Jump to content

Saint Joseph: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Telpardec (talk | contribs)
can't have death date 3 BC with Joseph still alive when Jesus 12 - don't need "File:" for infobox image - wiktionary:stepfather - refimprove - combine multiple refs into named ref - {{CN}} - copy edit - moved {{Josephology}} down
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Infobox saint
{{Infobox saint
|name= Saint Joseph
|name= Saint Joseph
|birth_date= [[Bethlehem]],<ref name=newadvent>Souvay, Charles. [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm "St. Joseph."] The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 8. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. 11 Oct. 2013</ref>c. 90 BC (according to non-canonical sources) <ref name=newadvent/>
|birth_date= [[Bethlehem]],<ref name=newadvent>Souvay, Charles. [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm "St. Joseph."] The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 8. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. 11 Oct. 2013</ref>c. 90 BC (apocryphal date) <ref name=newadvent/>
|death_date= [[Nazareth]], Between 3 B.C. and July 20, AD 18<ref name=newadvent/> (traditional)
|death_date= [[Nazareth]], July 20, AD 18<ref name=newadvent/> (apocryphal date)
|image=File:Guido Reni - St Joseph with the Infant Jesus - WGA19304.jpg
|image=Guido Reni - St Joseph with the Infant Jesus - WGA19304.jpg
|imagesize=290px
|imagesize=290px
|caption=''Saint Joseph with the Infant Jesus'', [[Guido Reni]] (c. 1635)
|caption=''Saint Joseph with the Infant Jesus'', [[Guido Reni]] (c. 1635)
Line 18: Line 18:
|patronage=The Catholic Church, unborn children, fathers, immigrants, workers, carpenters, realtors, against doubt and hesitation, and of a happy death, [[Croatia]], [[Philippines]], [[United States]], [[Vietnam]], many others
|patronage=The Catholic Church, unborn children, fathers, immigrants, workers, carpenters, realtors, against doubt and hesitation, and of a happy death, [[Croatia]], [[Philippines]], [[United States]], [[Vietnam]], many others
}}
}}
'''Joseph''' ([[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] יוֹסֵף, ''Yosef''; {{lang-syr|ܝܘܤܦ}}, ''Yawsep''; {{lang-el|Ἰωσήφ}}, ''Ioseph'') is a figure in the [[Gospels]], the husband of [[Mary (mother of Jesus)|Mary, the mother of Jesus]]. In [[Roman Catholic]], [[Eastern Orthodox]] and [[Anglican]] Christian traditions, he is regarded as '''Saint Joseph'''. Christian tradition places Joseph as Jesus' foster father. Historians such as [[Geza Vermes]], [[E. P. Sanders]], and [[Reza Aslan]] state Joseph as Jesus' father.<ref>{{cite book |title= Jesus the Jew: A Historian's Reading of the Gospels|edition= |last= Vermes|first= Geza|year= 1981|publisher= First Fortress|location= Philadelphia|isbn= 0-8006-1443-7|page= 283}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title= The Historical Figure of Jesus|edition= |last= Sanders|first= E. P.|year= 1995|publisher= Penguin|location= London|isbn= 978-0-14-014499-4|page= 333}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title= [[Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth]]|edition= |last= Aslan|first= Reza|authorlink= Reza Aslan|year= 2013|publisher= Random House|location= New York |isbn= 978-0-679-60353-5|pages= location 756}}</ref> Geza Vermes notes that the differing views are due to theological interpretations versus historical views.<ref>{{cite book |title= Jesus the Jew: A Historian's Reading of the Gospels|edition= |last= Vermes|first= Geza|year= 1981|publisher= First Fortress|location= Philadelphia|isbn= 0-8006-1443-7|page= 283}}</ref>
'''Joseph''' ([[Hebrew language|Hebrew]] יוֹסֵף, ''Yosef''; {{lang-el|Ἰωσήφ}}, ''Ioseph'') is a figure in the [[Gospels]], the husband of [[Mary (mother of Jesus)|Mary, the mother of Jesus]] and the stepfather<ref>[[wiktionary:stepfather|stepfather - Wiktionary]] "stepfather (plural stepfathers). The husband of one's biological mother, other than one's biological father", Retrieved 3 August 2014</ref> of [[Jesus]]. In [[Roman Catholic]], [[Eastern Orthodox]] and [[Anglican]] Christian traditions, he is regarded as '''Saint Joseph'''. Christian tradition places Joseph as Jesus' foster father.<ref name=newadvent/> Some historians state that Joseph was Jesus' father.<ref name=Vermes20/><ref>{{cite book |title= The Historical Figure of Jesus|edition= |last= Sanders|first= E. P.|year= 1995|publisher= Penguin|location= London|isbn= 978-0-14-014499-4|page= 333}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=TJllAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT42#v=snippet&q=Joseph%20father%20Jesus&f=false |title=Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth |last=Aslan |first=Reza |author-link=Reza Aslan |publisher=HarperCollins Publishers India |year=2014 |isbn=978-9351360773 |page=}}</ref> Some differing views are due to theological interpretations versus historical views.<ref name=Vermes20/>


The [[Pauline epistles]], generally considered the earliest extant Christian records, make no reference to Jesus' father; nor does the [[Gospel of Mark]], generally considered the first of the gospels.<ref name=Spong>Spong, John Shelby. Jesus for the non-religious. HarperCollins. 2007. ISBN 0-06-076207-1</ref> The first appearance of Joseph is therefore in the gospels of [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] and [[Gospel of Luke|Luke]]. Each contains a [[genealogy of Jesus]] tracing his ancestry back to King David, but the two are from different sons of David; Matthew follows the major royal line from [[Solomon]], while Luke follows a minor line from [[Nathan (son of David)|Nathan, another son of David and Bathsheba]]. Consequently all the names between David and Joseph are different. According to Matthew "Jacob was the father of Joseph," while according to Luke, Joseph, or possibly Jesus, is said to be "of [[Heli (Bible)|Heli]]." Some scholars reconcile the genealogies by viewing the Solomonic lineage in Matthew as Joseph's major royal line, and the Nathanic lineage in Luke to be Mary's minor line.<ref name="Ironside">{{cite book |last=Ironside |first=Harry A. |authorlink=Harry A. Ironside |title=Luke |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=cQBe5m6g8LoC&pg=PT37#v=onepage&q=%22genealogy%20of%20Mary%22&f=false |accessdate= |year=2007 |publisher=Kregel Academic |location= |isbn=978-0825496653 |page=73}}</ref><ref name="Ryrie">{{cite book |last=Ryrie |first=Charles C. |authorlink=Charles Caldwell Ryrie |title=Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=F55Dx_kFcZIC&pg=PA279#v=snippet&q=%22genealogy%20of%20the%20virgin%22&f=false |accessdate= |year=1999 |publisher=Moody Publishers |location= |isbn=978-1575674988 |page=}}</ref>
The [[Pauline epistles]], generally considered the earliest extant Christian records, make no reference to Jesus' father; nor does the [[Gospel of Mark]], generally considered the first of the gospels.<ref name=Spong>Spong, John Shelby. Jesus for the non-religious. HarperCollins. 2007. ISBN 0-06-076207-1</ref> The first appearance of Joseph is therefore in the gospels of [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] and [[Gospel of Luke|Luke]]. Each contains a [[genealogy of Jesus]] tracing his ancestry back to King David, but the two are from different sons of David; Matthew follows the major royal line from [[Solomon]], while Luke follows a minor line from [[Nathan (son of David)|Nathan, another son of David and Bathsheba]]. Consequently all the names between David and Joseph are different. According to Matthew "Jacob was the father of Joseph," while according to Luke, Joseph, or possibly Jesus, is said to be "of [[Heli (Bible)|Heli]]." Some scholars reconcile the genealogies by viewing the Solomonic lineage in Matthew as Joseph's major royal line, and the Nathanic lineage in Luke to be Mary's minor line.<ref name="Ironside">{{cite book |last=Ironside |first=Harry A. |authorlink=Harry A. Ironside |title=Luke |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=cQBe5m6g8LoC&pg=PT37#v=onepage&q=%22genealogy%20of%20Mary%22&f=false |accessdate= |year=2007 |publisher=Kregel Academic |location= |isbn=978-0825496653 |page=73}}</ref><ref name="Ryrie">{{cite book |last=Ryrie |first=Charles C. |authorlink=Charles Caldwell Ryrie |title=Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=F55Dx_kFcZIC&pg=PA279#v=snippet&q=%22genealogy%20of%20the%20virgin%22&f=false |accessdate= |year=1999 |publisher=Moody Publishers |location= |isbn=978-1575674988 |page=}}</ref>
Line 27: Line 27:
[[File:Guido Reni 042.jpg|thumb|St. Joseph by Guido Reni]]
[[File:Guido Reni 042.jpg|thumb|St. Joseph by Guido Reni]]


