Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Yayahjb (talk | contribs)
46 edits
→Booking.com B.V.: new section
Line 436: Line 436:


Please undelete this article, we have some additional recent material to add.
Please undelete this article, we have some additional recent material to add.

== Booking.com B.V. ==

*{{revisions|Booking.com B.V.}}
The page was not advesting Booking.com but was consider to be a seed for a comapny which consider to be the world largest hotels site in the world, the page was to provide more info. The ref used in the page was from 3rd party to provide an opportunity for the users and researcher to find info from outside the company not just through Booking site. -Khaled Attalla 16:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:28, 15 December 2013


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request diirectly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Graeme Fuller

reasoning -Graemef (talk) 23:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:The_Rahul_Jain/Jain

Userspace draft that I wish to restore to continue work on. -Rahul (talk) 05:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - U1 deletion restored on request. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Bhaskar Bhole

I, Shubharaj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Shubharaj (talk) 07:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rich Gaiti

I, 173.61.134.49, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 173.61.134.49 (talk) 14:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stuart Heritage

I, 86.6.47.159, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 86.6.47.159 (talk) 17:19, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Westleigh Rush (Footballer)

Hi there,

Regarding your request for Westleigh Rush's page to be deleted, I feel that everything I put was factually correct. Westleigh rush is a real person and I checked with him that it was all appropriate and relevant. I stated the relevance of this "person" that he was an English Footballer. I don't really know what more to do, this is my first submitted piece on Wikipedia. Please tell me what I have done incorrectly and inform me of it so I can amend it.

Thankyou,

Foxymush481. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxymush481 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Wikipedia is quite choosy about article subjects. Just being a real person and a footballer is not enough to have an article. The WP:Notability standard for footballers is at WP:NFOOTBALL - the player must actually have played for the first team in a fully-professional league. Being in a youth team or the reserves is not enough. When Westleigh has taken the field for Walsall's first team will be the time for an article, and it will need a reference to a reliable source to verify it. Read WP:Your first article for general advice. JohnCD (talk) 22:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EUHC Gamblers London

I, 95.172.74.47, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 95.172.74.47 (talk) 09:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

'EUHC Gamblers London'

I would like to edit it for resubmission -95.172.74.47 (talk) 09:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what's up gurgaon

reasoning -Smridhiagg (talk) 11:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Goodwerp

Hello! I was inquiring about a new page I created for a project management software labeled Goodwerp. It was flagged earlier this week for notability, advert and unreliable sources. I have rewritten the page, and I would like to submit it for review or further development. Are there any moderators that would be willing to help me out? Any further steps or advice would be most welcomed. -Tempertee (talk) 13:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LaTeXML

I, Physikerwelt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Physikerwelt (talk) 16:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clara Amfo

I, Bearian, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Bearian (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: The article was still under construction, for a marginally notable person. It should be userfied or created, not deleted. Bearian (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you; understood. Bearian (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LaTeXML

This system for translating LaTeX source to XML is a substantial open software contribution in the area of technical publishing and is worthy of a page describing its capabilities, historical evolution, and applications. -Gpetty (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree -- furthermore, different methods of converting between content formats (such as tex and XML) can be confusing, and of substantial interest to self-publishers (eg. academics), so articles giving overviews of the tools and history are useful. Petrelharp (talk) 18:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Well this is not deleted, its just a redirect. There is nothing to restore. Go to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LaTeXML&action=edit and write your article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter d'Entremont

I, Mittgenstein, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore as i now have time to work on it again. Mittgenstein (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pushpendra Nath Pathak

He has elected as MLA for Bijawar seat in 2013 State Election This is the link of Govt. Site declared him winning http://www.eciresults.nic.in/ConstituencywiseS1252.htm?ac=52 few news are here http://thebihartimes.com/bijawar-election-result-guddan-pathak-pushpendra-nath-from-bjp-is-winner-18737.html http://www.newsreporter.in/bijawar-constituency-election-results-2013-guddan-pathak-pushpendra-nath-of-bjp-wins-madhya-pradesh-469468[1] [2] -59.90.107.77 (talk) 09:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bochukov

Please restore this page into my user space. It was an forgotten unfinished work, but the deleting editor is extremely reluctant to restore it despite multiple requests. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC) -Staszek Lem (talk) 16:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Already done Someone has done it for you, but the sentence "Bochukov feminine: Bochukova (Бочуков, Бочукова) is a Bulgarian-language surname" was never worth requesting ANYONE to undelete. The deleting admin was not reluctant; they advised you it was fruitless. Your attacks on that admin are inexcusable ES&L 11:53, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Wow, It is extremely sad the admin community has such a demeaning attitude to a colleague. I explained my reason. Can you read carefully please what other person wrote before throwing shit onto him? This is why I am "acting over", if some curiosity left in you. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Golden Section Publishers, LLC

