Jump to content

User talk:Shwcz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎February 2015: more curlicues needed
Mufidkce (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 352: Line 352:
:That wasn't vandalism. [[User:Shhhhwwww!!|Shhhhwwww!!]] ([[User talk:Shhhhwwww!!#top|talk]]) 10:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
:That wasn't vandalism. [[User:Shhhhwwww!!|Shhhhwwww!!]] ([[User talk:Shhhhwwww!!#top|talk]]) 10:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
::{{ping|IndianBio}}, I agree. Shhhhwwww!! even gave an edit summary. I agree with the revert, but giving a level-2 vandalism notice (when there is no level 1) for a good-faith edit is not best practices. Cheers everyone! [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 14:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
::{{ping|IndianBio}}, I agree. Shhhhwwww!! even gave an edit summary. I agree with the revert, but giving a level-2 vandalism notice (when there is no level 1) for a good-faith edit is not best practices. Cheers everyone! [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h"><font color="008B8B"><b>78.26</b></font></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 14:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> [[User:Mufidkce|Mufidkce]] ([[User talk:Mufidkce|talk]]) 05:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:44, 11 February 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Shhhhwwww! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Petrb (talk) 20:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

DYK nomination of Philippines v. China

Hello! Your submission of Philippines v. China at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Philippines v. China

Gatoclass (talk) 10:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Old Tagalog

Hello! Your submission of Old Tagalog at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! czar  08:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the Philippines (1946–65) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {
  • date having been the day when in 1898, [[Emilio Aguinaldo]] declared independence from [[Spain]]). Later, Macapagal told author [[Stanley Karnow]] that the reason for the change was that American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm OccultZone. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Six Californias, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 14:00, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Partition and secession in California with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 14:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of recent bold edits

I have reverted WP:BOLD edits you recently made to the (1521-1898) and (1898-1946) articles about the History of the Philippines. Please discuss at Talk:History of the Philippines (1898–1946)#Bold edits to two articles by user Shhhhwwww!!. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of St. Augustine Parish Church (Bay)

Hello! Your submission of St. Augustine Parish Church (Bay) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 19:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of Kendall Jenner article reverted

I've reverted your renaming of the article, which was done without prior discussion and is, in my opinion, controversial. A quick search of e.g. Google News reveals that her full name is still very widely used. If you want the article renamed, you should initiate a formal discussion as explained at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. Favonian (talk) 07:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a matter of fact, a similar renaming was discussed at Talk:Kendall Jenner#Requested move 21 March 2014 and soundly defeated. Favonian (talk) 07:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for St. James the Apostle Parish Church (Paete)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Disappearance of Sherlyn Cadapan and Karen Empeño

Hello! Your submission of Disappearance of Sherlyn Cadapan and Karen Empeño at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Cape Bojeador

Hello! Your submission of Cape Bojeador at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Poro Point

Hello! Your submission of Poro Point at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Nuestra Señora de los Angeles Parish Church (Santa Maria)

Hello! Your submission of Nuestra Señora de los Angeles Parish Church (Santa Maria) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Transfiguration of our Lord Parish Church (Cavinti)

Hello! Your submission of Transfiguration of our Lord Parish Church (Cavinti) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chris Troutman (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tropical Storm Fung-wong (2014) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • com/news/2014-09-18/philippines-shuts-capital-as-storm-causes-flood-cancels-flights] [[Bloomberg)]].</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information you added to this article today. Unfortunately, it cannot go where you put it in section 13, because condemning a terrorist group is not the same as designating it as a terrorist organization. The designation of a country as a terrorist organization is a formal government ruling, and when a government does this it adds the name of the group to an official list. (You can see an example in the US citation in the information box.) I have moved your information an appropriate place in the Lead. --P123ct1 (talk) 12:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Edgardo Gomez

Hello! Your submission of Edgardo Gomez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —innotata 02:50, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gambling in Manila

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Edgardo Gomez

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Aserradora Mecanica de Tuason y Sampedro

Hello! Your submission of Aserradora Mecanica de Tuason y Sampedro at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Shhhhwwww!!, you still have not replied to this after over ten days. It is your responsibility, as nominator, to address issues with your DYK nominations as they come up, and I have yet to see you do so over very many nominations. If you wish to remain a nominator in good standing at DYK, you need to respond to messages like this one in a timely manner. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regrettably, I have to close this nomination. It is disappointing that you still have not had the courtesy to respond. When you abandon a nomination like this, it is unfair to the reviewer and to the rest of us who work at DYK, whose time you have wasted. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for San Sebastian Parish Church (Lumban)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Our Lady of Guadalupe Parish Church (Pagsanjan)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of University of Santo Tomas Baybayin Documents