The [[Pauline epistles]], generally considered the earliest extant Christian records, make no reference to Jesus' father; nor does the [[Gospel of Mark]].<ref name=Spong>Spong, John Shelby. Jesus for the non-religious. HarperCollins. 2007. ISBN 0-06-076207-1</ref> [[Geza Vermes]] notes that the Gospel of Mark identifies Joseph as Jesus' father.<ref>{{cite book |title= Jesus the Jew: A Historian's Reading of the Gospels|edition= |last= Vermes|first= Geza|year= 1981|publisher= First Fortress|location= Philadelphia|isbn= 0-8006-1443-7|page= 20}}</ref> The name of Joseph as the father of Jesus also appears in Luke and in a "variant reading in Matthew".<ref>{{cite book |title= Jesus the Jew: A Historian's Reading of the Gospels|edition= |last= Vermes|first= Geza|year= 1981|publisher= First Fortress|location= Philadelphia|isbn= 0-8006-1443-7|page= 20}}</ref> [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] and [[Gospel of Luke|Luke]] both contain a [[genealogy of Jesus]] tracing his ancestry back to King David, but the two are from different sons of David; Matthew follows the major royal line from [[Solomon]], while Luke follows a minor line from [[Nathan (son of David)|Nathan, another son of David and Bathsheba]]. Consequently all the names between David and Joseph are different. According to Matthew, "Jacob was the father of Joseph", while according to Luke, Joseph, or possibly Jesus, is said to be "of [[Heli (Bible)|Heli]]". Some scholars reconcile the genealogies by viewing the Solomonic lineage in Matthew as Joseph's major royal line, and the Nathanic lineage in Luke to be Mary's minor line.<ref name="Ironside">{{cite book |last=Ironside |first=Harry A. |authorlink=Harry A. Ironside |title=Luke |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=cQBe5m6g8LoC&pg=PT37#v=onepage&q=%22genealogy%20of%20Mary%22&f=false |accessdate= |year=2007 |publisher=Kregel Academic |location= |isbn=978-0825496653 |page=73}}</ref><ref name="Ryrie">{{cite book |last=Ryrie |first=Charles C. |authorlink=Charles Caldwell Ryrie |title=Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=F55Dx_kFcZIC&pg=PA279#v=snippet&q=%22genealogy%20of%20the%20virgin%22&f=false |accessdate= |year=1999 |publisher=Moody Publishers |location= |isbn=978-1575674988 |page=}}</ref> Although Joseph appears in descriptions of Jesus' childhood, no mention is made of him thereafter.<ref>{{cite book|title=Saint Joseph: His Life and His Role in the Church Today|first=Louise B.|last= Perrotta|year= 2000 |isbn= 978-0-87973-573-9 |pages= 21, 110–112 |publisher=Our Sunday Visitor Publishing }}</ref>
The [[Pauline epistles]], generally considered the earliest extant Christian records, make no reference to Jesus' father; nor does the [[Gospel of Mark]].<ref name=Spong>Spong, John Shelby. Jesus for the non-religious. HarperCollins. 2007. ISBN 0-06-076207-1</ref> [[Geza Vermes]] notes that the Gospel of Mark identifies Joseph as Jesus' father.<ref name=Vermes20>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=RvSEK2HALnwC&pg=PA20#v=onepage&q=Joseph%20Jesus%20father&f=false |title= Jesus the Jew: A Historian's Reading of the Gospels |last= Vermes|first= Geza|year= 1981|publisher= First Fortress|location= Philadelphia|isbn=978-1451408805 |page= 20}}</ref> The name of Joseph as the father of Jesus also appears in Luke and in a "variant reading in Matthew".<ref name=Vermes20/> [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] and [[Gospel of Luke|Luke]] both contain a [[genealogy of Jesus]] tracing his ancestry back to King David, but the two are from different sons of David; Matthew follows the major royal line from [[Solomon]], while Luke follows a minor line from [[Nathan (son of David)|Nathan, another son of David and Bathsheba]]. Consequently all the names between David and Joseph are different. According to Matthew, "Jacob was the father of Joseph", while according to Luke, Joseph, or possibly Jesus, is said to be "of [[Heli (Bible)|Heli]]". Some scholars reconcile the genealogies by viewing the Solomonic lineage in Matthew as Joseph's major royal line, and the Nathanic lineage in Luke to be Mary's minor line.<ref name="Ironside">{{cite book |last=Ironside |first=Harry A. |authorlink=Harry A. Ironside |title=Luke |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=cQBe5m6g8LoC&pg=PT37#v=onepage&q=%22genealogy%20of%20Mary%22&f=false |accessdate= |year=2007 |publisher=Kregel Academic |location= |isbn=978-0825496653 |page=73}}</ref><ref name="Ryrie">{{cite book |last=Ryrie |first=Charles C. |authorlink=Charles Caldwell Ryrie |title=Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=F55Dx_kFcZIC&pg=PA279#v=snippet&q=%22genealogy%20of%20the%20virgin%22&f=false |accessdate= |year=1999 |publisher=Moody Publishers |location= |isbn=978-1575674988 |page=}}</ref> Although Joseph appears in descriptions of Jesus' childhood, no mention is made of him thereafter.<ref>{{cite book|title=Saint Joseph: His Life and His Role in the Church Today|first=Louise B.|last= Perrotta|year= 2000 |isbn= 978-0-87973-573-9 |pages= 21, 110–112 |publisher=Our Sunday Visitor Publishing }}</ref>


Matthew and Luke are also the only gospels to include the [[Nativity of Jesus|infancy narratives]], and again they differ. In Luke, Joseph lives in Nazareth and travels to Bethlehem in compliance with the requirements of a Roman census. Subsequently, Jesus was born there. In Matthew, Joseph was in Bethlehem, the city of David, where Jesus is born, and then moves to Nazareth with his family after the death of Herod. Matthew is the only Gospel to include the narrative of the [[Massacre of the Innocents]] and the [[Flight into Egypt]]: following the nativity, Joseph stays in Bethlehem for an unspecified period (perhaps two years) until forced by Herod to take refuge in Egypt; on the death of Herod he brings his family back to [[Judea (Roman province)|Judea]], and settles in Nazareth. After this point there is no further mention of Joseph by name, although the story of Jesus in the Temple, in Jesus' 12th year, includes a reference to "both his parents". Christian tradition represents Mary as a widow during the adult ministry of her son. The gospels describe Joseph as a "tekton" (τέκτων); traditionally the word has been taken to mean "carpenter",<ref name="Freud109">{{cite book |last=Jonte |first=Diane |authorlink= |title=Teaching Freud |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=vZhtY5lV2SAC&pg=PA109#v=onepage&q=tekton%20joseph&f=false |accessdate= |year=2003 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location= |isbn=978-0198035855 |page=}}</ref> though the Greek term evokes an artisan with wood in general, or an artisan in iron or stone.<ref name="Deiss14">{{cite book |last=Deiss |first=Lucien |authorlink= |title=Joseph, Mary, Jesus |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=IZLWU9zvj-4C&pg=PA14#v=onepage&q=tekton%20joseph&f=false |accessdate= |year=1996 |publisher=Liturgical Press |location= |isbn=978-0814622551 |page=}}</ref> Very little other information on Joseph is given in the gospels. He is never quoted. Matthew records four dreams in which Joseph is supernaturally instructed before, and after, the birth and early years of Jesus. In the first dream, an angel confirms to Joseph that Mary is with child, conceived by the Holy Spirit, that she will bear a son to be named Jesus, Who will save His people from their sins; and Joseph should, therefore, not be reluctant to marry her. In the second dream, an angel tells Joseph to take Mary and Jesus to Egypt (from Bethlehem) and remain until the angel instructs further, because [[Herod the Great|Herod]] is seeking to kill Jesus. In Joseph's third dream, an angel instructs Joseph to return his family to Israel, implying that Herod is dead. However, Joseph hears that Herod's son [[Herod Archelaus|Archelaus]] reigns over Judea, and he is afraid to continue the journey. In the fourth dream, God Himself warns Joseph to avoid returning to Judea (Bethlehem). Joseph then settles Mary and Jesus in the region of Galilee in Nazareth.
Matthew and Luke are also the only gospels to include the [[Nativity of Jesus|infancy narratives]], and again they differ. In Luke, Joseph lives in Nazareth and travels to Bethlehem in compliance with the requirements of a Roman census. Subsequently, Jesus was born there. In Matthew, Joseph was in Bethlehem, the city of David, where Jesus is born, and then moves to Nazareth with his family after the death of Herod. Matthew is the only Gospel to include the narrative of the [[Massacre of the Innocents]] and the [[Flight into Egypt]]: following the nativity, Joseph stays in Bethlehem for an unspecified period (perhaps two years) until forced by Herod to take refuge in Egypt; on the death of Herod he brings his family back to [[Judea (Roman province)|Judea]], and settles in Nazareth. After this point there is no further mention of Joseph by name, although the story of Jesus in the Temple, in Jesus' 12th year, includes a reference to "both his parents". Christian tradition represents Mary as a widow during the adult ministry of her son. The gospels describe Joseph as a "tekton" (τέκτων); traditionally the word has been taken to mean "carpenter",<ref name="Freud109">{{cite book |last=Jonte |first=Diane |authorlink= |title=Teaching Freud |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=vZhtY5lV2SAC&pg=PA109#v=onepage&q=tekton%20joseph&f=false |accessdate= |year=2003 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location= |isbn=978-0198035855 |page=}}</ref> though the Greek term evokes an artisan with wood in general, or an artisan in iron or stone.<ref name="Deiss14">{{cite book |last=Deiss |first=Lucien |authorlink= |title=Joseph, Mary, Jesus |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=IZLWU9zvj-4C&pg=PA14#v=onepage&q=tekton%20joseph&f=false |accessdate= |year=1996 |publisher=Liturgical Press |location= |isbn=978-0814622551 |page=}}</ref>
{{Citation needed span|Very little other information on Joseph is given in the gospels. He is never quoted. Matthew records four dreams in which Joseph is supernaturally instructed before, and after, the birth and early years of Jesus. In the first dream, an angel confirms to Joseph that Mary is with child, conceived by the Holy Spirit, that she will bear a son to be named Jesus, Who will save His people from their sins; and Joseph should, therefore, not be reluctant to marry her. In the second dream, an angel tells Joseph to take Mary and Jesus to Egypt (from Bethlehem) and remain until the angel instructs further, because [[Herod the Great|Herod]] is seeking to kill Jesus. In Joseph's third dream, an angel instructs Joseph to return his family to Israel, implying that Herod is dead. However, Joseph hears that Herod's son [[Herod Archelaus|Archelaus]] reigns over Judea, and he is afraid to continue the journey. In the fourth dream, God Himself warns Joseph to avoid returning to Judea (Bethlehem). Joseph then settles Mary and Jesus in the region of Galilee in Nazareth.|date=August 2014}}