I, Robabis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Robabis (talk) 18:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GEM Society

I, Najeebrashid2003, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Najeebrashid2003 (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. Articles for creation is not for indefinite hosting of material not ready for the encyclopedia. Please read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John "Korney" Kwiatkowski

John is a notable person in Buffalo, NY -208.99.245.194 (talk) 20:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user JDDJS (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 11:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rajiv Manucha

This is a biography that was authorized/requested by the person in question. We are willing to rewrite it to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. -SueHWork (talk) 22:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this was deleted as, to quote the deleting administrator, "simply an advertisement full of the normal peacockery". Wikipedia is not a place for people to arrange puff pieces about themselves and their companies; articles need to be written from a neutral point of view and to establish Wikipedia:Notability by references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. If you work for, or are connected with, Mr Manucha, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shari Schneider

I, KJVandenbroek, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. KJVandenbroek (talk) 22:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, because I see you have re-created the page. It will not be accepted in its present form: read WP:Your first article for advice, and note particularly that references are necessary (a) because of the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source" and (b) in order to establish Wikipedia:Notability, which requires references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:24, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Big Chief Mkuja

reasoning -Kahouna Dreaming (talk) 00:24, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 1=Big Chief Mkuja 2=This page was deleted with little or no participation other than the nominator. The page met at least three of the criteria i.e. 2 notable musicians and 1 national media coverage. (firstly point 6- Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably-prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.[note 6] This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses.) and secondly point 12-Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.[reply]

Enough time was not allowed for any pro arguments to be made. This page was deleted in a perfunctory and undemocratic manner not allowing hardly any time for any pro arguments to be made.

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Chief Mkuja, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ES&L 11:38, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shelton Community Garden

I, Strikeroot, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Strikeroot (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. The article needs references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources in order to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 11:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fertility Check

I, 86.41.142.181, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I will reedit it to be more factual with more references. 86.41.142.181 (talk) 09:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Atong DeMach

I, Adney218, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Adney218 (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done as I see you have re-created it. See Wikipedia:Your first article for advice. I have added the AfC header which has links to more advice and a "Submit" button to send the article for review when you are ready. JohnCD (talk) 11:42, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Business school PAR

I, Parovci, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. PAR (talk) 12:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. some revisions restored Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

X500 - Drive

Hi. We are a mobile phone manufacturer based out of Miami, FL. We develop AWS devices for all of the prepaid carriers in the USA. Our devices can be found in over 20,000 retail stores across the country. Many people do not manufacture AWS devices so we want it known that our device is 3G on AWS bands. Currently, the device is available through T-Mobile, Go Smart, Ultra Mobile, Ready Sim channels just to name a few. I can have a spec sheet sent highlighting to AWS frequency and other features of the device to help with your review. Please let me know if I can provide yo with any more information to help have our device approved. Thank you

this is a valid entry -Samsocial (talk) 14:38, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment from deleting admin - this is not a valid entry. Nothing the company respresentative wrote above has any bearing on Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, namely WP:CORP. Furthermore, Samsocial does not appear to understand one of our core policies, that Wikipedia is not a publicity medium, and should review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before making further contributions.

Both articles I deleted, X500 - Drive and X500 drive were deleted under WP:CSD#A3 (article had only an infobox) and WP:CSD#G11 (article appeared to exist for publicity purposes only). Based on the comment from Samsocial above, G11 appears to be a valid rationale. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:42, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overworld (Band)

reasoning -Overworld Band (talk) 18:15, 11 December 2013 (UTC) This band is growing and needs more fans and more disclosure[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Montage Hotels & Resorts

Mboothmontage (talk) 19:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Machine Head Halo.jpg

Image was deleted because being non-free it was unused for more than 7 days. Please recover this file; it′s needed to ilustrate an article. -XXN (talk) 19:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Knitteds

I, Caeos, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Caeos (talk) 20:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

then move to namespace

Jack Muller

Please undelete my article, Jack Muller. I have the information needed to complete the article with verifiable references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxriver (talk • contribs) 21:04, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). ES&L 21:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bitfighter

