User talk:Urban Versis 32

This is my user talk page. I won't bother to archive anything (for now), so it's all here.

Message me for anything including but not limited to:

• Messages and updates regarding status of pages I've created
• A userbox or signature request
• Anything in general!

Urban Versis 32, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Urban Versis 32! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Samsung SVI Format

Hello, Urban Versis 32. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samsung SVI Format, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sony NWZ-E383

Hello, Urban Versis 32. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sony NWZ-E383, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

SVI (file format) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SVI (file format), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Alright, I will check the information and add more sources, thank you for the feedback! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 22:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SVI (file format)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SVI (file format), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SVI (file format) (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SVI (file format) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SVI (file format), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Samsung SVI Format

Hello, Urban Versis 32. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Samsung SVI Format".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sony NWZ-E383

Hello, Urban Versis 32. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sony NWZ-E383".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SVI (file format) (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SVI (file format) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SVI (file format), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 03:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Dornier Do 231

Was the aircraft ever constructed? if so how many were built? when was its test flight? All this information would assist in having amore complete article. Dan arndt (talk) 02:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I will try to improve my article! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Dornier Do 417

Thanks for creating an article on the Do 417. I'll be checking my university's library for more sources to expand the article. - ZLEA _T\^C 20:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

I found a source and have expanded the article. - ZLEA _T\^C 20:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft

Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 02:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Vickers Boxkite

It would be good to know who designed the originals, since Hewlett & Blondeau were not designers. But the real reason I'm leaving the note is that one of the references you gave is a site devoted to copyright violation, and so not acceptable. it would have been better to cite the book that it rips off. I have this at home (I edit from a public library) & will try to remeber to bring it along next time.TheLongTone (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Urban Versis 32! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Delete my user Sandbox, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 250,619 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia Teahouse

Your reply at Teahouse about referencing election results was wrong. David notMD (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me. Urban Versis 32 (talk) 23:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aereon VectoRotor

The article Aereon VectoRotor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject, cancelled, not-built project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahunt (talk) 02:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Sony NWZ-E383 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sony NWZ-E383, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dornier Do 235

The article Dornier Do 235 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable aircraft, apparently a proposed design that was never built. Single source is just an SPS with extremely limited information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilCat (talk) 00:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Dornier Do 235 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dornier Do 235 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dornier Do 235 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BilCat (talk) 05:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SVI (file format) (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SVI (file format) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SVI (file format), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 20:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for saving my article from being deleted Sides-Daren? (talk) 16:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - wolf 01:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 01:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - March–April 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 3–4
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Columns Announcements Content news Discussion report New articles
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Kamov AK moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kamov AK, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

GOCE April 2022 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors April 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the April newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2021. Election results: Jonesey95 retired as lead coordinator. Reidgreg was approved to fill this role after an 18-month absence from the coordinator team, and Baffle gab1978 was chosen as an assistant coordinator following a one-year break. Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu continued on as long-standing assistant coordinators. January Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up, 16 editors claimed 146 copy edits including 45 requests. (details) February Blitz: This one-week effort focused on requests and a theme of Africa and African diaspora history. Of the 12 editors who signed up, 6 editors recorded 21 copy edits, including 4 requests. (details) March Drive: Of the 28 editors who signed up, 18 claimed 116 copy edits including 25 requests. (details) April Blitz: This one-week copy editing event has been scheduled for 17–23 April, sign up now! Progress report: As of 11 April, copy editors have removed approximately 500 articles from the backlog and completed 127 copy-editing requests during 2022. The backlog has been hovering at about 1,100 tagged articles for the past six months. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for adding to my Kennametal edit. Gregwire13 (talk) 03:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 03:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I know that the Guild of Copy Editors will give you a fancier barnstar anyway, but I think you deserve this barnstar now for copyediting that 38k word article. Zippybonzo | talk 16:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Copy edit notes

Thank-you for your contributions to the April GOCE blitz. I'm going to review some of your copy-edits and provide feedback; please receive this constructively.