Hello! Your submission of University of Santo Tomas Baybayin Documents at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lagrange613 16:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Poro Point

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Betty Go-Belmonte

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for San Bartolome Apostol Parish Church (Nagcarlan)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sampaloc Church

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Transfiguration of our Lord Parish Church (Cavinti)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Our Lady of Candelaria Parish Church (Silang)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for University of Santo Tomas Baybayin Documents

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lichauco Heritage House

Hello! Your submission of Lichauco Heritage House at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 06:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Monsters Among Us

Hello! Your submission of Monsters Among Us at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Serten (talk) 21:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for St. Augustine Parish Church (Laguna)

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Disappearance of Sherlyn Cadapan and Karen Empeño at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Saint Paul the First Hermit Cathedral

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thunder (singer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [}Category:Filipino rappers]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:25, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nuestra Señora de Candelaria Parish Church (Mabitac)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Death of Jennifer Laude

Hello! Your submission of Death of Jennifer Laude at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Shhhhwwww!!, it has been a full week, and you have not yet addressed the issues raised in your DYK review. One week is a standard time on Wikipedia for a response. Your failure to respond to these requests on this and previous nominations has exhausted our willingness to extend the response time on your submissions. You have one more week to respond on the nomination page. If you do not, and have edited on Wikipedia in the interim, the nomination will be closed. I hope we hear from you before then. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:39, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of CNN Philippines

Hello! Your submission of CNN Philippines at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Philippines v. China
added a link pointing to Pedra Branca
Territorial disputes in the South China Sea
added a link pointing to Pedra Branca

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Monsters Among Us

Mike VTalk 08:14, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi there.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--220 of Borg 09:24, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for CNN Philippines

Harrias talk 00:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Megalopolis (city type)
added links pointing to Kediri and Ayuthaya
Mega Manila
added a link pointing to Megalopolis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014 Ghent apartment siege for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Ghent apartment siege is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Ghent apartment siege until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 05:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Americans, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not radically change the scope of an article in its lead section without receiving consensus on he article's talk page first.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:44, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal immigration ‎

I suggest that you need to justify your addition of the tag, by explaining it on the article talk page. If you look at the previous discussions on that page you will see that I share many of your apparent concerns over the article - but, so far, those opposing changes to the article or its title have successfully resisted changing it. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your controversial page move of the Illegal immigration and Illegal immigration to the United States articles

A move like the one you did of Illegal immigration should really not be done without a formal "Requested move" discussion. If you wish to start such a discussion, you can find instructions at WP:RM. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And the same thing (perhaps obviously) goes for your move of the Illegal immigration to the United States article. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Heartbeat Song (Kelly Clarkson song)

Hello! Your submission of Heartbeat Song (Kelly Clarkson song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final notice: this nomination, and Uma Thurman (song) below, will be marked as unsuccessful if you fail to respond in the next 12 hours. Your continuing failure to respond to any and all DYK notices is most unfortunate, and your apparent unwillingness to provide quid pro quo reviews as required means that making those nominations only serves to waste your time and ours. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Uma Thurman (song)

Hello! Your submission of Uma Thurman (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final notice: this nomination, and Heartbeat Song (Kelly Clarkson song) above, will be marked as unsuccessful if you fail to respond in the next 12 hours. Your continuing failure to respond to any and all DYK notices is most unfortunate, and your apparent unwillingness to provide quid pro quo reviews as required means that making those nominations only serves to waste your time and ours. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:37, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

STOP IT

MARWAN IS NOT HIS REAL NAME. HIS NAME IS ZULKIFLI ABDHIR. Breckham101 (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a proposed move should have been discussed first using the formal Wikipedia:Requested moves process. Moving "Zulkifli Abdhir" to "Marwan (terrorist)" is obviously controversial, especially when the article covers a high-profile current event. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of best-selling music artists. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 10:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@IndianBio:, I agree. Shhhhwwww!! even gave an edit summary. I agree with the revert, but giving a level-2 vandalism notice (when there is no level 1) for a good-faith edit is not best practices. Cheers everyone! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Mufidkce (talk) 05:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]