Bitfighter, while still small, has gained in popularity, is still active after (6?) years, has migrated to using the new SDL2 framework (see list of SDL games), has been added to Desura, and has been reviewed on several Linux gaming sites as well as a Linux talk show (Juniper Broadcasting). Thank you! -137.65.133.37 (talk) 22:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Lear's Fool, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. But you could create a new draft that addresses the non notability issues at WP:AFC Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/New Horizons High School

I, Lkohlert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Lkohlert (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Henry Earl

The consensus said undelete the article. So revisions of the talk page must be undeleted, as well. -George Ho (talk) 02:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I don't see a consensus to undelete: the DRV has only been running two days, and so far there seems a majority for endorse deletion. However, as the page has been temporarily restored for the DRV, it's reasonable to restore the talk page history too. JohnCD (talk)

SeriousFun Children's Network

The page was deleted as a copyright violation but earlier revisions exist that are not copyvios. I edited it under its former name Hole in the Wall Camps in 2008 and that version was legal. Please restore the complete history minus copyright-violating versions and delete the versions created by me dated 12 December 2013. Thanks. -davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Hammers (Climbing)

I, Unconventional2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Unconventional2 (talk) 04:53, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Hallman

reasoning -Ravpapa (talk) 06:34, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Actually, this is not really a request to undelete this article, but a request to create a new one on the same topic.[reply]

A few years ago, composer Joseph Hallman - then a completely unknown whippersnapper from Philadelphia - wrote a panagyric about himself in this encyclopedia. It was me who moved to delete the article. I don't know who the deleting admin was, and can't seem to find his name when I look for it.

Since then, Hallman has made a bit of a name for himself. He teaches composition at a respectable university (Drexel), he is composer in residence for a couple of institutions, and his works have been performed by serious orchestras and chamber groups and reviewed. So the time has come that he does indeed deserve an article.

I am prepared to create this article anew, but how do I insure that it will not be speedy deleted?

Thanks for your help and patience. --Ravpapa (talk) 06:34, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an interesting one, and a change from the usual requests here. The article was deleted after an AfD debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Hallman, so if re-created would be in danger of speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G4. What you need to do is make a draft article and then approach user Tone (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion, with a link to your draft, and ask for permission to post it. Failing that, you can apply at WP:Deletion review. I have userfied the article for you to User:Ravpapa/Joseph Hallman as a starting point, though it will need a fairly thorough rewrite. There are already several references to him in other articles, which looks hopeful. JohnCD (talk) 11:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, have followed your advice. --Ravpapa (talk) 13:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naveen_JaiHind

All information are accurate and doesn't harm anyone. Please do not delete this. -14.140.116.135 (talk) 13:50, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Naveen JaiHind, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. The only references given are his own Twitter and Facebook, which are not reliable sources and are not independent: to establish Wikipedia:Notability requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Also, Wikipedia is not a place like LinkedIn or Facebook for people to write about themselves, that is strongly discouraged, see WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 14:20, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brandon Hans

I, Brandonhans, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Brandonhans (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://www.reverbnation.com/brandonhans. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hradyesh

I, Aaanshu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Aaanshu (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shaquile Coulthirst

Made his debut for Tottenham Hotspur F.C. tonight - BBC Sport -JMHamo (talk) 21:45, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Safer Wholesale

Article was deleted as it was believed to be heavily promotional. Reading Chinavasions page, I see no difference in choice of verbiage; in fact, I clearly disclosed at the top of the page that additional citations may be required so others could help make the page better. I suggest no sales or visits to the site, I made no references to the page being 'the best', and the individual that deleted my page never specifically pointed out what verbiage was 'promotional' in nature. For these reasons, I would appreciate my page being restored. -TheDailyFlows (talk) 11:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, just an advertisement Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not an advertisement. If that's the case, delete Chinavasion as well. My article was no more or less promotional than any of a similar nature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDailyFlows (talk • contribs) 12:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The content of other articles is not a consideration in the deletion of this article. We have never had a page named "Chinavision" on Wikipedia (although we do have an article about the defunct TV station of that name; I fail to see how its content in any way resembles the deleted article's). Yunshui 雲‍水 14:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George Anson Starkweather (Michigan)

reasoning -Nadsab (talk) 15:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George Anson Starkweather (Michigan)

The file that was deleted from Wikipedia, GeoStarkweather.jpg, and which I uploaded several years ago, is a portrait of my GG Grandfather. I scanned it from an original photograph which was created in the 1890's and has been in our family since the 1890's. I took the time to write a little paragraph about him and about the local history associated - was the original creator of that page, and upoladed photo of him. This disputed photograph that was deleted by WIki - apparently by Stefan2 earlier this year.