==Paul and the canonical Gospels==
==Paul and the canonical Gospels==
Line 41: Line 43:
The last time Joseph appears in person in any Gospel is the story of the [[Passover]] [[Finding in the Temple|visit to the Temple]] in Jerusalem when Jesus is 12 years old, found only in Luke. Like the infancy narratives the story is didactic, emphasising Jesus' awareness of his coming mission: here Jesus speaks to his parents (both of them) of "my father," meaning God, but they fail to understand.({{Bibleverse||Luke|2:41-51|KJV}}).
The last time Joseph appears in person in any Gospel is the story of the [[Passover]] [[Finding in the Temple|visit to the Temple]] in Jerusalem when Jesus is 12 years old, found only in Luke. Like the infancy narratives the story is didactic, emphasising Jesus' awareness of his coming mission: here Jesus speaks to his parents (both of them) of "my father," meaning God, but they fail to understand.({{Bibleverse||Luke|2:41-51|KJV}}).


None of the Gospels mentions Joseph as present at any event during Jesus' adult ministry. The [[synoptic Gospels]], however, share a scene in which the people of [[Nazareth]], Jesus' hometown, doubt Jesus' status as a prophet because they know his family. In [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 6:3, they call Jesus "Mary's son" instead of naming his father. In [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]], the townspeople call Jesus "the carpenter's son," again without naming his father, and again he has [[desposyni|brothers named James, and Joses (i.e., Joseph), and Simon, and Judas]] ({{Bibleverse||Matthew|13:53-58|NIV}}). In Luke 3:23 "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was [the son] of Heli," and Luke makes no mention of any brothers ({{Bibleverse||Luke|4:16-30|NIV}}). In Luke the tone is positive, whereas in Mark and Matthew it is disparaging.<ref name="Vermes1">Vermes, Geza "The authentic gospel of Jesus" (London, Penguin Books, 2004) Chapter 1: Narratives and commands, p. 1-37.</ref> This incident does not appear at all in John, but in a parallel story the disbelieving Jews refer to "Jesus the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know" ({{Bibleverse||John|6:41-51|NIV}}).
None of the Gospels mentions Joseph as present at any event during Jesus' adult ministry. The [[synoptic Gospels]], however, share a scene in which the people of [[Nazareth]], Jesus' hometown, doubt Jesus' status as a prophet because they know his family. In [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 6:3, they call Jesus "Mary's son" instead of naming his father. In [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]], the townspeople call Jesus "the carpenter's son," again without naming his father, and again he has [[desposyni|brothers named James, and Joses (i.e., Joseph), and Simon, and Judas]] ({{Bibleverse||Matthew|13:53-58|NIV}}). In Luke 3:23 "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was [the son] of Heli," and Luke makes no mention of any brothers ({{Bibleverse||Luke|4:16-30|NIV}}). In Luke the tone is positive, whereas in Mark and Matthew it is disparaging.<ref name="Vermes1">Vermes, Geza "http://books.google.com/books?id=Qyl4ZuSuSkUC&pg=PP23#v=snippet&q=%22Narratives%20and%20commands%22&f=false The Authentic Gospel of Jesus]" (London, Penguin Books, 2004) Chapter 1: Narratives and commands, p. 1-37, ISBN 978-0141912608.</ref> This incident does not appear at all in John, but in a parallel story the disbelieving Jews refer to "Jesus the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know" ({{Bibleverse||John|6:41-51|NIV}}).


Joseph is not mentioned as being present at the [[Wedding at Cana]] at the beginning of Jesus' mission, nor at the [[Passion of Jesus|Passion]] at the end. If he had been present at the [[Crucifixion of Jesus|Crucifixion]], he would under Jewish custom have been expected to take charge of Jesus' body, but this role is instead performed by [[Joseph of Arimathea]]. Nor would Jesus have entrusted his mother to John's care had her husband been alive.<ref name=newadvent/>
Joseph is not mentioned as being present at the [[Wedding at Cana]] at the beginning of Jesus' mission, nor at the [[Passion of Jesus|Passion]] at the end. If he had been present at the [[Crucifixion of Jesus|Crucifixion]], he would under Jewish custom have been expected to take charge of Jesus' body, but this role is instead performed by [[Joseph of Arimathea]]. Nor would Jesus have entrusted his mother to John's care had her husband been alive.<ref name=newadvent/>


===Gospel harmony===
===Gospel harmony===
{{Josephology}}
A sample [[Gospel harmony]] of the episodes of the life of Saint Joseph in the [[canonical Gospels]], in summary form of harmonies for the four gospels.<ref>David A. Reed (2009) [http://www.parallelgospelsinharmony.com/ Parallel Gospels in Harmony - with Study Guide - An online harmony of the Gospels] Public Domain Paperback ISBN 978-0557074358</ref><ref>Ken Palmer (2013) [http://www.lifeofchrist.com/life/harmony/ Gospel Harmony A chronological chart of the Life of Jesus Christ]</ref><ref>Steven L. Cox, Kendell H Easley, 2007 ''Harmony of the Gospels'' ISBN 0-8054-9444-8</ref>
A sample [[Gospel harmony]] of the episodes of the life of Saint Joseph in the [[canonical Gospels]], in summary form of harmonies for the four gospels.<ref>David A. Reed (2009) [http://www.parallelgospelsinharmony.com/ Parallel Gospels in Harmony - with Study Guide - An online harmony of the Gospels] Public Domain Paperback ISBN 978-0557074358</ref><ref>Ken Palmer (2013) [http://www.lifeofchrist.com/life/harmony/ Gospel Harmony A chronological chart of the Life of Jesus Christ]</ref><ref>Steven L. Cox, Kendell H Easley, 2007 ''Harmony of the Gospels'' ISBN 0-8054-9444-8</ref>
<!-- Instructions for editing wikipedia tables: http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_User%27s_Guide:_Using_tables -->
<!-- Instructions for editing wikipedia tables: http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_User%27s_Guide:_Using_tables -->
Line 95: Line 96:
===Modern appraisal===
===Modern appraisal===