Some of the things I'm noting are referred to in Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MOS). This is our house style guide, which is specialized for the needs of an international online encyclopedia and may differ from the styles you're used to. Copy editors should be better informed of the MOS than the average Wikipedia editor. That doesn't mean you have to memorize it, just be aware of it and refer to it as needed.

Adını Feriha Koydum

• from January 14, 2011, to June 29, 2012. You removed the underlined comma. We actually need this comma because with month-day-year dates, the year is a parenthetical. See MOS:DATECOMMA. On the other hand, with from September 7, to December 14, 2012 the underlined comma should be removed. bigger issue next bullet
• There is a mix of date formats in the article (mdy and dmy). Copy editors should apply one style consistently throughout the article. There is a template at the top of the article's wikicode, {{use dmy dates}}. Assuming that was applied correctly, the dates should be changed to dmy format. The nice thing about dmy dates is that you don't have to worry about those commas.
• Note that the titles of major works of art (TV shows, films, music albums, books, plays, major paintings and statues) are styled in italics. The titles of minor works of art (TV episodes, skits, songs, book chapters, minor paintings and statues) are styled in double quotes. (See MOS:MAJORWORKS)
• The plot summaries for the seasons one and two describe what is happening within the context of the series, which is how plot summaries are generally handled. The third season describes it from outside of narrative (referring to "season 3" and "the story") which is a bit jarring. These should be consistent.
• I did a fair amount of additional copyediting and cleanup which you can see in this diff.

Will add more as I get to other articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 01:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for helping me to be a better copy editor! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

List of Eat Bulaga! segments

There may be some notability issues with this article so I'm not sure it's worth putting a lot of effort into it (as articles on non-notable subjects may be deleted).

Longer articles tend to be more complex and face more issues for copy-editors. In addition, the size of the article can pose problems for maintaining the level of concentration to take note of fine distinctions and apply consistent style. I generally discourage newer copy editors from working on long articles, but let's see how you did.

