Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/New article announcements: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Alex Bakharev (talk | contribs)
→‎URGENT ANNOUNCEMENT: What is the proper name?
Kuban kazak (talk | contribs)
Line 30: Line 30:
*[[Victory Day (Eastern Europe)]] is often attacked by different users. Should be expected at this time of the year but please keep an eye on it. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 06:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
*[[Victory Day (Eastern Europe)]] is often attacked by different users. Should be expected at this time of the year but please keep an eye on it. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 06:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
**Please check the discussion on the proper name for the article on [[Talk:Gomel#Homyel vs Homel vs Gomel]] [[User:Alex Bakharev|abakharev]] 23:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
**Please check the discussion on the proper name for the article on [[Talk:Gomel#Homyel vs Homel vs Gomel]] [[User:Alex Bakharev|abakharev]] 23:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
*I have proposed that [[Maładečna]] be moved to its English name [[Molodcheno]] as used by Britannica and have one thousand more widespread hits when googled. --[[User:Kuban kazak|Kuban Cossack]] [[Image:Romanov Flag.svg|25px|]] 23:59, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
===Pd-Soviet tag===
===Pd-Soviet tag===



Revision as of 23:59, 14 May 2006

Please use:

Please consider updating the new articles list at the template which shows up at the portal's front page with your article.

Please consider whether your new article could be used for portal's "Did You Know?" or main page WP:DYK sections and, if so, propose or post it there.

URGENT ANNOUNCEMENT

Pd-Soviet tag

Oops, I somehow missed this. Well done KK! -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 20:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If he continues, I will start spreading the word to ru-wiki. People we need to work together to crush this parasite. Spread the word to all ex-USSR wikipedias and portals. He upset a mountain, now he'll get an avalanche. --Kuban Cossack 20:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
BTw, don't we need reverting MediaWiki:Licenses too??? -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 20:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That was a clear abuse of admin power - WP:RFC/ADMIN I see no alternative. Someone draft it. --Kuban Cossack 20:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Anyone else thinks so (I hope :)? -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 21:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
more in Category:Pre-1973_Soviet_Union_images Elk Salmon 21:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted the commons template itself, absoloutely everybody there is finding the suggesting ludicrous. --Kuban Cossack 23:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Потому что этот Лупо ***** и *****... (ну всем понятно в общем, да? :) -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 23:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Everyone please have a look here and support us in our defence against this silly copyright nonsense. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 23:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep an eye out for vandalism to these two templates, top is commons, bottom is enwiki. Revert immediately--Kuban Cossack 23:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC) Template:PD-SovietTemplate:PD-USSR.[reply]

Guys, I would stongly suggest that you stop personalizing this. Calling other editors nasty words such as "nazi" or "parasite" is a flagrant violation of WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Lupo 08:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And twice neglect of our existance is NOT and a violation? And abuse of admin privliges? --Kuban Cossack 12:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime, can an admin revert this, please? -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 12:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have started it Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Lupo. --Kuban Cossack 12:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Statement part complete. Any user that still want the Easter Europe part of Wikipedia to live is wellcome to comment!!! -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 13:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
я вообщем новенький во всех этих делах внутренних. подскажите что там надо сделать? просто подписаться где остальные подписались? Elk Salmon 15:17, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ага. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 15:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden Gems

The Portal:Russia/Hidden Gems is to list recently unearthed articles that cover Russia-related topics which have been (a) neglected for quite some time and (b) require serious intervention of Russian editors. It is an extension of this page, according to the Russian proverb: "New" is something forgotten for good. As a rule of thumb, don't add articles edited by active members of project Russia.

May 1-15, 2006

I've translated it now. --Brand спойт 21:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
May be 1945 German instrument of surrender? --Brand спойт 17:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moscow Central administrative district by me. --Brand спойт 17:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Unless you want the collection of Moscow-related articles to become even more unmanageable than it is now, I would recommend moving this to Central Administrative Okrug, Moscow or to Tsentralny Administrative Okrug, Moscow (the latter is consistent with overall naming scheme of Russian federal subjects' administrative divisions). Normally, the term okrug is only translated for autonomous okrugs. Also, administrative okrugs of Moscow are subdivided into districts, not into municipal districts. The municipal districts are formed on the basis of districts (from the categorization point of view, they are a superentity of sorts), and presently match exactly. Also, please review the Moscow districts' naming conventions—the way the districts articles are currently organized (organized? ha!) is pretty darn horrible.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 19:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think that Tsentralny Administrative Okrug will be unintelligible for English-speaking people and in further indexation in Wikipedia. Meanwhile e.g. Google and Metacrawler are more relevant to Central Administrative District rather than Tsentralny Administrative Okrug. The last has only few hits. Generally I think only those terms that have not English real or literal equivalent, being too specific, should be transliterated literally (e.g. Latin pallium). In order to distinguish administrative okrug from district the first may be called administrative district while the second - simply district. The appropriate redirect to Central Administrative Okrug, Moscow could be made. The article may be moved to Moscow Central Administrative District for example. --Brand спойт 11:01, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am really not that much interested in all things Moscow-related, but as someone who edited his share of articles on Russian administrative divisions I just want to provide you a friendly warning—the way of your approach disaster lies :) Terminology must be as unambiguous as possible, and using the term "okrug" (which, incidentally, is included in English dictionaries) is a reasonable compromise which helps avoid using the scheme in which districts are divided into districts which, in turn, are divided into... districts. Not only is it confusing and looks unprofessional, it also mars the bigger picture. It is a mistake to always use the most common terms here (although, of course, a reasonable attempt should be made), because those terms are good when discussing a stand-alone topic, but not really when the whole administrative hierarchy is a subject. Please, reconsider. "Central" vs. "Tsentralny" is debatable and adjustable, but if you are going to use inconsistent terminology (i.e., "district" instead of "okrug"), it will break quite a few things without adding much value. Also, can we move this discussion to somewhere more relevant, please? Thanks.—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) • (yo?); 12:17, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Currently may be merged to Eastern Front (World War II)#Operations and/or Economy of the Soviet Union#Economic development. --Brand спойт 13:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Ghirla -трёп- 16:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unstubbed. --Brand спойт 22:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
File:Victoryday.JPG
Victory Day
I've tagged it with popcat. --Brand спойт 16:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unstubbed. --Brand спойт 14:20, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just moved, I haven't been sure of sp. --Brand спойт 17:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 16-30, 2006

April 1-15, 2006

I believe it is DYK-able. Please nominate. --Ghirla-трёп- 15:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done, but not sure about exact wording Kmorozov 05:30, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]