new languages specifically for use in the web started to emerge, such as ColdFusion, PHP and Active Server Pages.
While the vast majority of languages available to programmers to use in creating dynamic web pages have libraries to help with common tasks, web applications often require specific libraries that are useful in web applications, such as creating HTML (for example, JavaServer Faces). Eventually, mature, "full stack" frameworks appeared, that often gathered multiple libraries useful for web development into a single cohesive software stack for web developers to use. Examples of this include ASP.NET, JavaEE (Servlets), WebObjects, web2py, OpenACS, Catalyst, Mojolicious, Ruby on Rails, Grails, Django, Zend Framework, Yii, CakePHP and Symfony.
Types of framework architectures
Many frameworks follow the MVC architectural pattern to separate the data model with business rules from the user interface. This is generally considered a good practice as it modularizes code, promotes code reuse, and allows multiple interfaces to be applied. In web applications, this permits different views to be presented, such as web pages for humans, and web service interfaces for remote applications.
Push-based vs. pull-based
Most MVC frameworks follow a push-based architecture also called "action-based". These frameworks use actions that do the required processing, and then "push" the data to the view layer to render the results. Django, Ruby on Rails, Symfony, Spring MVC, Stripes, CodeIgniter are good examples of this architecture. An alternative to this is pull-based architecture, sometimes also called "component-based". These frameworks start with the view layer, which can then "pull" results from multiple controllers as needed. In this architecture, multiple controllers can be involved with a single view. Lift, Tapestry, JBoss Seam, JavaServer Faces, (µ)Micro, and Wicket are examples of pull-based architectures. Play, Struts, RIFE and ZK have support for both push and pull based application controller calls.
In three-tier organization, applications are structured around three physical tiers: client, application, and database. The database is normally an RDBMS. The application contains the business logic, running on a server and communicates with the client using HTTP. The client on web applications is a web browser that runs HTML generated by the application layer. The term should not be confused with MVC, where, unlike in three-tier architecture, it is considered a good practice to keep business logic away from the controller, the "middle layer".
Frameworks are built to support the construction of internet applications based on a single programming language, ranging in focus from general purpose tools such as Zend Framework and Ruby on Rails, which augment the capabilities of a specific language, to native-language programmable packages built around a specific user application, such as Content Management systems, some mobile development tools and some portal tools.
General-purpose website frameworks
Examples include Backbone.js, AngularJS, EmberJS, React.js and Vue.js.
Discussion forums, wikis and weblogs
For example, WikiBase/WikiWikiWeb.
Content management systems (CMS)
|This section does not cite any sources. (February 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
In web application frameworks, content management is the way of organizing, categorizing, and structuring the information resources like text, images, documents, audio and video files so that they can be stored, published, and edited with ease and flexibility. A content management system (CMS) is used to collect, manage, and publish content, storing it either as components or whole documents, while maintaining dynamic links between components.
Some projects that have historically been termed content management systems have begun to take on the roles of higher-layer web application frameworks. For instance, Drupal's structure provides a minimal core whose function is extended through modules that provide functions generally associated with web application frameworks. The Solodev and Joomla platforms provide a set of APIs to build web and command-line applications. However, it is debatable whether "management of content" is the primary value of such systems, especially when some, like SilverStripe, provide an object-oriented MVC framework. Add-on modules now enable these systems to function as full-fledged applications beyond the scope of content management. They may provide functional APIs, functional frameworks, coding standards, and many of the functions traditionally associated with Web application frameworks.
|This section does not cite any sources. (February 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Frameworks typically set the control flow of a program and allow the user of the framework to "hook into" that flow by exposing various events. This "inversion of control" design pattern is a considered to be a defining principle of a framework, and benefits the code by enforcing a common flow for a team which everyone can customize in similar ways. For example, some popular "microframeworks" such as Ruby's Sinatra (which inspired Express.js) allow for "middleware" hooks prior to and after HTTP requests. These middleware functions can be anything, and allow the user to define logging, authentication and session management, and redirecting.
Web template system
Web caching is the caching of web documents in order to reduce bandwidth usage, server load, and perceived "lag". A web cache stores copies of documents passing through it; subsequent requests may be satisfied from the cache if certain conditions are met. Some application frameworks provide mechanisms for caching documents and bypassing various stages of the page's preparation, such as database access or template interpretation.