• This list article is arranged like a glossary. If I felt the article was notable and worthwhile, I might apply MOS:GLOSS to it, which is a bit of work. I wouldn't consider this a must-do for copyediting, however.
• As I mentioned above, there are special stylings for titles of major and minor works of art. A segment or sketch is a fairly minor work of art, and would be styled with double quotes (or perhaps single quotes) rather than italics (MOS:MAJORWORKS). So It is a special segment that has a similar concept to I Object, Your Honor should be: It is a special segment that has a similar concept to "I Object, Your Honor". (This differentiates from the major work, Eat Bulaga!, which is styled in italics.) These styles should be applied consistently throughout the list article.
• This list article is very, very long. The maximum recommended article size is 10,000 words (WP:LENGTH), and this is more than three times that. Frankly, its bloated and possibly full of trivia. The list entries which are uncited may be removed as trivia, though you might get pushback from the article's authors for doing so. It might be better to mark these with {{citation needed}} or {{trivia-inline}}. That is optional but not a bad idea if you are making a thorough check of a problematic article. What I would expect you to do as a copy-editor is to make the language as concise as possible. A few examples:
  • It is a special segment that has a similar concept to I Object, Your Honor and I Object #NasaanAngHustisya?, that tests the cleverness and originality of the Eat Bulaga! hosts. The hosts are divided into two teams. In each round, both teams are given one specific object. Each group will take turns thinking of and acting out a clever use for that object by realizing what other objects it might resemble. For instance, a closed umbrella roughly resembles a sword or a walking cane. The team must then act out its new function. At the end of each round, the judges decide which team had the cleverest ideas. The only difference between ACTually and I Object is the theme and the setting, and that both teams must now require to mention the use and function of the object. → The hosts are divided into two teams and given an object to improvise a scene, which is judged on cleverness. It differs from "I Object" as the use and function of the object must be mentioned.
  • It is a Facebook promo for the entire month of August 2019 that is part of the 40th-anniversary celebration of Eat Bulaga!. Certain requirements will be met during the show. Participants watching on television must comment on the correct answer, along with a code that will be given by the program, on the designated Facebook post from the official Facebook page of Eat Bulaga! under a certain time limit. A total of 40 participants will be chosen, for the entire month of August 2019. 3 winners will be chosen, who will each win a monthly allowance of ten thousand pesos for one year. → An August 2019 viewer contest with three top prizes of 120,000 pesos.
  • After appearing as a three-year-old contestant in the segment Little Miss Philippines in 1987, Aiza Seguerra became a child wonder and subsequently joined the show to become the youngest host at that time. She received her own segment, Aiza's Kiddie Korner, to feature her funny antics and comic sketches with her co-hosts, and to headline her charisma and many talents, including her famous "duck walk" dance. Later, this segment was renamed Kiddie Korner together with Lady Lee. → A showcase for the talents of Aiza Seguerra, the youngest host at the time, who had previously appeared in "Little Miss Philippines" in 1987 at age 3.
  • It is a segment where the hosts of the Juan for All, All for Juan: Bayanihan of d'Pipol segment search for a sari-sari store that sells multiple Alaska Fortified Milk products on a certain barangay. The spotted sari-sari store will win a cash prize and gift packs from Alaska. The segment is sponsored by the milk brand Alaska. → A segment in the "Juan for All" theme, where the hosts search a particular neighbourhood for a sari-sari store which carries the line of their sponsor's products; the first store found receives a cash prize and merchandise from the sponsor.
• Like other proper names, brand names and companies are styled with word capitalization but not italics. multiple Alaska Fortified Milk products → multiple Alaska Fortified Milk products
• ATM with the BAE'S is a segment of Eat Bulaga! that aired since Sept 2015 - Jan 2016. Alden Richards and Sam Y.G are the Hosts of this EB! segment Acronyms should be defined on first use (MOS:ACRO). If you can't determine its meaning, tag it with {{expand acronym}}.
• 5 contestants are chosen from the studio audience In general use, numbers from 0–9 should be spelled out (though there are exceptions such as dates). It's particularly expected for such a number to be spelled out when it is at the beginning of a sentence (MOS:SPELL09).
• when the Music Stops to pick a BAE, so that they could join Jackpot Round that they called ATM Ang Tenga Mo!. All the contestants are willing to answer the Questions that they prepared in the Jackpot Round looks like a lot of overcapitalization (MOS:CAPS)

You made some good edits, but I don't feel it was nearly thorough enough to count as a completed copyedit. – Reidgreg (talk) 19:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Raza Academy

• It appears that you addressed the {{lead too short}} tag by moving the article's History section up into the lead. This is not a good editing practice. The lead should summarize the body of the article, and generally there shouldn't be anything in the lead which isn't also in the body of the article. (see WP:Lead dos and don'ts, MOS:LEAD.) A better edit would have been to retain the History section and summarize the key points of the History section and the other sections in the lead.
• A quotation was styled in italics; it should be styled in double quotation marks. (MOS:QUOTE)
• The court and government asked them to pay for 3 crore property damages. You removed the word crore, which is part of the Indian numeric system. What we should do here is to give the figure in Indian units, then Western units in parenthesis. i.e.: ₹3 crore (30 million rupees).
• The organisation had earlier protested programs You changed organisation → organization. However, Indian English uses the British spelling with an s. (see Indian English#Spelling and MOS:ENGVAR.)
• The section Relief and charity work is in reverse chronological order, which is a little weird.
• The section Advocacy and protests was disorganized, and could have used layout work as part of the copy edit. I organized it topically: protests which turned violent, protests against women's rights, protests against portrayals of Mohammad, and protests of things outside of India.

With the problems introduced, I wouldn't consider this a complete copy edit.

