Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 25: Line 25:
* {{pagelinks|1=Icebreaker (Suvorov)}}
* {{pagelinks|1=Icebreaker (Suvorov)}}


'''Temporary extended confirmed:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – There has been removal of sourced academic content under false pretenses And it has been reported. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jack90s15|Jack90s15]] ([[User talk:Jack90s15#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jack90s15|contribs]]) </small>
'''Temporary extended confirmed:''' Persistent [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]] – There has been removal of sourced academic content under false pretenses And it has been reported.[[User:Jack90s15|Jack90s15]] ([[User talk:Jack90s15|talk]]) 05:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[[Special:Contributions/Jack90s15|contribs]]) </small>


Another user picked up on the POV person that was happening and reverted the edit . [[User:Jack90s15|Jack90s15]] ([[User talk:Jack90s15|talk]]) 22:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Another user picked up on the POV person that was happening and reverted the edit . [[User:Jack90s15|Jack90s15]] ([[User talk:Jack90s15|talk]]) 22:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:36, 22 September 2019

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Anthony Schwartz (athlete)

    Temporary semi-protection: Recurring IP vandalism; Schwartz's Auburn Tigers are playing on national TV at the moment. Please semi-protect for 6-12 hours. --bender235 (talk) 21:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorry, but I don't see where the formatting is wrong. --bender235 (talk) 21:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    It's the extra spaces in the template. The spaces around the pipe and article name are not required and confuse the bot. –Darkwind (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's only one IP editing the article, which can be handled as vandalism as required at AIV. –Darkwind (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Icebreaker (Suvorov)

    Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – There has been removal of sourced academic content under false pretenses And it has been reported.Jack90s15 (talk) 05:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)contribs)[reply]

    Another user picked up on the POV person that was happening and reverted the edit . Jack90s15 (talk) 22:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @MelanieN: now an IP that as not been active all of a Sudden they start reverting back to the POV edits.Jack90s15 (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Newt Gingrich

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Apple & Onion

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Super Audio CD

    Full protection: Ongoing dispute over inclusion of reference to a controversial study in the lead; please continue page protection while RfC runs its course. Thanks. Dharmabumstead (talk) 03:49, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Rita Repulsa

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    StarStruck (season 7)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  04:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    2019 Formula One World Championship

    I don't understand why this page is under a semi-protection, also until November, why? I think is not necessary to have at the moment a semi-protection. Can anyone remove the semi-protection?--79.44.43.71 (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    @Chetsford: Any thoughts? Lectonar (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    There were a variety of IP editors and non-autopatrolled accounts adding significant, but unsourced, information to the article and the cadence of edits would have stressed PC Review to intercept. Two shorter periods of protection in the last six months, by different admins, failed to arrest the problems. The requesting editor felt that protecting until November (IIRC the series concludes on December 1) would remedy the situation as the issue was episodic. All that said, I have no problem if someone wants to lower or reverse the protection. Chetsford (talk) 20:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    So, what's your decision? Will you leave the semi-protection or will you remove it?--79.44.43.71 (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I favor keeping it. That article's protection log shows that it has needed repeated protection, for multiple months each time. This unfortunately also prevents good-faith edits by new or unregistered editors. If an unregistered user wants to make an edit, they can make a request at Talk:2019 Formula One World Championship. -- MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Synod of Bishops for the Pan-Amazon region

    Unprotection: I see it as inappropriate to infinitely fully protect an article on the mainspace. El C, the admin who initiated the protection on August 10 has been asked too. {{ping|waddie96}} {talk} 14:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Yazidis

    The protection should be back to semi-protection, the last protection move was made without much evidence of discruptive editing. Futebul (talk) 00:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


    Israel–Hamas war

    "Israeli military activities in the Gaza Strip remained unchanged following adoption of the resolution" needs a marker: citation needed. AmbroseVenture (talk) 18:42, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Israel–Hamas war

    "On 28 March, the IDF shot and killed two unarmed men in central Gaza, before burying them in sand with bulldozers.[397]" needs to be altered, the source gives two contradicting stories which CNN (the source) didn't clear up. In the article AJ argues without evidence the two videos they present are from the same people, the IDF tells those were two separate incidents. This has to be cleared up to remain factual. AmbroseVenture (talk) 18:44, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Israel–Hamas war

    The casualty figures for Syria and Lebanon need updating as they are now out of date, the page states that 326 Hezbollah fighters have been killed in Lebanon and 60 in Syria for a total of 386 but Hezbollah itself has admitted that over 410 of its fighters have been killed, the IDF has also provided consistent on the number of Hezbollah fighters eliminated, all of this information is easily accessible. 2A00:23C8:90A:1601:4D05:F3D3:86E0:59B9 (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    List of highest-grossing Indian films

    Add the movie Stree 2 to the list, in the wikitable in the section List of highest-grossing Indian films#Highest-grossing films. The movie has earned a Box office Worldwide collection gross of est. ₹367.86 crore by August 21, 2024. As of 20 August 2024, the film grossed ₹317.83 crore in India and ₹50.03 crore internationally, for a total worldwide gross of ₹367.86 crore.[1][2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.128.53 (talk) 10:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    References

    1. ^ "Stree 2 Box Office". Bollywood Hungama.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
    2. ^ Stree 2#Box office

    Mar Thoma Syrian Church

    Oriental Protestant Christian to Oriental Christian Christochiramukhathu (talk) 09:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    [[1]]

    Please change Oriental Protestant Christian church to Oriental Episcopal Christian church Christochiramukhathu (talk) 09:54, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{Pagelinks}} template and then the reason. It looks like this: Example (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) your request here. ~~~~

    Handled requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=917085265"