The name of Joseph is found almost exclusively in the genealogies and the infancy narratives.<ref name="Vermesepi">Vermes, Geza. The authentic gospel of Jesus. London, Penguin Books. 2004. Epilogue. p. 398-417.</ref><ref name = "ActJBirth">[[Robert W. Funk|Funk, Robert W.]] and the [[Jesus Seminar]]. ''The acts of Jesus: the search for the authentic deeds of Jesus.'' HarperSanFrancisco. 1998. "Birth & Infancy Stories" p. 497-526.</ref> The variances between the genealogies given in Matthew and Luke are explained in a number of ways, although one possibility is that Matthew's genealogy traces his legal descent, according to [[Halakha|Jewish law]], through St. Joseph; while Luke's genealogy traces his actual physical descent through Mary.<ref name="Ironside"/><ref name="Ryrie"/>
The name of Joseph is found almost exclusively in the genealogies and the infancy narratives.<ref name="Vermesepi">Vermes, Geza. ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=Qyl4ZuSuSkUC The Authentic Gospel of Jesus]''. London, Penguin Books. 2004. Epilogue. p. 398-417, ISBN 978-0141912608.</ref><ref name = "ActJBirth">[[Robert W. Funk|Funk, Robert W.]] and the [[Jesus Seminar]]. ''The acts of Jesus: the search for the authentic deeds of Jesus.'' HarperSanFrancisco. 1998. "Birth & Infancy Stories" p. 497-526.</ref> The variances between the genealogies given in Matthew and Luke are explained in a number of ways, although one possibility is that Matthew's genealogy traces his legal descent, according to [[Halakha|Jewish law]], through St. Joseph; while Luke's genealogy traces his actual physical descent through Mary.<ref name="Ironside"/><ref name="Ryrie"/>


Modern positions on the question of the relationship between Joseph and the Virgin Mary vary. The [[Eastern Orthodox Church]], which names Joseph's first wife as Salome, holds that Joseph was a widower and merely betrothed, but never married, to Mary,<ref>{{Cite book|author=Holy Apostles Convent |title=The Life of the Virgin Mary, the Theotokos |year=1989 |pages=64 |location=Buena Vista |publisher=Holy Apostles Convent and Dormition Skete |ISBN=0-944359-03-5}}</ref> and that references to Jesus' "brothers" are to children of Joseph and Salome. The position of the [[Catholic Church]], derived from the writings of [[Saint Jerome]], is that Joseph was the husband of Mary, but that references to Jesus' "brothers" should be understood to mean cousins or step-brothers. In both cases, the church doctrine of the Perpetual Virginity means that Joseph and Mary never had sexual relations. The Protestant churches, following the tenet of Virgin Birth but not that of Perpetual Virginity, hold no strong views on the subject.<ref>See, e.g., {{Cite book|author=David Brown |title=Commentary, Critical and Explanatory, on the Whole Bible |chapter=Commentary on Matthew 13:56 |chapterurl=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/jamieson/jfb.xi.i.xv.html#xi.i.xv-p102.3 |accessdate=2009-01-07 |quote=An exceedingly difficult question here arises—What were these 'brethren' and 'sisters' to Jesus? Were they, ''First'', His full brothers and sisters? or, ''Secondly'', Were they His step-brothers and step-sisters, children of Joseph by a former marriage? or, ''Thirdly'', Were they cousins, according to a common way of speaking among the Jews respecting persons of collateral descent? On this subject an immense deal has been written, nor are opinions yet by any means agreed. For the second opinion there is no ground but a vague tradition, arising probably from the wish for some such explanation. The first opinion undoubtedly suits the text best in all the places where the parties are certainly referred to (Mt 12:46; and its parallels, Mr 3:31; Lu 8:19; our present passage, and its parallels, Mr 6:3; Joh 2:12; 7:3, 5, 10; Ac 1:14). But, in addition to other objections, many of the best interpreters, thinking it in the last degree improbable that our Lord, when hanging on the cross, would have committed His mother to John if He had had full brothers of His own then alive, prefer the third opinion; although, on the other hand, it is not to be doubted that our Lord might have good reasons for entrusting the guardianship of His doubly widowed mother to the beloved disciple in preference even to full brothers of His own. Thus dubiously we prefer to leave this vexed question, encompassed as it is with difficulties!}}</ref>
Modern positions on the question of the relationship between Joseph and the Virgin Mary vary. The [[Eastern Orthodox Church]], which names Joseph's first wife as Salome, holds that Joseph was a widower and merely betrothed, but never married, to Mary,<ref>{{Cite book|author=Holy Apostles Convent |title=The Life of the Virgin Mary, the Theotokos |year=1989 |pages=64 |location=Buena Vista |publisher=Holy Apostles Convent and Dormition Skete |ISBN=0-944359-03-5}}</ref> and that references to Jesus' "brothers" are to children of Joseph and Salome. The position of the [[Catholic Church]], derived from the writings of [[Saint Jerome]], is that Joseph was the husband of Mary, but that references to Jesus' "brothers" should be understood to mean cousins or step-brothers. In both cases, the church doctrine of the Perpetual Virginity means that Joseph and Mary never had sexual relations. The Protestant churches, following the tenet of Virgin Birth but not that of Perpetual Virginity, hold no strong views on the subject.<ref>See, e.g., {{Cite book|author=David Brown |title=Commentary, Critical and Explanatory, on the Whole Bible |chapter=Commentary on Matthew 13:56 |chapterurl=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/jamieson/jfb.xi.i.xv.html#xi.i.xv-p102.3 |accessdate=2009-01-07 |quote=An exceedingly difficult question here arises—What were these 'brethren' and 'sisters' to Jesus? Were they, ''First'', His full brothers and sisters? or, ''Secondly'', Were they His step-brothers and step-sisters, children of Joseph by a former marriage? or, ''Thirdly'', Were they cousins, according to a common way of speaking among the Jews respecting persons of collateral descent? On this subject an immense deal has been written, nor are opinions yet by any means agreed. For the second opinion there is no ground but a vague tradition, arising probably from the wish for some such explanation. The first opinion undoubtedly suits the text best in all the places where the parties are certainly referred to (Mt 12:46; and its parallels, Mr 3:31; Lu 8:19; our present passage, and its parallels, Mr 6:3; Joh 2:12; 7:3, 5, 10; Ac 1:14). But, in addition to other objections, many of the best interpreters, thinking it in the last degree improbable that our Lord, when hanging on the cross, would have committed His mother to John if He had had full brothers of His own then alive, prefer the third opinion; although, on the other hand, it is not to be doubted that our Lord might have good reasons for entrusting the guardianship of His doubly widowed mother to the beloved disciple in preference even to full brothers of His own. Thus dubiously we prefer to leave this vexed question, encompassed as it is with difficulties!}}</ref>
Line 110: Line 111:


==Sainthood==
==Sainthood==
{{Josephology}}
[[File:Italian - Saint Joseph - Walters 27531.jpg|thumb||Saint Joseph ]]
{{Main|Holy Family|Josephology}}
{{Main|Holy Family|Josephology}}



Revision as of 07:09, 4 August 2014

Saint Joseph
Saint Joseph with the Infant Jesus, Guido Reni (c. 1635)
BornBethlehem,[1]c. 90 BC (apocryphal date) [1]
DiedNazareth, July 20, AD 18[1] (apocryphal date)
Venerated inCatholicism, Anglicanism, Lutheranism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Oriental Orthodoxy
FeastMarch 19 - Saint Joseph, Husband of Mary (Western Christianity),

May 1 - St Joseph the Worker (Roman Catholic Church),

The Sunday after the Nativity of the Lord (Eastern Christianity)
AttributesCarpenter's square or tools, the infant Jesus, staff with lily blossoms, two turtle doves, spikenard.
PatronageThe Catholic Church, unborn children, fathers, immigrants, workers, carpenters, realtors, against doubt and hesitation, and of a happy death, Croatia, Philippines, United States, Vietnam, many others

Joseph (Hebrew יוֹסֵף, Yosef; Greek: Ἰωσήφ, Ioseph) is a figure in the Gospels, the husband of Mary, the mother of Jesus and the stepfather[2] of Jesus. In Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Anglican Christian traditions, he is regarded as Saint Joseph. Christian tradition places Joseph as Jesus' foster father.[1] Some historians state that Joseph was Jesus' father.[3][4][5] Some differing views are due to theological interpretations versus historical views.[3]