Copy editing requires thoroughness, attention to detail, and a good understanding of style issues. I'm sure you'd get better results if you took your time and really considered the best way to present the information. – Reidgreg (talk) 01:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Health status of White Americans

Your copy edit seems to be limited to rephrasing one sentence and adding a half-dozen wikilinks. Here are some additional changes I made to the article:

• In the list of comparative health advantages, there is overcapitalization. The section also has a forward slash (MOS:SLASH) and some consideration should be given to whether the list should be ordered or unordered (MOS:LISTNUMBERED). If ordered, the list introduction should indicate why.
• There is more overcaptialization in later section headers, which should have sentence case.
• from 1978 - 1998 → from 1978 to 1998 (MOS:RANGE)

Note that the article was tagged with {{essay-like}}. This is an issue that a copy editor can address by applying encyclopedic tone to the article. Check the diff of my edit. While an essay tries to lead the reader through an argument, an encyclopedia article relays the accepted facts. – Reidgreg (talk) 22:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

April blitz bling

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Urban Versis 32 for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE April 2022 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 13:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - May 2022

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 5
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Columns Announcements On the Main Page Discussion report New articles
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

1. Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
2. AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
3. Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
4. Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
5. Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
6. Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
7. Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, but...

Please don't edit my user page, even though you meant well. In the future, you can just post a note on my talk page. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

I apologize. I will leave a message in the future. Urban Versis 32 (talk) 22:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. BilCat (talk) 22:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Before you create any more unnecessary subpages...

...please see Template talk:WEmoji. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Urban Versis 32 (talk) 15:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Kawasaki Ki-22 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kawasaki Ki-22, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 13:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Improving the Urban air mobility article

Hi User:Urban Versis 32 How are you? I noticed you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation and wanted to see if you'd be open to collaborate. The Wikipedia article Urban air mobility is outdated, and I've researched to create a better version in my sandbox. Another Wikipedian has given the proposed new version their thumbs up but has been inactive. Would you be open to review and if you accept it, publish the new content on the article. Please let me know if you have any questions!--Chefmikesf (talk) 22:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Sure, I always like to help review and improve articles that need them! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 02:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Message for Urban Versis 32

I saw your user name at adopt user page. I would like for you to adopt me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregwire13 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Sure, I would love to mentor you! Feel free to post any questions you have about anything here! Urban Versis 32 (talk) 00:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

New Article Needed for sysbench request help

Hi UV32,

sysbench needs an article. It is used by linux community and there is no article for this software. — Gregwire₁₃ ^(talk!) 22:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Gregwire, I would like to assist with your article. I need to do some research to see if the article is notable enough for its own page. I also use Linux and am part of the Linux WikiProject, so I know a little bit about the sysbench command. As soon as you publish the first revision of the article, I can help too. I will add it to the list of in-development pages at the Linux WikiProject too. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 22:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - June 2022

⭠ Previous Issue ⭢ Following Issue

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 6
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Columns Announcements On the Main Page Discussion report New articles
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Userbox request by @TheGOATTB12

Hi, Urban Versis 32. I read on the Userboxes page you are open to userbox requests. I do actually have a userbox that I want you to make. One that says "This user is grateful for Man-Man he opened up doors" but link the Man-Man to Kendrick Lamar, and in the left container thing an "FT" that links to Family Ties (song). I have no preference on colors or anything like that. Thanks! TheGOATTB12 (talk) 11:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I created your custom userbox. I am open to suggestions for tweaking it if you wish.

FTThis user is grateful for Man-Man he opened up doors.

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! This looks great! TheGOATTB12 (talk) 01:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Kaman K-700 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kaman K-700, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 03:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji

Template:WEmoji has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/bot

Template:WEmoji/bot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/clap

Template:WEmoji/clap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/cool

Template:WEmoji/cool has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/determined

Template:WEmoji/determined has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/expressionless

Template:WEmoji/expressionless has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/eyebrow

Template:WEmoji/eyebrow has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/grin

Template:WEmoji/grin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/grin2

Template:WEmoji/grin2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/highfive

Template:WEmoji/highfive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/monocle

Template:WEmoji/monocle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/ok

Template:WEmoji/ok has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/person

Template:WEmoji/person has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/rolleyes

Template:WEmoji/rolleyes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/sad

Template:WEmoji/sad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/sad2

Template:WEmoji/sad2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/smile

Template:WEmoji/smile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/smirk

Template:WEmoji/smirk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/speak

Template:WEmoji/speak has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/think