If there is any question related to the reference of the family genealogy book on that page, a family genealogy book written by a distant cousin Carlton Lee Starkweather - of whose book contains this same photo - this photo was LENT to CL Starkweather, by OUR family, in the early 1900's, for his book. Carlton Lee Starkweather, nor the publisher of his book NEVER owned the copyright to this photo. Carlton Self published the book anyway and only three hundred copies were published and provided to family members. There are now republished versions of this book and again, who ever is publishing that book owns absolutely no rights to OUR family photo.

I and I am sure many other contributors find it very disappointing, when ancestors of local history figures are willing to take the time to share stories about local history only to have such photos or material removed. Also disappointing to share family photos of local history figures only to be accused of stealing my/our own property. Very disappointing.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/World Association for Online Education (WAOE)

I, Azrin619, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Dr R Azrin (talk) 17:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ISIE International School of Intellect and Education

I, Giorgi Dolidze, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Giorgi Dolidze (talk) 18:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Unison RTOS

I, Ola.solonenko, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Ola.solonenko (talk) 21:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

vajazzle

reasoning -Fannyflash (talk) 22:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vajazzling, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Angr (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. If you want to recreate this you are going to have to provide multiple independent reliable and substantial references. And this is not just a quote from Jennifer Love Hewitt. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Huang (cricketer)

He has played in the Australian Test U-15s team. He has made some significance in the cricket world and thus, I think he should have a page. -123.243.11.47 (talk) 00:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment: This player is very likely not notable enough to qualify for an article in Wikipedia. The relevant guidelines are WP:NFOOTY, WP:NCRICK, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Corrected per below. What was I thinking, I know good and well that football != cricket. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Playing in national/international U-15 does not not meet the definition of notable for cricketers, yet ES&L 00:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just like to point it out though, that he has made some significance in cricket. The first Test of the U-15s Ashes bewteen Australia and England was recorded on FOX. 123.243.11.47 (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe that this person meets General notability criteria or WP:BIO and you can list a few reliable sources, independent of the player or his team/league/etc. which provide significant coverage of this person, you might have success. Otherwise, wait a bit. If he's that good, sooner or later he'll qualify under his sport's notability guidelines. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:29, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PlanB

I, 182.239.159.156, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 182.239.159.156 (talk) 09:40, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sirens (Nell Bryden Song)

This was requested by LaraSonnet (talk · contribs), but the request was malformed. I am merely restoring it on their behalf and have no opinion one way or another on the merits of the request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Thoreau

reasoning -98.218.9.49 (talk) 16:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)This page was important. Jackson Thoreau was one of the top writers and activists of the George W. Bush presidency.[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Thargor Orlando (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. If the page is to be kept, it needs references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Gibson (politician)

The article was deleted because of lack of importance, the person in question is a council alderman (councilman) and well known within the area. Other people in his positions have pages active.— Preceding unsigned comment added by LauncestonWiki (talk • contribs) 18:57, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Zwiebel photo

Please restore the older version of this file as it isn't a fair use image any more. -90.190.114.172 (talk) 21:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Millie Thrasher

She has a verified twitter account with over 30,000 twitter followers.. May I ask why this page was deleted? I requested a request to not speedy delete it, but right after I sent it, it was deleted by someone. She was on the X Factor USA Season 3 and placed 12th alongside her group Sweet Suspense. -Sweetsuspense (talk) 21:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(deleting admin) You really shouldn't be using that user name. You say you are just a fan, but Wikipedia has a policy against group user names, particularly when the account, as yours, is used in a promotional manner.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:32, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is whether the facts are a claim of importance. Persuade Bbb23 that it was, then the deletion criterion does not apply. Otherwise UND|ndp applies. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Johnatan Schneid

reasoning -173.60.109.244 (talk) 22:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for undeletion

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NearTree

I, Yayahjb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Yayahjb (talk) 03:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Please undelete this article, we have some additional recent material to add.

Booking.com B.V.

The page was not advesting Booking.com but was consider to be a seed for a comapny which consider to be the world largest hotels site in the world, the page was to provide more info. The ref used in the page was from 3rd party to provide an opportunity for the users and researcher to find info from outside the company not just through Booking site. -Khaled Attalla 16:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

  1. ^ http://zeenews.india.com/assembly-elections-2013/madhya-pradesh-polls/results.html
  2. ^ http://www.saharasamay.com/regional-news/madhya-pradesh-news/676544151/madhya-pradesh-assembly-election-results-2013-list-of-winning-ca.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=586205140"