The Pauline epistles, generally considered the earliest extant Christian records, make no reference to Jesus' father; nor does the Gospel of Mark, generally considered the first of the gospels.[6] The first appearance of Joseph is therefore in the gospels of Matthew and Luke. Each contains a genealogy of Jesus tracing his ancestry back to King David, but the two are from different sons of David; Matthew follows the major royal line from Solomon, while Luke follows a minor line from Nathan, another son of David and Bathsheba. Consequently all the names between David and Joseph are different. According to Matthew "Jacob was the father of Joseph," while according to Luke, Joseph, or possibly Jesus, is said to be "of Heli." Some scholars reconcile the genealogies by viewing the Solomonic lineage in Matthew as Joseph's major royal line, and the Nathanic lineage in Luke to be Mary's minor line.[7][8]

Joseph is venerated as a saint in the Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Anglican, Lutheran[9][10] and Methodist[11][12] faiths. In Catholic and other traditions, Joseph is the patron saint of workers and has several feast days. He was also declared to be the patron saint and protector of the Catholic Church by Pope Pius IX in 1870, and is the patron of several countries and regions. With the growth of Mariology, the theological field of Josephology has also grown and since the 1950s centres for studying it have been formed.[13][14]

Saint Joseph as Jesus' father

St. Joseph by Guido Reni

The Pauline epistles, generally considered the earliest extant Christian records, make no reference to Jesus' father; nor does the Gospel of Mark.[6] Geza Vermes notes that the Gospel of Mark identifies Joseph as Jesus' father.[3] The name of Joseph as the father of Jesus also appears in Luke and in a "variant reading in Matthew".[3] Matthew and Luke both contain a genealogy of Jesus tracing his ancestry back to King David, but the two are from different sons of David; Matthew follows the major royal line from Solomon, while Luke follows a minor line from Nathan, another son of David and Bathsheba. Consequently all the names between David and Joseph are different. According to Matthew, "Jacob was the father of Joseph", while according to Luke, Joseph, or possibly Jesus, is said to be "of Heli". Some scholars reconcile the genealogies by viewing the Solomonic lineage in Matthew as Joseph's major royal line, and the Nathanic lineage in Luke to be Mary's minor line.[7][8] Although Joseph appears in descriptions of Jesus' childhood, no mention is made of him thereafter.[15]

Matthew and Luke are also the only gospels to include the infancy narratives, and again they differ. In Luke, Joseph lives in Nazareth and travels to Bethlehem in compliance with the requirements of a Roman census. Subsequently, Jesus was born there. In Matthew, Joseph was in Bethlehem, the city of David, where Jesus is born, and then moves to Nazareth with his family after the death of Herod. Matthew is the only Gospel to include the narrative of the Massacre of the Innocents and the Flight into Egypt: following the nativity, Joseph stays in Bethlehem for an unspecified period (perhaps two years) until forced by Herod to take refuge in Egypt; on the death of Herod he brings his family back to Judea, and settles in Nazareth. After this point there is no further mention of Joseph by name, although the story of Jesus in the Temple, in Jesus' 12th year, includes a reference to "both his parents". Christian tradition represents Mary as a widow during the adult ministry of her son. The gospels describe Joseph as a "tekton" (τέκτων); traditionally the word has been taken to mean "carpenter",[16] though the Greek term evokes an artisan with wood in general, or an artisan in iron or stone.[17]

Very little other information on Joseph is given in the gospels. He is never quoted. Matthew records four dreams in which Joseph is supernaturally instructed before, and after, the birth and early years of Jesus. In the first dream, an angel confirms to Joseph that Mary is with child, conceived by the Holy Spirit, that she will bear a son to be named Jesus, Who will save His people from their sins; and Joseph should, therefore, not be reluctant to marry her. In the second dream, an angel tells Joseph to take Mary and Jesus to Egypt (from Bethlehem) and remain until the angel instructs further, because Herod is seeking to kill Jesus. In Joseph's third dream, an angel instructs Joseph to return his family to Israel, implying that Herod is dead. However, Joseph hears that Herod's son Archelaus reigns over Judea, and he is afraid to continue the journey. In the fourth dream, God Himself warns Joseph to avoid returning to Judea (Bethlehem). Joseph then settles Mary and Jesus in the region of Galilee in Nazareth.[citation needed]

Paul and the canonical Gospels

Holy Family with the Holy Spirit by Murillo, 1675-1682.

Joseph in the New Testament

The epistles of Paul are generally regarded as the oldest extant Christian writings. These mention Jesus' mother (without naming her), but do not refer to his father – other than God (Romans 15:26 etc.). The oldest gospel, that of Mark, also does not mention Jesus' father. Joseph first appears in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, generally regarded as later than Mark. Luke names Joseph's father as Heli, and Matthew names his father as Jacob, which parallels the Old Testament Joseph (whose father was also named Jacob) and is in keeping with that gospel's depiction of Jesus as a second Moses.[6] This theme is developed further in the infancy narratives, which, like the genealogies, have the function of establishing Jesus as the promised Messiah, the descendant of David, born in Bethlehem.

Like the two differing genealogies, the infancy narratives appear only in Matthew and Luke, and take different approaches to reconciling the requirement that the Messiah be born in Bethlehem with the tradition that Jesus came from Nazareth. In Matthew, Joseph obeys the direction of an angel to marry Mary and then to flee to Egypt to escape the massacre of the children of Bethlehem planned by Herod the Great, the tyrant who rules Judea. Once Herod has died, the angel tells him to return to Galilee instead of to Bethlehem, and so Joseph takes his wife and the child to Nazareth and settles there. Thus in Matthew, the infant Jesus, like Moses, is in peril from a cruel king, like Moses he has a (fore)father named Joseph who goes down to Egypt, like the Old Testament Joseph this Joseph has a father named Jacob, and both Josephs receive important dreams foretelling their future.[6] In Luke, Joseph already lives in Nazareth, and Jesus is born in Bethlehem because Joseph and Mary have to travel there to be counted in a census. Luke's account makes no mention of angels and dreams, the Massacre of the Innocents, or of a visit to Egypt.

The last time Joseph appears in person in any Gospel is the story of the Passover visit to the Temple in Jerusalem when Jesus is 12 years old, found only in Luke. Like the infancy narratives the story is didactic, emphasising Jesus' awareness of his coming mission: here Jesus speaks to his parents (both of them) of "my father," meaning God, but they fail to understand.(Luke 2:41–51).

None of the Gospels mentions Joseph as present at any event during Jesus' adult ministry. The synoptic Gospels, however, share a scene in which the people of Nazareth, Jesus' hometown, doubt Jesus' status as a prophet because they know his family. In Mark 6:3, they call Jesus "Mary's son" instead of naming his father. In Matthew, the townspeople call Jesus "the carpenter's son," again without naming his father, and again he has brothers named James, and Joses (i.e., Joseph), and Simon, and Judas (Matthew 13:53–58). In Luke 3:23 "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was [the son] of Heli," and Luke makes no mention of any brothers (Luke 4:16–30). In Luke the tone is positive, whereas in Mark and Matthew it is disparaging.[18] This incident does not appear at all in John, but in a parallel story the disbelieving Jews refer to "Jesus the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know" (John 6:41–51).

Joseph is not mentioned as being present at the Wedding at Cana at the beginning of Jesus' mission, nor at the Passion at the end. If he had been present at the Crucifixion, he would under Jewish custom have been expected to take charge of Jesus' body, but this role is instead performed by Joseph of Arimathea. Nor would Jesus have entrusted his mother to John's care had her husband been alive.[1]

Gospel harmony

A sample Gospel harmony of the episodes of the life of Saint Joseph in the canonical Gospels, in summary form of harmonies for the four gospels.[19][20][21]

Number Event Matthew Mark Luke John
1 Joseph lived in Nazareth Luke 2:4
2 Genealogy of Jesus Matthew 1:1–17 Solomon to Jacob Luke 3:23 Nathan to Heli
3 Joseph Betrothed to Mary Matthew 1:18
4 Angel visits Joseph (1st dream) Matthew 1:20–21
5 Joseph and Mary travel to Bethlehem Luke 2:8–15
6 Birth of Jesus Matthew 1:25 Luke 2:6–7
7 Temple presentation Luke 2:22–24
8 Angel tells Joseph to flee (2nd dream) Matthew 2:13
9 Flight into Egypt Matthew 2:14–15
10 Angel tells Joseph to return to Nazareth (3rd dream) Matthew 2:19–20
11 Joseph and family settle in Nazareth Matthew 2:21–23 Luke 2:39
12 Finding Jesus in the Temple Luke 2:41–51
13 Holy Family John 6:41–42

Professional life

St. Joseph the Carpenter, by Georges de La Tour, 1640s.