Template:WEmoji/think has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/thumbsdown

Template:WEmoji/thumbsdown has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/thumbsup

Template:WEmoji/thumbsup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/wink

Template:WEmoji/wink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/wp

Template:WEmoji/wp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WEmoji/write

Template:WEmoji/write has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

June GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2022 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since April 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Blitz: of the 16 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, 12 completed at least one copy-edit, and between them removed 21 articles from the copy-editing backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 27 editors signed up for our May Backlog Elimination Drive; of these, 20 copy-edited at least one article. 144 articles were copy-edited, and 88 articles from our target months August and September 2021 were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: our June Copy Editing Blitz, starting at 00:01, 19 June and closing at 00:59, 25 June (UTC), will focus on articles tagged for copy edit in September and October 2021, and requests from March, April and May 2022. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 07:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 209 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,404 articles. Election news: Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators continues until 23:50 on 15 June (UTC), after which, voting will commence until 23:59, 30 June (UTC). All Wikipedians in good standing (active and not blocked, banned, or under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft

Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I think there was a mistake -- I simply updated the note that was next to my username so that anyone who saw it could see my goals regarding the project. My apologies for the misunderstanding. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 22:55, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 GOCE blitz award

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Urban Versis 32 for copy edits totaling over 2,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE June 2022 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 01:15, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter

The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
• Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
• Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Bensen B-11 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bensen B-11, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 03:33, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Wikipedia ads sidebar

Module:Wikipedia ads sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamov AK (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dege31 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamov AK and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kamov AK, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dege31 (talk) 14:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Signature

Hello, your signature has a vertical bar in it (|) that can cause templates to break, as happened on the page Draft:DEEPAK RANJAN MAHARANA. Please replace this vertical bar with the template {{!}} instead to avoid this in the future. Clay (talk) 15:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for the heads-up. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 15:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Even after changing the signature, it still breaks the templates. Here's the code for my sig: [[User:Urban Versis 32|<span style="color:grey"><b>Urban</b></span> <span style="color:red"><b>Versis</b></span> <b>32</b>]]<sup>KB</sup> ⚡ <sup>([[User talk:Urban Versis 32|talk]] {{SUBST:!}} [[Special:Contributions/Urban Versis 32|contribs]])</sup>

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 16:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Actually, I'll change it to a slash to make everything simpler. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 16:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Signpost article

I just saw your WIP Signpost article. I have only one suggestion; it would be a good idea to mention when the GUW took place, and maybe even include a link to the arbitration case. - ZLEA _T\^C 03:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the input. I'll add that to the article. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 14:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

You Rejected a draft Draft:Khajan Das

Hi Urban Versis 32, You just rejected the Draft:Khajan Das giving a reason that submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. This is an Indian government website which is a reliable reference. And mla is a notable topic and passes WP:NPOL. Please read. Nupamjo (talk) 18:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

I know, however the other references may not be reliable. You can always remove the unreliable sources and replace them with the reliable ones, then re-submit. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 18:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Please explain why these references are not reliable? 1 (Aaj Tak), 2 (News18 India), 3 (ABP News), 4 (Election Commission of India). Nupamjo (talk) 19:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Well, I put "unreliable sources" because I am not sure if foreign languages count (#1, 2, and 3). I'll do some research and get back to you (#4 is a good source). Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 21:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Foreign sources are allowed per Wikipedia:Verifiability#Non-English_sources but English ones are preferable. If you think the sources are reliable, then they are reliable. My bad for thinking they weren't allowed. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Bradhurst

I see you verified my Bradhurst (surname) page. While i am glad you approved it, it was meant to be a neutral name page (for both given and surnames). I would like it if you would please remove the "(surname)" from the page's name. Thanks. OmniFrieza994 (talk) 21:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Sure, I can change the name back. My bad for the confusion. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Shrimad Rajchandra Love and Care

You cited the page reads like an advertisement. This organization is big - so it has a lot of content - and I believe you and other editors prior to you have failed to see the neutral sources and the neutral language presented.