Some web frameworks come with authentication and authorization frameworks, that enable the web server to identify the users of the application, and restrict access to functions based on some defined criteria. Drupal is one example that provides role-based access to pages, and provides a web-based interface for creating users and assigning them roles.
Database access, mapping and configuration
Many web frameworks create a unified API to a database backend, enabling web applications to work with a variety of databases with no code changes, and allowing programmers to work with higher-level concepts. Additionally, some object-oriented frameworks contain mapping tools to provide object-relational mapping, which maps objects to tuples.
Some frameworks minimize web application configuration through the use of introspection and/or following well-known conventions. For example, many Java frameworks use Hibernate as a persistence layer, which can generate a database schema at runtime capable of persisting the necessary information. This allows the application designer to design business objects without needing to explicitly define a database schema. Frameworks such as Ruby on Rails can also work in reverse, that is, define properties of model objects at runtime based on a database schema.
A framework's URL mapping or routing facility is the mechanism by which the framework interprets URLs. Some frameworks, such as Drupal and Django, match the provided URL against pre-determined patterns using regular expressions, while some others use rewriting techniques to translate the provided URL into one that the underlying engine will recognize. Another technique is that of graph traversal such as used by Zope, where a URL is decomposed in steps that traverse an object graph (of models and views).
A URL mapping system that uses pattern matching or rewriting to route and handle requests allows for shorter more "friendly URLs" to be used, increasing the simplicity of the site and allowing for better indexing by search engines. For example, a URL that ends with "/page.cgi?cat=science&topic=physics" could be changed to simply "/page/science/physics". This makes the URL easier for people to remember, read and write, and provides search engines with better information about the structural layout of the site. A graph traversal approach also tends to result in the creation of friendly URLs. A shorter URL such as "/page/science" tends to exist by default as that is simply a shorter form of the longer traversal to "/page/science/physics".
Some frameworks provide tools for creating and providing web services. These utilities may offer similar tools as the rest of the web application.
A number of newer Web 2.0 RESTful frameworks are now providing resource-oriented architecture (ROA) infrastructure for building collections of resources in a sort of Semantic Web ontology, based on concepts from Resource Description Framework (RDF).
- Comparison of web frameworks
- Rich Internet application
- List of rich Internet application frameworks
- List of web service frameworks
- Application server
- Comparison of application servers
- Application framework
- Application security
- Convention over configuration
- Don't repeat yourself (DRY)
- Solution stack
- Multiple phone web-based application framework
- Multiple (wiki). "Web application framework". Docforge. Archived from the original on 2015-07-23.
- "Top Open-Source Static Site Generators". StaticGen.
- "CGI: Common Gateway Interface". Archived from the original on 2009-04-09.
- "Yii PHP Framework".
- Thomson, Kris (2003-10-29). "Clarification on MVC= Pull and MVC Push". Retrieved 2007-07-29.
- "What are the fundamental differences between Struts and JSF". Struts.apache.org. 2011-02-14. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
- Microsoft. "Three-tiered distribution". Retrieved 2011-09-19.
- Oracle. "clustering_concepts_10en" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-09-19.
- Robert R. Perkoski. "Introduction to Web Development". Archived from the original on 2013-11-07.
- IBM. "Using Client Access Express in a three tier environment". Retrieved 2011-09-19.
- Oracle. "Understanding the Three-Tier Architecture". Retrieved 2011-09-19.
- Microsoft. "Pragmatic Architecture: Layering". Retrieved 2011-09-19.
- Arokia. "3-Tier Web Architecture". Retrieved 2011-09-19.
- "ASP.NET MVC Controller Best Practices". Retrieved 2011-09-19.
- Jamis Buck. "Skinny Controller, Fat Model". Archived from the original on 2015-05-16.
- KLIMUSHYN, Mel. "Web Application Architecture – Client-Side vs. Server-Side". Atomic Spin. Retrieved 2016-03-06.
- "AngularJS vs. Backbone.js vs. Ember.js". www.airpair.com. Retrieved 2016-06-04.
- Fowler, Martin. "bliki: InversionOfControl". martinfowler.com. Retrieved 2016-03-06.
- Xue, Qiang. "Capital One Engineering – Philosophies that Shaped Successful Frameworks". www.capitalone.io. Retrieved 2016-03-06.