Jesus is identified in the Gospel of Matthew 13:55 as the son of a τέκτων (tekton) and the Gospel of Mark 6:3 states that Jesus was a Tektōn himself. Tekton has been traditionally translated into English as "carpenter", but is a rather general word (from the same root that gives us "technical" and "technology") that could cover makers of objects in various materials, even builders.[22] But the specific association with woodworking is a constant in Early Christian tradition; Justin Martyr (died c. 165) wrote that Jesus made yokes and ploughs, and there are similar early references.[23]

John Dominic Crossan puts tekton into a historical context more resembling an itinerant worker than an established artisan, emphasizing his marginality in a population in which a peasant who owns land could become quite prosperous. Other scholars have argued that tekton could equally mean a highly skilled craftsman in wood or the more prestigious metal, perhaps running a workshop with several employees, and noted sources recording the shortage of skilled artisans at the time.[24] Geza Vermes has stated that the terms 'carpenter' and 'son of a carpenter' are used in the Jewish Talmud to signify a very learned man, and he suggests that a description of Joseph as 'naggar' (a carpenter) could indicate that he was considered wise and highly literate in the Torah.[25]

At the time of Joseph, Nazareth was an obscure village in Galilee, about 65 kilometres (40 mi) from the Holy City of Jerusalem, which is barely mentioned in surviving non-Christian texts and documents.[6][26][27][28][29] Archaeology over most of the site is made impossible by subsequent building, but from what has been excavated and tombs in the area around the village, it is estimated that the population was at most about 400.[30] It was, however, only about 6 kilometres from the city of Tzippori (ancient "Sepphoris"), which was destroyed by the Romans in 4 BC, and thereafter was expensively rebuilt. Analysis of the landscape and other evidence suggest that in Joseph's lifetime Nazareth was "oriented towards" the nearby city,[31] which had an overwhelmingly Jewish population although with many signs of Hellenization,[32] and historians have speculated that Joseph and later Jesus too might have traveled daily to work on the rebuilding. Specifically the large theatre in the city has been suggested, although this has aroused much controversy over dating and other issues.[33] Other scholars see Joseph and Jesus as the general village craftsmen, working in wood, stone and metal on a wide variety of jobs.[34]

Modern appraisal

The name of Joseph is found almost exclusively in the genealogies and the infancy narratives.[35][36] The variances between the genealogies given in Matthew and Luke are explained in a number of ways, although one possibility is that Matthew's genealogy traces his legal descent, according to Jewish law, through St. Joseph; while Luke's genealogy traces his actual physical descent through Mary.[7][8]

Modern positions on the question of the relationship between Joseph and the Virgin Mary vary. The Eastern Orthodox Church, which names Joseph's first wife as Salome, holds that Joseph was a widower and merely betrothed, but never married, to Mary,[37] and that references to Jesus' "brothers" are to children of Joseph and Salome. The position of the Catholic Church, derived from the writings of Saint Jerome, is that Joseph was the husband of Mary, but that references to Jesus' "brothers" should be understood to mean cousins or step-brothers. In both cases, the church doctrine of the Perpetual Virginity means that Joseph and Mary never had sexual relations. The Protestant churches, following the tenet of Virgin Birth but not that of Perpetual Virginity, hold no strong views on the subject.[38]

Later apocryphal writings

Christ in the House of his Parents, by Murillo
Christ in the House of his Parents, by John Everett Millais

The canonical gospels created a problem: they stated clearly that Mary was a virgin when she conceived Jesus, and that Joseph was not his father; yet Joseph's paternity was essential to establish Jesus' Davidic descent, and he and Mary were so much husband and wife that only divorce could dissolve their union (Matthew 1:19).[39] The theological situation was complicated by the gospel references to Jesus' "brothers and sisters" (repeated in Paul, where James is called the "brother of Christ"), and by the fact that he was described unambiguously by John and Mark as "Joseph's son" and "the carpenter's son."[39] From the 2nd century to the 5th writers tried to explain how Jesus could be simultaneously the "son of God" as well as the "son of Joseph".[39]

The first to offer a solution was the apocryphal Protoevangelium of James, written about 150 AD. The original gospels never refer to Joseph's age, but James presents him as an old man chosen by lot (i.e., by God) to watch over the Virgin. Jesus' brothers are presented as Joseph's children by an earlier marriage, and his years and righteousness explain why he has not yet had sex with his wife: "I received her by lot as my wife, and she is not yet my wife, but she has conceived by the Holy Spirit."[40]

The Protoevangelium was extremely popular, but it leaves open the possibility that Joseph might have had relations with Mary after the birth of Jesus ("she is not yet my wife..."). A few centuries later the developing doctrine that Mary was a virgin not only at the time of the conception and birth of Christ, but throughout her life, meant that this possibility had to be excluded. The apocryphal History of Joseph the Carpenter, written in the 5th century and framed as a biography of Joseph dictated by Jesus, describes how Joseph, aged 90 (the Protoevangelium had not given Joseph a specific age), a widower with four sons and two daughters, is given charge of the twelve-year-old Mary, who then lives in his household raising his youngest son James the Less (the supposed author of the Protoevengelium) until she is ready to be married at age 14½. Joseph's death at the age of 111, attended by angels and asserting the perpetual virginity of Mary, takes up approximately half the story.[41]

Sainthood

Together with the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Child Jesus, Joseph is one of the three members of the Holy Family; since he only appears in the birth narratives of the Gospels, Jesus is depicted as a child when with him. The formal veneration of the Holy Family began in the 17th century by François de Laval.

The earliest records of a formal devotional following for Saint Joseph date to the year 800 and references to him as nutritor Domini (educator/guardian of the Lord) began to appear in the 9th century, and continued growing to the 14th century.[42][43][44] Saint Thomas Aquinas discussed the necessity of the presence of Saint Joseph in the plan of the Incarnation for if Mary had not been married, the Jews would have stoned her and that in his youth Jesus needed the care and protection of a human father.[45][46]

In the 15th century, major steps were taken by Saint Bernardine of Siena, Pierre d'Ailly and Jean Gerson.[42] Gerson wrote Consideration sur Saint Joseph and preached sermons on Saint Joseph at the Council of Constance.[47] In 1889 Pope Leo XIII issued the encyclical Quamquam Pluries in which he urged Catholics to pray to Saint Joseph, as the patron of the Church in view of the challenges facing the Church.[48]

Josephology, the study of the theology of Saint Joseph, is one of the most recent theological disciplines.[49] In 1989, on the occasion of the centenary of Quamquam Pluries Pope John Paul II issued Redemptoris Custos, i.e. Guardian of the Redeemer which presented Saint Joseph's role in the plan of redemption, as part of the "redemption documents" issued by John Paul II such as Redemptoris Mater to which it refers.[50][51][52][53]

Feast days

St Joseph by William Dyce (1806–1864)

March 19, Saint Joseph's Day, has been the principal feast day of Saint Joseph in Western Christianity[54][55] since the 10th century, and is celebrated by Catholics, Anglicans, many Lutherans and other denominations.[56] In Eastern Orthodoxy, the feast day of Saint Joseph is celebrated on the First Sunday after the Nativity of Christ.

In 1870, Pope Pius IX declared Joseph patron of the universal Church and instituted another feast, with an octave, to be held in his honour on Wednesday in the second week after Easter. This was abolished by Pope Pius XII, when in 1955 he established the Feast of "St. Joseph the Worker", to be celebrated on 1 May. This date counteracts May Day, a union, workers and socialists holiday and reflects Joseph's status as what many Catholics and other Christians consider the "patron of workers" and "model of workers." Catholic and other Christian teachings and stories about or relating to Joseph and the Holy Family frequently stress his patience, persistence, and hard work as admirable qualities which believers should adopt.

Pope John XXIII added the name of Joseph to the Canon of the Mass. Pope Francis had his name added to the three other Eucharistic Prayers, not just the Roman Canon (Eucharistic Prayer I).[57]

The 19 March Feast is a Solemnity (first class if using the Tridentine calendar), and is transferred to another date if impeded. It would be impeded on 19 March if that day is a Sunday or in Holy Week.

The 1 May celebration is an Optional Memorial, and so is omitted if impeded, unless the day is raised to a higher rank because St. Joseph is the patron of the church, diocese, place, or institution. (However, the 1 May celebration is 1st class in the Tridentine calendar, so in it St. Joseph the Worker was celebrated on 2 May in 2008 because 1 May was Ascension Thursday and in 2011 because 1 May was in the Easter octave.)