This NGO is recognized by the United Nations, has several congressional proclamations in the United States. It has been noted for starting global movements for raising awareness of organ donations in Australia. It has several animal welfare initiatives in India and the United Kingdom.

The NGO just does a lot and because of the heavy content, it seems you have mistaken it for non-neutral or an "ad". I'm creating the page because it deserves to be out in the public where hopefully others will contribute to its edits.

I'm ready to make changes, but the overall page is objective. A request to re-read or point out sections where it's too "ad-like" and suggestions from existing pages so I can make a better edit.

Thank you so much for taking the time out to review, I truly appreciate it. Each edit has made me a better contributor, I feel. Dmehta81 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Alright, I'll leave some comments on your draft to point out parts of the article that aren't written from a neutral point of view. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Help on Userboxes

Dear, UrbanVersis32 I need some help with my userboxes on the user page. The text, drawings fall on to the right completely ruining the organization. If you could take some time to edit my page, I would be incredibly happy. Thank you. अथर्व कॉल (talk) 21:38, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I fixed the error causing the text to fall to the left. You had too many spaces between some userboxes, causing them to fail. I also noticed that one of your images was stuck below the userbox, the drawing of the Indosaurus Matleyi. Unfortunately, as the userbox template does not support images on the right-hand side, I had to replace the images with an image gallery. Please reply if you have any questions. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:06, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much अथर्व कॉल (talk) 01:03, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Draft:TMGM

Hello, could you please elaborate on the exact reasons for decline of DRAFT:TMGM. For example your message says it sounds like an advertisement and it is not from "neutral point of view," but I am having a hard part determining which exact parts have this issue? could you please state the exact parts or sentences that have this issue? In addition, which citations are not considered reliable or independent? I have not used any source that is not independent? "independent" means that they do not have any relations with the site. Please point out which exact source is not independent or reliable? There are 26 sources provided, are you saying everything not independent or reliable? Thanks. Chessterb (talk) 22:36, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Chessterb. Your draft reads more like an advertisement than a proper entry because it has sales-oriented language. In your article, try to avoid sentences like "TMGM offers contract for difference (CFD) trading with 7 asset classes and more than 15,000 trading products under the regulation of the Australian Security and Investment Commission (ASIC) and the Vanuatu Financial Services Commission (VFSC)." For more information, visit Wikipedia:Spam#Advertisements masquerading as articles and Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Also, please try to avoid citations in other languages than English. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you I will revise that. However, citations in other languages are acceptable. The 2 included are from reputable foreign publications and can easily be translated using Google Translate button in the chrome browser. I will look for some other sources before I resubmit. I know they have tons more coverage. Chessterb (talk) 07:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Also, can you tell me the issues with these sources?

https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/brokers/trademax-rebrands-to-tmgm-as-it-boosts-global-expansion/

https://www.leaprate.com/forex/market-news/forex-weekly-look-back-trademax-rebrands-to-tmgm-forex-analytix-and-forest-park-fx-launch-portal-tradersummit-net/

https://thebull.com.au/tmgm/

https://www.forexlive.com/Brokers/tmgm

https://www.cashbackforex.com/brokers/510/tmgm

There are bunch of review sites like the last 3, but just including 3 here. I have made sure they contain no affiliate links. I know that is not permitted, so these look to have no financial incentive for writing about TMGM. Chessterb (talk) 08:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm not saying any of those specific links are unreliable; check Wikipedia:Reliable sources for a more specific guideline. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Quiet quitting

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-to-rule is very similar to Quiet Quitting. I think you were looking for that.

The motivation is different (temporary industrial action vs. a personal and undeclared position). For my two cents', they're worth different articles but should have links to reach other. 49.186.33.53 (talk) 21:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the info. I'll set up "See Also" sections on both pages. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 01:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

User:Urban Versis 32/sandbox/Signpost/1

I gave a first copy-editing pass on your submission. I mostly tried to tighten the language, expanded the how to a bit, and reduce the number of sections and footnotes by merging them together and inlining the information.

Let me know how it looks. I tried to keep as much of your original written style as possible. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:50, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

The copy edit was great, thanks for helping with the article. :) Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 15:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Signpost article on Userboxes

Might be worth covering some of the more recent arguments about userboxes. Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:UBX/onemanonewoman_4th_nomination, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Qartagir/Userboxes/Fascist and Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:FerrousTigrus/ub/non-bias_hitler are good examples of how there's been a recent decision to ban user boxes that, well, encourage hatred towards groups of users that's pretty well enforced. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 05:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the info on userbox controversies, I'll add that to the article. By the way, I needed some more input for the "Interview" section of my article, so if you would like to be interviewed on userboxes, here are the questions:

1. How did you first get into userboxes?
2. How long have you been using/creating userboxes?
3. Why do you like userboxes?
4. What's your favorite userbox and why?

Thanks, Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 15:46, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

I have added the information to the article: Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Next_issue/In_focus#Recent_controversies. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 16:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

It's worth mentioning that I'm one of the ancients, so a lot of Userbox things for me were things I set up years ago. But I'd say I got into Userboxes through Commons. Commons is a multilingual site; as such, knowing what languages people speak is fairly vital, and a whole series of userboxes exist to communicate information about this. It's simple, easy to use, and just really helps communication there. Which I guess makes them my favourite userboxes, since I think they are by far the most important. I added them in 2008, about two years after I started editing, which I think I started doing in February 2006, though between Single Login not existing back then and a period of pseudonymous editing around 2008 after some harassment creating an account snarl here, it's a little harder to tell from my contributions on en-wiki as opposed to Commons, where I've always used my real name.

I suppose I'm not that interested in sharing personal details as some. If people need to know I act in Gilbert and Sullivan or write music or studied biology or live in Scotland or≥ am gay they probably know, and if they want to know what I primarily do on Wikipedia my user page archiving my 709 featured pictures will tell them. Hence, I'm not as userbox-y as some.

That said, I do believe Wikipedia should be a friendly, welcoming place, and any user box that espouses hate really has to go. Your right to say your awful views is not one that applies to Wikipedia. And, frankly? I'd rather, for example, that trans people feel safe editing Wikipedia even if we lose dozens of people who really, really want to use their userpages to attack trans people and are up in arena they can't. The kind of people desperate to use their userpages to attack other Wikipedians are exactly the kind of people we don't want. Basically, Wikipedia:No racists and Wikipedia:No Nazis. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 11:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

feel free to reformat that as you want Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 12:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the input! I really appreciate your time. :) Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

I saw the format my responses had to fit into and have taken the liberty of editing them a bit. I hope it's clear that while my interaction with Userboxes more recently has been to get rid of some awful ones, I do think they're great for Wikipedia. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 01:49, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I was worried I didn't edit it in correctly. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:SVI (file format)

Hello, Urban Versis 32. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SVI (file format), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Curtiss KDC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Curtiss KDC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtiss KDC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:54, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sony NWZ-E383

Hello, Urban Versis 32. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sony NWZ-E383".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Requesting a userbox on Pirates of the Caribbean

Hello... Apparently it is one of my favourite movies franchise. If you can, kindly create one for me. Thanks Volten001 ^☎ 17:33, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

@Volten001 Sure, I'll have that done for you, would you like a specific icon to be used for the userbox? Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:00, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Here's the first, non-image userbox draft.

This user loves Pirates of the Caribbean.

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Yeah an image of Jack Sparrow would be awesome or the title. Thanks again Volten001 ^☎ 04:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

I noticed u finished it already when I went to your userboxes linked page. Thanks a lot. A barnstar is definitely coming your way... Volten001 ^☎ 17:40, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your significant contributions and creating a userbox on my request on such a short notice. Gracias amigo (Thanks pal) Volten001 ☎ 17:44, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Looking for further feedback if possible on my draft.

First off thanks for helping make sure Wikipedia is able to function I appreciate you volunteering your time. I was wondering if you would take another look at the Draft:PCS VoIP article again, and provide any feedback if I had not made the sufficient changes. After looking at other VoIP company's pages it was clear to me that in my case less is more and focus on the technology of VoIP and Pathways to other areas of VoIP. I properly linked any locations and terminology and trimmed my sources to only include outside independent sources.