Patronage

San Giuseppe

Pope Pius IX proclaimed Saint Joseph the patron of the Universal Church in 1870, the unofficial patron against doubt and hesitation, as well as the patron saint of fighting communism, and of a happy death.[58] Having died in the "arms of Jesus and Mary" according to Catholic tradition, he is considered the model of the pious believer who receives grace at the moment of death.

Saint Joseph is the patron saint of a number of cities, regions and countries, among them the Americas, Canada, China, Croatia, Mexico, Korea, Austria, Belgium, Peru, the Philippines and Vietnam, as well as of families, fathers, expectant mothers (pregnant women), travelers, immigrants, house sellers and buyers, craftsmen, engineers, and working people in general. (For full list, see External lists: Saint Joseph at Patron Saints Index)

Places, churches and Institutions

Saint Joseph's Oratory, Montreal.

Many cities, towns, and locations are named after Saint Joseph. According to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the Spanish form, San Jose, is the most common place name in the world. Probably the most-recognized San Joses are San José, Costa Rica, and San Jose, California, United States, given their name by Spanish colonists. Joseph is the patron saint of the New World; of the countries China, Canada, Korea, Mexico, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Peru, Vietnam; of the regions Carinthia, Styria, Tyrol, Sicily; and of several main cities and dioceses.

Many churches, monasteries and other institutions are dedicated to Saint Joseph. Saint Joseph's Oratory is the largest church in Canada, with the largest dome of its kind in the world after that of Saint Peter's Basilica in Rome. Elsewhere in the world churches named after the saint may be known as those of San Giuseppe, e.g. San Giuseppe dei Teatini, San José, e.g. Metropolitan Cathedral of San José or São José, e.g. in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

The Sisters of St. Joseph were founded as an order in 1650 and have about 14,013 members worldwide. In 1871, the Josephite Fathers of the Roman Catholic Church were created under the patronage of Joseph, intending to work with the poor. The first Josephites in America re-devoted their part of the Order to ministry within the newly-emancipated African American community. The Oblates of St. Joseph were founded in 1878 by St. Joseph Marello. In 1999 their Shrine of Saint Joseph the Guardian of the Redeemer was named after the Apostolic exhortation Redemptoris Custos.[59]

Prayers and devotions

Altar of St. Joseph, Billafingen, Germany.

In the Eastern Orthodox Church, during the feast day of Saint Joseph the following hymn is chanted:

Verily, Joseph the betrothed, saw clearly in his old age that the foresayings of the Prophets had
been fulfilled openly; for he was given an odd earnest,
receiving inspiration from the angels,
who cried, Glory to God; for he hath bestowed peace on earth.

In the Catholic tradition, just as there are prayers for the Seven Joys of Mary and Seven Sorrows of Mary, so there are also prayers for the seven joys and seven sorrows of Saint Joseph; these include prayers for daily protection, vocation, happy marriage, happy death, and hopeless cases;[60] specific prayers, novenas and devotions include the Prayer to Saint Joseph and the Novena to Saint Joseph.[61] St. Francis de Sales included Saint Joseph along with Virgin Mary as saints to be invoked during prayers in his Introduction to the Devout Life,[62] Saint Teresa of Avila attributed her recovery of health to Saint Joseph and recommended him as an advocate,[63] and Saint Therese of Lisieux stated that for a period of time, every day she prayed to "Saint Joseph, Father and Protector of Virgins..." and felt safe and protected from danger as a result,[64] and Pius X composed a prayer to Saint Joseph which begins:[65]

Glorious St. Joseph, pattern of all who are devoted to toil,
obtain for me the grace to toil, in the spirit of penance,
in order to thereby atone for my many sins...

There is a belief that planting a statue of St. Joseph on a house will help sell the house.[66] This belief is held by some theists as well as atheists, but traditional Christian teachings view it as superstition and not a devotion.[67]

In art

Nativity by Martin Schongauer (1475–80)

Up to about the 17th century Joseph tends to be depicted as a man advanced in years, with grey hair, often balding, occasionally frail and with arthritic fingers and a sharp nose, a comparatively marginal figure alongside Mary and Jesus if not entirely in the background, passive other than when leading them on their flight to Egypt. Joseph is shown mostly with a beard, not only in keeping with Jewish custom, but also because – although the Gospel accounts do not give his age – later literature tends to present him as an old man at the time of his wedding to Mary. This depiction arose to allay concerns about both the celibacy of the newly wedded couple,[68] the mention of brothers and sisters of Jesus in the canonical Gospels,[69] and Joseph's other children spoken of in apocryphal literature – concerns discussed very frankly by Jean Gerson for example, who nonetheless favoured showing him as a younger man.[70]

In recent centuries – in step with a growing interest in Joseph's role in Gospel exegesis – he himself has become a focal figure in representations of the Holy Family. He is now often portrayed as a younger or even youthful man (perhaps especially in Protestant depictions), whether going about his work as a carpenter, or participating actively in the daily life of Mary and Jesus as an equal and openly affectionate member.[71] Art critic Waldemar Januszczak however emphasises the preponderance of Joseph's representation as an old man and sees this as the need, " to explain away his impotence: indeed to symbolise it. In Guido Reni's Nativity, Mary is about 15, and he is about 70 - for the real love affair - is the one between the Virgin Mary and us. She is young. She is perfect. She is virginal - it is Joseph's task to stand aside and let us desire her, religiously. It takes a particularly old, a particularly grey, a particularly kindly and a particularly feeble man to do that. It takes a Joseph. Banished in vast numbers to the backgrounds of all those gloomy stables in all those ersatz Bethlehems, his complex iconographic task is to stand aside and let his wife be worshipped by the rest of us. He is God's cuckold. And art has no choice but to point this out - while, of course, appearing not to." [72]

Full cycles of his life are rare in the Middle Ages, though the scenes from the Life of the Virgin or Life of Christ where he is present are far more often seen. The Mérode Altarpiece of about 1425, where he has a panel to himself, working as a carpenter, is an early example of what remained relatively rare depictions of him pursuing his métier. Some statues of Joseph depict his staff as topped with flowers, recalling the non-canonical Protoevangelion's account of how Mary's spouse was chosen by collecting walking sticks of widowers in Palestine, and Joseph's alone bursting into flower, thus identifying him as divinely chosen. Several Eastern Orthodox Nativity icons show Joseph tempted by the Devil (depicted as an old man with furled wings) to break off his betrothal, and how he resists that temptation. There are some paintings with him wearing a Jewish hat.

A modern representation of St Joseph in Saint Pancras Church, Ipswich

In music

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e Souvay, Charles. "St. Joseph." The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 8. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. 11 Oct. 2013
  2. ^ stepfather - Wiktionary "stepfather (plural stepfathers). The husband of one's biological mother, other than one's biological father", Retrieved 3 August 2014
  3. ^ a b c d Vermes, Geza (1981). Jesus the Jew: A Historian's Reading of the Gospels. Philadelphia: First Fortress. p. 20. ISBN 978-1451408805.
  4. ^ Sanders, E. P. (1995). The Historical Figure of Jesus. London: Penguin. p. 333. ISBN 978-0-14-014499-4.
  5. ^ Aslan, Reza (2014). Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth. HarperCollins Publishers India. ISBN 978-9351360773.
  6. ^ a b c d e Spong, John Shelby. Jesus for the non-religious. HarperCollins. 2007. ISBN 0-06-076207-1
  7. ^ a b c Ironside, Harry A. (2007). Luke. Kregel Academic. p. 73. ISBN 978-0825496653.
  8. ^ a b c Ryrie, Charles C. (1999). Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth. Moody Publishers. ISBN 978-1575674988.
  9. ^ St. Joseph's (Hill) Lutheran Church, Boyertown, Pennsylvania
  10. ^ St. Joseph Lutheran Church, Allentown, Pennsylvania
  11. ^ St. Joseph United Methodist Church, Fort Wayne, Indiana
  12. ^ St. Joseph United Methodist Church, Pikeville, North Carolina
  13. ^ P. de Letter, "The Theology of Saint Joseph", The Clergy Monthly, March 1955, Online at JSTOR
  14. ^ For the use of the term, see: A Thomistic Josephology by James J Davis 1967, University of Montreal, ASIN B0007K3PL4
  15. ^ Perrotta, Louise B. (2000). Saint Joseph: His Life and His Role in the Church Today. Our Sunday Visitor Publishing. pp. 21, 110–112. ISBN 978-0-87973-573-9.
  16. ^ Jonte, Diane (2003). Teaching Freud. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198035855.
  17. ^ Deiss, Lucien (1996). Joseph, Mary, Jesus. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0814622551.
  18. ^ Vermes, Geza "http://books.google.com/books?id=Qyl4ZuSuSkUC&pg=PP23#v=snippet&q=%22Narratives%20and%20commands%22&f=false The Authentic Gospel of Jesus]" (London, Penguin Books, 2004) Chapter 1: Narratives and commands, p. 1-37, ISBN 978-0141912608.
  19. ^ David A. Reed (2009) Parallel Gospels in Harmony - with Study Guide - An online harmony of the Gospels Public Domain Paperback ISBN 978-0557074358
  20. ^ Ken Palmer (2013) Gospel Harmony A chronological chart of the Life of Jesus Christ
  21. ^ Steven L. Cox, Kendell H Easley, 2007 Harmony of the Gospels ISBN 0-8054-9444-8
  22. ^ Dickson, 47
  23. ^ Fiensy, 68-69
  24. ^ Fiensy, 75-77
  25. ^ Landman, Leo (1979). The Jewish Quarterly Review New Series, Vol. 70, No. 2 (JSTOR). University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 125–128.
  26. ^ Ehrman, Bart D. Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. HarperCollins, 2005. ISBN 978-0-06-073817-4
  27. ^ Crossan, John Dominic. The essential Jesus. Edison: Castle Books. 1998. “Contexts,” p 1-24.
  28. ^ Theissen, Gerd and Annette Merz. The historical Jesus: a comprehensive guide. Fortress Press. 1998. translated from German (1996 edition)
  29. ^ Sanders terms it a "minor village." Sanders, E. P. The historical figure of Jesus. Penguin, 1993. p. 104
  30. ^ Laughlin, 192-194. See also Reed's Chapter 3, pp. 131-134.
  31. ^ Reed, 114-117, quotation p. 115
  32. ^ Reed, Chapter 4 in general, pp. 125-131 on the Jewish nature of Sepphoris, and pp. 131-134
  33. ^ Fiensy, 74-77
  34. ^ For example, Dickson, 47
  35. ^ Vermes, Geza. The Authentic Gospel of Jesus. London, Penguin Books. 2004. Epilogue. p. 398-417, ISBN 978-0141912608.
  36. ^ Funk, Robert W. and the Jesus Seminar. The acts of Jesus: the search for the authentic deeds of Jesus. HarperSanFrancisco. 1998. "Birth & Infancy Stories" p. 497-526.
  37. ^ Holy Apostles Convent (1989). The Life of the Virgin Mary, the Theotokos. Buena Vista: Holy Apostles Convent and Dormition Skete. p. 64. ISBN 0-944359-03-5.
  38. ^ See, e.g., David Brown. "Commentary on Matthew 13:56". Commentary, Critical and Explanatory, on the Whole Bible. An exceedingly difficult question here arises—What were these 'brethren' and 'sisters' to Jesus? Were they, First, His full brothers and sisters? or, Secondly, Were they His step-brothers and step-sisters, children of Joseph by a former marriage? or, Thirdly, Were they cousins, according to a common way of speaking among the Jews respecting persons of collateral descent? On this subject an immense deal has been written, nor are opinions yet by any means agreed. For the second opinion there is no ground but a vague tradition, arising probably from the wish for some such explanation. The first opinion undoubtedly suits the text best in all the places where the parties are certainly referred to (Mt 12:46; and its parallels, Mr 3:31; Lu 8:19; our present passage, and its parallels, Mr 6:3; Joh 2:12; 7:3, 5, 10; Ac 1:14). But, in addition to other objections, many of the best interpreters, thinking it in the last degree improbable that our Lord, when hanging on the cross, would have committed His mother to John if He had had full brothers of His own then alive, prefer the third opinion; although, on the other hand, it is not to be doubted that our Lord might have good reasons for entrusting the guardianship of His doubly widowed mother to the beloved disciple in preference even to full brothers of His own. Thus dubiously we prefer to leave this vexed question, encompassed as it is with difficulties! {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  39. ^ a b c Everett Ferguson, Michael P. McHugh, Frederick W. Norris, "Encyclopedia of early Christianity, Volume 1", article Joseph, p.629
  40. ^ Luigi Gambero, "Mary and the fathers of the church: the Blessed Virgin Mary in patristic thought" pp.35-41
  41. ^ "The History of Joseph the Carpenter". Comparative Religion. Retrieved 2007-05-06.
  42. ^ a b The liturgy and time by Irénée Henri Dalmais, Aimé Georges Martimort, Pierre Jounel 1985 ISBN 0-8146-1366-7 page 143
  43. ^ Holy people of the world: a cross-cultural encyclopedia, Volume 3 by Phyllis G. Jestice 2004 ISBN 1-57607-355-6 page 446
  44. ^ Bernard of Clairvaux and the shape of monastic thought by M. B. Pranger 1997 ISBN 90-04-10055-5 page 244
  45. ^ The childhood of Christ by Thomas Aquinas, Roland Potter, 2006 ISBN 0-521-02960-0 pages 110-120
  46. ^ Aquinas on doctrine by Thomas Gerard Weinandy, John Yocum 2004 ISBN 0-567-08411-6 page 248
  47. ^ Medieval mothering by John Carmi Parsons, Bonnie Wheeler 1999 ISBN 0-8153-3665-9 page 107
  48. ^ Vatican website: Quamquam Pluries
  49. ^ Sunday Catholic Magazine October 4, 2009
  50. ^ Foundations of the Christian way of life by Jacob Prasad 2001 ISBN 88-7653-146-7 page 404
  51. ^ Vatican website: Redemptoris Custos
  52. ^ Cradle of redeeming love: the theology of the Christmas mystery by John Saward 2002 ISBN 0-89870-886-9 page 230
  53. ^ Divine likeness: toward a Trinitarian anthropology of the family by Marc Ouellet ISBN 0-8028-2833-7 page 102
  54. ^ Roman Missal
  55. ^ Calendarium Romanum (Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1969), p. 89
  56. ^ 19 March is observed as the Feast of Saint Joseph, Guardian of Jesus, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod, the Wisconsin Synod, and the Evangelical Lutheran Synod. Some Protestant traditions also celebrate this festival.
  57. ^ http://attualita.vatican.va/sala-stampa/bollettino/2013/06/19/news/31223.html#TRADUZIONE%20IN%20LINGUA%20INGLESE
  58. ^ Foley, O.F.M., Leonard. Saint of the Day, Lives, Lessons, and Feast, (revised by Pat McCloskey O.F.M.), Franciscan Media,, ISBN 978-0-86716-887-7
  59. ^ Mention Your Request Here: The Church's Most Powerful Novenas by Michael Dubruiel, 2000 ISBN 0-87973-341-1 page 154
  60. ^ Devotions to St. Joseph by Susanna Magdalene Flavius, 2008 ISBN 1-4357-0948-9 pages 5-15
  61. ^ Favorite Prayers to St. Joseph Tan Books, ISBN 978-0-89555-446-8
  62. ^ Introduction to the Devout Life by St. Francis de Sales ISBN 0-7661-0074-X Kessinger Press 1942 page 297
  63. ^ The interior castle by Saint Teresa of Avila, Paulist Press 1979, ISBN 0-8091-2254-5 page 2
  64. ^ The Story of a Soul by Saint Therese De Lisieux Bibliolife 2008 0554261588 page 94
  65. ^ Ann Ball, 2003 Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices ISBN 0-87973-910-X page 449
  66. ^ Applebome, Peter (2009-09-16). "St. Joseph, Superagent in Real Estate". New York Times. Retrieved 2010-06-24.
  67. ^ Saint Joseph: His Life and His Role in the Church Today by Louise Bourassa Perrotta 2000 ISBN 0-87973-573-2 page 130
  68. ^ cf. Mt 1:25a
  69. ^ cf. Matthew 12:46–50, Mark 3:31–35, Luke 8:19–21; Matthew 13:55, Mark 6:3; cf. section above
  70. ^ Shapiro:6-7
  71. ^ Finding St. Joseph by Sandra Miesel gives a useful account of the changing views of Joseph in art and generally in Catholicism
  72. ^ Waldemar Januszczak, No ordinary Joe, The Sunday Times, December 2003 [1]

References

Further reading

  • Guardian of the Redeemer (Redemptoris Custos) by Pope John Paul II, St. Paul Books and Media (January 1, 1989) ASIN B002AQ5E08

Template:Persondata Template:Link FA


Template:Link FA