Thanks in advance,

Ryans0621. Ryans0621 (talk) 19:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi Ryans,

I recommend you take a look at some of the articles in Wikipedia:Advertising, because your article seems to read slightly like an advertisement. Also look into expanding your article. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 19:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up for our July Backlog Elimination Drive, 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Blitz: Participants in our August Copy Editing Blitz copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted here. Drive: Forty-one editors took part in our September Backlog Elimination Drive; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted here. Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 requests for copy edit – including withdrawn and declined ones – since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors – particularly for requests – so please get involved if you can. Election news: In our mid-year election, serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. Jonesey95, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout December. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's your Guild, after all! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tenryuu and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Baffle☿gab 03:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 32K resolution has been accepted

32K resolution, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Signature request

Hello, Urban Versis 32! I have noticed that you create signatures on request, so I want to ask for your kind help about it. I guess that, after using the standard signature since registering in 2010, I got a bit bored with it. So I'd love to have a "customized", or personalized signature. —Sundostund (talk) 12:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Sure, what type of signature would you have in mind? Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 22:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

I don't have some exact idea, actually. I was thinking of somewhat bold letters (similar to the letters in your signature), in green, as I use that color in the infobox on my user page for quite awhile now, so it became a kind of "trademark color" for me... Again inspired by your signature, I would also want to have both my talk page and contributions visible in the signature, with the exact style of the letters – somewhat small and not bold. —Sundostund (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Alright, I created two variations of something similar to your description:

• Sundostund ^{(talk / contribs)}
• Sundostund ^{(talk / contribs)}

If you want me to add, change, or remove something, don't hesitate to tell me and I'll change or fix it. A good signature, suited to your personal preference, is how others remember you! Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

I forgot to tag you, so hereby: @Sundostund

Also, I can add a dash right before the username if you wish. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your work, I really appreciate that! I prefer the first variation, as I like its darker shade of green. I would just change the italic-style of the last five letters; it would be better if all ten letters are written in the same, ordinary way, without italic. Also, would it be possible that, later on, I myself change something in the signature, if I want to? I wouldn't want to bother you about it, if I can do it by myself. —Sundostund (talk) 10:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

And yes, there should be a long dash (—) before the username, as I use in my current signature. —Sundostund (talk) 11:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Alright, here's the result of the requested adjustments:

Sundostund ^{(talk / contribs)}

And here's the code to copy into the settings:

[[User:Sundostund|<b><span style="color:green">Sundo<i>stund</i></span></b>]] <sup>([[User talk:Sundostund|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Sundostund|contribs]])</sup>

Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 23:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

You probably meant this to be the result of the adjustments:

— Sundostund ^{(talk / contribs)}

And its code:

— [[User:Sundostund|<b><span style="color:green">Sundostund</span></b>]] <sup>([[User talk:Sundostund|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Sundostund|contribs]])</sup>

It may be some misunderstanding; you posted one of the previous two versions of the signature, without changes. —Sundostund (talk) 23:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

I also have to ask, is it necessary to always use copy-paste of the code, for the signature to be used, or is there some "automated" way for it to become visible? —Sundostund (talk) 23:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

To answer the last question, to my knowledge the only way to start actively using a signature is to copy and paste it into the settings. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

I think I got it, by changing settings in Special:Preferences. — Sundostund ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help, really! When thinking of it, I'll probably not keep that long dash as an integral part of the signature; its somewhat aesthetically better if the dash is added separately from the signature. —Sundostund ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Sorry about the italics, I think I forgot to remove them before I copied the code. I apologize for the inconvenience. Anyway, I see you've started using the signature! Thanks for requesting my services (Before you I'd only done one other signature besides my own). Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kawasaki Ki-22

Hello, Urban Versis 32. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kawasaki Ki-22, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:46, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Age Userbox

I've been having trouble creating a simple age Userbox on my user page. Would you be able to help me out? WikidKev (talk) 01:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)